Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Sociologist.
http://www.jstor.org
The
and
Cultural
Social
Incorporation
of Sociological
Robert
Any
evaluation
examine
into
the
methods
and
public
degree
on
alienation
point
the
sociology
that made
obtuse
culture
to
point
develop
and
the
society.
The
techniques
incorporation
possible
between
in the
first
sociology
caused
problems
public
the
danger
notion
cannot
is that
by
that
compre
is too
sociology
we
incorporated
the
when
the way
article,
sociological
example
that
language
that
this
been
relationship
culture?for
general
problems
into American
incorporated
popular
in an
to
the
the
often
sociologists
from
is written
sociology
hend?we
edge
While
of
impact
on
only
In
have
concepts
and
society,
not
it is consumed.
the
society,
and
politics
Wolfe
to focus
ought
sociological
of American
policy.
certain
a discipline
on how
also
to which
the vernacular
and
but
and Alan
Merton
as
of sociology
is produced,
sociology
K.
Knowledge
readily
the more
Introduction
One of the least understood
of a science
is the
stages in the development
scientific
which
and
of
leave
take
process
by
findings, concepts,
ways
thinking
from the scientists who
enter
them
and
the
culture
and
the
originate
general
occurs
This
in
which
con
is of particular
larger society.
process,
any science,
cern
has
to sociologists.
described
been
everyday
The
of sociology
that
through a process
can
become
diffused
incorporation
throughout
in the process,
in the academic
language?often,
losing their origins
that gave them birth. Moreover,
and tech
sociological
knowledge
as cultural
discipline
nique can be
of social
the direct
subject to the parallel process
incorporation,
or indirect (and unwitting)
reliance on the findings and methods
of sociology by
social
institutions and aspects of the social structure, both macro
and micro.
Robert
Scholar
Merton
K.
of
Merton
is University
Professor
Foundation.
Sage
the Russell
Emeritus
at Columbia
University
and Wolfe
and
Foundation
15
and cultural
of a science
incorporation
assess
state
to
then
effort
the
of sociology
is,
any
in American
the way sociology has been received
If the social
ence
with
presumably
we
culture,
particular
ate
have
most
their discipline,
from a sister discipline?on
is produced.
Our
limited
to our
ourselves
edge
the knowledge
that originates
that academic
The sociology
of knowledge
to chart
of sociology. We want
as academic
becomes
sociology
As
sociologists
to
evalu
is often better
than
appreciated
of the ways
inwhich work
part of the culture and society
In so doing, we may well discover
some
themselves
sociologists
study.
of
into
the culture
incorporation
sociology
than
many
blessing
sociologists
might prefer.
Language
own.
are
are
focus?to
terms
borrow
quite properly
the supply side of the equation:
how new knowl
concern here is with the demand
side: how social knowl
that the
The
of the most
of them will
is consumed.
mixed
One
aspects
particular;
edge
culture.
interesting
is part of what
that sci
as a science
should deal
and
society
is more
of a
of Sociology
to begin
is with
the use of sociological
place
term charisma
knows Weber's
has
highly technical
istic expression
for those covering politics
well
(as
One
words.
Every sociologist
a favorite journal
as sports and popular mu
is also the name of a software
become
It is common
to some
of dysfunction,
the proper
meaning
degree
sociological
a journalist can write an article titled "We Have Met the Anomie
and He
to
Is Us." Clearly one way in which we can begin to get a grasp on the degree
are
terms
is
vernacular
which
into
the
sociological
by examining
incorporated
while
their use
not establish
Nexis/Lexis,
measuring
expressions
and
terms.
This
is,
of
course,
measure,
rough
16
since
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
of the
1995
1 presents
the frequency of selected
Table
(and related social
sociological
terms as cited in major newspapers
in the United States between
science)
Janu
can
A
be
and
number
of
observations
made
from
this
1991
1993.1
ary
June
that the frequency with which
information. For one thing, it appears
sociologi
terms enter
the general culture does not correlate with the frequency with
While
the Parsonian
has had
which
they are used by sociologists.
paradigm
enormous
within
Parsons's
less
the
such as
field,
impact
jargonistic concepts,
sick role, do not register in the general culture. Max Weber
gave contemporary
a way of discussing
and (as did Alfred Adler)
charisma
America
lifestyle, but
cal
are
informal
uninterested
spectacularly
rationality.
in entering the general culture is usually associated with those terms
the "triumph of the therapeutic"
has been called
that touch on what
(Rieff
a
term
one
ex
of
the
in
The
is
social
sense,
1966).
popularity
dysfunctional,
Americans
Success
that microsociological
is nothing
concepts
especially
complex
other nor looking
management,
or interaction
ritual?are
not common
some obvious
to the way
are, in addition,
aspects
political
sociology
the general culture. Wrong
has
that
enters the
(1990)
argued
sociology
general culture as a debunker of popular beliefs, and this is clearly confirmed by
our investigation. Terms which emphasize
less than positive aspects of American
There
enters
life tend
to be
the most
press, such as
frequently cited in the popular
it
must
be
alienation,
deviance,
anomie,
although,
pointed out, upward mobil
more
use
is
in
far
in
the
culture
than
downward
(The
general
ity
mobility.
to this point may well be words
that have a Marxist
exception
origin, such as
among
are closer
to the bottom of
which
aristocracy,
in
to
to
look
accentuate
the
list.) Journalists
not,
general,
sociology
of
more
American
is
to
be incorporated
positive aspects
society; sociology
likely
into the general culture when Americans
or
that culture as problematic
perceive
false
the
consciousness
and
labor
do
flawed.
as an additional
A political
element enters into our discussion
form; sociologi
cal expressions,
like the realities to which
Gans
they point, are hotly contested.
