You are on page 1of 1

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

146 / Monday, August 1, 2005 / Proposed Rules 44075

1970 (29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657), 29 CFR DATES: Written comments must be ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
part 1911, and Secretary of Labor’s received on or before August 31, 2005. AGENCY
Order 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 40 CFR Part 52
Issued at Washington, DC, this 26 day of identified by Docket ID No. R08–OAR–
July 2005. [R08–OAR–2005–UT–0002; FRL–7939–9]
2004–CO–0005, by one of the following
Jonathan L. Snare, methods:
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor. Approval and Promulgation of Air
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// Quality Implementation Plans; State of
[FR Doc. 05–15119 Filed 7–29–05; 8:45 am]
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line Utah; Salt Lake City Revised Carbon
BILLING CODE 4910–26–P
instructions for submitting comments. Monoxide Maintenance Plan and
• Agency Web site: http:// Approval of Related Revisions
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Regional Materials in EDOCKET (RME), Agency (EPA).
AGENCY EPA’s electronic docket and comment ACTION: Proposed rule.
40 CFR Part 52 system for regional actions, is EPA’s
preferred method for receiving SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to take
comments. Follow the on-line direct final action approving State
[RME Docket Number R08–OAR–2004–CO– Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
0005; FRL–7936–9] instructions for submitting comments.
submitted by the State of Utah. On
• E-mail: long.richard@epa.gov and October 19, 2004, the Governor of Utah
Clean Air Act Approval and platt.amy@epa.gov.
Promulgation of Air Quality submitted revisions to Utah’s Rule
Implementation Plan Revision for • Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert R307–110–12, ‘‘Section IX, Control
Colorado; Long-Term Strategy of State the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER Measures for Area and Point Sources,
Implementation Plan for Class I INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing Part C, Carbon Monoxide,’’ which
Visibility Protection comments). incorporates a revised maintenance plan
for the Salt Lake City carbon monoxide
Mail: Richard R. Long, Director, Air
AGENCY: Environmental Protection (CO) maintenance area for the CO
Agency (EPA). and Radiation Program, Environmental National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, (NAAQS). The revised maintenance
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Mailcode 8P–AR; 999 18th Street, Suite plan contains revised transportation
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 300, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466. conformity budgets for the years 2005
a State Implementation Plan (SIP) • Hand Delivery; Richard R. Long, and 2019. In addition, the Governor
revision submitted by the Governor of Director, Air and Radiation Program, submitted revisions to Utah’s Rule
Colorado with a letter dated April 12, Environmental Protection Agency R307–110–33, ‘‘Section X, Vehicle
2004. This revision replaces an August (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 999 Inspection and Maintenance Program,
19, 1998, submittal from the Governor 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado Part C, Salt Lake County,’’ which
and updates the Long-Term Strategy of 80202–2466. Such deliveries are only incorporates a revised vehicle
the Visibility SIP to establish strategies, accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. inspection and maintenance program for
activities, and plans that constitute to 4:55 p.m., excluding Federal Salt Lake County. EPA is proposing
reasonable progress toward the National holidays. Special arrangements should approval of the Salt Lake City CO
visibility goal. In the ‘‘Rules and be made for deliveries of boxed revised maintenance plan, the revised
Regulations’’ section of this Federal transportation conformity budgets, the
information.
Register, EPA is approving the State’s revised vehicle inspection and
SIP revision as a direct final rule Please see the direct final rule which maintenance program for Salt Lake
without prior proposal because the is located in the Rules section of this County, and the revisions to rules R307–
Agency views this as a controversial SIP Federal Register for detailed 110–12 and R307–110–33. This action is
revision and anticipates no adverse instructions on how to submit being taken under section 110 of the
comments. A detailed rationale for the comments. Clean Air Act.
approval is set forth in the preamble to In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
the direct final rule. If EPA receives no FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: section of this Federal Register, EPA is
adverse comments, EPA will not take Amy Platt, Environmental Protection approving the State’s SIP revisions as a
further action on this proposed rule. If Agency, Region 8, 999 18th St., Suite direct final rule without prior proposal
EPA receives adverse comments, EPA 300, Denver, Colorado 80202, 303–312– because the Agency views this as a
will withdraw the direct final rule and 6449, platt.amy@epa.gov. noncontroversial SIP revision and
it will not take effect. EPA will address SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the anticipates no adverse comments. A
all public comments in a subsequent information provided in the Direct Final detailed rationale for the approval is set
final rule based on this proposed rule. action of the same title which is located forth in the preamble to the direct final
EPA will not institute a second rule. If EPA receives no adverse
in the Rules and Regulations section of
comment period on this action. Any comments, EPA will not take further
this Federal Register.
parties interested in commenting must action on this proposed rule. If EPA
do so at this time. Please note that if Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. receives adverse comments, EPA will
EPA receives adverse comment on an Dated: June 30, 2005. withdraw the direct final rule and it will
amendment, paragraph, or section of not take effect. EPA will address all
Carol Rushin,
this rule and if that provision may be public comments in a subsequent final
severed from the remainder of the rule, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
EPA may adopt as final those provisions [FR Doc. 05–15053 Filed 7–29–05; 8:45 am] will not institute a second comment
of the rule that are not the subject of an BILLING CODE 6560–50–M period on this action. Any parties
adverse comment. interested in commenting must do so at

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:25 Jul 29, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\01AUP1.SGM 01AUP1

You might also like