Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263189190
READS
843
5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Jean Hernandez
Felix Santiago
1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS
6 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Angel Piero
University of Puerto Rico at Mayagez
4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
MODELAJE Y DISEO
HIDRULICO USANDO HEC-RAS
Contents
Introduccin .................................................................................................................................................. 5
Alcance del Proyecto..................................................................................................................................... 5
Parte I: Quebrada sin Puente ........................................................................................................................ 6
1.
Resumen ........................................................................................................................................... 6
2.
Antecedentes .................................................................................................................................... 6
3.
Discusin ......................................................................................................................................... 12
4.
Conclusin ....................................................................................................................................... 15
Resumen: ........................................................................................................................................ 16
2.
Antecedentes: ................................................................................................................................. 16
Puente ............................................................................................................................................. 16
3.
Puente ............................................................................................................................................. 24
4.
Conclusin ....................................................................................................................................... 33
Resumen ......................................................................................................................................... 34
2.
Antecedentes .................................................................................................................................. 34
3.
Discusin ......................................................................................................................................... 34
4.
Conclusin ....................................................................................................................................... 43
Lista de Figuras
FIGURA 1: VISTA DE PLANTA DEL REA DEL PROYECTO
FIGURA 2: SECCIN TRANSVERSAL TOMADA EN EL TRAMO ESTUDIADO DE LA QUEBRADA DE ORO
Modelaje y Diseo Hidrulico Usando HEC-RAS
INCI 5006 Hidrulica Aplicada
Lista de Tablas
TABLA 1: DISTANCIA ENTRE SECCIONES (M)
TABLA 2: PENDIENTES UTILIZADAS PARA DETERMINAR LAS CONDICIONES DE FRONTERA.
TABLA 3: COEFICIENTES DE MANNING UTILIZADOS EN LAS SECCIONES.
TABLA 4: RESULTADOS DEL ANLISIS DEL CANAL INSERTANDO SECCIONES DE PUENTE
TABLA 5: RESULTADOS DE ANLISIS DEL CANAL INSERTANDO CULVERT
Introduccin
El objetivo principal de este proyecto es generar un modelo con las condiciones
hidrulicas de la Quebrada de Oro mediante el cual se puedan realizar unos diseos
hidrulicos que ayuden a controlar la erosin en el canal natural y mitiguen las
inundaciones en el lugar. Para eso se realizar un modelo hidrulico de un tramo de la
Quebrada de Oro que se asemeje a lo que realmente existe en el lugar. Luego, realizaremos
diferentes anlisis del canal para ver el comportamiento del mismo. Adems, se estarn
realizando varias alternativas para canalizar el rea del canal natural y que este cumpla con
el flujo que recibe el mismo, pueda controlar la erosin y mitigar las inundaciones en el
tramo a estudiar.
Resumen
En esta parte del proyecto, se estar modelando el tramo estudiado en la Quebrada de
Oro sin incluir los puentes que se encuentran en dicho tramo. Esta parte del proyecto ser
utilizada para introducir las secciones transversales en el programa de HEC-RAS con sus
respectivas caractersticas. Luego de entrada todas las secciones, se proceder a calcular
un flujo mximo sin que las secciones lleguen al punto de desbordamiento. A
continuacin, los pasos y la informacin requerida para obtener dicho resultado.
2.
Antecedentes
Para poder modelar nuestro proyecto en el programa HEC-RAS, se necesita la
informacin de la geometra del canal, el flujo mximo sin que ocurra desbordamiento,
distancias entre las secciones, los coeficientes de Manning y las condiciones de fronteras
para poder realizar un proyecto que se asemeje a lo que est ocurriendo realmente en el
campo. A continuacin, la informacin utilizada para la modelacin del tramo de la
Quebrada de Oro para nuestro proyecto.
Secciones Transversales
Las secciones transversales de nuestro proyecto fueron medidas en un
levantamiento topogrfico realizado durante el semestre acadmico. Un total de
nueve (9) secciones fueron medidas para poder realizar nuestro modelaje
hidrulico de la Quebrada de Oro.
1) Geometra
La geometra de las secciones se midi en el levantamiento topogrfico.
Se consider el rea del canal y el rea de inundacin del mismo. En la
figura 1, podemos ver un ejemplo de la geometra de las secciones
medidas en el campo.
Seccin 1
8
7
Elevacin (m)
6
5
Seccion 1
4
3
2
1
0
0
20
40
60
Estacin (m)
80
100
120
Una vez obtenidas todas las secciones transversales del tramo a estudiar,
procedimos a introducir las secciones en el programa HEC-RAS. En la
figura 2, podemos apreciar los datos geomtricos de la seccin 1. Este
proceso se realiz para cada una de las secciones en nuestro tramo de
estudio. Una vez introducimos todas las secciones al programa, obtenemos
una vista de planta con las ubicaciones de las secciones (Ver figura 3).
3) Condiciones de Frontera
Direccin
Aguas Arriba
Aguas Abajo
Pendiente Promedio
0.0011
0.000629
4) Coeficiente de Manning
10
11
3.
Discusin
-
Flujo
El flujo para el anlisis del tramo estudiado se obtuvo aumentando el flujo hasta
que una de las secciones llegara a su profundidad normal mxima. La figura 7
muestra la seccin transversal que determin el flujo para este proyecto. Este flujo
ser el utilizado para las partes II y III. Ese flujo es el que entra a la primera
seccin transversal aguas arriba. El flujo calculado para nuestro tramo de estudio
ser de 50 m3/s (Ver figura 8).
12
Secciones
Todas las secciones cumplen con el flujo establecido. La seccin 8 es la nica
que tiene una profundidad mxima. Si aumentamos el flujo, esta seccin no
cumple por desbordamiento.
Seccin 8
13
Figura 11: Profundidad Normal y Critica del Tramo Estudiado en la Quebrada de Oro
Errores o Advertencias
La mayora de las advertencias que nos brinda el programa HEC-RAS es debido a
la distancia tan grande que hay entre secciones. Las prdidas de energa, la razn de
convergencia y la velocidad en el canal estn por encima de los valores esperados.
Por esa razn, el programa nos indica que tenemos que aadir ms secciones para
disminuir o aumentar estos valores. El programa tambin nos brinda unas anotaciones
que nos indican que est ocurriendo en la seccin. En nuestro caso, las notas nos
indican que tenemos flujo sper-crtico comenzando en la seccin 3 y un salto
hidrulico entre las secciones 1 y 2.
14
4.
Conclusin
Segn el anlisis, podemos concluir que el flujo obtenido como flujo base para
nuestro tramo de estudio cumple en todas las secciones transversales. Este flujo sera
el mximo permisible ya que si aumenta tendramos desbordamiento en una de las
secciones. El modelo del canal se comporta parecido al campo ya que tambin simula
el salto hidrulico que se haba obtenido en pasados proyectos realizados en la
Quebrada y que sabamos que estaba presente. En cuanto a los avisos del programa se
puede argumentar que en nuestro caso se pueden descartar ya que la parte canalizada
es bastante uniforme y el tramo en tierra no es muy extenso lo que significa que no
vara mucho su geometra en la distancia medida. Este modelo representa bien la
topografa del campo y el comportamiento del flujo en la quebrada. Se estar
utilizando este modelo en las siguientes partes del proyecto.
15
Resumen:
En la segunda parte del proyecto se analiz el canal incluyendo los puentes que
Cruzan el mismo. Para este anlisis se prosigui con el procedimiento de la parte I y
se le aadieron las secciones en los puentes. Estas secciones adicionales tomadas en
los puentes fueron insertadas en el programa HEC-RAS para analizar el canal. Por
otra parte se analizaron los puentes como Alcantarillas (Culverts). Se repiti el
procedimiento pero se le indico al programa que en lugar de ser puente sera un
Alcantarillado. Por ltimo se obtuvieron los resultados para ambos mtodos y se
compararon los resultados de los mismos. En las siguientes secciones se explica al
detalle la metodologa utilizada, los resultados y las conclusiones.
2.
Antecedentes:
Para realizar el modelaje del cruce de la carretera se utilizaron dos distintas formas.
La primera fue el modelaje de la quebrada con puente. La segunda forma fue el
modelaje de la quebrada con alcantarilla (culvert). Los dos mtodos se describen a
continuacin.
Puente
Se analiz la quebrada con el puente que conecta la Avenidas las Palmeras
con la Avenida Las Maras. Para esto se tomaron diferentes secciones aguas
arriba y aguas abajo del puente. Se midieron las invertidas en el centro y en
las esquinas del puente para obtener los detalles del puente. En la figura 13,
podemos observar dicho puente.
16
17
18
Figura 17: Datos del Tope en Pendiente del Puente (fuente: HEC-RAS)
Una vez se entraron todos los detalles del puente se procedi a analizar el
canal. En la figura 18 se observa la geometra del canal y se observa el puente
peatonal entre la estacin 1 y 1.04 y otro a una mayor escala entre las
secciones 3 y 4.
19
20
Alcantarilla (Culvert)
Del mismo modo en el que se introdujeron las secciones del puente en HECRas, se hizo lo mismo para el modelaje del culvert. Se puede observar los
datos entrados al programa para las estaciones y el high chord, tanto para
aguas arriba como para aguas abajo.
Figura 19: Datos de la Cubierta del Puente para el Culvert (fuente: HEC-RAS)
Luego de haber entrado los datos del detalle del deck/roadway se procedi a
analizar el culvert. La siguiente figura nos muestra la geometra del canal y se
puede observar el culvert entre las secciones 3 y 4.
21
22
En la siguiente figura se muestra una vista transversal del culvert tanto para
aguas arriba como para aguas abajo.
Figura 22: Vista Transversal del Culvert para Aguas Arriba y Aguas Abajo (fuente: HEC-RAS)
23
3.
Discusin y Resultados
-
Puente
Se corri el programa y se obtuvieron los resultados del mismo.
Tabla 4: Resultados del Anlisis del Canal Insertando Secciones de Puente
24
Tambin se midieron secciones en las caras aguas arriba y aguas abajo del puente.
Estas secciones lo son la seccin la seccin 4 y 3. Adems el programa genera unas
secciones aguas arriba y abajo del puente interpoladas dependiendo de la distancia
que se le indique que se encuentra el puente desde la seccin aguas arriba. Los
resultados para dichas secciones se pueden ver en las figuras 24, 25, 26 y 27.
25
26
27
El segundo caso para este puente evala la ecuacin de energa con el error mnimo
entre los valores asumidos y computados de la superficie de agua. En la figura 29, se
observan estos datos y advertencias.
28
La profundidad mxima del canal alcanza unos 1.49m mientras que la altura del
cruce de 2.92m. Por lo tanto la superficie del agua no alcanza la altura del cruce.
