EPA - Nutrient Control Design Manual

EPA/600/R-10/100 | August 2010 | www.epa.
gov/nrmrl
Nutrient Control Design Manual
Office of Research and Development

National Risk Management Research Laboratory - Water Supply and Water Resources Division
EPA/600/R10/100
August2010
NutrientControlDesignManual
by
TheCadmusGroup,Inc
57WaterStreet
Watertown,MA02472
Scientific,Technical,Research,Engineering,andModelingSupport(STREAMS)
TaskOrder68
ContractNo.EPC05058
GeorgeT.Moore,TaskOrderManager
UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency
OfficeofResearchandDevelopment/NationalRiskManagementResearchLaboratory
26WestMartinLutherKingDrive,MailCode445
Cincinnati,Ohio,45268
Foreword
TheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)ischargedbyCongresswithprotectingtheNations
land,air,andwaterresources.Underamandateofnationalenvironmentallaws,theAgencystrivesto
formulateandimplementactionsleadingtoacompatiblebalancebetweenhumanactivitiesandthe
abilityofnaturalsystemstosupportandnurturelife.Tomeetthismandate,EPAsresearchprogramis
providingdataandtechnicalsupportforsolvingenvironmentalproblemstodayandbuildingascience
knowledgebasenecessarytomanageourecologicalresourceswisely,understandhowpollutantsaffect
ourhealth,andpreventorreduceenvironmentalrisksinthefuture.
TheNationalRiskManagementResearchLaboratory(NRMRL)istheAgencyscenterforinvestigationof
technologicalandmanagementapproachesforpreventingandreducingrisksfrompollutionthat
threatenhumanhealthandtheenvironment.Thefocusofthelaboratorysresearchprogramison
methodsandtheircosteffectivenessforpreventionandcontrolofpollutiontoair,landwaterand
subsurfaceresources;protectionofwaterqualityinpublicwatersystems;remediationofcontaminated
sites,sedimentsandgroundwater;preventionandcontrolofindoorairpollution;andrestorationof
ecosystems.NRMRLcollaborateswithbothpublicandprivatesectorpartnerstofostertechnologies
thatreducethecostofcomplianceandtoanticipateemergingproblems.NRMRLsresearchsolutionsto
environmentalproblemsby:developingandpromotingtechnologiesthatprotectandimprovethe
environment;advancingscientificandengineeringinformationtosupportregulatoryandpolicy
decisions;andprovidingthetechnologicalsupportandinformationtransfertoinsureimplementationof
environmentalregulationsandstrategiesatthenational,state,andcommunitylevels.
ThispublicationhasbeenproducedaspartoftheLaboratorysstrategiclongtermresearchplan.Itis
publishedandmadeavailablebyEPAsOfficeofResearchandDevelopmenttoassisttheuser
communityandtolinkresearcherswiththeirclients.
SallyGutierrez,Director
NationalRiskManagementResearchLaboratory
iii
August2010
Notice
ThisdocumentwaspreparedbyTheCadmusGroup,Inc.(Cadmus)underEPAContractNo.EPC05058,
TaskOrder68.TheCadmusTeamwasleadbyPatriciaHertzlerandLauraDufresnewithSeniorAdvisors
CliffordRandall,EmeritusProfessorofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineeringatVirginiaTechandDirector
oftheOccoquanWatershedMonitoringProgram;JamesBarnard,GlobalPracticeandTechnology
LeaderatBlack&Veatch;DavidStensel,ProfessorofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineeringatthe
UniversityofWashington;andJeanetteBrown,ExecutiveDirectoroftheStamfordWaterPollution
ControlAuthorityandAdjunctProfessorofEnvironmentalEngineeringatManhattanCollege.
Disclaimer
Theviewsexpressedinthisdocumentarethoseoftheindividualauthorsanddonotnecessarily,reflect
theviewsandpoliciesoftheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA).Mentionoftradenamesor
commercialproductsdoesnotconstituteendorsementorrecommendationforuse.Thisdocumenthas
beenreviewedinaccordancewithEPAspeerandadministrativereviewpoliciesandapprovedfor
publication.
iv
August2010
Abstract
ThepurposeofthisEPAdesignmanualistoprovideupdated,stateofthetechnologydesign
guidanceonnitrogenandphosphoruscontrolatmunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlants(WWTPs).
SimilartopreviousEPAmanuals,thismanualcontainsextensiveinformationontheprinciplesof
biologicalnutrientremovalandchemicalphosphorusremovaltoserveasthebasisfordesign.Adetailed
descriptionoftechnologies,bothconventionalandemerging,servesasaresourceforpreliminary
technologyselection.BecausemostWWTPsintheUnitedStatesareequippedwithsecondary
treatment,thefocusofthisdesignmanualisonretrofitstoaddnutrientremovaltoexistingWWTPs
ratherthanonnewtreatmentplantdesign,althoughguidanceforgreenfielddesignispresented.Also
newfrompreviousversions,designguidancehereinisbasedontheuseofmathematicalmodelsand
simulators.Simulatorsallowdesignerstostudykineticaswellastimebasedsolutionswhile
determiningthetotalmassbalancesofmanyconstituents.Theyhavebecomeincreasinglypowerful,
easytouse,andwidelyacceptedforthedesignofbiologicalnutrientremovalfacilities.Themanualalso
includesnewinformationonemergingissuesintheindustrysuchassustainabilityinwastewater
treatmentdesignandoperation,nutrientrecoveryandreuse,effluentdissolvedorganicnitrogen,and
measurementoflowphosphorusconcentrations.
ThisreportwassubmittedinfulfillmentofEPAContractNo.EPC05058,TaskOrder68,byThe
CadmusGroup,Inc.underthesponsorshipoftheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency.This
reportcoversaperiodfromNovember2007throughApril2010andrepresentsworkcompletedasof
April2010.
August2010
Contents
AcronymsandAbbreviations .......................................................................................................xviii
Acknowledgements
.......................................................................................................xxii
1.
Introduction
.......................................................................................................11
1.1
HistoryofNutrientRemoval....................................................................................11
1.2
PurposeandScopeofthisManual..........................................................................13
1.3
ManualOrganization...............................................................................................15
1.4
References
.......................................................................................................16
2.
NeedforandBenefitsofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemoval.............................................21
2.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................21
2.2
SourcesofNitrogenandPhosphorusinWastewater..............................................22
2.2.1 Nitrogen......................................................................................................22
2.2.2 Phosphorus.................................................................................................23
2.3
StatusofWastewaterTreatmentintheUnitedStates...........................................23
2.4
NutrientImpairmentofU.S.Waterways.................................................................25
2.4.1 NorthernGulfofMexico.............................................................................25
2.4.2 ChesapeakeBay.........................................................................................26
2.4.3 GreatLakes.................................................................................................26
2.4.4 LongIslandSound.......................................................................................26
2.5
ClimateChangeImpacts..........................................................................................27
2.6
FederalandStateRegulationsandInitiativestoReduceNutrientPollution..........28
2.6.1 WaterQualityStandards............................................................................28
2.6.2 TotalMaximumDailyLoads(TMDLs).........................................................210
2.6.3 NPDESPermitting.......................................................................................210
2.6.4 WaterQualityTrading................................................................................211
2.6.5 TechnologyEvaluationandGuidance.........................................................212
2.7
IndustryInitiativesTheWERFNutrientRemovalChallenge.................................213
2.8
BenefitsofNutrientRemoval..................................................................................214
2.8.1 ImprovedPlantPerformance......................................................................214
2.8.2 CoRemovalofEmergingContaminants.....................................................214
2.8.3 NutrientRecoveryandReuse.....................................................................215
2.9
ChallengesofNutrientRemoval..............................................................................215
2.9.1 EnergyRequirements..................................................................................215
2.9.2 ReleaseofNitrousOxide............................................................................217
2.10 References
.......................................................................................................218
3.
PrinciplesofPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition....................................................31
3.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................31
3.2
AvailableFormsofMetalSaltsandLime.................................................................31
3.3
EquationsandStoichiometry...................................................................................32
3.3.1 RemovablePhosphorus..............................................................................32
3.3.2 ReactionsofMetalSaltsandPhosphorus..................................................32
3.3.3 ReactionsofLimewithPhosphorus............................................................35
3.4
SolidsSeparationProcesses.....................................................................................35
vi
August2010
4.
5.
3.5
3.6
3.7
EffectsonSludgeProductionandHandling.............................................................36
TwoFactorsthatMayLimittheAbilityofPlantstoAchieve
VeryLowEffluentLevels..........................................................................................37
References
.......................................................................................................38
PrinciplesofBiologicalNitrogenRemoval...........................................................................41
4.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................41
4.2
NitrogenRemovalbyBiomassSynthesis.................................................................42
4.3
MicrobiologyofNitrification....................................................................................43
4.4
ReactionsandStoichiometryofNitrification...........................................................45
4.5
NitrificationKinetics.................................................................................................46
4.5.1 AOBkinetics................................................................................................410
4.5.2 NOBkinetics................................................................................................413
4.5.3 EffectsofTemperatureandDissolvedOxygenonNitrificationKinetics....414
4.5.4 AOBandNOBKineticsatHighTemperature(SHARONprocess).............416
4.6
InhibitoryEffectsofEnvironmentalConditionsonNitrification.............................417
4.7
DenitrificationFundamentals..................................................................................420
4.8
MicrobiologyofDenitrification................................................................................420
4.9
MetabolismandStoichiometryofHeterotrophicDenitrification...........................421
4.10 BiologicalDenitrificationKineticswithInfluentWastewater..................................422
4.11 DenitrificationCarbonSourcesandRelativeConsumptionRatios..........................424
4.12 DenitrificationKineticsofExogenousCarbonSources............................................428
4.12.1 DenitrificationKineticswithMethanol.......................................................428
4.12.2 AlternativeExogenousSubstratesandDenitrificationKinetics.................430
4.12.3 AcclimationTimeandDegradativeAbilityofDenitrifyingBacteriawith
ExogenousSubstrates.................................................................................431
4.13 SpecificDenitrificationRates(SDNR).......................................................................432
4.14 SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification...............................................................434
4.15 MetabolismandStoichiometryandKineticsofANAMMOX.................................435
4.16 ImpactsonSludgeProductionandHandling...........................................................436
4.17 EffluentDissolvedOrganicNitrogen........................................................................436
4.18 References
.......................................................................................................439
PrinciplesofBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.......................................................................51
5.1
OverviewoftheBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalProcess.......................................51
5.2
SubstrateRequirements..........................................................................................53
5.3
SourcesofVolatileFattyAcids.................................................................................55
5.3.1 FermentationintheCollectionSystem......................................................56
5.3.2 AnaerobicFermentationofPrimaryorReturnActivatedSludge...............57
5.3.3 CommercialSources...................................................................................510
5.4
EnvironmentalConditions.......................................................................................511
5.4.1 DissolvedOxygenandNitratesintheAnaerobicZone..............................511
5.4.2 OxygenintheAerobicZone........................................................................511
5.4.3 pH
.......................................................................................................512
5.4.4 Temperature...............................................................................................512
5.4.5 Cations.......................................................................................................513
5.5
Kinetics
.......................................................................................................513
5.5.1 SolidsRetentionTime(SRT)........................................................................513
vii
August2010
6.
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.5.2 HydraulicRetentionTime(HRT)................................................................514
ImportantDesignandOperationalConsiderations.................................................514
5.6.1 AvoidingSecondaryReleaseofPhosphorus...............................................514
5.6.2 AvoidingBackmixing...................................................................................516
5.6.3 FlowandLoadBalancing............................................................................517
ImpactsonSludgeProcessingandHandling...........................................................517
References
.......................................................................................................518
OverviewofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies...........................................61
6.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................61
6.2
NitrogenRemovalTechnologies..............................................................................62
6.2.1 NitrogenRemovalinSingleProcessUnit....................................................63
6.2.1.1 ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)Process.....................................63
6.2.1.2 4StageBardenpho........................................................................65
6.2.1.3 MLEor4StageBardephowithMembraneBioractor(MBR)........65
6.2.1.4 SequencingBatchReactor(SBR)....................................................66
6.2.1.5 OxidationDitchwithAnoxicZone.................................................67
6.2.1.6 StepFeedBiologicalNitrogenRemoval(BNR)..............................68
6.2.1.7 SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification(SNdN)........................69
6.2.1.8 IntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS)...............................610
6.2.1.9MovingBedBiofilmReactor(MBBR)..............................................611
6.2.2 SeparateStageProcessesNitrification....................................................612
6.2.2.1 SuspendedGrowthNitrification....................................................612
6.2.2.2 AttachedGrowthNitrification.......................................................612
6.2.3 SeparateStageProcessesDenitrification................................................613
6.2.3.1 DenitrificationFilters.....................................................................614
6.3
PhosphorusRemovalTechnologies.........................................................................616
6.3.1 PhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition...............................................616
6.3.2 BiologicalPhosphorusRemoval..................................................................619
6.3.2.1 Phoredox(A/O).............................................................................620
6.3.2.2 OxidationDitchwithAnaerobicZone............................................621
6.4
CombinedNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies.................................622
6.4.1 Biological.....................................................................................................622
6.4.1.1 3StagePhoredox(A2/0)...............................................................622
6.4.1.2 5StageBardenpho........................................................................623
6.4.1.3 UniversityofCapetown(UCT),ModifiedUCT,andVirginiaInitiative
Project(VIP)...................................................................................624
6.4.1.4 Westbank.......................................................................................626
6.4.1.5 OxidationDitchwithAnoxicandAnaerobicZones.......................626
6.4.1.6 SequencingBatchReactor(SBR)....................................................627
6.4.2 HybridChemical/Biological.......................................................................627
6.4.2.1 BluePlainsProcess........................................................................628
6.4.2.2 BiologicalChemicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemoval(BCFS)
Process..........................................................................................628
6.5
EffluentFiltration.....................................................................................................629
6.5.1 ConventionalDownflowFilters.................................................................629
6.5.2 ContinuousBackwashingUpflowSandFilters(Dynasand)........................629
6.5.3 PulsedBedFilters........................................................................................630
viii
August2010
6.6
6.7
6.8
7.
8.
9.
6.9
6.5.4 TravelingBridgeFilters...............................................................................630
6.5.5 Discfilters....................................................................................................630
6.5.6 MembraneFilters.......................................................................................631
SidestreamManagement........................................................................................632
TechnologyPerformance.........................................................................................634
6.7.1 RemovalEfficienciesofBNRTechnologiesGeneralDiscussion...............636
6.7.2 TechnologyPerformanceStatisticsbasedonFullScaleOperatingData...637
FactorsinSimultaneouslyAchievingLowNitrogenandPhosphorusEffluent
Concentrations .......................................................................................................642
References
.......................................................................................................643
EstablishingDesignObjectives..............................................................................................71
7.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................71
7.2
CharacterizingExistingTreatment...........................................................................72
7.3
DesignFlowRates....................................................................................................73
7.3.1 CharacterizingExistingFlow.......................................................................73
7.3.2 ProjectingFutureConditions......................................................................75
7.3.3 SettingDesignFlowRates...........................................................................76
7.4
Wastewatercharacteristics.....................................................................................77
7.4.1 DataCollection............................................................................................77
7.4.2 DataVerification.........................................................................................710
7.5
TargetEffluentConcentrationsforTotalNitrogenandTotalPhosphorus..............715
7.6
GoalsforReliability,Sustainability,andProcessFlexibility.....................................716
7.7
SludgeTreatmentOptions.......................................................................................718
7.8
SiteConstraints.......................................................................................................718
7.9
SelectinganOverallProcessDesignFactor............................................................719
7.10 References
.......................................................................................................720
SelectingCandidateTreatmentProcessesforPlantUpgrades...........................................81
8.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................81
8.2
TechnologySelectionFactors..................................................................................81
8.2.1 SeasonalPermitLimits................................................................................81
8.2.2 Footprint.....................................................................................................82
8.2.3 HydraulicConsiderations............................................................................83
8.2.4 Chemicalneeds...........................................................................................83
8.2.5 AvailableSludgeTreatmentandOptions...................................................83
8.2.6 EnergyConsiderations................................................................................84
8.2.7 StaffingandTrainingRequirements...........................................................85
8.2.8 TechnologySelectionConsiderationsforSmallFlowSystems...................85
8.3
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofTechnologyTypes.............................................86
8.4
OverviewofRecommendedApproach....................................................................88
8.5
RecommendedUseofAdvancedTools...................................................................811
8.6
Patentissues .......................................................................................................812
8.7
References
.......................................................................................................813
DesignApproachforPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition......................................91
9.1
Introduction .......................................................................................................91
9.2
SelectingaChemicalPrecipitant..............................................................................91
ix
August2010
10.
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.2.1 AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMetalSalts...........................................91
9.2.2 AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofLime.....................................................93
9.2.3 Costs .......................................................................................................93
SelectingPoint(s)ofApplication..............................................................................94
DeterminingtheChemicalDose..............................................................................97
DesigningaChemicalFeedSystem..........................................................................910
9.5.1 Liquidfeedsystems....................................................................................911
9.5.1.1 Storagetanks.................................................................................911
9.5.1.2 FeedMethods................................................................................911
9.5.2 DryFeedSystems........................................................................................912
9.5.2.1 Storage...........................................................................................912
9.5.2.2 FeedMethods................................................................................913
9.5.2.3 LimeSlaking...................................................................................914
DesigningforRapidMixandFlocculation...............................................................915
9.6.1 TypesofMixers...........................................................................................915
9.6.2 DesignFactors.............................................................................................917
9.6.2.1 VelocityGradient...........................................................................917
9.6.2.2 PowerRequirements.....................................................................918
9.6.2.3 HydraulicRetentionTime..............................................................919
9.6.2.4 VesselGeometry............................................................................920
9.6.3 SummaryofTypicalDesignParameters.....................................................920
SolidsSeparationProcesses.....................................................................................921
9.7.1 PrimaryandSecondaryClarification...........................................................922
9.7.2 TertiaryProcesses.......................................................................................922
OperationalFactors................................................................................................922
9.8.1 DoseControl...............................................................................................922
9.8.2 MakeupWater...........................................................................................923
9.8.3 SludgeProductionandHandling................................................................923
9.8.4 pHAdjustment............................................................................................925
9.8.5 EffectonBiosolidsApplications..................................................................925
References
.......................................................................................................925
DesignApproachforBiologicalNutrientRemoval...............................................................101
10.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................101
10.2 PreliminaryDesignApproach..................................................................................103
10.3 OverviewofRecommendedApproachforPlantModeling.....................................105
10.4 EstablishingModelingObjectivesandRequirements.............................................107
10.4.1 IntendedModelUse...................................................................................107
10.4.2 GoalsforModelAccuracy...........................................................................107
10.4.3 Dynamicvs.SteadyStateSimulation..........................................................108
10.5 SelectingaProcessSimulationModel.....................................................................109
10.6 DataCollection .......................................................................................................1012
10.6.1 ProcessConfiguration.................................................................................1013
10.6.2 OperatingConditions..................................................................................1016
10.7 CharacterizationofOrganicMaterial......................................................................1016
10.7.1 RelationshipofOrganicMaterialandSuspendedSolidsinWastewater...1020
10.7.2 MethodsforDeterminingCODFractions...................................................1022
10.7.3 DataChecks.................................................................................................1025
August2010
11.
12.
10.8 CharacterizationofNutrientFractions....................................................................1026
10.8.1 Nitrogen......................................................................................................1026
10.8.2 Phosphorus.................................................................................................1029
10.9 KineticandStoichiometricParameters...................................................................1032
10.10 Calibration
.......................................................................................................1033
10.11Validation
.......................................................................................................1037
10.12 SimulationofDesignAlternativesforNutrientRemoval........................................1038
10.13 AdditionalProceduresforDesign............................................................................1039
10.13.1SequencingBatchReactors(SBRs).............................................................1039
10.13.2DenitrificationFilters..................................................................................1040
10.13.3PrimarySludgeFermenters........................................................................1041
10.14 DesignChecksforBiologicalNitrogenandPhosphorusRemoval...........................1042
10.15 References
.......................................................................................................1047
DesignApproachforEffluentFiltration...............................................................................111
11.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................111
11.2 SelectionofFiltrationTechnology...........................................................................112
11.3 GranularMediaFilters.............................................................................................113
11.3.1 InfluentWaterQuality................................................................................114
11.3.2 MediaSpecifications...................................................................................114
11.3.3 FilterLoadingRate......................................................................................116
11.3.4 Headloss......................................................................................................116
11.3.5 BackwashRequirements.............................................................................117
11.3.6 FlowControl...............................................................................................119
11.4 ClothMediaFilters...................................................................................................1110
11.5 LowPressureMembranes.......................................................................................1111
11.5.1 MembraneMaterial....................................................................................1112
11.5.2 MembraneConfiguration...........................................................................1113
11.5.3 ProcessConsiderations...............................................................................1114
11.5.4 PressureDrop.............................................................................................1115
11.5.5 FluxDetermination.....................................................................................1115
11.5.6 PerformanceData.......................................................................................1116
11.6 EmergingFiltrationTechnologiesforPhosphorusRemoval....................................1116
11.6.1 TwoStageFiltration....................................................................................1116
11.6.2 IronOxideCoatedMedia............................................................................1117
11.7 References
.......................................................................................................1118
OperationandOptimizationtoEnhanceNutrientRemoval...............................................121
12.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................121
12.2 AnalysisofExistingOperations................................................................................121
12.2.1 DataAnalysis...............................................................................................122
12.2.2 UseofProcessSimulationModels..............................................................125
12.3 IncorporatingSCADAandotherInstrumentation...................................................126
12.4 CommonOperationalChanges................................................................................126
12.4.1 AdjustSRT...................................................................................................126
12.4.2 AdjustAerationRates.................................................................................127
12.4.3 AddBafflestoCreateHighFoodtoMicroorganism(F/M)Conditions.......127
12.4.4 ChangeAerationSettingsinPlugFlowBasins............................................127
xi
August2010
12.4.5 MinimizeImpactofRecycleStreams..........................................................128
12.4.6 ReconfigureFlowthroughExistingUnits....................................................128
12.4.7 IncreaseVFAsforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.....................................129
12.5 References
.......................................................................................................1210
13.InstrumentationandControls.....................................................................................................131
13.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................131
13.2 FactorsinSelectingInstrumentation.......................................................................132
13.3 BasicOnlineInstrumentation..................................................................................133
13.3.1 Flow .......................................................................................................133
13.3.2 TotalSuspendedSolids(TSS)......................................................................134
13.3.3 SludgeBlanketDepth..................................................................................135
13.3.4 DissolvedOxygen(DO)...............................................................................135
13.3.5 pH
.......................................................................................................135
13.3.6 ORP .......................................................................................................136
13.4 OnlineInstrumentationforNutrientControl..........................................................136
13.4.1 NitrogenCompounds..................................................................................136
13.4.2 PhosphateandTotalPhosphorus...............................................................137
13.4.3 NADH(activebiomass)...............................................................................138
13.4.3 Respirometry..............................................................................................138
13.5 TypesofControl.......................................................................................................139
13.5.1 Feedforward..............................................................................................139
13.5.2 Feedback.....................................................................................................1310
13.5.3 Feedforwardandfeedback........................................................................1310
13.5.4 Cascade.......................................................................................................1310
13.5.5 AdvancedControl.......................................................................................1310
13.6 ControlEquipmentSCADA....................................................................................1311
13.7 References
.......................................................................................................1313
14.
SustainableNutrientRecoveryandReuse............................................................................141
14.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................141
14.2 SeparatingandTreatingWasteOnSite...................................................................141
14.3 UsingWastewaterTreatmentByproducts..............................................................142
14.3.1 Durham,OR,AdvancedWastewaterTreatmentFacility............................143
14.3.2 EastBayMunicipalUtilityDistrict,CA........................................................144
14.4 References
.......................................................................................................145
xii
August2010
Appendices
AppendixA.
AppendixB.
AppendixC.
RecommendationsforMethanolSafety
OrganicCompoundsandInhibitoryConcentrationstoNitrification
MathematicalModelsforWastewaterTreatment
xiii
August2010
Tables
Table31.
Table41.
Table42.
Table43.
Table44.
Table45.
Table46.
Table47.
Table48.
Table49.
Table410.
Table411.
Table412.
Table413.
Table414.
Table415.
Table4.16.
Table51.
Table52.
Table53.
Table61.
Table62.
Table63.
Table64.
Table65.
Table71.
Table72.
Table73.
Table74.
Table81.
Table82.
Table83.
Table91.
Table92.
ChemicalPrecipitants..............................................................................................32
PhylogenyofAmmoniaOxidizingBacteria..............................................................44
PhylogenyofNitriteOxidizingBacteria...................................................................45
SummaryofTestResultsonMeasuringSpecificEndogenousDecayCoefficient
Rates(AllRatesat20C)...........................................................................................411
SummaryofAOBNitrificationKineticCoefficientValues........................................412
ComparisonofNitrificationHalfVelocityCoefficients(mg/L)inMBRand
ConventionalActivatedSludge(CAS)Systems........................................................412
SummaryofNOBNitrificationKineticCoefficientValues.......................................414
NH4NandNO2NConcentrationsthatMayInhibitNitrificationasaFunction
ofpHat20C. .......................................................................................................419
HeterotrophicBacteriaKineticCoefficientsinAnoxic/AerobicActivated
Sludge
.......................................................................................................424
BiomassYieldsReportedforExogenousCarbonSources.......................................428
ReportedMaximumSpecificGrowthRatesat20CandTemperature
CoefficientsforMethanolUtilizationunderAnoxicandAerobicconditions..........429
ReportedKsvaluesforNO3Nreductionwithmethanolat20C.............................429
ComparisonofMaximumSpecificGrowthratesforMethanol,Acetate,andCorn
SyrupatHighandLowTemperatures.....................................................................430
ForBNRActivatedSludge,RatioofDenitrificationRatewithSubstrateAddition
toDenitrificationRatewithNoAddition.................................................................431
RatioofDenitrificationRatesforOtherSubstratesatDay50withEthanolor
MethanolAdditionVersusnoAddition...................................................................432
RangeofreportedSDNRvaluesinBNRactivatedsludgetreatment......................433
ANAMMOXBacteriaBiokineticParametersat300C.............................................435
VolatileFattyAcidsTypicallyFoundinFermentedWastewater.............................54
MinimumRatiosforAchievingTotalPhosphorusEffluentConcentrationof
lessthan1.0mg/L....................................................................................................54
EffectofCorrosionandOdorControlTechniquesonVFAProductionin
WastewaterCollectionSystems..............................................................................57
MatrixofBiologicalNitrogenRemovalTechnologies..............................................63
IFASMediaTypes,Applications,andDesignConsiderations..................................610
MatrixofPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies........................................................616
MatrixofCombinedBiologicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemovalTechnologies.622
MatrixofTertiaryFiltrationTechnologies...............................................................629
InfluentFlowComponents......................................................................................74
FlowCharacterization..............................................................................................74
ComparisonofFlowRatesandFlushVolumesBeforeandAfterU.S.Energy
PolicyAct
.......................................................................................................75
ExamplePermitLimitsforNutrients........................................................................716
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofTechnologyTypes............................................87
ExternalCarbonSources.........................................................................................812
IFASMediaTypes,Applications,andDesignConsiderations..................................815
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofCommonAluminumandIronSalts...................92
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMetalSaltApplicationPoints...........................96
xiv
August2010
Table93.
Table94.
Table95.
Table96.
Table101.
Table102.
Table103.
Table104.
Table105.
Table106.
Table111.
Table112.
Table113.
Table114.
Table115.
Table116.
Table121.
Table131.
Table132.
TypesofChemicalFeeders......................................................................................910
CommonlyUsedEquipmentforRapidMixing.........................................................916
ValuesofNPandNQforVariousTypesofImpellers................................................918
TypicalDesignParametersforTurbineandPropellerMixer...................................921
CommonlyUsedProcessSimulators.......................................................................1010
CODandParticulateFractionsinMunicipalWastewater.......................................1019
TKNFractionsinMunicipalWastewater..................................................................1028
TotalPhosphorusFractionsinMunicipalWastewater............................................1031
DesignChecksforBiologicalNitrogenRemoval......................................................1043
DesignChecksforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.................................................1045
CommonFilterMediaandCharacteristics..............................................................115
FilterMediaDepthsandParticleSizes....................................................................115
MembraneCharacteristics.......................................................................................1114
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMembraneMaterials........................................1115
PhosphorusRemovalReportedFromMembranePilotStudies..............................1119
PilotTestResultsfortheBlueWaterBluePROSystem........................................1121
RecommendedParametersforDataEvaluation.....................................................123
SummaryofBasicOnLineInstrumentation............................................................132
ComparisonofOnlineNitrateAnalyzers................................................................137
xv
August2010
Figures
Figure21.
Figure22.
Figure41.
Figure42.
Figure43.
Figure44.
Figure45.
Figure51.
Figure52.
Figure53
Figure54.
Figure61.
Figure62.
Figure63.
Figure64.
Figure65.
Figure66.
Figure67.
Figure68.
Figure69.
Figure610.
Figure611.
Figure612.
Figure613.
Figure614.
Figure615.
Figure616.
Figure617.
Figure618.
Figure619.
Figure620.
Figure621.
Figure622.
Figure71
Figure91.
Figure92.
PopulationservedbyPOTWsnationwideforselectyearsbetween1940and2004
andprojectedto2024(ifallneedsaremet),organizedbywastewater
treatmenttype........................................................................................................25
WaterqualitybasedapproachoftheCleanWaterAct..........................................210
PercentnitrogenremovalduetobiomasssynthesisasafunctionofSRTand
influentBOD/Nratio................................................................................................43
EffectofSRTandtemperatureoneffluentNH4+NandNO2Nconcentrations
usingkineticdatainTable46and44forCMAS....................................................415
EffectofDOconcentrationoneffluentNH4+NandNO2Nconcentrations
usingkineticdatainTable44and46andat15CforCMAS...............................415
EffectoftemperatureonminimalwashoutSRTAOB,HandNOB,Hfrom
Hellingaetal.(1998)andAOB,MandNOB,MfromTables42and44................417
RatioofCODrequiredtoNO3NcompletelyreduceNO3N(CRNO3)asa
functionofthebiomassyield..................................................................................426
TheoryofBPRinactivatedsludge...........................................................................51
BPRataWWTP.......................................................................................................53
BiologicalPathwaysofMethaneFormation............................................................5.8
Exampleofsecondaryreleaseinsecondanoxiczone.............................................514
ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)process...............................................................64
4stageBardenphoprocess.....................................................................................65
Commonconfigurationforamembranebioreactor4stagebardenphotreatment
system
.......................................................................................................66
Operatingperiodsofasequencingbatchreactor...................................................67
Exampleoxidationditchconfiguration....................................................................68
Stepfeedbiologicalnitrogenremoval.....................................................................67
Downflowdenitrificationfilter................................................................................614
Continuousbackwashupflowsand(CBUS)filters...................................................615
Closeupofcontinuousbackwashupflowsand(CBUS)filter..................................615
Densadeghighrateclarificationprocessflowdiagram.........................................618
CoMagTMprocessflowdiagram............................................................................619
Phoredoxprocess(A/O).........................................................................................621
Oxidationditchwithanaerobiczone.......................................................................622
3StagePhoredoxprocess(A2/O)...........................................................................623
5stageBardenphoprocess....................................................................................624
UCTandModifiedUCTprocess...............................................................................625
Westbankprocess....................................................................................................626
VT2processschematic.............................................................................................627
TheBluePlainsprocess............................................................................................628
Probabilityplotofsecondaryeffluentphosphorusdata.........................................639
Technologyperformancestatisticsfornitrogenremovalplants.............................640
Technologyperformancestatisticsforphosphorusremovalplants.......................640
Netsludgeproductionversussolidsretentiontimeandtemperature..................714
Possibleapplicationpointsforchemicaladdition(C).............................................94
Schematicofcommonjartestingapparatus...........................................................99
xvi
August2010
Figure93.
Figure101.
Figure102.
Figure103.
Figure104.
Figure105.
Figure106.
Figure107.
Figure111.
Figure112.
Figure113.
Figure114.
Figure115.
Figure116.
Figure121.
Typicaldrychemicalfeedsystem............................................................................913
Unifiedprotocolforactivatedsludgemonitoring..................................................106
Essentialrequirementsforwastewatertreatmentprocesssimulation..................1013
Examplesimulatorconfigurationforabiologicalnutrientremovalplant..............1014
CODcomponentsformunicipalwastewater...........................................................1018
RelationshipbetweenBOD,COD,TSS,andVSS......................................................1021
TKNcomponentsformunicipalwastewater...........................................................1027
Phosphoruscomponentsinmunicipalwastewater................................................1030
Upflowcontinuousbackflowfilter..........................................................................1111
OperationalmodelsoftheFuzzyFilter..................................................................1112
CutawayviewofAquaDiskclothmediafilter........................................................1113
Hollowfibermembraneconfigurationwithinsidetooutsideflow........................1116
ParksonDynasandD2advancedfiltersystem.........................................................1120
BluePROprocess...................................................................................................1121
Spatialandtemporalprofilesofammonia..............................................................125
xvii
August2010
AcronymsandAbbreviations
A/O
A2/O
AMO
ANAMMOX
AOB
AS
ASCE
ASM
AT3
BABE
BAF
BAR
BCFS
bDON
BHRC
BNR
BOD
BOD5
BPR
CCF
CFD
CIP
CMAS
C/N
COD
COV
CR
CSO
CSTR
CWA
CWSRF
DAF
DO
DON
DSS
EBPR
EDC
EDTA
ENR
EPA
FFS
F/M
FWPCA
FWS
GAO
Anaerobic/Oxic,Phoredox
Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic,3StagePhoredox
AmmoniaMonooxygenase
AnaerobicAmmoniaOxidation
AmmoniaOxidizingBacteria
ActivatedSludge
AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers
ActivatedSludgeModel
AerationTank3
BioAugmentationBatchEnhanced
BiologicalAeratedFilter
BioAugmentationRegeneration/Reaeration
BiologicalChemicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemoval
BiodegradableFractionofDissolvedOrganicNitrogen
BallastedHighRateClarificationProcesses
BiologicalNutrientRemoval
BiochemicalOxygenDemand
BiochemicalOxygenDemand(5day)
BiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
ContinuousContactFiltration
ComputationalFluidDynamic
CleaninPlace
CompletelyMixedActivatedSludge
CarbontoNitrogenRatio
ChemicalOxygenDemand
CoefficientofVariation
ConsumptiveRatio
CombinedSewerOverflow
ContinuousStirredTankReactors
CleanWaterAct
CleanWaterStateRevolvingFund
DissolvedAirFlotation
DissolvedOxygen
DissolvedOrganicNitrogen
DesignatedSuspendedSolids
EnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
EndocrineDisruptingChemicals
EthyleneDiamineTetraaceticAcid
EnhancedNutrientRemoval
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency
FixedfilmSystems
FoodtoMicroorganismratio
FederalWaterPollutionControlAct
FreeWaterSurface
GlycogenAccumulatingOrganism
xviii
August2010
GMP
HRSD
HRT
iDON
IFAS
ISF
ISS
IWA
JHB
LOT
MAUREEN
MBBR
MBR
MCL
MF
MGD
mg/L
MLE
MLSS
MLVSS
MMDF
MUCT
MWRDGC
N
NF
NTU
NOAA
NOB
NPDES
NTT
ORD
ORP
OSHA
OUR
OWASA
OWM
P
PACl
PAH
PAO
PHA
PHB
PHV
PID
PLC
POTW
PPCPs
RAS
GoodModelingPractices
HamptonRoadsSanitationDistrict
HydraulicRetentionTime
InertDissolvedOrganicNitrogen
IntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge
IntermittentSandFilter
InertSuspendedSolids
InternationalWaterAssociation
JohannesburgProcess
LimitofTechnology
MainstreamAutotrophicRecycleEnhancedNremoval
MovingBedBiofilmReactor
MembraneBioreactor
MaximumContaminantLevel
Microfiltration
MillionGallonsperDay
Milligramsperliter
ModifiedLudzackEttinger
MixedLiquorSuspendedSolids
MixedLiquorVolatileSuspendedSolids
MaximumMonthDesignFlow
ModifiedUniversityofCapetown
MetropolitanWaterReclamationDistrictofGreaterChicago
Nitrogen
Nanofiltration
NephelometricTurbidityUnits
NationalOceanicandAtmosphericAdministration
NitriteOxidizingBacteria
NationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem
NitrogenTradingTool
EPAOfficeofResearchandDevelopment
OxidationReductionPotential
OccupationalSafetyandHealthAdministration
OxygenUptakeRate
OrangeWaterandSewerAuthority
EPAOfficeofWastewaterManagement
Phosphorus
PolyaluminumChloride
PolycyclicAromaticHydrocarbons
PhosphateAccumulatingOrganism
Polyhydroxyalkanoate
Polyhydroxybutyrate
Polyhydroxyvalerate
PhasedIsolationDitch
ProgrammableLogicController
PubliclyOwnedTreatmentWorks
PharmaceuticalsandPersonalCareProducts
ReturnActivatedSludge
xix
August2010
RBC
rbCOD
rDON
RO
RSF
SAV
SBCOD
SBR
SCADA
SCM
SDNR
SHARON
SNdN
SRT
SSO
STAC
SWIS
TAL
TAN
TDS
TKN
TMDL
TN
TP
TSS
TUDP
UCT
UF
UOSA
USDA
USEPA
USGS
VFA
VIP
VSS
WAS
WEF
WEFTEC
WERF
WQS
WWTP
RotatingBiologicalContactor
ReadilyBiodegradableChemicalOxygenDemand
RecalcitrantDissolvedOrganicNitrogen
ReverseOsmosis
RecirculatingSandFilters
SubmergedAquaticVegetation
SlowlyBiodegradableChemicalOxygenDemand
SequencingBatchReactors
SupervisoryControlandDataAcquisition
SurfaceComplexationModeling
SpecificDenitrificationRate
SingleReactorHighActivityAmmoniaRemovalOver Nitrite
SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification
SolidsRetentionTime
SanitarySewerOverflow
ChesapeakeBayProgramScientificandTechnicalAdvisory
Committee
SubsurfaceWastewaterInfiltrationSystem
TechnologyAchievableLimit
TotalAmmoniaNitrogen
TotalDissolvedSolids
TotalKjeldahlNitrogen
TotalMaximumDailyLoads
TotalNitrogen
TotalPhosphorus
TotalSuspendedSolids
BioPModeloftheDelftUniversityofTechnology
UniversityofCapetownProcess
Ultrafiltration
UpperOccoquanSewageAuthority
U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture
U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency
U.S.GeologicalSurvey
VolatileFattyAcid
VirginiaInitiativePlant
VolatileSuspendedSolids
WasteActivatedSludge
WaterEnvironmentFederation
WaterEnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionand
Conference
WaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation
WaterQualityStandards
WastewaterTreatmentPlant
xx
August2010
Acknowledgements
Theprincipleauthorsofthisdocument,titledNutrientControlDesignManual,were:
Dr.CliffordRandall,ProfessorEmeritusofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineeringatVirginiaTechand
DirectoroftheOccoquanWatershedMonitoringProgram
Dr.JamesBarnard,GlobalPracticeandTechnologyLeaderatBlack&Veatch
Dr.H.DavidStensel,ProfessorofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineeringattheUniversityofWashington
LauraDufresne,SeniorEngineer,theCadmusGroup,Inc.
EPAtechnicaldirectionandoversightwereprovidedbyDanMurray,EPAOfficeofResearchand
Development,NationalRiskManagementLaboratory.
EPAtechnicalreviewsofthedocumentwereperformedby:
EPAOfficeofResearchandDevelopment
DonaldBrown
DouglasGrosse
RichardBrenner
JamesSmith
MarcMills
JeffryYang
EdwinBarth
EPAHeadquarters
DonaldAnderson
PhilZahreddine
JamesWheeler
EPARegions
DavidPincumbe,Region1
RogerJanson,Region1
RussMartin,Region5
DaveRagsdale,Region10
Externaltechnicalreviewsofthedocumentwereperformedby
JeanetteBrown,StamfordWaterPollutionControlAuthority
TanyaSpano,MetropolitanWashingtonCouncilofGovernments(MWCOG)
S.JohKang,TetraTech
xxi
August2010
ThefollowingmembersoftheOhioWaterEnvironmentAssociation:
DaleE.Kocarek,StantecConsulting,Inc.
WilliamBarhorst,ARCADIS
DennisP.Meek,DMEngineering
KimRiddell,CityofDelphos
PaulFletcher,Jones&HenryEngineers
JasonTincu,CityofXenia
GaryHickman,CityofColumbus
RogerF.Gyger,m2tTechnologies
TedMarten,CityofTwinsburg
DavidWilson,ButlerCountyWaterandSewer
KarenHarrison,Jordan,Jones,Goulding
MaryLong,Black&Veatch
RobertHollis,SummitCounty
RickNoss,StantecConsulting
ThepingChen,AECOM
ShaunBeauchesne,HachCompany
DavidFrank,ARCADIS
ThefollowingmembersoftheWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)NutrientsChallenge
Team:
JBNeethling,HDREngineering,Inc.
MarioBenisch,HDREngineering,Inc.
AmitPramanik,WERF
Diagramsforillustrationofspecificconceptswereprovidedby:
Dr.CliffordRandall,VirginiaTech
Dr.JamesBarnard,BlackandVeatch
Dr.H.DavidStensel,UniversityofWashington
xxii
August2010
1.Introduction
Chapter1covers:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
HistoryofNutrientRemoval
PurposeandScopeofthisManual
ManualOrganization
References
1.1
HistoryofNutrientRemoval1
Biologicalnutrientremoval(BNR)atwastewatertreatmentplants(WWTP)beganintheearly
1960s.PioneerssuchasLudzackandEttinger(1961)andWuhrman(1964)madeeffortstodevelop
biologicalnitrogenremoval(nitrificationdenitrification)wastewatertreatmentsystems.Levinand
Shapiro(1965)researchedbiologicalphosphorusremoval,anddevelopedapatentedprocessforit,
knownasPhoStrip.However,thesystemsdevisedbyLudzack,Ettinger,andWuhrman,didnotutilizean
internalrecycletoobtainsignificantutilizationoftheinfluentbiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD),and
theproposedbiologicalmechanismsofthePhoStripprocessremainedcontroversialbecauseitstwo
finalstepswerethereleaseofphosphorusfromactivatedsludgeunderanaerobicconditionsandthen
chemicalprecipitationofthereleasedphosphorusinaseparatereactor.
Themajorprocessdevelopmentbreakthroughsforbiologicalremovalofbothnitrogenand
phosphorusutilizingtheinfluentBODresultedfromtheworkofJamesBarnardinSouthAfricainthe
early1970s.Hefirstdevelopedasinglesludgeprocessconfigurationwithinternalrecyclethatutilized
theinfluentBODfordenitrification(1973).Itsubsequentlybecamethestandardnitrogenremoval
processforthewastewaterindustry.ItisnowknownasthemodifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)process.
Healsodemonstratedthatanaerobicaerobicsequencingofactivatedsludge,withinfluentBODfirst
flowingintotheanaerobiczone,wasnecessarytoobtainrobustbiologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR).
Thisdiscoverywasfirstpublishedin1975.Theoreticalsupportthatthemechanismwasbiologicaland
notchemicalwassuppliedbyFuhsandChen(1975)inthesameyear.Barnarddevelopedseveral
processconfigurationsforbothseparateandcombinedbiologicalremovalofnitrogenandphosphorus.
Afourstageanoxicaerobicanoxicaerobicprocessdesignedprimarilyfornitrogenremovalwas
patentedastheBardenphoProcess(1978).Thefivestageversion,createdbyaddingananaerobiczone
asthefirststagebecameknownastheModifiedBardenphoProcess.
Alsoduringthemid1970s,ananaerobicaerobicwastewatertreatmentconfigurationwasbeing
developedintheUnitedStatesforcontroloffilamentousgrowthsinactivatedsludge.Thisprocesswas
patentedbyMarshallSpectorandacquiredbyAirProductsandChemical,Inc.Theylearnedfrom
BarnardthatanaerobicaerobicsequencingofactivatedsludgealsocouldbeusedtoaccomplishBPR
andpatentedtheconfigurationastheAnaerobicOxic(AO)process,whichwasidenticaltothePhoredox
configurationdevelopedbyBarnardinSouthAfrica.Theythencombineditwithananoxiczoneand
patentedtheresultingconfigurationastheAnaerobicAnoxicOxic(A2/O)process,againidenticaltoa
configurationdevelopedbyBarnard.Atthistime,thedetrimentalimpactsofnitraterecycleinreturn
ByDr.CliffordRandall,ProfessorEmeritus,VirginiaTech
11
August2010
activatedsludge(RAS)totheanaerobiczoneonBPRperformancewasnotfullyunderstood,andmany
ofthePhoStrip,Phoredox/A2/O,andModifiedBardenphoplantswereremovingphosphoruserratically.
TheSouthAfricanGovernmentrequestedthatProfessorGerritMaraisandhiscoworkersatthe
UniversityofCapeTowninvestigateandresolvetheissue.Theydevelopedamodificationofthe
Phoredox/A2/Oconfiguration,dubbedtheUniversityofCapeTown(UCT)process,thatfirstsentthe
RAStotheanoxiczonethenaddedasecondinternalrecycletorecycledenitrifiedmixedliquorfromthe
effluentoftheanoxiczonebacktotheinfluentoftheanaerobiczone.Basedonthesuppositionthat
denitrificationwouldoccuronlyintheanoxiczone,amodifiedversionoftheUCTprocesswas
developedforwastewaterswithahighTotalKjeldahlNitrogen(TKN)toBODratio.
BNRwasintroducedtoNorthAmericaintheearly1980sthroughimplementationofBNR
facilitiesatKelowna,BC,Canada,andatOrangeCounty,FL.BNRwasintroducedtotheChesapeakeBay
regionin1984byaseminarandaworkshoporganizedbyDr.CliffordRandall(VirginiaTech)andheldat
Richmond,VA.Then,workingwiththeHamptonRoadsSanitationDistrict(HRSD)andtheVirginiaWater
PollutionControlBoard,apilotplantstudyofahighrateUCTprocesswasconductedattheHRSD
LambertsPointprimarytreatmentplantin198586,andfollowedbyfullscaleresearchdemonstrations
oftheA/O,A2/OandUCTprocessesattheHRSDYorkRiverPlantfrom198690.OverlappingtheYork
Riverdemonstrations,whichresultedinpatentingoftheVirginiaInitiativePlant(VIP)BNRprocess,were
fullscaledemonstrationsofBNR(bothNandPremoval)attheAnneArundelCounty,MD,Maryland
CityWWTP,andtheBowie,MD,WWTP.Alsooverlappingtheseeventswerethedesignand
constructionoftheMauldinRoadWWTP,Greeneville,SC,andmodificationoftwoplantsinCharlotte,
NC.NorthAmericanBNRdevelopmentsmovedrapidlyinthelate1980sandearly1990s,resultingin
BPRandBNRimplementation,designandconstructionatsitesasdiverseastheBonnybrookWWTP,
Alberta,Canada,HillsboroughCounty,FL,Frederick,MD,Atlanta,GA,andmodificationoftheHoward
County,MD,WWTPfromthePhoStriptothePhoredox/A2/Oconfiguration.
BNRbegantobeimplementedinEuropeonawidespreadbasisin1987,firstinGermanyand
TheNetherlands,followedbyDenmark,Austria,CzechRepublic,ItalyandFrance.SchreiberKlarenlagen
withtheiruniqueSimultechProcesswhereinBPR,nitrification,anddenitrificationalloccurred
simultaneouslyinonecontinuousflowreactorwasapacesetterinGermanywhileKruger,Inc.,ledthe
wayinDenmarkundertheguidanceofProfessorPoulHarremoesandhiscoworkersattheDanish
InstituteofTechnology.
TheengineeringartofBNRhasprogressedtowardsmaturityduringthepasttwodecadeswith
theadditionofadvancedpracticessuchasprefermentationofprimarysludgetoenhanceBPR,
integrationoffixedfilmmediaintoactivatedsludge(IFAS)toenhancenitrogenremoval,utilizationof
biologicalfiltersfornitrogenremoval,andwidespreaduseoftertiaryfiltersfordentrificationand
chemicalphosphorusremovaltolowerlevels.Recenteffortstodevelopeconomicalmethodsforthe
nutrientremovalinsiteswithlimitedspaceforexpansionhaveresultedintheemergenceoftwo
innovativetechnologicalapproaches:
1) Technologiessuchasmembranebioreactorsorballastedflocculationtoremovesuspended
solidstoverylowconcentrationsandsimultaneouslyeliminateorgreatlyreducethesizeof
secondarysettlingbasins.
2) SidestreamprocessessuchasSHARON,ANAMMOX,INNITRIandotherstoeitherremove
nitrogenfromammoniarichflowsfromsludgeprocessingorenhanceremovalinthemain
streamprocess.
12
August2010

NitrogenremovalhasbeenwidelyimplementedalongtheConnecticutcoastofLongIsland
Sound.Morestringenteffluentstandards,typically3.0milligramsperliter(mg/L)totalnitrogen(TN)and
0.1orlowermg/Ltotalphosphorus(TP),inregionssuchastheChesapeakeBaywatershed,coastal
areasofNorthCarolina,OkanaganLakeareaofBritishColumbia,Canada,midColoradoandKalispell,
WY,haveadvancedtheartfromBNRtoenhancednutrientremoval(ENR).AcombinationofBNR,
chemicaladditionsandeffluentfiltrationaretypicallyusedtoaccomplishENR.
Acleartrendofthewastewatertreatmentindustryisagreateremphasisonincorporating
elementsofrecycle,recovery,andreuseintoplantdesignandoperation.Sustainablenutrientrecovery
andreuseisgainingnationalandinternationalattentionaswastewaterutilitieslookforwaysto
decreaseenergycostsandgreenhousegasemissions,utilizeexcesscapacity,generatenewrevenue,
andaddressevermorestringentregulatoryrequirements.Thisevolutioninthinkingismoving
wastewatertreatmenttoenhancedenergyefficiencyandchangingtheroleofwastewatertreatment
facilitiesfromwastegeneratorstoresourceproviders.
1.2
PurposeandScopeofthisManual
Researchandtechnologydevelopmentthroughthemid70swerethebasisforEPAsfirstdesign
manualfornitrogencontroltechnologies.Thisdocument,ProcessDesignManualforNitrogen
Control,(EPA,1975)waspublishedin1975.Thismanualcoveredabroadrangeofprocessesthatwere
beingevaluatedandappliedatthetime.Theintentofthemanualwastopresentdesigninformationfor
technologiesthatappearedtohaveaviable,practicalapplicationtonitrogencontrol.Twobroad
categoriesoftreatmentprocesseswereaddressed.Thefirstgroupofprocessesprovidesforthe
conversionoforganicandammoniumnitrogenbyoxidationtonitratenitrogen.Theseprocessesare
biologicalandaregenerallyreferredtoasnitrification.Thesecondgroupofprocessesremovesnitrogen
fromthewastewater.Theseprocessesarealsobiological,usingananoxicdenitrificationstepwith
nitrification.Physical/chemicalprocesseswerealsopresentedfornitrogenremoval,includingion
exchange,ammoniastripping,andbreakpointchlorination.Betweenthepublicationofthefirstnitrogen
controlmanualandtheupdateofthemanualin1993,thetrendinnitrogencontroltechnologywas
almostexclusivelytowardsbiologicalprocesses.Biologicalprocessesbecameprovenandwell
demonstratedandweremostefficientlyexpandedorupgradedforbiologicalnitrificationortotal
nitrogenremoval.Thefocusofthe1993updateddocument,ManualNitrogenControl,(EPA,1993)
wasonbiological/mechanicalprocessesthatwerefindingwidespreadapplicationfornitrificationand
nitrogenremoval.
In1971,EPApublisheditsfirstphosphoruscontroldesignmanual.Thismanual,ProcessDesign
ManualforPhosphorusRemoval,(EPA,1971)focusedonphosphorusremovalmethodsthatinvolve
chemicalprecipitation.Primarily,themanualfocusedonthechemicalprecipitationofphosphorususing
saltsofaluminumandiron,andlime.Thechemicalapplicationpointsaddressedinthemanualwere
beforeprimarysettling,intheaerationtanks,beforefinalsettling,orinatertiaryprocess.In1976,
ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval(EPA,1976)wasupdated.Specifically,design
guidanceforphosphorusremovalusingmineraladditionandlimeadditionbeforeprimarysettlingwas
revised.Also,guidanceforchemicalstorage,chemicalfeedsystemsandresidualshandlinganddisposal
wasupdated.In1987,EPApublishedtwotechnicaldocumentsthataddressedphosphoruscontrol.The
firstwasanupdatetothe1976ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval(EPA,1987a).The
secondwasahandbooktitled,HandbookRetrofittingPOTWsforPhosphorusRemovalinthe
ChesapeakeBayDrainageBasin.(EPA,1987b)Theupdateofthedesignmanualincludedamajor
13
August2010
additionofguidanceforbiologicalphosphorusremoval.Also,theuseoflimeadditionwasnotcovered
inthisupdateduetoitslossofpopularityinthe80s.Thetechnicalguidanceprovidedinthe1987
handbookwasfocusedontheuniquephosphorusremovalrequirementsbeingappliedtomunicipal
wastewatertreatmentplantsintheChesapeakeBaywatershed.Becauseofthevaryinglevelsof
phosphoruscontrolwithinthewatershed,thehandbookincludedanassessmentoftechnologiesfor
meetingtotalphosphoruseffluentlimitsof0.2mg/L,0.5mg/L,1mg/L,and2mg/L.Becausesome
treatmentplantsintheChesapeakeBaywatershedneedtocontrolbothnitrogenandphosphorus,the
handbookincludedachaptertitled,CompatibilityofChemicalandBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalwith
NitrogenControl.
In2007,EPAinitiatedtheprocesstodevelopupdateddesignguidanceforbothnitrogenand
phosphorusremovalatmunicipalWWTPs.Thefirststepwasanextensive,stateofthetechnology
reviewofnitrogenandphosphoruscontroltechnologiesandtechniquescurrentlyappliedandemerging
atmunicipalwastewatertreatmentplants.Thistechnologyreviewculminatedwiththepublicationof
theNutrientControlDesignManual:StateoftheTechnologyReviewReport(USEPA2009)asan
interimdocumentinthedevelopmentoftheupdateddesignmanuals.
ThepurposeofthisEPAdesignmanualistoprovideupdated,stateofthetechnologydesign
guidanceonnitrogenandphosphoruscontrolatmunicipalWWTPstowastewaterutilityownersand
operators,stateandEPApermitwriters,andenvironmentalengineeringprofessionals.Similarto
previousEPAmanuals,thismanualincludesextensiveinformationontheprinciplesofbiological
nutrientremovalandchemicalphosphorusremovaltoserveasthebasisfordesign.Adetailed
descriptionoftechnologies,bothconventionalandemerging,servesasaresourceforpreliminary
technologyselection.Themanualpresentsnewinformationonemergingissuesintheindustrysuchas
sustainabilityinwastewatertreatmentdesignandoperation,nutrientrecoveryandreuse,effluent
dissolvedorganicnitrogen,andmeasurementoflowphosphorusconcentrations.Althoughthismanual
providessomeexamplesofproprietaryandemergingtechnologies,EPArecognizesthattheindustryis
continuallyevolvingandthatnewtechnologiesnotidentifiedinthismanualmayemergeinthefuture.
BecausethemajorityofWWTPsintheUnitedStatesareequippedwithsecondarybiological
treatment,thefocusofthisdesignmanualisonprocessandtechnologymodifications/additionsfor
nutrientremovalatexistingWWTPsratherthanonnewtreatmentplantdesign,althoughguidancefor
greenfielddesignispresented.Alsonewfrompreviousversions,designguidancehereinisbasedonthe
useofmathematicalmodelsandsimulators.Simulatorsallowdesignerstostudykineticaswellastime
basedsolutionswhiledeterminingthetotalmassbalancesofmanyconstituents.Theyhavebecome
increasinglypowerful,easytouse,widelyaccepted,andrecommendedbyWEFandASCE(2010)forthe
designofbiologicalnutrientremovalfacilities.EarlierversionsofEPAnutrientcontrolmanuals(USEPA
1993;USEPA1987a;USEPA1987b)stillcontainveryusefulguidance(includingexamples)onprocess
designusinghandcalculationsthatcanbeusedforverypreliminarysizingorchecksonsimulation
results.
Thismanualcomplimentsdetailedcostdataandindepthfacilitycasestudiespublishedinthe
MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument(USEPA2008a)andanalysisofemerging
technologiesfornutrientremovalpresentedintheEmergingTechnologiesReportonWastewater
Treatment(USEPA2008b).BothdocumentsareavailablefordownloadfromEPAswebsiteat
http://www.epa.gov/OWM/mtb/publications.htm
14
August2010
1.3
ManualOrganization
Thisdesignmanualhas14chaptersand3appendices.Itisgenerallyorganizedwiththetheory
ofnutrientremovalpresentedfirstfollowedbyadescriptionofnutrientremovaltechnologies;guidance
onestablishingdesignobjectivesandselectingcandidatetreatmentprocesses;anddesignapproaches
forchemicalphosphorusremoval,biologicalnutrientremoval,andeffluentfiltration.Laterchapters
describeoperationalimprovementsforenhancingtechnologyperformanceandguidanceon
instrumentationandcontrols.Thelastchapter,Chapter14,discussessustainablerecoveryandreuse.A
moredetaileddescriptionofeachchapterisprovidedbelow.
Chapter2.NeedforandBenefitsofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalprovidesbackground
informationonsourcesofnitrogenandphosphorusinwastewater.Itreviewsthestatusof
wastewatertreatmentintheU.S.,theimpairmentofwaterwaysbyexcessivenutrients,
governmentandindustryinitiativestoreducenutrientpollution,andtheadditionalbenefitsand
challengesofnutrientremoval.
Chapter3.PrinciplesofPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAdditiondescribestheavailable
formsofmetalsaltsandlimeandtheirreactionswithphosphorus.Itprovidesageneral
descriptionofsolidsseparationprocessandtheeffectsofvarioustreatmentoptionsonsludge
productionandhandling.
Chapter4.PrinciplesofBiologicalNitrogenRemovalexaminesthefundamentalmicrobiology
behindnitrificationanddenitrificationincludingstoichiometricsandkinetics.Itdiscusses
denitrificationkineticswithinternalandexternalcarbonsources.Simultaneousnitrification
denitrificationandpotentialimpactsonsludgehandlingarealsodiscussed.
Chapter5.PrinciplesofBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalprovidesadetaileddiscussionofthe
biologicalphosphorusremovalprocessincludingkinetics,substraterequirements,
environmentalconditions,designandoperationalconsiderations,andimpactsonsludge
processingandhandling.
Chapter6.OverviewofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologiesdescribesthe
technologiesavailableforremovingnitrogen,phosphorus,orbothfromwastewater.Diagrams
areprovidedformosttechnologies.Itpresentsinformationontechnologyperformance
includingdesignandoperationalfactorsaffectingaplantsabilitytoachieveloweffluent
concentrations.
Chapter7.EstablishingDesignObjectivessummarizesthiscriticalstepinupgradingor
retrofittinganexistingWWTP.Itprovidesguidanceonestablishingdesignflowrates,
characterizingflowandcontaminantsininfluentwastewaterincludingdetailedsampling
methodologiesanddataverificationsteps,andsettinggoalsforprocessreliability,sustainability,
andflexibility.Thechapteralsodescribessolidshandlingoptionsandsiteconstraints.
Chapter8.SelectingCandidateTreatmentProcessesforPlantUpgradesdescribestechnology
selectionfactorsincludingtreatmentgoals,availablefootprint,hydraulicconsiderations,
chemicalneeds,solidsprocessingcapabilities,andenergyconsiderations.Itsummarizes
advantagesanddisadvantagesofdifferenttechnologytypes.Italsoprovidesanoverviewofa
recommendedapproachtotechnologyselectionanddiscussesuseofadvancedtools.
15
August2010
Chapter9.DesignApproachforPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAdditionprovidesguidelines
onselectingachemicalprecipitant,choosingapplicationpoints,anddeterminingchemicaldose.
Itprovidesdetailedguidanceondesigningachemicalfeedsystemandconsiderationsforrapid
mix,flocculation,andsolidsseparationprocessestomaximizephosphorusremoval.
Chapter10.DesignApproachforBiologicalNutrientRemovalpresentsastepbystepapproach
fordesigningwastewatertreatmentupgradesfornutrientremovalusingmathematicalmodels.
Itprovidespracticalrecommendationsfordatacollectionandevaluationandmodelcalibration.
Itincludesdesignchecksfornitrogenandphosphorusremoval.Thischapteralsoprovidesan
alternativedesignapproachusinghandorspreadsheetcalculationsthatdesignerscanuseto
prepareroughestimatesand/ortocheckmodeloutputs.
Chapter11.DesignApproachforEffluentFiltrationdiscussestheoptionsinfiltration
technologyforeffluentpolishingandnutrientremoval.Itprovidesdesignguidanceongranular
mediafiltersandalternativetechnologiessuchasclothfilters,diskfilters,andmembranes.
Informationonemergingfiltrationtechnologiesforremovalofphosphorustoloweffluent
concentrationsisalsoprovided.
Chapter12.OperationandOptimizationtoEnhanceNutrientRemovalincludesinformationon
howtooptimizetheperformanceofexistingoperationsbyincorporatingSCADAandother
instrumentation.Thechapteralsodiscussescommonoperationalchangestoimprovesystem
performanceandenhancethecosteffectivenessoftreatmentprocesses.
Chapter13.InstrumentationandControlsdiscussesonlineinstrumentationfornutrientcontrol
includingautomatedcontrolandoptimization,advancedautomatedcontrol,andSCADA
equipment,allofwhichcanleadtobetterprocessoptimizationandmorestabletechnology
performance.
Chapter14.SustainableNutrientRecoveryandReuseexaminesthelatestadvancesinnutrient
recoveryincludingseparatingandtreatingwasteonsiteandhowtousewastewatertreatment
byproductstodecreaseenergycostsandgreenhousegasemissions,takeadvantageofexcess
capacity,andgeneratenewrevenue.
The manual is supported by three technical appendices containing recommendations on

methanolsafety(AppendixA),alistoforganiccompoundsandinhibitoryconcentrationstonitrification
(Appendix B), and background information on mathematical models for biological nutrient removal
(AppendixC).
1.4
References
Barnard,J.L.1973.BiologicalDenitrification.JournalofWaterPollutionControl72(6):705720.
Barnard,J.L.1975.NutrientRemovalinBiologicalSystems.JournalofWaterPollutionControl,143154.
Barnard,J.L.1978.TheBardenphoProcess.In:AdvancesinWaterandWastewaterTreatmentBiological
NutrientRemoval.M.P.WanielistaandW.W.Eckenfelder,Jr.(eds.),AnnArborScience,AnnArbor,MI.
16
August2010
Fuhs,G.W.andM.Chen.1975.MicrobiologicalBasisofPhosphateRemovalintheActivatedSludge
ProcessfortheTreatmentofWastewater.MicrobialEcology.2(2):11938
Levin,G.V.andJ.Shapiro.1965.MetabolicUptakeofPhosphorusbyWastewaterOrganisms.Journalof
theWaterPollutionControlFederation(JWPCF),37(6):800821.
Ludzack,F.J.,andM.B.Ettinger.1961.ControllingOperationtoMinimizeActivatedSludgeEffluent
Nitrogen.JournaloftheWaterPollutionControlFederation(JWPCF),34(9):920931,1961
Wuhrman,K.1964.NitrogenRemovalinSewageTreatmentProcesses.Verhandlungenden
InternationalenVereinLimnologie,15:580596,1964.
USEPA.1971.ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval.October1971.
USEPA.1975.ProcessDesignManualforNitrogenControl.October1975.
USEPA.1976.ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval.EPA/625/176001a,April1976.
USEPA.1987a.DesignManualPhosphorusRemoval.EPA/625/187/001,September1987.
USEPA.1987b.HandbookRetrofittingPOTWsforPhosphorusRemovalintheChesapeakeBayDrainage
Basin.EPA/625/687/017,September1987.
USEPA.1993.ManualNitrogenControl.EPA/625/R93/010,September1993.
USEPAb.2008a.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.OfficeofWastewater
Management,MunicipalSupportDivision.EPA832R08006.Availableonline:
USEPA.2008b.EmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeather
Management.EPA832R06006.Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/OW
OWM.html/mtb/emerging_technologies.pdf
USEPA.2009.NutrientControlDesignManual:StateofTechnologyReviewReport.OfficeofResearch
andDevelopment.EPA/600/R09/012.January2009.Availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r09012/600r09012.pdf#22
17
August2010
Thispageleftintentionallyblank
18
August2010
2.NeedforandBenefitsofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemoval
Chapter2covers:
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.10
Introduction
SourcesofNitrogenandPhosphorusinWastewater
StatusofWastewaterTreatmentintheUnitedStates
NutrientImpairmentofU.S.Waterways
ClimateChangeImpacts
FederalandStateRegulationsandInitiativestoReduceNutrient
Pollution
IndustryInitiativestheWERFRemovalChallenge
BenefitsofNutrientRemoval
ChallengesofNutrientRemoval
References
2.1
Introduction
Theharmfuleffectsofeutrophicationduetoexcessivenitrogenandphosphorusconcentrations
intheaquaticenvironmenthavebeenwelldocumented.Algaeandphytoplanktongrowthcanbe
acceleratedbyhigherconcentrationsofnutrients,leadingtoharmfulalgalblooms,hypoxia,andlossof
submergedaquaticvegetation(SAV).Dependingonthespecificwaterbodycharacteristics,either
nitrogenorphosphoruscanbelimiting(i.e.,presentinthesmallestamountcomparedtogrowth
requirements).Inadditiontostimulatingeutrophication,nitrogenintheformofammoniacanexerta
directdemandondissolvedoxygen(DO)andcanbetoxictoaquaticlife.Evenifawastewater
treatmentplant(WWTP)convertsammoniatonitratebyabiologicalnitrificationprocess,theresultant
nitratecanstimulatealgaeandphytoplanktongrowth.
Fromapublichealthperspective,eutrophicationmayalsocauseriskstohumanhealth,resulting
fromconsumptionofshellfishcontaminatedwithalgaltoxinsordirectexposuretowaterbornetoxins.
Eutrophication,inparticular,cancreateproblemsifthewaterisusedasasourceofdrinkingwater.
Chemicalsusedtodisinfectdrinkingwaterwillreactwithorganiccompoundsinthesourcewaterto
formdisinfectionbyproducts,whicharepotentialcarcinogensandareregulatedbytheUSEPA.Excess
levelsofnitratesabovethemaximumcontaminantlevel(MCL)indrinkingwater(10ppm)cancause
numerousnegativehealtheffectsduetothebodysconversionofnitratetonitrite,includingserious
illnessandsometimesdeath.Infantsinparticulararesusceptibletotheseeffects,whichcaninterfere
withtheoxygencarryingcapacityoftheblood.Thisinterferencecanleadtoanacuteconditioninwhich
healthdeterioratesrapidlyoveraperiodofdays.Symptomsincludeshortnessofbreathandbluenessof
theskin(methemoglobinemia;alsoknownasBluebabySyndrome).
Forthesereasons,itisimportanttolimitnitrogenandphosphoruscontaminationofsurfaceand
groundwater.Onewaytominimizethiscontaminationistoreducelevelsofnitrogenandphosphorus
inwastewatertreatmentplanteffluent.Thischapterwilldiscussthevarioussourcesofthese
21
August2010

contaminants,theimpactstheyhaveintheenvironment,initiativesthatarebeingtakentoreducethese
pollutants,andthebenefitsthatcanberealizedbytheseefforts.
2.2
SourcesofNitrogenandPhosphorusinWastewater
Thissectionprovidesanoverviewofthesourcesofnitrogenandphosphorusinwastewater.
2.2.1 Nitrogen
Nitrogenisanessentialnutrientforplantsandanimals.Approximately80percentoftheEarths
atmosphereiscomposedofnitrogen,anditisakeyelementofproteinsandcells.Themajor
contributorsofnitrogentowastewaterarehumanactivitiessuchasfoodpreparation,showering,and
wasteexcretion.Thepercapitacontributionofnitrogenindomesticwastewaterisaboutonefifthof
thatforbiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD).Totalnitrogenindomesticwastewatertypicallyranges
from20to70mg/Lforlowtohighstrengthwastewater(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Factorsaffecting
concentrationincludetheextentofinfiltrationandthepresenceofindustries.Influentconcentration
variesduringthedayandcanvarysignificantlyduringrainfallevents,asaresultofinflowandinfiltration
tothecollectionsystem.
Themostcommonformsofnitrogeninwastewaterare:
Ammonia(NH3)
Ammoniumion(NH4+)
Nitrite(NO2)
Nitrate(NO3)
Organicnitrogen
TotalKjeldahlNitrogen(TKN)isacommonnitrogenmeasurementparameter.Thismeasurement
combinesammoniumandorganicnitrogen,i.e.reducedformsofnitrogen.Italsoistypicallyequalto
thetotalnitrogen(TN)inwastewatersinfluenttosewagetreatmentplantsbecauseconditionsinsewers
usuallyresultinthereductionofalloxidizedformsofnitrogen.However,thisisnottrueinsome
collectionsystems,notablythoseinsteepterrainswheresheetflowmaydominateflowinthesewers,
resultinginaerationofthesewageandtheformationofnitratesduringflow.Theoxidizedformsof
nitrogenmustbemeasuredinadditiontoTKNtodetermineinfluentTNforsuchcollectionsystems.
Nitrogenindomesticwastewaterconsistsofapproximately60to70percentammonianitrogen
and30to40percentorganicnitrogen(Tchobanoglousetal.2003;CritesandTchobanoglous1998).
Mostoftheammonianitrogenisderivedfromurea,whichbreaksdownrapidlytoammoniain
wastewaterinfluent.
WWTPsdesignedfornitrificationanddenitrificationcanremove80to95percentofinorganic
nitrogen,buttheremovaloforganicnitrogenistypicallymuchlessefficient(PehlivanogluMantasand
Sedlak,2006).Domesticwastewaterorganicnitrogenmaybepresentinparticulate,colloidal,or
dissolvedformsandconsistofproteins,aminoacids,aliphaticNcompounds,refractorynatural
compoundsindrinkingwater(e.g.,humicsubstances),orsyntheticcompounds(e.g.,ethylenediamine
tetraaceticacid(EDTA)andtextiledyes).Organicnitrogenmaybereleasedinsecondarytreatmentby
microorganismseitherthroughmetabolismorupondeathandlysis.Somenitrogenmaybecontainedin
22
August2010

recondensationproducts.Hydrolysisofparticulateandcolloidalmaterialbymicroorganismsreleases
someorganicnitrogenasdissolved,biodegradablecompounds.Aminoacidsarereadilydegraded
duringsecondarybiologicaltreatment,with90to98percentremovalinactivatedsludgesystemsand
76to96percentremovalintricklingfilters.However,otherformsoforganicnitrogenmaybemore
persistentinwastewatertreatmentprocesses.
Theimportanceoftheorganicnitrogenfractionhasincreasedaseffluentlimitsonnitrogen
havebecomemorestringent.Withmoreimpairedwaterwaysfromnutrientloads,effluentlimitsfor
totalnitrogen(TN)concentrationsof3.0mg/Lorlessarebecomingmorecommon.Thedissolved
organicnitrogen(DON)concentrationintheeffluentfrombiologicalnutrientremoval(BNR)treatment
facilitieswasfoundtorangefrom0.50to1.50mg/Lin80percentof188plantsreportedbyPagilla
(STACWERF2007),andvaluesashighas2.5mg/Lwereobserved.Thus,forsystemswithouteffluent
filtrationormembranebioreactors(MBRs)thataretryingtomeetaTNtreatmentgoalof3.0mg/L,the
effluentDONcontributioncaneasilybe20to50percentofthetotaleffluentnitrogenconcentration,
comparedtoonlyabout10percentforconventionaltreatment(PehlivanogluMantasandSedlak2004).
SeeChapter4ofthismanualforadditionaldiscussionofeffluentDONanditsimplicationsfornutrient
removal.
2.2.2 Phosphorus
Totalphosphorus(TP)indomesticwastewatertypicallyrangesbetween4and8mg/Lbutcanbe
higherdependingonindustrialsources,waterconservation,orwhetheradetergentbanisinplace.
Sourcesofphosphorusarevaried.Somephosphorusispresentinallbiologicalmaterial,asitisan
essentialnutrientandpartofacellsenergycycle.Phosphorusisusedinfertilizers,detergents,and
cleaningagentsandispresentinhumanandanimalwaste.
Phosphorusinwastewaterisinoneofthreeforms:
Phosphate(alsocalledOrthophosphate)
Polyphosphate
Organicphosphorus
Theorthophosphatefractionissolubleandcanbeinoneofseveralforms(e.g.,phosphoricacid,
phosphateion)dependingonthesolutionpH.Polyphosphatesarehighenergy,condensedphosphates
suchaspyrophosphateandtrimetaphosphate.Theyarealsosolublebutwillnotbeprecipitatedoutof
wastewaterbymetalsaltsorlime.Theycanbeconvertedtophosphatethroughhydrolysiswhichis
verysloworbybiologicalactivity.
Organicphosphoruscanbesoluble,colloidalorparticulate,i.e.settleable.Itcanalsobedivided
intobiodegradableandnonbiodegradablefractions.Particulateandcolloidalorganicphosphorusis
generallysettledorprecipitatedoutandremovedwiththesludge.Solubleorganicbiodegradable
phosphoruscanbehydrolyzedintoorthophosphateduringthetreatmentprocess.Solubleorganicnon
biodegradablephosphoruswillpassthroughaWWTP.AssuminganinfluentTPof68mg/L,atypical
wastewaterwillcontain3to4mg/Lphosphorusasphosphate,2to3mg/Laspolyphosphate,and1
mg/Lasorganicallyboundphosphorus(WEFandASCE2006).
23
August2010
2.3
StatusofWastewaterTreatmentintheUnitedStates
The1972AmendmentstotheFederalWaterPollutionControlAct(FWPCA)(PublicLaw92500),
alsoknownastheCleanWaterAct(CWA),establishedthefoundationforwastewaterdischargecontrol
intheUnitedStates.TheCWAsprimaryobjectiveistorestoreandmaintainthechemical,physical,
andbiologicalintegrityoftheNationswaters.TheCWAestablishedaprogramtoensurecleanwater
byrequiringpermitsthatlimittheamountofpollutantsdischargedbyallmunicipalandindustrial
dischargersintoreceivingwaters.DischargesareregulatedundertheNationalPollutantDischarge
EliminationSystem(NPDES)permitprogram.Asof2004,therewere16,583municipalwastewater
treatmentplants[alsoknownasPubliclyOwnedTreatmentWorks(POTWs)]regulatedundertheCWA,
servingapproximately75percentofthenationspopulation(U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPA2008)
withtheremainingpopulationservedbysepticorotherdecentralized(cluster)systems.
Wastewatertreatmenthasgenerallybeendefinedascontainingoneormoreofthefollowing
fourprocesses:(1)preliminary,(2)primary,(3)secondary,and(4)advanced(ortertiary)treatment.
Preliminarytreatmentconsistsofgritremoval,whichremovesdenseinertparticles,andscreeningto
removeragsandotherlargedebris.Primarytreatmentinvolvesgravitysettlingtankstoremove
settleablesolids,includingsettleableorganicsolids.Theperformanceofprimarysettlingtankscanbe
enhancedbyaddingchemicalstocaptureandflocculatesmallersolidparticlesfortheprecipitationand
removalofphosphorus.Secondarytreatmentfollowsprimarytreatmentinmostplantsandemploys
biologicalprocessestoremovecolloidalandsolubleorganicmatter.Effluentdisinfectionisusually
includedinthedefinitionofsecondarytreatment.
EPAclassifiesadvancedtreatmentasaleveloftreatmentthatismorestringentthansecondary
orproducesasignificantreductioninconventional,nonconventional,ortoxicpollutantspresentinthe
wastewater(U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPA2008).Othertechnicalreferencessubdivide
advancedtreatment,usingthetermssecondarywithnutrientremovalwhennitrogen,phosphorus,or
bothareremovedandtertiaryremovaltorefertoadditionalreductioninsolidsbyfiltersor
microfilters(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Effluentfiltrationandnutrientremovalarethemostcommon
advancedtreatmentprocesses.
TheCWArequiresthatallmunicipalWWTPdischargesmeetaminimumofsecondary
treatment.Basedondatafromthe2004CleanWatershedsNeedsSurvey,16,543municipalWWTPs
(99.8percentofplantsinthecountry)meettheminimumsecondarywastewatertreatment
requirements.Ofthosethatprovideatleastsecondarytreatment,approximately44percent(7,322
plants)providesomekindofadvancedtreatment(U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPA2008).Figure2
1showshowsecondaryandadvancedwastewatertreatmenthasbeenimplementedsince1940and
alsoprovidesprojectedtreatmentfor2024.NotethatNoDischargereferstosystemsthatdonot
dischargetreatedwastewatertothenationswaterwaysbutinsteaddisposeofwastewaterviamethods
suchasindustrialreuse,irrigation,orevaporation.
24
August2010
Percent of Total U.S. Population

Receiving Wastewater Treatment
100.0%
No Discharge
Advanced
Secondary
Less Than Secondary
Raw
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
0.0%
1940
1950
1962
1968 1972
1978 1982
1988 1992 1996 2000 2004
Projected
Year
Figure21.PopulationservedbyPOTWsnationwideforselectyearsbetween1940and2004andprojectedto2024(ifallneeds
aremet),organizedbywastewatertreatmenttype.Source:U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPACleanWatershedsNeeds
Surveys2004ReporttoCongress(U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPA2008).
2.4
NutrientImpairmentofU.S.Waterways
Accordingtothe2007reportEffectsofNutrientEnrichmentintheNationsEstuaries:ADecade
ofChange,increasednutrientloadingspromoteaprogressionofsymptomsthatbeginwithexcessive
growthofphytoplanktonandmacroalgaeandadvancetothepointwheregrazerscannotcontrol
growth(Brickeretal.,2007).Thesebloomsmaybeproblematic,potentiallylastingformonthsatatime
andblockingsunlighttolightdependentSAV.Inadditiontoincreasedgrowth,changesinnaturally
occurringratiosofnutrientsmayalsoaffectwhichspeciesdominate,potentiallyleadingto
nuisance/toxicalgalblooms.Thesebloomsmayalsoleadtoother,moreserioussymptomsthataffect
biota,suchaslowDOandlossofSAV.Oncewatercolumnnutrientshavebeendepletedby
phytoplanktonandmacroalgaeandthesebloomsdie,thebacteriadecomposingthealgaethen
consumeoxygen,makingitlessavailabletosurroundingaerobicaquaticlife.Consequently,fishand
invertebratekillsmayoccurduetohypoxiaandanoxia(conditionsoflowtonoDO).
Fourexamplesofimpairedlargewaterbodiesimpactedbynutrientloadingsaredescribed
below.Therearemorethan80additionalestuariesandbays,andthousandsofrivers,streams,and
lakesthatarealsoimpactedbynutrientsintheUnitedStates.Infact,allbutonestateandtwo
territorieshaveCWAsection303(d)listed1waterbodyimpairmentsfornutrientpollution.Collectively,
stateshavelistedover10,000nutrientandnutrientrelatedimpairments.
2.4.1 NorthernGulfofMexico
Advancedeutrophicconditionscanleadtodeadzoneswithlimitedaquaticlife,which
describesthehypoxiaconditionthatexistsintheNorthernGulfofMexico.ArecentU.S.Geological
Survey(USGS)reporttitledDifferencesinPhosphorusandNitrogenDeliverytotheGulfofMexicofrom
RequiredbySection303(d)oftheCWA,the303(d)listisalistofstateswaterbodiesthatdonotmeetorarenot
expectedtomeetapplicableWaterQualityStandardswithtechnologybasedcontrolsalone.
25
August2010

theMississippiRiverBasindocumentsthecontributionofnitrogenandphosphorusfromagricultural
andnonagriculturalsourcesintheMississippiRiverbasin(Alexanderetal.2008).OnJune16,2008,the
jointfederalstateMississippiRiver/GulfofMexicoWatershedNutrientTaskForcereleasedits2008
ActionPlanforReducing,Mitigating,andControllingHypoxiaintheNorthernGulfofMexicoand
ImprovingWaterQualityintheMississippiRiverBasin,whichbuildsuponits2001planbyincorporating
emergingissues,innovativeapproaches,andthelatestscience,includingfindingsfromEPAsScience
AdvisoryBoard.ImprovementsincludemoreaccountabilitythroughanAnnualOperatingPlan,better
trackingofprogress,stateandfederalnutrientreductionstrategies,andaplantoincreaseawarenessof
theproblemandimplementationofsolutions(USEPA2008c).
2.4.2 ChesapeakeBay
NutrientpollutionhascausedsignificantproblemsintheChesapeakeBay.Elevatedlevelsof
bothnitrogenandphosphorusarethemaincausesofpoorwaterqualityandlossofaquatichabitatsin
theBay.Significantalgaebloomsonthewatersurfaceblockthesunsraysfromreachingunderwater
baygrasses.Withoutsunlight,baygrassescannotgrowandprovidecriticalfoodandhabitatforblue
crabs,waterfowl,andjuvenilefish.Createdin1983,theChesapeakeBayProgram(CBP)isa
comprehensivecooperativeeffortbyfederal,state,andlocalgovernments;nongovernmental
organizations;academics;andotherentitiesthatsharethemissionofrestoringandprotectingthe
ChesapeakeBayanditswatershed.TheCBPestimatesthat22percentofthephosphorusloadingand19
percentofthenitrogenloadingintheBaycomesfrommunicipalandindustrialwastewaterfacilities
(ChesapeakeBayProgram,2008).
ToaddresstheneedtodecreasethesepollutantsandrestorethehealthoftheBay,theUSEPA
ChesapeakeBayOffice(CBO),alongwithitspartners,developedtheChesapeakeActionPlan(CAP),
whichincludedgoalsfortheyear2000.TheCAPprovidedastrategicframeworkthatunifiedCBPs
existingplanningdocumentsandclarifiedhowCBPpartnerswouldpursuetherestorationand
protectiongoalsfortheBayanditswatershed;createdanactivityintegrationplanwithcomprehensive,
qualityassureddatafor2007thatidentifiesandcatalogsCBPpartnersimplementationactivitiesand
correspondingresources;andprovidedhighlevelsummariesofkeyinformation,suchasclearstatusof
progress,expectedprogresstowardcertainChesapeake2000goals,summariesofactionsandfunding,
andabriefsummaryofthechallengesandactionsneededtoexpediteprogress.Asummaryofthe
progresstodatecanbefoundinaJuly2008ReporttoCongress:StrengtheningtheManagement,
Coordination,andAccountabilityoftheChesapeakeBayProgram.Todate,uniformwaterquality
standardshavebeenadoptedacrosstheBay,anaggressivepermittingapproachforWWTPshasbeen
established,themostcosteffectiveagriculturalbestmanagementpractices(BMPs)havebeen
implemented,andforestsandwetlandssurroundingtheBayhavebeenrestored.
2.4.3 GreatLakes
TheGreatLakeswerethefirstbodiesofwatertoattractnationalattentiontotheproblemof
nutrientcausedeutrophication.Inthe1960s,LakeEriewasdeclareddeadwhenexcessivenutrients
intheLakestimulatedexcessivealgaebloomsthatcoveredbeachesandkilledoffnativeaquaticspecies
asaresultofoxygendepletion.Atthattime,phosphoruswastheprimarynutrientofconcerndueto
theuseofphosphatedetergentsandinorganicfertilizers.Algalassaysshowedthatphosphoruswasthe
limitingnutrientintheLakes,whichistypicalforfreshwaterbodies.Thus,thefocuswasonthecontrol
ofphosphorus.WiththeenactmentoftheCWAandtheGreatLakesWaterQualityAgreementin1972,
26
August2010

aconcertedeffortwasundertakentoreducepollutantloadings,particularlyphosphorus,totheLake.
AlthoughthehealthoftheLakeimproveddramatically,inrecentyears,therehasbeenrenewed
attentiontothereemergenceofadeadzoneinLakeErie,againduetonutrientloadings.Recent
studiesbyscientistsandtheNationalOceanicandAtmosphericAdministration(NOAA)havealso
hypothesizedarelationshipbetweenexcessivenutrientsintheLakeandthepresenceoftwoaquatic
invasivespeciesthezebramusselandthequaggamussel(Vanderploegetal.2002).
2.4.4 LongIslandSound
DevelopmentandpopulationincreasesintheLongIslandSoundWatershedhaveresultedina
significantincreaseinnitrogenloading,thecurrentlimitingnutrienttotheSound.Theincreased
nitrogenloadshavestimulatedplantgrowth,increasedtheamountoforganicmattersettlingtothe
benthiczone,loweredDOlevels,andchangedhabitats.TheprimaryconcernsintheSoundinclude
hypoxia,thelossofseagrass,andalterationsinthefoodweb.Managementeffortsarecurrently
underwaytoreducenitrogenpollutionbymorethanhalfwithafocusontwoareas:(1)upgrading
WWTPswithnewtechnologiesand(2)removingnitrogenbyreducingpollutedrunoffthroughBMPson
farmsandsuburbanareas(LongIslandSoundStudy2004).Theemphasishasbeenprimarilyonreducing
nitrogendischarges,butinrecentyearsphosphoruslimitationshavebeenplacedonupstreamWWTPs
dischargingtoriversthatdischargeintotheSound.
2.5
ClimateChangeImpacts
Climatechangemayalsobeasignificantinfluenceonthedevelopmentoffutureeutrophic
symptoms.AccordingtothereportEffectsofNutrientEnrichmentintheNationsEstuaries:ADecadeof
Change,thefactorsassociatedwithclimatechangethatareexpectedtohavethegreatestimpactson
coastaleutrophicationare:
Increasedtemperatures
Sealevelrise
Changesinprecipitationandfreshwaterrunoff
Increasedtemperatureswillhaveseveraleffectsoncoastaleutrophication.Mostcoastalspecies
areadaptedtoaspecificrangeoftemperatures.Increasesinwatertemperaturesmayleadtoexpanded
rangesofundesirablespecies.Highertemperaturesmayalsoleadtoincreasedalgalgrowthandlonger
growingseasons,potentiallyincreasingproblemsassociatedwithexcessivealgalgrowthand
nuisance/toxicblooms.Additionally,warmerwatersholdlessDO,thereforepotentiallyexacerbating
hypoxia.Temperaturerelatedstratificationofthewatercolumnmayalsoworsen,havingafurther
negativeeffectonDOlevels.
Climatechangemodelspredictincreasedmeltingofpolaricecapsandchangesinprecipitation
patterns,leadingtosealevelriseandchangesinwaterbalanceandcirculationpatternsincoastal
systems.Sealevelrisewillgraduallyinundatecoastallands,causingincreasederosionandsediment
deliverytowaterbodies,andpotentiallyfloodingwetlands.Theincreasedsedimentloadand
subsequentturbidityincreasemaycauseSAVloss.Aserosionincreases,sedimentassociatednutrients
alsoincrease,stimulatingalgalgrowth.Thispositivefeedbackbetweenincreasederosionandalgal
growthmayalsoincreaseturbidity.Thelossofwetlands,whichactasnutrientsinks,willfurther
increasenutrientdeliverytoestuaries.Incontrast,anincreaseinfreshwaterinflowmayreduce
27
August2010

residencetimeofpollutants,reducingtheprobabilityofbloomsinsomesystems.Inregionsof
engineeredwaterflow(e.g.,SouthAtlanticandGulfofMexico),theimpactsofchangesintheamountof
runoffwilldependonhowwatermanagementstrategiescontrolregionalhydrology.
AnotherreporttitledAquaticEcosystemsandGlobalClimateChangePotentialImpactson
InlandFreshwaterandCoastalWetlandEcosystemsintheUnitedStatesnotesthatclimatechangeofthe
magnitudeprojectedfortheUnitedStatesoverthenext100yearswillcausesignificantchangesto
temperatureregimesandprecipitationpatternsacrossthenation(Poffetal.2002).Suchalterationsin
climateposeseriousrisksforinlandfreshwaterecosystems(lakes,streams,rivers,wetlands)andcoastal
wetlands,andmayadverselyaffectnumerouscriticalservicesprovidedtohumanpopulations.
2.6
FederalandStateRegulationsandInitiativestoReduceNutrientPollution
ThissectiondescribesthefollowingFederalandstateregulationsandinitiativestoreduce
nutrientpollution:
WaterQualityStandards(WQSs)
TotalMaximumDailyLoads(TMDLs)
NationalPollutionDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)Permitting
Waterqualitytrading
Technologyevaluationsandguidance
Inadditiontotheseefforts,stateandEPAsurfacewateranddrinkingwaterprogrammanagersformed
anadhocNutrientInnovationsTaskGroupinOctober2008toidentifyandframekeynutrientissues,
questions,andoptionsonhowtoimproveandacceleratenutrientpollutionpreventionandreduction
atthestateandnationallevel(StateEPANutrientInnovationsTaskGroup,2009).Theirfinalreportis
availableonlineathttp://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/.
2.6.1 WaterQualityStandards
Waterqualitystandards(WQS)arethefoundationofthewaterqualitybasedpollutioncontrol
programmandatedbytheCWA.WQSdefinethegoalsforawaterbodybydesignatingitsuses,setting
criteriatoprotectthoseuses,andestablishingprovisionstoprotectwaterbodiesfrompollutants.The
WQSregulationrequiresthatstatesandauthorizedIndiantribesspecifyappropriatewaterusestobe
achievedandprotected.Appropriateusesareidentifiedbyconsideringtheuseandvalueofthewater
bodyforpublicwatersupply;forprotectionoffish,shellfish,andwildlife;andforrecreational,
agricultural,industrial,andnavigationalpurposes.Indesignatingusesforawaterbody,statesandtribes
examinethesuitabilityofawaterbodyfortheusesbasedonthephysical,chemical,andbiological
characteristicsofthewaterbody;itsgeographicalsettingandscenicqualities;andeconomic
considerations.
Statesandtribestypicallyadoptbothnumericandnarrativecriteria.Numericcriteriaare
importantwherethecauseoftoxicityisknownorforprotectionagainstpollutantswithpotential
humanhealtheffects.Narrativecriteriaarealsoimportantnarrative"freefrom"toxicitycriteria
typicallyserveasthebasisforlimitingthetoxicityofwastedischargestoaquaticspecies.Inadditionto
28
August2010

narrativeandnumeric(chemicalspecific)criteria,statescanandoftenadoptnutrientcriteria,whichare
definedasameanstoprotectagainstnutrientoverenrichmentandeutrophication.
In1998,EPApublishedaNationalStrategyfortheDevelopmentofRegionalNutrientCriteria,a
roadmapfordesigningguidanceforstatestouseinthedevelopmentofnumericwaterqualitycriteria
fornutrients.Thesetechnicalguidancedocumentsdescribethetechniquesusedtodevelopnutrient
criteriaforuseinstateandtribalwaterqualitystandards.Theycover:
EstuarineandCoastalWaters
LakesandReservoirs
RiversandStreams
Wetlands
Inadditiontotechnicalguidancefordevelopingnutrientcriteria,EPAhaspublishedadditional
technicaldocumentsandtoolstoaidstatesandtribesinassessingnutrientsintheirwaters.These
include:
MethodsforEvaluatingWetlandConditions:Aseriesofdocumentstohelpstatesandtribes
buildtheircapacitytomonitorandassessthebiologicalandnutrientconditionsofwetlands.
Thesemodulesaredesignedtohelpstatesandtribesestablishbiologicalandnutrient
assessmentandmonitoringprogramsforwetlands.Thesedocumentsareavailableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/guidance/wetlands/#modules
NSTEPS:Adatabasethatprovidestechnicalassistancetostateandregionalscientistsand
managerswhoaredevelopingnumericnutrientcriteriaandprovidesinformationtothepublic
regardingnutrientpollutionandEPA'sactivities.Thisdatabaseisavailableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/nsteps.html
OtherNutrientDatabases:DatabasesdevelopedbyEPAthatcontainsampledatafromvarious
watersthroughouttheUnitedStates,availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/database/index.html
Numericnutrientwaterqualitystandardsdrivewaterqualityassessmentsandwatershed
protectionmanagement.TheysupportimproveddevelopmentofnutrientTotalMaximumDailyLoads
(TMDLs;describedbelow).Perhapsmostimportantly,theycreatestateandcommunitydeveloped
environmentalbaselinesthatallowstatesandEPAtomanagemoreeffectively,measureprogress,and
supportbroaderpartnershipsbasedonnutrienttrading,BMPs,landstewardship,wetlandsprotection,
voluntarycollaboration,andurbanstormwaterrunoffcontrolstrategies.
Thereareanumberofkeyadvantagestoadoptingnumericstandards,including:
EasierandfasterdevelopmentofTMDLs
Quantitativetargetstosupporttradingprograms
EasiertowriteprotectiveNPDESpermits
Increasedeffectivenessinevaluatingsuccessofnutrientrunoffminimizationprograms
Measurable,objectivewaterqualitybaselinesagainstwhichtomeasureenvironmentalprogress
29
August2010

InDecember2008,EPApublishedareporttitled,StateAdoptionofNumericNutrientStandards
(19982008).Thereport,whichcanbefoundat
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/files/report19982008.pdf,providesanupdateof
stateeffortstodevelopnumericnutrientstandards.
Figure22depictstherelationshipsamongWQSandthetoolsusedtohelpmeetthese
standardssuchasTMDLs,NPDESpermits,andwaterqualitytrading.Thesetoolsarediscussedinmore
detailbelow.
Figure22.WaterqualitybasedapproachoftheCleanWaterAct
Source:USEPA2008f.
2.6.2 TotalMaximumDailyLoads(TMDLs)
CWASection303(d)requiresstatestodevelopTMDLsforwaterbodiesonthe303(d)listof
impairedwaters(e.g.,watersnotmeetingtheirdesignateduses).ATMDLisacalculationofthe
maximumamountofapollutantawaterbodycanreceiveandstillmeetWQS.TMDLsserveasatoolfor
implementingWQS.TheTMDLtargetsorendpointsrepresentanumberwheretheapplicableWQSand
designateduses(e.g.,publicwatersupply,contactrecreation,andthepropagationandgrowthof
aquaticlife)areachievedandmaintainedinthewaterbodyofconcern.TMDLsidentifythelevelof
pollutantcontrolnecessarytomeetWQSandsupportthedesignatedusesofawaterbody.Oncea
TMDLisset,thetotalloadisallocatedamongallexistingsources.Theallocationisdividedintotwo
portions: (1) aloadallocation(LA)representingnaturalandnonpointsourcesand(2)awasteload
allocation(WLA)representingNPDESpermittedpointsourcedischarges.Inmanyregions,waterbodies
haveapoorabilitytoassimilatenutrientsortheyarealreadyimpairedfrompastpollutionandcannot
handlelargeloadsofadditionalnutrients.Inthesecases,TMDLsmayrequirenutrientpermitlevelsto
beevenlowerthanwhatmightotherwisebeallowedbynutrientcriteria.
Althoughstatesarenotrequiredundersection303(d)todevelopTMDLimplementationplans,
manystatesincludeimplementationplanswiththeTMDLordevelopthemasaseparatedocument.
Whendeveloped,TMDLimplementationplansmayprovideadditionalinformationonwhatpointand
210
August2010

nonpointsourcescontributetotheimpairmentandhowthosesourcesarebeingcontrolled,orshould
becontrolledinthefuture.OnceaTMDLhasbeendefinedandvariousloadallocationsestablished,the
CWArequiresthatallNPDESpermitsassociatedwiththewaterbodymustreflecttheloadsestablished
intheTMDL.ForWWTPs,thismayincludespecificcriteriafornutrients.
2.6.3 NPDESPermitting
EstablishedbytheCWAAmendmentof1972,EPAsNPDESpermitprogramhasbeenthe
primarymechanismforcontrollingpollutionfrompointsources.Pointsourcesarediscreteconveyances
suchaspipesormanmadeditches.Individualhomesthatareconnectedtoamunicipalsystem,usea
septicsystem,ordonothaveasurfacedischargedonotneedanNPDESpermit;however,POTWsand
otherfacilitiesmustobtainpermitsiftheydischargedirectlytosurfacewaters.
NPDESpermitsforwastewaterdischargescontain,amongotherinformation,effluentlimitsfor
conventionalpollutantssuchasBOD,totalsuspendedsolids(TSS),andpHaswellaslimitsforspecific
toxicantsincludingvariousorganicandinorganicchemicals.Permitsmayalsoincludeeffluentlimitsfor
nonconventionalpollutantssuchasnitrogenandphosphorus.Effluentlimitscanbetechnology
basedand/orwaterqualitybased.EPAhasestablishedtechnologybased,secondarytreatmenteffluent
limitsforBODas5daybiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD5),TSS,andpH.Waterqualitybasedeffluent
limitsaresetifthetechnologybasedlimitsarenotsufficienttomaintaintheWQSofthereceiving
water.
InDecember2003,EPApublishedtheWatershedBasedNationalPollutantDischarge
EliminationSystem(NPDES)PermittingImplementationGuidance
(http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershedpermitting_finalguidance.pdf),whichdescribesthe
conceptofandtheprocessforwatershedbasedpermittingundertheNPDESpermitprogram.
WatershedbasedNPDESpermittingisanapproachtodevelopingNPDESpermitsformultiplepoint
sourceslocatedwithinadefinedgeographicarea(watershedboundaries)tomeetWQS.Thisapproach,
aimedatachievingnewefficienciesandenvironmentalresults,providesaprocessforconsideringall
stressorswithinahydrologicallydefineddrainagebasinorothergeographicarea,ratherthanaddressing
individualpollutantsourcesonadischargebydischargebasis.Thisreportwasfollowedbytechnical
guidanceissuedinAugust2007titled,WatershedbasedNationalPollutantDischargeElimination
System(NPDES)PermittingTechnicalGuidance,availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershed_techguidance_entire.pdf
FederalandStateregulationsrelatedtoWQSandTMDLsasdescribedpreviouslyareexpected
toresultinmorestringentNPDESeffluentlimitsfornitrogenandphosphorus.
2.6.4 WaterQualityTrading
Waterqualitytradingisamarketbasedapproachtoimproveandpreservewaterqualityonce
WQSand/orTMDLshavebeendefined.Tradingcanprovidegreaterefficiencyinachievingwaterquality
goalsbyallowingonesourcetomeetitsregulatoryobligationsbyusingpollutantreductionscreatedby
anothersourcethathaslowerpollutioncontrolcosts.Forexample,underawaterqualitytrading
program,aPOTWcouldcomplywithdischargerequirementsbypayingdistributedsourcestoreduce
theirdischargesbyacertainamount.Theuseofgeographicallybasedtradingratiosprovidesan
economicincentive,encouragingactiontowardthemostcosteffectiveandenvironmentallybeneficial
projects.
211
August2010
EPAissuedaWaterQualityTradingPolicyin2003toprovideguidancetostatesandtribeson
howtradingcanoccurundertheCWAanditsimplementingregulations
(http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading/finalpolicy2003.pdf).ThepolicydiscussesCWA
requirementsthatarerelevanttowaterqualitytradingincluding:requirementstoobtainpermits;anti
backslidingprovisions;developmentofWQS,includinganantidegradationpolicy;NPDESpermit
regulations,TMDLs;andwaterqualitymanagementplans.EPAalsodevelopedanumberoftoolsand
guidancedocumentstoassiststates,permittedfacilities,nonpointsources,andstakeholdersinvolved
inthedevelopmentoftradingprograms(www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading.htm).Recently,the
U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture(USDA)NationalResourcesConservationServicereleasedaNitrogen
TradingTool(NTT)prototypeforcalculatingnitrogencreditsbasedontheNitrogenLossand
EnvironmentalAssessmentPackageModel(Grossetal.2008).
Waterqualitytradingprogramshavebeensuccessfullyimplementedinseveralstatesand
individualwatershedsacrossthecounty.Forexample,nitrogenpollutionfrompointsourcesintothe
LongIslandSoundwasreducedbynearly25percentusinganinnovativenitrogencredittrading
program.InConnecticut,theprogramwasimplementedacross79sewagetreatmentplantsinthe
state.ThroughtheNitrogenCreditExchange,establishedin2002,theConnecticutprogramhasagoalof
reducingnitrogendischargesby58.5percentby2014.
ArecentAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineersjournalarticle(Landers2008)pointsout,however,
thatregulatoryframeworksforwaterqualitytradingprogramshaveyettobeadoptedbythemajority
ofstates.Barrierstoadoptingsuchprogramsincludeuncertaintyin:(1)themechanismsfor
determiningappropriatecreditsandratiosbetweenpointsourcesanddistributedsources;and(2)
approachestoensurethatpromisedreductionsactuallyoccur.Otherbarriersincludelackof
resources/stafftoorganizesuchprogramsandlackofspecificnutrientgoals/TMDLstodrivemarkets.
2.6.5 TechnologyEvaluationandGuidance
Inadditiontoregulatoryandpolicyinitiatives,EPAhelpscontrolnutrientsthroughthe
developmentanddisseminationoftechnicalinformation.Forexample,EPAsOfficeofWastewater
Management(OWM)hasdevelopedanumberoftechnologyfactsheetsonsecondaryandadvanced
biologicaltreatment(USEPA,1999b;1999c).OWMhasalsopublishedseveraltechnologyreports,
includingEmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeatherManagement
(USEPA,2008a).Thistechnologyguide,publishedinFebruary2008,isdesignedtohelpmunicipal
wastewatertreatmentsystemownersandoperatorsfindinformationonemergingwastewater
treatmentandinplantwetweathermanagement.InSeptember2008,OWMpublishedtheMunicipal
NutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument(USEPA2008d).Volume1ofthisreportprovides
detailedtechnicalandcostinformationonbiologicalandphysiochemicaltreatmenttechnologiesforthe
removalofnitrogen,phosphorus,oracombinationofthetwo.Thereportalsoincludesatleastone
yearsworthoffullscaleperformancedatafor27wastewatertreatmentfacilitiesintheUnitedStates
andCanadaand9detailedcasestudies.EPAsRegion10initiatedaprojecttoevaluatemunicipal
WWTPsthathavedemonstratedexemplaryphosphorusremovalthroughtheirtreatmentprocesses.In
April2007,theRegionpublishedareporttitled,AdvancedWastewaterTreatmenttoAchieveLow
ConcentrationofPhosphorus(EPARegion102007).
In1975,EPAsOfficeofResearchandDevelopment(ORD)publisheditsfirsttechnologydesign
guidancefornitrogenremoval:ProcessDesignManualforNitrogenControl.Themanualwasupdatedin
212
August2010

1993andfocusedonbiological/mechanicalprocessesthatwerefindingwidespreadapplicationfor
nitrificationandnitrogenremovalatthattime.Thedevelopmentofguidanceforphosphorusremoval
followedasimilarschedule,withORDpublishingthedocumentProcessDesignManualforPhosphorus
Removalin1971.In1976,themanualwasupdatedtoincludedesignguidanceforphosphorusremoval
usingmineraladditionandlimeaddition.In1987,EPApublishedtwotechnicaldocumentstoaddress
phosphoruscontrol:(1)anupdatetothe1976ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemovaland(2)a
handbooktitled,HandbookRetrofittingPOTWsforPhosphorusRemovalintheChesapeakeBay
DrainageBasin.EPAhasrevisedthesematerialstoprovideupdatedstateofthetechnologydesign
guidanceforbothnitrogenandphosphoruscontrolatmunicipalWWTPsaspresentedinthismanual.
2.7
IndustryInitiativesTheWERFNutrientRemovalChallenge
Inearly2007,theWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)createdtheNutrient
RemovalChallengeprogramwiththegoalsof:
Identifying,assessing,andmakingrecommendationstoimprovesustainablewastewater
nutrientremovaltechnologies.
Providinginformationtohelpagenciesmeetvariousreceivingwaterbodyrequirementsand
otherwastewatertreatmentgoals(e.g.,climatechange,sustainability,costeffectiveness,
reliability).
Conductingresearchtoinformregulatorydecisionmakingandhelppractitionerscomply
withincreasinglyhighlevelsofnitrogenandphosphorusremovalwithafocusonimproving
plantperformance.
Thismultiyearprogramwillbefundedfor5yearswithWERFandexternalfundsanticipatedtototal$8
10million.
Aspartoftheprogram'skickoffactivities,theWERFNutrientResearchStakeholderWorkshop
washeldonMarch7and8,2007inBaltimore,MD,tofurtherrefinetheChallenge'sresearchneedsand
toseekfundingpartnersandcollaborators.Atotalof25priorityareaswereidentified,manyofthem
analogoustothoseidentifiedinasimilarworkshopconductedbyWERFin2006.Generally,these
researchareasfallintooneofthefollowingthreecategories:
Characterizationofeffluentorganicnitrogen
Accuracyofanalyticalmeasurementtechniquesforlowconcentrationsofphosphorus
Alternativecarbonsourcesfordenitrification
WERFwillalsobedevelopingaNutrientCompendium,acomprehensive,livingdocumentthat
willdescribethecurrentknowledgeofregulatoryandtechnologicalnutrientremovalissues.The
documentwilldetailthekeyknowledgeareasaffectingnutrientremovaltoverylowlimitsandidentify
knowledgegapsrelatedtonutrientremoval.
Asof2009,WERFhas:
213
August2010
Launchedanewwebportal(http://www.werf.org/nutrients)withresearchinformation
andrelevantlinks
DevelopedtechnicaldocumentsfortheNutrientCompendium(preparationofadditional
technicalsummariesisunderway),including:
Tertiaryphosphorusremoval
Lowphosphorusconcentrationmeasurement
Effluentdissolvedorganicnitrogen
Externalcarbonaugmentationanddenitrification
Initiatedcollaborativeresearchinthreekeyareas
- Effluentorganicnitrogen/refractorydissolvedorganicnitrogen(RDON)
- Lowphosphorusanalysisandmeasurementatverylowlimits
- Alternativeexternalcarbonfordenitrificationtoreducecostandimproveefficiencyof
nitrogenremoval
2.8
BenefitsofNutrientRemoval
2.8.1 ImprovedPlantPerformance
BiologicalnutrientremovalatPOTWscanleadtoseveraloperationalimprovements.Inmost
cases,theadditionofananaerobiczoneforbiologicalphosphorusremovalwillincreasethesludge
densitybecauseofphosphorusaccumulation,andreducethegrowthoffilamentousorganismsbecause
oftheabsenceofDO,therebyimprovingsettleability.Apreanoxiczonefordenitrificationcanalso
leadtoamorestable,bettersettlingactivatedsludgeprocessastheanoxicaerobicprocessesfavor
goodsettlingflocformingbacteriaoverfilamentousgrowth.Additionalbenefitsofapreanoxiczone
includelessaerationenergyrequiredintheaerobiczoneasthenitrateproducedcanbeusedforBOD
removal,andlesssludgeproductioncomparedtopostanoxictreatmentwithsupplementalcarbon.
Anaerobicandanoxiczonesalsoprovidebettercontroloffoamingifbackmixingiseliminatedandthe
recycleofNOxandDOtothezonesisminimized.Further,goodremovalofnitrogenreducesconcern
overdenitrificationandfloatingsludgeinthesecondaryclarifiers,andprovidestheoptionofoversizing
theclarifierstobetterhandlewetweatherflows.
Theadditionofananaerobicoranoxiczoneaheadoftheaerobiczonecanimprovetherateof
oxygentransferinthewater.Asanexample,WEFandASCE(2006)reportedanalmostdoublingofthe
oxygentransferefficiencywhenthe23rdAvenuePlantinPhoenix,AZ,addedapreanoxiczone.
Nitrificationintheaerobiczonecansignificantlyreducethealkalinityofthemixedliquorand,in
situationswheretheinfluentalkalinityislow(e.g.,amunicipalitywithsoftwater),cancompletely
depletethealkalinityandcausearapiddropinpH.Thenitrificationratewillslowsignificantlybelowa
pHofapproximately6.8.Tchobanolgousetal.(2003)reportthatnitrificationratesatapHof6.0may
onlybeabout20percentofthatwithapHof7.0.Thus,plantswithlowalkalinitymayexperience
periodsofreducednitrificationandelevatedammonialevelsintheplanteffluent.Denitrificationfor
totalnitrogenremovalcanreplenishmuchofthealkalinitylostduringnitrificationandimprove
operationalstability.Approximately62.5percentoftheamountconsumedduringnitrateformationis
214
August2010

recoveredfromthenitratesreducedtonitrogengas.Thetotalrecoveryisseldommorethan50percent
forrecycleconfigurationssuchasMLEwithcompletedenitrificationintheanoxiczone.
2.8.2 CoRemovalofEmergingContaminants
Thetermemergingcontaminantsrefersbroadlytothosesyntheticornaturallyoccurring
chemicals,ortoanymicrobiologicalorganisms,thathavenotbeencommonlymonitoredinthe
environmentbutareofincreasingconcernbecauseoftheirknownorsuspectedadverseecologicalor
humanhealtheffects.Severalstudieshaveexaminedtheeffectivenessofcurrentwastewater
treatmenttechnologiesintheremovalofemergingcontaminants.Significantfindingsare:
Removalefficiencieswereenhancedforseveralinvestigatedcontaminantsatlongersolids
residencetimes(SRTs),withcriticalSRTsforsomecontaminantsbeyondwhichremovalrates
didnotimprove.
LongerSRTsallowfortheestablishmentofslowergrowingbacteria(e.g.,nitrifyingbacteriain
activatedsludge),whichinturnprovideamorediversecommunityofmicroorganismswith
broaderphysiologicalcapabilities,andthepotentialforgreaterbiodegradationofemerging
contaminants.
Reverseosmosishasbeenfoundtoeffectivelyremovepharmaceuticalandpersonalcare
products(PPCPs)belowdetectionlimitsincludingthosethatwerenotconsistentlyremovedat
longerSRTs.
AmoredetaileddiscussionofremovalofemergingcontaminantscanbefoundinEPAsNutrient
ControlDesignManualStateofTechnologyReport(EPA/600/R09/012,January2009)at
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r09012/600r09012.pdf.
2.8.3 NutrientRecoveryandReuse
Nutrientrecoveryandreuseisgainingnationalandinternationalattentionasakeyaspectin
sludgemanagementplans.Ratherthanbeingdisposedasawaste,sludgeisnowbeingharvestedfor
valuableresourcesandusedasanalternativesourceofenergy.InFebruary2008,theGlobalWater
ResearchCoalitionincooperationwithUSEPAandWERFreleasedareporttitledStateoftheScience
Report:EnergyandResourceRecoveryfromSludge(KalogoandMonteith2008).Inthereport,energy
recoverytechnologiesareclassifiedintosludgetobiogas,sludgetosyngas,sludgetooil,andsludgeto
liquidprocesses.Thereportalsodescribesvarioustechnologiesavailableforresourcerecovery,
includingthosetorecoverphosphorus,buildingmaterials,nitrogen,andvolatileacids.RefertoChapter
14ofthisManualformoreinformationonresourcerecoveryandsustainability.
2.9
ChallengesofNutrientRemoval
Twopotentiallynegativeenvironmentalimpactsofemployingadvancedtechnologiestoremove
nutrientsfromwastewateraretheincreaseintheenergyuseandreleaseofnitrousoxide(N2O),a
greenhousegas,intotheatmosphere.
2.9.1 EnergyRequirements
215
August2010
Whilesomeoperationalstrategiesforenhancingnutrientremoval,suchascyclicaerationfor
denitrificationandtheutilizationoffixedmediaforintegratedfixedfilmactivatedsludge(IFAS)
operationinpartiallyorfullynitrifyingsystems,donotrequireadditionalelectricitytooperate,many
BNRtechnologiesrequireaninputofenergybeyondthatneededforconventionalmunicipaltreatment.
Thisisobviouslytrueifthesystemtoberetrofittedwasnotdesignedtonitrifyduetoadditional
aerationrequired.Otherexamplesofretrofitsthatrequireadditionalenergyinclude(Kangetal.2009):
Additionalmixingbasins
Chemicaladdition
Additionalpumpingforrecycleflows
Additionalpumpingforfiltration
Useofanexternalcarbonsource
ItisnotunusualfortheadditionalenergyrequirementsofupgradingtoBNRtorequireanupgradeto
theentirepowersystem,includingphysicalspaceformotorcontrolcenters.
Nitrificationrequires50to100percentmoreaerationenergythannonnitrifyingsystems,
dependingupontheoperatingSRTselected.ThetotalBODNODaerationcosts,however,willbe
reducedbyabout20percentbydenitrificationto810mg/LTNfortypicalmunicipalwastewaters.The
quantityofWASproducedwillbegreatlyreducedwhichcansubstantiallyreducetheamountofenergy
neededfordewateringanddisposal.Thus,conversionofanonnitrifyingactivatedsludgesystemto
EBPRmaynotrequiremuchinthewayofadditionalenergy.Note,also,thatadditionofeitheran
anaerobicoranoxiczone(andparticularlyboth)aheadoftheaerobiczonereducestheaerationvolume
neededfornitrificationthroughremovalfromsolutionorthroughstabilizationofBODaheadofthe
aerobiczone,whichincreasestheeffectivenitrificationrateintheaerobiczone.
Chapter8ofthisdesignmanualprovidesadditionaldiscussionofenergyandidentifies
strategiesthatcanbeimplementedbynutrientremovalplantstoreduceenergyrequirementsand
improvesustainability.TheremainderofthissectionidentifiesEPAtoolsandothergeneralstrategies
thatcanbeusedtoreduceenergyneeds.
EPAencouragesutilitiestoidentifyapproachestointegrateenergyefficientpracticesintotheir
dailymanagementandlongtermplanning.The2008publication,EnsuringaSustainableFuture,an
EnergyManagementGuidebookforWastewaterandWaterUtilities(USEPA2008i),providesa
recommendedapproachforenergymanagementusingthePlanDoCheckActapproach.This
guidebookisavailableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterinfrastructure/bettermanagement_energy.html.
ASeptember2008publicationtitledNationalWaterProgramStrategyResponsetoClimate
Change(USEPA20008b)outlinesanumberofstepsthatEPAhastakenandthatutilitiescantaketo
improveenergyefficiency.Forexample,EPAsENERGYSTARprogramhasdevelopedaFocusinthe
waterandwastewaterindustries.AnENERGYSTARFocusisatargetedefforttoimprovetheenergy
efficiencywithinaspecificindustryorcombinationofindustries.Itcreatesmomentumforcontinuous
improvementinenergyperformance,providestheindustrysmanagerswiththetoolstheyneedto
achievegreatersuccessintheirenergymanagementprograms,andcreatesasupportiveenvironment
whereenergyefficiencyideasandopportunitiesareshared.
216
August2010

