You are on page 1of 6

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 34329

(h) If the wings or wing spars were Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by analyses of the wings of these airplanes,
replaced with new or used wings or wing Reference? recent cracks found on similar design
spars during the life of the airplane and (m) You must do the actions required by Model 402C airplanes, and the FAA’s
logbook records cannot positively show the this AD following the instructions in Cessna determination that repetitive
TIS of the wings or wing, then inspect and Multi-Engine Service Bulletin MEB02–5, inspections and a wing spar
modify within 400 hours TIS after June 22, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2004, and modification are necessary to address
2005 (the effective date of this AD), unless Service Kit SK402–47B, dated August 2, the unsafe condition. Consequently, this
already done. 2003. The Director of the Federal Register
(i) For all Cessna Models 402C and 414A approved the incorporation by reference of
AD would require repetitive inspections
airplanes with Cessna Service Kit SK402–47, this service bulletin in accordance with 5 and a spar strap modification on each
SK402–47A, or SK402–47B incorporated, U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To get a wing. The actions specified by this AD
inspect and repair or replace as necessary copy of this service information, contact are intended to prevent wing spar cap
prior to further flight after the inspection Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, failure caused by undetected fatigue
where cracks are found. Inspect following the P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277; cracks. Such failure could result in loss
procedures in Cessna Model 402C and 414A telephone: (316) 517–5800; facsimile: (316) of a wing with consequent loss of
Supplemental Inspection Document (SID), 942–9006. To review copies of this service airplane control. FAA is also issuing AD
Inspection ID 57–10–16 (compliance times in information, go to the National Archives and 2005–12–13 to require the spar strap
this AD take precedence over the compliance Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
modification and long-term inspections
times in the SID): Initially upon on Models 402C and 414A airplanes.
material at NARA, go to: http://www.
accumulating 12,500 hours TIS after
archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_ DATES: This AD becomes effective on
incorporating the applicable service kit on a federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html or call
wing spar or within the next 100 hours TIS June 22, 2005.
(202) 741–6030. To view the AD docket, go
after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of this to the Docket Management Facility; U.S. As of June 22, 2005, the Director of
AD), whichever occurs later, unless already Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh the Federal Register approved the
done, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, incorporation by reference of certain
500 hours TIS. You may request an Washington, DC 20590–001 or on the Internet publications listed in the regulation.
alternative method of compliance to adjust at http://dms.dot.gov. The docket number is We must receive any comments on
the compliance times for these inspections by FAA–05–21177; Directorate Identifier 2005– this AD by August 3, 2005.
following the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19 CE–26–AD.
and this AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 7,
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to
(j) Wing Spar Replacement if Cracks Found 2005. submit comments on this AD:
During any Inspection Required by this AD: • DOT Docket Web site: Go to
Prior to further flight, replace the wing spar Kim Smith,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
with a new wing spar or a used wing spar
Aircraft Certification Service. instructions for sending your comments
where wing or wing spar hours TIS can be
[FR Doc. 05–11613 Filed 6–13–05; 8:45 am] electronically.
positively identified. Do not install used
wings spars when you are not able to BILLING CODE 4910–13–U • Government-wide rulemaking web
positively identify total wing or wing spar site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
hours TIS. and follow the instructions for sending
(k) Reporting Requirement: Report any DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION your comments electronically.
cracks you find within 10 days after the • Mail: Docket Management Facility;
cracks are found or within 10 days after June Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
22, 2005 (the effective date of this AD), Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
whichever occurs later. Do not report if no 14 CFR Part 39 Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
cracks are found. Include in your report the
[Docket No. FAA–05–21176; Directorate 001.
aircraft serial number, aircraft TIS, wing spar
cap TIS, crack location and size, corrective Identifier 2005–CE–25–AD; Amendment 39– • Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
14128; AD 2005–12–12]
action taken, and a point of contact name and • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
phone number. Send your report to Paul RIN 2120–AA64 the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, ACE– 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
118W, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, Airworthiness Directives; Cessna DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
1801 Airport Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Aircraft Company Models 401, 401A, through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946– 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, and 411A
4125; facsimile: (316) 946–4107.
To get the service information
Airplanes identified in this AD, contact Cessna
May I Request an Alternative Method of AGENCY: Federal Aviation Aircraft Company, Product Support,
Compliance? P.O. Box 7706, Wichita, Kansas 67277;
Administration (FAA), DOT.
(l) You may request a different method of ACTION: Final rule; request for telephone: (316) 517–5800; facsimile:
compliance or a different compliance time comments. (316) 942–9006.
for this AD by following the procedures in 14 To view the comments to this AD, go
CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new to http://dms.dot.gov. The docket
send your request to your principal airworthiness directive (AD) to number is FAA–05–21176; Directorate
inspector. The principal inspector may add supersede AD 79–10–15, which applies
comments and will send your request to the Identifier 2005–CE–25–AD.
to all Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna)
Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification
Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Office, FAA. For information on any already Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
approved alternative methods of compliance,
402B, 411, and 411A airplanes. AD 79–
10–15 currently requires repetitive ACE–118W, Wichita Aircraft
contact Paul Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer, Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road,
FAA, ACE–118W, Wichita Aircraft inspections of the right and left wing
spar lower cap areas for fatigue cracks Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas
Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-
and requires wing spar cap repair or 67209; telephone: (316) 946–4125;
Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209;
replacement as necessary. This AD is facsimile: (316) 946–4107.
telephone: (316) 946–4125; facsimile: (316)
946–4107. the result of fatigue and crack growth SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1
34330 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

