Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1174-1185
P A L E O C U R R E N T A N A L Y S I S OF A L L U V I A L S E D I M E N T S :
A D I S C U S S I O N OF D I R E C T I O N A L V A R I A N C E A N D
VECTOR MAGNITUDEL 2
A N D R E W D. MIALL
Institute of Sedimentary and Petroleum Geology,
3303-33rd St. N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2L 2A7
ABSTRACT: A tabulation of recent work on current indicators in modern rivers shows that
directional variance increases with decreasing structure scale, in fairly close agreement
with the structure hierarchy concept of Allen (1966).
Fluvial currents are vectors, definable by direction and magnitude, but most paleocurrent
studies ignore magnitude. It is proposed that azimuth readings be weighted according to the
cube of current structure thickness, this being a volume measure corresponding to the
distance in all three dimensions over which a local flow vector might reasonably be assumed
to maintain the same direction. It is also a measure of the quantity of sediment moved by
the flow vector.
Examples are presented in which the proposed weighting factor is applied to data from
the fluvial Isachsen Formation (Cretaceous) and deltaic Eureka Sound Formation (Cretaceous-Tertiary) of Banks Island, Arctic Canada. It is shown that the use of the weighting
factor can differentiate flow patterns on the "basis of sedimentary structure size, leading to
interpretations of channel size, sinuosity, and other parameters of sedimentological importance. The weighting factor also provides an important check on calculations of vector
mean.
INTRODUCTION
Many authors have contributed to the extensive literature on this subject. Of especial
value are papers by Allen (1966, 1967, 1968,
1973) and a S E P M publication edited by Middleton (1965). T h e subject is a very complex
1Manuscript received November 28, 1973; revised
April 2, 1974.
Published with the permission of the Director,
Geological Survey of Canada.
PALEOCU1RRENT ANALYSIS
foreset dip measured immediately below. In his
particular study location (Platte River, Nebraska) his data show that only 42.6% of dip
directions are within 10 of local current flow.
However, the divergence is symmetrical, for
his study also shows that the mean foreset dip
azimuth corresponds very closely to mean channel direction. The implications for students of
ancient rocks are clear.
Other authors (Wright, 1959; Selley, 1968,
p. 100) have suggested that a certain type of
large scale crossbedding presumed to be most
typical of point bar deposits in high sinuosity
streams (Moody-Stuart, 1966), is built up in a
direction perpendicular to the primary current
direction, owing to the outward migration of the
point liar on the concave side of a river
meander, This particular type of crossbedding
is typically large in scale and lithologically
heterogenous. It was classified as epsilon crossbedding by Allen (1963, p. 102). Selley (1968,
Fig. 2A) suggested that a study of epsilon crossbedding would show a unimodal current direction with a vector mean 90 from the river
trend. This would possibly be true only if a
single point bar was studied, and only if the
stream were of very high sinuosity. However,
most point bar deposits are more complex than
Selley's illustration would suggest. A study
of randomly chosen erossbeds may show a bimodal pattern with a vector mean close to that
of the river trend.
One of the uncertainties in making highly
sophisticated analyses of bed forms is the assumption that equilibrium exists between flow
conditions and the resulting sedimentary structures. Allen (1973) has summarized the sparse
data that is available on this snbject, and it
showed that a time lag of several days may
exist between a change in flow character and
the complete readjustment of the bed forms.
For paleocurrent analysis this is probably not
important. A preserved bed form is a valid
indicator of current direction, taking into account the type of divergence documented by
Smith (1972), and whether or not the current
changes in direction subsequently could not be
determined from a single structure, although it
may be detected by analysis of vertical variability throughout a sedimentary succession.
Such changes may have an effect on directional
variance but it is arguable whether they would
affect the vector mean.
OF A L L U V I A L
SEDIMENTARY
STRUCTURE
HIERARCHY
1175
TiIE
SEDIMENTS
VARIANCE
STRUCTURE
IN
RELATION
TO
HIERARCHY
t176
el. D. M I A L L
.E
~q
<
<
<
<
.-'k
o-~
".2
"C
"~
cs
~<m
~.~
0 ,~
~~
----
~3
a,. ~
"~
"
--
-a.~'~.~
0
~ ~ ~.y~
'~
'"'~
~ ~
"C--,
-~.~ ~
~u
"o
~ "-~~ =~
~ ~.~
~ . ~~ ~ ~
~
~.~
0
0 0
~d
~,~
,,_ o o
~ ~~ - - " ~ - ~ i
~
~s
~-~
4..-~ ~
~ -.~'~
PALEOCURREiVT
g,
a
<
e,q
>,
I.
ai
gg 2:
<
".~"ga
~g5
N
'M
o
tr;
,aD
AA:ALYS'IS
OF ALLU['IAL
SEDIMEArT,~
1177
A. D. M I A L L
1178
. ::::: :
[.
