Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Communication Campaigns:
Storytelling Effects in Fundraising Campaigns across cultures
IBTIHAL ALALOUL
ZINEB BIRROU
"Tell me a fact and I'll learn. Tell me a truth and I'll believe. But tell me a story and it
will live in my heart forever."(Dunford)
University of Gothenburg
Department of Applied Information Technology
Gothenburg, Sweden, August 2014
ABSTRACT
In todays world, people are constantly exposed to a non-stop flow of information, news,
promotions, advertisements and all kinds of visuals in an attempt to make the most
majority of them either buy a product, vote for a candidate or donate money for a
humanitarian cause. The question a given organization might raise is: how would it be
possible to stand out, be memorable in peoples minds and increase their chances to make
a stronger impact and reach their objectives.
Far from all the latest technological innovations created for this specific objective, one of
the most ancient and basic communication tools has been receiving a special attention in
launching the most elaborate and successful communication campaigns: storytelling. For
this reason, the team is interested in investigating and deepening their knowledge about
the use of storytelling, its effect on individuals across the world and how it would make a
campaign stand out and win peoples hearts. More specifically, the present study aims at
cross-culturally investigating the effect of storytelling in fundraising campaigns.
In the attempt of analyzing the use of storytelling in fundraising campaigns, and its
impact across cultures, a thorough review of the existing literature and the relevant
theories were used. For the purpose of this study, two focus groups were conducted to
collect data. Originally, focus groups were used within communication studies to explore
the effects of films and television programs, this method could be used not only what
people think but how they think and why they think that way (Kitzinger, 1995). Focus
group interviews found a home within the boundaries of marketing research. In fact,
focus groups remain the major form of qualitative research for marketing researchers
(e.g., Bartos, 1986; Hayes & Tathwn, 1989; Moran, 1986; Morgan, 1989; 1997 cited in
Berg, 2001).
In this case, two groups were set, and exposed to the same visual stimuli. Each group
consisted of seven participants, one including Swedish participants (low-context culture),
and the second including Moroccan participants (high-context culture). Four video ads
and two posters from different fundraising campaigns were shown to the groups,
followed by an interactive conversation, allowing the participants to freely express their
opinions, feelings, ideas and attitudes towards the use of storytelling in the ads.
The findings revealed that regardless of ones cultural background, similar emotions were
expressed by most participants when describing the impact of storytelling in the
fundraising campaign material they were exposed to. It was quite interesting to note the
significant role globalization plays in the way the youth of todays world perceive and
interpret the stories surrounding them. This study also reveals the invaluable role of
Information Technology. The visual stimuli used in this research consisted of four videos,
and two photos available online, on YouTube and on social media (eg Facebook) making
it accessible to people from different parts of the world. People are indeed being exposed
to similar universal messages thanks to the development and sophistication of
Information Technology. Thus, moving towards shaping a common universal identity or
a global culture where people think in terms globally rather than locally. Communication
campaigns throughout the world ought to take advantage from the endless benefits
offered by the age of Information Technology, and make a stronger impact worldwide.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE USE OF STORYTELLING IN COMMUNICATION CAMPAIGNS: .............. 1
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4
ADDED VALUE ................................................................................................................. 4
THEORETICAL GAP........................................................................................................... 5
RESEARCH QUESTION ...................................................................................................... 5
STUDY OUTLINE .............................................................................................................. 5
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND MAIN CONCEPTS ................................ 6
2.1 KEY CONCEPTS .......................................................................................................... 6
2.2 DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATIONS ............................................................................ 20
2.3 VISUAL MATERIALS ................................................................................................. 21
3. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................... 23
3.1 RESEARCH METHOD................................................................................................. 23
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN ................................................................................................... 23
3.3 DATA ANALYSIS........................................................................................................ 25
3.4 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................... 26
4. RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 27
5. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION ............................................................................. 41
SIMILARITIES ................................................................................................................. 42
DIFFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 43
LIMITATIONS & FUTURE RESEARCH ............................................................................... 44
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 45
APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 49
1. INTRODUCTION
Once upon a time, it was a small gathering around a fire listening to the storyteller with
his tales of magic and fantasy. And now its the whole worldstill they want to hear
stories. But now, they gather in multiplexesits the magic of storytelling, it unites the
world. And that is truly gratifying said the world-known movie director Steven
Spielberg about storytelling. (Woodside et al, 2008, p.98). Storytelling is one of the
oldest and most powerful tools of communication.
A branding communication campaign aiming to convince consumers to buy a given
product, or a political campaign to persuade citizen to vote for a presidential candidate
does hold promises, and is supposed to make the persons life better somehow. If the
consumers for instance do choose to buy a product, it is a clear win-win situation for both
parties. On the other hand, fundraising campaigns could be considered much more
challenging. Convincing people to make a donation is far from being an easy task.
Making the world a better place, and helping the people in need matters. Receiving
donations is what allows non-profit organizations to survive, and make a positive impact
in peoples lives. It is, therefore, of a crucial importance, to find ways to make
fundraising campaigns as impactful and effective as possible. Thats why this study
would investigate the use of storytelling in fundraising campaigns.
Last, but not least, the cultural diversity of todays globalized world, raises important
questions on the cross-cultural aspect of any given issue. A number of multinationals
tend to adjust some of their advertisements depending on the countrys culture, others do
not. In some cases, intercultural differences matter, and in others they do not. This study,
will therefore, include the cross-cultural aspect to the question of storytelling and
communication campaigns success, enhancing ones understanding about the issue.
Added Value
Immersed in the communication field, through their studies and professional
experiences, the team was keen to deepen their knowledge on best practices on how to
best convey the right messages using the right tools to the target audiences, and achieve a
given communication campaigns objectives. Investigating a powerful communication
tool such as storytelling, and understanding its mechanisms and processes in
communication campaigns is one of the main purposes of the study. In addition, given
that the team holds a special interest in humanitarian work, this research will investigate
the impact of storytelling in fundraising campaigns. Both authors have been actively
involved in humanitarian work with various NGOs, and have been especially inspired by
their latest respective professional experiences, namely Save the Children Palestine, and
United Nations Headquarters. Working towards a common purpose of providing a better
protection to children in armed conflicts through various advocacy and communication
campaigns has triggered the authors interest to conducting this research.
Theoretical Gap
Developing and launching communication campaigns is often associated to either
marketing or politics. The non-profit field has not received as much attention, and fewer
studies have been conducted on the topic. Storytelling has been recognized as one of the
most effective tools in campaigning. In fact, numerous studies have previously been
conducted, and many books have been written on branding through storytelling,
emphasizing the role of the later in a successful marketing campaign (Fog et Al, 2010).
There is, however, a clear gap in the literature about the effect of storytelling in
fundraising campaigns.
The cross-cultural aspect in relation to storytelling is a fairly new aspect as well. Coming
from two high context cultures, Palestine and Morocco, but having been students in a
low context culture such as Sweden, provided the team with an interest to include a
cultural aspect to their research. Nowadays, many fundraising campaigns are global and
launched in various cultures.
Gaining a deeper insight into the cross-cultural aspect in the effectiveness of storytelling
in fundraising campaigns is the main purpose of the study at hand.
Research Question
This study aims at investigating the use of storytelling in fundraising campaigns and to
examine its effect across culture. Therefore, the following research question is pursued:
What is the effect of storytelling in fundraising campaigns across cultures? and
how can it enhance its effectiveness?
Study Outline
Chapter 1 gives a general view of the research and its background. It includes the
problem overview, theoretical gap and the research question.
Chapter 2 provides a review for the current literature on the key concepts in this study, a
description of the organizations involved and narrative of the visual material used in the
study.
Chapter 3 outlines research methodology including qualitative research approach, data
collection tools, data analysis, and ethical considerations.
Chapter 4 includes the analysis part of the collected data collected from participants in
Sweden and Morocco. Data is presented and analyzed by country then a comparison is
made for both countries.
Chapter 5 is dedicated for discussion of results and conclusion. The discussion includes
key similarities and differences between Sweden and Morocco. The researchers draw up
Limitations and recommendations future research.
Most research on the topic revolves around the same central idea, being that human
beings exist through the stories they hear, and the stories they tell. Storytelling seems to
be is vital element of what makes human beings humans.
The highly respected writer and movie director, Paul Auster, once stated that telling
stories is the only way we can create meaning in our lives and make sense of the world.
We need them in order to understand ourselves and communicate who we are...and by
sharing stories of our experiences, we can better understand the conflicts of our daily
lives and find explanations for how we fit into this world (Fog et Al, 2010, p.17).
It is clearly and repeatedly stated throughout the storytelling literature that sense-making
is one of the main uses of storytelling. History is rich of examples of strong charismatic
world leaders, and change agents who used storytelling to reach their purpose, giving
people the sense of meaningfulness and purposelessness they might have been seeking.
The most inspiring figures the world has witnessed, namely Ghandi, Nelson Mandela or
Martin Luther King, to name a few, share one common feature, they were outstanding
storytellers. Storytelling has shown the ability to unite people, inspire them, and change
the way they think or even act (Fog et Al, 2010). The authors of Branding through
Storytelling wisely mention the example of the renowned American Dream to
illustrate the successful use of storytelling. They claim that the melting pot aspect of the
American society is the result of the American Dream story; the story of a random
individual who through hard work only moves up in the social and economical ladder
fulfilling their dream of success. This story has inspired countless numbers of people
from all over the world to move to the USA hoping to make their dreams come true (Fog
et Al, 2010).
Considered an ancient art and discipline, storytelling has never ceased to exist. It is still
widely used, in various ways, in todays modern world. From the gathering around the
fire, storytelling is nowadays used in our everyday life, and is incorporated in all human
institutions (Abrahamson, 1998). In television, radio, emails, magazines, books, and
blogs or around the dinner table of countless families, storytelling exists.
Storytelling is not only used in ones private sphere as a mean of connecting with others
around, or in religion trying to demystify deep values and provide comfort in darker
times. It is also used as a mean of creating a stronger organizational culture, enhancing
employees feeling of belonging and commitment, strengthening the companys external
image, increasing sales, as a teaching method or motivating donations. Its uses are
numerous; within the scope of this study, however, the team will focus on organizational
uses of this powerful technique, both in profit and non-profit organizations.
The question arising from the overwhelmingly similar and positive views praising the
power of storytelling is what is/are the reasons of this success. Many studies have
touched upon brain-related theories, claiming that the human brain is naturally wired is
such a way that retains, and remembers each experience in a story format (Fog et Al,
2010). In fact, Neuroscience has shown that all information is organized, retained and
accessed by the human brain through stories (in Eck, 2006). In other words, storytelling
increases ones ability to retain information since it is the most convenient way for the
brain to receive and process the data from the outside world. This scientific reality
explains the organizational trend to use storytelling (Fog et Al, 2010). In his study, Eck
presents an overview of the literature regarding the effects of storytelling. According to
him, storytelling encourages an active engagement and participation from the audience,
which enhances learning and retention.
7
Richter & Koppett built on this, and added that a well told story can bring out a sense of
community and belonging in communities (2000, p.14). This engagement and
commitment created by storytelling, as described by researchers, is one of the key
strengths of this communication tool. Abrahamson elaborates, and argues that storytelling
does create a deeper engagement, not only do people hear the information but they are
immersed in the content on a deeper and richer level through emotional and personal
connection and visual imagery (1998, p.129). Human beings tend to store and recall
easily the experiences, information or knowledge associated to emotions (in Eck, 2006).
Once again, there seems to be a consensus among researchers regarding the power to
evoke emotions held by a good story, thus triggering the cognitive parts of the brain
responsible for retention and recall. The mental images stirred by storytelling make
people identify with the characters of the story, enhancing ones engagement.
As a result, in addition to increasing peoples understanding about a given issue, the
individual is more prompt to take action or apply what has been taught (Richter &
Koppett, 2000 cited in Eck, 2006). Moreover, research has demonstrated the undeniable
visual, auditory and even kinesthetic appeal of storytelling, evoking many intelligence
areas interpersonal, intrapersonal, linguistic, and spatial- (in Eck, 2006). From a very
young age, human beings express a special enjoyment towards stories. Today,
communication experts have thoroughly studied this phenomenon and its countless
benefits in order to use it personal or organizational goals.
In order to better understand the concept of storytelling, it is important to know the
elements of storytelling. In the article Sense making, storytelling and the legitimization
of elite business careers, the authors provide a description of the traditional basic
structure of a story: a beginning, middle and an end and usually includes characters, a
plot and a surprise (Maclean et Al, 2012). A story describes a sequence of actions or
experiences done or undergone by a certain number of peopleThese people are
presented either in situations that change or as reacting to such change. In turn, these
changes reveal hidden aspects of the situation and the people involved, and engender a
new predicament which calls for thought, action, or both. This response to the new
situation leads the story towards its conclusion. (Maclean et Al, 2012, p.4). Another, and
further detailed description of storytelling elements was provided in the book
Storytelling, Branding in Practice. The authors start with an analogy, comparing the
storytelling elements to the elements of nature. In both, there are four elements, like
nature has earth, wind, fire and water; storytelling ought to have a message, characters, a
conflict and a plot (Fog et Al, 2010).
What constitutes a story in the first place? And what makes a story good?
Unfortunately, there is no fixed formula. Furthermore, it would be nave to assume
that a narrow interpretation of what makes a story good will help us to become
better storytellers. Because storytellers encompasses so many different factors that
need to be fine-tuned to a specific audience and a given situation, it is virtually
impossible to lay down a hard set of rules. There are, however, some basic
guidelines that can be used. A peak in the annals of literary history shows that
most stories- from Aristotle to Hans Christian Andersen- entail at least some fixed
basic elements. (Fog et Al, 2010, 31).
Having a clearly defined message seems to be essential to strategic objectives behind the
use of storytelling. The same way every communication campaign must have clearly
defined messages, in order to ensure a smoother and more effective reach out, a story
must have a central message.
The authors refer to the work of the highly esteemed Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, in
which the central message was that love conquers everything, even death (2010). Clear
messages in the story help people understand, and even relate to the story in order to
spark action, which would be the ultimate goal. Second, a conflict is considered to be a
driving power of a great story. Conflict disturbs the harmony, and increases ones
attention, evoking emotions and the need to bring harmony back to the chaos (2010).
Too much harmony and not enough conflict makes for a story that is about as exciting
as watching paint dry (Fog et Al, 2010, p.34). Woodside argues that human beings relate
to each other in terms of stories, and this turns their thoughts and emotions into action. A
story would be called a story without a character, or a few. Most times, a character that
the audience easily relates to helps in conveying the central message, and reaches the
storytellers objective (2010). Emotions are clearly a crucial element in successfully
communicating the storytellers point of view, ideas and reaching ones objectives.
Finally, the last element described in the book is the plot. How your story and its events
vital to the audiences experience. Given the fact that a story exists only as a progression
of events within a given time span, the sequence of events needs careful consideration
(2010, p.44).
Marketing and Branding:
Keller (2003a) defined a brand as Technically speaking, then, whenever a marketer
creates a new name, logo, or symbol for a new product, he or she has created a brand
(p3). Whereas, in the same view, the American Marketing Association defined a brand as
a name, term, sign, symbol, design or some combination of these elements, intended to
identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers to differentiate them from
those of competitors (Kotler 2000, p. 396).
On the other hand, Healey (2008) stated that a brand is a promise of satisfaction. It is a
sign, a metaphor operating as an unwritten contract between a manufacturer and a
consumer, a seller and a buyer, a performer and an audience, an environment and those
who inhabit it, an event and those who experience it (p6). Franzen and Moriarty (2009)
see a brand as a complex system of interrelated management decisions and consumer
reactions that creates awareness, visibility, and meaning, as well as distinguishing a
product from its competitors (p. 6). Both opinions reflect two main aspects of branding:
the management decisions of the organization and consumer perception towards a brand.
In a different view, Scolari (2008c) stated that a brand is not just a set of values that can
be expressed in special texts. A brand offers an aesthetic, a series of textures, colors,
materials, and styles that create a difference with respect to other brands. He further
claimed that economic subjects of the world economy no longer attempt to sell their
products or services through persuasive advertising. They wish to build a symbolic
universe gifted with meaning i.e. brands (2008a).
The reason the book storytelling, branding in practice saw the day of light, and has
been quite successful, leading to the publication of a second edition was the sharp focus
on a practical, global and relevant issue in todays corporate world. In fact, there are
countless companies all around the world, with countless products and services. A daily,
and sometimes, overwhelming decision-making process takes place for the average
consumer. Sociologists say that we are experiencing increased levels of fragmentation in
today's society. The value systems that have traditionally guided us are coming undone,
in part caused by the lack of a dominating authority, such as science or religion, to dictate
what values we should adhere to (Fog et Al, 2010, p.20).
10
As a result, there are a lot of choices to make, and people are left to their own devices to
make decisions. Values and beliefs come into play here; our choices are then supposed to
reflect who we are, and what we believe in (2010). Branding is one of the strongest
means to do that; and communicating about peoples beliefs is being an essential asset
for strong brands. The best brands, according to the authors, are the ones that
successfully manage to go beyond representing products only, and create a powerful
culture, conveying a coherent set of values (2010). In addition, when we travel the world
using visual expressions and symbols that indicate who we are and what we believe, we
do this by the means of strong brands. It is not random that we prefer a hiking boots from
Timberland to another one from Nike because we tend to surround ourselves with brands
that signal our personality and values (Fog et Al, 2010, p.20).
Bruce (2001) claimed that a brand is to have a strong sense of its own value, if it has a
good story. Fog et al (2010) argued that a strong brand represents a story. For example:
Harley-Davidson represents the story of "freedom", while Nike represents the "will to
win". The story behind the brand builds on the culture within; addresses our emotions
and values; helps organizations to build a bridge between the company and the consumer
which is, the later, the main purpose of branding (Aaker, 1997)In todays competitive
world, it is becoming challenging for organizations to retain the loyalty of their
customers. Thus, they have to create a relevant experience which differentiates their
brands from others.
Fee Alexandra Haase, in her study entitled Your Story is Told, Your Issue is Handled:
The Myth of Social Activity Corporate Storytelling in English-Speaking Business
Communication in the Age of Technically Mediated Orality make a relevant and
interesting overview of storytelling in the corporate world. Haase supports the statement
describing this narrative mean of communication a uniquely powerful currency in
human relationships (n.d).
Holding the capacity to speak to ones rationality, as well as ones emotions, storytelling
in marketing expresses the companys vision in a focused manner (Haase, p.3). Stephen
Herskovitz and Malcolm Crystal add to the later, highlighting that this emotional bond is
created thanks to the relatable aspect of storytelling and its consistency, as well as the
fact that it is easily recognizable and memorable (2010). Numerous studies do show that
most people tend to make decisions based on more than mere facts, and try to make a
connection between their lifestyle choices and their values, and beliefs. In order to
achieve this, a strong coherent company culture seems to be a must.
A companys culture includes organizational values, vision, goals and most importantly
the why of its existence. It is believed that the art of storytelling is the most powerful
way to bring out the companys culture, and make its heart visible (Fog et Al, 2010).
Previous research has shown the vital role a strong culture plays in the survival of
companies, demonstrating the strong link between the companys culture, and satisfying
financial results (Fog et Al, 2010). Creating a strong commitment, engaging people,
internally and externally, requires organizations to speak both to the heart, as well as to
the mind. Communicating the companys culture using storytelling is claimed to allow
this heart-connection that is necessary to achieving the organizations goals, and survive
the fierce competitiveness. Needless to mention how challenging it is for companies to
stand out nowadays, and become memorable in peoples minds and hearts. The book put
on focus in this part aims at providing businesses with a practical toolbox on how to
strategically use storytelling, based on around twenty business cases.
11
The concept of core story is used throughout the book, described as the main
foundation any organization ought to work on to ensure the desired behavior and
attitude.The core story closes the gap between identity and image, between what an
organization is and stands for and how it is perceived from the outside world (Fog et Al,
2010, p.8).
Simply put, storytelling clearly explains what the company is about, in a demystified
language understandable by everyone. It is a bridge that translates abstract ideas into
tangible and human authentic stories. Storytelling is an indispensable tool for activating
and making the company's DNA visible and creating a shared direction (Fog et Al,
2010, p.8). It is a narrative form of communicative persuasion that many companies are
adopting (Haase, n.d). Storytelling is undeniably an impactful communication tool in the
business world, and the literature has vigorously expressed this reality.
Most of the existing studies have been focusing on storytelling within profitorganizations. For this reason, the team would like to first gain an understanding of the
practical usage of this ancient art in the business world. It could, indeed, be quite useful
in researching the use of this same tool in the non-profit area.
Branding and Storytelling:
In many ways the modern company resembles these tribes of old: the stories that
circulate in and around the organization paint a picture of the company's culture
and values, heroes and enemies, good points and bad, both towards employees
and customers. By sharing our stories, we define "who we are" and "what we
stand for". And just like the elders of the tribes of old, the strong leaders of
today's companies distinguish themselves by being good storytellers; voices that
employees listen to, are inspired by and respect. (Fog et Al, 2010, p.18)
In the corporate world, storytelling is used as a strategic persuasive tool supporting
companies goals. Haase underlines the challenging aspect to inspire customers, and
touching their emotions when the subject of the story is a product. Unluckily, a product,
be it a car or a drink, does not possess any emotional or ethical values on its own
(Haase, n.d, p.18). Values could, however, be created from the products greatest traits
and communicated by creative professionals (Haase). For instance, for a car selling
company, speed and safety could be the qualities derived conveying values that might be
appealing to customers (Haase). The stories on that level are argued to engage the
customers on conversations with brands that are both done on a conscious as well as
unconscious level of thinking (in Woodside et Al, 2008). A brand that inspires provides
the customer with a much richer experience than the only act of buying a product.
Looking around, it is not a secret to anyone that the most significant part of the world
lives in a material consumption never-ending spiral. Today, studies show that marketing
is about creating an emotional appeal and storytelling is the way to go. Many companies
have realized that branding goes hand in hand with the customers emotions. We
rationalize and legitimize with our brains, but we buy with our hearts, be it shampoo or
insurance (Fog et Al, 2010, 22); a combination between facts and feelings is argued to
be the winning ingredients that make up a strong brand, reinforcing their customers
loyalty. It is still, however, very challenging for a large number of organizations to break
free from their product-focused past.
