Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mail?) covering the whole face except the eyes. Both lower arms and thighs were protected by thickly padded silk or cotton
guards, called manikelia [6] for the arms, and kremasmata for the legs, but reinforced by zabai, here possibly meaning
panels of mail [7] or strips/plates of leather or horn (or possibly metal). On the lower leg greaves (chalkotoubai) were worn
- their construction is not described and the term is a transference of an ancient one, originally referring to the solid bronze
ones worn by classical Greek hoplites.
A series of luxury ivory ikons showing the Deesis (Christ enthroned with intercessors, here including rows of saints and
martyrs) was produced in Constantinople over the course of a century [21]. The Harbaville Triptych is the latest known
in the series (Fig. 4). The armoured military saints have petals at the top of their boots or leggings - realistic detail or
artistic flourish? Perhaps these are the tops of splinted greaves worn beneath the footwear...
Figure 4 - Military saints on the Harbaville Triptych: carved ivory ikon, Constantinople mid 11th c. Left, detail the two Saints Theodoros, teron and stratelates. Right, detail - Saints Georgios and Eustathios.
(source: Wikimedia Commons).
Historic clothing by itself can have distinct protective value [25], but it is good to have extra armour of some kind for
safety in our reenactment foot combats [26]. In Miklagard NVG, the preference should be to have arm and leg protection
hidden underneath clothing. Thus we can look authentic, but suffer less bruises!
As there is no specific authentic source to follow for Varangian guardsman, the second-best option may be to look to
Byzantine military texts of the period and make the manikelia of composite construction they describe. The obvious
drawback is that there are no original examples to copy.
Splinted armour is probably the next best choice. We have both archaeological and iconographic evidence that it was used
by neighbouring cultures in the period, so it is reasonable to suppose that it transferred to Byzantium, although we have no
firm proof.
Finally, copy a bazuband, or other similar pre-modern protection as your inspiration - at least it will be a functional design
tested in battle, but make sure any materials, technology or artistic embellishments (such as an engraved pattern) that would
mark it as anachronistic are replaced by those from our culture and period. Keep it unobtrusive, and if asked, make sure you
point out to new members and public that it is a non-authentic piece of gear worn for safety reasons.
Group 2 (Fig. 8) were 33-34 cm long, all more-or-less rectangular with a slight taper, though one has one
scalloped and one straight edge. Both ends are slightly bent outward. There are four broad splints which
have a pair of lines cut parallel to the edges, alternating with three narrower ones which are again marked
with (diagonal) hatching. At the narrower end are from 2 to 4 holes for rings linking them to a mail
garment. Though they all have five matching rows of 2, 3 or 4 bronze rivets, only the top, middle and
bottom rows were functional, attaching them to three leather staps (1.2 to 1.6 cm width).
Group 3 (Fig. 9) is pretty much a mirror-image of
Group 2, though slightly longer (35.5 to 36.7 cm) and
the system for attaching them to mail differs - the end
of each splint is bent over and has notches filed into it,
wherein the rings are fitted and held in place with a
piece of wire (Fig. 10):
Figure 10 - Valsgrde 8, attachment of mail to
splints (left) Groups 1 & 2;(right) Group 3 (source:
Arwidsson 1954, fig. 19).
Group 1 is currently interpreted as a forearm guard with attached mail hand protection, and Groups 2 & 3 as
shin guards with attached mail foot protection. Also found were two small bronze buckles and six small iron
buckles, which fastened the straps of the arm and leg armour respectively.
Held: Gustavianum, Uppsala University Sweden.
References: Arwidsson (1939 & 1954); Engstrm.
Figure 12 - Part of wooden shield covered with painted parchment, width 61 cm [27]. Qalai Mugh
(120km east of Samarkhand, modern-day Tajikistan), Sogdian, 7-8th c.
Figure 13 - Koz'i Skaly: (above) splint from vambrace; (below) splint from greaves.
(source: Kuznetsov & Rudnicki).
Description: Only one large splint from a greave and one smaller from a vambrace are shown (Fig. 13).
Both appear to have been riveted to pairs of leather straps (a similar construction to Catalogue, 2). The
greave splint is reflexively curved which could conceivably fit a rider in bent-legged position but seems
impractical for standing - possibly this is post-depositional damage. The vambrace broadens at both ends
and is bent out, presumably to accomodate the joints.
Held: not known.
References: Kuznetsov & Rudnicki; Gorelik, p.140, plate IX-5. Acknowledgements to Tozhe Forum
internet forum.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, J.C. (1997). The Madrid Chronicle of John Skylitzes (cat. no. 338), in H.C. Evans & W.D. Wixom (eds.) The Glory of Byzantium: Art
and Culture of the Middle Byzantine Era A.D. 843-1261. Metropolitan Museum of Art: New York, p.501-02.
