Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 (54) - 2012
Series 1: Special Issue No. 1
T. ONE1
I. POP1
282
283
Fig. 2. Bond stress versus concrete strength for different slip values and casting directions [5]
The bars positioned at the bottom of the
formwork and vertical bars loaded in
opposite direction of the casting direction
have higher bond strengths.
For vertical reinforcing bars parallel to
the casting direction, the combined effect
of bleeding in and settlement of the fresh
concrete leads to void formation
underneath the ribs of the bar and the bond
behaviour of the rebar is affected by the
direction in which it is loaded during the
experiments [6].
4. Top-bar effect
Top-cast bars have lower bond strengths
than bars cast lower in a member. This
behaviour is recognized in ACI318 [7] and
EC2 [8]. Top reinforcement, horizontal
reinforcement with more than 300 mm in
ACI318 and 250 mm in EC2 of fresh
concrete cast in the member below the
development length or splice, requires a
30% increase in development length. Most
research, however, indicates that while an
increased depth of concrete below a bar
reduces bond strength, the effect of
shallow top cover is of greater
significance. The impact of shallow top
cover on the top-cast bar effect is
emphasized by the fact that the strength
284
Fig. 3. Variation of bond strength in wall slab and column elements [9]
More extreme behaviour was obtained
from tests on round bars in 2 m high
columns, as can be seen in Figure 3. Each
data point is the average from bars at three
closely spaced levels. Columns with three
NVC and two SCC mixes with varying
strength
levels
were
tested,
and
considerable reductions in bond strength (of
up to 80%) were obtained with the two
lower strength NVC mixes. The two SCC
mixes and the highest strength NVC mix
showed broadly similar behaviour, with
reductions in bond strength similar to that
recommended in EC2 [8].
In Figures 4 and 5 are presented results
from a recent study made by Chan et al.
[10] dealing with pull-out tests. They have
reported that, as compared to NVC, SCC
exhibits higher bond to reinforcing bars and
lower reduction in bond strength due to topbar effect at all ages.
Khayat [11] studied the bond strength of
SCC with special focus on the effect of
VMA to reduce the top-bar effect of
285
286
5.
6.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the project
"Improvement of the doctoral studies
quality in engineering science for
development of the knowledge based
society-QDOC contract no.
POSDRU/107/1.5/S/78534, project cofunded by the European Social Fund
through the Sectorial Operational Program
Human Resources 2007-2013.
References
1. Poppe, A.-M., De Schutter, G.,
Audenaert, K., Boel, V.: Kennismaking
met
zelfverdichtend
beton
(1)
Samenstelling
en
reologie.
(Introducing self-compacting concrete
(1) Composition and rheology)
.Bouwkroniek 2002, 30-34.
2. EFNARC. The European Guidelines for
Self-Compacting
Concrete:
Specification, Production and Use;
ERMCO, 2005; p 68.
3. Fernando Menezes de Almeida et al.:
Bond-slip behaviour of selfcompacting concrete and vibrated
concrete using pull-out and beam tests.
In: Material and Structures (2008) 41:
1073- 1089.
4. Pieter Desnerck, Geert De Schutter et
7.
8.
9.