FACULTY OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF INRASTRUCTURE AND

GEOMATICS
LAB TRAFFIC & HIGHWAY ENGINEERING

FULL REPORT
Subject Code

BFC 32501

Code & Experiment Title

AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE

Section

02

Date

19/10/15

Group
Name

8
TUAN MUHAMMAD SYAHID BIN TUAN IBRAHIM

Members of Group

NURUL ATIQAH BINTI NIZAM

MOHD AMIRUL HAKIM BIN MOHD ZAILANI
NURUL FATINA BINTI MD SALI
MOHD HUZAIFAH BIN ZAINUDDIN
MUHAMAD SAUFI BIN AHMAD NASIR

Lecturer/Instructor/Tutor DR. KAMARUDDIN BIN AMBAK

Received Date
Criteria
Attendance
&
Discipline
(A2)

25/10/1
1

Student in laboratory more

than 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within 30

minutes to 1 hour late

Student in laboratory within 10 to Student in laboratory just

30 minutes late
before laboratory start

SCR

VT

Student in laboratory 10 minutes

earlier
1

Aim &
Purpose
(C3)

Purpose is not identified

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is somewhat vague

Relevant variables are not
described

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described in somewhat unclear

Purpose is identified
Relevant variables are
described

Purpose is clearly identified

Relevant variables are described

Materials
(optional)
(P3)

There is not a list of the

necessary lab materials

Most lab materials included

All necessary lab materials

included but not listed in any

All necessary lab materials

included and listed

All necessary lab materials

included and listed in an organized

Procedures are not listed

Procedures are listed but not in Procedures are listed in clear

clear steps
steps but not numbered and/or
in complete sentences

Procedures are listed in clear

steps
Each step is numbered and in
a complete sentence

Procedures are listed in clear

steps
Each step is numbered and in a
complete sentence
Diagrams are included to describe

Data lacks precision

Greater than 20%; difference
with accepted values

Accurate representation of
the data using tables and/or
graphs
Data is fairly precise
Less than 10?% difference with
accepted value
Trends / patterns are logically
analyzed
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is thoughtful

Accurate representation of the a

using tables and/or graphs
Graphs and tables are labeled and
data is precise with less than 5%
difference with accepted values

Tends / patterns are logically

analyzed
Questions are answered
thoroughly and in complete
sentences

Procedure
(P3)
Data is not represented or is
not accurate

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Questions are not answered
Analysis is not relevant

Trends / patterns are not

analyzed
Answers to questions are
incomplete
Analysis is inconsistent

Good representation of the

data using tables and tor
graphs
Less than 15% difference with
accepted values
Precision is acceptable
Trends /patterns are logically
analyzed for the most part
Questions are answered in
complete sentences
Analysis is general

No discussion was included or

shows little effort and
reflection on the lab

A statement of the results is

incomplete with little reflection
on the lab

A statement of the results of

the lab indicates whether
results support the hypothesis

Data (P3)

Analjsis /
Result (C3)

Discussion
(C3)

Participation Student was hostile about

(during
participating
experiment
(A2)

Interview
(C3)

The student cannot answer

questions about the
experiment

Participation was minimal

The student can answer

some questions about the
experiment

NAME OF LECTURER:

Comment by examiner

Accurate statement of the

results of the lab indicates
whether results support the
hypothesis
Possible sources of error
identified
Did the job but did not appear to Used time pretty well. Stayed
be very interested. Focus lost
focused on the experiment
on several occasion
most of the time

Accurate statement of the results of

lab indicates whether results
support hypothesis Possible
sources of error and t was learned
from the lab discussed

The student can answer

questions about the experiment
and begins to make
connections between the
experiment and its applications

The student can explain the results of

the experiment in detail and the ways
in which they relate to the research
focus. The student can also evaluate
the significance of the experiment to
the real situation

SIGNATURE:

The student can explain the

results of the experiment in
detail and the ways in which they
relate to the research focus

DATE:

Showed interest, used time very well,

guide other students and very
focused on experiment

TOTAL SCORE:

Received

TSCR(X)