Significantprogressisbeingmadeinthedevelopmentofnewtoolsforbenchmarkingenergy
performanceamongpublicwaterandwastewaterutilities.Forexample,theENERGYSTARprogramis
expandingthecapabilityofitsEnergyPerformanceRatingSystemtoenabledrinkingwaterand
wastewaterutilitiestoassesstheirenergyuseovertimeandcompareittootherutilitiesnormalized
forweatherandfacilitycharacteristics.AsofOctober2007,WWTPenergyperformancecanberated
usingtheENERGYSTARprogramsonlinetool,PortfolioManager.PortfolioManagercanbeusedto
establishbaselineenergyuse,prioritizeinvestments,setgoals,andtrackenergyuseandcarbon
emissionsreductionsovertime.
Many facilities have already installed alternative energy power production facilities, including
solar, wind, and hydro, for heating and electricity generation. For example, Calera Creek Water
Recycling Plant in Pacifica, CA is using solar panels that provide 1015 percent of its energy needs,
resultinginanestimated$100,000savingsannuallyinenergycosts(USEPA2006).
Wastewaterfacilitiescanalsogenerateenergyfromthecaptureanduseofmethane.Combined
heatandpower(CHP)systemscanrecoverbiogas(amixtureofmethane,carbondioxide,watervapor,
andothergases)fromanaerobicdigesterstoheatbuildingsortogenerateelectricity.Forexample,the
EastBayMunicipalUtilityDistrict(EBMUD)capturesandusesbiogastogenerateenoughenergyto
cover90percentofenergyneededatitsmainwastewaterfacility.Ifall544largesewagetreatment
plantsintheUnitedStatesoperatinganaerobicdigestersweretoinstallcombinedheatandpower,
about340megawattsofcleanenergycouldbegenerated,offsetting2.3millionmetrictonsofcarbon
dioxideemissionsannually(i.e.,equivalenttoplantingabout640,000acresofforest,ortheemissionsof
about430,000cars)(USEPA2007a).Thisenergyisalsomarketableasgreenpowertopowerutilities
thatarenowrequiredbyStatelawstohavealternativeorgreenpowerasapartoftheiroverall
production.
2.9.2 ReleaseofNitrousOxide
Nitrousoxide(N2O)isconsideredtobeagreenhousegaswithaglobalwarmingpotential
approximately300timesthatofthecontributionofcarbondioxide(CO2).N2Oaswellasnitricoxide
(NO)areknowntobeintermediatesofheterotrophicdenitrification(Ahnetal.2009).Untilrecently,
therehasbeenconsiderableuncertaintyregardingthemechanismsofN2Ogenerationandwhetheritis
producedandreleasedduringthenitrificationanddenitrificationprocesses.
In2008,WERFinitiatedaresearchproject(no.U4RO7)toquantifyN2Oemissions,determine
themechanismsbywhichitforms,anddevelopoperationalstrategiestopreventitsformationand
release.ThefirststepofthisprojectwastodevelopadetailedprotocolformeasuringN2OandNO
emissionsfromanactivatedsludgereactor.ThismethodhasnowbeenreviewedbyEPAand
implementedatseveralWWTPs(WERF2009).Preliminaryfindingsbasedonmonitoringconductedat
nitrogenremovalplantswerepresentedattheWEFSpecialtyConference:NitrogenRemoval2009and
aresummarizedbelow(Ahnetal2009;WERF2009).
N2Oemissionsarerelatedtoanimbalanceofthemetabolicpathwayor,insimplerterms,
recoveryfromstress.N2Ocanbeproducedbynitrifyingbacteriaintheaerobicanddenitrifying
bacteriaintheanoxiczone;however,denitrifyingbacteriacanconsumeN2Owhereasnitrifying
bacteriacannot.
217
August2010
MeasuredN2Oemissionsfromtheaerobiczonewerealwayshigherthanemissionsfromthe
anoxiczone,contrarytopreviousthinking.
N2Oemissionsfromtheaerobiczoneexhibitedspatialvariabilitywithinthezone.Thehighest
N2Olevelswereobservedclosetotheeffluent.
N2Oemissionsformasignificantdiurnalpatternthatcanbecorrelatedwithdiurnalloading
patternsofammonia.
ReleaseofN2OintheaerobiczoneislargelyafunctionofDOandammoniaconcentrations.
Samplingcampaignsatadditionaltreatmentplantsareunderway.Researchersareplanningtopublish
aninterimPhase1reportonthefindingsbytheendof2009(WERF2009).
2.10 References
Ahn,J.H.,S.Kim,H.Park,D.Katehis,K.Pagilla,andK.Chandran.SpatialandTemporalVariabilityinN20
GenerationandEmissionfromWastewaterTreatmentFacilities.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.
Washington,DC.WEF.
Alexander,R.B.,R.A.Smith,G.E.Schwarz,E.W.Boyer,J.V.Nolan,andJ.W.Brakebill.2008.Differencesin
PhosphorusandNitrogenDeliverytotheGulfofMexicofromtheMississippiRiverBasin.Environmental
ScienceandTechnology.42(3):822830.Availableonline:
http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/sparrow/gulf_findings.
Beline,F.,J.Martinez,C.Marol,andG.Guiraud.2001.Applicationof15NTechniquetoDeterminethe
ContributionsofNitrificationandDenitrificationtotheFluxofNitrousOxidefromAeratedPigSlurry.
WaterResearch.35:27742778.
Bricker,S.,B.Longstaff,W.Dennison,A.Jones,K.Boicourt,C.Wicks,andJ.Woerner.2007.Effectsof
NutrientEnrichmentintheNationsEstuaries:ADecadeofChange.NOAACoastalOceanProgram
DecisionAnalysisSeriesNo.26.SilverSpring,MD:NationalCentersforCoastalOceanScience.328pp.
Availableonline:http://ccma.nos.noaa.gov/publications/eutroupdate/
ChesapeakeBayProgram,2008.ChesapeakeBayProgramAWatershedPartnership.AccessedJuly1,
2008.Availableonline:http://www.chesapeakebay.net/nutr1.htm
CritesR.andG.Tchobanoglous.1998.SmallandDecentralizedWastewaterManagementSystems.New
York,NY:McGrawHill.
EPARegion10.2007.AdvancedWastewaterTreatmenttoAchieveLowConcentrationofPhosphorus.
EPARegion10.EPA910R07002.
GarridoJ.M.,J.Moreno,R.MendezPampin,J.M.Lema.1998.NitrousOxideProductionunderToxic
ConditionsinaDenitrifyingAnoxicFilter.WaterResearch.32(8):25502552.
218
August2010

Gross,C.M.,J.A.Delgado,S.P.McKinney,H.Lal,H.Cover,andM.J.Shaffer.2008.NitrogenTradingToolto
FacilitateWaterQualityTrading.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation.March/April2008.63(2):44
45.
Hong,Z.,Hanaki,K.,andMatsuo,T.1993.GreenhouseGasN2OProductionduringDenitrificationin
WastewaterTreatment.JournalofWaterScienceTechnology.28(7):203207.
Hynes,R.K.andKnowles,R.1984.ProductionofNitrousOxidebyNitrosomonasEuropaea:Effectsof
Acetylene,pH,andOxygen.CanadianJournalofMicrobiology.30:13971404.
Lo,I.,K.V.Lo,D.Mavinic,D.Shiskowski,andW.Remay.2008.ReductionofNitrousOxideFormation
fromaBiologicalNutrientRemovalSysteminWastewaterTreatmentFactorsofAeration,External
CarbonandpH.InWEFTEC2008.
Kalogo,Y.,andH.Monteith.2008.StateofScienceReport:EnergyandResourceRecoveryfromSludge.
PreparedforGlobalWaterResearchCoalition,byWERF,STOWA,andUKWaterIndustryResearch
Limited.
Kang,S.J.,K.P.Olmstead,K.M.Takacs,andJ.Collins.2009.SustainabilityofFullScaleNutrientRemoval
Technologies.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Kuai,L.andW.Verstraete.1998.AmmoniumRemovalbytheOxygenlimitedAutotrophicNitrification
DenitrificationSystem.AppliedEnvironmentalMicrobiology.64:45004506.
Landers,Jay.2008.HaltingHypoxia.CivilEngineering.PP.5465.Reston,VA:ASCEPublications.
LongIslandSoundStudy.2004.Protection+Progress:LongIslandSoundStudyBiennialReport2003
2004.ProjectManager/WriterRobertBurg,NEIWPCC/LISS.U.S.EPALongIslandSoundOffice,
StamfordGovernmentCenter.Stamford,CT.Availableonline:
http://www.longislandsoundstudy.net/pubs/reports/30350report.pdf
Meyer,R.L.,Zeng,R.J.,Giugliano,V.andBlackall,L.L.2005.ChallengesforSimultaneousNitrification,
Denitrification,andPhosphorusRemovalinMicrobialAggregates:MassTransferLimitationandNitrous
OxideProduction.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology.52:329338.
PehlivanogluMantas,E.andD.L.Sedlak.2006.WastewaterDerivedDissolvedOrganicNitrogen:
AnalyticalMethods,Characterization,andEffectsAReview.CriticalReviewsinEnvironmentalScience
andTechnology.36:261285.
Poff,L.N.,M.Brinson,andJ.Day,Jr.2002.AquaticEcosystemsandGlobalClimateChangePotential
ImpactsonInlandFreshwaterandCoastalWetlandEcosystemsintheUnitedStates.Preparedforthe
PewCenteronGlobalClimateChange.January2002.
Shiskowski,D.M.andMavinic,D.S.2006.TheInfluenceofNitriteandpH(nitrousacid)onAerobicPhase,
AuotrophicN2OGenerationInAWastewaterTreatmentBioreactor.JournalofEnvironmental
EngineeringandScience.5:273283.
219
August2010

Spector,M.1998.ProductionandDecompositionofNitrousOxideduringBiologicalDenitrification.
WaterEnvironmentResearch.70(5):10961098.
STACWERF.2007.WorkshopConsiderationsandPresentations.EstablishingaResearchAgendafor
AssessingtheBioavailabilityofWastewaterDerivedOrganicNitrogeninTreatmentSystemsand
ReceivingWaters,Baltimore,MD,September,28,2007.
StateEPANutrientInnovationsTaskGroup.2009.AnUrgentCalltoActionReportoftheStateEPA
NutrientInnovationsTaskGroup.Availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/
Tallec,G.,J.Garnier,andM.Gousailles.2006.NitrousRemovalinaWastewaterTreatmentPlantthrough
Biofilters:NitrousOxideEmissionsduringNitrificationandDenitrification.BioprocessandBiosystem
Engineering.29:323333.
Tallec,G.,J.Garnier,G.Billen,andM.Gousailles.2006.NitrousOxideEmissionsfromSecondary
ActivatedSludgeinNitrifyingConditionsofUrbanWastewaterTreatmentPlants:EffectofOxygenation
Level.WaterResearch.40:29722980.
Tchobanoglous,G.,F.L.Burton,andH.D.Stensel.2003.WastewaterEngineering:TreatmentandReuse.
NewYork,NY:McGrawHill.
Third,K.A.,N.Burnett,andR.CordRuwisch.2003.SimultaneousNitrificationandDenitrificationUsing
StoredSubstrate(PHB)astheElectronDonorinanSBR.BiotechnologyandBioengineering.83:706
720.
Thorn,M.andSorensson,F.1996.VariationofNitrousOxideFormationintheDenitrificationBasinina
WastewaterTreatmentPlantwithNitrogenRemoval.WaterResource.30(6):15431547.
USEPA.1976.ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval.GreatLakesNationalProgramOffice.
GLNPOLibrary.EPA625/176001a.April1976.
USEPA.1987.Handbook:RetrofittingPOTWsforPhosphorusRemovalintheChesapeakeBayDrainage
Basin.CenterforEnvironmentalResearchInformation.Cincinnati,OH.EPA/625/687/017.
USEPA.1993.NitrogenControlManual.OfficeofResearchandDevelopment.EPA/625/R93/010.
September1993.
USEPA.1998.NationalStrategyfortheDevelopmentofRegionalNutrientCriteria.OfficeofWater.EPA
822R98002.
USEPA.1999a.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:FineBubbleAeration.EPA831F99065.Available
online:http://epa.gov/OWM/mtb/mtbfact.htm
USEPA.1999b.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:SequencingBatchReactors.EPA832F99073.
Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/sbr_new.pdf
220
August2010

USEPA.2003a.WatershedBasedNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)Permitting
ImplementationGuidance.EPA833B03004.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershedpermitting_finalguidance.pdf
USEPA.2003b.WaterQualityTradingPolicy.OfficeofWater.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading/finalpolicy2003.pdf
USEPA.2006.WastewaterManagementFactSheet:EnergyConservation.OfficeofWater,Washington,
DC.EPA832F06024.http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/energycon_fasht_final.pdf
USEPA.2007a.OpportunitiesforandBenefitsofCombinedHeatandPoweratWastewaterTreatment
Facilities.U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,CombinedHeatandPowerPartnership,Washington,
DC.http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/wwtf_opportunities.pdf
USEPA.2007b.WaterQualityCriteriaforNitrogenandPhosphorusPollution.DatabaseTools.Website
updated27September2007.http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/database/index.html
USEPA.2007c.WatershedbasedNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)Permitting
TechnicalGuidance.OfficeofWastewaterManagement,WaterPermitsDivision.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/watershed_techguidance_entire.pdf
USEPA.2008a.EmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeather
USEPA.2008b.FinalClimateChangeStrategy.OfficeofWater.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/water/climatechange/strategy.html
USEPA.2008c.MississippiRiverBasin&GulfofMexicoHypoxia.EPAOfficeofWetlands,Oceansand
Watersheds.UpdatedJune26,2008.Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/msbasin/
USEPA.2008d.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.,Volume1Technical
Report.OfficeofWastewaterManagement,MunicipalSupportDivision.EPA832R08006.Available
online:http://www.epa.gov/OWM/mtb/mnrtvolume1.pdf
USEPA.2008e.OnlineTechnicalSupportforStates:NSTEPS.HealthandEcologicalCriteriaDivision,
OfficeofWaterNutrientCriteriaProgram.Websiteupdated21July2008.
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/nsteps.html
USEPA.2008f.OverviewofImpairedWatersandTotalMaximumDailyLoadsProgram.Wetlands,Oceans
&Watersheds.Websiteupdated16October2008.http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/TMDL/intro.html
USEPA.2008g.StateAdoptionofNumericNutrientStandards(19982008).OfficeofWater.EPA821F
08007.Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/files/report19982008.pdf
USEPA.2008h.WaterQualityTrading.OfficeofOceans,Wetlands&Watersheds.Websiteupdated15
December2008.http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/trading.htm
221
August2010

USEPA.2008i.EnsuringaSustainableFuture:AnEnergyManagementGuidebookforWastewaterand
WaterUtilities.January288.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/waterinfrastructure/pdfs/guidebook_si_energymanagement.pdf
USEPA.2009a.MethodsforEvaluatingWetlandConditions.Websiteupdated9February2009.
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/guidance/wetlands/#modules
USEPA.2009b.NutrientControlDesignManualStateofTechnologyReviewReport.OfficeofResearch
andDevelopment.EPA/600/R09/012.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r09012/600r09012.pdf
U.S.PublicHealthServiceandUSEPA.2008.CleanWatershedsNeedsSurveys2004ReporttoCongress.
Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/cwns/2004rtc/cwns2004rtc.pdf
Vanderploeg,H.2002.TheZebraMusselConnection:NuisanceAlgalBlooms,LakeErieAnoxia,andother
WaterQualityProblemsintheGreatLakes.2002.GreatLakeEnvironmentalResearchLaboratory.Ann
Arbor,MI.RevisedSeptember2002.Availableonline:
http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/pubs/brochures/mcystisflyer/mcystis.html
WEFandASCE.2006.BiologicalNutrientRemoval(BNR)OperationinWastewaterTreatmentPlants
MOP29.WaterEnvironmentFederationandtheAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers.Alexandria,VA:
WEFPress.
WERF.2007a.NutrientChallengeResearchPlan2007.October31,2007.Availableonline:
http://www.werfnutrientchallenge.com/docs/Nutrient%20Removal%20Challenge%20Research%20Plan
%202007.pdf
WERF.2007b.NutrientResearchStakeholderWorkshop.March7and8,2007.Baltimore,MD.
WERF.2009.MolecularLevelThroughWholeReactorLevelCharacterizationofGreenhouseNitrogen
EmissionfromWastewaterTreatmentOperations.ProjectNumber:U4R07.Updated:July16,2009.
Alexandria,VA:WERF.
Zeng,R.J.,Lemaire,R.,Yuan,Z.andKeller,J.2003.SimultaneousNitrification,Denitrification,and
PhosphorusRemovalinaLabScaleSequencingBatchReactor.BiotechnologyandBioengineering.
84(2):170178.
Zheng,H.,Hanaki,K.,andMatsuo,T.1994.ProductionofNitrousOxideGasduringNitrificationof
Wastewater.WaterScienceandTechnology.30(6):133141.
222
August2010
3.PrinciplesofPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition
Chapter3covers:
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.1
Introduction
AvailableFormsofMetalSaltsandLime
EquationsandStoichiometry
SolidsSeparationProcesses
EffectsonSludgeProductionandHandling
TwoFactorsthatMayLimittheAbilityofPlantsto
AchieveVeryLowEffluentLevels
References
Introduction
Chemicalprecipitationiswidelyusedtoremovephosphorusatwastewatertreatmentplants
(WWTPs).Chemicalssuchasmetalsaltsorlimecanbeaddedtoprimary,secondary,ortertiary
processesoratmultiplelocationswithintheplant.Solidsremovalfollowingchemicalprecipitationcan
beconventional,suchasprimaryorsecondaryclarification,oradvanced,suchastertiaryfiltrationor
alternativetechnologies.Chemicalprecipitationcanbeusedaloneorinconjunctionwithbiological
phosphorusremoval(BPR)toreducethecostsassociatedwiththechemicaldoseandsludgeproduction.
Thischapterdescribestheprinciplesofphosphorusremovalbychemicaladdition.Itincludesa
descriptionofchemicalsavailable,thelatestresearchonthemechanismsofphosphorusremoval,and
factorsaffectingperformancesuchaspointofapplicationandsolidsseparation.Lastly,itpresents
informationonsludgeproductionandlimitsofremoval.Chapter9followswithmoredetailed
recommendationsfordesigningachemicalphosphorusremovaltreatmentsystem.
3.2
AvailableFormsofMetalSaltsandLime
Chemicalsusedforphosphorusprecipitationaretypicallyeithermetalsaltsorlime.Thetwo
mostcommonmetalsaltsarealuminumsulfate(commonlyknownasalum)andferricchloride.Sodium
aluminatecanserveasasourceofalum,althoughitcanincreasethepHsubstantially(WEFandASCE
2009).Variousformsofpolyaluminumchloride(PAC)canalsobeusedforchemicalprecipitation.
Ferroussulfateandferrouschloride,whichareavailableasbyproductsofsteelmakingoperations
(pickleliquor),arealsoused.Limeistypicallyavailableinsolidformaseitherquicklime(CaO)or
hydratedlimeCa(OH)2.Table31summarizesthemostcommonchemicalprecipitantsusedfor
phosphorusremoval.Chapter9providesadditionalinformationonchemicalpropertiesandguidance
forchemicalselection.
31
August2010
Table31.CommonChemicalsUsedforPhosphorusRemoval
Chemical
Formula
Al2(SO4)3.14(H20)
AluminumSulfate
(Alum)
SodiumAluminate
Na2Al2O4
Polyaluminum
Chloride(PAC)
AlnCl(3nm)(OH)m
EX:Al12Cl12(OH)24
FerricChloride1
FeCl3
Pickleliquor(Ferrous
sulfateorFerrous
iron)
Lime
Fe2SO4orFe2+
1.
2.
CaO,Ca(OH)2
Description
Crystallized,dryform or
liquid
Powderorliquidform.
Granulartihydrateis
commoncommercialform
Rangeinthedegreeof
basicityandaluminum
concentration
Orangebrownaqueous
solution
Greenaqueoussolution
Drywhitepowderorliquid
formasquicklime,CaO,or
hydratedlime,Ca(OH)2
TypicalWeight
PercentinCommercial
Solutions2
48%
20%
51%
3747%
Varies
NA
FerricisalsocommontradenameforFeCl3andalso40%FeCl3solution
Source:WEFandASCE2006Tables8.6and8.9
3.3
EquationsandStoichiometry
Thissectiondescribestheformsofphosphorusthatcanberemovedbychemicaltreatment.It
followswithadetaileddiscussionofthechemicalreactionsamongmetalsalts,lime,andphosphorus
includingfactorsaffectingremovalefficiency.
3.3.1 RemovablePhosphorus
Chemicalprecipitationwillremoveonlythephosphate(i.e.,orthophosphate)fractionoftotal
phosphorusinwastewater.Influentphosphateistypically50to80percentoftotalphosphorusand
generallyexistsinoneoftwoforms,H2PO4andHPO42,withthefirstbeingdominantatpHbelow8.3.
Polyphosphateswillnotreactwithmetalsaltsorlime;however,theywillbeconvertedtophosphate
duringbiologicaltreatment1.Organicallyboundphosphorustypicallymakesupthesmallestfractionof
totalinfluentphosphorus(1<mg/L).Thecolloidalandparticulateportionwillgenerallyberemoved
duringsolidsseparationprocesses.Thesolubleorganicfractionmayeitherbehydrolyzedinto
orthophosphateduringthetreatmentprocess(ifbiodegradable)orwillpassthroughaWWTP(ifnon
biodegradable).
SeeChapter2,Section2.2.2foradditionalinformationontheformsofphosphorusininfluent
wastewater.SeeSection3.8foradiscussionontheimplicationsofrecalcitrantphosphorusonachieving
loweffluenttotalphosphorus(TP)concentrations.
Colorimetrictechniquesusedtoquantifyphosphateconcentrationsgiveresultsforreactivephosphorus,which
isprimarilyorthophosphatebutincludesasmallcondensedphosphatefraction.
32
August2010
3.3.2 ReactionsofMetalSaltsandPhosphorus
Themetalsaltdoseforchemicalphosphorusremovalhasbeenrecognizedasacriticaldesign
andeconomicparameterforchemicaltreatmentsystems.Inadditiontodose,thewastewater
characteristics,methodofchemicaladdition,chemicaladditionfeedingpoint(s),reactionpH,
flocculationmethod,andtimeafterchemicaladditionareimportantdesignandperformanceissuesthat
canaffecttherelationshipbetweendoseandphosphorusremovalefficiency.
Themetalsaltdoseiscommonlydescribedintermsofthemolesofmetaladded(Medose)per
moleofsolublephosphorusintheinfluent(Pini).Thetermstoichiometricdoseisbasedon1.0Me
addedperMoleofPremoved(i.e.,1.0Medose/Pini)whichwouldbethemolarratiorequirementfor
strictlyachemicalreactionbetweenaluminumorironsaltstoformaMPO4precipitateasshownin
Equations31and32(WEFandASCE2009,chargesomitted).
Al2(SO4)314H2O+2H3(PO4)2Al(PO4)+3H2SO4+18H2O
Eq.31
Eq.32
FeCl3(6H2O)+H2PO4+2HCO3FePo4+3Cl+2CO2+8H2O
AtrelativelyhigheffluentPconcentrations(above1.0mg/L),thestoichiometricrelationshipfor
metalsaltdoseiscommonlyobserved.Themolarratiotypicallyincreaseswellabovethestoichiometric
ratioaslowereffluentphosphorusconcentrationsareneeded.Thishascommonlybeenattributedto
substantialmetalhydroxideformationinadditiontometalphosphorusprecipitates(Sedlak,1991).
ResearchbySzabetal.(2008)andSmithetal.(2008)definedamechanismforphosphorus
removalbyferricchloridebasedonasurfacecomplexationmodel.Conceptually,theadditionofferric
chlorideresultsintheprecipitationofhydrousferricoxide(HFO),whichprovidessurfacesitesfor
reactionwithphosphorus.Thebasisofthephosphorusremovalmechanismisthatphosphateandiron
canshareanoxygenmoleculeandthatinteractionscanberepresentedbythefollowingsymbolic
reaction(chargesomitted)(Smithetal.2008):
Eq.33
FeOOH+HOPO3=FeOOPO3+H2O
Thereactiveoxygensaretermedsurfacesites,andtheiravailabilityisrelatedtomixingandaging
conditions.Underrapidmixing,surfacesitesarereadilyavailable.Withslowmixing,however,muchof
theHFOwouldformintheabsenceofphosphorusandresultinlessefficientphosphorusremoval.
AstheHFOforms,phosphateissimultaneouslyremovedthrough(1)coprecipitationof
phosphateintotheHFOstructure,and(2)adsorptionofthephosphateontopreformedHFOparticles
(Smithetal.2008).AftertheinitialHFOformationandphosphorusremoval,additionalphosphoruscan
beremovedovertimebydiffusionofphosphorusintothefloc.Theeffectofagingistoreducereactive
sitesandHFOphosphorusremovalcapacity.Additionalresearchisneededtoconfirmasimilarremoval
mechanismforaluminum.
ChemicalDoseandPhosphorusRemovalEfficiency
Inallobservationsonchemicalremovalofphosphorus,thepercentphosphorusremoval
increasesandeffluentphosphorusconcentrationdecreasesasthemolarchemicaldoseformetalsalts
increases,buttheincrementalremovaldiminisheswithincreaseddosages(Sedlak1991,Szaboetal.
33
August2010
2008,WEFandASCE2009).Smithetal.(2007)foundthatfortypicalinfluentphosphorus
concentrations,ferricdosesabove1.5to2.0Medose/Piniratiosaresufficienttoremove80to98percent
ofsolublephosphorus.ReachingveryloweffluentTPconcentrations,i.e.below0.10mg/L,requires
significantlyhigherratiosofabout6or7Medose/Pini.Asimilardosewasreportedfor75to95percent
phosphorusremovalfromwastewaterusingalum(WEFandASCE2009).Forsimilarphosphorusremoval
efficienciesusingprepolymerizedsaltssuchasPAClorsodiumaluminate,ahigherdoseisneeded.
FactorsthatinfluencedoseandremovalefficiencymayincludepH,alkalinity,competingsubstancesin
thewastewater,initialmixingconditionsandflocculation.
MixingattheDosagePoint
Mixingatthedosagepointisnecessarytoensurethatthemetalandphosphatemolecules
react.Mixingintensitycanberepresentedbythevelocitygradient,G,inunitsofseconds1.Smithetal.
(2007)reportedthatthereactionsofphosphatesatthesurfaceofthehydrousferricoxidesdepend
highlyonthemixingconditions.Rapidmixingmeansthatthesurfacesitesareavailable,whereaswith
slowermixing,manyofthemetaloxideswouldformintheabsenceofphosphateandrenderinternal
oxygenatomsunavailableforbinding.
BenchscalekineticexperimentsbySzaboetal.(2008)revealedthatamajorityofphosphatewill
reactwithironinthefirst10to20secondsunderidealmixingconditions(G=425second1).At
wastewaterplants,mixingatthedosagepointistypicallypoor,withGvaluesrangingfrom20to100
second1(Szabetal.2008).Szabetal.recommendthatplantsattempttoachieveaveryhighmixing
intensityatthedosagepoint(Gvaluesbetween200and300second1).Mixingtimesathighenergyare
generallyintherangeof10to30seconds.
Aftertheinitialrapidkinetics,phosphorusremovalcancontinuewithslowreactionkinetics
betweenthephosphateandironovermanyhoursandevendays(Szaboetal.2008).Theslowreaction
rateremovalismoreimportantforalumorferricadditiontoactivatedsludgebasinswithsolids
retentiontimesindays.
Flocculation
Afterrapidmixingatthedosagepoint,gentlemixingisneededtoformflocsthatcanbesettled
orremovedthroughasolidsseparationprocess.Thisiscriticalformeetingloweffluentphosphorus
requirements.Often,movementofthewastewaterthroughthetreatmentplantissufficientforfloc
formation(USEPA2008b).Flocculationcanbelimitedbyinsufficienttimeorconditionsthatdisruptfloc
formationsuchaspumpingandaeration.
pHandAlkalinity
ThehighestremovalefficiencyforchemicalprecipitationiswithinapHrangeof5.5to7.0
(Szabetal.2008).BetweenpH7and10,phosphorusremovalefficiencydeclinesbecausethesurfaces
ofmetalhydroxidesaremorenegativelycharged,andsolubleironhydroxidesbegintoform.AtlowpH
values,thesolubilityoftheprecipitantisreduced,andatextremelylowpHvalues,metalhydroxide
precipitationislimited.Szabetal.(2008)reportedsimilarrelationshipsbetweenphosphorusremoval
efficiencyandpHforbothalumandferricchloride.
34
August2010
CODandTSSinRawWastewater
Theefficiencyofmetalsaltadditionintheprimarytreatmentstepcanbeaffectedbythe
wastewatercharacteristics.Basedontheresultsofjartestsusingmunicipalwastewater,Szaboetal.
(2008)observedarelationshipbetweenorganiccontentandefficiencyofphosphorusremovalusing
metalsalts.Betweenchemicaloxygendemand(COD)valuesof300to700mg/L,thephosphate
removalefficiencydecreasedwithincreasingCOD.Similarresultswereobservedfortotalsuspended
solids(TSS),withlowerphosphorusremovalefficiencyathigherTSSconcentrations.Inadditionto
reducedefficiencyduringprimarytreatment,organiccontentcanreducetheefficiencyofmetalsalt
removalofphosphorusinactivatedsludgereactors.Ironandaluminumionscanreactwithhumicand
fulvicacidsubstancestoforminsolublecomplexeswiththemetalionsandtheirmineraloxides,thereby
blockingthereactivesitesforphosphateprecipitation(WERF2009).
3.3.3 ReactionsofLimewithPhosphorus
Whenlimeisaddedtowastewater,itfirstreactswiththebicarbonatealkalinitytoformcalcium
carbonate(CaCO3).AsthepHincreasestomorethan10,excesscalciumionswillreactwithphosphate
toprecipitatehydroxylapatite[Ca5(OH)(PO4)3]asshowninthereactionbelow.
Eq.34
5Ca2++4OH+3HPO4Ca5OH(PO4)3+3H2O
Becauseitreactsfirstwithalkalinity,thelimedoseisessentiallyindependentoftheinfluentphosphorus
concentration.Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)estimatesthelimedosetotypicallybe1.4to1.6timesthe
totalalkalinityexpressedasCaCO3.
LimeadditioncanraisethepHtogreaterthan11.Becauseactivatedsludgeprocessesrequire
pHlevelsbelow9,limecannotbeaddeddirectlytobiologicaltreatmentprocesses.
3.4
Solidsseparationmethodsarecriticalfordeterminingphosphorusremovalefficiencywith
chemicalprecipitationasalargeportionoftheeffluentphosphorusiscontainedinchemical
precipitates.Solidsseparationtechnologies,suchasclarificationandfiltrationareoftenusedin
combinationtoachieveloweffluentTPlevels.Polymerscanbeusedinadditiontothemetalsaltsfor
phosphorusprecipitationtoenhanceremovalforfineparticlesandcolloids.
Gravityseparationinprimaryorsecondaryclarifiersisatraditionalsolidsseparationmethodat
WWTPs.Clarifiersusedinchemicalprecipitationsystemsdifferverylittlefromthoseemployedin
conventionaltreatment,althoughuseofflocculationzonesisrecommendedtoprovideflocculationtime
afterchemicaladdition.
Forsecondaryclarification,flocculationcanoccurinaerationbasinsorchannelspreceding
clarification.Theuseofflocculationzonesinsecondaryclarifiersisarecommendedpracticetoallow
flexibilityinthepointofchemicaladditionandtoprovideazoneinwhichdirectcontrolcanbeexercised
overvelocitygradientstoachieveoptimumflocculation.
35
August2010
Membranebioreactorsforactivatedsludgewastewatertreatmentprovidemaximumsolids
separationwitheffluentturbidityvaluestypicallylessthan0.30NTUandnondetecteffluentTSS
concentrations.
Tertiaryfiltrationfollowingsecondaryclarificationisincreasinglybeingusedasapolishingstep,
withchemicaltoreduceTSSandtoachieveeffluentTPconcentrationsbelow0.50mg/L.Thetypesof
filtersavailableincludetraditionalmediafilters,upflowcontinuousbackwashfilters,clothfilters,and
membranes.Severalpatentedballastedhighrateclarifiers(BHRC)usingdifferenttypesofballastsuch
asrecycledsludge,microsand,andmagneticballast(USEPA2008b)havebeendevelopedinrecent
years.ExamplesincludeDensaDeg,Actiflo,andtheCoMagTMprocess.Chapter6ofthisdesign
manualprovidesanoverviewofthedifferenttertiaryfiltertechnologiesandChapter11provides
recommendationsfordesign.
3.5
EffectsonSludgeProductionandHandling
Sludgeproductionandhandlingisgenerallyconsideredtobeoneofthedownsidesofchemical
phosphorusremoval.Chemicalprecipitationmethodsalwaysproduceadditionalsolidsdueto
generationofmetalorcalciumphosphateprecipitatesandmetalhydroxidesludge.Theamountof
increasedsludgeproductionwilldependonthelocationofchemicaladdition,thechemicaldoseused,
andtheconstituentspresentinthewastewater.
Thestoichiometricrelationshipsshownbelowcanprovideagoodfirstestimateofadditional
solidsproductionfromchemicalprecipitation(WEFandASCE2009).ForalumadditiontheremovalofP
withAlcanberepresentedbyAl0.8(H2PO4)(OH)1.4andtheremainingaluminumaddedwillbedescribed
byaluminumhydroxideproductioninaccordancewithEq.35.Forferricremovalwithironthesludge
productionfromPremovalcanbeestimatedasFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8andtheremainingferricaddedwill
bedescribedbyferrichydroxideproductioninEq.36.
Al3++3H2OAl(OH)3+3H+
Eq.35
Eq.36
Fe3++3H2OFe(OH)3+3H+
Typically,theadditionofmetalsaltstotheprimaryclarifierforthepurposesofcompletephosphorus
removalwillincreaseprimarytreatmentsludgeproductionby50to100percentduetophosphorusand
hydroxideprecipitatesandincreasedsuspendedsolidsremoval.Inthiscasethesecondarysludge
productionislowerduetoremovalofadditionalTSSandBODintheprimaryclarifier.Thetotaloverall
plantsludgeproductioncanbeexpectedtoincreaseby60to70percent(WEFandASCE2009).For
metaladditiontothesecondarytreatmentprocesstoachieveeffluentPconcentrationsintherangeof
0.50to1.0mg/Lwiththestoichiometricmetalsaltdoseintherangeof2.0,thesludgeproductionmay
increaseby35to45percentandtheoverallplantsludgeproductionmayincreaseby5to25percent
(WEFandASCE2009).FortertiaryapplicationstoachieveeffluentPconcentrationsoflessthan0.10
mg/L,thechemicalstoichiometricdosecanbe2to3timesthatindicatedintheprevioussentencefor
secondarytreatment,buttheamountofPtoberemovedismuchless,sothattheeffectonsludge
productioncanbeestimatedtobeincreasedby45to60percentforsecondary/tertiarytreatmentand
by10to40percentfortheoverallplantsludgeproduction.SeeChapter9,Section9.8.3,foranexample
calculationofsludgeproductionincreaseresultingfromtheadditionofmetalsalts.
36
August2010
Limetypicallyproducesamuchhighersludgevolumecomparedtometalsaltsbecauseofits
reactionwithnaturalalkalinity.Thefollowingreactionsareimportantfordeterminingthesludge
producedfromlimeaddition(Tchobanoglousetal.2003):
10Ca2++6PO43+2OHCa10(PO4)6(OH)2
Eq.37
Mg2++2OHMg(OH)2
Eq.38
Ca2++CO32CaCO3
Eq.39
AnadvantageoflimesludgeisthatsomestabilizationcanoccurduetothehighpHlevelsrequired.One
disadvantageisthatlimecancausescalinginmechanicalthickeninganddewateringsystems.Although
alumtendstoproducelesssludgethanferricsalts,alumsludgecanbemoredifficulttoconcentrateand
dewatercomparedtoferricsludge.
Theuseofmetalsaltscanresultinincreasedinorganicsalts(salinity)inthesludgeandinthe
effluent.Salinitycancreateproblemswhenbiosolidsarelandappliedorwhentheeffluentisreturned
toexistingwatersupplyreservoirs.BiologicalphosphorusremovalwasdevelopedinSouthAfricadueto
thehighrateofindirectrecyclingofwastewatereffluent,whichledtoexcessivetotaldissolvedsolids
(TDS)inthewatersupplyduringdryperiods.Hightotalsaltscanreducegerminationratesforcrops
andnegativelyaffectthesoilstructure,inadditiontopotentialtasteandodorproblems.
3.6
TwoFactorsthatMayLimittheAbilityofPlantstoAchieveVeryLowEffluentLevels
Twofactorsmaylimittheabilityofplantstoachieveverylowlevels:thepresenceof
recalcitrantphosphorusandchallengesinmeasuringveryloweffluentconcentrations.
Aportionoftotalphosphorusinwastewatercanberecalcitrant,meaningthatitpassesthrough
thechemical,biological,andphysicaltreatmentprocessesandintotheeffluentunchanged.Lancaster
andMadden(2008)reportedatypicalrecalcitrantphosphorusspikesashighas0.5mg/Linmunicipal
wastewater,whichweresuspectedtooriginatefromanindustrialsource.Theauthorsspeculatedthat
therecalcitrantfractionwasmadeupofeitherdissolvedacidhydrolyzablephosphorus,organic
phosphorus,oracombinationofthetwo.Neethlingetal.(2007)postulatedthatrecalcitrant
phosphorusismostlythedissolvedorganicvariety.
StudiesconductedinWashingtonStateandNevadarevealedsignificantvariabilityinmeasured
phosphorusconcentrationslessthan0.020mg/L.TheCityofLasVegasPilotStudyfoundthatthe
accuracyofthemeasurementdependedonseveralfactorsincludingthesamplematrixanddigestion
procedure(EleuterioandNeethling2009).In2007,WERFinitiatedaprojecttoevaluatethecapabilities
ofcommerciallaboratoriestoaccuratelymeasurephosphorusconcentrationslessthan0.020mg/Land
determinefactorsthataffectmethodaccuracy.Keyfindings,whichwerepresentedattheWEF2009
specialtyconferenceonnutrientremoval,areasfollows:
Totalphosphorusmeasurementsexhibitedawidevariability.Thisrangewasattributedto
sampledigestionprocedures.
37
August2010
Orthophosphatemeasurementswereaccuratefordeionizedwater,butnotforwastewater
effluentsamples.Variabilityinresultswasattributedtosamplematrixanddigestion
procedures.
TheAscorbicAcidmethod(eithertheUSEPAorStandardMethodsprocedure)wasthemost
oftenusedandwasfoundtobeareliabletechniqueformeasuringorthophosphateatlow
concentrations.
EleuterioandNeethling(2009)concludedthatadditionalresearchisneededtoidentifythecompounds
interferingwiththemethodanddeveloptechniquestocorrecttheseinterferences.
3.7
References
Benisch,M.,D.Clark,Neethling,J.B.,H.S.Fredrickson,A.Gu.2007.CanTertiaryPhosphorusRemoval
ReliablyProduce10ug/L?:PilotResultsfromCoeurDAlene,ID.InNutrientRemoval2007.WEF.
Lancaster,C.D.andJ.E.Madden.2008.NotSoFast!TheImpactofRecalcitrantPhosphorusonthe
AbilitytoMeetLowPhosphorusLimits.InWEFTEC2008.
Neethling,J.B.,B.Bakke,M.Benisch,A.Gu,H.Stephens,H.D.Stensel,andR.Moore.2005.Factors
InfluencingtheReliabilityofEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.Alexandria,VA:WERFandIWA
Publishing.
Neethling,J.B.,M.Benisch,D.Clark,A.Gu.2007.PhosphorusSpeciationProvidesDirectiontoProduce
10g/L.InNutrientRemoval2007.WEF.
Sedlak,R.I.,editor.1991.PhosphorusandNitrogenRemovalfromMunicipalWastewater;Principlesand
Practice,2ndedition.LewisPublishers,BocaRaton,Fl.
Smith,D.S.,R.L.Gilmore,A.Szbo,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,andG.Daigger.2008.ChemicallyMediated
PhosphorusRemovaltoLowLevels:AnalysisandInterpretationofData.InWEFTEC2008.
Smith,S.,A.Szab,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,I.Licsk,andG.Daigger.2007.TheSignificanceofChemical
PhosphorusRemovalTheoryforEngineeringPractice.InNutrientRemoval2007.WEF.
Smith,S.,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,G.T.Daigger,andA.Szab.2008.PhosphateComplexationModelandIts
ImplicationsforChemicalPhosphorusRemoval.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(5):428438.
Alexandria,VA:WEF.
Szab,A.,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,G.T.Daigger,I.Licsk,andS.Smith.2008.SignificanceofDesignand
OperationalVariablesinChemicalPhosphorusRemoval.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(5):407
416.Alexandria,VA:WEF.
Tchobanoglous,G.,F.L.Burton,andH.D.Stensel.2003.WastewaterEngineering:Treatmentand
Reuse.NewYork,NY:McGrawHill.
38
August2010

USEPA.2000.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:ChemicalPrecipitation.OfficeofWater.EPA832F
00018.
USEPA.2008b.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.Volume1Technical
WEFandASCE.1998.DesignofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantsMOP8,4thEd.Water
EnvironmentFederationandAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers.Alexandria,VA:WEF.
WEFPress.
WEFandASCE.2009.DesignofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantsWEFManualofPractice8
andASCEManualsandReportsonEngineeringPracticeNo.76,5thEd.WaterEnvironment
Federation,Alexandria,VA,andAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineersEnvironment&WaterResources
Institute,Reston,Va.
WERF.2009.Chapter1,Introduction:TertiaryPhosphorusRemoval.NutrientCompendium.Website
accessed11March2009.http://www.werfnutrientchallenge.com/chapter1.asp?area=ch1
39
August2010
Thepageleftintentionallyblank
310
August2010
4.PrinciplesofBiologicalNitrogenRemoval
Chapter4covers:
4.1 Introduction
4.2 NitrogenRemovalbyBiomassSynthesis
Nitrification
4.3 MicrobiologyofNitrification
4.4 ReactionsandStoichiometryofNitrification
4.5 NitrificationKinetics
4.6 InhibitoryEffectsofEnvironmentalConditionsonNitrification
Denitrification
4.7 DenitrificationFundamentals
4.8 MicrobiologyofDenitrification
4.9 MetabolismandStoichiometryofHeterotrophicDenitrification
4.10 BiologicalDenitrificationKineticswithInfluentWastewater
4.11 DenitrificationCarbonSourcesandRelativeConsumptionRates
4.12 DenitrificationKineticsofExogenousCarbonSources
4.13 SpecificDenitrificationRates
AdditionalTopics
4.14 SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification
4.15 Metabolism,Stoichiometry,andKineticsofANAMMOX
4.16 ImpactsonSludgeProductionandHandling
4.17 EffluentDissolvedOrganicNitrogen
4.18 References
4.1
Introduction
Biologicalnitrogenremovalinwastewatertreatmentoccursbytwoprimarymechanisms:1)
biomasssynthesis(nitrogenassimilation)andsludgewasting,and2)biologicalnitrificationand
denitrification,withonlythelatterabletoachievehighlevelsofnitrogenremovalandloweffluent
concentrationsofinorganicnitrogeninbiologicalnutrientremovalprocessestreatingdomestic
wastewaters.Nitrificationisatwostepprocessinwhichonegenusofaerobicbacteriaoxidize
ammonianitrogen(NH3N)tonitritenitrogen(NO2N)followedbyanothergenuswhichoxidizesnitrite
nitrogentonitratenitrogen(NO3N).Undercertainconditions,e.g.inadequatedissolvedoxygen,the
processcanbestoppedatNO2Nformation.Inbiologicaldenitrification,acarbonsourceisoxidized
usingnitrateand/ornitriteaselectronacceptorsinbiologicaloxidationreductionreactionstoreduce
theoxidizednitrogen(NO3NorNO2N)toinertnitrogengas(N2).Ananaerobicprocessthatdoesnot
requireacarbonsourceforNO2NreductionistheANAMMOX(anaerobicammoniaoxidation)
processinwhichcertainbacteriaarecapableofoxidizingammoniawithnitritereductiontoproduceN2
(Sliekersetal.2002).
41
August2010
Thischapterprovidesanoverviewoftheprinciplesbehindbiologicalnitrogenremovalincluding
autotrophicandheterotrophicmicroorganismsresponsiblefornitrificationanddenitrification,reactions
andstoichiometry,kinetics,effectsofenvironmentalfactors,andfixedfilmprocessconsiderations,as
wellassimpledesigncalculations.
4.2
NitrogenRemovalbyBiomassSynthesis
Biochemicaloxygendemand(BOD)removalinbiologicalwastewatertreatmentprocesses
occurswithbacterialcellgrowth.Acommonlyusedformulationforbiomass(HooverandPorges1952)
isC5H7O2N,whichsuggeststhatnitrogenaccountsfor12percentofthebiomassvolatilesuspended
solids(VSS).Fordomesticwastewatertreatment,15to30percentofinfluentnitrogencanberemoved
viabiomasssynthesisandsludgewasting.Ifthewastesludgeisprocessedbyanaerobicdigestion,about
onehalfofthenitrogenremovedcanbereleasedasammoniainthedigesterandreturnedtothe
biologicaltreatmentprocessindewateringrecyclestreams,suchthatonly10to15percentnetremoval
bysynthesisoccurs.CentrateorfiltratefromdigestersolidsdewateringcancontainNH4N
concentrationsrangingfrom500to1200milligramsperliter(mg/L),dependingonthelevelofsolids
thickeningpriortoanaerobicdigestionandthedigesteroperation.
Thenitrogenremovalefficiencybybiomasssynthesisdependsonthebiologicalprocessinfluent
BODtototalnitrogen(TN)ratioandthebiomasssolidsretentiontime(SRT)inthesystem.With
increasingSRT,agreaterfractionofthebiomassundergoesendogenousdecay,releasingNH4Nand
decreasingthenetnitrogenremovalduetobothsynthesisanddecay.Notallofthenitrogenisreleased
withcellloss,assomeofitremainsunavailableincelldebrisfollowingcelldeath.TheeffectofSRTand
influentBOD/TNratioonthepercentnitrogenremovalduetobiomasssynthesisanddecayisillustrated
inFigure41.AtlowerSRTsandhigherinfluentBOD/Nratios,theremovalduetobiosynthesisand
sludgewastingishigher.Assumptionsusedwereabiomasssynthesisyieldvalueof0.50gVSS/gBOD
removedandanendogenousdecayrateof0.08gVSS/gVSSperday(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).The
fractionofbiomassdebrisremainingfromendogenousdecaywasassumedtobe0.08gVSS/gVSS
(BarkerandDold1997).
42
August2010
Percent Nitrogen Removal
35
30
BOD/N=6.0
BOD/N=4.0
25
20
15
10
5
0
10
SRT, days
15
20
Figure41.PercentnitrogenremovalduetobiomasssynthesisasafunctionofSRTandinfluentBOD/Nratio.
4.3
MicrobiologyofNitrification
Ammoniaandnitriteoxidizingbacteriaarereferredtoasautotrophicbacteriabecausetheyuse
carbondioxide(CO2)fortheircarbonsource.Morespecifically,theyareaerobicchemoautotrophic
bacteriabecause,inadditiontousingCO2,theyrequiredissolvedoxygentooxidizeaninorganic
compound(NH4NorNO2_N)toobtaincellenergy.Akeyfunctionalenzymepossessedbyallthese
bacteriaisammoniamonooxygenase(AMO).Thisenzymeoxidizesammoniatohydroxylamine,whichis
subsequentlyconvertedtonitritebyhydroxylamineoxidoreductase.Theammoniaoxidizingbacteria
(AOB)aredesignatedasNitrosoorganismsandincludethegeneraNitrosomonas,Nitrosospira,and
Nitrosococcus.Thenitriteoxidizingbacteria(NOB)aredesignatedasNitroorganismsandincludethe
generaNitrobacter,Nitrospira,Nitrococcus,andNitrospina(Rowanetal.2003).
Differencesin16SribosomalRNA(rRNA)sequencesforAOBandNOBgeneraresultsindistinct
differencesinphylogenics(Rowanetal.2003).ThephylogeneticdistributionofAOBissummarizedin
Table41.ThegeneraNitrosomonasandNitrosospiraaresoilandfreshwaterAOBthatareintheclass
Proteobacteria.FivelineagesofNitrosomonasAOBhavebeendeterminedbyKoopsand
PommereningRoser(2001)andareN.europaea/eutropha,N.communis,N.oligotropha,N.marina,and
N.cryotolerans.NitrosococcusAOBarelocatedintheProteobacteriandconsistofonlymarineAOB
specieswithstrainsNitrosococcusoceaniandNitrosococcushalophilus.Nitrosococcusmobiliswas
previouslymisnamedandnowbelongstotheProteobacterigenusNitrosomonasandnotthegenus
NitrosococcusintheProteobacteria.
43
August2010
Table41.PhylogenyofAmmoniaOxidizingBacteria
Subclassof
Proteobacteria SubClusters
europaea
mobilis
communis
Species
Salt
Requirement
Nitrosomonas
europea
Nitrosomonas
eutropha
Nitrosomonas
halophilar
Nitrosococcusmobilis
Nitrosomonas
communis
Nitrosomonassp.I
Nitrosomonassp.II
Nitrosomonasnitrosa
Nitrosomonasureae
oligotrophia
Nitrosomonas
oligotropha
Nitrosomonasmarina
Nitrosomonassp.III
Nitrosomonas
marina
aestuarii
Nitrosomonas
cryotolerans
Nitrosolobus
multiformis
nitrosospira
Nitrosovibriotenuis
Nitrosospirasp.I
Proteobacteria
Nitrosococcusoceani
Source:ModifiedfromKoopsandPommerening(2001).
Proteobacteria
NH3
affinity
Ks,M
Preferred
Habitat
Halotolerant,
moderately
halophilic
3061
WWTP,eutrophic
freshwater,brackish
water
Nosaltrequirement
1443
Soils(notacid)
Nosaltrequirement
1946
1.94.2
Nosaltrequirement
Obligatelyhalophilic
Eutrophic
freshwater
Oligotrophic
freshwater,
naturalsoils
5052
Marineenvironment
4259
Soils(notacid)
Nosaltrequirement
Soils,rocks,and
freshwater
Marineenvironment
ThefourNOBgenerashowmorediversephylogeneticswithNitrobacterwithinProteobacteri,
NitrococcuswithinProteobacteria,NitrospinawithintheProteobacteria,andthetwospeciesofthe
genusNitrospira,NitrospiramoscoviensisandNitrospiramarinawithinaseparatephylumclosetothe
subclassoftheProteobacteria(SiripongandRittmann2007).ThesearesummarizedinTable42(Koops
andPommereningRoser2001).WhileNitrobactergenerallyoccurasfreecells,Nitrospiraaremore
commonlyobservedattachedtoflocsorbiofilmsintheirnaturalenvironments.
44
August2010
Table42.PhylogenyofNitriteOxidizingBacteria
Subclassof
Ecophysiological
Proteobacteria
Species
parameters
Nitrobacteralkalicus
Nitrobacterwinogradskyi
Proteobacteria
Nitrobactervulgaris
Nitrobacterhamburgenis
Proteobacteria
Nitrococcusmobilis
Proteobacteria
Nitrospinagracilis
Nitrospiramoscoviensis
Nitrospiramarina
Source:ModifiedfromKoopsandPommerening(2001).
Preferred
Habitat
Alkaliandhalotolerant
Sodalakes
Nosaltrequirement
Freshwater,soils,rocks
Nosaltrequirement
Marineenvironments
Freshwater
Marineenvironment
Usingmolecularbiologytools,researchershaveidentifieddiversepopulationsofAOBandNOB
inactivatedsludgeandfixedfilmnitrificationsystems.SiripongandRittmann(2007)examinedthe
diversityofnitrifyingbacteriacommunitiesinthesevenactivatedsludgefacilitiesoperatedbythe
MetropolitanWaterReclamationDistrictofGreaterChicago(MWRDGC)withvaryingSRT,temperature,
andinfluentcharacteristics.TheyfoundthecoexistenceofAOBNitrosomonasandNitrosospiragenera
inallfacilitiesandthecoexistenceofNOBNitrobacterandNitrospiragenera.Coldertemperatures
appearedtoincreaseproportionsofNitrosospiraandNitrospira.Parketal.(2002)foundthattheAOB
communityinanaeratedanoxicprocesswasverydiverse,withbothNitrosomonasandNitrosospira
present.OthershaveshownthatNitrosomonasisverycommoninactivatedsludgetreatmentand
NitrospiraisthemostcommonNOB(Aoietal.2000;CoskunerandCurtis2002;andHarmsetal.2003;Li
etal.2005).
Inalaboratoryfixedfilmfluidizedbedreactor,Schrammetal.(1999)foundadominanceof
NitrosospiraforAOBandNitrospiraforNOB.Incontrast,Rowanetal.(2003)foundadominanceof
NitrosomonasforAOBinabiologicalaeratedfilterandtricklingfilterreceivingcombineddomesticand
industrialwastewater.
Thoughtheirroleinwastewatertreatmenthasnotbeendetermined,itisnotablethatthe
diversityofammoniaoxidationviaAMOextendstothedomainArchaeawithammoniaoxidationfound
inmemberstothekingdomCrenarchaeota.Originallythoughttobeamarineorganismwiththeir
discoverybyFuhrmanetal.(1992),theyhavealsobeenfoundinawiderangeofsoils,insediments,and
infreshwater(NicolandSchleper2006).Furthermore,Leiningeretal.(2006)foundthattheywere
moreabundantthanautotrophicbacteriaforammoniaoxidationinsoils.AmarineCrenarchaeota
isolatedbyKonnekeetal.(2005)wasabletogrowasachemoautotrophatratescomparabletoAOB,
anditalsohadamuchhigheraffinityforammonia(0.03to1.0M).However,thepresenceoforganic
substrateappearedtoinhibititsgrowth.
4.4
ReactionsandStoichiometryofNitrification
TheenergyyieldingammoniaoxidationreactionbyAOBisasfollows:
NH4 1.5O2 NO2 2H H2O
45
Eq.41
August2010

InEquation41,1.5molesofoxygenarerequiredtooxidize1moleofammoniaand2molesof
hydrogenareproduced.Thus,theoxygenrequirementtoproducenitriteis3.43gO2/gNH4Noxidized
toNO2N.TheenergyproducingreactionbyNOBisasfollowsandshowstheneedfor1.14gO2/gNO2
NoxidizedtoNO3N:
NO2 0.5O2 NO3
Eq.42
Theoverallreactionforthetwostepoxidationprocesscanbewrittenasfollowsandaccounts
foralkalinityconsumptionbythehydrogenproduced:
NH4 2O2 2HCO3 NO3 2CO2 3H2O

Eq.43
Basedontheabovestoichiometry,ammoniaoxidationtonitraterequires4.57gO2/gNH4N
oxidizedtoNO3Nandconsumes7.14galkalinity(asCaCO3)pergNH4Noxidized(Tchobanoglousetal.,
2003).
TheoxygenrequiredandalkalinityconsumptionpergNH4NremovedcalculatedfromEquation
43willbelessinreactorsbecausesomeoftheNH4Nremovedisconsumedforbiomasssynthesisby
thenitrifyingbacteria.WerzernakandGannon(1967)foundthattheoxygenconsumptionnormalized
tonitrogenremovalwas4.33gO2/gNH4NoxidizedtoNO3Nwith3.22gO2usedforNH4Noxidationto
NO2Nand1.11gO2foroxidationofNO2NtoNO3N.Thisfitsreasonablyclosetothestoichiometry
presentedbyHaugandMcCarty(1972)inwhichbiomassyieldsof0.15gVSS/gNH4Nand0.02gVSS/g
NO2Nremovedweredetermined.Theirbalancesareasfollows:
Ammoniaconsumption:
55NH 4 7 6 O 2 1 09 HCO 3
C 5H7NO 2 54NO 2 104H 2 CO 3 57H 2 O
Eq.44
Nitriteconsumption:
Eq.45
400NO NH 195O 2 HCO 4H 2 CO 3
C 5H7NO 2 400NO 3 3H 2O
Whenaccountingforsynthesispertheabovereactions,thecalculatedoxygenandalkalinity
consumptionsforNH4Nremovalarelowerbyabout5percentand1percent,respectively.Atlonger
SRTswithdecayofnitrifiers,ammoniawillbereleasedandthedifferenceisless.Byignoringsynthesis
andusingtheoxidationonlyvaluesof4.57gO2/gNH4NoxidizedtoNO3Nand7.14galkalinity(as
CaCO3)pergNH4Noxidized,theresultsareslightlyconservativebutpracticalfordesignestimates.
4.5
NitrificationKinetics
Whereammoniaremovalisneeded,nitrificationkineticswillgoverntheactivatedsludge
aerobiczonedesignasthenitrifyingbacteriahaveslowergrowthratesthentheBODconsuming
heterotrophicbacteriaandthusrequirealongerSRT.Bacterialgrowthratemodels(Monodmodel)or
46
August2010
substrateutilizationmodelsarecommonlyusedtodescribenitrificationkinetics.Themodelsareused
tofitdatafromsteadystateornonsteadystatenitrificationsystemstoobtainappropriatecoefficients.
BecauseithasasignificanteffectonAOBandNOBgrowthrates,substrateutilizationrates,and
endogenousdecayrates,temperatureisaccountedforinnitrificationkineticmodels.Themodelswillbe
reviewedfirstbeforepresentingkineticcoefficientinformation.
TheMonodmodelisusedtodescribethespecificgrowthrateofnitrifyingbacteriaasafunction
oftheconcentrationofthenitrogenspeciesbeingoxidized,DOconcentration,andendogenousdecay
rateasshowninEquations4.6and4.7belowforAOBandNOB,respectively.Forcompletelymixed
activatedsludgesystemsattemperaturesbelow25C,theprocessissufficientlymodeledbyconsidering
onlytheAOB,astheNOBareabletousenitritemuchfaster.However,athighertemperatures,the
kineticsofbothgroupsmustbeconsideredastheeffectofhighertemperaturefavorsAOBmorethan
NOB.ThisisanunderlyingbasisfortheSingleReactorHighActivityAmmoniaRemovalOverNitrite
(SHARON)processfornitrogenremoval,whichisdescribedlaterinthischapter.Fornitrificationin
batchfedsystemsorforaerobicreactorsinseries,itmaybemoreappropriatetomodelbothAOBand
NOBtodeterminetreatmentNH4NandNO2Nconcentrations(ChandranandSmets,2000).
SNH
So
AOB max,AOB
b AOB
SNH KNH So K o,AOB
Eq.47
Eq.46
SNO
So
NOB max,NOB
bNOB
SNO KNO So K o,NOB
Where:
AOB
=Specificgrowthrateofammoniaoxidizingbacteria,gVSS/gVSSd
=Specificgrowthrateofnitriteoxidizingbacteria,gVSS/gVSSd
NOB
MAX,AOB
=Maximumspecificgrowthrateofammoniaoxidizingbacteria,gVSS/gVSSd
MAX,NOB
=Maximumspecificgrowthrateofnitriteoxidizingbacteria,gVSS/gVSSd
bAOB
=Specificendogenousdecayrateofammoniaoxidizingbacteria,gVSSlost/gVSSd
bNOB
=Specificendogenousdecayrateofammoniaoxidizingbacteria,gVSSlost/gVSSd
=NH+4Nconcentration,mg/L
SNH
KNH
=HalfvelocitycoefficientforNH+4N,mg/L
So
=DOconcentration,mg/L
Ko,AOB
=HalfvelocitycoefficientforDOforAOB,mg/L
SNO
=NO2Nconcentration,mg/L
=HalfvelocitycoefficiencyforNO2N,mg/L
KNO
Ko,NOB
=HalfvelocitycoefficientforDOforNOB,mg/L
ThenextseveralequationsdescribethespecificgrowthrateofAOB,volumetricNH4Noxidation
rates,andeffluentNH4NconcentrationasafunctionofkineticparametersandsystemSRT.An
identicalsetofequationscanbeusedforNOBtodescribeNO2Noxidationkineticsandarenotwritten
here.
47
August2010
AOB
SRT
Eq.48
SNH
KNH (1 b AOB SRT)
SRT( max,AOB,DO b AOB ) 1.0
Eq.49
( max,AOB )(So )
(So K o,AOB )
Eq.410
max,AOB,DO
Where:
SRT
=Solidsretentiontime,days
=max,AOBcorrectedforDOconcentration,g/gday
max,AOB,DO
Thenextsetofkineticequationsdescribesnitrificationratesinbatchtestsusingactivated
sludgeornitrifierenrichmentsgrowninbenchscalestudies.Inthiscase,onlytheequationsforAOBare
shownbutasimilarsetofequationswouldapplytoNOB.FromtheMonodequation,bacteriaspecific
growthratecanbedescribedasafunctionofsubstrateutilization.
AOB
rx,AOB
X AOB
SNH
So
max,AOB
SNH KNH So K o,AOB
Eq.411
Where:
rx,AOB =AOBgrowthrate,mg/Lday
XAOB =AOBconcentration,mg/L
SNH
So
rx,AOB max,AOB
X AOB
SNH KNH S o Ko,AOB
Eq.412
Therateofbiomassgrowthisafunctionofthesubstrateutilizationrateandsynthesisyieldcoefficient:
Eq.413
rX, AOB YAOB (rNH )
Where:
=NH+4Noxidationrate,mg/Lday
rNH
CombiningEquations4.12and4.13givestheNH4Nutilizationrate.
48
August2010
SNH
So
rNH max,AOB
X AOB
YAOB SNH KNH S o K o,AOB
Eq.414
Besidesthekineticmodelparameters,theammoniautilizationratedependsontheAOB
concentration,whichcanbecalculatedfromamassbalanceontheaveragedailyamountofammonia
oxidized,theAOBsynthesisyieldandendogenousdecaycoefficient,andtheaverageSRT
(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
X AOB
Q(YAOB )(Nox)SRT
V(1 b AOB SRT)
Eq.415
Where:
XAOB
=AOBconcentration,mg/L
Q
=Averagedailyinfluentflow,L/day
Nox
=NH+4NoxidizedbyAOBfrominfluent,mg/L
V
=VolumeofreactorcontainingAOB,L
CombiningEquations414and415givestheNH4NutilizationratewiththegrowthreactorAOB:
Q(Nox)SRT
SNH
So
rNH max,AOB
SNH KNH S o K o,AOB V(1 b AOB SRT)
Eq.416
Equations49and416representexpressionsthatcanbeusedfortwodifferenttypesoftests
toobtainnitrificationkinetics.Inthefirstcase,theeffluentNH4Nconcentrationismeasuredat
differentoperatingSRTstofitthemodeltoobtainthemaximumspecificgrowthrate,max,AOB.For
Equation416,carefulmeasurementofNH4NoxidationovertimeandSRTcontrolandmaintenanceis
neededbeforeusingthereactorbiomassinbatchnitrificationtestsinwhichrNHversusSNHismeasured
toobtainmax,AOBbymodelfitting.Itshouldbenotedthatinbothcasesthevalueusedforthe
endogenousdecayrate,bAOB,affectsthecalculatedmax,AOBvalue.
4.5.1 AOBkinetics
Inthenitrificationmodelequationsshownpreviously,thevalueusedforthespecificdecay
coefficientdirectlyaffectsthecalculatedmax,AOBvalue.Foragivenobservednitrificationrateoreffluent
NH4NconcentrationwithSRT,higherspecificdecaycoefficientvaluesresultinhighermax,AOBvaluesand
viceversa.Thus,itisdifficulttocomparenitrificationkineticvaluesbetweenstudieswithoutknowing
thevalueforbAOB,andthemaximumspecificgrowthrateisnotaccuratelydeterminedwithoutan
accuratedeterminationofthespecificendogenousdecayratecoefficient(Doldetal.2005).
Inearlyworkonnitrificationkinetics,thespecificendogenousdecayratewasbelievedtobe
verylowandgenerallyignored(Downingetal.1964;USEPA1993).TestsevaluatingAOBnitrification
kineticsrevealedtheimportanceofthespecificendogenousdecayratevalue(Melceretal.2003).
Similarmax,AOBvalueswereobtainedinastudyusingthreedifferentexperimentalmethodstoobtain
nitrificationkineticsandapplyingabAOBvalueof0.17g/gdobtainedinaseparatetestmethod(Doldet
49
August2010
al.2002;Melceretal.2003).ThespecificendogenousdecaycoefficientobtainedintheWater
EnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)studyisincludedinTable43andcomparescloselytoresults
fromotherstudiesaimedatdeterminingbAOB.Manseretal.(2006)obtainedsimilarspecific
endogenousdecayratesforAOBandNOBand,inaddition,obtainedsimilarratesformembrane
bioreactor(MBR)andconventionalclarificationactivatedsludge.
Lowerspecificendogenousdecaycoefficientshavebeenfoundforanoxicaerobicsystemswith
LeeandOleszkiewicz(2003),Nowaketal.(1994),andSiegristetal.(1999)reportingabouta50percent
reductioninthedecayrate.Temperatureisalsoknowntoaffecttheendogenousdecayrateofboth
heterotrophicandautotrophicmicroorganisms.TheeffectoftemperatureontheAOBendogenous
decayratewasalsodeterminedintheWERFstudy(Melceretal.2003)from10to20C,andthe
temperaturecoefficient,,wasfoundtobe1.029inthetemperaturerelationshipgiveninEq.417
below.
Eq.417
b AOB,T b AOB,20 ( )(T 20)
Where:
bAOB,T
=EndogenousdecayrateattemperatureT,oC
bAOB,20
=Endogenousdecayrateat20oC
=Temperaturecoefficient,1.029
Table43.SummaryofTestResultsonMeasuringSpecificEndogenousDecayCoefficient
Rates(AllRatesat20C)
Specificendogenous
Nitrifier decayrate(b),gVSS/g
Bacteriaorsource
group
VSSday
Reference
Aerobicactivatedsludge
AOB
0.17
Melceretal.,2003
Nitrobacter
NOB
0.14
CoppandMurphy,1995
AOB
0.17
CoppandMurphy,1995
AOB
0.15*
Manseretal.,2006
NOB
0.14*
Manseretal.,2006
AOB
0.20**
Nowaketal.,1994
AOB
0.21**
Siegristetal.,1999
AOB
0.15
LeeandOleszkiewicz,2002
Anoxicaerobicactivatedsludge
AOB
0.10
LeeandOleszkiewicz,2003
AOB
0.09
Katehisetal.,2002
*Showedsimilarresultsformembranebioreactorandconventionalactivatedsludgesystems.
**Reportedthatthedecayrateunderanoxicconditionswasaboutoftheaerobicsystemrate.
OftenreferredtoasAUT,themaxvalueforAOBandNOBisacriticalkineticparameterand
showntobeafunctionoftemperature.AOBhashistoricallybeenthefocusofthesekineticevaluations,
andresultsonthe20Cvalueandeffectoftemperaturehavevariedwidely.Reportedvaluesforearly
studiesonAOBmaxat20Crangefrom0.320.77g/gday(Downingetal.1964;DowningandHopwood
1964;Barnard1975;LawrenceandBrown1976;HallandMurphy1980;Randalletal.1992),butthese
studiesassumednegligibleorverylowspecificendogenousdecayrates.Atthehighermeasureddecay
410
August2010
rate,theWERFstudy(Melceretal.2003)obtaineda20Cmaxvalueof0.90g/gdayforthreedifferent
testmethods.However,morerecentstudiesalsoshowawiderangeinAOB20Cmaxvalues;0.63
4.55g/gday(Chandranetal.2008;MarsiliLibellietal.2001,andIacopozzietal.2007).
Similarly,thereportedeffectoftemperatureonthe20Cmaxvaluehasalsorangedwidelywith
theratioofthe20Cmax/10Cmaxfrom2.2to3.7.TheratiointheWERFstudy(Melceretal.2003)was
2.0.Reporteddifferencesinkineticdataaretheresultofdataanalysismethods,activatedsludge
characteristics,andoperatingconditions.Comparingorusingonlysinglekineticparametervalues
betweenstudiesmaynotbevalidasthecalculatedkineticvalueisrelatedtothedeterminedor
assumedvaluesforotherkineticparametersinthenitrificationmodel.Becauseacompletesetof
modelparametersweredeterminedintheevaluationofAOBkineticsintheWERFstudy(Melceretal.
2003),thesevaluesaregiveninthefollowingnitrificationAOBkineticvaluesinTable44forusein
nitrificationkineticmodeling(Eq.49through416).ThesestudiesweredoneatDOconcentrationsin
the46mg/LrangesotheDOhalfsaturationvaluewasnotevaluated.ThevaluefromtheIWAactivated
sludgemodelreportisusedhere(Henzeetal.2000).Designersshouldnottakethesevaluesas
absoluteandifatallpossiblemeasureandcalibratenitrificationkineticvaluesforthedesignfacility
(SeeChapter10,Section10.8foradditionaldiscussion).
Table44.SummaryofAOBNitrificationKineticCoefficientValues.
20C
Temperature
Parameter
Units
Value
correctionvalue,
Yield,Y
Specificendogenousdecay
rate,b
Maximumspecificgrowth
rate,max
Halfvelocitycoefficient,
KNH
Halfvelocitycoefficient,K0
gVSS/gNoxidized
0.15
1.0
gVSS/gVSSday
0.17
1.029
gVSS/gVSSday
0.90
1.072
mg/L
0.70
1.0
mg/L
0.50
1.0
Source:AllfromMelceretal.(2003)excepttheDOhalfvelocitycoefficient;fromHenzeetal.(2000).
Mixing,flocsize,andsitespecificoperatingconditionscanaffectnitrificationkinetics.Largefloc
sizesandlessmixingwillhavemorediffusionlimitationswithlowerinorganicnitrogenandDO
concentrationswithinthefloc.Thus,lowerspecificnitrificationrateswillbeobservedastheratesare
normalizedtothetotalVSSconcentrationorbiomassconcentration.Theeffectofkineticlimitations
wasdiscussedbyManseretal.(2005)inwhichtheyobservedlowerAOBandNOBhalfvelocity
coefficientvalues(Table45)foraconventionalactivatedsludgeversusMBR.TheMBRhadsmallerfloc
size,whichtheyreasonedwasduetogreateragitationformembranescour.Theeffectwasgreateston
theoxygenhalfvelocitycoefficient.Ifconstanthalfvelocitycoefficientvalueswereassumedin
interpretingthetestdata,alowerobservedmaxvaluewouldhavebeendetermined.
411
August2010
Table45.ComparisonofNitrificationHalfVelocityCoefficients(mg/L)inMBRand
ConventionalActivatedSludge(CAS)Systems
Nitrifiergroup
MBR
CAS
AOB
Oxygen,Ko
Ammonia,KNH
NOB
Oxygen,Ko
Ammonia,KNH
Source:Manseretal.2005.
0.18
0.13
0.13
0.17
0.79
0.14
0.47
0.28
Inadditiontoflocsize,theoxygenuptakerate(OUR)oftheactivatedsludgecanaffectthe
observednitrificationrateatagivenbulkliquidDOconcentrationduetomoreoxygenlimitationinthe
flocatgreaterOURs.Stenseletal.(1993)showedthatforastagednitrificationaerationtank,ahigher
DOconcentrationwasneededtomaintainthesamenitrificationrateatagivenbulkliquidNH4N
concentrationformixedliquorintheinitialaerobicstagesversusmidtolatterstages.ThehigherOUR
resultedingreateroxygenlimitationsintheactivatedsludgeflocandaffectednitrificationrates.The
effectsofmixedliquorsuspendedsolids(MLSS)concentration,flocsize,andOURarenotcurrently
factoredintonitrificationkineticmodels.AlsonotethatthetransferrateofDOtothenitrifiersceases
tobeasignificantnitrificationfactorinlonghydraulicresidencetime(HRT)longSRTsystemssuchas
extendedaerationsystems.Forthesesystems,completenitrificationcanbeaccomplishedatverylow
DOconcentrations,i.e.<0.3mg/L,eventhoughthekineticratewouldbefasterifDOconcentrationwas
higher.
4.5.2 NOBkinetics
NOBkineticsareofmajorinterestwithregardtotreatinghightemperatureanaerobicdigestion
centrateorfiltratestreamsfornitrogenremovalwiththeSHARONprocess(discussedbelow)orfor
operatingconditionsthatleadtohighereffluentNO2Nconcentrations.StudiesonNOBkineticshave
beenbasedonmodelfittingofpilotplantorbenchscaleresultsinwhichselectedparametershave
beenarbitrarilyfixedoronevaluatingoneparticularkineticeffectsuchasDOconcentration.Previous
workhasshownthatNOBareinhibitedatlowDOconcentrationswithNO2Nconcentrationsincreasing
atlowDO(Picioreanuetal.1997;Garridoetal.1997;PengandZhu2006;Contrerasetal.2008),
suggestingahigherKoforNOBthanAOB.ValuesforKoforstudieswithNOBrangedfrom0.50to1.75
mg/L.ForstudieswithbothNOBandAOB,theratiooftheNOBtoAOBDOhalfvelocitycoefficients
were2.36(Guisasolaetal.2005),1.4(Ciudadetal.2006),and0.59(Manseretal.2005).Absolute
valuesofoxygenhalfvelocitycoefficientsdependontheoperatingandactivatedsludgeflocconditions
andpossiblediffusionlimitationsinadditiontothebacterialaffinityforDO.
NitriteoxidationKineticcoefficientsusedinmodelfitsvarywidely(Sinetal.,2008).Lacopozzi
etal.(2007)presentedamodelforthetwostepnitrificationprocessusing20CmaxvaluesfromMarsili
Libellieetal.(2001)of0.63g/ddforAOBand1.04g/gdforNOB.BasedonEq.417,theirassumed
temperaturecoefficient,,valuesformaxwere1.06forbothAOBandNOB.However,Kaelinetal.
(2009)fitatwostepAOBandNOBkineticmodeltoBNRpilotplantdataatwinterandsummer
conditionswithconstantorintermittentaeration.Theirdatafitresultedin20Cmaxvaluesof0.90and
0.65g/gdforAOBandNOB,respectively.Theyfoundthattheeffectoftemperaturewasmore
pronouncedwithAOBversusNOB,andbasedonEq.417,theirtemperaturecoefficient,,valuesfor
bothmaxandbwere1.13forAOBand1.08forNOB.Theseresultsareconsistentwithobservationsthat
412
August2010
athighertemperatures,above25C,effluentNO2NconcentrationscanbehigherthanNO3N
concentrations.ThereislittleworkonhalfvelocitycoefficientsforNO2NoxidationbyNOB.Manseret
al.(2005),inacomparativestudy,foundthattheNOBNsubstratehalfvelocitycoefficientwasslightly
higherthanthatforAOB,butobservationsonactivatedsludgenitrificationsuggestsalowerhalf
velocitycoefficientvalue.BasedontheinformationinTable43,thespecificendogenousdecayrate
maybeassumedequalat20CforAOBandNOB
ApossiblesetofkineticcoefficientsforNOBaregiveninTable46andareselectedto
representthegenerallyobservedeffectsoftemperatureandDOconcentration.TheDOhalfvelocity
coefficientismuchlowerthanthatforAOB,asshownbyContrerasetal.(2008)andGuisasolaetal.
(2005).MoreresearchisneededonNOBkinetics,andsitespecifictestingformodelcalibrationmay
giveadifferentsetofvaluesthanthatshowninTable46.
Table46.SummaryofNOBNitrificationKineticCoefficientValues
20C
Temperature
Parameter
Units
Value
correctionvalue,
Yield,Y
Specificendogenousdecay
rate,b
Maximumspecificgrowth
rate,max
Halfvelocitycoefficient,
KNO
Halfvelocitycoefficient,K0
gVSS/gNoxidized
gVSS/gVSSday
gVSS/gVSSday
mg/L
mg/L
0.05
0.17
1.00
0.20
0.90
1.0
1.063
1.063
1.0
1.0
4.5.3 EffectsofTemperatureandDissolvedOxygenonNitrificationKinetics
TheeffectsoftemperatureandaerationtankDOconcentrationoneffluentNH4NandNO2N
concentrationsareillustratedinFigures42and43,respectivelyforasinglecompletelymixedactivated
sludge(CMAS)aerationtankusingEqs.49and410.Nosafetyfactorsarebuiltintothesegraphical
presentations.Figure42showsthatamuchlongerSRTisneededatalowertemperaturetoachieve
loweffluentNH4NconcentrationsandthattheeffluentNO2Nconcentrationisalwayslowerthanthe
NH4Nconcentration.TheexampleinFigure43showsthatatthelongerSRTneededtohaveaneffluent
NH4Nconcentrationof1.0mg/LinaCMASsystemat100CtheeffectofDOconcentrationonthe
effluentNO2Nconcentrationisminimal,butatthehigher200CtemperatureandlowerSRTneededto
achieveaneffluentNH4Nconcentrationof1.0mg/L,lowerDOconcentrationsresultinmuchhigher
effluentNO2Nconcentrations.
413
August2010
3.5
NH4-N, 10
NO2-N, 10
NH4-N, 20
NO2-N, 20
2.5
2.0
1.5
NH -N, NO -N, mg/L
3.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
10
SRT, days
15
20
Figure42.EffectofSRTandtemperatureoneffluentNH4+NandNO2NconcentrationsusingkineticdatainTable46and44
forCMASwithnosafetyfactor
2.5
NO2-N, 20
NO2-N, 10
1.5
NH -N = 1.0 mg/L
NO -N, mg/L
2.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
DO, mg/L
2.0
2.5
Figure43.EffectofDOconcentrationoneffluentNO2NconcentrationsforSRTsat100Cand200CthatgiveaneffluentNH4N
concentrationof1.0mg/LusingkineticdatainTable44and46forCMASwithnosafetyfactor
414
August2010
ItshouldbenotedthattheaboveexamplesontheeffectofSRT,temperatureandDO
concentrationwerebasedonsteadystateconditionsofconstantflowandinfluentconcentrations.
Undertypicaldiurnalflowandconcentrationsfordomesticwastewaters,theSRTwouldhavetobe
increasedtoachievethesameeffluentconcentrationsshown.Dynamicsimulationmodelsareusedfor
designtoaccountforvariableloadingeffects.(SeeChapter10fordetailedguidelinesonusingmodels
fordesignofbiologicalnitrogenremovalsystems.)TypicallytheSRTmaybe40to80percentgreater
thanindicatedbythefigures.
TherequiredSRTfornitrificationcanbereducedsignificantlyformanyapplicationsbyusinga
seriesofaerationtanks(stagedsystems)versusasingleaerationtank.Theeffectdependsonthe
influentnitrogenconcentrationtotheaerationtank,temperature,andeffluentNH4Nconcentration
goal.Theeffectislesspronouncedforsystemswithhighreturnsludgerecyclerates,suchasMBRs,in
whichtheinfluentnitrogenissubstantiallydiluted.
4.5.4 AOBandNOBKineticsatHighTemperature(SHARONprocess)
TheeffectoftemperatureontherelativeAOBandNOBkineticsisimportantintheSHARON
(SingleReactorHighActivityAmmoniaRemovalOverNitrite)processusedinsidestreamtreatmentof
highammoniaanaerobicdigestioncentrate/filtratefrombiosolidsdewatering(VanHulleetal.2007;
Volckeetal.2007).Theprocesstakesadvantageofahightemperaturecondition(25Cto35C)inwhich
thespecificgrowthrateofAOBishigherthanthatforNOB,sothatatlowenoughoperatingSRTsthe
NOBcanbewashedoutandammoniaisoxidizedtomainlynitrite(nitritationprocess).Lowdissolved
oxygenconditionscanalsohinderNOBgrowthratesintheprocess.Basedontheoxygenrequirements
shownaboveof3.22gO2usedforNH4NoxidationtoNO2Nand1.11gO2foroxidationofNO2Nto
NO3N,thenitritationprocessreducestheenergyrequiredforcompletenitrificationby26percent.The
carbonneededfordenitrificationisalsodecreased.
WashoutoccurswhentheSRTislowerthanthatneededtoaccommodatethemaximumnet
growthrateofthenitrifiersinthereactor.FromEquations46and48,thewashoutorminimalSRTis
asfollowsassumingexcessNsubstrateandDOconcentration:
SRTmin
1
max b
Eq.418
ThewashoutSRTforAOBandNOBasafunctionoftemperatureusingthekineticcoefficientsin
Tables42and44,respectively,iscomparedtothatclaimedbyHellingaetal.(1998).Above20C,the
washoutSRTforAOBissimilarandbelowthatforNOB.
AcomprehensivemodelfortheSHARONprocess,includingalkalinityeffects,pH,freeammonia
andnitrousacidtoxicity,andAOBandNOBkineticswasevaluatedbyMagrietal.(2007)withabench
scalereactoroperationat35C.Themodelhightemperaturemaxanddecaycoefficient(b)valuesfor
AOBandNOBthatbestfitthelabresultswere1.75and0.56g/gdand0.23and0.04g/gd,respectively.
ThesevaluesresultinwashoutSRTsof0.66daysforAOBand1.92daysforNOB,whichisintherangeof
thatshownforFigure44at35C.
415
August2010
Minimal Washout SRT, days
6.0
5.0
4.0
AOB,H
AOB,M
NOB,H
NOB,M
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
0
Temperature, C
35.0
Figure44.EffectoftemperatureonminimalwashoutSRTAOB,HandNOB,HfromHellingaetal.(1998)andAOB,MandNOB,
MfromTables42and44.
4.6
InhibitoryEffectsofEnvironmentalConditionsonNitrification
EffectofpH
AmmoniaoxidationratesdecreaserapidlywithdecreasingpHbelowapHof6.8,andanoptimal
pHisintherangeof7.5to8.0(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).TheeffectoflowerpHontheammonia
oxidationratemaybeduetothereductioninfreeammonia(NH3)concentration,asSuzukietal.(1974)
reportedthatNH3NisthetruesubstrateforAOB.AnoperatingpHof7.0to7.2isoftenusedfordesign
andoperationtoassurereliablenitrificationrates,andforsomefacilitiesitisnecessarytoaddalkalinity
tomaintainpH.
EffectofFreeAmmoniaandNitrousAcid(HNO2)
Forhighammoniastrengthwastewaters,suchasfromanaerobicdigestercentratereturn,
animalfeedlots,andindustrialwastewater,theissueofNH3NandHNO2concentrationinhibitionon
AOBandNOBbecomesimportant.ConditionsthatinhibitNOBactivitytostopnitrificationatNO2N
havebeenmodeledforsequencingbatchreactors(Pambrunetal.2006;KyungandChoi2001).
NH3NismoreinhibitorytoNOBthantoAOB(PengandZhu,2006),whileHNO2ismore
inhibitorytoAOB.Anthonisenetal.(1976)andTurkandMavinic(1986)foundNOBinhibitionatNH3N
concentrationsfrom0.10to1.0mg/L,whereasMauretetal.(1996)foundinhibitionat6.6to8.9mg
NH3N/L.WongChongandLoehr(1975)reportedinhibitionbyNH3Nat3.5mg/Lforunacclimated
416
August2010
bacteriaand40mg/Lafteranacclimationphase.KyungandChoi(2001)found50percentinhibitionat
11.1mgNH3N/L.
ForAOBinhibitionbyNH3N,Anthonisenetal.(1976)reportedhigherconcentrationsthanfor
NOBat7.0mg/L,andAbelingandSeyfried(1992)foundcompletelossofactivityata20mgNH3N/L
concentration.However,withacclimationWongChongandLoehr(1975)foundstableAOBactivityat
50mgNH3N/L.HNO2concentrationsfoundinhibitorytoAOBwere0.065to0.83mg/LbyAnthonisen
etal.(1976).
TherelativeconcentrationofNH3NandHNO2areafunctionofpHandtemperatureandcanbe
calculatedaccordingtoAnthonisenetal.(1976):
NH3 N
TAN(10pH )
1 10pH
K
Eq.419
Eq.420
Eq.421
Eq.422
and

K a exp6,334/(273 T)
NO2 N

HNO2 N
pH
K
*
10
n
and
Kn exp 2,300/(273 T)
Where:
TAN
=Totalammonianitrogen,NH3N+NH4Nconcentration,mg/L
HNO2N =FreenitrousacidconcentrationasN,mg/L
NO2N =NitriteconcentrationasN,mg/L
T
=Temperature,oC
=Ionizationconstantforammonium
Ka
Kn
=Ionizationconstantfornitrousacid
ValuesforKaandKnat25Care109.24and103.4,respectively.
TheaboveequationswereusedtocalculatepossibleTANandNO2Nconcentrationsthatmay
inhibitAOBandNOBatpHvaluesfrom6.0to8.0at20C.ResultsaresummarizedinTable47
417
August2010

Table47.NH4NandNO2NConcentrationsthatMayInhibitNitrificationasaFunctionofpH
at20C.
NH3Inhibition
pH
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
AOB(7.0mgNH3N/L)
NH4N,mg/L
17,100
5,400
1,700
550
178
pH
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
AOB(0.065to0.80mgHNO2/L)
NO2N,mg/L
25311
80986
2533,118
8019,861
2,53331,185
NOB(0.10to3.5mgNH3N/L)
NH4N,mg/L
2448,500
772,700
25860
8274
389
HNO2Inhibition
Effectofsalinity
Nitrifyingbacteriaareabletomaintainactivityunderhighsalineconcentrations.Camposetal.
(2002)found100percentnitrificationat13.7gNaCl/Lbutadeclineatcloseto20g/L.
InorganicandOrganicCompoundInhibitorstoNitrification
Nitrifyingbacteriaaremuchmoresusceptibletoinhibitionthanareheterotrophicbacteria.
Theyareaffectedbyawiderangeoforganicandinorganiccompoundsthatinmanycasesdoesnotkill
thembutgreatlyreducestheirgrowthrate.Becauseoftheirsensitivity,theyhavebeenproposedas
indicatorsofthepresenceoftoxiccompoundsatlowconcentrations(BlumandSpeece1991).Toxic
organiccompoundsincludeorganicsolvents,amines,phenoliccompounds,alcohols,cyanates,ethers,
carbamates,andbenzenes.Themostsignificantheavymetalsthataretoxictonitrifyingbacteriaatlow
reactorsolubleconcentrationsarenickel(0.25mg/L),chromium(0.25mg/L),andcopper(0.10mg/L)
(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).AppendixBpresentsalistofknownorganiccompoundsthathavebeen
identifiedasinhibitorytonitrification(WEFandASCE1998).
4.7
DenitrificationFundamentals
Denitrificationisthebiologicalreductionofnitrateornitriteandcanbeassimilatoryand/or
dissimilatory.AssimilatorydenitrificationinvolvesthereductionofnitrateornitritetoNH4Nforusein
biomasssynthesiswhenNH4Nisnototherwiseavailable.Mostreferencestobiologicaldenitrification
fornitrogenremovalrefertodissimilatorydenitrificationinwhichnitrate/nitriteistheultimateelectron
acceptorinthebacteriacellrespiratoryelectrontransportchainfortheoxidationofvariousorganicand
inorganicsubstrates.
418
August2010

Nitratereductionfollowsaseriesofintermediateproducts,nitrite(NO2),nitricoxide(NO),and
nitrousoxide(N2O)tonitrogengas(N2),witheachstepusingaspecificreductaseenzymeinthe
respiratorychaintotransferelectrons.NOandN2OarenitrogengasesandtheemissionofN2Oisof
greatconcernbecauseitisoneofthemostsignificantgreenhousegases(SeeChapter2foradditional
discussion).
NO3 NO2 NO N2O N2

Eq.423
Denitrificationcanbeaccomplishedbyheterotrophicbacteriaoxidizingorganicsubstrates,
heterotrophicnitrifyingbacteria,andautotrophicbacteria.Heterotrophicbacteriaaremainly
responsiblefordenitrificationinthebiologicalnitrificationdenitrificationprocesses.Most
heterotrophicbacteriaresponsibleforbiologicaldenitrificationuseBODininfluentwastewaterare
facultativeaerobicbacteriawiththeabilitytouseelementaloxygen,nitrate,ornitriteastheirterminal
electronacceptorsfortheoxidationoforganicmaterial.Whenoxygenispresent,theywilluseoxygen
astheelectronacceptor,butthereductaseenzymesfordenitrificationareinducedintheabsenceof
oxygen(Payne1973).Autotrophicdenitrificationisofinterestforhighertemperaturerecyclestreams
fromanaerobicdigestioncentrate/filtratewiththeANAMMOXbacteriaprocessbeingtheprime
example.
Microbiologistsgenerallyusethetermanaerobictodescribebiologicalreactionsinthe
absenceofoxygen.Todistinguishanaerobicconditionsforwhichthebiologicalactivityoccursmainly
withnitrateornitriteastheelectronacceptorinbiologicalnitrificationdenitrificationprocesses,the
termanoxichasbeenapplied.
4.8
MicrobiologyofDenitrification
Heterotrophicbacteriacapableofdenitrificationareverycommoninwastewatertreatmentand
includethefollowinggenera:Achromobacter,Acinetobacter,Agrobacterium,Alcaligenes,Arthrobacter,
Bacillus,Chromobacterium,Corynebacterium,Flavobacterium,Hypomicrobium,Moraxella,Nesseria,
Paracoccus,Propionibacteria,Pseudomonas,Rhizobium,Rhodopseudmonas,Spirillum,andVibrio
(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
InmanyBNRprocessapplications,asupplementalcarbonsourcehasbeenneededto(1)
providesufficientcarbonfornitrate/nitritereductionforwastewaterswithlowerC/Nratios,(2)
acceleratedenitrificationratestoreducetankvolumerequirements,or(3)provideacarbonsourcefor
furthernitrate/nitritereductioninpostanoxicsystemssuchasdenitrificationfilters.Methanol(CH3OH)
hasbeencommonlyusedbecauseitisinexpensive,butbecauseofitsuniquesinglecarboncompound
structure,itsupportsgrowthofalessdiverse,morespecificbacterialpopulation.Themethanolutilizing
bacteriacommonlyfoundindenitrifyingsystemarebacteriaofthegenusHyphomicrobium
(TimmermansandVanHaute1983;SperlandHoare1971)andpossiblyParacoccusdenitrificans(Van
VerseveldandStouthamer1978).Recently,usingstableisotopeprobing,Baytshtoketal.(2008)
identifiedaMethyloversatilisuniversalisstraininadditiontoHyphomicrobiumzavarzinili.
AheterotrophicnitrifyingbacteriumthatcandenitrifyandhasbeenstudiedoftenisParococcus
pantotropha,whichobtainsenergybynitrateornitritereductionwhileoxidizingammoniaunder
aerobicconditions.Areadilyavailablecarbonsource,suchasacetate,isneeded(Robertsonand
419
August2010
Kuenen,1990).Theconditionsrequiredforthisformofdenitrificationarenotpracticalinbiological
wastewatertreatment.
Denitrificationhasbeenobservedforanumberofautotrophicbacteriausingnitrate/nitriteto
oxidizeavarietyofelectronacceptorsincludingzerovalanceironandFe(II)byParacoccusferrooxidans,
Paracoccusdenitrificans,P.pantotrophus,andP.versutus(Kumaraswamyetal.2006Kielemoesetal.
2000),reducedsulfurcompoundsbyThiobacillusdenitrificans(Bocketal.1995)andammoniaby
Nitrosomonaseutropha,nitrosomonaseuropaea,andnitrosolobusmultiformis(PothandFocht1985;
ZartandBock1998;Schmidtetal.2003).Ammoniaoxidationbynitrosomonasunderanoxicconditions
hasbeenshowntobeslowandoflittlepracticalsignificanceinactivatedsludgetreatment(Littletonet
al.2003).
MorerecentlyMulderetal.(1995)discoveredauniqueautotrophicbacteriainadenitrifing
fluidizedbedreactorwiththeabilitytooxidizeammoniatonitrogengasusingnitriteastheelectron
acceptor.ThisbiologicalreactionwastermedANAMMOX(ANaerobicAMMoniaOXidation).The
autotrophicorganismscapablenitritereductionwithoutcarbonadditionhavebeenidentifiedinthe
ANAMMOXprocess(Schmidtetal.2003)asCandidatusBrocadiaanammoxidansandCandidatus
KueneniastuttgartiensisandbelongtotheorderPlanctomycetales,adivisionwithinthedomain
Bacteria(Strousetal.1999).Underanaerobicconditions,ammoniaisoxidizedwiththereductionof
nitritetoproducenitrogengas.Theyareslowgrowingorganisms,andthereactionisbestaccomplished
attemperaturesabove25C.
4.9
MetabolismandStoichiometryofHeterotrophicDenitrification
Solubleorganicsubstratesareconsumedduringheterotrophicdenitrification,withaportionof
thesubstrateCODoxidizedusingnitrateornitriteastheelectronacceptorandtheotherCODportion
foundincellbiomass.Fordenitrificationofinfluentwastewatersuchasinpreanoxiczonesbefore
aeration,thesolubleorganicsubstrateconsumedisfromthefollowing:
ThesolubledegradableCODintheinfluentwastewater
HydrolysisofbiodegradableparticulateandcolloidalCODintheinfluentwastewater
DegradableCODreleasefromendogenousdecay
OxidationreactionsareshownasfollowsforwastewaterrepresentedasC10H19O3N(Tchobanoglouset
al.2003)andcommonexogenoussubstrates.
Wastewater:
C10H19O3N 10NO3 5N2 10CO2 3H2O NH3 10OH
Eq.424
Methanol:
5CH3OH 6NO3 3N2 5CO2 7H2O 6OH
Eq.425
Ethanol:
5CH3CH2OH 12NO3 6N2 10CO2 9H2O 12OH
Eq.426
420
August2010
Acetate:
5CH3COOH 8NO3 4N2 10CO2 6H2O 8OH
Eq.427
Inallthesereactions,1moleofhydroxidealkalinityisproducedpermoleofNO3reducedorone
equivalentOHperequivalentN.Thisequatesto50mgalkalinityasCaCO3per14mgNreducedor3.57
mgalkalinityasCaCO3producedpermgNO3Nreduced.ThesamealkalinityratioalsoappliestoNO2N
reduction.
Intheabovereactions,nitrateservesasanelectronacceptorforoxidationreductionreactions
tooxidizetheorganicsubstrateasisdonewithoxygenastheelectronacceptor.BecauseCODbalances
areusefulinbiologicalprocessdesigntoequatethebiodegradablesubstrateconsumedtooxygenor
electronacceptorneedsplusbiomassCOD,itisconvenienttounderstandtheoxygenequivalentofNO3
NandNO2N.Thiscanbedonebycomparingthehalfreactionsforamoleofelectrontransferas
follows:
Oxygen:
0.25O2 H e 0.5H2O
Eq.428
Nitrate:
0.20NO3 1.2H e 0.1N2 0.6H2O
Eq.429
Nitrite:
0.33NO2 1.33H e 0.17N2 0.67H2O
Eq.430
ForNO3N,0.20molesareequivalenttotheoxidationby0.25molesofoxygen,andthusthe
oxygenequivalentofNO3Nequals(0.25*32)/(0.20*14)=2.86gO2equivalent/gNO3Nreduced.
Similarly,theoxygenequivalentofNO2Nis1.73gO2/gNO2Nreduced.Thus,lesssubstrateoxidationis
neededperunitofoxidizednitrogenremovedforNO2NreductioncomparedtoNO3Nreductionso
thatprocessesthatstopnitrificationatNO2Nneedlesscarbonfordenitrification.
4.10 BiologicalDenitrificationKineticswithInfluentWastewater
DenitrificationratesinpreorpostanoxiczonesinBNRprocessesdependonmanyfactors.A
semiempiricalapproachhasbeentoassesstherateintermsofaspecificdenitrificationrate(SDNR)in
termsofgNO3Nreduced/gmixedliquorVSS(MLVSS)day.Dependingonthewastewater
characteristics,temperature,anddesignloadingtoapreanoxiczone,theSDNRmayrangefrom0.03to
0.20gNO3N/gMLVSSday.Forpostanoxictanksitmayrangefrom0.01to0.03gNO3N/gMLVSSday,
wherethedenitrificationrateisdrivenmainlybyendogenousrespirationrates(Tchobanoglousetal.
2003).Thedenitrificationrateinanactivatedsludgereactorisaffectedbymanyfactorsandcanbe
determinedusingsimulationmodelsbasedonkineticequations.
Theorganicsubstrateremovalratebydenitrifiersdeterminesthenitratereductionrate.The
substrateremovalrateiscommonlydescribedbyMonodkineticsasfollowsandisaffectedbythe
organicsubstrate,NO3NandDOconcentrations,andthebiomassinthereactorthatarefacultative
nitratereducers:
421
August2010
rSs
1 max (S s ) S NO K O,H
( ) X H
YH K s S s K NO S NO S O K O,H
Eq.431
Where:
rSs
=Substrateutilizationrateinthereactor,mg/Ld
YH
=Heterotrophicbacteriasynthesisyield,gVSS/gCODused
max =Maximumspecificgrowthrateofdenitrifyingheterotrophs,gVSS/gVSSd
andisafunctionoftemperature
=Solubledegradablesubstrateconcentration,mgCOD/L
SS
KS
=Substrateutilizationhalfvelocitycoefficient,mgCOD/L
SNO
=NO3Nconcentration,mg/L
=Nitratehalfvelocitycoefficient,mg/L
KNO
KO,H
=DOinhibitionconstantfornitratereduction,mg/L
SO
=DOconcentration
=Fractionofheterotrophicbacteriathatcanusenitrateinlieuofoxygen
XH
=Heterotrophicbacteriaconcentration,mg/L
Additionalequationsandmassbalancesarerequiredforthereactortodeterminethereactor
solubledegradableCODconcentrationasafunctionofutilizationwithnitrate,solublesubstrate
enteringthereactor,andsolublesubstrateproducedviahydrolysisofparticulateandcolloidal
degradableCODandfromcelllysisduetoendogenousdecay.Wastewaterswithahigherinfluent
solublebiodegradableCODfractionwillhavehigherdenitrificationratesasthehydrolysisstepto
convertparticulateandcolloidalCODtoreadilyuseablesolubleCODisslowerthanthesolubleCOD
uptakerate.
ThenitrateutilizationrateisrelatedtothefractionofbiodegradableCODusedthatisoxidized
andincorporatedintocellmass.AmassbalanceondegradableCODaccountsforCODoxidizedusing
NO3NandCODincorporatedintocellsynthesisasfollows(Tchobanoglousetal.2003):
rNO
1 1.42YH
rSs
2.86
Eq.432
Where:
=NO3Nreductionrate,mg/Lday
rNO
andcombiningEq.431and432givesthereactorNO3Nreductionrateasfollows:
1 1.42YH max (S s ) SNO K O,H
rNO
S K ( ) X H
2.86Y
K
S
K
S
H
s
s NO
NO O
O,H
Eq.433
Thevalueforisaffectedbythesystemoperatingconditionsandhowmuchofthegrowth
substrateisconsumedunderanoxicconditions.StenselandHorne(2000)showedthatthiscanbeat
least0.80foranoxic/aerobicBNRsystemswithsignificantBODremovalinapreanoxiczone.Literature
valuesfortheheterotrophickineticscoefficientsinEq.431varywidelyandmaybesystemspecificfor
theDOinhibitionandhalfvelocitycoefficients.ExamplesofcoefficientvaluesaregiveninTable48.
422
August2010
Table48.HeterotrophicBacteriaKineticCoefficientsinAnoxic/AerobicActivatedSludge
KineticModelParameter
Units
Maximumspecificgrowthrate,max
Temperaturecoefficient,
Heterotrophicbacteriasynthesisyield,YH
Substrateutilizationhalfvelocitycoefficient,Ks
Nitratehalfvelocitycoefficient,KNO
DOinhibitionconstant,KO,H
Source:BarkerandDold(1997)
TypicalValue
gVSS/gVSSd
gVSS/gCODremoved
mgCOD/L
mgNO3N/L
mgDO/L
3.2
1.029
0.47
5.0
0.10
0.02
TheDOinhibitioncoefficientinEq.433attemptstoaccountfortheinhibitoryeffectofoxygen
ondenitrification.DOinhibitionondenitrificationhasbeenshownatDOconcentrationsof0.20mg/L
bySkermanandMori(1975)andDawsonandMurphy(1972).Oxygeninhibitionisgreateronnitrite
reductionthanonnitratereduction.ThereislessconcernaboutpHeffectsondenitrificationthanfor
autotrophicbacteria,thoughDawsonandMurphy(1972)showedadecreaseindenitrificationratesas
thepHwasdecreasedfrom7.0to6.0inbatchtests.
4.11 DenitrificationCarbonSourcesandRelativeConsumptionRatios
Denitrifyingbacterianeedareadilyavailablecarbonfoodsource,suchassolubleBOD,torapidly
convertnitratetonitrogengas.WWTPsthatmeetverylowtotalnitrogenlimitsoftenuseasecondary
anoxiczoneinwhichsupplementalcarbonisadded.
Ageneralruleofthumbisthat4gofwastewaterinfluentBODisneededpergofNO3Ntobe
removedthroughbiologicaltreatment(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Whendenitrificationisneeded
afternitrification,thereislittleBODremainingsoasupplementalcarbonsourceisoftenneeded.
Supplementalsourcescanbeinternal,suchasfermentedwastewaterorsludge,orexternalor
exogenoussources,suchaspurchasedchemicals.Themostcommonexogenouscarbonsourceinuseis
methanol;however,duetoissuesregardingitssafety,kineticrates,andavailability,somewastewater
systemsareusingalternativecarbonsourcessuchasaceticacid,ethanol,sugar,glycerol,and
proprietarysolutionsdependingontheneedsoftheirparticularfacility(deBarbadilloetal.2008).
Equation432canberearrangedtoshowtheratioofbiodegradableCODrequiredforcomplete
NO3Nreductionasafunctionofthebiomasssynthesisyield.Thisissimilartotheconsumptiveratio
advancedbyMcCartyetal.(1969),inwhichtheyshowedthatexogenoussubstrateswithlowerbiomass
synthesisyieldshadlowerconsumptiveratios,andthusrequiredlesssubstrateadditionrelativetothe
amountofNO3Ntoberemoved.Theconsumptiveratioformethanolwasabout70percentofthatfor
glucose,whichhadahigherbiomasssynthesisyieldcoefficient.Alowerbiomasssynthesisyieldmeans
thatthebacteriaoxidizeagreaterportionofthesubstratetoprovideenergyforbiomassgrowthand
thusagreaterportionoftheCODusedisoxidizedbyNO3Nwithlessendingupinsludgeproduction.
CRNO3
bCOD
2.86

NO3 N 1 1.42YH
Eq.434
423
August2010
Where:
CRNO3 =gCODused/gNO3Nthatiscompletelyreducedintheanoxiczone.
Notethatthevalueof1.42(YH)isequaltothebiomassyieldingbiomassCODproducedpergCOD
consumedforanassumedbiomassformulaofC5H7N2O.
Basedontheoxygenequivalentoftheelectronacceptor,asimilarCRcanbedeterminedfor
bacteriausingNO2Noroxygeninananoxiczone.Oxygenmayentertheanoxiczoneinrecycleflowsor
intheinfluentwastewater.Thusthetotalexogenouschemicaldosemustaccountforotherelectron
acceptorsenteringtheanoxiczonebesidesNO3N.
CRNO2
bCOD
1.73

NO2 N 1 1.42YH
Eq.435
Where:
CRNO2 =gCODused/gNO2Nthatiscompletelyreducedintheanoxiczone.
ComparisonofEquations434and435showsthattheCODadditionforNO2reductionisabout60
percentofthatforNO3reduction.
CR O2
bCOD
1.0
DO
1 1.42YH
Eq.436
Where:
CRO2 =gCODused/gDOthatiscompletelyreducedintheanoxiczone.
Figure45showstheeffectofthebiomassyieldontheratioofelectrondonorneededasCODto
NO3NreducedtoN2.Substratesthathavelowerbiomassyieldswillrequirelowerconsumptiveratios.
424
August2010
8.0
g COD/g NO3-N
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
Biomass Yield, gVSS/gCOD
0.50
Figure45.RatioofCODrequiredtoNO3NcompletelyreduceNO3N(CRNO3)asafunctionofthebiomassyield.
ItshouldbenotedthatthebiomassyieldvalueinEquations434through436canalso
representtheoverallobservedyielddependingonthedenitrificationprocessdesignandwhere
endogenousdecayoccursforthebiomassgrownontheelectrondonor.Forexample,iftheexogenous
substrateisaddedinatertiaryapplicationinwhichthereactorismainlyanoxic,theyieldintheCR
equationscanbetakenastheobservedyield(Yobs)forthesystemasfollows:
2.86

1 1.42Yobs
YH
1 bSRT
CRNO3
Yobs
Eq.437
Eq.438
IftheexogenoussubstrateisaddedtoananoxicreactorinaBNRsystem,Equation434ismore
applicableforNO3reductionasmostoftheendogenousdecayforthemethylotrophswilloccurinother
aerobicandanoxiczones,whichrepresentalargeproportionofthetotalvolume.However,the
estimatedsubstrateadditionshouldalsotakeintoaccountthenitratedemandfromendogenousdecay
bythemixedliquorintheanoxiczone,whichwouldincludethatbymethylotrophsandother
heterotrophs.Theelectronacceptordemandbytheendogenousdecaywouldconsumeacertain
amountofNO3N.TheconsumptiveratiocanthenbeappliedtotheremainingNO3Ntoberemovedin
thatzonetoestimatetheexogenoussubstratedemand.Afurtherconsiderationthatwillraisethe
substratedemandisthatnotalloftheexogenoussubstrateaddedwillbeused.Equation433shows
425
August2010
thattheremustbeafinitesubstrateconcentrationtodrivethenitratereductionrate.Forsystemswith
smalleranoxictankvolumes,ahigherreactorsubstrateconcentrationisneededtoremovetheNO3Nat
afasterrate,whichincreasesthelossofsubstratetothereactoreffluentandincreasesthetotal
exogenoussubstratedemandabovethatpredictedbytheconsumptiveratio.Systemswithhigher
internalrecycleflowsthroughtheanoxiczonereceivingexogenoussubstrateswillhaveahigheroverall
feedCOD/NO3Nratio.
Valuesforbiomasssynthesisorobservedyieldsarehelpfulforestimatingexogenousorganic
carbonfeedquantitiesfornitrate/nitriteremoval.Informationonbiomassyieldsformethanol(the
mostcommonlyusedexogenoussubstrate)andotherpossibleexogenoussubstratesaresummarizedin
Table49.Inmanycases,theyieldsareobservedyieldsbasedondatafitsfromtestdataorcalculated
usingEq.437andthereportedCOD/NO3Nratio.
Thehigherthebiomassyield,thehigherwillbetherequireddosefortheexogenoussubstrate.
Formethanol,theyieldsrangedfromabout0.20to0.30gVSS/gCOD.UsingEq.437orFigure44,the
CRNO3requirementformethanolis4.0to5.0gCOD/gNO3N.MethanolhasaCODof1.5gCOD/g
CH3OH,sotherequirementbasedonmethanolis2.7to3.3gCH3OH/gNO3N.Fieldapplicationsinthe
rangeof3.5to3.8arecommonandaccountfortheyieldandtheneteffectofmixedliquorendogenous
decay,enteringDO,andeffluentmethanol.BasedontheyieldsinTable49,thedoseforacetateand
ethanolwillbehigherthanthatformethanol.CRNO3valuesrangedfrom2.2to0.2inanevaluationof30
industrialwasteorganicsbyMonteith(1980).
426
August2010
Table49.BiomassYieldsReportedforExogenousCarbonSources
BiomassYield
Substrate
gVSS/gCOD
Reference
Methanol
Ethanol
Acetate
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glycerin
Glucose
CornSyrup
1
Observedyield
2
FromCOD/Nratio
0.18
0.281
0.29
0.21
0.331
0.162
0.292
0.29
0.30
0.362
2
0.35
0.66
0.322
0.282
0.302
0.272
0.322
0.342
0.262
0.322
0.422
0.382
Stenseletal.(1973)
Doldetal.(2008)
Daiggeretal.2007
Christenssonetal.(1994)
Sobieszuketal.(2006)
Carreraetal.(2003)
Cherchietal.(2008)
Baytshtoketal.(2008)
PurtschertandGujer(1999)
Christenssonetal.(1994)
Cherchietal.(2008)
Kujawa&Klapwijk(1999)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
Bilyketal.(2009)
4.12 DenitrificationKineticsofExogenousCarbonSources
Becausemethanolhashistoricallybeenthemostcommonlyusedexogenouscarbonsource,it
hasreceivedthemostattentionfromindustryexpertsregardingitsdegradationkinetics.Morerecently,
therehasbeengreaterinterestindenitrificationkineticsusingethanol,acetate,andglycerol.
4.12.1 DenitrificationKineticswithMethanol
KineticcoefficientsformethanolutilizershavebeenevaluatedbasedonaMonodmodel(Eq.4
10),andresultsformax,fromvariousinvestigatorsaresummarizedinTable410alongwith
temperatureeffectsaccordingtoEquation417.Therangeoftemperaturecorrectioncoefficients
shownbyDoldetal.(2008)arebasedontwodifferentmethods.Thehighervalueisbasedontheirhigh
foodtomicroorganism(F/M)testproceduretoobtainmax.Theauthorsbelievethattheendogenous
decaycoefficientassumptionmayhavebiasedthetemperaturecorrectionvalue.Thelowercorrection
valueisbasedonobservedspecificdenitrificationratesfortheirmethanolenrichments.Inthestudyby
Baytshtoketal.(2008),maxwasalsodeterminedunderconditionsusingnitriteasanelectronacceptor
insteadofnitrate,andamuchlowerspecificgrowthratewasfoundat0.28gVSS/gVSSday.
Althoughthereareconsiderableresultsreportedfortheyieldcoefficientformethanol
utilization(Table49),thereisminimalinformationontheendogenousdecayratecoefficient.Stenselet
al.(1973)reportedavalueof0.04g/gd,andPurtchertandGujerobtainedavalueof0.25g/gdintheir
427
August2010
modelfittodenitrificationkineticswithmethanol.Itshouldbenotedthatanendogenousdecay
coefficientvalue(b)of0.04g/gdaywasusedbyNicholsetal.(2007)andDoldetal.(2008).Theuseof
highervaluesinthedatafittingmethodswouldhaveresultedinhighermaxvalues.
TheresultsreportedbyPurtschertandGujerareofpracticalinterestforBNRprocesseswith
methanolfeeding.Overdosingmethanoltotheanoxiczoneorhavingahighmethanolconcentrationin
theanoxiczoneeffluenttosupporthighdenitrificationrateswillthensupportgrowthofmethylotrophs
underaerobicconditions.Theirresultssuggestthatthesubstrateutilizationratesbymethylotrophic
organismsgrownunderaerobicconditionsmaybelowerthanthatgrownunderanoxicconditions.
Thus,kineticmodelsformethanolutilizationinBNRprocessesmayhavetoconsidertwomethylotrophic
populations:thosegrownunder(1)anoxicand(2)aerobicconditions.
Table410.ReportedMaximumSpecificGrowthRatesat20CandTemperatureCoefficients
forMethanolUtilizationunderAnoxicandAerobicconditions
Growth
Condition
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Aerobic
max,
Anoxic
1.86
1.25
1.30
1.25
0.94
1.30
0.81
max,
Aerobic
1.72
3.88
Temp.
1.12
1.13
1.091.13
1.14
Reference
Stensel(1973)
Nicholsetal.(2007)
Doldetal.(2008)
Cherchietal.(2008)
Littleinformationexistsonthemethanolhalfvelocity(Ks)coefficientvalue,andmore
informationisneededasthisgreatlydeterminesthereactormethanolconcentrationwhentryingto
achievesufficientdenitrificationrateswhilekeepingthereactoreffluentmethanolconcentrationlow.
Table411summarizesreportedKsvaluesdeterminedinlaboratorykineticstudies.Theresultsmaybe
highlydependentondatafittingmethods,andfurtherworkisneededtoevaluatedenitrificationatlow
methanolconcentrationstobetterdefineKs.
Table411.ReportedKsvaluesforNO3Nreductionwithmethanolat20C
Growth
Condition
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Anoxic
Ks,
mgCOD/L
9.1
15.6
31.7
<1.0
Reference
Stensel(1973)
Cherchietal.(2008)
Becauseoftherelativelyslowdenitrificationkineticsformethanolanditsrisingcost,thereisan
interestinusingotherexogenoussubstrateseitherlongterm,shorttermduringcoldweather
conditions,orincombinationwithmethanol.Inaddition,wherecarbonisneededonlyperiodicallyto
enhancedenitrificationrates,othercarbonsourcesaremoreattractiveastheydonotrequireaslongan
acclimationperiodcomparedtomethanol.
428
August2010
4.12.2 AlternativeExogenousSubstratesandDenitrificationKinetics
Evaluationofalternativesubstrateshasshownthatdenitrificationratesaremuchfasterwith
acetate,ethanol,andglycerolthanwithmethanol.UsingthesamehighF/Mtestmethodasusedfor
methanolkinetics,Doldetal.(2008)obtainedmuchhighervaluesofmaxforacetateorsugar;atabout
4.0g/gdayat20C.Cherchietal.(2008)usingthesametesttechniqueasDoldetal.(2008)obtaineda
20Cmaxvalueforacetateof2.2g/gday.Incomparingthemaximumspecificgrowthrateofbacteria
grownonmethanol,acetate,andcornsyrup(Table412),Mokhayerietal.(2006)foundthatacetate
andcornsyrupresultedinratesthatwereabout2.5timesthatformethanolgrownbacteriaat13Cand
about3.5timesfasterat19C.Christenssonetal.(1994)foundasimilareffectincomparingethanol
andmethanol.Themaximumspecificgrowthrateforethanolcomparedtomethanolwasabout2.5
timesfasterat15Candabout2.3at25C.
Table412.ComparisonofMaximumSpecificGrowthratesforMethanol,Acetate,andCorn
SyrupatHighandLowTemperatures
Reference
Mokhayerietal.
(2006)
Christenssonetal.,
1994
Substrate
Methanol
Acetate
CornSyrup
Methanol
Ethanol
max,gVSS/gVSSday
13C
19C
0.5
1.0
1.2
3.7
1.3
3.5
15C
25C
0.8
2.1
1.9
4.8
Mokhayerietal.(2008)alsofoundasimilarratecomparisonusingthreeenrichmentsgrownon
methanol,acetate,andethanolbycomparingSDNRswithunlimitedsubstrateat13C.Theratioofthe
acetatetomethanolSDNRswas3.4andforethanoltomethanolitwas3.3.Fillosetal.(2007)presented
theequationsshownbelowtodescribeSDNRswithmethanolorethanoladditiontoanactivatedsludge
BNRprocessasafunctionoftemperature.TheyshowedappreciabledifferencesinSDNRwithethanol
versusmethanol,butincontrasttotheabove,therelativedenitrificationrateswithethanolversus
methanolwasnotaslargeandgreaterathightemperature;ethanol:methanolSDNRsare2.2at20C
and1.8at10C.Aftera50dayacclimationperiodinafullscaleandpilotscaleanoxicaerobicBNR
systems,HallinandPell(1998)foundthatthesystemwithethanoladditionhadanSDNRthatwasabout
2.2timesthesystemwithmethanoladdition.
MethanolSDNR(Fillosetal,2007):
SDNRT 0.0738(1.11)(T20)
Eq.439
EthanolSDNR(Fillosetal.,2007):
SDNRT 0.161(1.13)(T20)
Eq.440
429
August2010
4.12.3 AcclimationTimeandDegradativeAbilityofDenitrifyingBacteriawithExogenous
Substrates
ForsomeBNRapplications,theneedforanexogenoussubstratemaybeseasonaltoincrease
denitrificationratesatlowtemperaturesorintermittentduetowetweatherconditionsorlowweekend
loads.Insuchcases,theabilityoftheBNRactivatedsludgemixedliquortorapidlyrespondtothe
exogenoussubstrateadditionisdesired.Formethanoladditions,aconsiderableacclimationperiodis
neededtofullyutilizethemethanoladdedandtoachievethefulldenitrificationratepossiblewiththe
methanoladdition.Acclimationtimeisnotasignificantissuewithsomeotherexogenoussubstrates,
suchasethanolandacetate.InfullscaleandpilotplantBNRsystemstudiestreatingmunicipal
wastewater,HallinandPell(1998)foundanimmediateresponsewithethanolandacetateaddition.In
contrast,atimeperiodofover50dayswasrequiredtoreachfulldegradationrateswithmethanolas
shownbybatchtestsusingtheBNRmixedliquorwithexcesssubstrate.Table413showstheincreased
denitrificationratesovertimerelativetotheBNRactivatedsludgewithoutsubstrateaddition.
Methanoladditiondidhavesomemildimmediateeffecttothedenitrificationratepotential,although
approximately1SRT(26daySRTforsystem)wasneededtofullydevelopthemethanoldegrading
population.Nybergetal.(1992,1996)alsoshowedtheneedforsignificantacclimationtimeoftwoand
threeSRTs(50and70days)withmethanolfeedingbeforethemethylotrophicpopulationreachedits
fulldegradativecapacity.
Table413.ForBNRActivatedSludge,RatioofDenitrificationRatewithSubstrateAdditionto
DenitrificationRatewithNoAddition
TimePeriod
Day1
Day50
Substrate
Methanol
1.2
2.0
Ethanol
4.0
4.1
Source:HallinandPell(1998)
AnotherimportantobservationbyHallinandPell(1998)wasthatthebacteriapopulations
developedbyethanolandmethanolfeedingcouldalsodegradeotherexogenoussubstrates(Table4
14).TheabilityofthemethanolfedBNRactivatedsludgetodegradeethanolwasalsoobservedbyDold
etal.(2008)inwhichtheycommentedthatitviolatedtherulethatmethylotrophscanonlyusesingle
carboncompounds.However,SperlandHoare(1971)notedthatthemethylotrophHyphomicrobium
sp.candenitrifywithethanol,propanol,butanol,acetate,formate,formaldehyde,methylamine,and
glycerol.ItshouldbenotedalsothatDoldetal.(2008)obtainedamaxvalueforethanolof0.37g/gdat
9.8C,whichisclosetothatpredictedformethanolatthesametemperature;however,anethanol
enrichedactivatedsludgeshouldhaveamuchhigherrate.Nybergetal.(1996)raisedthepossibilityof
usingethanolwithmethanoltoacceleratetheacclimationtimeofamethanolfeddenitrification
system.Cherchietal.(2009)foundthatamethanolacclimatedbiomasscouldalsouseacetate,
ethanol,andMicroCTMwithoutanacclimationperiod,althoughglucosedidrequireanacclimation
period.MicroCTMacclimatedbiomasswasfoundtobeabletodenitrifyusingmethanol,ethanol,
acetate,andglucosewithoutanacclimationperiod.Theyreportedthatacetateacclimatedbiomass
couldnotuseanyothercarbonsourcestodenitrifywithoutanacclimationperiod.
430
August2010
Table414.RatioofDenitrificationRatesforOtherSubstratesatDay50withEthanolor
MethanolAdditionVersusnoAddition
TestSubstrate
Methanol
Ethanol
Acetate
Propionate
Butyrate
Glucose
EthanolFedMixedLiquor
7.0
4.1
2.4
1.9
2.3
1.8
MethanolFedMixedLiquor
2.0
1.7
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
Source:HallinandPell(1998)
FortheresultsshownaboveinTable414,theethanolutilizationratebythemethanolfed
systemwas85percentofitsmethanolutilizationrate.Cherchietal.(2008)observedanethanol
degradationratethatwas18percenthigherthanthemethanolutilizationrateforamethanolfed
enrichment.Themethanolutilizingbacteriacontainmethanoldehydrogenaseenzymesthatcanacton
anumberofalcohols.
4.13 SpecificDenitrificationRates(SDNR)
SDNRvalueshavebeencommonlyusedtoestimatethesizeofpreandpostanoxiczonesfor
nitrogenremoval.Theyprovideasimplefirstcutapproximationoftheanoxicreactorsizing.More
precisecalculationsforanoxicreactorsizeandtheeffectofstagesarecommonlydonetodaywith
commercialsimulationmodelsoftwarethatmodelsthefateofdegradableparticulateandsoluble
substrates,activebiomass,andnitrogenspeciesandtheeffectoftemperatureandDOconcentration.
SeeChapter10forguidanceonusingsimulationmodelsforthedesignofbiologicalnutrientremoval
systems.Thissectionpresentsthefundamentalequationsusedinmodelstosizereactorsandpresents
typicalvaluesforkineticparameters.
TherequiredanoxicvolumefordenitrificationcanbeestimatedfromSDNRswiththefollowing
equation.
(NOR )
SDNR(X)
Eq.441
Where:
V
=Anoxiczonevolume,m3
SDNR =Specificdenitrificationrate,mgNO3Nremoved/mgMLVSSday
X
=MLVSSconcentration
NOR =Nitrateremovalrateinanoxiczoneequaltonitratefedratetoanoxiczoneviainternaland
returnsludgeflowsorfromupstreamnitrificationzone.
TypicalvaluesforSDNRaresummarizedinTable415.Temperaturecorrectionsformethanoladdition
havebeengivenpreviously.Forwastewaterfeedonly,reportedvaluesrangefrom1.03to1.08
(DawsonandMurphy,1972,Ekamaetal.,1984).
431
August2010
Table415.RangeofreportedSDNRvaluesinBNRactivatedsludgetreatment
Condition
SDNR,20C
gNO3N/gMLVSSd
0.050.15
0010.04
0.100.25
Preanoxic
Postanoxic
Withmethanoladded
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.2003
ThefollowingequationwasusedtofitSDNRdataversusthepreanoxiczonefoodtomassratio
(lbBODapplied/lbMLVSSday)foraBardenphoprocessat18Cwithnoprimarytreatment(Burdicket
al.,1982).
Eq.442
SDNR 0.03(F/M) 0.029
F QSo
M XAV
Eq.443
Where:
SDNR20 =Specificdenitrificationrateat200C,gNO3N/gMLVSSd
F/M =BODfoodtomassratiototheanoxiczone,gBOD/gMLVSSd
Q
=Influentflowrate,m3/day
So
=InfluentBODconcentration,mg/L
X
=MLVSSconcentrationoftheanoxiczone,mg/L
=Anoxiczonevolume,m3
V A
Equation442hastobeadjustedforotherconditionsofSRTandwastewatercharacteristicsthatwill
resultinadifferentactivebiomassfractionintheMLVSS.Theactivebiomassfractionforthedatafitwas
estimatedat0.30usingEquation444.Thus,Equation442isadjustedasfollows:
F
SDNR20 0.03(F/M) b 0.30 0.029
Eq.444
Eq.445
YH

(1 b SRT)
T

Fb
Y
H
(1 b SRT) YI
T
Where:
=ActivebiomassfractionofMLVSS
Fb
YH
=Heterotrophicbiomasssynthesisyield,0.47gVSS/gBODremoved
bT
=EndogenousdecayrateatMLVSStemperature,gVSS/gVSSd
b20
=Endogenousdecayrateat20C,0.10gVSS/gVSSd
YI
=InfluentinertVSSfraction,gVSSinert/gBOD
432
August2010
TheinfluentinertsolidsconcentrationgreatlyaffectstheactivebiomassfractionoftheMLVSS.
ValuesforYIaresitespecificbutgenerallyrangefrom0.10to0.30forsecondaryinfluentwastewaters
withprimarytreatmentand0.30to0.50withoutprimarytreatment(Tchobanoglousetal.,2003).
TemperaturecorrectionsappliedtotheSDNRinEquation444andfortheendogenousdecay
rate(bT)areasfollows:
b T b20 (1.029(T 20) )
Eq.446
SDNRT SDNR20 (1.07(T20) )
Eq.447
Forpostanoxicsystemsorfortheanoxiczoneofoxidationditchprocesses,ReflingandStensel(1978)
usedthefollowingequationtoestimatetheSDNR.
SDNRE,T
(AN ) 1
2.86(YN ) SRT
Eq.448
Where:
SDNRE,T =SDNRinanoxiczonesfollowingnitrificationandwithnoexogenouscarbonaddition,gNO3
N/gMLVSSd
=Fractionofheterotrophscapableofnitratereduction,0.50to0.85
AN
=Netoxygenrequirementbyheterotrophs,gO2/gBODremoved
YN
=Netheterotrophicbiomassyield,gVSS/gBODremoved
YNandANarecalculatedwithEquations449and450,respectively.
YH
1 b T SRT
Eq.449
AN 1.6 1.42(YN )
Eq.450
YN
4.14 SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification
Simultaneousnitrificationdenitrification(SNdN)referstoaconditioninactivatedsludge(or
biofilm)processesinwhichthepositivebulkliquidDOconcentrationislowenoughthattheDOdiffusing
intotheflocisremovedbeforeitcanpenetratetheentireflocdepth.Thus,nitrificationisoccurringon
theexteriorportionsoftheflocanddenitrificationisoccurringintheanoxic,interiorportion.
SNdNcommonlyoccursinoxidationditcheswithsufficientSRTandwithaerobicandanoxic
zonesasflowmovesdownstreamfromaerationintheditchchannels.Nitriteaccumulationdoesnot
typicallyoccurunderlowDOconditionswhenSRTsaremaintainedatappropriatevalues,meaningthat
theAOBandNOBpopulationsremainbalanced.Parketal.(2002)evaluatedtheAOBpopulationinan
aeratedanoxicOrbalprocessandfoundthatNitrosospiralikeorganismswereamajorcontributorto
ammoniaoxidation.Nitrosospirahaveahighaffinityforoxygenwhichallowsthemtogrowunderlow
DOconditions.
433
August2010

Daiggeretal.(2007)illustratedthattheflocsizeforagivensystemisanimportantparameter
thatcanaffecttheDOpenetrationandamountofdenitrification.TheDOconcentrationthatispossible
forSNdNdependsonanumberoffactorsincludingthemixedliquorconcentration,temperature,
oxygenuptakerate,substrateloading,andflocsize.InSNdNsystems,thenitrificationand
denitrificationratesarelowerthanthatforsystemswithseparatenitrificationzoneswithhigherDO
concentrationandseparatedenitrificationzoneswithnoDOpresent.Thus,thereactorvolumesfora
SNdNsystemshouldbelargerthanthatforasystemwithaseparateanoxicdenitrificationzoneand
higherDOaerobicnitrificationzone.
4.15 Metabolism,StoichiometryandKineticsofANAMMOX
Theautotrophicbacteriaanaerobicoxidationofammoniawithnitritehasbeentermedthe
ANAMMOXprocessorAnammoxreaction(Strousetal.,1998).Thestoichiometryforthebiological
reactiongivenbyStrousetal.(1998)isasfollows,showingthat1.32molesofNO2Narereducedper
moleofNH4Noxidized:
NH4 1.32NO21 0.13H 0.066HCO31

1.02N2 0.26NO31 0.066CH2O 0.5N0.15 2.03H2 O
Eq.451
Theseareslowgrowingorganismswithdoublingtimesofabout11daysat300C(Jettenetal.,1999).
BiokineticparameterswithselectedvalueshavebeenassembledbyCapunoetal.(2008)aspart
ofamodeldevelopmentfortheprocessinabiofilmreactor(Table416).
Table416.ANAMMOXBacteriaBiokineticParametersat300C
Parameter
Maximumspecificgrowthrate
Growthyield
NH4Nhalfvelocitycoefficient
NO2Nhalfvelocitycoefficient
Oxygeninhibitioncoefficient
SpecificEndogenousdecayrate
Units
gVSS/gVSSd
gVSS/gNoxidized
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
gVSS/gVSSd
Value
0.08
0.11
0.07
0.05
0.01
0.003
Source:(Capunoetal.,2008)
Theprocessissensitivetonitriteconcentration.AnNO2Nconcentrationof4.8mg/Lwasfound
todecreaseanammoxactivitybyWettetal.(2007).Musabyimanaetal.(2008)reportedthata
preferredpHoperatingrangeis7.0to7.7andthatactivitycouldbesustainedat50mg/LNO2N,though
inhibited.Theyalsonotedthatnitriteinhibitionwasreversible.
TheoriginalAnammoxprocessreliedonastepprocessinwhichnitriteisproducedunder
aerobicconditionsinaportionoftheammoniarichstreamandthenthestreamsarecombinedand
subjecttoanaerobicconditions.Otherprocessmodifications,suchastheDEMON,CANON,andOLAND
processesaredescribedinChapter6.
434
August2010
4.16 ImpactsonSludgeProductionandHandling
Lesssludgeproductionandbettersettlingandthickeningsludgeisfoundforactivatedsludge
systemsusinganoxic/aerobictreatmentfornitrogenremovalversusaerobictreatmentonly.Thesludge
productionislessbecausethebiomassyieldfromBODconsumptionusingnitrateasanelectron
acceptorinsteadofoxygenisabout40percentlower.Thenetreductioninsludgeproductionissite
specificanddependsontheportionoftheinfluentBODthatisoxidizedviabiologicaldenitrification.For
manyapplications,reductionsofbiomassproductionby10to20percentarepossible.Theimpactthis
willhaveontotalsludgeproductionbyatreatmentplantwilldependuponhowmuchwastesludgeis
producedbyothertreatmentunitssuchasprimaryclarifiersandchemicaltreatmentwithprecipitating
chemicals.
Implementationofbiologicalnitrogenremovalatconventionalactivatedsludgeplantsimproves
thesludgethickeningcharacteristicsduetoitsabilitytodecreasetheamountsoffilamentousbacteriain
theactivatedsludge.Theeffectofadditionalsolidproductionfromaddinganexogenouscarbonsource
toincreasedenitrificatonratesmustbeconsideredaspartoftheoverallsludgeproduction.Solids
producedfromnitrogenremovalprocessesgenerallythickenanddewaterwellandshownonegative
impactonanysolidsprocessingsystem.
4.17 EffluentDissolvedOrganicNitrogen
Aseffluentlimitationshavebecomemorestringent,theDONfractionintheplanteffluenthas
becomeincreasinglyimportant.MostBNRprocessescanremove80to95percentoftheinorganic
formsofnitrogen(ammonianitrogen,nitrate,andnitrite),butarelessefficientatremovingtheresidual
organicfractions(Sedlak2007).TheconcentrationofDONintheplanteffluent(alsocalledeffluent
DONorEDON)dependsoninfluentconcentrationandspecifictreatmentprocessandvariesfromplant
toplant.Basedoneffluentsfrom188BNRplants,Pagilla(2007)reportedconcentrationstypically
between0.5and1.5mg/Lwithsomevaluesashighas2.5mg/L.Likewise,Bratbyetal.(2008)found
EDONconcentrationsbetween0.4and2.2mg/Lwithanaveragevalueof1.8mg/Lbasedona
compilationoftheavailableliterature.TheEDONfractionisnotasimportantforplantstryingto
achieveaTNeffluentlimitof10mg/L,butbecomesamuchlargerpercentageofeffluentTNandmore
problematicforplantsattemptingtomeeta5mg/Lor3mg/Llimit.
ThetextboxbelowprovidesinformationonEDONintheformofquestionsandanswers.One
veryimportantandtimelyquestionfortheindustryiswhetherEDONcandegradeinthenatural
environmenttobioavailableinorganicnitrogenspecies.Bioavailableformscanbeusedbyalgaeand
otherphytoplanktonandthus,contributetotheproblemofeutrophication.AlthoughmuchofEDON
hasbeenthoughttoberecalcitrant,meaningthatitisinertandnotbioavailableinthenatural
environment,Mullhollandetal.(2007)notedthatphotochemicalreactionsandsalinityconditionscan
convertrecalcitrantmaterialtoinorganicformsofnitrogensuchasnitriteandammonium.Bacteriacan
alsoplayanimportantroleinthebreakdownofEDON(SedlakandPehlivanoglu2007).Summarizing
resultsofseveralresearchprojects,theWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)(2008)
estimatesthatforthoseWWTPsdischargingintofreshwaterwatersheds,20to60percentofEDON
couldbeconvertedtobioavailableforms.Theauthorsnote,however,thattheproportionsareverysite
specificandadditionalresearchisneededinthisarea.
435
August2010
QuestionsandAnswersRegardingEffluentDissolvedOrganicNitrogen(EDON)
WhatarethesourcesofEDON?Therearetwoprimarysources:
(1) InfluentDONthatisrecalcitrantandpassesthroughtheplantunchangedorinfluent
biodegradableDONthatisnotremovedduringtreatment.DONindomesticwastewatercan
bepresentasaminoacids,proteins,aliphaticNcompounds,syntheticcompoundssuchas
EDTA,andhumicorganicsubstances(WEF2008).
(2) DONcanalsobeproducedduringbiologicaltreatmentprocesseswithintheplantthrough
cellmetabolicprocesses,celldecay,andcelllysis.
Whatareitscharacteristics?EDONiscomposedprimarilyofdegradedaminosugars,peptides,and
porphyrins(Leenheeretal.2007ascitedinBratbyetal.2008).Themolecularweightvariesfrom
sourcetosourcebuthasbeenreportedtoberelativelysmalloverall(Bratbyetal.,2008).Sedlakand
Pehlivanoglu(2007)hypothesizedthatthehighmolecularweightportion(>1,000Daltons)isnot
biologicallyavailable,whereasalargeportionofthelowmolecularweightportion(<1,000Daltons)
maybebiodegradable.
Howisitmeasured?EDONisusuallydeterminedasthedifferencebetweenthemeasuredeffluent
solubleKjeldahlnitrogenandeffluentammoniawithfiltrationofbothsamplesthrougha0.45micron
filter.BecauseofchallengesassociatedwithmeasuringfractionsineffluentswithverylowTN
concentrations,researchersareinvestigatingothermethods.SattayetewaandPagilla(2008)
reportedsuccessusingapersulfatedisgestionmethodandsecondderivativeultraviolet
spectrophotometric(SDUS)combinedmethod.Currently,thereisnostandardmethodfor
differentiatingbetweentheinertportionandtheportionthatcanbeconvertedtobioavailable
inorganicnitrogeninthewatershed.
Howisitremovedattheplant?DONcanberemovedthroughhydrolysisandammonification.
Removalisdependentontemperatureandsolidsresidencetime.
Whatareitsenvironmentalconcerns?Themainconcerninthewastewaterindustryisthe
bioavailabilityofeffluentDONwhenitisalargefractionoftheeffluenttotalnitrogenconcentration.
Formoreinformation,seetheWEFNutrientCompendium,availableonlineat
http://www.werf.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Content_Folders&CONTENTID=8726&TEMPLATE=/
CM/ContentDisplay.cfm
436
August2010
4.18 References
Abeling,U.andC.F.Seyfried.1992.AnaerobicAerobicTreatmentofHighStrengthAmmonium
Wastewater;NitrogenRemovalViaNitrate.WaterSciandTech.26:10071015.
Anthonisen,A.C.,R.C.Loehr,T.B.S.PrakasamandE.G.Srinath.1976.InhibitionofNitrificationby
AmmoniaandNitrousAcid.J.WaterPollut.ControlFed.48(5):835852.
Aoi,Y.,T.Miyoshi,T.Okamoto,S.Tsuneda,A.Hirata,A.Kitayama,andT.Nagamune.2000.Microbial
ecologyofnitrifyingbacteriainwastewatertreatmentprocessexaminedbyfluorescenceinsitu
hybridization.JournalBioscienceandBioengineering.90(3):234240.
Barker,P.S.andP.L.Dold.1997.GeneralModelforBiologicalNutrientRemovalActivatedSludgeSystems:
ModelPresentation.WaterEnvironmentResearch.69(5):969999.
Barnard,J.L.1975.BiologicalNutrientRemovalwithouttheAdditionofChemicals.WaterRes.9:485.
Baytshtok,V.,S.Kim,R.Yu,H.Park,andK.Chandran.2008.MolecularandBiokineticCharacterizationof
MethylotrophicDenitrificationUsingNitrateandNitriteasTerminalElectronAcceptors.WaterSciand
Tech.58(2):359365.
Bilyk,K.,A.Stone,R.Latimer,P.Pitt,T.J.Lynch,andT.Mencome.2009.FullScaleDenitrification
EvaluationsUsingSugarWater,Glycerin,andMethanolinDenitrificationFiltersandActivatedSludge.
PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Blum,D.J.,andR.E.Speece.1991.ADatabaseofChemicalToxicitytoEnvironmentalBacteriaanditsUse
inInterspeciesComparisonandCorrelations.WaterEnviron.Res.63:198.
Bock,E.I.Schmidt,R.Stuven,andD.Zart.1995.NitrogenLossCausedbyDenitrifyingNitrosomonasCells
UsingAmmoniumorHydrogenasElectronDonorsandNitriteasElectronAcceptor.Arch.Microbiol.
163:1620.
Bratby,J.,J.Jimenez,D.Parker.2008.DissolvedOrganicNitrogenIsItSignificant,andCanitbe
Removed?PresentedatWEFTEC2008
Burdick,C.R.,Refling,andD.R.,Stensel,H.D.1982.AdvancedBiologicalTreatmenttoAchieveNutrient
Removal.J.WaterPollut.ControlFed.54:10781086.
Campos,J.L.,A.MosqueraCorral,M.Snachez,R.Mendez,andJ.M.Lema.2002.NitrificationinSaline
WastewaterswithHighAmmoniaConcentrationinanActivatedSludgeUnit.WaterResearch.36:2555
Capuno,R.E.,N.G.Love,A.Terada,S.Lackner,andB.F.Smets.2008.ModelPredictionofCompletely
AutotrophicNitrogenRemovalunderDifferentReactorConfigurations.ProceedingsofWEF75thACE.
Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Carrera,J.,T.Vicent,andF.J.Lafuente.2003.InfluenceofTemperatureonDenitrificationofanIndustrial
HighStrengthNitrogenWastewaterinaTwoSludgeSystem.WaterS.29(1):1116.
437
August2010
Chandran,K.,Z.HuandB.F.Smets.2008.ACriticalComparisonofExtantBatchRespirometricand
SubstrateDepletionAssaysforEstimationofNitrificationBiokinetics.Biotechnol.Bioeng.101:6272.
Chandran,K.andB.F.Smets.2000.ApplicabilityofTwoStepModelsinEstimatingNitrificationKinetics
fromBatchRespirogramsUnderDifferentRelativeDynamicsofAmmoniaandNitriteOxidation.
BiotechnologyandBioengineering.70(1):5464.
Cherchi,C.,A.OnnisHaydern,andA.Z.Gu.2008.InvestigationofMicrocasanAlternativeCarbon
SourceforDenitrification.ProceedingsWEF75thACE.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Cherchi,C.,A.OnnisHayden,andA.Z.Gu.2009.AbilityofSpecificEnrichedDenitrifyingCulturetoUtilize
OtherCarbonSources.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Christensen,M.H.andP.Harremos.1977.BiologicalDenitrificationofSewage:aLiteratureReview.
Prog.WaterTechnol.8:509.
Christensen,M.H.,E.Lie,andT.Welander.1994.AComparisonBetweenEthanolandMethanolas
CarbonSourcesforDenitrification.WaterSciandTech.30(6):8390.
Ciudad,G.,A.Werner,C.Bornhardt,C.Munoz,andC.Antileo.2006.DifferentialKineticsofAmmonia
andNitriteOxidizingBacteria:ASimpleKineticStudyBasedonOxygenAffinityandProtonRelease
DuringNitrification.ProcessBiochemistry.41:17641772.
Contreras,E.M.,R.Fabricio,andN.C.Bertoia.2008.KineticModelingofInhibitionofAmmonia
Oxidationbynitriteunderlowdissolvedoxygenconditions.JournalofEnvironmentalEngineering.
ASCE.134(3):184190.
Copp,J.B.andK.L.Murphy.1995.EstimationoftheActiveNitrifyingBiomassinActivatedSludge.Water
Research.29(8):18551862.
Coskuner,G.andT.P.Curtis.2002.InSituCharacterizationofNitrifiersinanActivatedSludgePlant:
DetectionofNitrobacterspp.JournalAppl.Microbiol.93(3):431437.
Daigger,G.T.,C.D.Adams,andH.K.Steller.2007.DiffusionofOxygenthroughActivatedSludgeFlocs:
Experimental Measurement, Modeling, and Implications for Simultaneous Nitrification and
Denitrification.WaterEnvironmentResearch.79(4):375387.
Dawson,R.N.,andK.L.Murphy.1972.TheTemperatureDependencyofBiologicalDenitrification.Water
Res.(G.B.)6:71.
DeBarbadillo,C.,J.Barnard,S.Tarallo,andM.Steichen.2008.GotCarbon?WidespreadBiological
NutrientRemovalisIncreasingtheDemandforSupplementalSources.WaterEnvironment&
Technology.Alexandria,VA:WEF.20(1):4953.
Dold,P.L.,R.M.Jones,andC.M.Bye.2005.ImportanceandMeasurementofDecayRateWhen
AssessingNitrificationKinetics.WaterSciandTech.52(1011):469477.
438
August2010
Dold,P.L.,H.D.Stensel,R.Ke,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,andH.Melcer.2002.ImportanceofDecayRatein
AssessingNitrificationKinetics.ProceedingsofWEF75thACE.Chicago,IL.September28October2,
2002.
Dold,P.,I.Takcs,Y.Mokhayeri,A.Nichols,J.Hinojosa,R.Riffat,C.Bott,W.Bailey,andS.Murthy.2008.
DenitrificationwithCarbonAdditionKineticConsiderations.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(5):417
427.
Downing,A.L.andA.P.Hopwood.1964.SomeObservationsontheKineticsofNitrifyingActivatedSludge
Plants.SchweizerischeAeitschriftfurHyddrologie.26:271.
Downing,A.L.,H.A.Painter,andG.Knowles.1964.NitrificationintheActivatedSludgeProcess.J.Inst.
Sew.Purification.64:130.
Ekama,G.A.,etal.1984.BiologicalExcessPhosphorusRemoval.InTheory,Design,andOperationof
NutrientRemovalActivatedSludgeProcesses.WaterResour.Comm.Pretoria,S.Afr.
Fillos,J.K.Ramalingam,R.Jezek,A.Deur,andK.Beckmann.2007.SpecificDenitrificationRateswith
AlternateExternalSourcesOfOrganicCarbon.Proceedingsofthe10thInternationalConferenceon
EnvironmentalScienceandTechnology.KosIsland,Greece.September57,2007.
Fuhrmann,J.A.,K.McCallum,andA.Davis.1992.ANovelMajorArchaebacerialGroupfromMarine
Plankton.Nature.356:148149.
Garrido,J.M.,W.A.J.vanBenthum,M.C.M.vanLoosdrechtandJ.J.Heijnen.1997.Influenceof
DissolvedOxygenConcentrationonNitriteAccumulationinaBiofilmAirliftSuspensionReactor.
BiotechnologyandBioengineering.53:168178.
Guisasola,A.,I.Jubany,J.A.Baeza,J.Carrera,andJ.Lafuente.2005.RespirometricEstimationofthe
OxygenAffinityConstantsforBiologicalAmmoniumandNitriteOxidation.J.Chem.Technol.Biotechnol.
80:388396.
Hall,I.R.andK.L.Murphy.1980.Estimationofnitrifyingbiomassandkineticsinwastewater.WaterRes.
(14):297.
Hallin,S.andM.Pell.1998.MetabolicPropertiesofDenitrifyingBacteriaAdaptingtoMethanoland
EthanolinActivatedSludge.WaterRes.32(1):1318.
Harms,G.,A.C.Layton,H.M.Dionisi,I.R.Gregory,V.M.Hawkins,K.G.Robinson,andG.S.Sayler.2003.
RealtimePCRQuantificationofNitrifyingBacteriainaMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlant.Environ.
Sci.Technol.37(2):343351.
Haug,R.T.andP.L.McCarty.1972.NitrificationwiththeSubmergedFilter.Jour.Wat.Poll.Contr.Fed.
44,50.
Hellinga,C.,A.A.J.C.Schellen,J.W.Mulder,andM.C.M.vanLoosdrecht.1998.TheSHARONProcess:
AnInnovativeMethodforNitrogenRemovalfromAmmoniumRichWastewater.WaterRes.37(9):
135142.
439
August2010

Henze,M.,W.Gujer,T.Mino,andM.C.M.vanLoosdrecht.2000.ActivatedSludgeModelsASM1,ASM2,
ASM2d,andASM3.IWAScientificandTechnicalReportNo.9.IWAPublishing,London.
Hockenbury,M.R.andC.P.L.Grady.1977InhibitionofNitrificationEffectsofSelectedOrganic
Compounds.J.WaterPollut.ControlFed.49,768.
Hoover,S.R.andN.Porges.1952.AssimilationofDairyWastesbyActivatedSludgeII:TheEquationof
SynthesisandOxygenUtilization.SewageInd.Wastes.24,306.
Iacopozzi,H.,V.Innocenti,S.MarsiliLibelliandE.Giusti.2007.AModifiedActivatedSludgeModelNo.3
(ASM3)withTwoStepNitrificationDenitrification.EnvironmentalModeling&Software.22(6):847
861.
Jetten,M.S.M.,M.Strous,K.T.vandePasSchoonen,J.Schalk,G.J.M.vanDongen,A.A.vandeGraaf,S.
Logemann,G.Muyzer,M.C.M.vanLoosdrecht,andJ.G.Kuenen.1999.TheAnaerobicOxidationof
Ammonium.FEMSMicrobiologyReviews.22:421437.
Kaelin,D.,R.Manser,L.Rieger,J.Eugster,K.Rotterman,andH.Siegrist.2009.ExtensionofASM3Four
TwoStepNitrificationandDenitrificationanditsCalibrationandValidationwithBatchTestandPilot
ScaleData.Wat.Res.ArticleinPress.113.
Katehis,D.,J.Fillos,andL.A.Carrio.2002.ComparisonofBenchScaleTestingMethodsforNitrifier
GrowthRateMeasurements.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.46(12):289295.
Kielemoes,J.,P.DeBoever,andW.Verstraete.2000.InfluenceofDenitrificationontheCorrosionofIron
andStainlessSteelPowder.Environ.Sci.Technol.34:663671.
Konneke,M.,A.E.Bernhard,J.R.delaTorre,C.B.Walker,J.B.Waterbury,andD.A.Stahl.2005.
IsolationofanAutotrophicAmmoniaOxidizingMarineArchaeon.Nature.437(7058):543546.
Koops,H.P.andA.PommereningRoser.2001.DistributionandEcophysiologyoftheNitrifyingBacteria
EmphasizingCulturedSpecies.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology.37(1):19.
Kujawa,K.andB.Klapwijk.1999.AMethodtoEstimateDenitrificationPotentialforPredenitrification
SystemsUsingNURBatchTest.WaterResearch.33(10):22912300.
Kumaraswamy,R.,K.Sjollema,G.Kuenen,M.C.M.vanLoosdrecht,andG.Muyzer.2006.Nitrate
Dependent[Fe(II)EDTA](2)OxidationbyParacoccusferrooxidansspnov.,IsolatedFromADenitrifying
Bioreactor.SystematicandAppl.Microbiol.29(4):276286.
KyungIk,G.andE.S.Choi.2001.ModellingofInhibitionofNitriteOxidationinBiologicalNitritation
ProcessesbyFreeAmmonia.BiotechnologyLetters.(23):20212026.
Lawrence, A.W., and C. G. Brown. 1976. Design and Control of Nitrifying Activated Sludge Systems. J.
WaterPollut.ControlFed.,48,1779.
440
August2010
Lee,Y.andJ.A.Oleszkiewicz.2002.EvaluationofMaximumGrowthandDecayRatesofAutotrophs
UnderDifferentPhysicalandEnvironmentalConditions.ProceedingsofWEF75thACE.Chicago,IL.
September28October2,2002.
Lee,Y.andJ.A.Oleszkiewicz.2003.EffectsofPredationandORPConditionsonthePerformanceof
NitrifiersinActivatedSludgeSystems.WaterRes.37(17):42024210.
Leininger,S.,T.Urich,M.Schloter,L.Schwark,J.Qi,G.W.Nicol,J.I.Prosser,S.C.SchusterandC.
Schleper.2006.ArchaeaPredominateAmongAmmoniaOxidizingProkaryotesinSoils.Nature
442(7104):806809.
Li,H.,M.Yang,Y.Zhang,X.Liu,M.Gao,andY.Kamagata.2005.ComparisonofNitrificationPerformance
andMicrobialCommunitybetweenSubmergedMembraneBioreactorAndConventionalActivated
SludgeSystem.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.51(67):193200.
Littleton,H.X.,G.T.Daigger,P.F.Strom,R.,andA.Cowan.2003.SimultaneousBiologicalNutrient
Removal:EvaluationofAutotrophicDenitrification,HeterotrophicNitrification,andBiological
PhosphorusRemoval.WaterEnviron.Res.75:138150.
Magri,A.,L.Corominas,H.Lopez,E.Campos,M.Balaguer,J.Colprim,andX.Flotas.2007.AModelfor
theSimulationoftheSharonProcess:pHAsaKeyFactor.Environ.Tech.28(3):255.
Manser,R.,W.Gujer,andH.Siegrist.2005.ConsequencesofMassTransferEffectsontheKineticsof
Nitrifiers.WaterRes.39(19):46334642.
Manser,R.,andW.Gujer,etal.2006.DecayProcessesofNitrifyingBacteriainBiologicalWastewater
TreatmentSystems.WaterRes.40(12):24162426.
MarsiliLibelli,S.,P.Ratini,A.Spagni,andG.Bortone.2001.ImplementationStudyandCalibrationofa
ModifiedASM2dfortheSimulationofSBRProcesses.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.43(3):6976.
Mauret,M.,E.Paul,E.PuechCostes,M.T.Maurette,andP.Baptiste.1996.ApplicationofExperimental
ResearchMethodologytotheStudyofNitrificationinMixedCulture.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.34(1
2):245252.
McCarty,P.L.,L.Beck,andP.St.Amant.1969.BiologicalDenitrificationofWastewatersbyAdditionOf
OrganicMaterials.Proc.IndustrialWasteConf.PurdueUniversityExt.Ser.,PurdueUniversity,
Lafayette,IN.135:12711285.
Melcer,H.,P.L.Dold,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,I.Takacs,H.D.Stensel,A.W.Wilson,P.Sun,andS.Bury.2003.
MethodsforWastewaterCharacterizationinActivatedSludgeModeling.WERFFinalReport.Project
99WWF3.
Mokhayeri,Y.A.Nichols,S.Murthy,R.Riffat,P.Dold,andI.Takacs.2006.ExaminingtheInfluenceof
SubstratesandTemperatureonMaximumSpecificGrowthRateofDenitrifiers.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.
54(8):155162.
Mokhayeri,R.Riffat,I.Takacs,P.Dold,C.Bott,J.Hinojosa,W.BaileyandS.Murthy.2008.Examiningthe
InfluenceofSubstratesandTemperatureonMaximumSpecificGrowthRateofDenitrifiers.Wat.Sci.
andTechnol.58(1):233237.
441
August2010
Monteith,H.D.1980.IndustrialWasteCarbonSourceforBiologicalDenitrification.Prog.WaterTechnol.,
12,127.
Mulder,A.,A.A.Graaf,L.A.Robertson,andJ.G.Kuenen.1995.AnaerobicAmmoniumOxidation
DiscoveredinaDenitrifyingFluidizedBedReactor.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology.,16(3):177184.
Musabyimana,M.,N.G.Love,C.Bott,S.Murthy,andG.Daigger.2008.EvaluatingtheImpactofNitrite
ConcentrationonAnaerobicAmmoniaOxidation.ProceedingsofWEF75thACE.Chicago,IL.October,
2008.
Nichols,A.,J.Hinojosa,R.Riffat,P.Dold,I.Takacs,C.Bott,W.BaileyandS.Murthy.2007.Maximum
MethanolutilizerGrowthRateImpactofTemperatureonDenitrification.ProceedingsofWEF74thACE.
SanDiego,CA.October,2007.
Nicol,G.W.andC.Schleper.2006.AmmoniaoxidizingCrenarchaeota:ImportantPlayersintheNitrogen
Cycle?TrendsinMicrobiology14(5):207212.
Nowak,P.,H.Schweighofer,andK.Svardal.1994.NitrificationInhibitionAMethodforEstimationof
ActualMaximumAutotrophicGrowthRatesinActivatedSludgeSystems.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.30(6):
919.
Nyberg,U.,B.AnderssonandH.Aspegren.1996.LongTermExperienceswithExternalCarbonSources
forNitrogenRemoval.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.33(12):109116.
Nyberg,U.,H.Aspegren,B.Andersson,andI.J.C.Jansen.1992.FullScaleApplicationofNitrogenRemoval
withMethanolasCarbonSource.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.26:10771086.
Pagilla, K. (2007) Presentation at Water Environment Research Foundation and Chesapeake Bay Science
andTechnologyAdvisoryCommitteeWorkshop,Baltimore,MD,September27/28,2007
Painter,H.A.1970.AReviewofLiteratureonInorganicNitrogenMetabolisminMicroorganisms.Water
Res.4,393450.
Painter,H.A.,andJ.E.Loveless.1983.EffectofTemperatureandPhValueontheGrowthRateConstants
OfNitrifyingBacteriaInTheActivatedSludgeProcess.WaterRes.7,238.
Pambrun,V.andE.Paul,andM.Sperando.2006.ModelingthePartialNitrificationinSequencingBatch
ReactorsforBiomassAdaptedtoHighAmmoniaConcentrations.BiotechnologyandBioengineering.
95(1):120131.
Park,H.D.,J.M.Regan,andD.R.Noguera.2002.MolecularAnalysisofAmmoniaOxidizingBacterial
PopulationsinAeratedAnoxicOrbalProcesses.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.46(12):273280.
Payne,W.J.1973.ReductionofNitrogenousOxidesbyMicroorganisms.BacterialRev.37,409.
Peng,Y.andG.Zu.2006.BiologicalNitrogenRemovalwithNitrificationandDenitrificationviaNitrite
Pathway.Appl.MicrobiolBiotechnol.73:1526.
Picioreanu,C.,M.C.M.vanLoosdrechtandJ.J.Heijnen.1997.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.36(1):147156.
442
August2010

Poth,M.andD.D.Focht.1985.15NkineticAnalysisofN2OProductionbyNitrosomonaseuropaea:an
ExaminationofNitrifierDenitrification.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.49:11341141.
Purtschert,I.andW.Gujer.1999.PopulationDynamicsbyMethanolAdditioninDenitrifyingWastewater
TreatmentPlants.WaterSci.Technol.39(1):4350.
Randall,C.W.,H.D.Stensel,andJ.L.Barnard.1992.DesignofActivatedSludgeBiologicalNutrient
RemovalPlants.InDesignandRetrofitofWastewaterTreatmentPlantsforBiologicalNutrientRemoval.
Lancaster,PA:Randall,Ed.TechnomicPublishingCo.Inc.
Refling,D.R.andStensel,H.D.1978.ARationalApproachtoBiologicalNitrogenRemoval.Paper
presentedat51stAnnu.Conf.WaterPollut.ControlFed.Anaheim,CA.
Richardson,M.1985.NitrificationInhibitionintheTreatmentofSewage.TheRoyalSocietyofChemistry,
BurlingtonHouse:ThamesWater,Reading,Pa.
Robertson.L.A.andJ.G.Kuenen.1990.CombinedHeterotrophicNitrificationandAerobicDenitrification
inThiosphaerapantotrophaandOtherBacteria.AntonieVanLeeuwenhoke.56:289299.
Rowan,A.K.,J.R.Snape,D.Fearnside,M.R.Barer,T.P.Curtis,andI.M.Head.2003.Compositionand
DiversityofAmmoniaOxidisingBacterialCommunitiesinWastewaterTreatmentReactorsofDifferent
DesignTreatingIdenticalWastewater.FEMSMicrobiologyEcology.43(2):195206.
Schmidt,I.,O.Sliekers,M.Schmid,E.Bock,J.Fuerst,J.G.Kuenen,M.S.M.Jetten,andM.Strous.2003.
NewConceptsOfMicrobialTreatmentProcessesfortheNitrogenRemovalinWastewater.FEMS
MicrobiologyReview.27:481492.
Schramm,A.,D.deBeer,J.C.vanden.Heuvel,S.Ottengraf,andR.Amann.1999.MicroscaleDistribution
ofPopulationsandActivitiesofNitrosospiraandNitrospiraSpp.alongaMacroscaleGradientina
NitrifyingBioreactor:QuantificationbyInSituHybridizationandtheUseofMicrosensors.Appl.and
Environ.Microbiol.65(8):36903696.
Sharma,B.andR.C.Ahlert.1977.NitrificationandNitrogenRemoval.WaterRes.(G.B.),11,897.
Siegrist,H.I.Brunner,G.Koch,P.Con.Linh,andC.VanChiew.1999.ReductionofBioMassDecayRate
UnderAnoxicandAnaerobicConditions.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.39(1):129137.
Sin,G.,D.Kaelin,M.J.Kampschreur,I.Takacs,B.Wett,K.V.Gernaey,L.Rieger,H.Siegrist,andM.C.M.
VanLoosdrecht.2008.ModellingNitriteinWastewaterTreatmentSystems:ADiscussionofDifferent
ModellingConcepts.Wat.Sci.andTechnol.58(6):11551171.
Siripong,S.andB.E.Rittmann.2007.DiversityStudyofNitrifyingBacteriainFullScaleMunicipal
WastewaterTreatmentPlants.WaterRes.,41(5):11101120
Sliekers,A.O.,N.Derwort,J.L.CamposGomez,M.Strous,J.G.Kuenen,andM.S.M.Jetten.2002.
CompletelyAutotrophicNitrogenRemovaloverNitriteinOneSingleReactor.Wat.Res.36,24752482.
443
August2010
SkermanandMori.1975[fullreferencetobeprovided]
Sobieszuk,P.andK.W.Szewczyk.2006.Estimationof(C/N)RatioforMicrobialDenitrification.
EnvironmentalTechnology.27:103108.
Sperl,GT.andD.S.Hoare.1971.DenitrificationwithMethanol:ASelectiveEnrichmentfor
HyphomicrobiumSpecies.Jour.Bacteriology.108:733736.
Stensel,H.D.,R.C.Loehr,andA.W.Lawrence.1973.BiologicalKineticsofSuspendedGrowth
Denitrification.Jour.WaterPollut.ControlFed.45:249261.
Stensel,H.D.,O.E.Albertson,andP.Hendricks.1993.EvaluationofAnoxicAerobicTreatmentofthe
Phoenix91stAvenueWWTP,LiquidProcessSymposiumProceedingsoftheWaterEnvironment
FederationConference.Anaheim,October1993.
Stensel,H.D.andG.Horne.2000.EvaluationofDenitrificationKineticsatWastewaterTreatment
Facilities.ResearchSymposiumProceedings.73rdAnnualWaterEnvironmentFederationConference.
Anaheim,CA.October1418,2001.
Strous,M.,J.J.Heijnen,J.G.Kuenen,andM.S.M.Jetten.1998.TheSequencingBatchReactorasa
PowerfulToolfortheStudyofSlowlyGrowingAnaerobicAmmoniumOxidizingOrganisms.Applied
MicrobiologyandBiotechnology.50:589596.
Strous,M.,.J.Fuerst,E.Kramer,S.Logemann,G.Muyzer,K.vandePas,R.Webb,J.G.Kuenen,andM.S.
M.Jetten.1999.MissingLithotrophIdentifiedasNewPlanctomycete.Nature.400:446449.
Suzuki,I.,U.Dular,S.C.Kwok.1974.AmmoniaorAmmoniumIonasSubstrateforOxidationby
NitrosomonaseuropaeaCellsandExtracts.JourBacteriol.120(1):556558.
Timmermans,P.andA.VanHaute.1983.DenitrificationwithMethanol.FundamentalStudyofthe
GrowthandDenitrificationCapacityofHyphomicrobiumsp.WaterResearch.17:12491255.
Turk,O.andD.S.Mavinic.1986.PreliminaryAssessmentofaShortcutinNitrogenRemovalfrom
Wastewater.Can.J.Civ.Eng.,(13):600.
September1993.
VanHulle,S.W.H.,E.I.P.Volcke,J.L.Teruel,B.Donckels,M.C.M.vanLoosdrecht,andP.A.
Vanrolleghem.2007.InfluenceofTemperatureandpHontheKineticsoftheSharonNitritation
Process.JournalofChemicalTechnologyandBiotechnology.82(5):471480.
VanVerseveld,H.W.andA.H.Stouthamer.1978.ElectronTransportChainandCoupledOxidative
PhosphorylationinMethanolGrownParacoccusDenitrifications.Arch.Microbiol.118:1320.
444
August2010
Volcke,E.I.P.,M.Sbarciog,M.Loccufier,P.A.Vanrolleghem,andE.J.I.Noldus.2007.Influenceof
MicrobialGrowthKineticsonSteadyStateMultiplicityandStabilityofaTwoStepNitrification(SHARON)
Model.BiotechnologyandBioengineering,98(4):882893.
Werzernak,C.T.andJ.J.Gannon.1967.OxygenNitrogenRelationshipsinAutotrophicNitrification.
AppliedMicrobiology.15(5).
Wett,B.,S.Murthy,I.Takacs,G.Bowden,A.Deur,andM.OShaughnessy.2007.KeyParametersfor
ControlofDemonDeammonificationProcess.Proceedings,IWA/WEFNutrientRemovalSpecialty
Conference.Baltimore,MD.March2007.
WongChong,G.M.andR.C.Loehr.1975.TheKineticsofMicrobialNitrification.WaterRes.9(12):1099
1106.
Zart,D.andE.Bock.1998.HighRateofAerobicNitrificationandDenitrificationbyNitrosomonaseutropha
GrowninaFermentorwithCompleteBiomassRetentionInThePresenceofGaseousNO2orNO.Arch.
Microbiol.169:282286.
445
August2010
446
August2010
5.PrinciplesofBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
5.1
Chapter5covers:
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
OverviewoftheBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalProcess
SubstrateRequirements
SourcesofVolatileFattyAcids
EnvironmentalConditions
Kinetics
ImportantDesignandOperationalConsiderations
ImpactsonSludgeProcessingandHandling
References
OverviewoftheBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalProcess
Biologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR)inwastewatertreatmentisaccomplishedbyencouraging
thegrowthofphosphateaccumulatingorganisms(PAOs).PAOsareheterotrophicbacteriathatoccur
naturallyintheenvironmentandinaerobicactivatedsludge.ThegrowthofPAOsisencouragedby
cyclingthembetweenanaerobicandaerobicconditions.
Inthepresenceofoxygen(i.e.,aerobicconditions),PAOsobtainenergyfromstoredfoodand
uptakelargeamountsofphosphorusintotheircells,whichtheystoreaspolyphosphates.These
polyphosphatescontainhighenergybondsandfunctionlikeenergystoragebatteries.Intheabsenceof
oxygen(i.e.,anaerobicconditions),PAOscanbreakthepolyphosphatebondsandusetheresulting
energytouptakeeasilybiodegradablecompounds,namelyshortchainvolatilefattyacids(VFAs)1.PAOs
polymerizeandstoretheVFAsintheircellsasintermediateproductsknownaspolyhydroxy
alkanoates(PHAs),ofwhichthemostcommonispolyhydroxybutyrate(PHB).Whenoxygen
becomesavailableagain(i.e.,aerobicconditions),theycanmetabolizethePHAstogenerateenergyand
uptakephosphorus(intheformofphosphate)andstoretheexcessamount.SeeFigure5.1fora
conceptualrepresentationofthetheoryofBPR.
Figure51.TheoryofBPRinactivatedsludge.
Forbiologicalnutrientremoval(BNR),itisimportanttodistinguishbetweenanaerobicconditionsinwhereno
oxygenispresentandanoxicconditionswhereoxygenisavailableincombinedformonly(e.g.,NO2,NO3)and
thereisnofreeoxygen.Anoxicconditionsaresufficientfordenitrification,whereasanaerobicconditionsare
requiredforBPR.
51
August2010

WhatmakesPAOsspecial?PAOshaveacompetitiveadvantageovermostaerobicbacteria
becausetheycanuptakeandstorefood(i.e.,VFAs)underanaerobicconditions.Mostother
microorganismsmustwaituntiloxygenisavailabletouptakeVFAs.Onenotableexceptionisglycogen
accumulatingorganisms(GAOs),whichcanalsouptakeVFAsinananaerobicenvironmentusingenergy
storedinglycogen.GAOscompetewithPAOsintheanaerobiczone;however,PAOsnearlyalwaysout
competeGAOsintemperateandcoldzonetreatmentplants.Thereisstilladebateamongresearchers
abouttheconditionslikelytofavorGAOsoverPAOs.Summarizinganumberofpublications,itwould
appearthatthefollowingconditionsfavorthegrowthofGAOsoverthatofPAOs:
Temperatureover28oC.
Strongerwastewithlownitrogencontent.
Polysaccharidessuchasglucosearethedominantfeedtotheanaerobiczone.
LowpHintheaerobiczone.
OtherfactorsthatmayfavorGAOsbutneedfurtherconfirmationarehighsolidsretentiontime(SRT),
longernonaeratedzones,andperiodsofintermittentloworganicsubstratelevelsintheplantinfluent.
NotethatsomeGAOsarealwayspresentintheanaerobiczonesofmunicipalBPRplants.Typicallytheir
impactsarenotnoticeablebecausethePAOsstillobtainenoughVFAstoremovethephosphorustothe
desiredeffluentconcentration.
ThekeystepsforachievingBPRatwastewatertreatmentplants(WWTPs)areillustratedinthe
simplifieddiagraminFigure52andsummarizedbelow.
1) Returnactivatedsludgefromthesecondaryclarifier,whichcontainsPAOs,isaddedtothe
influentwastewater.
2) Intheanaerobiczone,PAOsbreakpolyphosphatebondstogenerateenergy.Theyusethis
energytotakeupVFAsandstorethemasPHAcompoundssuchasPHB.WhenPAOsbreakthe
polyphosphatebonds,theyreleasephosphateions(PO43)intheircells.Becauseeach
phosphatemoleculeisnegativelycharged,itmustfirstbondwithpositivelychargedionssuchas
magnesiumorpotassiumtomoveacrossthecellmembraneandbereleasedintothewater.
3) Whenthemixedliquor(i.e.,wastewaterandreturnsludge)enterstheaerobiczone,thePAOs
useoxygentometabolizethestoredPHAstogenerateenergyforgrowthandmaintenance.
Theystoretheexcessenergybytakingupphosphateionsalongwithmagnesium,potassium,
andotherpositiveionsintotheircellsandformingpolyphosphates.Thisluxuryuptakeof
phosphorusresultsinmorebeingremovedintheaerobiczonethanwasreleasedinthe
anaerobiczone.
52
August2010
4) Asthewaterenterstheclarifier,PAOssettletothebottomwiththerestoftheactivatedsludge.
ThephosphorusstoredinthePAOsisremovedwiththewasteactivatedsludge,thereby
resultinginanetremovalofphosphorusduringtreatment2.
Influent
Anerobic Zone
AerobicZone
PAOs store
volatilefattyacids
asPHAs.
PAOs breakdownPHAs forenergyandto

obtaincarbonforgrowth.Theyusethis
energyforphosphorusuptakeandcell
growth
Effluent
Clarifier
ReturnActivatedSludge
PhosphorusWastedwith
WasteActivatedSludge
Figure52.BPRataWWTP
5.2
SubstrateRequirements
Theavailabilityofreadilybiodegradableorganiccarbon(i.e.,VFAs)intheanaerobiczoneis
criticaltothesuccessofBPR.Table51showstheVFAstypicallyfoundinfermentedwastewaterand
theobservedratioofmg/Lphosphorusuptakepermg/LofeachVFAconsumedduringthetreatmentof
municipalwastewater(AbuGhararahandRandall1991).Aceticacidandpropionicacidarethe
dominantVFAsindomesticwastewater,withtheotherformspresentinminimalconcentrations.
Commonpercentagesfromthefermentationofmunicipalwastewatersettledsolidsare60percent
acetic,30percentpropionic,and10percentoftheremainingfour.Largevariationsoccur,however.
Propionicacid,forexample,mayvaryfromlessthan20tomorethan50percent,andisovalericacid
maybeashighas10percent.ResearchhasshownthatGAOsdonotgrowwellonpropionicrelativeto
PAOs(ChenandRandall2004;LopezVazquezetal.2009).Therefore,theratioofpropionictoacetic
affectstheperformanceofBPR,withhigheramountsofpropionicrelativetotheaceticproducing
improvements.
Ifwastingisdirectlyfromareactorratherthanfromtheclarifierasispracticedatsomeactivatedsludgeplants
andatplantswithmembranebioreactors,theactivatedsludgeshouldbewastedfromanaerobiczone,preferably
whenthesludgephosphorusconcentrationisatamaximum(i.e.beforesignificantreleaseoccursfromextended
aeration).
53
August2010
Table51.VolatileFattyAcidsTypicallyFoundinFermentedWastewater
VolatileFattyAcid
(VFA)
ChemicalFormula
PhosphorusUptake/VFAas
CODConsumed
CH3COOH
0.37
CH3CH3COOH
0.10
Butyricacid
CH3CH3CH3COOH
0.12
Isobutyricacid
CH3CH3COOHCH3
0.14
Valericacid
CH3CH3CH3CH3COOH
0.15
Isovalericacid
CH3CH3COOHCH3CH3
0.24
Aceticacid
Propionicacid
Note:AceticacidandpropionicacidarethemostcommonVFAsfoundinfermentedwastewater.
Source:AbuGhararah&Randall(1991)aspresentedinTable4.2fromWEFandASCE(2006)
Table52summarizestheminimumratiosofsubstratetototalphosphorustoobtaineffluent
phosphorusconcentrationsoflessthan1mg/Lthathavebeenreportedintheliterature.Evaluatingthe
chemicaloxygendemandtototalphosphorus(COD:TP)andfivedaybiochemicaloxygendemandto
totalphosphorus(BOD5:TP)3ratioswillprovideonlyaroughapproximationofBPRcapabilities,butwill
provideausefulruleofthumbforestimations.EvaluatingtheratioofreadilybiodegradableCODtoTP
(rbCOD:TPratio)oftheprocessinfluentisamorereliablewayofassessingtheBPRcapabilitiesofa
wastewaterplantandofdeterminingifadditionalsubstrateisrequiredtoachievethedesiredeffluent
phosphateconcentration.AnalysisoftherbCOD:TPratioissuperiortoanalysisofVFA:TPbecausemuch
ofthenonVFArbCODcanbefermentedtoVFAintheanaerobiczoneaslongasthereissufficientSRT
(typicallyatleast1to2daysbutvarieswithtemperature;WEFandASCE2006).Hence,designersmay
underpredictperformanceandoverpredicttheneedforadditionalsubstrateifonlyVFA:TPratiosare
considered.SeethetextboxfollowingTable52forinformationonhowtoestimatetherbCOD:TPratio.
Table52.MinimumRatiosforAchievingTotalPhosphorusEffluentConcentrationoflessthan1.0
mg/L
SubstrateTypetoTotal
RecommendedMinimumRatio
References
Phosphorus
COD:TP
BOD:TP
rbCOD:TP1
VFA:TP
4045
20
1016
416
WEFandASCE2006
WEFandASCE2006
Barnardetal.2006
Neethlingetal.2005
Mostaccurate
COD=chemicaloxygendemand;BOD=biochemicaloxygendemand;rbCOD=readilybiodegradablechemicaloxygendemand;
VFA=volatilefattyacid;TP=totalphosphorus
Unlessotherwiseindicated,BODisbasedonthe5daytest.UltimateBOD(BODU)isbasedonthe20daytest
perstandardmethods(APHA,AWWA,andWEF2005).
54
August2010

HowcanIdeterminetherbCOD:TPratioatmywastewaterplant?
TotalPhosphorus(TP).InformationoninfluentTPlevelsshouldbeavailableforyourtreatment
plant.TPindomesticwastewatertypicallyrangesbetween4and8mg/Lbutcanbehigher
dependingonindustrialsources,waterconservation,andwhetherornotaphosphatedetergentban
isinplace.Itistypicallymeasuredusingcolorimetricanalysisorionchromatographyandrequiresa
digestionsteptoconvertpolyphosphateandorganicphosphorustoorthophosphate.TPloading
typicallyfollowsadiurnalpatternwithhighestconcentrationsduringtheday.Influent
concentrationsareusuallylowerduringpeakwetweatherflowevents.
ReadilyBiodegradableChemicalOxygenDemand(rbCOD).Theliteraturedescribesseveral
experimentalmethodsthatcanbeusedtoestimaterbCOD.Afterextensivereview,Melceretal.
(2003)concludedthattheAerobicBatchMethodisthemostpracticalofthebioassaymethods,has
theleastrequirementforanalyticallaboratoryfacilities,andlendsitselftoonsiteuseatWWTPs.For
detailedinstructionsonhowtoperformthismethod,refertoMelceretal.Asecond,lesstime
consumingmethodwaspublishedbyMamaisetal.(1993)andisbasedontheassumptionthattruly
solubledegradableCODisrepresentativeoftherbCOD.Themethodrequiresremovalofsolidsand
colloidsbyflocculationfollowedbyfiltrationthrougha0.45micronfilterpriortoCODanalysis.The
differenceinresultsforaninfluentandeffluentsampleistakentoberbCOD.Melceretal.found
thatalthoughtheMamaismethodiscomparabletobioassaymethods,resultscanbeupto5percent
higher.InfluentrbCODcanvarysignificantlybetweenseasonsintemperateclimateswithranges
from25to125mg/L.SeeChapter10foradditionalinformationonestimatingCODfractions.
ResearchresultssuggestthattheinstantaneousCOD:TPratioismoreimportantthantheoverall
average(Neethlingetal.2005).ShorttermdropsintheBOD:TPratiointheprimaryeffluenttobelow
thatrequiredforthedesiredquantityofphosphorusremovalcorrelatedwellwithrisesineffluent
phosphorus.Intermittentrecyclesofphosphorusrichreturnstreamsmaycauseshorttermvariability
intheBOD:TPratio.WeekendchangesintheBOD:TPratioalsocanaffectperformance.
5.3
SourcesofVolatileFattyAcids
Section5.2describedhowfermentationofthenonVFAportionofrbCODcanoccurinthe
anaerobiczoneofWWTPstoproduceadditionalVFAs.OthersourcesofVFAsinclude:
Fermentationinthewastewatercollectionsystem
Fermentationatthetreatmentplant(requiresnewprocessequipment)
Commercialsources
Eachsourceisdiscussedseparatelybelow.
55
August2010
5.3.1 FermentationintheCollectionSystem
Fermentationofwastewaterunderanaerobicconditionsoccurstoatleastsomeextentinall
wastewatercollectionsystems.Factorsthatfavoranaerobicconditionsare:
Longdetentiontimes(e.g.,inrelativelyflatcollectionmainsorpumpstationwetwells)
Highstrengthwaste
Warmtemperatures
ForcemainsarealsoexcellentfermentersfortheproductionofVFAsbecausetheyflowfullandthereis
noairwaterinterfaceforoxygentransfer.Often,theconcentrationofinfluentVFAsvariesfrommonth
tomonthdependingontemperatureandflowconditionsinthecollectionsystem.Furtherchangeswill
occurwithintheplantdependingontheextentandtypeofpretreatment,thetypesofsludgeprocessing
equipment,andtheutilizationofanaerobicdigestion.
InadditiontoVFAs,fermentationproducessulfide.Sulfideisconvertedtohydrogensulfide
(H2S)whenitentersairsuchastheheadspaceingravitysewersorinforcemaindischargemanholes.
Hydrogensulfidehasanobjectionableodor,anditsreleasecancausecorrosionproblemswhenitis
convertedtosulfuricacidbybacteriaonthepipewall.
Sometechniquesusedforodorandcorrosioncontrolinwastewatercollectionsystemsdosoby
reducinganaerobicconditions,whichcanhavedetrimentalimpactsonBPR.Kobylinskietal.(2008)
reportedthatchemicaloxidation,nitrateaddition,pHcontroltogreaterthan11,superoxygenation,
andvaporphaseodorcontrolcansloworstoptheproductionofVFAs.Othertechniquessuchasiron
additionandpHcontroltobetween9and10donotadverselyimpacttheproductionofVFAs.Table5
3providesasummaryoftheeffectofodorandcorrosioncontroltechniquesonVFAformationin
wastewatercollectionsystems.
56
August2010
Table53.EffectofCorrosionandOdorControlTechniquesonVFAProductioninWastewater
CollectionSystems
Corrosion/OdorControlTechnique
EffectonVFAProduction
OxidationofH2Sbyaddingastrongoxidant
StrongoxidantseasilyoxidizeVFAs.
(e.g.,chlorine,sodiumhypochlorite,
hydrogenperoxide)
Applicationofnitratesalts(common
method)
pHcontrol
Superoxygenation
Nitratecreatesanoxicconditionandpreventsfermentation,whichin
turnpreventsVFAformation.
Nitratecanalsoactasanelectronacceptor(similartooxygen),sothat
oxidizableVFAsareconsumedbybacteria.
pHbetween9and10willkeephydrogensulfideinionizedformand
preventreleasetoheadspacewithoutaffectingVFAproduction.
pHof11willsloworstoptherateofVFAfermentation.
Excessoxygenaddedincollectionsystemorinforcemainseliminates
productionofVFAs.
Excessoxygencanserveaselectronacceptorforheterotrophicbacteria
touptakeVFAs,butwithoutVFAstorage.
Vaporphaseodorcontrol
Chemicalblowdownfromwetscrubbinghashighchlorine
concentration,whichcanoxidizeVFAs.
Ironaddition(commonmethod)
IronadditionwillprecipitatesulfidewithoutimpactingVFAformation.
However,ifhydrogenperoxideisaddedatadownstreamlocationto
reactivatetheiron,VFAswillbeoxidized.
Source:DerivedfromKobylinskietal.(2008).
IndustrialdischargestothecollectionsystemcansignificantlyimpactVFAformation.Discharges
withhightemperaturesand/orBODloadingcanincreasefermentation,whiledischargescontaining
nitratewillinhibitVFAproductionbecausedenitrifyingbacteriawillusethenitratestofullymetabolize
theorganicsratherthanfermentthem.Someindustriesonlydischargeseasonallyoratcertaintimes
duringtheweek,whichcancausegreatvariationsinVFAsandrbCODenteringthewastewaterplant.
Thisismorelikelytobeaproblemonweekendswhenindustriesshutdown.Weekendeffectsalso
occurmostlyinsuburbanbedroomcommunities.
5.3.2 AnaerobicFermentationofPrimaryorReturnActivatedSludge
Sometreatmentconfigurations,suchastheWestbankprocess,makeuseofanaerobic
fermentationoftheprimarysludgetoprovideVFAstotheBPRprocess(SeeChapter6foradetailed
descriptionofthistechnology).Afermentationprocess,however,canbeaddedtoanyconfigurationto
provideVFAs,especiallyinareaswherelittlefermentationtakesplaceinthecollectionsystem.This
approachhasbeenusedverysuccessfullyincoldclimates.
FermentationoftheprimarysludgeortheRASwillproduceVFA.Primarysludgefermentationis
usedmorefrequentlyandisgenerallypreferredoverfermentationofRASforreasonsprovidedlaterin
thissection.
Inthenormalanaerobicfermentationofprimarysludge,thelargerproteinsandcarbohydrate
compoundsarereducedbyacidfermentationtoavarietyofsimpleproducts.Typicalfermentation
productsare:
57
August2010
Aceticacid
Propionicacid
Butyricacid
Hydrogen
UndernormaloperatingconditionsatpHnearneutral,60ormorepercentofthebyproductsformed
areaceticacid.Atotalof20to30percentcouldbeintheformofpropionicandbutyricacidwithonly
smallquantitiesofotherfattyacids.VFAproductionfromfermentingprimarysludgetypicallyyields
0.066to0.15gVFA/gtotalsolids(bothexpressedasCOD),althoughvaluesupto0.3gVFA/gsolidshave
beenreported(Barnardetal.2005).
Inanaerobicdigesters,methanefermentationisestablishedspontaneouslyfollowingthe
biologicalpathwaysshowninFigure53.Astheredoxpotentialdrops,methaneorganismswillsoon
reachanequilibriumwhereintheacetatesareconsumedattherateatwhichtheyareproduced.IfVFA
productionandaccumulationisdesiredthegrowthofmethaneorganismsshouldbeavoidedasmuchas
possible.ThisusuallycanbeaccomplishedbyoperatingthefermenteratSRTsofnomorethan4days.
Acid
Formation
Complex
Waste
15%
Propionic
Acid
65%
20%
15%
17%
Acetic
Acid
Methane
Formation
Other
Intermediates
35%
72%
13%
Methane
15%
Figure53.BiologicalPathwaysofMethaneFormation
Thereareseveralprimarysludgefermenterdesignsthathavebeenusedsuccessfullyinfullscale
plants.Thesimplestconfigurationallowstheformationofathicksludgeblanketintheprimaryclarifier
itselfwherefermentationtakesplace.Someofthethickenedsludgeisreturnedtotheinfluentofthe
primaryclarifiertoallowforelutriationoftheVFAtotheprimaryeffluent.Thisisreferredtoasan
activatedprimarysedimentationtank(Barnard1984).Anothervariationistopumpsludgetoa
completemixtankaheadoftheprimaryclarifiertoaccomplishfermentation.Thesludgeisthenpassed
totheprimaryclarifierforelutriationoftheVFA.Bothoftheseprocessesleadtoanincreasedsolids
loadontheprimaryclarifier.Sludgeageshouldbecontrolledtopreventmethanogenicbacteriafrom
growingandconvertingtheVFAtomethane.TheSRTofthesolidsinthefermenterwilldependonthe
58
August2010
wastewatertemperaturewhichcanvaryfromwintertosummer,butusuallylessthan4daysis
sufficient.
Analternativemethodaccomplishesfermentationinanoversizedgravitysludgethickenerby
holdingthesludgeunderanaerobicconditionsfortypically4to8days4(thisisreferredtoasastatic
fermenter).Thesupernatantcanthenbefeddirectlytotheanaerobiczone,avoidingahighloadonthe
primaryclarifier.Thickeningcaneitherbeaccomplishedwithasinglethickenerorintwostages.The
twostageprocesscaneitherbeacompletemixtankfollowedbyathickenerortwothickenersinseries.
IthasbeenshownthataddingmolassesorothersourcesofreadilybiodegradableCODcanimprovethe
performanceoffermenters(Bottetal.2007).Staticortwostagefermentershavetheadvantageover
fermentationintheprimarysedimentationtankbecausetheVFAsinthesupernatantcanbedischarged
directlytotheanaerobiczoneratherthanmixedwiththemaininfluentstream.Thisconfiguration
allowsthebypassingofstormflowswithoutsignificantlyaffectingthemassofVFAtotheanaerobic
zone.Elutriatingwater(eitherfromtheprimaryeffluentorthefinaleffluent)canbefedtothe
fermentertoflushouttheVFAsproducedandsendthemtotheanaerobiczone.
SomeoftheRAScanalsobefermentedinasidestreamprocessatsimilarSRTs;however,itis
criticalthatdesignerscarefullyconsiderandaccountforthepotentialforphosphorusrelease.Evidence
fromfullscaleplantsshowedthatwhensomeRASormixedliquorisfermentedinanupflowfermenter,
sufficientVFAisproducedtoovercomethereleaseofphosphorus.RASormixedliquorfermentation
couldbeusedinanyBPRprocess,butismostcommoninprocesseswithoutprimaryclarifiers.
FermentershaveseveraladvantagesoverexternalcarbonsourcesforBPR,including:
VFAgenerationresultsinafavorableratioofacetictopropionicacids.
TheVFAproducedcanenhancedenitrificationbyincreasingthegrowthrateofthe
denitrifiersbecauseVFAsaresimple,readilybiodegradablesubstrates.
Thesizeoftheanaerobiczonecouldbereducedtoabout5percentofthetotalvolume.
ThefermenterswillsupplyVFAataconstantrateeventhroughstormflows.
VFAfermentationforBPRresultsinsmallerincreaseinsludgeproductionwhencompared
withprecipitatingchemicals.
FermentationcanimprovesludgesettleabilityduetoselectionforPAOsthataregoodfloc
formers.
Disadvantagesoffermentationinclude:
Increasedbiologicalloadtotheaerationbasin.
Odorissueswhencomparedwithchemicalremovaladditionforphosphorusremoval(odor
controlistypicallyneeded).
TheactualSRTwilldependonthetemperatureandshouldbedesignedtoreducethegrowthofmethanogens.
59
August2010
Willreducedigestergasproductionwhichcanreduceenergyoutputiftheplantuses
digestergastoproduceelectricity.
Capitolcostsofequipment.
SeeChapter10forrecommendationsondesigningsludgefermentationsystems.
5.3.3 CommercialSources
ExternalsourcesofVFAscanbeaddedtotheWWTPtostimulateBPR.Acetateistypicallyused
becauseitisthemostefficientVFA.Acetatealone,however,doesnotmatchtheVFAsproducedduring
fermentationofmunicipalsewage.AsnotedpreviouslyinSection5.2,acetateusuallycomprises40to
60percent,propionate20to40percent,andtheotherVFAsupto10percentoftotalVFAsinmunicipal
wastewater.Thus,amixtureofacetateandpropionateplussmallamountsofbutyrateandvalerateand
theirisoformsmorecloselyrepresenttheproductsofsewagefermentation.Researchhasshownthat
themixturesignificantlyaffectsthecompetitionbetweenPAOsandGAOs.Thiswillbediscussedin
greaterdetailinsubsequentparagraphs.
Yuanetal.(2008)examinedtheeffectoftheorganiccarbonsourceonBPR.Theauthors
comparedtheproductionofPHB(butnottheotherPHAs)andtheuptakeandreleaseofphosphorus
achievedusingfourdifferentsourcesoforganiccarbon:acetate,beefextract,glucose,andmunicipal
wastewater.Experimentalresultsshowedthatthemosteffectivesubstratesforphosphorusuptakeand
releaseandPHBproductionandutilizationweresmall,simplemoleculessuchasacetateandglucose.
Glucosewasthesubstratethatresultedinthemostdissolvedorganiccarbonuptake,butthatwas
partiallybecauseitwasaddedinthelargestamount.Thefastestrateofphosphorusreleaseandhighest
uptakeoccurredwhenacetatewasusedasasubstrate,asexpected.Interestingly,theamountof
phosphorusreleasedperamountofdissolvedorganiccarbonuptakeobservedwasthesameforacetate
andmunicipalwastewater,indicatingthatthewastewaterorganicswerefermentedprimarilyto
acetate.Itshouldalsobementionedthattheyacclimatedtheactivatedsludgeusedforthebatchtests
usingsequencingbatchreactors(SBRs)fedbyasubstratethatwasphosphoruslimitedratherthan
organiccarbonlimited.
Severalstudieshaveexaminedtheeffectsofrelativeconcentrationsofaceticandpropionicacid
onthegrowthofPAOsandGAOs.AnAustralianstudyshowsthatwhilebothPAOsandGAOscoulduse
acetate,PAOswillhaveacompetitiveadvantagewhentheVFAsconsistofroughlyequalpartsofacetic
andpropionicacidasagrowthmedium.ThisisbecausePAOsthatarefedonacetateareabletoswitch
topropionatemuchmorequicklyandeffectivelythanGAOs(Oehmenetal.2005).Thisfindingledtoa
strategytofeedequalamountsofaceticacidandpropionicacidastheoptimalforstimulatingPAO
growth(Oehmenetal.2006,Bottetal.,2007).NotethatstudiespublishedbyChen,etal.(2004),
RandallandChen(2008),andLopezVasquezetal.(2009)haveshownthatanincreaseinthepropionic
toaceticacidratio,eveniftheaceticacidconcentrationisgreater,resultedinhighernetphosphorus
removalbecausethecombinationfavorsthePAOsovertheGAOs,therebyresultinginhigher
concentrationsofPAOsintheMLSS.
AnotherstudyshowedthatisovalericaciddrivesBPRevenbetterthanaceticacid(Bottetal.,
2007).ThisfindingisincontrasttotheresultsobtainedbyAbuGhararahandRandall(1991),who
concludedthatisovalericwasthesecondbestVFAforBPRbutonly65percentasefficientasacetic.
Isovalericacidismuchmoreexpensivethanaceticacidandismoreodorous.Italsoisnotsignificantly
510
August2010
generatedintheprimarysludgefermentationprocess.AdditionofrbCODsuchassugarsandalcohols
containingtwocarbonsormorecanincreasephosphorusuptakebyPAOswhenaddedtotheanaerobic
zonebutmaycausesludgebulkingifdosedinexcess(JenkinsandHarper2004).
5.4
EnvironmentalConditions
5.4.1 DissolvedOxygenandNitratesintheAnaerobicZone
Whendissolvedoxygenispresentintheanaerobiczone,heterotrophicaerobicorganismscan
usetheoxygenastheelectronacceptorandwillcompetewiththePAOsforVFAs.Thisresultsinless
VFAstorageand,subsequently,lessBPR.Moreover,ifoxygenisavailable,PAOscanmetabolizeVFAs
completelyandusetheenergyandcarbonobtainedforgrowthinsteadofstoringVFAsusingenergy
frompolyphosphatebondsforsubsequentphosphateuptake.IfPAOsuseoxygentometabolizeVFAs,
theydonotreleasephosphorusintheanaerobiczoneduringVFAstorage,andtheydonottakeup
excessphosphorusintheaerobiczone.
Nitratescanalsobeusedasanelectronacceptorbyfacultative(denitrifying)heterotrophs,
whichincludesomePAOs.Thepresenceofnitrateintheanaerobiczonewilldepletetheamountof
VFAsavailabletoPAOs,justasthepresenceofdissolvedoxygendoes.Nitratescanalsoinhibit
fermentationofrbCODandreducetheproductionofVFAsbecausemostofthefermenting
microorganismsarefacultativeandcanusenitrateasanelectronacceptortofullyoxidizethenonVFA
rbCODinsteadofproducingVFAsastheendproduct.
Oxygencanbeinadvertentlyaddedbacktotheanaerobiczonethroughrecycleflowssuchas
theRASandbybackmixingfrominadequatelybaffledaerobiczones.Nitratescanbeintroducedtothe
anaerobiczonebytheRAS,bymixedliquorrecyclesfromanoxiczones,bybackmixingfrom
inadequatelybaffledanoxiczones,andbyplantrecyclessuchassupernatantfromsludgehandling
facilities.SignificantnitrateinterferenceofBPRismuchmorecommonthandissolvedoxygen
interference,andeffortstocontrolnitrateintroductiontotheanaerobiczoneshouldbepracticedatall
BPRplants.Seesection5.6.2foradditionaldiscussion.
5.4.2 OxygenintheAerobicZone
PAOsneedoxygentodigestthestorageproductsanduptakeandretainphosphorusinthe
aerobiczone.MaintainingasufficientlyhighDOtransferintheaerobiczoneenhancesprocessstability
andhasbeenfoundtobeakeyfactorinphosphorusremoval(Bottetal.2007).However,itshouldbe
recognizedthattheappropriateDOconcentrationinthemixedliquorforanonlimitingoxygentransfer
rateisafunctionofthewaythebiologicalprocessisbeingoperated,notablytheSRT,themixedliquor
suspendedsolidsconcentration,andtheactualHRTinthereactor.Forhighratesystems,theDOneeds
tobe2.0mg/Lorgreaterintheeffluent,i.e.,priortoadeoxygenationzoneifoneisbeingused.Under
theseconditions,phosphorusremovalcanbeimprovedbyincreasingthemixedliquorDO
concentration.However,forlongresidencetimesystemssuchasoxidationditches,excellent
nitrification,denitrification,andexcessBPRarepossiblewhenDOinthesystemneverexceeds0.5mg/L,
andvariesfromnearzeroinsomesectionsoftheditchtoaneffluentconcentrationof0.25mg/L(Senet
al.1990).SimilarresultsarepossiblewithotherhighHRTconfigurationssuchastheSchreiberProcess.
ReaerationmaybeusefultoensurethatthereissufficientDOintheMLSSinthefinalclarifiersto
preventreleaseofphosphorusduringsettling.
511
August2010

5.4.3 pH
LowpHcanreduceandevenpreventBPR.BelowpH6.9,theprocesshasbeenshowntodecline
inefficiency(WEFandASCE2006).ResearchhasshownthatitisnotpossibletoestablishBPRwhenthe
pHintheanaerobiczoneislessthan5.5,evenifanabundantamountofVFAsarepresentinthe
anaerobiczone(TracyandFlammino1987;RandallandChapin1997).
Filipeetal.(2001)foundthatGAOsdonotgrowwhenthepHisgreaterthan7.25inthe
anaerobiczone.TheyalsoshowedthatlowpHvaluesintheaerobiczonewillinhibitBPR,butPAOs
havetheadvantageovertheGAOsifthezonepHis7.0orgreater.Fortunately,robustcontinuousflow
BPRsystemscommonlyexperiencealargepHswingbetweentheanaerobicandaerobiczones(e.g.,
from7.20.2to8.4ormore),andpHcontrolisunlikelytobeneededandinfactmaybedetrimental
whentreatingmunicipalwastewaters.Becausemanywastewaterprocessessuchaschemicaladdition
andnitrificationcanlowerthepH,itshouldbemonitoredintheanaerobiczoneandchemicallyadjusted
ifnecessary.
5.4.4 Temperature
Hightemperatures(i.e.,above20oC)stimulateGAOacetateuptakeratesmorethanPAOuptake
rates,andtemperaturesofapproximately30oCcanhaveanadverseeffectonphosphorusremoval
(WhangandPark2006).Bottetal.(2007)havereportedthatphosphorusremovalwillgenerallybe
impairedattemperaturesgreaterthan28C.ModelingstudieshaveshownthatGAOscandominateat
highertemperaturesbecauseoftheirincreasedabilitytouptakeacetateatthosetemperatures
comparedtoPAOs(Whangetal.2007).
Panswadetal.(2003)kineticallyinvestigatedmicrobialpopulationdynamicsinresponseto
gradualtemperatureincreasesinanenhancedBRPsystem.Asthetemperaturerosefrom20oCto30oC
to35.5oC,thepredominantmicrobialgroupchangedfromPAOs(4770percentoftotalvolatile
suspendedsolids(VSS))toGAOs(6475percentoftotalVSS)totheordinaryheterotrophs(90percentof
totalVSS),respectively.Despitethespeciesalteration,thephosphoruscontentsofthePAOsappeared
tobesteadywithin0.182to0.308mg/mgVSS(PAO)regardlessofthetemperaturelevel.Theinitial
specificphosphorusreleaserates,whicharesolelyduetotheactivitiesofthePAOs,increasedwith
temperaturefrombetween37.5and55.9tobetween51.8and61.3,52.0and76.9,147.2and210.3,
and374.2and756.3mgP/gmVSS(PAO)hr,at20oC,25oC,30oC,32.5oC,and35.5oC,respectively.
Althoughthemeaninitialspecificphosphorusuptakeratesofthebiomassdecreasedasthe
temperatureincreased,thedataimpliedthattheuptakerateofthePAOswashigherthantheothertwo
microbialgroups.TheseresultsindicatethatthePAOsarelowerrangemesophilesorpossibly
psychrophiles.Asthetemperaturerises,theportionofenergyrequiredformaintenanceincreases
substantially,whichreducestheenergyavailabilityforcellreproduction;hence,thePAOscanbe
washedoutfromthesystem.
Lowtemperaturescanalsolowerphosphorusuptake,althoughthishasnotbeenanissuein
welloperatedandproperlyacclimatizedplants(WEFandASCE2006).Reducedphosphorusremoval
performanceinthewinterisusuallycausedbyreducedfermentationorincreasedDOandnitrateinputs
totheanaerobiczone.Ingeneral,BPRcapacityisgreaterattemperaturesbelow15oCthanathigher
temperaturesifelectronacceptorinputs(DOandnitrates)arecontrolled.Inlabexperiments,Erdalet
al.(2002)foundthatPAOsoutcompetedGAOsat5CeventhoughthePAOmetabolismwasslowerat
512
August2010
5Cthanat20C.ThisoutcomewasbecauseGAOsrelyonglycolysisforenergy,andglycolysisisvery
sensitivetolowtemperatures,resultinginmuchslowergrowthratesfortheGAOs.TheGAOsvirtually
disappearedinthe5Creactor,resultinginamuchgreaterexcessphosphorusremovalcapacityofthe
biomassat5oCcomparedtothatobservedat20oCbecauseofthemuchhigherconcentrationofPAOs
intheMLSS.
AlthoughBPRcapacityisgreateratlowtemperatures,ithasbeenshownthatlowtemperatures
cancausePAOstowashoutofactivatedsludgebeforetheheterotrophscapableofremovingBOD
(McClintocketal.1991;McClintocketal.1993;MamaisandJenkins1992).MamaisandJenkins(1992)
showedthatthewashoutpointisdeterminedbyacombinationoftemperatureandSRTvalues.Thatis,
ateachSRTvalue,thereisatemperaturethatwillcauseBPRwashout.Thishasbeendemonstratedat
bothpilotplantandlargeplantscale.
5.4.5 Cations
Thebreakdownofpolyphosphatesincreasesthephosphateconcentrationinthecellandthe
releaseofphosphatesfromthecells.However,becauseeachphosphatemolecule(PO43)contains
threenegativecharges,itisunabletopassthroughthecellmembraneonitsown.Topassthroughthe
cellmembrane,thephosphatemoleculemustbondwithpositivelychargedionssuchasmagnesium
(Mg+2)andpotassium(K+).Oncethephosphatemoleculebondswiththesechargedions,itbecomes
neutralandcanbetransportedacrossthecellmembrane.Experimentshaveshownthatmagnesium
andpotassiumareessentialcationsforBPRratherthanjustprovidingchargeneutralization,whereas
calciumandothercationsthatmightbecomeinvolvedarenotessential(PattarkineandRandall1999).
ThereleaseofphosphatefromPAOcellsisacriticalstepintheanaerobiczoneofBPR
wastewatertreatmentsystems.Thephosphatewillnotbereleasedintheanaerobiczoneonceeither
magnesiumorpotassiumisdepleted,andBPRwillcease.Therearenoknowncases,however,ofBPR
limitationbecauseofinadequatemagnesiumindomesticandmunicipalwastewaters,butithasbeen
observedinindustrialwastewaters,aswellasinthelaboratoryunderexperimentalconditions.
5.5
Kinetics
ThebiologicalprocessesofWWTPsaredesignedonthebasisofSRTandHRT.ThedesignSRTis
basedonthegrowthrateoftheactivatedsludgemicroorganismsfortheorganicloadingrateofthe
influentwastewater,whichdeterminestheoxygentransferrequirementsandwasteactivatedsludge
production.ThenominalHRT(i.e.,thetimeittakestofillthereactor(s)ifonlythewastewaterisflowing
intoit)isusedforreactordesign.Itdeterminesthemixedliquorsuspendedsolids(MLSS)
concentrationforthedesignSRTvalue.
5.5.1 SolidsRetentionTime(SRT)
Ingeneral,aminimumsystemSRTof3to4daysbasedontotalreactorvolumeissufficientfor
BPRintemperateclimateconditions.AslongastherearesufficientVFAsavailable,higherSRTs(asgreat
as30days)willnotincreasephosphorusuptakebecausethePAOconcentrationinthemixedliquorwill
increaseuntileithertheVFAsortheavailablephosphatesbecomelimiting.IfSRTbecomestoogreat,
however,thequalityoftheeffluentwilldecreasebecauseendogenousrespirationwillcausereleaseof
phosphorusasbiomassdegrades.TheSRTlevelatwhichthissecondaryreleaseoccursissitespecific
513
August2010
basedonVFAuptake,PHApolymerizationanduse,andtheglycogenbreakdownandpolymerization
ratesincorrespondingzonesofthesystem(WEFandASCE2006).
5.5.2 HydraulicRetentionTime(HRT)
BothanaerobicandaerobicHRTcanimpactBPR.Intheanaerobiczone,sufficienttimeis
neededforthefermentationofnonVFArbCODtoVFAsandforthestorageofPHAs.AnHRTof1to2
hoursistypicallyrequiredifmostofthefermentationneedstotakeplaceintheanaerobiczone.VFA
uptakeandstorageasPHAs,however,isfairlyrapid.Thus,theHRTcanbemuchshorteriffermentation
ofrbCODintheanaerobiczoneisnotasignificantsourceofVFAs(aslowas30minutes,althoughone
hourwouldtypicallybeused).TheanaerobicHRTmayvaryfrom5to15percentofthetotalnominal
HRTofafullbiologicalnutrientremoval(BNR)system(removesbothnitrogenandphosphorus),with
theactualvaluedependingprimarilyuponwhetherornotVFAsaresuppliedtotheanaerobiczonefrom
asourceotherthantheinfluentwastewater.
5.6
ImportantDesignandOperationalConsiderations
ThissectionidentifiessomekeydesignandoperationalparametersthatcanimpactBPR.See
Chapter6fordiscussionofspecificwastewaterplantconfigurations.
5.6.1 AvoidingSecondaryReleaseofPhosphorus
ThereleaseofphosphorusintheanaerobiczoneisanessentialstepofBPRbecauseitindicates
thatPAOsareuptakingandstoringVFAsasPHBsandothercompounds.However,phosphorusrelease
canoccurforotherreasonssuchaslowpH,chemicaltoxicity,andexcessiveanaerobicrespiration
resultingindestructionofPAOcells.Thus,releaseofphosphoruscanalsooccurintheabsenceofa
sourceofVFAs.Forexample,someoftheenergystoredaspolyphosphateisusedforcellmaintenance,
andphosphorusisreleasedtotheliquidphase.IfPAOsreleasephosphoruswithoutstoringpolymerized
VFAs,theywillnothavesufficientenergytoremoveallofthereleasedphosphorusintheaerobiczone.
Thisoccurrenceisknownassecondaryrelease.
IfPAOsentertheaerobiczonewithinadequatePHA,theywillnothavetheenergyneededfor
completephosphorusuptakeandtheefficiencyofphosphorusremovalwilldecrease.Thismayoccurin
thefollowingprocessstages:
IntheanaerobiczoneiftheHRTistoolongandtheVFAsaredepletedaconsiderableperiod
beforetheendoftheretentiontime.
InthemainanoxiczonewhenthenitratesareexhaustedwellbeforetheendoftheHRT.
InthesecondanoxiczoneasshowninFigure54whentherearenonitratestoberemoved.
InthesludgeblanketsoffinalclarifierswhentheRASrateistoolowandsludgeisnotremoved
fastenough,resultingintheflowofreleasedphosphatesovertheeffluentweir.
Secondaryreleasemayalsohappeninaerobiczonesthataretoolarge,resultinginstored
substratedepletionanddestructionofPAOcellsbyendogenousmetabolism.Further,excessive
depletionintheaerobiczoneofthestoredglycogeninthePAOswillreduceVFAstorageand
514
August2010
Figure54.Exampleofsecondaryreleaseinsecondanoxiczone.
Re-aeration
2nd Anoxic
Anoxic
Phosphorus as P (mg/L)
phosphorusreleaseintheanaerobiczone,andresultinreducedphosphateremovalbytheBPRsystem
(PunrattanasinandRandall2000).
PhosphoruswillbereleasedfromPAOsinsludgetreatmentprocessesthatareanaerobic.
GravitythickeningofsludgefromBPRprocessescanleadtophosphorusreleaseiflongretentiontimes
areused.Mechanicaldewateringinsteadofgravitydewateringallowslessretentiontimeandless
phosphorusrelease(Bottetal.2007).Dissolvedairflotation(DAF)isusuallyrecommendedtothicken
sludgetoreducetheamountofphosphorusrelease.DAFthickeningcanbequitesuccessfulforthe
reductionofrelease,butifthethickenedsludgeisleftontheDAFbeachtoolongbeforeremoval,excess
releasewilloccurjustasitwillwhenthesludgeislefttoolonginagravitythickener.
Anaerobicdigestioncanalsoleadtoextensivephosphorusrelease.Someofthephosphorus
will,however,beprecipitatedoutaseitherametalsalt(e.g.,calciumphosphate)orasstruvite
(magnesiumammoniumphosphate,MgNH4PO4).PAOstakeupandreleasemagnesiumalongwith
phosphates,andthesetwoionscombinewithammonium(whichisalwayspresentinabundancein
anaerobicdigesters)toformstruvite(MgNH4PO46H2O).Struviteformationisveryfastandwill
continueuntiloneofthethreeionsisreducedtoitssolubilityconcentration.Magnesiumisusually
presentinthelowestconcentration,anditsdepletiontypicallylimitsstruviteformationwithinthe
anaerobicdigester.
Calciumphosphateprecipitatesalsotendtoforminanaerobicdigesters,buttheyarenon
stoichiometricandformmuchmoreslowlythanstruvite.Ifsubstantialamountsofphosphatesare
precipitatedbycalciumalongwiththestruviteformation,therewillbelittleifanypropensityfor
struvitetoformwhenthesludgeexitstheanaerobicdigesters.Fewstruviteproblemsoccurwithbelt
filterpressdewateringoftheanaerobicallydigestedsludge,butplantsusingcentrifugesfordewatering
havereportedproblemswithcloggingoftheports.Notethatifthedigestedsludgeiscompostedafter
dewatering,theresultingClassAsludgewillbeenrichedinmagnesium,phosphorus,nitrogen,and,toa
lesserextent,potassium,whichalsoistakenupandreleasedwithphosphorusbyPAOs.Onlythirty
515
August2010
percentofthephosphorusenteringtheanaerobicdigestersattheYorkRiverplantduringfouryearsof
BPRexperimentationwasrecycledbacktotheheadworksfrombeltfilterpressdewatering.However,it
waspossibletoconsistentlyproduceaneffluentoflessthan1mg/LTPwithouteffluentfiltration,in
spiteofthephosphorusrecycle,followingtheenactmentandimplementationofaphosphatedetergent
baninVirginia(Randalletal.1992).
Alternativestoanaerobicdigestionsuchascomposting,drying,oralkalinetreatmentcanbe
usedtoreducephosphorusreleaseandrecycle.Therehavebeenseveralstudiesthathaveexamined
struviteprecipitationasawaytorecoverphosphorusfromdigestersupernatant.Theseprocesseswere
testedatfullscalefacilitiesinTreviso,ItalyandEdmonton,Canada(SCOPE2004),andcurrentlyarestill
operatingatthosetwoplantsandothersincludingplantsinDurham,NC,andOlburgeninthe
Netherlands.
Whenanaerobicreleaseofphosphorusoccurs,recyclingthesestreamscanoverload
phosphorusremovalprocesses.Theeffectcanbeworsenedwhenthewastehandlingprocessisonly
operatedintermittently.Insomeinstances,thereisahighdegreeofphosphorusprecipitationinthe
anaerobicdigesters,andwithsufficientVFAsintheinfluent,thereturnedphosphorusmayberemoved.
However,inmanycircumstances,somechemicalsneedtobeaddedtothereturnstreamsortothe
anaerobicdigesteritselfsothatthemetalprecipitatewillberemovedwiththedewateredsludge.The
chemicalrequirementisusuallyconsiderablylessthanwhenaddedtothemainstreamplantinthe
absenceofBPR.RemovingphosphorusfromtherecyclestreamcouldalsoreducetheVFAdemandin
theanaerobiczoneandinsomecases,allowtheplanttoavoidaddingafermenterorexternalcarbon
source.
5.6.2 AvoidingBackmixing
Inconfigurationswheretheanaerobiczoneisfollowedimmediatelybyananoxicoraerobic
zone,backmixingcanoccurunlessthedesignensuresitisimpossible.Backmixingcancauseelevated
concentrationsofnitratesand/ordissolvedoxygenintheanaerobiczonewhichfavorsgrowthof
organismsotherthanPAOsandthuscaninhibitBPRbyreducingtheVFAsavailabletothePAOs.In
addition,backmixingcancausethickscumtoformonthesurfaceoftheanaerobiczone.
Aerationofmixedliquor,eitherdiffusedormechanical,increasesthedepthoftheliquid,which
causesahydraulicgradientbacktowardthenonaeratedzone.Ifthebafflingisinsufficient,flowfrom
theaeratedzonecanseepbackintothenonaerated(anaerobicoranoxic)zones.Backmixingcanbe
avoidedbyincreasedbafflingsuchasanunderflowbafflewithopeningssizedtomaintainaforward
velocityof1footpersecond(0.3m/sec)orgreateratalltimesorbychangingthemixingratesatthe
WWTP.
516
August2010
5.6.3 FlowandLoadBalancing
FlowsandloadstoWWTPscanvarywidelybecauseofregulardiurnalflowpatternsandbecause
oflarger,moreirregulardisturbancessuchasstormevents.Peaksineitherflowornutrientloadcan
stresstheBPRsystemandcausereducedperformanceasmeasuredbyeffluentphosphorus
concentrations.Flowpeakscanbeevenedoutbyusingequalizationtanksattheheadoftheplant.
Equalizationtanksincombinationwithnutrientsensorscanalsobeusedtobalancenutrientloads.In
thiscase,recyclestreamshighinnutrientconcentrationssuchasdigestersupernatantcanbestored
duringpeaknutrientloadsandrecycledduringtimeswhenconcentrationsarelow.
5.7
ImpactsonSludgeProcessingandHandling
SludgesfromBPRprocesseswillhavehigherphosphoruscontents,andthereforeahigher
settlingvelocity,butwillotherwisebesimilartosludgefromconventionalactivatedsludgeplants.The
storedphosphorusaddsdryweighttothesludgeandimprovessettling;however,PAOsproducefewer
VSSthanbacteriathatusedissolvedoxygeninmetabolismbecausethegrowthreactionislessefficient.
PAOscanstorephosphorusupto40percentoftheircellmass.Thus,thepercentphosphorusin
thewastedactivatedsludgewillbedeterminedbythefractionoftheactivatedsludgethatconsistsof
PAOs.ThisfractionisdeterminedbytheratiooftheVFAsthatbecomeavailabletothePAOsinthe
anaerobiczonetotheamountofavailablephosphorusintheanaerobiczone.EithertheVFAsorthe
phosphoruswillbecomelimitingintheanaerobiczone,andthePAOfractionwillbedeterminedby
whicheverislimited.
BPRforNorthAmericansewageusuallyresultsin4to8percentofphosphorusinactivated
sludgeasapercentageofmixedliquorvolatilesuspendedsolids(MLVSS).Phosphoruscontentashigh
as15percentofMLVSS,however,wasobservedforseveralweeksattheHRSDYorkRiverWWTPwhen
itwasoperatedasananaerobic/oxic(A/O)processpriortothephosphatedetergentbaninVirginia.
TheMLVSSatYorkRiverwas10percentphosphorusforseveralmonthsduring1986and1987.The
effluentsolublephosphorusconcentrationwas2.2to2.5mg/Lduringthisperiodoftime,illustratingthe
inverserelationshipbetweenpercentPintheMLVSSandeffluentTPthatiscommonforEBPR
processes.Thus,forsomewastewatersthefractionofphosphorusinthewasteddrysolidscouldbe8
percentormore,butasnotedearlieritwillcommonlybebetween4and8percentforNorthAmerican
sewage.ThereisatendencytothinkthateffluentTSSwillcontainthesameconcentrationof
phosphorusastheMLVSS,butitismuchmorelikelythattheeffluentTSSfromgravitysettlingwill
consistprimarilyofthelowspecificgravityflocsthatcontainlowconcentrationsofphosphorusrather
thanthehighspecificgravityPAOflocs.Microphotographsconsistentlyshowthatmicrobial
distributionsinactivatedsludgearenotuniform.
Withrespecttosettlinganddewatering,varyingresultshavebeenfound,withsomeplants
usingBPRreportinglittleornochangeinsludgecharacteristics(Knockeetal.1992)andothersreporting
enhancedsettlinganddewateringproperties(Bottetal.2007).ThesludgeproducedfromBPRwillhave
highermagnesiumandpotassiumconcentrationsinadditiontophosphorusbecausethePAOsalways
takeuptheseelementswithphosphorusduringBPR.
AsnotedinSection5.6.1,anaerobicdigestionofsludgewillleadtoreleaseofphosphorusinto
theliquidrecyclestreamfromdewateringorfromsupernatingofthedigester.Itisveryimportantthat
designersconsiderthispotentialwhendesigningforBPRbecausethephosphorusrecycledtothe
517
August2010
biologicalprocessmustberemovedinadditiontotheinfluentphosphorus.However,alsoasnotedin
section5.6.1,becausetheresultingdigesterliquidstreamisenrichedwithammonium,magnesiumand
phosphate,struvite(MgNH4PO46H2O)willprecipitateinanaerobicdigestersuntiltheconcentrationof
oneoftheconstituentsisreducedbelowitssolubilitypoint.Ifthedigesterisnotsupernated(i.e.the
digestedsludgeisnotpermittedtosettleandformsupernatantthatiswastedfromthesystem),the
concentrationswillremainathighlevelsandmorestruviteprecipitationwilloccurthanifsupernatingis
practiced,therebyreducingtheamountofphosphorusthatwillberecycledtothebiologicalprocess.
Withabundantphosphorusandammonium,magnesiumisusuallytheelementinshortsupplybecause
theionicstrengthofthemagnesiumtakenupandreleasedisonlyabout50percentoftheionicstrength
ofthephosphateuptakeandrelease.Additionalprecipitationofthereleasedphosphoruswithcalcium
willusuallyoccurafterstruviteprecipitationiscomplete.DuringtheHRSDYorkRiverstudy,onlyabout
30%ofthephosphatereleasedduringanaerobicdigestionoftheBPRsludgewasrecycledafter
dewateringonabeltfilterpress(Randalletal.1992).ItwasstillpossibletoobtainaneffluentTP
concentrationoflessthan1mg/Lwithouteffluentfiltrationafterthephosphatedetergentbanwent
intoeffect.Somedesignershaveproposedchemicallyprecipitatingstruviteorotherphosphatesolidsto
avoidhighphosphorusreturninrecyclestreams(Bottetal.2007).Dependingonwherestruvitecrystals
form,i.e.intheanaerobicdigesterorafterexitingthedigester,theycanplugcentrifugeports,aswellas
pumpsandpipesusedtoconveythesludge,ifnotcontrolled.However,becauseofthehigher
concentrationsofmagnesiumandphosphorusinanaerobicdigesterswhenBPRsludgeisdigested,
most,ifnotall,ofthestruviteformationoccurswithinthesludgeandremainswiththesludgerather
thanformingafterthesludgeandsupernatantexitthedigesters.Note,however,thereversetypically
happenswhennonBPRsludgeisanaerobicallydigested.Thestruviteformsafterthesludgeor
supernatantexitthedigesterratherthanwithinthedigester.
5.8
References
AmericanPublicHealthAssociation(APHA),AmericanWaterWorksAssociation(AWWA)&Water
EnvironmentFederation(WEF).2005.StandardMethodsfortheExaminationofWaterand
Wastewater,21stEdition.Eds.A.D.Eaton,L.S.Clesceri,E.W.Rice,A.E.Greenberg,andM.H.Franson.
AbuGhararah,Z.H.andC.W.Randall.1991.TheEffectofOrganicCompoundsonBiologicalPhosphorus
Removal.WaterScienceandTechnology.23:585594.
Barnard,J.L.2006.BiologicalNutrientRemoval:WhereWeHaveBeen,WhereAreWeGoing?InWEFTEC
2006.
Bott,C.B.,S.N.Murthy,T.T.Spano,andC.W.Randall.2007.WERFWorkshoponNutrientRemoval:How
LowCanWeGoandWhatIsStoppingUsfromGoingLower?Alexandria,VA:WERF.
Chen,Y.,A.A.Randall,andT.McCue.2004.TheEfficiencyofEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
fromRealWastewaterAffectedbyDifferentRatiosofAcetictoPropionicAcid.WaterResearch.38(1):
2736.
Erdal,U.G.,Z.K.Erdal,andC.W.Randall.2002.EffectofTemperatureonEBPRSystemPerformanceand
BacterialCommunity.InProceedingsofWEFTEC2002.
518
August2010
Filipe,C.D.M.,G.T.Daigger,andC.P.L.GradyJr.2001.pHAsaKeyFactorintheCompetitionBetween
GlycogenAccumulatingOrganismsandPhosphateAccumulatingOrganisms.WaterEnvironment
Research.Alexandria,VA:WEF.73(2):223232.
Fuhs,G.W.andM.Chen.1975.MicrobiologicalBasisofPhosphateRemovalintheActivatedSludge
ProcessfortheTreatmentofWastewater.MicrobialEcology.2(2):11938.
Jenkins,D.I.andW.F.Harper.2004.UseofEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalforTreating
NutrientDeficientWastewater.Alexandria,VA:WERFandIWAPublishing.
Knocke,W.R.,J.W.Nash,andC.W.Randall.1992.ConditioningandDewateringofAnaerobicallyDigested
BPRSludge.JournalofEnvironmentalEngineering.118(5):642656.
Kobylinski,E.,G.V.Durme,J.Barnard,N.Massart,andS.Koh.2008.HowBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
isInhibitedbyCollectionSystemCorrosionandOdorControlPractices.InWEFTEC2008.
LopezVazquez,C.M.,A.Oehmen,C.M.Hooijmans,D.Brdjanovic,H.J.Gijzen,Z.Yuan,andM.C.M.van
Loosdrecht.2009.ModelingthePAOGAOCompetition:EffectsofCarbonSource,pHand
Temperature.WaterResearch.43(2):450462.
Mamias,D.andD.Jenkins.1992.TheEffectsofMCRTandTemperatureonEnhancedBiological
PhosphorusRemoval.WaterScienceandTechnology.26(56):955965.
Mamias,D.,D.Jenkins,andP.Pitt.1993.ARapidPhysicalChemicalMethodfortheDeterminationof
ReadilyBiodegradableSolubleCODinMunicipalWastewater.WaterResearch.27(1):195197.
McClintock,S.A.,C.W.Randall,andV.M.Pattarkine.1991.TheEffectsofTemperatureandMeanCell
ResidenceTimeonEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.InProceedings,1991SpecialtyConference
onEnvironmentalEngineering.AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers.NewYork,N.Y.pp.319324.
McClintock,S.A.,C.W.Randall,andV.M.Pattarkine.1993.EffectsofTemperatureandMeanCell
ResidenceTimeonBiologicalNutrientRemovalProcesses.WaterEnvironmentalResearch.65(2):110
118.
Melcer,H.,P.L.Dold,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,I.Takacs,H.D.Stensel,A.W.Wilson,P.Sun,andS.Bury.2003.
MethodsforWastewaterCharacterizationinActivatedSludgeModeling.WERFFinalReport.Project
99WWF3.
Publishing.
Oehmen,A.,A.M.Sanders,M.T.Vives,Z.Yuan,andJ.Keller.2006.CompetitionbetweenPhosphateand
GlycogenAccumulatingOrganismsinEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalSystemswithAcetate
andPropionateCarbonSources.JournalofBiotechnology.ElsevierScienceBV.123(1):2232.
519
August2010
Oehmen,A.,Z.Yuan,L.L.Blackall,andJ.Keller.2005.ComparisonofAcetateandPropionateUptakeby
PolyphosphateAccumulatingOrganismsandGlycogenAccumulatingOrganisms.Biotechnologyand
Bioengineering.91(2).NewYork,NY:JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.
PanswadT.,A.DoungchaiandJ.Anotai.2003.TemperatureEffectonMicrobialCommunityofEnhanced
BiologicalPhosphorusRemovalSystem.WaterResearch.37(2):409415.
Pattarkine,V.M.andC.W.Randall.1999.TheRequirementofMetalCationsforEnhancedBiological
PhosphorusRemovalbyActivatedSludge.WaterScienceandTechnology.40(2):159165.
Punrattanasin,W.andC.Randall.2000.FactorsAffectingtheProductionandStorageof
PolyhydroxyalkanoatesinActivatedSludgeBiomass.Proceedings,1stWorldCongressofthe
InternationalWaterAssociation.July37.Paris,France.ISBN:2951541600.
Randall,C.W.andR.W.Chapin.1997.AceticAcidInhibitionofBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.Water
EnvironmentResearch.69(5):955960.
Randall,A.,andY.Chen.2008.TheKineticsofAnaerobicandAerobicCarbonandPhosphorus
TransformationforaSepticWastewaterwithVaryingPropionate:AcetateRatios.InWEFTEC2008.
Randall,C.W.,H.D.Stensel,andJ.L.Barnard.1992.DesignofActivatedSludgeBiologicalNutrient
RemovalPlants.InDesignandRetrofitofWastewaterTreatmentPlantsforBiologicalNutrientRemoval.
Lancaster,PA:Randall,Ed.TechnomicPublishingCo.,Inc.pp.125126.
SCOPE.2004.NewsletterNo.57.July.CentreEuropendEtudessurlesPolyphosphates.Brussels,
Belgium.Availableonline:http://www.ceep
phosphates.org/Files/Newsletter/Scope%20Newsletter%2057%20Struvite%20conference.pdf
Sen,D.,C.W.Randall,andT.J.Grizzard.1990.BiologicalNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalinOxidation
DitchandHighNitrateRecycleSystems.ReportCBP/TRS47/90.ChesapeakeBayOffice,USEPA,
Washington,D.C.
Sprandio,M.,V.Urbain,P.Ginestet,M.J.Audic,andE.Paul.ApplicationofCODFractionationbyaNew
CombinedTechnique:ComparisonofVariousWastewatersandSourcesofVariability.2001.
Tracy,K.D.andA.Flammino.1987.BiochemistryandEnergeticsofBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval.
ProceedingIAWPRCInternationalSpecializedConference,BiologicalPhosphorusRemovalfrom
Wastewater.Rome,Italy.September2830.InBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalfromWastewater.pp.
1526.R.Ramadori,Ed.NewYork,NY:PergamomPress.
520
August2010
WEFPress.
Whang,L.M.andJ.K.Park.2006.CompetitionBetweenPolyphosphateandGlycogenAccumulating
OrganismsinEnhancedBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalSystems:EffectofTemperatureandSludgeAge.
WaterEnvironmentResearch.78(1):411.
Whang,L.M.,C.D.M.Filipe,andJ.K.Park.2007.ModelBasedEvaluationofCompetitionBetween
PolyphosphateandGlycogenAccumulatingOrganisms.WaterResearch.41(6):13121324.
Xu,S.andS.Hasselblad.1996.ASimpleBiologicalMethodtoEstimatetheReadilyBiodegradableOrganic
MatterinWastewater.WaterResearch.30(4):1023.
Yuan,Q.,R.Sparling,andJ.Oleszkiewicz.2008.EffectofDifferentCarbonSourcesonBiological
PhosphorusRemovalandPolyhydroxyalkanoateProduction.InWEFTECProceedings2008.
521
August2010
522
August2010
6.OverviewofNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies
Chapter6covers:
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
Introduction
NitrogenRemovalTechnologies
PhosphorusRemovalTechnologies
CombinedNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies
EffluentFiltration
SidestreamManagement
TechnologyPerformance
FactorsforSimultaneouslyAchievingLowNitrogenandPhosphorus
EffluentConcentrations
References
6.1
Introduction
Thischapterdescribesthemanytechnologiesthatareavailabletoremovenitrogenand
phosphorusfromwastewater.Itpresentsfindingsfromanextensivereviewofnutrientremoval
technologiesandtechniquescurrentlyappliedandemergingatmunicipalwastewatertreatmentplants
(WWTPs).Thischapteralsoincludesadiscussionofachievableeffluentconcentrationsbasedonreal
worlddatafromwelloperatedplantsbeforeendingwithadiscussionofthekeyfactorsin
simultaneouslyachievingloweffluenttotalnitrogen(TN)andtotalphosphorus(TP)concentrations.
RefertoChapters3,4,and5fordetaileddiscussionsontheprinciplesofphosphorusremovalby
chemicaladdition,biologicalnitrogenremoval,andbiologicalphosphorusremoval,respectively.
TheinformationpresentedhereincomplementsfindingspublishedinthefollowingEPAreports
onthesubject:
NutrientControlDesignManualStateofTechnologyReviewReport(PublishedJanuary,2009):
Profilesthelatestadvancesintechnologytoachieveconsistentlylownutrientlevels,including
effluentfiltrationandadvancedclarificationtechniques,alongwithuptodateresearchonthe
removalofemergingmicrocontaminants.Thisreportwasaninterimproductinthe
developmentofthisdesignmanual.Fulltextavailableat:
MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument(PublishedSeptember,2008):
Presentsdetailedtechnicalandcostinformationaboutbothbiologicalandphysiochemical
treatmenttechnologiesfortheremovalofnitrogen,phosphorus,oracombinationofthetwo.
Includesatleastoneyearsworthoffullscaleperformancedatafor27wastewatertreatment
facilitiesintheUnitedStatesandCanadaand9detailedcasestudies.Fulltextavailableat:
EmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeatherManagement
(PublishedFebruary,2008):Describesinnovativeandemergingtechnologiesfornitrogenand
61
August2010
phosphorusremoval,assessestheirmeritsandcosts,andprovidessourcesforfurther
technologicalinvestigation.Fulltextavailableat:
Althoughthischapterprovidessomeexamplesofproprietaryandemergingtechnologies,itis
importanttorecognizethattheindustryisalwayschangingandthatnewtechnologiesnotidentifiedin
thischaptermayemergeinthefuture.Newtechnologiesmaybeinnovativeadaptationsofexisting
technologiesortechnologiesborrowedfromanotherindustry,andsomecouldleadtoconsiderable
performanceimprovementsandcostsavings.Whenevaluatingnewtechnologies,designersandplant
ownersshouldworkcloselywiththeirstateregulatoryagencyandusethebasictreatmentprinciplesin
Chapters3through5ofthisdesignmanualtoensurethatanynewtechnologyfollowsthesebasic
principlesandcanachieveitsclaimedremovalgoals.
6.2
NitrogenRemovalTechnologies
Nitrificationisanaerobicprocessinwhichautotrophicbacteriaoxidizeammoniaornitritefor
energyproduction.Ammonianitrogen(NH3N)isfirstconvertedtonitrite(NO2)byammoniaoxidizing
bacteria(AOB).Thenitriteproducedisthenconvertedtonitrate(NO3)bynitriteoxidizingbacteria
(NOB).BothreactionsusuallyoccurinthesameprocessunitataWWTP(e.g.,activatedsludgemixed
liquororfixedfilmbiofilm).Denitrificationisthebiologicalreductionofnitrateornitritetonitrogengas
(N2)intheabsenceofoxygen(orunderanoxicconditions).SeeChapter4fordetailedinformationon
theprinciplesofbiologicalnitrogenremoval.
Sincenitrogenintreatmentplantinfluentsismostly(70to80percent)ammonia,totalnitrogen
removalrequiresthatnitrificationoccurfirstfollowedbydenitrification.Inthepast,someWWTPswere
requiredonlytoremoveammonianitrogeninwastewatertoreducetoxicitytoaquaticorganismswith
nolimitsonnitrateortotalnitrogen.However,manytreatmentplantsarenowrequiredtoremove
nitrogenbecausebothammonianitrogenandnitratenitrogencanstimulatealgaeandphytoplankton
growthandleadtoeutrophicationofU.S.waterways(SeeChapter2foradditionaldiscussion).Many
plantsthatarentrequiredtoremovenitrogendosoanywaybyrecyclingmixedliquorfromthe
nitrificationaerationtanktoanupstreamanoxictankbecauseitproducesalkalinity,usesnitrate
producedinaerationzoneforBODremovaltothusreduceaerationenergy,andimprovessludge
settling.
Biologicalnitrogenremovalcanbeaccomplishedbyavarietyoftreatmentconfigurationsusing
suspendedgrowth,attachedgrowth,orcombinedsystems.Nitrification,denitrificationandbiochemical
oxygendemand(BOD)removalcanbeaccomplishedinasingleprocesswithbioreactorsfollowedby
secondaryclarifiers.SystemscanalsobedesignedasseparatestagesystemswithnitrificationandBOD
removaloccurringinthesamebioreactororinseparatebioreactors,anddenitrificationoccurringina
tertiaryprocess.Membranebioreactorscanbeusedforsolidsseparationinsteadofsecondary
clarifiers.Physical/chemicalmethodsfornitrogenremovalarenotcommonlyusedatmunicipalWWTPs
andarenotaddressedinthismanual.
Sidestreamtreatmentprocessescanbeusedtoenhancenitrification.Supplementalcarbonis
oftenaddedfordenitrification,andadvancedsolidsseparationsuchasmembranebioreactors(MBR)
andeffluentfiltrationcanbeusedtoachieveverylowlevels.
62
August2010
Table61liststhetechnologiesthatareavailabletoday(inuseandemerging)thatcanachieve
biologicalnitrogenremoval.Discussionofeachtechnologyfollowsthetable.Notethattechnologies
thatachievebothnitrogenandphosphorusremovalarediscussedinSection6.4.
Table61.MatrixofBiologicalNitrogenRemovalTechnologies1
Configuration
Type
Technology
SingleProcessUnit
forNitrificationand
Denitrification
Suspendedgrowth
Attachedgrowthor
hybrid
SeparateStage
Nitrification
SeparateStage
Denitrification
Suspendedgrowth
Attachedgrowthor
hybrid
Suspendedgrowth
Attachedgrowth
ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)
4StageBardenpho
MLEor4StageBardenphowithMembrane
Bioreactor
SequencingBatchReactor(SBR)
OxidationDitchwithAnoxicZone
StepFeedBiologicalNitrogen Removal
SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification
(SNdN)
IntegratedFixed FilmActivatedSludge
(IFAS)
Moving BedBiofilmReactor(MBBR)
Nitrification (Seesidestreamtreatment
processesinSection6.2.4fordiscussionof
nitrificationwithbioaugmentation)
BiologicalAeratedFilters(BAF)
SuspendedGrowthReactors(notcommon)
DenitrificationFilters
Downflow
UpflowContinuousBackwash
Section
Reference
6.2.1.1
6.2.1.2
6.2.1.3
6.2.1.4
6.2.1.5
6.2.1.6
6.2.1.7
6.2.1.8
6.2.1.9
6.2.2.1
6.2.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.3.1
1.Thesetechnologiesarefornitrogenremovalonly.Technologiesforremovalofbothnitrogenandphosphorusarepresented
inTable63.
6.2.1 NitrogenRemovalinSingleProcessUnit
Thissectionprovidesinformationontechnologiesthatachievenitrogenremovalinasingle
sludgeprocess,typicallybyalternatingbetweenanoxicandaerobicconditions.Suspendedgrowth
processesarediscussedfirstfollowedbyfixedfilmandhybridsystems.Supplementalcarboncanbe
addedtoasingleunitprocesstoenhancedenitrification,althoughthisismorecommonwithseparate
stageprocesseswhereBODisdepletedpriortothelastdenitrificationstep.SeeSection6.2.3.3fora
discussionofthevariouscarbonsourcesandissues.Sidestreamtreatmentprocessestoenhance
nitrificationarediscussedinsection6.6.
6.2.1.1
ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)Process
ThemostcommonnitrogenremovalprocessusedatWWTPs,theModifiedLudzackEttinger
(MLE)process,isapredenitrification,singlesludgesystem.Theprocessincludesaninitialanoxiczone
63
August2010
followedbyanaerobiczone.Intheanoxiczone,nitrateproducedintheaerobiczoneisreducedto
nitrogengasusingBODintheanoxiczoneinfluent.Nitrificationoccursintheaerobiczonealongwith
theremovalofnearlyallremainingsolubleBOD.Attheendoftheaerobiczone,pumpsrecyclethe
nitraterichmixedliquortotheanoxiczonefordenitrification.SeeFigure61fortheMLEprocess
schematic.
Figure61.ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)process.
RAS=Returnactivatedsludge;WAS=Wasteactivatedsludge
Source:USEPA2008bFigure23
TheMLEisconstructedeitherbyaddingananoxiczoneaheadofanaerobicactivatedsludge
processorbyconstructingwallsinanexistingaerationbasintocreateananoxiczoneattheinfluent
end,althoughthiswillreducetheaerationzonenitrificationcapacity.Aretrofittoanexistingactivated
sludgeplantwillrequirepumpingandpipingfortheinternalrecyclestream.Nitrogenremovalmightbe
limitedbyfactorssuchascarbonsourceavailability,processkinetics,andanoxicoraerobiczonesizes.
Oxygenrecycledfromtheaerobiczonecannegativelyaffectthedenitrificationrateintheanoxiczone.
Anadditionalcarbonsourcemaybeneededfordenitrification.
OnechallengeoftheMLEprocessandanysimilarprocessesthatrelyheavilyonrecyclingisto
makesurethatthesystemhydraulicsaresuitable.RASratescanbequitehighandbafflesneedtobe
designedaccordingly.
64
August2010
6.2.1.2
4StageBardenpho
Thefirsttwostagesofthe4stageBardenphoareidenticaltotheMLEsystem.Thethirdstageis
asecondaryanoxiczonetoprovidedenitrificationoftheportionoftheflowthatisnotrecycledtothe
primaryanoxiczone.Thefourthandfinalzoneisareaerationzonethatservestostripanynitrogengas
andincreasethedissolvedoxygen(DO)concentrationbeforeclarification(seeFigure62).Methanolor
anothercarbonsourcecanbeaddedtothethirdstagetoenhancedenitrification.Someconfigurations
haveusedanoxidationditchwithalowDOzoneinsteadofthefirsttwostages.
The4stageBardenphoprocessinvolvesseveralbasinsandhasalargerfootprintthantheMLE
process.Thefootprintcanbereducedbyaddingexternalorganiccarbontothesecondanoxicbasin.
Pumpingandpipingarerequiredfortheinternalrecycle.TheprocesshasbeencombinedwithMBRsto
achieveloweffluentnitrogen.
Figure62.4stageBardenphoprocess.
Source:USEPA2008bFigure25.
6.2.1.3
MLEor4StageBardenphowithMembraneBioreactor(MBR)
Membranebioreactors(MBRs)usemembranesplacedinthelastaerobiczoneofeitheranMLE
or4stageBardenphotreatmentsystemforliquidsolidseparationinsteadofconventionalclarification.
Membranescanbesubmersedinthebiologicalreactororlocatedinaseparatestageorcompartment.
SeeFigure63forcommonconfigurationofamembranebioreactorina4stageBardenphonitrogen
removalsystem.
65
August2010
Figure63.Commonconfigurationforamembranebioreactor4stagebardenphotreatmentsystem
Lowpressuremembranes(ultrafiltrationormicrofiltration)arecommonlyused.Systemscanbe
pressureorvacuumdriven.Despitesimilardesignsolidsresidencetimes(SRTs)anddesignprinciples,
MBRsystemsoperateatahighermixedliquorsuspendedsolids(MLSS)concentration,whichresultsin
smallertanksandsmallerspacerequirementsthanbiologicalnitrogenremovalsystemswithsecondary
clarifiers.Inaddition,membraneseparationprovidesforgreatlyreducedtotalsuspendedsolids(TSS)in
theeffluent,typicallywellbelow1.0mg/L,and,hence,slightlygreaterremovalofnitrogenand
phosphorus.
Membranematerialsareeitherorganicpolymersorinorganicmaterialssuchasceramics.They
aredesignedinmodularunitsandaretypicallyconfiguredaseitherhollowfiberbundlesorplate
membranes.Allmembranesystemsuseanairscourtechniquetoreducebuilduponthemembranes
(USEPA2007b;USEPA2008a).Membranesrequireperiodiccleaning(typically2to4timesperyear)
usingcitricacidorsodiumhypochloritesolution.Operationalissuesincludemembranebiofouling,
chemicalcosts,lossofproductionforcleaning,andincreasedpumpingrequirementswithincreased
electricitycosts(USEPA2007b;WEF2005).MBRsystemsoverallproducelesswastesludgethan
conventionalsystemsbecausetheytendtobeoperatedathigherSRTs.Whenoperatedatthesame
SRTsthereisverylittledifference,withtheMBRsystemproducingslightlymoresludgebecauseof
greatereffluentTSScapture.
6.2.1.4
Sequencingbatchreactors(SBRs)arefillanddrawbatchsystemsinwhichalltreatmentsteps
areperformedsequentiallyforadiscretevolumeofwaterinasingleorsetofreactorbasins.SBRsuse
fourbasicphasesformostsystems:fill,react,settle,anddecant,followedbyanidleperiod(seeFigure
64foradepictionofoperatingcycles).TheSBRcontrolsystemallowsittomimicthetreatment
environmentsofothersuspendedgrowthprocessessuchastheMLEor4StageBardenphosystemby
66
August2010
useofmultipleaerationandanoxicperiods.Ittypicallycompletes4to6cyclesperdaypertankwhen
treatingdomesticwastewater1.
AcommondesignistwoSBRsinparalleltoallowtreatmentofthecontinuousinflowandfor
onetobetakenoutofserviceformaintenance,plusonesparebasinusedforflowstorageand
equalization,initially,andbecomingthethirdSBRwhenexpansionisdesired.Additionaltreatment
trainscanimprovereliabilityformeetingloweffluentgoals.ThekeytotheSBRprocessisthecontrol
system,whichconsistsofacombinationoflevelsensors,timers,andmicroprocessors,whichcanbe
configuredtomeetsystemneedsfornitrogenremoval(Senetal.1990).SBRsareoftensoldaspackage
plantsandaremorecommonlyusedforsmallcommunityWWTPs.IndividualSBRbasinsarerelatively
smallbecausetheydonothaveaseparateclarifier,buttheoverallfootprintistypicallymediumbecause
designsusuallycallformultipleSBRsinparallelandtheuseofanequalizationbasin.Aprimary
advantageofSBRsisthatsettlingoccursunderquiescentconditions,thusmakingitmoreefficient,and
theyareeasytoautomate.
Figure64.Operatingperiodsofasequencingbatchreactor.
Source:USEPA2008c.
6.2.1.5
OxidationDitchwithAnoxicZone
Oxidationditchesareloopedchannelsthatprovidecontinuouscirculationofwastewaterand
biomass.Theytypicallyoperateasracetrackconfigurationsaroundacentralbarrier,withforward
mixedliquorflowsofapproximately1footpersecondormoreandlongSRTs(e.g.,15to30
days),althoughshorterSRTsarepossible.Theaeratorsaretypicallyrotatingbrushesorturbinesthat
movethewateraswellastransferoxygen.Therefore,noadditionalpumpingorpipingistypically
SBRscanbeoperatedtoachievebiologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR)byusingalargerbatchreactorwithan
anaerobicperiod;however,chemicaladditionismorecommonlyusedfortreatmenttoloweffluentTPlevels
(Young2008).
67
August2010
neededcomparedtoaconventionalactivatedsludgesystem,whichreducesenergycosts.Oxidation
ditchesarewidelyusedinsmalltomediumsizedcommunities(WERF2000a).Oxidationditchesare
commonlydesignedwithalargefootprintandthus,areusedlessforlarge,urbansystems.SeeFigure6
5foratypicaloxidationditchconfiguration
Figure65.Exampleoxidationditchconfiguration.
Source:USEPA2008b,Figure26
MostoxidationditchescanbeoperatedtoremoveasubstantialamountofTNduetothelong
SRTsthatensurecompletenitrification,thehighMLSSconcentrations(ofteninexcessof3,0006,000
mg/L)thatencouragesimultaneousnitrificationdenitrification,andtheuniqueDOprofilesalongthe
flowpaththatcanbemanipulatedbycontrollingoxygentransferbytherotormixingsystems.Oxidation
ditchesthatarespecificallydesignedtoremovenitrogentypicallyworkbycyclingtheflowwithinthe
ditchbetweenaerobicandanoxicconditions.TNremovalcanbeenhancedbyusingautomaticcontrols
(typicallyDOorOxidationReductionPotential)toturnrotors/mixersonandofftomaintaindesiredDO
setpointsalongtheflowpath.
PatentedoxidationditchdesignsfornitrogenremovalincludetheCarrouselandPhased
IsolationDitch(PID)(thelatteralsoknownastheBiodenitroandBiodenipho)processes.TheCarrousel
oxidationditchisavariationofthetraditionaldesign.Theseditchesaretypicallydeeperthanstandard
oxidationditchesanduseturbineaeratorsforaeration,mixing,andpropulsioninsteadofrotors.The
PIDprocessusespairsofditchesoperatinginalternatinganoxicaerobicoranaerobicanoxicaerobic
modes.Seesection6.4.1.5foradiscussionofproprietaryoxidationditchdesignsthatcanachieveboth
nitrogenandphosphorusremoval(e.g.,theOrbalprocess)
6.2.1.6
StepFeedBiologicalNitrogenRemoval
Thestepfeedbiologicalnitrogenremovalprocesssplitstheinfluentflowanddirectsaportionof
ittoeachoftwoormore(typically3or4)anoxicaerobiczonecombinationsinserieswithsimilar
portionsoftheinfluentflowgoingtoeachzonebutalesseramounttothelastanoxicaerobic
68
August2010
combinationpriortoclarificationtominimizethedischargeofammoniumintheeffluent(seeFigure6
6).Thebiomassinthelaterstagesisnotjusttreatinginfluentflowbutisalsoreducingnitratefromthe
upstreamzones.
Thestepfeedsystemalsoprovidesflexibilityforsystemstohandlewetweatherevents.The
excessiveflowisdirectedtothelastorlatterstagesandnormalflowismaintainedintheinitialstages.
Stepfeedsystemscanbecompatiblewithexistingconventionalplugflowactivatedsludgeprocesses,
andtheydonotrequiretheinstallationofrecyclepumpsandpiping,juststepfeedpipes.Thefootprint
canbelargetoaccommodatebothnitrificationanddenitrification;however,asaretrofittechnology,a
stepfeedsystemisabletoredirecttheflowsofanexistingactivatedsludgesystemwithoutneedingto
increaseitsfootprintthroughaddingtankvolume.Operationaldisadvantagesincludetheneedto
controltheDOconcentrationofaerationzonesprecedingthedownstreamanoxiczonesandtheneedto
controltheflowsplittingtothestepfeedpoints.
Figure66.Stepfeedbiologicalnitrogenremoval.
6.2.1.7 SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification(SNdN)
SimultaneousNitrificationDenitrification(SNdN)isaprocesswherebyDOconcentrationsare
lowenoughsothatoxygendoesnotpenetratetheentireactivatedsludgefloc.Thus,nitrificationis
occurringontheexteriorportionsoftheflocanddenitrificationisoccurringintheanoxic,interior
portions.SNdNcommonlyoccursinoxidationditches.SNdNnecessitatesalargerreactorvolume
comparedtonitrificationonly;however,itdoesnotrequireaseparatezonefordenitrificationandcan
resultinreducedenergyrequirements.Theneedforanadditionalcarbonsourcefordenitrificationis
typicallyreducedoreliminatedbecausetheentireprocessisaccomplishedinonetank.SeeChapter4,
section4.14foradditionaldiscussionofSNdNmechanisms.
69
August2010
OneexampleofapatentedtechnologythatusesSNdNistheSchreiberProcess.The
wastewaterentersacircularbasinequippedwitharotatingbridgethatprovidesmixing.Aerationis
providedbyfinebubblediffusersattachedtothebridge.Theaerationcanbeturnedofftosequence
betweenaerobicandanoxicconditionswhilethemovingbridgecontinuestokeepthetankmixed.The
separationofmixingandaerationmakesthesystemveryeasytocontrolforSNdN,aswellasforBPRin
thesamereactor.
AnothertechnologythattakesadvantageofSNdNismarketedastheproprietarySymbio
systembyEnviroquip,adivisionofEmicoWatertechnologies,Inc(USEPA2008a).Itusesaprobeto
measurethelevelofnicotinamideadeninedinucleotide(NADH)inthebiomassandtheDOofthe
wastewatertopredictchangesinBOD.Basedoninstantaneousreadings,aerationisadjustedto
maintainoptimalconditions(DO<1mg/L)forSNdN.OperatingdatafromthreemunicipalWWTPs
showTNremovalto10mg/Lorless(TrivediandHeinen2000).Thistechnologyiscommonlyusedfor
industrialtreatmentsystems.
6.2.1.8 IntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS)
Integratedfixedfilmactivatedsludge(IFAS)isarelativelynewtechnologythatdescribesany
suspendedgrowthsystemthatincorporatesanattachedgrowthmediawithinthesuspendedgrowth
reactor(eitheraerobicoranoxiczone)2.Manytypesoffixedandfloatingmediaareavailable,as
summarizedinTable62.
Table62.IFASMediaTypes,Applications,andDesignConsiderations
MediaType
Textileor
ropemedia
Sponge
Plastic
Description
ProductsNames DesignandOperationalConsiderations
(PartialList)
Alsocalledloopedcordor
AccuWeb
RopeneedstobelocatedinareawithlowBODand
strandmedia.Consistsofa
Cleartec
highammoniaconcentrationforenhancednitrification.
polyvinylchloridebased
Ringlace
Middleofaerationzoneisusuallytheoptimum
materialwovenintoropeor
Biomatrix
location.Aerationandmixingshouldprovidecrossflow
webwithloopsalongits
pattern.Wormgrowthhasbeenreportedbutcanbe
lengthtoprovidesurfacearea
controlledbycreatinganoxicconditionsand
forthebiomass.Arranged
chlorinatingtheRAS.HighDOencouragesworms,while
withinarigidframe.
lowDOincreasesSNdNanddiscouragesworms.
Freefloatingcuboidswith
Linpor
Requiresairknifeandairliftpumpwithanimpingement
specificgravityclosetowater
platepassivesqueezingtokeepmediafromsinking.
distributedthroughoutthe
Requiresdownstreamscreen.Replacementofsome
media
mediaisrequiredduringfirstfewyearsofoperation.
Freefloatingplasticmedia
Kaldnes
Requiresdownstreamscreen.Mediadoesnotneedto
HydroxyliPAC
bereplaced.
Entex
Notes:RAS=returnactivatedsludge;HDPE=highdensitypolyethylene
Source:USEPA2008b;WEFandASCE2006.
2
AlthoughmostIFASsystemshavebeenusedforbiologicalnitrogenremovalratherthanbiologicalphosphorus
removal,pilotscaleresearchbySriwiriyaratandRandall(2005)hasdemonstratedthatBPRcanbecombinedwith
IFASinthesametreatmenttrain.Researchersdidnotusemediaintheanaerobiczone,andrecommendagainst
thispractice.Mediawasusedintheanoxiczonewitheffectiveness.
610
August2010