RANK 2.
R A N K 4.
FIG. 1.--The sedimentary structure hierarchy, showing paleocurrent variability. Concept from Allen
(1966), although rank numbers used are different from Allen's, as discussed in the text, and as listed in
Table 1. Current rose diagrams illustrate directional variability present in the entire area shown for each
rank. This must be added to the variability shown by the larger scale structures to arrive at the total variability for the structures of each rank. The small squares show the areas chosen to illustrate the structures
of the next smaller scale. Structures illustrating rank 6 are bifurcating ripple crests.
tions have been carried out on some of the other
published figures. T h e resulting figures are
given in Table 1.
The data in Table 1 indicate that there can
be considerable variability in directional variance, even within the structures of a single r a n k
of the hierarchy. This may be directly attributed to different sinuosities of the rivers
under study. T h e amount of directional variance is thus a rough guide to sinuosity. O t h e r
sinuosity indicators in the form of vertical
stratigraphie sequence and sedimentary structure assemblage are discussed by M o o d y - S t u a r t
(1966), Allen (1970) and F r i e n d and MoodyStuart (1972, p. 39).
Figure 2 shows that variance increases
moving from high to low rank structures, the
increase being especially marked between ranks
2 and 3 and between 4 and 5. However, the
evidence available suggests that there is little
difference between the reliability of rank 5 and
rank 6 structures as paleocurrent indicators.
This was one of the main conclusions of B a r r e t t
t)ALEOCURRENT
A A : A L Y S I 5 " OF A L L U U I A L
I0000
800C
6000
4000
2000
2
3
4
5
sedimentary structure rank
SEDIMENTS
1179
PROBLEM
OF VECTOR WEIGHT
118()
A. I). M I A L L
USE
OF A \ V E I G I t T I N G
FACTOR:
gOME EXAMPLES
Method
The most commonly used method of processing orientation data is that based on the
circular normal distribution as is described by
Curray (1956) and Krumbein and Graybill
(1965, p. 128-131).
Mean azimuth 0 is given by the following
formula,
tan 0 = 2~n sirt 0
Xn cos O'
where 0 represents the azimuth observations,
from 0 to 360 . The quantity n is defined by
Curray (1956, p. 119) as the "observation vector
magnitude or, in the case of grouped data of
unit vectors, it is the number of observations
in each group." Ii1 this paper ungrouped data
are used, and 11 is used as a weighting factor
to control for vector magnitude, in this case
the cube of cross-set thickness.
Curray's equations are used to calculate L,
the magnitude of the resultant vector and p, the
Rayleigh significance test.
5"oarce of data
The examples used herein are derived from
the author's study of the Isachsen Formation
(Neocomian to A p t i a n ) and the Eureka Sound
118t
L
.~',4"N
I)31
J~/
0I
Thomsen River
, miss,
KIm
'5
2'0
No.
alpha
No.
epsilon
No.
theta
Total
obs.
26
24
31
29
30
2
0
2
1
13
23
18
20
29
57
1
0
3
0
3
28
18
25
30
73
~u
Lit
34
15
40
12
2
92.7
94.6
80.3
83.3
81.5
Pu
<10 -~
.Q10-'
<10-"
K10 -D
.(10 -~
~,~-
Lw
Pw
63
18
32
21
351
93.4
96.3
<10 -~
<10 -~
<10 "
<10 ~
~10 -~
77.5
71.6
89.9
0,,.-0a Lw-L~
A9
A3
C8
A9
Cll*
0.7
1.7
- 2.8
-11.7
8.4
d.D.
1182
'
'
'
MIALL
' 5'0%
A . unweighted
A. unweighted data
data
n: 73
n - 30
L = 81"5
p : ~ I 0 -21
p=<lO-9
B. weighted
data
n='T3
t~ = 351
L = 89,9
p =<10 -25
FiG. 4. Current rose diagrams for rank 5 sedimentary structures fluvial deposits (Isachsen Fm.)
at Ioc. 29. These diagrams and those in Figures 5
to 7 are drawn with segment radius proportional to
square root of percent number of readings, so that
percent is directly proportional to segment area.
North is to the top, as in Figures 5 to 7.
FIG. 5.--Current rose diagrams for rank 5 sedimentary structures, fluvial deposits (Isachsen Fro.)
at loe. 30.
o
I
50%
1
I)HLE()CURRENT
,qXHLYSIS"
OF ALLUVIAL
1183
SEDIMENTS
Loc,
Sed.
struct.
