Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This present observational, longitudinal, and non-concurrent study was developed with the purposes of
evaluate the profile of patients attended by a pharmacotherapeutic follow-up service and describe the
Drug-Related Problems (DRPs) found over there; determine the proportion of DRPs between the health
problems presented by the studied population, classifying them and identifying the situations related with
their appearance. The study was developed at the School Pharmacy of Newton Paiva University Center,
Belo Horizonte, MG, during the period from 2001 November up to 2003 November. Ninety seven patients
have been evaluated, the majority of female sex (66.0%), with up to 8 years of scholarship (45.4%), mean
age of 56.7 13.0 years; mean of 4 2 diagnosed diseases; 7 6 complaints and 4 2 medications per
patient. Nine hundred and twelve health problems have been identified: 56.5% uncontrolled. From the
uncontrolled problems, 380 (73.6%) were DRPs and between these, 81 (21.3%) were risks for DRP.
From the 97 followed-up patients, 89 (91.7%) have presented at least one DRP during the follow-up. The
more frequent DRPs were related to effectiveness (53.2%), to necessity (25.2%) and to safety (21.6%).
A great number of uncontrolled problems was observed, as well as the possibility to resolve them by
means of pharmaceutical care, indicating so the resolutive potential of this practice.
Uniterms: Pharmaceutical care. Pharmacotherapeutic follow-up. Drug Related Problem (DRP).
O presente estudo observacional, longitudinal, no concorrente teve por objetivos avaliar o perfil dos
pacientes atendidos por um servio de acompanhamento farmacoteraputico e descrever os problemas
relacionados com medicamento (PRM) encontrados; determinar a proporo de PRM dentre os problemas
de sade apresentados pela populao estudada, classific-los e identificar situaes relacionadas com
seu surgimento. O estudo foi realizado na Farmcia Escola do Centro Universitrio Newton Paiva, em
Belo Horizonte, MG, durante o perodo de novembro de 2001 a novembro de 2003. Foram avaliados 97
pacientes, maioria mulheres (66,0%), com at 8 anos de escolaridade (45,4%), mdia de idade de 56,7
13,0 anos; mdia de 4 2 doenas com diagnstico; 7 6 queixas e 4 2 medicamentos por paciente.
Foram identificados 912 problemas de sade: 56,5% no controlados. Dos problemas no controlados,
380 (73,6%) eram PRM e desses 81 (21,3%) eram riscos de PRM. Dos 97 pacientes acompanhados 89
(91,7%) apresentaram pelo menos um PRM durante o acompanhamento. Os PRMs mais freqentes foram
relacionados efetividade (53,2%), necessidade (25,2%) e segurana (21,6%). Observou-se grande
nmero de problemas no controlados e a possibilidade de resolv-los por meio da ateno farmacutica,
demonstrando o potencial resolutivo dessa prtica.
Unitermos: Ateno farmacutica. Acompanhamento farmacoteraputico. Problemas Relacionados
com Medicamentos (PRM).
INTRODUCTION
The pharmaceutical care (PC) is considered as a
change in the profession conception and has arisen at the
*Correspondence: Y. A. Nascimento. Centro Universitrio Newton Paiva.
Av. Silva Lobo, 1730 30.460-000 - Nova Granada - Belo Horizonte MG,
Brazil. E-mail: yone_almeida@hotmail.com
Article
Brazilian Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences
vol. 45, n. 2, abr./jun., 2009
322
323
Problem
DRP 1: The patient suffers from a health problem as a result of not taking the medicine that he needs.
DRP 2: The patient suffers from a health problem as a result of taking a medicine that he does not need.
Effectiveness
DRP 3: The patient has a health problem resulting from a non-quantitative ineffectiveness of a medicine.
DRP 4: The patient has a health problem resulting from a quantitative ineffectiveness of a medicine.
Safety
DRP 5: The patient suffers from a health problem as a consequence of a non-quantitative safety problem of a
medicine.
DRP 6: The patient suffers from a health problem as a consequence of a quantitative safety problem of a medicine.
Source: SEGUNDO CONSENSO DE GRANADA SOBRE PRM, 2002
without the detailing necessary for adoption of interventions); Health problem under evaluation (defined as a
problem for which an intervention had already occurred,
being necessary to wait for the respective result).
In this work, the definition and classification of
DRP professed by the Second Consensus of Granada
respecting Drug Related Problems (2002) (Table I) have
been adopted.
A descriptive data analysis has been developed, in a
procedure that has included the determination of proportion of drug related problems (DRP) between the health
problems presented by the studied population, in a general
way and according to professed categories. It has included
also frequencies distribution, central trend measures and
variability measures.
324
symptom or disease, during the formation of health professionals. Such a fact reinforces the importance of pharmacists
adequately trained for pain handling, who know exactly
when make use of therapeutic strategies, such as OTC medications, and what is the suitable moment to forward the
patient to a physician, for more detailed evaluation; contributing so to improve the quality of care provided to patients.
The other more reported complaints were fatigue/
malaise (5.0%, 34), intestinal constipation (4.3%, 29);
sleeping disturbances (4.3%, 29) and dizziness and
vertigo (3.9%, 26).
