Professional Documents
Culture Documents
pectin and tannins. 100 g of fruit pulp provides 5.1 or over 13% of dietary
fiber. NSP or dietary fiber in the food increases its bulk and augments bowel
movements thereby help prevent constipation. The fiber also binds to toxins
in the food thereby help protect the colon mucus membrane from cancercausing chemicals.
Tamarind fruit contains many volatile phytochemicals such as limonene,
geraniol, safrole, cinnamic acid, methyl salicylate, pyrazine and alkylthiazoles. This prized spice is a good source of minerals like copper,
potassium, calcium, iron, selenium, zinc and magnesium. Potassium is an
important component of cell and body fluids that helps control heart rate and
blood pressure. Iron is essential for red blood cell production and as a cofactor for cytochrome oxidasesenzymes.
In addition, it is also rich in many vital vitamins, including thiamin (36% of
daily required levels), vitamin-A, folic acid, riboflavin, niacin, and vitamin-C.
Much of these vitamins plays antioxidant as well as co-factor functions for
enzyme metabolism inside the body.
So why dont you try to taste some?!
History
Sampaloc Candy making originated from my great grandmother, Mena
Portugal. The recipe is what you can consider as hand-me-down recipe. It
was during the time of war and deprivation that drove my Abuela to look for
alternative sources of income. She relied on her culinary expertise specially
in making sweets. It was the time when sampaloc trees around the area
abound. She handed down the recipe to one of her daughters, Loreta fondly
called Ita by family and friends. Since then, Tita Ita supplied stores and
dealers with the delicious candy. Recently, many people going back to Manila
considered the sampaloc candy as one of their pasalubong of choice.
Length of Existence
Loreta Portugal had been making candies for 30 years by now together with
other delicacies such as Ginanga, Pansit Habhab, Sagot Gulaman and many
more. She owns a store inside the public market of Gumaca where she sells
food ingredients.
COMPETITORS
Other Sampaloc candy makers can be considered as competitors but
nonetheless its not really of a serious business competition in this scale of
production.
Presentation of Data
This Part deals with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of
data used to support to oppose the given hypothesis of the researcher
on the main problem why the study has to be conducted.
Table 1.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Packaging
Packaging
Very
Satisfactory
15
Satisfact
ory
26
Neutr
al
Good
10
Poor
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
15(5) + 26(4) + 10(3) + 0(2) + 0(1) = / 51
Criteria
VS
5
S
4
G
3
N
2
P
1
Total
Weighte
d Mean
Packaging
75
104
30
209
4.10
Very
4.50 5
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.10
Table 1.0 show that the frequency per rating towards the packaging of the
Sampaloc Candy states that Most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Table 1.1
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Visual Appeal
Visual
Appeal
Very
Satisfact
ory
Satisfact
ory
Good
Neutral
20
23
Poor
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
20(5)+23(4)+7(3)+1(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Visual
Appeal
Very
Satisfactory
VS
Total
Weight
ed
Mean
100
92
21
215
4.22
4.50 - 5
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.22
Table 1.1 shows that the frequency per rating towards Visual Appeal of the
Sampaloc Candy states that Most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good
Table 1.2
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Aroma
Aroma
Very
Satisfact
ory
19
Satisfact
ory
24
Good
6
Neutral
2
Poor
0
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
19(5)+24(4)+6(3)+2(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Aroma
VS
Total
Weight
ed
Mean
95
96
18
213
4.18
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
4.50 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.18
Table 1.2 shows that the frequency per rating towards Aroma of the
Sampaloc Candy states that most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good
Table 2.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Taste
Taste
Very
Satisfact
ory
32
Satisfacto
ry
14
Good
2
Neutral
3
Poor
0
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
32(5)+14(4)+2(3)+3(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Taste
VS
Total
Weight
ed
Mean
160
56
228
4.47
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
4.50 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.47
Table 2.0 shows that the frequency per rating towards taste of the
Sampaloc Candy states that most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Table 3.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Texture
Texture
Very
Satisfact
ory
24
Satisfact
ory
18
Good
9
Neutral
Poor
0
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
24(5)+18(4)+9(3)+0(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Texture
VS
5
120
4
72
3
27
2
0
1
0
Total
219
Weight
ed
Mean
4.29
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
4.50 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.29
Table 3.0 shows that the frequency per rating towards texture of the
Sampaloc Candy states that most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Table 4.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Price
Price
Very
Satisfacto
ry
38
Satisfact
ory
7
Good
6
Neutral
0
Poor
0
Total
51
Weighted Mean =
38(5)+7(4)+6(3)+0(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
VS
Total
Weight
Price
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
190
28
18
4.50 - 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
ed
Mean
236
4.63
4.63
Table 4.0 shows that the frequency per rating towards price of the Sampaloc
Candy states that most respondents rated the product as Satisfactory
followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Table 5.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Recommendation
Recommenda
tion
Very
Satisfacto
ry
Satisfact
ory
Good
Neutral
Poor
Total
28
18
51
Weighted Mean =
24(5)+18(4)+9(3)+0(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Recommendat
ion
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
VS
Total
Weight
ed
Mean
140
72
18
227
4.45
4.50 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.45
T able 5.0 shows that the frequency per rating towards recommendation of
the Sampaloc Candy states that most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Table 6.0
Frequency Distribution Regarding Sampaloc Candy
Product Buyability
Very
Satisfacto
Good
Neutral
Poor
Total
Recommenda
tion
Satisfacto
ry
ry
28
15
51
Weighted Mean =
28(5)+15(4)+8(3)+0(2)+0(1)=/51
Criteria
Recommenda
tion
Very
Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Neutral
Poor
VS
Tota
l
Weight
ed
Mean
140
60
24
224
4.49
4.50 - 5
3.50 4.49
2.50 3.49
1.50 2.49
1 - 1.49
4.49
Table 6.0 shows that the frequency per rating towards product buyability of
the Sampaloc Candy states that most respondents rated the product as
Satisfactory followed by Very Satisfactory and good.
Definition of Terms
Aroma
A pleasant characteristic odor, as of a plant, spice, or food.
Frequency distribution
An arrangement of statistical data that exhibits the frequency of the
occurrence of the values of a variable.
Folic acid
A crystalline vitamin C19H19N7O6 of the B complex that is used especially in
the treatment of nutritional anemias called also pteroylglutamic acid.
Ginangga
A fish recipe common to Gumaca.
Hand - me - down
Put in use by one person or group after being used, discarded, or handed
down by another.
Leguminous family
Of, relating to, or belonging to the Fabaceae (formerly Leguminosae), a
family of flowering plants having pods (or legumes) as fruits and root nodules
enabling storage of nitrogen-rich material: includes peas, beans, clover,
gorse, acacia, and carob.
Limonene
A widely distributed terpene hypocarbon C1oH6 that occurs in essential oils
(as oranges or lemons) and has a lemon odor.
Niacin
Riboflavin