19
0
19
~
19
0, K
20
a, ~
20
O, Tr
20
K
20
~, ~, O, K, ~r
21
0
21
K
21
0, K
19, 20, 21 or, ~, 0, ~r
19, 20, 21
K
19, 20, 21 ~,e, 0, K,,r
Rank
5
6
5,6
5
5
6
5,6
5
6
5, 6
5
6
5,6
No.
}.
L.
P~
?~
L~
P~
10
10
20
3
8
9
20
15
5
20
36
24
60
327
336
331
338
273
195
267
325
319
323
315
317
316
87,9
91.4
89.4
95.6
96.4
41.5
48.8
94.7
98.3
95.5
85.9
48.4
70.9
<10 -~
<10-'
<10-"
0.06
<10 -*
0.21
<10 ~
<10 -s
<I0 -~
<10 s
<10 n
<10 ~
<10 -x3
324
341
324
345
269
006
317
330
319
330
323
342
323
96.8
96.8
96.8
99.9
98.0
71.7
79.4
97.6
98.1
97.6
86.3
94.1
86.3
<10-"
<10-'
<10 -*
0.04
<10 ~
<10 -2
<10 -~
<10 -
<10 2
<10"
<10 -n
<10 -~
<10 -a9
obs.
8.9
5.4
7.4
4.3
1.6
30.2
30.6
2.9
-0.2
2.1
0.4
45.7
15.4
C4
C13
C8
C15
A50
A128
A56
C2
A4
0
A8
A6
A7
C1
C18
C1
C22
A54
C43
A6
C7
A4
C7
0
C19
0
Symbols as in Table ,,
"~ greek letters in column 2 refer to sedimentary structure types of Allen (1963).
sized subsamples and calculating mean and
variance for each using weighted and unweighted data. The differences between the
subsamples were smaller than the differences
tabulated for loc. 30 in Table 2, and were not
significant at the 95% confidence level.
The fact that one of the five fhtvial data sets
gives a significantly different vector mean using
the weighting method, indicates that even in a
braided stream environment, where variance is
relatively low, the weighting method may provide an important check on the validity of vector
mean calculations. The weighting method may
be equally important in providing additional information relating to the overall distribution of
current directions, as the preceding paragraphs
have attempted to show.
Very similar results are shown by data from
deltaic deposits of the Eureka Sound Formation (Table 3). For each of the three localities,
rank 5 and 6 structures have been considered
separately, and then combined, and a similar
treatment has been carried out on the data from
all three locations grouped together. The last
two columns of Table 3 list the deviations from
the grand vector mean of 32,3 shown by mean
azimuths derived from various portions of the
data. The grand vector mean of 323 was calculated from all combined and weighted rank 5
data, and is regarded as the best estimate of
regional paleoslope orientation.
It will be observed that when using weighted
data, the addition of rank 6 structure information to that of rank 5 creates no change in mean
azimuth and vector strength. The weighting
process reduces rank 6 data to insignificant
proportions, and this emphasizes the point made
earlier that structures of more than one rank
of the sediment hierarchy should not he analyzed together.
Variance of the combined unweighted outcrop data compares closely to that of the data
derived from modern rivers which are quoted
in Table 1 (and which are also unweighted).
Thus rank 5 data have a variance of 1020 and
rank 6 data 4900. These values were derived
from the figures for vector strength, using the
graph supplied by Curray (1956). A stream of
moderately low sinuosity is indicated.
0'
'
'
'
' 55"0%
A, unweighted dora
n : 36
: 3t5
L=85"9
p = < I0-11
B, weighted data
n=36
1~= 3 2 3
L = 86.3
p - < 1 0 -It
Fie.
6.--Current rose diagrams for rank 5 sedimentary structures, deltaic deposits (Eureka Sound
Fro.) locs. 19, 20, 21.
1184
J. 1-. . l t R A K O f [ C H
A . H, C O O G A N
cant differences between vector means calculated using weighted and unweighted data
(using t-test statistic at 95% confidence level).
In both cases the weighted data gives a mean
much closer to the best estimate of 323 .
50%
A , unweighted
AND
data
n= 24
= 317
L = Zl8.4
19 = < ] 0 -2
B. weighted data
n = 24
= 342
L = 94.1
p =<10 -9
CONCLUDING REMARKS
A valuable exercise that the author would
like to propose, would be to gather weighted
paleocurrent data in a modern fluvial system,
where "true" current directions are known.
This would provide a useful test of some of the
ideas presented herein. A considerable amount
of testing in ancient deposits is also considered
to be necessary, for the examples given here are
regarded not so much as a proof of the
weighting method but as illustrations of its
potential.
