GFCI E320934 TestRecord Ul943

Project No.
07ME07257
LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE
File
Page 1 of
36
E320934
Page
Date
[]CTDP
[]OTHER
Number of pages in this package _42_

TEST LOCATION:
[x]UL or Affiliate
Company Name
[]WTDP
UL Melville
Address
CLIENT INFORMATION
Company Name General Protecht Group Inc
555 Daxing Rd West Liushi, Yueqing, Zhejiang Province China.
AUDIT INFORMATION:
Description of Tests
Per Standard No.
UL 943
Edition
re
[] Tests Conducted by +
Printed name
te
Reviewer at client
facility (CTDP only)
Printed name
Reviewed and accepted

by Responsible Engineer
Frederick Reyes
S Billings
Fred Reyes
is
6/5/07
eg
5/29/07
Humidity Conditioning &

Leakage Currents
nR
Unwanted Tripping Test

(Ring Wave)
Signature
Signature
Printed Name
TESTS TO BE CONDUCTED:
Test
No.
Done
Test Name
Drop
Test
1
6/5/07
4th
Address
Signature
[] Comments/Parameters
[]Tests Conducted by ++
James J. Cavanagh
Please condition 2 samples
James J.Cavanagh
6/5/07
6/5/07
Surge Immunity Tests

(Combination Wave)
E.Bochan
6/6/07
Automated High Resistance

Ground Fault and False
Tripping Sequence.
James J. Cavanagh
6/8/07
E.Bochan
6/8/07
Dielectric Withstand Test
James J. Cavanagh
6/4/07
Overload Test
James J. Cavanagh
6/4/07
Low Resistance Ground

Fault Test
James J. Cavanagh
6/11/07
Endurance
James J. Cavanagh
ULS-02377-AAAG-DataSheet-0003
Form Issued:
Form Page 1
Form Revised:
Form Copyright 2004 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered as being covered by UL.
Project No. 07ME07257

TESTS TO BE CONDUCTED:
Test
No.
Done
File
E320934
Page
Date
Page 2 of
36
[] Comments/Parameters
[]Tests Conducted by ++
Test Name
6/13/07
6/6/07
Extra Low resistance

Ground Fault Test
James J. Cavanagh
11
6/6/07
Short Circuit Test
James J. Cavanagh
12
6/15/07
Normal Temperature
James J. Cavanagh
nR
eg
is
te
re
10
Test Equipment- See "TEST EQUIPMENT INFORMATION"

Samples See "TEST SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION"
Instructions + - When all tests are conducted by one person, printed name and signature can
be inserted here instead of including printed name and signature on each page
containing data. Must indicate number of pages in the data package.
++ - When test conducted by more than one person, printed name and signature
of person conducting the test can be inserted next to the test name instead of
including printed name and signature on each page containing data. Must
indicate number of pages in the data package.
Form Issued:
Form Page 2
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No. 07ME07257

File
E320934
Page
Date
Page 3 of
36
[]The test facility was deemed to have the environment and capabilities
necessary to perform the tests included in this data package. (WTDP Only)
nR
eg
is
te
re
Special Instructions
Form Issued:
Form Page 3
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E302934
Page
Tested by:
Page 4 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
TEST EQUIPMENT INFORMATION
Instrument
Type
Test Number +, Test

Title or
Conditioning
Function
/Range
Last Cal.
Date
Next Cal.
Date
is
te
re
Inst.
ID No.
eg
+ - If Test Number is used, the Test Number must be identified on the data
sheet pages or on the Data Sheet Package cover page.
Make/Model/Serial Number/Asset No.
Inst.
ID No.
nR
The following additional information is required when using clients or rented

equipment, or when a UL ID Number for an instrument number is not used. The
Inst. ID No. below corresponds to the Inst. ID No. above.
[x] Test equipment information is recorded on ULs Laboratory Project

Management (LPM)/Laboratory Equipment Management (LEM) database. (This
statement may be selected only if datasheets are completed electronically at a
UL facility)
Form Issued:
Form Page 4
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 5 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
TEST SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION:

The table below is provided to provide correlation of sample numbers to
specific product related information. Refer to this table when a test
identifies a test sample by "Sample No." only.
Date
Received
[] Test
No.
Sample
No.
Manufacturer, Product Identification and Ratings
Sample Card
No.
re
General Protecht Receptacle Cat No. DG15L GFCI 120 Vac, 20A, 60Hz.
nR
eg
is
te
Samples With Engineer
+ - If Test Number is used, the Test Number or Numbers the sample was used in
must be identified on the data sheet pages or on the Data Sheet Package cover
page.
[] Sampling Procedure -
Form Issued:
Form Page 5
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 6 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

