Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OVERVIEW
1.1 OBJECTIVE
Design of prefabricated modular housing for different occupancies for the
inhabitants (about 5327 households) displaced due to the implementation of the
Pancheshwar Power Project on Mahakali River (Nepal).
1.2 NECESSITY
Pancheshwar Power Project is proposed as a Nepal-India bi-national scheme
on the Mahakali River with a capacity of 6720 MW. With its implementation, a total of
41,330 persons from 5327 households have been displaced for which rehabilitation
works have to be completed by 2012-2013 but as for now the progress is too slow to
reach the deadline.
For faster construction and as an approach to affordable homes, it is
proposed to provide a solution to mass housing using modular coordination method.
1.3 SCOPE
The project envisages selection of a suitable plan as per modular
coordination and use of building architecture for proper functioning and orientation of
the building.
The houses are proposed to be classified on the basis of income groups (i.e.
High Income Group, Medium Income Group and Low Income Group) which will then
decide the corresponding plan areas.
1.4 METHODOLOGY
Collection of necessary data and codal provisions as per required for the
project.
1. Manufacturing constraints
The functional plan and the construction technology shall ensure that the
project can be implemented in the shortest possible time with acceptable
quality.
2. Safety constraints
The design of all joints between prefabricated components shall meet the
accepted procedures.
3. Social constraints
The compulsion to provide housing for people belonging to different strata in
society within the shortest possible time due to mass displacement.
Context
IS 10297: 1982
Code for practice for design and construction of floors and roof
using precast reinforced/ prestressed concrete.
IS 456: 2000
IS 3935:1966
IS 875: 1987
Part (1&2)
Context
1.9
M
Design of foundation
1.10
SOFTWARE/EQUIPMENT USED
AUTOCAD
1.11 CONCLUSION
1. The project would successfully complete the design of modular houses using
advanced technology and a solution to quicker construction with economic
advantages.
2. Completion of the project will finally help in gaining vital and practical
implementations in accordance with safety and serviceability of the designed
units.
1.12
The implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need
of quicker construction and in the field of mass housing techniques.
It will be a boon for the weaker sections of society where owning a house is
still a common dream and the economic advantage of the project would be
effectively implemented.
Provisions for extension of plan for other suitability issues is also included
for satisfying different functional needs.
CHAPTER 2
INTRODUCTION
2.1 GENERAL
As a civil engineer, one should be familiar with all the aspects of civil
engineering practices be it housing, industrial, roads, airports, docks and harbors, dams,
transmission line towers an other hydraulic structures together with power plant
structures. The curriculum for civil engineering, which has been exposed all these four
years, has dealt with the rudiments of the above subjects in our curriculum. In order to
have hands on experience with respect to designing a project, in which the design of
R.C. structural elements is involved, is taken.
2.2 LITERATURE REVIEW
The basic principle of prefabrication, whereby a home is prefabricated in one
location and then delivered to another, has been around for at least a few hundred years.
The most widely cited benefit of prefab is economy of scale, as components or entire
homes can be produced in large quantities. But this is not a prerequisite for success.
Theres value in faster project schedules, fewer weather delays, and more efficient use of
materials thanks to optimization and quality control. One of the primary benefits for the
buyer is predictability: Predefined design details and construction processes give the
client a degree of surety about the outcome that is often absent in custom projects.
2.2.1 Present scenario around the globe
Between 1908 and 1940, Sears, Roebuck, and Company sold over 70,000
prefabricated house kits by mail to enterprising do-it-yourselfers across North America.
These ready-to-assemble homes featured precut wooden components cross-referenced to
a blueprint. Thanks to robust engineering, durable materials, and some good
craftsmanship, many of these homes are still in use.
After World War II the United States faced a severe housing shortage, and
several ventures attempted to use industrialized factory-built housing to solve the crisis,
including Lustron Homes and the General Panel Corporation. The Eames House, in
Pacific Palisades, California (1949), explored the idea that a home could be constructed
from off-the-shelf industrial parts and harness economies of scale for ready-made
components.
In the 1970s the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
sponsored Operation Break-through, which advocated the use of factory-based
industrialization and mass production in the national home-building industry as a way to
drive down costs and make housing more affordable. Unfortunately, Operation
Breakthrough did not break through, and the entrenched method of site-building homes
remained in place.
Luminaries like Frank Lloyd Wright, Walter Gropius, and Buckminster
Fuller were among many who experimented with prototypes intended for mass
productiona goal none of them achieved.
The last decade has seen a resurgence of interest in prefab as entrepreneurial
architects redefine the architect-client relationship around a product-based business
rather than a service-based practice. Most of todays models are manufactured in small
quantities to the same codes and with similar materials to site-built houses.
Majority of the latent defects such as poor joining and water leakage problems
found in
previous projects have been eliminated using in-situ fixed approach.
Located in Delhi, today the government- run company prefabricates primarily precast
concrete for architectural and civil projects throughout greater India.
