Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ejay R. Domingo
SOH Liaison
<vacant>
Vice-President
<vacant>
SOH Secretary-Treasurer
<vacant>
JGSOM SecretaryTreasurer
<vacant>
Secretary-General
<vacant>
4 SOH Central Board Rep
<vacant>
<vacant>
Finance Officer
<vacant>
<vacant>
2 SOH Central Board Rep
<vacant>
2 JGSOM Central Board
Rep
<vacant>
1 SOH Central Board Rep
<vacant>
1 JGSOM Central Board
Rep
<vacant>
SOSS Chairperson
<vacant>
SOSS Secretary-Treasurer
COA President
Richard R. Milante
ARSA President
CENTRAL BOARD
<vacant>
Therese Francesca A.
4 SOSS Central Board Rep
Bonifacio
4 SOSE Central Board Rep
<vacant>
<vacant>
3 SOSE Central Board Rep 3 SOSS Central Board Rep
Jann Railey E. Montalan <vacant>
2 SOSE Central Board Rep 2 SOSS Central Board Rep
<vacant>
<vacant>
1 SOSE Central Board Rep 1 SOSS Central Board Rep
OTHER ATTENDEES:
Mela Suarez, 4 BS LM
Course Representative
Johannes Unana, CB
Committee on Rules
Christian Dy
CENTRAL BOARD
MINUTES
1) Decision Matters
a. Resolution awaiting approval: Christian Dy's stand on the Lumad issue.
i.
Camille Joy Leong will still have her input.
ii.
Discussion prolonged until September 27, aiming release on Monday,
September 28.
2) SOH IPR Bill
a. A resolution to institute an IPR Task Force was created by Ejay Domingo
and Koko Quilatan. A prior initiative by both SOH and SOSS. This was part
Quilatans platform, among other platforms in the past. In the past, there
had been many initiatives to solidify the SOH Sanggunians stand. The SOH
School Board has been very consistent in asserting its stand on IPR.
However, it has been inconsistent in regards to its actions.
b. Essence: To create a Task Force that will consult with different stakeholders
and experts to establish the protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the
Loyola Schools. Which would not be limited to Literature or Written works,
but will also be zoning in on to Visual IPR's (due to plagiarism of
promotional materials in the past). Establish parameters to make people
accountable in their violations of IPR.
c. The Student Handbook lists sanctions on academic plagiarism, but none on
Visual IPR. A Task Force based on consultations and research, to spread
general awareness to the LS Community.
d. Applications: Calls for a Task Force Head will be opened, to be deliberated
by the SOH School Board and by the Central Board. Initial
recommendations are from SOH, but plans to open it for general populace
are on the way.
a. Bonifacio: Remove line on School of Humanities School Board
recommendation. To avoid it appearing exclusive to SOH.
b. Montalan: Is it only for this year?
c. Quilatan: Not yet sure on the longevity of the Task Force, it will
depend on the consultations if this will be a department or a CB
Committee.
d. Montalan: Every year, Seniors Alliance is instituted via a resolution.
e. Del Rosario: The suggestion on talking to other schools is a good idea
since SOSE is also looking into it. Consider having a delegation,
similar to what ConCon has done.
3) SSS Updates
a. First wave of applications is done.
b. Breakdown:
i.
Number of accepted applications under advocacy: 10 out of 18
applications.
ii.
Number of accepted applications under academic: 9 out of 11
applications.
o 2 from SOH
o 7 from SOSE
c. On projects, half went to one organization.
d. Panelists:
i.
SOH - Mike Luanzon (student), Roy Tolentino (professor)
CENTRAL BOARD
ii.
f. Others apply in the second wave (e.g.: SOMBA, SOSS, etc) Theres still a
lot of budget for academic, not much left for advocacies. 10 more
applications can still be accommodated. Second wave applications
tentatively scheduled on December, results to be released on the second
semester,
g. Del Rosario: Come up with an effective strategy for proper dissemination. If
a candidate wins, get a representative for your team.
h. SSS is waiting for DIA if they assign any. The team is running smoothly even
if they are just three in the team.
i. On the panelists: It will depend on their response if they are still willing.
