Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Workshop
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Management
of Rural Development and Poverty Reduction Programs
H Ni
December 7 9, 2005
SYNTHESIS REPORT
Acknowledgements
This National Workshop was organized by the Project on Strengthening Capacity for
Management of Integrated Rural Development (2002 to 2005) under the Department of
Agriculture Economy, Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI). Funding for the workshop was
kindly granted by the United Nations Development Program in Viet Nam (through Project
VIE/01/023).
The workshop organizers would like to thank all the agencies and individuals who participated in
the workshop, including the representatives from central government agencies, representatives
from province departments in 10 provinces (Ha Giang, Tuyen Quang, Ha Tinh, Quang Tri, Son
La, Yen Bai, Kon Tum, Gia Lai, Tra Vinh and Soc Trang), and representatives from donors,
NGOs, project offices and research and training organizations. The active involvement and
discussion amongst all the participants during the workshop contributed greatly to a successful
event and to the quality of the workshop proceedings.
In particular, the organizers would like to thank all the agencies and authors who prepared papers
and presentations for the workshop. A great deal of time and effort was put into these papers,
which is reflected in their high standard and quality. These contributors include:
We would like to extend our particular thanks to Mr Vu Ngoc Anh and Mr Nguyen Tien Phong of
UNDP for their continuous support in implementing the Project VIE/01/023 and for their
guidance on achieving the objectives of the National Workshop. Our appreciation is also extended
to all the people who helped with the facilitation and organization of the workshop.
Ms L Th Thng
Director, Project VIE/01/023
Department of Agriculture Economy
Ministry of Planning and Investment
Abbreviations
ADB
AEC
CDBC
CDD
CIDA
DFID
GEUs
HRDP
IFAD
ILMC
IMBs
IPM
MDGs
M&E
MIS
MPI
NGO
NMPRP
ODA
O&M
PER
PMU
RDF
RUDEP
SEDP
UNDP
WUAs
VDGs
ii
List of Contents
Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... i
Abbreviations............................................................................................................................ ii
List of Contents........................................................................................................................iii
OPENING SPEECH ..................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 3
Objectives and activities of Project VIE/01/023 ...................................................................... 3
National workshop objectives and themes............................................................................... 4
List of papers and presentations .............................................................................................. 5
THEME 1: DECENTRALIZED COMMUNE MANAGEMENT .............................................. 8
Main issues and recommendations from the workshop .......................................................... 8
Summary of papers and presentations .................................................................................... 9
THEME 2: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF INFRASTRUCTURE...................... 13
Main issues and recommendations from the workshop ........................................................ 13
Summary of papers and presentations .................................................................................. 13
THEME 3: MOBILIZATION AND INTEGRATION OF RESOURCES ............................... 17
Main issues and recommendations from the workshop ........................................................ 17
Summary of papers and presentations .................................................................................. 18
THEME 4: MONITORING AND EVALUATION ................................................................... 21
Main issues and recommendations from the workshop ........................................................ 21
Summary of papers and presentations .................................................................................. 22
THEME 5: CAPACITY BUILDING AT GRASSROOTS LEVEL.......................................... 24
Main issues and recommendations from the workshop ........................................................ 24
Summary of papers and presentations .................................................................................. 25
Annex 1. List of publications by Project VIE/01/023 ............................................................ 27
Annex 2. List of invited workshop participants .................................................................... 28
iii
Opening Speech
Mr o Quang Thu
Director
Department of Agriculture Economy
Ministry of Planning and Investment
Dear Representative of the United Nations Development Program Office in Vietnam, Ladies and
Gentlemen, Distinguished Guests...
On behalf of the Agriculture Economy Department of the Ministry of Planning and Investment, I
would like to warmly welcome you, distinguished guests, and representatives from donors, central
agencies, provinces and projects to this workshop.
The Government of Viet Nam and donors attach high importance to rural development and
poverty reduction. In recent years, the Government has issued many policies and regulations to
support the implementation of investment programs targeted on rural development and poverty
reduction, such as the National Target Program on Poverty Reduction and Job Creation; the
Program on Socio-Economic Development of Communes with Special Difficulties in Remote and
Mountainous Areas (Program 135); the National Target Program on Clean Water Supply and
Rural Sanitation; the Five Million Hectares Reforestation Program and other programs.
In addition to the great efforts of the Government, international donors continue to support Viet
Nam to implement many important projects, such as the Northern Mountains Poverty Reduction
Project funded by the World Bank, the rural development projects in Ha Tinh, Quang Binh, Tuyen
Quang and Ha Giang funded by International Fund for Agriculture Development, the Central
Region Poverty Reduction and Livelihood Improvement Project funded by the Asian
Development Bank, and the Viet Nam - Sweden Chia Se Program funded by Sida, which are
amongst many other donor-assisted projects.
These projects and programs have significantly contributed to the promotion of socio-economic
development in Viet Nam in general and to rural development and poverty reduction in particular.
Thanks to them, the rate of poverty in Viet Nam according to Government figures has been
substantially reduced, from around 17.5% in 2001 to only 7% in 2005.
During the implementation of these projects and programs on rural development and poverty
reduction in recent years, there have emerged many successful investment models, good practices
and good experiences that need to be exchanged and replicated. At the same time, there are also
some inconsistent policies and regulations that need to be revised and completed so that they can
help to improve the investment efficiency of programs and projects geared towards rural poverty
reduction and community development objectives.
The main objective of the workshop today on Improving the Management Effectiveness of Rural
Development and Poverty Reduction Programs is to create an open forum for Government
agencies, donors, provinces, and programs and projects to exchange and share experience and to
generate recommendations. The recommendations made at the workshop will aim at improving
the policies and regulations, and efficiency in designing and implementing projects and programs
on rural development and poverty reduction that are being prepared and will be implemented in
the coming time.
In order for the workshop to achieve good results, the workshop has been divided into different
topics, including decentralizing project management, mobilizing and integrating resources,
monitoring and evaluation, operations and maintenance of infrastructure works at the commune
levels, and building capacity at the grassroots level for rural development projects. This division
of topics will facilitate discussion and the exchange of ideas and experience.
The valuable contributions and inputs from representatives from all agencies at all levels, central
and local, from donors and NGOs, and from projects will be carefully taken note of and
consolidated into the Workshop Proceedings that will be disseminated to management authorities,
researchers and relevant projects nationwide.
On behalf of the organizing committee, once again, I would like to warmly welcome distinguished
guests, ladies and gentlemen participating in this workshop. I hope your many good experiences
will be shared and exchanged to contribute to the success of the workshop.
On this occasion, allow me to convey our sincere thanks to UNDP for your support and funding
for MPI to organize this workshop.
I wish all participants good health and best success to our workshop.
o Quang Thu
National Workshop
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Management
of Rural Development and Poverty Reduction Programs
H Ni
December 7 9, 2005
SYNTHESIS REPORT
Introduction
This Synthesis Report provides a summary of the papers and presentations made at the National
Workshop on Enhancing the Effectiveness of Management of Rural Development Programs held
in Ha Noi in December 2005. The report also summarizes the main outputs of the workshop in the
form of a set of main issues and recommendations related to the workshop themes. The Synthesis
Report accompanies a CD containing the full proceedings of the workshop.
Objectives and activities of Project VIE/01/023
The Project on Strengthening Capacity for Management of Integrated Rural Development (UNDP
Project VIE/01/023) has been implemented by the Department of Agricultural Economy, Ministry
of Planning and Investment (MPI), in the period from August 2002 to December 2005.
The overall objective of this project is to strengthen the national and provincial capacities in cocoordinating, formulating and implementing the Hunger Eradication and Poverty Reduction
strategy and programs. One of the specific objectives of the project is to contribute to the
formulation of a national policy and implementation guidelines on integrated rural development
projects, drawing on a systematic review of lessons learned from on-going projects.
By the term integrated rural development it is understood that these projects and programs have
adopted a multi-component approach to the provision of rural infrastructure and services to
support household livelihood improvement. Commonly, these projects have two or more of the
following components: small-scale commune and village infrastructure, support for agriculture
extension and other production and household enterprise related activities, support for savingsand-credit and rural financial services, natural resource management such as forestry production
and protection, community development activities, and capacity building and training. These
projects usually take a province management focus, by working through the provincial authorities
and technical departments, and in districts and communes within the provinces.
In the period from 2002 to 2005, the project VIE/01/023 has conducted a number of thematic
studies and training courses on topics related to the design and preparation, management and
implementation, and technical content of these integrated rural development projects and
programs (see Box 1 & Annex 1 for a list of studies and publications by the project).
The topics for these thematic studies and training courses were identified and selected in
consultation with provincial and national partners through the Focal Point for Rural Development.
In each case, the studies were carried-out in collaboration with government, donor and NGO
projects and programs working in different provinces nationwide. A series of review workshops
organized by the project has provided an opportunity to discuss, share and widely disseminate the
lessons and recommendations from these studies, with the active participation of central and
provincial government representatives, with project and program managers, donor and NGO
representatives, and with representatives from research and training organizations.
Box 1. Thematic studies, training materials and publications by Project VIE/01/023
Capacity building at grass root level: the role of provincial training institutions (2005)
A guide for project monitoring and evaluation: translation of IFAD guidelines (2005)
Training course on design of integrated rural development projects using a Log frame
approach (2005).
poverty reduction projects and programs, as means to (b) enhancing their eff ectiveness in
implement ation, out comes and impacts.
The National Workshop was held over a period of three days. Days One and Two were devoted to
presentation of the papers and Working Groups on each theme. On Day Three, with the
participation of central government agencies and donor representatives, feedback presentations
were made by the Working Groups combined with discussion on the overall workshop results and
recommendations.
Participants at the workshop included: (i) representatives from central government agencies,
donors, NGOs and project management offices; (ii) representatives from 10 provinces (including
the Department of Planning and Investment, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development,
Department of Labour, Invalids and Social Affairs, and the Province Womens Union); (iii)
representatives from province projects; and (iv) resource persons making the papers and
presentations. A full list of the agencies invited to the workshop is given in Annex 2.
List of papers and presentations
The fifteen papers include 3 overview studies that were commissioned by Project VIE/01/023 on:
decentralized management of infrastructure investments at commune level; integration of different
projects at commune level; and the role of the provincial training institutions in capacity building
at grassroots level. The remaining papers and presentations were invited from rural development
projects and programs working in a selection of provinces nationwide.
The full list of papers and presentations, the contributing agencies and authors, and their contacts
details is given in the following table. The index number of each paper relates to the
corresponding file on the CD of Workshop Proceedings.
Paper
Contact details
Decentralized
Management of
Infrastructure
Investments at
Commune Level:
experience from rural
development projects.
Email:
haivd@hn.vnn.vn
and VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
1.2
Implementing the
Commune Development
Budget Component of
NMPRP.
Email NMPRP:
mpinmprp@fpt.vn
1.3
Decentralizing
Procurement and
Maximizing Local
Economic Benefits in
Rural Poverty Reduction
Programs.
Email :
eshanks@vnn.vn
1.4
Participatory Planning
and Decentralized
Management.