When HPL began it was intended to produce low-income housing solutions
for the deficit in India. Precast wall panels and frame members such as beams and
columns provided a much needed set of tools to erect quick structures for mass housing.
The most difficult technology transfer obstacle for the HPL has been the cost of
machinery and materials for production. Since the government could not recoup the
return on investment for the factory through housing production, prefabrication from
HPL began to service other markets including higher dollar civil and larger public and
hotel buildings.
The quality of construction is much higher when components are
manufactured in a stable environment such as the factory. This is especially true in India
where today, prefabrication has become synonymous with durable, modern, and western
construction methods. Materials are used more efficiently, are safer from climatic
damage, and can be reused in the material stream. Because of these benefits, a general
consensus in India is to move prefabricated building systems beyond precast concrete
for large-scale construction to additional market sectors including a resurgent interest in
applying prefabrication technology to housing.
Traditional construction techniques involve the use of timber molds or
shuttering for roof spans and other structural systems. These temporary timber structures
have a short lifespan and due to the volume of construction in the peak seasons of spring
and summer for larger well-funded projects are often unavailable. This hinders
construction schedules and does not allow projects to be completed before cooler or
rainy seasons begin. However, construction does not stop in the summer despite the lack
of proper equipment and material. Instead, using makeshift methods for construction on
site leads to inappropriate means and hence a substandard quality of construction in
finished buildings. The prefabricated alternative to roof construction removes the issues
of timber molds and shuttering.
Material advances in the prefabrication housing market have also helped to
mitigate material failures. The use of fly ash in concrete increases its workability and
improves thermal performance. In addition, fly ash concrete block is beginning to
replace traditional clay bricks because it does not contain expansive soils that cause
walls and floors to crack with fluxes of temperature and humidity. Fly ash is captured
from the coal burning process that generate electricity and then reused to manufacture
more durable and stable building materials in a factory environment. The material
manufacturing is more predictable and therefore serves to build more seismically
resistant structures.
Prefabrication technology has not transferred as easily when compared with
other technologies because it is a production technology or knowledge based and not a
consumption technology or product based. Technology transfer of prefabrication is not
as pertinent to architects as it is to manufacturers of building products, but we are
caretakers of culture in the AEC industry. In many cases we are asked to help with many
of the transfers that are occurring by way of global practice or working for multinational firms that are producing prefabricated components and entire buildings for India
and elsewhere. Although transfers will continue to occur, especially in the area of
prefabrication in building, we should be well aware of how the decisions of U.S. and
western architects may have an effect on the ethical dilemmas regarding less developed
countries development and culture (Ref. 3).
2.2.3 A few successful projects executed in India using prefab
By adopting Prefabrication techniques the Houses are delivered in record
time 1/4th of the conventional time, in real time situation, this is much faster considering
10
labor issues. By casting all the building elements at one go, which is monolithic in
nature results in elimination of stage construction practice, thus drives Prefab techniques
in bigger and faster way in mass housing, presently in India this sector strive to deliver
the houses for urban poor and middle class. The project including construction of a
cluster of 350 houses was implemented by Rajiv Gandhi Housing for The Karnataka
Housing Board Government of Karnataka. Specifications of the project include the
following:
cum toilet)
Cost of a House - Rs 2 lakhs
Prefabrication technique using Modular Coordination adopted.
Grade of Concrete M 20
The above cost does not include the additional cost-benefits such as early occupational
cost (4-5 months), and saving in interest cost, resources holding charges (4-5months)
etc. as in case of conventional construction. The wastage of materials at site not
accounted (3-5%). Considering above all cost aspects, by adopting Prefab Technique,
about 15-20% of overall cost shall be saved.
Another project located at Bankapura Shigao Dharawd District Karnataka
included construction of a Model house using Prefabrication techniques. The entire
house was completed in 6 days. Few conclusions drawn from the project are given
below:
With adaptation of Prefab Techniques, it has been proven that the perception has been
totally changed. This technique brings pride & appreciation to the designer, owner, and
contractor, agencies that associated with the project by the end users.
11
On Speed:
At site, 3 day or 4 day cycle can be easily achievable and can complete the
entire house in a week time. The Foundation, Wall & Roof components has to be
designed, based on the soil & structural considerations. All the details of Electrical &
Plumbing has to be precise and shall be placed in position before concreting. However,
the prefab technology is yet to mature enough in terms of cost, assembly of elements at
site, issues associated with Joints & its sealants etc.
On Quality:
The de-shuttering shall be done for wall & roof after 24 hours of concreting,
by leaving adequate props to support roof concrete. Hence quality houses are built at one
go. The maintenance of these houses over period will be very less or minimum. In all
other methods, considerable change in design, manual errors, rectification, repetitions of
works etc. is seen during the project period and subsequently demands high maintenance
cost.
On Labor:
The requirement of labors is very minimum and hence, lesser quality issues
On Technology:
The Prefab Technology delivers the strong houses, which are more durable,
& sustainable against tornados, earthquakes etc., compare to any other methods of
construction.