use
has
that
not
term
should
the
underclass
because
(1990)
argued
sociologists
it carries the implication of blaming those to whom
it is applied
for their con
or not sociologists
use the term,2 however,
dition. Whether
journalists clearly
do, for the term was one of the most widely cited of all sociological
expressions,
as is the term culture of poverty, which
is also disliked
for its political
implica
Merton
and Wolfe
17
Very
Strongly
_Cover
Lifestyle
Role Model
Standard of Living
Dysfunctional
Strongly
1
Terms
TABLE
of Selected
Frequency
Sociological
Terms
Incorporated
50OO citations)
106607
27054
19852
6260
Incorporated
Weakly
Underclass
Terms
3831
3433
2763
2303
2192
2179
2104
1417
1395
1254
1199
Demographic (y)
Peer Group
Subculture
Division of Labor
Altruism
White Collar Crime
Upward mobility
Self-fulfillingprophecy
Conspicuous consumption
Socialization
Moderately
Incorporated
Youth culture
Belief System
Meritocracy
Gender role
Life course
Counter culture
903
767
649
586
582
517
Folkways
Social mobility
Lifecycle
Glass ceiling
488
359
346
331
Primarygroup
Inner-directed
Social stratification
NOTE:
observe
Source:
18
Although
whether
Lexis/Nexis,
85
61
60
56
51
Upward mobility
Lumpenproletariat
Collective behavior
48
Authoritatianpersonality
Intermediategroup
Cultural lag
Gemeinschaft
Relative deprivation
Collective Conscience
Hidden currinculum
38
34
29
29
Cooptation
Generalized other
Thick description
Sexual division of labor
Unanticipated consequences
Labor aristocracy
Unanticipated consequences
12
10
Gift relationship
Anomie
Definition of the situation
Authoritarianpersonality
Role distance
Structuration
Ascribed status
Interactionritual
Total institution
Impressionmanagement
Symbolic interaction
Legitimation crisis
Looking glass self
Structural-functionalism
Organic solidarity
Habitus
Working class authoritarianism
Formal rationality
Abstracted empiricism
Cooling-out process
Instrumentalrationality
Indexical expression
Mechanical solidarity
Moral entrepreneurs
our
terms are used
these
by sociologists,
context.
in a sociological
cited
they were
all
January
27
25
21
21
19
17
16
~?;IXnfi o^tatedTerins
; <0-9citations)
268
263
257
231
224
218
215
192
169
161
159
150
133
123
114
105
Status Symbol
Achieved Status
Anomie
Class consciousness
Reverse discrimination
White collar crime
Ethnocentrism
Downward mobility
Leisure class
Other-directed
Culture of poverty
Mass societv
Reference group
Meritocracy
Unanticipated consequences
Civil religion
False consciousness
End of ideology
Gessellschaft
Terms
Terms
citations)
Civilizing process
Postindustrialsociety
Sick role
325
Double bind
Incorporated
!(10^
(1000^5000 citations)
Press
in the Popular
1,
1991
to June
30,
method
does
not
allow
us
to
1993.
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
tion. On
more
have
terms are
as
in different ways.
Some can be described
incorporated
a respectable
but not spectacularly
terms; they achieve
high visibility in
the general culture and tend to stay there. (Mass society, social
stratification,
are examples).
and end of ideology
Moreover
these terms achieve widespread
use among specialists
in a particular
field, even if they do not become
part of
the common
outside
discourse
that field; writers on religion nearly always use
Different
"niche"
Robert
Bellah's
term civil
religion,
the expression.
Some terms which
with
even
ifwriters
on politics
may
not be
familiar
will
events,
newsworthy
but
are
not.
In general,
the past few years have apparently
not seen any decrease
in the
extent to which
terms
have
been
into
the
sociological
incorporated
general
culture. Although
the recent availability of on-line technology makes
it impos
to search
account
to examine
this trend (see Table
usage during the period when data are available
seems
This
true
can
terms
of
that
be
used
in the context of self
2).
especially
or role model,
such as dysfunctional
both of which
help or group process,
the general
entered
culture with
increased
Less
during this period.
frequency
rapidly, but still notably,
other
terms?such
as anomie
or norm?also
increased
in usage.
to be something
like a natural history of the incorporation
of
appears
terms.
some
It
takes
time
before
sociological
clearly
any sociological
expression
enters the general culture; relatively recent terms?habitus,
dependency,
legiti
mation
crisis?will
have to rattle about in the academy
for some time before,
if ever, they enter the general culture. Other terms which
to have their
continue
uses among sociologists,
such as relative deprivation,
never seem to enter the
There
general
culture.
civil
At
the
same
time,
ox folkways,
far
older
terms,
such
as
conspicuous
con
sumption,
religion
once a term enters the culture,
use among professional
even if, as Table 2 shows, such terms reach
sociologists,
a steady-state. However,
not all terms which
a certain popularity will
achieve
remain in the culture forever. White-collar
crime and modernization
are terms
Merton
and Wolfe
19
2
TABLE
of Sociological
Incorporation
American
Four
Terms
Newspapers*
1985-1996
Term
Anomie
Peer
group
Role
model
1484
613
396
490
476
490
44
64
163
242
410
550
1538
1749
1978
2129
2025
1879
82
59
76
86
72
78
845
Folkways
41
Ethnocentrism
17
1536
1375
1648
1393
87
82
97
82
99
85
93
207
242
359
336
360
274
341
68
78
71
109
106
77
94
234
211
164
60
206
57
165
1988
1099
906
141
116
White-Collar
crime
451
71
58
Subculture
56
18
151
Conspicuous
Consumption
31
409
73
Underclass
46
39
650
Self-fulfilling
40
38
72
Prophecy
48
25
1554
Norm
1991
1987
14
Dysfunctional
1990
1986
371
Charisma
1992
1989
1985
113
150
252
250
57
56
58
65
41
11
23
24
25
18
184
209
145
102
116
Relative
Deprivation
Civil
religion
*New
York
less
likely
phenomena
Times,
to be
Post,
Washington
Angeles
lives. Economists,
everyday
the unity of their discipline;
economic
20
Chicago
Sun-Times.
are
the
the
into American
incorporated
is economics,
for, like sociology,
lead their
close to the way people
unlike
with
fairly common
is a far more
economics
though
rhetorical
Times,
now
Finally, it isworth
in which
the terms of other disciplines
way
culture. The most obvious point of comparison
that deals with matters
this is a social science
schools
12
a decade
than they were
ago, even
though
as
as
ever.
refer
be
may
they
ubiquitous
terms with
the incorporation
of sociological
comparing
cited
to which
Los
it too has a
than sociology,
discipline
no
matter
how
abstract
1985). Furthermore,
(McCloskey
can
more
direct policy
than
be, it is taken to have
implications
theory
technical
dimension
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
sociology;
For all
science
life. Indeed
economic
plines
is no Council
terms have
in Washington.
that economics,
of all the social
into
the
general culture of
incorporated
of Sociological
be thought
it might
reasons,
disciplines, would
American
logical
there
these
Advisors
be fairly well
it is, as Table
3 shows, but
into general
been
incorporated
seem
there
is no
evidence
that
far more
than socio
usage
rather parallel.4
Both disci
if lifestyle leads the list in
used;
leads the list in economics.
also
Both disciplines
a particular niche in the general culture; elasticity of
strati
is cited in the general culture at roughly the same rate as social
demand
as
terms
case
such
As
is
the
with
consump
sociological
conspicuous
fication.
law of diminishing
returns, the invisible hand?
tion, much older terms?the
and
demand
sociology,5 supply
terms with
have analogous
that sound
those
more
use
have
their business
sections,
Newspapers
from economics,
but they also have
their
terminology
use terminology
from sociology.
jargonistic.
of course,
lifestyle sections, which
terms that one might have expected
to
Moreover,
just as certain sociological
terms.
enter the general culture did not, the same is true for some economic
which,
of their technical
the way
and
economic
theorem,
Journalists
simply do not talk about the Coase
terms
School
such as backward-bending
Chicago
supply curves
wide.
let alone
non
and preference
schedules.
To summarize,
it seems that sociology
does enter into the culture
in which
is practiced,
if the incorporation
the science
of terms from the discipline
into
can
as
one
measure
as
we
be used
of such influence. This,
have
general usage
is true of any science,
including
of
evolution
and
survival
conceptions
said,
a wide
for
variety
of
seemingly
some
have
non-natural
of the natural
been
used
phenomena.
a particularly
form of what might
heightened
success."
know that their field is more
Sociologists
faces
sciences;
and misused
be
However,
called
Darwinian
to account
sociology
"the paradox
of
recog
likely to gain public
a reputation as useful, and entry into the vernacular
if the field develops
a
Faced with a choice
between
is often taken at least as a sign of relevance.
one
to
is
and
that
that
is
the
of
culture
concepts
sociology,
general
impervious
nition
willing
be
to adopt
advantages
Merton
sociological
to
the
there would
seem
to
latter.
21
and Wolfe
TABLE
of Selected
Frequency
3
Economic
Terms
^< ^
Y?ry.&f3&te^
126902
21396
Balance
-Steeply Incorporate
1465
1312
Price system
advantage
Comparative
??^Wl
f?in?BSii^li
946
935
823
739
691
630
538
399
227
220
side economics
Supply
Trade
regime
Invisible hand
Externality
out
Crowding
Stagflation
Excess
Demand
Disequilibrium
Law
returns
of diminishing
Fiscal
drag
182
119
117
108
104
Effective demand
Welfare
economics
Random
walk
of demand
Elasticity
Surplus value
^^
Marginal
NWeaklytneorporafe?
Veranar
62
utility
Allocative
60
power
Countervailing
50
efficiency
48
Wage drift
36
Clearing
themarket
33
Revealed
preferences
25
Shadow
prices
23
Demand
pull inflation
17
17
Disutility
Price
14
preference
Liquidity
10
inelasticity
Rational
expectations
10
theory
Mniii|jM
Satisficing
Indifference curve
Fiscal
illusion
Marginal
propensity
Preference
Average
Source:
22
Lexis/Nexis,
schedule
propensity
Age-earnings
Coase
to save
Backward
to consume
profile
theorem
January
1,
1991
to June
30,
1993.
The American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
as well.
Yet
words
As has been
reiterated with
become
noted,
"many sociological
successive
diminution
of mean
modish,
boringly
As terms in the vernacular
take on a life of their own,
ing." (Merton 1982:101).
can
far from any original sociological
wander
their meaning
associated
purpose
of such terms. One result is to denude
with
the development
important socio
conse
and scientific value?the
inevitable
of their precision
concepts
runs
in
the
of
risk
of
turn,
This,
quence
undermining
widespread
popularity.
to the discipline's
in direct relationship
support for the discipline
public
public
that the vagueness
and imprecision
For it is possible
of an incorpo
usefulness.
logical
rated
itwas
more
than charisma,
is now routinely
which
with
consciousness
appear
any frequency
at all, irrespective of what qualities
attention.
(Cars, and
bring them to public
are
we
other machines,
But
this
is
charisma
also,
being told, possess
quality.)
to rival charisma
not alone
in this regard. Role model
has surely come
in its
their precise
conceptual
to
applied
people who
meaning
in the public
as professional
from original meaning,
basketball
insist on
players
that they are not one.6 Max Weber's
Lebensstil
signified fairly pre
some of the cultural attributes associated with social class, and even when
wanderings
television
cisely
itwas
transformed
suggests,
an
course,
tinues,
order
that
rather
fulfilled
than
constricted."
he
"Unfortunately,"
and
con
it even more
trivialized
salesmen,
pop psychologists
1994: 109). Indeed, a glance
(Erwin
through the most fre
we
terms
1 suggests
list in Table
that most of them, in
incorporated
quently
have lost much or all of their original meaning
their popularity,
and
achieving
"journalists,
than usual"
rapidly
often
Sociology
text,
new
acquired
we
meaning.
point
contrast
by
mocked
to
the
but
(Darden
in many
1992).
ways
In this con
more
serious,
people
that it is introducing
The public
knowledge.
believe
for commonplace
at all, since
needed
therefore,
presumably,
terms into the general
completed?when
new observations
it and
new words
comes
or complex
formulations
to ask why
social science
is
the general
culture
share the same language
and
the same knowledge.
The
of
sociological
incorporation
a mixed
culture becomes
the cycle
is
blessing. When
terms to express
new concepts
or
have coined
sociologists
of social reality, only to have these transformed
into popular
of seeing their new
expressions,
they may gain the satisfaction
but misleading
in lights; but they lose the pleasure
that comes from having introduced
concepts
a way of seeing the social reality that the culture, inward looking as it is, cannot
see.
