DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rescission of Review This notice is issued and published in
The applicable regulation, 19 CFR accordance with sections 751 and 777(i) International Trade Administration 351.213(d)(1), states that if a party that of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). [A–570–849] requested an administrative review Dated: July 27, 2005. withdraws the request within 90 days of Barbara E. Tillman, Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel the publication of the notice of Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Plate From the People’s Republic of initiation of the requested review, the Administration. China: Notice of Rescission of Secretary will rescind the review. It [FR Doc. E5–4130 Filed 8–2–05; 8:45 am] Antidumping Duty Administrative further states that the Secretary may BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Review extend this time limit if the Secretary AGENCY: Import Administration, finds it reasonable to do so. Shougang International Trade Administration, withdrew its request for review after the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Department of Commerce. 90-day deadline; however, the Department finds it reasonable to extend International Trade Administration DATES: Effective August 3, 2005. the time limit by which a party may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A–533–809 withdraw its request for review in the Catherine Bertrand or Carrie Blozy, instant proceeding. The Department AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges finds it reasonable to extend the From India; Preliminary Results of New Administration, International Trade withdrawal deadline because the Administration, U.S. Department of Shipper Review Department has not yet devoted Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution considerable time and resources to this AGENCY: Import Administration, Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; review.1 Shougang was the only party to International Trade Administration, telephone: (202) 482–3207, and (202) request the review, and has withdrawn Department of Commerce. 482–5403 respectively. that request. Therefore, we are SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce SUMMARY: In response to a request by (the Department) is conducting a new rescinding this review of the Beijing Shougang Xingang Co., Ltd., and shipper review of the antidumping duty antidumping duty order on CTL Plate Beijing Alliance of Xingang Science and order on certain forged stainless steel from the PRC covering the period Trade Co., Ltd., (collectively flanges (stainless steel flanges) from November 3, 2003, through October 31, ‘‘Shougang’’), an exporter of subject India manufactured by Hilton Forge 2004. The Department will issue merchandise, the Department of (Hilton). The period of review (POR) appropriate assessment instructions Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) initiated covers February 1, 2004, through July an administrative review of the directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection within 15 days of publication 31, 2004. We preliminarily determine antidumping duty order on cut-to-length that Hilton made sales of subject carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL Plate’’) from of this recession. merchandise at less than normal value the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). Notification to Interested Parties (NV) in the United States during the No other interested party requested a This notice serves as a final reminder POR. review of Shougang. The period of to importers of their responsibility If these preliminary results are review (‘‘POR’’) is November 3, 2003, under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a adopted in the final results of this new through October 31, 2004. On July 5, certificate regarding the reimbursement shipper review, we will instruct U.S. 2005, Shougang withdrew its request for of antidumping duties prior to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to a review. The Department is now liquidation of the relevant entries assess antidumping duties on entries of rescinding the administrative review of the subject merchandise for which the during this review period. Failure to Shougang. importer–specific assessment rates are comply with this requirement could Background result in the Secretary’s presumption above de minimis. that reimbursement of the antidumping We invite interested parties to On November 1, 2004, the Department duties occurred and the subsequent comment on these preliminary results. published a notice of opportunity to assessment of double antidumping Parties who submit argument in these request an administrative review of the duties. proceedings are requested to submit antidumping duty order on CTL Plate from the PRC. See Antidumping or This notice also serves as a reminder with the argument 1) a statement of the Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or to parties subject to administrative issues and 2) a brief summary of the Suspended Investigation: Opportunity protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their argument. to Request Administrative Review, 69 responsibility concerning the return or EFFECTIVE DATE: August 3, 2005. FR 63359 (November 1, 2004). On destruction of proprietary information FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred November 29, 2004, Shougang requested disclosed under APO in accordance Baker or Robert James, AD/CVD an administrative review of its sales and with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Operations, Office 7, Import shipments to the United States during to govern business proprietary Administration, International Trade the POR. On December 27, 2004, the information in this segment of the Administration, U.S. Department of Department published a notice of the proceeding. Timely written notification Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution initiation of the antidumping duty of the return/destruction of APO Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, administrative review of CTL Plate from materials or conversion to judicial telephone : (202) 482–2924 or (202) the PRC for the period November 3, protective order is hereby requested. 482–0649, respectively. 2003, through October 31, 2004. See Failure to comply with the regulations SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Initiation of Antidumping and and terms of an APO is a violation that Countervailing Duty Administrative is subject to sanction. Background Reviews and Request for Revocation in 1 After analyzing Shougang’s questionnaire On February 9, 1994, the Department Part, 69 FR 77181 (December 27, 2004). response, the Department issued a supplemental published the antidumping duty order On July 5, 2005, Shougang withdrew its questionnaire to Shougang. Shougang did not on stainless steel flanges from India. See request for an administrative review. respond to the supplemental questionnaire. Amended Final Determination and
VerDate jul<14>2003 15:22 Aug 02, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03AUN1.SGM 03AUN1