12
Prefabrication can be located where skilled labour is more readily available and
costs of labour, power, materials, space and overheads are lower.
13
14
CHAPTER 3
3.1 OBJECTIVE
In rehabilitation works for the given power plant project, there is a need for
faster construction and as an approach to affordable homes for 5327 households, we
propose:
3.2 SCOPE
The rehabilitation site is Pithoragarh where an area of 81 hectares (200
acres) is allotted as shown in Figure 3.1.
15
carpet area will differ as per Government norms. The following are the carpet area
requirements for each type:
LIG 60 m2
MIG 90 m2
HIG - 150 m2
16
In order to reduce the time and cost of the project, it is proposed to adopt
prefabricated housing in this project.
To minimise the number of components to be produced on a mass scale,
modular coordination will be adopted by planning the different housing requirements.
17
18
(c) Preferred increments for sill heights, doors, and windows and other fenestration shall
be 1M.
(d) In the case of internal columns, the grid lines shall coincide with the center lines of
columns. In case of external columns and columns near the lift and stairwells, the grid
lines shall coincide with center lines of the column in the topmost storey.
19
(i) In some conventional forms of construction, experience has shown that the
structures are capable of safely sustaining abnormal conditions of loading and
remaining stable after the removal of primary structural member. It has been shown
that some forms of building structure and particularly some industrialized large panel
system have little reserve strength to resist forces not specifically catered for in the
design.
(ii) Adequate buttressing of external wall panels is important since these elements
are not fully restrained on both sides by floor panels. The designer may take
adequate design precautions. Experience shows that the external wall panel
connections are the weakest points of a precast panel building.
20
(iii) It is equally important to provide restraint to all load bearing elements at the
corners of the building. These elements and the external ends of cross-wall units
should be stiffened either by introducing columns as connecting units or by jointing
them to non-structural wall units which in emergency may support the load. Jointing
of these units should be done bearing in mind the need for load support in an
emergency.
(iv) In prefabricated construction, the possibility of gas or other explosions which
can remove primary structural elements leading to progressive collapse of the
structure shall be taken into account. It is, therefore, necessary to consider the
possibility of progressive collapse in which the failure or displacement of one
element of a structure causes the failure or displacement of another element and
results in the partial or total collapse of the building.
(v) Provision in the design to reduce the probability of progressive collapse is
essential in buildings of over six storeys and is of relatively higher priority than for
buildings of lower height.
(vi) It is necessary to ensure that any local damage to a structure does not spread to
other parts of the structure remote from the point of mishap and that the overall
stability is not impaired, but it may not be necessary to stiffen all parts of the
structure against local damage or collapse in the immediate vicinity of a mishap,
unless the design briefs specifically requires this to be done.
(vii) Additional protection may be required in respect of damage from vehicles,
further it is necessary to consider the effect of damage to or displacement of a loadbearing member by an uncontrolled vehicle. It is strongly recommended that
concrete kerbs or similar method adequately protect important structural members.
21
(viii) In all aspects of erection that affect structural design, it is essential that the
designer should maintain a close liaison with the builder or contractor regarding the
erection procedures to be followed.
(ix) Failures that have occurred during construction appear to be of two types. The
first of these is the pack-of-cards type of collapse in, which the absence of
restraining elements, such as partitions, cladding or shear walls, and means that the
structure is not stable during the construction period. The second is the situation in
which one element falls during erection and lands on an element below. The
connections of the lower element then give way under the loading, both static and
dynamic, and a chain reaction of further collapse is set up.
A precaution against the first form of failure is that the overall stability of
a building shall be considered in all its erection stages as well as in its completed
state. All joints that may be required to resist moments and shears during the erection
stage only shall be designed with these in mind. Temporary works required to
provide stability during construction shall be designed carefully.
To guard against the second form of failure, that is, the dropping of a unit
during erection, particular attention shall be given to the details of all pre-formed
units and their seatings to ensure that they are sufficiently robust to withstand the
maximum stresses that can arise from site conditions. Precast concrete construction
generally shall be capable of withstanding the impact forces that can arise from bad
workmanship on site.
22
The design of joints shall be made in the light of their assessment with
respect to the following considerations:
(i) Feasibility - The feasibility of a joint shall be determined by its load-carrying
capacity in the particular situation in which the joint is to function.
(ii) Practicability - Practicability of joint shall be determined by the amount and type
of material required in construction, cost of material, fabrication and erection and the
time for fabrication and erection.
(iii) Serviceability - Serviceability shall be determined by the joints and expected
behavior for repeated or possible overloading and exposure to climatic or chemical
conditions.
(iv) Fire Rating - The fire rating for joints of precast components shall be higher or at
least equal to connecting members.
(v) Appearance - The appearance of precast components joint shall merge with
architectural aesthetic appearance and shall not be physically prominent compared to
other parts of structural components.
The following are the requirements of a structural joint:
(a) It shall be capable of being designed to transfer the imposed load and moments
with a known margin of safety.
(b) It shall occur at logical locations in the structure and at points which may be most
readily analyzed and easily reinforced.