1.5
Email:
il mcnx@vnn.vn
Website:
www.cecivi etnam.com/ilmc
Email:
dnguyen1@worldbank.org
Sustainable Operations
and Maintenance Models
for Commune Level
Infrastructure.
Email:
kbinh@dng.vnn.vn
2.2
Email:
hrdp@hn.vnn.vn
Integration of Different
Projects at Commune
Level: experience from
rural development
projects.
Email:
ngvhuan@yahoo.com
and VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
3.2
Resources Integration in
Planning at the Village
and Commune Levels.
Email:
steffen.weidner@chiase.org
3.3
Integrated Commune
Development Planning in
Quang Ngai Province.
Email:
bdqnrdp@dng.vnn.vn
Website:
www.rudep.org
3.4
Agriculture Development
Planning and Extension
System Development: a
challenge for local
Government and projects
towards integration.
EMAIL:
advisor.tthrdp@vnn.vn
and/or hans@pmail.vnn.vn
Email:
quangrudep@vnn.vn
Website:
www.rudep.org
Capacity Building at
Grassroots Level:
potential role of
Provincial Training
Institutions.
5.2
Competency Based
Training in Quang Ngai.
Email: tuyenrudep@vnn.vn
Website:
www.rudep.org
5.3
Supporting Rural
Development through a
Community-Based
Extension Network.
Email:
il mcbt@vnn.vn
Website:
www.cecivi etnam.com/ilmc
and VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
The main focus of capacity building should be on local institutions rather than individuals.
A learning-by-doing approach should be adopted by combining capacity building and
training programs with the step-by-step approach to decentralization. Training contents
should be based on the real needs and contents of decentralization with respect to specific
tasks and responsibilities. And the rate of the decentralization process should be consistent
with the capacity strengthening program.
The Government should develop specific guidelines and regulations for commune
investment and financial management, and commune procurement of goods, services and
works. There is a need for more harmonized local procedures with respect to communes
working as the Investment Owners under different projects and programs. In this respect,
it should be recognized that some technical management tasks are not appropriate for full
commune management (such as the procurement of larger complex infrastructure schemes
that require a high level of technical design and safety standards).
Local government at different levels should pay attention to, direct and coordinate the line
agencies to actively support the decentralization process. The role of central agencies in
drawing good lessons and experiences and disseminating these more widely is essential.
This first paper under this theme on Decentralized Management of Infrastructure Investments
at Commune Level (Paper 1.1) sets the scene for the workshop by providing a comprehensive
review and analysis of issues relating to the decentralized management of investment activities at
commune level. The paper was commissioned by Project VIE/01/023 and is based on a survey of
several Government and donor-assisted projects and programs in provinces nationwide. Although
the paper concentrates primarily on infrastructure investments, many of the issues raised and
recommendations are broadly applicable to the topic of decentralized commune management.
The paper begins by defining decentralization in State administration system in its broadest
sense as a means of transferring power and responsibility from higher levels to local authorities
to implement and manage public works. Decentralization of investment management has been
gradually introduced in the state management system in recent years through the Public
Administration Reform Program (PAR), as well as in implementation of rural development
projects and programs. Decentralization is seen to go hand-in-hand with promoting good
governance and grassroots democracy, by strengthening community consultation and supervision
processes, and in order to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of the investment activities.
The paper provides a valuable summary of the Governments current policies and the regulatory
framework for decentralized commune management of infrastructure investment activities. The
paper also summarizes donor policies on decentralization, as applied in projects supported by the
UNDP, the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the International Fund for
Agriculture Development (IFAD). The paper then goes on to examine the factors that influence
application of these policies and regulations in project and program implementation.
Decentralized management of infrastructure investments is the assignment of rights and
responsibilities to the commune authorities to act as Investment Owners and managers for smallscale commune and village infrastructure works. This includes the following main elements: (i)
planning for infrastructure sub-projects (identifying needs and selecting infrastructure subprojects, preparing investment reports); (ii) carrying out project implementation plans (bidding
and procurement, payment and disbursement, construction supervision, mobilization of
community participation and contributions); and (iii) operating and maintaining sub-projects.
Other related stages (which may be implemented by communes, or by higher levels or other
relevant agencies) include the appraisal and approval of plans and related technical contents
(design and cost estimates, bidding, contract payment and finalization documents etc.).
In recent years, decentralized management of small-scale infrastructure investments to commune
level has been piloted and implemented by a number of Government, donor and NGO supported
projects and programs. A variety of approaches have been applied and the degree of
decentralization varies between them. However, decentralization is seen to facilitate local
peoples access to project activities. As a result, local people have contributed their resources and
labor to improve infrastructure conditions in rural areas. In some localities, the capacity of staff at
grassroots level and of local people has been stimulated through the decentralization process. And
an open and democratic relationship has been established from province to communal level, with
local authorities and people actively participating in project activities.
Significant efforts have been made in some localities to work out a suitable methods for the
process of decentralization. However, in some other provinces and localities, decentralization
faces difficulties and even becomes a burden for the local authorities. This may be caused by
specific socio-economic conditions in each locality. For instance, in the mountainous regions,
communities are isolated in terms of geography and sometimes separated in terms of culture, low
literacy rates and language barriers that hinder community participation in implementing
complicated projects. In addition, poor access to basic infrastructure and communication facilities,
limited capacity of local authorities and the dependent habit of people have considerably affected
the efficiency of the decentralization process. As a result, localities have faced difficulties in
providing guidance for implementation of decentralization.
This paper draws out a number of main lessons from the successes and failures of this
decentralization experience, and provides a detailed set of recommendations related to these:
Lesson 2: Too quick or too cautious steps in implementation of decentralized projects are
unsuitable and both result in a risk of failure. It is important to implement decentralization
comprehensively and consistently, in a multi-sector way, and with adequate support for
institutional capacity building.
Lesson 3: Provinces should take the initiative and be flexible in identification of the scale and
degree of decentralization in project design and take the real context of each province into
consideration. It is vital to promote willingness and a driving force for all State administrative
agencies involved in decentralized project implementation.
Lesson 4: Training and capacity building are the decisive factors for decentralized projects.
Successful projects have made large investments in capacity building and training for project
managers at all levels, especially at commune level. It is recommended that a reasonable ratio
out of total investment should be spent on software activities including advisory services and
capacity building as a vital support for decentralization.
Lesson 5: Community participation in all steps of project implementation has a great impact
on the success of projects that are promoting decentralized management and implementation.
Participatory planning approaches need to be simplified with the use of practical tools and
methods that can be applied on a large scale.
Lesson 6: In the decentralization process, there are many procedures which are unfamiliar to
communes or they unable to handle certain technical requirements. Adequate technical
assistance significantly contributes to project success (such as from District Technical Support
Teams and Community Facilitators) The design of decentralized projects must pay due
attention to the district level by delegating authority and responsibility to them in
implementing decentralization models, and building the capacity of district administrations
and staff to adequately support the communes.
The following papers under this theme document the experience of particular projects in
introducing decentralized approaches to project management and implementation, as well as
exploring related topics in more detail.
Paper 1.2 describes the experience of the Northern Mountains Poverty Reduction Project
(NMPRP) with Implementing the Commune Development Budget Component. The NMPRP
is one of several projects and programs in Viet Nam that are now transferring some
responsibilities for Investment Ownership to commune level. This includes models such as
Commune Development Budgets (Ngn sch pht trin x) and Commune and
Village Development Funds (Qu pht trin x / thn bn). Some of the common
features of these models are that:
Financial resources are transferred to the commune (and sometimes village) level for
management, usually in the form of a block grant on an annual basis;
This is used to finance small-scale sub-projects and activities, that are selected by local
people through participatory planning processes;
These sub-projects are often implemented by local communities themselves (for example,
through community participation contracting methods);
The Commune Peoples Committee is the Investment Owner and financial manager, with
commune accounts held either at the State Treasury or at a commercial bank.
This paper begins by highlighting the challenges of effectively supporting and implementing this
type of component on a large-scale. In the Commune Development Budget Component (CDBC)
of the NMPRP, eligible sub-projects include: small-scale commune and village infrastructure;
production support activities; natural resources management; improvements in household living
conditions; and education and healthcare support activities. The NMPRP project area covers
around 3,660 villages in 356 communes in 44 districts, with 89% ethnic minority population from
20 ethnic groups. The Commune Development Boards that are implementing the CDBC include
around 3,789 people that require training. Many commune staff positions are part-time, with
frequent turnover of some positions, and a lack of full-time staff to guide the local communities.
Given this situation, the paper recommends that the following issues should be addressed to help
ensure success. Because the CDBC financial management and procurement methods are
completely new to the Commune Development Boards, intensive training and re-training is
required over several cycles. This should be combined with careful preparation of CDBC training
manuals using standard formats to minimize complexity and confusion amongst grassroots staff.
Information dissemination and training methods should also be diversified, in order to enhance
peoples knowledge, especially people in remote areas. It is also necessary to have close and
concrete directions and instructions from the Peoples Committees at all levels, and effective
cooperation and coordination between district line-agencies. The experience from NMPRP shows
that in locations where the District Project Management Units have provided effective support, the
communes have also done a good job implementing the CDBC.
The following paper on Decentralizing Procurement and Maximizing Local Economic
Benefits in Rural Poverty Reduction Programs (Paper 1.3) begins by noting that many rural
communes today have two, three or more Government, donor and NGO projects and programs
operating side-by-side, but the procurement methods vary quite considerably. The paper suggests
that, at this point in time, there is an urgent need and opportunity to reassess the procurement
strategies and methods used in these decentralized projects and programs. This is in order to
promote greater harmonization of local procedures and consistency in the procurement methods.
Related to this, the paper addresses two main questions. Firstly, how can public investment and
procurement strategies be designed to more fully engage local businesses and other economic
units (such as local companies, small-scale enterprises, cooperatives, village production groups,
household enterprises and artisans) in bidding for and undertaking small public works and
services? Secondly, how can these activities help to create better long-term employment
opportunities for local people in poor rural areas? The paper recommends that these aspects
should receive more attention in both the policies on decentralization and in the design of rural
poverty reduction programs. It suggests that the procurement strategy is in many respects the key
aspect of program design, around which other components should be planned. This is because the
procurement strategy has major implications not only for the distribution of economic benefits,
but also for community participation and supervision processes, sub-project planning and
approval steps, fund flow arrangements and financial management systems, and mechanisms to
promote transparency, accountability and anti-corruption.
The paper on Participatory Planning and Decentralized Management (Paper 1.4) from the
Project on Improved Livelihoods for Mountainous Communities (ILCM) in Thanh Hoa Province
describes the decentralized planning, budget allocation and implementation process that has been
introduced by this project. The project uses a Response Development Fund (RDF) mechanism to
support decentralization, combined with enhanced community participation in planning, and
strengthening the role of local government.
This paper makes a good assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of this approach, by
comparing the conventional methods of planning and budget allocation with the new approach. It
identifies a number of clear advantages of the new approach, which include: more accurate
identification of community needs; community responsibility is increased; the quality of
infrastructure construction is improved; reduced losses in investment; and more transparent
financial management. At the same time, some important challenges remain, including:
The heavy emphasis on infrastructure in existing projects, while there are many other
needs that should be included in community development programs.
