Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2009
Topic #1:
1
Topic #2:
6
10
Contact Information
All correspondence and mailings should be addressed to:
Cambridge Michigan Language Assessments
Argus 1 Building
535 West William St., Suite 310
Ann Arbor, Michigan
48103-4978 USA
Phone: +1 734.647.0456
Fax: +1 734.763.0369
certificatetests@cambridgemichigan.org
www.CambridgeMichigan.org
The 2009 Benchmark set contains 10 compositions, all written by ECPE examinees and scored using the
5-point ECPE Writing scale (see page 22 of this document).
The performances in the 2009 benchmark set have been transcribed in order to preserve examinee
anonymity. They are responses to the following essay topics:
Essays 15 (inclusive):
Some psychologists claim that people inherit most of their personality traits from their parents. Do you think
this is true? Give specific examples from your own experience to support your viewpoint.
Essay 1:
Rating: A
Commentary on Essay 1
This essay develops the topic fully and completely; the examinee addresses both the inheritance and
environmental influence sides of the argument (though the environmental influence side is treated more
fully). The introduction is particularly strong. It addresses the question directly. Secondly, it provides the
writers understanding of the prompt by rephrasing the question rather than copying it word for word. Thirdly,
it gives the writers point of view.
Some aspects of the organization and connection could be improved. For instance, the writer does not put
all the arguments in favor of inheritance together and all the arguments in favor of environmental influences
together. Also the writer repeatedly uses the connector though incorrectly. When though is used, the
reader expects a two-part sentence where the second part of the sentence contains contrasting information
to the first part of the sentence. Because this error occurs more than once in the text we have to presume
that the writer did not learn this structure correctly.
However, these flaws do not impede the flow of information. Also, the essay has very strong grammar/syntax
and vocabulary. The writer correctly uses a wide range of syntactic structures and some very complex
modifiers; for example, very often differ greatly. Additionally, he/she uses a broad range of vocabulary that
is both powerful and appropriate to the meaning and context of the essay. For instance, in the final sentence
of paragraph 1, the writer begins with the word surely. This is a very simple but powerful indicator of his/
her position and is extremely effective. Also, in the second sentence of paragraph 3, the writer uses the
modifier typically. This is a very appropriate choice and would be expected in an academic essay.
There are some repeated punctuation errors (e.g., ones is persistently spelled as ones), but these are
rare and insignificant.
Overall, this essay has been awarded an A because it provides a balanced answer to the question,
addressing both sides of the argument. It also uses a variety of complex grammatical structures accurately
and makes very appropriate and powerful choices of vocabulary.
Essay 2:
Rating: B
Commentary on Essay 2
This essay develops the topic completely, with acknowledgement of its complexity. Like Essay #1 it has
a promising introduction; it addresses the question directly and the writer signals his/her point of view,
stating that he/she broadly agrees with the psychologists point of view (i.e., inheritance). Additionally,
the viewpoint that environmental influences can influence your personality is also introduced in the final
sentence of the introduction. This suggests that the essay will present a balanced argument.
The essay is generally well organized using a relatively simple rhetorical structure. For instance, in paragraph
2 the writer describes a characteristic. He/she then attributes feature to his/her sister, saying their father is
the same. This provides proof of the claim that we do inherit our personality traits from our parents. This
paragraph also shows that the writer can make smooth connections between sentences.
The essay displays a range of syntactic structures and is generally very accurate. The writer shows that he/
she can use subordinate clauses effectively; for example, All things considered, having a certain demeanor
may be due to a variety of circumstances, one of which is the inheritance from parents personality traits
(paragraph 5).
The vocabulary use shows flexibility and is usually appropriate but there are limitations. For instance, some
connectors between sentences are misused or absent (e.g., But in spite of is incorrect and inappropriately
used in the introductory paragraph; From my own experience is not appropriately used in paragraph 3).
These slips do not confuse meaning and on other occasions the connectors used are effective (e.g., of
course and all things considered). Nevertheless they indicate that the writer does not have full control
over his/her vocabulary. Another example of this shortcoming is in paragraph 3 where the writer uses
sensitivity/sensitive three times. If the word had been used once and then synonyms been used for the
other two mentions this would have helped the reader to better understand the concept being described.