Afinescreenisrecommendedupstreamofthesecondaryprocesstopreventmaterialsuchas
hairfrominterferingwiththesurfaceareaofthemedium(USEPA2008b).Freefloatingsystemsrequire
installationofeffluentscreenstokeepthemediainthereactor(Gellneretal.2008).Thefreefloating
mediaalsorequiresmoreenergyinputthanfixedmediabecauseoftheneedformixing.Sponges
requirerecycleaswellasmixing.
IFAShasseveralbenefitsoversuspendedgrowthnitrificationsystems,including(WEFandASCE
2006):
Increasedbiomasswithoutincreasedsolidsloadsonthesecondaryclarifier.
Canprovidemoretreatmentcapacitywiththesamefootprintbecausetheselectedmediais
installedwithinanexistingbasin.
Canimprovenitrificationundercoldtemperaturesbecausetheattachednitrifiershavea
muchlongerSRTthanthesuspendedgrowthones.
Sludgehasimprovedsettlingcharacteristics.
Nitrificationismoreresistancetotoxicsandwashout.
Lowadditionaloperatingcosts.
HigherresidualDOlevelsaretypicallyneededwhennonporousmediaareusedintheaerobic
zonetopenetratetheslimelayer,whichisafeatureofthistypeofmedia,iftheobjectiveistomaximize
nitrification.However,lowerDOconcentrationscanbeusedtoestablishsimultaneousnitrification
denitrification.PorousmediasystemstypicallyoperateatresidualDOlevelsof1.5to2.0mg/Lusingfine
bubblediffusers.Thomasetal.(2009)foundthatanIFASsystemcouldbeoperatedwithalower
volumefractionofmediaifhigherDOconcentrationswereusedduringlowtemperatureperiods.
6.2.1.9
MovingBedBiofilmReactor(MBBR)
Themovingbedbiofilmreactor(MBBR)issimilartothesuspendedmediaIFASsystemsinthatit
usesplasticmediawithalargesurfaceareatoincreasebiomasswithinthebiologicalreactor.However,
thereisnomixedliquorrecycleasthereiswithIFAS.TheMBBRmediaissubmergedinacompletely
mixedanoxicoraerobiczoneandcontainedinthezonewithscreensorsieves.Theplasticmediaare
typicallypolyethylenewithaspecificgravityofslightlylessthan1.0.Thecarrierelementsfrommost
manufacturersareshapedlikecylindersorwheelswithinternalandexternalfins.Theseshapesprovide
ahighsurfaceareaperunitvolumethatisprotectedfromshearforces,allowingbetterbiofilmgrowth
(USEPA2008b).Slowspeedsubmersiblemixersaretypicallyusedinanoxiczones,whileaerationis
typicallysuppliedbycoarsebubblediffusersinaeratedzones(WEFandASCE2006)toobtaingood
mixing.
LikeIFAS,MBBRcanbeusedinseparateaerobicandanoxiczones.Theycanreducesolids
loading,generatesludgewithbettersettlingcharacteristics,andpreventinhibitionandwashoutof
611
August2010
nitrifiersinaerobiczones.UnlikeIFAS,MBBRsystemsdonotinvolveanyreturnflowanddonotrelyon
suspendedgrowthtoprovidetreatment.
6.2.2 SeparateStageProcessesNitrification
6.2.2.1
SuspendedGrowthNitrification
SuspendedgrowthnitrificationandBODremovalarecommonlyaccomplishedinthesame
aeratedbasinaslongastwoconditionsexist:(1)thebiomassinventoryisretainedlongenoughto
establishastablepopulationofnitrifiersand(2)thehydraulicretentiontime(HRT)issuchthatthe
biomasscanreactwiththeammonianitrogenenteringthesystem.Becausenitrifyingbacteriahave
slowergrowthratesthanBODconsumingbacteria,nitrificationkineticsgoverntheprocessdesign,with
thecriticaldesignparameterbeingdesignSRT.
WithsufficientDO(generally2mg/Lorgreater)andadequatepH(generallyatleast6.8),typical
designSRTsrequiredfornitrificationrangefrom10to20daysat10oCand4to7daysat20oC(Randallet
al.,1992).Thenitrificationkineticsandthus,designSRT,varyconsiderablyfromsystemtosystem
dependingonsitespecificfactorssuchasoperatingDO,mixing,flocsize,temperature,alkalinity,and
presenceofinhibitorsintheinfluent.Becauseofthisvariability,designersarestronglyencouragedto
determinesitespecificnitrifiergrowthratesratherthanusingvaluesfromindustryliterature.See
Chapter10forguidelinesondeterminingsitespecificnitrifiergrowthrates.SeeChapter4foranin
depthdiscussiononthemicrobiologyofnitrification,reactionsandstoichiometry,nitrificationkinetics,
andfactorsaffectingnitrifierperformanceatWWTPs.
TheSRTneededfornearcompletenitrificationofinfluentammoniacanbereducedsignificantly
byusingaseriesofaerationtanks(stagedsystems)versusasingleaerationtank.Theeffectisless
pronouncedforsystemswithhighreturnsludgerecyclerates,suchasMBRs,inwhichtheinfluent
nitrogenissubstantiallydiluted.ForplantshavingdifficultyinnitrifyingduetoinsufficientSRT,there
aresomeemergingsidestreamprocessesthatcanincreasethenitrificationrate.Oneoftheseis
bioaugmentation.Bioaugmentationisaccomplishedbyseedingtheactivatedsludgeprocesswithan
externalsourceofnitrifyingbacteria(alsoknownasexternalbioaugmentation)ormakingprocess
improvementstoincreasetheactivityoforenrichthenitrifierpopulation(alsoknownasinsitu
bioaugmentation).SeeSection6.6foradiscussionofseveralbioaugmentationtechnologies.
6.2.2.2
AttachedGrowthNitrification
Tricklingfiltersandrotatingbiologicalcontactors(RBCs)havehistoricallybeenusedfor
biologicaltreatmentofwastewaterandcanachievenitrificationwithaloworganicloadinganda
relativelyhighmediavolume.Typically,nitrificationisachievedonthemediaaftermostoftheBODis
removedbecausetheheterotrophicpopulationcompeteswiththenitrifyingorganismsforoxygenand
spaceonthemedia.Majordisadvantagesofthesetechnologiescomparedtosuspendedgrowth
systemsisthattheSRTscannotbecontrolled,anddenitrificationiseitherfullydependentonthe
additionofasupplementalcarbonsourceoratwostagesystemmustbeconstructed,e.g.anoxicfilter
followedbyanaerobicfilterwithrecycleofnitratesbacktotheanoxicfilter.Suspendedgrowth
processes,ontheotherhand,aremoreflexiblebecausetheSRTcanbepreciselycontrolled,andthey
canbedesignedtodenitrify80percentormoreofthenitrateresultingfromnearcompletenitrification
612
August2010
usingtheincomingBODasthecarbonsource,whichisalowercostsolution.Consequently,trickling
filtersandRBCshavefallenoutoffavorfornutrientremovalapplications.
Existingtricklingfilters,however,canbeintegratedintoaBNRsystem(Hu2001).Oneapproach
ittofirsttreatwastewaterinananaerobicactivatedsludgebasin,followedbyinternalsettlingofthe
mixedliquor.Theclarifiedliquidissenttothetricklingfilterfornitrification,whereasthesettledflowis
routedtothemainanoxictank,whichalsoreceivesthenitrifiedeffluentfromthetricklingfilter,where
denitrificationisaccomplished.Thedenitrifiedflowfromtheanoxiczonegoestoasmallaerobicbasin
tostripthenitrogengasoutoftheflowpriortosettlingthemixedliquorinananoxicbasin.Fromthe
anoxicbasin,theflowisbrieflyaeratedtostripthenitrogengasandtheflowissettledwiththeRAS
returnedtotheanaerobiczone.ThiscanbeaccomplishedwithanactivatedsludgeSRTof8to10days
intemperateclimatesandalsoisusefulforcontrollingfilamentousmicroorganisms.
Newerattachedgrowthsystemscalledbiologicalaeratedfilters(BAF)havetakentheplaceof
tricklingfiltersandRBCs.Theydifferfromtricklingfiltersinthatthemediaissmaller,i.e.hasahigher
specificsurfacearea,andabuiltinaerationsystem.BAFsoriginatedinEuropeandnowareinstalledin
severallocationsinNorthAmerica(Senetal.2008).BAFscanbeconfiguredinseriestoremoveBODin
oneunitandoxidizeammonianitrogeninthenext,ortheycanbedesignedforBODremovaland
nitrificationinasingleunit,dependingonprocessgoals.Additionally,theyareusedfordenitrification.
BAFsrequirehigherDOconcentrationsinthebulkwatercomparedtosuspendedgrowthnitrificationto
promoteDOdiffusionintothebiofilm.Vidaletal.(1997)recommendaminimumDOconcentrationof
atleast6mg/L;recentpilotandfullscalestudiesinCaliforniafoundgoodnitrificationataconsistent
minimumDOconcentrationof7mg/L(Hollowayetal.2008).AdvantagesofBAFsincludetheirsmaller
footprint,higherhydraulicloadingrate,andlesssusceptibilitytowashoutthansuspendedsludge
systems(Vermaetal.2006).BAFperformanceisalsorelativelyinsensitivetotemperature(Zhuand
Chen2002;Hollowayetal.2008),whichcanbeasignificantadvantageincoldweatherregions.BAF
technologycanalsobeconfiguredforpreorpostdenitrification,withpostdenitrificationrequiringthe
additionofasupplementalcarbonsource.
TheEPAemergingtechnologiesreport(USEPA2008a)identifiedtwoproprietaryBAFdesignsas
establishedtechnologies:theBioforsystemandtheBiostyrsystem.TheBioforfiltrationsystemisa
fixedbed,upflow,expandedbedsystemwithdensegranularclaymedia.Airisspargedintothefilterto
maintainanaerobicenvironment.TheBiostyrsystemissimilarbutusesmediathatarelessdense
thanwater,andthesystemoperatesasanupflowpackedbedheldinplaceduringoperationbyascreen
atthetopofthecell.
6.2.3 SeparateStageProcessesDenitrification
Aseparatestagedenitrificationsystemmaybeappropriateforplantsthatareregularly
achievingnitrificationandneedtoadddenitrificationcapabilities.Suspendedgrowthsystemsarenot
common,althoughtheyhavebeenusedforsometreatmentplants.Suspendedgrowthreactors
typicallyhaveshortSRTsandasmallaeratedzonefollowingthedenitrificationzonetooxidizeexcess
methanolandreleasenitrogengasbubblescontainedinthedenitrifiedmixedliquor(WEFandASCE
2006).
613
August2010
6.2.3.1
Denitrificationfilterswerefirstinstalledinthe1970sandareapopularaddontechnologyfor
wastewaterutilitiestryingtoconsistentlyachieveloweffluentTNlimits.Theyhavetheadvantageof
providingbothdenitrificationandeffluentfiltration.BecausetheBODhasbeenremovedfromthe
wastewaterduringsecondarytreatment,asupplementalcarbonsourcemustbeadded(seeChapter4
foranextensivediscussiononconsumptionratesandkineticsofexogenouscarbonsources).
Denitrificationfilterstypicallyhaveasmallfootprintcomparetoattachedgrowthsystems,butrequire
additionalpumpingandenergycosts.
Denitrificationfiltershaveevolvedintotwomainprocessconfigurations:downflowfiltersand
upflowcontinuousbackwashfilters.Downflowdenitrificationfiltersaredeepbedfiltersconsistingof
media,supportgravel,andablockunderdrainsystem.Mediadepthsaretypically8to12feet,and
loadingratesarebetween2and3gallonsperminutepersquarefoot(gpm/ft2).Wastewaterflowis
directedoverweirsontothetopofthefilterwhereasupplementalcarbonsource,typicallymethanol,is
added.Backwashing(typicallyairscouringandbackwashingwithairandwater)isconductedatregular
intervalstoremoveentrappedsolidsfromthefilter.Duringoperation,nitrateisconvertedtonitrogen
gasandbecomesentrainedinthefiltermedia,increasingheadlossthroughthefilter.Torelease
entrainednitrogen,mostdownflowdenitrificationsystemshaveanitrogenreleasecycleoperationthat
essentiallybumpsthefilterbyturningonthebackwashpump(s)forashortperiodoftime.SeeFigure
67foraschematicofatypicaldownflowdenitrificationfilter.
Figure67.Downflowdenitrificationfilter.
Source:USEPA(2008b),Figure21
Upflowcontinuousbackwashfiltershavetheadvantageofremaininginserviceduring
backwashing,astheyareanintegralpartofthefilteringprocess.Wastewaterentersthebottomofthe
filterwhereacarbonsource,typicallymethanol,isadded.Waterflowsupthroughaninfluentpipeand
isdispersedintothefiltermediathroughdistributors.Filteredwaterdischargesatthetopofthefilter.
Filtermediacontinuouslytraveldownward,aredrawnintoanairliftpipeatthecenterofthefilter,and
614
August2010
arescouredbeforebeingreturnedtothefilterbed.SeeFigures68and69forprocessschematicsof
upflowcontinuousbackwashfilters.
Figure68.Continuousbackwashupflowsand(CBUS)filters.
Source:Feldthusen2004.NordicWaterProductsAB.Usedwithpermission
Figure69.Closeupofcontinuousbackwashupflowsand(CBUS)filter.
Source:Felduthsen2004.NordicWaterProductsAB.Usedwithpermission
615
August2010
Performanceofdenitrifyingfiltersdependsonmanyfactorsincluding:
Influentweirconfiguration(needstoreduceDO,whichcaninhibitdenitrificationat
concentrationsaslowas0.2mg/L)
Filtermedia
Underdrainsystem
Backwashsystem
FlowandmethanolfeedcontroltoavoidincreasedBODintheplanteffluent
OperatorsatawastewatersysteminConnecticutreportedthatkeyissuesforthemwereinfluentpiping
designtominimizeaeration,maintainingaconsistentflowtothefilters,andcontrolofmethanolfeed
basedoninfluentchemicaloxygendemand(COD)(Pearsonetal.2008).
6.3
PhosphorusRemovalTechnologies
WWTPsremovephosphorusbychemicalorbiologicalmethods.Acombinationofthese
methods(e.g.,biologicalphosphorusremovalandchemicalpolishing)canbeusedtoachieveverylow
effluentTPlevelsatminimalcosts.Table63liststhechemicalandbiologicalmethodsforphosphorus
removal.Adiscussionofeachtechnologyfollowsthetable.
Table63.MatrixofPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies1
Configuration
Type
Technology
ChemicalPrecipitation
FollowedbySolids
Separation
Section
Reference
Pre,co,orpost
precipitation
Additionoflimeormetalsaltatoneormultiple
6.3.1
locationswithintheplanttoreactwithphosphorus
toformprecipitate.Solidscanberemovedthrough
conventionalclarificationoradvancedsolids
separationprocesses.Tertiaryfiltrationcanremove
additionalsolidsandproduceeffluentwithverylow
TPconcentrations.(SeeSection6.5fordiscussionof
tertiaryfiltration.)
Biological
Suspendedgrowth Anaerobic/Oxic(A/O),i.e.Phoredox
6.3.2.1
OxidationDitchwithAnaerobicZone
6.3.2.2
1.Thesetechnologiesareforphosphorusremovalonly.Technologiesforremovalofbothnitrogenandphosphorusare
presentedinTable64anddiscussedinSection6.4.
6.3.1 PhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition
Chemicalprecipitationforphosphorusremovalisareliable,timetestedwastewatertreatment
methodthathasnotdrasticallychangedovertheyears.Toachieveremoval,variouschemicalsare
616
August2010
addedtowastewaterwheretheyreactwithsolublephosphatestoformprecipitates.Theprecipitates
areremovedusingasolidsseparationprocess,mostcommonlysettling(clarification).Chemical
precipitationistypicallyaccomplishedusingeitherlimeorametalsaltsuchasaluminumsulfate(alum)
orferricchloride.Theadditionofpolymersandothersubstancescanfurtherenhanceflocformation
andsolidssettling.Operatorscanuseexistingsecondaryclarifiersorretrofitprimaryclarifiersfortheir
specificpurposes.SeeChapter3foradetaileddiscussionontheprinciplesofphosphorusremovalby
chemicaladdition.
Theeffectivenessofphosphorusremovalbychemicaladditionishighlydependentonthesolids
separationprocessfollowingchemicalprecipitation.Thedirectadditionofmetalsaltstoactivated
sludgeprocessesfollowedbyconventionalclarificationcantypicallyremoveTPtoeffluentlevels
between0.5and1.0mg/L(Bottetal.2007).Tertiaryprocesses(postsecondarytreatment)canbeused
toremovephosphorustoverylowconcentrations.Forexample,Reardon(2005)reportsthatfour
WWTPswithtertiaryclarifiersachievedTPlevelsofbetween0.032and0.62mg/L.
Twocommontertiaryprocessesareclarificationandeffluentfiltration.Theseapproachescan
beusedseparatelyorincombination.Section6.5describeseffluentfiltrationtechnologies.
Conventionalclarificationandrecentadvancesintertiaryclarificationprocessesarediscussedbelow.
ConventionalClarification
Conventionalgravityclarifierscanbeusedveryeffectivelyforthetertiaryremovalof
phosphorusprecipitates.Theirperformancecanbeenhancedbytheadditionofsyntheticpolymers
followingprecipitationtoaidflocculationandsedimentation.Theprecipitatingchemicaltypicallywould
beaddedtotheflowupstreamoftheclarifier,andpolymercommonlywouldbeaddedatthecenter
welloftheclarifier.Thistechnologyfollowingsimultaneousprecipitationandclarificationinthe
activatedsludgeprocesswasusedtoobtaineffluentTPconcentrationsoflessthan0.18mg/L(monthly
average)attheFairfaxCounty,VA,LowerPotomacWWTPandtheArlingtonCounty,VA,WWTPfor
morethantwodecades.Thetertiaryclarifierswerefollowedbysandfiltration.
Limeclarification,althoughnotcommonlyusedtoday,isaviabletreatmentoptionfortertiary
removalofphosphorus(WEF2005).Mostexistingplantsuseatwostepprocesswherebyexcesslimeis
addedtothefirststagetoraisethepHtobetween11and12.Theeffluentispassedtoasecondstage
wherecarbondioxideandpossiblysodaashisaddedtostabilizethepHtobetween9.5and10.5andto
precipitateadditionalcalcium(recarbonation).Sandfiltrationisusedafterrecarbonation.This
technologyhasbeenusedattheUpperOccoquanSewageAuthorityAdvancedWastewaterTreatment
Plant,FairfaxCounty,VA,since1978toachieveeffluentTPconcentrationsoflessthan0.1mg/L(weekly
average).
Conventionalclarificationhasbeenusedformanyyearsanddesignandoperationiswell
coveredinothermanualssuchastheWEFmanualofpracticefordesignofmunicipalsWWTPs(WEFand
ASCE2010)andtheWEFClarifierDesignManual(WEF2005).
HighRateTertiaryClarificationProcesses
Twotypesofhighrateclarificationprocessesarecommon:densesludgeandballastedhigh
rateclarification(BHRC).Thelatterhasbeenusedsuccessfullytoachieveloweffluentphosphorus
concentrations(WEF2005).SeveralpatentedBHRCtechnologiesusingdifferenttypesofballast,suchas
617
August2010
recycledsludge,microsand,andmagneticballast(USEPA2008a),havebeendevelopedinrecentyears.
Theadvantagesofhighrateclarificationarethattheclarifiershaveasmallerfootprintandareableto
treatlargerquantitiesofwastewaterinashorterperiodoftime.Thefollowingpatentedprocessesare
examplesofhighrateclarification(includingperformanceestimates):
DensaDegusesacoagulantinarapidmixbasintodestabilizesuspendedsolids.Thewater
flowsintoasecondtankwherepolymer(foraidingflocculation)andsludgeareadded.The
sludgeactsastheseedforformationofhighdensityfloc.Thisflocisremovedinsettling
tubes(USEPA,2008).Themainadvantagesofthisprocessareasmallerfootprintand
densersludge,whichiseasiertodewater.PilottestingfortheCityofFortWorth,TXfounda
phosphorusremovalrateof8895percentforDensaDeg(USEPA2003).SeeFigure610for
theprocessconfigurationforthistechnology.
Figure610.DensaDeghighrateclarificationprocessflowdiagram.
Source:USEPA2008a
Actiflousesacoagulantinarapidmixbasintodestabilizesuspendedsolids.Thewater
flowstoasecondtankwherepolymer(foraidingflocculation)andmicrosandareadded.
Microsandprovidesalargesurfaceontowhichsuspendedsolidsattach,creatingadense
flocthatsettlesoutquickly.Clarificationisassistedbylamellaplatesettling.Productpilot
testinginFortWorth,TXshowedaphosphorusremovalefficiencyof9296percentfor
Actiflo(USEPA2003).
TheCoMagTMprocessusestheadditionofhighdensitymagnetiteballastwithmetalsalts
andpolymertopromoteflocformationandhighratesettling.Settlingisfollowedby
magneticseparationforfinaleffluentpolishingandrecoveryofthemagnetiteballastfrom
thetertiarysludge,utilizingitsstrongnaturalattractiontomagneticfields(USEPA2008a).
618
August2010
SinceNovember2007,CoMagTMhasbeeninoperationata1.2milliongallonperday(MGD)
WWTPinConcord,MA(EPARegion102007;ProakisEllisandCathcart2008).Shortlyafter
startup,thesystemreached0.05mg/LTPintheplanteffluentonanaveragedailybasisand
hasperformedtothislevelconsistentlyunderawiderangeofinfluentloadingconditions.
ProakisEllisandCathcart(2008)reportmanyoperationaladvantagesofCoMagTMincluding
reducedchemicalusageandlesssludgeproductioncomparedtousingalumalonefor
secondarytreatment.ThefinalpolishingelectromagnetinConcordrequiresrelativelyhigh
powerusage;however,newerinstallationsoftheCoMagTMsystemarebeingdesignedwith
finalpolishingmagnetsthatdonotrequireanypowerusage.SeeFigure611forthe
processconfigurationforthistechnology.
Figure611.CoMagTMprocessflowdiagram.
Source:USEPA2008a
6.3.2 BiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
Biologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR)isaccomplishedbyencouragingthegrowthofphosphate
accumulatingorganisms(PAOs).Underanaerobicconditions,PAOsuptakeandstoresimplecarbon
foodsourcessuchasvolatilefattyacids(VFAs)usingtheenergyinphosphatebonds,andrelease
phosphorustosolution.WhenthePAOsaresubjecttoaerobicconditions,theymetabolizethestored
carbontogenerateenergyforcellgrowthandmaintenanceandstoreexcessenergybytakingup
phosphateionsandcreatingpolyphosphates.ThephosphorusuptakebyPAOsintheaerobiczone
resultsinanetreductioninphosphorusinthewastewaterwhensludgeiswasted.
619
August2010
ThesuccessofbiologicalphosphorusremovalishighlydependentontheavailabilityofVFAsin
theanaerobiczone.VFAsareproducedbyfermentationofmunicipalwastewater,whichcanoccurin
thecollectionsystemorintheanaerobiczoneitself.IfsufficientVFAsarenotpresent,plantoperators
canconsideraddingVFAsbyusingonsitesludgefermentationorbyaddingacommercialsource.See
Chapter5foradditionalinformationontheprinciplesofBPR.
Allbiologicalphosphorusremovaltechnologiesaredesignedtocycletreatmentfromanaerobic
toaerobicconditionstoencouragePAOstogrowanduptakephosphorus.Thissectiondescribestwo
technologiesthathavebeendesignedtobiologicallyremovephosphorusonly(notnitrogen)from
wastewater.Mosttechnologieshavebeendesignedtoremovebothnitrogenandphosphorusandare
presentedinSection6.4.
AsnotedinChapter5,nitrateintherecyclestreamcaninhibitBPR.Thiscanbeaproblemfor
plantsthatnitrifybutdonotdenitrify.Inthesecases,nitrificationneedstobeeliminatedorgreatly
reducedtobiologicallyremovephosphorusunlessthereadilybiodegradableCOD(rbCOD)inthe
influentisveryhigh,whichittypicallywillnotbeformunicipalanddomesticwastewaters.Operatingat
anSRTlessthan4dayswillusuallywashoutnitrifiersattemperatureslessthan25oC.Notethatmost
WWTPsintheEasternUSAhaveeffluentammonialimits,whichmeansthatoperatingwithout
nitrificationisfrequentlynotpossible.Onceaplantispracticingnitrification,thereareadditional
advantagestoalsopracticingdenitrificationforTNremoval(seeSection6.8).
6.3.2.1
Phoredox(A/O)
ThePho-redox(A/O)processisaconventionalactivatedsludgesystemwithananaerobiczone
attheheadoftheaerationbasin.TheRASispumpedfromtheclarifiertotheanaerobiczone.Itisalow
SRTprocessthatisoperatedtoavoidnitrification.WithnonitratesintheRAS,theprocessisreliable
andeasytooperateexceptatmixedliquortemperaturesinexcessof25Cwhennitrificationisdifficult
toavoid.Ifnitratesarepresentintherecyclestream,theanaerobiczonecanbesplitintoananoxic
chamberfornitratedenitrificationandoneormoreanaerobiczonesforbiologicalphosphorusremoval.
Figure612providesaschematicforthissystem.
Thetechnologyisrelativelyeasytoretrofitintoanexistingbasinbyinstallingabafflewalland
mixerstoproduceananaerobiczone.Theaeratorswillneedtoberedistributedintheaerobiczone,
withcloserspacingintheinfluentendofthezone.
620
August2010
Figure612.Phoredoxprocess(A/O)
6.3.2.2
OxidationDitchwithAnaerobicZone
Similarindesigntotheoxidationditchesfornitrogenremovaldiscussedpreviously,oxidation
ditchesforphosphorusremovalareamodificationofthestandarddesignwiththerequirementthatan
anaerobiczonebeestablished.Theanaerobiczoneismostoftenaheadoftheditch(sometimescalleda
selector)oritcanbewithintheditchiftheDObalanceiscarefullymanaged,butfilamentous
organismswilltendtogrow.SeeFigure613foranexampleofanoxidationditchwithananaerobic
basin(alsocalledaselector).
Oxidationditcheswithphosphorusremovalbutnotnitrogenremovalmayencounterproblems
withlowalkalinitybecausenitrificationwilldepletealkalinitybutdenitrificationinananoxiczoneisnot
presenttopartiallyreplenishit.LowerTPeffluentlevelscanbeachievedbyclosemonitoringand
controlofDOandflowintheanaerobiczone.Thefootprintsizeforthisprocessispotentiallylarge
comparedtoothertechnologies.Itdoesnotrequireanyadditionalrecyclepipesorpumpingandneeds
minimalenergytooperate.
621
August2010
Figure613.Oxidationditchwithanaerobiczone.
6.4
CombinedNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalTechnologies
Table64presentsthetechnologiescapableofsimultaneouslyachievingbothnitrogenand
phosphorusremoval.Adiscussionofeachtechnologyfollowsthetable.
Table64.MatrixofCombinedBiologicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemovalTechnologies
Configuration
Type
Technology
SectionReference
Biological
HybridChemical/
Biological
Suspendedgrowth
3StagePhoredox(A2/O)
5StageBardenpho
UniversityofCapetown(UCT),
ModifiedUCT,andVirginiaInitiative
Project(VIP)
WestbankConfiguration
OxidationDitchwithAnoxicand
AnaerobicZone
BluePlainsProcess
BiologicalChemicalPhosphorusand
NitrogenRemoval(BCFS)
6.4.1.1
6.4.1.2
6.4.1.3
6.4.1.4
6.4.1.5
6.4.1.6
6.4.2.1
6.4.2.2
6.4.1 Biological
6.4.1.1 3StagePhoredox(A2/0)
The3StagePhoredox(A2/O)processaddsananoxiczonetotheA/Oprocessconfiguration
aftertheanaerobiczonetoachievedenitrification.Inaddition,nitraterichliquorisrecycledfromthe
622
August2010
endoftheaerobiczonetotheheadoftheanoxiczonetoenhancedenitrification,asshowninFigure6
14.Ashortcomingofthe3StagePhoredoxprocessisthattherewillbenitratespresentintheRAS,
potentiallymakingthephosphorusremovalprocessunreliable.WithA2/O,aswithallcombined
nitrogenphosphorusbiologicalsystems,somephosphorusistakenupintheanoxiczonebythePAOs,
andthesludgeresidencetimeineachzonemustbesufficienttoallowcompletephosphatereleaseor
uptake.Theclarifieralsomustbeoperatedtoregularlywastesolidstoavoidreleaseofphosphateby
theendogenousrespirationofPAOs.
Figure614.3StagePhoredoxprocess(A2/O).
6.4.1.2
5StageBardenpho
The5stageBardenphoprocessconsistsofthe4stageprocess(see6.2.1.2)withananaerobic
zoneaddedtothefrontofthesystem(seeFigure615).Anitraterichliquorisrecycledfromthefirst
aerobicstagetothefirstanoxiczone.TheRASisrecycledfromtheclarifiertothebeginningofthe
anaerobiczone.SincethenitratesintheRASaretypicallylow(from1to3mg/L),theydonothavethe
potentialtosignificantlyinterferewiththephosphorusremovalprocessaswiththeA2/Oconfiguration
(see6.4.1.1).Methanolmightneedtobeaddedtothesecondanoxiczoneforcompletedenitrification
ortominimizethevolumeofthesecondanoxiczone.
623
August2010
Figure615.5stageBardenphoprocess.Notethatalternativeexternalcarbonsourcescanbeusedinsteadofmethanol
6.4.1.3
UniversityofCapetown(UCT),ModifiedUCT,andVirginiaInitiativePlant(VIP)
TheUCTprocesswasdesignedtoreducenitratestotheanaerobiczonewhenhighremovalof
nitratesintheeffluentisnotrequired.Similartoothernitrogenandphosphorusremovaltechnologies,
itconsistsofthreestages:ananaerobicstage,ananoxicstage,andanaerobicstage.TheRASis
returnedfromtheclarifiertotheanoxiczoneinsteadoftheanaerobiczonetoallowfordenitrification
andtoavoidinterferencefromnitratewiththeactivationofthePAOsintheanaerobicstage.Anitrate
richstreamisrecycledfromtheaerobiczonetotheanoxiczoneinfluent.Denitrifiedmixedliquoris
recycledfromtheanoxiczoneeffluenttotheanaerobiczone.
ThemodifiedUCTprocesssplitstheanoxiczoneintotwostages.Thenitraterichrecyclefrom
theaerobiczoneisrecycledtotheheadofthesecondanoxicstage.Thedistinctionbetweenthe
modifiedandtheUCTprocessesisseeninFigure616.ThenitratecontainingRASisrecycledtothefirst
anoxicstagewhereitisdenitrified.Next,thedenitrifiedRASisrecycledfromtheendofthefirstanoxic
stagebacktotheheadoftheanaerobicstageandmixedwiththeincomingwastewater.
TheVirginiaInitiativePlant(VIP)issimilartotheUCTprocess,buttheanaerobicandanoxic
zonesarebaffledintotwoormoresectionseachtoincreaseratesofreactioninthefirstsectionofeach
zone,therebyfirmlyestablishingthedesiredanaerobicandanoxicconditionsinthesecondsection.
Theseconfigurationshaveamediumsizedfootprintand,insomecases,canbeinstalledin
existingbasins.Theyrequireextensivepumping,piping,andcontrolforthemultiplerecyclestreams.
However,internalrecyclescanbeinexpensivelyinstalledwhenretrofittingmostactivatedsludgebasins
byusinglowheadpumps,suchaspropellerpumps,andpipingalongoneinternalwallofthebasin.
624
August2010
UCTProcess
ModifiedUCTProcess
Figure616.UCTandModifiedUCTprocess.
Source:USEPA2008b,Figures224and225
625
August2010
6.4.1.4
Westbank
TheWestbankprocess,showninFigure617,hasasmall,preanoxiczonefollowedbyan
anaerobiczone,asecondanoxiczone,andlastly,alargeaerobiczone.Thepreanoxiczoneminimizes
DOandnitratesenteringtheanaerobicportion.Primaryeffluentisdividedamongthepreanoxiczone
(todenitrifytheRAS),theanaerobiczone(toprovidesomeVFAsforphosphorusremoval),andthe
secondanoxiczone(tostimulatedenitrification).Directfeedofprimaryeffluenttothesecondanoxic
zoneincreasesthedenitrificationrateandthereforedecreasesthesizeoftheanoxiczonecomparedto
the5stageBardenphosystem.Duringstormflows,excessflowispasseddirectlytothemainanoxic
zone.VFAsobtainedfromfermentationoftheprimarysludgearepassedtotheanaerobiczone.
Additionalpipingisrequiredtodischargetheinfluenttomultiplezones;however,recycle
streamsarereducedcomparedtosimilarlayouts.Thefermenterrequiresadditionalpumping,piping,
andcontrolsforoptimumfermentationandfeedingoftheVFAstotheanaerobiczone.Thedesignhasa
mediumsizedfootprint.
Figure617.Westbankprocess.
6.4.1.5
OxidationDitchwithAnoxicandAnaerobicZones
Section6.2.1.5describedoxidationditchesthatarebiologicallyconfiguredtoremovenitrogen.
Anyoftheseconfigurationscanbemodifiedwithananaerobicbasin(alsocalledaselector)beforethe
ditchtoaccomplishBPRinacombinedsystem.Becauseoftheveryhighinternalrecyclewithinthe
ditch,verylownitrateconcentrationscanbeachievedinthemixedliquorbeforesettling,which
minimizesnitrateintheRASstreamtotheanaerobicselectorzone,improvingBPRprocessefficiency.
Manyoxidationditchconfigurationshavebeendevelopedtosimultaneouslyachievebiological
nitrogenandphosphorusremovaltolowlevels.AnexampleistheVT2processdevelopedatBowie,
MD,whichoperatestwoPasveerditchesinserieswithdedicatedanoxic,nearanaerobic,andaerobic
zones(SeeFigure618).Italsohasasidestreamanaerobiczonethatreceivesapproximately30percent
oftheinfluenttoenhanceBPR.DenitrifiedMLSSfortheanaerobiczoneareobtainedfromtheendof
626
August2010
thenearanaerobiczoneoftheadjacentditch.Operatedwithoutprimarysedimentation,thesystem
consistentlyachievedverylowannualaverageeffluentTPconcentrations(0.160.24mg/L)without
chemicaladditionoreffluentfiltrationformorethan20years.Originallydesignedforonlyoneditch,
bothditcheshadtobeoperatedinseriesbecausetheplanthaslimitedclarificationcapacity.Series
operationofbothditchesresultedinlowerMLSSconcentrationstotheclarifiers.TheBiodenipho
processusespairsofditchesthatoperateinalternatinganoxicaerobicmodes.Ananaerobictankwith
RASreturnedtoitisplacedbeforetheditchestostimulateBPR,andtheditchesarealternatedbetween
aerobicandanoxicconditionsfornitrificationanddenitrification.TheOrbalprocessusesanaerobicand
anoxiczonesintheouterofthreeconcentricovalshapedditcheswithRASrecycledfromtheclarifierto
theanoxiczonetoremovebothnitrogenandphosphorus.
Figure618.VT2processschematic.
6.4.1.6
SBRscanbeoperatedtoaccomplishbothbiologicalphosphorusandnitrogenremovalby
progressingthroughanoxic/anaerobic/aerobicphases.BecauseofthefillanddrawnatureofSBRs,itis
necessarytoremovethenitratesremainingfromthepreviouscyclebeforeanaerobicconditionscanbe
established;thus,thetypicaltreatmentprogressionbecomesanoxic/anaerobic/aerobic.Additional
carbonmaybeneeded.SeeSection6.2.1.4foradditionaldiscussionofSBRs.
6.4.2 HybridChemical/Biological
Configurationsthatusesomeformofbiologicaltreatmentfornitrogenremovalandpossibly
phosphorusremovalcombinedwithchemicalprecipitationandadvancedsolidsremovalforphosphorus
arepopularandtypicallyreliabletreatmentoptionsforachievingloweffluentconcentrations.Many
differentcombinationsofthetechnologiesdiscussedpreviouslycanbeused.Thissectionpresentstwo
627
August2010
examples:TheBluePlainsProcessandtheBiologicalChemicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemoval
(BCFS)Process.
6.4.2.1
BluePlainsProcess
TheBluePlainsprocesswasaretrofittotheexistingnitrificationactivatedsludgeprocessatthe
Washington,DC,facility.AnewanoxiczonewithanHRTof0.8hourswascreatedinsidetheaeration
tankfromthenominal3.3hoursHRTofthetotalbasin(seeFigure619).Thedesignsludgeagewas13
days.Theexistingreturnactivatedsludgesystemremainedunchangedinthisretrofit.Methanolisfed
directlyintothisnewanoxiczoneforatargetnitrogenconcentrationof7.5mg/L(Kangetal.1992;
Sadicketal.1998).Phosphorusisremovedbyferricchlorideadditionandtertiaryfiltration(USEPA
2008b).
Theeffluentconcentrations(posttertiaryfilter)foundintheliteraturefortheBluePlains
processwere7.5mg/LforTNand0.12mg/LforTPonamonthlyaveragebasis(USEPA2008a),
However,thatwaswhenonlyhalfoftheplantwasmodifiedfornitrogenremoval.Whentheentire
plantwasmodified,theeffluentTNwaslessthan5mg/L(monthlyaverage).
Figure619.TheBluePlainsProcess.
6.4.2.2
BiologicalChemicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemoval(BCFS)Process
TheBiologicalChemicalPhosphorusandNitrogenRemoval(BCFS)processwasdevelopedfor
theWWTPinHolton,theNetherlands,toachievelowTNandTPeffluentconcentrationsatarelatively
lowBOD:TPandBOD:TNinfluentratio.ThedesignissimilartothemodifiedUCTprocess.Asludge
streamisremovedfromtheanaerobiczoneforthickening,andferricchlorideisaddedtothesludge
628
August2010
thickenertoremovephosphate.Thisprovidesanadvantageoverchemicaladditiontothesecondary
clarifierbecauseitdoesnotrequirethechemicalsludgetoberecycled.Additionalinformationcanbe
foundonthewebsiteoftheDutchFoundationforAppliedWaterResearch(STOWA),
http://www.stowaselectedtechnologies.nl/(seeFactSheets).
6.5
EffluentFiltration
ManyvarietiesoffilterscanbeusedinWWTPs.Mediarangefrommonomediasuchassandto
multimediasuchassandwithanthraciteandhighdensitygravel.Othermediasuchasclothor
membranes(operatedunderpressure)canbeusedtocapturesolids.Filterscanbeoperatedinupflow
ordownflowmodeandcanbebackwashedusingavarietyoftechniques.Designofmultiplefiltersin
seriesorfiltersprecededbyatertiaryclarifiercanimprovesolids(andtherebytotalphosphorus)
removal.Table65listssomemajorfiltrationtechnologies.Adescriptionofeachfollowsthetable.
Table65.MatrixofTertiaryFiltrationTechnologies
Configuration
Technology
TertiaryFiltration
Gravity(downflow)Filters
- Conventional
- DeepBed
ContinuousBackwashUpflowSandFilters
PulsedBedFilters
TravellingBridgeFilters
Discfilters(includingclothmedia)
MembraneFiltration
SectionReference
6.5.1
6.5.2
6.5.3
6.5.4
6.5.5
6.5.6
6.5.1 ConventionalDownflowFilters
Thesefiltersconsistoffixedmediabedsthataretypicallyupto3feetindepthandaresimilarto
filtersusedtotreatdrinkingwater.Mediacanbesinglemedia,dualmedia,ormultimedia.Single
mediaistypicallysandoranthracite.Dualmediacombinesanthraciteandsand.Multimediafilters
includealayerofgarnetorilmenite.Differencesinspecificgravitymakeitpossibletohavethelargest
particles(anthracite)inthetoplayerofthefilterandthesmallerones(garnet)inthebottomlayer.
Flowinthesefiltersisbygravityfromthetopdown.Mostoftheremovaloccursinthetopfewinches
ofthemedia,butmultimediafiltersusemoreofthebeddepthforactivefiltrationthanmonoordual
mediafilters.Thefiltermustbetakenofflineperiodicallytobackwashittopreventcloggingand
excessivepressureloss.
Deepbedfiltersaresimilartoconventionaldownflowfiltersbuthavedeeperbedsandlarger
mediasize.Thereforetheyhavetheadvantageoflongerruntimesbetweenbackwashes.Thesizeof
themediaislimitedbytheabilitytobackwashthefilter.Becausethesefiltersaremoredifficultto
backwash,airscourisnecessarytofullycleanthefilterbed.
6.5.2 ContinuousBackwashingUpflowSandFilters
Duringoperationofthecontinuousbackwashingupflowfilter,waterisintroducedthrough
risersatthebottomofadeepsandbed.Waterflowsupwardthroughthesandbedandoveran
629
August2010
overflowweir.Sandandtrappedsolidsflowdownwardthroughthefilterandaredrawnintothe
suctionofanairliftpipeinthecenterofthefilter.Asthesandtravelsuptheairliftpipe,theairscours
theparticlesandseparatesthesandfromfilteredsolids.Atthetopoftheairliftpipe,thecleansand
settlesbackontothetopofthefilterandthesolidsarecarriedawayintoarejectline.SeeFigures6.8
and6.9inSection6.2.3.1forcutawaydiagramsofacontinuousbackwashingupflowfilter.
Thesefiltershavetheadvantagesofnomovingpartsotherthantheaircompressorandless
energyandmaintenancerequirementsthantraditionallybackwashedfilters.Theyaresometimes
referredtobythetradenameDynasand.
Amodificationofthestandardcontinuousbackwashingupflowfiltermediaisuseofsand
coatedwithhydrousferricoxide.Ferricoxidecoatedmediaprovidesadsorptioninadditiontofiltration.
OneexampleistheBluePROTMsystemwhereferricsaltisaddedpriortothefiltertoaidincoagulation
andtoreplacetheferriccoating,whichisabradedfromthesand.Turbulencefromthecompressedair
knocksaccumulatedironandphosphorusalongwithanysolidsofftheparticleasthesandtravels
upward.Theiron,phosphorus,andparticlesarewasted,whilethecleansandisdepositedonthetopof
thebed.Benishetal.(2006)reportthatanaverageeffluentTPof0.06mg/Lwasobservedduringa
pilotstudyinMoscow,Idaho,andnear0.02mg/LwasachievedinapilotstudyinCoeurdAlene,Idaho.
EPARegion10(2007)summarizedresultsofdemonstrationoftheBluePROTMsystemata0.25MGD
HaydenWastewaterResearchFacility.Secondaryeffluentwithatotalphosphorusconcentrationof
between1and4mg/LwastreatedthroughatwosinglepassBluePROTMfiltrationsystem.Theaverage
effluentconcentrationfortheentiretestperiod(2005to2007)was0.014mg/L.
6.5.3 PulsedBedFilters
Pulsedbedfiltersareshallowfilterswithanunstratifiedfinesandmedia.Anairpulsedisturbs
themediaandallowspenetrationofsolidsintothemediabed,allowingtheentirefilterbedtobeused
forremovalofsolids.Thepulseisdesignedtoexpandthefilteroperationandreducethenumberof
backwashcycles,althoughthefiltermuststillbeperiodicallybackwashedtoremovethesolids.
6.5.4 TravelingBridgeFilters
Travelingbridgefiltersconsistoflongshallowbedsofgranularmediadividedintocells.
Wastewaterisappliedtothetopofthemediaandflowsdownward.Eachcellisindividually
backwashedbyatravelingbridgewhiletheothercellscontinuetooperate.Thebridgeusesfiltered
watertobackwashthefilters.ThistypeoffilterisusedfortheremovalofeffluentTSS,whichcan
enhancenutrientremovalbecauseTSScontainbothnitrogenandphosphorus.EffluentTSSisusually
between5and10mg/L,whichisnotsuitableforenhancingphosphorusremovalbelow0.5mg/L.
6.5.5 Discfilters
Discfiltersareaseriesofparallelmounteddisksusedtosupportaclothfiltermedia.Water
entersacentraltubeandflowsoutbetweenthetwolayersofclothineachdisk.Thedisksrotateand
arenormally60to70percentsubmerged.Theportionabovethewaterisbackwashedusingspray
nozzles.
630
August2010
Theclothmediadiskfilterissimilartothediscfilterdescribedabove.Inthiscase,thewater
flowsfromtheoutsideofthesubmergedclothdisksandintoacenterpipe.Diskscontinuetorotate
duringbackwash,aswaterispulledthroughthemediafromthediscusingsuctionheads.
Discfiltersandclothmediadiskfiltershavelimitedsolidsloadingcapacitiesandarethusmost
oftenusedforBNRapplicationsratherthanfollowingchemicaladditionforphosphorusremoval.
6.5.6 MembraneFilters
Membranesystemsuseapressureheadtodrivewaterthroughapermeablemembrane.
Membranefiltersaretypicallyclassifiedbytheirporesize,whichinturndeterminesthesizeofthe
particlestheyexcludeandguidesthepressurerequirements.Microfiltration,ultrafiltration,
nanofiltration,andreverseosmosis(RO)membranesremoveincreasinglysmallerparticles.Biological
treatmentthatincludesmicrofiltrationandultrafiltrationtypicallyremove3to6logsofbacteriaand95
percentormoreBOD,alongwithmostparticles(WEF2006).Nanofiltrationremovesnearlyallparticles,
includingsomeviruses.ROremovesallparticlesaswellasmostlargedissolvedconstituents,andis
capableofproducingpurewater.Typically,thewatermustbepretreatedbeforeusingROmembranes.
Pretreatmentcouldbeconventionalfilters,cartridgefilters,orlargerporemembranefilters.The
energycostforapplyingthepressureheadandtheneedtoreplacemembranesmakemembrane
filtrationamoreexpensivetechnology.Itcanachieveverylowconcentrationsofnutrientsandother
contaminants,however,andiscommoninwaterreuseprojects.
Membranescanbeconfiguredanumberofwaysincludinghollowfiber,spiralwound,plateand
frame,cartridge,orinpressurevessels.Membranescanfoulfromorganics,biologicalgrowth,ormetals
inthewastewater.Disinfectionmayberequiredtopreventbiologicalfouling.
631
August2010
6.6
SidestreamManagement
Solidshandlingprocessesresultinaliquidsidestreamthatisgenerallyrecycledtotheheadof
thetreatmentplantandcombinedwiththeinfluentwastewater.Theconcentrationofnitrogenand
phosphorusinthesidestreamdependsontheinfluentconcentrationsandthemainstreamremoval
technology.Italsodependshighlyonthesolidstreatmenttechnologyandequipment,withthehighest
nutrientconcentrationresultingfromanaerobicallydigestedorthermallyconditionedsludge(WEFand
ASCE2006).AswillbediscussedinChapter10,characterizingsidestreams(e.g.,nutrientloadingsand
whentheyaredischarged)isveryimportantwhendesigningfornutrientremoval,particularlyforplants
wantingtoconsistentlyachieveloweffluentconcentrations.
Equalizationofsidestreamsisaprovenmanagementtechniquetoreducetheimpactofthe
sidestreamsonthemaintreatmenttrain.Anequalizationtankcanbesizedtoholdthetotalvolumeof
recycleflowsforacertainperiodoftimesothattheycanbesenttothetreatmentsystematselected
ratesortimestominimizetheimpactonthetreatmentprocess(e.g.,atnightwhentotalplantflowsand
nutrientloadingsarelow).Anequalizationtankcanalsobedesignedtosettleandremovesolidsto
reducetheloadsbacktotheplant,butthesettledsolidshavetobecollectedandprocessed.Aeration
withinthetankorasaseparateprocesshasalsobeenshowntoreducetheammonialoadbacktothe
plantbyupto50percentgiventhatdetentiontimeissufficientandthetankcanbefullymixed(WEF
andASCE2006).
Overthelastseveralyears,patentedprocesseshavebeendesignedtoremovenitrogenfrom
recyclestreams.Thefollowingexamplesarediscussedinthissection,butnotethatthisisnota
completelistandnewprocessesarecontinuallybeingdeveloped:
Bioaumentation(e.g.,InNitriorBABE)
BAR
MAUREEN
SHARON
ANAMMOX
DEMON
CANON
OLAND
InNitriandBABEusebioaugmentation(i.e.,theseedingofnitrifiers)toenhancenutrient
removal.InNitri(InexpensiveNitrification)growsnitrifiersinasmall,sidestreamaerationclarifier
systembytreatinghighammonia,hightemperaturewaterfromdigestionanddewateringtoobtain
completenitrificationoftheammonia.Thewasteactivatedsludge(WAS)fromthesidestreamsystemis
dischargedtothemainaerationtanktosupplementthenitrifiersinthatreactor,therebyreducingthe
SRTneededtomaintainnitrificationatlowtemperatures.InNitridoesnotremovenitrogenbut
reducesthevolumeneededinthemainstreamreactortoaccomplishnitrification.
TheBABE(BioAugmentationBatchEnhanced)processusesasinglebatchreactortotreata
mixtureofhighammoniasidestreamsfromdewatering,RASfromthemainbiologicaltreatmentsystem,
andresidualbiomassremaininginthereactorfromtheprecedingcycle.Thehighammonia
concentrationiscompletelynitrifiedandthenpartiallydenitrifiedduringeachcycleofthebatchreactor
toobtainremovalofnitrogen.TheRASispartiallyseededwithnitrifiersanddenitrifiersbytheBABE
632
August2010
processduringthisoperation.TheBABEprocessisdesignedtooperatebetween20and25oC,and
temperaturesbelow20oCwilldramaticallyincreasethereactorvolumeneeded.
TheBioAugmentationRegeneration/Reaeration(BAR)processwasdevelopedintheUnited
StatesandisidenticaltotheRegenerationDeNitrification(RDN)processdevelopedindependentlyin
theCzechRepublic.Itworksbyrecyclingammonialadenfiltrateorcentratefromdewateringof
aerobicallydigestedsludgetotheheadoftheaerationtank.Thesidestreamisfullynitrifiedwhich
seedstheaerationtankwithadditionalnitrifyingbacteriaandallowsforreducedSRT.Thereare
numerousfullscaleapplicationsintheCzechRepublic,UnitedStates,andCanada.
TheMainstreamAUtotrophicRecycleEnablingEnhancedNremoval(MAUREEN)Processwas
developedforthetwosludgetreatmentconfigurationattheBluePlainsAdvancedWastewater
TreatmentPlantinWashington,DC.TheprocessinvolvesrecyclingofWASfromthenitrificationstage
toareactorwheretheAOBsareusedtooxidizethecentrateammoniatonitrite.Thenthenitriteis
reducedtonitrogengas,andtheAOBsaresenttothehighratecarbonremovalstagefor
bioaugmentationofthefirstsludgestageactivatedsludgetoaccomplishsomenitrificationinthatstage.
TheSHARON(SinglereactorforHighActivityAmmoniaRemovalOverNitrite)processtakes
placeinasinglereactoroperatedwithoutbiomassrecycle,i.e.,theSRTisequaltotheHRT.Developed
totreathighammoniaconcentrationsidestreamsfromsludgedigestion,thesystemisdesignedto
convertammoniatonitrite,thendenitrifythenitritetonitrogengas,thusavoidingtheconversionof
nitritetonitrateandtheneedtoreducenitratebacktonitritetoobtainnitrogenremoval.Thisprocess
isaccomplishedbyoperatingthereactorathightemperaturesandselectinganHRT(equalsSRT)that
willwashouttheslowgrowingnitriteoxidizers.Theprocessistypicallyoperatedat30to40oCwithan
HRTrangeof1to2days.Bypreventingtheconversionofnitritetonitrate,theSHARONprocess
reducestheamountofoxygenrequiredfornitrificationby25percentandthenreducestheamountof
CODneededfordenitrificationby40percent,comparedtofullnitrificationanddenitrification.See
Chapter4,Section4.5foradditionaldiscussionontheprinciplesoftheSHARONprocess.
TheANAMMOX(ANaerobicAMMoniaOXidation)processusesonlyautotrophicbacteriato
accomplishnitrogenremoval,i.e.denitrificationaswellasnitrification,and,becauseammoniumisused
asanelectrondonor,CODdoesnothavetobeaddedtoaccomplishnitrogenremoval.Inthe
conventionalANAMMOXprocessthefirststageissimilartotheSHARONprocessexceptthatonly50
percentoftheammoniaisoxidizedtonitrite,anda5050mixtureofammoniumandnitriteissentto
thesecondreactor,wheretheanammoxbacteriauseammoniumasanelectrondonorandreduce
nitritetonitrogengas.Thus,theoxygenrequirementisonly50percentofthatrequiredforcomplete
oxidationofammoniatonitritebytheSHARONprocess,oronly37.5percentoftheamountneeded
fornitrificationtonitrate,assumingnitrificationoftheentireammoniumload.Inaddition,theneedfor
organiccarboniscompletelyeliminated.Ithasbeenreportedthatthisprocessreducestheoperating
costsby90percentcomparedtostandardnitrificationdenitrification.SeeChapter4,Section4.12for
additionaldiscussionontheprinciplesoftheANAMMOXprocess.
633
August2010
ThecombinationofpartialnitrificationandAnammoxprocessescanalsobecarriedoutina
singlereactorandhasbeengivendifferentnames:DEMON(DEamMONification),OLAND(Oxygen
LimitedAutotrophicNitrificationDenitrification)orCANON(CompletelyAutotrophicNitrogenremoval
overNitriteprocess).Underoxygenlimitedconditionsacocultureofaerobicandanaerobic
ammoniumoxidizingbacteriacanbemaintainedasacocultureinasinglereactor.
TheDEMONRprocessusespHandDOcontrolinanSBRtomaintainbothnitrificationtoNO2N
andnitritereductionbyanammoxbacteriatoconvertammoniatonitrogengas.Itallowsbothofthese
typesofbacteriatocoexistinonesinglereactorvolume,despitethecompletelydifferentgrowth
characteristicsofthesebacteria.WithintheDEMONprocess,approximately50percentoftheammonia
isnitrifiedtonitrite.Externalcarbonadditionistypicallynotneeded.
AnothervariationoftheaboveapplicationoftheanammoxprocessinasingleSBRtankisthe
CANONprocess(VazquezPadinetal.,2009).Inthisapplication,airispulsedtothereactoratarateand
frequencytomaintainlowmicroaerophilicDOconcentrations.
TheOLANDprocesshadbeenusedinlaboratorystudieswithSBRandfixedfilmapplications
(Pynaertetal.,2002,Clippelieratal.,2009).ForSBRapplicationslowDOandlowvolumetricremoval
rateswereconsideredcriticaltomaintainananammoxcultureinagranularfloc.Thefixedfilm
applicationshowedthattheanammoxreactioncouldbemaintainedinarotatingbiologicalcontactor
withaliquidDOconcentrationofnear1.0mg/L.
6.7
TechnologyPerformance
Foragivenbiologicalnutrientremovaltechnology,thedailycompositeeffluentnitrogenand
phosphorusconcentrationswillvaryfromdaytodayandvaryamongsitesduetoanumberoffactors.
CommonlyrecognizedfactorsthataffectBNRplantperformancearesummarizedbelow.
WastewatercharacteristicsareofparticularimportanceinBNRprocesses.Thecharacteristics
andrelativeamountofinfluentbiodegradableCODarekeytobiologicaldenitrificationfor
nitrogenremovalandalsofortheperformanceandcapacityofenhancedbiologicalphosphorus
removal.Thisandotherimportantwastewatercharacteristicsaregivenasfollows:
- InfluentrbCOD:TPandBOD:TNratios
- Minimaltemperatureandtemperaturevariations
- Dailyandseasonalvariationsininfluentflowrates
- Dailyandhourlyvariationsinflowandconsitutentconcentrations
- Seasonalvariationsinflowandconstitutentconcentations
- Industrialcontributions(e.g.,toxins)
634
August2010
BNRTreatmentplantdesignandconfigurationinvolveanumberofcomplexprocess
considerationsandequipmentselection.Forexample,choosingahighSRTmaybebeneficialfor
someprocessessuchasnitrification,butnotforenhancedbiologicalphosphorusremoval.It
shouldbenotedthatfullscaleplantdatausedtojudgeBNRtreatmentperformanceistypically
obtainedfromplantsthataretovaryingdegreesbelowtheirdesigncapacity.Keyfactorsthat
canaffectperformanceareasfollows:
- DesignconservatisminSRTandHRT
- Treatmentgoals(relatedtopermitlevelandaveragingperiod)
- Processflexibility
- Solidsprocessingmethods
- Typeandmethodsofhandlingrecycleflows
- Equalizationcapability
- Sidestreamtreatmentofrecycleflows
Installedequipment
- Equipmentperformanceandreliability
- Equipmentmaintenancerequirements
- Redundancy
Operation
- Staffing
- Instrumentationandprocesscontrolmethods
WhenevaluatingeffluentconcentrationsforaspecificBNRtechnology,itisnecessaryto
recognizethattheeffluentperformancevariesdailyasafunctionofinfluentwastewater,process
conditions,operatingmethods,andbiologicaltreatmentvariations.Thus,theeffuentismoreaptly
characterizedintermsofastatisticalperformance.
Neethlingetal.(2009)introducedamethodforusingastatisticalapproachtodescribeprocess
performance.Inthisapproach,thetreatmentplantortechnologyperformanceistiedtothestatistical
ranktoexpresstheprobabilityofachievingacertainperformance.Buildingonthisstatisticalapproach,
thetermTechnologyPerformanceStatistic(TPS)wasusedataWEFTECworkshop(WEF/WERF,2009)to
assesstheperformanceoffullscaletreatmentplants.
TheTechnologyPerformanceStatistics(TPS)describestheperformanceofatechnologyor
processorplantunderspecificconditions.TheTPSisdeterminedfromperformancedataandislinked
totheoperationalconditionsduringwhichthedatawerecollected(pilot,fullscale,summer,winter,
excesscapacityavailable,SRT,etc).Theconditionsmustalsoincludeexternalfactorsthatimpactthe
technology,industrialloadings,seasonality,absenceofrecyclestreams,etc.Inaddition,theTPS
establishedusingpastperformance,istiedtothetreatmentobjectivesorpermitlimits.
AswillbedescribedinmoredetailinChapter7,permitlimitsfornitrogenandphosphoruscan
bebasedonannualaveragevalues,quarterlyaverages,seasonalaverages,maximummonthlyaverages,
maximumweeklyvalues,orattheirmoststringent,maximumdailyrecordedlevels.Limitsmaybe
concentrationormassbased.Manypermitsincludemultipletypesoflimitsfortheeffluentparameters.
635
August2010

AnnualaveragepermitlimitsforTNandTPclearlyprovidethegreatestflexibilityinoperation
andtheleastriskofviolations.Intemperateregions,theBNRsystemcanbeoperatedwithrelatively
higheffluentnitrogenconcentrationsduringthewintermonths,andthenoperatedtoobtainverylow
concentrationsduringthelatesummerearlyfallmonths.Seasonalaveragesprovideasimilarbutlesser
amountofflexibility.Monthlyorweeklylimitsnecessitatethateffluentlimitsbemetonaconsistent
basisregardlessofseasonaloperatingconditions.Theshorterthetimeperiodthelessforgivingthelimit
isforperiodicupsetsofthebiologicalsystem,suchaspartialnitrifierwashoutduringstormevents.The
endresultisthatWWTPsareoftenoperatedtoproduceeffluentconcentrationslowerthanthe
requiredvalue,providingamarginofsafetyandprotectingagainstasingledayexceedanceand
potentialpermitviolation.Thisapproachmayrequirehigheroperatingcostsormoreexpensive
technologiesthanwouldbedesignedandconstructedforthelongertermaverages.
Theremainderofthissectionprovidesageneralizeddiscussionoftheeffectivenessofnutrient
removaltechnologiesfollowedbyadescriptionofrecentresearchtoidentifyreliableeffluent
concentrationsusingdatafromfullscaletreatmentplants.
6.7.1 RemovalEfficienciesofBNRTechnologiesGeneralDiscussion
NitrogenRemoval
Forbiologicalnitrogenremoval,theattainableeffluentlimitforasuspendedgrowthprocess
dependsonthenumberofanoxiczonesandthenitraterecycleratiototheinfluentflow.Thebasic
configurationofasingleanoxicandaerobiczone(theMLEsystem),hashistoricallyachieved70to90
percentTNremoval.TNremovalbythisbasicconfigurationhasbeenimprovedbytheuseofattached
growthfiltersfornitrification(e.g,BAF)orattachedgrowthmediaintheanoxicand/oraerobicbasinto
increaseSRTandreducetherisksofwashout.Asecondanoxiczoneaftertheaerobiczone(e.g.,the4
stageBardenphoprocess)canachieveadditionalTNremovalbydenitrifyingthatportionoftheflowthat
isnotrecycledtothefirstanoxiczone.BecausetheBODhasbeenremovedintheaerobiczone,
denitrificationinapostanoxiczoneoftenrequiresasupplementalcarbonsourceespeciallyincolder
regionswheretheendogenousdenitrificationrateislow.
Nitrificationprocessescanbeoptimizedbycontrollinginfluentammonialoading(from
wastewaterorrecyclestreams)andflowtopreventwashoutofnitrifiers.Configurationofswingzones
thatcanbeoperatedinanoxicoraerobicmodescanhelpensureconsistentremovalundervarying
operatingconditions(e.g.,seasonalvariationsininfluentloading,temperaturechanges,flowvariation).
Similarly,onlinemonitoringandprocesscontrolofaerationsystemsandrecyclestreamscanallowfor
moreconsistentperformanceofsystems.Sidestreamtreatmentsuchasbioaugmentationcanbeused
toseedtheactivatedsludgeprocesswithanexternalsourceofnitrifierstoobtaincompletenitrification
atlowerSRTs.
Forremovaloftotalnitrogentoverylowlevels(3mg/Lorless),technologiesmaybelimitedby
biologicallyresistantdissolvedorganicnitrogen(rDON),whichistypicallybetween0.5and1.5mg/L.
ResearchisongoingintothedesignandoperatingconditionsthatcanbeusedtominimizerDON.
ProcessoptimizationandautomatedcontrolsystemsbecomeveryimportantinachievingtheselowTN
levels.Denitrificationfilterswithsupplementalcarbon(e.g.,methanol)additioncanprovideenhanced
TNremovalconsistentlytoloweffluentlevels.
636
August2010
PhosphorusRemoval
Forbiologicalphosphorusremoval,theattainableeffluentconcentrationisfundamentally
determinedbytherbCOD:TPratioenteringtheanaerobiczone,minusthemassofelectronacceptors
(i.e.,DOandnitrates)enteringtheanaerobiczone.IftherbCOD:TPratioisfavorable(16:1orhigher)
andtherecycleofnitrateandDOtotheanaerobiczoneiscarefullycontrolled,loweffluent
concentrationscanbereliablyobtainedusingalmostanyoftheBPRtechnologies.IfVFAsareadded
fromsludgefermentation,lowerrbCOD:TPratioscanachievethesameresults,withthevariability
dependinguponthequantityandmixofVFAsformedbythefermentation.Unsettledsewagewill
producelowereffluentsolublephosphorusconcentrationsthansettledsewagebecausesettling
changestheCODtoTPratioofthewastewaterinanunfavorabledirection.
Phosphorusremovalbychemicaladdition(withorwithoutbiologicalphosphorusremoval)can
reliablyachieveloweffluentTPlevels.Metalsaltssuchasalumandferricchloridearecommonlyused.
Completemixingofthechemicalatthedosingpointandadequateflocculationassurethatthemetal
reactswithphosphatetoformaprecipitant.Thekeyfactortoachievinglowlevelsisthemethodof
liquid/solidsseparation.Tertiaryfiltration,inparticulardeepbed,dualmediasystemsandmembranes,
providenearlycompleteremovalofparticulatematterandcanachieveveryloweffluentTPlevels.
Advancedprocessessuchasballastedhighrateclarification(BHRC)andfiltrationusingironoxide
coatedmediahavebeensuccessfulatremovingTPtolowlevelsinanumberoffullscaleapplications.
Forreliablyremovingphosphorustoverylowlevels,therecalcitrantfraction(i.e.,unreactive
fractionthatgoesthroughthetreatmentprocessunchanged)maybecomelimitingdependingonthe
natureoftheinfluentwastewater.Inaddition,variabilityinmeasurementofphosphateconcentrations
lessthan0.02mg/Lcouldbealimitingfactor.SeeChapter3,section3.7foradditionaldiscussion.
6.7.2 TechnologyPerformanceStatisticsbasedonFullScaleOperatingData
TheWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)sponsoredaprojecttoevaluatethe
performancecapabilitiesofnutrientremovalprocessesbycollectingdatafromsomeofthebest
performingnutrientremovalWWTPsinthecountytoimproveunderstandingofachievableeffluent
levelsfornutrientsandkeyfactorsaffectingplantperformancetotheselevels(WERFprojectno.
NUTR1R06j,2009).Preliminaryresultsoftheprojectwerepresentedatthe2009AnnualWater
EnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference(WEFTEC)(Neethling,etal.2009;Parker,
etal.2009;Bott,etal.2009).
Thefacilityevaluationswerebasedoncompleteoperatingdataandanalyticalinformation
providedbyplantmanagerscoveringa3yearperiod.Nospecialsamplingoroperationalchangeswere
madefortheperformanceevaluations.Statisticalmethodswereusedtodeterminetheprobability
statisticsfornitrogenand/orphosphorusremovalperformanceateachplant.Probabilityplotswere
developedusingnormalandlognormaldistributions.SeeBottetal.(2009)foradetaileddiscussionof
statisticalanalysesofplantdata.
TheWERFresearchersrecognizedthevariabilityinnutrientremovalperformancethatexistsin
allplantsduetovariationsinwastewatercharacteristicsandoperatingconditions,andconsequentlyit
wasnotconsideredpracticaltodescribetheachievablelimitsforatechnologybasedonasingle
numericalvalue.Thus,theachievableperformancewasdescribedasTechnologyPerformance
Statistics(TPS).Inthiswaytheperformancelevelscouldbedefinedintermsoffrequencyand
637
August2010
reliability.Inaddition,TPSresultsshouldconsidertheconditionsunderwhichthedatawerecollected
suchasprocessconfigurations,treatmentobjectives,existingversusdesignloadings,solidshandling
processes,etc.See(Neethling,etal.2009)formoreinformation.
ThreeTPSlevelscanbeusedtodefinethebest,median,andreliablyachievableperformance:
Bestperformance:Thelowestconcentrationachievedbytheplantduringa14dayperiod(TPS
14d).Neethling,etal.(2009)providestherationaleforthisvalue,explainingthata2week
periodwouldcapturetwoweeklycycles,eliminateoutlyingdata,identifyahighlevelof
treatmentthatcanoccasionallybeachieved,andperhapsalsocaptureacycleofatleastone
sludgeageinatypicalplantoperation.TheTPS14dcanbecalculatedintwoways:(1)
calculatingarunning14dayaverageanddeterminingtheminimumvalue,or(2)calculatingthe
3.84thpercentile.
Medianperformance:Theconcentrationachievedonastatisticalmedianbasis(TPS50%)
approximatingaverageperformance.Thisvalueindicatesthemedianperformanceofthe
technologythatcanbeachievedonanannualbasiswithnomarginofsafety.Itisstatistically
exceededeveryotheryearandrequiresamarginofsafetytoprovidereliableperformanceto
complywithdischargelimits.
ReliablyAchievablePerformance:Maybethe90th,95th,or99thpercentiledependingonthe
permitaveragingperiod.Neethling,etal.(2009)notesthatthe91.7thpercentile(11/12
percent)translatestoaplantwithmonthlylimitsexceededonemonthperyearonastatistical
basis.TheTPS95%indicatesamonthlyvaluethatisexceeded3monthsina5yearcycle.
Figure620illustratestechnologyperformancestatisticsofaphosphorusremovalplant.The
datafromthisfacilityfollowsagoodapproximationofthetypicallognormaldistribution.When
determiningperformancestatistics,therankisusedtocalculateperformancetoaccountfortheactual
performancedistributionasreportedbythetechnology.TheTPS3.84%orbestperformanceforthis
datasetis0.040mg/L.Thisvalueexcludesthebestreportedvalueof0.002mg/Lwhichislikelyan
outlier.The50thpercentileperformancestatisticof0.08mg/Lreflectsthemedianvalueandthe95th
percentilestatisticof0.23mg/Lthereliableperformance.The95thpercentileeffluentPconcentration
is3timesthemedianperformanceand6timesthebestperformance.
ThedistributioninFigure620illustratestheimportanceoftheaveragingperiodindetermining
plantperformance.Thisexampleplantdemonstratesthatitcanachieve0.08mg/Lonaverage,yetthe
reliablemonthlyvalueisthreetimeshigherat0.23mg/L.Thelongeraveragingperiodincreasesthe
abilityoftheplanttoachievethelimit.Ashorteraveragingperiodrequiresahighersafetyfactorto
increasetheabilitytoachievethelimitreliably.
638
August2010
10.00
1.00
mg/L
0.23
0.080
0.10
0.040
95%
0.01
50%
3.84%
0.00
0.1%
1%
10%
25%
50%
75%
90%
99%
99.9%
Percent of values less than of equal to indicated value
SE TP (all)
Figure 620. Probability plot of secondary effluent phosphorus data showing 3.84th, 50th, and 95th percentiles of the data
showingalognormaldistributionlineanddeterminingthepercentilesbasedonthislognormaldistribution(Exampledata).
SummaryofPerformanceData
TPSvaluesforthefacilitiesparticipatingintheWERFstudyaresummarizedinFigure621for
nitrogenremovalandFigure622forphosphorusremoval.Thefiguresshowthebest,median,and
reliable(95%)TPSvalues.
639
August2010
Combined
Multi
SeparateStage
Total Nitrogen, mg/L
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Iron Bridge Piscataway
Eastern
EWRF
Orange Co
WSSC
Fiesta
Village
TPS- 14 d
TPS- 50%
Western
Branch
River Oaks
TMWRF
Truckee
Meadows
Scituate
TPS- 95%
Figure621.Technologyperformancestatisticsfornitrogenremovalplantsshowingthebest(TPS14d),median(TPS50%)and
reliable(TPS95%)values.
Source:Clarketal.2010.Usedwithpermission.
0.8
1C
1B
2B
2C
Total Phosphorus, mg/L
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
TPS- 14 d
TPS- 50%
TPS- 95%
Figure621.Technologyperformancestatisticsforphosphorusremovalplantsshowingthebest(TPS14d),Median(TPS50%)
andreliable(TPS95%)values.
Source:Clarketal.2010.Usedwithpermission.
640
August2010
Nitrogenremovalfacilitiesaregroupedintothreecategories:
SeparateStageprocesses.Thesenitrogenremovalplantsuseseparateunitprocessesfor
nitrificationanddenitrification.Acarbonsourcesuchasmethanolisaddedtothedenitrification
stage.
Combinednitrogenremovalprocessesrepresentconventional,multiplezoneactivatedsludge
processesdesignedforbiologicalnitrogenremoval.TheseprocessesincludeMLE,Bardenpho,
stepfeed,orotherprocesses.Effluentfiltersareusedintheseplantswithoutaddedcarbon
thefilterremovesparticulatenitrogenbutdoesnotprovidedenitrification.
MultipleStageprocessesarethosethatuseconventionalbiologicalnitrogenremoval(asinthe
combinedprocesses)withadditionalnitrogenremovalinadenitrificationfilterwithcarbon
addition.
TheperformanceofthefacilitiesinFigure621showthethreeTPSvaluesingroups.Thegraphsshow
thatcombinedprocessesarenotachievingasloweffluentnitrogenvaluesasseparateandmultistage
processes.Inaddition,thevariabilityofthecombined(orconventional)processesishigh:fortwoofthe
facilities,thereliableTNconcentrationisabout3timesthemedianperformance.Multistageand
separatestagefacilitiesachievelowereffluentTNconcentrationsandshowlessvariabilitywithreliable
TPS95%valuesabout2timestheaverage.Thereasonfortheimprovedperformanceisintheabilityto
addexternalcarbontoovercomeexcursionsinperformanceandmaintaintheperformancelevelsatthe
targetbyadjustingthecarbonaddition.
Phosphorusremovalfacilitiesaregroupedintofourcategoriesdependingonthemainremoval
process(biologicalorchemical)anddependingonadditionoftertiarychemicaladdition:
1BrepresentsBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalwithapolishingfilter,butwithoutchemical
additiontothefilters.
1CrepresentsSingleChemicalPhosphorusRemovalintheprimaryorsecondaryprocesswitha
polishingfilterbutwithoutchemicaladditiontothefilters.
2BrepresentsBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalwithpolishingfilterwithchemicalforphosphorus
removal.
2CrepresentsSingleChemicalPhosphorusRemovalintheprimaryorsecondaryprocesswitha
polishingfilterwithchemicalforphosphorusremoval.
TheperformanceofthefacilitiesinFigure622showthethreeTPSvaluesingroups.Thegraphshows
that2stageprocessesareachievinglowereffluentphosphorusvaluesthansinglestageprocesses.
Thereappearstobelittledifferenceintheperformanceofplantsusingbiologicalandchemicalremoval
fortheprimaryandsecondaryprocess.Thevariabilityinthephosphorusremovalissignificant.The
reliableperformanceis1.5to4timeshigherthantheaverage.
641
August2010

6.8
FactorsforSimultaneouslyAchievingLowNitrogenandPhosphorusEffluent
Concentrations
Someuniquefactorsapplywhenplantsareattemptingtosimultaneouslyachievelownitrogen
andphosphorusintheplanteffluent.Keyfactorsarediscussedbelow.Foradditionaldiscussion,see
Section2.4.1oftheMunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument(USEPA2008b).
Themicroorganismsresponsibleforbiologicalremovalofphosphorusandnitrogencompetefor
bioavailablecarboninthewastestream.Theavailablecarbonintheinfluentorreturnsidestreamscan
beusedforbothbiologicalphosphorusremovalanddenitrification,butislikelytobeinsufficientto
simultaneouslyachieveveryloweffluentlevelsofboth,forinstance,below4.0mg/LTNand0.5mg/L
TP.Thislimitationcanbeovercomebyaddingasupplementalorganiccarbonsourcesuchasmethanol
orsomeotheralternativetothesecondanoxiczoneorVFAstotheeithertheanaerobicorsecond
anoxiczones,orboth.Plantsthatarerequiredtomeetveryloweffluentphosphoruslimitswillmost
likelyrequireboththeadditionofanalternativecarbonsourcetotheanaerobiczoneandtertiary
filtration.
Phosphorusisanecessarynutrientformicrobialgrowth.IfTPisreducedtoolowbeforea
biologicalprocesslikenitrificationordenitrification,thegrowthofthemicroorganismscouldbe
inhibited,necessitatingtheadditionofsupplementalphosphorus.Thisismostlikelytooccurwhen
tertiarydenitrificationfiltersareused;however,inhibitionofnitrificationalsohasbeenobservedin
plantspracticingchemicalphosphorusremovalintheprimaryclarifiers.
Inplantswithasingleanoxiczonefornitrification,nitratesmaybereturnedintheRASstream
totheanaerobiczone.ThiscanreduceBPRbecausesomeheterotrophicmicroorganismsusenitratesto
growandwillconsumeorganicsubstrateinsteadofthePAO.Toaddressthisissue,thefollowingdesign
optionscanbeused:
Convertthelastpartoftheaerationzoneintoadeoxygenationsectionbyreducingtheaeration.
Caremustbetakennottocauserisingsludgeinthesecondaryclarifier.
DiverttheRAStoasmalltankbeforereturningittotheanaerobiczone,suchasintheRDN
configuration.ThetankwouldreducetheDOandnitrateintheRAS,whichwouldfurther
improvetheperformanceoftheanaerobiczone.Theretentiontime,however,wouldhavetobe
limitedtopreventsecondaryreleaseofphosphorus.
DiverttheRAStotheanoxiczoneratherthantotheanaerobiczone,whereitwillboth
deoxygenateanddenitrify,andthenrecycletotheanaerobiczone,asintheUCT/VIP
configurations.
Plantsshouldbedesignedandoperatedtoavoidsecondaryrelease.Anaerobicoranoxiczones
thataretoobigremoveorganiccarbonandnitratesinlesstimethantheHRT.Thiscanresultinthe
releaseofphosphatewithoutpolyhydroxyalkanoate(PHA)storage,whichmeansthattherewillbe
insufficientstoredsubstratetotakeupthereleasedphosphorusintheaerobiczone.Plantoperators
canconsideraddingachemicaltoprimarysedimentationtanks(e.g.,ferricchloride)inthewinterto
removemoresolidsandreducetheneededSRTtoachievethesamenitrificationlevels.
642
August2010
Ifnitrateremovalhasbeenenhancedinthesecondaryprocess,phosphoruscanbereleased
fromthesludgeinthesecondaryclarifierifDOdepletionoccurs.Thismightnotbeobserved
immediatelybutcouldresultinabuildupofphosphorusinthesecondarytreatmentsystemthatwould
eventuallyraisetheeffluentTPlevels.Ifthisisapossibleissue,plantoperatorsshouldconsider
biologicalnitrificationandphosphorusremovalinatertiaryprocessusingchemicaladdition.
Temperatureaffectsbiologicalnitrogenandphosphorusremovalprocessessimilarlyalthough
nitrificationismoresensitivethanBPR.Incoldertemperatures,fermentationmightnotprovide
sufficientVFAsfortheBPRprocess.Sidestreamfermentationhasbeenusedverysuccessfullyto
augmentVFAsintheanaerobiczoneduringwinteroperation.Therateofnitrificationdecreases
significantlywithdecreasingtemperatures,withrates50percentlowerforevery8to10oCdropin
temperature(WEFandASCE2006).Tomaintainnitrificationofammonia(whichisthekeyfirststepto
nitrogenremoval),plantscandesignswingzonesandaeratethosezonesduringperiodsoflow
temperatures.Denitrificationratesalsodecreasewithdecreasingtemperature,althoughnotasrapidly.
Denitrificationratesatlowtemperaturesshouldalsobeconsideredwhendesigningandoperating
nutrientremovalsystems.
Bothnitrificationandchemicalphosphorusremovalconsumealkalinity.Lowalkalinitycan
inhibitnitrificationbecauseitisthecarbonsourceforthenitrifiers,andalsobecauselowalkalinity
usuallycauseslowpH,whichcaninhibitnitrifiers.Therefore,evenwhennitrogenremovalisnot
requiredbutphosphorusremovalis,practicingdenitrificationisusuallythemosteconomicalapproach
becausedenitrificationrestores50percentofthealkalinityconsumedduringnitrification.Ofcourse,
thisisausefulstrategyonlyifnitrificationisalreadybeingpracticed.Notethatchemicalprecipitation
willnotbecompleteifsufficientalkalinityisnotpresent.
6.9
References
Barnard,J.L.1984.ActivatedPrimaryTanksforPhosphateRemoval.WaterSA.10(3):121126.
Barnard,J.L.2006.BiologicalNutrientRemoval:WhereWeHaveBeen,WhereWeareGoing?In
WEFTEC2006.
Barnard,J.L.,H.Phillips,B.Sabherwal,C.deBarbadillo.2008.DrivingMembraneBioReactorstoLimit
ofTechnology.InWEFTEC2008.
Benish,M.,D.Clark,A.Z.Gu,J.B.Neethling.2006.HowLowCanYouGo?AchievingExtremelyLow
EffluentPhosphorusinWastewaterTreatment.WaterandWastesDigest,October2006.Volume46
Number:10.
Bott,C.B.,S.N.Murthy,T.T.Spano,andC.W.Randall.2007.WERFWorkshoponNutrientRemoval:
HowLowCanWeGoandWhatisStoppingUsfromGoingLower?Alexandria,VA:WERF.
Bott,C.B,D.Parker,J.B.Neethling,A.Pramanik,andS.Murthy.2009.WEF/WERFCooperativeStudyof
BNRPlantsApproachingtheLimitofTechnology:II.StatisticalEvaluationofProcessReliability.
PresentedatWEFTEC2009,Orlando,FL.
643
August2010
Clark,D.L.,Hunt,G.,Kasch,M.S.,Lemonds,P.J.,Moen,G.M.,Neethling,J.B.(2010)Nutrient
ManagementApproachestoProtectWaterQuality.Volume1ReviewofExistingRegulatoryPractices,
WERFNutrientChallengereportNUTR1R06i,WERF/IWAP.
Clippelier,H.D.,S.E.Vlaeminck,M.Carballa,andW.Verstraete,2009.ALowVolumetricExchangeRatio
AllowshighAutotrophicNitrogenRemovalinaSequencingBatchReactor,BioresourceTechnology
100:50105015.
DeBarbadillo,C.,J.Barnard,S.Tarallo,andM.Steichen.2008.GotCarbon?Widespreadbiological
nutrientremovalisincreasingthedemandforsupplementalsources.WaterEnvironment&
Dold,P.,I.Takcs,Y.Mokhayeri,A.Nichols,J.Hinojosa,R.Riffat,C.Bott,W.Bailey,andS.Murthy.
2008.DenitrificationwithCarbonAdditionKineticConsiderations.WaterEnvironmentResearch.
80(5):417427.WEF.
Ellis,E.P.andA.H.Cathcart.2008.Selection,Installation,StartupandTestingoftheWorldsFirstFull
ScaleCoMagPhosphorusReductionTertiaryTreatmentSystem.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.Chicago,
IL.
Feldthusen,M.2004.ContinuousSandFilters:TertiaryWWTandOtherApplications.SAWEA
Workshop.March22,2004.
Holloway,R.,H.Zhao,T.Rinne,G.Thesing,J.Parker,andM.Beals.2008.TheImpactofTemperature
andLoadingonMeetingStringentNitrogenRequirementsinaTwoStageBAFAComparisonofPilot
andFullScalePerformance.InWEFTEC2008.
Hu,Z.2001.EternalNitrificationBiologicalNutrientRemovalActivatedSludgeSystems:Development
andModeling.DoctoralDissertation.DepartmentofCivilEngineering,UniversityofCapeTown,
Rondebosch,7700,SouthAfrica.
Kang,S.J.,W.F.Bailey,andD.Jenkins.1992.BiologicalNutrientRemovalattheBluePlainsWastewater
TreatmentPlantinWashington,D.C.WaterScienceTechnology.UK26(911):22332236.
Publishing.
Neethling,J.B.,D.Stensel,D.Parker,C.Bott,S.Murthy,A.Pramanik,andD.Clark.2009.Whatisthe
LimitofTechnology(LOT)?ARationalandQuantitativeApproach.PresentedatWEFTEC2009,
Orlando,FL.
Parker,D.,C.Bott,J.B.Neethling,A.Pramanik,andS.Murthy.2009.WEF/WERFCooperativeStudyof
BNRPlantsApproachingtheLimitofTechnology:I.WhatCanWeLearnAbouttheTechnologies?
PresentedatWEFTEC2009,Orlando,FL.
Pynaert,K.,R.Sprengers,J.Laenen,andW.Verstraete,2002.OxygenlimitedNitrificationand
denitrificationinaLabscaleRotatingBiologicalContactor.EnvironmentTechnology.23(3):353362.
644
August2010
Pearson,J.R.,D.A.Dievert,D.J.Chelton,andM.T.Formica.2008.DenitrificationTakesaBAF:Starting
UptheFirstSeparateBiologicalAnoxicFilterinConnecticutRequiresSomeProblemSolvingand
KnowHow.WaterEnvironment&Technology.Alexandria,VA:WEF.20(5):4855.
Randall,C.W.,J.BarnardandD.Stensel.1992.DesignandRetrofitofWastewaterTreatmentPlantsfor
BiologicalNutrientRemoval.TechnomicPublishingCompany,Inc.,Lancaster,PA.
Reardon,RoderickD.2005.TertiaryClarifierDesignConceptsandConsiderations.InWEFTEC2005.
Sadick,T.,W.Bailey,G.Daigger,andM.McGrath.1998.LargeScaleNitrogenRemovalDemonstration
attheBluePlainsWastewaterTreatmentPlantUsingPostDenitrificationwithMethanol.Presented
atIAWQ19thBiennialInternationalConferenceonWaterQuality.Vancouver,B.C.,Canada.June
1998.
Sen,D.,C.Randall,andT.Grizzard.1990.BiologicalNitrogenandPhosphorusRemovalinOxidation
DitchandHighNitrateRecycleStreams.PubCDP/TRS47/90.USEPAChesapeakeBayProgram.
Sen,S.,VOcciano,P.Wong,andA.Langworthy.2008.ComparingImplementationofMBBRversusBAF
onaSpaceConstrainedSite.InWEFTEC2008.
STOWA.2006.BCFSProcessSheets.Websiteupdated13June2006.Availableonline:
http://www.stowaselectedtechnologies.nl/Sheets/Sheets/BCFS.Process.html
Trivedi,HirenandNicolasHeinin.2000.SimultaneousNitrification/DenitrificationbyMonitoring
NADHFluorescenceinActivatedSludge.InWEFTEC2000.
USEPA.2003.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:BallastedFlocculation.OfficeofWasteManagement.
MunicipalTechnologyBranch.EPA832F03010
USEPA.2007a.WastewaterManagementFactSheet:DenitrifyingFilters.EPA832F07014.
USEPA.2007b.WastewaterManagementFactSheet:MembraneBioreactors.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/etfs_membranebioreactors.pdf
USEPA.2008b.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocumentOfficeofWastewater
USEPA.2008c.OnsiteWastewaterTreatmentSystemsTechnologyFactSheet3:SequencingBatch
ReactorSystems.EPA625R00008.Websiteupdated:14April2008.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r00008/html/html/tfs3.htm
USEPA.2009.NutrientControlDesignManualStateofTechnologyReviewReport.OfficeofResearch
645
August2010

Vaxquez,J.R,M.Figueroa,I.Fernandez,A.MosqueraCorral,J.L.Campos,andR.Mendez.2009.Post
treatmenteofEffluentsfromAnaerobicDigestersbytheAnammoxProcess,WaterScienceand
Technology,60(5):11351143.
Verma,M.,S.K.Brar,J.F.Blais,R.DTyagi,andR.Y.Surampalli.2006.AerobicBiofiltrationProcesses
AdvancesinWastewaterTreatment.Pract.PeriodicalofHaz.,Toxic,andRadioactiveWasteMgmt.
10:264276.
Vidal,A.,R.Combeau,J.Costa,X.LeTallec.1997.BiostyrImprovements:ControlProcessofthe
Aeration.AnnualReportofAnjouResearchonBiostyrProcess.OTV,France.
WEFPress.
WEF.2006.MembraneSystemsforWastewaterTreatment.Alexandria,VA:WEFPress.
WEF.2005.ManualofPracticeFD8:ClarifierDesign,2ndEdition.Alexandria,VA:WEF.
WEFandASCE.2010.DesignofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantsWEFManualofPractice8and
ASCEManualsandReportsonEngineeringPracticeNo.76,5thEd.WaterEnvironmentFederation,
Alexandria,VA,andAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineersEnvironment&WaterResourcesInstitute,
Reston,Va.
WERF.2000a.TechnologyAssessments:NitrogenRemovalUsingOxidationDitches.Alexandria,VA,
WERF.
WERF.2000b.InvestigationofHybridSystemsforEnhancedNutrientControl.FinalReport,Collection
andTreatment.Project96CTS4.Alexandria,VA:WERF.
WE&T.2007.PlantProfile:WarrentonWastewaterTreatmentPlant.WaterEnvironment&Technology.
Alexandria,VA:WEF.Availableonline:
http://www.wef.org/ScienceTechnologyResources/Publications/WET/07/07May/07MayPlantProfile.ht
m
Young,T.,S.Crosswell,andJ.Wendle.2008.ComparisonofNitrogenRemovalPerformanceinSBR
Systems.InWEFTEC2008.
Zhu,S.andS.Chen.2002.TheImpactofTemperatureonNitrificationRateinFixedFilmBiofilters.
Aquacult.Eng.26,221237.
646
August2010
7.EstablishingDesignObjectives
Chapter7covers:
7.1
Introduction
7.2
CharacterizingExistingTreatment
7.3
DesignFlowRates
7.4
WastewaterCharacteristics
7.5
TargetEffluentConcentrationsforNitrogenandPhosphorus
7.6
GoalsforReliability,Sustainability,andProcessFlexibility
7.7
SolidsHandlingOptions
7.8
SiteConstraints
7.9
SelectinganOverallProcessDesignFactor
7.10
References
7.1
Introduction
Establishingdesigncriteriaisacriticalfirststepinupgradingorretrofittingawastewater
treatmentplant(WWTP)fornutrientremoval.Designcriteriaaretheconditionsunderwhichthe
WWTPmustoperatefollowingtheupgradeorretrofit.Theyincludefactorssuchasprojectedinfluent
flowrateandmassloading,effluentrequirements(e.g.,totalnitrogenlimits),andgoalsfor
sustainability,operability,andflexibility.Designersshouldworkcloselywithfacilityownersandother
stakeholderstodevelopdesigncriteriathatcarefullyconsiderfutureneedsandtreatmentconditionsfor
theentireplanningperiod(typically20years).Thetextboxonthenextpagehighlightssomekey
questionsthatshouldbeaskedduringdesigncriteriadevelopment.
Designcriteriaareanimportantpartofanoverallfacilityplan(alsocalledastrategicormaster
plan).Thefacilityplandocumentstheplanninganddecisionmakingprocessesthatleaddirectlyto
designandconstruction.Amongotherthings,itidentifiestheproblem,presentscriteriaand
assumptions,providespreliminarylayoutandcostalternatives,andreviewsstaffrequirements.Ten
StateStandards(2004)requiresthatcomprehensivefacilityplansbecompletedforprojectsinvolving
new,upgraded,orrehabilitatedwastewatertreatmentfacilities.Facilityplansareusuallypreparedbya
consultantandsignedandsealedbyaregisteredprofessionalengineer.Additionalguidanceon
developinganoverallfacilityplanisprovidedintheWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF)Manualof
PracticeNo.28,UpgradingandRetrofittingWaterandWastewaterTreatmentPlants(2005).
71
August2010
KeyQuestionstoConsiderwhenEstablishingDesignCriteria
Willtheserviceareaboundarychangeinthefuture?Aplannedresidentialcommunityor
annexationofanexistingcommunitycansignificantlychangeinfluentflowsandcharacteristics.
Whatisthepopulationprojectedtobeattheendofthedesignperiod(typically20years)?
Populationprojectionsshouldconsiderseasonalchangesinpopulationandnonpermanent
residents.
Isdecentralizedoronsitetreatmentbeingencouragedfornew,remotecommunities?Some
statesandlargewastewaterutilitiesareencouragingdecentralizedtreatmenttoreducethe
loadontheexistingcollectionsystemandsaveenergy.
Arethereanyanticipatedchangesinindustrialusers?Additionofamajorindustryorindustrial
plantshutdownscanhaveasignificantimpactonwastewaterquantityandquality.
Isthereastrongwaterconservationprograminyourserviceareaorisonebeingplanned?
Waterconservationcouldresultinreducedflowvolumesbuthigherconcentrationsofnitrogen
andphosphorusinthewastewater.
Howcertainareyouaboutfutureregulationsandflowquantity?Flexibilityindesigncanhelp
addressuncertaintyinfutureconditions.
Thischapterprovidestechnicalguidanceonestablishingdesigncriteriaforthepurposesof
upgradinganexistingfacilitytoprovidenutrientremoval(nitrogen,phosphorus,orboth)orimprove
nutrientremovalcapabilitiesiftheyalreadyexist.Itisimportanttonotethatthedatagatheringstepsin
Sections7.2through7.4gohandinhandwiththedevelopmentandcalibrationofaprocesssimulation
model.AswillbeexplainedinChapter10,modelingistherecommendedapproachfordesigning
WWTPupgradesforbiologicalnutrientremoval(BNR)becauseof(1)itsflexibilityinenablingdesigners
toquicklytestmanydifferentconfigurationsandoperatingscenariosand(2)itsabilitytosimulate
treatmentperformanceunderawiderangeofconditionsusingdynamicmodeling.
Manystateshavespecificrequirementsfordesigncriteriasuchasdesignflowsandreliability.
Designersshouldcarefullyreviewstaterequirementsandguidelineswhendevelopingcriteriafor
nutrientremovalupgradesorretrofits.Inadditiontothischapter,readersareencouragedtoreview
Chapter5,UpgradingExistingFacilities,intheMunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReference
Document(USEPA2008),availableonlineathttp://www.epa.gov/OWM/mtb/mnrtvolume1.pdf.
GeneralinformationonWWTPdesigncanalsobefoundinTenStateStandards(2004),WEFandASCE
(1998),andTchobanoglousetal.(2003).
7.2
CharacterizingExistingTreatment
Technologyselectionanddesignforefficientnutrientremovalrequiresanextensive
understandingoftheexistingplantsconfiguration,operation,andperformance.Forexample,an
operationsteamwishingtooptimizetheplantsactivatedsludgesystemfornitrificationneedsindepth
knowledgeofflowconfiguration,hydraulicresidencetime(HRT),solidsresidencetime(SRT),and
72
August2010
dissolvedoxygenlevelswithinthebasin(s)duringbothnormalandpeakflowconditions.Recycle
streams,suchassupernatantfromsludgedewateringoperations,canincreaseammoniaintheactivated
sludgebasinsandhaveanegativeimpactonnitrification.Theconfigurationofexistingsludgehandling
systemscanbeadrivingfactorinthedesignofchemicalphosphorusremovalsystems.Odorcontrol
practicesinthecollectionsystemcanreducetheamountofsubstrateavailableforbiological
phosphorusremoval.
Inadditiontoconfigurationandperformance,itisimportanttoascertaintheconditionof
existingequipmentsuchaspipingandpumpstodeterminetheirremaininglifeandrehabilitation
requirements.WEF(2005)recommendsplantwalkthroughsandinterviewswiththeownersand
operatorstogatherthisinformationanddeterminehowexistingequipmentwouldfitintotheupgraded
facilityplan.
7.3
DesignFlowRates
ThetotalflowdeliveredtoaWWTPcanvaryfromyeartoyearduetopopulationandindustrial
changeswithintheservicearea.Influentflowratecanalsovaryseasonallyespeciallyforareaswith
largeseasonalpopulationssuchasresortcommunities.WWTPscanexperiencesignificantpeakflows
duringwetweathereventsduetoinflowandinfiltrationoriftheyhaveacombinedcollectionsystem.
Forsmallplants,peakhourlyflowbasedonindividualusagepatternscanhaveasignificantimpacton
design.
Retrofitsfornutrientremovalshouldbedesignedforaverageandpeakflowconditions.These
flowconditionsshouldbeprojectedforinitialoperationandthroughtheendofthedesignperiod.The
typicaldesignperiodis20years;however,shorteralternativedesignperiods(e.g.,10years)maybe
usedforthephasedimplementationofretrofits.Energyefficiencyshouldbeconsideredforexisting
operationandattheendofthedesignperiod.
Thissectiondiscussesthevariousdesignflowratesthatareimportantfordesigningupgradesor
retrofitsfornutrientremoval.
7.3.1 CharacterizingExistingFlow
Designersshouldusehistoricaloperatingdatafromtheplanttoidentifythevarious
componentsoftheexistingflowandtocharacterizeitsvariabilityovertime.Atleastthreeyearsof
historicalflowdatashouldbeanalyzedifavailable.Graphicalandstatisticalanalysisofthisdatacanbe
extremelyuseful.Flowcharacterizationisalsoanimportantcomponentofdevelopingandcalibratinga
processsimulationmodel.Designersmaydecidetocollectdetailedflowdataformodelingpurposes.
Table71providesadescriptionofinfluentflowcomponents.Flowfromdomesticsourcesisa
keycomponentthatprovidesthebasisforflowprojections.Infiltrationandinflow(I&I)andstormwater
flowareneededfordefiningpeakflowvalues.Table72liststheflowcharacteristicsthatshouldbe
identifiedbasedonexistingplantrecords.
Existingflowdatashouldbeusedtoidentifyapeakingfactorfortheplant.Thepeakingfactor
isthepeakflowrate(typicallypeakhourlyflow)dividedbytheaveragelongtermflowrate.Atleast
threeyearsofflowdatashouldbeusedtodeterminethepeakingfactor(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
73
August2010
Table71.InfluentFlowComponents
Flowcomponent
Domesticwastewater
Description
Wastewaterfromresidential,commercial,
institutional,andsimilarfacilities.
Industrialwastewater
Wastewateroriginatingfromindustrial
processes.Characteristicsarehighly
variable.Cancontaincomponentsthat
inhibitbiologicalnitrogenremoval.
Stormwater,snowmeltorgroundwater
thatentersthecollectionsystemeither
throughcracksandothertypesofbreaksin
thesystem(infiltration)ordirectstorm
drainconnectionssuchasfoundationand
basementdrains(inflow).Muchlower
contaminantconcentrationscomparedto
domesticwastewater.
Infiltrationandinflow
(I&I)
Stormwater
EstimationMethodology
Averagedryweatherflowminus
industrialflow.Canbeestimated
assumingatypicalflowperdayper
person.
Fromwaterutilitymeterrecordsor
interviewswithowners.
I&Icanbeestimatedasthedifference
betweenaveragedailywetweather
flowandaveragedailydryweather
flow.Infiltrationcanbedetermined
separatelyfrominflowbycomparing
flowduringwetperiodswhenthe
groundwateriselevated,toflow
duringandshortlyafteraheavy
rainfall.
Afactoronlyforlocalitiesthatusethe
Difficulttodifferentiatebetween
samesystemforcollectingwastewaterand inflowandstormwaterflow.Canbe
stormwater(combinedsystems).Infiltration estimatedasthedifferencebetween
frompeakrainfallisincludedinI&Iabove.
dryweatherflowandwetweather
flow.
Table72.FlowCharacterization
FlowCharacterization
Annualaveragedaily
flow1
Averagedailydry
weatherflow
Averagedailywet
weatherflow
Maximumorpeak
dailyflow
Maximummonthly
flow
Peakhourlyflow
Peakinstantaneous
flow
Diurnalflowpattern
Atypicalevents
1.
Description
Averageflowrateoccurringwithina1dayperiodbasedonannualflowdata,i.e.1/365th
oftotalAnnualFlow.
Averageofdailyflowssustainedduringadryweatherperiod. Determinedasthedaily
averageflowforalldryweatherperiodsduringanaverageyear.
AverageofdailyflowssustainedduringawetweatherperiodwhenI&Iandstormwater
arefactors.Determinedasthedailyaverageflowforallwetweatherperiodsduringan
averageyear.
Thelargestvolumeofflowoccurringwithina1dayperiod duringanaverageyear.
Theaverageofdailyflowsforthemonthwiththehighesttotalflowduringanaverage
year.Oncedeterminedshouldbeusedfordesignflow.
Thelargestvolumeofflowoccurringwithina1hourperiod duringanaverageyear.
Highestrecordedflowrate.Maybeconsiderablybelowtheactualpeakflowbecauseof
equipmentlimitations,butshouldbeestimatedifso.
Thetypicaldailyflowpatternfordomesticwastewater,i.e. withpeaksoccurringinthe
morningandevening.
Typesofeventsincludestormflowsandlargeindustrialdischarges.Basedonhistorical
recordsgoingbackasmanyyearsaspossible(e.g.,basedonreviewofpast10years).
Anaverageyearisusuallytheaverageofthreeyears,ormore,atthediscretionofthedesigner.However,itsdefinition
maychangedependinguponwhetherornotthereisasteadyannualincreaseordeclineforknownreasons.
74
August2010
7.3.2 ProjectingFutureConditions
Thefollowinginformationisneededtoprojectfutureflowsandestablishdesignflowsforthe
project:
Projectedpopulationgrowthforthedesignperiodincludingtheestimatednumberofpeopleto
beservedattheendofthedesignperiod.
Perperson(percapita)flowrateestimateingallonsperday(gpd).
Projectedcommercialgrowth(includingzonedareasandexpectedtypesofbusinesses)andnew
institutionalandrecreationalfacilities.
Plannedindustrialcontributionsandanallowanceforunplannedcontributions.
Populationgrowthprojectionsareoftenmadebythecityorcountygovernment.Iftheseare
notavailable,historicalpopulationdatacanbeextrapolatedtopredictpopulationincreasesintothe
future,althoughthismethodiscrudeatbest.
Historicalflowrecordscanbeusedtoestimateaverageperpersonflowforagivencommunity
bydividingtheaverageannualdryweatherflow(expressedasadailyvalue)bythenumberofpeople
served.Industrialflowsshouldbesubtractedfromtheaverageannualdryweatherflowifpossible.
Historicalrecords,however,cannotalwaysbedependedupontogiveanaccuratepredictionoffuture
flows.Initsonsitewastewatertreatmentmanual,EPA(2002)reportsthataveragedailyflowsbetween
50and70gpdperpersonaretypicalforresidencesbuiltbefore1994.Newhomesandresidences
constructedafter1994aresubjecttotheU.S.EnergyPolicyAct(EPACT)standards,whichsetmaximum
flowvaluesforhouseholdplumbingfixturessuchastoilets,showerheads,andfaucets(Table73shows
thedifferenceinwaterusebetweenstandardfixturesandEPACTfixtures).EPAestimatesthathomes
builtafter1994orhomesthathavebeenretrofittedwithEPACTstandardfixtureshaveaveragedaily
wastewaterflowsbetween40and60gpdperperson(EPA,2002).Averagepercapitaflowmaybeeven
lessinregionsthathaveenactedwaterconservationprograms.
Table73.ComparisonofFlowRatesandFlushVolumesBeforeandAfterU.S.EnergyPolicy
Act
Fixturesinstalled
EPACTrequirements Potentialreduction
priorto1994
(effectiveJanuary,
inwater
Fixture
1994)
used(%)
Kitchenfaucet
Lavatoryfaucets
Showerheads
Toilet(tanktype)
Toilet(valvetype)
Urinal
Source:Konen,1995.
3.0gpm(0.19L/s)
3.0gpm(0.19L/s)
3.5gpm(0.22L/s)
3.5gal(13.2L)
3.5gal(13.2L)
3.0gal(11.4L)
2.5gpm(0.16L/s)
2.5gpm(0.16L/s)
2.5gpm(0.16L/s)
1.6gal(6.1L)
1.6gal(6.1L)
1.0gal(3.8L)
16
16
28
54
54
50
75
August2010
Designtextbooksalsoprovidetypicalrangesofflowperpersonperday.WEFandASCE(1998)
providearangeoftotalflowpercapitaofbetween60and110gpd/person.Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)
presentapossiblerangeofperpersonflowratevaluesofbetween46and97gpdbasedonthenumber
ofpersonsperhousehold,withhigherperpersonvaluesforsmallerhouseholds(citingMayer1999).
Somestatesprovideguidanceonselectingpercapitaflowrateestimates.TheWisconsinDepartmentof
NaturalResources(DNR)recommendsthatdesignengineersassume60to70gpd/personforplants
serving5,000orfewerpeople,andbetween65and80gpd/personforplantsservingmorethan5,000
people.Thishighervaluereflectsgreaterinfluenceofcommercialandindustrialcustomers(Wisconsin
DNR2006).Whencompletingflowprojections,regionalandstateguidanceshouldbeconsultedto
accountforthepotentialregionaldifferencesinwateruseandwastewatergeneration.
Wateruserecordsareanothersourceofdatathatcanbeusefulinpredictingpercapitaflow
andfutureflows.The1999report,ResidentialEndUsesofWater(Mayer1999),isoneofthemost
commonlycitedsourcesforwaterusedata.Theproportionofwaterconsumedthatbecomes
wastewaterdependsonregionalconditions.Higherproportions(ashighas90percent)canbeassumed
fornorthernstatesduringcoldweatherwhenirrigationuseislow.Asmallerproportion(60to70
percent)becomeswastewaterinaridregions(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
Futureflowprojectionsfornewcommercial,institutional,andrecreationalfacilitiescanbe
basedonmeterrecordsfromsimilarfacilities.DataTables32through34inTchobanoglousetal.
(2003)providetypicalvaluesifflowdataarenotavailable.
7.3.3 SettingDesignFlowRates
Averageannualdesignflowisimportantforconductingsteadystatemodelingsimulations.It
shouldbebasedonpopulationprojectionsandestimatedfutureflowsfromcommercial,institutionAL,
recreational,andindustrialfacilitiesfortheendofthedesignperiod(oratsomepointinthedesign
periodifusingaphasedapproachasdescribedinSection7.3).Averageannualflowshouldrepresent
normal,dryweatheroperatingconditions.
Biologicalreactors(e.g.,activatedsludgebasins)areusuallysizedusingtheMaximumMonth
DesignFlow,althoughshortSRTsystemsmayrequiresizingbasedonmaxweekorevenshortrunning
averages.Clarifiers,filters,andpumpstationsaretypicallysizedbasedonmaximumhydraulicorsolids
load,whichisoftenbasedonPeakHourlyDesignFlow.Maximumandpeakratesareusuallyderived
bymultiplyingtheaverageannualdesignflowbyapeakingfactor.Peakingfactorsarebasedonanalysis
ofexistingpeakflowscomparedtoaverageflows(seeSection7.3.1),withengineeringjudgmentapplied
toaccountforfuturechangesinI&I(e.g.,collectionsystemupgradescansignificantlyreduceI&I,but
aginginfrastructureincreasesI&I).Flowequalizationisasignificantfactorflowequalizationatthe
plantorinthecollectionsystemcanreducethepeakingfactor.Diurnalflowpatternforthedesignyear
arealsoveryimportantformodeling.
Designersshouldconsultwithstateregulatorstoensurethatdesignflowsadheretostate
requirementsandmeetstheforecastedneedsofthecommunitythroughtheendofthedesignperiod.
76
August2010