The last paper in this theme A Birds Eye View on Effectiveness of Targeted Rural
Development and Poverty Reduction Projects (Paper 1.5) begins by tracing the evolution of
different types of rural development and poverty reduction projects and programs in Viet Nam
over the last decade. This includes sector-based delivery programs, projects that introduced more
participatory approaches in during the 1990s, and more recent projects that have introduced
Community Driven Development (CDD) approaches on a larger scale. The paper assesses this
experience, and goes on to identify some key issues that should be addressed to enhance the
effectiveness of future programs of the Government. These include: (i) improved targeting at the
design stage and in program implementation mechanisms; (ii) local empowerment through
decentralization, participation, community control and capacity building; (iii) enhanced fiduciary
management in procurement and local financial management capacity; (iv) enhanced
sustainability in livelihood support services and operations and maintenance of infrastructure; and
(v) Improved program administration particularly with respect to monitoring and evaluation.
x
Studies have shown that a substantial maintenance gap and funding gap exists for O&M
in a majority of rural communes. Addressing this maintenance and funding gap will require
an increase in the recurrent budgets made available to communes. This is a priority issue
for attention by the Government.
The level of community contributions and user-fees for infrastructure construction, and
operations and maintenance, should be at a level that is affordable to poor people in poor
communes. In general:
-
Community contributions and user fees for O&M should be prioritized for those types
of infrastructure that will bring direct benefits to households (such as irrigation,
electricity, water supply, kindergartens, village paths...);
O&M of larger public infrastructure (such as larger commune roads, health clinics,
secondary schools...) should be covered by the recurrent commune budgets and/or
sector budget sources.
Formulating Operational Regulations for the IMBs and WUAs is essential in order to
create a legal channel for their establishment, and a regulatory framework for management
and O&M, and which can be applied to specific local conditions in a flexible manner.
Training for the IMBs and WUAs, on technical and management skills, is extremely
important to ensure sustainable management. Sufficient budgets should be allocated for
training on O&M for the IMBs and WUAs as part of sub-project costs.
The training should be practical and based on required skills. It should also be closely
linked to training in related issues such as agriculture extension training and IPM linked
to irrigation schemes, and training on sanitation issues linked to water supply schemes.
In recent years, a considerable amount of investment has been put into the construction of smallscale social and economic infrastructure in communes and villages throughout the country. This
investment has been made through both Government and donor-assisted projects and programs.
After the construction phase is completed, these small-scale schemes are handed over to the local
communities, and to the Commune Peoples Committees which are formally responsible for all
aspects of infrastructure management and O&M.
A number of recent studies, however, have suggested that O&M of these small-scale commune and
village infrastructure schemes is lacking in a number of important respects. In general, O&M has
not yet been put into a systematic procedure under many projects, or integrated with the regular
commune budgeting and management system. Although a legislative framework is in place that
allocates management responsibilities to the Commune Peoples Committees and local
communities, there is little practical guidance on how to support them to fulfill their infrastructure
O&M responsibilities. From a financing perspective, State budget allocations to communes are
generally sufficient only to cover basic salaries and administrative costs of the Commune Peoples
Committees, and limited recurrent funding is available for O&M. Infrastructure O&M is therefore
dependent on the contributions and user-fees mobilized from local communities, but these are often
only sufficient to cover the most basic and routine O&M activities.
Concern over infrastructure O&M was highlighted in the recent Public Expenditure Review (PER)
1
from 2005 , which suggests that O&M short-falls appear in two main ways: (i) through a frequent
failure to maintain completed projects so that they fail to function as planned, assets deteriorate
and costly rehabilitation becomes necessary; and (ii) general shortages of O&M funds in recurrent
budgets of the local authorities. The PER report suggests that these issues are particularly pressing
for O&M of irrigation schemes (PER Chapter 13 / page 93).
While many previous studies have highlighted the short-falls and difficulties associated with the
O&M of commune and village infrastructure, the two papers presented here are valuable because
they take a more forward looking perspective. They show that good models for O&M already exist
under some projects and programs in some localities, and they put forward specific suggestions for
how to improve O&M management and implementation practices.
Paper 2.1 on Sustainable Operations and Maintenance Models for Commune Level
Infrastructure is based on a study that was undertaken for the Committee on Ethnic Minority
Affairs. In the Socio-Economic Development Program for Communes with Extreme Difficulties in
Ethnic Minority and Mountainous Areas for the period 2006 to 2010 (Program 135 / Phase II) it is
intended that more attention should be given to O&M of commune and village infrastructure in
order to help ensure the sustainability of these investments. The purpose of this study was to
develop a strategy for improving O&M management, and to propose the design of pilot models
for sustainable O&M systems that could be implemented within the new program, taking into
account the special characteristics and needs of poor and remote communes.
This study is informative because it puts forward an approach for quantifying the total O&M
requirements for all types of commune infrastructure. Using several commune examples, the study
attempt to calculate the maintenance gap and the funding gap between available funding
resources and actual O&M needs (although it is noted that the data required to make this
assessment is often lacking). The available funding resources include those from the commune
budgets as well as from user-fees and community contributions. The study concludes that most rural
communes cannot cover the total maintenance needs and costs, and that O&M planning is based on
what can be mobilized rather than what work is actually required.
1 SRV. 2005. Vietnam managing public expenditure for poverty reduction and growth: public expenditure review and
integrated fiduciary risk assessment. Joint report of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam and the World Bank, prepared
with support of the Like Minded Donor Group. Financial Publishing House, Ha Noi.
The study also suggests that the level of community contributions and cost recovery fees in rural
communes is disproportionately high. Data on typical household contributions and user fees and
incomes was collected from three communes in Ha Tinh Province and compared against averages in
Ha Noi and Da Nang City (see Table 1). This indicates that rural communes are giving around 12%
of their income to support the running of their community, whilst city dwellers are only giving 3%.
This means that the relative contribution of rural households is over 4 times that of city dwellers
who often benefit from better quality and wider choice of facilities and services.
Table 1: Comparison of relative contributions of rural and urban households
HH annual contributions
/ incomes
Average in City
Average in Rural
Commune
380,000
530,000
1.39
Average Income
13,200,000
4,130,000
0.31
Contribution as % of
income
3%
12%
4.5
authorities intervene too deeply into WUA management affairs, by using the water user-fees for the
wrong purposes and thus making the WUA Management Boards loose their initiative.
It is also noted that those WUAs that are integrated with existing cooperatives are often not
operating effectively. This is because they lack a clear-cut division of work and responsibilities for
the members of the management boards. A number of cadres have not fully recognized the role and
functions of WUAs and therefore they are not supporting their operations. In this respect, the study
suggests that in order to effectively support establishment of the WUAs, it is necessary to have a
team of competent facilitators who have good community development skills.
The paper also emphasizes the critical importance of formulating and popularizing regulations for
O&M and for WUA management, in order to create a regulatory and institutional framework for
WUAs which can be applied to specific local conditions in a flexible manner. The HRDP has
2
prepared a handbook on management of local irrigation schemes , and the project has also
coordinated closely with province departments to formulate Operational Regulations for WUAs
3
that were approved and issued by the Province Peoples Committee in early 2005 . It is notable that
these regulations are applicable not only for HRDP, but also for other donor-supported irrigation
schemes in Ha Tinh Province, which is a successful example of scaling-up and integration of
project lessons and experience.
st
HRDP. 2005. Handbook on Management of Local Irrigation Schemes. Ha Tinh Rural Development Project. June 1
Publishing House, Ha Tinh Province.
3 Decision No.4/QD-UBND (dated 8 June, 2005) of the Province Peoples Committee on Regulations for the
management and Operations of Water User Associations in Ha Tinh Province.
2
The Government and donors attach high importance to the harmonization of procedures
and integration of resources in order to make Official Development Assistance (ODA)
more effective and efficient. This is particularly important at the local levels of project and
program implementation (district and commune) due to the potential for scattered and
ineffective investments that may be brought about by the decentralization process.
So far, however, the integration of resources and alignment of management structures and
systems for project and program implementation has not been fully followed or achieved at
the local levels. A more specific regulatory framework is needed for this in line with the
principles of the Ha Noi Core Statement, especially with respect to local planning and
budgeting systems, procurement methods and thresholds, financial management systems,
and monitoring and evaluation.
Some good models exist from several projects and in several localities with the
preparation of Integrated Commune Development Plans that link funding sources and
activities supported by different projects and programs. However, more attention should
be given to aligning the objectives of donor / NGO supported projects to the longer-term
Socio-economic Development Plans of the localities.
Better coordination in local planning systems, and the integration of different funding
sources, is most important for those types of small-scale sub-projects and activities that
may be supported by several agencies in a particular locality (for example, small-scale
commune infrastructure and extension activities are often supported by several projects
and programs in one commune). The model for Commune Development Budgets that are
directly managed by the Commune Peoples Committees may be a good way of ensuring
this coordination in the future.
In commune planning and budgeting systems, attention should also be given to the private
sector through an improvement in the investment environment, and mobilization of
resources from enterprises and businesses for commune and village development.
Initiatives are being taken by some provinces to establish more unified Program
Management Board structures at district and commune level, particularly for the
management of Government programs. At the same time, capacity building should focus
on building networks of cadres linking district and commune levels, inter-agency
coordination to support commune development activities, and improving the supervision
capacity of local communities.
Transparency and the provision of clear and sufficient information are pre-conditions for
successful integration. Information flow to the commune authorities and local people
should be strengthened, especially on the amount, sources and utilization of commune
budgets. The information should be more specific and appropriate to the interests and
literacy level of local people.
The Government of Viet Nam and donors attach high importance to the ownership, harmonization
and alignment of Official Development Assistance (ODA) in order to make aid more effective and
to help achieve the Vietnam Development Goals (VDGs) by 2010 and the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015. These objectives are embodied in the Hanoi Core
Statement that was adopted by donors at the Mid-term Consultative Group Meeting in June 2005.
Some of the agreed principles and indicators of the Hanoi Core Statement that relate, in particular,
to the design, management and implementation of poverty reduction and rural development
programs at the grassroots levels are listed in Box 2.
Box 2. Hanoi Core Statement principles that relate to design and implementation of rural
development and poverty reduction programs
Donors base their support on the Government of Viet Nams Socio-Economic Development
Plan (SEDP) and related national, regional and provincial, and sector plans.
Donors use country systems and procedures to the maximum extent possible. Where use of
country systems is not feasible, donors establish additional safeguards and measures in
ways that strengthen country systems and procedures.
Donors avoid creating parallel management structures (PMUs) for day-to-day management
and implementation of aid-financed projects and programs.
The Government of Viet Nam integrates capacity building objectives in the SEDP and
related national, regional and provincial, and sector plans and leads a comprehensive
capacity building program with co-ordinated donor support.
Donors progressively rely on the Government of Viet Nam's procurement system once
mutually agreed standards have been attained.