144.1-06, Cl. 6.3.2 and 5.8.1
DROP TEST:
For Engineering Use:
Method
re
The visual inspection test after the Drop Test is to be performed by the
project handler and compliance documented by this data sheet. See clauses
5.8 and 6.22 of UL 1699.
is
te
One sample was dropped 3 times from a height of 3 ft (.91m) onto a

concrete floor with different orientations for each drop. Following the three
drops, the sample was examined for accessibility of live parts, reduction of
spacings, and continuity of grounding The sample was then checked for proper
functioning by pressing the TEST & RESET buttons.
eg
The sample was then subjected to the Visual Inspection Test previously
described.
nR
Results
Evaluated by Fred Reyes 4/22/2008
There [was no] [was] accessibility of live parts, reduction of
spacings(Engineer will determine), or loss of grounding continuity.
After the impact, the unit [operated] [did not operate] correctly.
There [was no] damage or loosening of insulated conductors or the insulation

of splices and joints. (Engineer will determine)
All joints and connections [remained] mechanically secure and [did] provide
adequate and reliable contact without strain on connections and terminals.
(Engineer will determine)
Splices and joints not provided with insulation suitable for the temperature,
voltage, and intended use of the conductors themselves [continued] to comply
with Spacings, Clause 5.12, or Alternate Spacings Clearances And Creepage
Distances, Clause 5.13. (Engineer will determine)
[ ] In the portable cord-connected ground-fault circuit-interrupter, wire
terminations or splices [did not become] [became] free to bridge supplementary
Form Issued:
Form Page 6
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 7 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
nR
eg
is
te
re
or reinforced insulation. There [was no] [was] breakage at the terminations,

splices, or at wire binding screws or nuts.
Form Issued:
Form Page 7
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 8 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
Lab Use Only

Sample # ___1___
Criteria
Damage to sample?
Describe if Yes
(Engineer will determine)
te
[x ]
re
[x ]
[x ]
[x ]
[x ]
is
Result
[ ] Yes
No
Accessibility of live parts?
[ ] Yes
No
Reduction of spacings?
[ ] Yes
No
Loss of grounding
[ ] Yes
continuity?
No
Failure to operate?
[ ] Yes
No
Engineering Use Only:
eg
Lab. Conditions: 20c 65%RH 6/5/07
nR
Visual Inspection Test conducted by __Fred Reyes______________________
Criteria
Damage to insulated conductors
or splice insulation?
Loosening of insulated
conductors or splice
insulation?
Joints and connections not
secure or strain on connections
or terminals?
Noncompliance with applicable
spacings requirements?
Typed Name
Result
[ ] Yes [x]
No
[ ] Yes [x ]
No
[ ] Yes
No
[x ]
[ ] Yes
No
[x ]
Date
Describe if Yes
Form Issued:
Form Page 8
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 9 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
HUMIDITY CONDITIONING AND LEAKAGE CURRENT:

144.1-06, Cl. 6.5
Method
re
The same sample subjected to the [Drop] [Impact] Test was placed in a 30C
ambient until thermal equilibrium was attained. The sample was then
conditioned at 93 2% humidity and 32 2C for [168] [48] Hours.
eg
is
te
Following the conditioning, while still in the chamber or within 60 s after

removal from the chamber, the sample was connected to a 132 Vac supply. The
leakage current between the neutral supply conductor and accessible metal or a
20 cm x 10 cm piece of metal foil wrapped tightly around the insulating
enclosure was then measured. Following the leakage current measurement, the
sample was checked for proper functioning by pressing the TEST & RESET
buttons.
Please condition 2 samples
Results
[were] [were not] acceptable since the leakage

0.5 Ma to accessible metal parts or the foil
[not] exceed 3.5 Ma to inaccessible functionally
The unit [operated] [did not operate] correctly after
nR
The results of this test

current did [not] exceed
mentioned above [and did
insulated metal parts.]
the
conditioning.
Lab Use Only
Sample # ______1____
Conditioning Chamber Parameters:

Temp Setting ______32_____C, Humidity Setting ____93_______%
Leakage mA
S1 Open
S2 Norm.
Less than
0.3mA
S1 Open
S2 Rev.
Less than
0.3mA
S1 Closed
S2 Norm.
Less than
0.3mA
Form Issued:
Form Page 9
Form Revised:
S1 Closed
S2 Rev.
Less than
0.3mA
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 10 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
Criteria
1. Leakage current shall be no more than 0.5mA measured to accessible
metal parts or the metal foil mentioned in the Method.
2. Leakage current shall be no more than 3.5mA measured to inaccessible
functionally insulated metal parts.
Lab Use Only
Sample # _____1A_____
re
Conditioning Chamber Parameters:
Temp Setting _______32____C, Humidity Setting ____93_______%