23
(c) It shall accept the loads without marked displacement or rotation and avoid high
local stresses.
(d) It shall accommodate tolerances in elements.
(e) It shall require little temporary support, permit adjustment and demand only a
few distinct operation to make.
(f) It shall permit effective inspection and rectification.
(g) It shall be reliable in service with other parts of the building.
(h) It shall enable the structure to absorb sufficient energy during earthquakes so as
to avoid sudden failure of the structure.
Joining techniques/materials normally employed are:
(a) Welding of cleats or projecting steel.
(b) Overlapping reinforcement, loops and linking steel grouted by concrete.
(c) Reinforced concrete ties all round a slab.
(d) Prestressing.
(e) Epoxy grouting.
(f) Bolts and nuts connection.
(g) A combination of the above, and
(h) Any other method proven by test.
24
25
26
(e) Erection equipment such as cranes, derricks, hoists, chain pulley blocks, etc.
f) Transport machinery such as tractor-cum-trailers, dumpers, lorries, locomotives,
motor boats and rarely even helicopters.
(g) Workshop machinery for making and repairing Steel and timber moulds.
(h) Bar straightening, bending and welding machines to make reinforcement cages.
(i) Minor tools and tackles such as wheelbarrows, concrete buckets, etc.
(j) Steam generation plant for accelerated curing.
In addition to the above, pumps and soil compacting machineryare
required at the building site for the execution of civil engineeringprojects involving
prefabricated components.
27
CHAPTER 4
4.1 PLANNING
4.1.1
Introduction
28
system to define coordinating spaces and zones for building elements and for the
components which form them. It is a concept of coordination of dimension and
space, in which buildings and components are dimensioned and positioned in
terms of a basic unit or module, known as 1 M. There are standard rules to abide
by - Rules for locating building elements within the reference system; Rules for
sizing building components in order to determine their work sizes; Rules for
defining preferred sizes for building components and coordinating dimensions
for buildings. It permits a flexible type of standardization, which encourages the
use of a limited number of standardized building components for the construction
of different types of buildings. It ensures dimensional coordination between
installation (equipment, storage units, other fitted furniture etc.) as well as with
the rest of the building.
The application of Modular Coordination may be applied to the design,
manufacture and assembly of buildings, their components and installations, and
it affects the twin factors of position and dimension. Modular Coordination may
be applied to a wide range of building technologies, ranging from component
building through partial prefabrication to rationalized traditional building
methods. Additionally, components, which are coordinated on a modular basis,
may be used in renovation programs.
4.1.2.1 ORIENTATION
The ideal house orientation is that the main long axis of the building runs
East-West, i.e. ridge line. It is very important that the house should be oriented
29
with respect to the sun and not to magnetic north. The most used rooms must be
on the side of the house oriented towards the sun. Also the least used rooms on
the side of the house in shade. The orientation of a house is done according to the
sun-diagram as shown in Figure 4.1. (Ref. 1)
The dimensions of the human body as shown in Figure 4.2 and the sizes
of the furniture help in deciding the space required in the design of a room. The
size of the sofa in the living room, dining table in the dining room, bed in the
bedroom, stove and fridge in the kitchen, the closet in the bath etc. help to decide
the size of the rooms with proper clearances provided between the furniture for
easy movement.
The dimensions are inner dimensions and are in mm.
Kitchen cum dining (40002500): To be placed in Southeast direction with East
as the cooking direction.
30
31
32
The plan for LIG is shown in Figure 4.3 with a carpet area of 60 m2.
Fig. 4.3 Plan for LIG (Dimensions are inner dimensions and are in m.)
4.1.3.2 PROPOSED PLAN FOR MIG WITH GRID LINES
The plan for MIG is shown in Figure 4.4 with a carpet area of 90 m2.
33
Fig. 4.4 Plan for MIG (Dimensions are inner dimensions and are in m.)
The plan for HIG is shown in Figure 4.5 with a carpet area of 150 m2.
34
Fig. 4.5 Plan for HIG (Dimensions are inner dimensions and are in m.)
4.2 ANALYSIS
4.2.1
35
= wself
Floor Finish
=2
=1
kN
m2
kN
m2
36
4.2.2
37
38
4.3 DESIGNS
4.3.1 Introduction
The typical structural elements are identified considering the Figure The
indentified elements are
1. Footing
2. Column
3. Slab
4. Beams
39
The loads on these elements are calculated considering the plan. The
required data and other requirements for the design of structural elements are
provided then and there. All the elements are checked for adequacy with respect
to handling stresses which is unique for prefab construction. In the absence of
codal provisions for joints, the recommended detailing of joints are followed.
4.3.2
Foundation
40
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Pile foundation
Pier foundation
Well foundation
Caisson
Step-1:
Find out the depth of the foundation Df from the following formula:
q s 1sin 2
[
]
s 1+sin
(4.1)
Where,
Df= depth of foundation in meter
qs = safe bearing capacity of soil in kPa
s
kN
3
m
41
load
qs
Area = A =
(4.2)
Load = W + Wf
Where,
W = load from column in kN
Wf = self weight of foundation in kN = 10% of W
kN
m3
Step-3:
Find out the length and breadth of foundation.
