Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNIT 2.
Discourse: is a term associated most closely to Foucault, it refers to the way in
which meaning is formed, expressed and controlled in a culture through its use of
language.
It is through discourse that we constitute our experience, an analysis of discourse
can reveal how we see the world.
As language is the base symbol system through which culture is created and
maintained, it can be said that everything is discourse.
Meaning through language is controlled by the discursive structures of a culture.
New Historicism.
begins its quest to be political by denying that: a) any social world is stable b)
artworks are separated from the power struggles constituting a social reality.
accepts Foucaults insistence that power operates through a myriad capillary
channels, these include not just coercion and governmental action, but also daily
routines and language.
examines how particular texts are addressed to other texts, other discursive orders
in the wider culture. The text is a dynamic interweaving of multiple strands from a
culture which is itself an unstable field of contending forces.
wants to emphasize how history reveals the growth of forms of power that
continuously affect subjects lives.
studies a literary text not as autonomous objects but as material products emerging
out of a specific social, cultural and political contexts.
breaks down the traditional distinction between literary and non-literary texts and
forms.
Unit 3. Introduction to Feminism.
Feminist criticism is a part of the broader feminist political movement that seeks to
rectify sexsist discrimination and inequalities. Has brought revolutionary changes to
literary and cultural studies by expanding the canon, by criquing sexist
representations and values, by stressing the importance of gender and sexuality,
and by proposing institutional and social reforms. Argue that women have a
literature of their own, possesing its own themes, characters, forms, styles and
canons.
Feminist study of literature has generated a commitment to recovering forgotten,
ignored, silenced or disguised past women writers. This recovery of formerly
excluded women-authored texts has led to the re-reading of literary texts by men.
Writing by men is explored by feminist readers by (among other things) the way in
which it incorporates, replicates or otherwise perpetuates patriarchy inflected
relationships between women and men.
American feminists Gilbert and Gubar (The Madwoman in the Attic. 1979) argue
that Jane Austen created the paradigm of the double text which paid lip-service
(express approval of or support for something insincerely) to patriarchal literary
standards, even while it subverted them. Gilbert and Gubar also address (as did
Virginia Woolf before them) the reality of women authors exclusion from the
predominantly male pantheon of literary works (mostly on economic and social
grounds), they argue.
Their reading of Charlotte Bronts Jane Eyre famously problematizes the female
stereotypes the female stereotypes of angel (Jane) and monster (Bertha, or the
madwoman)
She asks her roosters What are you projecting? but her poem makes us aware of
what we project into roosters: as emblems the birds mean what we make them
mean, and we are not doomed to war because of masculinity.
At the end of the poem, when the sun rises faithful as enemy, or friend, Bishop
emphasizes the multiple significance of anything to which we grant emblematic
meaning
James Longenbuch Bishops Social Conscience
Another approach to Bishops poem emphasizes its dualism and contrasts.
The roosters can be read under two different views:
-As figures of militarization, denial and masculinity.
- As emblems of forgiveness and hope.
A transition is undergone throughout the poem. A shift in mood and chromatic focus
takes place. The theme of forgiveness which spans stanzas 30 to 39 prepares us for
this shift. In these stanzas the speaker signals an alternative masculinity.
The poem has undergone a progressive feminization from the overmasculine to the
lines of pink cloud in the sky
Ambiguity is part of this poem, the poem ends leaving uncertainty.
Strong anti-patriarchal and anti-militaristic tone.
UNIT 4
Lesbian critism aims:
- in part to challenge the erasure of lesbian existence from so much of scholarly
feminist literature.
- an erasure not just anti-lesbian, but anti-feminist.
- to encourage heterosexual feminists to examine heterosexuality as a political
institution which disempowers women
- women identification and women bonding.
- this would become a politically activating impulse.
Adrienne Richs main purpose is to consider the extent to which heterosexual
desire and identity are fundamental to womens oppression.
- Heterosexuality is compulsory because only partners of the opposite sex are
deemed appropriate. It is not natural but social.