S1 Closed
S2 Norm.
Less than
0.3mA
te
S1 Open
S2 Rev.
Less than
0.3mA
is
Leakage mA
S1 Open
S2 Norm.
Less than
0.3mA
S1 Closed
S2 Rev.
Less than
0.3mA
nR
eg
Criteria
3. Leakage current shall be no more than 0.5mA measured to accessible
metal parts or the metal foil mentioned in the Method.
4. Leakage current shall be no more than 3.5mA measured to inaccessible
functionally insulated metal parts.
Form Issued:
Form Page 10
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 11 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.6
VOLTAGE SURGE TESTS
re
GENERAL
The same sample that was subjected to the drop and Leakage Current Tests was
subjected to this test. The line side terminals of the Line-Neutral and LineLine terminals that are protected by the representative ground-fault circuitinterrupter were subjected to the following surge tests: Unwanted Tripping
Test, Surge Immunity Test.
nR
eg
is
te
The ground-fault circuit-interrupter was connected to a supply of rated

voltage. The grounding lead or terminal of the ground-fault circuitinterrupter (if provided) was connected to the supply conductor serving as the
neutral. The ground-fault circuit interrupter was placed in the on condition
with no load connected. A GFCI intended only for use in an enclosure was
tested in the intended enclosure that was representative of the worst case
situation for these tests.
Form Issued:
Form Page 11
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 12 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.6.2
UNWANTED TRIPPING TEST (RING WAVE):

METHOD
re
One representative ground-fault circuit interrupter was subjected to ten

random applications or three controlled applications of a 3 kV surge applied
at 60 second intervals. When three controlled applications were employed, one
application was essentially at zero of the supply voltage wave, one at the
positive peak, and one at the negative peak.
te
The surge generator had a surge impedance of 50 ohms. The no load waveform of
the surge generator was essentially as follows:
is
a) Initial rise time, 0.5 microseconds between 10 percent and 90 percent of

peak amplitude,
b) The period of the following oscillatory wave, 10 microseconds, and
c)Each successive peak, 60 percent of the preceding peak.
eg
Following the application of the surges, the sample was checked for proper
nR
RESULTS
The sample [did not] [did] trip after being subjected to the surges and was
functional at the conclusion of the test.
Lab Use Only:
Sample # _____1 _____

[x]Ten random applications
Trip
Yes
No
1
OK
[x]Ten random
2
OK
3
OK
4
OK
5
OK
6
OK
7
OK
8
OK
9
OK
10
Total
OK
(3 Controlled) applications
Trip
1
2
3
4
5
Yes
No
OK
OK
OK
Form Issued:
Form Page 12
Form Revised:
10
Total
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 13 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.6.3
SURGE IMMUNITY TEST (COMBINATION WAVE):
NOTE TO LAB TECHNICIAN:

testing.
Consult Corporate Laboratory Procedural Guide before
METHOD
re
All calibration waveforms are to be plotted and attached to the Data Sheet
package.
te
The same sample of the GFCI that was subjected to the Unwanted Tripping Test
was subjected to the Surge Immunity Test.
nR
eg
is
The sample was placed in the orientation to represent the most severe
conditions of normal installation while in an unheated condition. It was then
connected to a supply of rated voltage. Surge impulses were applied between
the points indicated in the table at the 90 and the 270 degree points of the
ac waveform. The test was conducted in accordance with the testing methods
described in IEC61000-4-5 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 4-5:
Testing and measurements techniques Surge Immunity Test. Five impulses were
applied in the positive direction and five impulses were applied in the
negative direction at each point for a total of 20 impulses. If the GFCI
tripped as a result of an impulse it was reset prior to the next impulse
application.
The wave shape specifications for each portion of the combination wave are as
follows:
Open Circuit Voltage 4 kV peak, 1.2 by 50 s
Short Circuit Current 2 kA peak, 8 by 20 s
During and after the surge application, the sample was examined for
a) Emission of flame, molten metal, glowing or flaming particles through
any openings,(either preexisting or created during the test),
b) Ignition of the Enclosure, or
c) Creation of an opening in the enclosure that results in accessibility of
live parts.
Following the application of the surges, the sample was checked for proper
Form Issued:
Form Page 13
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 14 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
RESULTS
L to N
Rated
Voltage
(V ac)
120
Ignition
of
enclosure?
[ ] Yes
[x ] No
re
Application
Points
Model No.
Sample
No.
Emission
of flame,
molten
metal or
particles?
[ ] Yes
[x ] No
Access to
Live
parts?
[ ] Yes
[ x] No
is
Engineering and Lab Use Only:
te
The sample [was] [was not] functional at the conclusion of the test.
eg
Application Points
For a single pole device: L N
For a two pole device: L1 L2 at 240 V; L1 N at 120 V; L2 N at 120 V
Total Number of Trips During Test
4
20
nR
Total Number of Surge Applications
AUTOMATED HIGH-RESISTANCE AND FALSE TRIPPING