Does the writer mean that he/she and his/her mother are more easily hurt? Or does sensitive here mean
that they are more aware of other peoples feelings?
Overall, even though the essay develops the argument well and has very good grammar and vocabulary, the
essay has limitations that make it a good example of a B level performance.
Essay 3:
Rating: C
Some psychologists claim that people inherit most of their personality from
their parents and I agree to some extend.
When babies are born, they show their personality. The way they behave, the
way they cry or even when they are hungry, the way they ask for food shows
or give us an indea of how his/her personality is going to be. From the very
beginning you can listen people making comments like he is sweet. shes got
bad temper, she wants to control everybody, etc.
Some of these sweet, bad-tempered, controller babies happened to be
different when they grow up. They grow up in an environment and the tend to
do what they see.
There are children who have problems at school. They fight, say bad words,
dont have respect for their teacher nor their peers. They show an aggressive
personality but sometimes they dont want to have those kind of reactions.
Renzo is a very intelligent and sweet boy who has problems at school. If
teachers treat him with love, pacience and respect, he produces good work and
has no problem with his friends, but if somebody pushes him as an accident he
reacts violently.
We have had interviews with his parents and we found out that his mother
treats him the same way he treats people at school. Therefore, this boy might
have a lovely personality but because of this influence and example of his mother
he reacts differently.
On the other hand we have children who have parents that are quite aggressive
and the children are sweet, delicate, kind.
Therefore I can conclude saying that we born with our own personality but life
might change it, sometimes for better and some for not. As adults we have to
be aware of this and as we live in a society we need to know how to control our
personality. We need to know how to behave in different situations. If you need
to be polite be polite.
6
Commentary on Essay 3
The opening paragraph gives a poor first impression; the first half of the introductory sentence of this essay
is copied from the prompt and the second half could be rote-learned language. Copying directly from the
prompt is an indication of a weak writer who does not have a broad enough vocabulary to use his/her own
words to rephrase the essay question.
Though the introduction is weak, the topic is developed on both sides (inheritance and environmental
influence). The writer even tries to show how complex the topic is by giving examples of children who are
affected by the behavior of their parents and children who are not (see paragraphs 6 and 7). The organization
is also generally controlled and the paragraphs are in a logical order. However, connections are sometimes
absent or unsuccessful and after paragraph 2 the essay has no clear argument thread. Instead, each
paragraph feels like a separate vignette rather than part of a cohesive whole.
Both simple and complex syntax are present but most sentences are relatively simple (with and or but
connectors). There are also a number of different grammatical errors such as subject-verb agreement,
missing prepositions, and incorrect tense choices. For instance, paragraph 3 has a number of small
grammatical errors that the reader has to mentally correct while reading.
The vocabulary is adequate but not always appropriately used. For instance, in paragraph 6 the examinee
writes, We have had interviews. Had is an efficient word choice but not contextually appropriate.
Conducted would be more appropriate.
Overall this essay shows that the writer can express his/her ideas but lacks the language resources to make
points effectively. This is very typical of a C level essay.
Essay 4:
Rating: D
Commentary on Essay 4
The opening paragraph of this essay seems to address the writing prompt but not precisely. It seems to be
about learning things from ones parents; this is the environmental influence side of the topic. However,
the core idea of the writing prompt, which is about the characteristics that we inherit from our parents,
is not discussed. Even though the writer uses the word inherit more than once during the essay, all the
examples relate to whether children are more influenced by their upbringing or by their wider environment
(each a different aspect of the environmental influence side of the argument) and are not about the
characteristics that we are born with. It is possible that the writer did not fully understand the essay prompt
and, as a result, his/her attempts to address different aspects of the topic were unsuccessful.
The grammar is also problematic. Morphological errors are frequent (e.g., satisfaction instead of satisfied
in paragraph 1, and image instead of imagine in paragraph 2). Also, though simple sentences tend to be
accurate, more complex ones tend to be inaccurate. For example, Actually, they have been clung to them
and better life in that (paragraph 2) is so garbled that the meaning is impossible to retrieve.