29
Alcantarilla (Culvert)
La siguiente figura muestra los resultados obtenidos luego de correr el programa
con el modelaje del culvert.
Se puede observar en la siguiente figura que se crea un salto hidrulico aguas arriba
del culvert, convirtiendo as el flujo en uno supercrtico, y luego del culvert se
observa una cada.
30
31
Las siguientes tablas muestran los resultados para la seccin 4 aguas arriba y la
seccin 3 aguas abajo al haber modelado un culvert.
Para la seccin aguas arriba se puede observar que la profundidad mxima del canal
alcanza unos 2.58m, mientras que la altura del culvert es de 3.05m por lo tanto al
igual que sucedi en el puente la superficie del agua no alcanza la altura del culvert.
32
4.
Conclusin
Al haber finalizado el modelaje tanto para el puente como para el culvert se obtuvieron
resultados los cuales nos mostraban lo que ocurrira con el canal si se construyera un
puente o un culvert. Para ambas formas de modelaje se encontr que producan una cada
hidrulica en la seccin 4 aguas arriba del canal y/o culvert, lo cual producira un flujo
supercrtico. A causa de esto se forma un salto hidrulico cierta distancia aguas abajo del
puente cuando el flujo vuelve a ser subcritico debido a la pendiente menos empinada. La
altura del puente aguas arriba y del culvert es de 3.05m. Esto es comparado con la altura
critica que producira la cada hidrulica, para el puente fue de 1.49m y para el culvert fue
de 2.58m segn es mostrado por los resultados en las tablas antes presentadas. Para los
dos casos la superficie del agua no alcanza la altura del puente y del culvert. No obstante,
es recomendado el modelaje del puente ya que es el que produce una altura crtica menor
comparado con la altura crtica del culvert y se pueden editar la geometra con ms
detalle.
33
1.
Resumen
El propsito de esta parte del informe fue evaluar la posibilidad de realizarle mejoras al
canal. Se evala la posibilidad de eliminar el salto hidrulico y se sugieren ciertas
medidas para lidiar con la contraccin que lo causa. Adems se evalan varias opciones
de canalizacin como hormign o riprap demostrando que la mejor de ambas es la de
hormign.
2.
Antecedentes
Como parte de la solucin en las mejoras del tramo de la quebrada de oro, el cual une al
canal trapezoidal revestido de hormign con el canal natural de tierra. Se requera hacer
una canalizacin entre las secciones 9 y 6 el tramo de canal en tierra. Para esto se
escogieron 2 tipos de revestimiento, en hormign y en Riprap.
Adems se requera tratar de mejorar las condiciones de flujo entre las secciones 3 y 5
donde comienza el canal en hormign y termina el puente de mangual. En estas secciones
ocurre una cada hidrulica que provoca un salto hidrulico aguas debajo de puente. Se
requiere determinar si el salto hidrulico es posible eliminarlo.
Por ltimo se utilizara el programa HEC-RAS para determinar si el diseo del
revestimiento hecho con los mtodos en clase est de acuerdo con los datos del modelo
generado previamente.
3.
Discusin
-
Diseo preliminar.
Se propuso como solucin para canalizar este tramo de tierra natural el revestirlo
con un canal de seccin trapezoidal de hormign. Para esta seccin utilizamos la
seccin ptima hidrulica para asignar algunas de sus dimensiones. La seccin
hidrulica ptima es una seccin que produce una descarga mxima para un rea de
flujo especfica. Segn la teora, la seccin hidrulica ptima produce el canal ms
econmico para su construccin. Para nuestro canal propuesta la seccin hidrulica
ptima para un trapezoide es el cual tiene un ngulo de las paredes del canal de 60
34
grados, con respecto a la horizontal. En otras palabras, las paredes del canal revestido
con hormign debe de tener una pendiente de 1.73 m/m; lo que significa que por cada
metro que subimos nos movemos horizontalmente 0.577 metros. Este valor es uno
muy bajo, el cual produce que las paredes del revestimiento sean casi verticales,
adems nos permite utilizar un ancho de fondo menor.
Para disear nuestro canal de revestimiento de hormign utilizamos los siguientes
parmetros. Nuestro flujo de diseo fue de 50 metros cbicos por segundo, el cual es
producido por la lluvia de los 100 aos. Nuestra pendiente del fondo del canal, dada
por la diferencia en elevacin de los puntos bajos del centro del canal y distancias
entre las secciones del tramo de tierra natural fue de 0.00109 metros por metros.
Adems vamos a brindar un acabado para el hormign conocido como trowel, el
cual es un hormign de superficie rugoso, estilo la gran mayora de las aceras de
nuestros vecindarios. Este acabado brinda una rugosidad hidrulica de 0.013. Con
todos estos valores podemos determinar nuestra profundidad normal dada las
condiciones. Cabe destacar, que segn nuestros valores de campo de este tramo de la
quebrada, la profundidad mxima de nuestro canal, el cual si se sobre pasa llega al
nivel de la carretera, es de 2.80 metros. Asumiendo un ancho de fondo de 8.45
metros, utilizamos la Ecuacin de Manning y resolvemos para la profundidad normal.
Dada todas las condiciones obtuvimos una profundidad normal de 1.734 metros, el
cual produce un flujo normal de 50 metros cubico por segundo. A este nivel normal
del agua debemos aadir un freeboard, el cual depende de la profundidad normal y
de una constante C, la cual depende del flujo de diseo. El freeboard se define
como la distancia vertical desde el nivel del agua normal hasta la ancho de tope del
canal. Para nuestro canal, la constante C fue de 0.65 para as obtener un freeboard
de 1.06 metros. Por ende, nuestra profundidad total fue de 2.79 metros, la cual est
por debajo de nuestra profundidad mxima fsica provista por el canal. Adems
obtenemos un ancho de tope de 11.7 metros. Donde su rea de flujo es de 16.4
metros cuadrados y un permetro mojado de 12.5 metros, para s obtener un radio
hidrulico de la seccin de 1.3 metros. En la figura 34, se observar un esquemtico
sobre la seccin transversal propuesta para el revestimiento del canal natural.
35
36
Segn los datos de campo sobre nuestro segmento, tenemos que la pendiente de los
lados no puede ser menor de 1.5 metros, ya que esto podra causar inestabilidad en los
taludes, por lo tanto utilizamos una pendiente de los lados de 2.0 metros.
Al calcular el esfuerzo cortante crtico para que inicie el movimiento de las rocas,
con la siguiente ecuacin:
; donde
es el dimetro de las rocas en pies,
obtenemos un valor de 47.88 pascasles. Luego calculamos el valor de la rugosidad
hidrulica de la ecuacin modificada de Strickler,
, el cual nos dio
un valor de 0.0317. Asumiendo un fondo de canal de 18 metros y con el flujo pico,
podemos obtener de la ecuacin de Mannings la profundidad normal, la cual fue una
de 1.744metros. Por lo tanto obtenemos un rea de flujo de 37.48 metros cuadrados,
con un permetro mojado de 25.8 metros y un radio hidrulico de 1.45 metros.
Ahora verificando el valor de esfuerzo mximo cortante de la pared, mediante la
siguiente ecuacin:
; donde y es la profundidad normal, R es el radio
hidrulico y gama es la gravedad especifica del agua , donde se asumi una
temperatura del agua de 20 grados Celcius (
). Obtuvimos un esfuerzo
37
de rocas en la esquina del fondo donde termina los lados, en donde se obtuvo
mediante la siguiente ecuacin:
; obtuvimos un valor de 9 pulgadas o
0.23 metros. Podemos observar que este espesor es mucho ms grueso debido a que
en el fondo del canal existen mayores velocidades las cuales producen que se
erosione ms.
Para este canal se calcul tambin el valor de Freeboard, el cual con su valor de
la constante C de 0.65, obtuvimos un Freeboard 1.07 metros. Para as obtener una
profundidad total de 2.8 metros. Con la cual obtenemos un ancho de tope de
29.2metros. En la figura 36, podemos observar una seccin de nuestro trapezoide
revestido con Riprap.
38
39
anlisis procedemos a comparar los datos entre las secciones que haban naturalmente
y las nuevas canalizadas. A continuacin se muestra una tabla con las diferencias
entre los valores de antes y despus de la canalizacin (figura 39).
Se puede ver de la tabla de resultados del nivel del agua en las secciones aguas
arriba a disminuido alrededor de unos 0.3 metros al igual que la velocidad promedio
por unos 0.4 m/s. Podemos tener una mejor idea del comportamiento si vemos una
vista de perfil comparando ambos anlisis. La figura 40, muestra la vista de perfil
comparando ambos resultados.
40
De la vista en perfil se puede ver que despus de la canalizacin el nivel del agua
es mucho ms uniforme en las secciones aguas arriba. An se sigue generando el
salto hidrulico ya que solo canalizamos desde la seccin 6 a la 9 y no se
consideraron las secciones 3 a la 5 que es donde se genera un estrangulamiento del
flujo, estas se tocaran ms adelante. Adems se debe sealar que precisamente debido
a esto el nivel del agua es mayor en los cmputos de HEC-RAS ya que en los
cmputos a mano no se consider la contraccin y la baja sbita entre las secciones 3
y 5 lo cual afectan el flujo aguas arriba ya que este es sub crtico. Por ltimo se
pueden observar las diferencias entre las secciones antes de canalizar el tramo y
despus (figura 41).
En la figura 41, se puede observar que la lnea rosa es el trazado de la seccin
modificada mientras que la lnea negra es la seccin natural del canal. Adems se
puede observar la diferencia entre los niveles de agua donde la lnea azul es el del
canal natural en tierra y la lnea roja es la del canal nuevo en hormign. Se pueden ver
otros datos por cada seccin como velocidad, lnea del gradiente de energa etc.
41
Figura 41: Comparacin de Secciones del Canal Antes y Despus de Canalizacin en Hormign
42
4.
Conclusin
Podemos concluir que, para el canal de seccin hidrulica optima, cumple con
parmetros de campo, ya que nuestro ancho de tope mximo que tiene nuestro tramo
natural es de 17 metros. Tambin, cumple con nuestra profundidad mxima del
segmento, la cual es 2.8 metros. Adems, cumple con las recomendaciones de que la
velocidad mxima para un canal revestido con hormign no es mayor a 18 ft/s, el cual
para esta seccin fue de 10 ft/s. Lo nico que tenemos que modificar seria el ancho del
fondo, ya que para este segmento nuestro ancho mximo es de 8 metros, pero nuestro
ancho de fondo de diseo es muy parecido, por ende no tendremos problemas algunos en
excavar 0.5 metros.