What Events Have Caused This AD? —A flight strain survey to develop stress Repetitively inspect the wing spar
spectra used in the analyses. caps and straps for fatigue cracks and
Initial AD Action
The inspections required by AD 79– repair or replace the wing spar caps
Reports of fatigue cracks of the wing 10–15 following Cessna Service Bulletin and straps as necessary.
spar lower cap areas caused FAA to ME79–16, Revision 3, use a • Docket No. 2002–CE–57–AD:
issue AD 79–10–15, Amendment 39– nondestructive inspection (NDI) surface applied to Cessna Models 402C and
3711 against Cessna Models 401, 401A, eddy current method. 414A airplanes and proposed to
401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, and 411A Based on the analysis, Cessna found supersede AD 2000–23–01 with a new
airplanes. AD 79–10–15 currently that the eddy current method will not AD that would require you to:
requires repetitive inspections of the find the crack until it is .03 inch longer
right and left wing spar lower cap areas ✓ Inspect the wing spar caps for fatigue
than the critical crack length. When the cracks;
for fatigue cracks and wing spar cap crack reaches the critical length, it is not ✓ Repair or replace the wing spar caps
repair or replacement as necessary. reliably detectable because it is under
Accomplishment of the actions as necessary; and
the head of the fastener. Once the main ✓ Incorporate a spar strap modification
mandated by AD 79–10–15 currently spar cap is severed, the remaining
requires following Cessna Service on each wing spar.
structure will no longer meet the
Bulletin ME79–16, Revision 3, dated The FAA invited interested persons to
residual strength requirements. Wing
February 8, 1980. separation could then occur under participate in the development of these
AD 79–10–15 allows for the loading conditions less than those amendments during the original 75-day
incorporation of Cessna Service Kit established for the design limit load. comment periods. We extended the
SK402–36 or SK411–56 on the front Cessna reported only one instance comment periods for another 30 days
wing spar lower cap as terminating where use of the NDI eddy current and then reopened the comment periods
action for the repetitive inspections on procedure detected cracks. There are for another 60 days. We received
the applicable wing. other reported instances where cracks numerous comments on the NPRMs.
In addition to AD 79–10–15, FAA were detected visually on the aft flange In addition, FAA held two public
issued AD 99–11–13 (64 FR 29781, June in the wheel well area. The access meetings: One on March 3 and 4, 2004,
3, 1999), requiring inspections of the doubler flanges cover a large percentage in Herndon, Virginia, and another on
forward, aft, and auxiliary wing spars of the forward spar flange, hampering August 18, 2004, in Kansas City,
for cracks on Cessna Models 402C the effectiveness of visual inspections. Missouri. The public meetings allowed
airplanes with repair or replacement as To meet industry NDI standards, an open flow of communication among
necessary. AD 99–11–13 also required cracks need to be found on Cessna FAA, the public, and industry on issues
the operator to report the results of the Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, related to the NPRMs.
inspections to FAA. AD 99–11–13 402B, 411, and 411A airplanes through After analyzing all information related
resulted from an accident where the NDI inspection methods with a 90- to this subject, FAA decided not to issue
right wing of a Cessna 402C failed just percent probability of detection at a 95- the ADs as proposed, and that the best
