Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CA and AUREA
MERCADO
G.R. No. 108952 January 26, 1995
___________________________
FACTS
Aurea seeks partition and
reconveyance to her of one-half of a real
property in QC, registered in the name of
Nilo. Aurea is legitimate sister. Before she
left for US in 1964 she gave her brother
money to buy this lot but she was not
given any receipt.
Nilo testified that the lot was bought
out of his money and a portion borrowed
from Aurea which he used to pay the
downpayment. The rest was through SSS.
It was however foreclosed by SSS. Then
he redeemed the property, got a certificate
of redemption after the cancellation of the
mortgage with SSS.
As proof of his ownership, he has
the tax declaration, TCT and real property
tax bill receipts.
ISSUES
Who owns the property?
Whether the mortgage of the
subject property to the SSS, its foreclosure
and subsequent redemption by the
petitioner extinguished private
respondent's co-ownership.
HELD
The subject property is co-owned by
Nilo and Aurea. This finding is based on
the admission made by petitioner himself
in his Affidavit: xxx That I am the co-owner
of the land, with my sister Aurea. This
affidavit is high quality evidence.
Second ISSUE: Pursuant to Art.
493, a co-owner has the right to alienate
his pro-indiviso share in the co-owned
property even without the consent of the
other co-owners. Nevertheless, as a mere
part owner, he cannot alienate the shares
of the other co-owners. The prohibition is
premised on the elementary rule that "no
one can give what he does not have.
(Nemo dat quod non habet).
Thus, in Bailon-Casilao vs. CA: