Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JS 44C/SDNY
REV. 4/2014
JUDGEH!: LERSTEIN
l i W 7976
The JS-Wt civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of
pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the
Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose
Judicial
- OCT 0 9 2015
DEFENDANTS
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP, 452 F FfTH AVE. NEW YORK, NY 10018
DAVID ZASLOWSKY
(212) $26-4100
CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE)
(DONOTCIT
Thisaction involves a federal dji^estion under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., and diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332.
rfg, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? NoZJ/esIbudge Previously Assigned
No 0
&Case No.
Yes
NATURE OF SUIT
TORTS
INJURY
PERSONAL INJURY
FORFEITURE/PENALTY
BANKRUPTCY
OTHER STATUTES
[ ] 422 APPEAL
[ J 367 HEALTHCARE/
I 1110
[ ]120
11130
[ 1140
I 1150
I ] 151
[ ] 152
INSURANCE
AIRPLANE
MARINE
MILLER ACT
NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENT
RECOVERY OF
OVERPAYMENT &
ENFORCEMENT
OF JUDGMENT
MEDICARE ACT
AIRPLANE PRODUCT
INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY
LIABILITY
ASSAULT, LIBELS
J LANDER
FIIDERAL
EMPLOYERS'
LIABILITY
RECOVERY OF
MDTOR VEHICLE
MDTOR VEHICLE
STUDENT LOANS
(EXCL VETERANS)
[ ]195
INJURY
RSONAL INJURY -
362 P
M ED MALPRACTICE
[ ]240
[ ]245
[ ]290
SOCIAL SECURITY
] 410
] 430
] 450
J 460
] 470
LABOR
PROPERTY DAMAGE
VACATE SENTENCE
iNon-Prisoner)
)441 VCTING
[ ) 442 EMPLOYMENT
\ i 443 HC USING/
FORECLOSURE
ACCOMMODATIONS
[ ] 445AMERICANS WITH
SABILITIES-
k/IPLOYMENT
TORT PRODUCT
LIABILITY
ALL OTHER
[ ] 448 t0UCATION
ANTITRUST
BANKS& BANKING
COMMERCE
DEPORTATION
RACKETEER INFLU
ORGANIZATION ACT
(RICO)
( ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT
[ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV
[ ] 850 SECURITIES/
COMMODITIES/
[
[
[
[
[
[ ] 462 NATURALIZATION
[ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS
[ ] 555 PRISON CONDITION
[ ] 560 CIVILDETAINEE
]861
] 862
] 863
] 864
] 865
HIA(1395ff)
BLACKLUNG (923)
DIWC/DIWW (405(g))
SSID TITLE XVI
RSI (405(g))
EXCHANGE
RELATIONS
28 USC 2255
REAL PROPERTY
[ J 220
[ J 230
REAPPORTIONMENT
[
[
[
[
[
LAND
CONDEMNATION
PROPERTY RIGHTS
PRISONER PETITIONS
LIABILITY
[ 1210
28 USC 157
[ ] 820 COPYRIGHTS
[ ] 830 PATENT
fc] 840 TRADEMARK
PERSONAL PROPERTY
[ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT
SUITS
OTHER
CONTRACT
CONTRACT
[ ]196 FRANCHISE
INJURY PRODUCT
LIABILITY
PRODUCT LIABILITY
STOCKHOLDERS
PRODUCT
[ ) 423 WITHDRAWAL
F RODUCT LIABILITY
BENEFITS
[ ]160
21 USC 881
, , RQn nTHFR
RECOVERY OF
OVERPAYMENT
OF VETERAN'S
[]190
PRODUCT LIABILITY
28 USC 158
LIABILITY
340M\3INE
345M^IN E PRODUCT
DEFAULTED
[ ]153
SEIZURE OF PROPERTY
APPLICATION
] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL
Defendant)
[ ]871 IRS-THIRD PARTY
] 895 FREEDOM OF
MATTERS
INFORMATION ACT
26 USC 7609
] 896 ARBITRATION
) 899 ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR
APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION
[ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF
STATE STATUTES
ACTIONS
CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
SABILITIES -OTHER
REAL PROPERTY
DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y.?
UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
DEMAND $
OTHER
JUDGE
DOCKET NUMBER
NOTE: You must also submit at the time of filing the Statement of Relatedness form (Form IH-32).