L
Step-4:
Find out maximum bending moment at the face of column
Step-5:
Find out the thickness of footing from the following formula.
42
(4.3)
Where,
Mu,limit = maximum bending moment in kN-m
N
mm2
u ,limit= .87 f y A st d 1
f y A st
f ck bd
(4.4)
M
Where,
Mu,limit = maximum bending moment in kN-m
fy = yield strength of steel in MPa
d = effective depth
Ast = area of tension steel
Step-7:
The footing must be checked for one way shear. According to IS-456:2000, the critical
section for one way shear will take place at a distance d from one face of column.
Where,
43
d
2
Step-9:
The footing must be checked for load at the base of column
wcol
c,br =
Ag
0.45 f ck
A1
A2
Where,
c,br
= bearing stress
A1
A2 = 2 (By IS: 456:2000)
Step 10:
44
0.785 2main
b
A st
0.785 2transverse
b
A st ,main
Data:
1
3
4
5
6
= 30
Grade of concrete = M 20
Steel bars used = Fe 415
Load from column = 258 kN
kN
m3
Depth of foundation =
q s 1sin 2
[
]
s 1+sin
200 1sin 30 2
[
]
18 1+sin 30
= 1.3 m
Hence we have to excavate soil upto 1.3 m below ground level
Step 2: Determination of plan area
45
Area = A =
load
qs
W +W f
qs
2
= 1.419 m
A = 1.419 = 1.19 m
wa
2
Where,
w= upward soil pressure in
kN
m
B b
a=
2 2
46
258
]
2
1.2
1.2
= 215
kN
m
Mu
= 32.65 kN-m
Step 5: Calculation of effective depth
2
M u=.36 f ck b d k (1.42 k )
d=
d =
Mu
.36 f ck bk ( 1.42 k )
32.65 106
.36 20 1200 .48(1.42 .48)
= 99.305 mm
A st
47
u=.87 f y A st d 1
f y A st
f ck bd
415 A st
6
32.65 10 = .87 415 A st 175 1 20 1200 175
A st
= 546.22 mm2
A st ,min =.0012(b D)
.0012(1200 230)
Hence,
= 331.2 mm2
A st > A st , min
48
1.5
258
.275 1.2
2
1.2
= 88.68 kN
Nominal shear stress = v =
V
bd
88.68 1000
1200 175
= .422 MPa
As per IS 456: 2000:
49
k c
A st
bd
= .26
For,
f ck
p = .26 and
= 20 MPa
c =.36 MPa
k =1
Hence,
v ( k c )
The depth chosen is not adequate as per one way shear criteria and the depth has to be
redesigned.
1.5 258
[ .275d ] 1.2=.36 1.2 d
2
1.2
50
v =
V
bd
255850
4 600 300
= .355 MPa
c = .25 f ck =.25 20
= .64 MPa
k s=1
51
v<
k s c
Bearing stress =
wcol
Ag
3
258 10
3002
= 2.867 MPa
. 45 f ck
A1
A2
= .45 20 2
= 12.47 MPa
=> 2.867<12.47
Hence, the design is safe against bearing.
Step 10: Spacing of reinforcement
.785 10 2 1200
546.22
172 mm 150 mm
Hence, 10 mm dia Fe 415 bars will be provided @ 150 mm c/c distance as main
reinforcement.
Spacing of transverse reinforcement:
52
.785 64 1200
.0012 356 1200
= 117.6 mm
100
mm
Hence, 8 mm dia Fe415 bars will be provided @ 100 mm c/c distance as transverse
reinforcement.
53
4.3.3 COLUMN
4.3.3.1 Introduction
Direct compression.
Compression as well as bending stress due to eccentric loading.
Types of columns:
I.
Pedestal:
A column is said to be pedestal if its effective length to breadth ratio is less than
3.
l eff
<3
b
Where,
Leff = effective length of column which is dependent upon the end
conditions.
B = least lateral dimension of the column.
54
II.
Short column:
A column is said to be short column when if its effective length to breadth ratio is
between 3 to 12.
III.
Long column:
A column is said to be long column if its effective length to breadth ratio is
greater than 12.
Here, in this project we will adopt limit state method for design of columns as per IS
456:2000.
STEP 1: Load calculations
Load on column= P kN
Design constant a) Grade of concrete =M 20 b) Grade of steel = Fe 415.
L = Unsupported length of the column in mm = L mm
Design load Pu = 1.5P =1.5P kN.
STEP 2: Column dimensions
The cross-sectional dimensions required will depend on the percentage of reinforcement.
Assume percentage of compression steel between 0.8 to 6% of gross cross section area
Assume 1.0 percent reinforcement and refer to Chart 25 SP16 Design Aids, and find Ag.
Adopt the column dimensions as per Ag value.
STEP 3: Type of column
Leff is dependent on end conditions of column.