Sequence

144.1-06, Cl. 6.7 and 6.8
Form Issued:
Form Page 14
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 15 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
METHOD
The same sample that was subjected to the Voltage Surge Tests was used for
this test. Testing was conducted in accordance with UL943, 3rd edition,
Sections 24 and 25 using automated test methods.
[ ] The tests were performed using the selected automated sequence, including
the automated method for determining most-adverse parameters.
re
[ ] The tests were performed using the selected automated sequence with the
specified most-adverse parameters. (The Most-Adverse Conditions test lines in
the automated sequence were not conducted.
eg
is
te
Most-Adverse Parameters (User specified)

MAhr
Volts
[ ]85-percent, [ ]100-percent, [ ]110-percent
Load
[ ]no-load, [ ]rated-load
Polarity
[ ]forward, [ ]reverse
Position
[ ]1, [ ]2, [ ]3, [ ]4, [ ]5, [ ]6
MAft
Volts
[ ]85-percent, [ ]100-percent, [ ]110-percent
Load
[ ]no-load, [ ]rated-load
Polarity
[ ]forward, [ ]reverse
Cat. No.
Sample No(s).
120vac
[ ]13A, [ ]15A, [x]20A,

[ ]50A
120/240vac [ ]6.5A, [ ]7.5, [ ]13A,
[ ]30A, [ ]40A, [ ]50A
[ ] Mechanical Latch, Pushbutton-Reset
[x] Mechanical Latch, Pushbutton-Reset
[ ] Mechanical Latch, Toggle-Handle
[ ] Electric-Latch, Manual Reset
[ ] Electric-Latch, Auto-Reset
[ ]no-delay (default), [ ]5-seconds,
Rating
nR
SAMPLE
Mechanism
Reset-Delay
Comments
[ ]30A,
[ ]40A,
[ ]15A,
[ ]20A,
with Lockout
[ ] 10-seconds
Form Issued:
Form Page 15
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 16 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
AUTOMATED SEQUENCE
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
[
[
[
[
]
]
]
]
04
04A
05
05A
Circuit
Circuit
Circuit
Circuit
[
[
[
[
[
[
]
]
]
]
]
]
06
06A
07
07A
08
08A
Auto-Reset
Auto-Reset
Auto-Reset
Auto-Reset
Auto-Reset
Auto-Reset
[
[
[
[
[
[
]
]
]
]
]
]
09
09A
10
10A
11
11A
Manual-Reset
Manual-Reset
Manual-Reset
Manual-Reset
Manual-Reset
Manual-Reset
Breaker
Breaker
Breaker
Breaker
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
120V (Full Program)

120V (Standard Program)
120/240V-LN (Full Program)
120/240V-LN (Standard Program)
120/240V+LN (Full Program)
120/240V+LN (Standard Program)
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
re
120V (Full Program)

120/240V (Full Program)
120/240V (Standard Program)
te
01
01A
02
02A
03
03A
120V (Full Program)

120V/240V-LN (Full Program)
120V/240V-LN (Standard Program)
120V/240V+LN (Full Program)
120V/240V+LN (Standard Program)
is
]
]
]
]
]
]
eg
[
[
[
[
[
[
120V (Full Program)

120V/240V-LN (Full Program
120V/240V-LN (Standard Program)
120V/240V+LN (Full Program)
120V/240V+LN (Standard Program)
nR
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
[ ] 12
[ ] 13
[ ] 14
- ALCI Plug - 120V (Standard Program)

- ALCI Plug - 120/240V-LN (Standard Program)
- ALCI Plug - 120/240V+LN (Standard Program)
[ ]
[x]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
15
15A
16
16A
17
17A
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
Receptacle
GFCI+LOF
GFCI+LOF
GFCI+LOF
GFCI+LOF
GFCI+LOF
GFCI+LOF
120V (Full Program)

120/240V-LN (Full Program)
120/240V-LN (Standard Program)
120/240V+LN (Full Program)
120/240V+LN (Standard Program)
Form Issued:
Form Page 16
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
AUTOMATED HIGH-RESISTANCE AND FALSE TRIPPING TESTS
18
18A
19
20
[ ] 21
OJ
OJ
OJ
OJ
Thermostat
Thermostat
Thermostat
Thermostat
120V
120V - one-position
120/240V-LN
120/240V+LN
]
]
]
]
(Contd)
- Receptacle GFCI+LOF - 120V with Open Neutral Protection
re
[
[
[
[
Page 17 of
36
is
-LN = no load-neutral
+LN = with load-neutral
+LOF = with Lockout feature
te
Note:
RESULTS
Lab Use Only:
nR
eg
The results were in that the GFCI [was] capable of interrupting the electric
circuit to the load within the required time interval under all required
conditions.(Engineer will determine)

