Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
L UMA MAHESWARI
(Reg. No. 732212631045)
Project Guide
INTERNAL EXAMINER
EXTERNAL EXAMINER
Declaration
DECLARATION
FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
TOWARDS
PRIMARYAGRICULTURAL
Acknowledgement
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I thank my faculty members, relatives and friends for their assurance and
encouragement. I am deeply indebted to my loving parents for their endurance and
perseverance during the course of my study.
L.UMA MAHESWARI
contents
CONTENTS
CHAPTER NO.
PARTICULAR
LIST OF TABLES
PAGE NO.
LIST OT CHARTS
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
1.INTRODUCTION
14
24
31
31
32
32
33
CHAPTER III
41
CHAPTER IV
59
4.2 SUGGESTIONS
60
4.3 CONCLUSION
61
APPENDICES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
List of tables
LIST OF TABLES
S.NO
PARTICULARS
PAGE. NO
42
3.2
45
3.3
48
3.4
50
3.5
52
3.1
List of CHARTS
S.NO
PARTICULARS
PAGE. NO
43
3.2
46
3.3
49
3.4
51
3.1
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Financial performance analysis is the process of identifying the financial strength and
weakness of the firm by properly established the relationship between the item of balance sheet
and profit and loss account.
Management, creditors, investors and others to firm judgment about the operating
performance and financial position of the firm use the information contained in this statement
can get further insight about financial strength and weakness of the firm to make their best use
and to be able to spot out financial weakness of the firm to take suitable corrective actions.
Chapter-I
Introduction
CHAPTER-I
1. INTRODUCTION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Financial management is broadly concerned with the acquisition and use of fund by a business
firm. Financial management emerged as a distinct field of study at the turn of this country. Its
evaluation may be divided into three broad phases.
1. The traditional phases
2. The transitional phases
3. The modern phases
Working capital management is concerned with the management of current assets. The goal of
Working capital management is to manage the firms current assets and current liabilities in such
a way that a satisfactory level of Working capital is maintained. If the firm cannot maintain
satisfactory level of Working capital it is to become insolvent and may even be forced to
bankruptcy. The current assets should be large enough to cover is current liabilities in order to
ensure a reasonable margin of safety. Each of the current assets must be managed efficiently in
order to maintain the liquidity of the firm, if the current assets are to high, profitability is
adversely affected. The interaction between current assets and current liabilities is, therefore, the
main theme of the theory of Working capital management.
In simple words, Working capital refers to that part of the firms capital which is required for
financing short term or current assets such as, cash, marketable securities, debtors, and
inventories or in other words the Working capital is the excess of current assets over current
liabilities.
ON HE BASIS OF TIME
Gross working
capital
capital
permanent or fixed
working capital
temporary
variable working
Seasonal
Working capital
special
Working capital
continuous production.
Exploitation of favorable material condition: Only concern with adequate working
capital can exploit favorable market condition such as purchasing it requirement in
bulk when the prices are lower and by holding its inventories for high prices.
In the first phase cash gets converted into inventory. This includes purchase of raw material to
work in progress, finished goods and finally the transfer of goods to stock at the end of the
manufacturing process. Phase I is absent in service organization. In second phase, inventory is
converted into receivables as credit sales are made to customer. In third phase, receivable are
collected and complete the operating cycle and goes on repeating. The speed with which the
working capital completes one cycle determines the requirement of working capital. Longer the
period of the cycle larger is the requirement and working capital.
RATIO ANALYSIS
The ratio analysis is one of the most powerful tools of financial management. Though ratio
are simple to calculate and easy to under and they suffer from some limitations.
Limited use of a single ratio
A single ratio, usually, does not convey much sense. To make better INTERPRETATION a
number of ratios have to be calculated which is likely to confuse the analyst than Helps him in
making any meaningful conclusion.
Lack of adequate standards:
There are no well-accepted standards or rules of thumb for all ratios, which can be accepted as
norms. It renders INTERPRETATION of the ratio difficult.
2. Inherent limitation of accounting:
Like financial statements, ratio also suffer from the inherent weakness of accounting
records such as their historical nature. Ratios of the past are not necessary.
3. Personal bias:
Ratio is only means of financial analysis and is not an end in itself. Ratios have to be
interpreted and difficult people may interpret the same ratios in different ways
CLASSIFICATION OF RATIOS
A ratio is a simple arithmetical expression of the relationship of one number to another. The
technique of the ratio analysis can be employed for measuring short-term liquidity or working
capital position of a firm. The following ratios may be calculated for this purpose
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Current ratio
Liquidity ratio
Absolute liquidity ratio
Working capital
Fixed ratio
Current ratio
Current ratio may be defined as the relationship between current assets and current liabilities.
