Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UserUser-based:
based: better performance, more
features, value, fitness for use,
support
ManufacturingManufacturing-based:
based: conformance to
standards, making it right the first
time
ProductProduct-based:
based: specific and
measurable attributes of the product
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Quality in Goods
Quality in Services
o Performance
o Tangibles
Improved response
o Features
o Reliability
Flexible pricing
o Reliability
o Responsiveness
Improved reputation
o Durability
o Competence
o Conformance
o Courtesy
o Serviceability
o Credibility
o Aesthetics
o Security
o Perceived quality
o Access
Improved
Quality
Increased
Profits
Increased productivity
Lower rework and scrap costs
o Communication
Figure 6.1
Fundamentals of Operations
Management 4e
8/11/2013
1. Company reputation
Perception of new products
Employment practices
Supplier relations
2. Product liability
Reduce risk
3. Global implications
Improved ability to compete
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Appraisal costs
Failure costs
Fundamentals of Operations
Management 4e
Categories
Leadership
Strategic Planning
Customer & Market Focus
Measurement, Analysis, and Knowledge
Management
Workforce Focus
Process Management
Results
Points
120
85
85
90
85
85
450
Cost Category
Prevention costs
Leader
Philosophy/Contribution
W. Edwards Deming
Joseph M. Juran
Top management
commitment, fitness for use
Armand Feigenbaum
Philip B. Crosby
Table 6.1
8/11/2013
Core Elements:
Environmental management
Auditing
Performance evaluation
Labeling
Life cycle assessment
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Advantages:
Positive public image and reduced
exposure to liability
Systematic approach to pollution
prevention
Compliance with regulatory requirements
and opportunities for competitive
advantage
Table 6.2
6. Start training
7. Emphasize leadership
8. Drive out fear
9. Break down barriers between
departments
10. Stop haranguing workers
11. Support, help, and improve
Table 6.2
8/11/2013
operations.
Causes of TQM Implementation Failures
competencies
o Obsolete, outdated organizational cultures.
Table 6.2
Fundamentals of Operations
Management 4e
Leadership
Employee involvement
o All employees assume responsibility for inspecting the
Continuous Improvement
Fundamentals of Operations
Management 4e
1.
o Design quality
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Continuous improvement
(Kaizen)
Six Sigma
Employee empowerment
Benchmarking
JustJust-inin-time (JIT)
Taguchi concepts
Knowledge of TQM tools
8/11/2013
Lower limits
Upper limits
Two meanings
2,700 defects/million
6
6
Figure 6.4
4. Act
1.Plan
1.Plan
Implement the Identify the pattern
plan document and make a plan
A strategy
2. Do
Test the plan
A discipline - DMAIC
Figure 6.3
Two meanings
Statistical definition of a process that is
99.9997% capable, 3.4 defects per
million opportunities (DPMO)
A program designed to reduce defects,
lower costs, and improve customer
satisfaction
DMAIC Approach
8/11/2013
Best Practice
Justification
Respond quickly to
complaints
Resolve complaints on
first contact
It reduces cost
Use computers to
manage complaints
Techniques
Table 6.3
Relationship to quality:
8/11/2013
Taguchi Concepts
Quality robustness
Quality loss function
TargetTarget-oriented quality
Unreliable
Vendors
Scrap
Capacity
Imbalances
Scrap
Capacity
Imbalances
8/11/2013
L = D2C
High loss
where
L = loss to society
D = distance from target
value
C = cost of deviation
Unacceptable
Loss (to
producing
organization,
customer, and
society)
Poor
Fair
Good
Best
Low loss
TargetTarget-oriented quality
yields more product in
the best category
TargetTarget-oriented quality
brings product toward the
target value
Frequency
Defect
A
B
1
///
//
2
/
/
//
3
/
4
/
/
Hour
5
/
6
/
7
///
//
8
/
///
//
////
ConformanceConformance-oriented
quality keeps products
within 3 standard
deviations
Lower
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Target
Specification
Upper
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.6
Check sheets
CauseCause-andand-effect diagrams
Productivity
Scatter diagrams
Flowcharts
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Absenteeism
Figure 6.6
(c) Cause
Cause--andand-Effect Diagram: A tool that identifies process
elements (causes) that might effect an outcome
Histogram
Statistical process control chart
Cause
Materials
Methods
Effect
Manpower
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Machinery
Figure 6.6
8/11/2013
Method
(shooting process)
Grain/Feel
(grip)
60
Bend knees
Air pressure
Hand position
Lopsidedness
Balance
FollowFollow-through
Training
Missed
freefree-throws
Rim size
Conditioning
Rim height
Motivation
Consistency
Backboard
stability
Rim alignment
Concentration
Number of
occurrences
30
20
12
10
CheckCheck-in
16%
Pool hours
5%
Minibar
4%
Misc.
