Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 2349-7750
ISSN: 2349-7750
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Available online at: http://www.iajps.com
Research Article
Corresponding Author:
Dr. H. Padmalatha
Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis & Quality Assurance,
Gyana Jyothi College of Pharmacy,
Uppal Depot, Ghatkesar (M), Hyderabad,
Rangareddy Distict, Telangana-500039.
QR code
Please cite this article in press as Divya and Padmalaha, Development and Validation of High Performance
Liquid Chromatography Method for the Determination of Darifenacin Hydrobromide, Indo Am. J. Pharm. Sci,
2015;2(11).
www.iajps.com
Page 1525
INTRODUCTION
Darifenacin
hydrobromide
is
the
Urinary
antispasmodic category. Used for the treatment of
overactive bladder with symptoms of urge urinary
incontinence, urgency and frequency. Darifenacin
selectively antagonizes the muscarinic M3 receptor.
M3 receptors are involved in contraction of human
bladder and gastrointestinal smooth muscle, saliva
production, and iris sphincter function. Chemically it
is
2-[(3S)-1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran5yl)ethyl]pyrrolidin-3-yl]-2,2-diphenylacetamide
hydrobromide [1-3].
Literature survey revealed that some analytical
methods like LC-MS and HPTLC have been reported
for the estimation of Darifenacin hydrobromide. The
present work reports simple, sensitive, accurate
precise and economical method for determination of
Darifenacin hydrobromide by HPLC method in the
pure form and its tablet formulation. The method was
validated by parameters such as linearity, precision,
accuracy, LOD&LOQ, robustness, stability and
system suitability as per ICH guidelines and USP
requirements.Suitable statistical tests were performed
on validation data [4,5]. The structure of Darifenacin
hydrobromide is given in figure 1.
ISSN 2349-7750
www.iajps.com
Page 1526
Robustness:
The percent recovery of Darifenacin hydrobromide was
good under most conditions and didnt show any
significant change when the critical parameters were
modified. The tailing factor for Darifenacin
hydrobromide was always less than 2.0 and the
components were well separated under all the changes
carried out. Considering the modifications in the
system suitability parameters and the specificity of the
method, as well as carrying the experiment at room
temperature may conclude that the method conditions
were robust.
40
ISSN 2349-7750
Detector A - 1 (285nm)
PUSP
12 apr dari 1053
40
Retention Time
20 Volts
Volts 20
3.108
0
0
0
10
Minutes
Detector A - 1 (285nm)
PUSP
13 apr dari 1072
40
40
20
0
0
Volts
20
3.125
Volts
Retention Time
0
3
10
Minutes
www.iajps.com
Page 1527
ISSN 2349-7750
Method Validation:
System Suitability:
This test was carried out to find the reproducibility of
the system for the analysis. The total results of the
system suitability studies summarized in Table 1
Table1: System Suitability Parameters
Parameter
Obtained Values
2135
Resolution
2.21
Asymmetry
1.15
Linearity
The linearity studies were determined at different
concentration ranging from 0 to 300g/ml for
Darifenacin hydrobromide. The regression coefficient
was 0.999 showing good linearity. This shows the
linearity of calibration curve.