7.4
Wastewatercharacteristics
Measureddatacharacterizingthequalityofwastewaterintheinfluentandatkeylocations
throughouttheplantareextremelyimportantfordesigningbiologicalnutrientremovalprocesses.
Mathematicalmodelsdependonaccuratedatatopredicttheperformanceofvarioustreatment
scenarios.Thephrasegarbagein,garbageout(GIGO)isveryappropriateheremodelpredictionsare
onlyasgoodasthedataonwhichtheyarebased.AswillbeexplainedfurtherinChapter10,oneofthe
keybenefitsofmodelingistheabilitytosimulatevariationsinwastewaterflowandcharacteristicsand
thus,produceatighterdesignwithlowerprocesssafetyfactors,savingoncapitalandoperations
costs.Tightdesignswithlowsafetyfactorsarehighlydependentongoodqualitydata.Toaddressthe
importanceofwastewatercharacterization,thebasicguidanceondatacollectioninSection7.4.1is
followedbyrecommendedstepsfordataverificationinSection7.4.2.
Itisveryimportanttonotethatcharacterizationofinfluentflowratesandmassloadingof
contaminantsgohandinhand.Acommonerrorindesignistoassumethatnutrientloadingsare
independentofflowratevariability,whichisnotthecaseinsystemsthatreceiveanyI&Iorstormwater
flow.Conversely,nutrientloadingsfromdomesticsourcesoftenvarydiurnallyandcanbegreatest
duringperiodsofhighflows.Asnotedthroughoutthisdocument,returnstreamscandischargehigh
nutrientconcentrationstotheheadofthetreatmentplant
7.4.1 DataCollection

Whichdataaretypicallyavailablefromtheplant?
Plantsroutinelymeasureflowandwastewaterqualitytoaidinbasicoperatingdecisionsandto
ensureregulatorycompliance.Mostmaintainhistoricaldatainelectronicformatsuchasspreadsheets,
databases,or,inthecaseofsmallsystems,handwrittenlogsheets.Dailycompositesorgrabsamplesof
theinfluentandeffluentaretypicallyavailablefromplantpersonnelforthefollowingparameters
(Melceretal.2003):BiochemicalOxygenDemand(BOD)1,TotalSuspendedSolids(TSS),mixedliquor
suspendedsolids(MLSS),ammoniaand/orTotalKjeldahlNitrogen(TKN),nitrate,andphosphorus
(sometimesonlyorthophosphorus).
Designersshouldstartbyobtainingasmuchhistoricaldataaspossiblefromthewastewater
utility.Whenworkingwithlargeplantswithelectronicrecords,designersshouldobtainasmanyas8to
10yearsofhistoricaldatatohelpidentifyannualtrendsandeliminatedataanomaliesanderrors.Itis
important,however,toonlyincludedatafromtimeperiodsthatrepresentcurrentconditions.Datesof
majorplantconfigurationoroperatingchangesshouldbediscussedwithplantoperatorsand
consideredwhenreviewinghistoricaldata.Suddenchangesininfluentconditionscouldalsorepresent
additionorremovalofamajorindustryorachangeinlaboratories.
ForthepurposesofthisdesignmanualBODrepresentsthe5dayBODmeasurementmethod(sometimes
referredtoasBOD5)unlessotherwisenoted.
77
August2010
Whatadditionaldataareneededformodelingnutrientremovalprocesses?
Ingeneral,thefollowingdataareneededtomodelnutrientremovalprocesses:
1) Averagevaluesforthefollowingparametersinthetreatmentplantinfluent,primaryeffluent,
andsecondaryeffluent.
Chemicaloxygendemand(COD)CODisusedinsteadofBODtomodelorganicsubstrate;
seethetextboxinthissectionforfurtherexplanation.Ifthe
Totalsuspendedsolids(TSS)
Volatilesuspendedsolids(VSS)
TotalKjeldahlNitrogen(TKN,whichisthesumoforganicandammonianitrogen)
Ammonianitrogen(NH4N,NH3N)
Nitratenitrogen(NO3N)
Totalphosphorus(TP)
Orthophosphate(OP)
Alkalinity
Temperature
pHspotsamples.Averageofsamplesismeaningless
2) DiurnalinfluentloadingpatternsforCOD,ammonia,andphosphatearealsoveryimportantfor
bothsteadystateanddynamicmodeling.
Datashouldrepresentnormaldryweatheroperatingconditionsandbebasedonseveralyearsof
historicaldata.
Inmostcases,historicaldataareinsufficienttomeetdesignobjectivesfornutrientremoval.If
timeandfundingallow,measurementcampaigns,alsocalledspecialsampling,canbeconductedearly
intheprocessbeforecalibrationbegins.Thisstepisrecommendedifkeydataaremissingorif
designersdonothaveconfidenceinexistingdata(e.g.,grabsamplinglocationsarenotrepresentative,
historicaldatadonotmatchexpectedvalues).Thedurationofatypicalmeasurementcampaignis1to
2weeks.24hourcompositesamplesshouldbecollectedfromwellmixedlocationsrepresenting
influentflow,primaryeffluent,andsecondaryeffluentandanalyzedforkeyparameterssuchasCOD2,
BOD,VSS,TSS,ammonia,nitrate,phosphate,alkalinity,andpH.Designersshouldconsider
supplementalsamplingoftheinfluenttoobtaindiurnalprofiles(e.g.,hourlygrabsamplesfor24to48
hoursmeasuringCOD,ammonia,andphosphate).Specialsamplingofoperatingparameterscould
includespotchecksofdissolvedoxygen(DO)concentrationsinaeratedzones,dailygrabsamplesof
mixedliquor,monitoringofRASrecyclerateandconcentration,andsamplingtocharacterizeside
streams(Melceretal.2003).WhereamplehistoricalBODinformationandnoCODdataareavailable,
designersshouldtrytoestablisharelationshipbetweentheCODandBODforrawandsettled
wastewater.SeethetextboxattheendofthissectionforguidanceonestimatingCODifonlyBODdata
areavailable.
Totalcostofa2weekcompositesamplingcampaignisestimatedtobeabout $20,000(Takacs 2009)

2
LaboratoryanalysisforCODshouldbedoneassoonaspossibleaftersamplecollectiontominimizepossible
errorsintroducedbypreservationtechniques(Takacs2009).
78
August2010
WhydomathematicalmodelsuseCODinsteadofBODtorepresentorganicmaterial?
ToexplainwhyCODistherecommendedmeasurementfororganicmaterialinwastewater,itis
usefultofirstprovideareviewofthewayinwhichmicroorganismsconsumeorganics.
Microorganismsuseorganicsubstrateintwoways.
(1)
TheyoxidizeittoCO2andwatertoprovideenergyformaintainingexistingcellmass.
Thisisaccomplishedbytransferringelectronsfromtheorganicsubstratetoa
terminalelectronacceptor(oxygen,orinthecaseofanoxicconditions,nitrate).
Undersubstratelimitingconditions,whicharetypicalforactivatedsludgesystems,
microorganismsusearelativelyfixedpercentageoforganicsubstrate,expressedas
COD,forthecellmaintenanceprocess.
(2)
Theyconvertorganicmaterialtonewcellmassusingtheenergygeneratedthrough
oxidation,asdescribedinitem(1)above.
CODmeasurestheamountofanoxidantthatreactswithasampleundercontrolled
conditions.Becauseeachmoleofoxygenacceptsfourelectronequivalents,theCOD
measurementofoxidantdemandisadirectmeasureoftheelectrondonatingpotentialofa
sample.Fromtheelectrondonatingpotential,itispossibletoquantifytheamountofCODand
oxygenconsumedandtheamountofsludgeproduced.
TheBODmeasurementmethodhasseverallimitations.Itonlyaccountsforthe
carbonaceousmaterialthatisusedforenergy,notorganicmaterialconvertedtonewcellmass.
MostBODmeasurementsarebasedonatestingdurationof5days(BOD5)whichonlyaccounts
fortheamountthatreactswithinafivedayperiodandnotalltheavailablecarbon.Depending
onhowrapidtheoxidationratesare,twodifferentwastewatersamplesmayhavethesame
ultimateBODbutdifferentBOD5concentrations.
Totalorganiccarbon(TOC)couldbeusedtorepresentcarbon;however,becausemodels
accountforreactionsbasedontheelectronstransferredandnotthemolesofcarbon,itwould
bedifficulttotrackthereactionsbasedonTOC.
MeasuringCODatvariouslocationsinthewastewaterplantallowsforamassbalance.
CODenteringthesystemmustequalthesumof(1)CODintheeffluent,(2)CODofthewasted
sludge,and(3)oxygenconsumedinutilizationoforganicmaterial.
Formoreinformation:SeeMelceretal.(2003),AppendixB;APHA,AWWA,andWEF(2005).
79
August2010
WhatiftheplantdoesnothaveCODdata?Thisisacommonproblem.ManyplantsmeasureBOD
insteadofCODbecausetheBODmethodhasbeenusedforalongtimeandisoftenthebasisfor
regulatorycompliance.IfCODmeasurementsarenotavailable,CODcanbeapproximatedby
establishingtheratioofCOD/BODorCOD/VSS.WhilesomemathematicalmodelsmaytakeBODas
theinput,itisstillnecessarytoadjusttheCODfractionsforgoodcorrelation.
AlthoughmeasuredvaluesofBOD,COD,andVSSintheplantinfluentvarygreatly,theratiosare
generallyconsistentforaspecificwastewater.COD/BODratiosaretypically1.9to2.2,withthehigher
ratiosforrelativelyfreshwastewater.COD/VSSshouldrangefrom1.42to1.48mgCODpermg
MLVSS.EstimatingtheratioofCOD/BODismorecommonthanCOD/VSS.
TodeterminetheCOD:BODratioforaspecificwastewater:
Collectseveralsamples(10to20arerecommended)ofinfluentwastewater.Thesamples
shouldberepresentativeoftotalinfluentflowandtakenatdifferenttimesofthedayatlow
andhighinfluentflowrate.
Splitthesamples,takingcaretohomogenizethemthoroughly.
AnalyzeeachsampleforCODandBOD.UsethesamemethodforBODthatisusedforthe
availableplantdata.(BOD5ismostcommon,althoughsomeplantswillhavecBOD5data.)
DeterminetheaverageCOD:BODratioforallsamples.
Repeatthetestwithprimaryeffluent
DesignerscanthenapplythisratiotohistoricalBODdatatodetermineCOD.
Limitationsinfundsandtime,however,oftenrenderextensivemeasurementcampaigns
impractical.Melceretal.(2003)recommendsaniterative,ortieredapproachwherebythemodelis
firstrunusinghistoricaldata.Additionaldataneedsaredeterminedbasedontheaccuracyofmass
balancesandothercalibrationchecks.SeeChapter10fordetailedguidanceonmodelcalibrationusing
thisrecommendediterativeapproach.
7.4.2 DataVerification
Thedesignershouldperformanumberofdatareviewandverificationstepsbeforemaking
calculationsorenteringdataintothemodel.Inthesimplestterms,designersshouldcriticallyevaluate
thedatatoanswerthequestions,dothedatamakesense?anddotheyfollowexpectedengineering
principles?Belowisarecommended4stepprocessforreviewingandverifyingdata.Chapter10
providesadditionalrecommendeddataverificationstepsfororganicsubstrate,nutrientfractions,and
kinetic/stoichiometricparameters,respectively.Additionalmassbalancesandcalibrationchecksare
recommendedinChapter10ofthisdesignmanual.
710
August2010
Step1:Reviewdataforanomalies.
Conductstatisticalanalysestodetermineaverage,median,minimum,andmaximumvalues.
Lookforobviousoutliersthatcouldbearesultofdataentryerror(e.g.,aparameterdifferent
thancomparablemeasurementsbyafactoror10couldbeanerrorindecimalplacement).
Plothistoricaldataovertimetoevaluatetrends.Extremechangesinreadingsorflatdatacould
indicatesensorproblems.
Step2:Reviewsamplinglocationsandcollectionprocedures.
Permanentinstrumentationshouldrepresenttheprocessandshouldbeinawellmixed
samplinglocation.
Checklocationsofflowmetersareseparateflowmetersinstalledforeachtrain?Ifnot,howis
splitestimated?
Checklocationofgrabsamplecollectionsometimesaconvenientplacetosamplefromabasin
isnotrepresentativeofthewaterqualityinthatbasin.
Example1:ImproperSamplingofPrimaryEffluent.
Anautomatedflowproportionalcompositesamplingdevicewasdrawingsamplealiquotsfromnear
thebottomofaprimaryeffluentchannel.Theprimaryeffluentchannelwasnotwellmixedandthus,
thesamplingdevicewasdrawinganunrepresentativeamountofparticulatematter.Asecond
problemexistedwiththesamplingdeviceitself.Thevacuumusedtowithdrawandtransportthe
samplefromtheprimaryeffluentchanneltothesamplecontainercausedthevolatileportionofthe
organicmattertodissipateasitenteredthereceivingvessel(Melceretal.2003).
Step3:Reviewanalyticalprocedures.
Checkthatsamplesareanalyzedusingapprovedstandardmethods.
CheckthemethodfordeterminingBOD.Becausemodelingexperienceisbasedonrelationships
betweenCODandBOD,alldatashouldbefromthe5dayBODtest(alsoreferredtoasBOD5),
notultimateBOD.CheckifBODisintheformofcarbonaceousBOD(cBOD).Plantmanagers
aremoreoftenmonitoringandreportingcBODinsteadofBODtobeconsistentwithstate
permitlimits.ThestandardmethodforcBODrequirestheadditionofaninhibitortoprevent
nitrificationthatwouldotherwiseregisterasBOD.Thereisevidencethatsomeoftheorganic
reactionsarealsoinhibited,leadingtoartificiallylowcBODvalues(Albertson1995).Others
(Bairdetal.2002)maintainthatthereisnoinhibitionofBODbut,instead,therearemore
nitrifiersinrawwastewaterthanusuallyassumed,leadingtoanapparentinhibitionofBOD.To
check,determinetheCOD/BODratioifCODdataareavailable.Theratioshouldbebetween1.9
and2.2.COD/BODratioshigherthan2.2mayindicateinhibitionforcBODdataorcouldresult
fromexcessiveparticulatematterfromindustries.Somedesignershavecorrectedthisby
adjustingcBODdataupwardby10to15percentfordomesticwastewater.
711
August2010
CheckthemethodforCODdetermination.Mercuricsulfate(HgSO4)mustbeaddedtocounter
theinfluenceofchlorides,andsilversulphateA(gSO4)isrequiredasacatalysttofacilitatefor
theoxidationofsomeorganicmattersuchasVFAs.Thesechemicalsarehazardousandmustbe
disposedoffollowingregulations.Theuseofmercurysaltsisnecessarywhenchlorideisa
factorinCOD,butcanbeomittedininstanceswherethecontributionofchloridetoCODis
negligible.WhenusinghistoricalCODvalues,checktoseewhetherthesechemicalswereused.
COD/BODratiosshouldbeasexpected(seeStep4).SeeStandardMethodsfortheExamination
ofWaterandWastewater(APHA,AWWA,andWEF2005)formoreinformationaboutmethods
5220AthroughD.
Example2:SignificantObservedDifferencesinCODinSplitSamples
Latimeretal.(2007)reportedseveralcasesofquestionablewastewatercharacterizationdata.In
oneinstance,largedifferencesinCODconcentrationwereobservedbetweensplitsamplesanalyzed
onsiteandatanapprovedcommerciallaboratory.AlthoughbothusedEPAapprovedmethodsand
typicalQA/QCprocedures,thelaboratoryresultswereonaverageapproximately30percentless
thanplantvalues.Thisdiscrepancypersistedevenaftereffortstoensurepropersampling,
preservation,andhomogenizingofthesamplepriortosplitting.Theonlyexplanationprovidedby
thelaboratorywasthatthemethodgavedifferentresultsdependingonthewaythevialwasturned
intheinstrument.Thisexampleunderscorestheimportanceoffollowingthemanufacturers
instructionswithrespecttohomogenizationofsamplesandtothecorrectorientationofvialsinthe
spectrophotometer.Therearemanycasessimilartothisexample,andiftheCODinformationlooks
suspectwhenmodeling,considerthatthemethodusedtodetermineitmaybeatfault.
CheckthesizeofthefilterusedtodifferentiatebetweenTSSandDSS(typically1.2to1.5m
glassfiberfiltersshouldbeused).Thisbecomesimportantwhenevaluatingfractions.
Checkthatoperatorsusedappropriatesamplepreservationandstoragetechniquesandmet
maximumallowableholdingtimes.
Checkthequalityassuranceprocedures.Areduplicatesandblanksregularlysenttothe
laboratory?
Checkthatsensorsandothermeasurementequipmentareregularlycalibrated.Forexample,
- MostTSSmetersshouldbecalibratedatleastweekly.
- IfmembraneelectrodesareusedforDOmeasurement,theyshouldbereplacedatleast
quarterly.
SeeChapter13oninstrumentationandcontrolsforadditionalrecommendations.
712
August2010
Example3:ErrorinCalculationofTotalizedFlow
Atonetreatmentplant,comparisonofinstantaneousflowmeasurementstototalizedflowshowed
largedifferences.Aninvestigationrevealedthattheprogrammablelogiccontroller(PLC)calculating
thetotalflowcontainedanerror,resultinginanunderestimateoftotalplantinflowofapproximately
25percent(Thirdetal.2006).Inanotherinstance,theflowmeterwasmeteringonlyoneoftwo
parallelstreams.ThePLCwouldmultiplythisbyafactoroftwofortotalplantflow.However,for
thefirstseveralyears,onlyoneofthetwoflowtrainswasusedandtheflowwasreportedatdouble
theactualflow.
Step4:Comparemeasuredratiostotypicalvaluesfordomesticwastewater.
COD/BOD:TheCOD/BODratioforinfluentwastewaterthathasalowdetentiontimeinthe
collectionsystem(i.e.,freshwastewater)shouldbe2.2orhigher.Wastewaterthattravels
throughfairlyflatcollectionlinesand/orforcemainsferments,whichincreasestheBOD5but
nottheultimateBODandthusreducestheCOD/BODratiotoaround2.0orless.TheCOD/
BODratiowillbehigherwhentheVSS/BODratioishigher.
COD/VSSratio:Thisratioshouldbe1.42to1.48mgCODpermgMLVSS.
VSS/TSSratio:Thisratioshouldbeontheorderof0.75mgVSS/TSSformunicipalwastewater
and0.83mgVSS/TSSforprimaryeffluent.
COD/TKNratio:AlthoughTKNandCODconcentrationsvaryintheplantinfluent,theratio
shouldbefairlyconstant.Forrawdomesticwastewater,theratiovariesfromapproximately9.5
to12.
TheCOD/TPratio:Valuesshouldrangefrom35to60.
TKN/VSSratio:Thisratioshouldvarybetween0.08and0.1formixedliquorVSSbutmayvary
muchmoreforrawdomesticwastewater.
Sludgegeneration(measuredasmassVSSorTSSgenerated)permassCODorBODininfluent:
CheckagainstsimilarplantswithsimilarSRTs.Figure71,whichshowssludgeproductionwith
andwithoutprimarytreatmentfordifferenttemperaturesandSRTs,canbeusedasaguide.
TheTSSandBODconcentrationsshouldbewithin10percent.
713
August2010
Figure71.Netsludgeproductionversussolidsretentiontimeandtemperature(a)withprimarytreatmentand(b)without
primarytreatment(lb/lb=kg/kg).
Source:WEFandASCE1998,Figure11.7,p.1120.ReprintedwithpermissionfromDesignofMunicipalWastewater
TreatmentPlantsMOP8,4thEdition,Copyright1998,WaterEnvironmentFederationandAmericanSocietyofCivil
Engineers,Alexandria,VA.www.wef.org
714
August2010
7.5
TargetEffluentConcentrationsforTotalNitrogenandTotalPhosphorus
Plantsshouldbasetheirtargeteffluentconcentrationsfortotalnitrogen(TN),andtotal
phosphorus(TP)onthefollowing:
NutrientlimitsinNationalPollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES)permitsincluding
numericlimitandaveragingperiodrequirements
Anoverallprocessdesignfactor
Inotherwords,thedesignvalueshouldbebelowthepermittedvaluetoprovideamarginofsafety.
IssuesrelatedtoNPDESpermitlimitsarediscussedinthissection.Applicationofanoverallprocess
designfactor(i.e.,safetyfactor)isaddressedinSection7.9
NPDESpermitsaresetona5yearcycle.Historically,NPDESpermitssometimesincludedan
effluentlimitforammonianitrogenbutnotTNorTP.Permitsthatincludedtotalnutrientlimitsoften
setmaximumallowablevaluesof10mg/LforTNand1.0mg/LforTP.Recognizingtheharmfuleffects
ofeutrophicationofthenationswaterwaysduetoexcessivenutrientloadings(seeChapter2,Section
2.4ofthismanualforacompletediscussion),regulatoryagencieshavestartedsettinglowernutrient
limitsinNPDESpermits.TNlimitationsof5.0or3.0mg/LandTPlimitsof0.5andeven0.1mg/Lorless
arebecomingmuchmorecommon.
Particularlyinwesternportionsofthecountry,nutrientrelatedwaterqualityproblemscan
occuronaseasonalbasis.Asaresult,waterqualitybasedeffluentlimitationsfornutrientsusually
applyonlyduringthecriticalperiod.Thisperiodroutinelyoccursfromlatespringthroughearlyfall
whenstreamflowsarelowandtemperaturesarewarm.
Theaveragingperiodforthepermitlimitsisanextremelyimportantfactorinselecting
technologies,establishingdesignparameters,andoperatingplantsfornutrientcontrol.Thefollowing
approachestolimitingeffluentnitrogenandphosphorushavebeenusedinNPDESpermits,eitheralone
orincombination:
Annualaverage
Quarterlyaverage
Maximummonth
Maximumweek
Maximumday
Seasonalaverage
Table74providesseveralexamplesofNPDESpermitlimitsfornutrientsaspresentedduringa
2008workshoponnutrientremoval.Otherexamplescanbefoundinstaterecordsandthroughoutthe
relatedliterature,andindividualNPDESpermitsandfactsheetscanbeaccessedthroughEnvirofacts.
VisittheEPAwebpagehttp://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/permitissuance/permitscanning.cfmformore
information.
715
August2010
Table74.ExamplePermitLimitsforNutrients
WWTP
Name
Location
TruckeeMeadows
Water
Reclamation
Facility
RiverOaks
Advanced
Wastewater
TreatmentPlant
FiestaVillage
Advanced
Wastewater
TreatmentPlant
OrangeCounty
EasternWater
Reclamation
Facility
Parkway
Wastewater
TreatmentPlant
Ann.
Avg.
Flow
(MGD)
TNLimits
mg/L
Lbs/
day
TPLimits
mg/L
Lbs/
day
Citation
Reno,NV
2.0dailymaxfor
nitrate
500
0.430dayavg
134
Gray2008
Tampa,FL
10
Phillips2008
Meyer2008
Orlando,FL
17.3
2.00dailymax
1.50wklyavg
1.25monthlyavg
1.00annualavg
1.0singlesample
0.75wklyavg
0.50monthlyavg
0.50annualavg
2.4weeklyavg
2.0monthlyavg
1.0annualavg
FortMyers,
FL
6.00dailymax
4.50wklyavg
3.75monthlyavg
3.00annualavg
6.0singlesample
4.5wklyavg
3.0monthlyavg
3.0annualavg
6.0wklyavg
5.0monthlyavg
3.0annualavg
Madhanagopal
2008
Laurel,MD
5.56
7.0monthlyavg
and11.0wkly
avgbetween4/1
and10/15
0.6mg/Las
ammonia
1.5weeklyavg
1.0monthlyavg
Selock2008
ClarkCounty
LasVegas,
110
511as 0.2mg/L
176
Drury2008
Water
NV
ammo
Reclamation
nia
District
RockCreek
Washington 30(dry
Noneprovided
0.10mg/L
Spani2008
Advanced
County,OR
weather)
monthlymedian
Wastewater
TreatmentFacility
0.35monthlyavg
Baily2008
Washington, 370(dry
7.5annualavg
BluePlains
0.18weeklyavg
DC
weather) changingto4.2
Advanced
annualavgin
Wastewater
TreatmentFacility
future
Source:WEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101:WEF/WERF:DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnology
NutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
7.6
GoalsforReliability,Sustainability,andProcessFlexibility
Reliabilityisthecapabilityofatreatmentprocesstoperformitsintendedfunctionwithout
failureorinterruptionoftreatmentsuchasduringfloods,powerfailures,orintheeventofequipment
failure.Reliabilitygoalsofanutrientremovalprocessshoulddependonthepermitlimitsandaveraging
period.Themostcommonsafetyfactoristodesignformaximummonthloadings.Reliabilityismore
importantandmaynecessitatelargersafetyfactorsiftheaverageperiodisdailyorweekly.Monthly,
seasonaloryearlypermitlevelsprovidesomedegreeofflexibilityforunforeseeneventswithout
exceedingthepermitlevel.SeeChapter6,Section6.7foradditionaldiscussiononreliabilityof
technologiesandeffluentlimits.
716
August2010

Itiscommonforstatestorequirethattreatmentcomponentsbedesignedtotreattheaverage
dailydesignflowwiththelargestunitoutofservice.TenStateStandards(2004)requiresthatallplants
beprovidedwithanalternativesourceofelectricpowerorpumpingcapacitytoallowcontinuityof
operationsduringpowerfailures.Methodsofprovidingalternativepowerincludeconnectingtoatleast
twoindependentpowersourcesandusingbackuppowergenerators.Sparepartsshouldbekeptonsite
toensurecontinuousnutrientremovalcapabilities,andequipmentshouldbeaccessibleforrepairs.
Designersshouldstronglyconsiderincorporatingonlineinstrumentationandcontrolsinto
design.Onlineinstrumentationcanproviderapidfeedbackcomparedtograbsamplingandenable
operatorstorespondmorequicklytoenvironmentalchanges,therebymaintainingnutrientremovalto
desiredlevels.Automatedcontrolcansignificantlyreduceworkloadwhileatthesametimeimproving
controlofprocessparametersthusimprovingtreatmentplantperformance,oftenatreducedenergy
costs.Automatedcontrolishighlyrecommendedforplantstryingtoachieveloweffluentnutrient
levels(e.g.,TN<3mg/LorTP<0.1mg/L).SeeChapter13ofthismanualforguidanceononline
instrumentationandcontrols.
Sustainabilityimpliesasimultaneousfocusoneconomic,social,andenvironmentalperformance
(USEPA2008).Onegrowingareaoffocusinrecentyearsistheinterrelationshipamongwater,energy,
andgreenhousegasemissions.InitsrecentlypublisheddocumentEnsuringaSustainableFuture:An
EnergyManagementGuidebookforWastewaterandWaterUtilities,EPAnotesthatenergy
managementisattheheartofeffortstoensuresustainabilityforutilities(USEPA2008b).When
consideringupgradesandretrofitstoexistingWWTPsforthepurposesofremovingnutrients,designers
shouldworkwithownerstoidentifysustainabilitygoalssuchasminimizingenergyuse,resource
recovery,andreducinggreenhousegasemissions.
Flexibilityindesigncanhelpaddressuncertaintiesinfutureconditions.Forexample,thedesign
shouldincludetheflexibilitytoincreaseitstreatmentcapacityifownersandregulatorssuspectthat
nutrientlimitswilldecreaseinthefuturebasedonnewwatershedanalysesandthesettingofnumeric
waterqualitycriteria.Similarly,thedesignshouldaddresstheelementsofuncertaintyinpopulation
projectionsandassumptionsregardingtheindustrialandcommercialcomponentsofwastewater.The
changesininfluentflowasaresultofwaterconservationhavebeenstudied(AWWARF1999)butare
veryareaspecific.Onemethodtoaddressuncertaintyinthedesignincludesdividingprojectsinto
severalphasestoeasethefinancialburdenonwastewaterutilities.Thisphasedapproachalsoreduces
uncertaintybymeetingshortertermdesignobjectivesfirstratherthanconstructingfacilitiestomeet
projectedcriteriathroughtheendofa20yearplanningperiod.Turndowncapacityofblowershas
beenfoundtobecriticalinthedesignofenergyefficientaerationsystemsandoftencompensatesfor
protectivedesignassumptions.WEF(2009)recommendsaminimumturndownratioof5:1.Multiple
blowersofmorethanonesizealsomaybeinstalledsothatblowerscanbeturnedoffwhenpossible.
Automationofturnoffshasproventoimproveenergyefficiency.
Operationalflexibilityisoftenneededtoremovenutrientstolowlevelsinareaswithsignificant
coldweatherperiods.Suchflexibilitymayalsobeadvantageousforplantswithhighlyvariableinfluent
flowandnoflowequalization.Onewaytobuildoperationalflexibilityintodesignistoincludeswing
zones.Swingzonescanbelocatedbetweentheanaerobicandanoxiczones,theanaerobicandaerobic
zones,ortheanoxicandaerobiczonesdependinguponthesecondaryprocessesselected(USEPA2008).
Forexample,aswingzonebetweentheanoxicandaerobiczonewouldcontainbothmixersand
diffusers.IfmoreSRTwererequiredfornitrification(e.g.,duringwintermonths),thediffuserscouldbe
717
August2010
operated.Duringwarmermonths,thediffuserscouldbeturnedofftocreateanaerobicconditionsand
promotephosphorusremoval.
Example1:SuccessfulUseofSwingZonestoRemovePhosphorusunderChangingConditions.
Jacksonetal.(2007)reportsuccessfuluseofswingzonestoprovidephosphorusremovalata5MGD
plantatTheColony,Texas.Basedonnewtotalnitrogenpermitlimits,theplantoperationteamhad
decidedtoretrofittheirexistingactivatedsludgeprocesswithanIntegratedFixedFilmActivated
Sludge(IFAS)systemandmodifytheirexistingcontactstabilizationprocessforplugflow.Afterthe
designwasfinalizedandconstructionwasabouttobegin,theteamlearnedofapendingrevisionof
theirphosphoruseffluentlimitto1mg/L.Thedesignwasmodifiedtoincludetwoanaerobicswing
zonescontainingbothcoarseairdiffusersandmixersystems.Theauthorsreportsuccessin
achievingbothnitrogenandphosphorusremovalbyoperatingthezoneanaerobicallyinallbutthe
coldestmonths.
Safetyandsecurityareimportantconsiderationsforanyupgradeproject.Allnewstructures
shouldbeenclosedandshouldhavesignsdiscouragingentryofanyonebutauthorizedpersonnel.
Handrailsandguardrailsshouldbeinstalledaroundtanks,trenches,pits,andotherhazardous
structures.Warningsignsshouldbeappropriatelyplaced,andadequateventilationshouldbeprovided.
Designersshouldworkwithplantownersandotherstakeholderstodetermineifadditionalsecurity
featuressuchaslights,motiondetectors,andcamerasareneeded.
7.7
SludgeTreatmentOptions
Boththequantityandqualityofthesludgeproducedshouldbeconsideredwhenestablishing
designcriteriafornutrientremovalprocesses.Biologicalnitrogenandphosphorusremovalprocesses
donotgenerallyproduceadditionalsludgequantities.Infact,inthecaseofnitrogenremovaloperated
withouttheadditionofanexternalcarbonsource,thebiologicalnutrientremovalprocesseswilllower
sludgequantities.Theadditionofchemicaltreatmentforphosphorusremoval,however,always
producesadditionalsludgeduetothegenerationofmetalorcalciumandphosphorusprecipitates.
Theadditionofnutrientremovalchangesthesludgecomposition,whichinturncanchangethe
thickeninganddewateringproperties.Nitrogenand/orphosphorusremovalcanimprovethickening
characteristicsduetodecreasedamountsoffilamentousbacteriaintheactivatedsludge.Sludgefrom
biologicalphosphorusremovalprocesseswillcontainadditionalphosphorus,butwillotherwisebe
similartosludgeproducedbyconventionalactivatedsludgesystems.Sludgesettlinganddewatering
characteristicsaregenerallythesameorimproved.Potentialissuesincludephosphorusreleaseand
struviteprecipitationunderanaerobicprocessingconditions.SeeChapters4and5ofthismanualfor
additionaldiscussionsoftheeffectsofnitrogenandphosphorusremoval,respectively,onsludge
handling.
7.8
SiteConstraints
Siteconstraintscanbeadrivingfactorinselectinganutrientremovaltechnology.Particularly
forlargerWWTPsinurbanareas,spacecanbelimited.Attachedgrowthandhybridsystemssuchas
IFASandmovingbedbioreactors(MBBRs)canachievenutrientremovalinsmallerfootprintsandcan
718
August2010
oftenbeusedtoretrofitanexistingbasinwithoutincreasingthefootprintatall.Chapter6andChapter
8provideadditionaldiscussionoffootprintrequirementsfornutrientremovaltechnologies.
OdorcanbeaseriousissueforWWTPs,particularlythoseinurbanareas.Designersshould
alwaysconsiderhowaplantupgradeorretrofitfornutrientremovalwillimpactthereleaseofodorsat
theplant.Containment(e.g.,coveringoftreatmentunits)andtreatmentofcapturedgasshouldbe
consideredforeachprocessupgrade.Forexample,theadditionoffermentationtoproducesubstrate
forbiologicalphosphorusremovalcanproducesignificantodors.Forthisreason,sludgethickenersfor
fermentationshouldbecoveredandtheheadspacescrubbedtocontrolodors.Manyretrofitsfor
biologicalnutrientremoval,however,donotincreaseodors.Forexample,theadditionofanaerobic
zonesforbiologicalphosphorusremovaldoesnotincreaseodorsbecauseofthecontinuousadditionof
oxidizedactivatedsludgetothezoneandalsobecausevolatilecompoundssuchasH2Sandvolatilefatty
acids(VFAs)arenotbeingstrippedandtheVFAsareusedbythephosphateaccumulatingorganisms.
BecauseimprovementstoWWTPsdirectlyimpactthecommunity,thepublicshouldbebrought
intotheprocessasearlyaspossibletoeducatethemontheneedfortreatmentchangesandtoobtain
theirsupport.Designersandownersshouldconsiderthefollowingoptionsforpublicinvolvement(WEF
2005):
Scheduleapublicmeetingatthebeginningoftheplanningprocesstoidentifymajorissues.
Scheduleadditionalmeetingsthroughoutplanning,design,andconstruction.
Considerlowcostimprovementssuchastreeplantingandimprovedstormdrainagetogain
publicsupport.
Establishacitizensadvisorygroupforlargeprojects.
Developproceduresfordealingwithpubliccomplaints.
Communicatewiththepublicregularlythroughflyers,newsletters,andinterviewsonlocalnews
stations.Regularlypostprojectupdatesincludingpicturesontheutilitywebsite.
7.9
SelectinganOverallProcessDesignFactor
Engineersroutinelyapplysafetyfactorsduringdesign,particularlyforsizingofbasinsandother
capitalequipment,toaccountforuncertaintiesinpredictedconditionsandtechnologyperformance.
Fordesignofnutrientremovalsystems,relevantuncertaintiesare:
Variationsinpredictedinfluentflowratesandcontaminantloadings.
Uncertaintyinpredictedtreatmentperformance(oftendrivenbyuncertaintyinbiokinetic
parameters).
Variabilityinmechanicalequipment.
Asuncertaintyineachofthesefactorsincreases,sodoesthesafetyfactor.Note,however,thatin
additiontoinefficienciesinoperation,oversizedunitsalsocanresultinreducedperformanceof
719
August2010
biologicalnutrientremovalsystems,particularlythosethatincludeenhancedbiologicalphosphorus
removal.Forsuchsystem,thebestsafetyfactorismultipletrainsratherthanlargerreactors.Then
trainscanbetakenonorofflinetomaintainnearoptimumperformance.Additionaltimespentearlyin
thedesignprocesstocarefullyevaluatedataandpredictconditionsthroughoutthedesignperiodcan
allowfortheuseofasmallerfactorandsavemoneyinconstructioncosts.
Safetyfactorsarehighlydependentontheextentofdatacollection,calibration,andtypeof
processsimulationmodelingperformedfortheproject.Asconfidencewithmodelparametersincrease,
thesizeofthesafetyfactordecreases.Onemajoradvantageofdynamicmodelingisitsabilityto
simulateanumberofdifferentfutureconditionsandthus,enabletheuseoflowersafetyfactors.See
Chapter10foradditionaldiscussion.
7.10 References
Bailey,W.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonMultipleStepChemicalAddition(BluePlains)forLowP.
PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,DemonstratedProcessesforLimitof
TechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.WEF/WERFChicago,IL.
October,2008.
Bratby,J.,J.Jimenez,D.Parker.2008.DissolvedOrganicNitrogenIsItSignificant,andCanitbe
Removed?PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Drury,D.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonFollowingBioPwithTertiaryChemicalRemovalSteps(Clark
County).PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,DemonstratedProcessesfor
LimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.WEF/WERF.
Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Gray,R.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonSeparateStageFixedFilmNandDNProcessesforLOT
(TruckeeMeadowsWaterReclamationFacility).PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshop
No.101,DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsand
StatisticalReliability.WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Jackson,D.R.,L.E.Ripley,T.Maurina,andS.Hubbell.2007.UptotheChallenge:IFASHelpsGrowing
TexasCityMeetDischargeLimits,ExpandCapacity.WaterEnvironment&Technology.19(11):5054.
Jeyanayagam,S.andI.Venner.2007.WastewaterProcessDesignwithEnergySavingsinMind.Florida
WaterResourcesJournal.January,PP.2833.
Konen,T.P.1995.WaterUseandEfficiencyUndertheU.S.EnergyPolicyAct.StevensInstituteof
Technology,BuildingTechnologyResearchLaboratory.Hoboken,NJ.
Lancaster,C.D.andJ.E.Madden.NotSoFast!TheImpactofRecalcitrantPhosphorusontheAbilityto
MeetLowPhosphorusLimits.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Leenheer,J.,A.Dotson,andP.Westerhoff.2006.DissolvedOrganicNitrogenFractionation.Annalsof
EnvironmentalScience,Vol1,4556.
720
August2010
Madhanagopal,T.2008.ManagersPerspectiveofaCombinedProcess(5StageBardenpho)Process
forLOWN(EasternWaterReclamationFacility)ModerateClimate.PresentedatWEFTECTechnical
EducationWorkshopNo.101,DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:
AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Mayer,P.W.,W.B,DeOreo,E.M.Opitz,J.C.Kiefer,W.Y.Davis,andB.Dziegielewski.1999.Residential
EndUsesofWater.AWWAandAWWAResearchFoundation.
Melcer,H.,P.L.Dold,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,I.Takacs,H.D.Stensel,A.W.Wilson,P.Sun,andS.Bury.
2003.MethodsforWastewaterCharacterizationinActivatedSludgeModeling.WERFFinalReport.
Project99WWF3.
Meyer,J.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonFollowingSeparateStageNitrificationwithFixedFilm
SystemsforLowN(FiestaVillage).PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,
DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatistical
Reliability.WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Mulholland,M.R.,N.G.Love,D.A.Bronk,V.Pattarkine,A.Pramanik,andH.D.Stensel.2009.
EstablishingaResearchAgendaforAssessingtheBioavailabilityofWastewaterTreatmentPlant
DerivedEffluentOrganicNitrogeninTreatmentSystemsandReceivingWaters.February27.
Mulholland,M.R.,N.G.Love,V.M.Pattarkine,D.A.Bronk,andE.Canuel.2007.Bioavailabilityof
OrganicNitrogenfromTreatedWastewater.STACPublication07001.Availableonline:
www.chesapeake.org.
Pagilla,K.(2007)PresentationatWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundationandChesapeakeBay
ScienceandTechnologyAdvisoryCommitteeWorkshop,Baltimore,MD,September27/28,2007
PehlivanogluMantas,E.andD.L.Sedlak.2006.WastewaterDerivedDissolvedOrganicNitrogen:
AnalyticalMethods,Characterization,andEffectsAReview.CriticalReviewsinEnvironmental
ScienceandTechnology.36:261285.
Phillips,D.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonSeparateStageSuspendedGrowthNandDNProcessesfor
LOT(RiverOaks).PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,Demonstrated
ProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.
WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Sattayatewa,C.andK.Pagilla.2008.NitrogenSpeciesMeasurementinLowTotalNitrogenEffluents.
PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Sedlak,D.2007.TheChemistryofOrganicNitrogeninWastewaterEffluent:WhatItIs,WhatItWas,
andWhatitShallBe.PresentationattheSTACWERFWorkshop:EstablishingaResearchAgendafor
ReceivingWaters.Baltimore,MD,September,28,2007.
721
August2010
Sedlak,D.L.andE.Pehlivanoglu.(2007)rDONfateandavailabilitytonitrogenlimitedalgae.
PresentationatWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundationandChesapeakeBayScienceand
TechnologyAdvisoryCommitteeWorkshop,Baltimore,MD,September27/28,2007
Selock,K.2008.ManagersPerspectiveofaCombinedProcess(5StageBardenpho)ProcessforLOWN
SevereClimate(ParkwayWWTP).PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,
DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatistical
Reliability.WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.October,2008.
Spani,C.2008.ManagersPerspectiveonMultipleStepChemicalAddition(RockCreek)forLowP.
PresentedatWEFTECTechnicalEducationWorkshopNo.101,DemonstratedProcessesforLimitof
TechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsandStatisticalReliability.WEF/WERF.Chicago,IL.
October,2008.
STACWERF.2007.WorkshopConsiderationsandPresentations.EstablishingaResearchAgendafor
ReceivingWaters,Baltimore,MD,September,28,2007.
Takcs,I.2009.Modeling101,HowDoInfluentCharacteristicsAffectModelOutputs?Presentedat
Modeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignandOperationofWastewaterTreatment
Facilities.WEFDistanceLearningWebcastSeries.ModelingExpertGroupoftheAmericas.February
25,2009.
TenStatesStandards.2004.RecommendedStandardsforWaterWorks,2007Edition:Policiesforthe
ReviewandApprovalofPlansandSpecificationsforPublicWaterSupplies.WaterSupplyCommittee
oftheGreatLakesUpperMississippiRiverBoardofStateandProvincialPublicHealthand
EnvironmentalManagers.Availableonline:http://10statesstandards.com/waterstandards.html
USEPA.2002.OnsiteWastewaterTreatmentSystemsManual.OfficeofWaterandOfficeofResearch
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/625r00008/html/625R00008.htm
USEPA.2008a.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.OfficeofWastewater
USEPA.2008b.EnsuringaSustainableFuture:AnEnergyManagementGuidebookforWastewaterand
WaterUtilities.January.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/waterinfrastructure/pdfs/guidebook_si_energymanagement.pdf
USEPA.2009.AccessingIndividualNPDESPermitsandFactSheetsthroughEnvirofacts.National
PollutantDischargeEliminationSystem(NPDES).Websiteupdated13February2009.Website
Accessed29April2009.Availableonline:
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/permitissuance/permitscanning.cfm
722
August2010
VADEQ.2004.Chapter790.SewageCollectionandTreatmentRegulations.Commonwealthof
Virginia,StateWaterControlBoard.9VAC25790.Availableonline:
http://www.deq.state.va.us/export/sites/default/wastewater/pdf/DEQ_SCAT_Reg.pdf
WEF.2005.UpgradingandRetrofittingWaterandWastewaterTreatmentPlants.WaterEnvironment
FederationManualofPractice,No.28.Alexandria,VA:WEFPress.
WEF.2009.RunningAnEnergyEfficientWastewaterUtilityModificationsThatCanImproveYour
BottomLine.WEF Distance Learning Webcast Series. Moderator: J.C. Cantwell. Webcast presented June
24, 3009.
WERF.2008.DissolvedOrganicNitrogen(DON)inBiologicalNutrientRemovalWastewaterTreatment
Processes.H.D.Stensel,LeadEditor.WERFDissolvedOrganicNitrogenCompendium.Available
online:
http://www.werf.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Nutrients&CONTENTID=8726&TEMPLATE=/CM/Con
tentDisplay.cfm
Eleuterio,L.andJ.B.Neethling.2009.LowPhosphorusAnalyticalMeasurementStudy.Presentedat
NutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
WisconsinDNR.2006.GuidanceforWastewaterTreatmentFacility,DesignFlowDeterminations.
Availableonline:http://dnr.wi.gov/org/water/wm/glwsp/facilities/designflow.htm.Websiteupdated
28August2006.WebsiteAccessed:29April2009.
723
August2010
724
August2010
8.SelectingCandidateTreatmentProcessesforPlantUpgrades
Chapter8covers:
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.1
Introduction
TechnologySelectionFactors
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofTechnologyTypes
OverviewofRecommendedApproach
RecommendedUseofAdvancedTools
PatentIssues
References
Introduction
Selectionofcandidatetreatmentprocessesforplantupgradesisbasedonmanyfactors
includingtargeteffluentlimits,existingtreatment,spaceavailable,andoperatorpreference.Selection
ismoreofanartthanascienceandisinfluencedbytheexperiencesandpreferencesoftheownerand
designengineers.GuidanceinChapters3through7ofthismanualprovidesthebasisfortechnology
selection.Thischaptersummarizesthekeyfactorsinselectingcandidatetreatmentprocessesfor
removingnitrogen,phosphorus,orbothfromwastewater.
8.2
TechnologySelectionFactors
Firstandforemost,thetechnologyselectedforthewastewatertreatmentplant(WWTP)needs
tomeetthetargeteffluentlimitsfornitrogenandphosphorus.SeeChapter7forguidelineson
determiningtargeteffluentlimits.Chapter6providesadiscussionofattainableeffluentlimitsforthe
variousnutrientremovaltechnologies.ItisnotedinChapter6andworthreiteratingherethatthese
guidelinesarenotuniversalandthatattainablenutrientremovalissitespecificanddependsona
numberoffactorsincludingwastewatercharacteristics,existingplantconfiguration,redundancyand
reliabilityofequipment,andoperation.Thissectionprovidesageneraldiscussionofsomeimportant
factorsaffectingtechnologyselection.
8.2.1SeasonalPermitLimits
Aseasonalpermitlimitcanhaveasignificanteffectonthedesigncriteriaandtechnology
selection.AsnotedinChapter7,itiscommoninaridregionsofthecountryforregulatoryagenciesto
requirenitrogenremovalonlyduringthewarmmonths,suchasfromMay1throughOctober31.Under
thisscenario,WWTPscanstopnitrificationeachfallandrestartitinthemonthofAprilwhen
temperaturesarewarmertobringtheplantintocompliancebythebeginningofMay.Another
commonapproachistobasepermitlimitsonannualaveragevalues.Thisapproachallowstheplantto
maximizenitrogenremovalduringwarmmonthsandpracticevariableremovalduringthecoldmonths
aslongasitcanmeettheannualaveragevalue.
Becausecompletenitrificationcanbeachievedinwarmermonthsusingrelativelyshortsolids
residencetimes(SRTs),thevolumesofbiologicalreactorsandsecondaryclarifierscanbesignificantly
reducediftheplanthasaseasonalorannualaveragepermit.Conventionalbiologicalnitrogenremoval
81
August2010
schemessuchastheModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE),Anaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic3StagePhoredox(A2/0),
andVirginiaInitiativePlant(VIP)processes,ratherthanadvancedremovalschemessuchasthe4or5
stageBardenpho,hybrid,orfixedfilmsystems,mayprovidesufficienttreatmenttomeettheseasonal
permitconditions.MaintaininglowerSRTsisnotwithoutoperationaldisadvantages,however,because
itincreasestheamountofwastebiomasssludgeproducedandthereforeincreasessludgeprocessing
anddisposalcosts.Onthepositiveside,reducingtheSRTreducestheamountofenergyrequiredfor
aeration.
Therearesomeadvantagestooperatingunderanannualaveragepermitratherthanaseasonal
permit.ItismoredifficulttoreestablishnitrificationinAprilafterithasbeencompletelystopped,
whichistypicalofseasonalpermits,thanwhenithasbeenpartiallymaintained,asistypicalofannual
averagepermits.Also,withannualaveragepermits,aspecificeffluentconcentrationdoesnothaveto
bemetinMay.
Itisimportanttonotethatbiologicalphosphorusremovalsystemsbecomemoreefficientas
temperaturedecreasesaslongasVFAsdonotbecomelimitingandtherecycleofelectronacceptors
(dissolvedoxygenandnitrates)totheanaerobiczoneisnotsignificant.ThisisbecauseGAOs,the
primarycompetitorswithPAOsforVFAs,dependuponglycolysis,whichismoretemperaturesensitive
thantheenergygeneratingsystemofthePAOs.Therefore,asthetemperaturedecreasesbelow20oC,
thePAOsobtainanincreasingfractionoftheVFAsintheanaerobiczone,andtheirpopulationincreases
relativetotheGAOs.Therefore,eventhoughPAObiochemicalreactionsslowdownwithtemperature,
asistypicalofallbiochemicalreactors,performanceoftenimprovesbecauseoftheincreaseinthePAO
populationrelativetotheGAOpopulation.
Permitsmayrequiretotalnitrogen(TN)removalduringsomepartsoftheyear,butlimitonly
theammoniatototalKjeldahlnitrogen(TKN)portionatothertimesoftheyear.Ifseasonal
denitrificationisattempted,theacclimationperiodrequiredforthebiomasswithsomeexternalcarbon
sourcesneedstobeaccountedforintheoperationalstartupofdenitrification.Providingsufficienttime
foracclimationisimportanttoassuringthatthesystemisoperatingforremovalwhenthelimitsare
applied.Insomecases,operatorsusingmethanolasthecarbonsourcefordenitrificationcontinueto
feedsmalldosesevenwhenthecarbonisnotrequiredjusttomaintainthemethanolmetabolizing
biomass.
8.2.2 Footprint
Thespaceavailableattheplantforupgradescanbethedrivingfactorforselectingamongst
varioustypesofnutrientremovaltechnologies.Technologiesrequiringlargefootprintsmaynotbe
feasibleinanurbanareawithlimitedspaceavailableforexpansion.
Conventionalnitrogenremovaltechnologiestypicallyhavelargefootprints.Ifspaceislimited,
therearemanyalternativesforreducingbasinrequirementsfornitrificationanddenitrificationas
outlinedinSection8.4.
Thefootprintfortheadditionalanaerobiczoneforbiologicalphosphorusremovalisrelatively
small,varyingfrom5to15percentofthetotalvolume.Spacemaybeneededforrecyclepipingbutthe
pipingfrequentlycanbeplacedinsidetheexistingreactor(whichenablestheuseoflowheadpropeller
pumps).Inmanyretrofits,theanaerobiczonecanbecreatedinanexistingactivatedsludgebasinusing
baffles.
82
August2010

Thefootprintforaddingchemicalfeedfacilitiestoprecipitatephosphorusistypicallysmall.A
newsolidsremovalprocess(tertiaryclarification,effluentfiltration)mayrequirealargerfootprint.High
rateclarification(HRC)canbeusedinsteadofconventionalclarificationtoreducethefootprintsize.
ExamplesofpatentedHRCsystemsareprovidedinChapter6.
8.2.3 HydraulicConsiderations
Certainprocessesrequireadditionalpressurehead,whichissuppliedbypumps.Forexample,
pumpingistypicallyrequiredforplantswithdenitrifyingfiltersbecausesufficienthydraulichead
followingtheaerationbasinsisnotusuallyavailable.Pumpingisalsousuallyrequiredforeffluent
filtration.Theadditionofoverflowbaffleswithdifferentelevationstoatreatmentsystemmayinduce
someheadlossesandrequireadditionalpumping.Underflowbafflesprovideanequalamountof
protectionagainstbackflowsifcorrectlydesigned,anddosowithoutheadloss.
Membranebioreactorsrequireadditionalpumpingtoforcewaterthroughthemembrane
material.Pressuredrivensystemsareusedifthemembraneisconfiguredaftertheaerobicandanoxic
basins.Vacuumdrivensystemsuseapumptopullwaterthroughthemembranewhenitissubmerged
inabiologicalreactor.
8.2.4 ChemicalNeeds
Theadditionofanycommercialchemicalrequiresdelivery,storage,andsafetyproceduresin
additiontomixinganddosingequipment.Threetypesofchemicalsmaybeaddedtowastewaterfor
nutrientremoval:metalsaltsorlimetoprecipitatephosphorus;anexternalcarbonsourceforBPRor
denitrification;andlime,bicarbonates,orcausticsodatomaintainalkalinity.
Metalsaltsorlimecanbeaddedtowastewatertoprecipitatephosphateandsubsequently
removeitusingasolidsseparationprocess.Manyplantsthatarerequiredtomeetloweffluenttotal
phosphorus(TP)limitsthatuseBPRareincorporatingchemicalphosphorusremovalasabackupsystem
toensurethatlimitscanbemetintheeventofabiologicalupset.Multiplefeedpointsarealso
becomingmorecommon.
Asnotedintheprevioussection,anexternalorganiccarbonsourcemaybeneededforBPRor
denitrification.Commonexternalsourcesincludemethanol,ethanol,andaceticacid,aswellassimple
sugars.
Thenitrificationprocessconsumesalkalinity.Althoughthedenitrificationprocesscanadd
alkalinitybacktothemixedliquorforsinglesludgetreatmentsystems,thereisstilltypicallyanetlossin
alkalinityof50percentormore.AlkalinitydepletioncanresultinpHdecreasesandinterferewith
biologicalprocesses.Aspreviouslynoted,plantscanaddalkalinitytomaintainadequatelevelsby
addinglime,bicarbonates,orcausticsodatotheinfluent.
8.2.5 AvailableSludgeTreatmentandOptions
AsnotedinChapter4ofthismanual,lesssludgeproductionandbettersettlingandthickening
sludgeisfoundforactivatedsludgesystemsusinganoxic/aerobictreatmentfornitrogenremovalversus
83
August2010
aerobictreatmentonly.Theimpactthiswillhaveontotalsludgeproductiondependsuponhowmuch
wastesludgeisproducedbyothertreatmentunitssuchasprimaryclarifiersandtreatmentwith
precipitatingchemicals.AsnotedinChapter5,sludgefromBPRprocesseswillhavehigherphosphorus
contents,andthereforeahighersettlingvelocity,butwillotherwisebesimilartosludgefrom
conventionalactivatedsludgeplants.
Additionalsludgeproductionisseenasoneofthemajordisadvantagesofchemicalphosphorus
removalcomparedwithbiologicalmethods.Thevolumeofadditionalsludgeproducedvaries
dependingontheinfluentphosphorusconcentration,chemicalapplicationpoint(s),chemicalused,and
targeteffluentlimit.Chemicallytreatedsludgehasahigherinorganiccontentcomparedtoprimaryand
activatedsludgeandwillincreasetherequiredsizeofaerobicandanaerobicdigesters,aswellas
dewateringequipment.Theuseofmetalsaltscanresultinincreasedinorganicsalts(salinity)inthe
sludgeandintheeffluent.Salinitycancreateproblemswhenbiosolidsarelandappliedorwhenthe
effluentisreturnedtoexistingwatersupplyreservoirs.Limetraditionallyproducesahighersludge
volumecomparedtometalsaltsbecauseofitsreactionwithnaturalalkalinity.
Designersshouldcarefullyconsidertheimpactsofsludgeprocessingonnutrientreleaseinto
recyclestreams.Anaerobicdigestioncanreleaseammoniaandphosphorusinlargequantities,resulting
insignificantrecycleloadstothebiologicalnutrientremoval(BNR)processes.Anaerobicdigestionof
BPRsludgesalsoreleasesmagnesiumalongwiththeammoniaandphosphorus,resultinginthe
formationofstruvite.Thisstruvitetypicallyremainsentrappedinthedigestedsolidsandreducesthe
loadsintheliquidstreamrecycledbacktothemainstreamprocesses.Althoughphosphorusremovalby
struviteformationisadesirablephenomenonfromtheperspectiveofrecycleload,struvitecrystalscan
plugcentrifugeports,aswellaspumpsandpipesusedtoconveythesludge,ifnotcontrolled.However,
becauseofthehigherconcentrationsofmagnesiumandphosphorusinanaerobicdigesterswhenBPR
sludgesaredigested,most,ifnotall,ofthestruviteformationoccurswithinthesludgeandremainswith
thesludgeratherthanstayinginsolutionandformingstruviteafterleavingthedigesters.
Innovativeworkisunderwaytorecovernutrientsfromsludge(includingstruvite)andconvert
themintocommercialfertilizersandotherproductsinwhichtheycanbereused.SeeChapter14for
discussionofnutrientrecoverytechnologies.
8.2.6 EnergyConsiderations
Treatmentplantupgradesfornutrientremovaloftenrequireadditionalenergytooperate.If
theydonotalreadyexist,additionofrecyclestreamsforBNRwillrequireadditionalpumpingenergy.
Filterslikelyrequireadditionalelectricityforpumpingtoprovidethepressureheadonthefilters.
Membraneshavethehighestpumpingcostbecausetheyrequirethemostpressuretopushthewater
throughthemembranematerial.Thesmallerthemembraneporesize,thehigherthepumpingcosts.
Anaerobiczones,fermenters,andchemicalfeedpumpsusuallyrequirearelativelysmallamountof
energy(USEPA2008a).Althoughsomeprocessesareinherentlylessenergyintensivethanothers(e.g.,
oxidationditchvsnitrifyingdiffusedairactivatedsludge),energyrequirementsgenerallyincreasewith
leveloftreatment.Theexceptioniswhenaprimaryanoxiczoneisaddedfordenitrificationwhen
nitrificationisalreadybeingpracticed.Thereductionofbiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD)inthe
anoxiczonereducestheamountofenergyneededtotransferoxygenintheaerobiczone.IftheBNR
systemisanMLEoranA2/Oconfiguration,theanticipatedreductioninaerationenergyiscommonly
about20percent.Also,usinglowheadpropellerpumps,orequivalent,andnitraterecyclelinesthatare
84
August2010
internaltotheactivatedsludgebasinswillsignificantlyreducepumpingenergycomparedtorecycle
pumpstations.
Energyrequirementsfornutrientremovalcanbefurtherminimizedbyimplementingthe
following(Kangetal.2009):
Useofswingzones
Stepaerationinactivatedsludgebasins
Fermentersforinplantcarbongeneration
Automatedcontrolofaerationequipment
Sidestreamtreatment
Flowequalizationforrecycleflows
Energyrequiredfornutrientremovalcanalsobeoffsetbyenergyconservationmeasures
(ECMs).ECMsrangefromnocostoperationalimprovementssuchaspeakloadshavingand
optimizationofmixingandaeration,toplantupgradessuchaspumpreplacementsformoreefficient
variablefrequencydrives.Wastewaterutilitieshaveanopportunitytobeenergygeneratorsbyusing
biogasfromanaerobicdigestiontogenerateelectricityonsite.Manyenergyefficiencymeasureshavea
shortpaybackperiodforthewastewaterutilitytorealizepositivecostbenefits.
Implementationofenergyefficiencymeasuresbeginswithbenchmarkingcurrentperformance
andconductinganenergyaudittoidentifyareasofimprovement.EPAhasdevelopedguidelinesfor
energyefficiencybasedonthePlanDoCheckActmanagementsystemapproachtohelpoperators
identify,implement,measure,andimproveenergyefficiencyandrenewableopportunitiesattheir
utilities.Formoreinformationandguidance,refertothedocument,EnsuringaSustainableFuture:An
EnergyManagementGuidebookforWastewaterandWaterUtilities,availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/waterinfrastructure/pdfs/guidebook_si_energymanagement.pdf.
8.2.7 StaffingandTrainingRequirements
Apotentialdisadvantagetosomeemergingtechnologiesistheamountoftrainingrequiredto
operateanonconventionalsystem.Eventhoughemergingtechnologies,overthelongterm,maybe
lesscomplexthanconventionalsystems,operatorsmayhaveapreferenceforamoreconventionaltype
systemthatfitsinwiththeexistingtechnologies.However,manyoperatorsliketolearnabout
innovativeprocessesandfrequentlylearntooperatetheminwaysthatovercomedesignlimitations.
BNRprocesseshavebeenoperatedverywellbymanyoperatorsafterarelativelyshorttrainingperiod.
Itisespeciallyimportantthattheoperatorsunderstandthemajoroperatingfactorsthataffectthe
performanceoftheBNRsystem.Automatedprocesscontrolcaneasetheburdenonoperatorsandis
recommendedforsystemstargetingveryloweffluentTNandTPlevels.
8.2.8 TechnologySelectionConsiderationsforSmallFlowSystems
Nutrientremovalmayberequiredforverysmallordecentralizedwastewatertreatment
applications.Uniquefeaturesofthesetreatmentapplicationswithregardtowastewater
characteristics,operationsandmaintenancecapabilities,andwaterreusepotentialaffecttheprocess
selectionanddesignapproaches.Incontrasttolargerflowsystems,thediurnalvariationsinthe
wastewaterflowratesandconcentrationsaremuchmoredramatic,withalargeincreaseinflowand
85
August2010
wastewaterstrengthafterdaybreakandwithminimalwastewaterflowsinthelateeveningandearly
morninghours.Thewastewaterstrengthisalsotypicallymuchgreaterthanthatfoundforcentralized
wastewatertreatmentfacilitiesmuchofthetime,whichgreatlyaffectstheprocessselection
alternativestomeetloweffluentnutrientconcentrations.
Smallflowanddecentralizedwastewatertreatmentsystemsgenerallyhavelessresourcesfor
operationalandmaintenancestaff,whichfavorsselectingprocessesthathavelessmechanical
complexityand/orexhibitahighdegreeofreliability,andprocessdesignswithhighersafetyfactors.
Manysmallflowanddecentralizedwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesarelocatednearapplicationsfor
waterreuse,suchthattheprocessselectionincludesbothnutrientremovalandrequiredwaterquality
forwaterreuse.Astheneedforhighertreatmentlevelshasevolvedforsmallsystems,manyofthe
processescommonlyusedinthepastmaybeoutdatedandnewapproachesarecontinuallybeing
developed.Foradditionalguidanceforsmallflowsystems,pleaseconsulttheEPAwebsiteat:
http://cfpub.epa.gov/owm/septic/septic.cfm?page_id=268.
8.3
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofTechnologyTypes
Toassistintechnologyselection,Table81providessomeverygeneraladvantagesand
disadvantagesofsomecommontechnologytypes.Adiscussionfollowsthetable.
86
August2010
Table81.AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofTechnologyTypes
Technology
Type
Attachedgrowth
comparedtosuspended
growth
Advantages
Chemicalphosphorus
removalcomparedto
biologicalphosphorus
removal
Mainstreamtreatment
comparedtosidestream
treatmentofrecycle
streams
Disadvantages
Smallerfootprint
Canbiologicallynitrifyat
lowerSRTs
Moreresilienttoshockloads
Lessbiologicalsludge
production
Bettersettlingsludge
Notsusceptibletobiological
upsetsandis,thus,generally
consideredmorereliableand
controllable.
Canincreasesludgesettling
rates.
Flowequalizationcanhelp
withwetweatherflowsand
canprovideoperational
flexibility
Mainstreamtreatmentis
straightforwardwithexisting
processes,whereas
sidestreamtreatmentmay
requireoperatingtraining
andvendorsupport
Highoxygentransferrequirements
Operationislessflexible(i.e.,
accumulationofnitrifyingbiomass
islimitedbecauseofcompetition
withheterotrophicmicroorganisms
forDOandcarbon)
Secondaryprocesssuchas
chemicalprecipitationisneeded
forphosphorusremoval
Increasedsludgevolume
Consumesalkalinity,whichcan
affectnitrification
Ifaddedtosecondarytreatment,
increasedMLSSconcentrationand
therefore,increasedclarifier
volume
Chemicalcosts
Equalization(EQ)basinsrequire
additionalspace,highcapitalcosts.
Sidestreamtreatmentrequiresan
additionalbutsmallerfootprint
thanEQbasins
Continuoussludgedewatering
requires24houroperationvs.
dailyoperation
Emergingtechnologies
comparedtoestablished
technologies
Canofferimproved
efficiencyandoperational
costsavings
Limitedexperienceunderavariety
ofoperatingconditions
Attachedgrowthsystemscanbeusedtoconsiderableadvantagefornitrificationand
denitrificationbiologicalaeratedfilters(BAF)beinganexamplebuttheyaredifficult,thoughnot
impossible,touseforbiologicalphosphorusremoval.Consequently,whenBAFsareusedand
phosphorusremovalisalsorequired,thephosphorusisalmostalwaysremovedbychemical
precipitation.TheBAFshaveasmallfootprint,whichcanbeamajoradvantage,buttheytendtohave
higheroxygentransferenergycostswhenusedfornitrification,andorganiccarbonhastobeaddedfor
denitrification.Flexibilityfortreatmentofchangingflowsandloadsonlycomesfromhavingmultiple
units,someofwhichcanbetakenonandofflineattheappropriatetimes.
Theadditionoffixedfilmmediatoanactivatedsludgebasinhasseveraladvantages.The
attachedbiomassdoesnotflowforwardtothesecondaryclarifier,reducingthesolidsloadingtothe
clarifier.TheSRToftheattachedbiomassislong,sothattheaverageSRToftheattachedand
suspendedbiomassislongenoughtoaccomplishnitrificationunderconditionsthatwouldnotbe
87
August2010
conducivetonitrificationwithsuspendedbiomassalone.Thedisadvantagesarethecostsand
installationofthemediaandnecessaryappurtenancessuchasscreens,airknifes,recyclepumpsand
mixers,dependinguponthetypeofmediaselected.
ChemicalphosphorusremovalusingironoraluminumsaltscanbeusedinsteadofBPRorasa
supplementtoBPR.Theadvantagesofchemicalphosphorusremovalarethat(1)thechemicaladdition
canbeturnedonandoffwithoutanacclimationperiodorharmtothebiologicalprocesses,(2)removals
canbeobtainedevenwhentherearebiologicalupsets,(3)theprocessiseasytocontrolforconsistent
removaltolowlevels,and(4)theadditionofthechemicalsincreasesthesludgesettlingrateswhen
addeddirectlytothemixedliquor.Disadvantagesofchemicaladditionare(1)theincreaseinsludge
production;(2)thecostofthechemicalsandconsumptionofalkalinitybybothironandaluminum
chemicals,whichmayresultinaneedtoaddalkalinityforbothchemicalcoagulationandnitrification;
(3)andincreasesintheMLSSconcentrationsinthereactors.Itisimportanttonotethatadditionof
VFAstoabiologicalphosphorusremovalprocessmakesiteasiertocontrolsimilartochemicaladdition
forphosphorusremoval,withalesserincreaseinwastesludgeproduction.
Sidestreamscanbemanagedattheplantthroughmainstreamtreatmentorcanbetreated
separatelyusingaconventionaloradvancedsidestreamtreatmentprocess.Consistentlyloweffluent
TNdoesnotrequireremovalofnitrogenfromsidestreams;mainstreamtreatmentsuchasflow
equalizationorcontinuousdewateringoperationscanbejustaseffective(Barnard2006).Mainstream
treatmentcanbealowercostoptionbutoftenrequiresadditionalmonitoringandcontrolledoperation.
Also,operatorsaremorefamiliarwithmainstreamascomparedtoadvancedtreatmentoptions.
Advancedsidestreamtreatmentmethods,however,havebeenincreasinglyusedinrecentyears.They
typicallyhavesmalleroverallfootprints.SeeChapter6,Section6.6foradescriptionofseveraladvanced
sidestreamtreatmentprocesses.
8.4
OverviewofRecommendedApproach
Althoughselectionofthemostappropriatenutrientremovaltechnologydependsonmany
factors,designerscanbeginwithageneralizedapproachbasedonafewimportantexternalconditions,
namely:
TargeteffluentlimitsforTN
TargeteffluentlimitsforTP
AvailableSpace
Temperature
Asnotedthroughoutthisdesignmanual,simulatorsarethebesttoolforprocessselectionanddesign.
SeeChapter6fordetailedinformationontheavailabletechnologiesfornitrogenandphosphorus
removalatWWTPsandChapter10forguidanceonprocessselectionanddesignusingmodelsand
simulators.
1. TargeteffluentlimitsforTN
Forupto70percentremovalofTNfromthewastewaterandtypicallyproducingeffluent
concentrationsbetween5and8mg/L,dependingupontheinternalrecyclerate,thebasic
configurationofasingleanoxicandaerationzone(e.g.,theMLEprocess)withconventional
88
August2010
secondaryclarifiersisoftensufficient.Targeteffluentlevelsbetween5and8mg/Lyear
round,however,maybedifficulttoachievewiththistechnologyinareaswithverycold
climatesorwherewaterconservationhasledtoamoreconcentratedwastewater.
Typically,however,effluentconcentrationsinthatrangecanbeobtainediftheinternal
recycleratecanbeincreasedtohigherrates.ThisassumesthedesignpermitstheRASrate
tobeincreasedtoatleast100percentoftheinfluent,andpreferablyto150percent.
For70to90percentremovalofTNfromwastewaterandtypicallyproducingeffluent
concentrationsbetween3and5mg/L,asecondanoxiczonecanbeaddedaftertheaerobic
zonesuchasinthe4stageBardenphoprocessconfiguration,oraneffluentdenitrification
filtercanbeusedtoachievetherequiredremovalbydenitrifyingtheportionoftheflow
thatisnotrecycledtothefirstanoxiczone.Completedenitrificationbythe4stage
Bardenphoprocesstypicallyrequiresadditionofanexternalcarbonsourcetothesecond
anoxiczoneunlessaverylargesecondanoxiczoneisused.Removalcanbeimproved
throughoptimizationofinfluentloadingbyequalization,orbycontrollingrecyclestreams
andinfluentflowtopreventwashoutofnitrifiers.
For90percentormoreremovalofTNfromwastewaterandtypicallyproducingeffluent
concentrationsof3mg/Lorless,removalmaybecomelimitedbydissolvedorganic
nitrogen(DON)intheplanteffluent.Basedonastudyof188plants,effluentDON(or
EDON)typicallyrangesbetween0.5and1.5mg/L(Pagilla2007).Researchisongoinginto
thedesignandoperatingconditionsthatcanbeusedtominimizeEDON.Process
optimizationandautomatedcontrolsystemsbecomeveryimportantinachievingtheselow
TNlevels.Denitrificationfilterswithsupplementalcarbon(e.g.,methanol)additioncan
provideenhancedTNremovalconsistentlytoloweffluentlevels.
SeeChapter6,Section6.7,foradditionaldiscussionofattainableeffluentTN.
2. TargeteffluentlimitsforTP
For80to90percentremovalofTPfromwastewaterandtypicallyproducingeffluent
concentrationsof0.5to1.0mg/L,BPRshouldbesufficientaslongasthefollowing
conditionsaremet:
- Theratioofreadilybiodegradablecarbonaceousoxygendemand(rbCOD)toTP
(rbCOD:TP)issufficient.Typically,BPRwillworkforrbCOD:TPratiosof10to16or
greater;seeChapter5,Section5.2ofthisdesignmanualforadditionalinformation.
- Therecycleofdissolvedoxygenandnitratestotheanaerobiczonearecontrolled.
- Largeamountsofphosphorusarenotreleasedduringsludgehandlingandrecycledto
thebiologicalprocessinfluent.
Toconsistentlyachievelowlevelsunderallconditions,chemicaladditionshouldbe
consideredasabackup.
89
August2010
For90percentormoreremovalofTPfromwastewaterandtypicallyproducingeffluent
concentrationslessthan0.5mg/LTP,itiscommonforBPRplantswithprimarysettlingto
needsupplementalchemicaladditionunlesssludgefermentationorsupplementalorganic
carbonadditionispracticed.ThekeytoachievinglowTPlimitsisthesolidsseparation
process.Conventionalclarificationisnotsufficientinmanycases.Lowtargetlimitsmay
requireadvancedclarificationprocessesoreffluentfiltration.NotethateffluentTP
concentrationsof0.2mg/LorevenlesscanbeconsistentlyachievedwithBPRifadequate
amountsofVFAsarepresentintheanaerobiczone(throughfavorablerbCOD:TPratiosin
theinfluentorthroughVFAaddition)andrecyclestreamsarecarefullycontrolled.
SeeChapter6,Section6.7foradditionaldiscussionofattainableeffluentTP.
3. AvailableSpace.RetrofittingforBPRoraddingchemicalsforphosphorusremovalrequiresvery
littleinthewayofadditionalspaceatthetreatmentplant.Thefootprintfortheanaerobiczone
forBPRistypically5to15percentofthetotalanaerobic/aerobicvolume,andthiscanoftenbe
createdusingbafflesintheexistingbasin.Chemicaldosingequipmentisrelativelysmalland
canusuallybeconfiguredwithintheexistingplantlayout.Advancedsolids/liquidseparation
technologiessuchastertiaryclarificationorfiltrationcan,however,havelargefootprintsand
requireadditionalspace.Highrateballastedclarification(HRBC)shouldbeconsideredwhen
spaceisconstrained.
Althoughspacerequirementsforphosphorusremovalaretypicallylow,suspendedgrowth
aerationprocessesfornitrogenremovalrequirehighSRTsandthus,largebasinscomparedto
conventionalactivatedsludgeprocesses.Ifsufficientvolumeisavailableintheexisting
activatedsludgebasin,itcanbemodifiedtoconfigureseparateanoxicandaerobiczonesby
addingbaffles,mixersandaninternalrecycle.Theconfigurationoftheactivatedsludgebasin
determinesthecomplexityoftheinternalrecyclesystem.Sometimesallthatisneededisaport
inoneofthewallsandapropellerpumpinstalledintheporttopumptherecyclethroughthe
walltotheadjacentbasin.Ifsufficientvolumeisnotavailableintheexistingactivatedsludge
basins(whichisoftenthecase),additionalbasinsmaybeneeded.Designersshouldconsider
thefollowingapproachestominimizethefootprintforbiologicalnitrogenremovalwhenspace
isconstrained:
Increasethebiomassintheactivatedsludgebasinsusingacombinationsuspended
attachedgrowthsystemsuchasIntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS).Thiswill
reducethesizeofthebiologicalreactorsand,therefore,thefootprint.
Usemembranebioreactors(MBR)forliquidsolidsseparationinsteadofconventional
clarification.MBRsystemscanoperateatahighermixedliquorsuspendedsolids(MLSS)
concentration,therebyreducingbasinrequirementsforthebiologicalreactors.
UseanattachedgrowthreactorfornitrificationsuchasaBiologicalAeratedFilter(BAF).
Insteadofasecondanoxiczone,consideradenitrificationfilter.Denitrificationfiltershave
theaddedadvantageofachievingloweffluentTNlimitsbutusuallyrequireasupplemental
carbonsource.Theyalsorequireadditionalpumpingtoprovidethepressureheadtomove
waterthroughthefilter.
810
August2010
ConsiderbioaugmentationofnitrifierstoreducetheneededSRTintheactivatedsludge
basinandthusprovidemoretreatmentinasmallervolume.
Ifpeakflowsaretheissue,considerastepfeedsystemtohandlewetweatherevents
insteadofconstructingadditionalbasins.
4. Temperature.Biologicaltreatmentprocessesaresensitivetochangesintemperature.The
mostsensitiveprocessisnitrification,withtherateapproximatelydoublingforevery8to10oC
increaseintemperature(WEFandASCE,2006).Itisveryimportantthatdesignersconsiderthe
annualtemperaturerange,notjustthedesigntemperaturewhenselectingcandidate
technologies.Intemperateregionsofthecountry,fixedfilmsystemssuchasBAFandhybrid
systemssuchasIFAScompensatefortemperatureimpactsbymaintainingthenitrifiersinthe
systemforverylongSRTs.Aswingzonethatallowsoperatorstoswitchbetweenanoxicand
aerobiczonesalsocanhelpensureconsistentremovalundervaryingtemperatureconditions.
Lowtemperaturescanalsointerferewithfermentationofwastewaterinsewersandanaerobic
zonesandreducetheproductionofVFAsrequiredforBPR.Onsitesludgefermentationhas
successfullybeenusedincolderclimatestoaddressthisissue.Aspreviouslynoted,BPRprocess
performanceoftenimproveswithlowertemperaturesbecauseofmicrobialpopulationshifts
thatresultinlargerpopulationsofPAOsrelativetotheGAOs,assumingtherecycleofelectron
acceptorstotheanaerobiczoneiscontrolled.SeeSections4.5.3,5.4.4,and8.2.1ofthismanual
foradditionalinformationontheeffectsoftemperatureonBNR.
8.5
RecommendedUseofAdvancedTools
Thissectionintroducesthreeadvancedtoolsthatcanbeusedfordesigningupgradesfor
nutrientremoval:pilottesting,mathematicalmodeling,andbenchscaletesting.
Pilottestingofthepreferrednutrientremovalalternativeisverycommoninthewastewater
industry.Testingtypicallytakes6monthsto1yeardependingonseasonalvariabilityandcanbedone
duringtheplanningorpreliminarydesignphase.Althoughitcanbeexpensive,pilottestingallows
designerstosizeandconfigureunitprocessesbasedonactualwastewaterandbiomasscharacteristics
andcanreducesafetyfactorsandthus,savecapitalcostsconsiderablyinexcessofthecostofthestudy.
Mathematicalequationsrepresentingwastewatertreatmentprocessesandsimulation
programsusedtosolvethemhavebecomeincreasingpowerfulandcommoninrecentyears.Computer
modelinghasmanybenefitsovertraditionaldesignapproaches.Designerscanusemodelstoquickly
testmanydifferenttreatmentconfigurationsanddesignparametersinafractionofthetimeandcostof
performingtraditionaldesigncalculationsandlaboratoryorpilottests.Whilesettingupandcalibrating
modelscanbeacomplexprocess,itisultimatelyeasierandmorepowerfulthantraditionaldesign
methods,whendoneproperly.Modelinghasthereforebecomethepreferredmethodofdesignfor
nutrientremovalatWWTPs.Chapter10providesadditionaldiscussionofthebenefitsofmathematical
modelingalongwithdetailedguidanceonsettingupandrunningaprocesssimulationmodelfor
nutrientremoval.
Datafrombenchscaletestsarecommonlyusedtocalibrateprocesssimulationmodels.Oneof
themostimportanttestsfornitrificationisthedeterminationofmaximumspecificnitrifiergrowthrate.
Chapter10discussestheimportanceofthisparameterandsummarizesprovencharacterization
811
August2010
methods.Benchscaletestscanalsoprovideveryusefulinformationontherelativefractionsof
particulate,soluble,andreadilybiodegradableorganicmaterial(whichisveryimportantforbiological
phosphorusremoval)andcanbeusedtoestimaterDON.Determinationofnonbiodegradable
suspendedsolidsfractionsisalsoveryimportantforaccurateestimatesofdesignMLSSconcentrations.
Becausereactionsarecomplexanddifficulttogeneralize,jartestingforchemicalphosphorusremovalis
alsohighlyrecommended.Benchscaletestingisalsocommonandrecommendedforevaluating
alternativecarbonsources.
8.6
Patentissues
Apatentisessentiallyatypeofpropertyright.Itgivesthepatentholdertherighttolimitothers
frommaking,using,offeringforsale,orsellingtheinventionintheUnitedStatesorimportingthe
inventionintotheUnitedStates.Ingeneral,thetermofapatentis20yearsfromthedatethatthe
patentapplicationwassubmitted.TheU.S.PatentandTrademarkOffice(USPTO)isthegovernment
agencyresponsibleforreviewingapplicationsandissuingpatents.
Therearethreetypesofpatents(USPTO2009):
Utilitypatentsmaybegrantedtoanyonewhoinventsordiscoversanynewandusefulprocess,
machine,articleofmanufacture,orcompositionofmatter,oranynewandusefulimprovement
thereof.
Designpatentsmaybegrantedtoanyonewhoinventsanew,original,andornamentaldesign
foranarticleofmanufacture.
Plantpatentsmaybegrantedtoanyonewhoinventsordiscoversandreproducesanydistinct
andnewvarietyofplant.
Patentsforwastewatertreatmenttechnologiesareusuallyutilitypatents.
Ifapatentedprocessisselectedfornutrientremoval,licenseandroyaltyfeesmayapplyand
shouldbeincludedinthecostanalysis.Feesareusuallynegotiatedbetweenthepatentholderandthe
plantowner.Tosearchforpatents,usetheUSTPOdatabase,availableonlineathttp://patft.uspto.gov/
orvisitapatentandtrademarkdepositorylibrary.Referto
http://www.uspto.gov/go/ptdl/ptdlib_1.htmlforlibrarylocationsinyourstate.
Ingeneral,patentandlicensingfeesarenotrequiredforbiologicalphosphorusremoval
systems.SomeofthebiologicalphosphorusremovaltechnologieslistedinChapter6ofthismanual
mayhaveatonetimebeenpatented,butmanyhavebeeninuselongerthanthepatentperiod.
Proprietarysystemsforattachedgrowthnitrificationandsidestreamprocessesarepatented,butthe
patentfeesareincludedinthepricefromthemanufacturer.
812
August2010
8.7
References
ProceedingsoftheWaterEnvironmentFederation,WEFTEC2006.
Bilyk,K.,J.Rohrbacher,T.Bruton,P.Pitt,R.Latimer.2009.EvaluatingtheCostandProcess
PerformanceofCarbonAlternativestoMethanol.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,
DC.WEF.
deBarbadillo,C.,J.Barnard,S.Tarallo,andM.Steichen.2008.GotCarbon?Widespreadbiological
nutrientremovalisincreasingthedemandforsupplementalsources.WaterEnvironment&
deBarbadillo,C.,P.Miller,andS.Ledwell.2009.AComparisonofOperatingIssuesandDosing
RequirementsforAlternativeCarbonSourcesinDenitrificationFilters.PresentedatNutrientRemoval
2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Copithorn,R.R.,G.D.Farren,D.SenandC.W.Randall.1993.FullScaleEvaluationofNitrificationand
DenitrificationonFixedFilmMedia(Ringlace)forDesignofaSingleSludgeNitrogenRemovalSystem,
ProceedingsLiquidTreatmentProcesses,66thAnnualConferenceWaterEnvironmentFederation,
(3):137148.Anaheim,California,October30,1993.
Cherchi,C.,A.OnnisHayden,andA.Z.Gu.2009.AbilityofSpecificEnrichedDenitrifyingCultureto
UtilizeOtherCarbonSources.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Gellner,W.J.,L.Samel,D.Howard,Al.Stone,andP.Pitt.2008.WhenConventionalDesignBidBuild
ApproachisUnconventionalDesignandBiddingofIFASFullScalePilotatGreensboro,NorthCarolina.
InProceedingsoftheWaterEnvironmentFederation,WEFTEC2008.
Johnson,T.L.,J.McQuarrie,andA.Shaw.2004.IntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS):The
NewChoiceforNitrogenRemovalUpgradesintheUnitedStates.InProceedingsoftheWater
EnvironmentFederation,WEFTEC2004.
Kang,S.J.,K.P.Olmstead,K.M.Takacs,J.Collins,J.Wheeler,andP.Zharaddine.2009.Sustainabilityof
FullScaleNutrientRemovalTechnologies.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.
WEF.
Maquarrie,J.,D.Waltrip,R.Rutherford,W.Thomas,C.Bott,R.Baumler,andD.Katehis.2009.Full
ScaleDesignChallengesfortheJamesRiverTreatmentPlantIFASImprovementProject:Usinga
DemonstrationScaleProjectoOptimizeFinalDesign.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.
Washington,DC.WEF.
Majed,N.,A.OnnisHayden,T.Welander,andA.Z.Gu.2009.DecouplingandOptimizationofBothP
andNRemovalinanAdvancedIFASEBRPMBRSystem.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.
Washington,DC.WEF.
OnnisHayden,A.,N.Majed,K.McMahon.,A.Gu.2008.PhosphorusRemovalandPAOsPopulationsat
aFullScaleIntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS)Plant.InProceedingsoftheWater
813
August2010
Phillips,H.M.andE.Kobylinksi.2007.SidestreamTreatmentvs.MainstreamTreatmentofNutrient
ReturnswhenAimingforLowEffluentNitrogenandPhosphorus.InProceedingsoftheWater
Randall,C.W.,andD.Sen.1995.FullScaleEvaluationofanIntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS)
ProcessforEnhancedNitrogenRemoval.Wat.Sci.Tech.(33)12:155162.ElsevierScienceLtd.,GB.
Sriwiriyarat,T.,andRandall,C.W.2005.EvaluationofIFASWastewaterTreatmentProcessesatHigh
MCRTandLowTemperatures.JournalofEnvironmentalEngineering.ASCE.131(11):15501556.
Thomas,W.A.,C.B.Bott,P.Regmi,G.Schafran,J.McQuarrie,B.Rutherford,R.Baumler,andD.Waltrip.
2009.EvaluationofNitrificationKineticsfora2.0MGDIFASProcessDemonstration.Presentedat
NutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
USEPA.2008a.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.OfficeofWastewater
http://www.epa.gov/OWM/mtb/mnrtvolume1.pdf
USEPA.2008b.EmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeather
WEFPress.
WERF.2008.CarbonAugmentationforBiologicalNitrogenRemoval.JulianSandino,LeadEditor.
WERFDissolvedOrganicNitrogenCompendium.
U.S.PatentOffice.2009.UnitedStatesPatentandTrademarkOffice,MainWebpage.Website
Accessed8May2009.http://www.uspto.gov/main/patents.htm
814
August2010
9. DesignApproachforPhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAddition
Chapter9covers:
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
9.1
Introduction
SelectingaChemicalPrecipitant
SelectingPoint(s)ofApplication
DeterminingChemicalDose
DesigningaChemicalFeedSystem
DesigningforRapidMixingandFlocculation
OperationalFactors
References
Introduction
Manywastewatertreatmentplants(WWTPs)thatarerequiredtoremovephosphorusdosoby
addingchemicalstoprecipitatephosphateandthenremoveitusingsolidsseparationtechniques.
Chemicalsmaybeaddedtoprimary,secondary,ortertiaryprocesses,oratmultiplelocationsinthe
plant.Chemicalsusedforphosphorusprecipitationincludemetalsalts,suchasferricchlorideand
aluminumsulfate(alum),andlime.
Chapter3explainedtheprinciplesofphosphorusremovalbychemicaladdition.Thepurposeof
thischapteristoprovideguidanceonkeydesignandoperationalissues.Thischaptersdiscussionon
solidsseparationfocusesonadvancedwastewaterclarification,whileeffluentfiltrationisdiscussedin
depthinChapter11.
9.2
SelectingaChemicalPrecipitant
Chemicalsforprecipitationarebasedoneitheraluminum(III),ferric(III),ferrous(II),orcalcium
(II)compoundsthatreactwithsolublephosphorus.Themostcommonchemicalsusedarealuminum(III)
andferric(III)compounds;inparticular,thetwometalsaltsaluminumsulfate(alum)andferricchloride.
Alumandferricchloridehavesimilarpropertiesandperformance.Comparedwithlime,theycreateless
sludgeandtendtobemorepopularwithoperators.Polymerscanbeaddedwithmetalsaltstoimprove
settlingortheremovalofprecipitatedphosphateviafiltration.
9.2.1 AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMetalSalts
Table91listsmetalsaltsavailableforphosphorusremovalandprovidesasummaryofavailable
formsandstoragerequirements,advantages,anddisadvantages.Adiscussionoftheadvantagesand
disadvantagesoflimeisprovidedinsection9.2.2.Notethatphosphorusremovalbymetalsaltsisbased
onstoichiometrywhereasremovalbylimeisbasedonachievingatargetpHrange.
91
August2010
Table91.AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofCommonAluminumandIronSalts
Type
Aluminum
Aluminum
sulfate(alum)
Sodium
1
aluminate
AvailableFormsandStorageIssues
Polyaluminum
Chloride(PACl)
Liquidordryform
Stableatroomtemperaturesin
closedcontainersundernormal
storageconditions
Nearunlimitedshelflife
Corrosive,dustisirritant
Liquidordryform
Liquidhas23monthshelflife,
strongalkali,handleascaustic
Dryhas6monthshelflife,non
corrosive,dustisirritant
Availableasliquid,hydrate
form.Availableindifferent
strengths
Corrosivemineralacid.
Requiresacidresistant
materialslikePVC,Teflon,
rubber,andceramicmaterials
Iron
Ferricchloride2
Advantages
Availableasliquid
Verycorrosive
Stainsconcreteandother
materials
Mostcommonformof
aluminumsalt.Hasbeen
usedtoachieveloweffluent
phosphorusconcentrations
Doesnotconsumealkalinity
Appropriateforlow
alkalinitywastewateror
wherepHisalreadylowand
furtherdepressionshould
beavoided
DoesnotchangepHof
wastewater
Variousformulations
(multiplealuminumatoms
bondedwithchloride)
availabledependingon
manufacturer
Canhelplowerturbidity
Morecommonthanferrous
chlorideorferroussulfate
Hasbeenusedtoachieve
loweffluentphosphorus
concentrations
Disadvantages
Ferrouschloride
Availableasliquid
Slightlylesscorrosivethan
ferricchloride
Canbeavailableasalow
costindustrialbyproduct
Mayneedexcesstodepress
thepHtoanoptimal
operatingenvironment
Alumsludgemaybemore
difficulttothickenand
dewaterthanironsludge
DissolvedCO2orotheracidity
isneededtoavoidpH
increaseaboveoptimum
zone
Performanceconsidered
inferiortoalum
Notcompatiblewithcarbon
steel,stainlesssteel,brassor
aluminum
Unitcostmaybehigher
Especiallycorrosiveand
requiresspecialpiping
Inplantswithpoorsolids
capture,ferricchloridemight
impartaslightreddishcolor
toeffluent
CanbeanissueifUV
3
disinfectionisdownstream
Ifindustrialbyproducts,may
havelargeamountsof
impurities,suchasfreeacid
ormetals
Produceslowphosphorus
levelsonlyathighpH
Ifindustrialbyproducts,may
havelargeamountsof
impurities,suchasfreeacid
Produceslowphosphorus
levelsonlyathighpH
Canbeavailableasalow
Availabledry
costindustrialbyproduct
Acidicwhendissolved
Oxidizesinmoistair
Cakesatstoragetempabove
20C
1. Granulartrihydrateisacommoncommercialform
2. FerricisalsoacommontradenameforFeCl3andalso40percentliquidFeCL3solution.
3. Potentialforproblemsdependsonchemicalapplicationpoint.Ofgreatconcernifitisaddedinchemicaltreatment
processpreceedingUVdisinfection.
Source:WEFandASCE(1998);USEPA(1987a);Gulbrandsen(2008);Tchobanoglousetal.(2003).
Ferroussulfate
92
August2010
9.2.2 AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofLime
AsexplainedinChapter3,limefirstreactswithbicarbonatealkalinitytoformcalcium
carbonate.AsthepHincreases,excesscalciumionswillreactwiththephosphorustoprecipitate
hydroxylapatite(Ca5(OH)(PO4)3).
Theprimaryreasonsforinfrequentuseoflimeforphosphorusremovalare:
Thesubstantialincreaseinthemassofsludgetobehandledcomparedtothatfromuseof
metalsalts.
PhosphorusprecipitationtolowconcentrationsoccursathighpHlevels(1112),andpH
neutralizationisrequiredbeforeeffluentdischarge.
Theoperationandmaintenanceproblemsassociatedwiththehandling,storage,and
feedingoflime.
Limesludgecanreach0.5percentofthevolumeofwastewatertreated(Tchobanoglousetal.
2003).Toavoidthislargeproductionofsludge,plantscanconsideraddinglimeinatertiaryprocess.
Tertiarydesignscanbesinglestagewithonerapidmix,flocculation,sedimentation,andrecarbonation
basinoratwostageprocesswithasecondsedimentationbasin,whichallowsforbettercontroland
higherremoval.Additionoflimetoprimarytankshastheadvantage,however,ofremovingsubstantial
amountsoftotalsuspendedsolids(TSS)andbiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD),reducingsecondary
treatmentrequirements.
Thekeyvariableinphosphorusremovalusinglimeisalkalinity.Ifthealkalinityistoolow,lime
additionwillcreateapoorlysettleablefloc(WEFandASCE1998).Ifthealkalinityismoderatetohigh(>
150milligramsperliter(mg/L)),theflocwillcontainagreaterfractionofdensecalciumcarbonate
precipitate,whichleadstoenhancedsettling.WEFandASCE(1998)reportexcellentphosphorus
removalwithhighalkalinitywaterswithlimetreatmenttoapHof9.5to10,buthigherpHvaluesare
commonlyused.Regardlessoftheapplicationpoint,pHadjustmentisneededfollowinglimetreatment
andisusuallyaccomplishedbyaddingcarbondioxideoraliquidacidsuchassulfuricacid,nitricacid,or
hypochlorite(Tchobanoglousetal.2003;USEPA1999).
Chemicalcostsforlimecanbereducedbyrecoveringlimeonsiteusinglimerecalcination.
Recalcinationisachievedbyheatingthesludgeto980oCtoconvertcalciumcarbonatetolime.The
carbondioxidefromthisprocesscanbeusedasasourceforrecarbonationofthewaterforpH
adjustment.
Limerequiresspecialhandlingthatsetsitapartfrommetalsalts.Carbonatescalingcanformon
equipmentandpipes.Limeslaking,wherequicklime(CaO)isreactedwithwatertoformCa(OH)2,isthe
biggestoperationaldisadvantage.Section9.5.2.3providesadiscussionoflimeslaking.
Althoughlimehadlostfavorduetoissuesassociatedwithchemicalhandlingandsludge
production,ithasbeenregainingpopularitybecauseofitsabilitytoreducephosphorustoverylow
levelswhencombinedwitheffluentfiltration,aswellasitsbeneficialmicrobialcontrolpropertiesduring
sludgedigestion.WEFandASCE(1998)reportthatresidualphosphorusconcentrationsof0.1to0.2can
beachievedwithlimetreatmentandgranularmediafiltration.TheUpperOccoquanSewageAuthority
AdvancedWastewaterTreatmentPlant,FairfaxCounty,VA,hasroutinelyandconsistentlyachieved
effluentsolublephosphorusconcentrationsoflessthan0.05mg/Lusinghighlimetreatmentfollowed
93
August2010
bysandfiltrationsinceJulyof1978,aperiodofmorethanthirtyyears.Theeffluentrequirementforthe
facilityovertheentireperiodoftimehasalwaysbeen0.1mg/LTP.
9.2.3 Costs
AccordingtotheU.S.GeologicalSurvey(USGS)2007MineralsYearbook,thecostforquicklime
in2007was$76.70perton,andhydratedlimecost$92.90perton(Miller2008).Dryalumcancost
around$260perton,andatonofliquidferricchloridecancostaround$400(YubaCity2007;Cityof
EastMoline2007;CityofSantaCruz2006;SaginawCityCouncil2006).Limeandotherchemicalcosts
areexpectedtocontinuetoriseinthecomingyearswithincreasingglobaldemandforchemicals,rising
oilprices,andpotentialsupplyshortages,whichcanbeworsenedbycertainlocalconditionslike
weathereventsthatdisruptdistributionsystems(Plank2008).
9.3
SelectingPoint(s)ofApplication
Metalsaltscanbeaddedatoneormultiplelocationswithinatreatmentplanttoremove
phosphorus(seeFigure91forpossiblepointsofchemicaladditionforaconventionalWWTP).Pre
precipitationiswhenchemicalsareaddedtorawwaterpriortoprimaryclarificationtoprecipitate
phosphorusintheprimarysedimentationbasins.Coprecipitationinvolvesaddingchemicalsdirectly
tothebiomassinthebiologicalsystemtoformprecipitatesthatcanberemovedwithbiologicalsludge.
Postprecipitationiswhenchemicalsareaddedaftersecondarysedimentationandprecipitantsare
removedinatertiaryprocesssuchassedimentationorfiltration(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Chemicals
alsocanbeaddedtowasteorrecyclestreamstoreducetherecycleofphosphorusreleasedduring
sludgehandling.Forexample,attheAlexandriaSanitaryAuthorityAdvancedWastewaterTreatment
Plant,thealuminthereturnstreamwasreportedtoaidinphosphorusremovalthroughtheplant(EPA
Region102007).
94
August2010
C
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Solids
Processing
Figure91.Possibleapplicationpointsforchemicaladdition(C).
Source:AdaptedfromBottetal.(2007),withPermissionfromtheWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation.
Table92summarizestheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofpossiblefeedpointsformetalsalts.
Theoptimalpointofchemicaladditionisspecificforagivenplantanddependsontheexisting
treatmentconfiguration,treatmentgoals,choiceofchemicals,andsolidshandlingissues.Oneofthe
mainadvantagesofmultiplepointadditionisasavingsintotalchemicalusage.Theamountofmetalsalt
perunitofphosphorusremovalincreasesasthefinalphosphorusconcentrationdecreases.Byusing
multipleadditionpoints,alargeportionofthephosphorusremovalcanbedoneatahigherphosphorus
concentrationandlowermetal/phosphorusremovalratio.
LimecannotbeaddeddirectlytobiologicaltreatmentprocessesbecauseitraisesthepHabove
10forphosphorusremovalandactivatedsludgeprocessespreferspHlevelsbelow8.5.Limecanbe
addedtoprimarysedimentationtanksandremovedwiththeprimarysludgeoritcanbeaddedasa
tertiarytreatmentprocessafterbiologicaltreatment.Whenaddedtoprimarytanks,itwillalsoresultin
theremovalofcolloidalmaterialthroughcoagulationandsettling,withaconcomitantremovalofTSS
upto80percentandCODupto60percent.Ineithercase,theneedforpHadjustmentfordownstream
processesshouldbeconsideredandistypicallyaccomplishedbyaddingCO2oraliquidacidsuchas
sulfuricacid,nitricacid,orhypochlorite(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
Itisimportanttonotethatdownstreambiologicaltreatmentmaybenegativelyaffectediftoo
muchphosphorusisremovedbychemicaladditioninprimarytreatment,asphosphorusisanessential
nutrientforgrowthofmicroorganisms.Foractivatedsludge,theminimumratioofphosphorustofive
daybiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD5)forarapidlygrowinglowsolidsretentiontime(SRT)systemis
typicallyabout1:100(WEFandASCE1998).Note,however,thattheamountofphosphorus(andall
othernutrients)requiredisafunctionofnetbiomassyieldanddecreasesastheoperatingSRT
increases.
95
August2010
Table92.AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMetalSaltApplicationPoints
ApplicationPoint
Advantages
Disadvantages
ControlissueofleavingenoughPfor
biotreatmentbutlowenoughforeffluent
Doesnotremovepolyphosphateswhich
willbeconvertedtoorthophosphateinthe
bioprocess
Competingreactionsforhydroxidescan
decreasedoseefficiency
Removesalkalinitybeforenitrification
process,whichcanresultinlowpHlevels
thatinhibitnitrification
RemovesBODthatcanbeused
downstreamfordenitrification.Canresult
inlargeranoxictanksoranincreasedneed
foranexogenouscarbonsourcefor
nitrogenremoval.
Removesalkalinitywithinthebiological
nitrificationprocesswhichcanlowerpH
andinhibitnitrification
MLSSincreaseswithproductionof
chemicalsludge,whichincreasesthesolids
loadingtothefinalclarifiers.Mayneed
largeractivatedsludgetanksorlarger
clarifiers.
PrimaryClarifieronly
(preprecipitation)
RemovesadditionalBODand
solids
Useslowerstoichiometricdose
Ironadditioncanreducesulfide
odors
Reducesoxygentransfer
requirementsinthebiological
process,andreducestheamount
ofexcessbiomasssludge
produced.
SecondaryTreatment
only,e.g.,aeration
basinorbefore
secondaryclarifier(co
precipitation)
ForeffluentPlessthan1.0mg/L
goodfinalcontrolpointfor
chemicaldosing
Polyphosphatesconvertedso
mostofPisavailable
MayhelpimproveTSSremovalin
clarifiers
HelppreventfoulinginMBR
systems
TertiaryTreatmentonly
(postprecipitation)
ForeffluentPlessthan0.5mg/L
goodfinalcontrolpointfor
chemicaldosing
Polyphosphatesalready
convertedsomostofPis
available
WillhelpimproveTSSremoval
Canrecycleprecipitantto
headworksforaddedPremoval
Filtrationincreasescapitalandoperating
costs
Filtrationincreasesoperationalcomplexity
andmaintenance
Filtersolidsbreakthroughcanleadto
spikesineffluentP
Premovaltolowlevelscaninhibitor
preventnitrogenremovalby
denitrificationfilters
Requiresseparatesludgehandling
CanachievelowereffluentTP
concentration
Optimizationofchemicaldoseto
lowerrequirements
Goodcontrolpointatfinaldosing
Providesflexibility
Additionalcostsforchemicalfeedand
controlequipmentinmultiplelocations.
Additionaloperationalcomplexity
Multiple
96
August2010
9.4
DeterminingtheChemicalDose
Chapter3,Section3.3.2providesadetaileddiscussionofthereactionsbetweenphosphorus
andchemicalprecipitantsandofdosingtheory.Forphosphorusremovalusingmetalsalts,themolar
ratioofthemetaltothesolublephosphorusconcentration(Medose/Pini)isthebasisforthechemical
dose.AsnotedinChapter3,recentresearchbySmithetal.(2007)showedthatfortypicalinfluent
phosphateconcentrations.
Dosesabove1.5to2.0Medose/Piniratiosaresufficienttoremove80to98percentofsoluble
phosphorus.
Reachingverylowlimitsrequiressignificantlyhigherratiosontheorderof6to7Medose/Pini.
Seetheexampleonthenextpageforanapproachtocalculatinganinitialferricchloridedoseusing
theseguidelines.
Forphosphorusremovalusinglime,thedoseisgenerallyindependentofthephosphorus
concentrationbecausethelimefirstreactswithalkalinitytoprecipitatehydroylapatite(seeChapter3
formoreinformation).Therecommendeddoseoflimeistypically1.4to1.6timesthetotalalkalinity
expressedasCaCO3(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
97
August2010
Example91:DeterminingInitialFerricChlorideDoseforPhosphorusRemoval
Problem:AWWTPoperatorwantstouseferricchloride(FeCl3)toremovephosphateinthe
secondaryclarifier.Theplantsflowrateis1.0MGD,andthemeasuredphosphateconcentration
enteringthesecondaryclarifieris4mg/LasP.
AssumptionsandConstants:
Ferricchloridesolutionstrength=40percent
Densityofferricchloridesolution=1.4kg/L
MolecularweightofFe=55.85
MolecularweightofFeCL3=162.2
MolecularweightofP=30.97
Solution:
1.Determinetheweightofiron(Fe)availableperliterofliquidferricchloride.
a.TheweightofFeCl3/Lperliterofferricchloridesolutionis:
FeCl3/L=(0.40)(1.4kg/L)=0.56kg/L
b.TheweightofFeperliterofferricchloridesolutionis:
Fe/L=FeCl3/LxmolecularweightofFe/molecularweightofFeCl3
=(0.56kg/L)x(55.85/162.2)=0.193kg/L
2.DeterminetheweightofFerequiredperunitweightofP.
a.Targetdosage =2.0moleFe(Fedose)per1.0moleP(Pini)toremoveupto98percentof
phosphate
b.Ironrequired
=2x(Fedose/Pini)
=2x(55.85/30.97)=3.61kgFe/kgP
3.DeterminetheamountofferricchloridesolutionrequiredperkgP.
Ferricchloridedose =3.61kgFexLferricsoln=18.70Lferricsoln/kgP
1kgP0.193kgFe
4.Determinetheamountofferricchloridesolutionrequiredperday
a.Convert1.0MGDtoL/d
=1x106gal/dx3.785L/gal=3.785x106L/d
b.Ferricchloridesolution/d =(3.785x106L/d)x(4mgP/L)x(18.65Lferricsoln/kgP)
(1x106mg/kg)
=283Lferricchloridesolution/dx1gal/3.785L
=74.8gal/d
98
August2010

Whiletheliteratureprovidesgoodgeneralguidelinesonchemicaldosesforphosphorus
removal,itdoesnotaccountforsitespecificfactorssuchastheinfluenceofcompetingreactionsand
theeffectsofpHandalkalinity.Thus,designersshouldconductjartestingtodeterminetheoptimum
doseandmixingconditionsforthespecificwastewatertobetreated.Jartestingisafast,lowcost
procedurethatiscommonlyusedinthewaterandwastewaterindustry.Itsimulatesrapidmixingand
flocculationonasmallscaletopredicttheperformanceoflargescaletreatmentoperations.Figure92
showsacommonjartestapparatus.Multipletestscanbeconductedatthesametimetocompare
alternativedoses,pHranges,ormixingspeeds.
Figure92.Schematicofcommonjartestingapparatus.
Source:PolandandPagano,1998,http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/wtprimer/jartest/jartest.html
Althoughjartestingiscommon,carefulplanningisstillrequired.Keystosuccessfuljartesting
aresummarizedinthetextboxbelow.
KeystoSuccessfulJarTesting
Determinevariablestobetested(i.e.,effectoftemperature,pH,
mixingintensity,etc.)
Varyonlyoneparameter(e.g.,alumdose)atatime.Allofthe
othervariablessuchasmixingrateandcontacttimeshouldremain
constantduringagiventest.
Becarefultomixsamplesthoroughlypriortotesting.
Selectreactionandflocculationtimestomirroroperational
conditionsattheplant.
Source:adaptedfromWERF2008

