Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alison Wright
1. Introduction......................................................................3
1.Introduction
Until recently, the pivotal issue within the climate change debate was
mitigation (Fussel & Klein,2006). While limiting greenhouse gas
emissions remains a priority, adaptation to climate change is
increasingly seen as an essential strand of policy at both national and
international levels (UNFCCC,2007). The acknowledgement that
2
climate change impacts are already being felt, and that further
changes are now inevitable has moved adaptation from a long term
option of last resort to an urgent imperative (IISD,2003)
3
At one level, this paper is therefore a call to greater engagement, and
an attempt to illustrate the potential that such engagement holds.
More specifically, I intend to show how approaches and ideas from the
livelihoods tradition can be used to study coping after a flood. The use
of such approaches, I argue, can uncover and elevate dimensions of
coping neglected or sidelined by many studies of vulnerability to
climate change. Furthermore, I intend to demonstrate that these
insights may force a rethinking of both the questions asked about
vulnerability and adaptive capacity, and the policies designed to
reduce it.
This empirical material for this study is drawn from rural Bangladesh
and primary data in the form of post-flood diaries is analysed.
Presented simultaneously as both highly vulnerable to the effects of
climate change and yet supremely adaptive, Bangladesh represents an
interesting context for such a study. Moreover, the rapidly shifting
socio-economic context presents an opportunity for the dynamics of
vulnerability to be explored.
4
vulnerability. Chapter 5 will consider the implications of these insights
and the shift in focus for vulnerability within a dynamic context.
Finally, I conclude by reflecting on how this study’s approach and
resulting insights might contribute to research into social vulnerability
to climate change.
5
within policy circles, the concept of vulnerability has hence been
elevated within research communities concerned with climate change
(ibid). The conceptual focus of this work would thus seem to offer a
point of overlap with work within the development community, where
the notion of vulnerability is also used.
The first part of this chapter will explore this conceptual terrain, and
demonstrate that, while the potential for conceptual overlap does
exist, the use of the term vulnerability within the climate change
community needs to be treated with caution. In the second half of this
chapter, I argue that social vulnerability studies have a number of
weaknesses, which a greater engagement with livelihoods research
would help them to address.
6
Superficially therefore, the concept of vulnerability seems to offer a
bridge between the two areas of research.
Vulnerability as an outcome
7
dominated by an ‘outcome’ understanding of vulnerability (see
McCarthy et al 2001). Consequently, the adaptation policy
prescriptions which follow from this perspective have been similarly
dominant; technological adaptations have consumed the attention of
many policy makers (O’Brien et al,2007; see MoEF,2008)
8
Adger & Kelly;1999), leading some authors to use the term ‘contextual
vulnerability’ (O’Brien et al,2007). The institutional context is a
particularly important focus of study: many studies draw attention to
the role that institutional structures play in mediating access to
resources and in constraining and enabling individual agency
(Adger,1999; Eakin,2005). Approaches originating in critical
discourses draw particular attention to the structures and relations of
power in which vulnerable actors are embedded
(Pelling,2003;Cutter,1996; Hewitt,1997;). As the context which
constructs a state of vulnerability changes over time, the state itself is
understood to be dynamic (Leichenko & O’Brien,2002; O’Brien et
al,2007). The policy implications of a focus on ‘social vulnerability’ are
therefore vastly different to those of ‘biophysical’ studies;
recommendations concentrate instead on policies to reduce existing
vulnerabilities.
9
The dominant conceptual influence on the understanding of social
vulnerability in the climate change literature has been the natural
hazards tradition (Adger,2006); it shares, of course the presence of an
external threat or hazard as its raison d’être. Vulnerability studies also
frequently draw on entitlement theory (for example: Adger,1999;
Brouwer et al,2007), which has its conceptual roots in the food
insecurity literature (Sen,1981; 1984)2. The implications of these
conceptual influences will be dealt with presently.