Merton
and Wolfe
23
Techniques
Sociological
is incorpo
that the discipline
terminology
just through sociological
or so
social
The
realities.
into
of
rated
obtaining
knowledge
larger
techniques
of sociology; more
the discipline
cial information have also reached out beyond
It is not
an increased
use of this
In short, both countries
experienced
was pub
the
when
Recent
Trends
Social
1933,
however,
year
By
technique.
that time the most comprehensive
in the
lished?until
effort ever undertaken
1991:
18, 29).
men
to apply social knowledge
to contemporary
conditions?no
tion of these earlier local surveys was made
1991: 290). Elites wanted
(Bulmer
information about national, not local, conditions;
and academic
them
sociologists
selves turned away, for a time, from the social survey as insufficiently scientific.
United
States
in the vacuum
the technique
of choice
created
opinion polling became
of
the
the
social
decline
As
Converse
stresses, survey research,
(1987)
survey.
by
the election polls taken by the Survey Research
Center of the Univer
especially
took its name from the social survey; but its inspiration came
sity of Michigan,
Public
in the
time?constituting
tudes and behavior
in the 1970s,
1950s, to quarterly
one of the most durable
records
(Curtin
1982).
a sociological
process by which
American
society functions
way
sions
are
not
the official
24
only
used
"economic
to measure
indicators"
There
at the present
atti
of people's
no better example
of the
to monthly
we
is probably
has become
technique
than this regularly
consumer
of impending
have
an important
reported
confidence,
states
The
survey;
they
are
part of the
its conclu
also
among
of the economy.
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
Survey research
they first expanded
are cited in more
our concern
Since
were
into American
society after
incorporated
techniques
in usage within
the social sciences.
The results of surveys
and more articles appearing
in social
science
publications.
in this paper
is with the demand
for sociological
knowledge
NORC
surveys.
Although
can be distorting
averages
an increase
1 demonstrates
when
preferences
in such citations
since the
differ dramatically,
Figure
1940s, from an average of about
of over
one
hundred
in the
citations
of survey findings
form in which
the GSS was
magazines,
specialized
annual
newsletters,
U.S.
government
agencies,
and
in
the
report
indicators
(Smith 1992: 4-19).
ing of social
of such methods
and techniques within
The expansion
the social sciences has
a
similar
outside
been accompanied
them, as institutions and or
by
expansion
in the larger society, especially
the mass media,
also come to rely on
ganizations
them. When
cited
the mass
media
surveys;
to one
according
opinion
about
science
reported social
half of all social science
a joint venture
to sample public opinion
1992: 2).
(Mann and Orren
repeatedly
Since that time, the use of polls and other ways of measuring
public opinion
can be compared
has grown;
1975 and the present
indeed, the period between
to the period
in the 1920s and the 1930s when
the social survey, which
had
in existence
Merton
and Wolfe
25
0\
G\
I
ON
00
to
P
?o 10?om ^ ;
26
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
effective
and
spread
misuse
of focus
of course, but it
and surveys are not used simply for electoral purposes,
that
their longtime and increasing validation by actual voting outcomes
one
The
dra
the technique
has accorded
1988).
legitimacy (Crespi
generalized
election of 1948 that forecast the defeat
matic polling error in the presidential
Polls
has been
et al. (1949)?
error consequentially
of Harry Truman?an
analyzed by Mosteller
in
those
of
confidence
led to only a temporary
among
newspaper
polling
lapse
in the use of polls (Merton and Hatt
served as strategic gatekeepers
editors who
information on just
1949). Since then, polls and surveys have come to collect
about
polls
birth
defects,
education,
medicine,
parks,
sex
religion,
savings
hunting,
taxation,
transit,
crimes,
time,
urban
areas,
labor,
waste,
So extensive
in the realm
with
respect
enable
the scientist to measure what people
that they would
research evidently anticipated,
the founders of public
opinion
rate of nonresponse,
use of polls has led to an increasing
to the technique
(Smith 1989;
of the findings from efforts to poll
feedback
as well,
abuse,
drug
immigration,
a phenom
has polling become
that we may witness
to
similar
of sociological
the
of success
technique
paradox
to sociological
terms. Early in the use of surveys, itwas
assumed
and women.
enon
police,
daylight
housing,
do
at least
some
think. More
Steech
1989). So,
the public
about
not believe
that
some Americans,
in general, do
while
trusting polls
can
the
entire
American
represent
accurately
samples
population
are also
effects from the society to social science
Feedback
polling;
than
the widespread
thus reflecting
(Roper
a part
1986).
of this
some
story. Inundated with polls and skeptical about their scientific character,
come
to feel that polling
is itself problematic.
individuals
Recent
criticisms of
are divided
about whether
their field has suf
themselves
Sociologists
niques.
fered a crisis of legitimacy
1990; Horowitz
1993), but the general
(Hargens
as Darden
in the popular culture seems to have decreased;
prestige of sociologists
(1992) discovered,
but positive.
The
Merton
use
the portrayal
of "focus groups"
on
of sociologists
the grand
scale
in popular
(Leo
literature
Bogart
is anything
[personal
and Wolfe
commu
27
Mean
TABLE 4
of Media
Polls
196&-89
Number
Year
TV
Newspapers
1968
1.7 0 0
19722.0
19762.1
1980
3.2
3.9
1984
1988
5.6
1989
5.2
Conducted
Stations
Annually
Media
Major
Organizations*
0.3
0.4
2.2
4.4
5.616.4
6.226.6
6.132.4
7.120.1
etc.
Wall
CBS News,
Street Journal,
News,
Ladd
and John Benson,
"The Growth
of News
Everett
Carll
in Thomas
E. Mann
and Gary R. Orren,
Polls
Politics,"
eds., Media
*ABC
Source:
(Washington:
Brookings
Institution,
the mixed
in American
Politics
23.
that some
research, estimates
advertising
in the use of this research procedure)
annually
can have as they are incorpo
fate sociological
techniques
1992),
in American
Polls
and
II and afterward,
and practices.
During World War
to obtain more
the
of
the
"focused
interview"
sociologists
developed
technique
data about the character
and sources of individual opinions,
detailed qualitative
in social
rated
institutions
attitudes, beliefs,
of questionnaires
eses which
could
came
to be known
guesses
ingly, plausible
been
taken as conclusive
decisions.