It is even appropriate to emphasize that 20 patients
(20.6%) presented complaints related to emotional status or behavior; yet 33% of patients reported sleeping
alterations. Such data look to be coherent with those
obtained by Szwarcwald (2004), in a published study
about Brazilians perception respecting their own health,
which verified that 25% of individuals reported a severe
or very severe grade of disturbance respecting the state
of mind (sadness or depression, worry or anxiety) and
18% presented sleeping problems. These results could be
evaluated based on the current social context, in which
situations of unsafety, criminality, unemployment and
inequality are present.
TABLE II Distribution of medications used by patients followed-up at FECUNP, from 2001 to 2003 First and second level of
ATC classification
Medications
Cardiovascular system
Diuretics
Acting over the renin-angiotensin system
Beta-blockers and associations
Calcium channel blockers and associations
Central nervous system
Psycholeptics1
Analgesics
Psychoanaleptics2
Gastrointestinal tract and metabolism
Used in diabetes
Antacids and other for ulcer and flatulence
Musculoskeletal system
Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic
Blood and hematopoietic organs
Antithrombotics
Genitourinary tract
Sexual/modulator hormones
Hormones
Thyroid treatment
Other
TOTAL
1
: 5.8% corresponding to anxiolytics; 2: 3.6% corresponding to anti-depressives.
Frequency
145
44
31
21
21
86
28
26
20
70
26
19
27
13
21
19
16
15
16
14
35
416
Percentage
34.9%
10.6%
7.5%
5.0%
5.0%
20.7%
6.7%
6.2%
4.8%
16.8%
6.2%
4.6%
6.5%
3.1%
5.0%
4.6%
3.8%
3.5%
3.8%
3.4%
8.5%
100,0%
325
FIGURE 1 Distribution of health problems, per category, presented by patients followed-up at FECUNP from 2001 to 2003.
The medications acting on the central nervous system corresponded to the second class of more mentioned
medications (20.7%), which looks to point out their use
with the purpose of relief symptoms/signals related to
emotional status as well as sleeping disturbances and
syndromes of cephalalgia and migraine, which if summed,
correspond to the third more frequent group of complaints.
Considering the previous discussion about multi-causality
of diseases, it becomes important to evaluate the role of
the medicalization of such disturbances, as well as to work
with the purpose to propose changes that are shown more
effective and/or safe for the treatment of such disturbances.
912 problems in the 97 participant patients have
been identified, being 516 (56.5%) of them uncontrolled,
requiring an intervention from the pharmacist. These
problems included the health problems non-related to
the use of medications, which presented themselves as
uncontrolled; and the real DRPs as well. Following, the
frequency distribution of problems according to categories
professed in this study (Figure 1).
Yet, Table III presents a descriptive analysis of
found problems. It is possible to perceive that the average
of health problems reported by individuals was similar to
Mean Standard
Deviation
Median
95
53
43
32
8
5
3
3
Range
Minimum
3
1
0
0
Maximum
23
16
12
10
326
TABLE IV Distribution of health problems, per category, presented by patients followed-up at FECUNP from 2001 to 2003
Diseases, disturbances and/or
signals and symptoms
Uncontrolled
Health Problem
TOTAL
25 (4.9%)
23 (4.4%)
34 (6.6%)
33 (6.4%)
10 (1.9%)
19 (3.7%)
11 (2.1%)
0 (0.0%)
6 (1.2%)
56 (10.9%)
217 (42.1%)
123
64
74
64
36
37
24
11
9
74
516 (100%)
327
TABLE V Main identified causes for DRP found at FECUNP from 2001 to 2003
Total of DRP
CAUSE
Frequency
96
79
73
35
35
19
Percentage
25.3%
20.8%
19.2%
9.2%
9.2%
5.0%
Non-utilization of medication
Prescription in lower dose
Unidentified cause1
Refractoriness
Non-prescription of required medications
Use of medication different than prescribed or
inadequate use
Interaction
18
4.7%
9
11.1%
Lacking access to medications
18
4.7%
7
8.6%
Prescription in higher dose
6
1.6%
0
0
Ignored
1
0.3%
0
0
Total
380
100.0%
81
100.0%
1
: Referred to cases of adverse reactions with undefined cause (n=61) and to cases of DRP 2, due to the use of unnecessary
medications (n=12).
328
REFERENCES
BARRON-RIVERA, A.J.; TORREBLANCA, F.L; SNCHEZCASANOVA, L.I; BELTRAN, M.M. Efecto de una
intervencin educativa en la calidad de vida del paciente
hipertenso. Salud Pblica Mx., v.40, n.6, p.503-509, 1998.
BETTENCOURT, A.R.C. ; OLIVEIRA, MA; FERNANDES,
ALG; BOGOSSIAN, M. Educao de pacientes com asma:
atuao do enfermeiro. J. Pneumol., v.28, n.4, p.193-200,
2002.
BRASIL. Ministrio da Sade. Sade Brasil, 2004: uma anlise
da situao de sade. Braslia, 2004. 350 p.
CARVALHO, M. M. Dor: um estudo multidisciplinar. So
Paulo: Summus, 1999. 341 p.
CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTH. The
integration of health behavior counseling into routine
medical care. Rev. Panam. Salud Pblica., v.9, n.6, p.413420, 2001.
329
C I P O L L E , R . J . ; S T R A N D , L . M . ; M O R L E Y, P. C .
Pharmaceutical Care Practice: The clinicians guide. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 2004. 394 p.
330