Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(i) DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the project work entitled
Factors affecting Brand loyalty in Pakistan
Submitted to the KASB Institute of technology, is a record of an original work done
by our group under the guidance of Assistant Professor Abdul Kabeer Kazi, a n d
this project work is submitted in the partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of bachelor's of Business Administration.
The results embodied in this Research report have not been submitted to any
other University or Institute for the award of any degree or diploma.
Group:
Farhanullah Soomro
Adeeba Farhan
__________________ ____________
of Assistant Professor Abdul Kabeer Kazi
Course Supervisor
Associate Dean, Faculty of Management Sciences (FMS)
KASBIT
BBA 5-B
(ii) Acknowledgements
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my course supervisor, Assistant Professor
Abdul Kabeer Kazi, for his patience, support and guidance. I am grateful to those who
agreed to participate in this research by completing the questionnaire, conducting
the survey, data capturing, analysis and editing. Including my colleagues for their
support. Words cannot express enough my appreciation to my family, for their love,
patience and support during the entire period. Above all, I glorify the Almighty Allah
for the strength, courage, wisdom and inspiration throughout the period of my
studies.
(iii) Abstract
The Apple iPhone brought a whole new level on interface and features such as
incorporating the iPod technology as well as multi-touch technology which let users
to control everything using only their fingers. The research on the level of customer
loyalty/satisfaction on buying an iPhone has been done across the world as it was
one of the first handphone that was release by Apple.
Customer satisfaction is a blurred and concrete concept and the actual expression of
the state of satisfaction will vary depending on individual's needs and it also depends
on the product or service. The level of loyalty/satisfaction can also vary depending
on other options the customer may have and other products against which the
customer can compare the organization's products. It also distinguishes six qualities
of attributes such as basic factors, excitement factors, performance factors,
indifferent attributes, questionable attributes and reverse attributes.
The objective of this research is to analyze the level of loyalty/satisfaction of having
an iPhone based on certain factors. This research will look into factors such as price
and quality where each factors has its respective advantages or disadvantages to
affect the customer's level of loyalty/satisfaction. This is because every diverse
consumer has their own priority of need before even getting a new hand phone.
The research will be focusing on the capability of the iPhone and what it has to offer
to the customers that makes it different and better than its competitors. These
capabilities refer back to the factors which were mentioned earlier in the paragraph
earlier. Technology for hand phones has been developing endlessly with new
features offered as time passed. Apple's new range of products, especially the
iPhone shows such vast improvement.
The research first looks at the background of the company which is Apple and what
they have offered to their customers before launching the iPhone. Next, the research
will provide detailed explanation and information on each factor that will affect the
customer's satisfaction. The research will use only secondary data such as online
journals and articles, blogs and newspapers so that the latest information can be
obtained for the research.
5.6 Service.(16)
5.7 Correlations.(17)
5.8 Regression analysis.(18)
Chapter No. 6 --- Conclusion...(19)
6.1 Conclusion.(19)
6.2 Recommendations for Future Research..(19)
References...(20-22)
Appendix A: Survey Questionnaire.(23)
1.1 Introduction
The term customer loyalty is used to describe the behavior of repeat customers, as
well as those that offer good ratings, reviews, or testimonials. Some customers do a
particular company a great service by offering favorable word of mouth publicity
regarding a product, telling friends and family, thus adding them to the number of
loyal customers. However, customer loyalty includes much more. It is a process, a
program, or a group of programs geared toward keeping a client happy so he or she
will provide more business.
Customer loyalty can be achieved in some cases by offering a quality product with a
firm guarantee. Customer loyalty is also achieved through free offers, coupons, low
interest rates on financing, high value trade-ins, extended warranties, rebates, and
other rewards and incentive programs. The ultimate goal of customer loyalty
programs is happy customers who will return to purchase again and persuade others
to use that company's products or services. This equates to profitability, as well as
happy stakeholders.
