Professional Documents
Culture Documents
18.1
Introduction
In this chapter we discuss the application of finite-state models to understanding a variety of features of the electrical patterns of activity of the
heart. These models consist of a spatially extended lattice of points; each
point is allowed to take on any of a set of discrete states, and there is a
dynamical rule that is applied to the lattice to iterate the evolution forward
in time, so that the state at each point on the lattice is allowed to change
based on the present and past values of the lattice states.
Such models, often termed cellular automata, have become of special
interest with the direct applicability to computer simulation, which represents any system by a finite set of discrete states. In fact, any sort of a finite
1 Harvard-M.LT. Division of Health Sciences and Technology, M.LT., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
438
439
1---1
FIGURE 18.1. Two-dimensional Square Lattice for CAMCC, with four nearest
neighbors and lattice spacing, a.
tion rule with some maximal physiological conduction velocity over some
minimum point-to-point distance defines some minimal time step (i.e., temporal resolution for a change in state), the resolution in space and time are
proportional. The computational time for a three-dimensional lattice will
therefore increase as the fourth power of the spatiotemporal resolution.
Efficient discrete CAMCC algorithms are a useful way to overcome this
scaling problem.
An early CAMCC was that of Moe and coworkers [54], who were interested in reentry and fibrillation, and examined the relation of these
arrhythmias to the dispersion of refractoriness hypothesis. Subsequently,
Smith and Cohen [69] examined a similar model in relation to reentrant fibrillation, as well as abnormalities in atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction
[70], as was also done recently by Chee and colleagues [12]. Extensions of
CAMCC to include features such as anatomical constraints, anisotropy due
to fiber orientation (e.g., in conduction velocity), and dynamical changes
in conduction parameters have been made [6,25,49,58,65,78,79].
There has also long been an interest in understanding the relation between the cellular electrical activity in the myocardium and the surface
potentials recorded clinically by electrocardiogram (ECG). CAMCC models with varying amounts of anatomical and physiological detail were used
by Selvester and coworkers [67,71] and others [1,16] to construct simulated
ECG or body surface maps under physiological conditions or abnormal
conditions such as regional ischemia.
440
18.2 CAMCC
18.2.1
DESCRIPTION
441
a)
+10
Vrn
(mV)
e
b)
sta;t~_______________
e
FIGURE 18.2. (A) Action potential: transmembrane voltage, Vm , vs. time, t. (B)
Discrete two-state cellular automata: State 0, resting; State 1, depolarized and
refractory; (J = refractory period.
442
State
: Repolarization
I
I
I
Depolarization
and activating state during which a given point will depolarize any of its
resting nearest neighbors, and (3) a refractory state during which a given
point is unable to depolarize neighboring points but has not itself recovered
to the resting state.
The transitions in this three-state model are represented in Figure 18.4
with reference to the time course of the action potential. Because the activation from neighbor to neighbor occurs not by a state transition (or
"edge") but by the occupation of an "activating" state, we will refer to this
as a "state-triggered" model. The activating state represents the duration
of time that a given region of membrane can source sufficient current to
depolarize nearby membrane beyond the threshold voltage to start an action potential. The three-state model allows the explicit manipulation of
the duration of this activating state as a physiological variable, in addition
to the duration of the refractory period. The two- and three-state models
are equivalent in discrete time (e.g., a cellular automata model) when the
duration of the activating state in the three-state model is just one time
step. This can be interpreted as implying the duration of the current source
is less than or equal to one time step (e.g., the strong sodium channel defining the leading edge of the action potential for a discrete time resolution
greater than 1 msec in normal propagation).
At this point, we make a careful distinction between the discrete nature
of functional states, as described above, and the limit-continuous (in space
and time) transmembrane voltage states. The points representing a limitcontinuous function like the transmembrane voltage can be arbitrarily close
together depending on the spatial and temporal sampling resolution of the
model. This is in contrast to the few discrete functional states defining the
temporal evolution of the CAMCC. We can couple the discrete state model
to a limit-continuous action potential by assigning each lattice point a specific dynamical parameter to represent separately the local transmembrane
443
444
\
I
\
\
S(ti+l)
FIGURE 18.5. Variables in CAMCC (at discrete times ti). Discrete: S = discrete
functional state of CAMCC. Limit-continuous: Vm = transmembrane voltage;
ECG = surface electrocardiogram (forward map); T = local myocardial tension
(stress); P = pressure (by contraction on volume). Dashed lines indicate that an
intermediate model can use continuous time variables to affect discrete functional
state transitions.
voltage. Thus, when a given lattice point undergoes the transition from a
resting functional state to the active functional state (i.e., that point has
been activated, which also corresponds to the initiation of depolarization),
we simultaneously represent the onset (at threshold) of the time course
of the local action potential in the transmembrane voltage variable. The
criterion for conduction from point to point remains only a function of the
discrete functional states. The dynamical behavior of the cellular automata
rules on the lattice would then permit the calculation of simulated epicardial voltages or torso surface potentials (ECG) by the forward map, for
example, similar to the map used in the nonpropagating model by Miller
and Geselowitz [52,53]' and as mentioned earlier, several CAMCC models
have taken a similar approach for this purpose. This is represented in Figure 18.5 by the heavy arrows connecting the evaluation at time ti of the
discrete functional state of the lattice, S(td, and the consequent values of
the transmembrane voltage and the ECG. A similar means can be used to
couple the dynamical history of a CAMCC to mechanical activity by invoking local contraction around a lattice point as a function of the changes
in functional states [13]. The temporal history of mechanical activity could
then be represented by a limit-continuous parameter (the distribution of
tension, T, or the blood pressure, P), as was the action potential waveform
in the forward ECG map (see Figure 18.5).