3%
Figure 6.7
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
72
40
Room svc
72%
Personnel
Equipment
54
50
Machine
(hoop &
backboard)
Manpower
(shooter)
100
93
88
70
Aiming point
Frequency (number)
Size of ball
Cumulative percent
Material
(ball)
Mechanical failures
Weather
Late fuel
Delayed
flight
departures
Procedures
Figure 4.11
Source:
Adapted from
D. Daryl Wyckoff,
Management:
Strategy
and New Tools for Achieving Service Quality. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant
Administration Quarterly, November 1984, pg. 89. 1984 Cornell H.R.A. Quarterly. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
MRI Flowchart
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
If unsatisfactory, repeat
Patient taken back to room
MRI read by radiologist
MRI report transferred to
physician
11. Patient and physician discuss
Percent
Frequency
Figure 6.6
8
1
80%
11
9
A
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
10
20%
Figure 6.6
8/11/2013
(f)
Frequency
Distribution
10%
0%
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
Game number
(g) Statistical Process Control Chart: A chart with time on the horizontal
axis to plot values of a statistic
Figure 6.8
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Target value
Issues
When to inspect
Where in process to inspect
Time
2011 Pearson Education,
Inc. publishing as Prentice
Hall
Figure 6.6
10
8/11/2013
Many problems
Worker fatigue
Measurement error
Process variability
Reliability
Responsiveness
Competence
Access
Courtesy
Communication
Credibility
Security
Understanding/
knowing the customer
Tangibles
Apologize
Notify
Table 6.5
React
11
8/11/2013
Organization
What is
Inspected
Standard
Is phone answered by the
second ring
Arnold Palmer
Hospital
Standard
Busboy
Busboy
Attorney
Promptness in returning
calls
Waiter
Table 6.4
What is
Inspected
What is
Inspected
Organization
Reception
desk
Doorman
Room
Minibar
Table 6.4
What is
Inspected
Table 6.4
Standard
Organization
Olive Garden
Restaurant
Billing
Organization
What is
Inspected
Organization
Standard
Nordstrom
Department
Store
Standard
Rotation of goods,
organized, clean
Salesclerks
Table 6.4
Japanese English
Term
Equivalent
Meaning in Japanese
Context
Seiri
Tidiness
Billing
Pharmacy
Prescription accuracy,
inventory accuracy
Seiton
Orderliness
Lab
Seiso
Cleanliness
Nurses
Admissions
Seiketsu
Standardization
Shitsuke
Discipline
Table 6.4
12
8/11/2013
Checklists
Attributes
Items are either good or bad, acceptable or
unacceptable
Does not address degree of failure
Headliner Defects
Defect type
Variables
Tally
Total
A. Tears in fabric
B. Discolored fabric
D. Ragged edges
Total
To Accompany Krajewski &
Ritzman Operations
Management:
Figure
4.12 Strategy and
Checklists
Headliner Defects
Defect type
Step 1Checklist
Step 2Pareto chart
Step 3Cause-and-effect
diagram
Step 4Bar chart
Tally
Total
A. Tears in fabric
B. Discolored fabric
C. Broken fiber board
//
D. Ragged edges
Total
Checklists
Checklists
Headliner Defects
Headliner Defects
Defect type
Tally
Defect type
A. Tears in fabric
A. Tears in fabric
B. Discolored fabric
B. Discolored fabric
Total
//
D. Ragged edges
D. Ragged edges
Total
Total
To Accompany Krajewski &
Ritzman Operations
Management:
Figure
4.12 Strategy and
Management:
Figure
4.12 Strategy and
Tally
Total
13
8/11/2013
Checklists
Cause-and-Effect Diagram
Headliner Defects
Defect type
People
Tally
Total
Materials
Training
Out of specification
A. Tears in fabric
Absenteeism
Not available
Communication
B. Discolored fabric
C. Broken fiber board
D. Ragged edges
//
Humidity
Broken
fiber board
maintenance
Machine
Machine speed
Schedule changes
Wrong setup
Total
Other
To Accompany Krajewski &
Ritzman Operations
Management:
Figure
4.12 Strategy and
Analysis, Seventh Edition
2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All
Process
Bar Chart
Headliner Defects
Tally
Total
A. Tears in fabric
Defect type
////
B. Discolored fabric
///
D. Ragged edges
36
7
50
20
Checklists
15
10
First
Pareto Chart
50
100
Second
Shift
Third
Entrance
Buffer
Work Station
Buffer
Door
Line
Teller
Served Customers
Number of defects
80
30
20
10
60
D
40
20
Work Station
Teller 1
Entrance
Buffer
Buffer
Door
Line
Served Customers
Work Station
Teller 2
B
0
Defect type
Cumulative percentage
40
two-teller bank
Figure 4.13
14
8/11/2013
Element
Element
Types
Names
Entrance(s)
Door
Buffer(s)
Line
Statistics
Overall
Means
Service level
0.90
Mean inventory
4.47
11.04
15