For example,
55
1.
2.
3.
4.
If both the ends are fixed then, Leff = 0.65 length of column.
If one end is fixed and another is pinned then Leff = 0.80 length of column.
If one end is fixed and other end is free then Leff = 2 length of column.
If both the ends are pinned then, Leff = 1.0 length of column.
If
l eff
, then the column is short column.
<12
b
If
l eff
, then the column is long column.
<12
b
Pu D
L
eff
2000
D
( )
Pu
Puz
and value of n
Mux = Muy
M ux, lim
M ux
M uy, lim
M uy
56
L
3
wl
2
wl2
8
57
v=
wu l
2
V
bd
For values of v and pt, refer table 19, IS456-2000; Pg: 73 to find the value of c.
c should be less than v, for safe in shear.
58
l eff
b
Pu D
L
eff
2000
D
( )
Pu D
L
eff
2000
D
( )
= 8.04 kN-m
= .2, n= 1
M uy, lim
M uy
59
L
3
4.10.
kN
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of column= 1.5625 m
Check for dimensions:
60
1.5625 1.55 2
2
wl
2
= 1.87 kN-m
wl2
8
1.5625 2.325 2
8
m
Net excess moment = 0.814 kN-m
Mexcess = 0.138fckbd2
d = 34.35 mm < 170 mm, Hence chosen depth is safe
Check for shear:
Vu =
wu l
2
1. 5625 1.15
2
Vu = .898 kN
v=
Vu
b d
898
250 250
= 0.014
pt = 1.0
(Refer table 19, IS456-2000; Pg: 73)
c = 0.62
N
mm2
> v (0.014
N
mm2 )
61
N
mm2
=1.05 kN-
62
4650
300
Pu D
L
eff
2000
D
( )
2000
300
= .2, n=1
63
= 9.29 kN-m
M uy, lim
M uy
64
L
3
kN
m
wl2
2
2.25 1.552
2
= 2.70 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl2
8
wu l
2
2.25 1.15
2
Vu = 1.29 kN
v=
Vu
b d
= 0.014
N
mm2
pt = 1.0
65
2.25 2.3252
8
= 1.528 kN-m
c = 0.62
N
mm2
> v (0.014
N
mm2 )
4.3.4 BEAM
66
4.3.4.1 Introduction
L
Basic value for vertical deflection limit as per IS 456: 2000; Page 37
D
2
67
W u l eff
8
Mu,lim= .138fckbd2
If Mu<Mu,lim adopted dimensions are safe.
STEP 4: Reinforcement details
Mu= 0.87fyAstd(1-
A st f y )
b d f ck
.85
fy
b D
68
area of one
Number of bars = A st , calA st , min w h ic h ever greater
For higher depth beams side face reinforcement are provided for Ast,face = .1% of bwdw
STEP 5: Design of stirrups
wu l
2
Shear force Vu =
Vu
b d
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete is referred from Table 19 IS 456 using M 20 and
Ast value.
If Nominal shear stress< Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
If Nominal shear stress> Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress.
Vus=
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
69
Basic
L
d
= 20
wl2
2
wl2
8
70
d=
L
15
= 200mm
3000
15
kN
m
kN
m
kN
m
kN
m
W u l eff 2
30
13 32
30
71
A st f y )
b d f ck
Ast=56 mm2
Ast, minimum=
. 85
fy
b D =
.85
415
wu l
2
13 3
2
Vu =
b d
= 19.5 kN
19500
150 200
= .65
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M20 and Ast = 150.72
mm , c =.3
N
mm2
Nominal shear stress > Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress.
72
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Vus=
19500 =
L
d
= 20
For pt = 0.502,
kt = 1.6
201.6 > 15
32 > 15
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3m offset from both edges.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam = .8625
73
kN
m
wl
2
.8625 0.3
2
= 0.039 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span =
wl2
8
.8625 2.4 2
8
= .621 kN-m
74
L
20
= 250 mm
5000
20
kN
m
Weight of brick masonry wall above plinth = masonry l t= 19 2.6 .15= 7.41
kN
m
kN
m
W u l eff 2
30
W u l eff 2
30
foundation)
Mu,lim= .138fckbd2 = 25.875 kN-m
Mu<Mu,lim Hence adopted dimensions are safe.
75
kN
m
Mu= 0.87fyAstd(1-
.85
fy
b D =
.85
415
wu l
2
13 5
2
Vu =
b d
= 32.5 kN
32500
150 250
= .87
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M 20 and Ast= 235.5
mm2, c=.5
N
mm2
Nominal shear stress> Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress.