Models intermediate between CAMCC and the continuum models mentioned earlier [7] can be formed by permitting limit-continuous variables,
triggered by discrete state transitions, for example, to affect the occurrence
of the discrete state transitions themselves. If we have a limit-continuous
representation of local cellular transmembrane voltage coupled to the discrete functional states, we might include the values of the transmembrane
445
446
tb)
Vrn
tFIGURE 18.6. (A) Autochrone ()[ corresponding to (B), series of local action
potentials.
2. A given lattice point remains refractory for some time 8 after the
most recent activation, that is, for a E [0,8].
The autochrone itself increments uniformly in time, except at the time
of a local activation when it is discontinuously reset to 0 (see Figure 18.6).
The determination of the loci of points where the autochrone equals 0 defines the spatial locus of the leading edge of the action potential. Note
that the level sets of the autochrone are equivalent to the isochrones traditionally defined in cardiac electrical mapping. The loci of points where
the autochrone equals 1 msec is equivalent to the corresponding isochrone,
which represents the location of the propagating wavefront 1 msec previous
to the current time. If we were able to determine the temporal history of
the spatial pattern of the autochrone field amplitude, we would then know
the temporal history of the electrical activity defined by action potential
propagation. The discrete state functional rules determining the behavior
of the CAMCC can then be interpreted as specifying the nontrivial behavior of the autochrone history, that is, the determination of where and when
the autochrone is discontinuously reset to o.
447
b)
18.2.2
EXAMPLE OF BEHAVIOR
448
18.3
The general features of the behavior of the CAMCC are not unique to
cardiac conduction. The generation of rotating spiral waves under constrained initial conditions is also observed in chemical reactions, such as the
Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction [4S,56,S6-88,93], and in biological systems
such as the Dictyostelium discoideum slime mold [21,SO,SS] and networks
of neurons, as in the retina [9,30,SS]. Such organizing patterns formed in
nonequilibrium states can be perturbed by introducing a variety of inhomogeneities into the systems. One would conjecture that the generic features
of the CAMCC might apply to these other problems in some cellular automaton limit, that is, that the cellular automata discrete functional state
transition rules are similar for different processes whose underlying continuum dynamics may be quite different. Such unifying cellular automata
features include the presence of an excitable, metastable field (the lattice
points in the resting state of the CAMCC, for example), which is stimulated to a decay transition (e.g., depolarization) by spatial coupling (in
the cardiac case, electrotonic coupling sourcing depolarizing current), and
then is reexcited by some local process (e.g., repolarization) after some critical recovery time (refractory period). The decay process, occurring at the
leading edge of the propagating wave, is permitted by the initial existence
of the metastable state. Such a general view has been presented earlier
[46], and the solitary propagating waves that result in such systems have
449
a)
c)
d)
FIGURE 18.8. Development of vortex reentry. (A) Half-plane block to propagation to begin vortex reentry. A linear wavefront (propagating from below) is
blocked from propagation along part of its length by forcing those lattice points
to be in the refractory state (as if the wavefront encountered a transient region
of prolonged refractoriness) . The refractory period after this block will be made
uniform and isotropic, equal to 6.5 time steps. (B), (C), and (D) Developing
vortex reentry after half-plane block.
450
a)
b)
c)
d)
FIGURE 18.9. Effect of dispersion on refractory period. (A) One time step after
the introduction of a small dispersion of refractoriness to the pattern of Figure
18.8D. The mean refractory period is still 6.5, but refractory periods now are
independently assigned to the lattice from an approximately gaussian distribution with standard deviation 0.5 time steps. (B) Conduction pattern with small
dispersion of refractoriness, 15 time steps after the pattern in (A). (C) One time
step after the introduction of a large dispersion of refractoriness to the pattern of
Figure 18.8D. Mean refractory period is still 6.5, but the standard deviation was
increased from 0 to 2 time steps. (D) Conduction pattern with large dispersion
of refractoriness, 15 time steps after the pattern in (C).