S 1 Original
Proceeding
ORIGIN
D 3 Remanded D 4 Reinstated or
state Court
from
Reopened
I I 7 Appeal to District
Litigation
Judge from
Magistrate Judge
Judgment
Appellate
Court
I | b. At Hast one
party i
pro se.
1 U.S. PLAINTIFF
BASIS OF JURISDICTION
Q2 U
IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE
4 DIVERSITY
CITIZENSHIP BELOW.
DEF
PTF
DEF
[ ]1
[ ]1
CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A
FOREIGN COUNTRY
M 3 [ ]3
I ]5
[]5
[ ]
[ ]2
[ ] 4 [ *4
FOREIGN NATION
[ ]6
[ ]6
PTF DEF
FRENCH CONNECTION
LIMITED
LONDON WC1R4JS
ENGLAND
HEREEY
MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN
""
Check one:
THIS ACTION
(DO NOT check ei
WHITE PLAINS
[x] MANHATTAN
COMPLAIN
DATE
siq(NA\ru
! I NO
RECEIPT #
Magistrate Judge is to be
Magistrate Judge
is so Designated.
Yr. 1985
JUDGE HELLERSTEIfil
David Zaslowsky
BAKER & McKEjNfelE LLP
15 * 7976
Plaintiff,
-aga: hst-
CASE NUMBER:
COMPLAINT
Defendant.
1.
French
, -Z,
Connection is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of England and
Wales with
2. Upon information and belief, TPR is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
of New York and has its principal place of business at 950 Third Avenue, 3rd Floor, New
York, NY 10022.
3.
U.S.C. 13^31
Lanham Ac
pursuant to
15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq. This court also has jurisdiction over the claims
in controversy exceeding $75,000 and Defendant and Plaintiff being a citizen of a State
4.
and a citizen
TPR resides
in this district. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and Section 17.2 of
the License
ddtli New York law, and the Parties consent to and subject themselves to the
accordance
exclusive jurisdiction
Background
5.
French Connection
appealed to
6.
broad market.
7.
is
has since worked hard to build on that vision and as a result, French
French Connection
FCUK trademarks
(the "Licensed Marks") and brand names and is engaged in the design,
French Connection';
ion's
innovative
highly recognized and respected clothing brands in the UK and across the world,
9.
French Conihbction
has retail stores in various countries around the world selling clothing
11. These comp ementary products are sold pursuant to license agreements in brick-and-
mortar retai
12. Upon information and belief, TPR is a NYC based investor and operator in the consumer
products industry
13. Upon information and belief, TPR creates, develops, sells and distributes fragrance and
cosmetics
pf(>ducts.
14. Upon information and belief, TPR became interested in obtaining rights to use the
Licensed Mkk-ks
The License Agreement
15. French Connection and TPR entered into a written license agreement dated April 28,
2010 (the "Mcense")1
property to
16. TPR
and
acknowledged in the License that the Licensed Marks were famous and valuable
territories
and
License.
18. Under the Ljibense, TPR obtained the right to use the FRENCH CONNECTION mark in
the US and
Canada and to use the FCUK mark throughout the world, with the exception
of the United
19. TPR agreed at its own expense, to develop, manufacture or assemble, sell, market,
distribute, a<|ifvertise and promote the Licensed Products. See Section 6.2, License.
A copy of the License is annexed hereto as Exhibit A.
high quality that are at least comparable to similar items offered at comparable prices,
and of such
manner reflect
adversely upon, the prestige of [Plaintiff] and the Licensed Marks and the
license for
Hfre United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland for the creation, development,
sale and distribution of the certain products listed in a Schedule B to the
manufacture
License.
22. TPR was made aware of this previous license as it is expressed in the License itself, and
through communications with French Connection.
Defendant's Breaches of the License
23. Section 9.1
qfthe License provides for quarterly royalty payments of 4.5% of net sales.
for the royalty payments are within 30 days of the completion of the
particular quarter (July 31, October 31, January 31 and April 30).
24. At the time
the License terminated, TPR had failed to pay the last quarterly royalty
payment foi the Quarter ending January 2015 (that had been due as of March 2, 2015).
That royalty payment has still not been made.
25. TPR has failed
to pay the royalty for the final quarter of the License ending April 2015
payments, 18 were not paid within the time provided for in the License,
of the License states that, "Time is of the essence under this Agreement."