inboard of the nacelle at Wing Station percent confidence level. way to address the unsafe condition is
(WS) 87. Investigation revealed fatigue Cessna’s analysis indicates the for FAA, the public, and industry to
cracking of the forward main spar that probability and confidence levels are develop alternative solutions to address
initiated at the edge of the front spar not being met. The FAA concurs. the unsafe condition.
forward lower spar cap. FAA Therefore, FAA withdrew the two
Action Based on Cessna’s Analysis NPRMs and gathered the necessary
determined the spar cap cracking could
continue to develop over the life of the We issued proposals to amend part 39 information to address the situation.
affected airplanes and issued AD 2000– of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 That information led to FAA’s
23–01, Amendment 39–11971 (65 FR CFR part 39) to include two ADs that determination, at that time, to initiate
70645, November 27, 2000), to require would apply to Cessna Models 401, AD action against the Models 401,
repetitive inspections of the forward, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 402C, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, and
aft, and auxiliary wing spars for cracks 411, 411A, and 414A airplanes. The 411A airplanes; and not against the
on Cessna Models 402C airplanes with proposals (Docket Nos. 2002–CE–05–AD Models 402C and 414A airplanes. The
repair or replacement as necessary. The and 2002–CE–57–AD) published in the plan was to address the action through
Model 402C airplanes have a similar Federal Register as notices of proposed the regular rulemaking process with a
type design to that of the Models 401, rulemaking (NPRMs) on May 15, 2003 notice of proposed rulemaking.
401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, (68 FR 26239 and 68 FR 26244). The
NPRMs proposed the following: Most Recent Service History
411A, and 414A airplanes.
• Docket No. 2002–CE–05–AD: In 2005, the FAA received reports of
Wing Analysis applied to Cessna Models 401, 401A, (and analyzed data from) cracks found
Cessna analyzed the wing, including 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, and 411A in the wings of two Cessna Model 402C
fatigue and crack growth analyses, on airplanes and proposed to supersede AD airplanes. The Model 402C airplanes
the affected airplanes. Analysis 79–10–15 with a new AD that would have a similar type design to that of the
included: require one of the following (depending Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A,
—A determination of the probable on the aircraft configuration): 402B, 411, 411A, and 414A airplanes.
location and modes of damage based ✓ For airplanes that do not incorporate On the first airplane, information
on analytical results, available test one of the specified Cessna Service indicated the airplane had severe
data, and service information; Kits: Repetitively inspect the wing cracking on its left wing in the vicinity
—Classical fatigue analyses; spar caps for fatigue cracks and repair of the forward spar and outboard engine
—Crack growth and residual strength or replace the wing spar caps as beam. The main lower spar cap had
analyses including use of linear necessary and incorporate a spar strap completely failed at about WS 114. The
elastic fracture mechanics methods; modification on each wing spar; or airplane had cracks in the lower wing
—Full-scale ground testing to validate ✓ For airplanes that incorporate one of skin and the web splice doubler. Also
analytical models; and the specified Cessna Service Kits: found were two popped rivets: One