451
452
18.4
18.4.1
The advantage of the CAMCC is in its simplification of very complex nonlinear behavior to a set of discrete state transition rules. The parameters
governing these transitions, such as the refractory period or the local conduction velocity, can be determined by electrophysiological measurement on
bulk tissue. The representation of the CAMCC is then one of a mesoscopic
view [68], wherein the details of the behavior of the ion channels are not
explicit, but instead are implicitly represented in the parameters governing
the state transition rules. This can have certain advantages in the face of
uncertainty about microscopic details. For example, by inserting a delay
in the passage of information from point to point on the lattice, one can
regulate the effective local conduction velocity for propagation of the active
state (leading edge of the action potential). In experimental measurements,
the local conduction velocity depends on myocardial fiber orientation, being two to three times as fast along the fiber as transverse [14,63,64,66]. By
representing conduction delays on the lattice by a discrete tensor form (depending on the spatial orientation between coupled lattice points relative
to local fiber orientation), the CAMCC conduction velocity can be made
anisotropic based on an assignment of myocardial fiber orientation at each
point. The actual microscopic rationale for this difference in conduction
velocity appears to lie in the elongated structure of the fibers and the orientation and location of the gap junctions that electrically couple the cells
[72-76]. A continuum approximation (to what is, at a microscopic level, actually a phenomenon of the discrete cellular structure itself) would involve
assigning effective parameters of intracellular resistivity, and so forth, in
an anisotropic fashion in an attempt to simulate the effect of the discrete
cellular structure [11,18,42,62,82]. The CAMCC avoids this intermediate
step and simply assigns the measured conduction velocity to the lattice.
Changes in the conduction velocity as a function of previous patterns of
stimulation (e.g., slowed conduction with premature stimulation) can be
represented by making the conduction velocity depend on the autochrone
history. Afterdepolarizations, which relate the transmembrane voltage history to previous patterns of stimulation (autochrone history), can also be
incorporated in intermediate models, where it is now the local v01tage at
a point that may itself rise above threshold (independent of neighboring
states) to trigger a spontaneous depolarization.
18.4.2
ELECTROTONIC INTERACTIONS
453
454
FIGURE 18.11. Three points lying within the electrotonic decay length, "I. (A)
Activating state. (B) Refractory state. (C) Resting, being depolarized by (A).
455
a
FIGURE 18.12. Electrotonic propagation: a = Lattice sampling length; 1/ = electrotonic decay length. See text for description.
456
1]/C (Figure 18.12), will be identical with either choice of ct. In the choice
ofthe larger value, ct = 1]/c, one will, however, sacrifice smoothness in the
temporal representation of parameters (as would naturally be expected).
This would be of more concern in an intermediate model, which might couple the transition to the activating state, S = 1, with a limit-continuous
model of current sourcing to nearby tissue that changes in strength depending on the autochrone value of the source point (e.g., decreasing current
strength as the autochrone increases, i.e., as the time since the last depolarization increases). At this point, we will introduce the activation field,
Ai,i(ai, di,i)' which will model current sourcing from the point i with autochrone ai, to depolarize the point j at a distance di,i = IXi - Xi I from i.
This is not an explicit representation of the actual physiological ionic currents, which would require the representation of the details of intracellular
and extracellular resistance, membrane capacitance, and so forth, which
we wish to subsume in a specification of mesoscopic parameters such as
the conduction velocity, refractory period, electrotonic decay length, and
so on. Rather, the activation field will allow us to distinguish patterns of
propagation with different current requirements, allowing us to simulate
failure or success of local propagation owing to electrotonic interactions.
In the following, we will take the liberty of referring to the activation field
as representing the amount of "current" sourced from a given point to its
surroundings. A general, detailed model might endow Ai,i(ai,di,i) with a
spatial exponential decay with length constant 1] and with a temporal dynamics as a function ofthe autochrone, ai, that would represent the change
in current sourced over time.
For a CAMCC, the simplest approximation is to make the current source
strength from point i to point j, Ai,i' a constant (A) for some interval in
time, for example, the activation time, T.
A- '(0" d . .) - { AB,,(xi,xi) if ai ~ Ti
I,]
1 , 1,1
0
otherwise
where
B (X
" I'X1
if IXi - Xi I ~
0 otherwise
)- { I
-
1]
(18.1)
(18.2)
defines the disc of points that can be stimulated by the point i. To represent
anisotropic conduction by an ellipse instead of a disc, because of faster
propagation longitudinal to fiber orientation (conduction velocity clI) than
transverse (conduction velocity C.l), the major and minor axes of the ellipse
would simply be cllct and C.lct, respectively.
The evaluation by any given point, j, as to whether it will receive sufficient current to depolarize beyond threshold can be done by summing
over the Ai,i' sourced from its neighbors at i, and comparing the sum to
a threshold parameter, (1i' If Li Ai ,i ~ (1i' then a resting point j will be
stimulated to the depolarized, activating state. Again, by making (1 a function of the autochrone, (1(0'), one can represent different requirements for
457
current to stimulate past threshold as a function of time (e.g., in representing relative refractory periods). Larger values of (1' correspond to a greater
current requirement for stimulation. Smaller values of (1' correspond to lower
current requirements for stimulation (as might be of interest in representing
supernormal excitability [77]).