12
Sangeeta Singh, and Stephan Sonnenburg provide a concrete example of a strong brand
Dove that switched from being product-driven to story focused, and moved to another
level of storytelling: co-creating the story with its customers through forums and open
discussions (2012). Dove launched their real beauty international campaign in 2014,
using storytelling to convey strong and positive values such as health, happiness and
well-being (Zhang, 2010). The main advertisement for the real beauty campaign had
gone viral, and in only three months, it had been viewed about three million times (Singh
& Sonnenburg, 2012).
Communicating positive values around the brand through stories about healthy and
happy women, made people relate to the brand in a more realistic way (Zhang, 2010). In
the article When Consumers and Brands Talk: Storytelling Theory and Research in
Psychology and Marketing, the authors explain the idea that some brands become
icons-brands that permit consumers to experience powerful myths, simple stories with
compelling characters and resonant plots; helping consumers make sense of the world
(in Woodside, 2008, p. 105). The brand considered as icons would be the ones that
succeed to make the myths more accessible by delivering it to their customers in a
tangible way. For instance, the brand Nike makes a very well use of the idea of
perseverance through the myth of individual achievement (in Woodside, 2008).
People would think: this could be more, and the emotions created then bond the
customer to the product. Marketing uses stories as a way to create and relevant
experiences for customers, thus responding to the need of meaningfulness most human
beings feel. The literature shows that storytelling, and how well to communicate values is
used differentiates between brands, and has the power to create strong bonds between
companies and consumers. The authors go a step further, claiming that the brand story
gradually becomes synonymous with how we define ourselves as individuals, and
products become the symbols that we use to tell our stories (Fog et Al, 2010, p.22).
In their research Brand performances in social media, Sangeeta Singh, and Stephan
Sonnenburg provide another example to illustrate the values-emotion-branding dynamic
around a core story created by another strong brand, Harley Davidson. Storytelling has
been wisely brightly used by this brand, nurturing the emotional bonds with their
customers. Stories help build awareness, comprehension, empathy, recognition, recall,
and provide meaning to the brand (Singh & Sonnenburg, 2012, p.4).
From a semiotic perspective, the brand is a device that can produce a discourse, give it
meaning, and communicate this to audiences. The brand expresses values, and is
presented as an interpretative contract between the companies and the consumers; it
proposes a series of values and the consumers accept (or not) to become part of this
world. Therefore, brands appear as narrative or possible worlds since they constitute
complex discourse universes with a strong narrative imprint (in Scolari, 2009, p.42).
Clearly, stories in branding are a strong bet to win over customers hearts. This trend is
best illustrated in this book, referring to Maslows traditional Hierarchy of Needs, only in
this case the Hierarchy would be upside down In the Western World all our basic
physical needs have been met. A high standard of living is taken for granted and focus
has shifted to realizing our own potential (Fog et Al, 2010, p.22).
Brain studies have also been conducted in the use of storytelling in the business world.
One of the major studies in the field, described by Malcome Crystal and Stephen
Herskovitz in their study The Essential Brand Persona: Storytelling and Branding
shows very significant results.
13
In this research, the scientists test the effect of branding on the participants brains when
offered Coke or Pepsi, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Crystal &
Herskovitz, 2010). Some of the participants, given the soda without knowing the brand,
were asked to choose their preference based on the taste only, while the rest of the group
was given the drink, and a photo of Pepsi or Coke was shown before they had their first
sip. This research showed the effect of branding in a very concrete measurable way. In
fact, the results showed that Coke lit up the hippocampus and the dorsolateral predrontal
cortex, areas of the brain related to memory, control of action, and self-image. Our brains
love Coke even more than our taste buds do (Crystal & Herskovitz, 2010, p.25). The
authors argue that the reason behind the result is the good use of storytelling by the Coke
Company. Coca Cola is one of the biggest and most successful corporations who have
managed to create well-told stories around their product, creating strong bonds with the
consumers.
Denning makes a strong point arguing that a sharp focus on the organizational goals and
using storytelling as a mean to this end is the key to be remembered, and thought of as a
top-of-the mind successful business (2006).
Fundraising campaigns:
All around the world, many communication campaigns are launched from various
sources, and for different purposes. RonalD E. Rice and Charles K. Atkin explain how
public communication campaigns have become a common and indispensable aspect of
the organizational culture (2012). Businesses, NGOs and governmental agencies of all
sizes find themselves involved in some kind of campaigning at some point or another.
Communication campaigns deal with various issues, ranging from health, political, to
social issues such as racial discrimination, children in armed conflicts, and environmental
issues. Businesses run campaigns that are not only meant to launch new products, but
also to polish their branding strategies reinforcing their public image, and identity. Every
campaign ought to have clear-cut, measurable, and specific goals, some of which might
be controversial and would require wide advocacy strategies (Rice & Atkin, 2012). The
target audiences, objectives, media tools, creative messages and evaluations processes
differ extensively depending on what kind of campaign it is. It is indeed very unlikely to
apply the same rules, and strategies to all; each and every campaign needs a
customization and tailoring to be able to achieve its unique goal.
Within the scope of this study, the team shed the light on the non-profit communication,
focusing on fundraising campaigns. In her article about communication for cultural nonprofit, Bowers argue that practitioners of non-profit organizations as well as their profit
colleagues are affected by the ever-changing challenges of the communication industry
(2000). In our contemporary world, it is becoming extremely challenging to get the
organization message to different audiences because of the volume of communications
and the drastic shift on its approach to the media, the constituents and the target
audiences.
In addition, the author Bowers recommends that non-profit practitioners should work
smarter than their for-profit counterparts because of the lack of funding that it is available
for marketing and communications. Fundraising is a fundamental element of the daily
activities of non-profit organizations. It is not only about raising money from donors; it is
the management of communication between an organization and it public donors.
14
She suggests that fundraisers spend less than 10 percent of their time pleading for for
donations; instead, they use their time to inform donors about programme successes and
updates as well as new opportunities (in Kelly, 1998).
Denning argues that the invaluable leadership tool discovered by organizations is
storytelling, in order to facilitate organizational change and reinforcing organizational
culture (2005). In addition, it is a powerful tool that can be used to in fundraising too. For
this reason, many corporations and organizations have put storytelling in the heart of
their communication strategy for more effective results (Eck, 2006). Non-profit and
charity organizations like the American Heart Association, Charity Water and Save the
Children use storytelling in their appeals for donations (Merchant et al, 2010). Different
types of organizations view stories not only as a content for their marketing campaigns
but also as the fuel that maintains a well-built corporate culture. Scott Harrison, CEO of
Charity Water, travels around the world to tell the story of how his non-profit began
(Duarte, 2013). Such stories built institutional memory concerning individuals
contribution toward a collective endeavor (Chen, 2013).
The same way profit-oriented organizations dedicate a considerable time, energy and
resources into branding, and look for significant ways to tell their stories, the non-profit
organizations do need to find ways to stand out and achieve its goals within the immense
pool of charitable organizations. The literature previously reviewed shows the crucial
role storytelling plays in evoking peoples emotions, and one could argue that there is
nothing more emotional than humanitarian causes. The existing literature on the use of
storytelling for non-profit is quite limited, especially compared to its use in the corporate
world.
Building on the work of woodwide and Chebat, the researchers Merchant Ford and
Sargeant leaned their interest on charitable organizations, and their use of storytelling.
Through an empirical study including 319 undergraduate students, the research
conducted demonstrates that the use of storytelling in fundraising is very effective
(2010). Using a story format is argued to work effectively because of the emotional
stages one goes through throughout the advertisement. The typical design used in these
stories tend to begin with an inciting incident; showcasing the issue and the
person/people in need (Merchant et Al, 2010). Starting with a negative situation, and
highlighting the issue at the heart of the organizations mission is claimed to be done on
purpose; thus generating negative emotions for the viewer (Merchant et Al, 2010). This
first stage would make people feel sadness, anger, fear or guilt creating a negative mood.
The authors present concrete uses of this negativity in real life campaigns; fear for
instance has been commonly used in campaigns against AIDS (Merchant et Al, 2010).
The same way anger has been commonly used in the first stage of campaigns against
drunk-driving, and guilt to fight poverty (2010).
The negative emotions put the viewer in an unbalanced emotional state, and non-profit
storytelling develops in a way that gives the opportunity for the audience to help, taking
action to reduce the tension (Woodside and Chebat, 2001; Woodside et al, 2008, p).
Woodside believes that the natural instinct of human beings is to do anything possible to
leave the negative state, and solve the issue (2008). This is the reason charitable
organizations would use the story structure starting with the problem, generating negative
states that the viewer would want to change. In this case, being given the opportunity to
donate would be the way out into their pursuit of positive and happy emotions
(Merchant et Al, 2010).
15
The last stage to ensure a successful and complete effect of the story is showing that the
goals have been reached thanks to the donation (Woodside and Chebat, 2001).
An important aspect worth mentioning when it comes to storytelling; people tend to like
the heroes who come in the story to make everything better (Woodside, 2008). In
fundraising advertisement using stories to convince people to donate, being given the
chance to be that hero is very impactful, as most people tend to like seeing themselves
involved in the story (in Merchant et Al, 2001). Most charitable organizations have
wonderful tales to tell. Hence, one frequently sees storytelling in the context of appeals
for charity (Merchant et Al, 2010, p.757).
According to the literature, non-profit organizations need to stand out as well, and use
strong appeals to attract potential donors. A well-told story helps the organization make
an impact on existing donors, potential future donors and the general opinion (Merchant
et Al, 2010). It is an efficient mean to keep the existing donors engaged, and remind them
of what sparked their involvement in the first people. They become part of the story, and
this feeling is believed to provide a strong emotional engagement, making them connect
to the protagonist on a more personal level (2001). Katherine K. Chen agrees with the
above arguments, stating that storytelling inspires action, and change, and reinforces
memory as well (2013).
Storytelling comes across as an essential element of fundraising campaigns for nonprofits; as many studies have showed that it is much more persuasive than rational
arguments. In her study Stories that Sell, Stories that Tell, Kauffman demonstrates
empirically the power of storytelling over facts and statistics, The fact is that a story
makes a topic much more real to the audience than the most rational persuasion because
it reframes the argument in an easy-to-grasp format anyone can relate to. When it
becomes necessary to influence people, a story frame is always more effective than a
rational, linear argument, provided the story answers the audience's question, "What's in
this for me?"(2003). Kauffman presents case studies of successful fundraising events,
quoting the director of the organization fight for children, as he insists on the critical
role of storytelling in enhancing fundraising.
The organization fight for children discussed in this study uses stories to captivate, and
make itself noticeable and memorable in the minds and hearts of people (2003). Dalia
Rodriguez points out to the fact that stories bring out empathy in people, creating a
deeper sense of togetherness and a sense of community and compassion pushing people
to act and help one another (2010). Some argue that empathy motivates selfless behavior,
inspiring a helping behavior born of pure altruistic motives (Merchant et Al, 2010).
