You are on page 1of 9

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

Economic Crises
The Global Economic Crisis of 2008/2009
During this period the global economy experienced many hits in terms of a
series of events. There was an oil conflict that resulted from political reasons.
It sparked off the destruction of some oil manufacturing plants. This affected
the worldwide economy as most economies are reliant on oil or oil-related
products. There was a fall in consumer confidence after the 9/11 terrorist
attacks on the US that shocked the American economy. Shortly after, there
was the subprime mortgage crisis, which resulted in people defaulting on
their bank loans, which caused the closure of many banks.

The effect of rising oil prices on macroeconomic


goals
Singapore is an importer of oil. As crude oil is an essential resource for
industrial products, transportation, utilities, petrochemicals and plastic
products, higher global oil prices can lead to a number of economic problems
for the Singapore economy. Crude oil is an important input for industrial
production, generation of power and electricity, for petrol and diesel as well
as the manufacture of plastic by-products. Thus demand is price-inelastic.
This includes slowing down growth and causing inflation in the country. The
seriousness of these problems depends on the magnitude of the increase in
oil prices, the cost of import of oil as a proportion of GDP and the ability of
Singaporeans to switch to alternative energy sources. The impact on
Singapores non-oil domestic exports would be indirect but of greater
importance, due to the heavy economic contribution of such exports. Higher
oil prices effectively transfers income from oil-importing countries to oilexporting countries. Consumers in the former group are known to have
significantly higher propensities to consume than those in the latter group.
The effect of higher oil prices would therefore reduce global demand.

Cost-push Inflation
Oil is an important factor input for production. In Singapores case, rising
global oil prices has a significant impact n its economy due to it being an oilrefining centre. The higher cost of oil implies a higher cost of production,
which affects the revenue earned. Higher oil prices also increase overall
costs of production, leading to cost-push inflation in Singapore. This is shown
by the shift of the aggregate supply curve to the left. As a result the general
price level rises. This increase may result in an inflationary spiral to develop,
which further increases prices. An inflationary spiral occurs as the increase in

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

cost of production, due to the rising oil prices, leads to a rise in the price of
goods and services. AS a result, trade unionists demand for higher wages,
driving up costs of production again. This chain effect further drives up the
general price level, leading to a high inflation rate.

Fall in Current Account of Balance of Payment


A rise in the cost of production can erode Singapores export competitiveness
since it is dependent on oil as an input. As demand for Singapores exports is
price-elastic, this results in a more than proportionate fall in export revenue.
The falling export revenue and rising import expenditure on oil imports can
cause a worsening of Singapores balance of payment. Hence this has an
adverse effect on the current account of balance of payment.

Fall in National income


At the same time, higher oil prices can cause the Singapore economy to
suffer from a fall in real national income, hence posing a risk to its growth.
This is because with higher oil prices, the cost of production increases for
firms, leading to lower profit margins. Marginal projects that become
unprofitable result in a fall in employment as firms lay off workers or may
even shut down. Unemployment increases and situation of stagflation (high
unemployment and high inflation) develops. Surging oil prices lead to
increases in prices and unemployment, which may widen income disparity
between low-income earners and high-income earners, and hence reduce
equity. This can cause a widening income disparity between low income
earners and high income learners and hence reduce equity. This can cause a
widening income gap and the standard of living for lower-income groups to
fall faster than that of higher income groups. Hence there may also be a fall
in overall standard of living.

Fall in consumption
Consumption may fall as consumers become more cautious about the
adverse economic outlook, which is likely to increase the chances of
retrenchment and unemployment. Hence consumers may instead increase
precautionary savings.

Fall in investment
Investment falls, as with lower expected profitability from higher oil prices
and firms invest less. Investment also falls as investors avoid making longterm deals in the face of uncertainty in price and cost.