One of the interesting suggestions of studies of fiber orientation induced
anisotropy in conduction is that the effective safety factor (which reflects
the balance between current source strength and current requirements for
stimulation) differs between longitudinal and transverse propagation [7376]. This can be represented by making the value of Ai,j depend on the fiber
orientation, oi and OJ (assumed normalized vectors), at points i and j. In
particular, a key point of interest is to be able to simulate the possibility
of unidirectional block at the boundary between orthogonal fibers, where
propagation from the longitudinal to the transverse mode is successful (i.e.,
a wavefront moving parallel to the fiber orientation at one point tries to
cross to motion orthogonal to the fiber orientation at another point; See
Figure 18.13A), while propagation from the transverse to the longitudinal
mode (Figure 18.13B) will fail. Because the value of AU is defined for
the point i sourcing current to the point j, We are at libet;ty to make Ai,j
nonsymmetric, so that Ai,j 1= Aj,i. In particular, if We define
-AX . .
'J '
x-x1
xjl
IXi -
(18.3)
458
;-t---'
b)
i
---------1 .
making it possible for conduction to block in either direction at the boundary of orthogonal fibers. By changing the functional form of f, we can alter
the magnitude and the angular sensitivity of the effective asymmetry in
current source (and hence likelihood of blocked conduction) as a function
of fiber orientation at the two points i and j.
Another feature of interest is the variable effect of wavefront curvature
and its interaction with fiber orientation through, for example, anisotropic
safety factors or current requirements for propagation. (Interactions between velocity of wavefront propagation and wavefront curvature have
been examined in analytical reaction-diffusion type models [81,94-96] .) The
topology of connection, that is, the number of neighbors included within
the electrotonic decay distance of a given point on the lattice, limits the
allowed resolution of the local curvature. This angular resolution is approximately afT} (for small af"'); in the simplest CAMCC with only coupling to
the four next nearest neighbors, the angulax resolution is only 90 0 , as seen
in the earlier Figures 18.7 and 18.8. Compare this with Figure 18.12, where
the lattice spacing a < '" yields a smoother approximation to the advanc-
459
a)
:.-..:
Cf
b)
~
~
--.
: ct
ing wavefront than the nearest neighbor model. Phenomena that might be
a function of this curvature will not be well represented in a lattice with
coupling to only a few nearest neighbors (e.g., for a> TJ). For example, the
ability to source current ahead of a sharply curved region versus line (or
plane in three-dimensions) may be different in a case representing marginal
propagation, and this in turn could advance or retard the propagation of
pieces of different curvature. By including electrotonic summation effects,
such an effect can be accounted for, as shown in Figure 18.14. In this figure, in both case A, planar wavefront, and case B, curved wavefront, the
advancing wavefronts source current to stimulate a point, p, a distance x
from the leading edge of the wavefront. The area behind the wavefront that
can source current will be of thickness CT, since T is assumed to represent
the duration of the activating state. The point, p, however, will sum over
current sources within the electrotonic decay length TJ and the total current
sourced will therefore be proportional to the area of overlap between a disc
of radius TJ centered at p and the area of activating points of thickness CT
behind the wavefront. In marginal propagation (through a region with a
high current requirement, or u) the difference in this area of overlap between the planar and curved wavefront may cause propagation to fail as
the curvature increases, hence blocking or retarding conduction of the large
curvature wavefront while still permitting normal propagation of the low
curvature or planar wavefront .
The CAMCC and its extension to intermediate models thus have the
virtue of providing the means to examine directly the implications of electrophysiological measurements for global behavior under a variety of condi-
460
461
FIGURE 18.15. Loop in space consisting of the discrete functional state and the
autochrone (0'), for periodic stimulation at period T. The transitions among the
discrete states are shown by the dashed arrows.
FIGURE 18.16. Periodic vortex motion around the core with velocity c creates
periodic wavefronts at spacing, ~ = cO, stimulating at the refractory period, O.
the onset of reentry can only be done in the continuum models. As has been
noted (pp. 200-201 Winfree, [88]), replacing the core of a vortex by inactive
medium still permits the circulation of a spiral wave, now around this obstacle to propagation (and perhaps with altered period of circulation). The
very existence of stable propagating reentrant vortices in CAMCC models
as well as continuum models argues that the existence and stability of these
structures is predominantly a function of the spatially extended autochrone
field (which represents the history of wavefront passage), and not so much
a function of the detailed representation of the core.
What the CAMCC can represent of the core is a length scale (by the
spatial extent of the line singularity in the autochrone), A, which is related
to the requirement of a minimal spatial extent for reentry to be successful,
given the conduction velocity, c, and refractory period, () (Figure 18.16).
Since circulation around the core occurs in time equal to the refractory
462
period (in the case of homogeneous parameters), the length of the core will
be >'/2, where>. = c(). A question for future study is whether the CAMCC
representation of the core is sufficient for the analysis of global stability of
behavior against reentrant arrhythmias (including reentrant fibrillation),
as opposed to the microscopic local study of the details of the inner reentrant core. In addition, another point of interest is what features (perhaps
electrotonic interactions with curvature effects, as discussed earlier) can
be added to the simple CAMCC to mimic features of slowed conduction
velocity near the core and wandering motion of the core itself, observed in
cardiac mapping experiments [41] and seen in continuum models [88,95].