This paper has been primarily concerned with
the smaller scale structures that are preserved
in alluvial rocks. The weighting method proposed could be applied to crossbedding of all
types, ripples, parting lineation, certain types
of sole structure, etc., but not to pebble imbrication, in which structure thickness, and thus
current size, are hard to assess.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Fie;. 7.--Current rose diagrams for rank 6 sedimentary structures, deltaic deposits (Eureka Sound
Fm.) locs. 19, 20, 31.
Figures 6 and 7 were constructed from the
rank 5 and 6 data, respectively, using combined
data from all three localities and as was seen
to be the case with the previous example the
process of weighting has a strong effect on
the modality of the sample. The secondary mode
in the rank 5 data between 260 and 280 is
made up primarily of large scale solitary and
grouped trough cross-sets (theta and pi crossstratification types of Allen, 1963) at loc. 20.
The reasons for the preferred directions of these
particular structures are not clear and need
further study.
Rank 6 data are all derived from climbing
ripples of kappa type, in the classification of
Allen (1963). T h e southerly directed mode
shown in Fig. 7 is reduced to an insignificant
feature by the process of weighting. The reason
is simply the smaller size of the ripples causing
this mode, suggesting that they were produced
by a low energy back-water eddy.
Two of the data sets in Table 3 show signifi-
I'A L t S O C U R R E N T
AA'ALY.S'IS
OF ALLUI'IAL
SEDIMENTS
1185
MECm.:L, L. D., 1967, Tabular and trough cross-bedding: comparison of dip azimuth variability:
Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 37, p. 80-86.
MiaLL, A. D., 1974, Bedrock geology of Banks
Island, District of Franklin, Northwest Territories: Geol. Surv. Canada Paper 74-1A, p.
336-342.
MIDDLETON, G. V., ed., 1965, Primary sedimentary
structures and flmir hydrodynamic interpretation: Soc. Econ. Paleontologists Mineralogists
Spec. Publ. No. 12, 265 p.
MOODY-STt',~R'r, M., 1966, High and low sinuosity
stream deposits, with examples from the Devonian of Spitzbergen: Jour. Sod. Petrology,
v. 36, p. 1102-1117.
OLSON, J. S., AND P. E. POTTER, 1954, Variance
components of cross-bedding direction in some
basal Pennsylvanian sandstones of the eastern
Interior Basin: statistical methods: Jour. Geology, v. 62, p. 26--49.
PETTIJOHN, F. J., 1962, Paleocurrents and paleogeography: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists,
v. 46, p. 1468 1493.
P~CAUD, M. D., AND L. R. Hmu, JR., 1973, Sedimentary structures of ephemeral streams: l)evelopments in Sedimentology, No. 17, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 223 p.
POSTER, P. E., kill) J. S. OLSON, 1954, Variance
components of crossbedding directions in ~ome
basal Pennsylvanian sandstones of the eastern
Interior Basin: Geological application : Jour.
Geology, v. 62, p. 50-73.
--,
AND F. J. PETTIJOHN, 1963, Paleocurrents
and basin analysis, Academic Press Inc., New
York, 296 p.
--,
.SNl~ R. SIEVES, 1956, Sources of basal Pennsylvanian sediments in tim eastern Interior
Basin, 1: erossbedding, Jour. Geology, v. 64, p.
225-244.
Rt:sL B. R , 1972, Structure and process in a
braided river: Sedimentology, v. 18, p. 221-245.
SELLEr, R. C., 1968, A classification of paleocurrent
models: Jour. Geology, v. 76, p. 99-110.
SS~ITH, N. D., 1971, Transverse bars and braiding
in the lower Platte River, Nebraska: Geol. Soe.
America Bull., v. 82, p. 3407-3420.
, 1972, Some sedimentological aspects of planar
cross stratification in a sandy braided river:
Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 42, p. 624--634.
, 1974, Some sedimentological aspects of
planar cross-stratification in a sandy braided
river: A reply to N. L. Banks and J. D. Collinson: Jour. Sod. Petrology, v. 44, p. 267-269.
THORSrEINSSOX, R., AND E. T. T0ZER, 1972, Banks,
Victoria and Stefansson Islands, Arctic Archlpelago: Geol. Survey Canada Mere. 330.
\\7ILLIAMS, G. E,, 1.971, Flood deposits o:E the sandbed ephemeral streams of central Australia:
Sedimentology, v. 17, p. 1----40.
\VILLIaMS, P. F., ANn B. R. RUST, 1969, The sedimentology of a braided river: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 39, p. 649-679.
\VRmH'r, M. D., 1959, The formation of crossbedding
by a meandering or braided stream: Jour. Sed.
PetroIogy, v. 29, p. 610~615.
YEAKEL, L. S., JR., 1962, Tuscarora, Juniata and
Bald Eagle Paleocurrents and Paleogeography
in the Central Appalachians: Geol. Soe. America Bull., v. 73, p. 1515-1540.