Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25 5
2006 5
Vol.25 No.5
May2006
100084)
1250
6.08.0
O 241
10006915(2006)05090105
AbstractThe elastoplastic numerical and experimental results of Laxiwa arch dam-foundation system are
presented by employing a finite element method simulation(TFINE code) and a geomechanical model experiment
with scale 1250. The failure mode of the arch dam-foundation during overloading process is given with the
above two methods. By analyzing and comparing the numerical and experimental datait is indicated that the
results of numerical simulation agree well with experimental resultsand the stability of Laxiwa arch dam satisfies
the general requests of arch dam design.
Key wordsnumerical analysisLaxiwa arch damfinite element methodgeomechanical model experiment
stability analysis
F73F166 F172F164
F164
NNW NNE NNW
250.0 m
0.10.5 m 1.01.6 m
2 460.0 m 2 452.0 m
2 4602 400 m II
2 296.0 m
F29L145
Hf3Hf7
[1]
F28F29L145 Hf8
TFINE
Hf10 F222F164F71
[2]
2004111220050125
(973)(2002CB412708)
(1978)2000
E-mailhys00@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
902
2006
S ij S ij = ij ij kk
3
k
c
2.2
2.1
(1)
2002 7
(2)
(3)
(4) 2 260 m
1.0
(5)
400 m 2 860 m
(6)
1 960 m ( 900 m)
/GPa
2.03.04.08.0
c/MPa
/(kNm )
3
20.0
1.00
4.00
0.167
24.0
18.0
0.90
1.70
0.250
26.0
23.0
1.00
2.50
0.250
26.8
F172
2.1
0.40
0.07
0.350
22.0
F28
0.4
0.40
0.07
0.350
22.0
F29
0.7
0.35
0.05
0.350
22.0
L145
7.5
0.50
0.30
0.350
22.0
F164
1.2
0.45
0.07
0.350
22.0
F166
1.2
0.45
0.07
0.350
22.0
10 F71
1.3
0.50
0.11
0.350
22.0
11 F222
3.8
0.45
0.09
0.350
22.0
12 Hf4
0.7
0.35
0.05
0.350
22.0
13 Hf8
0.6
0.40
0.07
0.350
22.0
3.1
1.0
(1)
C =
p
= 1.0
m
(2)
(2)
C =
16 408 9 284
1 056
p
= 1.0
m
(3)
f
C f = p = 1.0
fm
(3)
(4)
743
pm
TFINE
[3]
D-P
f = I1 + J 2 k 0
(1)
I1 ij J 2
(1)
25
C =
p
= 1 .0
m
903
(5)
(2002 7 )
(2)
Cl =
lp
(6)
lm
(3)
C = p = C Cl
m
(7)
(4)
E
C E = p = C
Em
Em =
Ep
C
Ep
(8)
C Cl
20 m
3.3
1 250
121 207
Cc = 250C = 1.0 C =
250 C E = 250
3.2
Hf7
1
Fig.1
904
2006
() 7
35
(Y ) 2
10
2(a)1Y5Y
12.0
10.0
(Y ) 2 2
4.1
8.0
1Y
6.0
2Y
3Y
4.0
4Y
2.0
5Y
0.0
0
500
1 000
3 3
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
2 460
2 260
3.0
2.0
200
400
2 340
600
800
1 000
/mm
mm
(b)
/m
2 420
2 210
1.0
(Y )
/m
3 000
8.0
(X )
2 500
9.0
1 500
2 000
/mm
(a)
2
Fig.2
(Y )
Relation curves between Y-displacement and water
2 460
10.80
2.9
80.64
81.2
10.2
5.2
2 420
6.99
5.9
64.40
77.3
8.9
7.8
2 340
NA
10.9
45.21
66.2
8.2
13.7
2 260
NA
15.4
12.80
38.5
NA
16.4
2 240
4.10
14.3
27.8
4.3
15.6
4.05.0
2 210
11.4
5.57
12.2
12.9
3
Table 3
3
mm
/m
2 460
(1.0)
(2.0)
2 420
(5.0)
(4.0)
2 340
(5.1)
(4.8)
2 260
(3.6)
2 240
(2.8)
2 210
(6.0)
(1.8)
8.0
(X )
ballast(crown cantilever)
3 5.0
7.08.0
4.3
4
4.4
80.64 mm 10.8 mm Z
4.2
6.0P0 6.0P0
25
4
Table 4
905
(a) 3.0P0
(b) 5.0P0
(c) 7.0P0
1.0P0()
2.0P0(
)
2 280 m
3.0P0(
)
2 320 m
3.0P0
4.0P0()
2 210 m
4.0P0
2 320 m
5.0P0()
6.0P0()
2 360 m
2 320 m
(7.0 8.0)P0( 2 280 m 2 280 m
150 m
90 m
(d) 8.0P0
3
Fig.3
2.0 3.0
6.08.0
2.0P0 F172
(References)
[1]
. [M]. 2003.(Wang
35 mm 810 m
2.0P0
Press2003.(in Chinese))
3.0P0(3.54.0)P0
[2]
. (TFINE
(7.08.0)P0
)[R]. 1988.
( 8.0P0)
5090 m
University1988.(in Chinese))
[3]
. [M]. 1990.(Zhou
90150 m