18.6
The CAMCC represents the spatial extent of the behavior ofthe system on
a discrete lattice. A question arises regarding the interpretation of the implicit limitation on spatial resolution imposed by the discrete lattice, when
one seeks to interpret the behavior of the CAMCC in relation to a spatially
continuous physical system (e.g., the syncytium model of cardiac conduction, spatially continuous chemical media, etc.). More precisely, in the case
of cardiac conduction, the existence of cellular structures (the anisotropic
location and density of gap junctions defining low-resistance connections
between the cells) make the assumption of continuous electrical behavior
problematic for cellular length scales. Because the sharpest dynamical transition in the propagating cardiac action potential, the leading edge defined
by the strong sodium current, has a time course on the order of 1 msec,
and hence an extent over many cells (the conduction velocity being on
the order of 0.1-1 mm/msec [14,63,64,66]), the approximation of propagation of electrical activity through continuous media is based on smoothing
spatially over length scales larger than those characterizing cellular sizes
(1001' x 201') [18,72].
Figure 18.17 illustrates the hierarchy of spatial representation. The
CAMCC takes the approximately smooth spatial behavior of the continuum
syncytial model and introduces a potentially coarse spatial representation.
Two possible interpretations can be made.
1. Each point on the lattice represents the behavior averaged over a
corresponding small spatial volume (e.g., cube for a cubic lattice in
three-dimensions) centered on that point. In this view, the properties of model conduction (conduction velocity, refractory period, etc.)
represent averaged properties over this small volume.
463
IDiscrete La ttice
Sampling
Continuum Syncytium
Spatial Smoothing
Cells
We will argue that the proper interpretation for scaling purposes is the
second. For when one interprets the CAMCC as a spatially sampled model,
the conduction rule that defines the temporal evolution of the CAMCC is
unaffected by the value of the spatial sampling length. No matter what
the sampling interval is, the temporal sharpness of the transition from the
resting to the activating, depolarized state is the same, as one is examining
the state transition for a point in the medium that remains dynamically
unaffected by the sampling interval. Hence, the representation of the dynamics by discrete state transitions, as is required by the CAMCC, is well
defined at any length scale of sampling.
By contrast, under the averaging interpretation the dynamical rule for
the evolution of the behavior at a point on the lattice must change as the
lattice spacing increases. Each cube of volume will contain some depolarized and some resting tissue, so that the dynamics between the discrete
physiological states will become smoothed. In the limit of very large lattice spacing, over length scales larger than the reentry criterion, each cube
may internally support self-sustained activity, and a dynamical rule involving transitions between three discrete activating, depolarized, and resting
states will no longer be appropriate. In fact, assuming that the parameters
of conduction are statistically identical between the cubes and that the
pattern of self-sustained activity is homogeneously distributed (as in fibrillation), each such cube supporting self-sustained reentry must be equivalent
to any other cube in averaged behavior and hence should be assigned the
same averaged state!
The interpretation of the spatial lattice of the CAMCC as a spatial sampling over the physical system preserves the discrete dynamics between a
few states independently of the length scale of the spatial sampling. This
allows one to interpret the effects of lattice scaling by increasing or decreasing the spatial sampling length while the dynamical evolution rule of the
464
e.
465
Tissue Volume
Reentry Criterion
Lattice Sampling
~
Correlation Length ---=---1
1-1
Electrotonic Decay ~
466
18.8
In CAMCC with static (time-independent) parameters of conduction physiology, the only variations possible are spatial fluctuations in these parameters. However, physiologically the conduction velocity and refractory period
will change as a function of the history of local electrical activity, which
can affect the initiation and stability of arrhythmias [28]. For example, the
refractory period will shorten under rapid sequences of stimulation while it
will lengthen under slow stimulation. As stated earlier, we can couple the
dynamical behavior of the refractory period to that of the action potential
duration. This dynamical behavior in turn can be described by a set of
parameters that reflect the ability of the myocardial cells to repolarize in
response to different stimulus sequences. One such model, generalized from
electrical restitution experiments to measure dynamical changes in action
potential duration, APD [8,22,23]' takes the form:
APD(ao, T) = G(T, a, b, c) E(ao,
where ao represents the value of the autochrone at the point at which the
current action potential was stimulated (i.e., the test stimulus interval in an
electrical restitution experiment). In this model the memory of the previous
patterns of activation is represented by T, which could itself represent a
complex function of the previous patterns of local activation, for example,
a weighted convolution over previous stimulus intervals or action potential
durations. (In electrical restitution experiments the cells are conditioned at
some constant stimulus interval, T, until they achieve a steady state before
the varying test stimulus interval, ao, is applied.) Here the Ti represent exponential decay constants for the function, E, while a, b, and c define the
shape of the steady state curve G. 4 The Ti and a, b, and c will be referred to
as characteristic parameters. Characteristic parameters define the dynamical behavior of physiological conduction parameters such as the refractory
period, action potential duration, or conduction velocity in response to previous patterns of electrical activity. We can introduce spatial variations in
these characteristic parameters (reflecting physiological inhomogeneities),
and so induce spatial inhomogeneities in the dynamical behavior of the
4 G defines the action potential duration in the case of constant stimulus interval, 0"0 = T, in electrical restitution experiments.