10
They focus firstly on identifying the determinants of adaptive capacity
empirically from the community, and secondly on analysing the
processes of decision making at different levels Keskitalo,2004; Smit &
Wandel,2005): interviews with and documents from different levels of
government often form part of the methodology (Adger,1999;
Eakin,2005; Sutherland et al,2005, Osbahr,2008). The contribution of
these studies in terms of adaptation policy include both
recommendations designed to reduce individual dimensions of
vulnerability through poverty reduction and diversification of
livelihoods, and prescriptions designed to promote the strengthening
and adaptation of formal institutional structures (Kelly & Adger,2000;
O’Brien et al,2007)
11
largely a function of household endowments, these are often rather
simplistically viewed in terms of material and sometimes human
resources4. Entitlement theory originating in the food insecurity
literature (Sen,1981) was also characterised by a reductionist
understanding of household resources (Ellis,2000)
4 Adger, (1999) and Brouwer et al( 2007) both use income poverty as a shorthand for
household resources.
12
Given these criticisms, a more thorough engagement by climate
change vulnerability researchers with the livelihoods literature, and
particularly with its more critical voices would, I argue, offer
opportunities for these shortcomings to be addressed.
Livelihoods literature
13
furthermore, offer opportunities to specifically address each of the
criticisms already raised.
14
Livelihood approaches are explicitly actor-oriented (Long, 2001); their
focus is on how individuals and households act strategically and
dynamically to construct their livelihoods over time within a complex
institutional landscape (Wood, 2005). While it has been acknowledged
that many studies of social vulnerability seemingly have a similar
focus, and take a ‘bottom up’ approach (Smit and Wandel,2005), the
manner of their engagement with the institutional context reveal
different epistemological assumptions. Engaging with realities from an
actor-oriented perspective shifts the focus from technocratic and
potentially ineffective interventions, while being sensitive to
prescriptions which may unwittingly heighten vulnerabilities.
Conclusion
15
as a parameter of vulnerability. However, in an effort to address what
are viewed as shortcomings of other such studies, the analysis will look
to the livelihoods tradition, and particularly to more its more critical
voices. These fresh insights, I will argue, have important implications
for our understanding of vulnerability and in turn for policy which aims
to reduce it.
16
3. Context
(PEP,2003:6)
(Maloney,1988:1)
17
economic change, which has the potential to impact on both
Physical vulnerability
Located at the convergence of three major rivers, most of its land area
is flat and deltaic; two third lies less than 5m above sea-level
18
Climate change in Bangladesh
that climate change will exacerbate many of the hazards which the
country currently faces (Figure 2). It seems likely that the summer
(MoEF,2008).
Riverbank erosion displaces one million people annually (Shamsuddoha & Chow
s in the North West (Ahmed,2006)
Increased flooding likely to lead to higher rate of erosion (MoEF, 2008)
anspiration likely to lead to greater severity and extent of droughts (ibid)
Key:
Existing hazards
Likely changes
6 Variation
ihood in low-lying coastal does
areas; exist between
projected 18% different climate
of land area may change scenarios forlost
be permanently Bangladesh.
(World Bank,2000)
See Ahmed (2006) for a review.
19
Cyclones bring storm surges and tidal flooding
Socio-economic context
live below the national poverty line (World Bank,2005) and half of
latest HDI rank was 140 in the world (UNDP, 2008). Despite increasing
(World Bank, 2006) (Figure 2), and it remains one of the most densely
20
pressure (Asaduzzaman,2003).
2000 (Hossain et al,2001). The overall result of these trends has been
(Rahman,R.,2003).
Methodology
strategies during and after the floods of July 2004. Broadly speaking,
21
vulnerability as a basis for extrapolating future trends (see
events has specific benefits. As Adger & Kelly (1999) argue, it is only
during times of crisis that latent and often fluid entitlements are
22
patterns in the nature of and ability to cope in a particular context
Context of research
the aftermath of the July 2004 floods. The floods resulted in 40% of
the population and causing the deaths of over 800 people (ADB,2004).