New
products
Politicians
findings and
are marketed
(Krueger
derived
as partial
on
based
1988; Morgan
1988). Increas
from focus group data have
and policy
for practical
bases
re
of focus-group
to the
election
precincts
the basis
alone.
of every stripe, from local
to the unsampled
draw upon focus groups to tailor their messages
House,
summit between
Ronald
It is even reported
that the 1988 Moscow
electorate.
was
on
the
American
and
Mikhail
Gorbachev
side, on
Reagan
partly designed,
search
White
of focus-group
data (Stewart and Shamdasani
1990: 124-126).
story does not end there. In the first stage of the incorporation
the basis
The
process
in
the aca
interview
(which
group
emerged
examining,
as a qualitative
source of hypotheses
for more
and
demic domain
systematic
was
into
and
marketers
transformed
by
political
pundits
quantitative
inquiry)
a sufficient basis for discovering what
focus groups
that were
taken to provide
we
are
was
on
28
the focussed
the minds
of Americans.
(On
the continuities
The
and differences
American
between
Sociologist/Fall
1995
the focused
interview
source
the academic
1984:
was
82.) Decades
"obliterated
later,
by in
it became
on the
attended a workshop
Thus, fifty-two sociologists
use of focus groups
in social research
that was held at the 1992 meeting
of the
a
American
Association
has
(Billson
1993).
gone
Sociological
Rarely
technique
to the society and back again quite as rapidly as this one.
from sociology
and focus groups are not the only sociological
that have been widely
into American
incorporated
society
Polls
feed back
has
of course,
techniques,
and, as a consequence,
out. Demographic
analysis, for one,
is carried
sociology
the
of
Americans
think about
The census,
themselves.
way
part
not a research
tool wholly
is
the clearest
developed
by sociologists,
once viewed
as a way of collecting
information that would
tell us how
now
it
is
of
the
definition
of
the
that
various
changed,
part
changes
become
although
example;
we have
the ways
in which
financial benefits are distributed
groups hope to see. Given
to
federal
the ways
in which
legislation according
by
population?or
Supreme
means
Court decisions
have
it
to be represented
interpreted what
by legisla
tors?the
stake in the information collected
enor
has become
by the census
mous. The fact that social scientists can speak of a "politics of numbers"
indi
cates
and
social
have
tion.
that numbers
Starr 1986).
Yet even
an impact on
those who
collect
them (Alonso
if there were
how we
facts about
led to a proliferation
no political
stakes involved
in determining
basic
fascinations with
and
culture
live, American
lifestyle
of stories based upon systematic
statistical
informa
know the importance
of turning to magazines
such
Intelligent
journalists
as American
on the baby-boom
for materials
down
Demographics
generation,
ward mobility, and other inherently sociological
Technical
topics.
reports deal
with
the
size
and
of
the
American
have
become
factors in
ing
shape
population
the way we think about and relate to immigration, AIDS,
intergenerational wealth
of defense
to civilian uses, or public
installations
and
transfers, the conversion
work?William
private education.
Important sociological
Julius Wilson's
(1980,
Sarah McLenahan's
1987) studies of inner city job loss and residential concentration,
work on the effects of single-parent
families (McLenahan
and Garfinkel
1986;
McLenahan
examples
academic
and Douglas
and Dent?n
1991),
(Massey
sociology,
The
of segregation
are conspicuous
discussed
in worlds
outside
widely
oriented
especially
magazines.
intellectually
of successful
is less evident with respect
to
incorporation
Massey's
1993)?are
studies
paradox
demographic
analysis than it is with respect to surveys and polling. The subtle
ties of statistical
tend to be beyond
the reach of most people,
interpretation
are sufficiently well
trained to understand
including
journalists, few of whom
over appropriate
academic
debates
As
methodology.
important as demographi
based
be
for
work
not
the general public,
may
cally
policymakers,
by
reaching
such work
tends not to suffer feedback
effects from the general culture.
Ironi
Merton
and Wolfe
29
that public
influence over the society. It is possible
its potential
a cover
zines will
feature such work?The
Atlantic
contained
There
to the general
who
develop
is an obvious
corporated
trends and
ever,
one
story dealing
even
this level of
1993)?but
(Whitehead
findings
culture does not appear to shape the work of the social
the findings.
with McLenahan's
extensively
exposure
scientists
interest maga
reason why
into American
suggest
should also
not
overlook
as well.
into American
One
the incorporation
difference between
of qualitative
sociology
the two forms of incor
society
is obvious:
studies are generally used in work published
in
quantitative
are usually published
in book
qualitative
journals, while
techniques
or
reach
the public;
social
scientists
(Wolfe
1990).8 Articles
journalists
poration
technical
form
for a popular
audience
report on the scientific findings of
as
in
such articles, acting
brokers
the process.
Yet books, even those published
in newspapers
reviewed
are, under certain circumstances,
by university presses,
on radio and television (Coser, Kadushin,
and magazines
and discussed
and Powell
interested
in writing
1982).
the fact that incorporation
and qualitative
of quantitative
research
Beyond
more professionalized.
have become
As rewards
may be different, sociologists
to those who win the respect of their peers for their
and prestige are attached
technical
counts
for the general public
for less among
competence,
writing
to sociological
in the popular
is that the
findings. The general
impression
on the
at the present
time concentrates
media
on
or
on
as
issues such
the other hand
popular
reporting of science
political
on the other, which
are usually
correctness
and multiculturalism
identified with
receptive
of ideas
coverage
will be recognized
if they have something
Sociologists
important
to say, but they rarely become
Between
academic
celebrities.
them, these two
trends suggest that, with
the exception
of books
such as Habits
of the Heart,
are
not
to
enter
ideas
culture
the
sociological
general
through direct in
likely
the humanities.
corporation.
of sociological
The incorporation
into American
society runs fewer
techniques
risks for practicing
of sociological
than the incorporation
sociologists
language
into the culture. To be sure, the widespread
and consequent
abuses
popularity
30
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
as focus groups
as well
with media
and interest polling
research. Non-response
of all sociological
for the delegitimation
for the science
rates will affect what
measure, with consequences
sociologists
a
retain
far greater control
of society that cannot be positive. Yet sociologists
over their technique
The world of research
than they do over their vocabulary.
associated
of method
could
make
remains
technique
fessional
standards
are
taken
lead
political pressures
dards for their techniques,
in polls
confidence
public
and
Sociology
Social
into one
in which
segment
peer review and pro
or
in
which
commercial
and
another
seriously,
to shortcuts. So long as sociologists
insist on high stan
bifurcated
if
their findings are more
likely to survive, even
or social knowledge
in general
is shaken for a time.
