You are on page 1of 1

Case 3:15-cv-03522-WHO Document 201 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION,

Case No. 15-cv-03522-WHO

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER RE TRO MATERIALS AND


MOTION TO QUASH

9
10

United States District Court


Northern District of California

11

CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS, et


al.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 193, 195, 197

Defendants.

12

Having reviewed defendants submission regarding Daleidins opposition to NAFs

13

request that Daleidin turn over all materials covered by the TRO to outside counsel for CMP (Dkt.

14

No. 195); I agree that such an order is premature absent evidence indicating that Daleidin may

15

have violated the TRO.

16

With respect to the Johnson Deposition, defendants have not raised any objection to the

17

deposition going forward. The only ground raised by Johnson in his motion seeking to quash the

18

deposition subpoena is that the subpoena violated the Federal Rules by providing him insufficient

19

time to raise objections. Dkt. No. 193. Having considered Johnsons objection and NAFs

20

response thereto and in light of my ongoing concern over potential violations of the TRO I

21

find this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b)

22

and vacate the December 9, 2015 hearing. I DENY Johnsons motion to quash, but in order to

23
24
25
26
27
28

provide Johnson more time to gather documents requested by the subpoena, ORDER that the
deposition shall take place the week of November 16th.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 4, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

You might also like