Donors progressively rely on the Government of Viet Nams public financial management
system once mutually agreed standards have been attained.
The Government of Viet Nam and donors increasingly use program approaches.
The papers under this theme examine various aspects of the mobilization and integration of
resources at the local levels of program implementation. Paper 3.1 on Integration of Different
Projects at Commune Level: Experience from rural development projects was commissioned
by Project VIE/01/023, and provides an overview of the current situation based on a survey
undertaken in three provinces (Lao Cai, Ha Tinh and Ben Tre). The specific objectives of this study
were to: (i) assess the experience of both successful and unsuccessful approaches to project and
program integration at commune level; and (ii) to make recommendations to enhance local
efficiency in regulating and managing different funding sources, in order to build-up and implement
poverty reduction and rural development programs in the period 2006 to 2010.
The paper begins by noting that many good initiatives towards integration are already taking place.
Several examples are given, including: (i) linking Government program support to more
comprehensive socio-economic development planning at commune level (in Ben Tre Province); (ii)
establishing more unified Program Management Boards for different projects and programs at
commune level (in Lao Cai Province); (iii) good integration of some NGO projects with local socioeconomic development plans at the project preparation stage (e.g. ActionAid in Ha Tinh province);
and (iv) the coordination of different funding sources from projects working in poor communes
included in Program 135 in several provinces.
However, the steps that have been taken so far towards increasing integration are primarily with
respect to Government program funding sources. The integration of donor-assisted projects at the
local level is more problematic for a number of reasons. The paper identifies several common
constraints that need to be addressed, including: (i) the need for donor / NGO supported projects to
align their objectives to the long-term development strategy and plans of the localities; (ii)
Government and donor projects and programs operate through separate PMU structures, with
different planning and financial management procedures, which makes it difficult for localities to
integrate funds from different sources; and (iii) the need for more specific guidelines on integration
of resources, and for the harmonization of local implementation procedures.
The paper also presents an interesting discussion on different viewpoints on the question of
overlap. This is often considered in a negative sense for instance, in the stated need to avoid
duplication in investment activities, which results in a situation whereby resources are often
divided up between different agencies and PMUs. The study proposes that overlap should be
viewed in a more positive sense by promoting greater complementarities between programs and
coordinating resources to have fully completed and sustainable sub-projects.
The following paper (Paper 3.2) on Resources Integration in Planning at the Village and
Commune Level describes the local planning and management model and process that is being
introduced through the Sida-supported Chia S Program in Yen Bai, Ha Giang and Quang Tri
provinces. The Chia S Program is one of several donor-assisted programs that are now more
actively promoting resource integration in local planning processes, and cooperation and
coordination with other poverty reduction programs in the communes and districts.
The paper notes that in many of the communes and villages in which the Chia S Program is
working there are several Government, donor and NGO supported projects and programs operating
side-by-side. In this situation, there is an urgent need for more coordinated planning and integration
of funding resources. The example is given of one village in Van Chan District (in Yen Bai
province) that currently has multiple sources of support, including: Government investment
programs including Program 135 and Program 661 on reforestation and forest protection; several
healthcare programs; a rural electrification program; production support through the District
Agriculture Extension Station and Veterinary Station; credit supply from the Bank for Social
Policies and the Vietnam Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development; and two donor-assisted
projects including the Chia S Program and the Northern Mountains Poverty Reduction Project
(NMPRP).
The approach taken by the Chia S Program is to assist the communes and villages to conduct and
prepare Iintegrated Commune Development Plans that are not limited to activities funded by the
Chia S Program. In these planning exercises, the focus is on the making an overall commune and
village situation analysis, and setting long-term visions and multi-year objectives that reach beyond
the duration of the Chia S Program. It also involve the identification of all available resources from
different sources (including funds, human resources, knowledge etc.) in the Integrated Commune
Development Plans.
The Quang Ngai Rural Development Program (RUDEP) is promoting a similar approach. Paper 3.2
on Integrated Commune Development Planning in Quang Ngai describes this approach whereby
annual Commune Development Plans are used to identify and allocate funds from different
Government and donor funding sources to support priority community needs. This paper provides
an in-depth analysis of the existing government annual planning system, and shows how the system
can be strengthened by applying Grassroots democracy approaches to increase transparency and
local participation.
The RUDEP is also addressing the issue of scaling-up in the province, by 2006 it is proposed that
Integrated Commune Development Plans will be conducted in all communes in 6 upland districts,
and by 2007 in all communes in the province. This paper highlights the importance of developing
district and commune capacity to conduct Integrated Commune Development Planning on a large
scale, which is initially being supported through the establishment of District Working Groups.
The final paper under this theme on Agriculture Development Planning and Extension System
Development A challenge for local Government and projects towards integration (Paper 3.4)
examines these issues of resource integration and inter-agency coordination within the specific
agriculture development and extension sector. This is based on the experience of the Thua Thien
Hue Rural Development Program (Phase II) which is supported by the Government of Finland. A
number of similar recommendations emerge from this case-study, including:
The need to bring different projects and programs under more unified board structures (e.g.
Province Agriculture Extension Boards) to coordinate resources and implementation.
The need to develop more consistent formats for Agriculture Development Plans and
associated training manuals for province, district and common level.
The need for more sharing of experience, manuals and technology packages with other
government agencies and projects (both within and outside the province).
Support for the improvement of output and impact oriented planning and monitoring and
evaluation systems of the local government authorities, to monitor progress and assess
impacts based on a common set of indicators.
The need to enhance capacity in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is a cross-cutting theme
that is highlighted by many of the papers and presentations in the workshop. Improved M&E
is seen to be an essential component to ensure success of the decentralization process, and
of successful integration and harmonization so that different projects and programs are
working towards achieving the development goals and objectives set out in the SocioEconomic Development Plans.
Much useful practical experience is already available on the design of M&E systems for
these types of decentralized rural development and poverty reduction projects and
programs. However, this is an aspect in which many new projects and programs appear to
re-invent the wheel. So far only limited exchange of experience has taken place in order
to more widely apply successful models. One of the main recommendations made by the
workshop participants is that M&E is a topic for further studies and workshops to exchange
experience between Government and donor projects and programs.
The design of M&E systems in donor-assisted projects is still geared primarily to donor
information needs and reporting requirements, rather than to those of the local government
authorities. This is one of the most important areas for greater integration in the future.
More attention should be given to introducing improved methods and systems of M&E
within the local administrative systems. And province and district departments should be
directly involved in the development of M&E systems as early as possible to ensure
relevance and usefulness of these systems.
More attention should also be given to finding ways to use M&E data in regular meetings,
to develop mechanisms for prompt feedback of information from management levels to
implementation levels, and to monitor progress and assess impacts based on a common set
of indicators that are linked to the local Socio-economic Development Plans.
The management of M&E systems commonly suffers from a number of constraints that
influence the usefulness, relevance and sustainability of these systems. These constraints
include a lack of budget for M&E activities and a lack of full-time M&E staff within the
local government administrations. The design and management of M&E systems, and data
collection and analysis, are specialized tasks that are not necessarily amongst the skills of
regular government staff. The establishment of M&E Units and training for full-time staff
is therefore is important. Resources should also be mobilized to involve research
institutions in carrying out M&E studies on a more formal basis.
The need to improve capacity in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of rural development and
poverty reduction programs is a cross-cutting theme which is highlighted by many of the papers and
presentations in the workshop (although only one paper is specifically devoted to this topic here).
Improved M&E is seen to be an essential element of the overall decentralization process (under
Theme 1), and of successful integration and harmonization so that different projects and programs
are working towards achieving the development goals and objectives set out in the Socio-Economic
Development Plans of different localities (under Theme 3).
Paper 1.1 (on decentralized management of infrastructure investments at commune level)
recognizes that decentralization does not only mean the transfer of rights and responsibilities for
investment management to communes without any follow-up. If decentralization is carried out
without strict monitoring and supervision it may result in a risk of corruption, off-track performance
and failure. Regular supervision and instruction by higher levels will help to consolidate the
administrative roles and responsibilities of different government levels, as well as helping to
increase the effectiveness of decentralization.
Paper 1.3 (on decentralizing procurement) also notes that the shift towards locally managed
investment activities brings with it important issues with respect to how to build in effective
mechanisms to ensure transparency, fiduciary control and accountability. This paper suggests that
an appropriate and realistic balance needs to be achieved between upward, horizontal and
downward reporting and accountability mechanisms, as follows:
Upward accountability mechanisms include:
Screening and approval of annual / activity plans by higher levels;
Sub-project approval, disbursement release and final liquidation procedures;
Regular accounting and financial reporting requirements and procedures;
Technical supervision by higher levels;
External / independent audits (physical and financial).
Horizontal accountability mechanisms include:
Screening and approval of commune plans by the Peoples Councils;
Introducing elements of competitiveness into commune procurement;
Community supervision (e.g. through Commune Supervision Boards);
Cross-learning and joint review activities (between communes).
Downward accountability mechanisms include:
Annual village planning and review meetings;
Regular information provision on plans, budgets and expenditures;
Local peoples representation on Commune Supervision Boards;
Public opinion surveys (carried out on a periodic basis).
Upward reporting requirements tend to be heavy under most existing projects and programs. For
example, it is frequently stated by commune officials that final liquidation and financial reporting
requirements are often too heavy and complicated for the types of small-scale activities and subprojects managed by the communes (especially given the travel distance and time involved in
moving regularly between the remote communes and district centres).
Experience has shown that if information provision to local people on plans, budgets and
expenditures is strictly and effectively applied, then local people can and will exercise a degree of
financial oversight that can help balance and reduce the upward reporting requirements. Similarly,
if close attention is given to the formation and training of the Commune Supervision Boards, these
boards can help ensure transparent management and the quality of works and activities.
The paper included here on The Role of Monitoring and Evaluation in Rural Development in
Quang Ngai (Paper 4.1) presents the M&E system that has been introduced by RUDEP in Quang
Ngai Province. This system includes three main sub-components:
Management Information System (MIS) that is used primarily by the Program Management
Unit to collect, store and analyze data to support the management and reporting of program
activities
Monitoring and Evaluation System that is designed for the Commune Peoples Committees
(CPC) and District Peoples Committees (DPC) to manage and report on project activities
within their commune or district.
The paper puts forward some useful recommendations based on this RUDEP experience, as
follows: (i) it is important to differentiate between M&E activities that are required by donors and
those that can and should be sustained to improve management and implementation of all activities
in a commune or district; (ii) it is preferable for local staff (provincial and especially district and
commune) to be involved in the development of the M&E system as early as possible, so that the
system will be of most use to them; (iii) the indicators used to monitor program progress and
effectiveness must be clear, simple and relatively easy to collect; (iv) more attention should be
given to capacity building activities, such as study tours for local officers to other projects to
exchange experiences in M&E; and (v) more attention should be given to finding ways to use M&E
data in regular meetings, to analyze and learn about implementation progress and to determine
solutions for the improvement of future activities.
At provincial level, the Province Peoples Committees should take initiative to mobilize
resources for capacity building programs conducted by the province training schools, with
budget allocations prioritized for mountainous and remote areas.