% Recovery of
pure drug
Statistical
analysis
Mean= 99.96
S.D=0.0862
%RSD=0.0862
Mean=100.79
S.D= 0.6683
%RSD=0.6631
Mean=100.82
S.D=0.8818
%RSD= 0.0862
Pure drug
Formulation
80 %
10
99.92
100 %
10
10
100.26
120 %
12
10
101.67
www.iajps.com
Page 1528
Precision
System Precision
System precision was determined by injecting sample
solution
of
concentration
of
Darifenacin
hydrobromide for nine times. The chromatograms
were recorded for Darifenacin hydribromide and
ISSN 2349-7750
Peak area
Statistical analysis
Retention
time
Statistical
Analysis
10
51167
Mean=50703
3.096
Mean=3.103
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
10
10
20
20
20
50
50
50
50139
50803
95432
96379
97108
245399
246767
244993
SD=521.2447
%RSD=1.028
Mean=96306
SD=840.35
%RSD=0.872
Mean=245719
SD=929.45
%RSD=0.378
3.089
3.125
3.092
3.103
3.111
3.100
3.125
3.099
SD=0.0190
%RSD=0.6123
Mean=3.102
SD=0.0095
%RSD=0.3062
Mean=3.108
SD=0.0147
%RSD=0.4729
Day
Table4:Inter-day Precision
Day
Concentration
(in g/ml)
Peak area
Statistical analysis
Retention
time
Statistical
Analysis
10
51167
Mean=50703
3.096
Mean=3.103
10
50139
SD= 521.2447
3.089
SD=0.0190
10
50803
%RSD=1.028
3.125
%RSD=0.6123
20
95432
Mean=96306
3.092
Mean=3.102
20
96379
SD=840.35
3.103
SD=0.0095
20
97108
%RSD=0.872
3.111
%RSD=0.3062
50
245399
Mean=245719
3.100
Mean=3.108
50
246767
SD=929.45
3.125
SD=0.0147
50
244993
%RSD=0.378
3.099
%RSD=0.4729
www.iajps.com
Page 1529
Robustness
In the robustness, the changes in the flow rate and
mobile phase composition were made to evaluate
impact on the method and retention times were
significantly changed.
ISSN 2349-7750
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are thankful to Gyana Jyothi College Of
Pharmacy, Hyderabad for their valuable guidance,
innovate advice, technical and moral support given to
me throughout the entire course to carry out this
project work.
Conditions
Mobile phase
Composition
65:35
70:30
75:25
0.8
1
1.2
283
285
287
Flow rate
(ml/min)
UV detection
(nm)
Peak
area
458599
469065
470096
460025
469065
459583
453649
469065
463252
Retention
time
3.001
3.108
3.236
3.496
3.108
2.896
3.114
3.108
3.321
www.iajps.com
REFERENCES
1.Barry Kaye, William J. Herron, Paul V. Macrae,
Sylvia Robinson, David A. Stopher, Richard F.
Venn, and William Wild Rapid; Solid Phase
Extraction Technique for the High-Through put
Assay of Darifenacin in Human Plasma. Anal.
Chem., 1996; 68 (9):16581660.
2. H. Beckett and J.B. Stenlake, Practical
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vol.2, CBS Publishers
and Distributors.
3. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Validation
Of Analytical Procedures: Text And Methodology,
Q2(R1) , Current Step 4 version, Parent Guideline
dated 27 October 1994, (Complementary Guideline
on Methodology dated 6 November 1996
incorporated in November 2005)
4.L. Stevens, C.R. Chapple, P. Tophill, R.C.
Williams, J. Urol., 2004, 171(4), 143 [A535]. [6] L.
Stevens, R.C. Williams, C.R. Chapple, J. Urol.,
2004, 171(4), 143 [A527]. [7] ICH Harmonized
triplicate guidelines on validation of analytical
procedures: Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), 2005.
5.MurthyM.Vishnu,
Raghavacharyulu.S.V,
Krishnaiah Ch., KatkamSrinivas ,K.Mukkanti
N.Ramesh Kumar ; A Stereo selective, Stability
Indicating Validated LC-Assay Method For The
Separation And Quantification Of Darifenacin And
Its
Enantiomer. Analytical
Research
and
Development, Integrated product development
operations,2009; 8( 1): 26-30.
6.Praveen P Say, Shaiba,M, Swetha A, Jyothi A
Aruna , Nishat Amreen; Spectrophotometric
methods for
the determination of darifenacin.
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and
Chemical Sciences,2010; 1(4): 35.
7.Radhakrishnanand P., and V. Himabindu ; A
Validated LC Method for Determination of the
Enantiomeric Purity of Darifenacin in Bulk Drug
and Extended Release Tablets. Chromatographia
Volume 68, Numbers 11-12, 1059-1062, DOI:
10.1365/s10337.
Page 1530