Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bangladesh
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Electrical & Electronic
Engineering
Title of Project
Goals and Potential Benefits of the
Project
Model/Experimental Design (Block
diagram)
Experimental/Simulation Results so
far
Project Timeline (Gantt Chart)
References
1 Page
1 Page
1 Page
*Exact title can be provided later in the Thesis book and Final Defense.
FOR FACULTY USE ONLY
COMMENTS BY SUPERVISOR:
Faculty of Engineering, American International University Bangladesh
SUPERVISORS NAME
DATE
SUPERVISORS SIGNATURE
Thesis Title: Implementation of the features of the ZigBee Protocol and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC
Specification and performance evaluation of different ZigBee topologies.
Goals and Potential benefits of the Thesis:
This primary goal of this thesis is to demonstrate some of the implemented features of the
ZigBee protocol and IEEE 802.15.4 MAC specification, using OPNET's ZigBee model suite,
like:
1. Mesh routing vs. tree routing,
2. Roaming between Personal Area Network (PANs) &
3. Failure and Recovery procedures.
Then the performance of the three topologies (Star, Tree and Mesh topology) will be analyzed.
Recently, ZigBee technology has been widely adopted to develop wireless sensor network
applications [1] by forming a wireless mesh network with low rate, low power consumption, and
secure networking. In ZigBee protocol stack, the physical layer and the MAC layer protocols
have been defined by IEEE802.15.4 standard [2]. Its network layer built upon both lower layers
should be designed to enable a mesh networking, support node joining or leaving, assign
network addresses to devices, and perform routing. ZigBee Alliance is working at providing a
standardized base set of solutions for sensor networks [3].
Wireless sensor networks generally comprise a large number of sensor nodes deployed in an
area of interest to collect physical or environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity,
pressure, etc. In wireless sensor networks, performance evaluation is critical to test the
Simulation Scenario:
The two scenarios contain identical networks. The same network tree structure forms in each
case. The majority of the nodes have been configured with Random traffic, however Router 1
has been explicitly configured to send traffic to Router 3.
The PAN in the Tree Routing scenario (Figure 1) has been configured as a Default Tree
Network. Application traffic will be routed to the destination along the parent-child links of the
network tree.
The PAN in the Mesh Routing scenario (Figure 2) has been configured as a Default Mesh
Network. After mesh routes have been established (a few seconds after network formation),
application traffic will be routed by the shortest route possible, using any router or coordinator
in the simulation as a relay. End devices do not participate in mesh routing, therefore they
must still route traffic through their parent node.
Results:
1) Number of Hops for Router 1:
Faculty of Engineering, American International University Bangladesh
Figure 3 indicates the number of hops network traffic originating in Router 1 takes to reach
its destination. The red line is for Tree Routing while the blue is for Mesh Routing. Note
that both lines begin at two hops, but the Mesh Routing line quickly changes to one hop for
the remainder of the simulation.
References:
[1] ZigBee Alliance (2005) Zigbee specification V1.0. Available: http://www.ZigBee.org
[2] IEEE Standards Association (2011) IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks
Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs).
Available: http://standards.ieee.org/ about/get/802/802.15.html
[3] IEEE Standards Association (2011) IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks
Part 15.4: Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs).
Available: http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.15.html
GROUP MEMBERS
(Maximum FOUR students are permitted to carry out a single Project/Thesis. However, depending
on the capability of the students, less number of students may be allowed)
NAME:
NAME:
ID
ID
PROGRAM: EEE/COE
PROGRAM: EEE/COE
ADDRESS:
ADDRESS:
EMAIL:
EMAIL:
CELL/TELEPHONE NO:
CELL/TELEPHONE NO:
SIGNATURE:_____________________
SIGNATURE:_____________________
NAME:
NAME:
ID
ID
PROGRAM: EEE/COE
PROGRAM: EEE/COE
ADDRESS:
ADDRESS:
EMAIL:
EMAIL:
CELL/TELEPHONE NO:
CELL/TELEPHONE NO:
SIGNATURE:_____________________
SIGNATURE:_____________________