99
August2010
9.5
DesigningaChemicalFeedSystem
Theobjectiveofanyfeedsystemistoaddthechemicaltothewastewateratacontrolledrate.
Designersshouldalwaysconsiderthepropertiesofthechemicalbeingadded(aslistedintheMaterial
SafetyDataSheet)andstaterequirementswhendesigningthechemicalstorageandfeedsystem.
Safetyprecautionssuchascontainmentincaseofspillandpersonnelsafetyequipmentrequirements
areextremelyimportant.
Table93summarizesthetypesofchemicalfeederstypicallyusedatmunicipalWWTPs.Section
9.5.1providesguidancefordesignofliquidfeedsystems,followedbySection9.5.2withguidanceonthe
designofdryfeedsystems,includinglime.
Table93.TypesofChemicalFeeders
Category
FeederType
Use
General
DryFeeder:
Volumetric
Oscillatingplate
Oscillatingthroat
(universal)
Rotatingdisc
Rotatingcylinder
(star)
Screw
Ribbon
Belt
DryFeeder:
Gravimetric
Continuousbelt
andscale
Lossinweight
Solution
Feeder:
Nonpositive
Displacement
SolutionFeed:
Positive
displacement
Proportional
Pump
Decanter(lowering
pipe)
Orifice
Rotameter
(calibratedvalue)
Lossinweight(tank
w/controlvalve)
Rotatingdipper
Diaphragm
Piston
1.
2.
3.
Anymaterial,granules,or
powder
Anymaterial,anyparticlesize
EquipmentLimitations
Capacity
Feedrate
(m3/h)1
range2
0.0013.1
40to1
0.0029.0
40to1
Usediskunloader
forarching
0.0010.09
20to1
0.7180
0.6527.0
0.0051.7
10to1or
100to1
20to1
0.0020.015
10to1
0.009270
10to1
Usehopperor
agitatorto
maintain
constantdensity
0.0020.18
100to1
0.0027.2
100to1
MostmaterialsincludingNaF,
granules,orpowder
Anymaterial,granules,or
powder
Dry,freeflowingmaterial,
powder,orgranular
Dry,freeflowingmaterial,
powder,granular,orlumps
Dry,freeflowingmaterialup
to1.5insize,powder,or
granular
Dry,freeflowinggranular
material,orfloodable
material
Mostmaterials,powder,
granular,orlumps
Mostsolutionsorlight
slurries
Mostsolutions
Clearsolutions
0.00090.9
100to1
Noslurries
Noslurries
10to1
10to1
Mostsolutions
Noslurries
0.0150.045
0.00050.015
0.00020.018
0.00020.018
Mostsolutionsorslurries
0.0092.7
100to1
Mostsolutions,Specialunit
for5%slurries3
Mostsolutions,lightslurries
0.00040.014
100to1
0.000115.3
20to1
30to1
Volumetricfeedcapacitiesaregivenbecausechemicalspecificgravitiesmustbeknowntospecifymassfeedcapacity.
Rangesapplytopurchasedequipment.Overallfeedrangescanbeextendedmore.
Usespecialheadsandvalvesforslurries.
Source:WEFandASCE2009,Table16.13
910
August2010
9.5.1 Liquidfeedsystems
Liquidorsolutionfeedsystemsaretypicallyusedinthefollowingcases(WEFandASCE1998):
Ifchemicalsareappliedatlowrates.
Ifchemicalsarelessstable.
Whenthedustofthedryformofthechemicalishazardousordifficulttohandle.
Whenonlyliquidchemicalsareavailable.
9.5.1.1
Storage
Alumistypicallystoredwithoutdilutionattheshippingconcentrationreceivedattheplant.
Storagetankslocatedoutsideshouldbeclosedandvented,withprovisionsforheatingtomaintain
temperaturesabove4C(25F)topreventcrystallization.Liquidalumstoragevesselsareconstructed
oftype316stainlesssteel,fiberglassreinforcedplastic(FRP),steellinedwithrubber,orpolyvinyl
chloride(PVC).Liquidalumcanbestoredindefinitely.
Ferriccompoundsareacidicandrequirespecialstorageandhandlingprocedures.Fiberglass
reinforcedplasticorpolyethylenetankscanbeusedtostoreliquidferricsolutions(WEFandASCE
2006).
Storagetanksshouldbesizedtoaccommodatea10dayto2weeksupplyandshouldbe
capableofhandling11/2timesthemaximumquantityshipped.Somestateregulationsrequirethat
storagetimesberelatedtopotentialdeliverydelaysorspecificperiodsataveragechemicalfeedrates.
9.5.1.2
FeedMethods
Severalalternativesareavailableforfeedingliquidchemicalsorchemicalsolutions.Descriptions
ofcommonfeedsystemsareprovidedbelow.Selectionofthefeedmethodissitespecificanddepends
onfactorssuchasfeedpressure,fluidproperties,typeofcontrol,andtreatmentgoals.
Manufacturersrecommendationsshouldbefollowedregardingselectionofpumpmaterialsfor
thespecificchemicalofinterest.Becauseironandaluminumsaltsolutionsareacidicandcorrosive,
WEFandASCE(2006,p.297and303)recommendthatpumpheadsbepolyvinylchloride(PVC)andthat
piping,fittings,andvalvesbePVCorchlorinatedPVC(CPVC).Pipeselectionforpolymerserviceshould
bemadeafterthetypeofpolymerhasbeendetermined(plasticpipeortype316stainlesssteelis
normallyused).Pipesthatareabovegroundintemperateregionsmayneedtobeheattraced.
Itisimportanttonotethatitisgenerallynotnecessarytodiluteliquidalumorferricchloride
priortofeedingintotheprocess.AdditionofcarrierwatercouldraisethepHandresultinformationof
metalhydroxideswhichcanprecipitateandcauseplatinginchemicalfeedlines.Ifdilutionisneeded,
carrierwatershouldbeaddedasclosetotheinjectionpointaspossible(WEFandASCE2006).For
polymers,dilutionofthestocksolutionisoftenpracticedtoallowbetterdispersionofthepolymerin
thewastewater.
911
August2010
RotaryDipperFeedersorRotameters
Rotarydipperfeedersarereliablefeedersthatarecommonlyusedforgravityflowapplications.
Feedratescanbevariedbasedonasignalfromamainstreamflowmeter(flowproportionalcontrol).
Rotametersinconjunctionwithcontrolvalvesmayalsobeusedforsmallapplicationswherefrequent
variationinchemicalfeedrateisnotrequired.Rotametersshouldnotbeusedwithferricchlorideor
otherironsolutionsbecausethesightglasswillbecomestainedandopaque.
NonpositiveDisplacementPump
Anonpositivedisplacementpump,orakineticpump,deliverswaterinasteadystream.Energy
addedtothefluidincreasestheflowvelocityinsidethepumprelativetothevelocityatdischarge.
Examplesofkineticpumpsincludesolidshandlingcentrifugalpumps,recessedimpellerpump,
screw/combinationcentrifugalpumps,andgrinderpumps(WEFandASCE1998).
Acentrifugaltransferpumpisanexampleofanonpositivedisplacementpump.Thesepumps
shouldbedirectlyconnectedbutnotclosecoupledtopreventleakageintothemotor
PositiveDisplacementPump
Whenthedischargevolumesofapumpareseparatedbyaperiodofnodischarge,itisreferred
toasapositivedisplacementpump.Apositivedisplacementpumppullswaterintothepumpchamber
withavacuumcreatedbythewithdrawalofapiston,whichdisplacesasetvolumeofwaterfromthe
chamberandforcesitthroughthedischargevalveandpipe(WEF2008).Examplesofpositive
displacementpumptypesaretheplungerpump,thereciprocatingpiston,peristalticpump,pneumatic
ejector,rotarylobepump,airoperateddiaphragmpump,andprogressingcavitypump(WEFandASCE
1998).Meteringpumpsareeitherofthediaphragmorplungertype.Diaphragmpumpsprotectedwith
internalorexternalreliefvalvesarepreferred.Abackpressurevalveisrecommendedtoprovide
positivecheckvalveoperation.
ProportionalPumps
Aproportionalpumpisatypeofpositivedisplacementpumpcommonlyusedforchemicalfeed.
Itisatypeofdiaphragmpumpthathasaflowratethatcanbepreciselyadjustedviachangingthe
lengthofthestrokeorthestrokespeed.Themechanismofadiaphragmpumpisthatthediaphragmis
apartmadeofflexiblerubbertypematerialfastenedwithinaverticalcylinder.Thediaphragmisraised,
producingsuction,andwhenitisdropped,itforcesliquidoutofadischargevalve(WEF2008).Ithas
beenreportedthatthistypeofpumpisverysusceptibletocloggingandthatafiltershouldbeinstalled
topreventanysedimentfromreachingthepump.
9.5.2 DryFeedSystems
9.5.2.1Storage
Bulkdryalumcanbetransferredwithscrewconveyors,bucketelevators,orpneumatic
conveyors.Bagsanddrumsofalumshouldbestoredindrylocations.Dayhoppersreceivingalumfrom
bagsordrumsshouldhaveaminimumstoragecapacityofeighthoursatthemaximumexpectedfeed
rate.Hopperbottomsshouldhaveaminimumwallslopeof60degreestopreventarching.Atypical
bulkstoragetankfordrychemicalsisshowninFigure93.
912
August2010
Figure93.Typicaldrychemicalfeedsystem.
Source:USEPA(1987b),citedinTchobanoglousetal.(2003)
9.5.2.2
FeedMethods
Thefollowingstrategyforfeedingappliestodrychemicals:
Waterisblendedwiththechemicalinamechanicallyagitateddissolvingtankorsolution
tank.
Forbulkchemicals,awatermeterinconjunctionwithavariableratefeederachievesa
continuousstreamofthesolutionattheproperstrength.
Forbagsorcontainers,thepropersolutionismadeupmanuallyonabatchbasis.
Dependingonthetypeofchemical,variousfeedingprotocolsarenecessary:
Alum,sodiumaluminateordryferroussulfate
913
August2010
Recommendedminimumsolutionstrengthis6percentor0.06kg/literofwater(0.5
lb/gal).
Detentiontimeinthedissolvershouldbe5minutesatthemaximumfeedrate.
Ferricsulfate
-
Solutionsaremadeupatawatertochemicalweightratioof2:1to8:1,withatypical
ratiobeing4:1or0.25kgFe2S04/Literofwater(2.1lb/gal).
Solutionsunder1percentstrengtharesubjecttohydrolysisanddepositionofferric
hydroxide.
Thedegreeofautomationindrychemicaldissolutionsystemswilldependonthesizeofthe
plantanddailychemicalusage.Forplantstreatinglessthan1milliongallonperday(MGD),manual
preparationofthechemicalsolutiononabatchbasismaybesufficient.Thisistypicallyaccomplishedin
adaytankinwhichdry,baggedchemicalismechanicallymixedwithwatertoreachthedesired
concentration.Forlargerfacilities,thechemicalsolutionispreparedautomaticallyusingacontroller
thatadjustsfeedrateofdrychemicalinproportiontopotablewaterflowrate(asshowninFigure93in
Section9.5.2.1)(Daniels1973).
Volumetricfeedersaretheleastexpensiveoptionandcanbeusedwherecostisaconcern,
chemicaldeliveryratesarelow,andgreataccuracyisnotrequired.Volumetricfeedersgenerally
employascrewfeedmechanism.
Lossinweightgravimetricfeedersprovideahighdegreeofaccuracy(upto99percentaccurate)
andarerecommendedwhereclosecontrolofchemicaldosagescanresultinsubstantialsavingsin
chemicalcosts.Beltgravimetricfeedersareintermediateincostbetweenvolumetricandlossinweight
gravimetricfeeders,andcanprovideaccurateandreliableservice.
Ingeneral,closedconstructionispreferableforchemicalfeeders,becausethisexposesa
minimumofoperatingcomponentstothecorrosivevaporsfromthedissolvingorsolutiontank.
Gravimetricfeedersofferthefollowingadvantagesovervolumetricfeeders:
Calibrationusuallynotrequired
Greateraccuracyanddependability
Incorporationoftotalizertoallowmaintenanceofaccuraterecordsandinventories
Automaticproportioning
Lowmaintenance;simpleoperation
9.5.2.3
LimeSlaking
Limeisavailableeitheraspowderedhydratedlimeoraspebblequicklime.Powderedhydrated
limetendstobemoreconvenientbecauseithasalreadygonethroughtheslakingprocess.Slakingisa
messyprocessthatrequiresspecialconsiderationsbecauseoftheinherentnatureoflime:
Thereactionoflimeandwatergeneratesalargeamountofheat.
Causticpropertiescreateahazardtooperatorsandequipment.
914
August2010
Chemicalhandlingcreateslimedust.
Limehasatendencytoprecipitateoutduringslaking.
Limecancakewhenexposedtomoistureandcarbondioxideinair.
Limecanformahardscaleonequipment.
Duetotheaddedcostofslaking,hydratedlimecostsabout30percentmorethanquicklimeand
canproduceextradustduringhandling.However,thesystemcanavoidtheburdenofslaking,and
hydratedlimetendstohaveamorestablestoragelife.Forplantsthatuseatleast2to3tonsoflime
perday,bulkquicklimemaybethemostaffordableoption.Thebestqualityofquicklimehasahigh
percentageofpurity(greaterthan62percentquicklime)andquickslakingability.Forplantswhere
limeuseisnotrequireddaily,hydratedlimemaybebetterintermsofconvenienceandstorage(WEF
andASCE1998).
9.6
DesigningforRapidMixandFlocculation
Rapidmixisabriefprocesswherethechemicaldoseisvigorouslyblendedwithwastewater.
Chemicalsshouldbedisperseduniformlytoensureformationofprecipitates.Recentresearchhas
confirmedthatrapidmixingatthepointofchemicaldosageiscriticalforefficientphosphorusremoval
usingironsalts(Smithetal.2007).
Therapidmixingprocessisfollowedbyflocculation(slowmixing)toallowagglomerationof
solidstoformlargerflocswithimprovedsettlingcharacteristics.Itisimportanttominimizeagitationof
thewaterduringflocculationtopreventflocdestruction.Existingplantcomponentssuchasaerated
gritchambers,aerateddistributionchannels,orfeedwellsofclarifiersarecommonlyusedfor
flocculation,oftenaftersomemodification.
Thissectionprovidesinformationonmixerconfigurationsavailableforrapidmixand
flocculationandguidanceonsettingdesignparameters.
9.6.1 TypesofMixers
Mixersaredesignedtoachievethegoalsofthetypeofmixingintended.Rapidmixingisa
shorter,fasterprocessmeanttomaximizecontactofcoagulantsandpolymerwiththewastewater,
whileflocculationrequireslongerhydraulicretentiontimes(HRTs)andmorecarefulagitationto
increaseflocsizeandsettling.Typicalmixerdesignsforbothrapidmixandflocculationaredescribedin
Table94.
915
August2010
Table94.CommonlyUsedEquipmentforRapidMixing
Typeof
Mixing
RapidMix
Mixing
Equipment
Staticinlinemixer
Inlinemixer
Highspeed
inductionmixer
Pressurizedwater
jets
Rotatingimpeller
(Turbineor
propeller)
Flocculation
GeneralDescription
DesignOptions
Uniqueinthattheyhavenomoving
partsandprovidemixingbyusingvanes
orplatestocausesuddenchangesin
flowdirection.Mostcommontypeofin
linemixer.
Similartostaticinlinebutcontain
rotatingmixingelementtoenhance
process.
Mixingtimevarieswithlengthof
mixer.Degreeofmixingrelatedto
pressuredropthroughthemixer.
Bettermixingresultsinlargerpressure
drops.
Powercanbeprovidedbyanexternal
sourceorbytheturbulencecreatedby
theconfigurationofthemixerand
rotatingelement.
Highspeedscanresultin
instantaneousdispersionofchemicals.
Animpellerisrotatedatasufficient
speedtocauseavacuumbehindthe
impeller.Thisvacuumpressureisthen
usedtodrawchemicalstotheimpeller.
Chemicalisaddedthroughahigh
pressurewaterjet.Thevelocityofthe
jetmustbehighenoughtomixwaterin
allpartsofthepipeline.
Constructedwithverticalshaftdrivenby
electricalmotor.Impellersmountedon
theshaftprovidemixing.Flowcanbe
horizontalorvertical.Turbinesare,in
general,highervelocity,andgreater
turbulenceleadstoimprovedmixing.
Highspeedmixerswithsmallimpellers
arebetterforrapidmix,whileslow
speedmixerswithlargerimpellersare
usedforflocculation.
Static
Wastewaterissubjectedtoreversalsin
flow
Paddle
Consistsofaseriesofpaddlesspaced
apartandmountedtoashaft;slow
movingpaddlespromotegentle
flocculation.Lesscommonlyusedthan
othermethodsbecauseofmaintenance
issues.
3to4bladesmountedtoaverticalshaft.
Turbineand
Propeller
Ballasted
Usescontinuouslyrecycledmediaanda
varietyofadditivestoimprovesettling
propertiesofsuspendedsolidsthrough
improvedflocbridges.
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.(2003);USEPA(2003)
Asmalldiameterreactortubecan
increasemixingeffectiveness;power
providedbysolutionfeedpump.
Twobasicimpellertypesare(1)radial
flowimpellerswithflatorcurved
bladesmountedparalleltotheaxisof
theshaft,and(2)axialflowimpellers
atanangle<90withthedriveshaft.
Axialflowimpellerscanbevariable
pitchconstantangleorconstantpitch
variableangle.
Smallmixersrevolveat1750rpm,
largemixersrevolveat400to800
rpm;morethanonepropellermaybe
mountedonthesameshaft.
Mayincludeflowchannelslaidout
horizontallytocauseenergyproducing
friction;channelspacingmaybe
designedtodecreaseenergyovertime
tokeeplargeflocsfrombreakingapart
Paddlesmountedonhorizontalor
verticalshaft;agitationspeed
importanttopromoteflocformation
andmaintainingflocsizefor
settleability.
Bladesmayberectangularorhydrofoil
shaped;specificdesignmeantto
reduceflocshearing;considersize
relatedtopowerandpumping;tip
speedandsuperficialvelocity.
Examplesofproprietarydesigns
includeActiflo,DensaDeg,CoMag,
andLamellaplateclarification
system.
916
August2010
Often,movementofwastewaterthroughtheplantissufficientforflocculation,althoughcare
shouldbetakennottodisruptflocformationthroughpumpingoraeration.Anotherapproachistouse
aflocculatingclarifier,inwhichanexpandedcenterwellprovidesthedesireddetentiontimeforslow
mixing.Thecontentsoftheflocculationwellcanbeagitatedbymechanicalmixersordiffusedair,
althoughthehydraulicregimeinthecenterwellmaybesuchthatmechanicalorairmixingdoesnot
provideadditionalbenefit.Althoughnotcommon,mechanicalflocculationusingamixerorairagitation
canbeusedtoimproveperformanceofclarifiers.Proprietarytechnologiesusingballastedflocculation
combinerapidmix,flocculation,andsedimentationinoneunit.Theycansignificantlyreducefootprint
requirementsandcanbeveryeffectiveatphosphorusremoval.Chapter6,section6.3.1providesa
descriptionofseveralproprietarytechnologies.
9.6.2 DesignFactors
Themostimportantparametersfordesigningrapidmixandflocculationsystemsarethe
velocitygradient(G),thehydraulicdetentiontime(t),andthevesselgeometry.Forstaticmixers,the
degreeofmixingisrelatedtotheheadlossthroughthemixer.Foranykindofrotatingimpellersystem
(forrapidmixorflocculation),theimportantdesignparametersaretherotationalspeed(n)andthe
ratiooftheimpellerdiametertotheequivalenttankdiameter(D/Te).Forpaddleflocculators,the
powerisrelatedtothedragforceonthepaddles.Eachofthesedesignfactorsisdiscussedbelow.A
summaryofkeyparametersisprovidedinSection9.6.3.Foradditionalguidanceandexample
calculations,seeChapter5ofTchobanoglousetal.(2003)andWEFandASCE(1998).
9.6.2.1
VelocityGradient
Thevelocitygradientisameasureoftheshearintensityimpartedtoafluid.Itcanbeestimated
usingthefollowingequation(Tchobanoglousetal.2003):
G=[P/V]1/2
Eq.91
Where:
G =Velocitygradient,second1
P =Powerrequirement,W(kgm2s3)
=Absolutefluidviscosity,kgm1second1
V =Basinvolume,m3
Forrapidmix,Smithetal.(2007)recommendsGvaluesgreaterthan300seconds1,although
velocitygradientsofupto1,000seconds1havebeenrecommended(BarthandStensel1981).Velocity
gradientsforflocculationprocessesgenerallyare3060seconds1,dependingonthechemicalsadded
andpointofaddition(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Lowervelocitygradientsmayyieldflocparticleswith
toomuchtrappedwater,whereashighervelocitygradientsmaycauseexcessiveflocshearandfloc
deterioration.
Insomecases,chemicalsareaddeddirectlytotheactivatedsludgeprocesswithnoadditional
mixingotherthanthatalreadydesignedforaerationandmixingofsolidsandmixedliquorinthebasin.
Althoughthispracticecanbeeffective,itrepresentslessthanidealconditionsforflocculation,as
velocitygradientsinaerationbasinsusuallyresultinflocshear.Inonestudy,airflowratesinthe
downstreamendoftheaerationbasinwerereducedtoachieveavelocitygradientof60seconds1,
917
August2010
whichwasfoundtobeoptimumforflocculationusingferricchloride(Singhal1980).Additionofanionic
polymerpriortoclarificationassistsintheagglomerationofshearedfloc.
9.6.2.2
PowerRequirements
Ifatargetvelocitygradienthasbeenselected,designerscanderivethetheoreticalpower
requirementusingequation91,solvingforPasfollows:
P=G2V
Eq.92
Forrotatingimpellersystems,thepowerisrelatedtotherevolutionspersecondanddiameter
oftheimpellerbythefollowingequation:
P=Npn3D5
Eq.93
Where:
P =Powerinput,W
Np=Powernumberfortheimpeller,unitless
=Massdensityofthefluid,kg/m3
n =Impellerrevolutionspersecond,s1
D =Diameteroftheimpeller,m
Pumpingcapacityofthemixercanbeestimatedusingsimilarinputs:
Qi=NQnD3
Eq.94
Where:
=pumpdischarge,m3/sec
Qi
NQ
=flownumberoftheimpeller,unitless
Powernumbersandflownumbersfordifferenttypesofimpellersalongwithqualitativeinformationon
pumpingcapacityareprovidedinTable95.Designersshouldconsultmanufacturersforpowerandflow
numbersforaspecificpieceofmixingequipment.
Table95.ValuesofNPandNQforVariousTypesofImpellers
TypeofImpeller
Verticalflatbladeturbine(VBT)
Diskturbine
Pitchedbladeturbine(45oPBT)
Pitchedbladeturbine(32oPBT)
Lowshearhydrofoil(LS,3blade)
Lowshearhydrofoil(LS,4blade)
Propeller
NP
3.5 4
NQ
0.84 0.086
1.6
1.1
0.30
0.60
0.084 0.086
0.084 0.086
0.50
0.55
PumpingCapacity
Low
Low
Moderate
High
High
High
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.(2003),Table512
918
August2010

Equation93appliesiftheflowisturbulent(i.e.,theReynoldsnumber,NR,isgreaterthan
10,000),whichisgenerallythecaseforrapidmixdesigns.Whenmechanicalpaddlemixersareusedfor
flocculation,powerisrelatedtothedragforceonthepaddlesasfollows(Tchobanoglousetal.2003):
P=(CDA2p)/2
Eq.95
Where:
P =Powerrequirement,W
CD =Coefficientofdragofpaddlemovingperpendiculartofluid,unitless
A =Crosssectionalareaofthepaddles,m2
=Massdensityofthefluid,kg/m3
P =Relativevelocityofthepaddleswithrespecttothefluid,m/s,usuallyassumedtobe0.6to
0.75timesthepaddletipspeed.
Thisequationcanberearrangedtodeterminetherequiredpaddleareafortherequiredpower,as
derivedusingequation92.
Forstaticmixers,thekeyparameterfordesignisnotpowerrequiredsincetherearenomoving
parts,butheadlossthroughthemixer.Theheadlosscanbeestimatedasfollows:
Eq.96
h=KSM2
Where:
h =Headlossacrossthestaticmixer,m
KSM =Overallcoefficientforthestaticmixer,sec2/m,asprovidedbythemanufacturer
=Approachvelocity,m/sec
9.6.2.3
HydraulicRetentionTime
Thehydraulicretention(ordetention)timeistheamountoftimeaunitoftheprocessflow
stayswithinatankforagivenflowrate.Itiscalculatedasfollows:
t=V/Q
Eq.97
Where:
t =Hydraulicretentiontime,seconds
V =Reactorvolume,ft3orm3
Q =Flowrate,ft3/secorm3/sec
Dependingonthemixingdeviceandchemicalcoagulantchosen,achemicaladditionprocess
willrequiredifferentratesofrapidmixingtoensureadequatehydraulicretentiontime,butstilllimit
contactinthemixer.Forexample,staticinlinemixers,inlinemixers,andhighspeedinductionmixers
areusedforalum,ferricchloride,andcationicpolymerwheninstantaneousmixingisrequired.A
hydraulicretentiontimeofonly1secondorlessisrequiredforthesetypesofmixersbecausethe
chemicalprecipitantstendtohaveafastreactionrate.However,applicationsusinglimemayrequire
between10and30secondsofhydraulicretentiontimesincelimereactsmoreslowlywithwastewater
919
August2010
(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).TenStateStandards(2007)recommendadetentiontimeofatleast30
secondsforbasinsequippedwithmechanicalmixingdevices.
Theprocessoftheflocculationofsmallparticlesofsolidphosphorusisnotcompletely
understood.TheseparticlesareaffectedbypHandthesurfacechemistryofthemetaltophosphorus
complexes(WERF2008).Smithetal.(2008)reportedthatflocagingmaycontributetoadecreaseinthe
phosphorusremovalefficiencyofwastewater.Spentflocscanberecycledtopromoteflocculationin
thewastewaterstream,butbasedonthisresearch,theeffectofflocageondecreasingflocsurfacearea
andtherelatedabilitytobindwithphosphorusshouldbeconsidered.Despitethesomewhatlesser
understoodfactsaboutflocculation,itiscommonlyknownthatpolymercanimproveflocculation.The
polymerworksbycapturingsmallcolloidalparticlesandhelpingthemtojoinviathelongchainpolymer
moleculestoformlargerparticlesthatwillsettleoutmorereadily.
9.6.2.4
VesselGeometry
Vesselsforrapidmixingshouldbedesignedtoavoidtheformationofvortexes.Ifthevesselis
small,theimpellersshouldbemountedoffcenteroratanangle.Forlargervessels,designers
commonlyavoidvortexingbyinstallingfourormoreverticalbaffles(alsocalledstatorbaffles)extending
approximately1/10thto1/12thofthediameteroutfromthewall(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Vortexing
canalsobeminimizedbychoosingaflatbladedimpellerinsteadofafanorpropellerimpellerand
introducingchemicalsatthebladelevel.
Theratiooftheimpellerdiametertotheeffectivetankdiameter(D/Te)isanimportant
parameterfordesignanddependsonwhethertheflowmoveshorizontallyorverticallythroughthe
mixingvessel.Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)recommendD/Tevaluesof0.25to0.4forhorizontalflow
vesselsand0.40to0.60forverticalflowvessels.NotethatTeforrectangularbasinscanbeestimatedas
follows:
Te=1.13(LXW)1/2
Eq.98
Where:
Te =Effectivediameterforarectangulartank,m
L =Basinlength,m
W =Basinwidth,m
9.6.3 SummaryofTypicalDesignParameters
Table96summarizestypicaldesignparametersforrapidmix.Thesevaluesshouldbeusedas
generalguidelines;finaldesignvaluesforvelocitygradientandhydraulicretentiontimeshouldbe
establishedduringjarorpilottestingandbasedonmanufacturersrecommendations.Design
parametersforballastedsystemsareprovidedintheEPAWastewaterTechnologyFactSheet,Ballasted
Flocculation(USEPA2003),availableonlineat
http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/ballasted_flocculation.pdf.
920
August2010
Table96.TypicalDesignParametersforTurbineandPropellerMixers
Parameter
Symbol
Unit
Value
Velocitygradient
1/s
5002500
Rotationalspeed
rpm
40125
D/Te
unitless
0.250.40
Velocitygradient
1/s
5002500
Rotationalspeed
rpm
2545
D/Te
unitless
0.400.60
Horizontalflowmixing
Ratioimpellerdiameterto
equivalenttankdiameter
Verticalflowmixing
Ratioimpellerdiameterto
equivalenttankdiameter
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.(2003),Table511
9.7
Althoughchemicaladditionremainsareliablemethodforphosphorusremoval,therehavebeen
fewdramaticchangesinboththetypesofchemicalsavailableandtheirapplications.However,tofill
theneedforlowerandlowereffluentphosphorusrequirements,thefieldofsolidsseparationhas
expandedtoprovidemoreeffectiveoptionsforremovinginsolublephosphorus.
Theoptionsforsolidsseparationdependonamultiplebarrierapproachstandaloneprocesses
maybeusedforsolidsseparation,butdependingontreatmentgoals,twoormoresystemstogether
maybeabletoachievelowerandmorereliablephosphorusconcentrations.Ingeneral,thesolids
separationprocessrangesfromtheconventionaltotheadvancedasfollows(WERF2008):
Conventionalsedimentationusesclarifiersforsettlingoffloc,and,muchofthetime,follows
thatwiththesecondarybarrierofafiltrationprocesstoremoveadditionalsolids.
Highrateflocculationandsedimentationincludesamoreadvancedclarifiertoprocesslarger
volumesofwastewatermorequickly(e.g.ballastedflocculation/sedimentation,lamellatube
settlers).Commonlyfollowedbyfiltration.
Thedirectfiltrationmethodusesasinglebarrierapproachwithnosedimentation.
Twostagefiltrationusesmultiplefilters.
Microfiltrationorultrafiltrationtheoreticallyremovesallinsolublephosphorussincethefilter
sizeisunderthe0.45musuallyconsideredtobethelimitofinsolubility;inpractice,
membranedefectscanlessenfiltereffectiveness.
921
August2010
Ballastedseparationandmagneticpolishing,suchasthepatentedCoMagprocessdiscussed
laterinthissection.
9.7.1 PrimaryandSecondaryClarification
Solidsseparationprocessescanbeappliedatvariouslocationsintheprocesstrain,typically
directlyfollowingchemicaladdition.Whenchemicalsareaddedpriortoprimaryorsecondary
clarification,clarifierdesignbecomesakeyfactorinremovaloftheprecipitatedphosphorus.Clarifiers
usedinchemicalprecipitationsystemsdifferlittlefromthoseemployedinconventionalbiological
treatment,althoughuseofflocculationzonesisrecommendedtoallowflocculationtooccurafter
additionofcoagulants.Provisionofdistinctflocculationzonesisrecommendedforeitherprimaryor
secondaryclarifiers,dependingonthepointofchemicaladdition.Distinctflocculationzonesare
particularlyimportantforprimaryclarifiers,becausetheremaybelittleopportunityforflocculationto
occurinexistingprocesses.Forsecondarychemicaladdition,flocculationcanoccurinaerationbasinsor
channelsprecedingclarification,buttheuseofflocculationzonesinsecondaryclarifiersisa
recommendedpracticeasitallowsflexibilityinthepointofchemicaladditionandprovidesazonein
whichdirectcontrolcanbeexercisedovervelocitygradientstoachieveoptimumflocculation.
TheWEFManualofPracticeFD8,ClarifierDesign(WEF2005)providesdetaileddesignguidance
forachievingsolidsremovalsinclarifiersincludingrecommendeddesignstandards,softwaremodeling,
detailsonprocessesandequipment,andperformancemonitoringandcontrol.Bottetal.(2007)report
thatsolidsremovalthroughconventionalclarifierscanreliablyremoveTPtoeffluentlevelsbetween0.5
and1.0mg/L,andlowereffluentlevelscanfrequentlybeobtained.
9.7.2 TertiaryProcesses
Tertiaryprocesses(postsecondarytreatment)useclarification,someformoffiltration
technology,orbothandcanbeusedtoconsistentlyremovephosphorustoverylow(<0.1mg/L)
concentrations.Tertiaryclarifierscanbeconventional,oneortwosludgelime(secondsludgeincludes
recarbonationandsettling),solidscontact,highrate,andballastedhighrate.Theyaresizedonthe
samebasisasprimaryandsecondaryunits.Highrateandballastedhighrateclarificationistypically
combinedwithflocculationandrapidmixinginproprietarysystems.Theseproprietarysystemshave
beendescribedpreviouslyinSection9.6.Chapter6summarizestertiaryfiltrationtechnologieswith
designguidelinespresentedinChapter11ofthismanual.
9.8
OperationalFactors
9.8.1 DoseControl
Thesuccessofphosphorusremovalbychemicaladditiondependsonproperinstrumentation
andcontrol.Dosagecontroltypicallytakestheformofmanualoperation(forsmallsystems),
adjustmentsbasedonautomaticflowmeasurements,orthemoreadvancedonlineanalyzerswith
automateddosagecontrol.Flowpaceddosing(feedforwardcontrol)iscommon.Moreadvanced
controlsystemsmayuseonlinephosphateanalyzersoroxidationreductionpotential(ORP)forcontrol.
SeeChapter13ofthisdesignmanualforadditionalinformationoncontrolstrategies.
922
August2010
9.8.2 MakeupWater
Chemicalpropertiesofanywaterusedformakingsolutionsshouldbeconsideredtapwater
highindissolvedsolidscouldcausesludgetoformwhenmixedwithcoagulants(WEFandASCE1998)
andcouldleadtocloggingofchemicalfeedlines.
9.8.3 SludgeProductionandHandling
Chemicalprecipitationmethodsalwaysproduceadditionalsolidsduetogenerationofmetalor
calciumphosphateprecipitatesandadditionalsuspendedsolids.Limetraditionallyproducesahigher
sludgevolumecomparedtometalsaltsbecauseofitsreactionwithnaturalalkalinity.Anadvantageof
limesludgeisthatsomestabilizationcanoccurduetothehighpHlevelsrequired.Onedisadvantageis
thatlimecancausescalinginmechanicalthickeninganddewateringsystems.Althoughittendsto
producelesssludgethandoferricsalts,alumsludgecanbemoredifficulttoconcentrateanddewater
comparedtotheferricsludge.
StoichiometricequationsforestimatingsludgeproductionareprovidedinSection3.5ofthis
designmanual,butagoodruleofthumbisabout10gofchemicalsludgepergPremovedbychemical
treatment.Examplecalculationsareprovidedinthetextboxonthenextpage.
923
August2010

Example92:DeterminingIncreaseinSludgeProductionfromAdditionofFerricChloride
inExample91
Problem:AWWTPoperatorwantstouseferricchloride(FeCl3)toremovephosphateinthe
secondaryclarifier.Theplantsflowrateis1.0MGD,andthemeasuredphosphateconcentration
enteringthesecondaryclarifieris4mg/LasP.FromExample91andconfirmedthroughjartesting,
74.8gallonsofferricchloridesolutionwillbeaddedperdaytoremoveupto98percentofthe
phosphate.Theoperatorwantstoestimatethemassofadditionalsolidsthatwillneedtobe
removedfromthesecondaryclarifierasaresultoftheferricchlorideaddition.
Constants:
Ferricchloridesolutionstrength=40percent
Densityofferricchloridesolution=1.4kg/L
MolecularweightofFe=55.85;MolecularweightofFeCL3=162.2;MolecularweightofP=30.97
MolecularweightofO=16;MolecularweightofH=1
Solution:
1. Assumethatthephosphorusremovedwillbecontainedinthefollowingprecipitatewithironas
Fe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8andtheremainderoftheironaddedwillbeasFe(OH)3.SeeChapter3,Section
3.5foradditionaldiscussion.
2. Calculatethemillimolesperliter(mM/L)ofironaddedperdaythatprecipitatesasmM/Lof
Fe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8andasmM/LofFe(OH)3.precipitate.
a. PremovedasmM/L=(0.98)(4mgP/L)/(30.97mgP/mMP)=0.127mMPremoved/L.
b. Theamountofironaddedwas2.0mMFe/mMPinfeed.FeaddedasmM/L=(2.0mM
Fe/mMP)(4mgP/L/(30.97mgP/mMP)=0.258mMFe/L
c. PrecipitateasmMFe/LinFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8=1.6mMFe/mMPremoved=(1.6)0.127mMP
removed/L=0.203mMFe/L
d. PrecipitateasFeinFe(OH)3=mM/LofFeaddedminusmM/LofFeinFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8.=
0.258mMFeadded/L0.203mMFe/L=0.055mMFeinFe(OH)3/L
3. CalculatesludgeproductionassumofFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8andFe(OH)3.
a. MWofFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8=1.6(55.85)+2+30.97+(4)(16)+3.8(16)+3.8(1)=250.9;MWof
Fe(OH)3=55.85+(3)(16)+(3)(1)=106.85
b. SludgeasFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8=0.203mMFe/L(1.0mMFe1.6(H2PO4)(OH)3.8/1.6mMFe)(250.9
mg/mM)=31.83mg/L
c. SludgeasFe(OH)3=0.056mMFe/L(1.0mMFe(OH)3/mMFe)(106.85)=5.98mg/L
d. TotalsludgeproductionfromFeCl3addition=31.83+5.98=37.8mg/L=(37.8mg/L)(8.34
lb/MGmg/L)(1.0MGD)=315.4lb/d(143.1Kg/d)
Theinorganicsludgeproductionof315.4lb/d(143.1kg/day)isinadditiontowhatwouldbe
removedwithouttheadditionofferricchloride.Thisisaninitialdesignestimateandmayvary
dependingonwastewaterconditionsandthepointofaddition.
924
August2010

9.8.4 pHAdjustment
DependingonthewastewatercompositionandpH,pHadjustmentmaybenecessarytoachieve
efficientphosphorusremovalwithchemicaladdition.OtherusesforpHadjustmentincludethe
neutralizationofthewastewaterfloweitherfollowingchemicaladditionandpriortobiological
treatment,orpriortoeffluentdischarge.TheimportantcomponentsofapHadjustmentprocess
includethewastewaterflowrate,hydraulicretentiontime,andtheprecisionofthechemicalmetering
system.Laboratorytitrationexperimentsaregenerallynecessarytodeterminethecorrectdoseofacid
orbase(WEFandASCE1998).TargetpHvaluesforoptimumresultsvarywiththechemicalbeingused,
andtypicalvaluesaregivenintheliterature.However,jartestsshouldbeusedtodetermineand
confirmthespecificoptimumvalueforthechemicalandwastewaterbeingreacted.
RaisingthepHofanacidicwastewaterstreamisgenerallyaccomplishedthroughtheuseof
lime,suchashighcalciumlime,quicklime,hydratedorslakedlime,ordolomiticlime.Calciumand
magnesiumoxidesorhydroxidesmayalsobeusedinamixture.Limeproductstendtobeinsolubleand
requirelongerretentiontimesthanotherchemicalscalciumandmagnesiumoxidesinparticular
requirelongHRTs,butarefavoredduetotheirrelativelowcost.Aswithotherapplicationsoflime,lime
usedforpHadjustmentcreatesasignificantamountofsludge.Causticsodaandsodaasharemuch
moresoluble,createlesssludge,andreactmuchmorequicklywithacidinwastewater.Thehighercost
ofcausticsodaandsodaashcomparedtolimecompoundsshouldbefactoredintoanydecisionmaking
process.Drysodaashcanbefedbyacontinuousfeederusingvolumetric,gravimetric,orlossinweight
gravimetricmechanicalfeeders,whileasolutionfeedcanbepumped(WEFandASCE1998).
LoweringahighpHtoamoreneutrallevelforeffluentdischargemaytakeplaceviaanacidfeed
systemthataddssmallquantitiesofsulfuricacidorhydrochloricacidtothewastewater.Forlarger
systems,theacidsolutionmaybeappliedatthepointofdischarge.Nitricacidisreadilyavailablebut
generallynotpreferredduetotheadditionofnitrogenspecies(WEFandASCE1998).
9.8.5 EffectonBiosolidsApplication
Theuseofmetalsaltscanleadtolargeincreasesininorganicsolidsinthesludge,whichcan
resultinincreasedinorganicsalts(salinity)insludgeandintheeffluent.Salinitycancreateproblems
whenbiosolidsarelandappliedorwhentheeffluentisreturnedtoexistingwatersupplyreservoirs.
BiologicalphosphorusremovalwasdevelopedinSouthAfricaduetothehighrateofindirectrecycling
ofwastewatereffluent,whichledtoexcessivetotaldissolvedsolids(TDS)duringdryperiods.Hightotal
saltscanreducegerminationrateforcropsandnegativelyaffectthesoilstructure.
9.9
References
10StatesStandards.2007.RecommendedStandardsforWaterWorks,2007Edition:Policiesforthe
AmericanPublicHealthAssociation(APHA),AWWA,andWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF).1998.
StandardMethodsfortheExaminationofWaterandWastewater.20thEdition.220pp.Washington,
D.C.:APHA,AWWA,andWEF.
925
August2010
ASCE.1977.WastewaterTreatmentPlantDesign.ASCEManualNo.36.WPCFManualofPracticeNo.
8,AmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers,NewYork,NYandWaterPollutionControlFederation,
Washington,DC,1977.
Barth,E.F.andH.D.Stensel.1981.InternationalNutrientControlTechnologyforMunicipalEffluents.
JWPCF53(12):16911701.
Black,S.A.1980.ExperiencewithPhosphorusRemovalatExistingOntarioMunicipalWastewater
TreatmentPlants.In:PhosphorusManagementStrategiesforLakes,eds:RC.Loehr,C.S.Martin,W.
Rast.AnnArborSciencePublishers,Inc.AnnArbor,MI.
LowCanWeGoandWhatisStoppingUsfromGoingLower?Alexandria,VA:WERF.ChemExpo.2000.
OnlineChemicalExposition,Archives.May2000.
CityofEastMoline.2007.MinutesoftheMeetingoftheMayorandtheCommitteeoftheWholeof
theCityofEastMoline,Illinois.November19.Availableonline:
http://www.eastmoline.com/Minutes/COW/1119
07.cfm?MonthChange=None&eventid=78&LastDate=08/31/2008
CityofSantaCruz.2006.FerricChloridefortheWastewaterTreatmentFacilityAmendment#1to
SoleSourcePurchaseAgreement.CityCouncilAgendaReport.CityofSantaCruz,CA.February9.
Culp,R.L..,Wesner,G.M.andG.L.Culp.1978.HandbookofAdvancedWastewaterTreatment.Second
Edition.VanNostrandReinholdCompany,NewYork.
Daniels,S.L.1973.InstrumentationandAutomaticControlofPhosphorusRemovalProcesses.In:
PhosphorusRemovalDesignSeminar,ConferenceProceedingsNo.1.Toronto,Canada.May2829.
EPA910R07002.
InfilcoDegremont,2000.DesigninformationontheDensaDegsystem.
Gulbrandsen.2008.PolyaluminumChlorideSolutionProductDescription.Clinton,NJ:Gulbrandsen
Technologies,Inc.Availableonline:http://www.gulbrandsen.com/pdf/PolyalumCl_4.pdf
Heim,N.EandB.EBurris.1979.ChemicalAidsManualforWastewaterTreatmentFacilities.NTISNo.
PB116816,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,OfficeofWaterProgramOperations,Washington,
DC.EPA430/979018.
Hortskotte,G.A.,D.G.Niles,D.S.Parker,andD.H.Caldwell.1974.Fullscaletestingofawater
reclamationsystem.JournaloftheWaterPollutionControlFederation.46(1):181197.
Miller,M.M.2008.2007MineralsYearbook:Lime[AdvanceRelease].U.S.GeologicalSurvey.U.S.
DepartmentoftheInterior.Availableonline:
http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/lime/myb12007lime.pdf
Plank,D.2008.ChemicalPricesSkyrocket,NoEndinSight.EMainstream.AWWA.Posted15July.
Availableonline:http://www.awwa.org/publications/MainStreamArticle.cfm?itemnumber=39577
926
August2010
Poland,J.andT.Pagano.1998.JarTesting.WaterTreatmentPrimer,CE4124:Environmental
InformationManagement.CivilEngineeringDept.VirginiaTech.Availableonline:
http://www.cee.vt.edu/ewr/environmental/teach/wtprimer/jartest/jartest.html
Reardon,R.D.2005.TertiaryClarifierDesignConceptsandConsiderations.PresentedatWEFTEC2005.
SaginawCityCouncil.2006.Memo:WaterTreatmentPlantLiquidFerricChloridePurchase.Bids
receivedforchemicalsupplyfromJuly1,2006June30,2008.CityofSaginaw,MI.Availableonline:
http://www.saginawmi.com.
Singhal,A.K.1980.PhosphorusandNitrogenRemovalatCadillac,Michigan.JWPCF.52(11):27622770.
Smith,S.,A.Szab,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,I.Licsk,andG.Daigger.2007.TheSignificanceofChemical
PhosphorusRemovalTheoryforEngineeringPractice.InNutrientRemoval2007.WEF.
Szab,A.,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,G.T.Daigger,I.Licsk,andS.Smith.2008.SignificanceofDesignand
OperationalVariablesinChemicalPhosphorusRemoval.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(5):407
Smith,S.,I.Takcs,S.Murthy,G.T.Daigger,andA.Szab.PhosphateComplexationModelandIts
ImplicationsforChemicalPhosphorusRemoval.2008.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(5):428438.
Alexandria,VA:WEF.
USFilterKruger,2000.DesigninformationontheActifloprocessforwastewater.
USEPA.1975.ProcessDesignManualforSuspendedSolidsRemoval.EPA625/175003a,NTISNo.PB
259147,U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,CenterforEnvironmentalResearchInformation,
Cincinnati,OH,1975.
USEPA.1976.ProcessDesignManualforPhosphorusRemoval.GreatLakesNationalProgramOffice.
GLNPOLibrary.EPA625/176001a.April1976.
USEPA.1987a.DesignManual:PhosphorusRemoval.CenterforEnvironmentalResearchInformation.
Cincinnati,OH.EPA/625/187/001.
USEPA1987b.RetrofittingPOTWsforPhosphorusRemovalintheChesapeakeBayDrainageBasin.
Cincinnati,OH.EPA/625/687/017
USEPA.1999.EnhancedCoagulationandEnhancedPrecipitativeSofteningGuidanceManual.Officeof
Water.EPA815R99012.
USEPA.2000.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:ChemicalPrecipitation.OfficeofWater.EPA832F
00018.
USEPA.2003.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:BallastedFlocculation.OfficeofWaste
Management.MunicipalTechnologyBranch.EPA832F03010.
927
August2010
USEPA.2008.EmergingTechnologiesforWastewaterTreatmentandInPlantWetWeather
Management.EPA832R06006.Availableonline:
http://www.epa.gov/OWOWM.html/mtb/emerging_technologies.pdf
WEF.1983.NutrientControl.WEFManualofPracticeNo.FD7.WaterEnvironmentFederation.
Washington,DC.
WEF.2005.ClarifierDesign,2ndEdition.WEFManualofPracticeNo.FD8,WaterEnvironment
Federation,Washington,DC.
WEF.2008.OperationsGlossary.[Accessed1October2008].Availableonline:
http://www.wef.org/ConferencesTraining/SkillsBuilder/Operations_Glossary.htm
WEFPress.
WERF.2008.NutrientCompendium.Chapter1,TertiaryPhosphorusRemoval.Availableonline:
http://www.werfnutrientchallenge.org/chapter1.asp?area=ch1
Wilkes,W.1973.PhosphorusRemovalbyChemicalAdditionUsingPrimaryTreatment.In:Phosphorus
RemovalDesignSeminar,ConferenceProceedingsNo.1,Toronto,Canada,May2829.
YubaCity.2007.AgendaforStaffReportonChemicals(FB0707).CityofYubaCity,CA.Available
online:http://www.yubacity.net/documents/Agendas/2007/041707Council/041707AgendaItem9.pdf
928
August2010
10.DesignApproachforBiologicalNutrientRemoval
Chapter10covers:
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
Introduction
PreliminaryDesignApproach
OverviewofRecommendedApproachforPlantModeling
EstablishingObjectivesandRequirements
SelectingaProcessSimulator
DataCollection
CharacterizationofOrganicMaterial
CharacterizationofNutrientFractions
KineticandStoichiometricParameters
Calibration
Validation
SimulationofDesignAlternativesforNutrientRemoval
AdditionalProceduresforDesign
DesignChecksforNitrogenandPhosphorusRemoval
References
10.1 Introduction
Bythisstageoftheprocess,designengineersshouldhavecompletedthefollowingsteps:
Reviewedthemechanismsforbiologicalnutrientremovalatwastewatertreatmentplants
(WWTPs)(seeChapters4and5).
Characterizedthewastewaterandestablisheddesignobjectives(seeChapter7).
Reviewedflowsheetsandotherinformationonavailabletreatmentmethodsforbiological
nutrientremoval(seeChapter6).
Selectedcandidateprocessesfortheplantupgrade(seeChapter8).
Thedesignerisnowreadytoselectanddesignthefinalupgradeoption(orstartprocessselectionfor
Greenfieldplants)andtheoperatingconditionsunderwhichtheplantcanachievedesiredobjectivesfor
nutrientreduction.
AlthoughprocessdesignforWWTPupgradesforbiologicalnutrientremovalcanstillbedone
usingtraditionalengineeringmethods(i.e.,handcalculationsorspreadsheetsusingtheoretical
equations),processsimulators1havebecomeincreasinglypowerful,easytouse,andwidelyacceptedin
1
Forthepurposesofthisdesignmanual,mathematicalmodelsormoresimplymodelsaresetsofequationsthatdescribea
physicalsystem.Examplesincludetheactivatedsludgemodels(ASM),biofilmmodels,andcomputationalfluiddynamic(CFD)
modelsforsecondaryclarifiers.Processsimulatorsorsimulatorsarecomputerprogramsthatallowtheusertospecifyall
theprocessesofaWWTP,selectmodelsforeach,andsolvethemodelstopredictplantperformance.ExamplesareBioWin
andGPSX(SeeTable101forafulllist)
101
August2010
recentyears.Simulators,whichsolvemathematicalmodelsandtypicallyprovideresultsinauser
friendlyformat,allowdesignerstostudykineticaswellastimebasedsolutionswhiledeterminingthe
totalmassbalancesofmanyconstituents.WEFandASCE(2010)notethatThecomplexityofbiological
activityandreactorbehaviorandthenumberofvariablesimportanttonutrientremovalrequiretheuse
ofcomputermodelsfordetailedsolutions.
Simulatorshavemanyadditionaladvantagesovertraditionaldesign.Designerscanuse
simulatorstoquicklytestmanydifferenttreatmentconfigurationsanddesignparametersinafraction
ofthetimeandcostitwouldtaketoperformtraditionaldesigncalculationsandlaboratoryorpilot
tests.Theadditionalcostofdevelopment(e.g.,costofsettingupthesimulator,specialsamplingto
defineinputs)isusuallysmallcomparedtothemonetarybenefitsofmoreaccuratepredictionsand
thus,lowersafetyfactorsindesign.Forthesereasons,simulationhasbecomethepreferredmethodof
processdesignforbiologicalnutrientremovalatWWTPs.
BenefitsofUsingModelsforProcessDesign
Thetraditionalapproachfordesigningbiologicalnutrientremovalsystems(e.g.,fornitrification)was
todeterminesolidsresidencetime(SRT)basedonkineticequations,thentoapplyasafetyfactor
basedonengineeringjudgment.Thenewmethodcurrentlybeingusedbydesignengineersisto
determinesitespecificnitrificationkineticsbasedoninfluentqualityandperformdynamicmodeling
ofthesystemtocapturevariability.Lowersafetyfactorscanbeusedindesignwithmoreconfidence
thattheplantcanachievethedesiredtreatmentobjectivesunderavarietyofoperatingconditions.
Althoughmodelsarethepreferredmethodfordesignofbiologicalnutrientremoval,theremay
beinstanceswherepreliminaryhandorspreadsheetcalculationscanbeusefulaloneorasacheckon
modeledoutput.MostengineeringfirmshaveusedthemathematicalequationsfoundinChapters4
and5ofthismanualinaspreadsheettoestimatethebasinssizes.Suchspreadsheetscanbedeveloped
toestimatethefollowing:
Sizeoftheanaerobiczone.
SolidsResidenceTime(SRT)requirementsfornitrificationatminimumexpectedmixedliquor
temperature.
Minimumrequirementsfordenitrificationzones.
Mixedliquorrecyclerates.
Oxygenrequirementsfornitrificationandcarbonremoval.
Productionofsurplus,i.e.wasteactivatedsludge(WAS).
Clarifiersizerequirements.
Returnactivatedsludge(RAS)pumpingranges.
Effectofapproximatepeakingfactors.
102
August2010

Section10.2providesamethodologyforapreliminarydesignapproachusingequationsand
graphs.Theremainderofthischapter(Sections10.3through10.14)presentstherecommended
modelingapproach,providingpracticalguidanceonhowtousecommerciallyavailableprocess
simulatorstodesignnutrientremovalprocesses.ThisChaptercontainsguidanceonselectinga
simulator,establishingmodelobjectivesandrequirements,collectingandverifyingdata,calibratingand
validatingthemodel,andsimulatingalternatives.Examplesareprovidedthroughout.
Thischapterassumessomefamiliaritywith
Accuratecharacterizationofinfluentflowand
processsimulators;readersusingmodelsforthefirst
plantoperationiscriticaltomodelingnutrient
timeshouldcarefullyreviewtechnical
removalprocesses.Mistakesin
documentationandworkwithvendor
characterizationcanhavesevereimpactson
representativestogetthesimulatorupandrunning
design.Thus,agoodportionofthischapteris
properly.Readersarealsoencouragedtoreview
devotedtoproviding:
industrystandardsandtechnicaldocumentsfor
Guidanceongatheringinputdata
additionalrecommendationsonmodelingprotocols,
Discussionofhowthedataarerelated
wastewatercharacterizationmethods,anddetailed
Informationonwhythesedataare
calibrationprocedures.Aparticularlygood
importantinthedesignofnutrientremoval
referenceisthe2003WaterEnvironmentResearch
processes
Foundation(WERF)report,MethodsforWastewater
CharacterizationinActivatedSludgeModeling(Melceretal.2003).Inaddition,modelersshouldcheck
forthependingpublicationoftheInternationalWaterAssociation(IWA)ScientificTechnicalReport,
GoodModelingPractice(GMP)GuidelinesforUseofActivatedSludgeModels(IWA2009).Historical
backgroundandinformationonunderlyingmathematicalmodelsisprovidedinAppendixCofthis
manual.
10.2 PreliminaryDesignApproach
Forpreliminarydesign,asimplestepbystepapproach(providedbelow)canbeusedto
estimatebasinsizeforbiologicalnutrientremoval(nitrogenandphosphorus).Notethatthis
methodologyisnotmeanttobeprescriptivestepsmaybedoneinadifferentorderandrulesof
thumbshouldbecarefullyevaluatedbythedesignerandtreatmentplantoperators.Thekeyisthatany
methodologybebasedonthefundamentalscienceofbiologicalnutrientremovalaspresentedin
Chapters4and5ofthismanual.Inadditiontoguidanceinthissection,thereaderisalsoencouragedto
reviewstepsandexamplecalculationsprovidedintheUSEPANitrogenControlManual(1993)andnewly
updatedManualofPracticeNo.8bytheWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF)andtheAmerican
SocietyofCivilEngineers(ASCE),DesignofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlants(WEFandASCE
2010).
Step1:Characterizetheinfluentflow.
SeeChapter7,Section7.4fordetailedguidance.Keyfactorsfordesignareasfollows:
ThelowestmixedliquortemperaturefordeterminationofrequiredSRT.Usuallybasedonthe
coldesttemperaturesustainedforatwoweekperiod,buttheperiodcouldbeshorterifvery
lowSRTsarebeingconsidered.
103
August2010
Theexpectedchemicaloxygendemand(COD)toTotalKjeldahlNitrogen(TKN)orbiochemical
oxygendemand(BOD2)toTKNratio,andtheCODtoTotalPhosphorus(TP)ratio.Thedesired
ratioisthatofthesettledsewageifprimarysedimentationisincludedinthetreatmenttrain.
Forcompletedenitrification,aCOD/TKNratioofmorethan8andaBOD/TKNratioofmorethan
4areneeded.Forbiologicalphosphorusremoval,aCOD/TPratioofgreaterthan40and
BOD/TKNratioofmorethan20areneededwhentargetingeffluentTPconcentrationslessthan
1.0mg/L.Amoreaccurateratioforenhancedbiologicalphosphorusremoval(EBPR)isthe
readilybiodegradableCOD(rbCOD)toTPratioofthesettledsewage(shouldbe>15,see
Chapter5fordiscussion).NotethatifrbCODispresentinatrulyanaerobicreactor(no
dissolvedoxygen(DO),nonitrateornitrite),someEBPRwillalwaysoccur.Theamountofsoluble
phosphorusintheplanteffluentwilldependupontherbCOD/TPratioavailabletothe
phosphorusstoring(polyP)bacteriaintheanaerobiczone.TheconcentrationofthepolyP
bacteriaintheactivatedsludgeshiftsastherbCOD/TPratioshifts.
Step2:DeterminetherequiredSRTfornitrification.
UsegraphsorequationsprovidedinChapter4todeterminetheminimumSRTfornear
completenitrification.Multiplybyasafetyfactorthisistypicallygreaterthan2orrepresentedbythe
peakTKNdividedbythemedianTKNintheprocessinfluent.Bothoftheseapproximationswillprovide
alargesafetyfactorthatcanbereducedusingdynamicsimulationwithacalibratedcomputermodel.
Designersshouldcarefullyconsidertheeffluentrequirementsincludingtherequiredaveragingperiod
whenselectingasafetyfactorforpreliminarydesign.Forexample,iftheeffluentlimitis3.0mg/L,a
singlevalueof5.0mg/Lwillbeverydifficulttoaverageoutiftheaveragingperiodisonemonthbecause
thereislittlepossibilityofproducinganeffluentconcentrationoflessthan3.0mg/Lformost
wastewaters.However,iftheaveragingperiodisseasonalorannual,suchanexcursionisofsignificantly
lessconcernandasmallersafetyfactorshouldbeused.
Step3:DeterminerequiredSRTfordenitrificationandphosphorusremoval(ifrequired).
UsegraphsorequationsprovidedinChapter4todeterminethedenitrificationratesatthe
lowestdesigntemperatureandusethatvaluetodeterminetheSRTrequiredfortheanoxiczones.Add
theSRTrequirementsfordenitrificationtothatrequiredfornitrification.Ifbiologicalphosphorus
removalisrequired,addananaerobicvolumeof1.5to2hours.Recognize,however,thatcomplete
characterizationoftheprocessinfluentwastewateranddynamicsimulationmightshowthatan
anaerobicnominalHRTperiodaslowas0.5hourswouldbesufficientforhighrbCOD/TPratiosentering
theplant,(forexample,iftheplantisfedbyforcemainsand/orthewastewaterisfullyfermentedwhen
itreachestheplantasislikelytohappenforhightemperatures).Theanaerobicvolumecanbe
significantlyreducedbyaddingvolatilefattyacidsfromprefermentationorbychemicaladditionfor
polishing.
Step4:DetermineOverallSludgeInventory.
ApreliminaryestimateofthesludgeinventoryfortheBNRactivatedsludgesystemtobe
designedcanbederivedfromFigure71,whichisthesameasFigure14.20fromtheWEFASCEManual
ofPractice8(2010).ForthetotalSRTandtemperatureasidentifiedinSteps1through3,estimatethe
2
ForthepurposesofthisdesignmanualBODrepresentsthe5dayBODmeasurementmethod(sometimes
referredtoasBOD5)unlessotherwisenoted.
104
August2010
netsludgeproductionasafunctionofinfluentBOD(i.e.,assumethat100percentoftheBODwillbe
removedduringthetreatmentprocess).SeeChapter14ofMOP8(WEFandASCE2010)forguidance
onperformingdetailedcalculationsanddeterminingtheoverallsludgeinventory.Estimatethesludge
wastagerateasafunctionofthenetsludgeproductionandinfluentflowrate,i.e.calculatethemassof
BODthatwillberemovedperday.Thisrequiresassuminganominalhydraulicretentiontimeforthe
totalbiologicalreactorvolume.ForconventionalBNRactivatedsludge,thiswouldbe6to10hours
dependinguponthedesigntemperatureandtheMLVSSconcentrationdesired.Usingthefactor
selectedfromFigure71,calculatethemassofVSSthatwillbeproducedperdayfromthemassofBOD
thatwillberemovedperday.DividethisnumberbytheselectedSRTtodeterminearough
approximationofthewasteactivatedsludgethatwillbeproducedperday.
Step5:EstimateMLSSandDetermineOverallBasinVolume.
DecideonaMLSSvalue,usuallyrangingfrom2,200to3,500mg/Lifgravitysedimentation
clarifiersarebeingused.TheMLSSconcentrationisbasedonthesecondaryclarifierdesign,ifgravity
sedimentation,oronareasonableconcentrationformembraneseparation,e.g.8,000to10,000mg/L.
IfIntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge(IFAS)isused,designersneedtodeterminethebiomassthat
willbeattachedtothemediaforthedesignoperatingconditions.Thatisbestdoneusingacomputer
model.FinalselectionofMLSSmaybedonebytrialanderrorandshouldconsidersolidssettlingand
thickeningproperties(WEFandASCE2010).
MultiplytheSRT(days)fromSteps1through3bythesludgewastagerate(mass/day)and
dividebytheMLSSconcentration(massperunitofarea)toestimatetherequiredminimumreactor
volume.
Step6:DetermineInternalRecycleandRASPumpRates
Allowformixedliquorinternalrecyclepumpsthatcanreturn2to4timestheinfluentflowfor
nitraterecyclefromtheendofthefirstaerobiczonetotheinfluentendoftheanoxiczone.Also,ifthe
UniversityofCapetown(UCT)ortheVirginiaInitiativeProject(VIP)configurationsarebeingused,
recycleMLSSatarateofapproximately1timestheinfluentflowfromtheendoftheanoxiczonetothe
influentoftheanaerobiczoneforEBPR.Theinternalrecycletotheanaerobiczoneisnotneededifthe
RASisreturnedtotheanaerobicreactorinfluent.Notethatthemostefficientinternalnitraterecycle
ratedependsontheCOD/TKNratioenteringtheanoxiczone.Abovethisrate,thereisinsufficientBOD
toreducethequantityofnitratesenteringthezoneandadditionalrecycleisdetrimentalratherthan
usefulbecauseinternalrecycletypicallyrecyclesDOaswellasnitrates.Thereisrarelyjustificationfor
recycleratesgreaterthan4timestheinfluentflowbecauseoftheincreaseinpumpingcostsforthe
sameamountofadditionalnitratethatwillbereduced,evenifsufficientbiodegradableCODisavailable.
TheRASrateshouldgenerallybe0.5to1.2timestheinfluentflowrate.Theoperatorshouldbe
providedwithsubstantialRASrateflexibilitysothatadjustmentscanbemadeforvariationsinsludge
settlingratesandforchangesintheMLSSconcentrationinthebiologicalreactors.
Designersalsoshouldallowflexibilityforwhentheplantisunderloadedduringtheearlyyears
ofoperationorwhentheorganicloadingisconsiderablylessthanthedesignloading.Becauseunder
loadedBNRprocessesdonotperformaseffectivelyasfullyloadedBNRprocesses,theuseofmultiple
trainsisthebestwaytoprovideflexibilityduringtheunderloadedyears.Alsonotethatnitrification
processesrequireminimumamountsofalkalinitytofunctionoptimally.Theactualamountsofalkalinity
105
August2010
inthewastewatershouldbedeterminedandcomparedtothenetquantitythatwillbeconsumedby
nitrificationandphosphorusprecipitatingchemicalsaftercorrectionforalkalinitythatwillbeproduced
duringdenitrification.
10.3OverviewofRecommendedApproachforPlantModeling
Severalgroupshavepublishedrecommendedprotocolsandguidelinesforactivatedsludge
modeling(Petersenetal.2002;Hulsbeeketal.2002;Melceretal.2003;Shawetal.2007).Recognizing
theneedforaconsistentprotocol,IWAestablishedataskgroupongoodmodelingpracticetoprepare
guidelinesfortheuseofactivatedsludgemodels.Thetaskgrouphopestofinalizetheguidancein2010
(Rieger2009).
Todate,thetaskgrouphasdevelopedaUnifiedProtocolformodelingwiththefollowingfive
keysteps:
1. Projectdescription,includingidentificationofobjectivesandmodelrequirements
2. Datacollectionandreconciliation
3. Modelsetup
4. Calibrationandvalidation
5. Simulationandresultsinterpretation
Figure101showstheUnifiedProtocolaspublishedbyIWA.Modelersshouldgenerallyfollowthis
protocolwhendesigningretrofitstoanexistingtreatmentplanttoenhancenutrientremoval.
106
August2010
MODEL SET UP
DATA COLLECTION AND RECONCILIATION
Requirements (data, model accuracy, )
no
Selection of the parameters and stop criteria
Agreement on the objectives and
budget?
yes
Calibration
no
Calibration successful?
Data
collection
Additional
data
(physical, operational, influent, effluent)

collection
yes
(direct
parameter
Validation
measurements,
sampling
Process flow diagram (process units, boundaries)
campaign,
no
missing data)
Validation successful?
Data and process evaluation
yes
Calibration / validation adequate ?
Data sufficient and validated?
no
yes
yes
no
Data and process validated?
Simulation and result interpretation
yes
Results sufficient?
Plant model building
(input specification, sub-model selection)
no
Functional evaluation
Objectives achieved?
yes
no
Sensible outputs?
Report
yes
no
Model adequate?
yes
Figure101.Unifiedprotocolforactivatedsludgemodeling.
Source:IWA,2009.UsedwithpermissionfromtheIWA(http://www.modeleau.org/GMP_TG/UP.htm),fromanupcomingreport
(http://www.iwapublishing.com/template.cfm?name=isbn9781843391746&type=forthcoming)
107
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION
Objectives
no
no
SIMULATION AND RESULT

INTERPRETATION
PROJECT DEFINITION
Problem statement
August2010
10.4 EstablishingObjectivesandRequirements
Asearlyaspossibleinthemodelingprocess,designersandplantoperatorsshouldagreeonthe
following:
Modelingobjectives
Boundaries,answeringquestionssuchasUnderwhatenvironmentalandoperatingconditions
willthemodelbeused?andWhattypesofsimulationswillbeperformed?
Preconditions
Performancecriteria(e.g.,goalsformodelingaccuracy)
Responsibilities
Requireddata
Timeandbudgetconstraints
Threetopicsintendeduseofmodeling,goalsforaccuracy,andtypesofsimulationsareparticularly
importantinthedesignofnutrientremovalsystemsandarediscussedinsubsequentsubsections.
10.4.1 IntendedUseofModeling
Thisdesignmanualassumesthatmodelingwillbeusedforthedesignofretrofitstoexisting
plantstoenhancenitrogenand/orphosphorusremoval,butcanbeusedforgreenfielddesignsaswell
Thesamesimulatorsdevelopedfordesignpurposes,however,canhavemanyotherfunctions.
Simulatorscanbeusedtoassessunitprocesscapacitiesunderdifferentoperatingconditionstoidentify
whichprocessesarecriticalbottlenecks.Theycanbeveryusefulasaprocessoptimizationtoolthrough
themanipulationofvariouscontrollableparameters.Thesamesimulatorusedfordesigncanbeused
tooptimizeperformanceoncetheretrofitsareinplace.Designersshouldalsodetermineifthe
simulatorwillbeusedforoperatortrainingforexample,tosimulatewhatif?scenariosthatcould
havesignificantimpactsonplantperformance.
10.4.2 GoalsforModelingAccuracy
Becausethesimulatorisasimplifiedrepresentationanddoesnotaccountforeverybiological
processandchemicalreactionthatoccursintherealworld,aperfectcalibrationtoobserved
performanceisnotpracticallyachievableandisnotarecommendedstandardofmodeling.An
acceptablelevelofagreementisgenerallyforobservedandpredictedvaluestobewithin10to15
percentforaninitialdesignwhencalculatedonamonthlyaveragebasisandbelow10percentforafinal
design.Withonlineinstrumentationthatcantrackthediurnalvariations,itmaybepossibleto
approach5percentaccuracyonadailyaveragebasisformodelcalibrationofmostoftheparameters
suchassludgeproduction,MLSS,effluentammoniaandsolubleCOD.Someeffluentparameterssuchas
nitratesaredependentonthedegreeofsimultaneousnitrificationanddenitrification,whichismore
difficulttomodel.Agreementwillbelessfortransientconditionsfurtherawayfromsteadystatesuchas
stormeventsorspikesinnutrientloading.Thegoalformodelingaccuracyshouldtakeintoaccountthe
designcriteriafornutrientlimits.Asmallermarginoferrorispreferableforverylowtargeteffluent
levelsforTNand/orTP.
Designersshouldcoordinatecloselywiththeplantownertoestablishtargetaccuracypriorto
developingthemodel.Notethatthemodeloutputisonlyasaccurateastheinputandthemethod
108
August2010

usedtomakethemeasurementforinputsandoutputs.Thebettertheinputinformation,thelowerthe
safetyfactorthatisneeded.
10.4.3 Dynamicvs.SteadyStateSimulation
Modelscanberuninsteadystateordynamicsimulationmode.Steadystatesimulationspredict
treatmentplantperformancewhenthereisnovariationintheloadorflowtotheplant.Diurnal
patternsforinfluentflowvolumeandloadings(i.e.,CODandTKN)maybeusedinsteadystatemodels,
butthemodelswillaveragetheflowandloadandproducesteadystateoutputs.Dynamicmodelsrely
onthesamemathematicalrelationshipsassteadystatemodels,buttheycanalsosimulatehourly
variationsinmeasuredinfluentflowandoperatingparameters(e.g.,recycleflows)overanumberof
days,months,orseasons.
Industryexpertsconsiderdynamicmodelingtobesuperiortosteadystatemodeling(Hulsbeek
etal.2002;Merloetal.2008;Alexetal.2007).Dynamicsimulationsmorecloselyapproximateactual
plantoperationsandallowfortheuseofsmallersafetyfactorsfordesign.Theyareextremelyusefulfor
wetweathermodeling,determiningdailymaximumlimits,andsizingaerationequipmentforpeak
demand(Johnson2009).Designobjectives,however,shouldbebalancedwithsignificantlylargerdata
requirements(e.g.,hourlymeasurementsofinfluentflowandnutrientloadingsforseveraldays)and
hence,thehighercostsassociatedwithbuildingadynamiccomparedtoasteadystatemodel.Asnoted
previously,however,thecostofmoresamplingandanalysisisafractionofthesavingspossiblethrough
amoreaccuratedesignandlowersafetyfactors.
Dynamicmodelingbecomesparticularlyimportantandisrecommendedwhentargetingvery
lownutrientlimitssuchas3.0mg/Lfortotalnitrogen(TN)and/or0.1mg/Lfortotalphosphorus(TP).
Reasonsforthisarediscussedbelow.
Becausenitrifyingbacteriadonothaveadsorptivecapacity,therateatwhichtheycanreduce
ammoniaisdirectlyrelatedtothemassofnitrifiersinthemixedliquor,whichisinturndeterminedby
theaverageinfluentammonialoadandtheSRTintheaeratedbasin.Influentammoniaconcentrations
vary,withpeaksoccurringduringthedayandmuchlowerconcentrationsoccurringovernight.Infact,
peakammonialoadduringthemorningcanbeashighas2.8timestheaverage(Barnard1975).Influent
ammoniaconcentrationscanbegreatlyincreasedbyconcentratedammoniainreturnstreamsfrom
sludgedewateringoperations.Inmanyplants,dewateringofdigestedsludgeoccursduringtheday,
andthesupernatantfromthedewateringoperationisreturnedtotheheadoftheplantinthe
afternoon.Thecombinationofpeakammonialoadsfromtheinfluentwastewaterandadditional
ammoniafromreturnstreamscanresultinpeaksthatcannotbefullyoxidizedbytheavailablenitrifiers
resultinginpeaksofammoniaintheeffluent.ThesizeofthepeakswillalsoberelatedtotheSRTandis
notnecessarilyanindicationofimminentplantfailure,i.e.nitrifierwashout.Steadystatemodeling
wouldnotcapturethisscenario.Whentherearesubstantialdailyammoniapeaks,thesteadystate
modelmayshowthatnitrificationispossiblewhilethediurnalmodelmayindicateinadequate
performanceofthenitrifiersbecauseofammoniabreakthroughs.Forexample,whentheaverage
influentnitrogenis30mg/Landthereisanincreaseto60mg/LwithoutanincreaseintheSRTduring
thetransitionfrom30to60mg/L,someammoniawillbleedthroughuntilthemassofnitrifiershas
doubled.Insimulationoractualpractice,thiswouldtakeasignificantnumberofdays.Itisunlikelythat
thehighloadwillpersistlongenoughfortheincreaseinnitrifierstotakeplaceunlesstherehasbeena
permanentadditiontotheammoniaload.Therefore,significantvariationsintheeffluentammonia
concentrationcouldbeobservedbutthereislittleornodangeroflosingnitrification.Notealsothat
109
August2010

sincethenitrifierpopulationisalowfractionofthetotalMLSS,thetotalMLSSwillincreaseonlyslightly
(2to3percent)ifapermanentincreaseinammonialoadinghasoccurred.
Similartothereducedtreatmentcapacityofnitrificationsystemscausedbyammoniainrecycle
fromsludgedewateringunits,reducedphosphorusremovalcanbecausedbynitratesintherecycle
stream.Thisisbecausesomeheterotrophicaerobicorganisms,includingsomephosphorusstoring
organisms,canusenitrateasanelectronacceptorandwillcompetewiththephosphateaccumulating
organisms(PAOs)forvolatilefattyacids(VFAs).SeeChapter5foradditionalinformationonthe
biologicalphosphorusremovalprocessandinhibitoryeffectsofnitrateintherecyclestream.
Themainsimulatormodelsincorporateaonedimensional(1D)mathematicalmodelfor
secondaryclarifiersbasedonthemixedliquorsettlingcharacteristicsasrepresentedbytheVesilind
equations(Vesilind1968;Zhouetal.1982).These1Dmodelscanpredictthebehavioroftransientloads
throughthesecondaryclarifiersduringdynamicmodeling,whichisextremelyimportantwhenremoving
nutrientstolowlevels.The1Dmodels,however,arelimitedbecausetheyassumeideallayered
clarificationandthickening.Twoorthreedimensional(2Dor3D)computationalfluiddynamic(CFD)
modelscanmoreaccuratelyrepresentthedynamicbehaviorofspecificclarifierconfigurations(Merloet
al.2007).CFDmodelscouldbecoupledwiththeoverallsimulatormodels;however,theyrequireavery
largecomputermemorytorun,whichslowsdowntheiterationsrequiredtosolvethemultiple
interrelatedbiologicalequations.Mostdesignersusethe1Dmodelsforsolvingthebiologicalreactions
andtheeffectoftransientloads,thenstudythefinalclarifiersusingCFDmodeling.
Ifdesignerswouldliketoseetheeffectofdynamicmodelingbutonlydailyaverageandsome
peakflowvaluesareavailable,theycanusetypicalpatternsforflowandconcentrationderivedfrom
similarplants(itshouldbenotedontheoutputsthattheseareestimates).Designerscanuseaseparate
inputofcleanwatertosimulateastormeventoffixeddurationthenmixthisinputwithregularplant
influent.Thestormcouldbesimulatedatvarioustimesduringa24hourperiodtoassessitspotential
impact.Recycleflowscanalsobesimulatedasbeingstoredandfedatvarioustimeswithina24hour
periodundervariousstressconditions,suchaslowtemperatureorlowVFAsintheplantinfluent.For
example,thecentratefromdigestedsludgecouldbemodeledforreturnover8hours,24hours,ortobe
dischargedduringthenightwhentheincomingammonialoadislow.Someplantsmayrunoutof
alkalinityrequiredfornitrificationatlowflowsandsomeprogramscansimulatethis.
10.5 SelectingaProcessSimulator
Processsimulatorsallowuserstolinkunittreatmentprocessessuchasbioreactorsandclarifiers
togetheraccordingtotheconfigurationofaparticularplant.Eachunitprocessincorporatesa
mathematicalmodeltorepresentbiological,physical,and/orchemicalinteractionswithinthatunit.The
processsimulatorusesthisinformationtomimictheperformanceofaplantunderspecificoperating
andinfluentloadingconditions.Eachindividualbiologicalreactorinthemodelsisassumedtobe
completelymixed.
Table101liststhecommonlyusedcommerciallyavailablesimulators(thisisnotanexhaustive
listasthesimulatormarketiscontinuallychanging).EachsimulatorisCODbased,allowsdynamicand
steadystatesimulations,hasgraphicalinterfaceandgraphicaloutput,andcomputestruemass
balances.Eachsimulatorcanalsoperformwholeplantmodeling,whichincludesnotonlyprimary
treatmentprocesses,butalsosolidstreatmentandrecyclestreams.Commerciallyavailablesimulators
vary,however,accordingtotheirgraphicinterface,themathematicalmodelsincludedforspecific
1010
August2010

treatmentprocesses,thedegreeofcustomizationavailable,thedegreeofknowledgerequired,and
cost.
Table101.CommonlyUsedProcessSimulators
Simulator Distributor Description

toU.S.
Biowin
Use
Website
Evirosim
AssociatesLtd.
(Flamborough,
Ontario)
Usesaproprietarycombinedmodelthat
AlongwithGPSX,
http://www.envirosim
isbasedontheASMmodelsbut
dominantinNorth .com
integratesthemwithmodelsforfixed
America
film,digestion,settling,chemical
addition,andfiltration(supermodel
approach).Itiscustomizableand
compatiblewithExcel,andhasaunique
pHcalculatorthatcandeterminepH
changescausedbywastewaterreactions
andmodelprecipitationofstruviteand
otherminerals.
GPSX
Hydromantis
Usesaproprietarymodelbasedonthe
AlongwithBioWin, http://www.hydroma
Inc.(Hamilton, ASMmodels.Includesmodelsforfixed
dominantinNorth ntis.com
Ontario)
film,digestion,settling,chemical
America
addition,andfiltration.Itiscustomizable
andcompatiblewithExcelandMatlab.It
isabletoperformautomaticsensitivity
analysesandhasanextensiveprocess
modellibrary.
SIMBA
ifake.V
BasedontheASMmodels,alsohas
MainlyGermany
http://simba.ifak
(Germany)
modelsforsettlinganddigestion.Itis
andHolland
md.de/simba/index.p
customizableandusesMatlabasabasis.
hp?option=com_cont
Welldesignedtolookatcontrol
ent&task=view&id=34
elements,itcanlinkwithcollection
&Itemid=104&lang=e
systemandstreammodels.
n
STOAT
WRcplc
AllowsuseofmodifiedversionofASM
Predominantly
http://www.wrcplc.co
(Swindon,
modelsthatarebasedonBODinsteadof UnitedKingdom
.uk/default.aspx?item
England)
COD.Itiscustomizableandcanperform
=1052
automaticsensitivityanalyses.UKspecific
data.
WEST
DHIWater
Opensystem,i.e.,canuseany
Belgiumand
http://www.dhigroup.
(Hrsholm,
mathematicalmodeltopredictplant
Europe
com/Solutions/Solutio
Denmark)
performance.
nSoftware/WEST.aspx
Aninternetavailableprogrambasedon
Developedinthe
AQUIFAS
Aquaregen
http://www.aquifas
theASMmodelsthatutilizesExcel.It
USA,butcurrently .com
Mountain
includesmodelsfortheincorporationof
usedinseveral
View, CA
alltypesoffixedfilmmediaintoactivated countriesaround
USA
sludgebioreactors.AlsoMBRandwhole
theworld.
plantsimulation.
Source:Melceretal.2003;Shaw2009.SenandRandall2008a,b,&c.WeblinkscurrentasofMarch23,2010.
Twosimulators,BioWinandGPSX,dominatethemarketinNorthAmerica.Botharerelatively
easytouseandproduceoutputdatainsimplegraphicalformat(Shawetal.2007).In1995,theDutch
FoundationofAppliedWaterResearch(STOWA)recommendedtheuseofSIMBA,whichpromptedits
adoptionbymorethan100plantsintheNetherlands(Hulsbeeketal.2002).STOAT,ontheotherhand,
1011
August2010

istheonlysimulatorthatincludesbiochemicaloxygendemand(BOD)basedmodels.Westispopular
withsomeintheacademiccommunitybecauseofitsabilitytoaccommodateanymodelandbecauseit
runsinatransparentenvironment.
Newsimulatorsarecontinuallybeingdeveloped,sometomeetspecificneedsofcertainusers.
Forexample,AQUASIMandASIMareproducedbyEAWAGandhavefoundhighusageamong
academics(formoreinformationonthesemodels,seehttp://www.asim.eawag.ch/).SenandRandall
(2008a,2008b,and2008c)developedaninternetavailablespreadsheetmodelcalledAquifas
primarilyformodelingattachedgrowthprocessesincludingmembranebioreactors(MBR),integrated
fixedfilmactivatedsludge(IFAS)systems,andmovingbedbioreactors(MBBR),butitcanbeusedfor
wholeplantsimulationsofalltypesofactivatedsludgesystems,includingheadworks,anaerobic
digestersandsludgeprocessing,andisadaptableforfixedfilmprocessessuchastricklingfiltersand
RBCs.Usershavetheoptionofselectingempiricalmodelsorbiofilmdiffusionmodelsforpredicting
performanceandcanrunbothsteadystateanddynamicsimulations.Aquifasisavailablefreeofcharge
athttp://www.aquifas.com/.
Whilenosetofmathematicalequationscanperfectlyreplicateasystem,designersshouldbe
carefultoselectasimulatorthatcontainsallsignificanttreatmentprocessesoccurringintheplantand
candidateprocessesunderconsiderationforupgrades.Thechoiceofsimulatorswillalsodependon
userpreferenceandskilllevel.Whilesomesimulatorsallowagreatdealofflexibilitytoadjustand
changemodels,theyalsorequiregreaterskillandunderstandingoftheprocess.Thegraphicalinterface,
userfriendliness,andcompatibilitywithexistingsoftwarewillalsobeimportantfactors.Some
programshaveahighinitialcostbutwillmostlikelyoffertrainingandahigherdegreeofcustomer
support,whileotherscostlessbutdonotprovideasmuchsupport.Thetextboxonthenextpage
providesalistofquestionsthatshouldbeconsideredbydesignerspriortoselectingaprocess
simulator.
1012
August2010
WhatquestionsshouldIaskbeforeselectingaprocesssimulator?
Howwillyouusethesimulator?Whatdoyouwantthesimulatortodonowandinthefuture?
Whowillrunthesimulationsandkeepthemodelsuptodate?
-
DecideonFEATURES.
Determineexpertiseneededtorunandmaintainthesimulator.
QuestionsforVendors:
-
Whatprocessesandfunctionswillitmodel?
HowdoesitinterfacewithothersoftwaresuchasExcel?
Istherealeaseoption?Thistypeofagreementcanbeverycosteffective.
Whatisthecostandavailabilityoftraining?
Whattypeofsupport(fromcompanyand/orusergroups)isoffered?
Howextensivearethedocumentationandhelpfunctions?
Source:Shaw2009.
10.6 DataCollection
Figure102,adaptedfromWilsonandDold(1998),showstheinputsneededtosetupaprocess
simulatorforanexistingWWTP.Inputdatathatcanbeobtainedfromplantrecordsorbydirect
measurementinclude:
Processconfigurationdatasuchasplantlayout,reactorsizing,andrecyclestreams
Processoperatingconditionssuchasflowsthrougheachprocessandflowratesofrecycle
streams
Processinputs,namelywastewatercharacteristicsandinfluentloadingdata
Rieger(2009)estimatesthat50to60percentoftheentiremodelingeffortgoesintodatacollectionand
reconciliation.
Subsections10.6.1and10.6.2discussprocessconfigurationandoperatingconditions,
respectively.GuidanceforwastewatercharacterizationandinfluentloadingdataisprovidedinChapter
7.Forguidanceonestimatingfractionsoforganicsubstrateandnutrientloadingparameters,see
Sections10.7and10.8,respectively.Estimatingkineticandstoichiometricparametersforprocess
modelsarediscussedinSection10.9.
1013
August2010
Figure102.Essentialrequirementsforwastewatertreatmentprocesssimulation.
Source:WilsonandDold1998.ReprintedwithpermissionfromProceedingsofWEFTEC.1998,the71stAnnualWater
EnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference,Orlando,Florida,October37,1998.Copyright1998,Water
EnvironmentFederation,Alexandria,Virginia,www.wef.org.
Theaccuracyofanysimulatorishighlydependentonthequalityofthedatausedtobuildit.
Designersshouldcriticallyevaluatedatatoensurethattheyarelogical(i.e.,dataarenotoutsidethe
normalrangeforWWTPs)andmeasuredparametersareasexpectedforeachsamplinglocationgiven
theupstreamtreatmentprocesses.Chapter7,Section7.4.2recommendsdatachecksthatshouldbe
completedpriortoenteringinformationintothemodel.Massbalancestofurthervalidateinfluent
loadingandplantoperatingdataarediscussedinSection10.10(modelcalibration).
10.6.1 ProcessConfiguration
SimulatorsrequireuserstoconfigureunitprocessesastheyoccurattheWWTPandenter
informationonthesizeofeachcomponent,pointsofinputandoutput,andrecyclestreamssuchasthe
RASandMLSSrecycle.Mostsimulatorsallowuserstobuildaplantbyselectingiconsforunit
processesandenteringbasicdataforeach(e.g.,volume,length,width,anddepthforaerationbasins
andclarifiers).TheendresultisavisualrepresentationoftheexistingWWTPtobeupgradedor
retrofittedortheconceptfortheGreenfieldplant.SeeFigure103foranexampleofasimulator
configurationforaThreestagePhoredoxProcess(A2O)plantwithprimarysedimentationtanks,a
fermenterforVFAgeneration,wasteactivatedsludgethickening,digestion,anddewatering.Designers
shouldalwaysconsiderwholeplantmodelingfornutrientremovalprocesses,meaningthatsludge
productionandrecyclestreamsareconfiguredinthesimulatorratherthanjustthemajortreatment
processes.
1014
August2010
Influent
Mixer
PST
Anaerobic
Anoxic
Aerobic
Aerobic
Clarifie
Storm Flow
Fermenter
Digester
Biosolids
Figure103.Examplesimulatorconfigurationforabiologicalnutrientremovalplant(courtesyofEnviroSimAssociates,LTD).
1015
August2010
Allthemajorprocessesincludingsecondaryclarifiers,bioreactors,andanyfiltersshouldbe
included.Ifanobjectiveofmodelingistoevaluateaerationsystemperformance,diffuserdimensions
anddensitiesshouldalsobeincluded(Melceretal.2003).Itisnotusuallynecessarytoincludesludge
treatmentprocess(e.g.,digestion),althoughanyreturnstreamsfromtheseprocessesshouldbe
specified.Ifpossible,paralleltreatmentprocessesshouldbemodeledasindividualunits(Shawetal.
2007).
Informationonphysicalconfigurationcanbeobtainedfromplantmanagersoroperatorsorcan
beobtainedfromasbuiltconstructionrecords.Duringinitialmodelsetup,designersshouldcompare
designcapacitiesforeachunittothemodeledoutputsduringmaximumoperatingcapacity(Thirdetal.
2006).SeeSection10.9foradditionalinformationonmodelrunsandcalibration.
Thesetupofsuspendedgrowthbioreactorsisveryimportantforaccuratemodelingofcarbon
removalandnitrification.Thesimulatorsusecontinuousstirredtankreactors(CSTRs)torepresentthe
suspendedgrowthactivatedsludgesystems,meaningthatadropofwaterisinstantaneouslymixed
withtherestofthewaterassoonasitentersthatreactor.Inrealplants,theflowthroughbioreactorsis
somewherebetweenplugflowandcompletelymixeddependingondesignandoperationalfactorssuch
asshapeofthereactor,flowrate,baffling,andmixingpatternofaerationequipment.Toaccountfor
nonidealmixingconditions,individualbioreactorsshouldberepresentedbyatleasttwoCSTRsin
seriesforsquaretanksandmorethantwoforrectangulartanksinthemodel.
Ifthedesignofthereactorfavorsplugflowconditions(e.g.,longnarrowtankswithnodividing
wallbetweencells),designerscanusethefollowingformulatoestimatethenumberofCSTRsinseries
forthemodel:
Eq.101
N=7.4*L*Q(1+RR)
W*H
Where:
N
=equivalentnumberoftanksinseries(shouldneverbegreaterthan12)
L
=aerationtanklength(m)
Q
=wastewaterflow(m3/sec)
RR
=RASrecycleratio(dimensionless)
W
=aerationtankwidth(m)
H
=waterdepth(m)
ThisformulawasdevelopedbytheWaterResearchCentreintheUnitedKingdom.Foradditional
information,seeMelceretal.(2003).
Anothermorerigorousapproachtocharacterizingflowthroughabioreactoristoperforma
tracertest.Aslugofinerttracer(e.g.,lithiumorfluorescentdye)isaddedtotheheadofthetankand
monitoredtodevelopawashoutcurve.SeethepublicationGuidanceManualforSewageTreatment
PlantLiquidTrainProcessAudits(EnvironmentCanada1995)forthedetailedmethodology.
Themainreasonformatchingthenumberofindividualcompletelymixedtankswiththeshape
oftheexistingorproposedtankistosimulatethedifferentoperatingconditionsindifferentzones.E.g.
ifthelengthtowidthratiofortheaerationsectionis3,theoxygendemandinthefirstsectionwillbe
1016
August2010

higherwhilethedissolvedoxygenlevelinthissectionmustatleast2mg/Ltominimizebulkingsludge
developmentandtoenhancebothnitrificationandbiologicalphosphorusuptake.Incontrast,bythe
timethemixedliquorreachesthethirdsection,theammoniamaybedepletedresultinginadropin
oxygendemandwhichmayleadtooveraeration.Airflowstothedifferentzonesshouldmatchthe
demandtosaveenergyandensurethatthebiologicalfunctionsworkoptimally.Inaddition,theremay
beamixedliquorrecyclefromtheaerationbasintotheanoxiczonewhichwouldchangetheflow
patternsintheaerationbasin
10.6.2 OperatingConditions
Thefollowingoperatingparametersareimportantmodelinputsandareavailableatmost
WWTPs:
Flowroutingintoandoutofmajorunittreatmentprocesses
RASandmixedliquorrecyclerates
Primaryandsecondarywastageflows(withschedulesincasesofintermittentwasting)
Flowrateandscheduleforreturnstreamsthatcontainhighsolids,nitrogen,orphosphorus
Controlschemesformechanicalequipmentsuchasaeratorsandpumps(basedonSCADA
systemrecordsorinterviewswithplantoperators)
Designersshouldreviewseveralyearsofdatatodetermineoperatingconditionsunderdryweather,
normaloperationratherthantakinganaverageofseveralmonthsofdata.Operatingparameters
shouldalsobeestablishedforextremeconditionssuchaspeakwetweatherevents.
Plantsmaybemissingoperatinginformation,suchastheproportionofflowgoingtomultiple
treatmenttrains.Designersshouldinterviewoperatorstoapproximatemissingoperationaldataoruse
portableequipment(e.g.,flowmeters)todirectlymeasureandrecordmissingparameters.Sitevisits
tothetreatmentplanttointerviewoperators,conductawalkthroughoftheplant,andobserve
treatmentprocessesarehighlyrecommended(Hulsbeeketal.2002).
Acommonsuspectoperatingparameteriswastageflowduetothedifficultyinmeasuring
sludgedensitiesoverthefullperiodofwastage(Melceretal.2003).SeeSection10.10forguidanceon
checkingwastageflowratesduringcalibration.
10.7 CharacterizationofOrganicMaterial
Whenusingmodelsfordesign,organiccompoundsneedtobedifferentiatedintoanumberof
separatecomponentsbasedontheircharacteristics,namelywhetherthematerialissoluble3and/or
biodegradable.Therelativefractionsoforganicmaterialinwastewaterareveryimportantbecausethey
determinetheamountofsubstrateavailabletomicroorganismsforbiologicalnutrientremoval
processesandaffecttheamountofDOrequiredandthevolumeofsludgeproduced.Mostmodels
3
Melceretal.(2003)reportsalackofclarityinuseofthetermsoluble.Mosttechnicalreferencesdefinesoluble
asmaterialpassingthrougha0.45micron(m)membranefilter.Totaldissolvedsolids(TDS),however,are
routinelymeasuredusingglassfiberfilterswithnominalporesizesof1.2to1.5m.Thedifferenceisinthe
colloidalmaterial,withmostcolloidalCODpassingthroughaglassfiberfilterbutretainedona0.45mfilter.Itis
thereforeveryimportanttonotethefiltertypeusedwhenexamininghistoricaldataanddocumentthefiltertype
usedforallexperiments.
1017
August2010

includedefaultvaluesfororganicfractions;however,sitespecificcharacterizationisstrongly
recommendedforthedesignofnutrientremovalsystems.
CharacterizationoforganicmaterialisalmostalwaysintermsofCODratherthanBOD4.Evenif
thesimulatorsallowuserstoenterBODvalues,theyareconvertedtoCODformassbalancesor
simulations,usingtheCODfractionsinthemodel.Foradditionalrationale,seethetextboxinChapter
7,Section7.4.1.WhenCODdataarenotavailable,CODcanbeestimatedbasedonitsrelationshipto
measuredBODandVSSvalues(seeSection10.7.1forguidelines).ItisalsocommonwhenonlyBOD
valuesareavailabletorunaseriesofBODandCODdeterminationsonthesamesamplestofinda
reasonablecorrelationcurvewhichcanbeusedtodeterminetheCODforeveryBODvalue.
Figure104providesaschematicrepresentationoftheCODcomponentsinwastewater.
Commonlyusedsymbolsforeachcomponentalongwithadescriptionandoverviewofmeasurement
methodsareprovidedinTable102.ThenamingconventionforthesymbolsisSforsoluble,Xfor
particulate,Iforunbiodegradableorinert.CODcomponentsaretypicallyreportedinmilligramsper
liter(mg/L),butcanalsoberepresentedasfractionsofthetotalasindicatedbytheletterFwiththe
symbolasasubscript(e.g.,FSI=thefractionoftotalCODthatissolubleandunbiodegradable).
AsshowninFigure104,totalCODintheplantinfluentisthesumofthesolublebiodegradable
portion,includingbothvolatilefattyacids(VFAs)andnonVFAcompounds;thesolubleunbiodegradable
(orinert)material;slowlybiodegradablematerial,whichcanbeeithercolloidalorparticulate;and
particulateunbiodegradablematerial.Asaformula,thisrelationshipisexpressedas:
Eq.102
CODTINF=SA+SF+SI+SCOL+XS+XI
Where:
CODTINF=TotalinfluentCODconcentration
=Volatilefattyacids
SA
SF
=ComplexbiodegradablesolubleCOD
SI
=SolubleunbiodegradableCOD
SCOL =SlowlybiodegradablecolloidalCOD
XS
=SlowlybiodegradableparticulateCOD
=ParticulateunbiodegradableCOD
XI
TheSTOATsimulatorcontainsmodifiedmathematicalexpressionsthatallowtheusertocharacterizewastewater
usingBODinsteadofCOD.STOATistheonlyoneofthecommonlyusedprocesssimulatorsshowninTable101
withthisfeature.
1018
August2010
Soluble VFA (SA)
Readily
Biodegradable
(SS or rbCOD)
Soluble Non-VFA
(SS)
Flocculated
and Filtered
COD
Soluble
Unbiodegradable (SI)
Slowly
Biodegradable
(SBCOD)
Filtered
COD
Total
COD
Slowly
Biodegradable
Colloidal (SCOL)
Slowly
Biodegradable
Particulate (XS)
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
(XI)
COD
Figure104.CODcomponentsformunicipalwastewater
Note:CODfractionsarenottoscaleandvaryfromplanttoplant.
Source:DerivedfromMelcer,H.,P.L.Dold,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,I.Takacs,H.D.Stensel,A.W.Wilson,P.Sun,andS.Bury.
2003.Figure45,withPermissionfromtheWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation.
1019
August2010
Table102.CODandParticulateFractionsinMunicipalWastewater
Fraction
Symbol1
Description
HowItCanBe
Measured
TotalInfluentCOD
CODT,INF
Readily
Biodegradable
COD
SS(or
rbCOD)
VolatileFatty
Acids
SA(or
VFAs)
SF
Complex
Biodegradable
SolubleCOD
Soluble
Unbiodegradable
COD
SI
Slowly
Biodegradable
COD
SBCOD
Slowly
Biodegradable
colloidalCOD
Slowly
Biodegradable
ParticulateCOD
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
COD
SCOL
XS
XI
Concentrationin
Municipal
Wastewater2
(mg/L)
Quantifiesstrengthof
organicmaterialinthe
influent
Canbeeasilyabsorbedby
organismsandusedfor
energyandsynthesisof
cellmass.IsthesumofSA
andSF
AfractionofSS
Directlymeasuredor
estimatedbasedon
relationshiptoBOD
Directly measuredby
respirometry,butother
methodsareavailable
usingsimplifying
assumptions
Directlymeasuredusing
ionorgaschromatography
ThefractionofSS thatis
notVFA
SSSA
PortionofsolubleCOD
unaffectedbybiological
reactionsattheplant.
Leavesthesecondary
clarifieratsame
concentrationasinfluent
Portionofbiodegradable
CODthatrequires
extracellularenzymatic
breakdownpriorto
adsorptionandutilization.
IsthesumofSCOLandXS
PortionofSBCODthatis
colloidalandtypicallynot
settleable
PotionofSBCODthatis
particulateandsettleable
Approximatedasthe
2050
soluble(filtered)CODofa
wellnitrifiedplanteffluent
PortionofparticulateCOD
unaffectedbybiological
reactionsattheplant.
Accumulatesinsludge
mass.
250700
25125
Typicallydetermined as
CODT,INFSISSXI
200400
Thedifferencebetween
thefilteredCODandthe
ffCODoftheeffluent
SBCOD SCOL
35110
Determinedfromthe
modelorestimatedbased
oninfluentCOD,BOD,and
TSS
Notes:
1.Theliteraturecontainsmorethanonesymbolforsomecomponents.Thesymbolsshownaregenerallyconsistentwith
Melceretal.(2003).Othercommonlyusedsymbolsareincludedinparentheses.Notethatthesymbolshownrepresents
concentration,expressedasmilligramsperliter(mg/L).FractionsoftotalCODarerepresentedbytheletterFandasubscript
(e.g.FSIisthefractionoftheinfluentCODthatisunbiodegradableandsoluble).
2.DerivedfromMelceretal.(2003),Table42andexperiencewithsystems.Concentrationmayvaryduetovariablepercapita
waterconsumption.
1020
August2010

ThesignificanceoftheCODfractionsonwastewatertreatmentisdescribedbelow.
ReadilybiodegradableCOD(SSorrbCOD)isanextremelyimportantmodelingvariablefor
biologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR)systemsasitdeterminestheamountofsubstrateavailable
forPAOstouseintheanaerobiczone.ItincludesVFAsandsoluble,readilybiodegradableCOD
thatarenotVFAsbutcandegradetoVFAsintheanaerobiczone.
SlowlybiodegradableCOD(SBCOD)ismadeupofparticulateandcolloidalmaterialthat
requiresextracellularbreakdownpriortoadsorptionbymicroorganisms.Thedifference
betweentheparticulatefraction(XS)andthecolloidalfraction(XCOL)isimportantwhen
modelingperformanceofprimaryclarifiersbecauseaportionoftheparticulatefractionwill
settleandberemovedwiththewastesludgewhileallthecolloidalmatterwillpassthroughto
theaerobicprocess.
SolubleunbiodegradableCOD(SI)issignificantinthatitpassesthroughtheplantandendsup
intheplanteffluent.Itisimportanttodistinguishthisportionfromthesolublebiodegradable
fractionintheplantinfluent.SIistypicallyasmallfractionofthetotal.
ParticulateunbiodegradableCOD(XI)willaccumulateinthewastesludge.Fromamass
balanceperspective,themassofXIinthesystemisequaltothemasscomingintothesystem
perdaymultipliedbytheSRT.XIaccountsforincreasingVSSinthesludgewithincreasingSRT.
Inadditiontotheorganicmatterfractionsdescribedabove,activebiomasswillbecapturedby
totalCODmeasurementmethodsandisreflectedinparticulateCODfractions(XIandXS).Orhonand
Cokgor(1997)estimatethatactivebiomassmakesupbetween7and25percentoftotalCODin
municipalwastewater.ActivebiomassCODisnottypicallymeasuredortakenintoaccountformodeling
andwillnotsignificantlyimpactmodelpredictionsofplantperformanceexceptinsomehighrate(low
hydraulicresidencetime(HRT))systems.SeeMelceretal.(2003)fordeterminingactivebiomassCODif
youbelievethatitmightbeasignificantfractioninyoursystem.
TheaggregationsontherightsideoftheschematicinFigure104relatemeasurementmethods
totherepresentativefractions.ThefilteredCODismeasuredafterthesamplehasbeenfilteredthrough
a0.45mfilterandrepresentsbothveryfinecolloidalandsolublematerial.Thecolloidalmaterialcan
beremovedbyflocculatingthesamplebeforefilteringit.Theresult,calledtheflocculatedandfiltered
CODorffCOD,representsonlythereadilybiodegradableandtrulysolubleunbiodegradableCOD.
ImportantrelationshipsbetweenorganicandparticulatematerialarediscussedinSection
10.7.1.Section10.7.2presentsvariousmethodsfordeterminingCODfractionsforagivenwastewater.
RecommendeddatachecksforCODfractionsareprovidedinSection10.7.3.
10.7.1 RelationshipofOrganicMaterialandSuspendedSolidsinWastewater
Figure105showstherelationshipsbetweenBOD,COD,TSS,andVSSalongwithkeyfractionsof
each.UnderstandingtheserelationshipscanhelpdesignersestimateCODfractionswhendataarenot
availableorcheckresultsagainstotherparameterswhenCODfractiondataareavailable.
1021
August2010
ISS
SBCOD
Unbiodegradable
Particulate
Particulate
Particulate
XI
VSS
Soluble
nonVFA
Biodegradable
Particulate
Soluble
Colloidal
SS
VFA
BOD
SI
COD
TSS
Figure105.RelationshipbetweenBOD,COD,TSS,andVSS.
Note:BOD=biochemicaloxygendemand;COD=chemicaloxygendemand;TSS=totalsuspendedsolids;VSS=volatile
suspendedsolids;XI=particulateunbiodegradableCOD;SI=solubleunbiodegradableCOD;VFA=volatilefattyacids;ISS=
Inorganicsuspendedsolids
BODcanbeeithersolubleorparticulate.ThesolubleBODisrepresentedinCODasthetotalof
thereadilybiodegradableportion(Ss)andthecolloidalportionofSBCOD.Theparticulateslowly
biodegradableCODcorrespondstotheparticulatefractionofBOD.Theparticulateandsoluble
unbiodegradablefractionsofCODarenotcapturedbytheBOD5method.TheCOD/BODratioformost
municipalwastewateris1.9to2.2mgCODpermgBOD(seethetextboxinthissectionforguidanceon
estimatingCODbydeterminingtheCOD/BODratio).
Totalsuspendedsolids(TSS)representtheparticulateportionofCODplustheinorganic
suspendedsolids.TSSistypicallydeterminedbyweighingthesolidsretainedona1.2mglassfiber
filter.Thesamplecanthenbeignitedandweighedagain.Theweightretainedistheinertsuspended
solids(ISS),andthedifferencebetweenTSSandISSisthevolatilesuspendedsolids(VSS).TheISSisan
importantparameterinmodeling.Thesesolidspassthroughtheplantunreactedandareremovedin
thewastesludge,withasmallportionleavingintheeffluent.ISScanhaveasignificanteffectonthe
mixedliquorsuspendedsolids.Inplantswithnophosphorusremovalorchemicaladdition,aplant
balanceonISSisagoodcheckonthesolidsfractionsastheISSintotheplantshouldequaltheISSout.
Whenphosphorusisremovedfromtheliquidphasebyeitherbiologicalorchemicalmeans,itleavesthe
plantthroughthesolidsandregistersasISS.
1022
August2010

TheparticulatefractionofCODcanbecorrelatedtohistoricaldataonVSSofthemixedliquor
(MLVSS).Thisratioistypicallybetween1.42and1.48mgCODpermgMLVSS;however,theratiocanbe
higherforsolidsotherthanbiomass.SomemodelsuseaconstantCOD/VSSratiotodetermineVSS
throughouttheplant,whileothersmayallowdifferentvaluesfordifferentsolidsfractionssuchas
biomass,XI,andXS.
WhatiftheplantdoesnothaveCODdata?Thisisacommonproblem.ManyplantsmeasureBOD5
insteadofCODbecausetheBODmethodhasbeeninuseforalongtimeanditisoftenthebasisfor
regulatorycompliance.IfCODmeasurementsarenotavailable,CODcanbeapproximatedby
establishingtheratioofCOD/BODorCOD/VSS.WhilesomeprogramsmaytakeBODastheinput,itis
stillnecessarytoadjusttheCODfractionsforgoodcorrelation.
AlthoughmeasuredvaluesofBOD,COD,andVSSintheplantinfluentvarygreatly,theratiosare
generallyconsistentforaspecificwastewater.COD/BODratiosaretypically1.9to2.2,withthehigher
ratiosforrelativelyfreshwastewater.COD/VSSshouldrangefrom1.42to1.48mgCODpermg
MLVSS.EstimatingtheratioofCOD/BODismorecommonthanCOD/VSS.
TodeterminetheCOD:BODratioforaspecificwastewater:
Collectseveralsamples(10to20arerecommended)ofinfluentwastewater.Thesamples
shouldberepresentativeoftotalinfluentflowandtakenatdifferenttimesofthedayatlow
andhighinfluentflowrate.
Splitthesamples,takingcaretohomogenizethemthoroughly.
AnalyzeeachsampleforCODandBOD.UsethesamemethodforBODthatisusedforthe
availableplantdata.(BOD5ismostcommon,althoughsomeplantswillhavecBOD5data.For
mostmunicipalwastewatersthereisverylittledifferenceinBOD5andcBOD5ifsettledprimary
sludgeisusedastheseedbecauseveryfewnitrifierswillbepresentandtheygrowtooslowly
tosignificantlyaffecttheresultsafterjustfivedays.If,ontheotherhand,effluentfroma
nitrifyingplantisusedastheseed,theresultswillbesubstantiallyinfluencedbynitrification
andtheanswerwillmisrepresentthebiodegradableorganicmatterinthewastewater.)
DeterminetheaverageCOD:BODratioforallsamples.
Repeatthetestwithprimaryeffluent
DesignerscanthenapplythisratiotohistoricalBODdatatodetermineCOD.
1023
August2010
10.7.2 MethodsforDeterminingCODFractions
IndustryliteratureprovidesmanydifferentapproachesforsitespecificcharacterizationofCOD
fractions.Thissectionpresentsthefollowingthreepossibleapproaches,movingfromtheeasiesttothe
mostcomplex:
1. ConductamassbalanceoftheCOD/VSSratioandBODaroundtheprimaryclarifierusingmodel
defaultvaluesforCODfractions.Thismethodrequiresminimalsamplingandcanbeagoodfirst
screeningstepbasedonexistingdata.
2. Conductspecialsamplingoftheplantinfluentandeffluenttoestimateeachfraction.Several
measurementmethodsandapproachesforapproximatingfractionsareavailable.Atminimum,
thismethodrequiresadatasetforfilteredCODandflocculatedandfilteredCOD(ffCOD)forthe
plantinfluentandeffluent.Advancedmeasurementtechniquessuchasrespirometryare
recommendedinsomecases.
3. Benchscalesequencingbatchreactor(SBR)tests(alsocalledtheLowF/MSBRtest).This
approachrequiresa6weekstartupperiodand2weeksofintensivemonitoring(Reiger2009).
Itisthemostexpensive(approximately$50,000)butcanprovideexcellentcharacterizationof
CODfractions,TKNfractions,andnitrifiergrowthrate.
METHOD1:MassBalancearoundthePrimaryClarifier
BecausealargeportionoftheVSSwillberemovedintheprimarysludgeandthesolubleCOD
passesintotheeffluent,amassbalancearoundtheprimaryclarifiercanprovidesignificantinformation
onCODfractions.TheCODremovedintheprimaryclarifiersshouldcorrelatewiththeremovalofBOD
andVSSsincethelatteralsoregistersasCOD.
Themassbalancerequiresthefollowinginformation:
CODandBODdatafortheclarifierinfluentandeffluent.
TSSandVSSdatafortheclarifierinfluentandeffluent.IfeitherTSSorVSSdataarenot
available,theycanbeapproximatedbyassumingaVSS/TSSratioof0.75forclarifierinfluentand
0.83forclarifiereffluent.
Flowrateintoandoutoftheclarifier.
Wastagerate.
Percentsolidsremoval.
EnterthesedataintothemodelandusedefaultvaluesforCODfractions.Runamassbalancearound
theprimaryclarifier.Ifthemassbalancecloses(i.e.,theeffluentBODcalculatedinthemodel
approximatetheactualBODeffluent)andthepredictedeffluentCODandTSSvaluesmatchtheactual
values,thedefaultvaluesforCODfractionsaregoodapproximations.Ifthemassbalancedoesnot
1024
August2010

closeorthepredictedandactualvaluesdonotmatch,thenthedefaultvaluesfortheCODfractions
needtobeadjusted.SeeMethods2and3.
METHOD2:SpecialSamplingofPlantInfluentandEffluent
ThissectionpresentsrecommendedmethodsforestimatingeachCODfraction.Inmanycases,
morethanonemethodisavailable.
ReadilyBiodegradableCOD(Ss)
ThesimplestwaytodetermineSSistomeasureflocculatedandfilteredCOD(ffCOD)ofthe
influentandeffluentofaplantproducingloweffluentammoniaandBOD,andassumethefollowing:
AllofthereadilybiodegradableCOD(SI)isconsumedintheplantandnegligibleintheplant
effluent.
ThereisnogenerationofsolubleunbiodegradableCOD(SI)intheplant(i.e.,itisthesame
concentrationintheinfluentandeffluent).
SSisthendeterminedasthedifferencebetweentheinfluentandtheeffluentffCOD.
TheassumptionthateffluentSSiszerogenerallyholdswhenthesludgeageis3daysorolder.
TheassumptionregardingthegenerationofSIcanbecheckedbymeasuringboththeinfluentand
effluent.Ifeitherassumptionisnotvalidorifresultsarenotasexpected,SScanbedeterminedusing
respirometrictechniques.SeveraltechniquesareavailableandcanbefoundinMelceretal.(2003).
TodistinguishbetweentheVFAportionofSS,measureVFAintheplantinfluentdirectlyusing
ionorgaschromatography.
SolubleUnbiodegradableCOD(SI)
SIcanbedeterminedbasedonthefollowingassumptions:
ThereisnogenerationofSIwithinthesystem.Whileitispossiblethatsomemicrobial
processesmayaddSI,thisisgenerallyasmallportionofthetotal.
ThesolublebiodegradableCODintheplanteffluentisnegligiblecomparedtothe
unbiodegradableportion.Thisisparticularlytrueiftheeffluentammoniaislessthan0.2mg/L.
TheeffluentsolublebiodegradableCODisassumedtobezero.
Theeffluenthasverylittlecolloidalmatterbecauseitisabsorbedonmixedliquorsolids(thisis
generallythecaseformunicipalwastewatersbutmaynotholdtrueforindustrialwastes).
Therefore,effluentcolloidalCODisassumedtobezero.Ifcolloidalmatterispresent,itcanbe
flocculatedandfilteredout.
ItfollowsthatSIcanbeapproximatedbymeasuringthesolubleCOD(i.e.,theportionpassingthrougha
0.45mfilter)intheplanteffluent.
1025
August2010
SlowlyBiodegradableCOD(SBCOD)
SBCODincludesbothparticulateandcolloidalCODandcangenerallybefoundbysubtracting
theotherportionsoftheCODfromthetotalusingthefollowingequation:
Eq.103
SBCOD=CODT,INFSISSXI
TodistinguishbetweenthecolloidalandparticulatefractionsofSBCOD,designerscancompare
thefilteredCODresultstoffCODresultsforinfluentsamples.Thedifferenceistheslowlybiodegradable
colloidalCOD(XS)
ParticulateUnbiodegradableCOD(XI)
SeveralmethodsareavailableforestimatingXI.Melceretal.(2003)reportsthatitismosteasily
estimatedbyaniterativeapproachwhereXIisadjustedinthesimulatoruntilthepredictedMLVSS
matchestheobservedvalues.ChangingXIwillalsochangetheoxygenuptakerate(OUR),soOURshould
becheckedtomakesureitdoesnotexceedthelimitsoftheaerationsystem.
TheXIfractioncanalsobeestimatedusinghistoricalplantdataforCOD,BOD,andVSSby
assumingavaluefortheCOD/VSSratiooftheinfluentsolids.SeeMelceretal.(2003),Section6.8for
thecalculationprocedure.
METHOD3:BenchScaleTests
LaboratorybenchscaleanalysiscanprovideaccurateestimatesofCODfractionsaswellasother
usefulinformationsuchasTKNandTPfractionsandnitrifierspecificgrowthrates.Theseanalyses,
however,arelaborintensiveandtimeconsuming(approximately8weeks).Melceretal.(2003)
recommendsthattheybeconsideredifplantdataarenotavailableorifresultsareunusual.
Therecommendedapproachistousealaboratoryscalefillanddrawsequencingbatchreactor
(SBR)system.Thedesignershouldselectasludgeageforthesystemthatallowsgoodsolidliquid
separation(theexamplefromMelceretal.usedasludgeageof15days).Atstartup,theSBRisseeded
withmicroorganismsfromtheactivatedsludgesystem.Wastewaterisaddedtothesystemwhereitis
treatedthroughthestandardfillreactsettlewastedrawSBRcycle.TheSBRshouldbeoperatedover
atleast2to3sludgeagestoachievesteadystate.Intensivemonitoringcanthenbeusedto
characterizeCODandTKNfractionsandnitrificationkinetics.SeeAppendixDofMelceretal.(2003)for
thefullmethoddescription.
ThecostofanSBRbenchscaletestisestimatedtobearound $50,000 (Takacs2009).
10.7.3 DataChecks
ThefollowingshouldbetrueforCODfractionsformostmunicipalwastewaters:
XIshouldbe20to40percentofVSS.
1026
August2010
TheSS(orrbCOD)fractionishigherwhenconditionsinthecollectionsystemarefavorablefor
fermentation(i.e.,warmclimate,flatsewers,manyforcemainsseeChapter5for
background).
WhenTSSintheplantinfluentishigherthannormal,theparticulateunbiodegradableCOD
fractionmaybehigherthannormal.
10.8 CharacterizationofNutrientFractions
10.8.1 Nitrogen
TotalnitrogeninmunicipalwastewateristypicallycharacterizedbyTKN.Insomecases,
althoughrarely,nitrateornitritenitrogen(NOX)maybepresent,suchaswhenrecyclestreamsreturn
appreciableamountsofNOXtotheheadoftheplantorthesewershaveverysteepslopesresultingin
rapidsheetflowwithinthesewers.NOXshouldthenbeincludedasaninfluentcharacteristicseparate
fromTKN.
Figure106showstheTKNfractionsthatareusedinmodeling.Table103providesa
description,themeasurementmethod,andarangeofexpectedconcentrationsforkeynitrogen
fractions.Ammonia(bothfreeandsaline)makesup60to75percentofTKN,withtheremaining
portionasorganicallyboundbiodegradableandunbiodegradablematerial.Theammonia/TKNratiois
ofparticularimportanceindeterminingtheeffectsofnitrificationonpH.Whilenitrificationof
ammoniatonitrateconsumesalkalinity,hydrolysisoforganicallyboundTKNaddsalkalinity.Ifthe
latterisnotconsidered,themodelcouldpredictanunrealisticallylowpH.
Solubleunbiodegradable(inert)nitrogen,sometimesreferredtoasrecalcitrantdissolved
organicnitrogen(rDON),hasbecomeincreasinglyimportantforplantstryingtoachieveloweffluentTN
concentrations,asitpassesthroughtheplantandintotheeffluent.ThehighertherDON,thelowerthe
concentrationsofammoniaandNOxmustbetoachieveacertaineffluentTNconcentration.
WWTPswillusuallyhavehistoricdataforinfluentandeffluentTKNorammonia.Historicaldata
mayonlycontainammonia,whichmaybereportedastotalnitrogen,andadditionaltestsmaybe
neededtodeterminetheammonia/TKNratio.Plantsmayalsohaveammoniaornitrateconcentrations
dependingonpermitrequirementsandmonitoringpractices.
Recommendationsforestimatingtheremainingnitrogenfractionsareprovidedbelow.
1027
August2010
Ammonia (SNH)
Soluble
Soluble
Unbiodegradable
TKN (NOB)
Total TKN
Soluble
Biodegradable
TKN (SNB)
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
TKN (XNI)
Particulate
Particulate
Biodegradable
TKN (XNB)
Figure106.TKNcomponentsformunicipalwastewater.
Note:TKNfractionsarenottoscaleandvaryfromplanttoplant.
1028
August2010
Table103.TKNFractionsinMunicipalWastewater
Fraction
Symbol1
Description
TotalKjeldahl
Nitrogen
TKNINF
Thetotalnitrogenloadon
theplant
Ammonia(freeand
saline)
Soluble
UnbiodegradableTKN
SNH
Thetotalammonia
NUB
(rDON)
SolubleBiodegradable
TKN
SNB
Solubleunbiodegradable
dissolvedorganicnitrogen
thatpassesthroughthe
plantuntouched
Theportionof
biodegradablenitrogenthat
issoluble
Particulate
UnbiodegradableTKN
XNI
Theportionofparticulate
boundnitrogenthatisnot
biodegradable
Particulate
BiodegradableTKN
XNB
boundnitrogenthatis
biodegradable
Measurement
Method(s)
Typical
Concentrationin
Municipal
Wastewater2(mg/L)
Directlymeasuredusing
colorimetricortitration
techniques
Directlymeasured
2570dependingon
percapitawater
consumption
2030
Difficulttodetermine,
defaultvaluesoften
used
0.5 1.5.Highervalues
whenspecificindustrial
wastesareadded
Totalsolublefraction
SNB+XNB=010
determinedbyfiltering
sample,measuringTKN,
andsubtracting
ammonia.The
biodegradableportionis
determinedusing
assumptions
Totalparticulatefraction 28
sampleandsubtracting
thesolubleTKN.The
unbiodegradable
fractionisdetermined
usingassumptions.
Totalparticulatefraction SNB+XNB=010
sampleandsubtracting
thesolubleTKN.The
biodegradablefractionis
determinedusing
assumptions.
Notes:
1
Theliteraturecontainsmorethanonesymbolforsomecomponents.Thesymbolsshownaregenerallyconsistentwith
torepresenttheinfluentCODfraction(e.g.FSIisthefractionoftheinfluentCODthatisunbiodegradableandsoluble).
2
DerivedfromMelceretal.(2003),Table42.
1029
August2010
Ammonia(SNH)
WhencharacterizingTKN,themostimportantfractionistheammoniafraction,SNH.Itisthe
largestfractionandthecomponentofTKNthatisoxidizedtonitritethennitrateduringnitrification.
Ammoniaismeasureddirectlyusingstandardlaboratorymethodsorwithonlineanalyzers.
SolubleNitrogenFractions
Solubleunbiodegradablenitrogen(SNI)isalsooftenreferredtoasrDON.rDONisimportant
becauseitpassesthroughtheplantunreactedandcanlimittheamountofnitrogenremovalthatis
possible.Solublebiodegradablenitrogen(SNB)isorganicallyboundnitrogenthathasnotyetbeen
convertedtoammonia.
Thetotalsolublenitrogencanbedeterminedbysubtractingtheammoniaconcentrationfrom
theTKNconcentrationofafilteredsample.Unfortunately,thereisnorapidmethodforexperimentally
differentiatingbetweenSNBandrDON.ThemoststraightforwardwaytodeterminerDONistoruna
pilotorbenchscaletestatalongSRT(>12days).Designersshouldcheckthatallotherrequirements
fornitrificationsuchasDOandpHaremetandthendeterminetheconcentrationofammoniaandTKN
intheeffluent.Theammoniashouldbebelow0.1mg/L,andthebiodegradableorganicnitrogenwould
alsobeverylow.TheremainderofTKNisthenrDON.
SitespecificdeterminationofrDONbecomesveryimportantforplantstargetingloweffluent
concentrationsforTN(e.g.,3.0mg/L).Inothercases,defaultmodelvaluesoftensufficeasthefractions
aregenerallyasmallpercentageofthetotal(<3percent).
ParticulateNitrogenFractions
Particulatenitrogencanbebiodegradable(XNB)orunbiodegradable(XNI).Aswiththesoluble
TKNfraction,itisnotpossibletodirectlymeasurethebiodegradableandunbiodegradablefractions.
Theparticulateunbiodegradableportion,however,canbederivedbasedonitsrelationshipto
particulateunbiodegradableCOD(XI)inthemixedliquorsolids.TheratioofTKNtoCODinthemixed
liquorsolidsisknowntobeapproximately0.07mgN/mgCOD.Therefore,XNIcanbecalculatedas:
Eq.104
XNI=0.07XI
Asacheck,resultsshouldbecomparedtototalinfluentTKN.Melceretal.(2003)reportthatXNIis
approximately10percentofinfluentTKNformunicipalwastewater.
10.8.2 Phosphorus
Knowingthephosphorusfractionationisimportantforplantsthatprovidebiological
phosphorusremoval.TheP/VSSratioisimportantinsizingtheanaerobiczoneandwillalsobeafactor
indesigningthedenitrificationprocess.Figure107showsthefractionsoftotalphosphorus.Table10
4providesadescription,themeasurementmethod,andarangeofexpectedconcentrationsforkey
phosphorusfractions.AllfractionsareexpressedasphosphorusinmgP/L.
1030
August2010
Orthophosphate
(SPO4)
Soluble
Soluble
Unbiodegradable
Phosphorus (SPI)
Total P
Soluble
Biodegradable
Phosphorus(SPB)
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
Phosphorus (XPI)
Particulate
Particulate
Biodegradable
Phosphorus (XPB)
Figure107.Phosphoruscomponentsinmunicipalwastewater.
Note:TPfractionsarenottoscaleandvaryfromplanttoplant.
1031
August2010
Table104.TotalPhosphorusFractionsinMunicipalWastewater
Fraction
Symbol1
Description
TotalPhosphorus
TP
Thetotalphosphorusload
ontheplant
Orthophosphate
Soluble
Unbiodegradable
Phosphorus
SPO4
SPI
Thetotalorthophosphate
Solubleunbiodegradable
phosphorus
SolubleBiodegradable
Phosphorus
SPB
Theportionof
biodegradablephosphorus
thatissoluble
Particulate
Unbiodegradable
Phosphorus
XPI
boundphosphorusthatis
notbiodegradable
Particulate
Biodegradable
Phosphorus
XPB
boundphosphorusthatis
biodegradable
Measurement
Method(s)
Typical
Concentrationin
Municipal
Wastewater2(mg/L)
Measuredasortho
phosphorusfollowing
chemicalconversion
Directlymeasured
measuredforfiltered
sample,estimatefor
unbiodegradableportion
measuredforfiltered
sample,estimatefor
biodegradableportion
Totalparticulatefraction
measuredbysubtracting
solublefromtotal,
estimatefor
measuredbysubtracting
solublefromtotal,
estimatefor
415
212
WithXPB010
14
WithSPB010
Notes:
1.Theliteraturecontainsmorethanonesymbolforsomecomponents.Thesymbolsshownaregenerallyconsistentwith
torepresenttheinfluentCODfraction(e.g.FSIisthefractionoftheinfluentCODthatisunbiodegradableandsoluble).
2.DerivedfromMelceretal.(2003),Table42.
Orthophosphate
Orthophosphateisdeterminedbydirectmeasurement.Alongwithsolublebiodegradable
phosphorus,itrepresentsthephosphorusthatwillbetakenupbyPAOsintheaerobiczone.Complex
solublephosphorusandsomeparticulatephosphorusarehydrolyzedtomostlyorthophosphateinthe
firststageoftreatment.OrthophosphatetypicallymakesupalargeportionofTPinmunicipal
wastewater(50toashighas80percent).Afterprimarysedimentation,nearlyalloftheremaining
phosphorusisrapidlyconvertedtoorthophosphorusinthefirstbioreactor.Almostalloftheeffluent
solublephosphorusisorthophosphate.
1032
August2010