Al comparar la opcin de revestir el canal natural con Riprap con los parmetros fsicos
de nuestro canal, podemos ver que cumple con la profundidad mxima de nuestro canal,
el cual fue de 2.8 metros. Por otra parte, podemos ver que el ancho del fondo de canal
que cumple para nuestro diseo no cumple con el mximo fsico el cual era de 8 metros.
Adems, este diseo no cumple con el ancho mximo de tope, ya que sobre pasa los 17
metros por 12.2metros. Por lo tanto, al comparar los requisitos que cumple cada diseo,
observamos que la opcin de canalizar el tramo mediante un revestimiento de hormign
trapezoidal es la ms efectiva y apropiada para la geometra de nuestra seccin.
Podemos mencionar que al comparar los datos de las secciones canalizadas en el
modelo con el diseo a mano los resultados varan bastante. Esto se debe mayormente a
que el programa toma en cuenta el tramo entero y eso incluye la transicin del puente de
Mangual el cual afecta el flujo aguas arriba ya que antes de llegar ah es sub crtico y
todas las condiciones aguas abajo afectan el flujo aguas arriba siempre y cuando sea sub
critico lo cual causa que el flujo se aguante y suba su nivel de agua ms de los esperado
en los cmputos a mano. Adems, podemos concluir que para las condiciones presentes
en el campo del tramo en tierra el revestimiento que provee las condiciones de flujo ms
adecuadas es hormign esto se puede ver ya que los cmputos del canal en Riprap las
dimensiones del Top Width dieron mayores del espacio disponible para hacer el canal de
acuerdo con el flujo especificado y por esta misma razn no se pudo modelar en HECRAS.
Por ltimo, el salto hidrulico que se produce a cause de las condiciones geomtricas
entre las secciones 3 y 5 se debe mayormente a la contraccin del canal en esta parte del
tramo. Se trat de ajustar la pendiente del tramo pero an se generan condiciones crticas
en el puente que son causa del salto hidrulico en la quebrada canalizada. Se recomienda
reestructurar este puente o canalizar una transicin que provea un movimiento de flujo
sub crtico a travs de cauce para as evitar cambios de estado en el flujo.
43
Referencias Bibliogrficas
USACE. (2010). HEC-RAS River Analysis System.Users Manual ver.4.1.
Silva Araya,W. (2014). Presentaciones Open Channel, Clase INCI 5006
44
Apendices
Apendice A Informe HEC-RAS (plan sin puente)
HEC-RAS Version 4.1.0 Jan 2010
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrologic Engineering Center
609 Second Street
Davis, California
X XXXXXX
X X
X X
XXXX
X
XXXX
X X
X X
X X X
XXXXXXX XXXX
X X
X X
X X
X XXXXXX
X X
XXXXXX
XXXX
X X
X
XXXX
XXX XXXX
X X
XXXX
XX
X X
X
X XXXXX
PROJECT DATA
Project Title: INCI5006
Project File : INCI5006.prj
45
Project in SI units
PLAN DATA
Flow Title
: FlujoPico
Flow File
Multiple Openings = 0
Culverts
= 0
Inline Structures = 0
Bridges
= 0
Lateral Structures =
Computational Information
Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.003
46
= 20
= 0.1
= 0.001
Computation Options
Critical depth computed only where necessary
Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only
Friction Slope Method:
Average Conveyance
Mixed Flow
FLOW DATA
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
Oro
RS
PF 1
9
50
47
Boundary Conditions
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
Profile
Oro
Upstream
PF 1
Normal S = 0.0011
Downstream
Normal S = 0.000629
GEOMETRY DATA
CROSS SECTION
RS: 9
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
num=
25
48
Sta
Elev
Sta Elev
0 10.84
4.4
9.37
Sta
Elev
8.32
Sta Elev
8.56 17.32
Sta
Elev
8.31 22.77
8.31
29.25
8.44 31.79
7.89 34.95
7.57 36.27
6.95 37.61
6.69
40.34
6.17 41.96
5.59 42.64
4.82 44.76
4.62 46.16
4.87
47.2
6.54 47.96
8.01 51.93
8.25 55.13
8.28 55.24
8.14
61.36
8.16 61.45
8.3 64.63
8.29 77.34
8.39
8.43
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
51.93
num=
Sta n Val
8.32
Sta n Val
.016 22.77
.013 55.13
89.2
Sta n Val
.03 34.95
.016 61.45
Sta n Val
.035 46.16
.013 64.63
.03
.03
.3
7.94
Element
0.25
Wt. n-Val.
7.70
52.97
7.00
0.08
0.003255
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
14.11
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
0.08
0.034
0.02
1.26
53.46
53.14
22.72
22.72
49.98
12.85
49
2.19
0.30
3.08
876.4
Conv. (m3/s)
0.4
53.46
1.27
Min Ch El (m)
4.62
Alpha
1.01
Note:
Shear (N/m2)
0.06
1.77
876.0
2.03
15.17
47.80
0.16
2.20
0.01
0.00
0.00
6.70
0.03
4.76
0.00
0.05
0.20
CROSS SECTION
RS: 8
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
15.91
Elev
8.5
num=
Sta Elev
4.39
8.43
5.99 15.94
Sta
9.57
25
Elev
Sta Elev
7.93 11.93
5.99 16.86
Sta
6.36 13.59
5.63 17.98
Elev
6.16
5.01 19.13
4.69
50
20.53
4.57 20.74
4.6 21.56
4.62 21.82
5 21.99
5.15
22.95
6.72 23.45
7.02 24.09
7.59 31.95
8 35.13
7.98
35.23
7.85 41.25
7.85 41.38
8 44.49
8.02 47.91
8.16
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
35.13
num=
Sta n Val
9.57
Sta n Val
.035 20.53
.016 41.38
8
Sta n Val
.03 24.09
.013 44.49
Sta n Val
.03 31.95
.013
.03
.1
.3
7.78
Element
0.21
Wt. n-Val.
7.56
6.79
0.002710
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
13.93
2.05
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
2.99
960.4
0.033
51.06
51.38
53.14
24.34
24.34
50.00
13.93
2.05
1.75
960.4
51
51.38
Min Ch El (m)
4.57
Alpha
1.00
16.02
40.38
0.26
0.05
0.00
5.44
4.04
0.00
0.05
0.20
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous cross
section. This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 7
INPUT
Description:
52
Elev
Sta
num=
Elev
9.43 12.16
34
Sta Elev
9.01 14.09
Sta
Elev
8.53 30.27
Sta Elev
8.58
42.4
8.57
52.27
8.41
60.7
8.05 61.61
6.62 62.18
6.37 63.04
6.18
63.9
5.8 64.28
5.34 64.53
4.94 66.06
4.77 67.42
4.65
67.91
4.54
68.1
4.62 68.34
4.72 68.69
4.79 69.08
4.77
69.29
4.96 69.69
5.44 70.59
5.92 70.91
6.65 72.47
7.39
73.24
7.82 77.27
7.94 78.85
7.98 79.08
7.83
7.8
85.29
7.95 88.43
7.97 98.41
7.87 118.31
7.85
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.03 30.27
77.27
.016
.013 78.85
85.1
Sta n Val
42.4
.03
.016 85.29
Sta n Val
60.7
Sta n Val
.035 69.08
.013 88.43
.03
.03
.1
.3
7.47
Element
0.70
Wt. n-Val.
6.77
6.77
0.034
13.46
14.42
14.63
13.46
53
0.012425
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
9.64
3.72
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
13.46
50.00
9.64
3.72
2.23
448.6
Conv. (m3/s)
448.6
14.42
11.30
Min Ch El (m)
4.54
Alpha
Frctn Loss (m)
C & E Loss (m)
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.40
145.13
0.02
0.16
0.00
4.47
3.43
0.00
0.05
0.20
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning: During the standard step iterations, when the assumed water surface was set equal to
critical depth, the calculated
water surface came back below critical depth. This indicates that there is not a valid
subcritical answer. The program
defaulted to critical depth.
54
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 6
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
7.83
num=
Sta Elev
Sta
15
Elev
Sta Elev
7.2 17.31
Sta
Elev
6.68 22.14
4.53
25.3
4.49 27.65
4.49 29.84
6.97 33.23
7.45 39.08
7.33
54.12
7.34 57.81
7.2 65.49
6.99 78.17
6.76
6.72
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.03 12.97
12.97 33.23
Sta n Val
.013 33.23
Sta n Val
.03 39.08
.98
Sta n Val
.016 54.12
86.4
1.06
.1
.03
55
7.29
Element
0.18
Wt. n-Val.
7.12
6.22
0.000398
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
42.74
1.56
2505.2
0.98
Alpha
Frctn Loss (m)
C & E Loss (m)
1.41
0.06
1.06
25.62
Area (m2)
6.45
25.62
6.45
48.30
1.70
17.21
1.89
25.53
0.26
1.49
0.25
Conv. (m3/s)
2420.1
85.1
18.82
Shear (N/m2)
0.00
0.030
0.98
4.49
0.96
2.63
Min Ch El (m)
0.013
Flow (m3/s)
5.32
25.94
0.97
0.00
4.18
3.24
0.00
0.00
0.01
56
CROSS SECTION
RS: 5
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
8.12
num=
Sta Elev
6.9
18
Sta
Elev
8.13 17.08
4.49
8.09 25.08
33.29
7.78 34.42
51.47
7.99
65.3
8 68.21
94.98
7.26
98.5
7.31 103.48
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.03 33.29
68.21
37.8
num=
Sta Elev
4.47
Elev
7.92 31.22
7.72
39.8
4.51 42.56
7.85
7.98 74.73
7.65 89.34
7.5
7.28
Sta n Val
.013 42.56
Sta
Sta n Val
.03 51.47
.016
Sta n Val
65.3
.013
.03
1.81
1.79
.1
57
7.23
Element
0.82
Wt. n-Val.
6.41
6.41
0.001992
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
7.61
4.01
1.81
12.46
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
12.46
50.00
7.61
4.01
1.94
1120.3
Conv. (m3/s)
1120.3
1.81
9.87
4.47
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.64
24.67
0.00
0.00
1.79
0.00
0.00
4.17
3.23
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning: During the standard step iterations, when the assumed water surface was set equal to
critical depth, the calculated
58
water surface came back below critical depth. This indicates that there is not a valid
subcritical answer. The program
defaulted to critical depth.
CROSS SECTION
RS: 4
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
8.83
17
Sta
7.97 15.96
Elev
Sta Elev
7.94 20.19
Sta
Elev
7.91 26.25
7.95
30.3
7.96 30.82
4.4 33.02
4.43
34.6
4.47 36.17
4.47
37
4.48 39.08
7.96 43.49
7.95
51.4
7.84 63.69
7.87
86.98
7.91 127.37
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
7.72
num=
Sta n Val
30.3
30.3 39.08
Sta n Val
.013 39.08
.03
Sta n Val
51.4
.016 63.69
Sta n Val
11.7
.1
.03
59
7.18
Element
1.21
Wt. n-Val.