Others, on the other hand, believe that the desire to help is caused by a selfish need to
solve ones own negative state (2010).
Culture:
According to the American anthropologist, Blumenthal (1940), culture never has been
precisely defined according to the standards of science. Different scholars have made
several contributions to define the concept culture. The most famous contribution is
Hofstedes definition (1980) as the collective programming of the mind which
distinguishes the members of one human group from another.
16
On the other hand, Hall (1976) views culture from a different perspective with a strong
focus on correlation of language and context in communication (in Mller and Turner,
2004). He claimed that culture is the total communication framework: words, actions,
postures, gestures, tones of voice, facial expressions, the way he handles time, space and
materials, and the way he works, plays, makes love, and defends himself. He further
explained that all those named above and more are complete communication systems
with meanings that can be read correctly only if one is familiar with the behavior in its
historical, social, and cultural context ( Hall, (1976, p.42).
Hall (1976) grouped cultures into 2 categories by the contextually related language.
High-context and low-context communication are based on the extent to which speakers
depend on factors other than explicit speech to get their messages across (LeBaron,
2003). Hall stated that a high context communication or message is one in which most
of the information is either in the physical context or internalized in the person, while
very little is in the coded, explicit, transmitted parts of the message (p.91). In high
context messages people tend to use nonverbal language rather than speak their mind out
to convey their messages. On the contrary, in low context communication information is
shared explicitly with detailed codes (Hall, 1976; LeBaron, 2003).
Hofstedes Cultural Framework
According to Blodgett et al (2008), Hofstede's cultural framework is based on the
principle that people from around the world are guided by different attitudes, beliefs,
customs, morals and ethical standards. Societies are based upon different traditions,
rituals, and religions; and promote different views regarding family, work, social, and
personal responsibilities. The framework measures cultural differences based on four
dimensions which are: power distance, individualism versus collectivism, uncertainty
avoidance, and masculinity versus femininity.
Power Distance:
This dimension expresses the degree to which the less powerful members of a society
accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. A key issue in this dimension here
is how a society deals with inequalities among people. In societies with high power
distance, people accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a position and which
needs no further justification. In societies with low power distance, people strive to
equalize the distribution of power and demand justification for inequalities of power
(Hofstede, 2001).
Individualism versus Collectivism:
Individualism refers to a loosely-knit framework in which individuals are expected only
to take care of themselves and their immediate families. Conversely, collectivism refers
to a tightly-knit framework in which individuals belong to groups and can expect their
relatives or members of their groups to look after them in exchange for unquestioning
loyalty. Peoples self-image in terms of I or we reflects the position of their society
in this dimension (Hofstede, 2001).
Uncertainty Avoidance:
The uncertainty avoidance dimension assesses the degree to which members of a society
feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity. A key issue here is a society attitude
towards future and how it deals with the fact that the future can never be known.
17
Countries expressing strong uncertainty avoidance sustain rigid codes of belief and are
intolerant of deviant behavior and ideas. On the other hand, societies expressing weak
uncertainty avoidance uphold a more risk tolerant and they exhibit relaxed attitude in
which practice counts more than principles (Hofstede, 2001).
Masculinity versus Femininity:
The value of masculinity in a society exhibits a preference for achievement, heroism,
assertiveness and material rewards for success. Society at large is more competitive. In
contrast, femininity stands for a preference for modest, cooperation, caring for the weak
and quality of life. Society at large is more consensus-oriented (Hofstede, 2001).
The fifth dimension, Long-term versus short-term orientation, was added by Hofstede
after being influenced by Chang and Dins work in 1995 (Mller and Turner, 2004). This
dimension orientation measures the development of virtues related to the past such as
respect for tradition. Long Term Orientation stands for the fostering of virtues oriented
towards future rewards, in particular perseverance and thrift. Its opposite pole, Short
Term Orientation, stands for the fostering of virtues related to the past and present, in
particular, respect for tradition, preservation of face and fulfilling social obligations
Hofstede (2001).
Blodgett et al (2008) claimed that Hofstede's framework has been applied in a wide
variety of behavioral research and has delivered the basis on which most cross-cultural
marketing and consumer behavior research has been founded. In the fields of marketing,
Hofstedes Framework was mainly employed to examine cross-cultural differences in
consumer marketing contexts like in researches about advertisement, complaint behavior,
and global brand strategies (in Rafique and Pannavalee, 2008).
18
19
Americans, on the other, were eager to talk and tell stories about themselves (2006,
p.13). On the contrary, Randoplh T. Barker and Kim Gowner, emphasize the universal
aspect of storytelling, which should be used as effective cross-cultural communication
technique in todays globalized and diverse organizational reality (2012).
Established in 1946, after World War II, by the United Nations in order to help providing
food, health care and clothing to the children affected by the ravaging effects of the war,
UNICEF (the United Nations Childrens Funds) had been a permanent member of the
20
UN since 1952. Today, it operates in 190 countries, the same way Save the Children
does, on a big international scale to reach similar objectives (UNICEF website, 2014).
Part of SOS childrens villages, SOS May Day is a Norwegian non-profit, an action
network relying on donations to provide help and assistance to children in need, and react
to emergencies in the world (SOS MayDay Website, 2014).
21
UNICEF:
Video 3: I Believe in Zero
Starting with Let me tell you about a place for believers as an opening statement, the
storyteller tells the story of previous great achievements that were once thought to be
crazy ideas I the past. From walking on the moon, to womens right to vote, the central
idea of the video is that everything has we see today, and might take for granted has
started with a belief. The video, 1 minute long, is part of the UNICEF campaign I
believe in Zero. Half time through it relating past success stories of true believers who
turned beliefs into realities, the viewer sees a little boy, approaching the microphone, in
front of an audience and saying that he believes in Zero. Dazzling the audience, the little
boy continues and explains how he believes in Zero children suffering from hunger, or
dying when they do not have to, zero children out of school. This video has been viewed
53999 times on YouTube, and is part a broader campaign.
Photos:
Both photos chosen are part of UNICEFs campaign to end female genital mutilations.
They use a storytelling format, presenting two quotes with photos of their authors, two
very young girls in this case. The first quote is from a 14 year old Ethiopian girl, who
says: In my village, there is one girl who is younger than I am who has not been cut
because I discussed the issue with her parents emphasis the role of raising awareness
around. The second one, Neshwa, a 15 year old teenager from Sudan reported There is
this new movement that is trying to teach people about the dangers of cutting their
daughters. It is good for us to be able to discuss these things in school.
SOS MayDay:
Video 4: Would you help a Freezing Child
Made in Norway, the video was made I a story format as well as a social experiment with
hidden cameras. It portrays the story of a young Norwegian boy, who got his jacket
stolen in the middle of the Harsh Norwegian winter, and is waiting in a bus stop to be
picked up. At first, the objective seems to see if people would react to a freezing child or
not, and how would they try to help (if they do). The video lasts 2.28 minutes, where you
see that people end up helping the child and giving him their own jackets, scarfs or
gloves to keep him warm. At the very end of the video, the viewer understands that the
actual objective is to donate to children in Syria, in need of warm clothing. This video
has gone viral on the internet, and has reached 3 268 589 views on YouTube.
22
3. METHODOLOGY
23
In this study, two focus groups of 45 minute each were therefore conducted. Both were
presented with the four videos presented earlier, as well as two photos and asked a series
of 8 questions to trigger an extensive sharing of opinions, ideas, and emotions. One of
the purposes of the research is to study the potential differences/similarities between a
low and a high context culture when it comes to the impact of storytelling. For this
reason, the first group was composed of seven Moroccan participants (high context
culture), while the second one was made up of seven Swedish Participants (low context
culture).
Participants
The participants in both groups were nominated by the researchers, as the literature
suggests it is one of the most common means to select participants in a focus group. key
individuals nominate people they think would make good participants, nominees who are
known for their ability to respectfully share their opinions, and willing to volunteer about
two hours of their time (Elliot et Al, 2005). The main selection criteria was nationality,
and advanced English skills in order to be able to fully comprehend the content of the
material suggested. For this reason, the researchers recruited a quite homogeneous group
of participants, between 20 and 30 years old, 4 women and 3 men in each, some are
young professionals while others are about to finish their studies. The two sessions took
place during a Saturday, at the convenience of the participants, and the researchers were
moderating and simultaneously taking notes as the participants were interacting between
each other.
Table 1: Profile of Participants
Moroccan Group
No. Gender
Age
M1 Female
25
M2 Female
27
M3 Female
30
M4 Female
20
M5 Male
30
M6 Male
20
M7 Male
25
Education
Engineering
Marketing
Engineering
Economics
Politics
Medicine
Economics
Swedish Group
No. Gender
S1
Female
S2
Female
S3
Female
S4
Female
S5
Male
S6
Male
S7
Male
Age
27
26
24
28
28
29
30
Education
Teaching
Communication
Communication
Nursing
Engineering
Economics
Teaching
Interview guide:
Ideally, eight questions are asked to the participants, organized in the following manner:
engagement questions, exploration questions and an exit question to end the session
(Elliot, 2005). The point of the engagement questions would be to break the ice at first,
and make the participants more familiar with the subject in general.
The exploration questions represent the core interest of the study; sparking deep
discussions and making the subjects talk about their true opinions and feelings. Lastly,
the exit question helps wrap up the discussion and gives the opportunity for the
participants to add anything they might have forgotten to mention earlier (Elliot, 2005).
In this study, the team has designed a rough guide composed of eight questions, and
including the three kinds of questions, namely engagement, exploration and an exit
question. The objective in this case was to let the participants freely express their
24
opinions without the need for a specific structure, as long as the why aspect of all
statements was explained.
The team ended up asking six questions, after giving a short introduction about the
subject at hand. These questions were given in the beginning in order to set the tone of
what the session was about:
1- Out of the four videos, which one was your favorite?
2- Out of the two photos presented, what one was your favorite?
3- Could tell us what thoughts and feelings you had when you saw every
video/photo?
4- Could you explain why you thought/felt so?
5- What did you think of the use of storytelling?
6- Would any of these visual material make you act (donate, raise awareness
etc)? Why/why not?
These six questions were used as a preliminary skeleton to guide a free-flowing
discussion, leaving as much as room as possible for spontaneity in order for the
participants to feel as comfortable as possible. Throughout the session, the researchers
would ask for further clarification if needed.
25
26
4. RESULTS
The data analysis of focus group transcripts revealed recurrence of similar themes for
both the Swedish, and the Moroccan group with a few variations in the sub-themes as
well as the frequencies. Consensus has been reached by the analysts breaking it down to
five main themes, and a different number of sub-themes for each. The two groups,
representing a high-context culture (Morocco) and a low-context culture (Sweden)
brought up many similar themes, i.e., the variation of strong positive and negative
feelings, the technical use of the visual material, the relatable and engaging aspect and so
on. Below is a summary of the categories and sub-categories that resulted from the
qualitative data analysis conducted using the scissor and sort technique.