9 As Wood (2007) argues, greater security translates into longer time horizons.
23
developing countries (Wed 2007)10. A core tenet of the conceptual
Data used here has been drawn from two villages: Bichitropur and
was affected for a week. The two villages are contextually contrasting.
these differences, drawing upon data from two sites does allow a wider
Details of research
The data used was entirely qualitative and collected in the form of
flood diaries, analysed here for the first time. Households kept the
self-administered diaries for a year after the flood12, which allowed for
these diaries have been analysed and quoted in their original form. A
10 Details of WeD methodology:http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/methods-
toobox/toolbox-intro.htm
11 Details from community profiles: http://www.welldev.org.uk/research/methods-
toobox/cp-countries/cp-bangladesh.htm.
12 Sample size: Bichitropur: 40 households, Achingaon: 20 households
24
broadly inductive approach to coding and analysis was adopted13.
to the limited scope of this study, only open coding was conducted.
used in the WeD research: questions were asked about the effects of
cultural resources.
25
households
Occupational Majority in non-farm Greater dependence on
structure activities; farm sector: 29% have
farming as primary
Some villagers have strategy.
arable land and produce
crops as a secondary Significant number of
livelihood strategy. migrants; 75 people work
in Dhaka; 34 villagers
Large number of migrants have migrated overseas
to Dhaka
Communication improved
with road to district town.
Increase in politically
motivated violence
26
4. Discussion of Findings
27
straightforward connection to vulnerability as it pertains directly to
28
household members to work was compromised by flood related illness
aftermath of the flood. In the longer term, loss of assets affected the
and disrupted income. Many people were unable to work during the
fields flooded. Finally, as prices of basic goods rose during the flood,
households.
albeit impressionistically.
29
Differences in households’ ‘need to cope’
& Dreze, 1989), along with their potential for diversification were
greater.
14 1 Bigha=1/3 acre
15 Households were self-categorised as poor, middle or rich.
30
In the context of this discussion, another feature of livelihoods such as
other hazards such as ill health, external support was sought in order
31
While in general, households positively endowed with assets and
who relied more heavily upon physical and natural assets often
suffered greater aggregate losses and took longer to recover their pre-
...they did not need to buy the rice from the market as they used to produce
rice in their own land and during the flood it was in their store...they
mentioned that they did not suffer much (Nurul Haque: Middle household,
Achingaon)
...he has 10 Pakhis16 of cultivable land and he faced a huge loss during flood.
He cultivated paddy and maize in his land and all the crops went under
water... (Shrish Chandra Shaha: Rich household, Bichitropur)
of the type of resources relied upon and the potential for these
universally more vulnerable; they often expressed that they were less
32
Another important difference between households was in the type of
During the flood... he had to keep his factory closed for twenty days... It was a
huge loss to stop production of bread and his income was reduced.
(Mostafizur Rahman Mollik: Middle household, Bichitropur)
and degree to which its income sources and resources are flood
33
degree to which a household needs to ‘cope’. Moreover, inferences
rising prices of food and additional transport costs therefore did not
34
despite experiencing considerable livelihood disruption, was still able
to cope autonomously:
Shrish is well enough financially compared to all the other villagers.... he did
not need to borrow anything as loan in the form of cash or kind from any
person or organization (Shrish Chandra Shaha: Rich household: Bichitropur)
was more often through NGOs: Grameen Bank was frequently cited as
increase adaptive capacity over the longer term; longer time horizons
in providing loans of food and money and offering shelter, but also for
35
their social resources, which had implications for their coping ability.