- Institutions by which women have traditionally been controlled: patriarchal
motherhood, economic exploitation, the nuclear family.
- Patriarchal society is threatened by womens independent action.
- The lesbian, unless in disguise, faces discrimination, harassment and violence.
- Rich argues that the issue feminists have to address is not simple gender
inequality.
Compulsory heterosexuality is central to creating and preserving the inequality
between men and women as it systematically ensures the power of men over
women.
Rich creates woman-identified language to replace the stigmatized and clinical term
lesbianism: lesbian experience for the historical and and contemporary presence
of lesbian creation, and lesbian continuum to include the entire range of womanidentified experience.
Lesbian experience: refers to the actual presence of lesbians, past and present. It
is simultaneously a challenge to heterosexuality, to the inclusion within a male
homosexuality, to male access to women.
It is a reassertion of the female in all its empowering dimensions. It comprises
both the breaking of a taboo and the rejection of a compulsory way of life.
- Rich creates woman-identified language to replace the stigmatized and clinical
term lesbianism: lesbian experience.
One of the main aims of the critics was to do away with the stereotypes the
coloniser had purposefully utilised in order to dehumanise the colonised.
Stereotypes became a fundamental strategy to present an oversimplified and, on
most occasions, caricaturesque vision of the natives, who were repeatedly
downgraded and even compared to animals.
you think about Africa?", and he said, "Oh, they are capable of terrible deeds, but
they are also capable of extraordinary and good actions". In other words, like people
anywhere else (laughs).
What is the effect of this media coverage?
Thats really the issue. It makes it impossible for us to understand one another.
People go to Africa and confirm what they already have in their heads and so thay
fail to see what is there in front of them. This is what people have come to expect. It
s not viewed as a serious continent. Its a place of strange, bizarre and illogical
things, where people dont do what common sense demands.
- Pecola, Claudia and Pauline are defined by how they respond to ideals of white
female beauty.
- Paulines strategy of gauging her self-worth according to white screen legends is
inherited and intensified by her daughter Pecola, with even more devastating
personal results. Pecolas craving for blue eyes, and her own strategies for acquiring
them, from drinking milk out of a blue-and-white Shirley Temple cup to asking
Soaphead Church to cast a spell to change the colour of her eyes, provide much of
the narrative backbone of Morrisons novel.
-Note that both Pauline and Pecola are described by the narrator as being physically
unattractive.
The narrator wonders why she and her children are so ugly, including Pecola, were
so ugly.
The source of that feeling of ugliness, the narrator realizes, lies less in empirical fact
than in a deeply held belief.
The dominant white ideology has been internalized by Pauline and Pecola, and the
black community at large.
Note that when Mr. Henry, the MacTeer roomer, first appears in the family, he teases
the young Claudia and Frieda by addressing the as Greta Garbo and Ginger Rogers.
The girls giggle and their father smiles, indicating that a certain ethnically
marked white- standard of beauty has become naturalized to the point that it has
been internalized by the black community.
But not uniformly, so Claudia sets the terms of the debate when she describes her
response on being given a white, blue-eyed doll for Christmas:
I could not love the doll. But I could examine it to see what it was tajt all the
world said was lovable. Break off the tiny fingers, bend the flat feet, loosen the hair,
twist the head around, and the thing made one sound Mama, Remove the
cold and stupid eyeball, it would bleat still.. take off the head, shake out the
sawdust, crack the back against the brass bed rail, it would bleat still The gauze
back would split, and I could see the disk with six holes, the secret of the sound. A
mere metal roundness
The crescendo in violence stands in representation of what the narrative itself
perfoms: it uncovers the nuts and bolts of a white supremacist ideology, revealing it
to be a mere construct- a mere metal roundness- that can be as easily
deconstructed as it is constituted/arrange/assembled in the first place. This is what
Claudia does before our very eyes. She realizes that race constructs are less about
race than they are about power: we were not strong, only aggressive; we were not
free, merely licensed.
Note how the entire text revolves around colour. Morrisons palette foregrounds
blue, certainly (as in the title, first and foremost), but also, and emphatically, black
and white.