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 34331

between the heat shield and the wing These inspection techniques allow for What does this AD require? This AD
skin and another between the factory longer intervals between repetitive supersedes AD 79–10–15 with a new
installed web splice doublers and web. inspections than in emergency AD AD that incorporates the actions in the
The airplane had 20,355 total hours 2005–05–51. Based on this, FAA issued previously referenced service bulletins.
time-in-service (TIS). AD 2005–05–52, Amendment 39–14022 Why do the compliance times of this
During the airplane’s most recent (70 FR 13362, dated March 21, 2005). AD range between 100 hours TIS and
flights before the cracking was found, The inspection techniques addressed by 800 hours TIS? We have established the
the pilot noticed that roll trim was AD 2005–05–52 for the Cessna Models compliance times based on risk analysis
required. The flights required the pilot 402C and 414A airplanes are similar to that also allows for compliance
to use aileron trim to maintain level those required by AD 79–10–15 for the scheduling. Some of these airplanes
flight. The airplane landed safely and Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, utilize ‘‘for hire’’ operations and could
inspection revealed the cracks. 402B, 411, and 411A airplanes. accumulate as many as 200 hours TIS in
On the second airplane, fatigue cracks However, based on the analysis and a month. The compliance time range is
were found at about WS 114 in the main recent service history, the FAA has based on total hours TIS, which will
lower spar cap of another Model 402C determined that the long-term address those high-usage airplanes first.
airplane that had over 20,000 total hours operational safety of the Cessna We are issuing this AD as a final rule;
TIS. Fatigue analysis shows that similar airplanes addressed by both AD 2005– request for comments instead of a notice
fatigue cracks could also develop in the 05–52 and AD 79–10–15 can only be of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). We
wings of the Model 414A airplanes. assured through the incorporation of a have evaluated comments from the
Logbook records indicated that both spar strap modification and long-term previous AD actions on this subject and
airplanes with cracked spars were in repetitive inspections. Since Models the two public meetings as well as the
compliance with AD 2000–23–01. The 402, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, incidents that have occurred since (e.g.,
FAA received a third report of another and 411A have a similar type design to the actions of Emergency AD 2005–05–
cracked spar found at WS 114 on one of that of Models 402C and 414A 52). Based on this, FAA has determined
the two Model 402C incident airplanes. airplanes, FAA is also issuing AD 2005– that addressing the unsafe condition
Therefore, FAA issued Emergency AD 12–13 to require the spar strap with public comment prior to issuing
2005–05–51 to detect and correct modification and long-term inspections this AD action is impracticable. The
cracking in the wing spars of the Cessna on those airplanes. FAA will evaluate any new comments
Models 402C and 414A airplanes before What is the potential impact if FAA received and amend the AD as
the cracks could grow to failure. Such took no action? Wing spar cap failure necessary.
a wing failure could result in the wing How does the revision to 14 CFR part
caused by undetected fatigue cracks
separating from the airplane with 39 affect this AD? On July 10, 2002, we
could result in loss of a wing with
consequent loss of control of the published a new version of 14 CFR part
consequent loss of airplane control.
airplane. 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which
Is there service information that
Emergency AD 2005–05–51 governs FAA’s AD system. This
applies to this subject? Cessna has
superseded AD 2000–23–01 and: regulation now includes material that
issued the following:
• Required the visual inspections of relates to altered products, special flight
—Original issue dated September 24, permits, and alternative methods of
the forward, aft, and auxiliary wing
2001, and Revision 1, dated December compliance. This material previously
spars for cracks more frequently on
22, 2003, of both Cessna Multi-engine was included in each individual AD.
Model 402C airplanes including special
Service Bulletin MEB01–06 and Since this material is included in 14
emphasis areas;
• Added inspection requirements for Service Kit SK402–46A; and CFR part 39, we will not include it in
the Model 414A airplanes; and —Original issue dated September 24, future AD actions.
• Included provisions to position the 2001, of both Cessna Multi-engine
Service Bulletin MEB01–07 and Comments Invited
airplane to a home base, hangar,
maintenance facility, etc. Service Kit SK411–59. Will I have the opportunity to
Emergency AD 2005–05–51 did not This service information includes comment before you issue the rule? This
affect those airplanes that incorporated procedures for inspecting lower wing AD is a final rule that involves
a spar strap modification on each wing spar caps and incorporating a spar strap requirements affecting flight safety and
following the original release of (or a modification. was not preceded by notice and an
later FAA-approved revision to) Cessna opportunity for public comment;
FAA’s Determination and Requirements however, we invite you to submit any
Service Bulletin MEB02–5 and Cessna of the AD
Service Kit SK402–47 (currently at written relevant data, views, or
MEB02–5 Revision 2 and SK402–47B). What has FAA decided? We have arguments regarding this AD. Send your
evaluated all pertinent information and comments to an address listed under
Long-Term Continued Operational identified an unsafe condition that is ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
Safety likely to exist or develop on other 05–21176; Directorate Identifier 2005–
Emergency AD 2005–05–51 was products of this same type design. CE–25–AD’’ in the subject line of your
considered an interim action to Since the unsafe condition described comments. If you want us to
immediately require visual inspection of previously is likely to exist or develop acknowledge receipt of your mailed
the forward, aft, and auxiliary wing on other Cessna Aircraft Company comments, send us a self-addressed,
spars for cracks. The intent was to Models 401, 401A, 401B, 402, 402A, stamped postcard with the docket
immediately detect existing cracking 402B, 411, and 411A airplanes of the number written on it; we will date-
before it grew to wing failure. same type design, we are issuing this stamp your postcard and mail it back to
Cessna developed inspection AD to detect and correct wing spar cap you. We specifically invite comments
techniques (eddy current) for the failure caused by undetected fatigue on the overall regulatory, economic,
forward spar that are more effective at cracks. Such failure could result in loss environmental, and energy aspects of
detecting cracks before the structural of a wing with consequent loss of the rule that might suggest a need to
integrity of the wing is compromised. airplane control. modify it. If a person contacts us