Managerial mechanisms:
The Province Peoples Committees should facilitate relations between national universities
and academies and the province training schools to help improve training capacities and for
the development of curricula and course materials.
Local governments should conform strictly to the regulations about standardization of the
cadres at grassroots level. At province level, line departments need to perform properly their
role in monitoring and providing specialist inputs to training programs of the province
training schools.
The District level should be active in preparation of plans for capacity building, and should
be enabled to undertake these activities since the district level is closer to the practical
situation of commune cadres.
Training delivery:
The training programs for elected commune officials need to be carried out immediately
after voting, and should have a cycle of 4 years with continuous implementation throughout
the country. Training Needs Assessments (TNA) for capacity building of grassroots level
needs to be conducted regularly.
There is an urgent need for more intensive training for the Village Heads in community
development skills in order to facilitate villager participation.
Higher levels of funding are required to support commune and village cadres to participate
in training programs, especially for staff from ethnic minority groups, remote areas and low
income families.
There is a need to up-date curricula and course materials that are practical and appropriate
for decentralized rural development for grassroots level training programs. The content of
decentralized rural development and knowledge and skills of community development need
to be integrated in the training programs of the province training schools.
The papers under this theme examine three inter-related aspects of strengthening the delivery and
integration of capacity building and training programs at the grassroots level. This includes: (i)
strengthening the capacity of the province training schools to deliver training for commune and
village cadres; (ii) introducing competency-based training approaches and methods to improve the
quality of these programs; and (iii) strengthening grassroots extension networks in order to help
scale-up the training and integrate the introduced knowledge and skills at community level.
Paper 5.1 on Capacity Building at Grassroots Level: Potential Role of the Provincial Training
Institutions provides a situation analysis of the training provided by the province training schools
(such as the Political Training Schools, the Economic and Technical Training Schools, and the
Agriculture and Forestry Schools), as well as training provided by sector departments and projects,
based on a survey undertaken in Ha Bnh, Hung Yn and Qung Tr provinces. This
includes the types of training courses that are being offered, an overall assessment of the
existing capacity (annual intake, equipment and facilities etc), the quality of training and staff
competencies. On this basis, the study makes recommendations for further actions and inputs that
are required to make these institutions capable of meeting the capacity building needs at the
grassroots level.
This study found that in all three province there is a diversity of different types of training being
provided for commune cadres, including official training programs through the province training
schools, and unofficial training provided by different projects and programs. However, there is
often a lack of coordination between them, and in only a few cases are rural development projects
working in partnership with the province training schools. There is also generally weak
coordination in resource allocation for commune cadre training between responsible Ministries at
national level and the Province Peoples Committees.
The study found a number of common constraints and weaknesses in the training programs
provided by the province training institutions. The training content often focuses too heavily on
theory, but less on practice. Training methods are not regularly renovated, and do not meet the
demand of daily practice of grassroots level staff. The capacity of most trainers and the content of
training materials also does not meet the demand of decentralized rural development, public
administration reform and the practice of community development. And the infrastructure, facilities
and equipment of many province training schools is in many cases limited and needs up-grading.
At the same time, the paper notes that there are a number of advantages and potentials of the
provincial training schools which have not yet been fully exploited. The staff have good experience
of education and training activities in each province, there are available trainers and training
infrastructure, and the especially important advantage that the provincial training institution can
provide training services for communes on the large scale that is required.
A number of recommendations are made for actions and inputs to build the capacity of the province
training schools to design and deliver training for commune cadres, including: (i) an overall need to
strengthen institutional arrangements, at both national and province levels, to mobilize and
coordinate resources for grassroots capacity building and training; (ii) the Province Peoples
Committees should facilitate linkages between the schools and national education and training
institutions to support and help improve the capacity building program; (iii) select and support
appropriate focal province training schools to be active in taking the lead in developing training
capacity and mobilizing training experts from other institutions; (iv) the District Peoples
Committees should be empowered to select relevant training institution by a contract mechanisms;
and (v) specific steps should be taken to improve the quality and content of the training provided.
The following paper on Competency Based Training in Quang Ngai (Paper 5.2) documents a
systematic approach to commune and district cadre training that is being introduced by the Quang
Ngai Rural Development Program. The paper defines competency based training as a system of
instruction whereby the trainees achieve a pre-defined level of knowledge and skills. The main
steps in this type of training program are as follows: (i) developing Capacity Profiles for each staff
group to identify the skills and knowledge required to implement their duties more effectively; (ii)
conducting Training Needs Assessment on an annual basis to identify who requires training and in
what topics; (iii) training program and course development; (iv) training course delivery; and (v) an
essential element to evaluate the training courses so that improvements can be made over time.
The paper reflects on a number of factors that influence the effectiveness and contribute to the
success of this type of systematic training program. Short duration training (of between 2 and 4
days) is good because the courses can be broken into manageable units, interspersed with periods of
practicing the acquired knowledge and skills. However, this is also a problem because not all the
people who attended the first units can attend the next course. There needs to be commitment from
the trainees and their superiors that the trainees will be permitted to complete a full series of course
units to complete the training program. District and commune officials are also busy with their
work, and can change at election time. Therefore, there needs to be a continuous training program
implemented on a cyclical basis. Lastly, knowledge and skills gained in training courses can be lost
over time if people are not given appropriate coaching in the workplace. Adequate follow-up
support is therefore required to practice and apply these skills and to ensure sustainability.
The last paper in this theme on Supporting Rural Development through a Community-Based
Extension Network (Paper 5.3) looks at the related issue of scaling-up access to training and
advisory services at community level. This is based on the experience of the Improved Livelihoods
for Mountainous Communities Project in Thanh Hoa Province.
The role of the Agriculture Extension Centre (AEC) is to provide farmers with training on new
technologies. However, the paper notes that the outreach capacity of the AEC is limited in terms
of the staff available to conduct training in all communes and villages. In this situation, the ILMC
has been supporting the formation of Grassroots Extension Units (GEUs) to extend the outreach
capacity of the AEC. This model is a cost-effective system which provides training on a larger-scale
by way of: collaboration with commune-based extension agents; using Farmer Field Schools and
group-based training methods; small demonstration models using a learning by doing approach;
and involving lead farmers as part of commune training networks to spread demonstration results
and provide advice to other farmers. The study recommends that to support these efforts, clear
criteria and policies for recruitment to the GEUs are needed. Adequate funds should also be made
available for capacity building in both agriculture techniques and participatory extension methods.
For effective scaling-up, there needs to be better coordination, with the same extension agency
being responsible for both human resource management and technical support activities similar to
other line agencies.
Nguyn Hng
Th, Institute
Nguyn
9. commune
Integrationlevel
of different
Vietnam
Economic
projects
Research
at commune level
team: PhD. Trn Th Minh
experience from rural
Ngc, PhD. Nguyn T Sim, V
projects
Hng
ng, o
Th Hong
10.development
Designs of integrated
PhD. CDimyati
Nangju
and VICA
rural
Consultant Ltd.
development project
using Log- frame
11. Workshop Enhancing
Project VIE/01/023, synthesized by
the
Edwin Shanks
Effectiveness of
Management of Rural
development and Poverty
12.Reduction
National Programs
Conference07on Project VIE/01/023
Integrated Rural
Development, August
Synthesis
Report
13.2004
Inception
report
Project Rab Nawaz STA, Project
VIE/01/023
VIE/01/023
14. Report on Study
Proejct VIE/01/023
Tour to Pakistan
Date
to
issu
11/2003
Published in
English Vietname
Yes
Yes
5/2003
Yes
Yes
2004
Yes
Yes
1/2005
No
Yes
4/2005
Yes
Yes
4/ 2005
Yes
Yes
5/2005
Yes (not
printed)
Yes (not
printed)
12/ 2005
Forthcomin Forthcomin
g
g
12/ 2005
Forthcomin Forthcomin
g
g
2005
1/2006
Yes ( not
printed)
Forthcomin Forthcomin
g
g
8/2004
Yes (not
printed)
8/2002
Yes (not
printed)
Yes
1/2004
8/2004
1/2006
Yes (not
printed)
(Website
http://www.u
nd
p.org.vn/und
p/p
Yes (not
printed)
Yes
(not
printed
)
No
Yes (not
printed)
Yes (not
Yes (not
Publicatio
Author
ns
s
Project VIE/01/023
Provincial Level (Hatinh Rural Development Project)
17. Manual on local
HRDP
participatory
irrigation
18. Ti liu
tp hun Ph
T.S Trn Ngc Ln, T.S Trn Ngc
ng php lp k
Hng, Ths. Nguyn Vn Sn v
hoch pht trin
nhm t vn,
cng tham gia
Trung tm CERD- i hc Vinh
19. Guidelines
on
HRDP
decentralized
implementation
of
commune
infrastructure
20.
Regulationsschemes
on
PhD. Nguyn Quang Trung, Water
operation of
Resource Science Institute, Ha
water users
Tinh Irrigation management
associations
Dept, Ha Tinh DARD, HRDP
Date
to
issu
Published in
English Vietname
printed)
printed)
9/2005
No
Yes
10/2002
No
01/2004
Yes (not
printed)
Yes
(not
printed
) Yes
06/2005
No
Yes
B K hoch v u t
Chng trnh Pht trin ca Lin hp quc
D n Tng cng Nng lc Qun l Pht trin Nng thn tng hp
(VIE/01/023)
Li ni u
Trong khun kh D n Tng cng Nng lc Qun l Pht trin (t 2002-2005) thuc V Kinh
t Nng nghip, B K hoch v u t (MPI) do Chng trnh Pht trin ca Lin hp quc ti
Vit Nam ti tr (thng qua d n VIE/01/023), Hi tho quc gia v Nng cao hiu qu qun l
cc chng trnh xa i gim ngho v pht trin nng thn c t chc ti H ni t 7 n
9 thng 12 nm 2005.
Ban t chc xin chn thnh cm n tt c cc i din cc n v tham gia hi tho t cc c quan
trung ng, cc s ban ngnh thuc 10 tnh (H Giang, Tuyn Quang, H Tnh, Qung Tr, Sn
La, Yn Bi, Kon Tum, Gia Lai, Tr Vinh v Sc Trng) v cc nh ti tr, t chc phi chnh ph
(NGOs), cc vn phng d n v cc t chc o to v nghin cu. S tham gia, tho lun tch
cc ca qu v i biu ti Hi tho ng gp vo s thnh cng v cht lng ti liu ca Hi
tho.
c bit, ban t chc cng xin chn thnh cm n tt c cc n v v tc gi chun b cc bi
vit v bi thuyt trnh cho Hi tho. Cht lng cc bi vit v thuyt trnh ti hi tho c
nh gi l c cht lng cao v c chun b rt chu o v cng phu. Cc n v c ng gp
ch yu bao gm:
D n Pht trin Nng thn tnh H Tnh (IFAD)
D n Ci thin sinh k cho cc x min ni ti Thanh Ha (CECI/CIDA)
D n gim ngho cc tnh min ni pha Bc (World Bank/DFID)
D n Pht trin Nng thn tnh Qung Ngi (AusAid)
Cng ty o to, t vn v nghin cu pht trin nng thn
D n pht trin nng thn tnh Tha Thin Hu (Phn Lan)
Cng ty T vn VICA
Vin Kinh t Vit Nam
Chng trnh Chia s Vit Nam-Thy im (SIDA)
Ngn hng th gii
WSP quc t
Chng ti cng xin c c bit cm n ng V Ngc Anh v ng Nguyn Tin Phong, UNDP,
lin tc ng h D n VIE/01/023 v gip t c mc tiu ca Hi tho quc gia ny.