8.5(c) of the License, TPR agreed to pay an advertising fee of one percent
of net sales.
29. With one
30. TPR has fat ed and refused to pay the advertising fee for the period ending April 28,
2015.
by TPR's
French
chief
Section 11.1
35. Section 11
attached at
Schedule F and deliver the same to Licensor within ten (10) days of the end of
36. TPR never submitted a monthly report form in the form attached as Schedule F.
37. With respect to the monthly report forms TPR did submit, 55 out of 60 were not
submitted within the 10-day period required by the License. The report for May 2010
was submitted more than one year late.
38. Section 11.3
At least once during each Annual Period, not later than 90 days after the end of
Licensor's
2<: p)
of the License says that "Prior to the opening of each selling season,
Licensee and Licensor shall meet at Licensor's office in London where Licensee will
present
cf the License says that "Licensee shall prepare and submit to the Licensor a
Period on or
Period."
43. TPR did not
first.
44. The License
indirectly thifou gh its distributors) only in the Territory, defined in Section 1.21 of the
License as
in respect of the 'FCUK' Licensed Mark, the world excluding the United
retailers at
Kingdom, including
i
Argos (a national low-end home and general merchandise retailer),
The Perfumlci Shop (a national discount perfume retailer), Savers (a national discount
fc
chain sellinig household goods and health and grooming products), TJ Hughes (a discount
department store) and Wilkinson (a regional low-end hardware and home goods store),
47. TPR is
awate of the availability of Licensed Products for sale throughout the United
Kingdom
48. Upon information and belief, TPR and/or its distributors is, and throughout the term of
the License
49. Section 2.5( c) of the License states that "any 'FCUK Licensed Products' sold by Licensee
to Licensee
restriction
Ireland"
prohibiting the importation into the United Kingdom and the Republic of
(emphasis added).
50. Upon iinformation and belief, TPR sold Licensed Products to distributors outside the
European L iiion without the contractual restriction required by Section 2.5(c) of the
License
51. Section 7.2(a) of the License set forth certain criteria for the retail stores into which the
Licensed Products could be sold.
52. Upon infonbation and belief, TPR sold, and permitted its distributors to sell, Licensed
Products into
i
stores that did not meet the requirements of Section 7.2(a) of the License,
(a) of the License includes the following provision: "Licensee shall impose
contractual
Licensed
Products to any retail store or outlet that does not meet the Criteria."
54. Upon info:nil ation and belief, TPR sold Licensed Products to distributors without the
contractual
Licensee, it its sole cost and expense, shall prepare and maintain, in
Agreement,
reement.
It also granted French Connection the right to have an independent auditor review TPR's
records to c<bhfirm
pursuant to
section 11.4(a) of the License. In breach of its obligations under the License,
TPR failed
and refused to provide KPMG with the records necessary for KPMG to
conduct a
Obligations by certain dates and then did not abide by those commitments.
Correction was repeatedly required to chase after TPR to submit reports required
under the
59. French Comection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
60. Section 5.1
commencing on April 28, 2010, and terminating on the fifth anniversary thereof,
61. Section 5.2
provides, in relevant part, that the License "shall be renewed for a further
period of fiv|c| (5) years at the expiration ofthe Term subject to the following conditions:
5.2.2 The Licensee has not committed any material breach or persistent
5.2.3 The Licensee has performed its obligations under this Agreement to the
62. By letter dawd January 20, 2015, TPR sought to renew the License.
63. By letter dotted January 22, 2015, French Connection rejected the renewal because, as
described
ab!4)ve, TPR had committed material and persistent breaches of the License and
because TPR
did not perform under the License to the reasonable satisfaction of French
Connection
64. The conduc;
by TPR.
65. Because of tijie conduct described above, French Connection was not satisfied with TPR's
67. On March 1'3, 2015, French Connection's counsel wrote to TPR and stated, inter alia:
It is FC's
itself as if trie License has been renewed. Such conduct will cause irreparable
harm to FC and FC plans to go to court to enjoin such conduct. Injunctive
relief will not , however, be necessary if TPR acknowledges that the License
terminates on April 28, 2015. Such acknowledgement will allow the parties to
know that, as of April 29, they are operating under the provisions of Section 13
of the Licensb
the letter, French Connection was prepared to go into court to protect its
rights if TPIJ. did not agree that the License would terminate effective April 28, 2015.