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1
34332 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

through a nonwritten communication, responsibilities among the various § 39.13 [Amended]


and that contact relates to a substantive levels of government. ■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
part of this AD, we will summarize the Will this AD involve a significant rule
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
contact and place the summary in the or regulatory action? For the reasons
79–10–15, Amendment 39–3711, and by
docket. We will consider all comments discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory adding a new AD to read as follows:
received by the closing date and may
amend the AD in light of those action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2005–12–12 Cessna Aircraft Company:
comments. 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the Amendment 39–14128; Docket No.
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures FAA–05–21176; Directorate Identifier
Authority for This Rulemaking (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 2005–CE–25–AD.
What authority does FAA have for 3. Will not have a significant When Does This AD Become Effective?
issuing this rulemaking action? Title 49 economic impact, positive or negative, (a) This AD becomes effective on June 22,
of the United States Code specifies the on a substantial number of small entities 2005.
FAA’s authority to issue rules on under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. Are Any Other ADs Affected by This Action?
aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106
We prepared a summary of the costs (b) Yes. This AD supersedes AD 79–10–15;
describes the authority of the FAA
to comply with this AD (and other Amendment 39–3711.
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the information as included in the What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
scope of the agency’s authority. Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in (c) This AD affects Models 401, 401A,
the AD Docket. You may get a copy of 401B, 402, 402A, 402B, 411, and 411A, all
We are issuing this rulemaking under
this summary by sending a request to us serial numbers, that are certificated in any
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
at the address listed under ADDRESSES. category.
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
Include ‘‘AD Docket FAA–05–21176;
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in
Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–25–AD’’
section, Congress charges the FAA with This AD?
in your request.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in (d) This AD is the result of fatigue cracks
air commerce by prescribing regulations List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 found in the lower wing spar caps. We are
for practices, methods, and procedures Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation issuing this AD to prevent wing spar cap
the Administrator finds necessary for failure caused by undetected fatigue cracks.
safety, Incorporation by reference, Such failure could result in loss of a wing
safety in air commerce. This regulation Safety.
is within the scope of that authority with consequent loss of airplane control.
because it addresses an unsafe condition Adoption of the Amendment What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
that is likely to exist or develop on ■ Accordingly, under the authority (e) Repetitive Inspection and Modification
products identified in this AD. delegated to me by the Administrator, of the Wing Spars:
the Federal Aviation Administration (1) For Cessna Models 411 and 411A
Regulatory Findings airplanes that do not incorporate Cessna
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Service Kit SK411–56, SK411–56A, SK411–
Will this AD impact various entities? Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
We have determined that this AD will 56B, or SK411–59, maintain the repetitive
not have federalism implications under inspections required by AD 79–10–15,
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Amendment 39–3711, and do the actions
Executive Order 13132. This AD will DIRECTIVES below. You may terminate the repetitive
not have a substantial direct effect on inspections of AD 79–10–15 after you
the States, on the relationship between ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
incorporate the modification using the
the national government and the States, continues to read as follows: service information in paragraph (h)(2) of this
or on the distribution of power and Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. AD:

Then initially inspect and modify using the service infor-


If you have equal to or more than— But less than— mation in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD, and reinspect as
specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this AD

(i) 18,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) on the wing or Not applicable .................... Within 1000 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effec-
wing spar. tive date of this AD), unless already done.
(ii) 12,00 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar .................. 18,000 hours TIS ............... Within 200 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(iii) 10,000 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ............... 12,000 hours TIS ............... Within 400 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(iv) 5,500 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ................. 10,000 hours TIS ............... Within 800 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(v) 0 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ......................... 5,500 hours TIS ................. At whichever of the following occurs later:
• Upon accumulating 5,500 hours TIS on the wing or
wing spar; or
• Within 800 TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.