Fall in net exports

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

Exports fall as export competitiveness is affected by an increase in the costs


of production and the resulting inflation. Imports increases as they become
relatively cheaper as compared to domestically produced goods. The
Singapore economy is highly dependent on external demand, which
contributes 80% of its total demand.
Rising oil prices usually leads to a slower world growth and these adversely
affects the income of Singapores export markets. Its exports will thus suffer
as demand falls.
Fall in C + I + G + (X-M) Fall in AD Fall in EG
Thus all these factors lead to a fall in aggregate demand, which will slow
down economic growth in Singapore.

Evaluation
However, the extent of the above economic problems faced by the Singapore
economy depends on the extent of the oil price increase. If this is
substantial, the impact can be great. Since Singapore is an open economy
that is heavily dependent on imported oil, it is likely that with higher oil
prices can have a large impact on the economy. The only consolation is that
with globalisation and the competition from emerging countries such as
China and India, producers are more subdued in wanting to pass on the
higher costs to consumers. Instead, they may mitigate this by being more
efficient in their usage of oil, even switching to alternative energy sources.

Suggested Policies
Fiscal policy (subsidies)
In the face of the above problems of cost-push inflation and a slowdown in
growth, the government can use fiscal policies to overcome them. Fiscal
policy refers to a deliberate attempt by the government to adjust
macroeconomic variables by adjusting government expenditure and revenue
to help lower costs of production. The government can use fiscal spending to
subsidise oil importers on the condition that they do not pass on higher
energy costs to the rest of the economy and consumers. Limitations
This benefits oil consumers in the short run. Moreover, the Singapore
government has the means to subsidise because it has accumulated
substantial fiscal reserves over many years. However, in the long run, the
appropriateness and sustainability of continuing to use taxpayers money to
compensate a few oil-importing firms becomes questionable.

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

Expansionary fiscal policy (increase in government


expenditure)
The government can increase funding into research and development to
reduce the countrys dependence on crude oil as the only energy source and
instead begin to diversify into alternate forms of energy like liquefied natural
gas or green energy like solar and hydro power. The availability of substitutes
raises the price elasticity of oil and reduces imported oil inflation.
Limitation: This is a very long-term measure.

Expansionary fiscal policy (reduction tax rate)


Reduce income tax: The government can reduce the personal income tax
rate to cost consumption. This results in more disposable income as well as
greater incentive to work harder. Hence this may boost domestic
consumption and increase AD, NY, output and employment via the multiplier
effect.
Limitation: This policy may not be very useful given the high marginal
propensity to save in Singapore. This may render the policy ineffective in
stimulating consumption.
Reducing corporate tax: The government can also reduce corporate tax rate
in the hopes of a boost in investment. This results in more post-tax profits for
firms and hence investment increases, causing a rise in AD, NY, output and
employment via the multiplier to cope with demand-deficient unemployment
brought about by slowing AD.
Limitation: This policy may not work as well as the appreciation of the
Singapore dollar as it does not target the root cause of the problem, which is
rising oil prices. Hence this may only be a stop-gap measure to ease with the
economic slowdown but not fully beneficial to reduce the cost of production
associated with the rise in oil prices. Other problems include time lags such
as decision lags and implementation lags. A tax cut takes time for the effect
to be felt.

Increase in government expenditure


The Singapore government conducts expansionary fiscal policy with supplyside effects, which involves a boost in the construction sector bringing
forward of $1.3billion government projects to 2009. They include HDB lift
upgrading, building of park connectors and upgrading of military facilities.
These projects can lead to an increase in government expenditure,

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

increasing AD via the multiplier effect in the short run as well as the increase
in the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) in the long run.
While the fiscal policy does bring about improvement in economic growth
and cyclical unemployment, the nature of the monetary injection could be
restricted to the construction sector. AS the source of crisis comes from the
financial sector, mismatch in skills between the retrenched from financial
sector and construction sector may mean that the problem of cyclical
unemployment may not be resolved.
Limitation: A fiscal policy may not be the most appropriate in managing most
harmful effects of the recent global financial crisis in Singapore. Other
policies must be implemented to work hand-in-hand with it to achieve the
objective of resolving the harmful effects of the recent global financial crisis
in Singapore.