144.1-06, Cl. 6.11
DIELECTRIC WITHSTAND TEST:
Method
A 60 Hz essentially sinusoidal potential was gradually increased from zero to
the value indicated and then applied for one minute between each of the
locations specified in Results
Results
Method I
Sample No. 1
Form Issued:
Form Page 17
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
[x]
Printed Name
Signature
Date
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V)ac between grounding
circuit and ALL live parts
GFCI LATCHED
[x ] No indication of Breakdown
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V) ac between line and
Face with the GFCI tripped.
[ x] No indication of Breakdown
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V) ac between load
terminals and face circuits
with the GFCI tripped.
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

load terminals with the GFCI
tripped.
[ ] Indication of Breakdown at
Volts
Volts
Volts
_______
_______
_______
_______
nR
eg
Note:
(FI) = Functional Insulation
(SI) = Supplementary Insulation
(RI) = Reinforced Insulation
Volts
re
[x]
Signature
te
[x]
Printed Name
is
[x]
Page 18 of
36

144.1-06, Cl. 6.12
OVERLOAD TEST: 3 & 4
METHOD I
A previously untested sample was connected to a 60 Hz source of supply, at a

load current of 120 A (6 x rated), with a closed circuit voltage of (greater
than 85% of rated) 102+ V and an open circuit voltage of 120 V (100-105% of
rated), at a power factor of 45 50%. A 1-A fuse was connected from the
grounded supply conductor to the accessible conductive parts of the unit
(metal foil). The device was turned on for one second and off for nine
seconds, for a total of 25 operations, at a rate of six cycles per minutes.
The load was connected to the LOAD HOT and LOAD Neutral Terminals of the
sample.
Form Issued:
Form Page 18
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 19 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
RESULTS I
[x ] The unit continued to operate without failure or impairment and did not
trip during the test. The 1A fuse did not open.
The unit did not continue to operate without failure or impairment.
[ ]
The unit tripped during the test.
[ ]
The 1A fuse opened.
[x ]
The results (were)/(were not) acceptable
re
ETHOD II
[ ]
te
The test of Method I was repeated on the same sample except the load was
connected to the GFCI face by means of a suitably rated attachment plug.
is
RESULTS II
eg
[ x] The unit continued to operate without failure or impairment and did not
trip during the test. The 1A fuse did not open.
The unit did not continue to operate without failure or impairment.
[ ]
The unit tripped during the test.
[ ]
The 1A fuse opened.
[x ]
The results (were)/(were not) acceptable
nR
[ ]
Form Issued:
Form Page 19
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 20 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
OVERLOAD TEST (Continued):

FOR LAB USE ONLY:
Method II
Open Circuit V
122
122
Closed Circuit V
120
Amperes A
120
Power Factor
.45
120
te
eg
No. cycles of
Operation
120
.45
25
25
is
1 A Ground Fuse
condition
re
Sample No.
Method I
nR
Form Issued:
Form Page 20
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 21 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.13
LOW RESISTANCE GROUND FAULT:5 & 6
METHOD I
te
re
A previously untested sample was connected to a 60 Hz supply source with an

open circuit voltage of 120 V (100-105% rated). A resistor was connected
between the ungrounded load terminal and the grounded supply conductor as
shown (See Fig. 31.1 of UL 943), simulating a ground fault. The resistance was
adjusted to draw a 120 A load (6 x rating). The closed circuit voltage was
(greater than 85% of rated) 102+ Vac.
is
The accessible conductive parts (metal foil) was connected to the grounded
supply conductor through a 1 A fuse. The test was initiated 25 times by
depressing the reset button every ten seconds to complete the circuit. The
trip time was measured for each operation.
eg
RESULTS I
nR
There was no indication of a hazard or impairment of the device tested. The

average trip time was ____18.75___ milliseconds. The maximum trip time was
__29.2_____milliseconds.
[x ]
The 1 A ground fuse remained intact.
[ ]
The 1A ground fuse opened.

