You are on page 1of 3

3548 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices

permit to the Applicant for the assure consideration. Information and nondegradation of water quality in the
incidental take of the covered species. materials for consideration in this 5-year Barton Springs watershed; (2) a plan to
We will make our final permit decision review of the Barton Springs salamander avoid, respond to, and remediate
no sooner than 60 days from the date of must be received no later than March hazardous materials spills within the
this notice. 28, 2005. However, we will continue to Barton Springs watershed is in place
Dated: January 6, 2005. accept new information about any listed with high priority measures
Nicole Alt, species at any time. implemented to minimize risks to the
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review Barton Springs salamander; (3)
Acting Deputy Manager, California/Nevada
Operations Office. the Draft Recovery Plan may obtain it measures to ensure that continuous,
from the Internet at http:// natural springflows are maintained at all
[FR Doc. 05–1287 Filed 1–24–05; 8:45 am]
endangered.fws.gov/recovery/. You may four spring outlets are in place and
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
also request a copy from the U.S. Fish effective; (4) a healthy, self-sustaining
and Wildlife Service, Austin Ecological natural population of Barton Springs
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Field Office, 10711 Burnet salamanders is maintained within its
Road, Suite 200, Austin, Texas, 78758. historical range; (5) measures to remove
Fish and Wildlife Service Comments and materials concerning local threats to the Barton Springs
this Draft Recovery Plan and/or the 5- ecosystem have been implemented; (6)
Notice of Availability of the Draft year status review may be mailed to at least two genetically representative
Barton Springs Salamander Recovery ‘‘Field Supervisor’’ at the address above. captive populations of Barton Springs
Plan; Notice of Initiation of a 5-Year Information received in response to this salamanders have been established in
Status Review for the Barton Springs notice and review will be available for secure locations with the completion of
Salamander (Eurycea sosorum) a captive propagation and contingency
public inspection, by appointment,
plan.
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, during normal business hours at the
The Draft Recovery Plan proposes the
Interior. above address. delisting of the Barton Springs
ACTION: Notice of document availability FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: salamander when the downlisting
and notice of review. Robert Pine, Austin Ecological Services criteria have been achieved and the
Field Office, at the above address; following additional criteria have been
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife telephone (512) 490–0057, facsimile
Service (Service) announces the met: (1) Water quality protection
(512) 490–0974. mechanisms are shown to be effective
availability for public review of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: and commitments are in place to
Draft Barton Springs Salamander
Draft Recovery Plan continue protection; (2) measures to
Recovery Plan (Draft Recovery Plan).
implement the catastrophic spill
The Barton Springs salamander The Barton Springs salamander was avoidance, response and remediation
(Eurycea sosorum) is known to occur listed as endangered on May 30, 1997, plans are ensured; (3) measures to
near four springs outlets that under authority of the Endangered maintain adequate springflows are