SolubleFractions
Solublefractionsofphosphorusrepresenttheorganicphosphorusthatisnotparticulatebound.
Thebiodegradableportion(SPB,)representsorganicallyboundphosphorusthatistakenupintothe
biomassforgrowth.Theunbiodegradableportion(SPI)isfinelycolloidalorsolubleorganiccompounds,
someofwhichareassociatedwiththesolubleunbiodegradableCOD.Thetotalsolubleportioncanbe
determinedbyfilteringasampleandmeasuringtotalphosphorusinthefiltrate.SPIandSPBarenot
easilydifferentiated.GenerallyadefaultvaluecanbeusedforthefractionofTPthatisSPI.SPBisthen
determinedbysubtractingSPI.
ParticulateFractions
Theparticulatefractionsareorganicallyboundphosphoruswithinparticles.Thebiodegradable
portion(XPB)isassociatedwiththebiodegradableparticulateCOD.Theunbiodegradableportion(XPI)is
associatedwithunbiodegradableCOD.Thetotalparticulatefractionisdeterminedbysubtractingthe
totalsolublefractionasdeterminedabovefromthetotalphosphorus.XPIcanbedeterminedasitisa
givenfractionoftheunbiodegradableCOD.Typicallyavalueof0.02to0.03isused.XPBcanthenbe
determinedbysubtractingXPIfromthetotalparticulatephosphorus.
10.9 KineticandStoichiometricParameters
Mathematicalmodelsrequireestimatesofkineticandstoichiometricparameterssuchasyield
andgrowthratestopredictperformanceofwastewatertreatmentprocesses.Modeldefaultvaluesfor
theseparametersarebasedonthousandsofobservationsandshouldgenerallybeacceptableformost
plants.Theexceptionisnitrificationrates.
Themaximumspecificnitrifiergrowthrate,AUT,andtheendogenousnitrifierdecayrate,bAUT,
areextremelyimportantinthedesignofactivatedsludgenitrificationsystems.Thisisbecausethenet
growthrate(AUTbAUT)determinesminimumSRTneededforcompletenitrificationtooccurduring
steadystateconditions.Inequationformat,
Eq.105
SRT =1/(AUTbAUT)
Where:
SRT =Solidsresidencetime(days)
AUT, =Specificnitrifiergrowthrate(d1)
bAUT =Endogenousnitrifierdecayrate(d1)
(Source:adaptedfromWEFandASCE2006,equation3.8)
Theliteraturereportslittlevariationinendogenousnitrifierdecayrate,bAUT,fromplantto
plant.Previously,bAUTwasconsideredtobelowcomparedtoAUTand,forthisreason,itwasexcluded
frommuchofthepreviousliteratureonnitrificationrates.RecentresultssummarizedbyMelceretal.
(2003)showthatexperimentalmethodsunderestimatedbAUTandthatitismoresignificantthan
previouslyreported(bAUTwaspreviouslythoughttobebetween0and0.05d1;however,newdata
showedthatitcouldbeashighas0.2d1at20oC).UnderestimatesofbAUThaveresultedin
underestimatesofAUTbyafactorof2insomecases(Melceretal.2003).Althoughnotanissuefor
1033
August2010

completelynitrifyingsystems,anunderestimateinAUTcouldleadtoconservativepredictionsof
performanceforlowSRTsystems.SeeChapter4foradditionaldiscussionofnitrificationkinetics.
Melceretal.includesnewmethodsforsitespecificdeterminationofbAUT.Intheabsenceof
morespecificdata,theauthorsprovidethefollowingasareasonableestimateofbAUT:
bAUT=0.17*1.029(T20)d1
Eq.106
Where:
T
=TemperatureinoC
d
=Days
AlthoughbAUTisbelievedtobefairlyconsistentfromplanttoplant,researchershaveobserved
significantvariationinAUT,withmeasuredvaluesat20oC(AU20)of0.2to1.0perday.Factorsaffecting
therateofnitrificationincludeindustrialinput,dissolvedoxygenconcentration,temperature,alkalinity,
pH,andhydraulicswithinthereactor.RecentstudiesreportAU20rangesfrom0.7to1.0ifnoinhibition
isexperienced(Melceretal.2003).SeeChapter4foranindepthdiscussionofthenitrificationprocess.
Becauseofitsimportanceindesigningnitrificationsystems,AUTshouldbebasedonsite
specificcharacterizationoftheinfluentwastewater.Melceretal.(2003)presentsthreerapidmethods
formeasuringAUT:LowF/MSBR,HighF/M,andthewashoutmethod.Eachmethodhasitsdistinct
advantagesanddisadvantages.Themethodshaveproducedthesameresultswhenconductedin
parallel;therefore,thechoiceofthemethoddependsonthepreferencesofthedesigner.Itis
importanttonotethateachofthesethreemethodsdeterminesthenetgrowthrate(AUTbAUT),not
AUTexplicitly.bAUTmustthereforebeestimatedseparatelyorassumed.
Insomecases,itmaybepossibletousethemodeltoestimateAUTbyadjustingituntilmodel
predictionsmatchobservedeffluentquality(e.g.,ammoniaconcentration)fromthenitrification
process.Thisiterativeapproachrequiresextensivedatacollectionandisonlymeaningfulwhenthere
arediurnalammoniainfluentandeffluentdata.InfullynitrifyingplantsoperatingathighSRTs,the
effluentammoniawillalwaysbelow,andthismethodwouldnotapply.
10.10 Calibration
CalibrationistheprocessofadjustingsimulationparameterstomatchperformanceofaWWTP.
Calibrationhasthreemainobjectives,assummarizedbelow.
1) Tominimizetheerrorbetweenpredictedandmeasuredperformance:Theacceptablelevelof
agreementshouldmatchobjectives(seeSection10.4.2).Typicalgoalsarenomorethan10to
15percentdifferenceforinitialdesignand5percentforfinaldesign,althoughlargerdeviations
duringdynamicsimulationsarecommonlyaccepted.Errorcanbedeterminedeitherbyvisual
analysisofobservedandpredicteddataorstatisticalanalysis.Aperfectmatchisnotachievable
andshouldnotbeagoalofcalibration.
2) Todefinetheaccuracyofthemodel:Basedonthefinalagreementbetweenmeasuredand
predictedvalues,theexpectedaccuracyofthemodelcanbedefinedforindividualunit
processesandconstituents(e.g.,COD,N).
1034
August2010
3) Toestablishthecircumstancesunderwhichthemodelcanbeusedtosimulatethetreatment
plant,alsoreferredtoasthemodeldesignspace:Amodelshouldnotbeusedforconditions
forwhichithasnotbeencalibratedtoactualplantperformance(e.g.,extremeflowconditions
suchasastormevent).
Thecalibrationprocessdependsontheextentandqualityofavailabledataandthecomplexity
oftheexistingtreatmentprocesses.Theintendeduseandgoalsofmodelingdefinethelevelof
calibration(i.e.,theacceptableerrorandwhetherornotthemodelneedstobecalibratedtodynamic
operatingconditions).Goodcalibrationrequiresdetailedunderstandingofthefundamentaltreatment
processesattheplantandoftheprinciplesofthemodel.Overridingprinciplesofcalibrationare
providedinthetextboxonthenextpage.
Inanidealsituation,historicaldataforinfluentloadingandplantoperationsareaccurateand
meetcalibrationneeds.However,thisisrarelythecase.Asnotedearlierinthischapter,atiered
approachisrecommendedwherebydesignersfirstattempttocalibratethemodelwithexistingdata
thencollectadditionaldatabasedoncalibrationresults.Datacheckingandadditionaldatagathering
occurthroughoutthecalibrationprocedure.Thisiterativeapproachisoftentimeconsumingandwill
requireseveralroundsofdatachecking,operatorinterviews,andinsomecasesadditionalsampling.
Severalreferences(e.g.,Petersenetal.2002;Hulsbeeketal.2002)reportthatthetimerequiredfor
calibrationisoftenlongerthanexpected.
Calibrationshouldfollowastepwise,iterativeprocedurestartingwithsludgeproductionand
proceedingtocomposition,aeration,nitrification,denitrification,andbiologicalphosphorusremoval.
Massbalancesareanintegralpartofcalibrationandareincorporatedthroughouttheprocedure.
Designersshouldfirstcalibratethemodelforsteadystateconditions(e.g.,averageconcentrationsin
influent,effluent,andwastestreamsduringnormaldryweatherconditions),thencalibrateitfor
dynamicconditions.Fordynamicsimulations,itisimportanttoinitializethemodelproperlytoestablish
operatingconditionsconsistentwithobserveddatatobeusedforcalibration.
Anoverallrecommendedapproachtocalibration,includingmassbalancechecks,isprovided
below. Therecommendedapproachhas6steps,assumingthatthereaderhasalreadygonethrough
thedatachecksinChapter7.Theapproachisbasedonareviewofseveralpublicationsonthetopic
(Thirdetal.2007;Gernaeyetal.2002;Melceretal.2003;Hulsbeeketal.2002;andPetersenetal.
2002).The6stepcalibrationapproachisnottheonlyvalidonealternativeapproachescanworkjust
aswellaslongasdesignersadheretotheoverridingprinciplesofcalibrationasstatedinthetextboxon
thefollowingpage.ReadersshouldalsoconsulttheGMPUnifiedProtocolwhenitbecomesavailable
fromIWA.TechnicalpaperssuchasMcConnelletal.(2008)andLatimeretal.(2008)provideadditional
examplescalibrationexperiencesandmaybeusefulreferencesforthereader.
1035
August2010
PrinciplesofCalibration
Useaprocessengineeringapproach.Adjustparametersonebyonebasedontheexperience
ofthedesignerandanindepthunderstandingoffundamentalwastewatertreatment
processes.
Ifthemodeledtreatmentplantperformancedeviatessubstantiallyfromobservedvalues,it
mayresultfromerrorsinthehydraulicmodel(e.g.,flowsplits,recycleflowrate,wastagerate
notproperlyconfigured).Theproblemcouldalsobemajoroperationalsetpointssuchas
minimumDOconcentrationandaerationrate.Operationaldatahavealargeinfluenceon
modeloutputscomparedtowastewatercharacterizationandkinetic/stoichiometric
parameters(Gernaeyetal.2003).Anotherproblemmaybechangesintheinfluent
characteristicsthatarenotmodeledsuchaschlorineadditioninthecollectionsystemforodor
control.
Adjustkineticandstoichiometricparametersonlyasalastresort.Thedefaultkineticand
stoichiometricvaluesinmodelsrepresentaveragesofthousandsofmeasuredvaluesfrom
hundredsofplants.Withfewexceptions(seebelow),theyshouldnotdeviatesubstantially
fromplanttoplant.Ifpredictedresultsdonotagreewithmeasuredvalues,designersshould
alwaysfirstaskthequestions,Istheresomethinghappeningattheplantthatcouldcausethis
result?andWhatarethepossiblereasonsthattheplantisnotperforminginthemodelas
predicted?Theexceptionisthemaximumspecificnitrifiergrowthrate(AUT),whichcouldbe
verylowifthereisnitrifyinginhibitorsinthewastestreamorhigheriffewerthanaverage
inhibitorsarepresent.
Justifyanddocumentchangestokineticandstoichiometricparametersandestimated
constituentfractions.
Step1.CheckProcessConfigurationandPlantHydraulics
Comparedesigncapacitiesofeachunitprocesstomodeledoutputswithmaximumoperating
capacities(Thirdetal.2007).
PerformtotalflowbalancefortheWWTP.Mostsimulatorswillautomaticallyperformaflow
balancearoundtheplant.Insimpleterms,influentflowshouldequaleffluentflowpluswaste
streamflows.
Performflowbalancesforeachunitprocessconsideringwastageandrecycleflows.
Step2.CalibrateSludgeProductionandCharacteristics
Ifnotdonealready,performmassbalanceforCODandTSS/VSSaroundtheprimaryclarifier
(seeSection10.7.2,Method1).
1036
August2010
Performmassbalanceoftheinertfractionsthroughtheplant.Becauseitisnotchangedduring
biologicalreactions,themassofinertsolidsinandoutoftheplantshouldbalance.Takeinto
accountthatphosphorusandmagnesiumremovedeitherbychemicalsorbiologywillregister
asinertmaterial.Also,themetalsusedforprecipitationwouldaddtothisfraction.Iftheinert
massofthesolidsinthewasteproductsoftheexistingplantdoesnotbalance,checkthe
following:
- Wastagerate(thisisaverycommonproblem)
- RASflowrate
Thepredictedmassbalancefortotalsolidsinthesimulatormodelshouldcorrelatewiththatin
thefullscaleplant,takingintoaccounttheissueofinertsolidsasdiscussedabove.
Amassbalancefornitrogenisnotpossiblebecauseofthedenitrifiednitrogenthatisreleased
totheatmosphere.
Performmassbalanceforphosphorus,whichcannotbedestroyedandhasnogaseousphase,
bymeasuringinfluent,effluent,andwastedsludgeconcentrations.Resultscanbeusedto
checkthemassofsludgewasted.
Step3. CalibratetheAerationProcess
ACODbalancecanbeusedtochecktheoxygenuptakeattheWWTP.Forthefollowing
equation,solveforOUR:
Eq.107
CODT,INF=CODe+OUR+(Nd*2.86)+QS*Gs,org*1.42)(4.56*Nn)
Where:
CODT,INF=CODloadintheinfluent(kgO2/d)
CODe =CODloadintheeffluent(kgO2/d)
OUR =Oxygenuptakerate(kgO2/d)
=Totaldenitrifiednitrogenload(kg/d)
Nd
2.86 =Oxygenreductionequivalent(1kgNO3Nisequivalentto2.68kgO2)
QS
=Dailyvolumeofexcesssludge(m3/d)
Gs,org =ConcentrationofVSSintheexcesssludge(kgVSS/m3)
1.42 =ConversionfactionfromVSStoCODequivalents(kgCOD/kgVSS)
4.56 =Conversionfactorforcalculationofoxygenuptakeduringnitrification
=Totalnitrifiednitrogenload(kg/d)
Nn
(Hulsbeeketal.2002,equation3)
DesignerscanusetheestimatedOURtochecktheaerationefficiencyoftheplant(kgO2/kWh)
ortodetecterrorsinthesetupofaerators.
1037
August2010

Step4. CalibratetheNitrificationProcess
CompareobservedeffluentNH3Nconcentrationstosimulationresults.Ifresultsdonotmatch,
checkthefollowing:
- Predictedvs.observedDOconcentrationinaerationbasin
- Basinhydraulicsforshortcircuiting
- Alkalinitydepletion
- Methodfordeterminingmaximumnitrifierspecificgrowthrateanddecayrate(seesection
10.9)
Rechecksludgeproduction(Step2).
Step5. CalibratetheDenitrificationProcess
MakesurethatthemodelfunctionforcarryingDOfromonebasintothenextison.Thiswill
modelthetransferofoxygenintherecycledmixedliquor.
CompareobservedeffluentNO3Nconcentrationstosimulationresults.Ifresultsdonotmatch,
checkthefollowing:
- Denitrificationinreturnsludge
- Reaerationofdenitrificationprocess(e.g.,frompumpsoroverflowweirs)
Ifthisdoesnotsolvetheproblem,considermodifyingtheanoxicreductionfactororpossibly
theheterotrophicdecayfactor(Hulsbeeketal.2002).
Rechecksludgeproduction(Step2).
Step6. CalibratetheBiologicalPhosphorusRemovalProcess
CompareobservedeffluentTPconcentrationstosimulationresults.Ifresultsdonotmatch,
checkforthefollowing:
- DOandnitrateintheanaerobiczone
- rbCODintheanaerobiczone
- Additionofoxidizingagentsuchaschlorinetotheinfluentthatwillresultininhibitionof
fermentationintheanaerobiczone
10.11Validation
Whereascalibrationensuresthemodelfitstheoriginaldataset,validationseekstoensurethat
themodelisvalidoverawiderrangeofconditions.Validationincludesrunningthemodelwithasecond
setofdata,differentthantheoriginalcalibrationdata.Italsoincludescheckingthemodelresultsto
ensuretheymakesensewiththephysicalsystem.Thenewsetofdatadoesnotneedtobeasextensive
astheoriginalcalibrationdata.Anadditionalsetoftypicallymeasuredwastewaterinfluent
characteristicsandflowsalongwitheffluentdatashouldbesufficient.Thedatashouldbeunder
1038
August2010

differentconditionsthanthecalibrationdata,butshouldstillremainwithintheconditionsunderwhich
themodelisvalid.
Thenewdatashouldbeenteredintothemodelandthemodelrun.Ifthemodelpredictsthe
effluentdatawithinanacceptableerror,themodelcanbeconsideredvalidated.Ifnot,themodel
calibrationproceduremayneedtoberepeated.Thefollowingarecommonchecksthatshouldbe
conductedwiththenewdatasettovalidatethemodel.
Checkmassbalances.Usingthenewsetofdata,checkthemassbalancesforflowand
solidsagain.Ifanerrorisfound,thesludgewastagerateandsludgecompositionarefactors
thatshouldbeexamined.
Checknutrientbalances.Checkthebalancesforphosphorusandnitrogenagainwiththe
newdata.Modelparameterstocheckincludethenitrifiergrowthrate,thenitrogen
contentofinertparticles,andtheammoniaandoxygenhalfsaturationconstantsfor
heterotrophsandautotrophs.
Checkalkalinitybalance.Thedifferencebetweentheinfluentalkalinityandtheeffluent
alkalinityshouldequalthenetconsumptionofalkalinityfromthebiologicalreactions.
Checksolidsproductionandnetsolidsyield.Ifthesevaluesareoff,theycouldindicate
errorsinthesludgewastagerateorsolidscontent.
Checknitrificationanddenitrificationrates.Reasonablevaluesofrateconstantscanbe
foundinJeppsson(1996)andHulsbeeketal.(2002).
Checkresidencetimes(SRTandHRT).Theresidencetimesinthereactorsshouldbe
checkedusingthevalidateddata.Ifthetimesarenotreasonableanddonotcorrelatewith
actualplantdata,themodelshouldberecalibrated.
10.12 SimulationofDesignAlternativesforNutrientRemoval
Oncethedesignerhascalibratedandvalidatedthemodel,thenextstepistosetupandrun
designscenariosforbiologicalnutrientremovalthatanswerthequestionslaidoutinthemodeling
objectives.Insimpleterms,theinfluentflowandwastewatercharacteristicsaremodifiedtomatch
designconditions,andtheconfigurationoftheexistingplantismodifiedtoincorporatecandidate
treatmentprocessesasidentifiedinChapter8ofthisdesignmanual.Designersshouldthenconduct
thefollowingsimulationstodetermineifthecandidatetreatmentprocessesmeetthedesignobjectives
(Rieger2009):
Steadystatesimulations,checkingfor:
Overallmassbalancing
Longtermperformancebyevaluatingeffluentquality
Dynamicsimulationsasfollows:
Simulatediurnalpeakstodetermineequipmentlimits
Determinesetpointsforcontrollerdesign
1039
August2010
Simulateseasonalchangestoestablishlongtermoperationalstrategies
Simulatestormeventstodetermineoptimalhandling
Itisinthisstepthatdesignersrealizethebenefitsoftheeffortrequiredtosetupandcalibratea
detailedsimulatoroftheexistingWWTP.Alargenumberofoperatingadjustmentsandtreatment
alternativescanberapidlysimulatedtodeterminetheireffectiveness.Dynamicmodelingisan
extremelypowerfultoolindeterminingthemostefficientoperationsforbiologicalnutrientremoval.
Forthemostpromisingbiologicalnutrientremovaltechnologiesevaluated,designersshould
summarizeinformationonlongtermperformanceduringavarietyofoperatingconditions,ifpossible,
andoperatingrequirements(e.g.,energyrequirements,chemicaladdition,etc.).
10.13 AdditionalProceduresforDesign
Thissectionprovidesrecommendationsfordesign,equipmentspecification,andoperationofthe
followingnutrientremovaltechnologies:
SequencingBatchReactors
PrimarySludgeFermenters
10.13.1
SequencingBatchReactors(SBRs)
SBRsarefillanddrawsystemsthatcombineequalization,biologicaltreatment,andsecondary
clarificationinonetankusingatimecontrolsequence.AsnotedinChapter6,theycanbedesignedand
operatedfornitrogenandphosphorusremovalbycyclingthroughaerobic,anoxic,andanaerobic
conditions(USEPA1999).Recommendationsforthedesignandoperationfornutrientremovalare
presentedbelow.
DesignsshouldhaveaminimumoftwoSBRbasinstoallowformaintenance,handlingofhigh
flows,andseasonalvariations.Designsshouldalsoconsiderinfluentequalizationbasinswith
capacitytoholdpeakflowsduringonetreatmentcycle.
Fornitrogenremoval,aninitialanoxicphase(mixingonly,noaeration)shouldbefollowedbyan
aerobicphase,mimickingtheModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)process.Multipleanoxicphases
withinasingleSBRcyclecanimproveperformance(i.e.,asecondanoxicphaseaftertheaerobic
phasecanbeusedtomimica4stageBardenphoprocess).
Alkalinitymayneedtobeaddedtokeepitintherangeof40to70mg/LasCaCO3.Methanolor
anotherexternalorganiccarbonsourcemayneedtobeaddedfordenitrificationtomaintaina
relativelyhighrateofdenitrification,althoughthisisnotcommon.
SBRscanbedesignedforbiologicalphosphorusremoval(BPR)byusingalargebatchreactor
withareseedinganaerobiczone(WEFandASCE2006).IfthebiodegradableCODtoTKNplusTP
ratioissufficientlylarge,BPRcanbeaccomplishedbymaintainingnonaeratedconditionsafter
allofthenitrateshavebeendenitrified,i.e.afterthesystemhasbecometrulyanaerobic.Itis
necessaryforVFAstobeavailableduringtheanaerobicperiodforBPRtooccur.Theeffluent
1040
August2010

solublephosphorusconcentrationwillbedeterminedbytheVFAtoTPratioduringthatperiod
oftime,assumingthatconditionsaresuitableforphosphorusuptakeduringthesubsequent
aeratedperiod.ManySBRsystemssuccessfullyremovephosphorusbyaddingametalsalt
eitherupstreamoftheSBR,duringthereactphase,orfollowingtheSBRifeffluentfiltrationisin
place(Young,2008).
Typicaldesignparametersareasfollows(WEFandASCE2006,Table5.2):
SRT(includinganaerobicandanoxiczones):20to40days,althoughSRTsconsiderablyless
than20dayscanbeused.TheprimarypurposeoflongSRTsistominimizetheproduction
ofWAS
- MLSS:3to4g/L
- HRT(intermsofaverageflow):
Anaerobicperiod:1.5to3hrs
Anoxicperiod:1to3hrs
Aerobicperiod:2to4hrs
Settlingperiod:0.5to1hr
Decantperiod:0.2to1hr
-
NotethatananaerobicperiodcannotbeobtainedinanSBRwherenitrificationisobtaineduntil
allofthenitrateshavebeenreducedtonitrogengas.InfluentBODisusedfornitirifcation
resultinginreductionofrbCODneededforBPR.
SomesimulatorpackageshavemodelsforsimulatingavarietyofSBRprocesses.Theinputof
wastewaterdataandplantspecificcharacteristicssuchasnitrificationratescanbeintroducedasfor
modelingtheflowthroughprocess.BecauseanSBRisneveratsteadystate,diurnalmodelingshouldbe
used.Thesimulatormayneedtoberunforalongperiodtoensurestabilization.
10.13.2
Traditionaldesignofdenitrifyingfiltersisdonebyfirstcalculatingarequiredsurfaceareabased
onanassumedloadingrate.Loadingratesof1.5to2gpm/ft2andmediadepthsof6to9feetare
commonlyused.Fordownflowfilters,thebackwashisdesignedtominimizetheamountofair
introduced.Theinfluentweirisalsodesignedtoavoidintroductionofair.Upflowfiltershavethe
advantageofnotrequiringbackwash.Themethanolfeedsystemshouldbedesignedtoadjustthefeed
ofmethanolbasedontheCODintheinfluent.EPAhaspreparedafactsheetondenitrificationfilters
thatincludesthefollowinginformation(USEPA2007):
Filterdesigncharacteristics,including:
- Influentweirs
- Media
- Underdrainsystem
- Nitrogenreleasecycle
- Backwashingandfiltercontrols
- Methanolfeedcontrolsystem
1041
August2010
Acomparisonofdenitrificationfiltermanufacturersandequipment
Costfactors
Thefactsheetcanbeaccessedathttp://www.epa.gov/OWM//mtb/mtbfact.htm.
10.13.3
PrimarySludgeFermenters
Section5.3.2ofthisdesignmanualdescribesthewidevarietyofapproachesthatcanbeusedto
achievefermentationofprimarysludgeforBPR.Thefollowingshouldbeconsideredasgeneral
guidelinesfordesignandequipmentspecificationregardlessofconfiguration(WEFandASCE2006;
Chanono2006;Chen2004):
Sludgecollectordesignsshouldbehighertorquethanconventionaldesignsduetoincreased
solidsloading.
ThemaximumSRTshoulddependonthetemperaturetoavoidmethanogenesis.Itmayrange
from2to8days.
Airspargersmaybeusedtoreducemethanogenesis.
Atemperaturebetween16and25degreesCelsiushasbeenfoundoptimalbutmanyfermenters
workatlowertemperatures.Coveringandinsulationincoldclimateshasmerit.
Thesludgeconcentrationintothethickenerwilldependontheflowrateoftheprimarysludge.
Acontinuousflowofaround2to4percentoftheinfluentisrecommendedtoallowliquidfor
VFAelutriation.Inastaticfermenterthesludgecouldbethickenedto6percentsolidsprovided
thesludgepumpscanhandlethedensesludge.ThedenserthesludgethemoreVFAwillbe
elutriated.
Becauseofthepotentialtoproducecarbondioxideandhydrogensulfide,corrosionresistant
materialsshouldbeused.
Primaryandfermentedsludgepumpsshouldgenerallybeofthepositivedisplacementtype.
Recessedimpellercentrifugalpumpscanbeusedforlowersolidscontentstreamssuchas
fermentate.
Sludgegrindersorscreensshouldbeinstalledonsludgerecyclelinestopreventcloggingofthe
pumps.
Forcompletemixtanks,slowspeedmixersthatimpart8to10W/m3energyintotheliquidare
recommended.
Scumremovalshouldbeprovidedonmixingtanksandthickeners.
Thickenersshouldbecoveredandtheheadspacescrubbedtocontrolodor.
1042
August2010
Measuringoxidationreductionpotentialandkeepingitabove600mVbyintermittently
bubblingairthroughmayhelppreventmethanogenesisincompletelymixedfermenters.
Addingsomenitrifiedeffluenttothestaticfermenterfeedwillservethesamepurpose
Installationofhydrogensulfidesensorsandalarmsisagoodideatoensureworkersafetyand
preventmethanogenesissincebothtendtobegeneratedatthesameoxidationreduction
potential.
SludgedensitymetersandpHmeterscanaidinprocesscontrol.ApHlevelofaround5isan
indicationofgoodacidfermentation.
10.14 DesignChecksforBiologicalNitrogenandPhosphorusRemoval
Tables105and106providekeydesignchecksforbiologicalnitrogenandphosphorusremoval
systems,respectively.Thesetablessynthesizeinformationpresentedthroughoutthisdesignmanual
andcanbeusedatvariousstepsinthedesignprocesstoensurethatkeyfactorsareconsidered.
1043
August2010
Table105.DesignChecksforBiologicalNitrogenRemoval
Question
1. Isthenitrificationprocessdesignedforcoldweatherconditions?
Therateofnitrificationissignificantlyimpactedbytemperature.Itwilldecrease
byapproximatelyhalfforevery8to10oCdecreaseinoperatingtemperature.
2. Doesthenitrificationsystemdesignconsidertheimpactofdiurnalloadingsof
ammonia?
Influentammoniaconcentrationsvary,withpeaksoccurringduringthedayand
muchlowerconcentrationsoccurringovernight.Peakloadsduringthedayare
typically1.5to2.0timestheaveragewithsomeobservationsashighas2.8
timestheaverage.
3. Doesthenitrificationsystemdesignaccountforrecycles,includingrealistic
predictedconstituentloadings,flowrate,andschedule?
Returnstreamsfromsludgedewateringoperationscanaddsignificantammonia
totheheadoftheplant.Inmanyplants,supernatantfromsludgedewateringis
dischargedduringtheday,whichcoincideswithpeakammonialoadingstothe
plant.
4. Howdoesthedesignofthenitrificationsystemtakeintoaccountwetweather
flows?
Wetweatherflowscansignificantlyincreasehydraulicloadingtothetreatment
plant,changethenatureoftheinfluentwastewater,andpotentiallywashout
thenitrificationsystem.Strategiesformanagingwetweatherflowsrangefrom
collectionsystemimprovementstoinplantdesignssuchasequalizationbasins.
5. IstheoperatingDOfornitrificationatleast2.0mg/L?
Ingeneral,theDOattheinfluentendoftheaerationbasinshouldbeatleast2.0
mg/L.ForlongerSRTsystems,itcantaperto0.5mg/Lattheendofthebasin.
Therearemanybenefitstodesigningflexibleaerationsystemsthatallow
operatorstoreducetheDOattheendofthebasinaftertheammoniahasbeen
oxidizedandlessoxygentransferisrequired.IntegratedFixedfilmActivated
Sludge(IFAS)systemsmayrequirehigherDOconcentrationsinthemixedliquor
tomaintaintheoxygenneededforattachedbiomassifmaximumnitrification
ratesaredesired.However,ifsimultaneousdenitrificationisdesiredinanIFAS
system,lowerDOconcentrationscanbothstimulatedenitrificationandreduce
theoxygenrequirementintheaeratedbioreactorbecauseofCODstabilized
usingNOxastheelectronacceptor.Thiscanbeaneffectivemethodofnitrogen
removalandcanremoveasmuchas30%oftheinfluentnitrogen.Inlong
nominalhydraulicretentiontimesystemssuchasoxidationditchesorextended
aerationsystems,DOconcentrationsbetween0.25and0.50mg/Lcanproduce
excellentsimultaneousnitrification/denitrificationinthesamebioreactor
becausetherateofoxygentransferdoesnotcontroltherateofnitrificationin
suchaprocess,stoichiometrydoes(i.e.thebalancebetweenelectrondonors
(BOD)andelectronacceptors(DO,NOx)inthebioreactor).
Yes
No
1044
August2010
Table105.DesignChecksforBiologicalNitrogenRemoval(Continued)
Question
6.DoesthedesignconsiderimpactsofnitrificationonalkalinityandpH?
Thenitrificationprocessconsumesalkalinity.Iftheinfluentalkalinityislow,
nitrificationmayreducethemixedliquorpH,whichcanhaveanimpacton
performancebecausepHvaluesbelow7.0significantlyinhibitnitrificationand
pHvaluesbelow6.5stronglyinhibitnitrificationandmayresultInnitrifier
washout.Denitrification,however,partiallyreplenishesalkalinity(50percentof
thealkalinitydestroyedbycompletenitrificationof1mg/LofNH4Nisrestored
bydenitrificationof1mg/LNO3N).Additionoflime,sodiumhydroxide,orsoda
ashcanbeusedtoaddalkalinityiflowalkalinityisdeterminedtobeaproblem.
7. Isthedesignofthenitrificationsystembasedonsitespecificdeterminationof
thenitrificationrate?
Thenitrificationrateisextremelyimportantbecauseitdeterminestheminimum
SRTneededforcompletenitrificationtooccurduringsteadystateconditions.
Thenitrificationratevariessignificantlyfromplanttoplantandcanbelowif
inhibitorssuchasheavymetalsareinpresent.Melceretal.(2003)presents
threerapidmethodsformeasuringmaximumspecificnitrifiergrowthrate,AUT.
8. Doesthedesignminimizetheamountofoxygeninthedenitrificationsystem?
DesignandoperationmethodsthatminimizeDOquantitiesenteringtheanoxic
zonescanreducetheamountofexogenouscarbonneededandprovideamore
stableoperation.
9. Ifanexternalcarbonsourceisaddedfordenitrification,doesthedesign
includeananalysisofpossibleincreasedsludgevolume?
Ifanexternalcarbonsourceisaddedtoimprovedenitrification,theremaybea
smallincreaseinwastesludgeproduction.Themagnitudeoftheincrease
dependsontheamountandtypeoforganiccarbonadded.Nitrification
processesusuallydecreasetheamountofsludgeproduced,however,sonet
productionforthedesignofanewcombinednitrification/denitrificationsystem
maybeequaltoorlessthansludgeproductionbythesamesizeconventional
activatedsludgeplant.
10. Ifthedesigncallsformethanoltobeaddedfordenitrification,areproper
safetyandhandlingproceduresconsidered?
Methanoliscorrosiveandcombustibleandrequiresspecialhandlingtomeet
OccupationalSafetyandHealthAdministration(OSHA)andotherrequirements.
11.Ifbiologicalorchemicalphosphorusremovalisalsobeingpracticed,doesthe
designconsiderthepossibleimpactsofphosphorusdepletiononnitrification
anddenitrification?
Phosphorusisanecessarynutrientformicrobialgrowth.IfTPisreducedtoolow
beforenitrificationordenitrification,thegrowthofthemicroorganismscouldbe
inhibited,therebyrequiringtheadditionofsupplementalphosphorus.Thisis
mostlikelytooccurwhentertiarydenitrificationfiltersareused,butinhibitionof
nitrificationalsohasbeenobservedinplantspracticingchemicalphosphorus
removalintheprimaryclarifiers.ItisalsoimportanttonotethatbothBPRand
denitrificationrequireBODtodrivethereactions.IfBPRisconsumingsomeof
theBOD,therewillbelessfordenitrification.
1045
Yes
No
August2010
Table106.DesignChecksforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
Question
Yes
No
1. IstherbCOD:TPratiooftheinfluentconsistently15:1orhigher?
Ifnot,considerastrategytoincreaserbCODsuchasfermentingprimarysludgeor
addingacommercialproduct(e.g.,aceticacid).
2. Areodorcontrolstrategiesusedinthecollectionsystem(e.g.,chlorination,
additionofnitratesalts)?
Ifyes,thecollectionsystemmanagersshouldusestrategiesthatdonotprevent
fermentationofrbCODtoVFA(e.g.,ferricironadditionforodorcontrolor
modifyingthepHtobetween9and10).
3. InsituationswhereBPRisoperatedwithoutnitrification,isthedesignSRTfor
theentireBPRsystematleast3to4daysintemperateregions?
TheminimumSRTtopreventwashoutofBPRisafunctionofthemixedliquor
temperature,andBPRcanbeaccomplishedatSRTslessthan4daysifthe
temperatureishigh.BecauseBPRisdrivenprimarilybymicrobialpopulation
dynamicsresultingfromtheavailableVFAtoavailableTPratiointheanaerobic
zone,SRTvaluesabovetheminimumvalueupto25daysormorehavelittleeffect
uponthephosphorusremovalaccomplishedbytheprocess.Populationdynamics
alsoresultinbettersteadystateperformanceofBPRatlowtemperatures
becausetheprimarycompetitorsofthePAOs,theglycogenaccumulating
organisms(GAOs),aremorestronglyinhibitedbytemperaturethanPAOs.
4. DoesthedesignSRTforfermentersconsideroperatingtemperature?
VFAformationinthesewersistemperaturedependent.Checkthewinter
production.HigherSRTs(>4days)maybeneededincolderclimatestoaccount
forslowerfermentationofrbCODtoVFA.
5. Doesthedesigntakeintoaccountwetweatherflows?
Aswithallbiologicalwastewatertreatmentprocesses,BPRworksbestunder
steadystateconditions.Equalizationbasinscanbeveryeffectiveatmanaging
stormflowsaswellasnutrientrichrecyclestreams.Designsshouldalsoconsider
flexibilityinaerationbasinstotakebasinsorcompartmentsonandofflinein
responsetoseasonallychangingflows.
6. Doesthedesignallowforflexibilityofoperations?
Mostplantsinitiallyoperatewellbelowthedesignload.Thedesignshouldallow
fortheflexibleoperationofvariousanaerobic,anoxic,andaerobiczonestomatch
changesinoperatingconditions(e.g.,turndownonblowers,recyclepumps,or
lessmixingenergyintheaerationbasin).Agoodapproachtousewhenflowsand
loadsarelowismultipletreatmenttrains,ofwhichoneormorecanbetakenout
ofservice.
1046
August2010
Table106.DesignChecksforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval(Continued)
Question
Yes
No
7. DoesthedesignHRToftheanaerobiczoneconsidersecondaryrelease?
IftheHRToftheanaerobicbasinistoolong,secondaryreleaseofphosphoruscan
occurafterdepletionofVFA.TheanaerobicHRTisrecommendedtobe5to15
percentofthetotalHRToftheBPRsystem.HRTsonthelowersidemaybeusedin
warmclimatesandonthehighersideincolderclimates.Note,however,thatthe
developmentofanaerobicconditionsinthelatterpartoftheanoxiczonetypically
doesnotcausesecondaryrelease,butaddstotheVFAuptakeaccomplishedinthe
anaerobiczone,resultingingreaterphosphorusremovalbythetotalsystem.Also
notethatanoversizedaerobiczonewillresultinexcessiveglycogendepletionin
thePAOs,resultinginlessVFAstorageintheanaerobiczoneandlessoverall
phosphorusremoval.
8. DoesthedesigntakeintoaccountDOornitratesinrecyclestreamstothe
anaerobiczone?
Thedesignshouldminimizeintroductionofdissolvedoxygenornitratestothe
anaerobiczonefromrecyclestreams.AnyDOorNOxintheanaerobiczonewill
reduceVFAstoragebythePAOs,and,thus,thetotalphosphorusremoval
obtained.
9. Aremeasuresinplacetopreventbackmixing?
Iftheanaerobiczoneisfollowedimmediatelybyananoxicoraerobiczone,the
configurationshouldpreventmixedliquorfromseepingbackintotheanaerobic
zone.Aeratedzoneshaveahigherwatersurfacethatunaeratedzones.Usean
overflowbafflebetweenzonesoranunderflowbafflewithopeningssmallenough
tomaintainaforwardvelocityofatleast1footpersecond.Modelingcanalsobe
usedtoensurethattheconfiguration,mixingrate,andoverallhydraulicsaresuch
thatnobackmixingoccurs.
10. WillchemicaladditionornitrificationcausethepHoftheanaerobiczoneto
regularlyfallbelow6.9?
Ifyes,consideraddingalkalinitytoincreasepHtomorethan7.0.However,note
thatBPRcanbeaccomplishedatpHvaluesintheanaerobiczoneaslowas6.3,
butatsignificantlyslowerratesthanatpHvaluesabout7.Iftheanaerobiczone
pHislessthan6.0,BPRwillbecompletelyinhibited.AcommonpHprofilefora
BPRprocessis6.8to7.0intheanaerobiczone,but7.8to8.2intheaerobiczone,
particularlyifthesystemincludesananoxiczonebetweenthem.
11. Doesthedesigntakeintoaccountphosphatesinreturnstreamsfromsludge
dewatering?
InBPRplants,anaerobicdigestionofsludgecanreleasephosphorusintotheliquid
stream,whichisnormallyreturnedtotheplantaftersludgedewatering.Muchof
thereleasedphosphoruscan,however,precipitatewithinthedigesterasstruvite,
calciumphosphateprecipitates,orvivianite.Dissolvedairflotation(DAF)or
mechanicalthickeningcanbeusedinsteadofgravitythickeningtoreduce
phosphorusreleaseduringWASprocessing.
1047
August2010
Table106.DesignChecksforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval(Continued)
Question
Yes
No
12. Ifphosphorusremovalisaccompaniedbynitrificationinasinglesludgesystem,
doesthedesignfactorconsidernitrateintheRASanditsimpactonBPR?
Nitratecanactasanelectronacceptorforsomeheterotrophs,allowingthemto
useVFAintheanaerobiczoneintheabsenceofoxygen.Itwillalsoprevent
fermentationoftherbCODtoVFA.Themodelwillgenerallyaccountforthis.
13 Doesthedesigntakeintoaccountpossiblestruviteformation?
WhenBPRispracticed,struvitemayprecipitateinanaerobicsludgehandling
processes.Dependingonwheretheyform,struvitecrystalscanplugcentrifuge
portsandthepipesandpumpsusedtoconveysludge.Somemodelspredict
struviteformation,butnottheimpactsofit.Notethatmodelsdonotcaptureall
phosphorusprecipitationoradsorptionmechanisminthedigesterandthusmay
underpredictstruviteprecipitationandoverpredictphosphateintherecycle
stream.
10.15 References
Albertson,O.E.1995.IsCBOD5TestViableforRawandSettledWastewater?JournalofEnvironmental
Engineering.121(7):515520.
Alex,J.,M.Wichern,V.Spering,N.Halft,M.Ahnert,T.Frehmann,I.Hobus,G.Langergraber,M.Plattes,
S.Winkler,andD.Woerner.2007.AMethodtoUseDynamicSimulationinCompliancetoDesign
RulestoRefineWWTPPlanning.InProceedings10thIWASpecialisedConferenceonDesign,
Operation,andEconomicsofLargeWastewaterTreatmentPlants.September913.IWA.
Aquifas.2009.AquifasUnifiedModelforActivatedSludge,MembraneBioreactorMBR,IFAS,MBBR
andBAF.Cupertino,CA:MECTechnologies.Availableonline:www.aquifas.com
ASIM.2009.ASIMVersion4.0.2.4.EAWAG,TheSwissFederalInstituteofAquaticScienceand
Technology.Dbendorf,Switzerland:EAWAG.Availableonline:http://www.asim.eawag.ch/
Baird,R.andR.Smith.2002.ThirdCenturyofBiochemicalOxygenDemand.WEF.
Barker,P.S.andP.L.Dold.1997.GeneralModelforBiologicalNutrientRemovalActivatedSludge
Systems:ModelPresentation.WaterEnvironmentResearch.69(5):969999.
Barnard,J.L.1975.Biologicalnutrientremovalwithouttheadditionofchemicals.WaterResearch,
9(5/6),485490.
1048
August2010

Bilyk,K.,I.Takcs,J.Rohrbacher,P.Pitt,R.Latimer,andP.Dold.FullScaleDynamicTestingAdvances
FundamentalUnderstandingofDenitrificationFilters.InWEFTEC2008.Chicago,IL.
Brdjanovic,D.,M.C.M.vanLoosdrecht,P.Versteeg,C.M.Hooijmans,G.J.Alaerts,andJ.J.Heijnen.
2000.ModelingCOD,NandPRemovalinaFullscaleWWTPHaarlemWaarderpolder.Water
Research.34(3):846858.
Borger,A.R.,I.Takc,P.M.Roeleveld,H.W.deMooij.SHARONProcessStabilityModeledbyBioWin.In
WEFTEC2008.WEF.
AutotrophicNitrogenRemovalunderDifferentReactorConfigurations.InWEFTEC2008.WEF.
Chanono,J.,J.Ribes,A.Seco,andJ.Ferrer.2006.OptimumDesignandOperationofPrimarySludge
FermentationSchemesforVolatileFattyAcidsProduction.WaterResearch.40(1):5360.
Chen,W.,F.M.Steen,P.G.Green.2004.KeyInfluentialFactorsforSludgePrefermentationProcess
Design:ACaseStudy.EnvironmentalTechnology.25(4):381390.
Comeau,Y.,andI.Takcs.2008.SchematicRepresentationofActivatedSludgeModels.InWEFTEC
2008.WEF.
Copp,J.2009.Modelling101,HowCanIUseaProcessModeltoHelpMeRunMyPlantorDesignPlant
Upgrades?WEFDistanceLearningWebcastSeries.ModelingExpertGroupoftheAmericas.
February25,2009.
EnvironmentCanada.1995.GuidanceManualforSewageTreatmentPlantLiquidTrainProcessAudits.
OntarioMinistryofEnvironmentandEnergy.PreparedbyCH2MHillandHydromantis,Inc.Toronto
ON,Canada:OntarioMinistryofEnvironmentandEnergy.
Gernaey,K.V.,M.C.M.VanLoosdracht,M.Henze,M.Lind,andS.B.Jorgensen.2004.ActivatedSludge
WastewaterTreatmentPlantModelingandSimulation:StateoftheArt.EnvironmentalModelingand
Software.19:763783.
Grady,C.P.L.,G.T.Daigger,andH.C.Lim.1999.BiologicalWastewaterTreatment.NewYork:Marcel
Dekker.
Gujer,W.,M.Henze,T.Mino,andM.C.M.vanLoostrecht.1999.ActivatedSludgeModelNo.3.Water
ScienceandTechnology.39(1):183193.
Henze,M.,W.Gujer,T.Mino,T.Matsuo,M.Wentzel,andG.v.R.Marais.1995.ActivatedSludgeModel
No.2.IAWPRCScientificandTechnicalReportNo.3.London,UK.IWA.
Hu,Z.,M.C.Wentzel,andG.A.Ekama.2007.AGeneralKineticModelforBiologicalNutrientRemoval
ActivatedSludgeSystemsModelDevelopment.Biotech.Bioeng.98(6)12421258.
1049
August2010

Hulsbeek,J.J.W.,J.Kruit,P.J.Roeleveld,andM.C.M.vanLoosdrecht.2002.APracticalProtocolfor
DynamicModellingofActivatedSludgeSystems.WaterScienceandTechnology.45(6)127136.IWA
Publishing.
IWA.2009.GoodModelingPractice:GuidelinesforUseofActivatedSludgeModels.IWATaskgroup.
InternationalWaterAssociation.Websiteaccessed26January2009.Availableonline:
http://www.modeleau.org/GMP_TG/UP.htm
Johnson,B.WhatIsModeling?PresentedatModeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignand
OperationofWastewaterTreatmentFacilities.WEFDistanceLearningWebcastSeries.Modeling
ExpertGroupoftheAmericas.February25,2009.
Kissel,J.C.,P.L.McCarty,andR.L.Street.1984.NumericalSimulationsofMixedCultureBiofilims.
JournalofEnvironmentalEngineering.110:393411.
Latimer,R.J.,P.E.Paul,A.Pitt,andJ.Rohrbacher.2007.BNR/ENRModelCalibrationExperience
IndicatesDeviationsinKeyModelingParameters.NutrientRemoval2007.WEF.
Latimer,R.J.,P.Pitt,P.Dold,I.Takacs,andT.Lynch.2008.KineticParametersforModelingTwoStep
NitrificationandDenitrificationCaseStudy.InWEFTEC2008.WEF
McConnell,W.C.,D.M.Hurtado,T.Cote.2008.HowMuchNitrogencanthisPlantRemove?InWEFTEC
2008.WEF.
Melcer,H.,P.L.Dold,R.M.Jones,C.M.Bye,I.Takacs,H.D.Stensel,A.W.Wilson,P.Sun,andS.Bury.
2003.MethodsforWastewaterCharacterizationinActivatedSludgeModeling.WERFFinalReport.
Project99WWF3.
Merlo,R.,D.Parker,J.Jimenez,E.Wahlberg,andJ.Bratby.2008.AlternativeLevelsofProcess
ModelinginConsultingWhatisBestforourClients?InWEFTEC2008.WEF.
Merlo,R.,D.Parker,andE.Wahlberg.2007.ClarifyingCFDModelingsBenefits.WaterEnvironment&
Technology.19(4):4853.WEF.
Orhon,D.andE.U.okgr.1997.CODFractionationinWastewaterCharacterizationtheStateofthe
Art.J.Chem.Tech.Biotechnol.68:283293.
Petersen,B.,K.Gernaey,M.HenzeandP.A.Vanrolleghem.2002.EvaluationofanASM1Model
CalibrationProcedureonaMunicipalIndustrialWastewaterTreatmentPlant.Journalof
Hydroinformatics.4(1):1538.IWAPublishing.
Reichert,P.1998.AQUASIM2.0UserManual.SwissFederalInstituteforEnvironmentalScienceand
Technology(EAWAG).Dubendorf,Switzerland.
Rieger,L.2009.Modelling101,HowDoICarryOutaSuccessfulModellingProject?:TheGMPUnified
Protocol.PresentedatModeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignandOperationof
WastewaterTreatmentFacilities.WEFDistanceLearningWebcastSeries.ModelingExpertGroupof
theAmericas.February25,2009.
1050
August2010
Rittmann,B.E.andP.L.McCarty.2001.EnvironmentalBiotechnology:PrinciplesandApplications.
McGrawHillNY.
Saez,P.B.andB.E.Rittmann.1992.AccuratePseudoanalyticalSolutionforSteadyStateBiofilms.
BiotechnologyandBioengineering.39:790793
Sen,D.andC.W.Randall.2008a.ImprovedComputationalModel(AQUIFAS)forActivatedSludge,
IntegratedFixedFilmActivatedSludge,andMovingBedBiofilmReactorSystems,PartI:Semi
EmpiricalModelDevelopment.WaterEnvironmentResearch.Alexandria,VA:WEF.80(5):439453.
Sen,D.andC.WRandall.2008b.ImprovedComputationalModel(AQUIFAS)forActivatedSludge,IFAS
andMBBRSystems,PartII:BiofilmDiffusionalModel.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(7):624632.
Sen,D.andC.WRandall.2008c.ImprovedComputationalModel(AQUIFAS)forActivatedSludge,IFAS
andMBBRSystems,PartIII:AnalysisandVerification.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(7):633645.
Shaw,A.2009.Modelling101,WhatShouldIConsiderWhenSelectingaProcessSimulator?Presented
atModeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignandOperationofWastewaterTreatment
25,2009.
Shaw,A.,H.M.Phillips,B.Sabherwal,andC.deBarbadillo.2007.SucceedingatSimulation.Water
Environment&Technology.19(4):5458.WEF.
STOWA.1996.MethodsforInfluenceCharacterization,InventoryandGuidelines,ReportNR9608,in
Dutch.
STOWA.1999.InfluentCharacterisationofRawandPreTreatedWastewater.ReportNR9913,in
Dutch.
Takcs,I.2009.Modeling101,HowDoInfluentCharacteristicsAffectModelOutputs?Presentedat
Modeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignandOperationofWastewaterTreatment
25,2009.
Third,K.A.,A.R.Shaw,andL.Ng.2006.ApplicationoftheGoodModellingPracticeUnifiedProtocoltoa
PlantWideProcessModelforBeenyupWWTPDesignUpgrade.London,UK:IWAPublishing.
September1993.
USEPA.1999.WastewaterTechnologyFactSheet:SequencingBatchReactors.EPA832F99073.
Availableonline:http://www.epa.gov/owm/mtb/sbr_new.pdf
USEPA.2007.WastewaterManagementFactSheet:DenitrifyingFilters.EPA832F07014.Available
online:www.epa.gov/OWM//mtb/etfs_denitrifying.pdf
1051
August2010

Wanner,O.,andW.Gujer.1986.AMultispeciesBiofilmModel.BiotechnologyandBioengineering.
28:314328.
WEFPress.
WEF.2009.Modeling101HowtoUseSimulatorsintheDesignandOperationofWastewater
TreatmentFacilities.WEFDistanceLearningWebcastSeries.ModelingExpertGroupofthe
Americas.February25,2009.
Wett,B.,S.Murthy,M.OShaughnessy,J.Sizemore,I.Takcs,W.Bailey,M.Musabyimana,P.Sanjines,
D.Katehis,andG.T.Daigger.2008.DesignConsiderationsforSBRsUsedinDigestionLiquor
SidestreamTreatment.2008.InWEFTEC2008.WEF.
Wilson,A.W.andP.LDold.1998.GeneralMethodologyforApplyingProcessStimulatorstoWastewater
TreatmentPlants.InProc.71stAnnualConferenceoftheWaterEnvironmentFederation,Orlando,FL.
Alexandria,VA:WaterEnvironmentFederation.
Vesilind,P.A.1968.TheInfluenceofStirringintheThickeningofBiologicalSludge.Ph.D.dissertation,
UniversityofNorthCarolina,ChapelHill,N.C.
Young,T.,S.Crosswell,andJ.Wendle.2008.ComparisonofNitrogenRemovalPerformanceinSBR
Systems.InWEFTEC2008.
Zhou,S.,J.A.McCorquodale,andZ.Vitasovic.1992.InfluencesofDensityCurrentsonCircularClarifiers
withBaffles.JournalofEnvir.Engineering.ASCE.118(6):829847.
1052
August2010
11.DesignApproachforEffluentFiltration
Chapter11covers:
11.1
Introduction
11.2
SelectionofFiltrationTechnology
11.3
GranularMediaFilters
11.4
ClothMediaFilters
11.5
LowPressureMembranes
11.6
EmergingFiltrationTechnologiesforPhosphorus
Removal
11.7
References
11.1 Introduction
Effluent(ortertiary)filtrationisaprocesstophysicallyseparatesolidsfromwastewaterduring
tertiarytreatment,eitherwithorwithouttertiaryclarification.Tertiaryfiltrationisusedforeffluent
polishingandcanbeveryeffectiveinremovingparticulateandcolloidalphosphorusfromwastewater.
Whencombinedwithchemicaltreatment,tertiaryfiltrationcanachieveverylowtotalphosphorus(TP)
levelsinplanteffluents.Tertiaryfiltrationalsoreducestotalsuspendedsolids(TSS)toverylowlevels,
whichinturncanresultinmoreefficientdisinfectionandallowforthepossibleuseofalternative
disinfectantstochlorinesuchasultravioletlight(UV)(EPARegion102007).Turbidityisoftenusedas
themeasureoftertiaryfilterperformanceinsteadofTSSbecauseturbiditycanbemonitored
continuouslyusingonlineinstruments.
Filtrationtechnologiesforwastewatertreatmentarecontinuingtoevolve.Historically,granular
mediafiltrationwasthemostcommontypeusedatwastewatertreatmentplants(WWTPs),particularly
forlargesystems.Itprovidesphysicalstrainingofsolidsaswatermovesthroughfilterbedscontaining
sandandothermedia(e.g.,anthracite).Downflowsystemsarethemostcommontype,butcontinuous
backwashingupflowsystems(e.g.,Dynasand)arebecomingmorepopular.Granularfilterscomeina
varietyofconfigurationsbasedondepth,media,drivingforce(e.g.,gravityorappliedpressurethrough
pumping),andmethodofflowcontrol.
Advancedfiltrationtechnologieshavebeendevelopedtoprovideenhancedperformanceand,in
somecases,reducedfootprintrequirements.Someareadaptationsofconventionalgranularmedia
filtration.Forexample,thepulsedbedfilterintermittentlypulsesairthroughashallowsandbedto
bringcleansandtothetopandburytrappedsolids,therebymakinguseofthefulldepthofasinglefilter
media.Thetravelingbridgefilterisashallow,lowpressureheadfilterwithanoverheadtravelingbridge
assemblyforcollectingbackwashwater.Membranefiltershavesmallerporesizesandcanremove
solidstoverylowlevels,buttheyrequirehigherpressurestooperate.Specialtymediafiltershavebeen
designedspecificallytoremoveadditionalphosphorus.SeeChapter6,Section6.5forasummaryof
availableeffluentfiltrationtechnologies.
Severalpublicationsprovidedetaileddesignguidanceforeffluentfiltration(e.g.,WEFandASCE
2010;WEF2006;Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Thepurposeofthischapteristoprovidekeydesign
factorsthataffecttheperformanceofeffluentfiltrationforthepurposesofremovingTPtoloweffluent
111
August2010
levels.Manystatesalsohavedesigncriteriaforfiltrationprocesses;designersshouldcarefullyreview
staterequirementsandguidelines.Becauseoftheinherentvariabilityininfluentsolidstobefiltered,
designersshouldstronglyconsiderpilottestingtoestablishthedesignparametersforfullscaleeffluent
filtration(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
Anewtoolforthedesignoftertiaryfiltersiscomputationalfluiddynamic(CFD)modeling.CFD
modelingcanbeusedtopredictfilterperformancepriortodesign.Itcanbeusedtocomplement
laboratoryorbenchscaletests.WaterOnline(2009)reportsthatCFDmodelingwasusedtopredict
performanceofadeepbedgranularmediafiltrationtechnologyforanupgradetotheBluePlainsWWTP
inWashington,D.C.
11.2 SelectionofFiltrationTechnology
Selectionofafiltrationprocessdependsonmanyfactorsincludingeffluentgoals,available
space,operationalconsiderations,reliability,andcosts.Chapter8ofthisdesignmanualprovides
generalguidelinesforselectingcandidatetreatmentprocessesforplantupgrades.Somekey
considerationsforselectingaspecifictertiaryfiltrationtechnologyarehighlightedbelow.
DesiredEffluentTP.Whenoperatedproperly,mostconventionalgranularmediafilterscan
achieveconsistenteffluentlevelsoflessthan0.1milligramsperliter(mg/L)TP(aslongas
solublephosphorushasbeenremovedtolessthanthatconcentration)andlessthan5mg/L
TSS1.Combinationtechnologies,membranes,andsomeemergingtechnologiescanachieve
additionalTPremoval.TechnologiesthatcanpotentiallyachieveextremelyloweffluentTP
levelsoflessthan0.05to0.01mg/Lincludethefollowing(Bottetal.2007;Barnardetal.
2008;EPARegion102007):
- Twostagefiltration.
- Enhancedclarificationandtertiaryfiltration.Enhancedclarificationmayincludehigh
rateballastedsedimentationorsludgeblanketclarification.
- Membranefiltration(microfiltrationorultrafiltration).
- Specialtyfilters(e.g.,anironoxidecoatedsandfilter).
Asnotedelsewhereinthisdesignmanual,removingphosphorusthroughchemical/physical
processesrequiresachemicaladditionsteptoconvertsolublereactivephosphorustoa
particulateorcolloidalform.Thisconversionistypicallyaccomplishedbyaddingametalsalt
suchasalumorferricchlorideandrequirespropermixing.SeeChapters3and9ofthis
designmanualfordetailsaboutthetheoryofphosphorusremovalbychemicaladditionand
thedesignofchemicalfeedandmixingsystems.
ModeofOperation.Operationalconsiderationsareimportantwhenevaluatingfilter
technologies.Sometechnologies, suchasthecontinuousupflowbackwashingfiltersand
1
Althoughtheseeffluentconcentrationshavebeenobservedinthefield,technologyperformancedependsona
numberoffactorsandlowlimitsaremaynotbeconsistentlyachievableinallcases.SeeChapter6forfull
discussionoftechnologyperformance.
112
August2010
thetravelingbridgefilter, donotneedtobetakenoutofserviceforbackwashing.Shallow
bedsystemssuchaspulsedbedandtravelingbridgefiltersrequirealowerflowrateand
generatelessbackwashwatercomparedtoconventionalgranularmediasystems.The
travelingbridgefilterproducesarelativelyconstantamountofbackwashwhenthefilteris
inoperation,whichmayeliminatetheneedforstorageofthebackwashwaterbeforeitis
introducedtotheheadofthetreatmentplant.
SizeConstraints.Thesurfacearearequiredforfiltrationdependsonthehydraulicloading
rate.Cloth,disk,andmembranefiltersoperateathigherloadingratesandthus,have
smallerfootprintsthantraditionalgranularmediafilters.Pulsedbedandtravelingbridge
filtershavelargefootprintsbuthaverelativelyshallowfilterbedsandthus,mayrequireless
pumpingforregularoperation.
FlexibilityinOperations.Thetotalfilterareashouldbeprovidedintwoormoreunits,
allowingforcontinuedoperationifonefilterneedstobetakenofflineforbackwashingor
maintenance.
Costs.CostscanbeoneofthemostimportantfactorsinselectingaWWTPupgradeoption.
Costestimatesforcomparingfiltrationtechnologiesshouldbelifecyclecostsandshould
includeallcapitalcostsforconstruction,aswellasoperationsandmaintenancecosts.For
tertiarysystems,itisimportanttoweightheadditionalcapitalandoperatingcostsfor
advancedsystemswithmoreoperatortrainingandtimerequiredforlessadvanced,
manuallyoperatedandadjustedsystems.Costestimatesvarywidelyfromfacilitytofacility;
refertotheUSEPAMunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument(2008b)
foranevaluationofcostfactorsthatshouldbeconsideredfortertiaryfiltrationsystems.
11.3 GranularMediaFilters
Granularmediafiltersremovesolidmaterialfromwastewaterbypassingthewaterthrougha
filterbedcontainingmediasuchassandoranthracite.Suspendedsolidsareremovedprimarilythrough
physicalstrainingparticleslargerthantheporespacesareremovedmechanically,whilesolidssmaller
thantheporespacescanberemovedthroughchancecontact.Assolidsaccumulatewithinthefilter
media,flowwilldecreaseandheadlosswillincrease.Filtersareperiodicallytakenoutofserviceand
backwashed,typicallyonthebasisofeffluentqualityormeasuredheadloss,toremovetheaccumulated
solidsfromthemedia.
Thefiltermediumcanbeasingletype(typicallysand),dualmedia(commonlysandand
anthracite),ormultimedia(e.g.,sand,anthracite,andgarnetorilmenite).Thedepthofthefilteris
classifiedasconventional(typically2feet)ordeepbed(typically4to6feet).Thefiltermedium
commonlyrestsonalayerofgravel,whichthenrestsonafilterunderdrainsystem,althoughadirect
mediaretentiondraincanbeusedwhichdoesnotrequiregravel.Thedeeperthebed,thelongerthe
filtercantypicallyoperatewithoutbackwashing,butahigherdegreeofpumpingisrequired.
Downflowfiltersareequippedwithaninletchanneltodispersethewaterevenlyoverthefilter.
Theyhaveabackwashsystemwithcontrolvalvestostoptheinfluentflow,apumptoforcewaterup
throughthebedtoexpandthemedia,andcollectiontroughsabovethetopofthemediatocollectthe
backwashwater.Cleanwaterforbackwashingisusuallypumpedfromafilteredwaterclearwellor
113
August2010
providedbygravityfromanelevatedtank(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Asurfacewashmaybeused
priortobackwashingtobreakupthesolidsthataccumulateonthetopofthefilter.
Aseffluentfiltrationhasbecomemorecommonforwastewatertreatment,designersand
manufacturershavemodifiedtheconventionaldownflowtechnologiesindifferentwaystoimprove
performance.Travelingbridgefiltersandupflowcontinuousbackwashingfiltersdonotneedtobetaken
offlineforcleaning.Pulsedbedfiltersmakeefficientuseoftheentiredepthofasinglemedium.As
notedintheprevioussection,designersmaywanttoconsideroneofthesemodificationsforimproved
operationsandperformancedependingonplantconditionsandtreatmentgoals.
Thefollowingarekeydesignfactorsforremovingparticulatephosphorusfromwastewaterand
arediscussedinthissection:
Influentwaterquality
Mediaspecifications
Filterloadingrate
Headloss
Backwashing
Flowcontrol
Additionalinformationandguidelinesfordesignareprovidedinstandardindustryreferences
suchasWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF)andAmericanSocietyofCivilEngineers(ASCE)Manualof
PracticeNo.8andTchobanoglousetal.(2003).
11.3.1 InfluentWaterQuality
Themostimportantinfluentcharacteristicsfordesigningatertiaryfiltersystemare(1)theTSS
concentration,(2)theparticlesizeanddistribution,and(3)theflocstrength.TheTSSofsecondary
effluenttypicallyrangesfrom6to30mg/L,withcorrespondingturbidityvaluesof3to15nephelometric
turbidityunits(NTU).Thedistributionofparticlestendstobebimodal,meaningthattherearetwo
distinctpeaks.Oneistypicallybetween0.8and1.2micrometers(m),andthesecondisbetween5and
100m(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).Therearealsoafewlargerparticlesthatdonotreadilysettlein
secondaryclarifiers.Pilottestingisrecommendedtoaddresstheinherentvariabilityininfluentwater
quality.
Ifachemicalcoagulantsuchasalumorferricchlorideisaddeddirectlypriortothefilterfor
phosphateremoval,thechemicalshouldbewellmixedtoensureformationofthesolidprecipitate.
Organicpolymerscanbeaddedtoincreaseparticlesizeandimprovefiltrationperformance.Jartesting
shouldbeusedtodeterminecoagulantand/orpolymerdose.Pipesorconduitsaheadoffiltersshould
bedesignedtominimizeshearingofflocparticles(TenStateStandards2004).
11.3.2 MediaSpecifications
Inamonomediafilter,largermediawillsettletothebottomandsmallermediawillsettleatthe
topduringbackwashing.Thissettlingpatternresultsinalargeproportionofsolidsbeingremovedinthe
firstfewinchesofthebed,leavingtherestofthebedunusedandresultinginhighheadlossandshort
filterruns.Dualandmultimediafiltersaremorecommonlydesignedtoutilizetheentirefilterbedby
114
August2010
layeringthemediawithlarger,lightermediaonthetop(e.g.,anthracite)andsmaller,heaviermedia
(e.g.,sandandgarnet)onthebottom.Duringthebackwash,mediawillstratifyastheysettle,retaining
thedesiredgradation.
Importantcharacteristicsofgranularfiltermediaaredensity,sphericity,size,uniformity
coefficient,anddepthofmedia.Table111liststhemostcommonfiltermediaalongwithinformation
ondensityandsphericity.Table112providessometypicalvaluesfordepth,particlesize,and
uniformitycoefficientfordifferentfiltertypes.
Table111.CommonFilterMediaandCharacteristics
Media
Density(Typical),
Sand
2.65
Anthracite
1.6
Garnet
4.2
Ilmenite
4.5
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)
Sphericity
0.400.60
0.750.85
0.600.80
N/A
Table112.FilterMediaDepthsandParticleSizes
Media
Depth(in)
EffectiveParticleSize
(mm)
Uniformity
Coefficient
ConventionalSingleMedia(SandorAnthracite)
Sand
Anthracite
1830
2436
0.0150.03
0.030.08
1.21.6
1.31.8
3672
3684
0.080.12
0.080.16
1.21.6
1.31.8
715
1536
0.0150.03
0.030.08
1.21.6
1.31.6
26
920
924
0.0080.024
0.0150.03
0.040.08
1.51.8
1.31.8
1.41.8
DeepBedSingleMedia(SandorAnthracite)
Sand
Anthracite
DualMedia
Sand
Anthracite
Multimedia
Garnet
Sand
Anthracite
Source:Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)
Thedepthofthefilterbedwilldependonthemediasizeandthedesiredoperation.Deeper
bedscangolongerbetweenbackwashes;however,theywillincurlargerheadlossandrequiremore
vigorousbackwashing.Theeffectiveparticlesizeisdefinedasthe10percentsizebymassandmaybe
designatedasd10.Theuniformitycoefficientisameasureoftheuniformityofthesizeofthemedia.Itis
definedastheratioofthe60thpercentilediametertothe10thpercentilediameter.Whileperfectly
uniformmediaisnotnecessary,toolargeauniformitycoefficientcanleadtosmallerparticlesfillingin
theporespacesbetweenlargerparticles,whichcancausefiltercloggingtohappenearlier.The
uniformitycoefficientshouldbe1.7orless(WEFandASCE1998;TenStateStandards2004).Typically
theeffectivesizeanduniformitycoefficientvaluesareusedtospecifygranularmedia.
115
August2010
11.3.3 FilterLoadingRate
Thefilterloadingrate,alsocalledthefiltrationrate,istheflowperunitareaappliedtoafilter,
typicallyexpressedingallonspersquarefootperminute(gal/ft2min)orliterspersquaremeterper
minute(L/m2min).Thedesignratedependsprimarilyontheflocstrengthandsizeoffiltermediaand
typicallyvariesbetween2and8gal/ft2min(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
Thenumberandareaofthefiltersshouldbesuchthatthedesignfilterloadingrateisnot
exceededwhenonefilteristakenofflineforbackwashing.Itmaybedesirabletohaveflowequalization
beforethefilterstoavoidlargepeaksinloadingrates.
11.3.4 Headloss
Theoperationalheadlossthroughthefilterscanbeespeciallyimportantforretrofitswherea
limitedamountofpressureheadtothefiltersisavailablebeforeadditionalpumpingisrequired.Two
importantdesignparametersarecleanfilterheadlossandterminalheadloss(i.e.,maximumheadloss
beforethefilterisbackwashed).
Severalequationsexistforheadlossinacleanfilter.Oneequationpopularinthewaterindustry
istheKozenyequation(AWWA1999):
Eq.111
h=Lk/g*(1)2/3Sv2V
Where:
h =Headlossinft
L =Depthofthefilterbedinft
k =Kozenyconstantwhichisapproximately5formostfiltermedia
=Viscosityofwaterinlb*s/ft2
=Densityofwaterinlb/ft3
g =Accelerationduetogravity(32ft/s2)
=Porosityofthemedia
Sv=Specificsurface,theratioofvolumetosurfaceareaforaparticle
V =Filtrationvelocityinft/s,whichisthefilterloadingratedividedbythetotalfilterarea
Fordualandmultimediafilters,theequationiscalculatedforeachmedialayerandsummedtogetthe
total.Thesizefractionsaredeterminedbyasieveanalysisofthemedia.Porosityandthespecific
surfacedependonthecharacteristicsofthemedia.Thespecificsurfacecanalsobedenotedas6/d
whereisthesphericityanddiameter.Themediasuppliershouldbeabletosupplyvaluesofsphericity,
porosity,andsieveanalysisresultsforthemediatobeused.
Theterminalheadlossofagranularmediafilteristhecleanbedheadlossplustheincreasein
headlossfromremovalofparticulatematerialfromthewater.Thedesignvaluedependsonthesolids
storagecapacityandsolidscaptureefficiencyofthefilterandisusuallybasedonpriorexperienceor
pilotstudies(AWWA1999).
116
August2010
11.3.5 BackwashRequirements
Thepurposeofthebackwashistoremovetrappedsolidsfromthefilter.Inaconventionalfilter,
backwashisaccomplishedbyclosingthefiltereffluentvalve,stoppingflowintothefilter,andpumping
cleanwaterbackthroughthemediafromtheunderdrainstothesurface.Thebackwashvelocityis
increaseduntilthebedisfluidizedandexpanded.Thevelocityofthewaterandtheabrasionfrom
particlecollisionscausesparticlestoseparatefromthefiltermedia.Thelighterentrappedparticlesare
carriedupwardbythefluidvelocityandcollectedinthebackwashtrough.Thefiltermediasettlesback
intothebedoncethebackwashisstopped.Backwashwateristypicallyreturnedtotheprimaryclarifiers
(WEFandASCE2010).
Thefollowingequationcanbeusedtoestimatetheexpandedbeddepth(Tchobanoglousetal.
2003):
Eq.112
Le/L=(1)/(1(v/vs)0.22)
Where:
L =Unexpandedbeddepthinmeters(m)
Le =Expandedbeddepthinm
=Porosity
v =Backwashvelocityinm/s
vs =Particlesettlingvelocityinm/s
Theparticlesettlingvelocity,Vs,isgivenby:
Eq.113
vs=g(sgp1)d2p/18
Where:
g =Accelerationduetogravity,9.8m/s2
sgp =Specificgravityofthemedia
dp =Diameterofthemediainm
Kinematicviscosityinm2/s
Le/Lisimportantindeterminingtherequiredfreeboardandthedistancefromthetopofthe
unexpandedfilterbedtothebottomofthebackwashtrough.Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)recommends
thatthebackwashtroughsbeset2to6inchesabovetheexpandedfilterbedandhaveaminimum
freeboardof24inchesattheupperendofthetrough.
Becauseofthenatureofwastewater,additionalabrasionmaybenecessarytoachieveproper
filtercleaning.Thisisespeciallytruewithanthracitemedia,which(becauseofitsnature)canadsorb
organiccomponentssuchasoilsandgreases.Additionalscourcanbeobtainedbyaddingairtothe
backwashand/orbyasurfacescour.Careshouldbetakentominimizelossofanthracitemediaduring
thedesignoftheairscoursystem.Itisimportanttonotethatdeepbedfilterscannotbefullyfluidized
andwillrequireairscouringtoachievepropercleaning.
Filterscanbebackwashedeitheratsetintervalsorbasedonagivenheadlossoreffluent
turbidity.Theycanalsobeoperatedwithacombinationofthetwo,backwashingthefilteronsettime
117
August2010
intervalswithanalarmsettoautomaticallybackwashthefilterifturbidityorheadlosslevelsgettoo
high.
Onewaytoextendthetimebetweenbackwashesispulsedbedfilters.Pulsedbedfiltersare
proprietaryshallowbedfilters.Theyusetheentirebedofthefiltertocaptureandstoresolids.Pulsed
bedfiltershaveairtrappedintheunderdrainsystem.Apulseofairisperiodicallyreleasedandallowed
toflowupwardthroughthemediabed.Theairdisruptsthefilterbedandallowsthesolidstopenetrate
furtherintothebed,breakingupthematofsolidsthatwouldotherwiseformonthesurfaceofthefilter
andenablinglongerfilterruns.
AutomaticBackwashDesigns
Figure111showsaschematicofanupflowcontinuousbackwashingfilter.Thewateris
introducedatthebottomofthemediaandallowedtoflowupwardthroughthemedia.Itiscollectedat
thetopofthefilterandsenttotheeffluent.Mediaareallowedtoflowdownwardthroughthefilterand
arecollectedatthebottom.Anairliftpipeatthebottomofthefiltercollectsspentmediaand
transportsittothetopofthefilterusingcompressedair.Asthespentmediaandwateraretransported
upwardbythecompressedair,capturedparticlesarescouredfromthemedia.Themediaanddirty
wateraredischargedintoawashingchamberatthetopofthefilter.Thespentsandisallowedtosettle
andisthenreturnedbacktothetopofthefilter.Thecapturedparticlesandwatercarryingthemare
dischargedthrougharejectcompartmentasbackwashwater.Acommontradenameforthiskindof
filterisDynasand.
Continuousbackwashfiltershaveseveraladvantages,includingcapabilitytohandlehigherTSS
concentrationswithoutbinding,lowmaintenanceduetonomovingmechanicalparts,lowheadloss,and
noequalizationrequiredforbackwashwater.Disadvantagesaretheforeignobjectscanplugtheairlift
pipeandmostunitsareproprietary.
118
August2010
AFeed
BFeedassembly
CDistribution
DSandbed
EFiltrate
FAirliftpump
GAirliftdischarge
HRejectcompartment
IWashersection
JFiltrateweir
KRejectweir
LRejectline
Figure111.ExampleofUpflowContinuousBackflowFilter(DynaSandFilter)
Source:CourtesyofParksonCorporation
11.3.6 FlowControl
Thereareseveralwaystocontroltheflowratethroughaconventionaldownflowgranular
mediafilter.Themostcommonmethodsareconstantratefiltrationwithafixedhead,constantrate
filtrationwithavariablehead,andvariabledecliningratefiltration.Inconstantratefiltrationwitha
fixedhead,thefiltrationrateiskeptconstant.Pumps,weirs,oreffluentcontrolvalvesareusedto
maintainaconstantflowandconstantwaterlevelinthefiltersassolidsaccumulateandtheheadloss
increases.Inconstantratefiltrationwithvariablehead,pumpsandweirsareusedtokeeptheflow
throughthefilterconstant,butthewaterlevelabovethefiltersisallowedtochange.Thefilteris
backwashedwhenthelevelreachesapresetlevel.Invariabledecliningratefiltration,theflowis
allowedtodecreaseastheheadlossinthefilterbuildsup.Thefilterisbackwashedwhentheminimum
designflowisreached.
119
August2010

Itisalsopossibletohavepressurefilterswherethefilteriscontainedinapressurevessel,anda
highpressureisappliedtodrivetheliquidthroughthefilter.Thesefilterscanachievehigherfiltration
ratesthanconventionalfiltersandrequirelessspace.Theyaregenerallyusedatsmallertreatment
plantsbutdorequiremoremaintenanceandcare.
11.4 ClothMediaFilters
Clothmediafiltersremovesolidsbypassingwaterthroughaclothdisk.Theclothpanelsare
installedverticallyinsideatankwithwatermovinghorizontallythroughthepanels.Clothfiltersare
generallydesignedinoneoftwoconfigurations,althoughnearlyallofthemareproprietaryandwill
involveslightdifferences.Inoneconfiguration,twoormoreclothdisksareinstalledverticallyinsidea
tank.Watertobefilteredisintroducedbetweenthedisksandflowsoutwardthroughthecloth.The
disksslowlyrotatewithapproximately60to70percentofthesurfaceareasubmergedatanygiven
time.Theunsubmergedportionissprayedwithbackwashwatertoremoveaccumulatedsolids.The
dislodgedsolidsarecollectedinabackwashtroughandrecycledtotheheadoftheplant.Thebackwash
canbeappliedcontinuouslyanddoesnotrequiretakingtheunitoffline.
Anotherconfigurationalsoconsistsofaseriesofverticaldiskscoveredwithclothsubmergedin
atank.Inthiscase,flowisfromonesideofthetankthroughtheclothandintoacollectiontubeor
header.Thedisksdonotrotateandarefullysubmerged.Whenthepressuredropreachesapre
determinedlevel,theunitistakenofflineandbackwashed.Becauseofthenatureoftheclothmaterial,
cleaningwithajetsprayisoccasionallyneeded.Figure112showsanexampleofthisconfiguration.
Figure112.CutawayviewofAquaDiskclothmediafilter.
Source:http://www.aquaaerobic.com/default.asp,reprintedwithPermissionfromAquaAerobicSystems,Inc.
1110
August2010
Clothfiltershaveporesizesontheorderof10to30m.Theycanoperateatahigherhydraulic
loadingratethangranularmediafiltersandrequirealowerbackwashratesincethemediadonotneed
tobefluidized.Theyhavebeentraditionallyinstalledinsmallplants(5to10MGD)buthaverecently
beenusedatlargerinstallations(USEPA2008b).
Lin(2007)reportedresultsfromtwopilottestsofAquaDiskclothmediafilterswithrespectto
phosphorusremoval.Designflowswereapproximately2and6MGD,respectively,andhydraulicloading
ratestothefilterrangedfrom3to6.7gpm/ft2.Priortofiltration,atwostagesystemprovidedrapidmix
offerricsulfateandpolymerfollowedbyflocculation.Pilottestingresultsshowedthatbothferric
sulfateandpolymeradditionwerekeytoTPremovaltoconcentrationsoflessthan0.3mg/L.
Anewfiltrationtechnology,theUltrascreenMicrofilterwasrecentlytestedattheSouthern
WaterReclamationFacilityinPalmBeach,FL.Theunitisaclothdiskfilterbutuniqueinthatthedisks
aremountedatlessthan90degrees,resultingintangentialfiltration.Daltonetal.(2008)observedthat
itcanoperateathigherhydraulicloadingrates(upto12gpm/ft2)comparedtotraditionaldiskfilters.
TheauthorsdidnotevaluateeffluentTPlevelsbutobservedveryloweffluentturbidityof2NTU.
11.5 LowPressureMembranes2
Membranefiltrationremovesparticlesbyforcingwaterthroughaporousmembrane.
Membranescanbeclassifiedbythepressuresusedtooperatethem,theporesize,orthemechanismby
whichseparationisachieved.Microfiltration(MF)andultrafiltration(UF)areconsideredlowpressure
membraneswithoperatingpressuresuptoabout90poundspersquareinch(psi).Theyhaverelatively
welldefinedporesandgenerallyoperatebasedonsizeexclusion,withparticleslargerthantheaverage
poresizebeingrejectedandthosesmallerpassingthroughthemembrane.MFandUFsystemsusedfor
wastewatertreatmenthaveporesizesthattypicallyrangefrom0.04to0.2microns.Nanofiltration(NF)
andreverseosmosis(RO)arehighpressuremembranes,operatingatpressuresupto1,200psi,andare
typicallyusedforwaterreuseapplications.Table113showsthecharacteristicsofdifferentmembrane
types.
Table113.MembraneCharacteristics
MembraneType
LowPressure
HighPressure
Microfiltration(MF)
Ultrafiltration(UF)
Nanofiltration(NF)
ReverseOsmosis(RO)
PoreSize(microns)
0.110
0.010.1
0.0010.01
<0.001
OperatingPressure(psi)
130
380
70220
8001200
Source:WEF(2006)
Inrecentyears,lowpressuremembraneshavebeenconsideredfortertiaryfiltration.Low
pressuremembranescanconsistentlyachievesignificantreductionsinTPaslongasithasbeen
2
Notethatthissectiondiscussesmembranetechnologiesforeffluentfiltration.SeeChapter6foradiscussionof
membranebioreactors(MBR).
1111
August2010
convertedtoparticulateandcolloidalform.Significantphosphorusremovaltolessthan0.01mg/Lhas
alsobeenreportedforpilotanddemonstrationstudies(Bottetal.2007;seeSection11.5.6formore
information).WEF(2006)reportsthatbasedonresultsofa2003surveyoffullscalesystems,thelargest
useoflowpressuremembranesistopretreatpriortohighpressuremembranesystemssuchas
reverseosmosis(RO)forthepurposesofreuse.
Thissectionhighlightskeydesignparametersforlowpressuremembranesystemsforthe
purposesoftertiaryfiltration.DesignersshouldrefertotheWEFpublication,MembraneSystemsfor
WastewaterTreatment(2006)foradditionalinformation.
11.5.1 MembraneMaterial
Membranesusedinwastewaterprocessesaregenerallymadeofcelluloseorotherorganic
polymers.Althoughinorganicmembranematerialsexist,theyaregenerallyexpensiveandhavenot
foundwideuseinmunicipalwastewaterprocesses.Elementstoconsiderinselectingamembrane
materialincludethermalstability,chemicalstability,cost,andchlorineresistance.
Thermalstabilitycanbeimportantinareasexperiencinghightemperatures.Somemembrane
materialscandegradeathightemperatures;forexample,celluloseacetatemembranescannotbeused
attemperatureshigherthan86oF.Differenttypesofmembranematerialscanbedegradedbydifferent
typesofchemicalssuchasaromatichydrocarbons,acids,andchlorine.Table114showstheadvantages
anddisadvantagesofvariousmembranematerials.
1112
August2010
Table114.AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofMembraneMaterials
Material
Advantages
CelluloseAcetate
Inexpensive
Easytofabricate
Polyamide
Thermallystableto122F
StableforpH3to11
Moderatethermalstability
Polypropylene
Polysulfone
Polytetraflouroethylene
PolyvinylideneFluoride
Thermallystableto167F
pHrangeof1to13
Goodchlorineresistance
Resistanttoaliphatichydrocarbons,
fullyhalogenatedhydrocarbons,
alcohols,andacids
Veryhydrophobic
Excellentorganicresistance
Excellentstabilitywithacids,bases,and
solvents
Stableoverallprobabletemperatures
Autoclavable
Goodsolventresistance
Disadvantages
Temperaturelimitedtobelow86F
pHlimitedtobetween3and6
Poormechanicalstability
Biodegradable
Limitedchlorineresistance
Chlorinesensitive
Lesschemicalresistantthan
polytetrafluoroethylene
Elongatedpores
Chlorinesensitive
Poorresistancetoaromatic
hydrocarbons,ketones,ethers,and
esters
Lowpressurelimits(25100psi)
PoresizesbelowMFunavailable
Expensive
Lesschemicallyresistantthan
polytetrafluoroethylene
PoresizesbelowUFunavailable
11.5.2 MembraneConfiguration
Membranesareavailableinanumberofconfigurations.Individualmembranescanbe
constructedinflatsheets,hollowfibers,tubes,andspiralwoundconfigurations.
Flatsheetmembranesaresecuredwithinsupportingplatesandplacedinahousingparallelto
manyotherflatsheets.Waterisfilteredasitpassesthroughthechannelsbetweentheplates.
Hollowfibermembranesconsistofsmalldiameterhollowfiberbunchedtogetherinbundles
consistingofhundredsoreventhousandsoffibers.Watertobefilteredisintroducedintotheinsideof
thefiberandflowstotheoutside.Hollowfibermembranesarepopularbecausethesmalldiameter
allowsforalargenumberofmembranestobegroupedtogetherwithamuchgreatersurfaceareaper
volumeratiothanothermembraneconfigurations.Theyalsorequirelowerpressuretodrivethe
filtration.Thisconfigurationcanleadtolowerlifecyclecosts.
Tubularmembranesaresimilartohollowfibermembranesexceptthatthesizeofthehollow
tubeisaboutanorderofmagnitudegreater.Hollowfibersaretypicallyontheorderofafew
millimetersindiameter,whiletubularmembranesareontheorderofcentimeters.Thelargersizeof
tubularmembranesmakesthemeasiertocleanandbetterforwaterswithhighersolidscontent.
Spiralwoundmembranesconsistofaflexiblepermeatespacerplacedbetweentwomembrane
sheets,whicharethenwrappedinaspiralconfigurationaroundaperforatedpipe.Themembraneis
1113
August2010
sealedonallsidesexceptthesideexposedtotheperforatedpipe.Permeateisintroducedalongthe
spacerparalleltothepipeandflowsthroughthemembranesintotheperforatedpipe.
Membranescaneitherbehousedinapressurevesselorsubmergeddirectlyinanopenchannel
orchamber.Flatsheetmembranesandhollowfibermembranescanbeusedinopenchannelsor
pressurevessels.Spiralwoundandtubularmembranesareusedinpressurevessels.
Flowthroughamembranecanbeoftwotypes:crossflowanddirectfeedflow.Incrossflow
mode,waterflowstangentialtothemembrane.Waterthatdoesnotpassthroughthemembraneis
collectedattheendoftheunitandrecirculatedwithadditionalfeedwater.Directfeedflowrequiresall
thewatertopassthroughthemembraneonthefirstpass.
11.5.3 ProcessConsiderations
Processconsiderationsfordesigningmembranesystemsincludepretreatment,backwashing,
cleaning,andintegritytesting.
Solids,filamentousorfibrousmaterial,metals,microbialgrowth,andsomeorganicscancause
foulingofmembranes.Foulingcanleadtoincreasedcleaningfrequencyandshortermembranelife
leadingtolowerflowratesandhighercosts.Variouspretreatmentfacilitiescanbeinstalledtoreduce
foulingandincreasemembranelife.Strainingshouldbedonetoremovefilamentousmaterialpriorto
themembranes.Typicallystrainerswithanopeningof2mmorlessareused.Granularmediaand
cartridgefiltersarealsousedtoremovelargerparticulatespriortothemembranes.ForNFandRO
systemswheresolidsremovalismoreimportant,lowpressuremembranessuchasMForUFareoften
installedasapretreatmentstep.
Membranesarebackwashedtoremovesolidsthathaveaccumulatedonthefeedsideofthe
membrane.Backwashingisaccomplishedbytakingthemembraneoutofserviceandreversingtheflow.
Backwashesaremorefrequentwithmembraneapplicationsthanconventionalfiltration,withtypical
periodsbetweenbackwashesontheorderof15minutestoanhour.Backwashistypicallyinitiated
basedonchangesintransmembranepressure(TMP).Aswithconventionalfiltration,sufficient
membraneunitsshouldbeinplacesothatnooneunitisoverloadedifonemembraneisofflinefor
backwashingorcleaning.Backwashwaterisusuallyreturnedtotheheadofthetreatmentplant.WEF
(2006)reportsthatthetotalbackwashvolumeisbetween2and10percentofaveragedailyflow.
Althoughbackwashingcanbeveryeffectiveinremovingmostcontaminants,itcannotremove
allcontaminantsorcompoundsembeddedinthemembraneitself.Forthisreason,mostlowpressure
membranetechnologiescomeequippedwithchemicalcleaningcapabilities,orcleaninplace(CIP)
systems.Proceduresforcleaningmayincludeaprolongedbackwashwithchemicaladditionor
immersioninachemicalbath.Cleaningchemicalsincludeacids,bases,andsurfactants.Designersshould
consultthemanufacturertoensureuseofchemicalssuitableforthemembranematerial.CIPchemicals
willrequireastoragetank,mixingsystem,andachemicalfeedpump.UFandMFmembranesare
typicallycleanedonceeverythreetofourmonths.
Integritytestingofmembranesisnotgenerallyrequiredforwastewatersystems;however,itis
recommendedtoensurethatnoneofthemembranesaredamaged.Integritytestingcanbeindirector
direct.Indirectmethodsmeasurewaterqualityparameterssuchasturbidityorparticlecountsto
determineifthemembraneisnotfunctioningproperly.Theyarenotassensitiveasdirectmethodsbut
1114
August2010
donotrequiretakingthemembraneoffline.Directmethodsgenerallyarebasedonfillingthepermeate
sideofthemembranewithair.Ifthemembraneiswet,increasedpressurewillberequiredtopush
waterthroughthemembraneduetothesurfacetensionwithinthepores.Thepressuredecaytest,
diffusiveairflowtest,bubblepointtest,andsonictestingaredifferentmethodsthatcandetectleaksin
amembrane.Thefrequencyoftestingisabalancebetweentheinconvenienceoftakingaunitoffline
fortestingandtheneedforensuringeffluentquality.
11.5.4 PressureDrop
Pressuredropacrossthemembraneisimportantfordeterminingtherequiredenergynecessary
forthefiltrationprocess.Formembranesinacrossflowconfiguration,thetransmembranepressure
(TMP)canbecalculatedusingthefollowingequation:
Eq.114
Ptm=(Pf+Pc)/2Pp
Where:
Ptm=Transmembranepressureinbars
Pf =Pressureofthefeedstreaminbars
Pc =Pressureoftheconcentratestreaminbars
Pp =Pressureofthepermeatestreaminbars
Formembranesinadirectfeedconfiguration,theequationis:
Eq.115
Ptm=PfPp
Thetransmembranepressureincombinationwiththerequiredfluxacrossthemembranewill
determinetherequiredmembranearea.
11.5.5 FluxDetermination
Fluxistheflowperunitareaacrossamembrane,typicallyreportedinliters/meters2hour
(L/m hr)orgpd/ft2.Themembranefiltrationsystemcanbeoperatedinoneofthreeways:(1)the
pressurecanbekeptconstantandthefluxallowedtovary,(2)thefluxcanbekeptconstantandthe
pressureallowedtovary,or(3)bothpressureandfluxcanbeallowedtovary.Nearlyallmunicipal
membranesystemsoperateaccordingtothefirst,onaconstantfluxbasis.Onestudy,however,
indicatedthatallowingbothpressureandfluxtovarymaybethemosteffectivemodeofoperation
(Bourgeousetal.1999).
Thefluxisrelatedtoflowandareabytheequation:
Eq.116
Qp=FwA
Where:
Qp =Permeateflowrateinm3/s
Fw =Transmembranefluxrateinm/s
A =Membraneareainm2
2.
1115
August2010
Thefluxcanberelatedtothepressuredropbytheequation:
Fw=Ap(PTPO)
Eq.117
WhereAPisthemembranepermeabilitycoefficientinL/m2*h/kPa,PTisthetransmembranepressurein
kPaorpsi,andPOistheosmoticpressureofthefeedsolutioninkPaorpsi.
Kwwillvarydependingonthetemperature,membranecharacteristics,andinfluentwater
characteristics.Ingeneralduringdesign,anoperatingpressurewillbechosenandthefluxdetermined
forthedesiredflowrate.Theareaofmembranerequiredcanthenbecalculated.Theprocesscanbe
iteratedifthegivenareaisnotfeasible.Typicaloperatingpressuresandfluxescanbeobtainedfromthe
manufacturerforagivenmembrane.Immersedmembranestypicallyoperatebetween16and24
gpd/ft2.Pressurizedinsideandoutside,theycanoperateathighfluxvaluesofbetween30and35
gpd/ft2(WEF2006).
11.5.6 PerformanceData
Table115summarizesresultsfromrecentpilotstudiestoevaluatetheremovalofphosphorus
usinglowpressuremembranesastertiaryfilters.
Table115.PhosphorusRemovalReportedFromMembranePilotStudies
Location
TypeofStudy
andTestPeriod
MembraneTested
Spokane,
WA
Demonstration
pilot,AugtoDec
2007
Submergedhollow
fiberUFwith
nominalporesize
of0.05byKoch
Coeur
DAlene,ID
Pilot,MaytoOct
2006
Configuration
Two30m2
modulesand
tank
Immersedhollow
Notreported
fiberUFwith
nominalporesize
of0.04.ZeeWeed
500systemby
Zenon
Sources:Stahyamoorthyetal.(2008);Benischetal.(2008)
Operating
Flux
(gpd/ft2)
2034
EffluentTP
(mg/L)
Notreported
0.024to
0.067
0.3to1.7,
(Avg=0.7)
Comments
Removalwas
highly
dependenton
alumaddition
priortofilter
Excursions
causedby
problemswith
alumfeedor
inadequatepH
control
11.6 EmergingFiltrationTechnologiesforPhosphorusRemoval
11.6.1 TwoStageFiltration
Twofiltersinseriescanprovideenhancedsolidsremovalandprocesscontrol.EPARegion10
(2007)reportedexcellentphosphorusremovalfortheBreckenridge,theSnakeRiver,andtheAlexandria
WWTPsusingatwostagetreatmentprocesswithchemicaladditionandtertiarysettlingpriorto
filtration.Aproprietarytwostagefilter,theDynasandD2filtrationsystembyParkson,hasbeentested
atseveralfacilitiesandisreportedtoachieveextremelyloweffluentTPlevelswhencombinedwith
chemicaladdition(EPARegion102007;Bottetal.2007).Benishetal.(2008)reportedoperational
1116
August2010
problems,however,duringpilottestingthatresultedineffluentTPlevelsaveraging0.084mg/L
comparedtothetargeteffluentlimitof0.050mg/L.
TheDynasandD2filterconsistsoftwocontinuouslycleaningupflowgranularmediafiltersin
series(seeFigure113foratypicalconfiguration).Thefirstisadeepbedfiltercontaininglargesand
grains.Itemploysaproprietaryprocesscalledcontinuouscontactfiltration(CCF)wherecoagulation,
flocculation,andsolidsremovaloccurwithinthefilterbed.Thesecondfilterisapolishingfilterandhas
smallersandgrainsandashallowerbed.Thewaterisintroducedintothebottomofthesandbed
throughanumberofradialarms.Particulatesareremovedasthewaterflowsupwardthroughthebed.
Sandmediaiscontinuouslydrawnintotheairliftpipeatthebottomofthefilterwhereitisscouredand
returnedtothetopthroughacentralassembly.Therejectratereportedbythemanufactureris0.5
percentoffeedflow,althoughhigherrateshavebeenreported(EPARegion102007).
Figure113.ParksonDynasandD2advancedfiltersystem.
Source:USEPA2008b,Figure218.
11.6.2 IronOxideCoatedMedia
TheBluePROTMprocessisacontinuousupflowbackwashingfilterdesignedspecificallyto
removephosphorustoextremelyloweffluentlevelsthroughadsorptionofprecipitatedphosphorus.
ThefilterwasoriginallydevelopedattheUniversityofIdahoandhasbeentestedatWWTPsinIdaho
andFlorida.Skidmountedsystemscantreatbetween5and100gpm,andconcreteslabunitscantreat
upto1MGD.USEPA(2008a)reportsthatthisparticularsystemisnotsuitableforplantstreatingmore
than10MGDduetothesheernumberofunitsthatwouldberequired.
Thefiltermedia(sand)iscoatedwithahydrousferricoxidecoating,whichenhances
phosphorusremovalthroughadsorption.Aferricsaltisaddedpriortothefiltertoaidincoagulationand
toreplacetheferriccoating,whichisabradedfromthesandduringoperation.Waterflowsupthrough
thefilterwhilethesandtravelsdown.Anairlifttubeatthebottomofthefiltercarriesthesandupward.
Turbulencefromthecompressedairdislodgesaccumulatedironandphosphorusalongwithanysolids.
Theiron,phosphorus,andparticlesarewasted,whilethecleansandisdepositedonthetopofthebed.
TheBluePROfilterrunscontinuouslyanddoesnotneedtobetakenofflineforbackwashing.Ithasan
1117
August2010
addedadvantageofrecyclingmaterialinsteadofaccumulatingphosphorusinsludgewhereitis
susceptibletosecondaryreleaseduringprocessing.
SeeFigure114foratypicaltwostageconfiguration.Resultsfrompilotstudiesaresummarized
inTable116.
Figure114.BluePROprocess.
Source:USEPA2008b,Figure220.
Table116.PilotTestResultsfortheBlueWaterBluePROSystem
Location
Flow
Duration InfluentTP EffluentTP
(MGD) ofStudy
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
HaydenWastewater 0.25
3months
6mg/L
Avgof0.011
ResearchFacility,
(Dec05Feb
HaydenID
06)
CoeurDAlene,ID
0.0130.034
(Avgof0.021)
EasternFlorida(test 0.0144(10
2months
4mg/L
Allresults<
resultsreportedby
gpm)
(NovDec
0.010
manufacturer)
07)
Sources:Newcombeetal.(2008);Benischetal.(2007);BlueWaterTechnologies(2008)
OperationalFactors
Fedose=5mg/L
Fedose=38mg/L
OptimizedFedosewaskeyto
performance
11.7 References
AWWA.1999.WaterQuality&Treatment:AHandbookofCommunityWaterSupplies,5thEdition.
Letterman,R.D.,TechnicalEd.McGrawHill,Inc.
Barnard,J.L.,H.Phillips,B.Sabherwal,C.deBarbadillo.2008.DrivingMembraneBioReactorstoLimitof
Technology.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Benisch,M.,D.Clark,Neethling,J.B.,H.S.Fredrickson,A.Gu.2007.CanTertiaryPhosphorusRemoval
ReliablyProduce10ug/L?:PilotResultsfromCoeurDAlene,ID.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2007.
WEF.
1118
August2010
BlueWaterTechnologies.2008.BlueProPilotProjectReport:PhosphorusRemovalfromWastewater
LocatedataMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantinFlorida.BlueWaterTechnologies,Inc.Hayden,
Idaho.
Borgeous,K.,G.Tchobanoglous,andJ.Darby.1999.PerformanceEvaluationoftheKochUltrafiltration
MembraneSystemforWastewaterReclamation.CenterforEnvironmentalandWaterResources
Engineering.ReportNo.992,DepartmentofCivilandEnvironmentalEngineering,Universityof
CaliforniaDavis,CA.
LowCanWeGoandWhatisStoppingUsfromGoingLower?Alexandria,VA:WERF.
Caliskaner,O.andG.Tchobanoglous.2005.ModelingDepthFiltrationofActivatedSludgeEffluentUsing
aCompressibleMediumFilter.WaterEnvironmentResearch.77(7):3080.
Caliskaner,O.andG.Tchobanoglous.2008.DevelopmentandSolutionofDepthFiltrationEquation.
Chalmers,R.B.,M.Patel,B.Dunnivin,andD.Cutler.2008.OrangeCountyWaterDistrictsGroundwater
ReplenishmentSystemisNowProducingWater.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Dalton,D.,D.E.Loy,M.G.Schill.2008.Demonstrationof"DynamicTangentialFiltration"atPalmBeach
CountytoProduceHighQualityReuseWater.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
EPARegion10.EPA910R07002.Availableonline:
http://yosemite.epa.gov/r10/water.nsf/Water+Quality+Standards/AWT
Phosphorus/$FILE/AWT+Report.pdf
Hendron,L.,M.Laquidara,S.Sathyamoorthy,G.Shrope,GaleOlrich,andJ.Barr.2008.WaterReuseas
PartoftheCityofSpokane'sIntegratedApproachtoReducePhosphorusDischarge.Presentedat
WEFTEC2008.
Lin,H.,D.J.Binder,andL.W.Johnson.2008.EffectofParticleRemovalbyOptiFiberPA13NylonPile
MediaonParticleSizeDistributionandCorrelationbetweenTurbidityandTotalSuspendedSolids.
Mller,G.2006.Absolute(1000fold)PhosphorusRemoval:Performance,mechanismsandengineering
analysisofironbasedreactivefiltrationandcoupledCEPTattheHayden,IdahoWWTP.Universityof
Idaho.
Newcombe,R.L.,R.A.Rule,B.K.Hart,andG.Mller.2008a.PhosphorusRemovalfromMunicipal
WastewaterbyHydrousFerricOxideReactiveFiltrationandCoupledChemicallyEnhancedSecondary
Treatment:PartIPerformance.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(3):238247.
Newcombe,R.L.,D.G.Strawn,T.M.Grant,S.E.Childers,andG.Mller.2008b.PhosphorusRemovalfrom
MunicipalWastewaterbyHydrousFerricOxideReactiveFiltrationandCoupledChemicallyEnhanced
SecondaryTreatment:PartIIMechanism.WaterEnvironmentResearch.80(3):238247.
1119
August2010

Olivier,M.andD.Dalton.2002.FilterFresh:ClothMediaFiltersImproveaFloridaFacilitysWater
ReclamationEfforts.WaterEnvironment&Technology.14(11).Alexandria,VA:WEF.
Sathyamoorthy,S.,M.Laquidara,N.Anand,Z.Nikolic,S.Dukes,andA.vonGottberg.2008.Operationof
SubmergedHollowFiberUltrafiltrationMembraneforTreatmentofSecondaryEffluent.Presentedat
WEFTEC2008.
Scott,S.A.andE.A.Lawrence.2007.PilotStudyApplicationofTertiaryClarificationandFiltrationto
MeetProposedUltraLowPhosphorusDischargeLimitsontheSpokaneRiver.PresentedatNutrient
Removal2007.WEF.
TenStatesStandards.2007.RecommendedStandardsforWaterWorks,2007Edition:Policiesforthe
USEPA.2008b.MunicipalNutrientRemovalTechnologiesReferenceDocument.,Volume1Technical
WaterOnline.2009.ITTLeopoldCompletesTertiaryFiltrationProjectforWastewaterTreatmentPlant
inWashington,D.C.Websiteaccessed9April2009.Availableonline:
http://www.wateronline.com/article.mvc/ITTLeopoldCompletesWastewaterProjectInN0001
Reston,Va.
WEF.2006.MembraneSystemsforWastewaterTreatment.Alexandria,VA:WEFPress.
WERF.2008.WERFNutrientChallenge,Chapter1:TertiaryPhosphorusRemoval.Accessed11March
2009.Availableonline:http://www.werfnutrientchallenge.org/chapter1.asp?area=ch1
1120
August2010
12.OperationandOptimizationtoEnhanceBiologicalNutrientRemoval
Chapter12covers:
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
Introduction
AnalysisofExistingOperations
IncorporatingSCADAandotherInstrumentation
CommonOperationalChanges
References
12.1 Introduction
Dependingontheexistingplantconfigurationandoperatingconditions,itmaybepossiblefor
plantstomeetnewperformancegoalsbyoptimizingexistingtreatmentprocesses,particularlyif
biologicalnutrientremovalisalreadybeingpracticed.Itisoftenmorecosteffectivetooptimize
operationsthantoaddanewtreatmentprocessortoconstructnewreactorvolumes.
Processsimulationmodelscanbeextremelyusefulinoptimizingtheoperationofanexisting
wastewatertreatmentplant(WWTP).Operatorscanadjustparametersandpredicttheirimpact
withouthavingtodoextensivetestingattheplant.Modelscanalsohelptoidentifybottlenecksatthe
plant.
Thischapterprovidesgeneralguidelinesforevaluatinganexistingplantandchangingplant
operationtoimproveperformance.Whilethischapterincludesmanyexamplesofplantoperational
improvements,eachplantisunique,andalternativeapproachesmayworkbetterforagivensituation.
OperatorsanddesignersshouldalwaysapplythefundamentalprocessinformationprovidedinChapters
3through5ofthismanualtoaddressoperationalissuesandimproveperformance.
12.2 AnalysisofExistingOperations
Processoptimizationbeginswithananalysisoftheperformanceofeachtreatmentprocessat
theexistingplant.Thepurposeofthisanalysisistoanswerquestionssuchas:
Whatarethefactorsthatarelimitingnutrientremoval?
Wherearethehydraulicbottlenecks?
Doparalleltreatmentunitsachievedifferentperformancelevelsfornutrientremoval?Ifso,
why?
Whatiscausingvariabilityineffluentqualitywithrespecttonutrients?
Whatarethecausesofintermittentincreasesinnutrientconcentrationsintheplant
effluent?
121
August2010
Thissectiondescribesdataanalysisandmodelingtechniquesthatcanbeusedtoanswerthese
questionsandultimatelyimproveperformanceoftheexistingWWTP.
12.2.1 DataAnalysis
Thefollowing4stepprocedureisonepossibleapproachtocollectingandanalyzingplantdata
forthepurposesofprocessoptimization.AlternativeapproachescanbefoundinChapter15of
Tchobanoglousetal.(2003)andChapter12ofWEFandASCE(2006).Notethatalldataanalysesshould
bedoneinclosecoordinationwithplantoperationsstaff.Plantpersonnelmayhaveuniqueinsightinto
theinfluenceofoperationalchangesonmeasuredparameters,andviceversa,thatcouldbeextremely
valuableforprocessoptimization.
Notethatallinfluent,primaryeffluent,secondaryeffluent,andplanteffluentsamplesshouldbe
24hourcompositesamples.Grabsampleswillnotusuallyprovidethenecessaryaccuracy,andresults
canbeverymisleading.
Step1:CompileExistingData
Obtainasmuchdataaspossiblefortheinfluent,primaryeffluent,secondaryeffluent,andplant
effluent.SeeTable121foralistofrecommendedparametersfordataanalysis.
Step2:CollectAdditionalData
Ifthedataarenotsufficienttoevaluateplantoperationsorifdesignerssuspectthatsomedata
maynotbeaccurate,considercollectingandanalyzingadditionalsamplestocharacterizeplant
performance.Atleastsomeformofspecialsamplingisusuallyneededforprocessoptimization.A
successfulsamplingcampaignrequirescarefulplanningandexecutionusingpropertechniquesfor
samplecollection,handling,andlaboratoryanalysis.SeeChapter7,Section7.4,forrecommendations
regardingmeasurementcampaigns.Belowareadditionalconsiderationsforsamplingforthepurposes
ofprocessoptimization.
Ifoperatorssuspectinconsistentperformanceamongparalleltreatmenttrains,eachshould
besampledseparately.Alternatively,intensesamplingcanbedoneformanylocations
alongonetreatmenttrain.Includeflowmeasurementsforeachoftheparalleltrains.
Considerperformingaflowbalancefortheentiretreatmentsystemasacheck(include
comparisonofinfluentandeffluentflows).
Considerintervalsampling,particularlyifplantpersonnelsuspectthatshorttermvariations
ininfluentqualityand/orintermittentdischargeofrecyclestreamshaveasignificantimpact
onthenutrientloadingtotheplant.Samplerscanbeprogrammedtosegregatesamplesfor
specifictimeperiods(WEFandASCE2006).Adurationof2to3daysistypicallysufficient
forintervalsampling.
Considerinstallingonlinemonitoringequipment.Iftheyareintegratedintotheprocess
controlsystem,onlinemonitorscanprovidetheaddedbenefitofenablingrealtime
operationalchanges.SeeSection12.3foradditionaldiscussionofautomatedprocess
control.
122
August2010
Table121.RecommendedParametersforDataEvaluation
Parameter1
Flow
TotalBOD/COD
Soluble1
BOD/COD
TSS,VSS
DO
pH
Location(s)
Rationale
Influent,effluent,flowsplits,
recycles
Influent,primaryeffluent,
effluent,anaerobic&anoxiczone
effluents
Primaryeffluent,secondary
effluent,finaleffluent
Essentialfordevelopingmassbalances,whichareessentialfora
completeunderstandingofthetreatmentsystem.
Canbeusedtoevaluatesubstrateavailabilityforbiological
processes.HigheffluentBODcouldindicateactivatedsludge
performanceproblem.
Importantifphosphorusisremovedchemically.UsedtocalculateISS,
determineclarificationefficiency,anddetermineanaccuratesolids
residencetime(SRT)forthebacteria.
MinimumDOof2.0isusuallyneededtominimizeoxygenlimitation
ofnitrificationrates,whichisimportantforlowSRT/HRTsystems.
DOshouldnotbepresentinanoxicoranaerobiczones.
Shouldbeabove6.5andbelow9.0forbiologicalnitrogenremoval.
LowpHorwideswingsinpHcouldmeansignificantindustrial
component.CouldaffectBPRandnitrification.
Ifeffluentisbelow50,thereisprobablenitrificationinhibition,and
processissusceptibletolargepHdropsasaresultofnitrificationor
chemicaladditionforphosphorusremoval.
Lowtemperaturescansignificantlyreducenitrificationrate.Forthe
typicalrangebetween10and25oC,theratewilldropbyhalffor
every8to10oCreductioninmixedliquortemperature.Reactor
temperaturesarelikelytobesignificantlydifferentfrominfluent
temperaturebecauseofaeration.
Canbeusedtoevaluateloadtoandperformanceofbiological
nitrificationkinetics.
Aerobic,anaerobic,andanoxic
zones(multiplelocations
recommended)
Influent,mixedliquors,effluent
Alkalinity
Influent,primaryeffluent,mixed
liquorsupernatants,effluent
Temperature
Influent,mixedliquorsof
reactors,effluent
NH3NorTKN
Influent,primaryeffluent,reactor
mixedliquors,secondary
effluent,effluent
Influent,reactormixedliquors,
secondaryeffluent,effluent
Influent,primary&secondary
WAS,planteffluent
Reactormixedliquors,primary&
secondaryeffluents,effluent
Anaerobic&anoxicreactormixed
liquors
Nitrate
Acheckonnitrification,andcanbeusedwithTKNtocalculate
denitrification.
TotalPhosphorus
Usedtocalculatephosphorusremovalefficiencybytreatment
processes.
Phosphate
Usedtodeterminereleaseanduptakeinreactors,releasein
secondaryclarifier,andphosphorusremovalefficiency.
ORP
Measuresthebalancebetweenoxidizedandreducedcompounds
presentinsolution.Willdetectpresenceofsignificant
concentrationsofoxidizedcompounds.Canbeusedforautomatic
detectionofexcesselectronacceptors(DO,nitrate,andnitrite)in
reactors.
VFAorrbCOD
Influent,primaryeffluent
Canbeusedtoevaluatesubstrateavailabilityforenhancedbiological
phosphorusremoval.
MLSS&MLVSS
MLSS&MLVSS:wellmixed
MLSSandWAStestsprovidesuspendedsolidsconcentrationsand
testandWAStest locationinaerationbasin
canbeusedtodeterminepercentphosphorusinsludge.This
WAS:wellmixedand
information,inconjunctionwithaerationbasinvolumeandWAS
representativesamplefromthe
flow,canbeusedtocalculateSRT.MaintainingSRTiscriticalfor
nitrificationand,sometimes,forenhancedbiologicalphosphorus
WASpipe(mayneedcomposite
sample)
removal.
1.
BOD=biochemicaloxygendemand
TotalBOD/COD=unfilteredBOD/COD
(5dayunlessotherwisenoted)
SolubleBOD/COD=BOD/CODoffiltratefrom0.45mporesizefilter
COD=chemicaloxygendemand
VSS=volatilesuspendedsolids
TSS=totalsuspendedsolids
ORP=oxidationreductionpotential
DO=dissolvedoxygen
NH3N=ammoniaNitrogen
TKN=totalKjeldahlNitrogen
rbCOD=readilybiodegradableCOD
VFA=volatilefattyacids
WAS=wasteactivatedsludge
MLSS=mixedliquorsuspendedsolids
MLVSS=mixedliquorvolatilesuspendedsolids:Inorganicsuspendedsolids(ISS)=MLSSMLVSS
Source:WEFandASCE(2006)
123
August2010