Arwidsson, G. (1939). Armour of the Vendel period. Acta Archaeologica 10, 31-59.
Arwidsson, G. (1954). Valsgrde 8 (Die Grberfunde von Valsgrde, II). Almqvist & Wiksell: Uppsala.
Dain, A. (1938). Sylloge tacticorum, quae olim Inedita Leonis Tactica dicebatur. Socit ddition Les Belles Lettres: Paris.
Dawson, T. (2002). Suntagma hopln: the equipment of regular Byzantine troops, c.950 to c.1204, in: D. Nicolle (ed.), Companion to Medieval
Arms and Armour, p.81-90. Boydell: Bury St Edmunds.
Dennis, G.T. (2010). The Taktika of Leo VI. (Dumbarton Oaks Texts 12). Dumbarton Oaks: Washington DC.
Engstrm, J. (1997). The Vendel chieftains: a study of military tactics, in: A. Nrgrd Jrgensen & B.L. Clausen (eds.) Military Aspects of
Scandinavian Society in a European Perspective, AD 1-1300, p.248-55. National Museum of Denmark: Copenhagen.
Evans, H.C. & W.D. Wixom (1997). The Glory of Byzantium: Art and Culture of the Middle Byzantine Era A.D. 843-1261.Metropolitan Museum of
Art: New York.
Franklin, S. & A. Cutler (1991). Varangians, in A.P. Khazdan (ed.) Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 3. Oxford University: New York,
Oxford, p.2152.
Gorelik, M. (2002). Arms and armour in south-eastern Europe in the second half of the first millenium AD, in: D. Nicolle (ed.),Companion to
Medieval Arms and Armour, p.127-49. Boydell: Bury St Edmunds.
Haldon, J.F. (1975). Some aspects of Byzantine military technology from the sixth to the tenth centuries. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 1,
p.11-47.
Heath, I. (1979). Byzantine Armies 886-1118 (Men-at-Arms 89). Osprey: London.
Hitti, P.K. (trans.) (1929). An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades: Memoirs of Usamah ibn-Munquidh. (Series Records of Western Civilization). Columbia University Press: New York (reprinted 2000).
Ierusalimskaja, A.A. and B. Borkopp (1996). Von China nach Byzanz: Frmittelalterliche Seiden aus der Staatlichen Ermitage Sankt
Petersburg. Bayerisches Nationalmuseum: Munich.
James, S. (2004). Excavations at Dura Europos 1928-1937. Final Report VII: The Arms and Armour and Other Military Equipment.British
Museum: London.
Jeffreys, E. (1998). Digenis Akritis: the Grottaferrata and Escorial versions. (Cambridge Medieval Classics 12). Cambridge University: Cambridge.
Kalavrezou, I. (1997). Triptych Icon with the Deesis and Saints (cat. no. 79), The Harbaville Triptych (cat. no. 80), in H.C. Evans & W.D.
Wixom (eds.) The Glory of Byzantium: Art and Culture of the Middle Byzantine Era A.D. 843-1261. Metropolitan Museum of Art: New York,
p.131-4.
Kirpitchnikov, A.N. (1971). Drevnerusskoe Oruzhie 3: Dospekh, komplekhs boevykh sredstv IX-XIII vv. Arkheologiia SSSR (Akademiia nauk
SSSR, Institut Arkheologii). Nauka: Leningrad.
Kolias, T.G. (1988). Byzantinische Waffen: ein Beitrag zur Byzantinischen Waffenkunde von den Anfngen bis zur Lateinischen
Eroberung (Byzantina Vindobonensia, vol. 17). Verlag der sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Vienna 1988.
Kuznetsov, V.A. and R.R. Rudnicki (1998). Poselenie Koz'i Skaly u g. Beshtau. Materialy po izucheniiu istoriko-kul'turnogo naslediia
Stavropol'skogo Kraia 1.
Lszl, G. and I. Rcz (1977). Der Goldschatz von Nagyszentmikls. Corvina Kiad: Budapest.
Luttwak, E.N. (2009). The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Empire. Harvard University: Cambridge MA.
Magnusson, M and H. Plsson. (transl.) (1966). King Haralds Saga. Penguin Classics (reprinted 1984).
Medvedev, A.F. (1959). Oruzhie Novgoroda velikogo. Materialy i issledovaniia po Arkheologiia SSSR 65, p.121-191.
McGeer, E. (1995). Sowing the Dragons Teeth: Byzantine Warfare in the Tenth Century (Dumbarton Oaks Studies 33). Dumbarton Oaks:
Washington DC.
Nicolle, D. and A. McBride (1992). Romano-Byzantine Armies 4th-9th Centuries (Men-at-Arms 247). Osprey: London.
Oberhelman, S.M. (transl. & ed.) (1991). The Oneirocriticon of Achmet: A Medieval Greek and Arabic Treatise on the Interpretation of
Dreams. Texas Tech University: Lubbock TX.