Chng ti cng nh gi cao tt c nhng ngi gip v to iu kin cho vic t chc Hi
tho.
B L Th Thng
Gim c, D n VIE/01/023
V Kinh t Nng nghip
B K hoch v u t
ii
Mc lc
Li ni u ............................................................................................................................ i
Nhng thut ng vit tt ............................................................................................. ii
Mc lc..................................................................................................................................iii
Gii thiu....................................................................................................................................... 3
Cc mc tiu v hot ng ca D n VIE/01/023 ....................................... 3
Cc mc tiu v ch ca Hi tho quc gia ................................................. 4
Danh sch cc ti liu v cc bi thuyt trnh .................................................. 5
Ch 1: Phn cp qun l X .................................................................................................... 8
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh t Hi tho .............................................. 8
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh .............................................................. 9
Ch 2 : Vn hnh v bo dng Cng trnh c s h tng .................................................. 13
Cc ni dung chnh v kin ngh t hi tho ................................................... 13
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh ............................................................ 14
Ch 3: Huy ng v lng ghp cc ngun lc ....................................................................... 17
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh ca Hi tho ......................................... 17
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh ............................................................ 18
Ch 4: Theo di v nh gi .................................................................................................. 21
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh ca Hi tho ......................................... 21
Tm tt cc bo co v thuyt trnh .................................................................... 22
Ch 5 : Tng cng nng lc cho c s ................................................................................ 24
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh ca Hi tho ......................................... 24
Tm tt cc bo co v thuyt trnh .................................................................... 25
Ph lc 1. Danh sch cc n phm do D n VIE/01/023 xut bn .. 27
Ph lc 2. Danh sch cc thnh vin c mi tham d hi tho........ 28
iii
Knh tha i din Vn phng Chng trnh pht trin ca Lin hp quc ti Vit Nam,
Cc Qu ng, Qu b, v cc v khch qu
Thay mt V kinh t nng nghip, B K hoach v u t, ti xin c cho mng qu v i
biu, cc v khch qu, i din ca nh ti tr, cc c quan trung ng, a phng v d n, n
tham d hi tho ny.
Chnh ph Vit Nam v cc nh ti tr rt ch trng n cng tc gim ngho v pht trin nng
thn. Trong nhng nm gn y, Chnh ph ban hnh nhiu chnh sch v quy nh h tr
vic thc hin cc chng trnh u t nhm mc ch pht trin nng thn v xa i gim
ngho, v d nh Chng trnh Mc tiu Quc gia v gim ngho v to vic lm; Chng trnh
v pht trin kinh t- x hi ca cc x c bit kh khn cc tnh min ni (Chng trnh 135);
Chng trnh mc tiu quc gia v cung cp nc sch v v sinh nng thn; Chng trnh trng
rng 5 triu hecta v cc chng trnh khc.
Cng vi nhng n lc ca Chnh ph, cc nh ti tr quc t tip tc h tr Vit Nam thc hin
nhiu d n quan trng nh D n gim ngho cc tnh min ni pha Bc do Ngn hng th gii
ti tr, v Chng trnh Chia S Vit Nam-Thy in do Sida ti tr, y ch l mt trong s rt
nhiu cc d n ca cc nh ti tr.
Cc d n v chng trnh ny ng gp to ln vo vic pht trin kinh t x hi ca Vit Nam
ni chung v pht trin nng thn, gim ngho ni ring. Nh c s gip to ln ny m t l
ngho ca Vit Nam, theo thng k ca Chnh ph, gim ng k, t khong 17.5% trong nm
2001 xung cn khong 7% trong nm 2005.
Trong qu trnh thc hin cc d n v chng trnh pht trin nng thn v gim ngho trong
nhng nm qua, chng ta c c rt nhiu cc m hnh u t thnh cng, nhng kinh nghim
v thc tin qu bu cn c trao i v nhn rng. ng thi, chng ta cng nhn thy c mt
s chnh sch v quy nh cha c nht qun cn phi sa i v hon thin cc chnh sch
v quy nh ny c th tr thnh nhng cng c c lc h tr nng cao tnh hiu qu u t ca
cc chng trnh v d n hng ti mc tiu gim ngho nng thn v pht trin cng ng.
Mc tiu chnh ca Hi tho ngy hm nay v Nng cao hiu qu qun l cc Chng trnh Gim
ngho v Pht trin Nng thn l to ra mt din n m cho cc c quan ca chnh ph, cc
nh ti tr, cc tnh v c chng trnh, d n trao i v chia s kinh nghim v xut nhng
kin ngh. Nhng kin ngh, xut nu ra ti hi tho l nhm sa i chnh sch v nhng quy
nh, v tnh hiu qu trong vic thit k v thc hin cc d n, chng trnh v pht trin nng
thn v gim ngho ang c chun b v thc hin trong thi gian ti.
c th c c nhng kt qu tt, Hi tho s c chia ra lm nhiu ch khc nhau, bao
gm: phn cp qun l d n; huy ng v lng ghp cc ngun lc; theo di v nh gi; vn
hnh v bo dng cc cng trnh h tng ti cp x; v tng cng nng lc ti cp c s cho
cc d n pht trin nng thn. Vic chia nh cc ch s to iu kin cho vic tho lun v
trao i kin v kinh nghim
Nhng kin ng gp qu bu ca cc qu v i biu t cc b, ban ngnh cc cp, t trung
ng n a phng, t cc nh ti tr v cc t chc phi chnh ph, cc d n s c ghi nhn
v a vo trong cc Ti liu Hi tho, sau s c chuyn n cc cp qun l c thm
quyn, cc nh nghin cu v cc d n c lin quan trong c nc.
Thay mt Ban t chc, mt ln na, ti xin c trn trng cho n cc qu v i biu, cc v
khch qu, qu ng, qu b tham d hi tho. Ti hy vng vic chia s v trao i cc kinh
nghim qu bu ca qu v s gp phn vo thnh cng ca Hi tho.
Nhn dp ny, cho php ti c by t s cm n chn thnh ti UNDP ng h v ti tr cho
MPI t chc hi tho ny.
Ti xin chc qu v i biu sc khe v chc Hi tho thnh cng tt p.
o Quang Thu
BO CO TNG HP
Gii thiu
Bo co ny tm tt cc bi vit v thuyt trnh ti Hi tho quc gia v Nng co Hiu qu Qun
l cc Chng trnh pht trin nng thn c t chc ti H Ni thng 12/2005 va qua. Bo co
cng tm tt cc kt qu chnh ca hi tho v cc ni dung c bn v cc khuyn ngh c lin
quan. Tt c cc ti liu ca hi tho c ghi vo a CD km theo bo co ny.
Cc mc tiu v hot ng ca D n VIE/01/023
D n Tng cng Nng lc Qun l Pht trin Nng thn tng hp (D n UNDP
VIE/01/023) c V Kinh t Nng nghip, B K hoch v u t thc hin trong giai on
t thng 8/2002 n thng 12/2005.
Mc tiu tng qut ca d n l tng cng nng lc ca quc gia v a phng trong vic iu
phi, thit lp v thc hin chin lc v cc chng trnh Xa i, Gim ngho. Mt trong
nhng mc tiu c th ca d n l gp phn a ra nhng chnh sch cp quc gia v cc
hng dn v thc hin cc d n pht trin nng thn tng hp, tin hnh nh gi c h thng
cc bi hc c c t cc d n ang thc hin.
Thut ng Cc d n pht trin nng thn tng hp c hiu l cc d n v chng trnh c
cc cch tip cn a hp phn, h tr xy dng cc c s h tng v dch v nng thn gp
phn ci thin sinh k cho cc h nng dn. Nhn chung, cc d n ny thng c t 2 hp phn
tr ln bao gm: xy dng c s h tng quy m nh cho x v thn bn; h tr khuyn nng; cc
hot ng sn xut v cc kinh doanh h gia nh; h tr cc qu tit kim; tn dng v cc dch
v ti chnh nng thn; qun l ti nguyn thin nhin nh trng v bo v rng; cc hot ng
pht trin cng ng; tng cng nng lc v o o. Cc d n ny thng tp trung vo cp
qun l ca tnh bng cch lm vic vi chnh quyn tnh, cc s chuyn ngnh, v cc x, huyn
trong tnh.
Trong giai on t 2002 n 2005, d n VIE/01/023 tin hnh mt s nghin cu chuyn
ngnh v cc kha o to lin quan n thit k, chun b, qun l v thc hin, cng nh cc ni
dung k thut ca cc d n v chng trnh pht trin nng thn tng hp (xem Hp 1 v Ph
lc 1 danh sch cc nghin cu v ti liu xut bn ca d n).
Cc ti nghin cu v cc kha o to c xc nh v la chn trn c s tham kho kin
ca cc i tc cp tnh v quc gia thng qua cc u mi Pht trin Nng thn. Cc nghin cu
c thc hin trn c s phi hp gia Chnh ph, nh ti tr v cc t chc phi chnh ph ang
hot ng trn cc tnh trn ton quc. Mt lot cc hi tho nh gi do d n t chc to c
hi cc i din cc cp qun l trung ng v a phng, cc nh qun l chng trnh v d
n, i din cc nh ti tr v NGO, cc trung tm nghin cu v o to cng tho lun, chia s
Cc thng l tt nht v thit k v thc hin cc d n pht trin nng thn tng hp
(2003)
nh gi cc m hnh trnh din nng nghip trong cc d n pht trin nng thn tng
hp v cc chng trnh ca chnh ph (2004).
Cc hot ng to thu nhp phi nng nghip trong cc d n pht trin nng thn tng
hp: c hi v thch thc (2005).
Cc kha o to v thit k cc d n pht trin nng thn tng hp s dng cch tip
cn Khung logic (2005)
Hi tho quc gia v Nng cao Hiu qu qun l Chng trnh gim ngho v pht trin nng
thn c t chc thng 12/2005 nh mt s kin chnh kt thc D n VIE/01/023. Mc tiu
tng qut ca D n Quc gia l:
To ra mt din n cc c quan ca Chnh ph, cc nh ti tr, v cc d n c
th chia s v hc hi kinh nghim v a ra cc khuyn ngh phc v sa i cc
chnh sch v nng cao hiu qu trong thit k v thc hin cc chng trnh gim
ngho v pht trin nng thn ti Vit Nam.