(vi) If the wings or wing spars were wing spar times in paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and modify within 100 hours TIS after June
replaced with new or used wings or wing through (e)(1)(v) of this AD. 22, 2005 (the effective date of this AD),
spars during the life of the airplane and (vii) If the wings or wing spars were unless already done.
logbook records positively show the TIS of replaced with new or used wings or wing (2) For Cessna Models 401, 401A, 401B,
the wings or wing spars, then initially spars during the life of the airplane and 402, 402A, and 402B airplanes that do not
inspect and modify at applicable wing or logbook records cannot positively show the incorporate Cessna Service Kit SK402–36,
TIS of the wings or wing spars, then inspect SK402–36A, SK402–36B, SK402–36C,

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 34333

SK402–46, or SK402–46A, maintain the below. You may terminate the repetitive service information in paragraph (h)(1) of this
repetitive inspections required by AD 79–10– inspections of AD 79–10–15 after you AD:
15, Amendment 39–3711, and do the actions incorporate the modification using the

Then initially inspect and modify using the service infor-


If you have equal to or more than— But less than— mation in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, and reinspect as
specified in paragraph (e)(4) of this AD

(i) 18,000 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ................. Not applicable .................... Within 100 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(ii) 12,000 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ................ 18,000 hours TIS ............... Within 200 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(iii) 10,000 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ............... 12,000 hours TIS ............... Within 400 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(iv) 6,500 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ................. 10,000 hours TIS ............... Within 800 hours TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.
(v) 0 hours TIS on the wing or wing spar ......................... 6,500 hours TIS ................. At whichever of the following occurs later:
• Upon accumulating 6,500 hours TIS on the wing or
wing spar; or
• Within 800 TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective
date of this AD), unless already done.