This ratio, also known as working capital ratio,is a measure of general liquidity and is most
widely of the firm, it is calculated by dividing the total of current assets by total of the current
liabilities.
Current assets
Current ratio=
Current liabilities
The two basic components of this ratio are: current assets andcurrent liabilities. Current assets
include cash and those assets which can be easily converted into cash with in a short period of
time generally, one year, such as marketable securities, bills receivable sundry debtors,
inventories, work in progress. Prepaid expenses should also be included in current assets because
they represent payments made in advance which will not have to be paid in near future. current
liabilities are those obligations which are payable within a short period of generally one year and
include outstanding expenses, bill payable, sundry creditors, accrued expenses, short-term
advances, income tax payable, etc.
LIQUID RATIO
The ratio between quick asset and current liabilities is called liquid assets.
Liquid assets
Liquid ratio=
Current liabilities
It refer to the assets which can be converted into cash very quickly. They are also called liquid
assets. Here liquidity means the ability of the assets to be quickly converted into cash. Therefore,
it is assumed that if stock-in-trade is excluded from current assets, we may have a measure of
quick or liquid assets.
authorities are of the opinion that the absolute liquid ratio should also be calculated together with
current ratio and acid test ratio so as to exclude even receivable from the current assets and find
out the obsolete liquid assets.
Absolute liquid assets
Absolute liquid ratio=
Current liabilities
Fixed asset
Fixed asset ratio =
Long term funds
The author discusses the development of agriculture in India, and the strategy followed over at 1899,
which has made India self-sufficient in meeting its food-grains requirement. Needless to say agricultural
credit, improved technologies and institutional access to markets and development programs have played
an instrumental role in meeting these objectives of self-sufficiency. He discusses the development and
evolution of co-operative societies in India since 1904 when the first co-operative law was enacted, and
the role played by primary agricultural credit societies (PACS) in the overall agricultural development of
the country. He then discusses the relationship between the primary agricultural credit societies, the
District central co-operative bank, the state co-operative banks and the National Bank of Agriculture and
Rural Development (NABARD). He argues that in spite of the leading role that has been played by the
NABARD in meeting the agricultural credit needs, the future of agricultural credit societies leaves a
question mark especially because the relationship between the primary societies and their federal
structures has not evolved organically and the dependence of primaries on NABARD credit is getting
more pronounced. Moreover, primaries are not focusing on their basic task of mobilizing and distributing
resources locally, and there is a distict more away from member centrality. While in the short term, there
is no effect on the agricultural co-operative scenario, in the long run this dependence on NABARD may
have a rather negative effect on the primaries.
To raise capital for the purpose of giving loans and supporting the essential activities of the
members.
To collect deposits from members with the objective of improving their savings habit.
To arrange for supply and development of improved breeds of livestock for the members.
To make all necessary arrangements for improving irrigation on land owned by members.
Years
Numbers
of
societies
Member
(in thou)
Deposits
(in thou
Rs.)
1950-55
115462
5154
44829
4265
187843
1956-65
159939
7791
70469
10148
417849
1966-75
212129
17041
145800
38617
1747216
1976-85
191904
26135
344918
90908
3444092
1986-90
160780
30963
694558
98819
6354271
1991-95
134678
876788
967899
1235786
6789980
1996-01
178554
987665
1235678
1978656
9778689
exemption from taxation and rule making power. All other operational and managerial issues
were left to the local governments namely to formulate suitable rules and model bye-laws of the
cooperative societies. The institution of the Registrar, visualized as a special official mechanism
to be manned by officers with special training and appropriate attitudinal traits to prompt and
catalyze cooperative development was the result of the Cooperative Societies Act of 1904.
Committees recommendations,
which are detailed in Annexure-3, are basically related to credit cooperatives. It recommended
building up a strong three-tier structure in every province with primaries at the base, the Central
Cooperative Banks at the middle tier and the Provincial Cooperative Bank at the apex, basically
to provide short-term and medium-term finance. Considerable emphasis was laid on ensuring the
cooperative character of these institutions and training and member education, including training
of the Registrar and his staff.
After the 1912 Act, the first Cooperative Housing Society, the Madras Cooperative Union in
1914, the Bombay Central Cooperative Institute in 1918 and similar institutions in Bengal, Bihar,
Orissa, Punjab etc. came up. Other than consumer cooperatives and weavers cooperatives, other
non-agricultural credit cooperatives generally performed well and grew in strength and
operations during this period.