collectively make up Barton Springs in Species Act of 1973, as amended (62 FR shown to be effective; (4) the Barton
Austin, Texas. The Service solicits 23377). The water that discharges from Springs salamander population is
review and comment from the public on Barton Springs is essential to the shown to be viable and stable or
this Draft Recovery Plan. The Service survival of the salamander. Barton increasing; (5) measures to remove local
also announces a 5-year status review of Springs is a segment of the Edwards threats to the Barton Springs ecosystem
the Barton Springs salamander under Aquifer, a karst limestone aquifer are shown to be effective and a
section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Endangered containing a complex system of caves, commitment is in place to continue the
Species Act of 1973 (Act) (16 U.S.C. sinkholes, fractures, and faults. The appropriate management of the surface
1531 et seq.). The purpose of reviews Edwards Aquifer is particularly habitat; and (6) captive breeding is
conducted under this section of the Act vulnerable to contamination and land shown to be effective and reliable and
is to ensure that the classification of the use changes that degrade the quality of commitments are in place to maintain
species as threatened or endangered on stormwater runoff. The primary threat adequate captive populations for any
the List of Endangered and Threatened facing the survival and recovery of this needed restoration work.
Wildlife and Plants (List) is accurate. A species is the degradation of water Because the Barton Springs
5-year review is based on the best quality and quantity of water that feeds salamander relies on continuous flow of
scientific and commercial data available Barton Springs. This degradation has clean spring water, many of the high-
at the time of the review. Therefore, we resulted from urbanization over the priority recovery tasks outlined in the
are requesting submission of any such Barton Springs watershed (including Draft Recovery Plan include actions to
information on the Barton Springs roadway, residential, commercial, and ensure adequate water quality and
salamander that has become available industrial development). The Draft quantity within the Barton Springs
since its original listing as an Recovery Plan includes information watershed such as: (1) Developing and
endangered species in 1997. If the about the species, provides recovery implementing catastrophic spill
present classification of this species is objectives and criteria, and describes the avoidance, response, and remediation
not consistent with the best scientific actions needed to recover the species plans; (2) implementing programs to
and commercial information available, such that it no longer warrants listing as protect sensitive environmental features
the Service will recommend whether or endangered or threatened. important to salamander habitat or the
not a change is warranted in the Federal The Draft Recovery Plan proposes effective recharge of clean water such as
classification of Barton Springs reclassification of the Barton Springs caves, sinkholes, fissures, springs, and
salamander. Any change in Federal salamander from endangered to riparian zones; (3) developing and
classification would require a separate threatened when the following criteria implementing programs to identify and
rule-making process. have been met: (1) Mechanisms (such as correct problems from point and non-
DATES: Comments on the Draft Recovery laws, rules, regulations, and cooperative point source pollution discharges; and
Plan are due by March 28, 2005 to agreements) are in place to ensure (4) creating a regional management