The most productive social relationships for the poor were those with
chairman:
Samsuddin received fertiliser and seeds twice from the government through
the UP member in his village... There is good relationship between the UP
member and this family, and the UP member is also their relative (Samsuddin
Mollik: Poor household: Bichitropur).
little more in the way of resources to enable coping, as was the case
Daradi said that during the flood they eat only one meal a day instead of
three. But they did not take any loan because no one would give them loan,
as they are poor (Daradi Mollik: poor household: Bichitropur)
36
maintenance or they could be subject to decline. The importance of
Dorbesh Mia now always stays in the house as he cannot walk for a long time
and so he tries to avoid that... Day by day his social connections are
decreasing. He always tries to maintain a good relationship with the powerful
people of this village. They have managed an old-age allowance for him
(Dorbesh Mia: poor household, Achingaon).
which they are embedded. A key finding from the preceding analysis
has been the importance of social resources for the poorest. The
conceptual lens through which they can be viewed. It will then move
37
Figure 4: Coping
framework
DIMENSION 1: NEED FOR ‘COPING’
Re c
lia e
re n
Highly disrupted livelihood
so a
ur n
ce c
s i
38
e
Conceptualising relationships
The pattern and structure of such relationships are highly complex and
(Devine,1999).
39
The significance of relationships is that they form the basis of
Buchignana, 1997).
Sen’s (1981) original notion were the rules which rendered claims over
codes, all of which are associated with their own rules of obligation and
40
primary means of non-autonomous coping: loans and informal
their ‘social resources’ in order to cope with the flood translates into a
18 This overlap was also suggested by the RANQ data which found that households
with a close relative in a government position had higher levels of needs satisfaction
(McGregor et al, 2007)
41
understanding of vulnerability in rural Bangladesh necessitates that
methods are too high (Dreze & Sen,1989), and in situations where the
He worked mainly for those people who were very poor, were living in his
village, and went to him for help. ...During the flood his wife helped their
neighbours who were poor by giving rice. In this way he improved his social
acceptance. (Shrish Chandra Shaha: Rich household: Bichitropur)
42
Superficially therefore, it would seem that the argument made by
that the implications for vulnerability are more ambivalent but are also
entitlement for poor people are often those in a similar position which
43
networks or relationships, for reasons as diverse as illness, infertility
and divorce.
44
argument has more direct implications for adaptive capacity. Wood
These arguments should not be taken to suggest that poor actors are
5.
Conclusion
they are less likely to be disrupted in the event of a flood. They are
45
greater security, translating into longer time horizons. This dimension
flood.
This in turn translates into a focus on the local and contextual ways in
will now suggest, are particularly important when the dynamic socio-
46
5. Reflections on dynamics
have argued that this framework highlights not only the value of
47
the influence of social resources and informal institutions on
vulnerability.
account.
Dimension 1
Impacts of trends
I have suggested that the first dimension of coping, the ‘need to cope’,
broadly positive.
48
(Hossain et al, 1996), and the proportion of households engaged in
49
requires access to capital to fund the initial move and therefore those
who receive remittances are usually not the poorest (ibid). Likewise,
insecurity of work for the poorest migrants may actually increase their
insecurity (ibid)
jobs in the farming sector have been lost (Saha, 2003). Invariably, the
the brunt of this loss (Rahman, R.2003). Moreover, while the central
however, are eroding this source of security and forcing poor people
50
determining the ‘rules of the game’; a shift in influence from
and trading systems (Rahman, R.,2003), yet poor households are often
assistance. For poor actors, this means that, in many cases, their
context.
fronts: their limited resource endowments prevent their entry into new
areas of employment, while their access to, and the nature of the
51
these factors mean that access to non-farm livelihood opportunities is
Dimension 2
Implications of trends
52
(Helme & Levitsky,2004); the discussion that follows is therefore
discernable effect at some level on the ‘rules of the game’ and the
The penetration of macro politics and market forces into rural space,
53
recent decline of traditional leadership, while the increased mobility of
rationale for this study’s design was climate change is likely to result
households, this means that they are likely to have to make increasing
54
extent can they continue to provide a safety net in the face of regular
collective loss?
