dec 18 lecture

KHAN JR VS SIMBILLO
can no. 5299 aug 19 2003
suspended for 1 year
for publishing
there is concern that publishing in net, radio etc
sending txt
xx sending letters is also unethical
using net not regulated

chan robles is a vitual library but also accepting clients

publishing that their lawyers were competent
it is indirect soliciting
nicolas and de vega law office
atty marlon valderama
e-lawyers
solicitationalso
libayan & asso law firm
free legal advice
is also solicitation
why choose us ? -isa solicitation
The sc did not regulate the violation of code ethics

rule 2.04
customary rate ex 20t means u cannot charge lower than that

_--------_-----------jan 7,2015
canon 5
case: hernandez vs padilla ac no. 9387 june 20, 2012
case of disbarment against atty padilla
padilla said no lawyer client relationship and he cannot be charged
padilla give advice to be settled
ruling:
sc sustained it
there was relationship because he receive apperance fee
case2:
santiago vs rafanan AC No. 6252 Oct 5, 2004
rafanan notarized affidavit
he failed to put the cedula by reason santiago failed in a case
santiago filed a case
ruling:
sc explain the importance of indicating cedula in affidavit
even if it a practice in locality the non indication of cedula for long years
it cannot be change the path
he was fined 3 thousand
case3:
veroy vs
there was a houseowner give warning to neigbor to evacuate due to dilapidated wall and it
happens
the owner was charge and order to pay damages
the lawyer failed tosubmit motion to recon instead submit for extension

case 4: benito vs balindong

Am no rtj 08 2103 feb 23, 2009

employee was terminatedby mayor

ombudsman said case was merit and order the mayor to pay and suspended
mayor file at rtc jufge balindong
which was approved the injuction and tro
benito appealed in sc
sc ruled that judge should know thelaw and his defense in good faith is not acceptable
he was fine 10 t and
30t for gross ignorance.
case5:
Pp vs Gacott Jr. Gr No. 116049. July 13,1995
gross ignorance:
trend on specialization
benefits
lawyers choose to concentrate , competense
greater expertise
general cannot compet especialist, much less expensive
canon 7
-------------------Jan 9 2015
Canon 6
cases:
Cuenca vs CA. Gr 109870. dec 9 1995
far eastern coy vs Ppa. Gr No 136068. Oct 1 1998

Austria vs Abaya
Am No, R-705 Rtj
Collantes vs Renomeron
AC No. 305
atty renomeron was disbarred for his act of oppression
remedy: file a petition for admission
pcgg vs sandigan lucio tan
genbank has a probs
central bank has extended support
rule 6.03
genbank was not able to recover
lucio tan was d hihest bidder
estilito mendoza intervene
Canon
January 21,2015 Legal Ethics Lecture
Cases: Canon 7 take note At all times
1.) Silverio-Buffe A.M. No. 08-6-352RTC
2.) Ventura v Samson A.C No. 9608, 11/27/12
Rule 7.01
1.) Leda v.s Tabang, A.C No. 2505, 2/21/92
Rule 7.03
1.) Barandon, Jr v.s Ferrer Sr., A.C No. 5768, 3/26/10
2.) Galicinao v.s Martinez, AC No. 639610/25/05
3.) Tumbukon v.s Pefianco, A.C No. 6116, 8/1/12
4.) Macarrubo v.s Macarubo A.C No. 6148 2/27/04
5.) Guevarra v.s Eala A.C No. 7136 8/1/07

Lecture 1/22/. 15 ethics

Canon 8
1. Que vs revilla A. C No. 7054 12/4/09
Filed a petition for annulmentof judgement
Rule 8.01
1. Seludov.s Judge Fineza A.M No. RTJ-03-1813 11/21/03
Congenital liar
2. Foddsphere,Inc v.s Atty Mauricio Jr A.C No. 7199 Jly 22, 2009
Seeling can goods CDO liver spread