Table 2: Summary of Themes Obtained from Code Analysis
1. Feelings
1.1 Positive
1.2 Negative
1.3 Neutral
1.4 Other (Nostalgia)
1. Feelings
1.1 Positive
1.2 Negative
1.3 Neutral
2. Techniques
2.1 The slogan (written text)
2.2 Physical & audio features
2.3 Visual quality
2. Techniques
2.1 Cleverness
2.2 Curiosity
2.3 Length
3. Relating ability
3.1 Relationship to the self
3.2 Familiarity & closeness
3.3 Stereotypes
3. Relating ability
3.1 Relationship to the self
3.2 Familiarity & closeness
4. Credibility
4.1 Actor performance & emotions
4.Credibility
4.1 Reality Vs Fiction
1. Feelings:
27
The most recurring, and strongest theme for both groups was the various, and rather
strong feelings the material presented generated. Most statements from participants
started, or included I feel. This confirms the consensus built in the literature over the
power storytelling holds in evoking ones emotions. The cultural aspect did not seem to
have a considerable impact, and both Swedes and Moroccans were emotionally impacted
by the material. Nevertheless, even though we could all agree that was evidence of
emotional effect, there were variations in what feelings were brought to the surface in
each video or photo depending on the individual rather than the group. The researchers
gathered, and group all the feelings evoked by the participants, and came up with similar
sub-themes for both the Moroccan, and the Swedish group with the exception of one
additional sub-theme belonging to the Moroccan group.
Morocco:
Findings show how the Moroccan group had put a great deal of emphasis on their
feelings, and most of them provided a detailed description, highlighting at what stage of
the story each emotion happened.
Hope, inspiration & nostalgia stand out in comparison. Mentioning the different stages,
and monitoring the changes throughout the videos.
1.1. Positive
The findings showed that the stories had evoked positive emotions in most participants,
whether at the beginning, in the middle or around the end of the story. A pattern noticed
within the Moroccan group is the importance of the time those positive emotions
emerged, conveying an impression of breaking-down the videos into smaller parts, each
with its own specificities, instead of viewing it as a whole. In this sub-theme, five key
feelings stood out due to its frequency of use:
Inspiration
Hope
Warmth
Love
Happiness
I loved the video of the little British girl, and I had very positive feelings at first when I
saw the birthday, the happy daily activitiesthis story convinces my heart, no rational
argument! (M1)
The freezing child video is very positive, I loved it! Strong impact and strong positive
emotions at first, lost a little bit in the middle, and back again when you see the
willingness of random strangers to help out the kid, it makes you feel good that people
are involved and you react to the goodness in people, they start looking like real life
heroes. (M2)
The hero effect has been studied by a number of storytelling researchers, and discussed
in the literature review is supported by the findings. It claims that the traditional format
of a story tends to involve a hero/heroes; the good-hearted characters who solve the
conflict, and restore the balance, both in the story and in the audiences emotional state.
In the freezing child video, aiming at showing how simply helpful gestures can make a
difference, and convincing people to donate for Syrian children in need of warm
clothing, the hero effect is clearly illustrated, and noted by some participants. The
28
emotional state of viewers gets disturbed by the conflict, in this case, the child shivering
because of the cold. The human nature would push one to restore the balance, and get rid
of the negative emotions caused by the conflict. In stories, heroes play this role and in
this case, participants expressed how heart-warming they felt to see the goodness in
people who helped the child. Positive feelings were restored. Fundraising campaigns use
this as a way to make people see that they have the possibility as well to be that hero
through donations.
The freezing child video is poignant and heart-warming! Small actions can make a big
difference (M6)
The freezing child story was to touching, I had tears in my eyes because I was really
moved by the goodness in people who helped him. (M3)
Two distinctive positive feelings brought up by the findings within the Moroccan group
were hope and inspiration, which did not come up in the Swedish group.
The UNICEF I believe in Zero video gives me hope, it also brings up dreams (M3)
I love the advertising; it is really inspiring, it makes you dream, it makes you feel like you
can do something that is known as impossible (M7)
The photos made me feel that there is hope for a better future (M4)
The first photo, I loved it, it is very touching to see that she took the decision to go and
discuss the issue with other parents to prevent this mutilation to happen again, her
courage is inspiring (M5)
The positive emotions expressed were powerful, and the participants body
language and facial expressions conveyed the same message as their words.
1.2. Negative
As the conflict arises in the stories, the findings show that negative feelings were
evoked. A few key emotions emerge:
Sadness
Confusion
Pain
Guilt
Negative feelings quickly escalate when the troubles start in the happy life of the little
British girl, it makes you want to help her, you can feel her confusion and you start
feeling confused as well! (M7)
I felt so bad for the freezing child at first and wanted to be there and give him something
(M3)
The story of the little prince in the UK conveys a lot of sadness, but only felt
overwhelmed and wanted to stop watching (M1)
My heart ached at the thought of those young girls who might get mutilated, it hurts a lot
when you imagine them suffering, especially considering their young age (M5)
29
Negative emotions were described vividly by the participants, making them feel bad or
sorry for the children. Some participants mentioned that the use of children (instead of
adults) enhanced those negative emotions because of the innocence and vulnerability
children have. They reported feeling that it was adults responsibility to protect them
(from cold, from warms or from the devastating effects of poverty). Guilt was brought up
by three participants (out of seven), not because of the characters in the story presented,
but because it reminded them of the large number of Moroccan children in similar or
even worse situations (referred to the ad about fighting poverty). At some point in the
discussion, the focus was not on the topic discussed in the campaigns but about what
could be done in the Moroccan context.
Note: many negative feelings in this group were because of the texts used or the visual
quality, which will be further explored in another theme).
1.3. Neutral
The photos have made no emotional impact on some, unlike the videos, which have
all sparked various emotional responses.
The photos did not make me feel anything, but did make me think that I might want to
read more on the issue discussed (M4)
1.4. Other: Nostalgia
Interestingly, the Moroccan group did refer to their cultural historical bond with the
art of storytelling.
I loved the ad, and especially the beginning with the use of once upon a time, it
reminds you of your childhood, and all the stories that were animating family gatherings
around grand-parents. The voice of the narrator is amazing; it reminds you of all the
fairy tales we used to watch as kids (M2)
The feeling of nostalgia was not frequently mentioned, but it worth mentioning
since it was specifically brought up by the high-context culture only (Morocco).
Sweden:
Similarly, the findings of the focus group data analysis of the Swedish participants,
showed a tremendous and frequent referral to the emotional impact the material for
fundraising campaigns had on them. There were variations, nevertheless, in defining the
emotions evoked. Sympathy, comfort, relief and sadness, and hopelessness were some of
the most frequent emotions described.
1.1 Positive
Many positive emotions were expressed by the Swedish group as well. Findings
show that the main recurring feelings could be summed up in the following list
Sympathy
Comfort
Likeness
Trust
Happiness
30
I sympathize with the girl and the later part of the video gets to me of course (S1)
First, you feel happy with the kid and then suddenly it becomes really serious (S2)
In addition, analysis noted that this group links the emotions felt with how well the
video had been made, or how informative it is.
The story is so elaborate that you could easily sympathize with the families, its touching
and informative at the same time, I like it (S3)
It is not difficult to be moved by the video (S3)
Besides describing the emotional impact of the videos/photos, questions were raised by a
few participants.
I was filled with curiosity about what people's reactions would be to the little freezing
boy sitting on a bench in Oslo and as I saw the help the boy received I was relieved and
happy that people would act in the most humane way there is (S5)
I liked the video since it was quite heart-warming but thing is it also brings up questions
on how helpful the same people would be towards someone who looks more like a
stranger to them (S4)
Similar responses were noted, and even same wordings were used in some cases to
express the joy, comfort and hope seeing helpful people acting to end someones
suffering. The hero effect clearly applies to both cultures in this case, regardless of
nationality. A new key word appeared within the Swedish focus group cession, that was
absent within the Moroccan group, which is trust. Later in the analysis, the feeling trust
will appear to play an important role in the decision-making process of whether to donate
or not.
Then, I got happy that people are actually helping the freezing child (S7)
I got hopeful about mankind that people are actually being helpful when a person is in
need (S4)
It is comforting that people take action when there is an obvious need that they can settle
with direct action (S3)
I liked the posters, especially the first one, it had an impact on me; it showed some kind
of hope, she helped someone so she can help more...or more people could. It gives you
hope, I trusted her (S6)
1.2 Negative
The two groups shared a significant number of similar negative emotions throughout the
broadcast cession, such as:
Sadness
Confusion
Anger
31
This was a sad movie; I almost wanted to start crying. What can save the children do
about the war, it was really impacting. Do not really know what more to say, but it
impacted me a lot (S7)
I was puzzled about the story that they are trying to tell. It impacts me, almost feeling
hopeless about mankind and the cruelty of war (S4)
At first, I got really irritated that no one helped the kid (S7)
On the other hand, guilt or pain was not brought up by any participants. They did,
however, use other negative adjectives to describe their emotions, for instance:
When all the chaos ensued, I felt really sorry for her, the little girl, even worse that it is
happening to a completely defenseless kid... (S3)
Then, it becomes really serious and I got a little shocked (S2)
It is also scary to see how the whole structure in the society falls apart when the war
begins (S6)
The whole idea that a 14- year old convinced parents to refrain from cutting their
daughters scares me. How it is possible to harm their own offspring makes me scared,
scared and angry (S4)
1.3 Neutral
Some of the material presented did not have any emotional effect on the participants of
this group. They reported:
The UNICEF video had no effect on me, I even forgot about it as soon as it ended. It felt
more like a commercial for the States then helping children (S4)
The freezing child video did not have any effect on me, hard to explain why, maybe it was
hard to see the connection between an actor freezing without a jacket, to a lot of children
in need (S7)
The pictures are not making me feel much, I do think it is good though to spread
awareness about such issues (S1)
The fact that it made no emotional impact does not imply it had no impact at all. It did,
indeed, raise questions and provoked thoughts and opinions. Findings from both group
show that the videos and photos that used storytelling for their fundraising campaigns did
generate a significant amount of powerful emotional responses.
This theme feelings is the pre-dominant of all, and confirms the claims and arguments
presented in the literature review that storytelling speaks to the heart, rather than the
brain.
32
2. Techniques:
This theme is quite broad, including various technical aspects and decisions the
organizations used in making those videos/photos. In terms of frequency, this theme
came right after feelings. In additional to the emotional impact, both groups measured
the impact by aspects of the technical communication of those stories, such as the text
used, the length, the music or the physical features of the characters and how expressive
they are.
The format of the story being told directly involves you, or not. It could make you
reached your objective, or fail at it. It could make people act or forget about the ad as
soon as it is finished (M1)
Morocco:
The group discussed the format, and technical aspects of the videos/photos that, and
explained how that could make them decided whether to act or not.
2.1. Slogan/Written text
The group paid close attention to the wording chosen to send the messages to the
audience, and while some were quite effective, others were described as inappropriate or
even offensive. Every detail mattered, the wording, the content, the format where it is
presented and so on.