(vi) If the wings or wing spars were 36B, SK402–36C, SK402–46, or SK402–46A (g) Reporting Requirement: Report any
replaced with new or used wings or wing incorporated, inspect in the following areas cracks you find within 10 days after the
spars during the life of the airplane and and repair or replace as necessary prior to cracks are found or within 10 days after June
logbook records positively show the TIS of further flight after the inspection where 22, 2005 (the effective date of this AD),
the wings or wing spars, then initially cracks are found. Inspection areas and whichever occurs later. Do not report if no
inspect and modify at applicable wing or procedures are defined in the Cessna Models cracks are found. Include in your report the
wing spar times in paragraphs (e)(2)(i) 401and 402 SID (compliance times in this AD aircraft serial number, aircraft TIS, wing spar
through (e)(2)(v) of this AD. take precedence over the compliance times in cap TIS, crack location and size, corrective
(vii) If the wings or wing spars were the SID): action taken, and a point of contact name and
replaced with new or used wings or wing (i) Area ‘‘A’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–11): phone number. Send your report to Paul
spars during the life of the airplane and Initially upon accumulating 15,000 hours TIS Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, ACE–
logbook records cannot positively show the after incorporating the applicable service kit 118W, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office,
TIS of the wings or wing spars, then inspect on a wing spar or within the next 100 hours 1801 Airport Road, Mid-Continent Airport,
and modify within 100 hours TIS after June TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946–
22, 2005 (the effective date of this AD), this AD), whichever occurs later, unless 4125; facsimile: (316) 946–4107.
unless already done. already done, and thereafter at intervals not (h) Service Information to Perform the
(3) For all Cessna Models 411 and 411A to exceed 5,000 hours TIS. Actions of this AD:
airplanes with Cessna Service Kit SK411–56, (ii) Area ‘‘B’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–12): (1) Original issue dated September 24,
SK411–56A, SK411–56B, or SK411–59 Initially upon accumulating 7,500 hours TIS 2001, and Revision 1, dated December 22,
incorporated, inspect in the following areas after incorporating the applicable service kit 2003, of both Cessna Multi-engine Service
and repair or replace as necessary prior to on a wing spar or within the next 100 hours Bulletin MEB01–06 and Service Kit SK402–
further flight after the inspection where TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of 46A; and
cracks are found. Inspection areas and this AD), whichever occurs later, unless (2) Original issue dated September 24,
procedures are defined in the Cessna Model already done, and thereafter not to exceed 2001, of both Cessna Multi-engine Service
411 Supplemental Inspection Document 5,000 hours TIS. You may request an Bulletin MEB01–07 and Service Kit SK411–
(SID): alternative method of compliance to adjust 59.
(i) Area ‘‘A’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–11): the compliance times for these inspections by
Initially upon accumulating 5,500 hours TIS following the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19 May I Request an Alternative Method of
after incorporating the applicable service kit and this AD. Compliance?
on a wing spar or within the next 100 hours (iii) Area ‘‘C’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–08): (i) You may request a different method of
TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of Upon accumulating 20,000 hours TIS after compliance or a different compliance time
this AD), whichever occurs later, unless incorporating the applicable service kit on a for this AD by following the procedures in 14
already done, and thereafter at intervals not wing spar or within the next 100 hours TIS CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise,
to exceed 2,500 hours TIS. after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of this send your request to your principal
(ii) Area ‘‘B’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–12): AD), whichever occurs later, unless already inspector. The principal inspector may add
Initially upon accumulating 5,500 hours TIS done, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed comments and will send your request to the
after incorporating the applicable service kit 2,500 hours TIS. Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification
on a wing spar or within the next 100 hours (f) Wing Spar Replacement if Cracks Found Office, FAA. For information on any already
TIS after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of During any Inspection Required by this AD: approved alternative methods of compliance,
this AD), whichever occurs later, unless (1) Prior to further flight, replace the wing contact Paul Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
already done, and thereafter at intervals not spar with a new wing spar or a used wing FAA, ACE–118W, Wichita Aircraft
to exceed 1,000 hours TIS. spar where wing or wing spar hours TIS can Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-
(iii) Area ‘‘C’’ (Inspection ID 57–10–08): be positively identified. Do not install used Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209;
Upon accumulating 20,000 hours TIS after wings spars when you are not able to telephone: (316) 946–4125; facsimile: (316)
incorporating the applicable service kit on a positively identify total wing or wing spar 946–4107.
wing spar or within the next 100 hours TIS hours TIS.
after June 22, 2005 (the effective date of this (2) After replacement, initially inspect at Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by
AD), whichever occurs later, unless already the applicable time in paragraphs (e)(1)(i) Reference?
done, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed through (e)(1)(vii) or (e)(2)(i) through (j) You must do the actions required by this
2,000 hours TIS. (e)(2)(vii) of this AD and repetitively inspect AD following the instructions in Cessna
(4) For all Cessna Models 401, 401A, 401B, at the times specified in paragraphs (e)(3)(i) Multi-Engine Service Bulletin MEB01–6 and
402, 402A, and 402B airplanes with Cessna through (e)(3)(iii) or (e)(4)(i) through Service Kit SK402–46, both dated September
Service Kit SK402–36, SK402–36A, SK402– (e)(4)(iii) of this AD. 24, 2001; Cessna Multi-Engine Service

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1
34334 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