5.97
6.25
0.003640
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
7.30
4.88
Conv. (m3/s)
10.67
Min Ch El (m)
4.40
10.24
50.00
7.30
4.88
Shear (N/m2)
1.40
828.7
9.50
38.50
0.00
0.04
11.70
10.24
828.7
10.67
10.52
Flow (m3/s)
1.57
1.00
0.013
Area (m2)
Alpha
0.00
0.00
4.15
3.22
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
60
RS: 3
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
7.63
num=
Sta Elev
.36
Sta
7.69 16.14
20
Elev
Sta Elev
7.64 37.46
Elev
7.71 37.54
7.68 77.99
109.98
4.41 114.52
7.73 118.58
7.84 154.4
7.82 185.77
7.8
190.36
7.87 192.84
7.87 197.15
7.77 229.46
7.79 260.64
7.81
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.016 38.55
197.15
num=
7.57 102.46
7.67
38.55
Manning's n Values
7.72 98.13
Sta
4.41
Sta n Val
.03 98.13
4.44 105.81
Sta n Val
.013 118.58
Sta n Val
.016 185.77
.03
.016
.3
61
7.08
Element
1.68
Wt. n-Val.
5.40
5.92
0.007450
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.20
5.74
26.95
8.71
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
8.71
50.00
10.20
5.74
0.99
579.3
Conv. (m3/s)
579.3
26.95
10.84
Min Ch El (m)
4.41
Alpha
Frctn Loss (m)
C & E Loss (m)
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
0.85
58.72
0.05
0.05
29.56
0.00
0.00
4.04
3.12
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
CROSS SECTION
62
RS: 2
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
7.82 20.93
19
Sta
Elev
7.6 28.88
Sta Elev
7.51 29.36
Sta
Elev
7.56 29.87
7.52
29.9
7.56 31.09
7.5 52.77
7.89 78.75
7.82 84.03
7.19
84.23
6.4 88.08
4.34 91.98
4.31 94.99
4.32 98.98
7.23
119.55
7.67 119.66
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
7.81 151.11
num=
Sta n Val
.016 52.77
7.84 184.79
Sta n Val
.03 78.75
7.77
Sta n Val
.013 119.66
Sta n Val
.03 151.11
.016
.3
6.82
Element
1.40
Wt. n-Val.
0.013
63
5.42
5.86
0.005681
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.44
5.25
663.3
102.28
Min Ch El (m)
4.31
50.00
10.44
5.25
0.91
Conv. (m3/s)
9.53
663.3
11.07
47.96
0.17
0.08
98.78
9.53
1.11
1.00
102.28
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Alpha
106.09
0.00
0.00
3.80
2.84
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
CROSS SECTION
RS: 1
INPUT
64
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
6.87
num=
Sta Elev
8.92
30
Sta
Elev
6.66 21.73
Sta Elev
6.68 26.04
6.77
Sta
Elev
26.1
6.63
26.45
6.65 26.49
6.67
30.3
6.79 30.35
6.9 30.99
6.91
31.1
6.83 35.96
6.71 36.07
6.67 36.42
6.67 36.65
6.84
6.67 39.36
6.66 43.13
6.57 45.63
4.3
49.51
4.28 51.34
4.31 52.65
4.34 56.89
6.58 57.37
6.77
59.7
6.71 69.58
6.79 78.58
6.76 95.42
6.88 103.97
7.3
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 38.92
.013
Sta n Val
59.7
.03
.3
6.58
Element
0.35
Wt. n-Val.
6.23
5.84
0.000779
Area (m2)
0.013
112.12
114.54
117.65
18.96
18.96
65
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
12.72
2.64
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
1.95
1792.0
Conv. (m3/s)
114.54
Min Ch El (m)
4.28
1.00
2.64
Shear (N/m2)
1.49
1792.0
13.93
10.39
0.08
12.72
Alpha
50.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
2.34
1.66
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
CROSS SECTION
RS: 0
INPUT
Description: Ultima Seccion Aguas Abajo (POSTE)
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
Sta
14
Elev
Sta Elev
Sta
Elev
66
0 8.172
1.43 8.217
1.58 6.222
5.48 4.309
8.19 4.279
12.36 4.248 16.65 5.949 19.49 6.558 22.21 6.561 25.33 6.572
31.42 6.621 38.98 6.599 49.88 6.502 58.35
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.016
num=
Sta n Val
1.58
1.58 19.49
Sta n Val
.013 19.49
6.45
.03
.3
6.48
Element
0.27
Wt. n-Val.
6.21
5.75
0.000629
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
16.26
2.28
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
1.96
1992.9
0.013
21.92
21.92
50.00
16.26
2.28
1.35
1992.9
17.06
67
Min Ch El (m)
4.25
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
7.93
0.00
0.00
River:Quebrada Oro
Reach
River Sta.
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
Oro
.03
.016
.03
.035
.03
.013
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.035
.03
.03
.013
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.03
.016
.03
.035
.03
.013
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.016
.03
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.03
.016
Oro
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.016
.013
.03
n9
.03
.03
.03
.016
68
Reach
River Sta.
Left
Channel
Right
Oro
52.97
53.46
53.14
Oro
51.06
51.38
53.14
Oro
13.46
14.42
14.63
Oro
.96
.98
Oro
1.87
1.81
Oro
10.52
10.67
11.7
Oro
23.73
26.95
29.56
Oro
106.09
102.28
98.78
Oro
112.12
114.54
117.65
Oro
1.06
1.79
69
Reach
River Sta.
Contr.
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Expan.
Reach
River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G.
Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl
(m3/s)
(m2)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m/m)
(m/s)
(m)
70
Oro
22.80
9
14.11
PF 1
0.53
50.00
4.62
7.70
7.00
7.94
0.003255
2.20
Oro
24.34
8
13.93
PF 1
0.50
50.00
4.57
7.56
6.79
7.78
0.002710
2.05
Oro
13.46
7
9.64
PF 1
1.00
50.00
4.54
6.77
6.77
7.47
0.012425
3.72
Oro
32.07
6
42.74
PF 1
0.49
50.00
4.49
7.12
6.22
7.29
0.000398
1.89
Oro
12.46
5
7.61
PF 1
1.00
50.00
4.47
6.41
6.41
7.23
0.001992
4.01
Oro
10.24
4
7.30
PF 1
1.32
50.00
4.40
5.97
6.25
7.18
0.003640
4.88
Oro
8.71
3
10.20
PF 1
1.98
50.00
4.41
5.40
5.92
7.08
0.007450
5.74
Oro
9.53
2
10.44
PF 1
1.75
50.00
4.31
5.42
5.86
6.82
0.005681
5.25
Oro
18.96
1
12.72
PF 1
0.69
50.00
4.28
6.23
5.84
6.58
0.000779
2.64
Oro
21.92
0
16.26
PF 1
0.63
50.00
4.25
6.21
5.75
6.48
0.000629
2.28
RS: 9
Profile: PF 1
71
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 8
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous
cross section. This may indicate
the need for additional cross sections.
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 7
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning:During the standard step iterations, when the assumed water surface was set equal to
critical depth, the calculated
water surface came back below critical depth. This indicates that there is not a valid
subcritical answer. The
program defaulted to critical depth.
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 6
Profile: PF 1
72
RS: 5
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning:During the standard step iterations, when the assumed water surface was set equal to
critical depth, the calculated
water surface came back below critical depth. This indicates that there is not a valid
subcritical answer. The
program defaulted to critical depth.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 4
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note: Program found supercritical flow starting at this cross section.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 3
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 2
Profile: PF 1
73
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 1
Profile: PF 1
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
X XXXXXX
X X
X X
XXXX
X
XXXX
X X
X X
X X X
XXXXXXX XXXX
X X
X X
X X
X XXXXXX
X X
XXXXXX
XXXX
X X
X
XXXX
XXX XXXX
X X
XXXX
XX
X X
X
X XXXXX
74
PROJECT DATA
Project Title: INCI5006
Project File : INCI5006.prj
Run Date and Time: 5/21/2014 3:56:08 AM
Project in SI units
PLAN DATA
Flow Title
: FlujoPico
Flow File
= 0
Multiple Openings = 0
Inline Structures = 0
75
Bridges
= 2
Lateral Structures =
Computational Information
Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.003
Critical depth calculation tolerance = 0.003
Maximum number of iterations
= 20
= 0.1
= 0.001
Computation Options
Critical depth computed only where necessary
Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only
Friction Slope Method:
Average Conveyance
Mixed Flow
FLOW DATA
76
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
RS
Oro
PF 1
9
50
Boundary Conditions
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
Profile
Oro
PF 1
Upstream
Normal S = 0.0011
Downstream
Normal S = 0.000629
GEOMETRY DATA
CROSS SECTION
RS: 9
77
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
0 10.84
4.4
9.37
Sta
25
Elev
8.32
Sta Elev
8.56 17.32
Sta
Elev
8.31 22.77
8.31
29.25
8.44 31.79
7.89 34.95
7.57 36.27
6.95 37.61
6.69
40.34
6.17 41.96
5.59 42.64
4.82 44.76
4.62 46.16
4.87
47.2
6.54 47.96
8.01 51.93
8.25 55.13
8.28 55.24
8.14
61.36
8.16 61.45
8.3 64.63
8.29 77.34
8.39
8.43
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
51.93
num=
Sta n Val
8.32
Sta n Val
.016 22.77
.013 55.13
89.2
Sta n Val
.03 34.95
.016 61.45
Sta n Val
.035 46.16
.013 64.63
.03
.03
.3
7.94
Element
0.25
Wt. n-Val.
7.69
52.98
0.034
53.47
53.14
78
7.00
0.003320
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
14.00
2.21
0.07
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
0.07
0.02
22.58
49.98
1.16
0.29
3.07
867.7
Conv. (m3/s)
0.3
53.47
1.16
Min Ch El (m)
4.62
Alpha
1.00
Note:
12.84
2.21
Shear (N/m2)
22.58
0.06
1.76
867.4
1.90
15.16
48.50
0.16
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.00
6.69
4.70
0.00
0.08
0.23
CROSS SECTION
RS: 8
INPUT
Description:
79
Elev
8.5
num=
Sta Elev
4.39
25
Sta
8.43
9.57
Elev
Sta Elev
7.93 11.93
Sta
Elev
6.36 13.59
6.16
15.91
5.99 15.94
5.99 16.86
5.63 17.98
5.01 19.13
20.53
4.57 20.74
4.6 21.56
4.62 21.82
5 21.99
5.15
22.95
6.72 23.45
7.02 24.09
7.59 31.95
8 35.13
7.98
35.23
7.85 41.25
7.85 41.38
8 44.49
8.02 47.91
8.16
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
35.13
num=
Sta n Val
9.57
Sta n Val
.035 20.53
.016 41.38
4.69
Sta n Val
.03 24.09
.013 44.49
Sta n Val
.03 31.95
.013
.03
.1
.3
7.77
Element
0.22
Wt. n-Val.
7.55
0.002778
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
0.033
51.08
51.36
53.17
24.13
24.13
50.00
80
13.89
2.07
13.89
2.07
2.98
948.7
Conv. (m3/s)
948.7
51.36
15.97
Min Ch El (m)
4.57
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.74
41.16
0.23
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.00
5.45
3.99
0.00
0.08
0.23
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 7
INPUT
81
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
9.43 12.16
34
Sta
Elev
9.01 14.09
Sta Elev
8.53 30.27
Sta
8.58
Elev
42.4
8.57
52.27
8.41
60.7
8.05 61.61
6.62 62.18
6.37 63.04
6.18
63.9
5.8 64.28
5.34 64.53
4.94 66.06
4.77 67.42
4.65
67.91
4.54
68.1
4.62 68.34
4.72 68.69
4.79 69.08
4.77
69.29
4.96 69.69
5.44 70.59
5.92 70.91
6.65 72.47
7.39
73.24
7.82 77.27
7.94 78.85
7.98 79.08
7.83
7.8
85.29
7.95 88.43
7.97 98.41
7.87 118.31
7.85
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.03 30.27
77.27
.016
.013 78.85
85.1
Sta n Val
42.4
.03
.016 85.29
Sta n Val
60.7
Sta n Val
.035 69.08
.013 88.43
.03
.03
.1
.3
7.51
Element
0.51
Wt. n-Val.
7.00
0.034
13.45
14.41
14.62
82
0.007945
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.28
3.17
15.79
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
15.79
50.00
10.28
3.17
2.46
561.0
Conv. (m3/s)
561.0
14.42
12.12
Min Ch El (m)
4.54
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.54
101.49
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.01
0.00
4.42
3.37
0.00
0.08
0.23
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
83
REACH: Oro
RS: 6
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
7.83
num=
Sta Elev
6.37
Sta
15
Elev
7.54 12.97
Sta Elev
7.2 17.31
Sta
Elev
6.68 22.14
4.53
25.3
4.49 27.65
4.49 29.84
6.97 33.23
7.45 39.08
7.33
54.12
7.34 57.81
7.2 65.49
6.99 78.17
6.76
6.72
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.03 12.97
12.97 33.23
Sta n Val
.013 33.23
Sta n Val
.03 39.08
Sta n Val
.016 54.12
86.4
.98
1.06
.03
.1
.3
7.39
Element
0.14
Wt. n-Val.
7.25
Area (m2)
0.013
0.96
0.02
0.030
0.98
28.03
0.02
1.06
10.15
28.03
10.15
84
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
49.68
1.31
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
2.76
Alpha
0.05
Conv. (m3/s)
0.98
18.84
0.04
29.89
0.28
1.49
0.34
0.1
2658.2
162.8
0.96
20.47
30.42
0.08
4.22
0.00
2.89
1.68
2821.1
1.56
0.95
0.02
4.49
47.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.03
0.00
4.10
3.16
0.00
0.01
0.02
CROSS SECTION
85
REACH: Oro
RS: 5
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
0 8.12
num=
Sta Elev
6.9
18
Sta
Elev
8.13 17.08
4.49
8.09 25.08
33.29
7.78 34.42
51.47
7.99
65.3
8 68.21
94.98
7.26
98.5
7.31 103.48
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03 33.29
68.21
37.8
num=
Sta n Val
Sta Elev
4.47
Sta
Elev
7.92 31.22
7.72
39.8
4.51 42.56
7.85
7.98 74.73
7.65 89.34
7.5
7.28
Sta n Val
.013 42.56
Sta n Val
.03 51.47
.016
Sta n Val
65.3
.013
.03
1.81
1.79
.1
.3
7.35
Element
0.50
Wt. n-Val.
6.84
0.013
1.87
1.81
1.79
86
0.001008
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
8.12
3.14
15.91
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
15.91
50.00
8.12
3.14
2.38
1574.6
Conv. (m3/s)
1574.6
1.81
10.90
4.47
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.96
14.43
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
4.08
3.14
CROSS SECTION
RS: 4
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
Sta
17
Elev
Sta Elev
Sta
Elev
87
8.83
7.97 15.96
7.94 20.19
7.91 26.25
7.95
30.3
7.96 30.82
4.4 33.02
4.43
34.6
4.47 36.17
4.47
37
4.48 39.08
7.96 43.49
7.95
51.4
7.84 63.69
7.87
86.98
7.91 127.37
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
7.72
num=
Sta n Val
30.3
Sta n Val
.013 39.08
5
Sta n Val
.03
51.4
.016 63.69
Sta n Val
11.7
.03
.1
.3
7.32
Element
0.42
Wt. n-Val.
6.90
6.26
0.000811
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
7.99
2.88
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
2.50
1756.2
0.013
0.10
0.10
0.10
17.37
17.37
50.00
7.99
2.88
2.17
1756.2
88
0.10
Min Ch El (m)
Alpha
4.40
1.00
11.98
0.00
Shear (N/m2)
11.53
0.05
0.00
0.00
4.05
3.13
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
BRIDGE
RS: 3.5
INPUT
Description:
Distance from Upstream XS =
Deck/Roadway Width
Weir Coefficient
.1
= 10.51
=
1.4
89
num=
8.85
7.45 39.08
8.85
7.45
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
8.83
17
Sta
7.97 15.96
Elev
Sta Elev
7.94 20.19
Sta
Elev
7.91 26.25
7.95
30.3
7.96 30.82
4.4 33.02
4.43
34.6
4.47 36.17
4.47
37
4.48 39.08
7.96 43.49
7.95
51.4
7.84 63.69
7.87
86.98
7.91 127.37
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
7.72
num=
.03
Sta n Val
30.3
Sta n Val
.013 39.08
.03
Sta n Val
51.4
Sta n Val
.016 63.69
.03
.3
77.99
7.72
0 98.13
102.46
8.74
7.32 105.81
7.84
8.74
7.32 98.13
7.32 114.52
7.32
8.74
7.32
90
114.52
7.82
0 154.4
7.82
Elev
7.63
num=
Sta Elev
.36
20
Sta
Elev
7.69 16.14
Sta
Elev
7.64 37.46
Elev
7.71 37.54
7.68 77.99
109.98
4.41 114.52
7.73 118.58
7.84 154.4
7.82 185.77
7.8
190.36
7.87 192.84
7.87 197.15
7.77 229.46
7.79 260.64
7.81
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.016 38.55
197.15
num=
7.57 102.46
7.67
38.55
Manning's n Values
7.72 98.13
Sta
4.44 105.81
4.41
Sta n Val
.03 98.13
Sta n Val
.013 118.58
Sta n Val
.016 185.77
.03
.016
.3
.98
91
= Broad Crested
Number of Abutments = 2
Abutment Data
Upstream
num=
Sta
Elev
30.3
7.45 30.82
Downstream
Sta
Sta Elev
7.45
num=
Elev
94.13
Sta Elev
7.32 102.46
7.32
Abutment Data
Upstream
num=
Sta
Elev
37
7.45 39.08
Downstream
Sta
109.98
Elev
Sta Elev
num=
7.45
2
Sta Elev
7.32 118.58
7.32
92
7.32
Element
6.90
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
6.33
5.62
6.33
6.07
Q Weir (m3/s)
1.93
1.21
Weir Submerg
Froude # Chl
Q Bridge (m3/s)
50.00
Inside BR US Inside BR DS
7.27
7.17
4.30
5.51
11.63
1.00
9.07
1.60
32.85
1.88
32.47
1.21
93
7.45
9.96
Delta EG (m)
0.17
992.3
657.6
Delta WS (m)
1.52
6.18
7.52
18.57
5.51
Coef of Q
Br Sel Method
9.92
0.04
0.06
29.08
51.86
0.00
0.00
Warning: For the final momentum answer at the bridge, the upstream energy was computed
lower than the downstream energy.
This is not physically possible, the momentum answer has been disregarded.
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 3
94
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
7.63
num=
Sta Elev
.36
Sta
7.69 16.14
20
Elev
Sta
7.64 37.46
Sta
Elev
7.71 37.54
7.68 77.99
109.98
4.41 114.52
7.73 118.58
7.84 154.4
7.82 185.77
7.8
190.36
7.87 192.84
7.87 197.15
7.77 229.46
7.79 260.64
7.81
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.016 38.55
197.15
num=
7.57 102.46
7.67
38.55
Manning's n Values
7.72 98.13
Elev
4.41
Sta n Val
.03 98.13
4.44 105.81
Sta n Val
.013 118.58
Sta n Val
.016 185.77
.03
.016
.3
7.15
Element
1.77
Wt. n-Val.
5.38
5.92
0.008071
Area (m2)
0.013
23.74
26.95
29.56
8.48
8.48
95
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.14
5.90
Flow (m3/s)
50.00
10.14
5.90
0.97
556.6
Conv. (m3/s)
556.6
26.95
10.76
Min Ch El (m)
4.41
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
0.84
62.37
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
3.94
3.06
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 2
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
num=
19
96
Sta
0
Elev
Sta Elev
7.82 20.93
Sta
Elev
7.6 28.88
Sta Elev
7.51 29.36
Sta
Elev
7.56 29.87
7.52
29.9
7.56 31.09
7.5 52.77
7.89 78.75
7.82 84.03
7.19
84.23
6.4 88.08
4.34 91.98
4.31 94.99
4.32 98.98
7.23
119.55
7.67 119.66
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
7.81 151.11
num=
Sta n Val
.016 52.77
7.84 184.79
7.77
Sta n Val
.03 78.75
Sta n Val
.013 119.66
Sta n Val
.03 151.11
.016
.3
6.87
Element
1.47
Wt. n-Val.