76
Vus=
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
32500 =
L
d
= 20
For pt = 0.628,
kt = 1.8
20 1.8 > 20
36 > 20
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3 m offset from both edges as shown in Figure 4.14.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam= 1.05
77
kN
m
wl2
2
1.05 0.32
2
0.047 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl2
8
1.05 4.42
8
78
= 2.541 kN-m
L
12
3000
12
= 250 mm
D
2
300
2
= 150 mm
79
kN
m
Live Load
=2
kN
m
Floor Finish
=1
kN
m
Total Load
= 7.625
kN
m
kN
m
Mu=
W u l eff
8
11.5 32
8
= 12.94 kN-m
A st f y )
b d f ck
Ast=136.7 mm2
80
kN
m
Ast, minimum=
. 85
fy
b D =
.85
415
wu l
214
11.5 3
2
Vu =
b d
= 17.25 kN
17250
150 265
= .43
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M20 and Ast=235.5
mm , c =.5
N
mm2
Nominal shear stress< Permissible Shear Strength, still nominal stirrups are provided for
Nominal shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
81
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Vus=
17250 =
L
d
= 20
For pt = 0.592,
kt = 1.8
20 1.8 > 11.32
36> 11.32
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3m offset from both edges.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam= 1.125
Check for dimensions:
82
kN
m
wl
2
1.125 0.3
2
= 0.05 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl2
8
1.125 2.4 2
8
= .81 kN-m
83
L
15
5000
15
= 333.33 mm
kN
m
Live Load
=2
kN
m
Floor Finish
=1
kN
m
Total Load
= 8.35
kN
m
kN
m
Mu=
W u l eff 2
8
13 5 2
8
= 40.625 kN-m
84
kN
m
Mu= 0.87fyAstd(1-
.85
fy
b D =
.85
415
wu l
2
13 5
2
85
= 32.5 kN
Vu =
b d
32500
200 335
= .485
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M 20 and Ast=343.17
mm , c=.3
N
2
mm
Nominal shear stress> Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress.
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Vus=
32500 =
Asv=80.61 mm2
For a two legged 8 diameter stirrup, 250.24=100.48 mm2>Asv
Hence provide 2LY8@300 mm c/c as shear reinforcements.
STEP 6: Check for deflection
Basic
L
d
= 20
86
24 > 14.93
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3m offset from both edges.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam= 1.85
kN
m
wl2
2
1.85 0.32 =
2
0.083kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl2
8
87
L
20
3000
20
= 150 mm
88
kN
m
Weight of brick masonry wall above plinth = masonry l t= 19 1.55 .15= 4.42
kN
m
kN
m
kN
m
W u l eff 2
8
8 32
8
= 9 kN-m
A st f y )
b d f ck
Ast=204.88mm2
Ast, minimum=
.85
fy
b D =
.85
415
89
Number of bars = 3
Hence providing 3Y10 as tension steel and 2Y8 as top hanger bars.
STEP 5: Design of stirrups
wu l
2
8 3
2
Vu =
b d
= 12 kN
12000
150 150
= .53
N
2
mm
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M20 and Ast=235.5
mm2 ,c = .3
N
mm2
Nominal shear stress> Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
Vus=
12000 =
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Asv=81.01 mm2
For a two legged 8 diameter stirrup, 250.24=100.48 mm2>Asv
Hence provide 2LY8@300 mm c/c for shear reinforcements.
90
L
d
= 20
For pt = 0.872,
kt = 1.1
201.1 > 20
22 > 20
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3 m offset from both edges.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam= .675
kN
m
wl2 =
2
.675 0.32 =
2
0.03 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl
8
91
.675 2.4
8
=.486 kN-m
L
20
3000
20
= 250 mm
92
kN
m
Weight of brick masonry wall above plinth = masonry l t= 19 1.55 .15= 4.42
kN
m
kN
m
kN
m
W u l eff 2
8
8.25 2
8
= 25.625 kN-m
A st f y )
b d f ck
Ast=352.74 mm2
Ast, minimum=
.85
fy
b D =
.85
415
93
8.25
2
Vu =
b d
= 20.5 kN
20500
150 250
= .55
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete as per Table 19 IS 456 for M20 and Ast=392.5
mm2 ,c=.62
N
2
mm
Even though Nominal shear stress< Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for
Nominal shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
Vus=
20500 =
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
94
L
d
= 20
For pt = 1.04,
kt = 1.1
20 1.1 > 20
22 > 20
Hence Deflection is Safe.
STEP 7: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 0.3 m offset from both edges.
Load on beam due to erection= self weight of beam= 1.05
kN
m
wl2
2
1.05 0.32
2
0.047 kN-m
Positive moment at mid span=
wl
8
95
1.05 4.4
8
= 2.541 kN-m
4.3.5 Corbel
96
W u l eff
2
Mu,lim= .138fckbd2
If Mu<Mu,lim, adopted dimensions are safe.
STEP 4: Reinforcement details
Ast, minimum= .2%bD
Adopt diameter bars.
area of one
A st ,min
Number of bars =
W u l
2
Vu
b d
97
If Nominal shear stress< Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
If Nominal shear stress> Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress.
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Vus=
br,limit=
f ck
F .o.s
W beam
b l
If br,calculated > br,limitthen the adopted dimensions of the corbel are safe.
