You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Notices 21245

Drug Schedule Dated: April 14, 2005. Dated: April 14, 2005.
William J. Walker, William J. Walker,
N-Hydroxy-3,4- I Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
methylenedioxyamphetamine Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
(7402). Administration.
Administration.
3,4-Methylenedioxy-N- I [FR Doc. 05–8141 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am]
ethylamphetamine (7404). [FR Doc. 05–8140 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
3,4- I BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Methylenedioxymethamphetam-
ine (7405).
Alpha-methyltryptamine (AMT) I DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
(7432).
Bufotenine (7433) ......................... I Drug Enforcement Administration Employment and Training
Diethyltryptamine (7434) .............. I Administration
Dimethyltyptamine (7435) ............ I Manufacturer of Controlled [TA–W–56,168]
Psilocybin (7437) .......................... I Substances; Notice of Application
Psilocyn (7438) I AG Communication Systems, a
5-methoxy-N-,N- I Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title Division of Lucent Technologies,
diisopropyltryptamine-(5-MeO- 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations Genoa, IL; Including Employees of AG
DIPT) (7439). (CFR), this is notice that on February 1, Communication Systems, a Division of
N-Ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine I 2005, Penick, Corporation, 158 Mount Lucent Technologies, Genoa, IL
(7455). Olivet Avenue, Newark, New Jersey Working in the States of: TA–W–
1-(1-Phenylcyclohexyl) pyrrolidine I 56,168A Florida, TA–W–56,168B
(PCPy) (7458).
07114, made application by renewal to
the Drug Enforcement Administration Wisconson, TA–W–56,168C California,
1[1-(2 Thienyl) cyclohexyl] piper- I TA-W–56,168D Texas; Amended
idine (7470). (DEA) to be registered as a bulk
manufacturer of the basic classes of Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Dihydromorphine (9145) ............... I
controlled substances listed in Apply for Worker Adjustment
Normorphine (9313) ..................... I
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Methamphetamine (1105) ............ II Schedules II:
Adjustment Assistance
1-Phenylcylohexylamine (7460) ... II
Phencyclidine (7471) .................... II Drug Schedule In accordance with Section 223 of the
Phenylacetone (8501) .................. II Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
1- II Cocaine (9041) ............................. II Department of Labor issued a
Piperidinocyclohexanecarbonitr- Codeine (9050) ............................. II Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
ile (8603). Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Cocaine (9041) ............................. II Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II Alternative Trade Adjustment
Codeine (9050) ............................. II Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II Assistance on January 4, 2005,
Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II Ecgonine (9180) ........................... II applicable to workers of AG
Benzoylecgonine (9180) ............... II Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II Communication Systems, a division of
Ethylmorphine (9190) ................... II Morphine (9300) ........................... II Lucent Technologies, Genoa, Illinois.
Morphine (9300) ........................... II Thebaine (9333) ........................... II The notice was published in the Federal
Noroxymorphone (9668) .............. II Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II Register on February 7, 2005 (70 FR
6460).
The company plans to manufacture The company plans to manufacture At the request of the State agency, the
small quantities of the listed controlled the listed controlled substances in bulk Department reviewed the certification
substances for reference standards. for distribution to its customers. for workers of the subject firm. New
No comments or objections have been Any other such applicant and any information shows that worker
received. DEA has considered the person who is presently registered with separations have occurred involving
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and employees of AG Communication
DEA to manufacture such a substance
determined that the registration of Systems, a division of Lucent
may file comments or objections to the
Technologies, Genoa, Illinois working in
Applied Science Labs to manufacture issuance of the proposed registration
Florida, Wisconsin, California and
the listed basic classes of controlled pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Texas. These employees provide
substances is consistent with the public Any such written comments or support function services for the
interest at this time. DEA has objections being sent via regular mail production of telecommunications
investigated Applied Science Labs to may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to equipment produced at the Genoa,
ensure that the company’s registration is Illinois location of the subject firm.
the Deputy Assistant Administrator,
consistent with the public interest. The Based on these findings, the
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
investigation has included inspection Department is amending this
Enforcement Administration,
and testing of the company’s physical certification to include employees of AG
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA
security systems, verification of the Communication Systems, a division of
Federal Register Representative, Liaison
company’s compliance with state and Lucent Technologies, Genoa, Illinois
and Policy Section (ODL); or any being
local laws, and a review of the working in Florida, Wisconsin,
company’s background and history. sent via express mail should be sent to
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA California and Texas.
Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, The intent of the Department’s
and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, Federal Register Representative/ODL,
certification is to include all workers of
the above named company is granted 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
AG Communication Systems, a division
registration as a bulk manufacturer of Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be of Lucent Technologies who were
the basic classes of controlled filed no later than June 24, 2005. adversely affected by a shift in
substances listed. production to Malaysia.

