You are on page 1of 1

44560 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

148 / Wednesday, August 3, 2005 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rescission of Review This notice is issued and published in


The applicable regulation, 19 CFR accordance with sections 751 and 777(i)
International Trade Administration 351.213(d)(1), states that if a party that of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
[A–570–849] requested an administrative review Dated: July 27, 2005.
withdraws the request within 90 days of Barbara E. Tillman,
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel the publication of the notice of Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Plate From the People’s Republic of initiation of the requested review, the Administration.
China: Notice of Rescission of Secretary will rescind the review. It [FR Doc. E5–4130 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am]
Antidumping Duty Administrative further states that the Secretary may BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Review extend this time limit if the Secretary
AGENCY: Import Administration, finds it reasonable to do so. Shougang
International Trade Administration, withdrew its request for review after the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Department of Commerce. 90-day deadline; however, the
Department finds it reasonable to extend International Trade Administration
DATES: Effective August 3, 2005.
the time limit by which a party may
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A–533–809
withdraw its request for review in the
Catherine Bertrand or Carrie Blozy, instant proceeding. The Department
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges
finds it reasonable to extend the From India; Preliminary Results of New
Administration, International Trade withdrawal deadline because the
Administration, U.S. Department of Shipper Review
Department has not yet devoted
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution considerable time and resources to this AGENCY: Import Administration,
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; review.1 Shougang was the only party to International Trade Administration,
telephone: (202) 482–3207, and (202) request the review, and has withdrawn Department of Commerce.
482–5403 respectively. that request. Therefore, we are SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: In response to a request by (the Department) is conducting a new
rescinding this review of the
Beijing Shougang Xingang Co., Ltd., and shipper review of the antidumping duty
antidumping duty order on CTL Plate
Beijing Alliance of Xingang Science and order on certain forged stainless steel
from the PRC covering the period
Trade Co., Ltd., (collectively flanges (stainless steel flanges) from
November 3, 2003, through October 31,
‘‘Shougang’’), an exporter of subject India manufactured by Hilton Forge
2004. The Department will issue
merchandise, the Department of (Hilton). The period of review (POR)
appropriate assessment instructions
Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) initiated covers February 1, 2004, through July
an administrative review of the directly to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection within 15 days of publication 31, 2004. We preliminarily determine
antidumping duty order on cut-to-length that Hilton made sales of subject
carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL Plate’’) from of this recession.
merchandise at less than normal value
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Notification to Interested Parties (NV) in the United States during the
No other interested party requested a This notice serves as a final reminder POR.
review of Shougang. The period of to importers of their responsibility If these preliminary results are
review (‘‘POR’’) is November 3, 2003, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a adopted in the final results of this new
through October 31, 2004. On July 5, certificate regarding the reimbursement shipper review, we will instruct U.S.
2005, Shougang withdrew its request for of antidumping duties prior to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
a review. The Department is now liquidation of the relevant entries assess antidumping duties on entries of
rescinding the administrative review of the subject merchandise for which the
during this review period. Failure to
Shougang. importer–specific assessment rates are
comply with this requirement could
Background result in the Secretary’s presumption above de minimis.
that reimbursement of the antidumping We invite interested parties to
On November 1, 2004, the Department
duties occurred and the subsequent comment on these preliminary results.
published a notice of opportunity to
assessment of double antidumping Parties who submit argument in these
request an administrative review of the
duties. proceedings are requested to submit
antidumping duty order on CTL Plate
from the PRC. See Antidumping or This notice also serves as a reminder with the argument 1) a statement of the
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or to parties subject to administrative issues and 2) a brief summary of the
Suspended Investigation: Opportunity protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their argument.
to Request Administrative Review, 69 responsibility concerning the return or EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 2005.
FR 63359 (November 1, 2004). On destruction of proprietary information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
November 29, 2004, Shougang requested disclosed under APO in accordance Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD
an administrative review of its sales and with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Operations, Office 7, Import
shipments to the United States during to govern business proprietary Administration, International Trade
the POR. On December 27, 2004, the information in this segment of the Administration, U.S. Department of
Department published a notice of the proceeding. Timely written notification Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
initiation of the antidumping duty of the return/destruction of APO Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
administrative review of CTL Plate from materials or conversion to judicial telephone : (202) 482–2924 or (202)
the PRC for the period November 3, protective order is hereby requested. 482–0649, respectively.
2003, through October 31, 2004. See Failure to comply with the regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Initiation of Antidumping and and terms of an APO is a violation that
Countervailing Duty Administrative is subject to sanction. Background
Reviews and Request for Revocation in 1 After analyzing Shougang’s questionnaire
On February 9, 1994, the Department
Part, 69 FR 77181 (December 27, 2004). response, the Department issued a supplemental
published the antidumping duty order
On July 5, 2005, Shougang withdrew its questionnaire to Shougang. Shougang did not on stainless steel flanges from India. See
request for an administrative review. respond to the supplemental questionnaire. Amended Final Determination and

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:22 Aug 02, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1

You might also like