VerDate jul<14>2003 13:14 Jan 24, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices 3549

program that will be used to ensure the is neither endangered nor threatened for How Is Barton Springs Salamander
protection of aquifer level and one or more of the following reasons: (1) Currently Listed?
springflows under normal and drought The species is considered extinct; (2) The List is found in 50 CFR 17.11
conditions. Other high-priority recovery the species is considered to be (wildlife) and 17.12 (plants).
actions include ensuring protection for recovered; and/or (3) the original data Amendments to the List through final
existing spring habitats and establishing available when the species was listed, or rules are published in the Federal
and maintaining adequate captive the interpretation of such data, were in Register. The List is also available on
breeding populations. error. Any change in Federal our internet site at http://
Restoring an endangered or classification would require a separate endangered.fws.gov/
threatened animal or plant to the point rulemaking process. The regulations in wildlife.html#Species. The Barton
where it is again a secure, self- 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish Springs salamander is listed as
sustaining member of its ecosystem is a a notice in the Federal Register endangered. It occurs only in the state
primary goal of the Service’s announcing those species currently of Texas. The final rule listing it as
endangered species program. To help under active review. endangered was published in the
guide the recovery effort, the Service is The City of Austin initiated Barton Federal Register in 1997 (62 FR 23377
working to prepare recovery plans for Springs salamander surveys in 1993,
most of the listed species native to the 23392).
and is currently conducting monthly
United States. Recovery plans describe surveys of salamanders at all known Definitions Related to This Notice
actions considered necessary for salamander locations. Although The following definitions are
conservation of listed species, establish monitoring of the status of the Barton provided to assist those persons
criteria for downlisting or delisting considering submission of information
Springs salamander is an ongoing
those species, and estimate time and regarding the species being reviewed:
process, the Service is now initiating an
cost for implementing the necessary A. Species includes any species or
active, periodic review on the status of
recovery measures. subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
The Act requires the development of the Barton Springs salamander in
accordance with section 4(c)(2)(A) of the and any distinct population segment of
recovery plans for listed species, unless
Act. This information may include any species of vertebrate, which
such a plan would not promote the
population trend data and information interbreeds when mature.
conservation of a particular species. B. Endangered means any species that
Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in on the threats faced by the salamander.
The recovery planning process is an is in danger of extinction throughout all
1988, requires that public notice and an or a significant portion of its range.
opportunity for public review and appropriate time to conduct an active
review of a species’ status, as the C. Threatened means any species that
comment be provided during recovery is likely to become an endangered
plan development. The Service Service is actively seeking all relevant
information on the salamander and the species within the foreseeable future
considers all information presented throughout all or a significant portion of
during a public comment period prior to threats it faces. This notice announces
our active review of the Barton Springs its range.
approval of each new or revised
recovery plan. The Service and others salamander, which is currently listed as How Do We Determine Whether a
also take these comments into account endangered. Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
in the course of implementing recovery What Information Is Considered in the Section 4(a)(1) of the Act establishes
plans. Review? that we determine whether a species is
The Draft Recovery Plan is being endangered or threatened based on one
submitted for review to all interested A 5-year review considers all new
or more of the five following factors:
parties and for independent peer information available at the time of the A. The present or threatened
review. After consideration of review. These reviews will consider the destruction, modification, or
comments received during the review best scientific and commercial data that curtailment of its habitat or range;
period, and including new information has become available since the current B. Over-utilization for commercial,
and materials provided for the 5-year listing determination or most recent recreational, scientific, or educational
status review, the Draft Recovery Plan status review of each species, such as: purposes;
will be prepared for final approval. A. Species biology including, but not C. Disease or predation;
5-Year Status Review limited to, population trends, D. The inadequacy of existing
distribution, abundance, demographics, regulatory mechanisms; or
Under the Act, the Service maintains and genetics; E. Other natural or manmade factors
a list of endangered and threatened affecting its continued existence.
B. Habitat conditions including, but
wildlife and plant species at 50 CFR Section 4(a)(1) of the Act requires that
not limited to, amount, distribution, and
17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for our determination be made on the basis
suitability;
plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act of the best scientific and commercial
requires that we conduct a status review C. Conservation measures that have
data available.
of listed species at least once every five been implemented to benefit the
years. Then, on the basis of such species; What Could Happen as a Result of This
reviews under section 4(c)(2)(B), we D. Threat status and trends (see five Review?
determine whether or not any species factors under heading ‘‘How do we If new information concerning Barton
should be removed from the List determine whether a species is Springs salamander indicates a change
(delisted), or reclassified from endangered or threatened?’’); and in classification may be warranted, we
endangered to threatened or from E. Other new information, data, or may propose a new rule that could do
threatened to endangered (downlisted). corrections including, but not limited one of the following: (a) Reclassify the
Delisting a species must be supported to, taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, species from endangered to threatened;
by the best scientific and commercial identification of erroneous information or (b) remove the species from the List.
data available and only considered if contained in the List, and improved If we determine that a change in
such data substantiates that the species analytical methods. classification is not warranted for

VerDate jul<14>2003 13:14 Jan 24, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1
3550 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 15 / Tuesday, January 25, 2005 / Notices