Apple Inc. is an American multinational corporation that designs and manufactures
consumer electronics, computer software, and personal computers. The company's
best-known hardware products include Macintosh computers, the iPod, the iPhone
and the iPad. Apple software includes the Mac OS X operating system; the iTunes
media browser; the iLife suite of multimedia and creativity software; the iWork suite
of productivity software; Aperture, a professional photography package; Final Cut
Studio, a suite of professional audio and film-industry software products; and Logic
Studio, a suite of audio tools. As of January 2010 the company operates 284 retail
stores in ten countries, and an online store where hardware and software products
are sold. As of the third quarter of 2009, it is the tenth largest company in the world.
We have selected apple because of quality, class, expensive simple, Sleek, Fantastic,
Simple, and Complex Smart, Beautifully designed. Stylish, Classic, technology driven
expensive, expensive slick, expensive, trendy Mint, reliable, fresh, Innovative,
Modern clean, efficient, crisp Slick, efficient, worth-it Mint.
1.2 Problem statement
Many researchers have been conducted to indentify the effect of service, Customer
Satisfaction, and Trust on customers brand loyalty. Some of them found positive impact
of services on customers brand loyalty 1. Some researcher also found no impact of these
variables on customers brand loyalty 2. There is a need to identify the relation of service
quality, service, Customer Satisfaction, and Trust with customers brand loyalty.
1.3 Research Objective
The objective of the research is to investigate the impact of perceived determinants on Brand
loyalty of Apple IPhone. The impact of Customer satisfaction, service features and trust on
brand loyalty.
Brand loyalty as a concept has its origins in the 1920s (Bennett 2001, p.3).The most
commonly used definition of brand loyalty is The biased (non-random) behavioral
response (purchase) expressed over time by some decision-making unit with respect to
one or more alternative brands out of a set of brands and is a function of psychological
processes (Jacoby 1971, p.25). Fournier and Yao (1997) described the centre of
companies marketing strategies is the development and maintenance of consumer brand
loyalty. The phenomenon is especially seen in markets with tough competition, highly
unpredictable and low product differentiation. Carroll and Ahuvia (2006) suggested that
Brand love, in turn, is associated to higher levels of brand loyalty and positive word-ofmouth. Importance of brand loyalty Brand loyalty is of paramount importance for
marketers and consumer researchers (Aaker, 1991; Reichheld, 1996).In services context,
many scholars focused on importance and significance of brand loyalty (AsuncianET AL.,
2004; Bloamer et al., 1999; Caruana, 2002). The organization that have pool of brand
loyalists have greater market share and higher rates of return on investments, in turn.
Many other researchers favored this (Buzzell et al., 1975; Raj, 1985; Jensen and Hansen,
2006). Such results persuade marketing officials to generate and up-hold brand loyalists.
To attain such targets, information about variables which causes brand loyalty becomes a
core issue.
Anderson et al. (2004) argued a loyal anD CONTENTED CUSTOMER BASE HELPS to increase
the organizations relative bargaining power regarding suppliers, partners and channels.
So, customer loyalty should affect shareholder value in a positive manner by reducing
instability and associated risk with expected future cash flows. Dick and Basu (1994) hold a
view that customer loyalty creates positive WOM communication (word of mouth) and
competitive strategies are resisted by loyal customers. Such findings appeal to strategists
and marketers to build and hold strong customer loyalty. Oliver (1999) agreed with Dick
and Basu that customer loyalty is engaged in affirmative word of mouth communication.
Kotler and Keller (2005) said that based on a 20-80 principle, the top 20% of the
customers may create 80% of profit for a company. Thus a favorable connection between
a company and its customers is lucrative for the business.