The professors are okay in becoming a panelist since they cannot
participate in sit down meetings due to their schedule constraints. By
having the deliberations done online, the professors are more open to
becoming panelists.
j. Deliberations will start: A week after. For Financial Procedures, Ma'am
Julie of OSA will be helping. The MOA with on SSS applicants is still being
written.
4) INAF Student Representatives
a. Last Wednesday, September 23, a courtesy call with ADSF was held on a
prospect for having a more instituted INAF student representative
committee.
b. Current Integrated Ateneo Formation Representatives:
i.
InTACT Railey Montalan
ii.
NSTP Ejay Domingo
iii.
JEEP Chris Yu
iv.
Praxis Richard Tee
c. Proposal by Dr. Guevarra: Have a more established/continuous rep. Usually
the rep is a year above. But what he wants is have one from the current
year to know current concerns. Next year, the representatives from the
same year will be staying.
d. For SIP, one more rep is needed. Richard Tee is currently handling it, as he
is under Seniors Alliance for ADSA and OSCI.
e. Suarez: I'll tap the 4 SOM reps, since they are currently underutilized.
f. Montalan: I need a new person to coordinate w/ ADSF.
g. Current Committee on Formation Services Representatives:
i.
LSOGC Richard Tee
ii.
LSOPCS Chris Yu
CENTRAL BOARD
iii.
iv.
5) Budget Hearing
a. SOM
i. SOM Week
1. SOM Week budget proposal has been divided between COA
and Sanggu.
2. Breakdown:
a. Food: expenses for judges and crew
b. Logistics: Irwin Theater rental, sockets, table, tents
c. Promos: tarps and tents
d. Tokens: certificated for judges, prizes for winners,
bazaar capital, photo booth
e. Materials: supplies for competitive events, games,
shirts
f. Expected revenue: P84,000.00
g. Food: P1,230.00
h. Logistics: P40,137.50
i. Materials: P15,055.00
j. Tokens and fees: P47,781.13
k. Promotions: P8230.00
l. Other (allowance for unexpected finances): P5,000.00
m. Total: P33,433.63
3. Discussion:
a. For tokens and fees: P80,000.00 starting capital,
P10,000.00 per org. Will be given them, but it should
go back to us.
b. Vinzon: P200.00 is the cap per head for tokens. It is
for speakers and panelists. It should not be used for
giveaway. If it is, ask the Central Board first.
c. Program flow:
i. A week prior the event: ATF Partnership to
have an online marketing corporation.
ii. Event Proper:
Day 1.Opening night
Day 2.Strategy game (e.g.: tradeoffs, prisoners dilemma, etc)
Day 3.Midweek show
Day 4.SOM Masterpiece (i.e.: art attack to show core competency)
Day 5.Procter and Gamble Case Competition results announcement, Mr. and
Ms. SOM, SOM Culminating
iii. Throughout of the week: SOM Bazaar (main
event of the week) to showcase the sustainable
products from different committees. Proceeds
will go to the same communities.
iv. Talks:
1. Monday SOM Department Arranged
Finance Talk
2. Friday Financial Literacy
v. Irwin will only be on Friday.
CENTRAL BOARD
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
b. DIA
i. RegCom Talk (retroactive budget proposal).
ii. Conclusion: Receipts will be collated again.
c. ATF
CENTRAL BOARD
CENTRAL BOARD
b. Bonifacio: It was deferred because of: (i) budget problems; and (ii) the
resolution has to be reimagined. The purpose of it was to elevate the political
landscape. We became iffy with the budget.
c. Reminders:
i.
Ed Garcia Talk on Monday, September 28
ii.
ConCon Focus Group Discussion on Wednesday, September 30
Prepared by:
Johannes Andrei A. Unana
Deputy
Committee on Rules, Central Board
Sanggunian ng mga Mag-aaral ng mga
Paaralang Loyola ng Ateneo de Manila