METHOD II
The test of Method I was repeated on [a new] [the same] sample except the
resistor load was connected to the GFCI face by means of a suitably rated
attachment plug.
RESULTS I
There was no indication of a hazard or impairment of the device tested. The
average trip time was __18.0____ milliseconds. The maximum trip time was
28.8___milliseconds.
[ x]
The 1 A ground fuse remained intact.
[ ]
The 1A ground fuse opened.
Form Issued:
Form Page 21
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 22 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
LAB USE ONLY:

Method I
Method II
Open Circuit V
122
122
Closed Circuit V
120
120
Amperes A
120
120
Power Factor
N/A
N/A
OK
OK
is
te
1 A Ground Fuse
condition
No. cycles of
Operation completed
re
Sample No.
eg
Method I
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
20.0
19.2
23.2
20.4
18.0
20.0
19.2
18
19.6
23
21.2
21.2
13
22.4
19
22.8
24
18.4
19.6
14
19.6
20
19.2
25
18.4
20.0
15
19.6
21
29.2
MAX
29.2
10
19.2
16
19.6
22
18.8
AVG
18.75
nR
12
Method II
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
Trip
#
Trip
Time
(ms)
22.8
18.4
12
17.6
18
17.6
23
18.0
18.4
18.8
13
18.8
19
19.6
24
28.8
20.4
18.0
14
18.0
20
19.6
25
18.8
19.2
24.8
15
17.2
21
20.4
MAX
18.0
18.4
10
19.2
16
18.4
22
19.6
AVG
28.8
Form Issued:
Form Page 22
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 23 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.14
ENDURANCE:7 & 8
METHOD I
re
A previously untested sample was connected to a 60 Hz source supply, at a load

of 20A (rated), with a closed circuit voltage of (97.5% of rated)117+ V and an
open circuit voltage of (100-105% of rated) 120 V, at a power factor of 0.75
0.80 The sample was connected to the supply source using No. 12 AWG wire. A
1 A fuse was connected from the grounded supply conductor to the accessible
conductive parts (metal foil).
te
The sample was operated by depressing the reset button to turn the device
on and depressing the test button to turn the device off at a rate of
six operations a minute until a total of 3000 operations had been completed.
is
[ ] The sample was operated an additional 3000 times using the manual
switching means provided.
eg
At the completion of the (3000)\(6000) cycles, the unit was tripped by means
of the supervisory circuit and reset, at rated voltage without load, 25 times
in as rapid succession as possible.
nR
[x]At the conclusion of all of the above cycles of operation, the sample was
subjected to the Dielectric Withstand Test
RESULTS I
[ x] At the end of the test the unit was still operating normally and no
adverse effects had been noted. The 1 A ground fuse was intact.
[ ]
The unit did not operate after the test and the 1A ground fuse was not
intact.
[x ]
There [was]\[was no]evidence of dielectric breakdown
METHOD II
The test of Method I was repeated on the same sample except the load was
connected to the GFCI face by means of a suitably rated attachment plug.
Form Issued:
Form Page 23
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 24 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
RESULTS II
[ x] At the end of the test the unit was still operating normally and no
re
There was no]evidence of dielectric breakdown
FOR LAB USE ONLY:
is
Method I
122
Closed Circuit V
119
Amperes A
20
.78
3000 + 25
8
122
119
20
.78
OK
at no load
OK
3000 + 25
at no load
No. cycles of
Operation
nR
Open Circuit V
1 A Ground Fuse
condition
Method II
eg
Sample No.
Power Factor
te
[x]
[ ]
intact.
Lab. Conditions: 20c 64%RH 6/11/07 (Method I)

Lab. Conditions :19c 68%RH 6/13/07 (Method II)
Form Issued:
Form Page 24
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 25 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
Dielectric Results:
Method I
Sample No.7
[x]
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

tripped.
re
Volts
Volts
_______
_______
_______
eg
[x]
Volts
te
[x]
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

GFCI LATCHED
is
[x]
_______
nR
Volts
Lab. Conditions:20c 70%RH 6/12/07
Form Issued:
Form Page 25
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 26 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
Method II
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

re
Volts
te
[x]
Volts
is
[x]
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

GFCI LATCHED
Volts
eg
[x]
Sample No.8
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

tripped.
_______
_______
Volts
_______
nR
[x]
_______
Form Issued:
Form Page 26
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 27 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.18, Table
6.18.1, Fig. 6.18.1
EXTRA LOW RESISTANCE GROUND FAULT:
METHOD I
is
te
re
A previously untested sample of was connected using two 4-ft lengths of No. 12
AWG wire, to a 60 Hz supply with an open circuit voltage of 120 V(100-105% of
rated), capable of producing or 2000 A at a power factor of 90 100%, when
the supply terminals were short-circuited. The line circuit included a series
20A cartridge fuse. The grounded supply lead was connected to the accessible
metal parts and ground pin through a 1 A fuse. Surgical cotton was placed
over openings in the device. A 4 ft. length of No. 12AWG wire was connected
between the hot load terminal and the grounded line terminal as a simulated
ground fault.
Current was initiated once by a remote switch in the supply circuit.
eg
At the conclusion of the above test, the sample was subjected to the
nR
The test was repeated on a new sample except that current was initiated once
by depressing the reset button to complete the circuit.
RESULTS I
Sample 9 and 10
[x ] At the end of each test the unit was still operating normally and no
[ ]
intact.
[ ]

