Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMARY
Indonesian oil patch is full of marginal oil fields which if developed will help to boost the economy of the continent
tremendously. Such marginal field is uneconomic to be developed using current technologies based on the existing
production facilities. This research proposed a methodology to optimize FSO principal dimension based on motion
criteria subject to defined platform and metocean at a specified location. Parametric study involving 72 main dimensions
variation had been carried out for various L/B and B/D ratios. Such main dimension variations were derived based on
the existing FSO operated in Java Sea. Numerical simulations have been conducted using Hydrostar to investigate
motion responses in both regular and irregular waves. The results obtained from the investigation indicated that heave,
roll and pitch motions were influenced by L/B and B/D ratios. It is concluded that the design methodology to suit
specific metocean conditions is an effective approach to minimise motion behaviours.
NOMENCLATURE
p
M
MA
B
K
F
X
S
A
Hs
Tp
Lwl
Bmld
Hmld
L
B
D
T
Displ
1.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
INTRODUCTION
Global oil prices have fallen sharply over the past year,
leading to significant revenue shortfalls in many oil
exporting nations, and forcing them to decommission
rigs and sharply cut investments in exploration and
production. Consequently, Indonesia as one of oilproducing countries will face economic challenges. In
addition, Indonesian oil patch is full of marginal oil and
gas fields which if developed will help to boost the
economy of the continent tremendously. It is therefore
necessary to optimize such marginal oil field facilities in
order to reduce capital and operating costs.
FSO may be used as a floating production facility for oil
marginal field. In the life cycle of a floating facility, it is
) )
)]
3.1
3D HULLFORM MODELLING
VALIDATION
3.3
PARAMETRIC DESIGN
L (m)
153.75
157.5
161.25
165
168.75
172.5
176.25
180
183.75
187.5
191.25
195
198.75
202.5
206.25
210
213.75
217.5
221.25
225
164
168
172
176
180
184
188
192
196
200
204
208
212
216
220
224
228
232
236
240
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
275
B (m)
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
D (m)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
T (m)
18.9
18.45
18.03
17.62
17.22
16.85
16.49
16.15
15.82
15.5
15.2
14.91
14.62
14.35
14.09
13.84
13.6
13.36
13.14
12.92
16.62
16.22
15.84
15.48
15.14
14.81
14.49
14.19
13.90
13.62
13.36
13.10
12.85
12.62
12.39
12.16
11.95
11.75
11.55
11.35
10.63
10.38
10.14
9.91
9.69
9.48
9.28
9.08
8.90
8.72
8.55
8.38
8.23
8.07
7.93
L/B
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
B/D
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
280
285
290
295
300
150
160
170
180
190
200
225
240
255
270
285
300
50
50
50
50
50
37.5
40
42.5
45
47.5
50
37.5
40
42.5
45
47.5
50
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
7.79
7.65
7.52
7.39
7.27
19.38
17.03
15.09
13.46
12.08
10.9
12.92
11.35
10.06
8.97
8.05
7.27
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
2
2
2
2
2
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
4.
4.1
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
Figure 10. The Increase of Significant Roll Amplitude
as a Function of Significant Wave Height Increment
From the analysis above it indicates that for 100-yearreturn period, FSO no.34 has better roll motion quality
when compared to FSO no.72 at Java Sea.
5.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
4.
5.
9.
AUTHORS BIOGRAPHY