Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
During the power system operation arise a lot of fast
changes, which can cause a disproportion between
production and consumption of electricity what also
means big changes of rotor angles. Fast changes in
power system consist for example of switching
operations, source or load outages, but the most
frequently the short circuits, what is associated with
step change of impedance of power system.
Synchronous generators respond to fast changes
in electromechanical swings and during these
swings can generators get into a situation when the
rotor angle stabilises at a new value or the rotor
angle will grow to a loss of synchronism. [1]
In real operation, each generator complies with
condition of static stability. But it is necessary to
add that a generator which complies with
a condition of static stability does not have to
comply with dynamic stability. The main difference
between the assessment of static and dynamic
stability is that in static stability is determined the
ability of generator to operate in a steady state and
in dynamic stability is determined and investigated
the impact and course of transient state to
synchronous generator.
(1)
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
47
2M
0 P0
( crit 0 ),
(3)
0 nominal angular velocity of generator; M
mechanical rotor torque of generator; P0 generator
power before short circuit; 0 rotor angle of
generator (by P0); crit critical rotor angle of
generator.
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
48
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
49
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
50
6 Conclusion
The simulated events in this paper can be sorted in
terms of the significance of their impact on the
dynamic stability of synchronous generator from the
most affecting as follows:
1. 3-phase short circuit on power line V1 with
failure of circuit breakers QM1, QM2
2. 3-phase short circuit on power line V1 with
failure of circuit breaker QM1
3. 3-phase short circuit on power line V1 with
failure of circuit breaker QM2
4. 3-phase short circuit on power line V1
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
51
References:
[1] Revkov, D., Eleschov, ., Bel, A.,
Prechodn javy v elektrizanch sstavch,
Bratislava, Vydavatestvo STU, 2008, 180 s,
ISBN 978-80-227-2868-3.
[2] Eleschov, ., Bel, A., CCT Basic Criteria
of Power System Transient Stability, The 11th
International Scientific Conference EPE 2010,
Brno, 2010, pp. 157-161, ISBN 978-80-2144094-4.
[3] Eleschov, ., Bel, A., Factors affecting the
length of critical clearing time, The 9th
International Scientific Conference Control of
Power System 2010, Tatransk Matliare, 2010,
pp. 1-7, ISBN 978-8089402-20-5.
[4] Janek, F., Arnold, A., Gorta, Z., Elektrick
stanice, Bratislava, Vydavatestvo STU, 2001,
286 s, ISBN 80-227-1630-8.
[5] Paar, M., Toman, P., Distribution Network
Reconfiguration Based on Minimal Power
Losses, The 9th International Scientific
Conference Electric Power Engineering 2008,
Brno, 2008, pp. 211-215, ISBN 978-80-2143650- 3.
[6] Orsgov, J., Toman, P., Evaluation of
Negative Effects of Distributed Generation,
The Power Quality and Supply Reliability,
Tallin, 2008, pp. 131-135, ISBN 978-1-42442500-6.
Event
bus bar
short
circuit
3-p short
circuit on
power line
V1
Voltage at
the Generator
Terminals
[kV]
Rotor Angle
[ ]
Current
[kA]
Active
Power
[MW]
min
max
min
max
min max
min
max
5,46
16,46
2,90
44,07
4,5
27,9
6,5
371,7
6,8
Acknowledgement
3-p short
circuit on
power line
V1 with
failure of
QM1
10,16 16,76
3,49
51,34
3,8
3-p short
circuit on
power line
V1 with
failure of
QM2
11,42 16,48
7,90
28,81
6,2
3-p short
circuit on
power line
V1 with
failure of
QM1,QM2
10,68 16,77
1,40
56,23
3,2
17,5
ISBN: 978-1-61804-128-9
89,8
401,8
52