Hi tho Quc gia bao gm 15 bo co v trnh by v 5 ch chnh ca Hi tho nh sau:
Ch 1: Qun l phn cp cc d n gim ngho v pht trin nng thn
Ch 2: Vn hnh v bo dng c s h tng ti cp x
Ch 3: Huy ng v lng ghp cc ngun lc
Ch 4: Theo di v nh gi
Ch 5: Tng cng nng lc ti cp c s
C quan v tc gi
chnh
a ch lin lc
Qun l phn cp u t
c s h tng cp x;
kinh nghim t cc d
n pht trin nng thn
ng Nguyn Thanh Hi
Cng ty T vn VICA
Nghin cu do D n
VIE/01/023 t hng
Email:
haivd@hn.vnn.vn
v VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
1.2
ng Nguyn Tho
Nguyn,
Email NMPRP:
mpinmprp@fpt.vn
Phn cp u thu v
Ti a ha li ch kinh t
a phng trong cc
Chng trnh gim
ngho nng thn
ng Edwin Shanks (T
vn hi tho VIE/01/023)
1.3
D n gim ngho cc
tnh min ni pha Bc
(NMPRP), MPI, Ngn hng
th gii, DFID
Email :
eshanks@vnn.vn
1.4
1.5
nh gi tng th v
Hiu qu ca D n
gim ngho v pht
trin nng thn mc tiu
ng Nguyn Th Dng,
Ngn hng th gii
Email:
il mcnx@vnn.vn
Trang web:
www.cecivi etnam.com/ilmc
Email:
dnguyen1@worldbank.org
M hnh Vn hnh v Bo
dng bn vng cho cc
cng trnh c s h tng
cp x
Email:
kbinh@dng.vnn.vn
2.2
ng Trn nh Ha,
Gim c d n, D n
pht trin Nng thn tnh
H Tnh
Email:
hrdp@hn.vnn.vn
Lng ghp cc d n
ng Nguyn Vn Hun,
khc trn a bn x:
Vin kinh t Vit Nam.
Kinh nghim t cc d n Nghin cu do D n
pht trin nng thn
VIE/01/023 t hng
Email:
ngvhuan@yahoo.com
v VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
3.2
ng Steffen Weidner
Chng trnh gim ngho
Chia s Vit Nam-Thy
in
Email:
steffen.weidner@chiase.org
3.3
ng Bede B. Evans,
C vn v pht trin c
s tham gia cho d n
Pht trin Nng thn tnh
Qung Ngi (RUDEP)
AusAid.
Email:
bdqnrdp@dng.vnn.vn
Trang web:
www.rudep.org
3.4
EMAIL:
advisor.tthrdp@vnn.vn
v/hoc
hans@pmai l.vnn.vn
4.1
ng Phm Vn Quang,
Cn b theo di v nh
gi. Chng trnh Pht
trin Nng thng tnh
Qung Ngi (RUDEP)
AusAid
Email:
quangrudep@vnn.vn
trang web:
www.rudep.org
5.2
o to da trn nng
lc ti Qung Ngi
B Trn Th L Tuyn,
Cn b tng cng nng
lc, Chng trnh Pht
trin Nng thn Tnh
Qung Ngi
Email: tuyenrudep@vnn.vn
trang web:
www.rudep.org
5.3
ng Trng Vn Lch,
Gim c, Phng Nng
nghip v Pht trin Nng
thn Huyn B Thc. D
n ci thin sinh k cho
Cng ng min ni ti
Thanh Ha (ILMC). CIDA
Email:
il mcbt@vnn.vn
Trang web:
www.cecivi etnam.com/ilmc
v VIE/01/023:
fprd.vn@undp.org
Ch 1: Phn cp qun l X
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh t Hi tho
Khuynh hng phn cp l khng th trnh khi v cn thit. Tuy vy, cn phi c mt l
trnh thch hp cho vic phn cp hiu qu trn c s tng bc mt. L trnh ny nn da
trn 4 yu t sau: (i) pht trin mt khun kh php l ton din; (ii) vic chuyn giao
qun l ngn sch v qun l ti chnh nn c tin hnh ng thi vi cc hot ng
khc; (iii) phn cp nn da trn phm vi v quy m u t; v (iv) da trn nng lc
qun l ca x.
Phn cp nn i i vi phn quyn quyt nh v trch nhim hnh chnh, chu s gim
st ca cp qun l cao hn v tng cng gim st v kim tra ca cng ng a
phng. i vi vn ny, cn phi c c mt s cn bng hp l gia trch nhim
gii trnh t trn xung, t di ln v ngang vi cc c ch bo co.
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh
khn cho vic tham gia ca cng ng vo thc hin cc d n phc tp. Thm vo , vic tip
cn kh khn i vi c s h tng, thit b lin lc c bn, kh nng ca chnh quyn a phng
cn hn ch, thi quen ca ngi dn ph thuc vo chnh quyn cng nh hng ng k n
hiu qu ca qu trnh phn cp. Do vy, cc a phng cn gp rt nhiu kh khn c th
a ra cc hng dn hp l cho vic thc hin phn cp.
Bo co ny rt ra mt s bi hc c bn t nhng thnh cng, tht bi ca qu trnh phn cp v
a ra mt s nhng kin ngh c th nh sau:
Bo co ny m u bng vic nhn mnh nhng thch thc trong vic h tr v thc hin hiu
qu loi hp phn ny trn phm vi rng. Cc tiu d n tiu chun c ti tr t Hp phn
Ngn sch pht trin x (CDBC) ca NMPRP bao gm: c s h tng thn, x quy m nh; cc
hot ng h tr sn xut; qun l ti nguyn thin nhin; ci thin iu kin sng cho cc h gia
nh; cc hot ng h tr y t v gio dc. D n NMPRP bao gm 3660 thn thuc 356 x
thuc 44 huyn, vi 89% l dn tc thiu s gm 20 dn tc khc nhau. Cc Ban Pht trin x
ang thc hin CDBC c khong 3789 ngi v nhng ngi ny u c nhu cu c o to.
Cc v tr cn b x thng l kim nhim , mt s v tr thay i thng xuyn dn n tnh trng
thiu nhn vin chuyn trch hng dn cng ng.
Trc tnh hnh ny, m bo s thnh cng ca d n, bo co a ra mt vi kin ngh di
y. Do cc phng php u thu v qun l ti chnh ca CDBC l cc khi nim hon ton mi
i vi cc Ban Pht trin x, v vy cc kha o to v ti o to cp tc trong mt vi chu k
l ht sc cn thit. Vic o to cn kt hp vi vic xy dng mt cch k lng cm nang cho
Hp phn ngn sch pht trin x trong s dng cc mu biu chun gim thiu s phc tp
v trnh gy nhm ln cho cc cn b c s. Cng tc tuyn truyn thng tin v cc cch thc o
to nn c a dng ha c th nng cao nhn thc ca ngi dn, c bit l cc vng cao.
Cn thit phi c nhng hng dn v ch o st sao v c th ca y ban nhn dn ti tt c cc
cp, v s hp tc c hiu qu gia cc c quan huyn. Kinh nghim t NMPRP cho thy ni no
PMUs huyn h tr tt th ni ban pht trin x cng thc hin tt chc nng ca mnh.
Bo co tip theo v Phn cp mua sm v ti a ha li ch kinh t cho a phng
trong cc Chng trnh xa i gim ngho nng thn (Bo co 1.3) m u bng
vic nhn mnh tnh trng nhiu x nng thn hin nay c 2, 3 hoc nhiu hn cc d n/
chng trnh ca Chnh ph, cc nh ti tr hoc cc t chc phi chnh ph hot ng ng thi
vi nhau nhng cc phng php mua sm li khc nhau ng k. Bo co ngh y chnh l
thi im, c hi quan trng nh gi li ton b chin lc v cc phng php mua sm
c s dng trong cc chng trnh v d n phn cp. Mc ch l nhm nng cao hn na vic
hi ha cc th tc ca a phng v s nht qun trong cc phng php mua sm.
Lin quan n vn ny, Bo co nu ra hai cu hi chnh: Th nht, lm th no thit k
c cc chin lc u t v mua sm cng c th thu ht c cc doanh nghip a phng v
cc n v kinh t khc (nh cng ty a phng, cc doanh nghip c quy m nh, hp tc x, cc
nhm thn ngh, h kinh t gia nh v ngi lm ngh th cng) tham gia u thu v thc hin
cc cng vic v dch v cng quy m nh? Hai l, lm th no cc hot ng ny c th gip
to ra cc c hi vic lm di hn tt hn cho ngi dn a phng cc vng ngho? Bo
Hn ch v nng lc ca cc cn b k ton x.
i vi cc cng trnh cng cng c quy m ln khc (nh ng lin x, bnh vin,
trng cp 2), chi ph vn hnh v bo dng nn c chi tr bng cc ngun ngn
sch x c phn b li v/hoc cc ngun ngn sch khu vc.
The training should be practical and based on required skills. It should also be closely
linked to training in related issues such as agriculture extension training and IPM linked
to irrigation schemes, and training on sanitation issues linked to water supply schemes.
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh
Mc trung bnh ca
thnh ph
Mc trung bnh ti x
nng thn
Tng mc ng gp/chi
ph
380,000
530,000
1.39
13,200,000
4,130,000
0.31
% ng gp/thu nhp
3%
12%
4.5
(Thu nhp v ng gp hng nm c tnh bng VN trn mc trung bnh ca cc h gia nh)
Bo co ny cng nhn nhn li mt s m hnh qun l c s h tng x c gii thiu trong mt
vi d n v chng trnh gn y (bao gm ban qun l c s h tng, hip hi ngi s dng
nc, ban kim sot x v.v). ng ch l trong khi nhiu d n khng h tr trc tip cho cng
on hu xy dng, vn hnh v bo dng, cc d n ny li t chc cc kha o to m rng, v
c ku gi s tham gia v qun l ca cng ng vo vic xy dng c s h tng. y l vic lm
ht sc cn thit trong tng lai. Cc m hnh ny c th ci thin cht lng v gim st xy dng,
nng cao quyn lm ch v trch nhim qun l v vn hnh v bo dng cc c s h tng.
Bo co tip theo v T chc v tng cng nng lc cho Hip hi nhng ngi s dng nc
(WUAs) (Ba co 2.2) trnh by 6 nm kinh nghim ca D n Pht trin Nng nghip tnh H
Tnh (HRDP) v lin kt gia cc u t pht trin thy li nh vi cc hot ng pht trin cng
ng. m bo hiu sut v tnh bn vng ca cc cng trnh thy li, Cc hip hi nhng ngi
s dng nc c thnh lp thu ht s tham gia ca ngi nng dn vo qu trnh t vn
hnh v bo dng. D n t chc nhiu kha hc v cc hnh thc h tr khc cho cc Hip hi
nhng ngi s dng nc.
Kt qu l d n c c nhiu thnh tu ng khch l. Cc hip hi nhng ngi s dng nc
c thnh lp cho 43 cng trnh thy li, tng din tch ti tiu cho cc cng trnh ny l
3.780 hc ta, lm li cho 16.879 h gia nh (23.4% l h ngho). Bo co cng nu r rng c mt
s hip hi s dng nc c t chc tt c cc Ban Qun l c nng lc, cc quy nh hot ng
c th v vic phn chia trch nhim v quyn li r rng i vi cc bn c lin quan. Nng lc a
phng cng c nng cao, v ngi s dng cng t nguyn tun th cc quy nh ca Hip hi,
thanh ton y phi v tham gia vo cc hot ng vn hnh v bo dng. Trong cc trng hp
ny, ph s dng c dng mt cch ng n vo cc hot ng qun l v vn hnh v bo
dng cc cng trnh.