Expansionary monetary policy


An expansionary monetary policy can be used via lower interest rates to
boost consumption and investment. The money supply increases when there
is a decrease in interest rates. This is because the cost of borrowing has
been reduced. This encourages an increase in consumption investment and
hence aggregate demand. This increases national income, output and
employment via the multiplier effect.
Moreover, investment may be interest-inelastic, especially when businesses
are very pessimistic or have idle machinery and excess capacity. Cheap loans
are unlikely to stimulate borrowing.

Exchange-rate Policy
Singapore has always relied on its exchange-rate policy to fight imported
inflation as it has very few monetary tool to work with. Allowing the SGD to
undergo modest and gradual appreciation helps to cushion the impact of
higher energy import prices to some extent. By allowing the SGD to
appreciate gradually, imports become cheaper in terms of the local currency
and this helps to negate the higher prices of oil in terms of US dollar.
However, it can be costly on Singapores foreign reserves if the government
is required to intervene in the foreign exchange market often to buy
Singapore dollars in order to assist the currency to appreciate. Hence it is
important the fundamentals of the Singapore economy are strong so that
market forces can increase the exchange rate without much government
intervention to buy SGD all the time. While a stronger exchange rate seems
to be able to ward off imported inflation, one also has to be mindful of its
adverse effects on exports as a higher exchange rate makes prices of

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

exports more expensive in terms of foreign currency. Although the import


content Singapores exports may be high and overall strengthening of the
SGD could still be beneficial, the MAS has to be cautious not to allow it to
appreciate too much.

Supply-side Policies
Hence, to solve cost-push inflation and the slowdown of the economy due to
higher oil prices, it is more appropriate to use supply-side policies.
Government funding on education and training and greater expenditure on
research and development can increase the productivity of workers.
Government funding on infrastructural development to raise Singapores
long-run productive capacity .This increase in aggregate supply, ceteris
paribus, lowers the cost of production and hence increases Singapores
export competitiveness in the long run. Such policies can directly increase
efficiency and productivity, resulting in a reduction of cost of production and
hence attacking the root cause of inflation. One supply-side policy that has
been used in Singapore is the reduction of costs by reducing the CPF
contribution rates by the employers. Others include reduction in rental and
port charges.
Job Credit Scheme: To sustain jobs for Singaporeans, the government
introduced the Jobs Credit Scheme, which encourages businesses to preserve
jobs in a downturn. This is a temporary scheme to help companies through
an exceptional downturn. Details of the scheme are as follows:
1. Employers receive a 12% cash grant on the first $2500 of each
months wages for each employee on their CPF payroll.
2. The Jobs Credit Scheme lasts for one year, and employers receive the
jobs credit in four payment: March, June, September and December
2009. For each payment, employers receive jobs credits on the
employees in the previous quarter becomes the qualifying wages used
to calculate the 12% cash credit that employers would receive.
3. For the first payment received at the end of March 2009, businesses
would receive jobs credit on the employees that were on their payrolls
in January 2009. The wages paid to these employees in October to
December 2008 were the qualifying wages used to calculate the 12%
cash credit that employers received.
4. Anchoring on the AD/AS framework, this would result in a rightward
shift of the SRAS due to a fall in unit Cop, given the wage subsidy. Jobs
can be preserved as during the downturn and cyclical unemployment
can be resolved. This is an appropriate policy targeted at resolving
cyclical unemployment. Ass compared to one that provides a cash
subsidy of the firm to tide over a difficult time, this specifically

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

encourages preservation of jobs as the subsidy is on the CF payrolls of


the workers. In addition, as explained earlier, this approach is
applicable to sectors beyond the construction sector, such as the
finance and tourism sectors, which are also severely hit by the crisis.
Limitation: However, most supply-side policies tend to yield results only in
the long term. Only those measures that can cut costs quickly are able to
produce results quickly.