2.2 Services
Loyalty literature has revealed that for consumable, durable and services, markets have
different approaches so loyalty is measured differently. Literature also revealed that
goods and services market are different in terms of what and how we measure brand
LOYALTY. JAVALGI AND MOBERG (1997) stated if consumer has a good relation with
service provider, there are more chances of consumer being loyal to the brand. Lovelock
et al. (1998) said services are becoming increasingly important to the Australian economy
as it represents 70% of GNP and 77% of total employment in Australia. In the next
decade 90% of all new jobs in Australia and Newzeland are expected to be in the SERVICES
SECTOR (LOVELOCK ET AL.1998, P6). Moreover, amongst the services, the cellular
network providers sector is significant one because of its high penetration. So this sector
has become an essential because of its widespread use now a day. Thus, marketers
considered it as attractive avenue in which firms try to behave responsibly towards the
service users. Antecedents of brand loyalty Some drivers of brand loyalty are PERCEIVED
RISK, INERTIA, HABIT, involvement, satisfaction, and relationship between product or
service providers (Rundle-Theile and Bennet, 2001). A series of very positive encounters
will increase customer satisfaction, truST, RELATIONSHIP COMMITMENT AND continuity
(Hellier et al., 2003; Morgan and Hunt, 1994; Selnes, 1998). Aydin and Ozer (2005) stated
some antecedents of customer loyalty. Corporate image, perceived service quality, trust
and customer switching costs are the influential factors of brand loyalty. Moreover the
results described that trust is one of the most important antecedents of brand loyalty.
Although perceived service quality and perceived switching cost appeared to have the
same level of influence on brand loyalty.
2.3 Consumer satisfaction
In most literature related to behavioral intentions, overall satisfaction was integrated as a
dominant factor of purchase intentions with reference to brand loyalty (Spreng et al.,
1996). In the viewpoint of Bloamer and Kasper (1995), customer loyalty is one of the
considerable paths with which customer satisfaction about product or services received is
expressed. For this reason brand loyalty is at heart of strategic marketing.Soloman (1994)
explored that purchase decisions of loyal costumer may become a habit in nature, even
quite simple and provide satisfaction with current brand(s) as a result. Many scholars
concluded that satisfaction is one of the important determinants of customers loyalty
(Jamal and Anastasiadou, 2007; Bearden and Teel, 1983; Dick and Basu, 1994). Bontis et
al. (2007) conducted the research and found that customer satisfaction improves
reputation in the services markets. Reputation partially intervene the relationship
between satisfaction and loyalty and the relationship between satisfaction and
recommendation. Tovikkai and Jirawattananukool (2001) pointed out that realizing the
fact that retaining existing consumers are easier than finding new consumers. Consumers
who have high purchase frequency are most likely considered as satisfied with the
products.
2.4 Trust
10
Morgan and Hunt (1994) described that Trust is an important factor in the development
of marketing relationships and exists when one party has confidence in an exchange
partner's reliability and integrity"(p. 23). Ballester and Aleman (2001) described that trust
and satisfaction are conceptually connected. As variables that generate consumer
commitment especially in the situation of high involvement. Anderson and Narus (1990)
argued that trust arise when someone hold a belief that the second persons actions
would cause affirmative effects for his/herself. Accordingly, in order to trust a brand,
consumers should perceive quality as favorable object.
2.5 Theoretical framework
Network Diagram
11
12
13
My data source of data collection is university. Data is collected from the BBA,
MBA morning. Whose age (20-30). Majority of the student like to have apple
IPhone. They have a good knowledge about apple IPhone.
4.5.2 Data Collection Technique
Data collection technique of our research is questionnaire. Questionnaire of
our research is easy and understandable for everyone. There is not technical
term used in questionnaire basically our Questionnaire is based on some
specific question related to our dependent variables and independent
variables.
4.5.3 Data Collection Instrument
Our research instrument Questionnaires have been adopted by some
researchers kumar (2010), Gabbie (1997), Phelan (2011).
14
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
N of Items
.659
12
With the help of using SPSS version 16.0 for the data analysis so, we see that the
alpha in reliability test for the all variables combine is 0.659 which is more than the
0.6 so from this we conclude that the data which we have gather from different
people is reliable for the further tests in our research.