4.3.5.2 Design
98
d= 0.3 m
STEP 2: Loads
Self weight of the corbel wself= conc b d = 250.30.3= 2.25
kN
m
kN
m
W u l eff 2
2
6.15 0.62
2
= 1.107 kN-m
99
kN
m
kN
m
101. 38
78.5
Number of bars=
~=3
Hence providing 3Y10 as top tension steel and 2Y8 as bottom hanger bars.
STEP 5: Design of stirrups
W u l
2
6.15 0.3
2
Vu
b d
= 0.92 kN
920
300 300
= .01
N
mm2
Permissible Shear Strength of concrete is referred from Table 19 IS 456 using M 20 and
N
2
mm
Nominal shear stress< Permissible Shear Strength, stirrups are provided for Nominal
shear stress= Permissible Shear Strength.
0.87 f y A sv d
Sv
Vus=
br,calculated=
W beam
b l
1850000
300 500
= 12.33
100
N
2
mm
br,limit=
f ck
F .o.s
Sincebr,calculated(12.33
20
2
= 10
N
mm2
N
mm2 ) > br,limit(10
N
mm2 ), the adopted dimensions of the
4.3.6 Slab
101
4.3.6.1 Introduction
A slab is a common structural element of modern buildings. These are most often
used to construct floors and ceilings. It is of two types on the basis of behavior- One way
slab and Two way slab.
One way slab needs moment resisting reinforcement only in short direction.
Because, the moment about long axis is so small that it can be neglected. When the ratio
of length of long direction to short direction of slab is greater than two it can be
considered as a one way slab.
Two way slab needs moment resisting reinforcement in both directions. When
the ratio of length of long direction to short direction of slab is less than two it can be
considered as a two way slab and then movement in both directions should be
considered in design.
Ly/Lx > 2
Specify end conditions of the slab, for simply supported slab all four edges will be
discontinuous.
102
Effective depth =
span
28
= wself
Floor Finish
=2
=1
kN
m2
Long direction
103
kN
m2
3d
2.
300 mm
wu l x
2
104
Vu
b d
L
d
= 20
wl
2
wl
8
105
If Mexcess<Mu,member then chosen dimensions are safe for erection stresses too.
4.3.6.3 Design
fck = 20
N
mm2
fy = 415
N
mm2
Ly/Lx = 1.667< 2
106
kN
m2
=2
Floor Finish
=1
Total load
= 6.5
kN
m2
kN
2
m
Wu = 9.75
kN
m2
say 10
kN
m2
107
kN
m2
b)
Long direction
= 3(120) =360 mm
108
Distribution steel
As per minimum steel,
Ast = 168 mm2
Provide 8 mm diameter bars @ 300 mm c/c as distribution steel.
STEP 7: Check for shear
Considering the short span unit width of slab.
wu l x
2
10 3
2
Vu
b d
15000
1000 120
pt = 0.28
(Refer table 19, IS 456:2000; Page: 73)
c = 0.39
N
2
mm
> v (0.107
N
2
mm )
L
d
= 15 kN
= 20
109
= .107
N
mm2
For pt = 0.28,
kt = 1.2
Max > Actual
Basic kt >21.42
201.2 > 21.42
24 > 21.42
Hence, safe in deflection.
STEP 9: Check for erection stresses
Hooks are provided at 1 m offset from edge in longer span and .5 m offset from edge in
shorter span, at all four corners of slab as shown in Figure 4.21.
110
kN
m
wl2
2
=6.56 kN-m
2
111
52.5 0.52
2
4.3.7.1 Introduction
112
In foundation to column joints, the infill should be prepared with the use of
expansive cements so that no cavity formation takes place after hydration.
Continuity bars should extend beyond both the edges of the exterior slab.
Dowels bars should extend beyond the column and beam joint to both of the
sides.
Details of typical bearing of a floor unit over the precast beam are shown
in Figure 4.23 the stirrups of the precast beams are protruded and function as shear
connectors.
113
The bracket support for the beam over the column is shown in Figure 2.
A tolerance of 2-3 cm is allowed at the seating of the beam over the bracket.
A dowel bar inserted through the holes provided in the bracket and the beam
114
The foundations usually cast as in-situ isolated footings as the local soil
conditions warrant.
115
The bottom end of the precast column is connected to the foundation as shown in
Figure 4.24.
116
For facilitating erection, lifting hooks are provided in the precast floors and
beams. Erection eyes as provided in the structural elements help in lifting them during
transportation and erection using temporary bracing. The hooks have a typical design as
shown in Figure 4.24.
117
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
5.1 CONCLUSION
The project successfully completes the design of modular houses using advanced
technology and a solution to quicker construction with economic advantages.
Completion of the project has finally helped in gaining vital and practical
implementations in accordance with safety and serviceability of the designed
units.
The implementation of the project will be of a great help to the rising need of
quicker construction and in the field of mass housing techniques.
It will be a boon for the weaker sections of society where owning a house is still
a common dream and the economic advantage of the project would be effectively
implemented.
118
Provisions for extension of plan for other suitability issues is also included for
satisfying different functional needs.
119