Trade Policy
To help the growth of the Singapore economy in the midst of rising oil prices,
the government can also use trade policies. Free trade agreements can help
Singapore negotiate for the removal or reduction in tariffs and other forms of
protectionist measures imposed by other countries and help make
Singapores exports more competitive and better able to penetrate foreign
markets. Removing the obstacles for foreign investment would also help to
encourage more capital inflow into countries. In addition, trade fairs can be
enhanced to increase the size of Singapores export market. However, local
industries must also be ready for foreign competition, as foreign goods and
investment can also flood the local markets and squeeze out inefficient firms.

Conclusion
Combination of policies
In conclusion, fiscal policies by themselves are not the best policies to fight
economic problems that arise in Singapore due to higher oil prices. A
combination of policies is needed to aggress the root cause of such
problems.

Short-run and long-run policies


Rising oil prices are beyond the control the government, but given the
undesirable impact rising global oil prices, the government has to come up
with both short-term and long-term policies to cushion its impact. While
short-term measures may not be viable if oil prices continue to increase in
the near future, long-term policies are more appropriate measures to take to
ensure sustainable price stability and economic growth.

The Eurozone Crisis (2010-2013)


In 2010, Greece faced a severe debt crisis and its government had to pass a
series of strict austerity measures. Such measures included the reduction of
government expenditure as well as an increase in taxes, the aim of which

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

was to reduce the budget deficit. The fall in government expenditure came
from a reduction of the public-sector pay. This caused a severe knock-on
effect, as unemployment rose and caused the crisis to not only affect Greece
but also other European nations. While the short-term goal of the austerity
were meant to improve the economy, it also caused as series of economic
problems for the Eurozone. The increase in corporate tax rates decreases the
after-tax profits of firms and hence investments decreased. An increase in
personal income tax caused a fall in disposable income, leading to a fall in
consumption. A fall in government expenditure, investment and consumption
had the direct impact of causing a fall in aggregate demand, and hence
economic growth, output and employment fell by a multiple due to the
reverse multiplier. With globalisation, the economies around the world had
been integrated through trade, capital flows and international movement of
labour.

Implication on the Singapore economy


The contagion effect hit Singapores economy as well. Due to lower national
income of the Eurozone, their imports decreased, meaning that other
countries exporting to them (such as Singapore) would suffer a fall in export
earnings. This led to a fall in aggregate demand. There was unplanned
investment as firms added unsold goods to their inventories and reduced
output in the next production cycle to restore inventories to their optimal
level. This leads to a fall in the derived demand for factors of production such
as labour. Thus there is a reduction in factor income paid out to households,
causing income-induced consumption to fall, together with a fall in
withdrawals (savings, taxes, imports). This causes a further fall in aggregate
demand. This process, known as the multiplier effect, continued until there
was no more additional contraction in real national income and cyclical
unemployment rose The effect of the Eurozones austerity measures on
investors confidence and its impact on FDI into Asia is significant. As
Singapore is a manufacturing base in the production of foods and services
and the EU is one of its export destination, the contraction in EU economies
reduced the expected returns on investment and reduced FDI inflows, hence
causing a fall in AD and AS.

Conclusion
The extent of fall in export is unlikely to be significant if there is relatively
less exposure to the EU economies. A fall in exports from the EU may be
offset by a rise in exports demanded from other economies. Since Singapore
is a very open economy, the more vulnerable the country is to fall in external
demand, since exports takes up a large percentage of its AD. Even with the
governments deliberate attempt to increase the components in Singapores

MACROECONOMICS IN SINGAPORE

AD by using various macroeconomic policies, it is unlikely to make a huge


difference to offset the fall in exports. This is because the domestic sector in
Singapore is relatively smaller than its external sector. Singapore is more
likely to hand others to go into a recession, whereas the less open economies
in Asia are more resilient.

You might also like