Pryor, J.H. & E.M. Jeffreys (2006). The Age of the Dromon: The Byzantine Navy ca 500-1204 (The Medieval Mediterranean 62). Brill: Leiden.
Sewter, E.R. (transl.) (1969). The Alexiad of Anna Comnena. Penguin Classics (reprinted 1988).
Vickers, M. (1979). Scythian Treasures in Oxford. Ashmolean Museum: Oxford.
NOTES
[1] The year of the formal inauguration of the Imperial Varangians guard unit is debatable, the mainstream position is 988 (eg. Franklin & Cutler)
but anyway it is likely to be within a couple of decades either side of 1000. PB (back)
[2] I acknowledge of course that the label Byzantine Empire is a neologism, and its inhabitants justifiably called themselvesRhomaioi, Romans,
not Byzantines. With due respect to modern scholars who prefer to use more accurate terms like Rhomania, or the continuing Eastern Roman
Empire, I have used the more generally familiar Byzantium, which thanks to their efforts is now largely devoid of the negative associations it
used to conjure. PB. (back)
[17] A disputed set of gold tableware discovered in modern-day Romania, and displaying features of Sassanian Persian, Byzantine and Central
Asian art - different authorities have assigned it to the Avars, Bulgarians, Khazars or Hungarians, with dates ranging from the 6th to the end of the
10th century. Held - Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna (Austria). (back)
[18] The Scythians probably invented splint armour, which is well-attested both in art of the period and in the archaeological record. PB. (back)
[19] Currently scholarly consensus holds that the ms. was produced in southern Italy (Palermo?), and should be dated 1150-75 (Anderson,
1997). Held - Biblioteca Nacionale, Madrid (Vitr. 26-2). (back)
[20] Heath, p.11. (back)
[21] The Harbaville triptych is held in the Louvre, Paris (inv. no. OA 3247: Kalavrezou 1997, cat. no. 80). The series prototype is held in the
Palazzo Venezia (Venice), dated c.950. A third triptych of intermediate date is kept at the Vatican (Museo Sancta della Biblioteca Apostolia: inv.
no. 2441: Kalavrezou 1997, cat. no. 79). (back)
[22] Kolias, p.65-9. (back)
[23] The expedition which took place against the island of Crete and the arming of both the ships and the cavalry under Constantine and Romanos,
the Emperors born in the purple, faithful in Christ, in indiction seven, recorded by Constantine VIIPorphyrogennitos c.949, incorporated in de
Cerimoniis. Note that in this troop transport role, the dromons crew plus passengers totalled 300. Pryor & Jeffreys, [b].II 1-22 (p.556-7). (back)
[24] The very untypical (and legendary) Byzantine hero Digenis Akritis disdained to don armour, whether fighting men (even whole armies!), beasts
or monsters - so it is interesting that he wears his manikin (bracers) when fencing with a most dangerous band of outlaws (Digenis, Grottaferrata
version Book 6: Jeffreys, p.161). Although the setting of Digenis is the Arab-Byzantine frontier of the 9-10th c. our earliest known version was
written c.1300, and it incorporates some later material (Jeffreys, p.xli). (back)
[25] For example, the experience of a Kurdish huntsman, witnessed and related by ibn-Munqidh (Syrian, c.12th): The lion came towards Zahr-alDawlah while he lay prostrate on the ground. He lifted his leg high and the lion bit at it. We rushed at the lion, killed it and pulled the man out safe
and sound. Then we said to him, O Zahr-al-Dawlah, why didst thou lift thy leg to the mouth of the lion? He replied: My body, as you see it, is
thin and lean; and I have on me only a garment and a tunic. There is nothing in me better clothed than my foot, with its stockings, boots and
leggings. I therefore thought that I would keep the lion busy with it rather than my ribs, hand or head until such time as Allah (exalted is he!) should
provide relief. (from Hitti, p.116).
A silk-covered kaftan excavated from 8-9th c. Alanic graves at Moschevaya Balka (northwestern Caucasus) had two interlayers in the sleeves = silk
outer / raw linen / leather / linen lining (Hermitage, St. Petersburg: inv. no. Kz 6733: Ierusalimskaja & Borkopp, cat. no. 3, p.22-23). (back)
[26] There is no mention of soldiers wearing gloves in any source either, but it would be extremely unwise for us to go without these!
Possibly manikelia incorporated protection for the hands as well as lower arms? PB. (back)
[27] In this reference the location is called Gendjik or Tuapse, and the reconstruction is different, but it is almost certainly the Borisov find. (back)
[28] Source: Fine Art Images (back)
Armour in Byzantium in the early years of the Varangian Guard, with special reference to limb defenses, written and webbed by Peter Beatson.
(c) Birka Traders 2011-12. Not to be copied without permission.
All rights to materials in any linked pages belong to their respective owners.