5.40
5.86
0.006109
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.37
5.38
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
1.09
0.013
95.56
95.56
95.56
9.30
9.30
50.00
10.37
5.38
0.90
97
639.7
Conv. (m3/s)
10.99
Shear (N/m2)
50.69
4.31
1.00
0.19
639.7
0.09
0.00
0.00
3.70
2.78
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
BRIDGE
RS: 1.04
INPUT
Description: Peatonal de Mangual
Distance from Upstream XS = 95.56
Deck/Roadway Width
Weir Coefficient
= 6.68
=
1.4
98
84.03
8.79
7.19 98.98
8.83
7.23
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
7.82 20.93
19
Sta
Elev
7.6 28.88
Sta Elev
7.51 29.36
Sta
Elev
7.56 29.87
7.52
29.9
7.56 31.09
7.5 52.77
7.89 78.75
7.82 84.03
7.19
84.23
6.4 88.08
4.34 91.98
4.31 94.99
4.32 98.98
7.23
119.55
7.67 119.66
7.81 151.11
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 52.77
84.03 98.98
7.77
Sta n Val
.03 78.75
7.84 184.79
Sta n Val
.013 119.66
Sta n Val
.03 151.11
.016
.3
8.17
6.57 56.89
8.18
6.58 57.37
6.77
num=
30
99
Sta
0
Elev
6.87
Sta Elev
8.92
Sta
Elev
6.66 21.73
Sta
Elev
6.68 26.04
6.77
Sta
Elev
26.1
6.63
26.45
6.65 26.49
6.67
30.3
6.79 30.35
6.9 30.99
6.91
31.1
6.83 35.96
6.71 36.07
6.67 36.42
6.67 36.65
6.84
38.92
6.81 39.36
6.67 39.36
6.66 43.13
6.57 45.63
4.3
49.51
4.28 51.34
4.31 52.65
4.34 56.89
6.58 57.37
6.77
59.7
6.71 69.58
6.79 78.58
6.76 95.42
6.88 103.97
7.3
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 38.92
.013
Sta n Val
59.7
.03
.3
.98
=
= Broad Crested
100
6.87
Element
5.40
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
6.24
6.23
5.86
5.85
Q Weir (m3/s)
1.93
1.95
Q Bridge (m3/s)
50.00
Inside BR US Inside BR DS
6.59
2.60
19.22
6.58
2.64
18.96
101
Weir Submerg
Froude # Chl
0.69
0.69
29.82
29.94
1.47
1.49
7.23
14.21
Delta EG (m)
0.19
1807.5
1791.9
Delta WS (m)
-0.83
13.11
12.72
23.56
2.64
Coef of Q
Br Sel Method
13.93
0.01
0.00
10.15
10.40
0.00
0.00
Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is
weir flow. The momentum
answer has been disregarded.
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous cross
section. This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
Modelaje y Diseo Hidrulico Usando HEC-RAS
INCI 5006 Hidrulica Aplicada
102
CROSS SECTION
RS: 1
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
6.87
num=
Sta Elev
8.92
30
Sta
Elev
6.66 21.73
Sta Elev
6.68 26.04
6.77
Sta
Elev
26.1
6.63
26.45
6.65 26.49
6.67
30.3
6.79 30.35
6.9 30.99
6.91
31.1
6.83 35.96
6.71 36.07
6.67 36.42
6.67 36.65
6.84
38.92
6.81 39.36
6.67 39.36
6.66 43.13
6.57 45.63
4.3
49.51
4.28 51.34
4.31 52.65
4.34 56.89
6.58 57.37
6.77
59.7
6.71 69.58
6.79 78.58
6.76 95.42
6.88 103.97
7.3
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 38.92
.013
Sta n Val
59.7
.03
103
43.13 56.89
.3
6.58
Element
0.35
Wt. n-Val.
6.23
5.84
0.000779
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
12.72
2.64
Conv. (m3/s)
114.49
Min Ch El (m)
4.28
18.96
50.00
12.72
2.64
Shear (N/m2)
1.49
1791.9
13.93
10.40
0.00
0.00
117.67
18.96
1791.9
114.49
112.09
Flow (m3/s)
1.95
1.00
0.013
Area (m2)
Alpha
0.00
0.00
2.34
1.66
CROSS SECTION
104
RS: 0
INPUT
Description: Ultima Seccion Aguas Abajo (POSTE)
Station Elevation Data
Sta
num=
Elev
Sta Elev
0 8.172
1.43 8.217
14
Sta
Elev
Sta Elev
1.58 6.222
Sta
5.48 4.309
Elev
8.19 4.279
12.36 4.248 16.65 5.949 19.49 6.558 22.21 6.561 25.33 6.572
31.42 6.621 38.98 6.599 49.88 6.502 58.35
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.016
num=
Sta n Val
1.58
1.58 19.49
Sta n Val
.013 19.49
6.45
.03
.3
6.48
Element
0.27
Wt. n-Val.
6.21
0.013
105
5.75
0.000629
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
16.26
2.28
1992.9
Alpha
1.00
50.00
16.26
4.25
21.92
1.96
Min Ch El (m)
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
21.92
2.28
1.35
Conv. (m3/s)
1992.9
17.06
Shear (N/m2)
7.93
0.00
0.00
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
River:Quebrada Oro
Reach
River Sta.
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
n9
106
Oro
.03
.016
.03
.035
.03
.013
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.035
.03
.03
.013
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.03
.016
.03
.035
.03
.013
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.013
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
3.5
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.016
.03
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.03
.016
Oro
1.04
Oro
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.016
.013
.03
.03
.03
.03
Bridge
.016
Bridge
Reach
River Sta.
Left
Channel
Right
Oro
52.98
53.47
53.14
Oro
51.08
51.36
53.17
107
Oro
13.45
14.41
14.62
Oro
.96
.98
Oro
1.87
1.81
Oro
10.52
10.67
11.7
Oro
3.5
Oro
23.74
26.95
29.56
Oro
106.09
102.26
98.77
Oro
1.04
Bridge
Oro
112.09
114.49
117.67
Oro
1.06
1.79
Bridge
Reach
River Sta.
Contr.
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Expan.
108
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
3.5
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
1.04
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Bridge
Bridge
Reach
River Sta Profile Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S. E.G. Elev E.G.
Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl
(m3/s)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m/m)
(m/s)
(m2)
(m)
Oro
22.65
9
14.00
PF 1
0.53
50.00
4.62
7.69
Oro
24.13
8
13.89
PF 1
0.50
50.00
4.57
7.55
7.77
0.002778
2.07
Oro
15.79
7
10.28
PF 1
0.82
50.00
4.54
7.00
7.51
0.007945
3.17
Oro
38.20
6
49.68
PF 1
0.44
50.00
4.49
7.25
7.39
0.000314
1.68
Oro
15.91
5
8.12
PF 1
0.72
50.00
4.47
6.84
7.35
0.001008
3.14
7.00
7.94
0.003320
2.21
109
Oro
17.37
4
7.99
PF 1
0.62
Oro
3.5
Oro
8.48
3
10.14
PF 1
2.06
Oro
9.30
2
10.37
PF 1
1.81
50.00
4.40
6.90
6.26
7.32
0.000811
2.88
50.00
4.41
5.38
5.92
7.15
0.008071
5.90
50.00
4.31
5.40
5.86
6.87
0.006109
5.38
Bridge
Oro
1.04
Bridge
Oro
18.96
1
12.72
PF 1
0.69
50.00
4.28
6.23
5.84
6.58
0.000779
2.64
Oro
21.92
0
16.26
PF 1
0.63
50.00
4.25
6.21
5.75
6.48
0.000629
2.28
RS: 9
Profile: PF 1
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 8
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
110
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 7
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 6
Profile: PF 1
RS: 4
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 3.5
Profile: PF 1
Warning:For the final momentum answer at the bridge, the upstream energy was computed
lower than the downstream energy. This
is not physically possible, the momentum answer has been disregarded.
111
RS: 3.5
Profile: PF 1 Downstream
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note: The energy method has computed a class B profile.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 3
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note: The energy method has computed a class B profile.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 2
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1
Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there
is weir flow. The momentum
answer has been disregarded.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1 Upstream
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous
Modelaje y Diseo Hidrulico Usando HEC-RAS
INCI 5006 Hidrulica Aplicada
112
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1 Downstream
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program selected the water
surface that had the least amount of error between computed and assumed values.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 0
Profile: PF 1
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
X XXXXXX
X X
X X
XXXX
X
XXXX
X X
X X
X X X
XXXXXXX XXXX
X X
X X
X X
XX
X
X X
XXX XXXX
X X
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXX
X X
113
X XXXXXX
XXXX
X X
X XXXXX
PROJECT DATA
Project Title: INCI5006
Project File : INCI5006.prj
Run Date and Time: 5/21/2014 3:58:20 AM
Project in SI units
PLAN DATA
Flow Title
: FlujoPico
Flow File
114
Multiple Openings = 0
Culverts
= 0
Inline Structures = 0
Bridges
= 2
Lateral Structures =
Computational Information
Water surface calculation tolerance = 0.003
Critical depth calculation tolerance = 0.003
Maximum number of iterations
= 20
= 0.1
= 0.001
Computation Options
Critical depth computed only where necessary
Conveyance Calculation Method: At breaks in n values only
Friction Slope Method:
Average Conveyance
Mixed Flow
FLOW DATA
115
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
Oro
RS
PF 1
9
50
Boundary Conditions
River
Reach
Quebrada Oro
Oro
Profile
PF 1
Upstream
Normal S = 0.0011
Downstream
Normal S = 0.000629
GEOMETRY DATA
CROSS SECTION
116
RS: 9
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
num=
Elev
Sta Elev
Sta
0 10.84
4.4 9.37
8.32
24
Elev
Sta Elev
8.56 17.32
Sta
Elev
8.31 22.77
8.31
29.25
8.44 31.79
7.89 34.95
44.76
4.62 45.71
4.87
47.2
6.54
47.96
8.01 51.93
8.25 55.13
8.28 55.24
8.14 61.36
8.16
61.45
8.3 64.63
8.29 77.34
8.39
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
num=
Sta n Val
.035 46.16
64.63
.03
89.2
4.62
8.43
11
Sta n Val
45.82
.03 51.93
Sta n Val
.03 34.95
Sta n Val
.035 35.705
.013 55.13
.016 61.45
.013
.013
.3
117
7.46
Element
0.17
Wt. n-Val.
7.29
6.06
0.000452
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
12.05
1.80
53.47
27.72
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
27.72
50.00
12.05
1.80
2.67
2352.7
Conv. (m3/s)
2352.7
53.47
15.06
Min Ch El (m)
4.62
Alpha
1.00
Note:
2.30
Shear (N/m2)
8.15
0.03
0.00
53.14
0.00
0.01
0.00
7.52
4.69
0.00
0.09
0.24
CROSS SECTION
118
RS: 8
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
8.5
num=
Sta Elev
4.39
8.43
Sta
9.57
20
Elev
Sta Elev
4.62 21.82
22.95
6.72 23.45
7.02 24.09
7.59 31.95
35.23
7.85 41.25
7.85 41.38
8 44.49
Sta n Val
0
.03
31.95
num=
Sta n Val
9.57
.013 35.13
5 21.99
5.15
8 35.13
7.98
8.02 47.91
8.16
Sta n Val
.035 11.29
Elev
Manning's n Values
Sta
Sta n Val
.013 21.107
.016 41.38
Sta n Val
.03 24.09
.013 44.49
.03
.03
.1
7.43
Element
0.15
Wt. n-Val.
