You are on page 1of 2

34441

Notices Federal Register


Vol. 70, No. 113

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER Additional information related to the proposed. Standards and guidelines
contains documents other than rules or proposed amendment can be obtained specific to the Valle Vidal would take
proposed rules that are applicable to the from the Forest’s Web page at http:// precedence over Forest-wide standards
public. Notices of hearings and investigations, www.fs.fed.us/r3/carson/ or directly and guidelines. Generally these
committee meetings, agency decisions and from the Forest on compact disc or a standards compliment the Forest-wide
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
paper copy. standards.
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The The proposed action would
examples of documents appearing in this information presented in this notice is recommend a 4,083-acre botanical area
section. included to help the reviewer determine as a Special Area (Management Area
if they are interested in or potentially 19). A few specific standards and
affected by the proposed action. guidelines are proposed for this
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE management area.
Purpose and Need for Action
Forest Service In 1982, Pennzoil Corporation A detailed description of the
donated 101,794 acres (Valle Vidal) to Proposed Action can be accessed via the
Southwestern Region, Arizona, New the American people. Due to the timing Internet at http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/
Mexico, West Texas and Oklahoma: of the donation, the lack of resource carson/. This site also contains
Proposed Land and Resource inventories, and the fact the Carson background information about the
Management Plan Amendment for the National Forest had already begun the management of the Valle Vidal and
Valle Vidal, Carson National Forest, development of its Land and Resource discussion on why additional
Taos and Colfax Counties, NM Management Plan (Forest Plan), the management direction is needed for the
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. management of the Valle Vidal was only area.
ACTION:Notice of Intent to prepare an partially considered in the development
of the Forest Plan. Timber suitability Public Involvement
environmental impact statement.
was analyzed as part of plan Over the last several months, the
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service is development, however a desired Forest has received from the public over
preparing an Environmental Impact condition and standards and guidelines 5,000 form letters, 120 post cards, 600
Statement (EIS) to consider and disclose for the Valle Vidal were never
individual letters, a petition and many
the effects of amending the Carson established. A Multiple Use Area Guide
phone calls expressing their views on
National Forest’s 1987 Land and was developed in October 1982 and
the management of the Valle Vidal.
Resource Management Plan (hereafter provides general direction for the Valle
Open house informational meetings
called Forest Plan) to incorporate Vidal.
In order to bring management were held in Taos, Raton and Santa Fe
standards and guidelines for the
direction for the Valle Vidal into full earlier this year. Comments raised
management of the Valle Vidal area of
conformance with the Carson National during these meetings, as well as other
the Carson National Forest. The
Forest’s Forest Plan, an amendment is public comments, helped in formulating
proposed Forest Plan amendment
needed to establish Forest Plan natural the proposed action is largely to
includes a recommendation for a special
resource goals, objectives, standards and formalize the current management
area designation of the ‘‘Upper Ponil
guidelines, and desired future condition strategy.
Botanical Area.’’
DATES: Comments on the proposed for the Valle Vidal. The plan Additional open house meetings will
amendment should be submitted before amendment will speak directly to the be held in July and august during the
September 15, 2005. desired condition, with standards and scoping period. These meetings are
The Draft EIS is expected to be guidelines needed to meet this desired tentatively scheduled for Taos, Raton,
available for public review sometime in condition. and Santa Fe. Due to the large amount
February or March 2006. At that time, Proposed Action of public interest expressed in the
a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS development of the proposed action the
The Forest Service proposes to scoping will run for 90 days.
will be published in the Federal
provide additional guidance for the
Register and a 90-day comment period
Valle Vidal Unit on the Carson National Preliminary Issues and Alternatives
will follow. The Final EIS is scheduled
Forest through a Forest Plan
to be completed in September 2006. The Forest Service has developed the
amendment. This area was identified as
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning the Management Area 21 in the Land and proposed action to meet the purpose
proposed amendment should be sent to Resource Management Plan (1986). and need for action with the best
Carson National Forest, ATTN: Valle The proposed action would establish information available—it is not a
Vidal Forest Plan Amendment, 208 Cruz a long-term desired condition for the decision. This proposal is intended to
Alta Road, Toas, NM 87571. E-mail Valle Vidal and would incorporate facilitate public involvement in
comments may be sent to comments- Forest-wide prescriptions and specific identifying pertinent issues, developing
southwestern-carson@fs.fed.us. ‘‘Valle Management Area prescriptions meaningful alternatives, and analyzing
Vidal Forest Plan Amendment’’ must be (standards and guidelines) from the relevant effects. A range of alternatives,
in the subject line of the e-mail. current Forest Plan to apply on the Valle including the no action alternative, will
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vidal. be developed based upon issues
David Seesholtz, Forest Planner, Carson Area specific standards and identified during our scoping process
National Forest, at (505) 758–6210. guidelines for the Valle Vidal are also and the associated analysis.