Impacts on vulnerability
Given that the institutional changes suggested here are the subject of
some debate, and that the relationship between these institutions and
yielding resources for the poor. This is partly a question of their extent
and coverage, and partly about the norms which underpin political and
(Wood,2005).
55
From a more critical perspective, new forms of hierarchical
56
Indra & Buchignan’s (1997) study of Uthuli households20 in Bangladesh
suggests that informal institutions can indeed adapt. They argued that
the other hand, suggested that, even under stress, such arrangements
57
6. Conclusions
This paper began with the recognition that many climate change
turn, I suggested, may limit the relevance and success of their policy
prescriptions.
58
This approach revealed that it is necessary to look beyond differences
necessity of this shift in focus lends support to the claim made at the
outset: the assumption that the formal institutional domain is the most
59
The translation of these findings is that studies of social vulnerability
operation.
raises further issues and questions. When considering the potential for
due to their lack of physical and human resources. While these issues
60
them. An awareness of the actual functioning of formal institutions
partly of their lack of the ‘right’ social connections, may also limit their
So what does this mean for adaptation research and policy? If the
61
This paper provides support for this call to engagement; by adopting
While these dimensions may seem less amenable to policy, there are
same trends are held accountable for the possible erosion of coping
62
References
ADGER, W. N. 1999. Social vulnerability to climate change and
249-269
387 - 404.
63
ADGER, W. N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental
77-86.
1596
64
1942-88. Comilla: Bangladesh Academy for Rural Development.
Department Of Environment.
from: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Economic
65
BBS. 1986. Census of Agriculture and Livestock, 1983-84.
Dhaka: BBS
Available from:
http://www.bbs.gov.bd/dataindex/Pre-report-Agri-census-2008-
Routledge
66
CHAMBERS, R. 1989. Vulnerability, coping and policy: Editorial
893-906.
DEVINE, J. 1999. One foot in each boat the macro politics and
of Bath.
67
DIRKS, R. 1980. Social Responses During Severe Food
33, 1923-1938.
http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/openmeeting [Accessed
25/06/09]
487-498.
68
FIRTH, R. 1959. Social change in Tikopia. New York, Macmillan.
Switzerland.
69
HOSSAIN, M. 2000. Recent Development and Structural
HOSSAIN, M., RAHMAN, H.Z. AND SEN, B. 1996. What has been
1617.
Development.
70
http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2003/ natres_livelihoods_cc.pdf
[Accessed 25/02/09]
pp. 25-64.
111
71
change in human populations’. In: C. Laughlin & I Brady (eds.).
pp. 1-18
72
MIRZA, M. 2001. Global warming and changes in the probability
221 - 232.
73
2008. Effective livelihood adaptation to climate change
http://www.energyandenvironment.undp.org/undp/index.cfm?
module=Library&page=Document&DocumentID=5050
[Accessed 25/07/2009]
74
RAHMAN, H. Z. 2003. Re-thinking local governance: towards a
say. In: K. Toufique & C. Turton (eds) Hands not Lands: how
Press.
75
SEN, A. & DREZE, J. 1989. Hunger and public action. Oxford:
Clarendon
In: J.J. McCarthy, O. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken and K.S.
Blackwell.
76
Vulnerability in Samoa. Tiempo, 54, pp. 11-15
77
UNFCCC, 2007. Bali Action Plan: Decision 1/CP.13. Bonn: United
3/09/09]
University Press
78
Gough and A. McGregor (eds). Wellbeing in developing
development team
Available from:
http://esds80.mcc.ac.uk/WDS_WB/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?
Available from:
http://esds80.mcc.ac.uk/WDS_WB/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?
Available from:
http://esds80.mcc.ac.uk/WDS_WB/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?
79
Available from:
http://esds80.mcc.ac.uk/WDS_WB/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?
Available from:
http://esds80.mcc.ac.uk/WDS_WB/TableViewer/dimView.aspx?
80
81
82
83
84
1