15
CustomerSatisfaction
Trust
Service
Valid
50
50
50
50
Missing
20
20
20
20
Mean
89.76
87.22
89.65
89.43
Std. Deviation
8.269
8.785
9.322
7.124
Variance
68.369
77.180
86.908
50.758
Skewness
-1.090
-.416
-1.415
-.920
.337
.337
.337
.337
1.618
.365
2.418
3.708
.662
.662
.662
.662
5.5 Trust
The means comes out to be 89.65. The standard deviation and variance of data is 9.322 and
86.908 respectively. The value for skewness is -1.415 which is within average of (-+2.00) which
means our data follows normality. The value for kurtosis is 2.418 which is a bit out of range of
(+-2.00).
16
5.6 Service
The means comes out to be 89.43. The standard deviation and variance of data is 7.124 and
50.758 respectively. The value for skewness is -0.920 which is within average of (-+2.00) which
means our data follows normality. The value for kurtosis is 3.708 which is a bit out of range of
(+-2.00).
5.7 Correlations
Correlations
CustomerSatisfa
BrandLoyalty
BrandLoyalty
Pearson Correlation
ction
CustomerSatisfaction
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Trust
.163
-.191
.004
.258
.184
50
50
50
50
**
.170
.026
.236
.857
.004
50
50
50
Pearson Correlation
.163
.170
-.016
Sig. (2-tailed)
.258
.236
50
50
50
50
-.191
.026
-.016
.184
.857
.912
50
50
50
Pearson Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
17
.403
.403
50
N
Service
Service
**
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Trust
.912
50
Variables
Model
Variables Entered
Service, Trust,
Removed
Method
CustomerSatisfacti
on
. Enter
Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model
R Square
.460
Adjusted R Square
.211
Estimate
.160
7.579
ANOVA
Model
1
Sum of Squares
Regression
df
Mean Square
707.993
235.998
Residual
2642.085
46
57.437
Total
3350.078
49
18
Sig.
4.109
.012
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model
1
B
(Constant)
Std. Error
70.910
19.357
CustomerSatisfaction
.369
.125
Trust
.082
-.232
Service
Coefficients
Beta
Sig.
3.663
.001
.392
2.951
.005
.118
.093
.699
.488
.152
-.200
-1.525
.134
19
References
20
Lewitt T (1983). After the sale is over. Harv. Bus. Rev., 8793.
Lewis BR (1991), Service quality: an International comparison of bank
customers expectations and perceptions. J. Mark. Manage., 7(1): 4762.
McConnell DJ (1968). The Development of Brand Loyalty: An
Experimental Study. J. Mark. Res., 5: 1319.
Moorman C, Zaltman G, Deshpande R (1992). Relationships between
Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust
Within and Between Organizations. J. Mark. Res., 29: 314328.
Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1995). The Commitment Trust Theory of
Relationship marketing, J. Mark., 58(3): 2039.
Newman K (2001), Interrogating SERVQUAL: a critical assessment of
service quality measurement in a high street retail bank. Int. J. Bank.
Mark., 19(3): 126-139.
Oliver RL (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? J. Mark., 63: 3344.
Reichheld FF (2003). The One Number You Need to Grow. Harv. Bus.
Rev., 81(12): 4655.
Reichheld FF, Markey RG Jr, Hopton C (2000). E-customer loyalty
applying the traditional rules of business for online success. Eur. Bus.
J., 12(4): 173-9.
Reichheld FF, Markey RG, Hopton C (2000). The loyalty effect the
relationship between loyalty and profits. Eur. Bus. J., 134139.
Sheth JN (1968). A Factor Analytical Model of Brand Loyalty. J. Mark.
Res., 5: 395404.
Spekman RE (1988). Strategic Supplier Selection: Understanding LongTerm Buyer Relationships, Bus. Horiz., 7581.
Souro J (2010). What is a representative sample size for a survey,
Retrieved October 30, 2010 from:
http://www.measuringusability.com/survey-sample-size.php
21
22
Appendix A:
3. How would you rate our commitment with your preference brand?
5. Based on your own experience, how would you rate your satisfaction with
the brand of your Smartphone?
8. Would you like to upgrade your smart phone to the latest model of the
same brand?
23
11. Do you think Operating system is the most important factor that makes
you purchase a specific brand of Smartphone?
24