What I did not really understand was the phrase they chose to finish the video
with "It shouldn't happen here" - should it happen anywhere else in the world? I found
this a tang bit offensive. The reason I found it a bit offensive is because I come from a
developing country where it's often seen by the outside world as quite normal and
common for this and much worse level of poverty to exist (M7)
I liked the format, but I didnt like the end, the slogan believe in zero was
inappropriate in my opinion. Zero conveys negative things! It could have been more
effective is they used 100% that projects a potential future success. In this case, the
wording sounds weak and does not inspire me to act (M6)
The written facts and statistics at the same time as the story is being told were
disturbing. I thought it was all messy, and overwhelming. It made it hard to be fully
focused on the story, and the size of the text made it even worse. It did not make me want
to finish the video, or act in any way (M2)
On the other hand, other participants within the same group had opposing views
regarding similar aspects of the same video.
The concept 0 is very relevant and so clear! It is easy to understand. It makes you feel
inspired and makes u want participate to this 0 by helping children even locally (at your
level) (M3)
I liked the slogan just because it isnt happening here, it does not mean it is not
happening in the little British girls video by save the children to make people relate to
33
what is happening to children in Syria. The slogan is catchy, is relatable It makes the
impact even stronger! (M5)
In this photo, what I affected me the most and drew my attention at first was the text.
While reading, I really felt that things were changing to the better and that prevention is
happening, slowly but surely. The poster is very effective, in the sense that we understand
that this fight again those inhumane behavior in slowly taking place (M7)
The text used the time it is showed and how it is presented played an important role in
shaping the groups attitude towards the campaign. Every detail seems to matter, and
many emphasized the necessity to keep the viewers sympathy throughout the
video/posters, paying careful attention not to offend anyone, as it has been the case by
the message used by Save the Children in their campaign against poverty in the UK It
Shouldnt Happen Here.
2.2. Physical & audio features
Audio & physical features in the videos were one of the explanations given when
participants were explaining the reasons why they were impacted by one video/photo and
not the other. Physical features include the eyes, or look of the character for instance,
while audio features mainly refer to the music background or the voice of the narrator or
characters. The Moroccan group made a clear connection between their feelings and the
eyes, smile, facial expressions or voice of the characters in the story.
The storyteller voice was amazing, I loved the feel you get from it, it really reminds you
of the once upon a time style when you hear him. I was interested to hear more and
more. The inspirational background music does add to the inspirational aspect of the
message but does not necessarily make a lasting impact (M3)
The color of the little girls eyes, and her eyes in general, were very expressive. I felt
more engaged because of that, because at first, I had a hard time getting into the story,
but at some point, we can so clearly see the confusion in her eyes, it made me want to go
there and take her out of her misery (M6)
The voice of the little boy in the UNICEF video is very low, and comes across too
weakWhich is touching, but not powerful (M7)
2.3. Visual quality
The overall visual quality of the videos and posters plays an important role when
measuring the impact of storytelling in these cases. The Moroccan group was quite
sensitive to the visual quality of the material in affecting the way they feel about it.
The Uk little prince video did not appeal to me at all. For one, it looked like a reality tv
show, I do not know, but the quality of the video, even though made by highly skilled and
professional people, looked like an amateur work (M1)
Sweden
2.1 Cleverness
Describing the messages impact went hand in hand with evaluating the effectiveness and
cleverness of technical decisions in the video/photo. For the Swedish group, it was
important to mention the clever use of the messages or the characters as a whole,
34
without breaking it down to physical features or audio features. The whole picture was
what mattered the most, and triggered some reflection for them.
It is a clever move to use what seems to be an English girl living her ordinary life in
England and then showing what life can turn into because of war. The message gets
through and it is of course a smart choice to use children to play on peoples emotions
(S4).
Its clever and makes you think; it was a very effective video to catch our attention (S5)
The leap between a freezing child in Norway and freezing war victims in Syria is, once
again, clever but somewhat lost on me. I can appreciate that the movie itself is liked,
shared and watched with joy; however it doesnt make me feel any different about
children in Syria (S5)
Thinking the video/photo was a product of smart professionals was underlined by the
group, nevertheless that did not necessarily mean that they were convinced only because
it was well-made, and it made them think.
2.2 Curiosity
Most of the stories presented proved to spark curiosity in the participants, keeping the
attention alive. The findings show that curiosity help the group in staying interested in
the videos.
At first I was just curious wondering how us following the life of what seemed like a
suburban English little girl would lead us to a fundraising campaign (S6)
As I watched this video I was filled with curiosity, and wanted to know more (S3)
2.3 Length
This group linked the length of the video to their keeping their attention throughout the
videos, or to their ability to relate to the story.
Im not as affected by the whole video as I think I might have been if the clips in it were
longer and showed more surroundings/other people and helped to get to know the girl
better. Perhaps if she talked more? With that said I dont feel the need for a longer clip
since that might have just made it too long with the effect of switching channels or what
not (S3)
The last movie was too long with too much text to take in (S1)
3. Relating ability
A major part of the findings showed how the ability to relate between the characters in
the story and ones emotional effect as a whole was crucial. Both groups discussed this
aspect of storytelling thoroughly. It shows that the chances a story reaches out its
objective are highly enhanced when the audience can relate to it. It becomes much more
engaging, and touches the viewer on a deeper emotional level. This might explain the
reasons participants expressed all those emotions before.
35
The researchers emphasized the importance in trying to justify ones statements as much
as possible in order to gain a deeper understanding of the storytelling effect in such
campaigns. This theme includes some of the most significant justifications.
Morocco
3.1. Relationship to the self
The association between oneself and the main character in the story is undeniable. If
failed to establish or maintain, the participant would not be emotionally affected.
This video engages you, because it shows it could be you! It makes it more powerful
(M1)
The British girl, I saw sadness but I could not feel it. It shows only beautiful things in the
girls daily life playing, birthday etc) and does not include all aspects of daily life that
are less fun such has homeworks, making their beds etc. I could not relate to her
because of that. I also had the impression that she lives in her own bubble as they
show that she was not even realizing what was happening around her (the newspaper, the
TV news etc).I could not feel the connection to her (M2)
I had a hard time relating to the little girl at first (M6)
3.2 Familiarity & closeness
Very much related to the relationship to the self, many participants insisted on the way
some videos/posters created a sense of closeness or familiarity with the character, and
how much did it affect them.
You feel close to her, and you feel involved, it is the best way to show that it can happen
to anyone. I loved it. It directly involves you (M1)
The characters and voices make you feel you like you know them (M7)
The stories, in the video format, there is life, it is engaging, you feel closer to the cause
(M4)
The freezing child, engaging, simple and matters a lot. It brings out your humanity (M5)
The Freezing child, it did not touch my feelings because I had a hard timing relating to
him and the situation the way it was presented (M6)
The findings show that participants need to feel close or familiar to the character in order
to feel a connection, and potentially act.
3.3 Stereotypes
Some participants mentioned the importance of the role stereotypes play in such
situations. In fact, some of them argued that it might change their perception of the story.
The fact of not showing the typical, African, middle eastern or Asian kid, for a
humanitarian cause was interesting. Many people got so used to see those stereotypical
36
profiles in appeals for donations that it does not necessarily make a strong impact
anymore (M1)
It could be you or your child. Avoiding the stereotypes was quite good! (M7)
The choice of the British little girl or the Norwegian boy stand out compared to what we
are used to see when it comes to fundraising campaigns. I really liked that novelty
aspect! (M5)
Sweden
3.1 Relationship to the self
The same way Moroccans expressed the need to relate, and see themselves in the
characters of the story; many Swedish participants have expressed the same need,
arguing that relating oneself to the story is the most effective way to convince their hearts
(emotions) or fail at doing so.
I liked the first video the most because it focused more on a situation that I can relate to
then to a specific child. It is easy to say when seeing videos like this It is far away, not
here but the video says that its closer then we think and it could happen anywhere. It is
all her future-dreams being taken away from here, dreams that I can relate to as well.
Remind us that even if we do not see it every day - it's happening to someone just like us
(S1)
It is also scary to see how the whole structure in the society falls apart when the war
begins. How fragile it is and how it could happen anywhere. It was very impactful with
short clips showing the difference in her life, and that could be taken away from her so
fast. It touched me so much because I could relate to her, and then understand what it
would feel like being taking away from it (S3)
It addresses something anonymous that I have a hard time relating to just from looking at
the video (S4)
The Swedish participants put a great deal of emphasis on how impactful it was to see,
through the way the story unfolds, that it truly can happen to them as well, and that the
thought they have that it just happen to others living far away is actually an illusion.
The thought that it could happen to them increased their sympathy and connection to the
characters, and had a powerful emotional effect.
3.2 Familiarity & closeness
The Videos/photos that were most appreciated, and had the most positive effect were the
ones that successfully manage to make the participants feel close and familiar with the
main character.
This film affects me more than the previous one with the fast clips. Possibly because the
child speaks and it make-The general feeling about all the videos is that the closer the
video makes me feel to a phenomenon such as poverty or war, the more keen I am to take
actions against it. The more personal and the more vivid the story is the better. The
broader and general the picture or problem, the less motivated I get (S3)
37
The child in the video got just a short time in the spotlight so we didnt have time to get
to know him (S5)
The Swedish participants conveyed an enhanced feeling of trust when the stories focus
on helping the viewers get to know the characters, and their stories.
4. Credibility
The findings of the qualitative analysis reveal, from both groups, the necessity of
trusting the message. Nevertheless, the standards of defining this key credibility factor
varied from one group to the other.
Morocco
4.1. Actor performance & emotions
The participants made a close link between the videos credibility and the actors
performance and their ability to convey true emotions.
I have no issues at all that they are actors, as long as there make you believe in the story
(M1)
When I saw the whole video, I saw sadness but I didn't feel it...I don't know how to
explain but the first part seemed a little bit fake (M2)
Last but not least, the little girls eye color and eye expression in general is very
expressive; it made me connect to the story (M6)
In the UNICEF posters, I liked the first one better, simply because of the look on the
girls eyes , which looks really authentic and touching and that made an impact on me,
while the second poster is a portrait as well with a quote about the same issue, but no
effect (M3)
We can feel the innocence in the little boys voice that got me (M4)
Sweden
The Swedish group emphasized the importance of credibility emphasizing the
seriousness of the ads when explaining how they felt about it. Unlike Moroccans, they
brought up another aspect of those stories to evaluate their credibility: reality versus
fiction. In fact, there was a consensus between all participants that real-life stories would
be preferable, but for these cases, the more real it looks, the better.
4.1 Reality Versus fiction
I thought they were more well done and more thoughtful but it did not have a real
effect. If felt less real, knowing it was actors (even if we know they are acting real
38
situations) and therefore did not make me as emotionally involved. This video felt too
made up to be real (S7)
Felt too much like putting on a show and just waiting to see what people would doI did
not like this fake impression in this story (S1)
I trust the message of the movie and the recipient feels serious (S4)
It looked like a serious advertising (S5)
A significant number of participants expressed rational thinking when describing
their impressions about the stories presented, evoking their factual aspect.
This story does not give me the confidence that we have solution for ending childrens
suffering. I believe in Zero is maybe just a nice dream but not the toolbox (S5)
This video was quite informational and actually taught me something I didn't know; I
liked that the video gave us some information and numbers since it attributed to a
novelty-factor in this campaign.
Its touching and informative at the same time. I like it, even though my liberal ideology
thoughts linger with the question how it is possible to end up in poverty in a country such
as the UK? I want background stories!!(S6)
5. Awareness raising Versus donating
In this study, the participants from both groups discussed what would be the end result
(thoughts, emotions, actions) after watching those campaigns.