Bulletin MEB01–6, Revision 1 and Service DATES: Effective June 29, 2005. The Relevant Service Information
Kit SK402–46A, both dated December 22, Director of the Federal Register
2003; and Cessna Multi-Engine Service We have reviewed and approved the
approved the incorporation by reference technical contents of Turbomeca
Bulletin MEB01–7 and Service Kit SK411–59, of certain publications listed in the
both dated September 24, 2001. The Director Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No.
of the Federal Register approved the
regulations as of June 29, 2005. 319 73 2080, Update No. 1, MSB No.
incorporation by reference of this service We must receive any comments on 319 73 2081, Update No. 1, MSB No.
bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) this AD by August 15, 2005. 319 73 2082, Update No. 1, and MSB
and 1 CFR part 51. To get a copy of this No. 319 73 2090, all dated February 13,
service information, contact Cessna Aircraft ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this AD. 2004. These MSBs describe procedures
Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706, for upgrading the engine control system
Wichita, Kansas 67277; telephone: (316) 517– • DOT Docket Web site: Go to software. This upgrade is applied by
5800; facsimile: (316) 942–9006. To review http://dms.dot.gov and follow the
copies of this service information, go to the either replacing the EECU or by
instructions for sending your comments uploading the software. This upgrade
National Archives and Records
electronically. improves the engine control system’s
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, go • Government-wide rulemaking web ability to detect loss of pitch tolerances,
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and ability to tolerate the loss of steps
code_of_federal_regulations/ and follow the instructions for sending on the fuel metering valve actuator. The
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To your comments electronically. DGAC classified these MSBs as
view the AD docket, go to the Docket mandatory and issued airworthiness
Management Facility; U.S. Department of
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 directive F–2004–017 R1, dated March
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 3, 2004, in order to ensure the
Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,
DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at http:// Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590– airworthiness of these Turbomeca
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–05– 0001. turboshaft engines in France.
21176; Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–25– • Fax: (202) 493–2251. Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement
AD.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on These engine models are
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 7, the plaza level of the Nassif Building, manufactured in France and are type
2005.
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, certificated for operation in the United
Kim Smith, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday States under the provisions of section
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, through Friday, except Federal holidays. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation
Aircraft Certification Service. Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
Contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220
[FR Doc. 05–11612 Filed 6–13–05; 8:45 am] applicable bilateral airworthiness
Tarnos, France; telephone 33 05 59 74
BILLING CODE 4910–13–U
40 00, fax 33 05 59 74 45 15, for the agreement. Under this bilateral
service information identified in this airworthiness agreement, the DGAC
AD. kept the FAA informed of the situation
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION described above. We have examined the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: findings of the DGAC, reviewed all
Federal Aviation Administration Christopher Spinney, Aerospace available information, and determined
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, that AD action is necessary for products
14 CFR Part 39 FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, of this type design that are certificated
[Docket No. FAA–2005–21443; Directorate
12 New England Executive Park, for operation in the United States.
Identifier 2005–NE–08–AD; Amendment 39– Burlington, MA 01803–5299; telephone
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
14124; AD 2005–12–08] (781) 238–7175; fax (781) 238–7199.
of This AD
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The The unsafe condition described
RIN 2120–AA64 Direction Generale de L’Aviation Civile previously is likely to exist or develop
(DGAC), which is the airworthiness on other Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2 B1, 2
Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca
authority for France, notified us that an B1A, 2 B1A–1, and 2 B2 turboshaft
S.A. Arrius 2 B1, 2 B1A, 2 B1A–1, and
unsafe condition may exist on engines of the same type design. We are
2 B2 Turboshaft Engines
Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2 B1, 2 B1A, 2 issuing this AD to prevent simultaneous
AGENCY: Federal Aviation B1A–1, and 2 B2 turboshaft engines. loss of automatic control of both engines
Administration (FAA), DOT. The DGAC advises that a case of and subsequent loss of control of the
ACTION: Final rule; request for simultaneous loss of automatic control helicopter. This AD requires within 90
comments. of the two Arrius 2 B1 engines occurred days after the effective date of the AD,
during a flight, on a Eurocopter simultaneously, on both engines of the
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new Deutschland EC 135 helicopter. helicopter, performing a onetime
airworthiness directive (AD) for Simultaneous transition of both engines upgrade of the software version, by
Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2 B1, 2 B1A, 2 from automatic control to manual either replacing the EECU or by
B1A–1, and 2 B2 turboshaft engines. control could lead to subsequent loss of uploading software. You must use the
This AD requires replacing the software control of the helicopter. The engine service information described
in the Engine Electronic Control Unit control system’s intolerance to the loss previously to perform the actions
(EECU). This AD results from a report of of steps on the fuel metering valve required by this AD.
simultaneous loss of automatic control actuator causes the loss of automatic
of both engines of a Eurocopter control. Loss of steps can lead to a FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Deutschland EC 135 helicopter, during FADEC FAIL indication of the full Date
flight. We are issuing this AD to prevent authority digital electronic control Since an unsafe condition exists that
simultaneous loss of automatic control (FADEC) and cause the fuel flow requires the immediate adoption of this
of both engines and subsequent loss of metering valve to freeze up and AD, we have found that notice and
control of the helicopter. transition to manual fuel flow control. opportunity for public comment before

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:17 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM 14JNR1

You might also like