467
conduction parameters. It is possible to have the actual values of the refractory period (or action potential duration) be the same at two points
even though the corresponding characteristic parameters are quite different, either by variations in the history of activity at the two points or by, for
example, the fact that both points might share the same limiting behavior
at long time intervals between stimulations. This latter case might result
in uniform conduction properties measured at long stimulus cycle lengths
while uncovering dispersion (or gradients) at short stimulus cycle lengths.
Conversely, two points (or an entire lattice) sharing identical characteristic parameters may actually have different values for the refractory period,
based on differences in the history of electrical activity that might occur by
virtue of the spatial pattern of the depolarizing wavefront. In fact, there can
be a feedback relation between the patterns of electrical activity and the
parameters of conduction; incoherence and spatial disorganization in the
pattern of electrical activity may induce spatial variation (dispersion) in
conduction parameters, which in turn may increase the disorganization of
the electrical activity. We are currently pursuing the significance of this coupling in the stability and occurrence of reentrant arrhythmias in CAMCC
models.
Current work suggests that as the dispersion of conduction parameters
increases, the coherence of reentrant vortex patterns decreases, and one
ultimately approaches a fibrillatory pattern of self-sustained activity. In
the analysis of the effects of dispersion in conduction parameters, CAMCC
models with static parameters represent intrinsic inhomogeneities that are
unchanging. Characteristic parameters, defining the dynamical behavior of
conduction parameters in response to previous patterns of electrical activity, permit variable, dynamic inhomogeneities in conduction parameters
representing both spatial fluctuations in the characteristic parameters and
spatial fluctuations in the patterns of electrical activity.
This suggests that new experimental measurements are required to analyze the dynamical behavior of conduction velocity and refractory period
as functions of:
1. Space: the distinction of gradients and dispersion, and the measure-
468
(by a Markov vector of the m - 1 previous stimulus intervals and values of the conduction parameters), and would be important in examining
by CAMCC modeling and theory the possible feedback relation between
dynamical conduction parameter inhomogeneity and patterns of electrical
activity.
18.9 Conclusion
CAMCC have been useful for the analysis of dynamical properties of the
patterns of cardiac electrical behavior. In particular, they represent well
the relation of inhomogeneities in parameters of conduction physiology to
the global structure of patterns of cardiac electrical activity, from the organized, coherent wavefronts or reentrant vortices (spiral waves) also seen in
a variety of other active media (chemical, Belousov-Zhabotinsky reactions,
and cellular, Didyostelium discoideum slime molds or neural fields of the
retina), to the disorganized, incoherent structure of fibrillatory patterns.
In the representations of the complex, nonlinear dynamics of these active
media, the simplification by discrete state transitions used in the CAMCC
results in algorithms that are computationally simple and fast. This can be
quite significant when studying questions that involve examining large-scale
structural features of behavior where large lattices must be used, such as is
the case for reentrant arrhythmias. However, this simplification of a discrete
lattice results in limitations of the dynamical representation. In particular,
details about the core of reentrant vortices are not well represented. The
results of CAMCC must be qualified by this limitation, which may have
significance, for example, in determining the exact threshold for change in
patterns of behavior.
We will argue, however, that the global features of activity are insensitive to these microscopic details. The transition between classes of dynamical states (e.g., fibrillation vs. normal patterns of depolarization) may
be quantitatively affected by the detailed representation of the microscopic
membrane dynamics, but should not be qualitatively affected. The existence of organized spiral waves both in CAMCC and in cardiac or other
continuous physical systems argues for the essential qualitative accuracy of
the CAMCC representation. We have attempted in this chapter to clarify
the interpretation of this relation by the specification of the general dynamical algorithm and the interpretation of the discrete spatial lattice. For
the analysis of reentrant arrhythmias, the simplest CAMCC with specification of conduction velocity and refractory period is sufficient to generate
both organized and disorganized self-sustaining patterns of reentry. The
CAMCC and its extensions to intermediate models provide the ability to
model many other forms of electrophysiological behavior thought to underlie dysrhythmogenesis and the variable response to exogenous stimulation.
Ultimately the relation of the CAMCC to cardiac conduction physiology
469
and arrhythmogenesis must be further examined in the future by experimental analysis, comparison of predictions from modeling by CAMCC versus continuous representations, and theoretical analysis.
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by NASA grant #NAGW988 and a grant from the Whitaker Foundation. B.E.H. Saxberg is grateful
for support from NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship #1-F32-HL08014.
REFERENCES
[1] D. Adam, P. Levy, A. van Oosteran, and S. Sideman. On the generation of surface potential maps by a distributed conduction velocities
model. In Computers in Cardiology, pages 483-486. IEEE Computer
Society Press, Washington, DC, 1988.
[2] M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, and F.J.G. Schopman. Circus movement
in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia. Cire. Res.,
33:54-62, 1973.