Policy
can
sociologist who
his or her findings with respect
an austere
immigration,
Yet when
will
or health-related
resist an invitation
to crime, alcoholism,
behavior.
to discuss
with
divorce,
and
be
are
It is
policymakers
poverty,
ethnicity,
do involve themselves
in public policy, many
sociologists
directly
who
invited them to do so and why.
In 1954, for example,
the
Court received a brief signed by thirty-five social scientists, headed
by
wonder
Supreme
Kenneth
addressed
response,
Clark
and
the social
Mr.
Justice
Paul Lazarsfeld
sociologists
of
school
consequences
segregation
including
Jackson's
chief
clerk,
E.
Barrett
and Arnold
(Kluger
Prettyman,
Rose, which
In
1976: 557).
wrote
a memo
it called
Sewall,
on sociolo
and Wilensky
1967).
One
Merton
and Wolfe
31
scientists
Social
that
1991: 120)9?argued
(Lemann
sociology"
of blocked
in part the product
opportunities.
and the Ford Founda
Institute of Mental Health
tion brought
Administration
their ideas to the Kennedy
through David Hackett,
on Juvenile Delin
who had been named director of the President's
Committee
were
Before
the
their
notions
quency.
long
policy,
especially
shaping public
a key
of the poor"?which
became
participation
It is a sign of sociology's
in theWar on Poverty (Lemann
1991: 120-129).
on social policy
that when
later came under heavy criticism,
this phrase
notion
of
phrase
"maximum
feasible
impact
one of the
scientist: Daniel
also a sociologist
and political
leading critics was
in
to
Patrick Moynihan
added
his name
turn,
Furthermore,
(1967).
Moynihan,
as
of race and poverty
few
any serious discussion
(see Rainwater
1967),
just
to the Coleman
serious discussions
of education
took place without
reference
(Coleman
Report
Yet were
the
After
seemed
1966).
influence over social policy?
1960s the heyday of sociology's
if sociology's
fate is tied to the fate of the welfare
state, the latter
all,
to reach
of American
to policy:
"Sociology
has
seen
the
pe
departure
criminologists,
planners,
demographers,
international development
short,
nologists, hospital administrators,
specialists?in
the entire range of scholars for whom
is linked to public policy"
social science
of sociology does not mean
that
1993: 13). Thus the "decomposition"
(Horowitz
to Horowitz,
social science
is falling apart; according
is flourish
social science
ing, but
removed
it does
so with
new
and disciplinary
organizational
Association.
Sociological
is correct,
We
should, ifHorowitz
sociology on public policy decreased
the case
in the early
that this was
administration
made
clear
designations
far
its determination
to cut
for social
research;
that had funded sociological
agencies
governmental
including the Cen
projects,
ter for Metropolitan
Institute of Mental Health, were
Problems
of the National
support
undertaken
in Great Britain.)
(Similar efforts were
government
by the Thatcher
Moreover with the election of Republican
in Congress
in 1994, efforts
majorities
are underway
at this writing
to reduce or eliminate
the social and behavioral
sciences
Science
Foundation.
In one particularly
of hostility to social science,
the govern
striking example
ment made quite clear its view that research
into sexual behavior being carried
32
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
Professional
TABLE 5
to Presidential
Appointments
1973-1984
Field
Law
17
Economics
Medicine
Political
13
11
Science
6
Psychology/Psychiatry
2
Ethics/Theology
Journalism
1
1
Nursing
Environmental
Studies
Nutrition
1
1
Chemistry
Source:
Calculated
Commissions,
Appointments
Sociology
Engineering/Technology
6
Physics
5
Education
Business
Administration
Social
Work 4
4
History
Other
# of
Commissions
from
1973-1984
D. Zink, Guide
to the Presidential
Stephen
VA: Chadwyck-Healy,
(Alexandria,
1987).
Advisory
and Rockefeller,
research during this period, shift
grew unhappy with academic
in the direction of direct political
intervention
into
ing their own efforts more
seems little doubt that a combination
a changed
of less money,
society. There
to the country, and a public suspicion
coloration
of experimentation
ideological
in social
of some urgency
Merton
that requires
expert,
and usually
nonpartisan,
advice.
and Wolfe
Since
the
33
issued re
such commissions
seventy-four
published,
at the
often esoteric, but they have included concerns
as
such
biom?dical
heart of sociological
ethics,
privacy,
inquiry,
population,
social secu
mental
the status of women,
health,
immigration,
unemployment,
volume
Komarovsky
ports. Their
was
subjects were
housing,
rity, alcoholism,
seventy-four commissions.
and
crime.
In all,
individuals
1,505
were
served
on
these
as profes
ninety-six
were
to
other
six
sociolo
of
whom
sors,
sociologists.10
disciplines,
Compared
were
were
seventeen
not bypassed
law professors
gists
during this period. There
as Table
on these commissions,
and thirteen professors of economics
represented
Of
this group,
identified
as fully represented
as political
5 indicates.
Still, sociology was
science,
engi
and
and
than
and
neering
technology,
physics,
better-represented
history and
are any indication,
If these commissions
impact on so
sociology's
psychology.
cial policy
during
the 1970s
and
1980s,
but neither
did
it disap
pear.
after divorce
and Cherlin
1988; Furstenberg
(Cherlin
1991) This re
relevant to discussions
of welfare
is, at the moment,
reform; if families
were
assume more responsibility
to remain more
for
intact, or if fathers would
their children after divorce,
be lessened. The
the burden on government would
children
search
same
other
is true of criminology,
income
immigration,
that have both
topics studied by sociologists
cations
Direct
during
ignored. Those
fast answers
makers want
the cautions
size one
American
any of the
interest and impli
that barely
policy does pose risks for sociologists
to be
the Reagan-Bush
when
tended
advice
years,
sociological
are
well
known
and
need
risks
repeating here; policy
barely
existed
nore
distribution?or
scientific
additional
If sociologists
sell their ideas to
on
too enthusiastically,
what
they can deliver.
they over-promise
may transfer its skepti
already skeptical of government,
public,
culture?the
policy-makers
The American
under
and ambivalences
risk of disappointment.
to social science
if social science
is seen as too close an ally to government.