VerDate jul<14>2003 20:14 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1
34442 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 14, 2005 / Notices

Lead and Cooperating Agencies considered; however, those who submit DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
USDA Forest Service, Carson National anonymous comments will not have
Forest will serve as the lead agency for standing to appeal the subsequent Forest Service
this analysis. decision under 36 CFR parts 215 or 217.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27 Dakota Prairie Grasslands; North
Responsible Official (d), any person may request the agency Dakota and South Dakota; Dakota
The Forest Supervisor for the Carson Prairie Grasslands Noxious Weed
to withhold a submission from the
National Forest of the Southwestern Management Strategy EIS
public record by showing how the
Region of the USDA Forest Service is Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
the Responsible Official. permits such confidentiality. Persons ACTION:Notice of intent to prepare an
Nature of Decision To Be Made requesting such confidentiality should environmental impact statement.
be aware that, under FOIA,
Forest Plans define the direction for confidentiality may be granted in only SUMMARY: The Dakota Prairie Grasslands
managing the National Forests. This very limited circumstances, such as to (DPG) proposes to use an integrated
amendment will provide the protect trade secrets. The Forest Service approach to treat and control noxious
management direction for the Valle weeds on approximately 35,000 acres of
will inform the requester of the agency’s
Vidal and provide the foundation for existing infestation sites, and 8,000
decision regarding the request for
future activities. The amendment acres of new or previously unknown
confidentiality, and where the request is
defines the overall management vision acres in a manner consistent with
of the Valle Vidal and identifies specific denied, the agency will return the
Dakota Prairie Grasslands Land and
standards and guidelines that will help submission and notify the requester that
Resource Management Plan direction
move management of the Valle Vidal the comments may be resubmitted with
and applicable laws. The Environmental
towards this vision. The decision made or without name and address within
Impact Statement (EIS) will analyze the
through this amendment would serve as seven days.
methods to be used in an integrated
Forest Plan direction until the Forest The Forest Service believes, at this approach, and disclose the
Plan is further amended or revised. early stage, it is important to give environmental effects of the proposal
Other analyses may be completed in reviewers notice of several court rulings and alternatives.
the future to determine the appropriate related to public participation in the DATES: Comments concerning the scope
level of activities to occur by a specific environmental review process. First, of the analysis must be received within
program. The Leasing Analysis required reviewers of draft environmental impact 30 days of publication of this notice in
to determine whether to make certain statements must structure their the Federal Register. The draft EIS is
lands available to development of participation in the environmental expected by September 2005 and the
natural gas resources is an example of review of the proposal so that it is final EIS is expected by February 2006.
possible future analyses. Future meaningful and alerts the agency to the ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
decisions would have to be consistent reviewer’s position and contentions. Sheila McNee, Noxious Weed EIS,
with the management direction Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. Dakota Prairie Grasslands, 240 W.
provided through this current analysis NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, Century Ave., Bismarck, ND 58503 or e-
or would have to amend this direction. environmental objections that could be mail your comments to comments-
Comment Requested raised at the draft environmental impact northern-dakota-prairie@fs.fed.us.
stage but that are not raised nolil after FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Forest Service would like to
completion of the final environmental Sheila McNee, Project Leader, Dakota
know of any issues, concerns, and/or
impact statement may be waived or Prairie Grasslands, USDA Forest Service
suggestions the public, Native American
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon at the above address or call (701) 250–
tribes, or other government agencies
have about the proposal. Comments v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 4443.
should be as fully formed as possible to 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc., 490 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
assist in the analysis. If you have any F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wise. 1980).
Because of these court rulings, it is very Purpose and Need for Action
questions, or if something is unclear,
contact David Seesholtz at 505–758– important that those interested in this An aggressive and effective weed
6210 before submitting your comments. proposed action participate by the close control program is dictated by U.S.
Although comments are welcome at of the comment period so that Forest Service policies (FSM 2080), the
any time, they will be most effective if substantive comments and objections DPG Land and Resource Management
received by September 15, 2005. Send are made available to the Forest Service Plan (Grasslands Plan), other Forest
comment to: Carson National Forest, at the time when it can meaningfully Service objectives, and by the February
ATTN: Valle Vidal Plan Amendment, consider them and respond to them in 3, 1999 Executive Order 13112 ‘‘to
208 Cruz Alta Road, Taos, NM 87571. the final environmental impact prevent the introduction of invasive
Alternately, e-mail your commentsto statement. PAuthorization: National species and provide for their control
comments-southwestern- Environmental Policy Act of 1969 as and to minimize the economic,
carson@fs.fed.us. ‘‘Valle Vidal Forest amended (42 U.S.C. 4321–346); Council ecological and human health impacts
Plan Amendment’’ must be in the on Environmental Quality Regulations that invasive species cause.’’ The DPG
subject line of the e-mail. (40 CFR parts 1500–1508); U.S. has been treating noxious weeds on
Reviewer’s Obligation: Comments Department of Agriculture NEPA each Ranger District under previous
received in response to this solicitation, Policies and Procedures (7 CFR part 1b). NEPA decisions including the 1986
including names and addresses of those Dated: June 8, 2005. Custer National Forest Noxious Weed
who comment, will be considered part Environmental Impact Statement;
Martin D. Chavez Jr.,
of the public record on this proposed however, an updated noxious weed
action and will be available for public Forest Supervisor, Carson National Forest. control analysis is needed to address
inspection. Comments submitted [FR Doc. 05–11702 Filed 6–13–05; 8:45 am] newly listed noxious weeds species, to
anonymously will be accepted and BILLING CODE 3410–11–M identify additional acres of noxious

VerDate jul<14>2003 20:14 Jun 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

You might also like