The vocabulary is limited in range and is sometimes inappropriately used to the point that it causes
confusion. For instance, the writer says, to have rights that only adults can have (paragraph 2) and dont
make their mind to them (paragraph 3). These are vague and the reader cannot be sure of the precise
meaning intended. Additionally, the writer makes incorrect word choices such as trait instead of inherit,
and willings instead of wishes.
Even though it is possible to retrieve the gist of this essay, the text is confusing and garbled throughout,
with many huh moments. Essays such as this, where the reader can grasp the main meaning intended but
needs to work hard to reformulate many individual sentences, are very good examples of a D level essay.
Essay 5:
Rating: E
10
Commentary on Essay 5
The writer attempts an introduction but copies a lot from the original wording of the prompt. Therefore, it
is not clear from the outset whether the writer has actually understood the prompt. The rest of the essay
develops the topic very simply, particularly the examples given to show how our parents behavior can affect
our behavior. Connections between ideas are often absent or unsuccessful. For example at the beginning of
paragraph 4, the writer says, on the other hand. This connector is used to indicate that an opposing point
of view is going to be presented. However, what follows seems to be corroborating evidence.
There are pervasive and basic errors in sentence structure (e.g., word order, articles, and prepositions)
that cause confusion. Incorrect use of vocabulary also causes confusion. For instance, the writer uses
meaningless, canned phrases (e.g., you wont have problems with other people) and L1 influence is clearly
evident. There are many unclear phrases; for example, birth us, characterist of their face, open mind
head.
Overall the essay requires a lot of effort to decode and it is never clear whether the writer has understood the
word inherit from the prompt. This persistent lack of meaningfulness is characteristic of an E level Essay.
11
Essay 6:
Rating: A
Nowadays, various blockbuster movies are based on books. This has resulted
in people debating about which version is better, the movie or the book. In my
opinion, reading a book is more preferable for a number of reasons.
To begin with, books allow the reader to let his/her imagination free and
imagine the plot taking place any way s/he wants. The reader is free to set
up the scenery s/he wishes in his mind and not as the director of the movie
maker would visualize it. For instance, he may be able to decide whether its
a sunny or rainy day, whether its morning or evening, whether the actor is
happy or sad.
Moreover, books give the reader more time flexibility. That means that at
any time they want they have the opportunity to leave the book and continue
reading it later. In addition, they have the ability to take the book with them.
For example, if they have to go to work they could take the book with them
and read it on the bus. Another option would be to take the book in the park
and read it there enjoying the nice weather and greenery at the same time.
Furthermore, books give the opportunity to the reader to let the information
sink in at their own time. For example, if a reader is reading a mystery novel s/
he can take the time s/he wants in order to try and hypothesize what might
have happened, before s/he reaches the end.
On the other hand, it needs to be acknowledged that move versions may offer
greater excitement due to the special effects and action used. However, this
is only for a short period of time as long as the movie lasts, whereas the
excitement books offer may be of lesser degree but last longer.
Overall, although [essay is unfinished]
12
Commentary on Essay 6
This is an example of a low A band essay. The introduction begins well; the writer rephrases the prompt in
his/her own words and shows that he/she has understood the question. The final sentence of the paragraph
makes clear the writers point of view. The organization is well-controlled and appropriate to the material.
Connections are smooth and sometimes unusual (e.g., moreover). The writer structures the argument very
well, making an abstract claim and then providing a concrete example (e.g., paragraph 3). This demonstrates
the writers ability to present his/her ideas in different ways to clarify his/her meaning effectively. One side
of the topic is richly, fully, and complexly developed and the other side of the topic is also addressed
competently.
Sentence structures are varied, complex and accurate. Morphological (word forms) control is nearly always
accurate. The writer also appropriately uses a broad range of vocabulary including idiomatic phrasal verbs
(e.g., sink in, paragraph 4) and modifiers (e.g., it needs to be acknowledged, paragraph 5).