Morocco
5.1. Emotions & Patriotism
Powerful emotional stories, able to touch their hearts seem to be one of the key factors to
make the Moroccan group willing to act upon the campaigns message. Another aspect
brought up in the discussions was related to nationality. Indeed, the fact that a campaign
would be to help fight poverty in the UK made a few participants reluctant as they
automatically compared both poverty levels between the two countries.
It shows also that poverty does exist in UK (and I guess in other developed countries that
we tend to idealize)...1.6 Millions of poor people in UK is very sad. However, I couldn't
help but think about the 15 millions of Moroccans (and I am sure they are much more
numerous) for whom I am doing nothing...Bottom line: the video makes u feel guilty and
makes you think about all the brave princes in the world and especially in my
country...the video makes me in a reflective mode, and pushes me to act but not about this
cause specifically, but in general (M2)
It makes you feel inspired and makes u want to participate to this 0 by helping children
even locally (at your level) (M4)
I got attached to the characters of the story, and through their stories, I really want to
help all those children in need. So, yes, I would donate! No need for rational things, it
convinced my heart (M3)
39
Sweden
5.2 NGO Reputation /Solutions and proofs
Unlike the Moroccan group, Swedes were quite clear and specific about what would
make them act after watching those campaigns. In fact, the findings show that knowing
where the money is going, how it would be used and proofs of what had been before
were far more convincing.
The NGOs reputation was mentioned as a potential proof of their seriousness, thus
making them feel safe and more motivating about making donations. Most of them
clearly stated they would respond better to facts and informational material.
Its clever and makes you think, but I think that when it comes to me taking actions I
respond better to pictures of actual poverty and/or war victims than this fictive version
(S1).
When it comes to taking action this video doesnt make me jump to get my credit card,
and it doesnt change my take on poverty or literacy either. Once again it could be useful
to raise awareness, but I think that educated people have that awareness anyway (S5).
The message is also more appealing to me than the first film because I get a price to pay
for something tangible (a jacket for 90kr). Affected by bad press when it comes to badly
managed help-organizations I am reluctant to pay to general charity if I believe there
is a risk that a too large part of my contributions will be lost on the way (costs for
management and administration etc) (S4).
It also boils down to which organization I trust with my money or time. The reputation
and goodwill/bad will of a help-organization is of utmost importance when it comes to
actually contributing for me. It would help for me to get some kind of proof that the
children in Syria are wearing jackets paid by SOS in Norway, and that children in the UK
get meal packs or such from Save the Children (S2).
The pictures could prove as an example to what I was looking for in the videos proof of
something that has been done and that has worked (S7).
40
The findings revealed that the two groups shared a significant number of similarities,
resulting around the same themes throughout the analysis such as emotional effect,
credibility, or technical communication. Nevertheless, the variations were quite
significant within the sub-themes, such as the importance on physical features conveying
emotions of characters versus the need for real facts and information. The effects of the
stories as a whole did not very much, however; the justifications and argumentation that
follow showed significant differences. The final outcome, which answers the question:
why would I donate to this cause differed from one group to the other. Despite
individual differences within the same group regarding each video or poster; there was a
general consensus when it comes to why would they act upon the message or not.
The high context culture (Morocco) reported that storytelling was the most effective way
to convey the message, and if the visual material is well-made and manages to make
them relate, connect and feel engaged, they would donate. The low context culture
(Sweden) expressed a general agreement that the NGO reputation, previous
achievements and proofs that it will help is very important in their decision-making
process in order to make donations. The NGO ought to be able to establish a feeling of
trust; and to help achieve this group agreed that real-life stories would be much more
effective.
In addition, the study reveals the impact of globalization on the way non-profit
organizations design and shares their communication campaigns.
41
Another key result of this study is that it underlines the important role of the revolution of
communication technologies such as social multimedia networks such as YouTube. The
visual materials used for fundraising campaigns were all shared on social networks which
make it easier for people to access it all over the world. Social media tools can provide
forums for interactive discussions, disseminate news about activities and advocate for a
cause. In addition, social networks are used by non-profits as low-overhead marketing
tool as well as an effective tool to map out and analyze donors.
Similarities
The study builds on the work of Woodside et al. (2008) and Woodside and Chebat (2001)
literature about storytelling which proposes that different levels of positive and negative
emotions are evoked by the different phases of the story. Exposed to the same visual
stimuli (videos and posters), both groups reacted similarly towards many aspects.
Participants from both high & low context culture expressed how emotionally impacted
they felt. All participants expressed sympathy, and empathy towards the characters in the
story, thus to the cause it represents. The same universal emotions were expressed by all,
such as anger, fear, and joy. This shows that storytelling holds an undeniable universality
aspect when it comes to generating basic universal emotions regardless of nationality.
The two groups were quite sensitive to whether they could relate to the characters, hence
to the cause, or not. Everyone believes it is crucial to be able to relate in order to create a
sense of engagement. As the literature revealed, every story has a problem to overcome.
Woodside et al. (2008) named this the inciting incident. This incident focuses the
consumer's attention on the problem and the character of the story.
42
The findings of this study show that both groups were emotionally engaged the by the
visual materials. Hence, they could relate to the character of the story which drives them
to take some actions to achieve goals and reduce the tension created by the unbalanced
state (Merchant et al, 2010). The results show that many of the Moroccan participants
believe that through the character in the story, we can relate to the bigger picture of the
actual children out there.
In addition, in the two sessions, participants emphasized the importance of the technical
aspect of the videos and posters. They argued that a well-made engages the viewer
more, because it is more real.
Establishing a sense of trust was mentioned by both, even though there were differences
in how the trust could be built. The credibility of the campaigns and the ads is very
important for both groups. Overall, every participant said they enjoyed the campaigns
and were moved by the stories.
The similarities could be explained by the universality aspect of emotions evoked by
storytelling, as well by the nature of storytelling itself. In fact, neuroscience has proved
that all brains, regardless of cultural background, react the same way to storytelling (Fog
et Al, 2010). Human beings like stories, and use it every day without even being fully
conscious about it.
Differences
There were differences between the low context culture (Sweden) and the high context
culture (Morocco). It was interesting to see that the analysis revealed the same theme
emerged from both sessions. The difference lay in the sub-themes however. As shown in
the data analysis part, even though both groups would mention the crucial importance of
credibility in these stories, the evaluation of credibility itself differs widely.
On one hand, the Swedish group would argue that the credibility of the stories is crucial
into convincing them to act. This would include examining the reputation of the NGO, its
reliability and previous success stories. Regarding the videos and posters shown, the
more real it looks, the more credible it is the better.
Some participants expressed having an issue with the fact that the characters are actors.
In their opinion, this diminishes the messages credibility because no matter how
touching it is, we know that they are just actors one participant said. In addition, many
Swedes reported that including statistics and facts helped in increasing the credibility.
Many reported that they enjoyed the informative aspect of some ads.
On the other hand, the Moroccan group evaluated the ads credibility based on the story
itself and the context of it. For example, the Moroccan group vision of save the children
video fighting poverty in the UK, as a developed country, contradicts with the video
and made them feel that it was not believable. Although the video tells the same story of
an English child facing poverty in the UK and the same verbal communication is
conveyed to both groups, the Moroccan group perception depended on other factors other
than explicit speech which are not showed in the video itself (LeBaron, 2003).
43
They argued that the voice, facial expressions and especially the eyes and look of the
characters played an important role. Through the eyes and innocent voice of Alex, I
could not help but think about all the real children suffering. This group did not have
any issue with the fact that the ads used actors as long as they convey authenticity and
emotion.
The different sub-themes reveal the importance of the cultural background of the
audience. In the video Save the Children made in order to fight poverty in the UK,
Swedes did not react in any particular way to this ad, compared to others. A few of them
briefly highlighted that there are people who have it much worse. However, Moroccans
reacted strongly to this ad. They argued that coming from a developing country; they
could not help a sense of patriotism and belonging towards the Moroccan children living
in worse conditions than people in the UK. This collectivistic aspect of the Moroccan
culture is reflected in the high scores of the dimension individualism vs. collectivism by
Hofstede (2001).
This shows the importance of taking into account the audiences culture, and perhaps
customizing the ads depending on the country in order to have a bigger impact. Stories
seem to be enjoyable for most people, but it depends on the stories being told and the
way they are being told. Effective storytellers should take into account all aspects of the
story in order to achieve their objectives.
44
REFERENCES
Aaker, Jennifer L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality, Journal of Marketing
Research, 34 (August), 347-356.
Abrahamson, C. (1998). Storytelling as a pedagological tool in higher education.
Education.11 8(3). Retrieved October 7, 2005 fiom the Ebsco Host database.
Barker, R. T., & Gower, K. (2010). Strategic application of storytelling in organizations
toward effective communication in a diverse world. Journal of Business Communication,
47(3), 295-312.
Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interviews: An underutilized research technique for
improving theory and practice in heal the education. Health Education Quarterly 14, 411148.
Berg, Bruce L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th
international edition), Allyn and Bacon.
Bowers, V. (2000). Communication At Cultural Non-Profits. Public Relations Tactics,
7(4), 11.
Blodgett, J. G., Bakir, A., & Rose, G. M. (2008). A test of the validity of Hofstede's
cultural framework. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(6), 339-349.
Blumenthal, A. (1940). A new definition of culture. American Anthropologist, 42(4),
571-586.
Chen, K. (2013). Storytelling: An Informal Mechanism of Accountability for Voluntary
Organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 42(5) 902-922. The online
version of this article can be found at: http://nvs.sagepub.com/content/42/5/902 .
Dabbs, J. M, Jr. (1982). Making things visible. In J. Van Maanen (Ed), Varieties of
Qalitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Denning, S. (2006). "Effective storytelling: strategic business narrative techniques",
Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 34 Iss: 1, pp.42 48.
Denning, S. (2005). The leaders guide to storytelling: Mastering the art and discipline of
business narrative, San Francesco: Jossey-Bass.
De Sousa Santos, B. (2006). "Globalizations." Theory, Culture & Society 23.2-3 393399.
Drucker, P. (2011). Managing the Non-profit Organization. First published by
Butterworth-Heinemann. 2011 version published by Routledge.
Duarte, N. (2013). Strengthen and Sustain Culture with Storytelling. retrieved July 17,
2014
from
http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20131001194940-172811strengthen-and-sustain-culture-with-storytelling.
45
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Chia R. (2012). Sensemaking, storytelling and the
legitimization of elite business careers. Human Relations 65(1) 17-40. The Tavistock
Institute. The online version of this article can be found at:
http://hum.sagepub.com/content/65/1/17.
Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2010). Charitable organizations' storytelling
influence on donors' emotions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 754762.
Mller, R. and Turner, J.R. (2004). Cultural differences in project owner-project
manager communications, in Slevin, D.P., Cleland, D.I. and Pinto, J.K. (Eds),
Innovations: Project Management Research 2004, Project Management Institute,
Newtown Square, PA, pp. 403-17, Chapter 24.
Rafique, G. & Pannavalee, W. (2008). How is decision making in project teams
influenced by national cultures?. (Student paper). Ume universitet Ume:
Handelshgskolan vid Ume universitet.