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:40 Apr 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1
21246 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 78 / Monday, April 25, 2005 / Notices

The amended notice applicable to TA- investigation was initiated on March 14, The survey revealed no increase in
W–56,168 is hereby issued as follows: 2005 in response to a petition filed by imports of wheel molds during the
All workers of AG Communication a state agency representative on behalf relevant period. The subject firm did not
Systems, a division of Lucent Technologies, of workers at Ansonia Copper and Brass, import wheel molds in the relevant
Genoa, Illinois (TA–W–56,168), including Ansonia, Connecticut, and Ansonia period nor did it shift production to a
employees of AG Communication Systems, a Copper and Brass, Waterbury, foreign country.
division of Lucent Technologies, Genoa, Connecticut.
Illinois, working in Florida (TA–W– The petitioner alleges that the subject
The petitioner has requested that the
56,168A), Wisconsin (TA–W–56,168B), firm lost its business due to its major
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
California (TA–W–56,168C) and Texas (TA– customers importing products and
the investigation has been terminated.
W–56,168D), who became totally or partially shifting their production abroad.
separated from employment on or after Signed at Washington, DC this 6th day of
December 3, 2003, through January 4, 2007, April 2005. In order to establish import impact,
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance Richard Church, the Department must consider imports
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
that are like or directly competitive with
and are also eligible to apply for alternative Adjustment Assistance. those produced at the subject firm. The
trade adjustment assistance under Section
[FR Doc. E5–1934 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am] Department conducted a survey of the
246 of the Trade Act of 1974. subject firm’s major declining customer
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of regarding their purchases of wheel
April 2005. molds. The survey revealed that the
Richard Church, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR declining customers did not increase
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade their imports of wheel molds during the
Adjustment Assistance. Employment and Training relevant period.
[FR Doc. E5–1937 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am] Administration
The petitioner further alleges that the
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P [TA–W–56,083] major customer of the subject firm has
shifted its production of wheels to
Apex Pattern Company, Los Angeles, Mexico and that workers of this firm
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CA; Notice of Negative Determination were certified eligible for TAA.
Regarding Application for
Employment and Training The fact that subject firm’s customer
Reconsideration
Administration shifted its production abroad and were
By application of February 14, 2005 a certified eligible for TAA is relevant to
[TA–W–56,838]
petitioner requested administrative this investigation if determining
Alden Manufacturing, Co. Chicago, IL; reconsideration of the Department’s whether workers of the subject firm are
Notice of Termination of Investigation negative determination regarding eligible for trade adjustment assistance
eligibility for workers and former (TAA) based on the secondary upstream
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade workers of the subject firm to apply for supplier impact. For certification on the
Act of 1974, as amended, an Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and basis of the workers’ firm being a
investigation was initiated on October Alternative Trade Adjustment secondary upstream supplier, the
14, 2003 in response to a petition filed Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice subject firm must produce a component
on by a company official on behalf of was signed on February 1, 2005 and part of the article that was the basis for
workers of Alden Manufacturing, Co., published in the Federal Register on the customers’ certification.
Chicago, Illinois. March 9, 2005 (70 FR 11703).
The petitioner has requested that the Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) In this case, however, the subject firm
petition be withdrawn. Consequently, reconsideration may be granted under does not act as an upstream supplier,
the investigation has been terminated. the following circumstances: because wheel molds do not form a
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts component part of the aluminum
Signed at Washington, DC this 30th day of
not previously considered that the automotive wheels. Thus the subject
March 2005.
determination complained of was firm workers are not eligible under
Richard Church,
erroneous; secondary impact.
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance. (2) If it appears that the determination Conclusion
[FR Doc. E5–1936 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am] complained of was based on a mistake
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
in the determination of facts not After review of the application and
previously considered; or investigative findings, I conclude that
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying there has been no error or
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or misinterpretation of the law or of the
of the law justified reconsideration of facts which would justify
EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING the decision. reconsideration of the Department of
ADMINISTRATION The TAA petition, filed on behalf of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
workers at Apex Pattern Company, Los application is denied.
[TA–W 56,756 and TA–W 56,756A]
Angeles, California engaged in
Signed at Washington, DC this 31st day of
Ansonia Copper and Brass, Anosonia, production of wheel molds was denied March, 2005.
CT, Ansonia Copper and Brass, because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’
group eligibility requirement of Section Elliott S. Kushner,
Waterbury, CT; Notice of Termination
222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
of Investigation Adjustment Assistance.
met. The ‘‘contributed importantly’’ test
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade is generally demonstrated through a [FR Doc. E5–1938 Filed 4–22–05; 8:45 am]
Act of 1974, as amended, an survey of the workers’ firm’s customers. BILLING CODE 4510–30–P

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:40 Apr 22, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1