0.019
119
7.28
51.08
0.000490
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
13.19
1.71
51.36
29.19
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
29.19
50.00
13.19
1.71
2.72
2259.0
Conv. (m3/s)
2259.0
51.36
15.97
Min Ch El (m)
4.56
Alpha
1.00
Note:
2.21
Shear (N/m2)
8.78
0.02
0.00
53.17
0.00
0.01
0.00
6.00
4.02
0.00
0.09
0.24
CROSS SECTION
RS: 7
INPUT
120
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
9.43 12.16
19
Sta
Elev
9.01 14.09
Sta Elev
8.53 30.27
Sta
8.58
Elev
42.4
8.57
52.27
73.24
7.82 77.27
7.94 78.85
7.98 79.08
7.83
85.29
7.95 88.43
7.97 98.41
7.87 118.31
7.85
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
77.27
num=
Sta n Val
.03 30.27
.013 78.85
7.8
Sta n Val
.016
85.1
42.4
Sta n Val
.03 60.664
.016 85.29
Sta n Val
.013 73.095
.013 88.43
.03
.03
.3
7.41
Element
0.17
Wt. n-Val.
7.24
0.000242
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
0.013
13.45
14.41
14.62
27.62
27.62
50.00
121
11.68
1.81
11.68
1.81
2.74
3215.8
Conv. (m3/s)
3215.8
14.42
14.83
Min Ch El (m)
4.51
Alpha
1.00
Note:
2.37
Shear (N/m2)
4.41
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
4.54
3.38
0.00
0.09
0.24
CROSS SECTION
RS: 6
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
7.83
num=
Sta Elev
6.37
Sta
7.54 12.97
16
Elev
Sta Elev
7.2 17.31
Sta
Elev
122
18.85
4.49
25.3
4.49 27.65
4.49 29.84
6.97 33.23
7.45
39.08
7.33 54.12
7.34 57.81
7.2 65.49
6.99 78.17
6.76
86.4
6.72
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.03 12.97
39.08
Sta n Val
.013 17.674
.016 54.12
7
Sta n Val
.013 27.35
Sta n Val
.013 33.23
.03
.03
.98
1.06
.1
.3
7.39
Element
0.10
Wt. n-Val.
7.28
0.000212
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
51.55
1.15
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
2.79
3432.0
0.013
0.96
0.07
0.98
32.19
0.07
0.00
1.06
11.23
32.19
47.25
1.64
0.06
0.04
Conv. (m3/s)
0.3
0.030
19.09
1.47
11.23
2.75
30.82
0.24
1.69
0.36
3243.2
188.6
123
0.98
Min Ch El (m)
Alpha
4.49
1.54
1.64
0.09
21.47
3.12
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
31.39
0.74
0.00
4.11
3.16
0.00
0.01
0.02
CROSS SECTION
124
REACH: Oro
RS: 5
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
8.12
33.29
num=
Sta Elev
6.9
18
Sta
Elev
8.13 17.08
7.78 34.42
4.49
8.09 25.08
37.8
51.47 7.99
65.3
8 68.21
94.98
98.5
7.31 103.48
7.26
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.03 33.29
68.21
num=
Sta Elev
4.47
Elev
7.92 31.22
7.72
39.8
4.51 42.56
7.85
7.98 74.73
7.65 89.34
7.5
7.28
Sta n Val
.013 42.56
Sta
Sta n Val
.03 51.47
.016
Sta n Val
65.3
.013
.03
1.81
1.79
.1
.3
7.35
Element
0.50
Wt. n-Val.
6.84
0.013
1.87
1.81
1.79
125
0.001008
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
8.12
3.14
15.91
Area (m2)
15.91
Flow (m3/s)
50.00
8.12
3.14
2.38
1574.6
Conv. (m3/s)
1574.6
1.81
10.90
4.47
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
1.96
14.43
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
4.08
3.14
CROSS SECTION
RS: 4
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta Elev
Sta
num=
Elev
17
Sta Elev
Sta
Elev
Sta Elev
126
8.83
7.97 15.96
7.94 20.19
7.91 26.25
7.95
30.3
7.96 30.82
4.4 33.02
4.43
34.6
4.47 36.17
4.47
37
4.48 39.08
7.96 43.49
7.95
51.4
7.84 63.69
7.87
86.98
7.91 127.37
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.03
7.72
num=
Sta n Val
30.3
Sta n Val
.013 39.08
5
Sta n Val
.03
51.4
.016 63.69
Sta n Val
11.7
.03
.1
.3
7.32
Element
0.42
Wt. n-Val.
6.90
6.26
0.000811
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
7.99
2.88
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
2.50
1756.2
0.013
0.10
0.10
0.10
17.37
17.37
50.00
7.99
2.88
2.17
1756.2
127
0.10
Min Ch El (m)
Alpha
4.40
1.00
11.98
0.00
Shear (N/m2)
11.53
0.05
0.00
0.00
4.05
3.13
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
BRIDGE
RS: 3.5
INPUT
Description:
Distance from Upstream XS =
Deck/Roadway Width
Weir Coefficient
.1
= 10.51
=
1.4
128
num=
8.85
7.45 39.08
8.85
7.45
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
8.83
17
Sta
7.97 15.96
Elev
Sta Elev
7.94 20.19
Sta
Elev
7.91 26.25
7.95
30.3
7.96 30.82
4.4 33.02
4.43
34.6
4.47 36.17
4.47
37
4.48 39.08
7.96 43.49
7.95
51.4
7.84 63.69
7.87
86.98
7.91 127.37
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
7.72
num=
.03
Sta n Val
30.3
Sta n Val
.013 39.08
.03
Sta n Val
51.4
Sta n Val
.016 63.69
.03
.3
77.99
7.72
0 98.13
102.46
8.74
7.32 105.81
7.84
8.74
7.32 98.13
7.32 114.52
7.32
8.74
7.32
129
114.52
7.82
0 154.4
7.82
Elev
7.63
num=
Sta Elev
.36
20
Sta
Elev
7.69 16.14
Sta Elev
7.64 37.46
Elev
7.71 37.54
7.68 77.99
109.98
4.41 114.52
7.73 118.58
7.84 154.4
7.82 185.77
7.8
190.36
7.87 192.84
7.87 197.15
7.77 229.46
7.79 260.64
7.81
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.016 38.55
197.15
num=
7.57 102.46
7.67
38.55
Manning's n Values
7.72 98.13
Sta
4.44 105.81
4.41
Sta n Val
.03 98.13
Sta n Val
.013 118.58
Sta n Val
.016 185.77
.03
.016
.3
.98
130
= Broad Crested
Number of Abutments = 2
Abutment Data
Upstream
num=
Sta
Elev
30.3
7.45 30.82
Downstream
Sta
Sta Elev
7.45
num=
Elev
94.13
Sta Elev
7.32 102.46
7.32
Abutment Data
Upstream
num=
Sta
Elev
37
7.45 39.08
Downstream
Sta
109.98
Elev
Sta Elev
num=
7.45
2
Sta Elev
7.32 118.58
7.32
131
7.32
Element
6.90
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
6.33
5.62
6.33
6.07
Q Weir (m3/s)
1.93
1.21
Weir Submerg
Froude # Chl
Q Bridge (m3/s)
50.00
Inside BR US Inside BR DS
7.27
7.17
4.30
5.51
11.63
1.00
9.07
1.60
32.85
1.88
32.47
1.21
132
7.45
9.96
Delta EG (m)
0.17
992.3
657.6
Delta WS (m)
1.52
6.18
7.52
18.57
5.51
Coef of Q
Br Sel Method
9.92
0.04
0.06
29.08
51.86
0.00
0.00
Warning: For the final momentum answer at the bridge, the upstream energy was computed
lower than the downstream energy.
This is not physically possible, the momentum answer has been disregarded.
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 3
133
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
Elev
0 7.63
num=
Sta Elev
.36
Sta
7.69 16.14
20
Elev
Sta Elev
7.64 37.46
Elev
7.71 37.54
7.68 77.99
109.98
4.41 114.52
7.73 118.58
7.84 154.4
7.82 185.77
7.8
190.36
7.87 192.84
7.87 197.15
7.77 229.46
7.79 260.64
7.81
Sta n Val
0
Sta n Val
.016 38.55
197.15
num=
7.57 102.46
7.67
38.55
Manning's n Values
7.72 98.13
Sta
4.41
Sta n Val
.03 98.13
4.44 105.81
Sta n Val
.013 118.58
Sta n Val
.016 185.77
.03
.016
.3
7.15
Element
1.77
Wt. n-Val.
5.38
5.92
0.008071
Area (m2)
0.013
23.74
26.95
29.56
8.48
8.48
134
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.14
5.90
Flow (m3/s)
50.00
10.14
5.90
0.97
556.6
Conv. (m3/s)
556.6
26.95
10.76
Min Ch El (m)
4.41
Alpha
1.00
Shear (N/m2)
0.84
62.37
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
3.94
3.06
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note:
CROSS SECTION
RS: 2
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
num=
19
135
Sta
0
Elev
Sta Elev
7.82 20.93
Sta
Elev
7.6 28.88
Sta Elev
7.51 29.36
Sta
Elev
7.56 29.87
7.52
29.9
7.56 31.09
7.5 52.77
7.89 78.75
7.82 84.03
7.19
84.23
6.4 88.08
4.34 91.98
4.31 94.99
4.32 98.98
7.23
119.55
7.67 119.66
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
7.81 151.11
num=
Sta n Val
.016 52.77
7.84 184.79
7.77
Sta n Val
.03 78.75
Sta n Val
.013 119.66
Sta n Val
.03 151.11
.016
.3
6.87
Element
1.47
Wt. n-Val.