Step3:ReviewandSummarizeData
Reviewdataforanomaliesandpossiblesamplingerrors.Thisstepisalsocalleddatacleaningor
dataverification.SeeSection7.4.2ofthisdesignmanualforrecommendeddatachecks.Massbalance
diagramsareparticularlyhelpful,andshouldbedevelopedforallloadinginformationandforinert
fractions(ISS)throughtheplant.Additionalsamplesmayneedtobetakenasaresultofthesesteps.
Theevaluationofplantperformanceisfacilitatedbypresentingdataincarefullyannotated
tables,graphs,andfigures.Belowarepossibleapproachestoorganizingplantdataforanalysis:
Summarizekeyparametersintabularform.
Considerannotatingaprocessflowdiagramwithflowweightedaverageddata(Franketal.
2008).
Plotsamplingresultsforkeyparametersovertimetoassesstemporaltrendsandat
differentlocationstoassessspatialtrends.
Considerusinghistogramstodepicttheproportionofmeasuredvaluesthatfallindistinct
categories.
Considerplottingmultipleparametersmeasuredataspecificlocationtogetheronthesame
plottoevaluatepossiblerelationships.
3dimensionalgraphswithmeasureddata(e.g.,ammonia),samplinglocation,andtimeare
aninformativewaytodisplaybothspatialandtemporaltrends.SeeFigure121foran
exampleusingspecialsamplingdatafromtheWashingtonSuburbanSanitaryCommission
(Franketal.2008).
124
August2010
Figure121.Spatialandtemporalprofilesofammonia.
st
Source:Franketal.(2008),Figure6.ReprintedwithpermissionfromProceedingsofWEFTEC.2008,the81 AnnualWater
EnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference,Chicago,Illinois,October1822.Copyright2008Water
EnvironmentFederation,Alexandra,VA.,www.wef.org.
Step4:EvaluateRelationshipsbetweenKeyParameters
Statisticalanalysescanprovideveryusefulinformation.Considerlinearregressionanalysisto
evaluatetherelationshipbetweenwaterqualityandoperationalparameters.
12.2.2 UseofProcessSimulationModels
Processsimulationmodels,particularlyiftheyhavebeencalibratedtodynamicoperating
conditions,canbeextremelyusefultoolsforprocessoptimization.Designerscanusemodelsto
simulatemanydifferentoperatingscenariosandanalyzeresultstodetermineifnutrientremoval
efficienciescanbeimproved.Forexample,designerscansimulatechangesinaerationratestogauge
theeffectsonnitrification,orsimulateincreasedwastageratefromthesecondaryclarifiertodetermine
theeffectonSRT.Dynamicmodelingcanalsobeusedtochecktheplantsabilitytotreatpeakloads.
Forexample,dynamicmodelingoftheBeenyupplantinWesternAustraliashowedthatthenitrification
processwaslimitedbythecapacityofthediffuserstomeetthepeakairdemand(Thirdetal.2006).In
additiontodynamicsimulations,steadystatemodelingcanbeusefulindeterminingmajorprocess
bottlenecksbycomparingsimulatedoperatingconditionswithoriginalprocessdesigncapacities.
Steadystatemodelingcanalsobeusedtocompareperformanceunderdifferentoperatingscenarios.
Theusefulnessofsimulationmodelsforprocessoptimizationreliesheavilyonpropermodel
developmentandcalibration.SeeChapter10ofthisdesignmanualforguidanceonmodeldevelopment
andcalibration.
125
August2010

12.3 IncorporatingSCADAandotherInstrumentation
Comparedtograbsampling,onlinemonitoringcangiverealtimeinformationonprocesses
occurringwithinthetreatmentplantandisnotsusceptibletoimpropersampling,holdingtimes,or
inconsistenciesinlaboratoryanalysis.Chapter13describesthetypesofinstrumentsandcontrol
systemsfornutrientremoval.
Onthemostbasiclevel,onlinesensorscanprovideinformationtooperatorsandassistthemin
makingoperationaldecisions.Moreadvancedonlinemonitoringapplicationsfeedthemeasureddata
intoacontroller.Thecontrollercanbeprogrammedtoautomaticallyadjustacontrolparameter(e.g.,
diffusersetting)dependingonthemeasuredvalue.Thissetupisreferredtoasacontrolloopfor
automatedprocesscontrol.
Historically,thelackofreliablesensorshasbeenthebiggestbarriertoimplementingautomated
processcontrol.Recentimprovementsinbasicandadvancedonlinesensorshavemadethemmore
reliableandmorecommonlyused(Jeppssonetal.2002).Automatedcontrolhasmanyadvantages
includingreducingstaffworkload,allowingformoreprecisecontrolofprocessparameters,and
providingautomaticdataloggingandarchiving(Tchobanoglousetal.2003).
Inthepast,proprietarydistributedcontrolsystemswererecommendedforWWTPs(WEFand
ASCE2006).Moreandmorefacilities,however,areimplementingcomprehensivesupervisorycontrol
anddataacquisition(SCADA)systems.SCADAsystemsencompassprocesscontrol;dataacquisition;
supervisorycontrol;distributedalarming;historicalcollection,display,andanalysis;information
systems;andsecurity.SeeChapter13,Section13.8foradditionaldiscussionofSCADAfunctionality.
12.4 CommonOperationalChanges
12.4.1 AdjustSRT
NitrificationishighlydependentonsufficientSRTintheaerobicbasin.Denitrificationcanbe
limitedbytheanoxicSRT.BiologicalphosphorusremovalcanalsowashoutatlowtemperaturelowSRT
combinations.HigherSRTsareneededforcoldertemperaturesandviceversa.
CapitalimprovementstoincreaseSRTincludeconstructingadditionalbasinvolume;installinga
fixedfilmmediainthebasin,suchasintegratedfixedfilmmedia(IFAS);orusingmembranebioreactors
(MBRR).Operationalimprovementscansometimesbeimplementedatamuchlowercost.Operating
changesthatcanbeusedtoincreaseSRTinclude:
IncreasetheMLSS/MLVSSconcentrationintheaerationbasin.However,thisislimitedby
thesolidsseparationprocess.
Incorporateswingzonestoutilizethemaximumavailableaerationvolumeorthemaximum
anoxicvolumeduringpeakloadings.ThisincreasestheaerobicoranoxicSRT.
126
August2010
12.4.2 AdjustAerationRates
TaperedaerationwithlowerDOlevelsattheendoftheaerationbasincanpromote
simultaneousnitrificationdenitrification(SNdN).SNdNcanalsobeincreasedbycyclingtheaironand
off.ItcanbeoptimizedbyautomatingtheDOlevelfortheformercase,ortheonoffcyclingtimesfor
thelattercase,viaautomaticmonitoringofammoniumandnitrateusingprobesandfeedbacktoa
controlsystem.TaperedaerationalsooptimizestheutilizationofDOandtheneedtotransferDO,
resultinginthereductionofenergyrequirements.Ifanoxicreactionsareincreased,theamountofWAS
producedalsoisreduced.
12.4.3 AddBafflestoCreateHighFoodtoMicroorganism(F/M)Conditions
Theperformanceofexistingcontinuousflow,activatedsludgeBNRsystemscangenerallybe
improvedbyusingplugflowratherthancompletemixconfigurations,andtheplugflowunitscanbe
improvedbyusingbafflestodividetheanaerobic,anoxic,andaerobiczonesintotwoormoresections
each.Theuseofmultiplesections(2or3)inanaerobiczonesisparticularlybeneficialbecauseit
increasesthesubstrateconcentrationssurroundingtheactivatedsludgemicroorganismsinthefirst
section.Thisincreasestheratesofreactionwithinthesection,whichreducesthetotalvolumeneeded
forthezone.Additionally,thefirstsectionprotectstheremainingsection(s)frominfluentnitratesand
DO,whichhelpsensurethedevelopmentofanaerobicconditionswithinthezoneandprovidesasafety
factoragainstnitrateandDOexcursions.Similarstatementscanbemaderegardingtheanoxiczone
wherethepurposeofbafflingistoprovideprotectionfromtherecirculationofunusuallyhighDO
concentrations,thusensuringthatanoxicconditionsareobtainedwithinthezoneinadditionto
obtaininghigherratesofreactioninthefirstsection.
Thereislessjustificationfortheuseofbafflesintheaerobiczonebecause(1)thephosphorus
removalratesofreactionarefastrelativetothenitrificationrates,(2)highDOconcentrationsincrease
bothreactions,and(3)therearenootherelectronacceptorsthatinterferewiththedesiredreactions.
Notethatsolublesubstrateisusuallyneareffluentconcentrationswhentheflowenterstheaerobic
zoneifafullBNRsystem(i.e.withanaerobic,anoxic,andaerobiczones)isused.Bafflingforasmall
aerobiceffluentsectioncouldbeusedtoreducetheDOconcentrationsrecycledtotheanoxiczoneand
enteringthesecondaryclarifiers,thelatterofwhichwouldreducetheDOrecycledtotheanaerobic
zoneinthereturnactivatedsludge(RAS).However,adequatereductionofDOintheaerationbasin
effluentcangenerallybeaccomplishedbysimplyreducingtheamountofairdeliveredtothelast5
percentoftheaerationbasin.
Bafflesshouldalwaysbedesignedtopreventbackmixing.Becausethewatersurfaceelevation
inaeratedzonesarehigherthanthoseinnonaeratedzones,backmixingofDOandnitratescancause
floatingscum.Underflowbaffleswithtopsthatextendabovethewatersurfacesareexcellent
protectionagainstbackmixing.Aminimumforwardflowof1footpersecondisrecommendedthrough
theunderflowopeningstopreventbackmixingduringlowflowperiods.
12.4.4 ChangeAerationSettingsinPlugFlowBasins
Therearemanyinstanceswhereenterprisingoperatorsatconventionalplantswithplugflow
aerationbasinshaveachieved80percentormorephosphorusremovalwithlessthan1mg/Ltotal
127
August2010
phosphorus(TP)intheplanteffluentbyturningoffairormixers.Switchingoffaerationattheinletside
ofthebasinsystemwillcreateaninitialanaerobiczone.Aslongasthereisenoughreadily
biodegradablechemicaloxygendemand(rbCOD)intheplantinfluent,PhosphateAccumulating
Organisms(PAOs)willgrowandremovephosphorus.Itisimportanttoensurethattheprocessesstill
havesufficientSRT,particularlyfornitrificationintheaeratedportionsofthebasin.
ThePineyWater,CO,plantisa5stageBardenphoplantwithnoprimarysedimentationandfew
VFAsintheinfluent,whichresultedinlittlephosphorusremoval.Byswitchingoffamixerinoneofthe
anaerobiczones,sludgesettledtothebottomandfermented,whichsuppliedtheVFAsforreducingthe
orthophosphatetolessthan0.2mg/L.AsimilaroperationattheHenderson,NV,plantina
JohannesburgProcess(JHB)hadthesameeffect.
Someplugflowaerationplantssucceededinreducingphosphorustobelow1mg/Lbyturning
offaerationatthefeedendoftheplant,suchastheBlueLakesandSenecaplantsoperatedbythe
MetropolitanCouncilEnvironmentalServiceinMinnesotaandtheSt.Cloud,MN,plant.
12.4.5 MinimizeImpactofRecycleStreams
DischargeofsupernatantfromsludgehandlingoperationscanhaveasignificantimpactonBNR
processes,particularlyformediumandsmallWWTPsthatdischargerecycledflowsintermittently.For
example,aWWTPtreatingapproximately4MGDcorrelatedincreasedeffluentTPconcentrationswith
dischargefromsludgehandlingfacilities.Plantoperationsstafftrackedtheproblemtophosphorus
releaseinsludgeholdingtanks.Improvedaerationwithintheholdingtankspreventedphosphorus
release,reducedintermittentphosphorusloading,andsubsequentlyallowedtheplanttoachievemore
consistenteffluentTPlevels(Smithetal.2008).
Asecondpotentialproblemisincreasedammonialoadinreturnstreamsfromsludge
dewateringoperations.Insomeplants,dewateringisoperatedduringthedayandsupernatantfrom
digestedsludgeisreturnedtotheheadoftheplantintheafternoon.Thiscoincideswithadiurnal
ammoniapeakinresidentialsystemsandcanoverwhelmnitrificationprocesses.WEFandASCE(2006)
reportthatasmalltankcansignificantlyreducevariationofinfluentammonialoadbystoringrecycle
flowfromthedewateringfacility.Thetankcanbefilledduringpeakhoursandemptiedduringoffpeak
hoursusingasimpletimer.
12.4.6 ReconfigureFlowthroughExistingUnits
SomeplantsmayfindopportunitiestoreconfigureflowthroughexistingbasinstoenhanceBNR.
Forexample,plantoperatorsintheCityofXenia,OH,reconfiguredtheirexistingBNRsystemtoinclude
aswingzonethatcouldbeadjustedtorespondtoshorttermvariationsinhydraulicandorganicloading
conditions(Smithetal.2008).Thismodificationallowedtheplanttoachieveenhancedbiological
phosphorusremovaltoeffluentTPlevelsof0.5mg/L(annualaverage).
TheWestHickmanCreekTreatmentPlantinLexington,KY,reportedsuccessfulconversionof
existingprimaryclarifierstoanaerobiczonesforbiologicalphosphorusremoval(WaterandWastewater
Asia2006).Toconverttheprimaryclarifiers,theplantoperationsstaffinstalledfinescreensatthe
influentandconvertedtheanaerobicdigesterstoaerobicsludgeholdingtanks.Theyusedrespirometry
techniquestoassesstheavailabilityofVFAs,evaluatedthehydraulicsoftheexistingprimaryclarifiers,
anddeterminedthatitwassufficientforbiologicalphosphorusremoval.Theplantexperienced
128
August2010
additionalbenefitsofimprovedsettlingandclarificationandreduceduseofcoagulantdoseforchemical
polishing.
12.4.7 IncreaseVFAsforBiologicalPhosphorusRemoval
Theamountofreadilybiodegradableorganicmaterialdeterminestheamountofbiological
phosphorusremovalthatcanbeachievedatagivenplant.AsstatedinChapter5,theminimum
rbCOD/TPratioforcompletebiologicalphosphorusremovalis10to16(Barnard2006).Ifthisminimum
isnotbeingmet,considerthefollowingapproaches:
Checkodorcontrolpractices.Odorcontrolinthecollectionsystemcanreduceanaerobic
conditions,whichcanreducetheformationofVFAsinthesystem.Considerodorcontrol
practicesthatdonotadverselyaffectVFAproductionsuchasironadditionandpHcontrol
between9and10.SeeChapter5,Section5.3.1formoreinformation.
Considerfermentingtheprimarysludgebyincreasingthedepthofthesludgeblanketinthe
existingbasin.
Althoughnotastrictlyoperationalimprovement,additionoffermentershasbeenvery
successfulforprovidingsubstrateforbiologicalphosphorusremoval,particularlyincoldclimates.For
example,acompletemixtankcanbeinstalledaheadoftheprimaryclarifierforfermentationofthe
VFAs.SeeSection5.3.2ofthismanualforadiscussionoftheprinciplesofprimaryorRASsludge
fermentation.SeeChapter10foradditionaldesignguidance.
12.5 References
WEFTEC2006.
Frank,K.,G.Davies,N.Shirodkar,andA.Sauvageau.2008.FullScalePerformanceTestingand
OptimizationofanOldSchoolProcesswithLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemovalCapabilities.In
WEFTEC2008.
Jeppsson,U.,J.Alex,M.N.Pons,H.Spanjers,andP.A.Vanrolleghem.2002.StatusandFutureTrendsof
ICAinWastewaterTreatmentAEuropeanPerspective.WaterScienceTechnology.45(45):485
494.
Lopez,C.,R.Wachter,C.Meyer,B.Narayanan,andC.Baer.2008.OptimizationofBiologicalNutrient
RemovalSystemsinResponsetoIncreasedLoadings.InWEFTEC2008.
Quast,D.,P.LaMontagne,andR.Knuteson.2008.PuttingtheOperatorinCharge;ImprovingHuman
MachineInterfaceLeadstoSignificantCentrifugeOperationSavings.InWEFTEC2008.
Smith,R.C.,J.Tincu,andS.Jeyanayagam.2008.MaximizingEBPR:GoingfromaBlackBoxtoaGlass
BoxApproach.InWEFTEC2008.
129
August2010
Swift,J.,D.Bradshaw,L.Pierce,W.Robinson,P.Williamson,P.Jue,J.Damitio,D.Welce,andJ.
Dufresne.2008.FullScaleEvaluationofOnLineUltravioletNitrateandNitriteMonitoringSystems.
InWEFTEC2008.
Third,K.A.,A.R.Shaw,andL.Ng.2006.ApplicationoftheGoodModellingPracticeUnifiedProtocoltoa
PlantWideProcessModelforBeenyupWWTPDesignUpgrade.London,UK:IWAPublishing.
Wahlberg,E.J.,B.Browne,N.Fulcher,BijuGeorge,D.Linn,L.Scanlan,D.Siler,W.Anderson,M.Daniels,
St.Rogowski,andS.Walker.2008.ProcessOptimizationSavesMoneyandUnlocksCapacity.In
WEFTEC2008.
Water&WastewaterAsia.2006.BiologicalNutrientRemoval:OnlineSludgeLevelMonitoringSupports
EfficientNutrientRemoval.Water&WastewaterAsia.January/February2006.Availableonline:
http://www.waterwastewaterasia.com/WWA_archive/JanFeb06/hach.pdf
WEFPress.
1210
August2010
13.InstrumentationandControls
Chapter13covers:
13.1 Introduction
13.2 FactorsinSelectingInstrumentation
13.3 BasicOnlineInstrumentation
13.4 OnlineInstrumentationforNutrientControl
13.5 TypesofControl
13.6 ControlEquipmentSCADA
13.7 References
13.1 Introduction
Nutrientremovalatwastewatertreatmentplants(WWTPs)requiresknowledgeandcareful
controlofmanykeyvariables.Variablessuchasdissolvedoxygen(DO)concentration,nutrient
concentrations,solidscontent,andflowratesareimportanttomonitorthroughouttheprocess.
ControlofvariablessuchasDO,solidsresidencetime(SRT),hydraulicretentiontime(HRT),andreturn
flowscanbekeytoachievinglownutrientconcentrationsintheeffluent.Usinginstrumentationto
monitortheseandothervariablesandautomaticallycontrolcertainoperatingparameterscanleadto
processoptimizationandmorestableperformance.Useofadvancedinstrumentationandautomatic
controlisstronglyrecommendedforplantstargetingveryloweffluenttotalnitrogen(TN)levelsand/or
totalphosphorus(TP)levels.
Thischapterwillbeginwithadiscussionoffactorstoconsiderwhenselectinginstrumentation
andcontrolstrategies.Itthenprovidesabriefdescriptionofthetypesofonlineinstrumentation
available(basicandinstrumentationdevelopedspecificallyforcontrollingnutrientremovalprocesses).
Followingisageneraldiscussionofthevarioustypesoflogicusedincontrolprocessesandthetypesof
equipmentused.
Thefollowingtechnicalreferencesprovideadditionalinformationoninstrumentationfor
nutrientremovalprocesses:
Chapter7,ProcessInstrumentationintheWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF)Manualof
Practice(MOP)11,OperationofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlants,6thEdition(WEF
2007).
Chapter13,InstrumentationandAutomatedProcessControlintheWEFMOP29,Biological
NutrientRemoval(BNR)OperationinWastewaterTreatmentPlants(WEFandASCE2006).
SensingandControlSystems:AReviewofMunicipalandIndustrialExperiences.(Hilletal.
2002).
131
August2010
DesignofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantsWEFMOP8andASCEManualsandReports
onEngineeringPracticeNo.76,5thEd.(WEFandASCE2010)
TheInstrumentationTestAssociation(ITA)offeringtestreports,studies,andworkshop
proceedingsregardingonlineinstrumentationandautomationforwaterandwastewater
treatmentapplications.Informationisavailableonlineathttp://www.instrument.org.
TheInternationalWaterAssociation(IWA)TaskGrouponBenchmarkingofControlStrategies
forWWTPs.Informationavailableonlineathttp://www.benchmarkwwtp.org/
Itisimportanttonotethattechnologyoftenchangesfasterthanbooksandlargestudies.Designers
shouldcheckwithprofessionalassociationssuchastheirlocalWEFchapter,otherutilities,and
manufacturersforthelatestinformation.Onsitetestingofvariousbrandsofthedifferenttypesof
instrumentsunderconsiderationcanprovideexcellentdataforanalysisofthespecificwastewater
basedonthemostcurrentinstrumentmodels.
13.2 FactorsinSelectingInstrumentation
Severalfactorsshouldbeconsideredwhenselectinginstrumentationfornutrientremoval
processes.
Onlineanalyzerscomparedtoofflinesampling.Grabsamplesmaybeadequatefor
parametersthatchangeslowlyanddontrequiretightcontrol.However,muchcanbegainedin
processcontrolbyonlineequipmentthatcanprovideoperatorswithrealtimemeasurements,
particularlyforplantstryingtoachieveverylowTNand/orTPeffluentlimits.
Accuracyandreliability.Accuracyrepresentshowcloseameasuredvalueistothetruevalue,
whereasreliability(orrepeatability)isthemeasureofagreementamonganumberof
measurementswiththesameinputvaluesandoperatingconditions.Forthepurposesof
control,reliabilityandreproducibilityaremoreimportantthanaccuracy.WEFandASCE(2006)
notethatitisbettertouseareliable,lowmaintenancemeterthanaveryaccuratemeterthat
requiressignificantmaintenance.TheexceptionispHaccuratepHreadingswithin+/0.1unit
aredesirable.
Operationsandmaintenancerequirements.Akeyfactorinselectinginstrumentationisthe
amountofoperatorattentionrequiredtocalibrate,clean,andmaintaintheequipment.Ifstaff
isnotavailabletoperformtheseduties,moredurableandmaintenancefreeinstrumentsshould
bechosen.Automatedcleaningandcalibrationareavailableforsomeinstruments.The
additionalcapitalcostsrequiredforthesefeaturesareoftensmallcomparedtothereduced
operatorrequirementsandrisksoffailure.
Samplecollectionandpretreatment.Properdesignandmaintenanceofthesamplepump,
piping,andpretreatment(e.g.,asrequiredforanalysisofnutrients)arekeytoobtainingreliable
readings.WEFandASCE(2006)notethatthesecomponentsoftencostmorethanthe
instrumentsthemselvesandrecommendthatdesignerscheckthemanufacturersplant
installationlisttolearnmoreaboutsuccessfulsamplecollectionandpretreatmentsystems.
132
August2010
Notethatsomemanufacturersavoidsamplepumpsandpipingbyofferingprobeswhichcanbe
installeddirectlyinthewater.
Itisimportanttouseinstrumentsspecificallydesignedforwastewaterinthepast,attemptswere
madetoadaptequipmentfromthedrinkingwaterindustrytowastewater.Theseattemptswerelargely
unsuccessfulduetothehighsolidsandmicrobiologicalpopulationsinwastewater.
13.3 BasicOnlineInstrumentation
Onlineinstrumentationhasbeenusedformanyyearsinwastewaterapplications.Manyplants
haveonlinemonitorsforDOandtotalsuspendedsolids(TSS)forbasicprocesscontrol.Somebiological
nutrientremoval(BNR)plantsalsouseonlinepHandoxidationreductionpotential(ORP)meters.For
themostpart,theavailableinstrumentscantakerealtimemeasurementsandprovidehighreliability.
Table131summarizestheinstrumentsusedforbasicmeasurementsandlistsadvantagesand
disadvantagesofeachtype.
Table131.SummaryofBasicOnLineInstrumentation
Analyte
Typeof
Measurement
Advantages
Disadvantages
Flow
Mechanical
PressureDrop
Accurate
Lowcost
Magnetic
ReflectiveSonic
Nomovingparts,nowear
Nopressuredrop,lowmaintenance,
lowcost
ParshallFlume
Simple,wideflowrange
Lightscattering
(backscattered)
LightAdsorption
Bettersensitivity,widermeasuring
range
Lesssensitive,smallerrange,
inaccurateatlowranges
Insensitivetocolor
Insensitivetointerference
Lowmaintenance
SeeTSS
Lowcost
Weardown
Highlydependentoninstallation,
pressuredrop
Highcost,inaccurateatlowflow
Limitedsizeofconduit,cantuse
aggregatelinedpipe,inaccurateatlow
flow
Pressuredrop,requirescleaning,slow
response
Needseffectivecleaningsystem
TSS
Sludgeblanket
monitor
DO
pH
ORP
Ultrasonic
Microwave
Ultrasonic
TSSorTurbidity
Membrane
electrode
Galvanicelectrode
Opticalprobe
Electrode
Electrode
Durable,reliable
Durable,lowmaintenance,reliable
Indicatestrueoxidizingenvironment
(anaerobic,anoxic,oraerobic)
Abletohandlefoulingbetterwithout
cleaningsystem
Fouling,backgroundreadingrequired
Highcost,onlyworksforhighTSS
Highmaintenance
Interferencefromhydrogensulfide,
needsfrequentcalibration
Higherinitialcost
Fouling
Indirectmeasurement
13.3.1 Flow
Flowrateisanextremelyimportantparameterforcontrolatwastewaterplants.Varioustypes
offlowmetersareavailable.Mechanicalflowmetersdependonanimpellerturningasthefluidpasses
133
August2010
throughthemeterorbymovingknownvolumesoffluidthroughaseriesofgears.Otherflowmeters
measurethepressuredropasthefluidpassesthroughaflowconstriction.Magneticmetersmeasure
thevoltagegeneratedbyamagneticfieldacrosstheflow.Reflectivesonicandtransmissivesonic
meterscanalsobeused.MeasuringthelevelinaParshallflumeisamethodusedforopenchannels.
Mechanicalmeterscanbeveryaccuratebutneedtobereplacedmorefrequentlyduetothe
abrasivenatureofwastewater.Magneticmeterswilllastlongerastheyhavenomovingpartsandare
unaffectedbythenatureofthewastewater.Theyareexpensive,however,comparedtomechanical
metersandcanperformpoorlyatlowflow.
Differentialpressuremetershavearangeofaccuracydependingonhowtheywereinstalled.
Improperinstallationcanresultinveryinaccuratereadings.Theyalsohavealimitedrange,withthe
maximumandminimumflowsneedingtobewithinafactoroffourofeachother.Differentialpressure
metersalsocauseaheadlossintheflow.
Reflectivesonicinstrumentsinstalledinopenchannelshavegoodaccuracy,lowmaintenance,
anddonotcauseapressuredrop.Theyarelimitedinthesizeoftheconduit.Reflectivesonic
instrumentsinstalledoutsideaclosedpipearelessaccuratethanthoseinstalledinthepipebutstilldo
notcausepressuredropandarealowcostandlowmaintenanceoption.Theycanalsohaveproblems
measuringflowincleanfluids.
Manytypesofflumesareavailableformeasuringflowinopenchannels;howeverParshall
flumesarebyfarthemostcommon(WEFandASCE2009).Parshallflumesareveryeasytouseand
comeinprefabricateddesigns;theydo,however,createheadlossandhaveaslowerresponsetime
comparedtoothertypesofflowmeasurementdevices.
13.3.2 TotalSuspendedSolids(TSS)
TSSmetersarebasedonopticalscatteringoflightoronthedifferenceinthevelocityof
ultrasonicwaves.MicrowaveinstrumentscanbeusedforveryhighTSSconcentrations(>10,000mg/L).
Lightisemittedfromalightsourceandthenmeasuredbyareceptoratagivenpoint.Thetwoprinciple
typesuseeitherforwardscatteredlightorbackscatteredlight.Somesensorswilltrytoimprove
reliabilitybyaddingmultiplebeamsandsensors.Thesemultichannelinstrumentsmayalsohelpprovide
colorindependentanalysis,asitcanbemoredifficulttogetareliablereadinginaveryconcentrated
darksludge.1Ultrasonicmetersrequirethemeasurementofabackgroundvelocityinamicrobialfree
sample.
TSSmeterscanbecomefouledinwastewater.Automaticcleaningsystemsareimportantfor
maintainingsensorreliability.Typesofcleaningsystemsincludewaterorairpurging,wipers,or
ultrasonicsystems.Althoughsomesensorsmaybeabletomaintainreliablefunctionalitywithonly
occasionalmanualcleaning,itisagoodideatohaveautomaticsystemsinstalledtoensureregularand
effectivecleaning.
Note,however,thatmostlightscatterandlightabsorptionmethodsutilizenearinfraredlightsourcesat860
nanometers,whichremovescolorissuessincethelightsourceisnotawhitelightsource.
134
August2010
13.3.3 SludgeBlanketDepth
Sludgeblanketdepthisanimportantparameterforoptimizingsettlingwithinclarifiers.
Controllingthesludgeblanketdepthcanbeusedtopreventexcessivedenitrificationintheblanketand
thesecondaryreleaseofphosphorus.
Newsludgeblanketmonitorsusesonictechniquestodeterminethepositionofthesludge
blanket.Theseinstrumentsworkbysendinganultrasonicpulsefromtheinstrumentdowntothe
sludgeblanketandanalyzingthetimeforthepulsetotravelbacktotheinstrument.Unitstypicallyare
equippedwithacleaningmechanismtopreventbuildup.Otherunitsdetecttheheightofthesludge
blanketbymultipledepthreadingstodeterminethepointoflargestchangeinTSSorturbidity.
13.3.4 DissolvedOxygen(DO)
DOisakeycontrolparameterinachievingnutrientremoval.Itcanbeagoodindicatorof
biologicalactivity,especiallynitrification.HavingpoorcontrolofDOcanleadtoinadequatenitrification
andphosphorusremoval,disinfectionproblems,andhighenergycosts.Itisestimatedthattightcontrol
ofDOcansaveawastewaterplantbetween10and30percentofoperatingcosts(WEFandASCE2006).
DOcanbemeasuredbymembraneelectrodes,galvanicelectrodes,andopticalDOprobes.
Membraneelectrodesallowdiffusionofoxygenacrossamembraneandmeasuretheoxygengasatan
electrodeintheinnerchamber.GalvanicelectrodessuchastheproprietaryZulligtechnology,usea
galvaniccurrenttomeasuretheoxygen.Opticalmethodsmeasurechangesinlightemittedbya
luminescentchemicalandrelatetherateofchangetotheDOinsolution.
Membraneelectrodesarereliableandeasytousebutmustbecalibratedfrequently(typically
onceperweekorpermonthdependingonthemanufacturer).Theycanalsoexperienceinterference
fromchlorine,iron,andhydrogensulfide.Galvanicelectrodesaremoreexpensivebuttendtobemore
durableandreliablethanmembraneelectrodes.OpticalDOprobes,thelatesttechnologyinDO
measurement,donotconsumeoxygenorelectrolytesandareveryreliable.
13.3.5 pH
pHisanimportantvariableinanybiologicaltreatmentprocess.Onlinemonitoringcanhelp
operatorsrespondtochangesinpHduetowastewatercompositionorchemicaladditions.Itisalsoan
importantparameterfornitrification.Thenitrificationprocessproducesacidand,ifthereisinsufficient
alkalinitypresentinthewastewater,willdecreasethepHtoapointthatwillinhibittheorganisms
responsiblefornitrification.OnlinemonitoringofpHcanprompttheoperatortoaddalkalinitywhen
necessary.Also,therateofnitrificationvarieswiththepH,andmaintaininganoptimalpH(78)
sometimescanbeusedtomaintainnearcompletenitrificationatlowtemperatures.
AllpHmetersarebasedonpotentialmeasurementusinganelectrode.Themeterconsistsof
twoprimaryparts,ameasurementelectrodeandareferenceelectrode.Theycanbeconfiguredasan
electrodepairoracombinationelectrodeinonesingleglassbodyassembly,withthelatterbeingmore
common(WEFandASCE2006).Althoughinterferencefromotherionsinsolutionisnotlikely,sodium
ionscanhaveanaffect(WEF2007).Likemostelectrodes,pHmeterscanfoulandwillneedtobe
calibratedandreplacedmorefrequentlythaninwaterapplications.
135
August2010
13.3.6 OxidationReductionPotential(ORP)
ORPprobesareelectrodesthatmeasuretheoxidizingandreducingactivityinasolution,i.e.
whichdominatesandbyhowmuch.Theycanbeusedtodetectchangesintheoxidationstateofthe
processwaterandtodetermineifaerobic,anaerobic,andanoxiczonesarebeingcorrectlymaintained.
Thereadoutofthesensorisinmillivolts(mV),withpositivereadingsindicatinganoxidativestateand
negativereadingsindicatingareductivestate(WEFandASCE2006)whenthestandardhydrogen
electrode(SHE)isusedasthereference.However,thestandardcalomelelectrodeiscommonlyusedas
thereferenceelectrodeforfieldmeasurementsandithasa+241mVreadingwhentheSHEiszero.The
calomelelectrodeismorerobustthantheSHE,andgivesrelativelystablereadings.Operatorsneedto
ensurethattheadjustmentismadetotheSHEwhenthecalomelelectrodeisused.
TheORPofinfluentwastewatertypicallyrangesfrom50mVto400mV(WEF2007)becauseit
istypicallyreducedwhenitreachesthewastewatertreatmentplant.BecauseORPisanonspecific
measurement,absolutevaluesbasedonindustrystandardsarenottypicallyusedforcontrol.Instead,
operatorscanevaluateORPforsuddenchangesorgradualchangesovertimecomparedtoother
operatingparameters.
Aspreviouslynoted,ORPmetersaresimilartopHmetersinthattheyconsistofameasuring
electrodeandareferenceelectrode.Thereferenceelectrodeistypicallythesamecalomelelectrode
usedinpHinstruments(WEFandASCE2006).Dependingonthemanufacturer,ORPmetersneedtobe
cleanedoftenorequippedwithautomatedcleaning(typicallyusingairorwaterjets).
13.4 OnlineInstrumentationforNutrientControl
Althoughitismoreexpensiveandrequiresmoreattentionthanbasicinstrumentation,online
instrumentationspecificallyfornutrientcontrolcanbeveryimportantinoptimizingnitrogenand
phosphorusremovalprocesses.Itcanalsoleadtoassociatedenergy(andcost)savingsviatheuseof
automatedcontrolsystems.Thenextseveralsectionsdiscusstechniquesandinstrumentationavailable
foronlinemonitoringfornutrientcontrol
13.4.1 NitrogenCompounds
Onlinemonitoringofammoniaafterthenitrificationbasin,intheeffluent,andinreturnstreams
fromanaerobicdigestionmaybeveryusefulforprocesscontrolandoptimization.Measurementof
nitrateandnitriteareimportantindetermining1)theloadrecycledtotheanaerobicreactorofBPR
processes,2)theloadtothedenitrificationprocess,3)theloadinthedenitrificationprocesseffluent
and4)thecontrolofexternalcarbonadditionfordenitrification.
Ingeneral,manufacturersofonlineinstrumentsforthevariousnitrogenspeciesuseoneof
threemethods(Palmeretal.2007):
Colorimetricapproach.Colorimetricmeterstypicallywithdrawasamplefromthewastewater
andgiveperiodicreadingsandrequirethesampletobepretreatedthroughafilter.
Ionsensitiveelectrodes(ISEs).Thesearemounteddirectlyinthewaterandcangiverealtime
readings.ThismethodissimilartoStandardMethods4500NH3D(APHAetal.2005)
136
August2010
UVabsorbanceormultiplewavelengthUVabsorbancespectrophotometers.Thismethodis
basedonStandardMethodsnitrogenpersulfatedigestionmethod4500NBandnitrate,
ultravioletspectrophotometricmethod4500NO3B(APHAetal.2005).
Instrumentsbasedoncolorimetrytypicallyhaveanaccuracyof3to5percent.ISEsaremuchfasterand
aresimilarlyreliablewithin2to5percent.ISEsrequiremoremaintenancethancolorimetricmethods
becausetheelectrodeisplaceddirectlyinthewastewaterstream.Electrodescanalsoexperience
interferenceandhavealimitedpHrangeinwhichtheywillfunction.
ThemostcommonmeasurementtechniquefornitrateandnitriteisUVabsorbance.Online
instrumentsdirectUVlightthroughthesampleandmeasuretheamountoflightthatisabsorbedata
specificwavelength.Becausesuspendedsolidsinterferewiththemeasurementmethod,filtrationor
solidscompensationisneeded.Thechemicaloxygendemand(COD)ofthewatercanalsointerferewith
spectrometerreadings.Toaccountfortheseinterferences,manufacturershaveincorporatedmulti
wavelengthmeasuresorrecommendmembranefiltration(e.g.,ultrafiltration)priortosampleanalysis.
ISEandcolorimetrictechniquescanalsobeusedtomeasurenitrateandnitrite;however,theUV
absorbancemethodismostcommon(WEFandASCE2006).
Palmeretal.(2007)presentstestdataoncommerciallyavailableinsituUVabsorptionanalyzers
fornitrate.Theauthorsevaluatedaccuracyinmeasurementsbycomparingthemtolabvalues.They
alsocollectedinformationoncapitalcosts,installationrequirements,calibrationrequirements,and
annualmaintenancecosts.SomekeyresultsofthestudyaresummarizedinTable132.
Table132.ComparisonofOnLineNitrateAnalyzers1
Manufacturer
Model
MeanDeviationfrom
LaboratoryConformance
Test
Correlationto
Laboratory
ConformanceTest
(R2)
NumberofField
TestMaintenance
andCalibration
Events
Endress+Hauser
StamoSens
CNM750/CNS70
EvitaInsitu5100
2
(Danfoss)
NITRATAXplussc
82NNitrolysersensor
/8580Constat
analyzer
STIPscan
0.08
0.92
None
2.88
0.02
0.97
0.91
1
3
0.61
HACH
HACH
0.68
s::can
0.26
Messtechnik
GmbH
Wedgewood
0.55
Analytical/E+H
1. Notethatresultsbasedontestdatafromonefacility
2. HachEvitaInsitu5100sensorisnolongeronthemarket(discontinuedin2007)
Source:Palmeretal.2007
13.4.2 PhosphateandTotalPhosphorus
Monitoringphosphate(PO4)andtotalphosphorus(TP)isimportantinestablishingthe
phosphorusloadontheplant,tocontrolthephosphorusremovalprocesses,andforcompliancewith
137
August2010
permits.Measurementsmaybetakenintheinfluent,effluent,anaerobiczone,anoxiczone,aerobic
zone,andreturnstreamsfromdigestionprocesses.MostonlineinstrumentsmeasurePO4.Notethata
readingof3milligramsperliter(mg/L)asPO4isroughlyequivalentto1mg/Lofphosphorus.Operators
shouldconsiderreportingresultsasPratherthanasPO4,i.easPO4P.toavoidconfusion(WEFandASCE
2006).
Phosphatemonitorstypicallyusecolorimetrictechniques,especiallyformeasurementatlow
(0.1mg/Lorless)concentrations.ThetwomostcommonlyusedtechniquesaretheMolybdenumblue
techniqueandthemolybdovanadatetechnique,alsocalledtheyellowmethod.Themolybdenum
bluetechniquegenerallyhasarangeof0.01to5mg/LPO4P,whiletheyellowmethodhasarangeof
0.1to50mg/LPO4P.Bothmonitorstypicallyhaveaccuracyandrepeatabilityofapproximately2
percentofreading.Theyellowmethodismorecommonduetotherelativesimplicityoftheinstrument
andreagents,butthebluemethodisrequiredforconfirmingveryloworthophosphateconcentrations
intheplanteffluent(WEFandASCE2006).
Totalphosphorusinstrumentstypicallyconvertpolyphosphateandorganicphosphorusto
phosphateandthenmeasurephosphateusingoneoftheabovementionedmethods.Becausethe
conversionstepsrequirehightemperaturesandpressures,onlinetotalphosphorusmonitorsarevery
expensiveandtypicallyonlyusedforeffluentmonitoring,ifatall.Manyplantsmeasure
orthophosphateintheeffluentasasurrogateparameter.Accurateestimatesoftotalphosphoruscan
beobtainedbycombiningitwiththeeffluentTSSmeasurements.
Neupaneetal.(2009)reportsveryrecentfindingsinastudyoforthophosphateandnitrogen
speciesanalyzersaspartofapilotstudyofaMovingBedBioreactor(MBBR)attheBluePlainsAdvanced
WWTPinWashington,DC.TheChemScananalyzer(UV6101)wasusedtomeasureorthophosphateat
sevenlocationsandcomparedtolaboratoryanalysisofgrabsamplesforatotalof6months.The
ChemScanusesUVabsorbanceforallparametersandreportsadetectionlimitof0.05mg/Lfor
orthophosphate.Neupaneetal.(2009)notedthattomaintaininstrumentaccuracy,frequentcross
checkswiththelabandrecalibrationwererequired.Weeklycheckingandreplenishingofreagentswas
alsoneeded.However,authorsreportthattheChemScanOPreadingswereveryaccurateat
concentrationsbetween0.5and1.0mg/L.TheChemScancouldnotreadorthophosphateaccuratelyat
thelowerendofitscalibrationrange.
13.4.3 NADH(activebiomass)
AnewtechnologydevelopedintheNetherlandsusesfluorescencetomeasurechangesin
intracellularnicotinamideadeninedinucleotide(NADH)ofmicroorganisms,whichcanprovide
informationonthestatusofbiologicalwastewatertreatmentprocessessuchasnitrificationand
denitrification.TheNADHsensorrequiresminimalmaintenanceandcanproviderealtimeinformation
forprocesscontrol(WeerapperumaanddeSilva2004).NADHandDOmonitoringcanbeusedto
achievesimultaneousnitrificationanddenitrificationinthesamebasin.
13.4.4 Respirometry
Respirometryinvolvesmeasurementoftheoxygenuptakerate(OUR)byabiologicaltreatment
culture.Inbenchscalerespirometryexperiments,asampleofmixedliquor,possiblyamendedwithan
organicsubstrateorammonia,isplacedinasealedvessel.Therateofoxygenconsumptionwithinthe
138
August2010
vesselismonitoredovertime.Alkalinityoftenneedstobeaddedtonitrifyingculturestomaintaina
neutralpH.
Onlinerespirometerscanbesetupinseveralmodesforprocesscontrol.Theyallrequirea
biomasssourcerepresentingthebiomassinthereactorreceivinginfluentwastewater.Thiscanbe
biomassfromtheprocessitself,thereturnactivatedsludgeline,orfromanofflinepilotreactor(Love
2002).Thebiomass,substrateifadded,liquidphase,andoxygenarecontainedinaflowthrough
systemorwellmixedbatchreactor.Itisimportantthatsufficientoxygenbepresentintheliquidorgas
phasetopreventoxygenlimitingconditions(Love2000).Oxygenismeasuredduringtheexperimentsto
determineoxygenuptakeratesundernormaloperatingconditions.
Onlinerespirometryhasseveralapplicationsforactivatedsludgeandnitrificationtreatment
processes.ItcanbeusedinsteadofonlineDOmeasurementstodetermineandcontrolaeration
requirementsandreduceelectricityneeds.OnestudyinChicagoshowedthatthiscontrolistechnically
feasibleusingafeedforwardcontrolstrategy(Tataetal.2000).Itcanalsobeusefulasanupsetearly
warningdeviceforthenitrificationprocess.AsexplainedinChapter4ofthismanual,nitrifyingbacteria
arevulnerabletoinhibitionfromanumberofdifferentcompounds.AspartofaWERFstudyofupset
earlywarningdevices,Love(2000)reviewedanddocumentedseveralcommercialdevicesthatmonitor
forinhibitionofnitrificationactivitiesbasedonammoniaconsumptionorratioofammoniatoBOD.
13.5 TypesofControl
Regardlessofthecommunitytheyserveandtreatmentconfiguration,allplantsexperience
changesinexternalconditions,suchasflowrateandconstituentloading,andinternalconditions,such
asgrowthofcertaintypesoforganisms.Controlsystemsforwastewatertreatmentattempttorespond
tothesechangesbymaintainingcontrolparameters(e.g.,DO)attargetvaluesbychangingmanipulated
parameters(e.g.,aerationrate).
Inthepastandstillthecaseformany(especiallysmaller)utilities,plantswereoperated
manuallywithoperatorscollectingsamplesfromvariouslocationsattheplant,bringingthembackto
thelaboratoryforanalysis(whichcouldtakeseveralhours),evaluatingtheresults,andchanging
operatingparameterstomaintaindesiredcontrolparameters.Automatedsystemsessentiallyperform
thesesametasksusingonlineanalyzers,computers,actuators,andcommunicationssystems.
Automatedcontrolcansignificantlyreduceworkloadwhileatthesametimeimprovecontrolofprocess
parametersandthus,improvetreatmentplantperformance,oftenatreducedoperatingcosts.
Thereareseveraldifferenttypesofcontrolsystems.Selectionofthemostappropriateone
dependsonmanyfactorsincludingthespecificcontrolandmanipulatedparameters.Themaintypesof
controlfeedforward,feedback,cascade,andadvancedarediscussedbelow.
13.5.1 Feedforward
Feedforwardcontroladjustsaparameterbasedonameasuredchangeinanothervariable.The
parameterisadjustedinproportiontothemeasuredvariable.Thevalueoftheadjustedparametercan
berepresentedby:
Qa=K*Qm
Eq.131
139
August2010

WhereQaistheadjustedparameter,Kisaconstant,andQmisthemeasuredparameter.Feedforward
controliscommonlyusedwhenaparametercanbesetbasedonflowrate.Examplesincludechemical
additionprocessesandreturnactivatedsludgeflowrates.
13.5.2 Feedback
Feedbackcontrolisbasedonadjustingaparametertocorrectanundesirablesituation.The
adjustedparameterischangedinresponsetothemeasuredparameterdepartingfromadesiredvalue
orsetpoint.Dissolvedoxygencontrolinaeratedzonesisoftenfeedbacktype.
ThereareseveraltypesoffeedbackcontrolincludingOn/Off,proportional,integral,
proportionalintegral,proportionalderivative,andproportionalintegralderivative.Thecontroltypes
varyinhowtheadjustedparameterischangedinresponsetothedepartureofthemeasuredparameter
fromthesetpoint.
On/Off Control
On/Offcontrolisthesimplesttypeoffeedbackcontrol.Init,apieceofmachineryisturnedon
whenthemeasuredvariablefallsoutsideofasetrangeandturnedoffwhenthemeasuredvariable
returnstothatrange.ExamplesincludeturningonairblowerswhenDOlevelintheaerationbasin
dropsbelowasetlevel.Proportionalcontroladjustsaparameterinproportiontothedepartureofthe
measuredparameterfromasetpoint.Integralcontrolvariestheadjustedparameterinproportionto
theareaunderaplotofthedifferencefromtheoffsetovertime.Proportionalintegralcontrolisa
combinationofproportionalandintegralcontrol.Proportionalderivativecontroladdsaresponsethat
isproportionaltothederivativeofthedifferencebetweenthemeasuredvalueandthesetpoint.The
addedderivativecontrolmakesthesystemmuchfastertorespond,butalsomorelikelytoexperience
chatterasthecontrollersearchesforthecorrectvaluearoundthesetpoint.Thistypeofcontrolisnot
aspopular.Proportionalintegralderivativecontrolcombinesallthreefeedbackcontrolmethods.
Whilethistypeofcontrolcombinesthebenefitsofallthreetypesofcontrol,itcanbehardertotunethe
controllerbecauseofthelargernumberofvariables.
13.5.3 Feedforwardandfeedback
Feedforwardandfeedbackcontrolcombinesthetwocontrolstrategies.Thecontrollerinitially
respondstoadisturbancefromthesetpointusingafeedforwardcontrolstrategy.Theresponseis
thenfinetunedusingafeedbackcontrol.Again,whilecombiningstrengthsofthetwostrategies,this
typeofcontrolcanbedifficulttotune.
13.5.4 Cascade
Incascadecontrol,onefeedbackcontrollersetsthesetpointforasecondcontroller.This
configurationisusedwheretwocontrolloopsmayinteractwitheachother.Forexample,controlofair
controllersandcontrolofDOconcentrationsinteractandcanbeacandidateforthistypeofcontrol.
13.5.5 AdvancedControl
Advancedcontrolsystemsapplyuniquealgorithmsspecifictoagiventreatmentconfiguration
throughuseofacomputerorotherprogrammabledevices.Theyuseinputfrommanysensorsand
1310
August2010
mathematicalmodels,equations,orconditionmatricestomanipulateequipmenttoobtainthedesired
outcome.Otherstraightforwardcontrolsystemssuchasfeedforwardorfeedbackareoftenpartofan
advancedsystem.ControlcanbebasedonmathematicalmodelssuchasASM1(seeChapter10for
additionalinformationonthemanyusesofmodelsforplantdesign,operation,andoptimization).
13.6 ControlEquipmentSCADA
SupervisoryControlandDataAcquisition(SCADA)systemsinvolveacentralcomputerthatis
linkedtovariousdevicesbymeansofacommunicationssystem.Thecentralcomputerreceivesand
sendsinformationbymeansofthecommunicationssystem,whichcanbethroughphonelinesorradio
waves.SCADAsystemscanbeusedforcontinuousprocesscontrol,dataacquisition,supervisory
control,alarming,historicaldatacollection,asaninformationdatabase,andtoprovidesecurityfor
storedinformation.
ASCADAsystemwillconstantlymonitorandmaybeusedtocontrolthewastewaterprocess.
Thecentralservercancommunicatewithindividualsensorsandmakecontroldecisionsbasedon
processlogiccontainedintheserver.Communicationwithoperatorconsolesoccursthrougheither
proprietaryprotocols,TCP/IPprotocols,orthroughOPCprotocols.ProgramlogicshouldmeetIEC
611313standards.
TheSCADAsystemwillalsomonitorallsensorsthroughouttheplant.Thedataarecollected
andcanthenbeusedforotherfunctionssuchascontrol,displayforoperators,orhistoricalstorage.
SupervisorycontrolisoneoftheessentialfeaturesofaSCADAsystem.Itallowsoperatorsto
makechangestotheautomaticcontroloftheplantbychangingsetpointsandstartingandstopping
machinery.TheSCADAsystemwillalsoallowtheoperatortomonitorthevariousprocessesfroma
centralpoint.
SCADAsystemsalsoperformtheimportantfunctionofnotificationofproblemsthrougha
hierarchyofalarms.TheSCADAsystemwillrecordalarmconditions,prioritizealarms,notifyoperators
throughaudibleandvisiblealarms,andallowalarmacknowledgement.SCADAsystemscanalsobeset
tonotifyoffsitepersonnelthroughphonemessagesortextmessages.
SCADAsystemscanarchivealldatacollectedsuchasprocessvariables,alarmlogs,and
operatingconditions.Thesedatacanbedisplayedatanytimefortroubleshootingandanalysisofthe
plant.DatacanbeanalyzedusingfunctionsontheSCADAcomputerandcanalsobeusedasinputsfor
wastewatermodelsandotheranalytictools.TheSCADAsystemstoresallinformationinacentral
databasewhereitcanbeaccessedbyallplantpersonnelforvariouspurposesincludingpreparing
reports,troubleshooting,andmonitoringtheplant.
SecurityisanessentialcomponentofaSCADAsystem.Thesecurityissetuptoprevent
unauthorizeduseandalsotospecifywhatfunctioneachauthorizedusercanperformdependingonthat
personsresponsibilities.
1311
August2010
13.7 References
Akin,B.S.andA.Ugurlu.2005.MonitoringandControlofBiologicalNutrientRemovalinaSequencing
BatchReactor.ProcessBiochemistry.40(8):28732888.
Baeza,J.A.,D.Gabriel,andJ.Lafuente.2004.EffectofInternalRecycleontheNitrogenRemoval
EfficiencyofanAnaerobic/Anoxic/Oxic(A2O)WastewaterTreatmentPlant.ProcessBiochemistry.
39(11):16151624.
Baeza,J.A.,E.C.Ferreira,andJ.Lafuente.2003.KnowledgeBasedSupervisionandControlofWastewater
TreatmentPlantRealTimeImplementation.WaterScienceandTechnology.14(12):129137.
Barnard,J.L.,A.Shaw,J.B.Watts.2003.OptimizedControlofNitrifyingSuspendedGrowthSystems
UsingRespirometry.ProceedingsoftheOzwaterConventionandExhibition,AWA20thConvention,
Perth,Australia.Sydney:AustralianWaterAssociation.
Ekster,A.andI.RodrguezRoda.2003.TheEffectofSludgeAgeontheOperationCostofActivated
SludgeSystem.PresentedatWEFTEC2003.
Hill,R.D.,R.C.Manross,E.V.Davidson,T.M.Palmer,M.C.Ross,S.G.Nutt.2002.SensingandControl
Systems:AReviewofMunicipalandIndustrialExperiences.WERFReport99WWF4.WERF.
Alexandria,VA.
Isaacs,S.,M.Henze,andM.Kummel.1995.AnAdaptiveAlgorithmforExternalCarbonAdditiontoan
AlternatingActivatedSludgeProcessforNutrientRemovalfromWastewater.ChemicalEngineering
Science.50(4):617629.
Kestel,S.,G.J.Duffy,M.Gray,T.Stahl,andG.Lee.2009.DOControlBasedonOnlineAmmonia
Measurement.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Lara,J.M.V.andB.E.A.Milani.2005.ControlofNitrateFlowinPrenitrificationSystemsUsingLongRange
IdentificationforPredictiveControl.DecisionandControl.2005EuropeanConference.
Love,N.G.2000.AreviewandNeedsSurveyofUpsetEarlyWarningDevices.WERFReport99WWF2.
WERF.Alexandria,VA
Liu,W.,G.Lee,andJ.Goodley.2003.UsingOnLineAmmoniaandNitrateInstrumentstoControl
ModifiedLudzackEttinger(MLE)Process.PresentedatWEFTEC2003.
Ma,Y.,Y.Peng,andS.Wang.2005.NewAutomaticControlStrategyforSludgeRecyclingandWastage
fortheOptimumOperationofPredenitrificationProcesses.JournalofChemicalTechnologyand
Biotechnology.81(1):4147.
1312
August2010
Manning,A.2008.Automation,InstrumentationGenerations2,3andBeyond:LetsGetitRightThis
Time.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Meyer,J.2008.FiestaVillageAdvancedWastewaterTreatmentPlant:ManagersPerspectiveon
FollowingSeparateStageDenitrificationwithFixedFilmSystemsforLowNitrogen.Presentedat
WEF/WERF:DemonstratedProcessesforLimitofTechnologyNutrientRemoval:AchievableLimitsand
StatisticalReliability.October18,2008.Chicago,IL.
Neupane,D.,M.Peric,B.Stinson,M.Laquidara,S.Kharkar,N.Passarelli,S.Murthy,W.Bailey,R.
DerMinassian,andM.Sultan.2009.ComparativeStudyofOnlineInstrumentsforMonitoringLow
NutrientConcentrations.PresentedatNutrientRemoval2009.Washington,DC.WEF.
Palmer,T.2007.On-Line Nitrogen Monitoring and Control Strategies. Report: 03CTS8.Alexandria,VA:

WERF.
Puznavan,N.,S.Zeghel,andE.Reddet.1998.SimpleControlStrategiesofMethanolDosingforPost
denitrification.WaterScienceandTechnology.38(3):291297.
Samuelesson,P.,Carlsson,B.2001.ControlofAerationVolumeinanActivatedSludgeforNutrient
Removal.ProceedingsofthefirstIWAConferenceonInstrumentation,ControlandAutomation.
Malmo,Sweden,June37.pg.429437
Tata,P.,K.Patel,S.Soszynski,C.LueHing,K.Carns,andD.Perkins.PotentialfortheUseofOnline
RespirometryfortheControlofAeration.PresentedatWEFTEC2000.
Weerapperuma,D.andV.deSilva.2004.OnlineAnalyzerApplicationsforBNRControl.Presentedat
WEFTEC2004.
WEF,2007.OperationofMunicipalWastewaterTreatmentPlantsMOP11,6thEd.WaterEnvironment
Federation.Alexandria,VA.WEFPress.
WEFPress.
Reston,Va.
Yuan,Z.,H.Bogaert,P.Vanrolleghem,C.Thoeye,G.Vansteenkiste,andW.Verstaete.1997.Journal
EnvironmentalEngineering.123(11):10801086.
1313
August2010

Yuan,Z.andJ.Keller.2003.IntegratedControlofNitrateRecirculationandExternalCarbonAdditionina
PredenitrificationSystem.WaterScienceandTechnology.48(1112):345354.
1314
August2010
14.
SustainableNutrientRecoveryandReuse
Chapter14covers:
14.1
14.2
14.3
14.4
Introduction
SeparatingandTreatingWasteOnSite
UsingWastewaterTreatmentByproducts
References
14.1 Introduction
Sustainablenutrientrecoveryandreuseisgainingnationalandinternationalattentionas
wastewaterutilitieslookforwaystodecreaseenergycostsandgreenhousegasemissions,utilizeexcess
capacity,generatenewrevenue,andaddressevermorestringentregulatoryrequirements.This
evolutioninthinkingismovingwastewatertreatmenttoenhancedenergyefficiencyandchangingthe
roleofwastewatertreatmentfacilitiesfromwastegeneratorstoresourceproviders.
IntheUnitedStatesandabroad,researchoninnovativesustainablenutrientrecoverysystems
ischangingthewayliquidandsolidwasteisbeingtreatedandreused.Thischapterwilldescribesome
oftheonsiteandcentralizedtechnologiesandapproachescurrentlybeinginvestigatedand
implemented.
14.2 SeparatingandTreatingWasteOnSite
AnumberofEuropeancountriesincludingSwitzerland,Sweden,andtheNetherlandsare
conductingresearchoninnovativesustainablenutrientrecoverysystems.Theconceptbehindthese
newtechnologiesistoseparatetoiletwastebeforeitleavesthehomeorbuildingandmixeswiththe
largerwastestreamtobecarriedtowastewatertreatmentplants(WWTPs).Recentstudieshaveshown
thatabout80percentofthenitrogenand50percentofthephosphorusinwastewaterarederivedfrom
urine,eventhoughurinemakesuponly1percentofthevolumeofwastewater(LarsenandLeinert
2007).Separatingtheurinefromwastewatercouldoffervariousadvantages:WWTPscouldbebuilton
asmallerscale,waterbodieswouldbebetterprotectedfromnitrogenandphosphoruspollution,
nutrientscouldberecycledforagriculturaluse,andvariousconstituentsofconcernincludinghormones
andpharmaceuticalcompoundsfoundinurinecouldberemovedwithoutbeingmixedwithwastewater
andreleasedtotheenvironment.AmajorbenefitwouldbereducedenergyconsumptionatWWTPsas
aresultofreducedtreatmentrequirementsfornitrogen.Also,separating50to60percentofurine
couldreduceinplantnitrogengasdischargesandresultinfewerimpuritiesinmethanecapturedfrom
sludgedigestion.
OrganizationssuchastheSwissFederalInstituteofAquaticScienceandTechnology(EAWAG)
arecurrentlyexperimentingwiththedevelopmentandapplicationofNoMixtechnologytoseparate
urinefromsolidwasteatthetoiletbowl.Whilesimilarinsizeandshapetocurrenttoilets,thisnew
technologyhastwowastepipesasmallfrontonethatcollectsanddivertsurineintoastoragetank,
andalargerrearwastepipethatoperateslikeastandardtoilet.Thefirstofthesetoiletswereinstalled
intwoecovillagesinSwedenin1994andsincethenhavespreadtootherlocationsthroughoutthe
countryandtoDenmark,theNetherlands,andSwitzerland.TheconceptisnowtakingholdinAustria
141
August2010
andGermany.Whiletheurine,orurevit,canbesprayapplieddirectlyontoagriculturalfields,a
companycalledGrontmijintheNetherlandstransportsstoredurinetoaspecialtreatmentplantwhere
thephosphateisprecipitatedoutasstruvite(magnesiumammoniumphosphate)andusedasa
fertilizer.
EAWAGisalsoexperimentingwithapilotdecentralizedbasementsewageplantinwhich
domesticwastewateristreatedinamembranebioreactor(MBR)soitcanbereusedforflushingthe
toiletsorwateringthegardenandthesludgeiscomposted.Whilestillexperimental,someofthese
technologiesmayhavepracticalfutureapplicationsifwidelyapplicablelowcostsolutionscanbefound
forurinetransport,orstableandcosteffectivetechnologiescanbedevelopedfordecentralized
treatment.Whilestudiesofconsumerattitudesandacceptanceappeartobepositive,technological
improvementsarestillneededtopreventclogginginpipes,toidentifybesttreatmentoptionsthatcan
beappliedinpractice,andtoidentifyhowandwheretoconverturinetofertilizer.
14.3 UsingWastewaterTreatmentByproducts
Sustainabilityconcernsarealsodrivingthewastewatertreatmentindustrytolookatliquidsand
sludgeasrenewableresources.Historically,agriculturalusehasbeenthetraditionalapproachfor
disposalofmunicipalsludgeduetoitshighnutrientcontentforfertilizingcropsanditslowcost.As
scientificadvancesdetectsmallerandsmallerquantitiesofchemicals,heavymetals,pathogenic
microorganisms,pharmaceuticals,andpersonalcareproducts,concernsarebeingraisedabout
continuingthispractice.
Researchersareexploringalternativeapproachestotreatingandusingthevaluableproducts
generatedfromsewagetreatmentbyproductssuchasenergyextractedfromanaerobicdigestion,
constructionmaterialssuchascementandbricks,andnutrientssuchasphosphorusthatcanbe
extractedfromsludgeandusedasfertilizer.Liquidsgeneratedthroughthetreatmentprocessarealso
beingharvestedfornutrientsforfertilizersandreusedasnonpotablesourcesofwaterforagriculture,
landscapeirrigation,andindirectpotablereusesuchasaquiferstorageandrecovery.Ithasalsobeen
demonstratedthatstruvitewillforminanaerobicdigesterstreatingbiologicalphosphorusremoval
(BPR)sludgesandwillremaininthesludgeratherthansubsequentlyprecipitateintheoutflowpipes.
Thesludgecanthenbesterilizedbyfurtherprocessingsuchascomposting.Additionally,several
processeshavebeendevelopedfortheprecipitationofstruvitefromhighlyconcentratedwastestreams
suchasdigestersupernatantsanddewateringfiltrates.Severaldifferentprocesseshavebeenproposed
thatrelyonprecipitationofthephosphorusaseitherstruviteorcalciumphosphate.Scope(2004)
reportedthatatthetime,workwasunderwayinItaly,Germany,theNetherlands,andCanada.
InFebruary2008,thenonprofitGlobalWaterResearchCoalition,aninternationalwater
researchallianceformedby12worldleadingresearchorganizations,releasedareportincollaboration
withUSEPAandtheWaterEnvironmentResearchFoundation(WERF)titled,StateofScienceReport:
EnergyandResourceRecoveryfromSludge(KalogoandMonteith2008).Thereportfocuseson:
Theinternationalsituationofenergyandresourcerecoveryfromsludge.
Howtheuseofdifferentsludgetreatmentprocessesaffectsthepossibilityofrecovering
energyand/ormaterialsfromtheresidualsludge.
Theinfluenceofmarketandregulatorydriversonthefateofthesludgeendproduct.
142
August2010

Thefeasibilityofenergyandresourcerecoveryfromsludge.
Thesocial,economic,andenvironmentalperformance(triplebottomlineorTBL
assessment)ofcurrentalternativetechnologies.
Inthereport,energyrecoverytechnologiesareclassifiedintothefollowingprocesses:sludge
tobiogas,sludgetosyngas,sludgetooil,andsludgetoliquid.Thetechnologiesavailableforresource
recoverydiscussedinthereportincludethosetorecoverphosphorus,buildingmaterials,nitrogen,and
volatileacids.Thereport,whichcoversbothestablishedandemergingtechnologies,formsthebasisof
thecoalitionsstrategicresearchplanonenergyandrecoveryfromsludge.Asatechnicalresource,it
providesavaluableoverviewofsludgedisposalpracticesinvariouscountriessuchastheUnitedStates,
theNetherlands,theUnitedKingdom,Germany,Sweden,Japan,andChina,aswellasanumberof
treatmentprocessesforresourcerecovery.
Examplesoftheseprocessesaredescribedbelow.
14.3.1 Durham,OR,AdvancedWastewaterTreatmentFacility
OperatedbyCleanWaterServices,theDurhamAdvancedWastewaterTreatmentFacilityin
Tigard,OR,hasincorporatedanewtechnologyfromOstaraNutrientRecoveryTechnologies,Inc.to
extractphosphorusandothernutrientsfromwastewaterandrecyclethemintoanenvironmentallysafe
commercialfertilizercalledCrystalGreen.Ratherthanreprocessingthesludgeliquidsbackthrough
thewastewatersystem,theOstaraproprietaryfluidizedbedreactorusesmagnesiumtorecover
ammoniaandphosphateandturnsthemintoafertilizerpellet.Byextractingthesenutrients,the
concretelikescaleofpuremineralcalledstruvite(magnesiumammoniumphosphate)nolongerclogs
thefacilityspipes,valves,andotherequipment,therebyincreasingplantcapacityandreducing
maintenancecosts,whilecreatingarevenuegeneratingbyproduct.Struviteisaveryvaluableslow
releasefertilizer.FullscaleplantoperationbeganinMay,2009.Itisprojectedthatmorethan90
percentofthephosphorusinthereturnstreamswillberemovedandmorethan500tonsofstruvite
fertilizerwillbeproducedannuallyandsoldtocommercialenterprises.CleanWaterServicesexpects
thattheinitialinvestmentof$2.5millionwillbepaidbackwithinfiveyears.Formoreinformation,see
theCleanWaterServiceswebsiteat
http://www.cleanwaterservices.org/AboutUs/WastewaterAndStormwater/Ostara.aspx
Inadditiontophosphorusrecovery,theOstaraprocess:
Reducespollution
Reduceschemicaluse
Removesabout20percentofthenitrogeninthereturnstreams
Generatesrevenuefromthesaleofthefertilizer
Increasesthereliabilityandcapacityofthewastewaterfacility
Reducesoperationandmaintenancecosts
Reducesgreenhousegasemissionsthroughreducedenergyuse
Potentiallygeneratescarboncredits
143
August2010
Theprocessdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonhowwastewateristreated.Moreover,itdoesnot
requirefurtherchemicalphosphorusprecipitationfromthereturnstreamwhileitremovessomeofthe
ammoniathatwillotherwiseneedtobeoxidizedanddenitrifiedinthemainstream.Thistechnologyis
particularlysuitedforWWTPsthatemploybiologicalphosphorusremovalandanaerobicsludge
digestion.
14.3.2 EastBayMunicipalUtilityDistrict,CA
EastBayMunicipalUtilityDistrict(EBMUD)hasapplieditsbiosolidstoagriculturallandsfor
decades,returningnutrientstothesoil.Biosolidsarerichinnutrientssuchasnitrogenandphosphorus,
andthebenefitsoflandapplicationarewellknown.However,manyagriculturalcommunitiesare
adoptingmorestringentlandapplicationstandardsbecauseofconcernsregardingpathogens.EBMUD
hasconductedresearchtodevelopeconomicalalternativesfortheproductionofClassA(pathogen
free)biosolids,includingthermophilicanaerobicdigestion.EBMUDholdsapatentforathermophilic
anaerobicdigestionprocess.In2005,EBMUDdevelopedanenvironmentalmanagementsystem(EMS)
toidentifycostandenvironmentalsavings,ensureregulatorycompliance,andincreasepublic
awarenessandinvolvementinthebiosolidsprogram.AspartofthisprogramEBMUDundergoesthird
partyaudits.Forresults,seeEBMUDswebsiteathttp://www.ebmud.com/ourwater/wastewater
treatment/wastewatertreatmentprograms/environmentalmanagementsystem.
EBMUDalsocapturesandreusesbiogasfromitsanaerobicdigesters.Methanefromthebiogas
isusedtofuela6megawattonsitepowerplant.Toincreasemethaneproduction,EBMUD
implementedatruckedwasteprogramwherebytheyacceptliquidandsolidwastestreamsfrom
outsidetheirserviceareaandprocessitattheplanttoincreasemethaneproduction.Wallisetal.
(2008)reportedadoublingofenergyproductionoverthepastsixyears.EBMUDplanstoaddtwo4.5
megawattturbinesthatwillallowthemtogenerate100percentoftheirenergyneedsonsitebytheend
of2010.FormoreinformationonEBMUDssustainabilityprograms,see
http://www.ebmud.com/environment/sustainability.
14.4 References
Kalogo,Y.,andH.Monteith.2008.StateofScienceReport:EnergyandResourceRecoveryfromSludge.
PreparedforGlobalWaterResearchCoalition,byWERF,STOWA,andUKWaterIndustryResearch
Limited.
Larsen,T.A.,andJ.Leinert,Eds.2007.NovaquatisFinalReport.NoMixANewApproachtoUrban
WaterManagement.Switzerland:EAWAG,Novaquatis.
SCOPE.2004.NewsletterNo.57.July.CentreEuropendEtudessurlesPolyphosphates.Brussels,
Belgium.Availableonline:http://www.ceep
phosphates.org/Files/Newsletter/Scope%20Newsletter%2057%20Struvite%20conference.pdf
Wallis,M.,M.Ambrose,andC.Chan.2008.ClimateChange:ChartingaWaterCourseinanUncertain
Future.JournalAWWA100:6,June2008.
Water&WastewaterNews.2008.OregonPlantRecyclesNutrientsintoFertilizer.L.K.Williams,Ed.
October2,2008.Availableonline:http://www.wwnonline.com/print.aspx?aid=68074.
144
August2010
AppendixA.
RecommendationsforMethanolSafety
AppendixA.RecommendationsforMethanolSafety
Methanol(CH3OH)isarelativelysimplecompoundwithasinglecarbonbond.Clearand
colorlessatroomtemperature,itisfullysolubleinwaterandhasafaintlysweetpungentodor.Itis
typicallymadefromnaturalgas,althoughitcanbegeneratedusingrenewablematerialssuchaswood.
AsnotedinChapter4,methanolisthemostcommonexternalcarbonsourcefordenitrification
becauseofitshistoricallylowcostandrelativelylowcellyield.Theuseofmethanol,however,poses
severalsafetyandhealthrisks:
RiskofFire.Methanolishighlyflammable,withaflashpointof12oC(54oF).Evenmixtures
containingaslittleas25percentofmethanolbyweightareflammable.Becausemethanolis
heavierthanair,vaporscantraveltoasourceofignitionandflashback.Vaporscanalso
accumulateinconfinedspacesandmayexplodeifignited.Containersofmethanolsolutioncan
ruptureifexposedtofireorexcessiveheatforalongduration.Methanolburnswithaclearblue
flame.Duringdaylighthours,methanolfiresmaynotbevisibletothenakedeye.TheU.S.
DepartmentofTransportation(DOT)ranksmethanolandsolutionsofmethanolwithstrengths
ofgreaterthan25%asClass3FlammableLiquids,meaningthattheycouldigniteunderalmost
allambientconditions.
HealthRisks:Methanolisirritatingtotheeyes,skin,andrespiratorytrackandisveryharmfulif
swallowedorabsorbedthroughtheskin.Swallowingaslittleas50millilitersofmethanol(1/4
ofacup)canbefatal.Inhalationisthemostcommonformofexposureandcanleadto
respiratoryproblems.Methanolcanalsoaffectthenervoussystemandcausealossof
consciousness.Repeatedexposurestolowconcentrationsmayaccumulateinthebodyand
causeillness.Foradditionalinformationonthehealtheffectsofmethanol,seeinformation
fromEPAsIntegratedRiskInformationSystem(IRIS)at
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0305.htm.
Thisappendixcontainsrecommendationsformethanolhandling.Literaturereviewedforthe
appendixincludedareportbytheU.S.ChemicalSafetyandHazardInvestigationBoardontheBethune
PointWastewaterTreatmentPlantaccident,aWaterEnvironmentFederation(WEF)webcastentitled,
MethanolSafety:UnderstandingandManagingRisks,andproceedingsfromWEFTEC2008.When
designingandoperatingamethanolfeedsystem,plantsshouldalwaysfollowguidelinesinthe
manufacturersMaterialSafetyDataSheet(MSDS).Agoodclearinghouseofinformationonmethanol
isprovidedonlinebytheMethanolInstitute,http://www.methanol.org/.Wastewaterutilitiesshould
alsoalwaysfollowOccupationalSafety&HealthAdministration(OSHA)regulationsandNationalFire
ProtectionAssociation(NFPA)codesandstandards.
A.1
PreventativeMeasures
Itisimperativetokeepopenflames,sparks,andoxidantsawayfrommethanol.Thebestwayto
preventfireistoeliminatethesourceofignition.Operatorsandmaintenancepersonnelshouldalways
usehandtoolsthatdonotspark.
A2
August2010

Methanolstorageandhandlingareasshouldbeequippedwiththefollowing:
Localexhaust
Safetyshowerandeyewashstation
Smokeand/orheatdetectors
Firesuppressionsystem(extinguishingmaterialsincludingdrychemicalpowder,alcohol
resistantfoam,andwater)
Supplyofabsorbent,noncombustiblematerialsineventofsmallspill
Controlmeasurestolimitspreadofspillorfire(i.e.,secondarycontainment)
Wastewaterutilitiesshouldconsidermonitoringformethanolvaporsusingdetectortubes,electronic
instruments,absorbenttubes,orbiologicalmonitoring(Dolan2007).
Methanolisnoncorrosivetomostmetals,theexceptionsbeinglead,magnesium,andplatinum.
Mildsteeliscommonlyusedformethanolstorage.Vaporcontrolsincludeinternalorexternalfloating
roofs,inertgasblanketing(suchasdrynitrogen),andpressurevacuumrelieftocontroltankpressures
(Methanex2006).Flamearresterscanbeattachedtoventpipestoallowpassageofmethanolvapors
butpreventflamefrommovingintothepipebytransferringheattometalwiresorplates.Flame
arrestersmaybecomeineffectiveiftheycontainanyblockagesorcorrosion.
Whendesigningandconstructinganewmethanolfeedsystem,considerinvolvinglocalfire
officialsintheprocess.AttheStamfordWaterPollutionControlAuthority(WPCA),theFireMarshall
waspresentatthestartupofthemethanolsystemandwitnessedtheinitialfoamfiresuppression
systemtest.TheFireMarshallsofficeperiodicallyinspectsthefacilityandalarm,sprinkler,andfoam
suppressionsystems(Brown2007).
Operationsmanualsshouldspecifyregularinspectionsandmaintenanceofmethanolhandling
equipment.Operatorsshouldundergoregulartrainingonmethanolhandlingandsafety.
A.2
AddressingaSpill
Themethodforcleaningupamethanolspilldependsonitssize.Forsmallspills(generallyless
thanthecontentsofa55gallondrum),methanolcanbeabsorbedwithearth,sand,orothernon
combustiblematerial.Materialshouldbestoredinasealedcontaineranddisposedofatafacility
licensedtohandlehazardouswaste.Afinewatersprayorvaporsuppressingfoamcanbeusedto
reducevapor.Personnelshouldwearprotectivegloves,fireretardantclothing(e.g.,rubber),andsafety
gogglesorotherformofeyeprotection.
Forlargerspills,itisimportanttofollowlocalemergencyprotocolsandtreatthespillasa
hazardoussituation.Wastewaterutilitypersonnelshouldeliminateignitionsources,securetheareaup
toa500meterradius,restrictaccess,movepersonnelupwind,anddecontaminatepersonneland
equipment.Allpersonnelallowedentryshouldwearafullchemicalsuit,compressedairbreathing
apparatus(CABA),rubberboots,andgloves.Althoughmethanolbiodegradesquicklyinsoilandwater,
measuresshouldbetakentopreventmethanolfromenteringwaterways,sewers,basements,or
confinedareas.
Intheeventofafire,utilitypersonnelshouldfollowwrittenemergencyresponseprocedures
andshouldimmediatelynotifylocalauthoritiesincludingthefiredepartmentandEmergency
A3
August2010

ManagementServices(EMS)personnel.Powderextinguisher,alcoholresistantfoam,carbondioxide,
andlargeamountsofwatercanbeusedtosuppressthefireintheeventofanemergency.Watercan
belesseffectivethanothermethods;however,itmaybeusefulindilutingmethanoltoanon
flammablelevel.Avoidusingstraightstreamsofwatertopreventspreadofcontamination.Drums
shouldbekeptcoolbysprayingthemwithwatertopreventexplosion.
A.3
References
Brown,J.A.2007.MethanolStorageandDeliverySystem.WERFExternalCarbonWorkshop.Stamford
WPCA.December12,2007.Washington,DC.
deBarbadillo,C.,J.Barnard,S.Tarallo,andM.Steichen.2008a.GotCarbon?:WidespreadBiological
NutrientRemovalisIncreasingtheDemandforSupplementalSources.WaterEnvironment&
deBarbadillo,C.,P.Miller,S.Ledwell.2008b.AComparisonofOperatingIssuesandDosing
RequirementsforAlternativeCarbonSourcesinDenitrificationFilters.InProceedingsofWEFTEC
Dolan,G.2007.MethanolSafeHandling.WERFCarbonSourcesSeminar.MethanolInstitute.
December12,2007.Washington,DC.
EDIE.MethanolStorageandDosingforDenitrification.Gee&CompanyProductInformation.
EnvironmentalDataInteractiveExchange.Surrey,England:FavershamHouseGroup.AccessedJuly
24,2008.Availableonline:http://www.edie.net/products/view_entry.asp?id=2401
IPCS.2004.MethanolDataSheet:0057.InternationalProgrammeonChemicalSafety.Available
online:
http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safework/cis/products/icsc/dtasht/_icsc00/icsc0057.ht
m
MethanexCorporation.2006.TechnicalInformation&SafeHandlingGuideforMethanol,Version3.0.
Vancouver,BritishColumbia,Canada:Methanex.
MethanexCorporation.MethanolSafeHandlingandStorage,DistributedGenerationCodeWorkshop.
Vancouver,BritishColumbia,Canada:Methanex.
MethanolInstitute.MethanolEmergencyResponseFactsheet.Arlington,VA:MethanolInstitute.
MethanolInstitute.MethanolHealthEffectsFactsheet.Arlington,VA:MethanolInstitute.
MethanolInstitute.2005.MethanolandWastewaterDenitrification.Arlington,VA:Methanol
Institute.
MethanolInstitute.WastewaterTreatmentwithMethanolDenitrification.Arlington,VA:Methanol
Institute.
A4
August2010

NPI.2007.Methanol:Rank24of90Substances.AustralianGovernment.Departmentofthe
EnvironmentandWaterResources.NationalPollutantInventory.LastupdatedOctober26,2007.
Availableonline:http://www.npi.gov.au/database/substanceinfo/profiles/54.html
OnnisHayden,A.andA.Z.Gu.2008.ComparisonsofOrganicSourcesforDenitrification:
Biodegradability,DenitrificationRates,KineticConstantsandPracticalImplicationforTheir
ApplicationsinWWTPs.InProceedingsofWEFTEC2008.Alexandria,VA:WEF.
TerraNitrogenCorporation.2001.MaterialSafetyDataSheet:Methanol.MSDSNumber2016.Sioux
City,Iowa:Terra.
U.S.ChemicalSafetyandHazardInvestigationBoard.2003.PublicBoardMeeting.March6,Houston,
Texas.
U.S.ChemicalSafetyandHazardInvestigationBoard.2007.InvestigationReport:MethanolTank
ExplosionandFire,BethunePointWastewaterTreatmentPlant,CityofDaytonaBeach,FL,January11,
2006.Report200603IFL.
WEF.2008.MethanolSafety:UnderstandingandManagingRisks.WebcastorganizedbytheWEF
Safety,Security,andOccupationalHealthCommittee(SSoHC)withtheWEFMunicipalWastewater
DesignCommittee,theMethanolInstitute,andtheChemicalSafetyBoard.23July2008.
A5
August2010

A6
August2010
AppendixB.
OrganicCompoundsandInhibitoryConcentrations
toNitrification
AppendixB.OrganicCompoundsandInhibitoryConcentrationstoNitrification
OrganicCompound
InhibitoryConcentration(mg/L)
Acetone
2000
Allylalcohol
19.5
Allylchloride
180
Allyl
1.9
Allylthiourea
1.2
AM(2amino4
50
Aminoacids
11000
Aminoethanol
12.2
Aminoguanidine
74.0
2Aminophenol
0.27
4Aminophinol
0.07
Aminopropiophen
43
Aminotriazole
70.0
Ammonium
1000
Aniline
7.7
1Arginine
1.7
Benzene
13.00
Benzidine
50.0
Benzocaine
100
Benzothiazzole
38.0
Benzylamine
100
Benzyldimethyldod
2.0
Benzylthiuronium
40.0
2.2'Bipyridine
10.0
BisphenolA
100
Bromodichloropro
84.0
2Bromophenol
0.35
4Bromophenol
0.83
nButanol
8200
Cadmium
14.3
Carbamate
B2
August2010
OrganicCompound
Carbondisulphide
35.0
Chlorine
Chlorobenzene
0.71,500
Chloroform
18.0
2Chloronaphthol
14.3
2Chlorophenol
2.70
3Chlorophenol
0.20
4Chlorophenol
0.73
5Chloro1
0.59
2Chloro6
11.0
mCresol
01.100
oCresol
11.4
pCresol
12.8
Cyanide
16.5
Cyclohexylamine
0.500
Diallylether
100
1,2Dibromoethane
50.0
Dibromethane
60
1,2
100
1,1Dichloroethane
0.91
2,4Dichloroethane
0.79
1,5
13.00
2,3Dichlorophenol
0.42
2,3Dichlorophenol
0.61
2,6Dichlorophenol
8.10
3,5Dichlorophenol
3.00
1,3
0.67
1,3
0.48
Dicyandiamide
250
Dicyclohexylcarbod
10.0
Diethyl
0.1
Diguanide
50.0
Dimethylgloxime
140
B3
August2010
OrganicCompound
Dimethylhydrazine
19.2
Dimethylp
19.0
Dimethylp
30
2,4Dinitrophenol
37.0
Diphenylthiocarbaz
7.5
Dithiooxamide
Dodecylamine
<1
Erythromycin
50.0
Ethanol
2400
Ethanolamine
100
Ethylacetate
18
Ethylenediamine
100
Ethylurethane
1000
Ethylxanthate
10
Flavonoids
0.01
Guanidine
4.7
Hexamethylene
85
Histidine
Hydrazine
58.0
Hydrazinesulphate
200
Hydrogensulfide
50
8Hydroxyquiniline
Lauryl
118
1Lysine
4.0
Mercaptobenzothi
Methanol
160
Methionine
9.0
nMethylaniline
<1
Methylhydrazine
12.3
Methyl
0.800
Methylmercaptan
300
Methylpyridines
100
2Methylpyridine
100
B4
August2010
OrganicCompound
4Methylpyridine
100
Methylthiourea
0.455
Methylthiuronium
Methylamine
100
Methyleneblue
30
Monethanolamine
>200
Nserve
10
Napthylethylenedi
23
Ninhydrin
10.0
pNitroaniline
10.0
50.0
Nitrobenzene
50.0
4Nitrophenol
2.60
2Nitrophenol
11.00
2Nitrophenol
50.0
Nitrourea
1.0
Panthothenicacid
50
Pentachloroethane
7.90
Perchloroethylene
5.6
Phenolics
100
Phenolicacids
0.01
pPhenylazoaniline
100
Potassium
800
Potassiumchlorate
2500
Potassium
6.0
Potassium
300
nPropanol
20.0
Purines
50
Pyridine
10.0
Primidines
50
Pyruvate
400
Resurcinol
7.80
Skatole
7.0
B5
August2010
OrganicCompound
Sodiumazide
23.0
Sodiumazide
20
Sodiumarsenite
2000
Sodiumchloride
35000
Sodiumcyanate
100
Sodiumcyanide
Sodiumdimethyl
13.6
Sodiummethyl
0.90
Sodiumpluoride
1218
Sodium
ST(sulfathiazole)
50
Strychnine
100
Sulphides
5.0
Tannin
0.01
Tetrabromobisphen
100
1,2,3,4
20.00
1,2,4,5
9.80
1,1,1,2
8.70
1,1,2,2
1.40
12,3,5,6
1.30
Tetramethylammon
2200
Tetramethyl
Thiamine
0.530
Thioacetamide
500
Thiocyanates
0.180
Thiosemicarbazide
0.760
Thiourea
Thiourea
3.6
1Threonine
Threonine
50.0
2,4,6
7.70
2,4,6
50
2,4,6
2.5
B6
August2010
OrganicCompound
2,2,2
2.00
1,1,2
1.90
Trichloroethylene
0.81
Trichlorophenol
100
2,3,5
3.90
2,3,6
0.42
2,4,6
7.90
Triethylamine
100
Trimethylamine
118
2,4,6
30.0
1Valine
1.8
Vitaminsriboflavin,
50
Source:ReprintedwithpermissionfromBiologicalNutrientRemovalOperationinWastewaterTreatmentPlants,Copyright
2005,WaterEnvironmentFederationAlexandria,VA,www.wef.org.FromBlumandSpeece,1991;ChristensenandHarremos,
1977;HockenburyandGrady,1977;Painter,1970;Payne,1973;Richardson,1985;SharmaandAhlert,1977.
B7
August2010
B8
August2010
Appendix C.
Mathematical Models for Wastewater Treatment
AppendixC.MathematicalModelsforWastewaterTreatment
Modelsaresetsofequationswhichdescribeaphysicalsystem.Wastewatermodelinghas
advancedfromarudimentaryunderstandingoftheactivatedsludgeprocesstocomplexsystemsof
equationsrepresentingalltheprocessesoccurringinawastewaterplant.FigureC1showsabrief
outlineofthedevelopmentofmodelingofactivatedsludgeprocesses.Activatedsludgemodelingfirst
begantofindwidespreaduseinthewastewaterindustryaftertheInternationalWaterAssociation
(IWA)producedthefirstActivatedSludgeModel(ASM1)in1986.Sincethenmanyenhancementshave
beenaddedtoASM1resultinginseveralimprovedversionsofthebasicASMmodels.Severalother
modelshavealsobeendevelopedtoaddressspecificprocesseswithintheactivatedsludgeprocessas
wellasmodelsforfixedfilmprocessesandsettling.Powerfulsimulationpackageshavealsobeen
developed,capableoflinkingseveralmodelsrepresentingeachprocessintheplantfromprimary
settlingthroughtheactivatedsludgeprocesstosecondaryclarificationandsludgedigestion.
C2
August2010
FigureC1TheDevelopmentofActivatedSludgeModels.
Source:Johnson,2009,slide6.ReprintedwithpermissionfromtheDistanceLearningWebcastSeries,February25,2009,Copyright2009,WaterEnvironmentFederation,
Alexandria,VA,www.wef.org.
C3
August2010

Modelscanbeeitherblackboxmodelsorwhiteboxmodels.Blackboxmodelsfitasetof
experimentaldatatoanempiricalequation.Whiteboxmodelsarebasedonactualknowledgeofthe
processesandtheirdescriptioninmathematicalterms.Althoughsomeworkhasbeendoneusingblack
boxmodelsinwastewater,mostcommonlyusedmodelsfordesignarewhiteboxmodels.This
appendixwillfocusonthosewhiteboxmodelscommonlyusedfordesignofwastewaternutrient
removal.
Therearemanyexcellentreferencesonmathematicalmodelingofwastewatertreatment
plants.Gernaeyetal.,(2004)provideaconcisesummaryofexistingmodelsandtheirunderlying
assumptions.ComeauandTakcs(2008)proposeschematicrepresentationsforthemathematical
modelsandastandardizedlistofsymbolstofurtherunderstandingofthemodelsmechanisms,use,and
limitations.AdditionalinformationonfixedfilmmathematicalmodelscanbefoundinWanneretal.,
(2006).ReferencesforindividualmodelscanbefoundintablesC1andC2.
C.1
DescriptionofAvailableModels
Settling
Modelsavailableforsettlingarewellknownandaregenerallybasedonmathematicalconcepts.
Mostsimulatorsusesimilaronedimensional(ID)settlingmodelsforprimaryandsecondaryclarifiers.
Themodelsmaydifferslightlyintermsofthenumberoflayersusedtomodeltheclarifierandthe
methodsfordeterminingthesettlingvelocitiesofparticles.Thesemodelsdonotgenerallytakeinto
accountanybiologicalreactionsoccurringintheclarifierorcompressionofthesludgeblanket.
Recently,somemodelshaveintegratedanactivatedsludgemodeltoaccountforreactionstakingplace
intheclarifier.
Onedimensionalclarifiermodelstypicallyarebasedonmassfluxtheorywhichcalculates
settlinginonedimensionbasedonthesludgecharacteristics.Onedimensionalmodelscannottakeinto
accountdensitycurrentsandothernonverticalflowsinaclarifierandthusrepresentanidealized
condition.Inordertomoreproperlyrepresentactualclarifierperformance2and3dimensionalmodels
arenecessary.Thesemodelshavebeenconstructedusingcomputationalfluiddynamics(CFD).CFDisa
mathematicalmodelingmethodwhichusesnumericaltechniquestosolvethemassandenergy
conservationequationsintwoandthreedimensions.Thesemodels,whilemorecomplicated,can
modelthecurrentscausedbydensitydifferencesandalsoflowcurrentsduetobafflingandother
structuralfeatures.AliteraturereviewofCFDtechniquesandstudiescanbefoundinBrouckaertand
Buckley(1998).
ActivatedSludge
Themostsignificantdecisionisintheselectionofamodeltodescribetheactivatedsludge
system.ActivatedsludgemodelingfirstgainedwideacceptancewhentheInternationalWater
Association(IWA)releasedtheactivatedsludgemodel,laterknownasASM1.Althoughvery
sophisticated,therearenumeroussimplifyingassumptionsunderlyingASM1.Theseincludeconstant
temperatureandpHandnodependenceofthebiologicalreactionratesonfoodsource.Themodelalso
didnotincludephosphorusremoval.ASM2andASM2dweredevelopedtocapturebiological
phosphorusremoval.ASM3followedandincludesawidertemperaturerangeandallowsfortheeffects
ofdifferentfoodsources.AdditionalequationscanbeaddedtoASM3toaccountforbiological
phosphorusremoval.ThemetabolicbiologicalphosphorusmodeloftheDelftUniversityofTechnology
C4
August2010

(TUDP)wasdevelopedtofullyaccountforthemetabolismoccurringinphosphorusaccumulating
organisms(PAOs)duringenhancedbiologicalphosphorusremoval.BarkerandDold(1997)developeda
modeltoincludedifferentratesofgrowthdependingonthecarbonsource.TheUCTPHO+modelisable
tomodeluptakeofphosphorusunderbothanoxicandanaerobicconditions.TableC1liststhe
activatedsludgemodelsavailableforvarioussuspendedgrowthbiologicaltreatmentprocesses.
TableC1.AvailableActivatedSludgeModelsforSuspendedGrowthProcesses
ModelName WastewaterTreatmentUnitProcesses
ASM1
ASM2
Carbonoxidation,nitrification,denitrification
Carbonoxidation,nitrification,denitrification,enhanced
biologicalphosphorusremoval,fermentation,chemical
phosphorusremoval
ASM2d
biologicalphosphorusremoval,fermentation,chemical
phosphorusremoval
ASM3
Carbonoxidation,nitrification,denitrification
ASM3w/BioP
biologicalphosphorusremoval
TUDP
biologicalphosphorusremoval,fermentation
B&D
biologicalphosphorusremoval,fermentation
UCTPHO+
Carbonoxidation,nitrification,denitrification,biological
phosphorusremoval
Sources:WERF2003,Gernaeyetal.2004,Comeauetal.2008
Reference
Henzeetal.1987
Henzeetal.1995
Henzeetal.2000
Gujeretal.1999
Reigeretal.2001
Brdjanovicetal.2000
BarkerandDold1997
Huetal.2007
SomereactionratespredictedbytheASMfamilyofmodelsfortheliquidphasemaybevalidfor
biofilmreactionsaswell,butthetransferofmaterialtoandfromthebiofilmforreactioncannotbe
handled.Therefore,attachedorfixedgrowthprocessesrequireadifferentmathematicalmodelto
representtransportofsubstratetothebiofilm,consumptionofthesubstrateinthebiofilm,andthen
transportoftheproductsoutofthebiofilm.
Therearenumerousmathematicalmodelscapableofmodelingattachedgrowthprocesses.
Unfortunatelytheyarenotasstandardizedastheactivatedsludgemodelsandthereareaconsiderable
numberofthem.Aswithactivatedsludgemodels,amodelfullydescribingallaspectsofthebiofilm
processwouldbeexceedinglycomplexandwouldrequirelargeamountsofcomputingpowertosolve.
Thereforenumeroussimplifyingassumptionsaremade.
Biofilmmodelscanbecategorizedasanalytical,pseudoanalytical,1dimensional,and
multidimensional.Inanalyticalmodels,enoughassumptionsaremadethattheequationscanbesolved
analytically.Psuedoanalyticalmodelsmakeafewlesssimplifyingassumptionsbutrequiresimple
numericalprocedurestofindasolution.Onedimensionalmodelsmakelessassumptionsbutmustbe
solvednumerically,althoughtheycanstillbesolvedusingadesktopcomputer.Twoand3dimensional
modelsareverycomplexandalthoughtheyhavefewerassumptionstheyrequiresignificantlymore
computingtime.Thesemultidimensionalmodelshavenotfoundwideuseinindustryandarenot
includedinanywidelyavailablesimulators.Theywillnotbediscussedfurther.TableC.2listssome
referencesavailabledescribingpseudoanalyticaland1dimensionalmodels.
C5
August2010
TableC2.ReferencesforBiofilmModels
ModelType
References
PsuedoAnalytical
1Dimensional
RittmannandMcCarty2001,Gradyetal.1999,SaezandRittmann1992
Kisseletal.1984,WannerandGujer1986,Reichert1998
Inaddition,workiscontinuallybeingdonetodevelopmodelsfornewandinnovativeprocesses.
Forexample,investigatorshaveadaptedbiofilmmodelstosimulatetheAnnamoxprocess(Capunoetal.
2008;DapenaMoraetal.2004).Modelshavealsobeendevelopedtodescribeotheremerging
processessuchasSHARON(Volckeetal.2006;WettandRauch2003;Borgeretal.2008),DEMONand
STRASS(Wettetal.2008).Thesemodelsfornewprocessescanbelinkedwiththeexistingmodelsfor
activatedsludgeplantsusingsimulatorstomodelnewerflowdiagrams.
C.2
ComparisonofMathematicalModels
SuspendedGrowthActivatedSludgeModels
AssummarizedinTableC1,thereareanumberofmodelsavailabletorepresentactivated
sludgeprocesses.ThelistinC1isnotexhaustive,butonlyrepresentsthemajormodelsinusetoday.
Eachmodelhasitsownsetofstatevariables.Astatevariableisaparameterusedtodescribethe
conditionofthesystem.Inthecaseofactivatedsludgemodelstheyarethespeciesthatmakeupthe
systemsuchasparticulateorganiccarbonandheterotrophicbiomass.Eachmodelisalsorepresented
byasetofreactionswhichdescribethetransformationsundergonebythestatevariables.TableC3
summarizesthenumberofstatevariablesandreactionseachofthemajormodelsuse.
TableC3.StateVariablesandReactionsforActivatedSludgeModels
Model
NumberofStateVariables NumberofReactions
ASM1
13
ASM2
19
ASM2d
19
ASM3
12
ASM3w/BioP
16
TUDP
14
BarkerandDold
19
UCTPHO+
16
Source(s):ComeauandTakcs(2008),Gernaeyetal,(2004)
8
19
21
12
23
21
36
35
Whileacompletelistofallthestatevariablesandreactionsisbeyondthescopeofthis
appendix,TableC4givesanexampleofthestatevariablesusedfortheASM3w/BioPmodel.
C6
August2010
TableC4StateVariablesfortheASM3w/BioPModel
StateVariable Description
S S
Readilybiodegradableorganicmatter
SI
Solubleunbiodegradableorganicmatter
SO
Dissolvedoxygen
X S
Slowlybiodegradableorganicmatter
XSTO
Generalstoragecompound
StoredPHA
XPHA
XI
Particulateunbiodegradableorganicmatter
SNH
Totalammonia
SNO
Totalnitrateandnitrite
SN2
Nitrogengas
SPO4
Inorganicsolublephosphorus
Storedpolyphosphate
XPP
XH
Ordinaryheterotrophicorganisms
XA
Nitrifyingorganisms
XPAO
Phosphorusaccumulatingorganisms
SHCO
Solubleinorganiccarbon
XTSS
Totalsuspendedsolids
Source:ComeauandTakcs(2008)
Units
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mgO2/L
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mgN/L
mgP/L
mgP/L
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mgCOD/L
mmolC/L
mgTSS/L
Thereactionsofeachmodelrepresentthetransformationofthestatevariables.Comeauand
Takcs(2008)havedevelopedaschematicrepresentationofthesereactions.FigureC2showssucha
schematicrepresentationoftheASM3wBio/Pmodel.Eachlinewithanarrowrepresentsareactionin
themodel.Eachreactionisrepresentedbyconstantswhichindicatetherateofthereactionandthe
stoichiometryofthereaction.ForexampleinthediagramtheareaproceedingfromSStoXSTOshows
thatreadilybiodegradablematterinthepresenceofoxygenornitrateisconvertedintogeneralstorage
compoundinordinaryheterotrophicorganisms.Areactionlinemeetingaverticallineoutsidethe
dottedboundaryrepresentstheproductionofenergy.
C7
August2010
SO, SNO
SNH
Ordinary heterotrophic
organisms
(SNH)
SO, SNO
XS
SS
XSTO
SO, SNO
XH
SI
effluent
SO, SNO
XI
SNH
XI
SNH
SO, SNO
XNIT
SO
Nitrifying organisms
SNO
SO SNO
Phosphate Accumulating Organisms
P10 P11
SS
XPHA
SO, SNO
XPAO
XI
SO, SNO
XPP
SO, SNO
(Cell lysis)
SPO4
FigureC2SchematicRepresentationofASM3w/BioP
Source:ComeauandTakcs2008fromWEFTECconference2008.ReprintedwithpermissionfromProceedingsofWEFTEC.08,
the81stAnnualWaterEnvironmentFederationTechnicalExhibitionandConference,Chicago,IL,October1822,2008.
Copyright2008WaterEnvironmentFederation,Alexandria,Virginia,www.wef.org.
C8
August2010

Eachmodelhasitsownsetofreactionsalongwithasetofassumptionsunderlyingthose
assumptions.TableC5showsthemajormodelsandsomeofthekeyassumptions.Adiscussionofeach
followsthetable.
TableC5.AssumptionsofActivatedSludgeModels
Model
Temperature Microbial Heterotroph
Dependent Growth
GrowthRate
Dependenton
FoodSource
ASM1
N
DR
N
ASM2
Y
DR
N
ASM2d
Y
DR
N
ASM3
Y
ER
Y
ASM3w/BioP
Y
ER
Y
TUDP
Y
DR
N
BarkerandDold
Y
DR
Y
UCTPHO+
Y
ER
Y
Key:DRdeathregeneration;ERendogenousrespiration;NAnotapplicable.
Source:Gernaeyetal.2004
PAOscan
Denitrify
PAODecay
Dependent
onFood
Source
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
NA
N
N
NA
Y
Y
Y
Y
Mostreactionsaretemperaturedependent.ASM1doesnotincludetemperaturedependence,
insteadincludingachoiceofeither10or20degreesCelsius.Theothermodelsdoincludetemperature
dependentterms.Temperaturedependentterms,however,areoftenlimitedintheirapplicability.For
example,thetermsusedinASM2areonlyvalidbetween10and25degreesCelsius.
Microbialgrowthisgenerallydescribedinoneoftwoways;deathregenerationorendogenous
respiration.Thedeathregenerationconceptsetsseparateratesforthegrowthanddecayof
microorganisms.Endogenousrespirationassumesamaintenanceconceptwheremicroorganismsusea
portionoftheirmasstoprovideenergy.Eachapproachhasitsstrengthsandweaknesses.Death
regenerationallowsthemodeltotakeintoaccountdifferentreactionsoccurringupondeathofthe
microorganismanddifferentfatesofthematerial.Itlumpstogether,however,thereactionsof
heterotrophsandautotrophs.Theendogenousrespirationconceptclearlyseparatesheterotrophand
autotrophreactionsbutcannottakeintoaccountthedifferentreactionsoccurringonthedeathofthe
microorganisms.
Microbescanutilizesomefoodsourcesmoreeasilythanothers.Forexample,whileboth
methanolandVFAcanbeusedasasubstratefordenitrifyingbacteria,onlyVFAcanbeusedasafood
sourceforphosphorusaccumulatingorganisms(PAO).Alsobacterialgrowthratescandifferdepending
onthecarbonsource.Manymodelsdonottakethisintoaccount.
IthasbeenshownthatdenitrificationcanbeaccomplishedbyPAOsintheanaerobiczoneof
biologicalphosphorusremovalplants.Someofthebiologicalphosphorusmodelsincludethisoption.
Importantlimitationsofvariousmodelsarelistedbelow:
ASM1modelsdonottakeintoaccounteithernitriteproductionorproductionofnitrogengas.
ThereforeitisnotpossibletoclosethenitrogenbalanceusingtheASM1model.
C9
August2010
TheASM2,ASM2d,andTUDPmodelsdonotaccountforGAOcompetitionwithPAOsduring
biologicalphosphorusremoval.
NoneofthemodelslistedinTableC2canaccountforfilamentousbiomassorsludgebulking.
Biologicalphosphorusmodelscannothandletotaldepletionofsubstrateorthesimultaneouspresence
ofsubstrateandanotherfoodsource.
BiofilmModels
Characterizationforthebiofilmmodelsarebasedonmodeltypeandassumptionsaboutnot
onlykineticsandbiologicalgrowthbutalsotransportandthenatureofthebiofilm.TableC6
summarizeseachtypeofmodelandtheassumptionsandtypesofproblemsitcansolve.
TableC6.ApplicabilityofBiofilmModels
ModelType
Assumptions
Analytical
PsuedoAnalytical
1Dimensional
1substrateisratelimiting,homogenous1Dbiofilm,first
orzeroorderkinetics
1microbialspecieslimitedabilitytomodelmultiple
species,1ratelimitingsubstrate,monodkinetics
Heterogenousbiomass,masstransferinbiofilm
Analyticalmodelsareverysimpleandcanonlyhandleverysimpleproblems.Theyarelimited
tobiofilmsofeventhicknessandmadeupofasinglespecies.Onlyasingleratelimitingsubstratecanbe
used.Thisdoesnotmeanthatthereactionofmorethanonesubstratecannotbehandled,butthat
microbialgrowthcanonlybelimitedbyoneofthem.Forexample,consumptionofbothnitrateand
oxygencanbemodeled,butthemodelermustdecidebeforehandwhichwillbetheratelimiting
concentrationformicrobialgrowth.Analyticalmodelscanonlyusefirstorzeroorderrateconstants
insteadofthemorerealisticmonodrateconstants.Althoughnosystemmatchesthesedetailsexactly,
somemaybecloseenoughdependingontheobjective.Iftheonlyinterestisinsteadystate
consumptionofasinglesubstrate(e.g.nitrate)andthebiofilmisfairlyeven,theanalyticalmodelmay
beappropriate.Nonmonodkineticsmaybeappropriateifthehalfsaturationconstantisnotnearthe
concentrationofsubstrateinthebulksolution.Ifthesubstrateconcentrationismuchlessthanthehalf
saturationconstant,firstorderkineticscanbeused.Ifthesubstrateconcentrationismuchgreaterthan
thehalfsaturationconstant,zeroorderkineticsareappropriate.Ifthesubstrateconcentrationandhalf
saturationconstantareaboutthesamemagnitude,analyticalmodelsarenotappropriate.
Pseudoanalyticalmodelsusemostofthesameassumptionsaboutbiomassastheanalytical
models.Theystillgenerallyonlytakeintoaccountasinglespeciesandratelimitingsubstrate.Some
modificationscanbemadetohandlemultiplespeciesifeachspecieshasonlyonelimitingsubstrate.
Thebiggestadvantageofthepseudoanalyticalmodelisthatitcanincludemonodkinetics.Otherwise
itsapplicabilityissimilartotheanalyticalmodel.
The1dimensionalmodelskeepseparatetrackofdissolvedandparticulatecomponentsandcan
modeltheconcentrationofasubstratethroughoutthebiofilmwithtime.Thesemodelsareabletouse
C10
August2010

anykineticexpressionsandcanhandlemultiplespeciesandmultipleratelimitingsubstrates.They
cannothandletheeffectsoffluidvelocityonsubstratetransferorbiofilmgrowth.Theyalsocannot
handleunevenbiofilmgrowth.Thedisadvantagetothe1dimensionalmodelsistheyrequiremore
computingpowerandtime,althoughmanysimulatorprogramstodaynowinclude1dimensional
models.
C.3
References
Barker,P.S.andP.L.Dold.1997.GeneralModelforBiologicalNutrientRemovalActivatedSludge
Systems:ModelPresentation.WaterEnvironmentResearch.69(5):969999.
Borger,A.R.,I.Takcs,P.M.Roeveld,andH.W.deMooij.2008.SHARONProcessStabilityModeledby
BioWin.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Brdjanovic,D.,M.C.M.vanLoosdrecht,P.Versteeg,C.M.Hooijmans,G.J.Alaerts,andJ.J.Heijnen.
2000.ModelingCOD,NandPRemovalinaFullscaleWWTPHaarlemWaarderpolder.Water
Research.34(3):846858.
Brouckaert,C.J.,andC.A.Buckley.1998.ResearchontheApplicationofComputationalFluidDynamics
toImprovingtheDesignandOperationofWaterandWastewaterTreatmentPlants.Universityof
Natal,Durban,SouthAfrica.
AutotrophicNitrogenRemovalunderDifferentReactorConfigurations.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Comeau,Y.andI.Takcs.2008.SchematicRepresentationofActivatedSludgeModels.Presentedat
WEFTEC2008.
DapenaMora,A.,S.W.H.VanHulle,J.L.Campos,R.Mendez,P.A.Vanrolleghem,andM.Jetten.2004.
EnrichmentofAnammoxBiomassfromMunicipalActivatedSludge:ExperimentalandModeling
Results.JournalofChemicalTechnologyandBiotechnology.79(12):14211428.
Gerges,H.andA.McCorquodale.2008.ThirtyYearsofSedimentationTanksModelingLearningfrom
Experience.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
K.V.Gernaey,M.C.MvanLoosdrecht,M.Henze,M.Lind,andS.B.Jorgensen.2004.ActivatedSludge
WastewaterTreatmentPlantModellingandSimulation:StateoftheArt.EnvironmentalModelling
andSoftware.19(9):763783.
Grady,C.P.L.,G.T.Daigger,andH.C.Lim.1999.BiologicalWastewaterTreatment.NewYork:Marcel
Dekker.
Gujer,W.,M.Henze,T.Mino,andM.C.M.vanLoostrecht.1999.ActivatedSludgeModelNo.3.Water
ScienceandTechnology.39(1):183193.
Henze,M.,C.P.L.Grady,W.Gujer,G.v.R.Marais,andT.Matsuo.1987.ActivatedSludgeModelNo.1,
IAWQ,LondonUK.
C11
August2010

Henze,M.,W.Gujer,T.Mino,T.Matsuo,M.Wentzel,andG.v.R.Marais.1995.ActivatedSludgeModel
No.2.IAWPRCScientificandTechnicalReportNo.3.London,UK.IWA
Henze,M.,W.Gujer,T.Mino,andM.C.M.vanLoosdrecht.2000.ActivatedSludgeModelsASM1,ASM2,
ASM2dandASM3.IWAScientificandTechnicalReport.IWAPublishing.London,UK.
Hu,Z.,M.C.Wentzel,andG.A.Ekama.2007.AGeneralKineticModelforBiologicalNutrientRemoval
ActivatedSludgeSystemsModelDevelopment.Biotech.Bioeng.98(6)12421258.
Jeppsson,U.1996.ModellingAspectsofWastewaterTreatmentProcesses.ThesisLundInstituteof
Technology.Lund,Sweden.
Johnson,B.R.2009.WhatisModeling?PresentedintheWEFwebinar:Modeling101HowtoUse
SimulatorsintheDesignandOperationofWastewaterTreatmentFacilities.WEFDistanceLearning
WebcastSeries.ModelingExpertGroupoftheAmericas.February25,2009.
Kissel,J.C.,P.L.McCarty,andR.L.Street.1984.NumericalSimulationsofMixedCultureBiofilims.
JournalofEnvironmentalEngineering.110:393411
MerloR.,D.Parker,andE.Wahlberg.2007.ClarifyingCFDModelingsBenefits.Waterand
EnvironmentTechnology.(19):4853.
Merlo,R.,D.Parker,andE.Wahlberg.2007.ClarifyingCFDModelingsBenefits.WaterEnvironment&
Technology.19(4):4853.Alexandria,VA:WEF.
Naranyan,B.,S.Parker,J.Demir,J.K.Esler,S.P.Zhou,S.Stinebaugh,J.Schwall,andM.Kumel.2002.
SidebySideHydrodynamicModelingandFullscaleHydraulicTestingofSecondaryClarifiers.
ProceedingsofWEFTEC2002.
Reichert,P.1998.AQUASIM2.0UserManual.SwissFederalInstituteforEnvironmentalScienceand
Technology.Dubendorf,Switzerland.
Rieger,L.,G.Koch,M.Kuhni,W.Gujer,andH.Siegrist.2001.TheEAWAGBioPModuleforActivated
SludgeModelNo.3.WaterRes.35(16):38873903.
Rittmann,B.E.andP.L.McCarty.1980.ModelofSteadyStateBiofilmKinetics.Biotechnologyand
Bioengineering.22:23432357.
Robinson,C.M.E.,D.J.Burt,D.A.Egarr,andA.K.Nair.2008.DevelopmentandApplicationofan
AutomatedCFDToolforModelingWastewaterClarifiers.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
Saez,P.B.andB.E.Rittmann.1992.AccuratePseudoanalyticalSolutionforSteadyStateBiofilms.
BiotechnologyandBioengineering.39:790793.
Volcke,E.I.P.,M.Loccufier,E.J.L.Noldus,andP.A.Vanrolleghem.2007.OperationofaSHARON
NitritationReactor:PracticalImplicationsfromaTheoreticalStudy.WaterScienceandTechnology.
56(6):145154.
C12
August2010

Wanner,O.,H.Eberl,E.Morgenroth,D.Noguera,C.Picioreanu,B.Rittmann,andM.vanLoosdrecht.
2006.MathematicalModelingofBiofilms.IWApublishing,London.
Wanner,O.,andW.Gujer.1986.AMultispeciesBiofilmModel.BiotechnologyandBioengineering.
28:314328.
WERF.2003.ExecutiveSummary:MethodsforWastewaterCharacterizationinActivatedSludge
Modeling.Alexandria,VA:WERFandIWAPublishing.
Wett,B.,S.Murthy,M.OShaughnessy,J.Sizeore,I.Takcs,W.Bailey,M.Musabyimana,P.Sanjines,D.
Katehis,andG.T.Daigger.2008.DesignConsiderationsforSBRsUsedinDigestionLiquorSidestream
Treatment.PresentedatWEFTEC2008.
C13
August2010

EPA - Nutrient Control Design Manual

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EPA - Nutrient Control Design Manual

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EPA/600/R-10/100 | August 2010 | www.epa.

Nutrient Control Design Manual

Office of Research and Development

13.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................131

13.3.1 Flow .......................................................................................................133

13.3.6 ORP .......................................................................................................136

14.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................141

The manual is supported by three technical appendices containing recommendations on

Percent of Total U.S. Population

1988 1992 1996 2000 2004

Percent Nitrogen Removal

NH4 1.5O2 NO2 2H H2O

NO2 0.5O2 NO3

NH4 2O2 2HCO3 NO3 2CO2 3H2O

400NO NH 195O 2 HCO 4H 2 CO 3

SNH KNH So K o,AOB

SNO KNO So K o,NOB

KNH (1 b AOB SRT)

SRT( max,AOB,DO b AOB ) 1.0

SNH KNH So K o,AOB

SNH KNH S o Ko,AOB

YAOB SNH KNH S o K o,AOB

V(1 b AOB SRT)

SNH KNH S o K o,AOB V(1 b AOB SRT)

NH -N, NO -N, mg/L

Minimal Washout SRT, days

NO3 NO2 NO N2O N2

5CH3COOH 8NO3 4N2 10CO2 6H2O 8OH

1 1.42YH max (S s ) SNO K O,H

b T b20 (1.029(T 20) )

SDNRT SDNR20 (1.07(T20) )

NH4 1.32NO21 0.13H 0.066HCO31

PAOs breakdownPHAs forenergyandto

Percent of values less than of equal to indicated value

Total Nitrogen, mg/L

Total Phosphorus, mg/L

Totalcostofa2weekcompositesamplingcampaignisestimatedtobeabout $20,000(Takacs 2009)

DATA COLLECTION AND RECONCILIATION

Requirements (data, model accuracy, )

(physical, operational, influent, effluent)

Data and process evaluation

Calibration / validation adequate ?

Data sufficient and validated?

Data and process validated?

Simulation and result interpretation

(input specification, sub-model selection)

CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION

SIMULATION AND RESULT

Simulator Distributor Description

Soluble VFA (SA)

ThecostofanSBRbenchscaletestisestimatedtobearound $50,000 (Takacs2009).

Palmer,T.2007.On-Line Nitrogen Monitoring and Control Strategies. Report: 03CTS8.Alexandria,VA:

Phosphate Accumulating Organisms

You might also like