In this way,
of sociology
into American
the incorporation
society through influ
ence over public policy could come to replicate
the implications
of the incor
terms are
that sociological
of terms and technique.
poration
Already convinced
cism
are flawed,
the consequences
for soci
trite, and that social science
techniques
came
to
if
that
would
be
serious
ideas
Americans
also
believe
sociological
ology
or counter-productive.
about public policy are inherently unworkable
Conclusion
Terms,
variously
34
The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
to sociological
time seems particularly
ways of knowing. At the height
receptive
noted that "Those of us who
Richard
Rovere
of sociology's
postwar popularity,
think in sociological
in the twentieth
have been educated
century habitually
or
we
in
not
have
had
This
whether
terms,
is, if any
any training
sociology."
are
even
more
true
At
time
Americans
in the 1990s.
this
thing,
exceptionally
as
of ethnicity, group
they are, with questions
loy
a
to
We
live
in
continue
culture,
sociological
lifestyles.
in the United States. Sociology,
one important reason why sociology
prospered
has been influenced by the general culture and society. The women's
moreover,
sociolo
movement
has had a major
impact on the field; the number of women
sociological?preoccupied,
alty, immigration, and
(Collins
1986).
now
a series
of demands
culture"
social
name
ancestors
have fewer common
only, whose members
common
to
few
less
talk
and
about
ago,
concepts,
years
about
itwith"
twenty
to talk
each
other,
"decomposition"
of sociology
lost standards
is one
direct
and a commitment
to excellence.
The
a process
of
incorporation.
case
The
although
necessary
quality
Merton
that sociology
has lost its scholarly
to dispute,
integrity is open
come
to
has
be
it is not
(Wolfe
1992). However,
ideology
widespread
a
on
to take
of whether
the question
has lost its
position
sociology
in order
to consider
the benefits
and drawbacks
of cultural
and Wolfe
and
social
35
and
of Americans
to know
more
to understand
presume
some
that
deal
One
awkward
way
sociologists
position.
on
is to retreat from the general culture, to concentrate
of the interest that the culture
its findings irrespective
and
about
themselves,
society in an
the awkwardness
American
with
their own
and
discipline
in such findings.
is to transform sociology
A contrasting
directly into a policy science,
objective
in a sense,
its full incorporation
into the society.
Still others try to
seeking,
on circum
these two imperatives,
and
forth
balance
back
shifting
depending
shows
stances.
It is not our intention to argue for or against any of these responses,
that all of them have their roots in the problem
of social
rather to emphasize
cultural
incorporation.
but
and
eso
that it has become
variously maintain
exceptionally
a
fetish
of
teric,
language,
by making
technique,
political
ideology or
assume
more
a disci
critics
esoteric
foundations.
Such
that
the
epistemological
the less the public will be interested in its findings. Our analysis
pline becomes,
Critics
of sociology
either
to a different problem
of the public. A large risk
that leads to alienation
points
we face as a discipline
is that those whose
behavior we study will take what we
It is not the decline
take ourselves.
of
say about them more
seriously than we
us
so
as
to
that
the
of
interest
the
much
preoccupy
ought
balancing
sociology
public
social
in what
we
do with
our vocational
commitment
to the furtherance
of
knowledge.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Patrick Bova of the National Opinion
the information contained
in Figure 1.We also wish to acknowledge
by Jonathan Imber.
Notes
dictionaries
and a recent encyclo
obtain this information we consulted
the most common sociological
and
Collins Dictionary
George A. Theodorson
pedia: David Jary and Julia Jary, The Harper
of Sociology;
Achilles G. Theodorson,
A Modern Dictionary
of the
of Sociology; G. Duncan Mitchell, A New Dictionary
Social Sciences; Michael Mann, The International
Encyclopedia
of Sociology; Raymond Boudon and Fran?ois
and Edgar F. and Maria A. Borgotta, Encyclopedia
Bourricaud, A Critical Dictionary
of
of Sociology;
in these sources?bureaucracy,
Some of the terms contained
class, status, race, ethnicity, insti
Sociology.
so common that little could be gained by including them without modifications
tution, urbanization?are
"
instead of "class," "status symbol" rather
instead of "ethnicity," "class consciousness
Cethnocentrism"
than "status"). On the other hand, we did include terms such as "altruism,"
"lifestyle," "hegemony," and
terms of which we report on
"alienation."
We eventually examined
the frequency of 205 sociological
1. To
p. 92.
Although
use was
can be traced back to Gunnar Myrdal,
its more contemporary
the term "underclass"
to
to criticism, Wilson
indicated his willingness
In response
largely introduced by William Julius Wilson.
use other terms, such as "ghetto poor."
to search through Lexis/Nexis
for specific terms in specific years cited in specific
3. Our procedure was
newspapers.
followed a similar method here of consulting Donald
Rutherford's Dictionary
4. We
culling
of Economics,
are listed in Table 3.
from it 41 terms, which
2.
36 The
American
Sociologist/Fall
1995
References
New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
and Paul Starr. 1986. The Politics of Numbers.
Alonso, William
12-18.
Berger, Peter L. 1992. "Sociology: A Disinvitation?"
Society, 30 (November/December):
in the 1990s." Society, 30 (November/December):
S. and William C. Rau. 1992. "Sociology
Becker, Howard
70-74.
in Focus Group Training." Footnotes,
1993- "Sociologists
Billson, Janet Mancini.
January, p. 6.
Participate
Contributions
of Quantitative
American
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1989. "The Real and Unrealized
Sociology."
54 (June): 447-460.
Review,
Sociological
2d ed. Chicago:
Crain Books.