[3] M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, and F.J.G. Schopman. Circus movement
in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia II. The role of
nonuniform recovery of excitability in the occurrence of unidirectional
block, as studied with multiple microelectrodes. Cire. Res., 39:168177,1976.
[4] M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, and F.J.G. Schopman. Circus movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of tachycardia'III. The
"leading circle" concept. Cire. Res., 41:9-18, 1977.
[5] M.A. Allessie, W.J.E.P. Lammers, F.I.M. Bonke, and J. Hollen. Intraatrial reentry as a mechanism for atrial flutter induced by acetylcholine and rapid pacing in the dog. Cireulation, 70:123-135, 1984.
[6] P.M. Auger, A.L. Bardou, A. Coulombe, and J.M. Chesuais. Computer simulation of ventricular fibrillation and of defibrillating electric
shocks. In Computers in Cardiology, pages 387-390. IEEE Computer
Society Press, Washington, DC, 1989.
[7] G.W. Beeler and H. Reuter. Reconstruction of the action potential
of ventricular myocardial fibers. J. Physiol., 268:177-210, 1977.
[8] M.R. Boyett and B.R. Jewell. A study of the factors responsible for
rate dependent shortening of the action potential in mammalian ventricular muscle. J. Physiol., 285:359-380, 1978.
[9] J. Bures, V.1. Koroleva, and N.A. Gorelova. Leao's spreading depression, an example of diffusion-mediated propagation of excitation in
470
471
472
tricular arrhythmias in the early phase of regional myocardial ischemia. Cire. Res., 49:1069-1081, 1981.
[41] M.J. Janse, F.J. van Capelle, H. Morsink, et al. Flow of injury cur-
473
[49] M. Malik and T. Cochrane. Shell computer model of cardiac electropotential changes. J. Biomed. Eng., 7:266-274, 1985.
[50] R.E. McAllister, D. Noble, and R.W. Tsien. Reconstruction of the
electrical activity of cardiac Purkinje fibers. J. Physiol., 251:1-59,
1975.
[51] A.B. Medvinsky, A.V. Panfilov, and A.M. Pertsov. Properties of rotating waves in three dimensions. Scroll rings in myocardium. In
V.I. Krinsky, editor, Self-Organization, Autowaves and Structures Far
from Equilibrium, pages 195-199. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984.
[52] W.T. Miller and D.B. Geselowitz. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram I. The normal heart. eire. Res., 43:301-315, 1978.
[53] W.T. Miller and D.B. Geselowitz. Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram II. Ischemia and infarction. Cire. Res., 43:315-323, 1978.
[54] G.K. Moe, W.C. Rheinboldt, and J.A. Abildskov. A computer model
of atrial fibrillation. Am. Heart J., 67:200-220, 1964.
[55] E.N. Moore, J.B. Preston, and G.K. Moe. Durations of transmembrane action potentials and functional refractory periods of canine
false tendon and ventricular myocardium: Comparisons in single fibers.
Cire. Res., 17:259-273, 1965.
[56] S.C. Muller, T. Plener, and B. Hess. The structure of the core of the
spiral wave in the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction. Science, 230:661663,1985.
[57] G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine. Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium
Systems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1977.
[58] M. Okajima, T. Fujino, T. Kobayashi, and K. Yamada. Computer
simulation of the propagation process in excitation of the ventricles.
Circ. Res., 23:203-211, 1968.
[59] N.H. Packard and S. Wolfram. Two dimensional cellular automata.
J. Statistical Phys., 38:901-946, 1985.
[60] A.V. Panfilov and A.T. Winfree. Dynamical simulations of twisted
scroll rings in three dimensional excitable media. Physica D., 17:323330, 1985.
[61] R. Plonsey. Bioelectric Phenomena. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
[62] F.A. Roberge, A. Vinet, and B. Victorri. Reconstruction of propagated electrical activity with a two-dimensional model of anisotropic
heart muscle. Cire. Res., 58:461-475, 1986.
474
[63] D.E. Roberts, L.T. Hersh, and A.M. Scher. Influence of cardiac fiber
orientation on wavefront voltage, conduction velocity, and tissue resistivity in the dog. Cire. Res., 44:701-712, 1979.
[64] T. Sano, N. Takayama, and T. Shimamoto. Directional difference of
conduction velocity in the cardiac ventricular syncytium studied by
microelectrodes. Cire. Res., 7:262-267, 1959.
[65] B.E.H. Saxberg, M.P. Grumbach, and R.J. Cohen. A time dependent
anatomically detailed model of cardiac conduction. In Computers in
Cardiology, pages 401-404. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, 1985.
[66] R.H. Selvester, W.L. Kirk, and R.B. Pearson. Propagation velocities
and voltage magnitudes in local segments of dog myocardium. Cire.
Res., 27:619-629, 1970.
[67] R.H. Selvester, J. Solomon, and D. Sapoznikov. Computer simulation
of the electrocardiogram. In L.D. Cady, editor, Computer Techniques
in Cardiology, pages 417-453. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1979.