However, it is important to note that the essay is unfinished. This suggests that the writer needed to take
time to ensure the high level of grammatical accuracy and to select appropriate vocabulary. This in turn
suggests that his/her language resources are not as automatic as you might expect for a very proficient
writer. However, the quality of the text produced is excellent and this is why an A should be awarded.
13
Essay 7:
Rating: B
Commentary on Essay 7
This is an example of a composition that has some significant shortcomings as well as some very clear
strengths. One important shortcoming is that the essay does not directly answer the prompt. The essay topic
asks examinees to discuss which is better, books or their film versions. This response takes an interesting
alternative route, choosing to discuss the kind of book that translates well into celluloid. As a result, the
response is not directly relevant to the essay question. Because it is off-topic it is very important to look in
detail at the response to determine whether the essay has been memorized beforehand or whether it is an
original piece of writing. This means that the quality of the language and the writers ability to develop his/her
ideas must come under particular scrutiny.
This essay has a clear two-part structure, first looking at books which do translate well into film and then
looking (more briefly) at books that do not make the crossover as successfully. The organization of the essay
is controlled and shows appropriateness to the materials. The connections between ideas are seamless
using very proficient, implicit markers such as pronoun referents (e.g., one movie like this) rather than
explicit connectors. These are signs of a proficient writer.
The writer uses both simple and complex syntax. Some of the complex phrases and clauses are also very
elegant (e.g., on which movies are based, paragraph 2). The writer makes some distracting, basic mistakes
in language areas like plurals and agreement but these slips do not confuse meaning. The vocabulary used
is appropriate and shows flexibility (particularly in the choice of adverbs and adjectives).
Overall, a careful analysis of the language features of this essay suggests that it is probably an original piece
of writing. However, it is very important to remember that the essay topic has been misread (and probably
misunderstood). Also there are low-level grammatical slips. These problem areas make this a B level essay.
15
Essay 8:
Rating: B
16
Commentary on Essay 8
This essay has a clear introduction. The writer rephrases the essay prompt very well and this demonstrates
that he/she has understood the topic. By the end of the paragraph the writer also makes his/her point of
view clear.
The topic is clearly and completely developed with acknowledgement of its complexity (see paragraph 4,
there is always the other side of the coin). Organization is controlled and each paragraph contains a
clear main point which is connected logically to the subsequent paragraphs. As a result a coherent argument
is developed.
Both simple and complex syntax are adequately used but the writer tends to prefer simple sentence
structures. Additionally, some constructions are clumsy and unidiomatic (e.g., the way the reader is
wishing, paragraph 2). Vocabulary use shows flexibility but words are sometimes used incorrectly or
imprecisely (e.g., intrigue, paragraph 2, is a nice word but is used inappropriately here).
Finally, the conclusion is clearly marked (with all in all) but seems rushed. It is as though the writer ran out
of time. Overall, this is a B level essay.
17
Essay 9:
Rating: C
For a long time has the world been imersed into a cultural darkness and for a long
time information and knowledge have been priceless.
With the advent of the popular reproduction of books printing them, instead of
hand-copying them a new cultural dimension has been created and with that the
socialization of ideas and the observation of new horizons for those who sought
scientific breakthroughs or leisure.
Books are mostly important because they allow you not only to expose your ideas
and ideals but also because they allow your imagination and personal experience to
participate, interpretating the authors ideas based on some of your own ideas and
your cultural background and that is one of the reasons I have to advocate for the
books cause: they amplify your minds horizons, lifting you up to a higher level as if
you could almost reach the stars with your imagination.
Whereas the books have this much importance for the mankind in general, the movies
represent a new kind of art. Expressing your ideas using images and people to make
the books stories come true can be tricky and intricating, even so, they tend to limit
your imagination because what you see, you see through other peoples eyes.
In conclusion, books will never be overwhelmed by the movies as they are a fountain
of unchenqueable fire since your imagination has no limits.