Bogart, Leo. 1984. Strategy in Advertising.
of the Social Survey Movement
and the Rise of American Empirical Sociol
Bulmer, Martin. 1991. "The Decline
Perspec
ogy." In Martin Bulmer, Kevin Bales, and Kathryn Kish Sklar, (eds.), The Social Survey in Historical
tive. New York: Cambridge University Press, 291-315.
In
Bulmer, Martin, Kevin Bales and Kathryn Kish Sklar. 1991. "The Social Survey in Historical Perspective."
Janowitz, 99-136.
12: 21-29.
Darden, Donna K. 1992. "Thou Shalt Not . . .Commit a Social Science."
Spectrum,
Sociological
1: 108-115.
Erwin, Robert. 1994. "Lifestyle." The Wilson Quarterly,
Families:
What Happens
to Children When Parents
Furstenberg, Frank F. and Andrew Cherlin. 1991. Divided
Part. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
as a Planning Concept." fournal
the Underclass:
The Term's Dangers
Gans, Herbert 1990. "Deconstructing
of
the American
56: 271-77.
Association,
Planning
Promotes
State Power. New York: Basic
1986. The Captive Public: How Mass
Ginsberg, Benjamin.
Opinion
Books.
New York: Basic Books.
Gouldner, Alvin. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology.
Assessments
of the State of Sociology."
The American
22: 200
Hargens, L. L. 1990. "Sociologists'
Sociologist,
208.
Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American
Politics. Chicago: Univer
Herbst, Susan. 1993. Numbered
Press.
sity of Chicago
1993- The Decomposition
Horowitz,
Irving Louis.
of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
v. Board
The History of Brown
and Black America's
1976. Simple fustice:
Kluger, Richard.
of Education
New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Struggle for Equality.
Merton
and Wolfe
37
New York:
Commissions.
and Public Policy: The Case of Presidential
1975. Sociology
Komarovsky, Mirra.
Elsevier.
Guide for Applied Research.
Park, CA: Sage
1988. Focus Groups: A Practical
Newbury
Krueger, Richard.
Publications.
1922. "The Growth of News Polls in American Politics." In Thomas E. Mann
Ladd, Everett Carll and John Benson.
The Brookings Institution, 19-31.
Politics. Washington:
Polls in American
and Gary R. Orren, (eds.), Media
in the United States.
Laumann, Edward O. et al. 1994. The Social Organization
of Sexuality: Sexual Practices
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1967. The Uses of Sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, William H. Sewell and Harold L. Wilensky.
New
and How It Changed America.
Land: The Great Black Migration
1991. The Promised
Lemann, Nicholas.
York: Knopf.
In Mann and Orren,
Mann, Thomas E. and Gary R. Orren. 1992. "To Poll or Not to Poll. . . and Other Questions."
1-18.
1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and theMaking
of the Underclass.
Massey, Douglas and Nancy A. Dent?n.
Harvard University Press.
Cambridge:
Press.
Madison: University of Wisconsin
Donald.
1985. The Rhetoric of Economics.
McCloskey.
Interests." In Joan Huber, (ed.),
and Children's
Sarah. 1991. "The Two Faces of Divorce: Women's
McLenahan,
in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications,
Macro-Micro
193-207.
Linkages
Sarah and Irving Garfinkel. 1986. Single Mothers and Their Children: A New American Dilemma.
McLenahan,
-.
-.
1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
Research." Quali
1984. "Focus Groups: A New Tool for Qualitative
Morgan, David L. and Margaret T. Spanish.
tative Sociology,
7: 253-270.
Research.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Morgan, David L. 1988. Focus Groups as Qualitative
Polls of 1948.
1949- The Prediction
Frederick, Herbert H. Hyman, Philip J. McCarthy, Eli S. Marks.
Mosteller,
New York: Social Science Research Council.
Action in the War on Poverty.
Feasible Misunderstanding:
Community
Moynihan, Daniel P. 1967. Maximum
New York: Free Press.
1967. The Moynihan
Rainwater, Lee and William L. Yancey.
Report and the Politics of Controversy. Cambridge:
MIT Press.
Rieff, Philip. 1966. The Triumph
Roos, Patricia A. and Katherine
Sociology."
Ohio.
Roper, Burns.
-.
-.
presented
Cincinnati,
50: 1-9.
1986. "Evaluating Polls with Poll Data," Public Opinion Quarterly,
In Herbert J. O'Gorman,
(ed.), Surveying Social Life: Papers
Singer, Eleanor. 1988. "Surveys in the Mass Media."
Conn: Wesleyan
in Honor
University Press, 413-436.
of Herbert H. Hyman. Middletown,
on the 1980 General Social Survey."
1989. "The Hidden 25 Percent: An Analysis of Nonresponse
Smith, Tom W.
In Eleanor Singer and Stanley Presser, (eds.), Survey Research Methods.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press,
50-68.
Social Survey,
and Why: An Analysis of the Usage of the General
1992. "Who, What, When, Where,
Research Center.
GSS Project Report # 18, National Opinion
1972-1991."
In Singer and Presser, 32-49.
1989. "Trends in Nonresponse
Rates, 1952-1979."
Steech, Charlotte.
1990. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Stewart, David W., and Prem N. Shamdasani.
Publications.
Science: An Institutional
1990. The Impossible
Turner, Stephen Park and Jonathan H. Turner.
Analysis
of
American
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Sociology.
Barbara Dafoe.
1993. "Dan Quayle Was Right." The Atlantic
Whitehead,
(April): 47-84.
Institutions.
Wilson, William Julius. 1980. The Declining
of Race: Blacks and Changing American
Significance
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
and Public Policy. Chicago: University
The Inner City, The Underclass,
1987. The Truly Disadvantaged:
of Chicago
Press.
Alan 1990. "Books versus Journals: Two Ways of Publishing
ber): 477-489.
1992. "Weak Sociology/Strong
Sociologists:
Consequences
Social Research,
59: 759-779.
Wolfe,
-.
Paper
Sociology,"
Sociological
and Contradictions
Forum,
of a Field
5 (Septem
in Turmoil."
Wrong,
-.
ology
Merton
and Wolfe
39