69. TPR
responiflpd in a letter from its lawyers dated March 24, 2015. While reserving TPR's
Based on th s clear statement from TPR, French Connection did not seek injunctive relief
in April 201
70. Consistent with
wrote to TPR ,
reminded TPR that the License had expired on April 28, and reminded
TPR that, gotog forward, the parties' respective rights and obligations would be governed
by the termination
ion provisions in Section 13 of the License. TPR did not object,
71. Rather, upoji information and belief, for about five months, TPR indeed conducted itself
as if the LSbense
the process
of
provided that TPR could sell Inventory not purchased by French Connection
3.4 made clear that "such sales shall be made only with the prior approval of
[French Coiiiiection]"
73. After almos;
five months of acting consistently with the License having been terminated,
on September 18, 2015, TPR wrote to French Connection and stated, "We never agreed
that the lice ise
is terminated. (In fact we believe our option is valid, has been exercised
Co Tnection
obtaining, French
Connection' 3 consent.
75. On or about October 2, 2015, TPR informed one of its customers that it would soon have
10
76. By reason
Connection
pursuant to
77. French Connection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
78. The License
80. TPR breachdd the License by failing to make all royalty payments required under Section
9 of the License.
^fthe License required TPR to spend, each year, specified minimum amounts
on advertisi^]g, sales and promotion. Shortfalls in any given year were to be spent in the
following
year
TPR was required to pay that amount to French Connection within 30 days of the end of
the License
83. At the end
sales and
:}f the License, there was a shortfall in the minimum spend on advertising,
11
License.
Connection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
86. Under the License, TPR was obligated to pay 5.5 percent of net sales in royalty and
advertising payments
87. Upon information and belief, the amount that TPR reported as due for the period through
December 31, 201
was less than what was owed under the terms of the License, thereby
3.1 of the License, French Connection had the right to purchase Licensed
89. During the License term, French Connection purchased Licensed Product from TPR.
90. Upon
infonriation and belief, TPR charged French Connection a price higher than that
provided for in the License. French Connection has been damaged by TPR's charging French
91. French Comection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
92. TPR breacr^d the License by failing to deliver Quarterly Statements and annual
statements.
93. A purpose of these reports was to permit French Connection to obtain independent
confirmation from
PR's outside accountants that the amounts TPR was paying in royalties were
12
94. Because TPR. did not submit such reports, French Connection lost the benefit of this part
of its bargain and d^es not know whether TPR has underpaid under the License.
Connection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
96. Under Sectipn 9.5 of the License, TPR agreed that "any royalty payments which are due
and not paid on thb date due hereunder shall accrue interest at a rate of one and one-half
TPR's failure to make timely royalty payments under the License, interest
is due at the agreed ikpon rate from the date each payment was due.
98. French Comection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set forth
herein.
99. Section 11
independent auditoi inspect and audit TPR's record. In addition, Section 11.4(b) states:
If, as a result of any inspection and/or audit of Licensee's books and records or
otherwise, it is determined at any time and from time to time that Licensee's
payments tc Licensor hereunder were less than the amount which should have
been paid
with
correct and
Section 9.5) within ten (10) days after receipt of notice by Licensor. In addition, if
reveals an underpayment of 5% or more then Licensee shall
reimburse Licensor for all costs and expenses of Licensor and its representatives
the examination
incurred in
deficiency
was
discovered by Licensor.
13
100.
KPMG's findings
TPRI
Accordingly, TPR is
procedures,
has failed to pay these costs and French Connection has been damaged as a
result.
Frenlcjh Connection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set
forth herein.
103.
The
Sect: on
13 of the License sets forth the rights and obligations of the parties upon
Frenqh Connection has performed all of its obligations under the License.
106.
TPR
under Section 13, dospiite TPR's ability to fully perform under the License,
107.
TPRf
License is a breach
<bf the terms of the License and deprives French Connection of the benefit of
the License.
109.
Frenph Connection requests that this Court enter an order requiring TPR to
14
110.
French Connection re-alleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as though fully set
forth herein.
111.
In claiming that the License has been renewed and continuing to manufacture and
sell Licensed Products, TPR has admitted that it plans to use French Connection's Licensed
Marks without Frenlcth Connection's consent.
112.
The
113.
The
"CUK mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Registration
114.
