Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One of the primary uses of red flags is to bridge the cultural difference. For
example, Filipino culture gives little attention to medical records. Filipinos, as a
culture, generally do not care if their medical records are shown to others. The same
can be said of medical conditions, and Filipinos even consider questions about
medical conditions as a kind of emotional support. This culture makes it easier for
local companies and the Philippine government to gather medical documents or
legal documents pertaining to medical conditions. Americans, on the other hand,
generally put premium on privacy. Medical records are considered as private
information, and as such, authorizations are needed before other entities can legally
gather aforesaid documents. Furthermore, medical documents gathered are to be
treated with utmost confidentiality. Thus, when these documents are processed by
outsourced legal professionals, they are reminded of the confidentiality of these
medical documents by a HIPAA Cover Sheet, bearing a confidentiality blurb. While
these HIPAA cover sheets have legal bearing and are provided in consonance to the
law, they are a red flag for Filipino outsourced professionals. They are to process the
aforesaid documents with utmost care, ensure that all legal processes have been
followed, and the privacy of the patients is respected.
Another red flag is a confidential marking. Filipinos generally see entities on
the same side as virtually one and the same, without any distinction. This is
commonly known as the us-against-them mentality. Everyone is expected to give
all they have for the common purpose. A confidential marking aids in showing that
not all member of the team should be given access to said document. When an
outsourced paralegal handles a case which has multiple co-defendants that are
otherwise competitors outside the legal battle, a confidential marking can
determine which defendant can access the document. This scenario is highly-likely
when the case is about a billion-dollar injury or wrongful death litigation involving
various competitor companies as co-defendants. Even though these companies
have defenses common to each other, they also have their own trade secrets that
they want to protect. Examples of such documents that may have trade secrets in
them are internal memoranda, and research output of experts hired by the
company. These documents, depending on whether trade secrets actually exist, can
be given to co-defendants in drafting a common defense. In reading thousand-page
documents, the only way to determine whether said document is for a common
defense or for a particular defendants defense is through a confidential marking.
A confidential marking does not only heighten the alertness and focus of
outsourced paralegals handling said document, it also requires them to be careful
as to who else can know the existence of said document. A trade secret is of great
value to a corporation, since it can be what makes a company different from its
competitors, or because it provides a decisive advantage over competitors. Allowing
a competitor access to a trade secret, for any reason whatsoever, is a major
security breach and will be dealt with severely.