[68] R. Serra, M. Andretta, M. Compiani, and M. Zanarini. Introduction
to the Physics of Complex Systems. Pergamon Press, New York, 1986.
[69] J .M. Smith and R.J. Cohen. Simple computer model predicts a wide
range of ventricular dysrhythmias. PNAS, 81:233-237, 1984.
[70] J .M. Smith, R.L. Ritzenberg, and R.J. Cohen. Percolation theory
and cardiac conduction. In Computers in Cardiology, pages 201-204.
IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, 1984.
[71] J. Solomon and R.H. Selvester. Simulation of measured activation
sequence in the human heart. Am. Heart J., 85:518-523, 1973.
[72] J .R. Sommer and P.C. Dolber. Cardiac muscle: Ultrastructure of its
cells and bundles. In A. Paes de Carvalho, B.F. Hoffman, and M.
Lieberman, editors, Normal and Abnormal Conduction in the Heart.,
pages 1-28. Futura Publishing Co, Mount Kisco, New York, 1982.
[73] M.S. Spach. The discontinuous nature of electrical propagation in
cardiac muscle. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2:209-261, 1983.
[74] M.S. Spach. The electrical representation of cardiac muscle based on
discontin,uities of axial resistivity at a microscopic and macroscopic
level. In A. Paes de Carvalho, B.F. Hoffman, and M. Lieberman,
editors, Normal and Abnormal Conduction in the Heart, pages 145180. Futura Publishing Co, Mount Kisco, New York, 1982.
[75] M.S. Spach and J .M. Kootsey. The nature of electrical propagation
in cardiac muscle. Am. J. Physiol., 244:H3-H22, 1983.
475
[76] M.S. Spach, J .M. Kootsey, and J. Sloan. Active modulation of electrical coupling between cardiac cells of the dog. Circ. Res., 51:347-362,
1982.
[77] J.F. Spear and E.N. Moore. The effect of changes in rate and rhythm
on supernormal excitability in the isolated Purkinje system of the
dog. Circulation, 50:1144-1149, 1974.
[78] C.A. Swenne, H.A. Bosker, and N.M. vanHemel. Computer simulation of compund reentry. In Computers in Cardiology, pages 445-448.
IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, 1987.
[79] N.V. Thakor and L.M. Eisenman. Three dimensional computer model
of the heart: Fibrillation induced by extrastimulation. Compo Biomed.
Res., 22:532-545, 1989.
[80] J.J. Tyson, K.A. Alexander, V.S. Manoranjan, and J.D. Murray. Spiral waves of cyclic AMP in a model of slime mold aggregation. Physica
D., 34:193-207, 1989.
[81] J.J. Tyson and J.P. Keener. Singular perturbation theory of traveling
waves in excitable media (A review). Physica D., 32:327-361, 1988.
[82] F.J.L. van Capelle and D. Durrer. Computer simulation of arrhythmias in a network of coupled excitable elements. Circ. Res., 47:454466, 1980.
[83] V.A. Vasiliev, Y.M. Romanovskii, D.S. Chernavskii, and V.G. Yakhno.
Autowave Processes in Kinetic Systems. D. Reidel Publishing Co,
Boston, 1987.
[84] J. von Neumann. Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. University
of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1966.
[85] S. Weidmann. The effect of the cardiac membrane potential on the
rapid availability ofthe sodium carrying system. J. Physiol., 127:213224,1955.
[86] A.T. Winfree. Rotating chemical reactions. Sci. Am., June:82-95,
1974.
[87] A.T. Winfree. Spiral waves of chemical activity. Science, 175:634-636,
1972.
[88] A.T. Winfree. When Time Breaks Down: The Three-Dimensional Dynamics of Electrochemical Waves and Cardiac Arrhythmias. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987.
476
[89] A.L. Wit, M.A. Allessie, F.I.M. Bonke, W. Lammers, J. Smeets, and
J .J. Fenoglio Jr. Electrophysiologic mapping to determine the mechanism of experimental ventricular tachycardia initiated by premature
impulses: Experimental approach and initial results demonstrating
reentrant excitation. Am. J. Cardiol., 49:166-185, 1982.
[90] S. Wolfram. Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Rev. Mod.
Phys., 55:601-644, 1983.
[91] S. Wolfram, editor. Theory and Application of Cellular Automata.
World Scientific, Singapore, 1986.
[92] S. Wolfram. Universality and complexity in cellular automata. Physica D., 10:1-35, 1984.
[93] A.N. Zaikin and A.M. Zhabotinsky. Concentration wave propagation in two-dimensional liquid-phase self-oscillating systems. Nature,
225:535-537, 1970.
[94] V.S. Zykov. Analytical evaluation of the dependence of the speed of
an excitation wave in a two-dimensional excitable medium on the
curvature of its front. Biophysics, 25:906-911, 1980.
[95] V.S. Zykov. Kinematics of the non-steady circulation of helical waves
in an excitable medium. Biophysics, 32:365-369, 1987.
[96] V.S. Zykov. Kinematics of the steady state circulation in an excitable
medium. Biophysics, 25:329-333, 1980.