No. 3028227.
French Connection mark is registered with the United States Patent and
The
Trademark Office, $
115.
116.
TPR s
TPR
The
products.
119.
TPRf^ sales and advertisement of products bearing the Licensed Marks after
expiration of the License are directly competing with French Connection's products bearing the
same marks.
120.
TPRl is infringing the Licensed Marks, as the License expired on April 28, 2015.
121.
As
15
Connection is likelv to succeed on the merits of its claims for breach of contract.
122.
French Connection
as to the identity
which there is no
123.
Marks and is likely to cause confusion, mistake and deception to the public
and
By reason of the foregoing acts, TPR is liable to French Connection for trademark
competition with
1125(a). TPR's ubfair competition is causing irreparable harm to French Connection for which
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff French Connection seeks relief and demands judgment against
Defendant TPR as follows:
1.
On
2.
On
3.
4.
b. for ejich Annual Period under the License, in accordance with Section 11.3 of the
License, a statement, signed and certified by TPR's regularly engaged
16
it has
year
examined the Quarterly Statements submitted by TPR during the prior fiscal
knd that such statements accurately reflect the information in the financial
records of TPR.
On
On
Cbunts VII and VIII, an injunction and order of specific performance against
TPR, as follows (wi|t|h defined terms to be as they are defined inthe License):
a.
17
From and after the date of this Order, TPR shall not use or
permit others to use any such items or other Materials, or any variations
thereof.
Unless such dates have already passed, on the last day of each month
during the period defined in Section 13.4 of the License, TPR shall
immediately deliver to French Connection a complete and accurate written
schedule of TPR's inventory of finished Licensed Products, related workin-process then on hand (including uncut piece goods and products and
materials in the process of manufacture), confirmed orders, and all
Packaging Materials, advertising and promotional materials and Business
Materials or other documents or items that bear the Licensed Marks or
18
With respect to those items on which French Connection has exercised the
Inventory Option in accordance with its Notice dated September 14, 2015,
TPR shall (i) deliver forthwith to French Connection or its designee the
Inventory items in its possession, (ii) provide within five (5) business days
the dates on which it plans to deliver the Inventory items not yet in its
possession, such dates to be within sixty (60) days of this Order, and
(iii) with respect to the Inventory that is not yet in TPR's possession,
deliver same to French Connection or its designee on the dates provided in
(ii) above. French Connection shall pay TPR, at the prices set forth in the
July 22, 2015 spreadsheet listing the Inventory, for the Inventory items it
chooses to purchase within forty-five (45) calendar days following its
receipt thereof, provided that French Connection shall be entitled to
deduct as offset from such purchase price any amounts owed to French
Connection by TPR (and/or to direct payment for any part of such
Inventory to any supplier of Licensed Products in order to reduce an
outstanding balance due to such supplier from TPR).
If French Connection does not exercise the Inventory Option to purchase
all the Inventory, TPR shall be entitled, for a period of time (as agreed to
by the Parties but in no event extending beyond October 28, 2015) (the
"Sell-Off Period"), but in no event beyond the Sell-Off Period, to sell and
dispose of such of the Inventory as French Connection did not elect to
purchase pursuant to the Inventory Option, on a non-exclusive basis. Such
sales shall be made only with the prior approval of French Connection and
conducted in accordance with all of the provisions of the License and this
injunction, including an accounting therefor and the payment of
Percentage Royalties thereon. Such accounting and payment shall be due
within ten (10) calendar days following the end of each month in the SellOff Period. Any items in the Inventory not sold and remaining after the
Sell-Off Period shall be delivered, disposed of or destroyed, in accordance
with French Connection's instructions, without charge to French
Connection or its Affiliates.
No later than the end of the Sell-Off Period (as defined in Section 13.4 of
the License), TPR shall promptly cause any entity formed under
Section 10.2(d) , including, without limitation, French Connection Beauty
Corp., to cease all operations and cease using the "French Connection"
and/or "FCUK" names.
Subject to the other provisions of the Court's Order, TPR shall not deliver
products to any distributor unless it has first provided to French
Connection a copy of the contract with said distributor that includes the
19
9.
Suclt other and further relief as the Court shall deemjust and proper.
Respectfully submitted,
October 9 2015
BAKER & McKENZfE LLP
David Xasloi
452 Fifth Avenue
20