18
Commentary on Essay 9
This essay does not have a traditional introduction. The opening sentence (paragraph 1) is very elegantly
written but is meaningless. Paragraph 2 is also just one long sentence and is just as unfocused as paragraph
1. This type of opening language is encouraged in some writing cultures but is not appropriate when writing
in English.
In the rest of the essay both sides of the topic are addressed but not completely or with acknowledgement
of its complexity. In fact, the essay only makes one point; a book is mentally and emotionally enriching.
The sentence structures in this essay are generally very complex and long; the writer has good control over
multiple subordinate clauses. There are also many elegant, low-frequency words. This could lead to the
conclusion that the essay should receive a high grade. However, there are numerous collocation errors and
vocabulary is not always used appropriately or correctly. For instance, it is not at all clear what the writer
means by the phrases the socialization of ideas and the observation of new horizons. Additionally, in
paragraph 3, expose does not collocate with ideas.
Finally, the punctuation in this essay is sometimes distracting; some of the sentences should have been
broken up into two or more shorter sentences. Overall, this is a C level essay.
19
Essay 10:
Rating: D
It is an undeniable fact that many famous movies are based on novels, which
makes them even more popular. However, it is widely debated whether the
movies or the books are better. This issue have made two groups of people,
which of whom strongly support their opinion.
Some books have had enormous success and are considered all time classics.
The perfume, Da Vinci Code, Alexander The Great, etc. have gained peoples
admiration and are getting known from generation to generation. Almost in
every home there are some famous novels like those.
One the other hand, great movies, which are based on novels, have been created.
With huge care and a really high budget brilliant movies have forged people to
fullfil the cinemas. The enormous movies industry have succeed to form a movie
in a great similarity to its source-novel.
Athought this huge effort, in my opinion it is impossible to be a real
transformation of the books elements to a film. The imagination world that
we can find in books cant be replaced by a movie. Books make us imagine and
participate to the scenes in our mind. Alexander The Great as a movie, for
instance make a lot of people dissapointed.
Consequently, as hard as movie industry can try cannot replace books with
movies. Books will always be in the first place of our heart.
20
Commentary on Essay 10
The introduction paraphrases the prompt and indicates that there is debate on the issue. From the outset,
however, there are signs that the writer is not very proficienct. First, the language used is a little strong (e.g.,
it is an undeniable fact). The strong language used suggests more controversy than the prompt actually
implies. Second, the final sentence of the introduction is muddled and the reader has to make considerable
effort to understand what is meant.
The remainder of the essay develops the topic simply. The writer gives examples of three books and states
that these are very popular. He/she then states that some films are extremely popular. However, the essay
does not clearly develop the reasons for these claims. As a result, the essay is unsuccessful in its attempts
to address different perspectives on the topic.
The essay contains numerous, low-level grammatical errors (e.g., articles, plurals, tense and aspect,
and prepositions). The reader has to pay close attention to understand what the writer is trying to say.
Additionally, words are used inappropriately to the point that they cause confusion (e.g., forged,, fullfil,
and formall in paragraph 3).
Overall, the reader has to make considerable effort to understand what the writer is trying to say. This is
indicative of a D band essay.
21
RATING
A
Honors
RHETORIC
Topic richly, fully, complexly
developed
Organization well-controlled,
appropriate to the material
Connection is smooth
GRAMMAR/SYNTAX
VOCABULARY
Broad range,
appropriately used
Spelling and
punctuation errors are
rare and insignicant
Spelling and
punctuation errors
are infrequent and not
distracting
Adequate vocabulary,
but may sometimes be
inappropriately used
Spelling and
punctuation errors
sometimes distracting
Vocabulary may be
limited in range,
and is sometimes
inappropriately used
to the point that it
causes confusion
Spelling and
punctuation errors are
frequently distracting
Incorrect use of
vocabulary causes
confusion
Basic vocabulary
words regularly
misspelled
Little or no control
over sentence
boundaries
Any inappropriate
vocabulary does not
confuse meaning
MECHANICS
Overreliance on prefabricated
language and/or language from
the prompt
Organization partially controlled
22
Spelling and
punctuation errors
regularly cause
confusion