5.40
5.86
0.006115
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
10.37
5.38
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
Top Width (m)
Avg. Vel. (m/s)
1.09
0.013
95.56
95.56
95.56
9.29
9.29
50.00
10.37
5.38
0.90
136
639.4
Conv. (m3/s)
10.98
Shear (N/m2)
50.73
4.31
1.00
0.19
639.4
0.09
0.00
0.00
3.70
2.78
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
BRIDGE
RS: 1.04
INPUT
Description: Peatonal de Mangual
Distance from Upstream XS = 95.56
Deck/Roadway Width
Weir Coefficient
= 6.68
=
1.4
137
84.03
8.79
7.19 98.98
8.83
7.23
Elev
num=
Sta Elev
7.82 20.93
19
Sta
Elev
7.6 28.88
Sta Elev
7.51 29.36
Sta
Elev
7.56 29.87
7.52
29.9
7.56 31.09
7.5 52.77
7.89 78.75
7.82 84.03
7.19
84.23
6.4 88.08
4.34 91.98
4.31 94.99
4.32 98.98
7.23
119.55
7.67 119.66
7.81 151.11
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 52.77
84.03 98.98
7.77
Sta n Val
.03 78.75
7.84 184.79
Sta n Val
.013 119.66
Sta n Val
.03 151.11
.016
.3
8.17
6.57 56.89
8.18
6.58 57.37
6.77
num=
30
138
Sta
0
Elev
6.87
Sta Elev
8.92
Sta
Elev
6.66 21.73
Sta
Elev
6.68 26.04
6.77
Sta
Elev
26.1
6.63
26.45
6.65 26.49
6.67
30.3
6.79 30.35
6.9 30.99
6.91
31.1
6.83 35.96
6.71 36.07
6.67 36.42
6.67 36.65
6.84
38.92
6.81 39.36
6.67 39.36
6.66 43.13
6.57 45.63
4.3
49.51
4.28 51.34
4.31 52.65
4.34 56.89
6.58 57.37
6.77
59.7
6.71 69.58
6.79 78.58
6.76 95.42
6.88 103.97
7.3
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
.016 38.92
.013
Sta n Val
59.7
.03
.3
.98
=
= Broad Crested
139
6.87
Element
5.40
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
6.24
6.23
5.86
5.85
Q Weir (m3/s)
1.93
1.95
Q Bridge (m3/s)
50.00
Inside BR US Inside BR DS
6.59
2.60
19.22
6.58
2.64
18.96
140
Weir Submerg
Froude # Chl
0.69
0.69
29.82
29.94
1.47
1.49
7.23
14.21
Delta EG (m)
0.19
1807.5
1791.9
Delta WS (m)
-0.83
13.11
12.72
23.56
2.64
Coef of Q
Br Sel Method
13.93
0.01
0.00
10.15
10.40
0.00
0.00
Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there is
weir flow. The momentum
answer has been disregarded.
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning: The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous cross
section. This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning: The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
Modelaje y Diseo Hidrulico Usando HEC-RAS
INCI 5006 Hidrulica Aplicada
141
CROSS SECTION
RS: 1
INPUT
Description:
Station Elevation Data
Sta
0
Elev
6.87
num=
Sta Elev
8.92
30
Sta
Elev
6.66 21.73
Sta Elev
6.68 26.04
6.77
Sta
Elev
26.1
6.63
26.45
6.65 26.49
6.67
30.3
6.79 30.35
6.9 30.99
6.91
31.1
6.83 35.96
6.71 36.07
6.67 36.42
6.67 36.65
6.84
38.92
6.81 39.36
6.67 39.36
6.66 43.13
6.57 45.63
4.3
49.51
4.28 51.34
4.31 52.65
4.34 56.89
6.58 57.37
6.77
59.7
6.71 69.58
6.79 78.58
6.76 95.42
6.88 103.97
7.3
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
num=
Sta n Val
Sta n Val
59.7
.03
142
43.13 56.89
.3
6.58
Element
0.35
Wt. n-Val.
6.23
5.84
0.000779
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
12.72
2.64
Conv. (m3/s)
114.49
Min Ch El (m)
4.28
18.96
50.00
12.72
2.64
Shear (N/m2)
1.49
1791.9
13.93
10.40
0.00
0.00
117.67
18.96
1791.9
114.49
112.09
Flow (m3/s)
1.95
1.00
0.013
Area (m2)
Alpha
0.00
0.00
2.34
1.66
CROSS SECTION
143
RS: 0
INPUT
Description: Ultima Seccion Aguas Abajo (POSTE)
Station Elevation Data
Sta
num=
Elev
Sta Elev
0 8.172
1.43 8.217
14
Sta
Elev
Sta Elev
1.58 6.222
Sta
5.48 4.309
Elev
8.19 4.279
12.36 4.248 16.65 5.949 19.49 6.558 22.21 6.561 25.33 6.572
31.42 6.621 38.98 6.599 49.88 6.502 58.35
Manning's n Values
Sta n Val
0
.016
num=
Sta n Val
1.58
1.58 19.49
Sta n Val
.013 19.49
6.45
.03
.3
6.48
Element
0.27
Wt. n-Val.
6.21
0.013
144
5.75
0.000629
Q Total (m3/s)
50.00
16.26
2.28
1992.9
Alpha
1.00
50.00
16.26
4.25
21.92
1.96
Min Ch El (m)
Area (m2)
Flow (m3/s)
21.92
2.28
1.35
Conv. (m3/s)
1992.9
17.06
Shear (N/m2)
7.93
0.00
0.00
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
River:Quebrada Oro
Reach
n11
River Sta.
n1
n2
n3
n4
n5
n6
n7
n8
n9
n10
145
Oro
.013
.03
.016
.03
.035
.013
.035
.03
.013
.016
Oro
.03
.035
.013
.03
.03
.013
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.03
.016
.03
.013
.03
.013
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.03
.013
.013
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.03
.013
.03
.016
.03
Oro
3.5
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.016
.03
Oro
.016
.03
.013
.03
.016
Oro
1.04
Oro
.016
.013
.03
Oro
.016
.013
.03
.03
Bridge
.016
Bridge
Reach
Oro
River Sta.
Left
52.98
Channel
53.47
Right
53.14
146
Oro
51.08
51.36
53.17
Oro
13.45
14.41
14.62
Oro
.96
.98
Oro
1.87
1.81
Oro
10.52
10.67
11.7
Oro
3.5
Oro
23.74
26.95
29.56
Oro
106.09
102.26
98.77
Oro
1.04
Bridge
Oro
112.09
114.49
117.67
Oro
1.06
1.79
Bridge
Reach
River Sta.
Contr.
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Expan.
147
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
3.5
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
1.04
Oro
.1
.3
Oro
.1
.3
Bridge
Bridge
Reach
River Sta Profile
Plan
Q Total Min Ch El W.S. Elev Crit W.S.
E.G. Elev E.G. Slope Vel Chnl Flow Area Top Width Froude # Chl
(m3/s)
(m/s)
(m2)
Oro
0.000452
Oro
0.003320
Oro
0.000490
Oro
0.002778
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m/m)
(m)
1.80
PF 1
27.72
CanalOptimo 50.00
12.05
0.38
2.21
PF 1
22.65
Puente
14.00
1.71
PF 1
29.19
CanalOptimo 50.00
13.19
0.37
2.07
PF 1
24.13
Puente
13.89
50.00
0.53
50.00
0.50
4.62
4.62
4.56
4.57
7.29
7.69
7.28
7.55
6.06
7.00
7.46
7.94
7.43
7.77
148
Oro
0.000242
Oro
0.007945
Oro
0.000212
Oro
0.000314
Oro
0.001008
Oro
0.001008
Oro
0.000811
Oro
0.000811
Oro
CanalOptimo 50.00
11.68
0.38
3.17
PF 1
15.79
Puente
10.28
1.47
PF 1
43.48
CanalOptimo 50.00
51.55
0.36
1.68
PF 1
38.20
Puente
49.68
3.14
PF 1
15.91
CanalOptimo 50.00
8.12
0.72
3.14
PF 1
15.91
Puente
8.12
2.88
PF 1
17.37
CanalOptimo 50.00
7.99
0.62
2.88
PF 1
17.37
Puente
7.99
3.5
Oro
0.008071
Oro
0.008071
Oro
1.81
PF 1
27.62
50.00
0.82
50.00
0.44
50.00
0.72
50.00
0.62
4.51
4.54
4.49
4.49
4.47
4.47
4.40
4.40
7.24
7.41
7.00
7.51
7.28
7.39
7.25
7.39
6.84
7.35
6.84
6.90
6.90
7.35
6.26
6.26
7.32
7.32
Bridge
5.90
PF 1
8.48
CanalOptimo 50.00
10.14
2.06
5.90
PF 1
8.48
Puente
10.14
PF 1
CanalOptimo
50.00
2.06
50.00
4.41
4.41
4.31
5.38
5.38
5.40
5.92
5.92
5.86
7.15
7.15
6.87
149
0.006115
Oro
0.006109
Oro
5.38
9.29
5.38
PF 1
9.30
10.37
1.81
Puente
10.37
50.00
1.81
1.04
Oro
0.000779
Oro
0.000779
Oro
0.000629
Oro
0.000629
4.31
5.40
5.86
6.87
Bridge
2.64
PF 1
18.96
CanalOptimo 50.00
12.72
0.69
2.64
PF 1
18.96
Puente
12.72
2.28
PF 1
21.92
CanalOptimo 50.00
16.26
0.63
2.28
PF 1
21.92
Puente
16.26
50.00
0.69
50.00
0.63
4.28
4.28
4.25
4.25
6.23
6.23
6.21
6.21
5.84
5.84
6.58
6.58
5.75
5.75
6.48
6.48
RS: 9
Profile: PF 1
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 8
Profile: PF 1
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
150
RS: 7
Profile: PF 1
Note: Manning's n values were composited to a single value in the main channel.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 6
Profile: PF 1
RS: 4
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 3.5
Profile: PF 1
Warning:For the final momentum answer at the bridge, the upstream energy was computed
lower than the downstream energy. This
is not physically possible, the momentum answer has been disregarded.
151
RS: 3.5
Profile: PF 1 Downstream
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Note: The energy method has computed a class B profile.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 3
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Note: The energy method has computed a class B profile.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 2
Profile: PF 1
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1
Note: Momentum answer is not valid if the water surface is above the low chord or if there
is weir flow. The momentum
answer has been disregarded.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1 Upstream
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program used critical depth
for the water surface and continued on with the calculations.
Warning:The velocity head has changed by more than 0.5 ft (0.15 m). This may indicate the
need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The conveyance ratio (upstream conveyance divided by downstream conveyance) is
less than 0.7 or greater than 1.4.
This may indicate the need for additional cross sections.
Warning:The energy loss was greater than 1.0 ft (0.3 m). between the current and previous
Modelaje y Diseo Hidrulico Usando HEC-RAS
INCI 5006 Hidrulica Aplicada
152
RS: 1.04
Profile: PF 1 Downstream
Warning:The energy equation could not be balanced within the specified number of iterations.
The program selected the water
surface that had the least amount of error between computed and assumed values.
River: Quebrada Oro Reach: Oro
RS: 0
Profile: PF 1
Note: Hydraulic jump has occurred between this cross section and the previous upstream
section.
153