METHOD II
The test of Method I was repeated on [a new] [the same] sample except the 4 ft.
wire was connected to the hot contact of the GFCI face by means of a suitably
rated attachment plug.
Form Issued:
Form Page 27
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 28 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
RESULTS II
Sample 11 and 12
[x ] At the end of each test the unit was still operating normally and no
There [was]\[was no]evidence of dielectric breakdown
re
[x]
[ ]
intact.
FOR LAB USE ONLY:
Remote Switch
Reset
10
11
12
is
Reset
122
Closed Circuit V
N/A
Amperes A
2000
Power Factor
.90-100
122
122
122
N/A
N/A
N/A
2000
2000
2000
.90-100
.90-100
.90-100
nR
eg
Open Circuit V
OK
OK
OK
OK
Open
Open
Open
Open
_20__ A Line fuse

condition
Method II
Remote Switch
Sample No.
1 A Ground Fuse
condition
te
Method I

Dielectric Results - Method I:
Method I
Sample No.9 & 10
Remote Switch
(9)
Reset (10)
Form Issued:
Form Page 28
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

GFCI LATCHED
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
re
[x]
Printed Name
[x]
Page 29 of
36
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

tripped.
nR
[x]
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
is
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
eg
[x]
te
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts

Dielectric Results - Method II:
Method II
Sample No.11 & 12
SEE NOTE ABOVE

Remote Switch
(11)
Reset (12)
Form Issued:
Form Page 29
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Signature
Date
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V) ac between line
and Face with the GFCI
tripped.
[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x] No
indication of
Breakdown
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

[x ] No
indication of
Breakdown
re
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V)ac between
grounding circuit and ALL
live parts GFCI LATCHED
[ ] Indication of
Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

and load terminals with the
GFCI tripped.
nR
[x]
Printed Name
te
[x]
Signature
is
[x]
Printed Name
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x] No
indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[x] No indication
of Breakdown
[x] No
indication of
Breakdown
eg
[x]
Page 30 of
36
[ ] Indication of
Breakdown at
_______ Volts
[ ] Indication
of Breakdown at
_______ Volts

Form Issued:
Form Page 30
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 31 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.19
SHORT CIRCUIT:
METHOD I
te
re
A new sample was connected using the circuit described previously in the Extra
Low Resistance Ground Fault Test, except that the ground fault was removed. A
20 inch length of No.12 AWG wire was connected between the load terminals. The
line circuit included a series 20 A cartridge fuse. The grounded supply lead
was connected to the accessible metal parts and ground pin through a 1 A fuse.
Surgical cotton was placed over openings in the device. Current was initiated
once by a remote switch in the supply circuit.
At the conclusion of the above test, the sample was subjected to the
is
RESULTS I
eg
[x ] At the end of the test the unit was still operating normally and no
METHOD II
[ x]
nR
[ ]
intact.
The test of Method I was repeated on [a new] [the same] sample except the 4 ft.
wire was connected to the hot contact of the GFCI face by means of a suitably
rated attachment plug.
RESULTS II
[x ] At the end of the test the unit was still operating normally and no
[ ]
intact.
[ x]
Form Issued:
Form Page 31
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 32 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
nR
eg
is
te
re
Form Issued:
Form Page 32
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 33 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
FOR LAB USE ONLY:
Method I
Method II
13
14
Sample No.
122
122
Closed Circuit V
N/A
N/A
Amperes A
2000
2000
Power Factor
.90-100
re
OK
Open
is
Dielectric Results:
Open
eg
_20__ A Line fuse

condition
OK
.90-100
te
1 A Ground Fuse
condition
Open Circuit V
Method I
[x]
[x]
14
[x] No indication of
Breakdown
[x ] No indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Breakdown at _______
Volts
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

and Face with the GFCI
tripped.
Breakdown
[ x] No indication of
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

terminals and face
circuits with the GFCI
tripped.
Breakdown
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

Rated V)ac between
grounding circuit and ALL
live parts GFCI LATCHED
[x]
13
nR
Sample No.
Method II
Form Issued:
Form Page 33
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
[x]
Page 34 of
36
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
[x]1240 V [ ] 1000 + (2x

and load terminals with
the GFCI tripped.
Breakdown
Breakdown
[ ] Indication of
Volts
[ ] Indication of
Volts
re
Note:
nR
eg
is
te
Form Issued:
Form Page 34
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page
Tested by:
Page 35 of
36
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date

144.1-06, Cl. 6.10
TEMPERATURE TEST
SAMPLE 15
METHOD
The sample was installed in an outlet box of appropriate size, in normal

orientation (see sketch).
te
[x]
12AWG wire.
The value of
re
The sample was connected as shown in Figure 24.1 of UL 943 using