Tm tt cc bo co v bi thuyt trnh
Chnh ph Vit Nam lng ghp cc mc tiu nng cao nng lc trong K hoch pht trin
kinh t x hi v cc k hoch pht trin ton quc, vng, tnh, v ngnh c lin quan v
xy dng mt chng trnh nng cao nng lc ton din vi s h tr ca cc nh ti tr.
Chnh ph Vit Nam v cc nh ti tr s dng ngy cng nhiu cc cch tip cn theo
chng trnh.
Cc bo co trong ch ny xem xt nhiu kha cnh khc nhau ca vic huy ng v lng ghp
cc ngun lc khi thc hin chng trnh ti cp x. Bo co 3.1 Lng ghp cc d n khc
thnh cng v lng ghp cc chng trnh v d n ti cp x; v (ii) kin ngh cc bin
php nng cao hiu sut ca a phng trong vic quy nh v qun l cc ngun ti
chnh khc nhau vi mc ch xy dng v thc thin cc chng trnh gim ngho v pht
trin nng thn trong giai on t 2006 n 2010.
Bo co m u bng vic nu ra v d rt nhiu cc sng kin v lng ghp c p dng trn
thc t. V d nh : (i) Kt ni cc chng trnh ca Chnh ph vi k hoch pht trin kinh t x
hi ton din ti cp x (tnh Bn Tre); (ii) Thnh lp cc Ban qun l chung i vi mt s d n
v chng trnh khc nhau ti cp x (tnh Lo Cai); (iii) lng ghp hiu qu mt s cc d n ca
cc t chc phi chnh ph vi cc k hoch pht trin kinh t x hi ngay trong giai on chun b
d n (Action aid ti H Tnh); v (iv) phi hp cc ngun vn khc nhau t cc d n h tr cc x
ngho bao gm Chng trnh 135 ti mt s tnh.
Tuy nhin, phn ln cc n lc lng ghp cho n nay ch yu l i vi cc chng trnh ca
Chnh ph. Vic lng ghp cc d n do cc nh ti tr h tr ti cp x gp nhiu kh khn hn do
mt s l do. Bo co ny nu mt s cc tr ngi chung cn phi c gii quyt, bao gm: (i) cc
chng trnh/d n ca cc nh ti tr/t chc phi chnh ph cn tun th vi chin lc pht trin
v k hoch di hn ca cc a phng; (ii) Cc chng trnh v d n ca Chnh ph, v nh ti
tr hot ng thng qua cc PMU ring l vi cc th tc qun l ti chnh v k hoch khc nhau
to ra nhng kh khn cho a phng trong vic lng ghp ngun vn t cc ngun ti chnh
khc nhau; (iii) Cn phi c cc hng dn c th hn v vic lng ghp cc ngun ti chnh ca
nhiu d n v chng trnh khc nhau v v vic hi ha cc th tc a phng.
Bo co cng nu ra nhng tho lun th v v cc quan im khc nhau lin quan n vn trng
lp. Trng lp thng c nhn nhn mt cch tiu cc - vd. trnh trng lp trong cc hot ng
u t c th dn n tnh trng cc u t manh mn gia cc c quan v ban qun l khc nhau.
Bo co xut khi nim trng lp nn c nhn nhn mt cch tch cc hn bng vic thc
y b tr v phi hp cc ngun lc c c cc tiu d n bn vng v hon chnh hn.
Bo co tip theo (s 3.2) v Lng ghp cc ngun lc trong lp k hoch ti cp x, thn
pht trin nng nghip- Mt thch thc cho chnh quyn a phng v cc d n
trong qu trnh lng ghp (Bo co 3.4) Bo co r sot vn lng ghp cc ngun lc v
phi hp gia cc c quan trong lnh vc khuyn nng v pht trin nng nghip. Bo co ny da
trn cc kinh nghim ca Chng trnh pht trin nng nghip Tha thin Hu (Giai on 2) do
Chnh ph Phn Lan ti tr. Mt lot cc xut tng t c a ra, bao gm:
Cn phi xy dng thm cc mu biu thng nht cho cc K hoch pht trin nng nghip
cng nh cc cm nang o to cho cc cp tnh, huyn v x.
Ch 4: Theo di v nh gi
Cc ni dung chnh v khuyn ngh ca Hi tho
Tm tt cc bo co v thuyt trnh
Nhu cu nng cao nng lc theo di v nh gi (M&E) ca cc chng trnh gim ngho v pht
trin nng thn l ch quan trng c nhn mnh trong nhiu bo co cng nh thuyt trnh ti
Hi tho (mc d ch c mt bo co chuyn v chuyn ny). Nng cao cng tc theo di v
nh gi c coi l mt yu t cn thit trong ton b qu trnh phn cp (ch 1), lng ghp
thnh cng v hi ha th tc cc d n v chng trnh khc nhau cng hot ng nhm t
c mc tiu v mc ch pht trin nu trong K hoch Pht trin Kinh t X hi ca cc a
phng khc nhau (ch 3).
Bo co 1.1 (v qun l phn cp u t c s h tng ti cp x) cho rng phn cp khng c ngha
l vic chuyn giao quyn v trch nhim qun l u t cho cc x m khng cn c s gim st.
Nu phn cp c tin hnh m khng km theo gim st cht ch th c th dn n tham nhng,
thc hin lch trng tm v d dn n tht bi. Gim st v hng dn thng xuyn ca cp trn
s gip cng c vai tr qun l v trch nhim ca cc cp chnh quyn cng nh gip tng cng
hiu qu ca qu trnh phn cp.
Bo co 1.3 (v phn cp mua sm) nhn mnh vic chuyn hng cho cc a phng qun l u
t v nu ln mt s vn quan trng nh lm th no xy dng cc c ch hiu qu c th
m bo tnh minh bch, gim st v trch nhim gii trnh. Bo co ny kin ngh phi c c s
cn bng hp l v thc t gia h thng bo co t trn xung, ngang v t di ln v c
ch gii trnh nh trn s sau:
C ch gii trnh t di ln, bao gm:
Cp trn nh gi v ph duyt cc k hoch hnh ng/hng nm;
Ph duyt tiu d n, gii ngn v cc th tc quyt ton;
Cc yu cu v th tc k ton v bo co ti chnh thng xuyn;
Cp trn gim st k thut;
Yu t bn ngoi/ kim ton c lp (ti sn v ti chnh)
C ch gii trnh theo chiu ngang:
Hi ng nhn dn nghin cu v ph duyt k hoch x;
Gii thiu cc yu t cnh tranh vo th tc u thu x;
Gim st cng ng (v d nh thng qua Ban Kim sot X)
Cc hot ng nh gi chung v kim tra cho (gia cc x).
C ch gii trnh t trn xung, bao gm:
Cc cuc hp nh gi v lp k hoch thn x hng nm;
Cung cp thng tin thng xuyn v k hoch, ngn sch v chi tiu;
Cam kt ca ngi dn a phng v Ban Kim sot X;
Kho st kin cng chng (thc hin trn c s nh k)
Cc yu cu bo co t di ln c khuynh hng tng thm gnh nng cho hu ht cc chng
trnh v d n hin ti. V d, cc chnh quyn x thng xuyn cho rng cc yu cu v quyt ton
v bo co ti chnh thng nng v phc tp i vi cc hot ng quy m nh v tiu d n do
cc x qun l (c bit khi tnh n khong cch v thi gian phi i li gia cc x v trung tm
huyn xa xi ho lnh).
Kinh nghim cho thy, nu vic cung cp thng tin cho ngi dn a phng v k hoch, ngn
sch v chi tiu c tun th mt cch cht ch v hiu qu, th ngi dn a phng c th v s
thc hin chc nng gim st ti chnh ca mnh, gip cn bng v gim thiu cc i hi phi bo
Ngi (Bo co 4.1) trnh by h thng M&E c gii thiu trong RUDEP ti Tnh Qung
Ngi. H thng ny bao gm 3 tiu hp phn:
H thng thng tin qun l (MIS) c cc PMUs s dng thu thp, lu tr v phn tch
s liu h tr qun l v bo co cc hot ng ca chng trnh.
Ti cp tnh, y ban Nhn dn Tnh nn i u trong vic huy ng cc ngun lc cho cc Trng
o to tnh thc hin cc chng trnh nng cao nng lc, u tin phn b ngn sch cho cc khu
vc min ni xa xi, ho lnh.
C ch qun l:
y ban Nhn dn tnh nn to iu kin h tr thit lp mi quan h gia cc trng i hc quc gia,
cc vin nghin cu v cc trng o to tnh gip tng cng nng lc o to cng nh cc
chng trnh hc v ti liu ging dy.
Cn t chc kha o to tp trung cho cc Trng Thn bn v cc k nng pht trin cng ng
h tr s tham gia ca ngi dn thn bn.
Cn cng c i ng cc gio vin chuyn nghip, tng cng nng lc ca cc gio vin v 3 kha
cnh: kin thc, k nng v thi . Cng cn phi ci thin c s h tng v ngun lc cho cc
trng o to tnh.
Cn phi thng xuyn cp nhn cc chng trnh hc v cc ti liu ging dy sao cho thc t v
ph hp vi cc cn b c s trong qu trnh pht trin nng thn phn cp. Ni dung ca pht trin
nng thn phn cp, cc kin thc v k nng pht trin cng ng cn c lng ghp vo trong cc
chng trnh o to ca cc trng o to cp tnh.
Tm tt cc bo co v thuyt trnh
ra mt cch tip cn c h thng ca Chng trnh Pht trin Nng thn Qung Ngi v
o to cho cn b huyn, x. Bo co nh ngha o to da trn nng lc l mt h thng
8/2004
p/p
rog/profile/e
khng
C (khng
xut bn)
Ti liu, bo co
v gim ngho giai on
200616.2010
Bo co nh gi kt
thc d
n (ti liu hi ngh nh
gi kt
Cp tnh
(d n PTNT H Tnh)
17. S tay qun l thu
nng c
s liu tp hun Ph
18. Ti
ng
php lp k hoch
pht
tham
19. H
ngtrin
dn cng
quy trnh
thc
hin phn cp cc
cng trnh XDCB d
n HRDP (Ban hnh theo
Quyt nh s
20. Quy
ch hot ng ca
hi
ng i s dng n c (Ban
hnh km Quyt nh
s 48/2005/Q/UB-NL
ngy 08/6/2005 ca
Tc gi
Thi gian
pht hnh
Xut bn
Ting Anh Ting Vit
D n VIE/01/023
1/2006
C (khng C (khng
xut bn) xut bn)
D n PTNT H Tnh
9/2005
06/2005
Khng
Khng
C
C (khng
xut bn)
C (khng
xut bn)
Khng