Atkin, C. K., & Freimuth, V. S. (2012). Guidelines for formative evaluation research in
campaign design. Public communication campaigns, 53.
Rodriguez, D. (2010). Storytelling in the Field: Race, Method, and the Empowerment of
Latina College Students. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies 10(6) 491-507. SAGE
Publications. The online version of this article can be found at:
http://csc.sagepub.com/content/10/6/491.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing data.
Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1996). The emerging nonprofit sector: An overview
(Vol. 1). Manchester University Press.
47
Save
The
Children,
retrieved
June
20,
2014
from
http://www.savethechildren.org/site/c.8rKLIXMGIpI4E/b.6115947/k.8D6E/Official_Site.
html.
Scolari, C. (2008a). Online brands. Branding, possible worlds and interactive grammars.
Semiotica 169(1/4), 143162.
Scolari, C. (2008c). The grammar of hypertelevision. Character multiplication and
narrative complexity incontemporary television. Paper presented at the 2008 ICA
International Conference, Montreal.
Scholari, C. (2009). Transmedia Storytelling: Implicit Consumers, Narrative Worlds, and
Branding in Contemporary Media Production. International Journal of Communications
3, 586-606. Available at http://ijoc.org.
Singh, S., & Sonnenburg, S. (2012). Brand performances in social media. Journal of
Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 189-197.
Sos Mayday, retrieved June 20, 2014 from http://www.sos-barnebyer.no/Mayday/Syria
Stephen Herskovitz, Malcolm Crystal, (2010) "The essential brand persona: storytelling
and branding", Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 31 Iss: 3, pp.21 28.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and its Discontents. WW Norton & Company.
Thomas, L., MacMillan, J., McColl, E., Hale, C., & Bond, S. (1995). Comparison of
focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with
nursing care. Social Sciences in Health, 1(4), 206-220.
United Nations Funds for Children. Unicef, retrieved June 20, 2014 from
http://www.unicef.org/.
Wiggill, M. N. (2011). Strategic communication management in the nonprofit sector: a
simplified model. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 226-235.
Woodside AG, Chebat JC, (2001). Updating Heider's balance theory in consumer
behavior: a Jewish couple buys a German car and additional buyingconsuming
transformation stories. Psychol Mark;18(5):47595.
Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008). When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling
theory and research in psychology and marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 97-145.
48
APPENDICES
I-
Name: feelings
<Internals\\M-movie1> - 3 references coded [5.22% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 0.88% Coverage
3: positive feelings
Reference 2 - 2.42% Coverage
3: the conflict (negative feelings) with the troubles,
Reference 3 - 1.91% Coverage
3: Convinced ur heart, no rational argument
<Internals\\M-movie3> - 3 references coded [20.53% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.90% Coverage
2: NO emotions at all. No effect.
Reference 2 - 2.03% Coverage
5: felt so sad when i saw the video
Reference 3 - 16.60% Coverage
5: the video Makes u feel guilty and Makes you think about all the brave princes in the world and my
country ... Especially in this thought-provoking & the obligation to help (this is not like the 2nd video that
inspires ... this video gives you a bad conscience)
<Internals\\M-movie4> - 6 references coded [21.42% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.07% Coverage
2: strong emotions,
Reference 2 - 4.77% Coverage
2: negative feelings feel bad for him, wanna be there & give him something
Reference 3 - 2.55% Coverage
3: Loved it- poignant- warms up ur heartReference 4 - 2.55% Coverage
49
9: The advertisements from the organizations are for me a little bit reproachful or accusing, so I
don't like them so much (maybe if I feel bad that I can't help so much). I feel pity for the people
that aren't well
4: I felt like I could really relate to the child in the movie and felt really sorry for her. When the
final comment came up I felt it was a very effective video to catch our attention and remind us
that even if we do not see it every day - it's happening to someone just like us or even worse a
completely defenseless kid.
5: The message gets through and it is of course a smart choice to use children to play on peoples
emotions. I sympathize with the girl and the later part of the video gets to me of course.
50
6: This was a sad movie, I almost wanted to start crying. What can save the children do about the
war, it was really impacting. Do not really know what more to say, but it impacted me a lot.
7: It impacts me, almost feeling hopeless about mankind and the cruelty of war.
8: I thought the video was really well made, first you feel happy with the kid
8: then suddendly it becomes really serious and I got a little sad and shocked.
9: Its also scary to see how the whole structure in the society fall apart when the war begins.
How fragile it is and how it could happen anywhere. It was very effectful with short clips showing
the difference in her life, and that could be taken away from her so fast. It touched us because we
could relate to her, and then understand what it would feel like being taking away from it.
4: I felt a bit inspired by the little boy talking and I guess my mother-instinct popped up when
you hear him talking with a slight lisp.
6: The first two videos were more personal and because of that also touched me more.
10: I think it is well made and not really on the pity or sorry feeling side,
5: the story is so elaborate that you could easily sympathize with the families. Its touching
51
9: The boy is really cute and you can feel sorry for him and his family.
4: As I watched this video I was filled with curiosity about what people's reactions would be to
the little freezing boy sitting on a bench in Oslo
4: as I saw the help the boy received I was relieved and happy that people would act in the most
humane way there is.
5: The movie makes me happy and warm (much like the kid when he gets the jackets)!
5: The picture itself (including the text of course) isnt making me feel anything other than a
little satisfaction that something has changed for the better and that it might spread.
52
53
5: It starts out good with a narrator that builds up excitement, and really nice footage.
Reference 5 - 1.35% Coverage
7: it could be useful to raise awareness,
<Internals\\S-movie 3> - 6 references coded [28.15% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 7.02% Coverage
4: This video was quite informational and actually taught me something I didn't know. 2- I liked that the
video gave us some information and numbers since it attributed to a novelty-factor in this campaign.
Reference 2 - 6.64% Coverage
4: What I did not really understand was the phrase they chose to finish the video with "It shouldn't happen
here" - should it happen anywhere else in the world? I found this a tang bit offensive.
Reference 3 - 0.97% Coverage
5: informative at the same time
Reference 4 - 5.01% Coverage
5: like it, even though my liberal ideology thoughts linger with the question how it is possible to end up
in poverty in a country such as the UK?
Reference 5 - 7.64% Coverage
8: But still why should I help them what will they do with my money, this is not as much a cause for
charity rather for the government to solve with wealth distribution as in this case it not a lack of resources
in the area.
Reference 6 - 0.86% Coverage
10: too much text to take in.
<Internals\\S-movie 4> - 3 references coded [10.19% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 4.78% Coverage
4: Yet a part of me wanted to know if they would have helped the boy if he had looked a bit dirtier,
poorer, couldn't speak norwegian and possibly looked like someone from another nationality.
Reference 2 - 4.73% Coverage
4: I liked the video since it was quite heart-warming but thing is it also brings up questions on how
helpful the same people would be towards someone who looks more like a stranger to them.
Reference 3 - 0.68% Coverage
55
56
58
8: This could be any kid with dreams and hopes. This should be accessible for all kids, and they should
not be impacted but their parent being poor.
Reference 6 - 4.22% Coverage
9: I think it's also because it's from the UK and not so far away so I think it's more real for me to see this
kind of video.
<Internals\\S-movie 4> - 4 references coded [14.96% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 4.48% Coverage
4: I would act on the final message to help children in Syria simply because this video caught my
attention long enough to make me think about my own attitude towards other people.
Reference 2 - 3.12% Coverage
5: The leap between a freezing child in Norway and freezing war victims in Syria is, once again, clever
but somewhat lost on me
Reference 3 - 6.59% Coverage
5: I can appreciate that the movie itself is liked, shared and watched with joy, however it doesnt make me
feel any different about children in Syria. However, if the purpose of the video is to raise awareness of that
people in Syria need aid, the goal is reached.
Reference 4 - 0.78% Coverage
6: it makes me getcloser to him
Name: credibility
<Internals\\M-movie1> - 1 reference coded [7.36% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 7.36% Coverage
6: I don't know how to explain but the first part seemed a little bit fake / Shows only beautiful things that
happened in this kid's life (playing, birthday...)
<Internals\\M-movie3> - 2 references coded [8.62% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 6.27% Coverage
2: Didnt like it- uk developed country, hard to believe, lacks credibility, African or middle eastern
Reference 2 - 2.34% Coverage
2: Least fav. Reality tv. Not appealing.
<Internals\\M-photos> - 1 reference coded [1.75% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.75% Coverage
60
5: I think that when it comes to me taking actions I respond better to pictures of actual poverty
and/or war victims than this fictive version.
6:
Reference 2 - 6.68% Coverage
8: However I thought this video was worse compared to the others, because you can feel that
they want you to feel sorry and give money. It was a little exaggerated (even I know it happens in
reality for me it was too much like: ohhh you should feel sorry for her).
9:
<Internals\\S-movie 2> - 1 reference coded [3.90% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 3.90% Coverage
9: But it does not give me the confidence that we have solution for it. Just maybe a nice dream
but not the toolbox.
61
6: Regardless, it is not difficult to be moved by the video. Once again I think its the ability to
show something and make us feel like it is real.
9: I think it's really really cool that they write in the end that it was an actor and that it could be a
normal boy, so it's kind of making it more serious and not just wanting me to feel bad for the boy
and for me that I don't give money to them.
5: Im not as affected by the whole video as I think I might have been if the clips in it were
longer and showed more surroundings/other people and helped to get to know the girl better.
Perhaps if she talked more?
11: The child in the video got just a short time in the spotlight so we didnt have time to get to
know him
7: The message is also more appealing to me than the first film because I get a price to pay for
something tangible (a jacket for 90kr).
4: there is absolutely no reason as to why this tradition should still exist yet I want to find out
more what the help offered actually is since I've read some on the subject and know it is not
something simple to solve
62
4: I would feel safer knowing that the help offered is none that uses methods that could backfire
on the girls such as by forcing people to abolish genital mutilation which has sometimes led
people to simply start doing it in secrecy and under even worse circumstances than done before.
6: I like this picture better since it gives a very clear message of what the message is and in what
form the help will be brought
Name: Awareness raising Vs donating
<Internals\\M-movie1> - 5 references coded [8.57% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.91% Coverage
3: touches u u feel like u have to an action
Reference 2 - 0.47% Coverage
3: Make u ACT
References 3-4 - 4.84% Coverage
6: it makes us want to help towards the end but this is not enough (I feel that it is not engaging enough).
Reference 5 - 1.35% Coverage
7: not make u act (some would).
<Internals\\M-movie2> - 2 references coded [9.92% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.58% Coverage
5: act (some of it would)
Reference 2 - 8.34% Coverage
7: It makes you feel inspired and makes u wanna participate to this 0 by helping children even locally (at
your level).
<Internals\\M-movie4> - 5 references coded [12.56% Coverage]
Reference 1 - 1.07% Coverage
2: Make u act).
3:
Reference 2 - 1.68% Coverage
3: makes u really wanna actReference 3 - 3.83% Coverage
63
64
7: When it comes to taking action this video doesnt make me jump to get my credit card, and it
doesnt change my take on poverty or literacy either.
66
Appendix B:
Poster 1
67
Poster 2
68