The line voltage was set to 120 V, 60 Hz, with the load at 20 A.
ground fault current was set to 3.5 mA by adjusting RB.
is
Temperatures were recorded by means of thermocouples attached to the points

tabulated under Results until thermal equilibrium was attained.
[ ] Coil temperatures were obtained by the change in - resistance method.
eg
Acceptable Results Evaluated by Fred Reyes 4/22/2008

RESULTS
nR
The following temperatures were measured at the indicated locations:

Thermocouple Location
Ambient Air
1.
line hot terminal
2.
Joint where Line hot busbar meets
3.
line hot contact arm
4.
Between D1 and PWB
5.
Between R4 and PWB
6.
Load Hot bus bar closest to Contact
7. Load hot terminal
Temperature C
20
54-20=34
62-20=42
56-20=36
51-20=31
75-20=55
54-20=34
48-20=28
Form Issued:
Form Page 35
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03
Project No.
07ME07257
File
E320934
Page 36 of
36
Page
Tested by:
Date
Witnessed by:
(WTDP Only)
Printed Name
Signature
Printed Name
Signature
Date
TEMPERATURE TEST (Continued)

FOR LAB USE ONLY:
Starting Time_7:00AM____ (Reset Position)

Temperature C
Temp. Reading #
1:15PM
Ambient Air
20
20
20
line hot terminal
54
54
54
62
3.
line hot contact arm
56
4.
Between D1 and PWB
5.
Between R4 and PWB
62
56
56
51
51
51
75
75
75
54
54
54
48
48
48
nR
6.
Load Hot bus bar
closest to Contact
7. Load Hot Teminal
1:30PM
62
eg
2.
Joint where Line hot
busbar meets braid wire
te
1.
1:ooPM
is
Temp Reading Time
re
Thermocouple Location
TEMPS ARE GOOD> FRED R.
Form Issued:
Form Page 36
Form Revised:
2005-12-19
2006-05-03

GFCI E320934 TestRecord Ul943

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GFCI E320934 TestRecord Ul943

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project No.

Number of pages in this package _42_

Per Standard No.

Reviewed and accepted

Humidity Conditioning &

Unwanted Tripping Test

Surge Immunity Tests

Automated High Resistance

Dielectric Withstand Test

Low Resistance Ground

Project No. 07ME07257

Extra Low resistance

Short Circuit Test

Test Equipment- See "TEST EQUIPMENT INFORMATION"

Project No. 07ME07257

TEST EQUIPMENT INFORMATION

Test Number +, Test

Make/Model/Serial Number/Asset No.

The following additional information is required when using clients or rented

[x] Test equipment information is recorded on ULs Laboratory Project

TEST SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION:

Manufacturer, Product Identification and Ratings

Samples With Engineer

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

For Engineering Use:

One sample was dropped 3 times from a height of 3 ft (.91m) onto a

There [was no] damage or loosening of insulated conductors or the insulation

or reinforced insulation. There [was no] [was] breakage at the terminations,

Lab Use Only

(Engineer will determine)

Lab. Conditions: 20c 65%RH 6/5/07

Visual Inspection Test conducted by __Fred Reyes______________________

HUMIDITY CONDITIONING AND LEAKAGE CURRENT:

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

Following the conditioning, while still in the chamber or within 60 s after

[were] [were not] acceptable since the leakage

The results of this test

Conditioning Chamber Parameters:

Conditioning Chamber Parameters:

Temp Setting _______32____C, Humidity Setting ____93_______%

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

VOLTAGE SURGE TESTS

The ground-fault circuit-interrupter was connected to a supply of rated

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

UNWANTED TRIPPING TEST (RING WAVE):

One representative ground-fault circuit interrupter was subjected to ten

a) Initial rise time, 0.5 microseconds between 10 percent and 90 percent of

Lab Use Only:

Sample # _____1 _____

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

SURGE IMMUNITY TEST (COMBINATION WAVE):

NOTE TO LAB TECHNICIAN:

Consult Corporate Laboratory Procedural Guide before

Engineering and Lab Use Only:

Total Number of Surge Applications

Lab. Conditions: 20c 65%RH 6/5/07

AUTOMATED HIGH-RESISTANCE AND FALSE TRIPPING

UL943, 4th Ed./CSA 22.2 No.

Most-Adverse Parameters (User specified)

[ ]13A, [ ]15A, [x]20A,

120V (Full Program)

120V (Full Program)

120V (Full Program)

120V (Full Program)

Visual Inspection Test conducted by Fred Reyes____________________

Temp Setting _32C, Humidity Setting 93_%

Sample # _1 _