Barton Springs salamander, it will Dated: December 3, 2004. plan in the Proposed Resource
remain on the List under its current H. Dale Hall, Management Plan Amendment/Final
status. Information provided during this Regional Director, Region 2, Fish and Wildlife Environmental Impact Statement
5-year review could also affect the Service. (PRMPA/FEIS), dated December 2003.
recommendations of the recovery plan [FR Doc. 05–1290 Filed 1–24–05; 8:45 am] In response to the PRMPA/FEIS, the
for this species. BILLING CODE 4310–55–P Governor of New Mexico submitted a
Consistency Review that recommended
Public Comments and New Information adopting an alternative plan he had
Solicited DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR developed. This alternative was similar
to an alternative that was analyzed by
The Service solicits written comments Bureau of Land Management the BLM in the draft and final
on the draft recovery plan described environmental impact statements;
above. All comments received by the [NM–030–04–1610–DR]
therefore, the BLM determined it did
date specified above will be considered Notice of Availability of Record of not require an additional public
prior to approval of the recovery plan. Decision (ROD) and Resource comment period. The Governor’s
To ensure that the 5-year status Management Plan Amendment (RMPA) Consistency Review helped lead to the
review is complete and based on the for Federal Fluid Minerals Leasing and May 2004 PRMPA/FEIS Supplement
best available scientific and commercial Development in Sierra and Otero that included the proposed closure of
information, we are also soliciting new Counties 35,790 acres to leasing. This closure was
information from the public, concerned a change from the proposed plan in the
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, PRMPA/FEIS where those acres were to
governmental agencies, Tribes, the Interior.
scientific community, industry, be withheld from leasing for five years
ACTION: Notice of availability. and re-evaluated. The BLM New Mexico
environmental entities, and any other
interested parties concerning the status State Director declined to accept the
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
of the Barton Springs salamander. other recommendations made by the
National Environmental Policy Act
Governor, but replied with a written
Comments on the draft recovery plan (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and
response addressing issues raised in the
and information and/or materials for the Management Act (FLPMA), and the
Consistency Review. Public comments
5-year review should be provided to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
on the supplement were taken for 30
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin management policies, the BLM
days, and those comments have been
Ecological Services Field Office (see announces the availability of the ROD/
considered and addressed in the ROD/
ADDRESSES section). Information
RMPA for Federal fluid minerals leasing
RMPA.
submitted should be supported by and development in Sierra and Otero
Counties, New Mexico. The New The Governor appealed the State
documentation such as maps, Director’s decision not to fully adopt his
Mexico State Director has signed the
bibliographic references, methods used alternative plan to the BLM Director.
ROD/RMPA, which amends the White
to gather and analyze the data, and/or Sands RMP. The BLM Director has issued a final
copies of any pertinent publications, response affirming the State Director’s
ADDRESSES: Copies of the fluid minerals
reports, or letters by knowledgeable decision. All formal protests to the
ROD/RMPA are available upon request
sources. Our practice is to make PRMPA/FEIS have also been resolved.
from the Field Manager, Las Cruces
comments, including names and home Minor modifications have been made
Field Office, Bureau of Land
addresses of respondents, available for to the proposed plan as set forth in the
Management, 1800 Marquess St., Las
public review during regular business Cruces, NM 88005 or via the Internet at PRMPA/FEIS and Supplement. The
hours. Respondents may request that we http://www.nm.blm.gov. modifications corrected errors noted in
withhold a respondent’s identity, as the review of the PRMPA/FEIS and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
allowable by law. If you wish us to provide further clarification regarding
Phillips, RMPA Team Leader/Land Use
withhold your name or address, you some of the decisions.
Planner, 1800 Marquess St., Las Cruces,
must state this request prominently at
NM 88005. Telephone number is (505) Linda S.C. Rundell,
the beginning of your comment. We will 525–4377, email address is State Director.
not, however, consider anonymous Tom_Phillips@nm.blm.gov. [FR Doc. 05–1316 Filed 1–24–05; 8:45 am]
comments. To the extent consistent with
applicable law, we will make all SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The fluid BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P

submissions from organizations or minerals RMPA was developed with


businesses, and from individuals broad public participation through a 6-
year public planning process. This DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of RMPA addresses management of the
Bureau of Land Management
organizations or businesses, available Federal fluid mineral resources on
approximately 2.1 million acres of Notice of BLM Director’s Response to
for public inspection in their entirety.
public lands in the planning area. The an Appeal From the Governor of New
Comments and materials received will
fluid minerals RMPA is designed to Mexico Regarding the Resource
be available for public inspection, by
identify which lands under BLM Management Plan Amendment for
appointment, during normal business jurisdiction in Sierra and Otero
hours (see ADDRESSES section). Federal Fluid Minerals Leasing and
Counties will be made available for Development in Sierra and Otero
Authority potential fluid mineral leasing, and Counties
what measures are needed to manage
This document is published under the those lands and protect other resource AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
authority of the Endangered Species Act values. Interior.
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et The approved fluid minerals RMPA is
ACTION: Notice of availability.
seq.). relatively unchanged from the proposed

VerDate jul<14>2003 13:14 Jan 24, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JAN1.SGM 25JAN1

You might also like