Government of India Act, 1919
In 1919, with the passing of the Reforms Act, Cooperation as a subject was
transferred to the provinces. The Bombay Cooperative Societies Act of 1925, the first provincial
Act to be passed, among others, introduced the principle of one-man one-vote. The agricultural
credit scenario was a matter of concern and various committees looked into the problems of
cooperative banks in various provinces. The Royal Commission on Agriculture in 1928 also
reviewed the cooperative sector and among others recommended the setting up of land mortgage
banks.
In both agricultural and non-agricultural non-credit sectors, societies were
organized, but most faced difficulties in operation as a result of opposition by private marketing
agencies and also the inexperience of their office bearers. This focused attention on
strengthening of cooperative institutes and unions for education and training. A prominent
development of this time was the setting up of the All India Association of Cooperative Institutes
in 1929.The setting up of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) in 1934 was a major development in
the thrust for agricultural credit. The Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 itself required the RBI to
set up an Agricultural Credit Department. As cooperatives were to be channels for rural
development, with the establishment of popularly elected governments in 1935, programs were
drawn up in which rural indebtedness received priority. The Mehta Committee appointed in 1937
specifically recommended reorganization of Cooperative Credit Societies as multi-purpose
cooperatives.
The Second World War boosted the prices of agricultural commodities leading to increased
returns to farmers and consequently reduction in over-dues to the cooperatives. To counter shortages of essential commodities for domestic consumption as well as raw materials, the
Government resorted to procurement of commodities from producers and rationing, for which it
decided to utilize the cooperatives. This provided a momentum to the growth of multi-purpose
cooperatives. The period between1939-1945 provided a further stimulus to the growth of the
Urban Cooperative Credit structure. Many societies had started banking functions and had grown
in size and operations over a period of time, with substantial diversification of activities.
Multi-Unit Cooperative Societies Act, 1942
With the emergence of cooperatives having a membership from more than one state such
as the Central Government sponsored salary earners credit societies, a need was felt for an enabling cooperative law for such multi-unit or multi-state cooperatives. Accordingly, the MultiUnit Cooperative Societies Act was passed in 1942, which delegated the power of the Central
Registrar of Cooperatives to the State Registrars for all practical purposes. In 1944, the Gadgil
Committee recommended compulsory adjustment of debts and setting up of Agricultural Credit
Corporations, wherever cooperative agencies were not strong enough.
Cooperative Planning Committee (1945)
The Cooperative Planning Committee under the chairmanship of Shri R.G. Saraiya was
set up in 1945. The Committee found cooperative societies to be the most suitable medium for
democratization of economic planning and examined each area of economic development. 9
Pre-Independence Development
In 1946, inspired by SardarVallabhBhai Patel and led by ShriMorarji Desai and
ShriTribhuvan Das Patel, the milk producers of Khera District of Gujarat went on a fifteen day
strike. Their refusal to supply milk forced the Bombay Government to withdraw its order
granting monopoly procurement rights to Polson, a private dairy. History was made when two
Primary Village Milk Producer Societies were registered in October 1946. Soon after on 14th
December 1946, the Khera District Cooperative Milk Producers Milk Union known as Amul was
registered. The Registrars Conference in 1947 recommended that the Provincial Cooperative
Banks be re-organized to give greater assistance to primary societies through Central Banks. For
the first time an effective linking of credit with marketing, and providing assistance by way of
liberal loans and subsidies for establishment of a large number of go downs and processing
plants was considered.
RBI is empowered to direct the cooperative banks to maintain assets not exceeding 40
per cent of demand and time liabilities. In other words, cooperative banks shall be required to
maintain a statutory liquidity ratio RBI is also empowered to order special audit of cooperative banks In addition to the above regulatory powers, the major change introduced by the
Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 2012, is that freedom given to the primary co-operative credit
societies to function as banks, without a license from RBI, is withdrawn. As far as the existing
primary co-operative credit societies functioning as banks are concerned, they are given time up
to a year, extendable and not exceeding to three years, to close the banking business or obtain a
license from RBI.
Document of the society
a.original copies of the Basic and Operational Regulations of the Society
b. the business plan of the Society
c.
Individuals appointed to temporarily manage the society until the Management Committee
e.
A plan on how to acquire adequate finances to carry out the mandate of the Society and a plan of
how the accounts and documents of the society will be maintained should be included in the
business plan.
Conditions for members of Cooperative Societies
a)
b)
Each person should purchase or acquire at least one share of the society in order to become a
member. The individual should not have been previously expelled from any society due to abuse
of funds.
c)
The individual should not have previously been charged, or currently be serving a criminal or
legal sentence. (If a member of the society is charged with a criminal or legal offence, the
member shall be removed from the society.
d)
The accounts of the co-operative society should be auditing and maintained by an auditor
approved by the registar.
The annual accounts of each year should be documented, and the accounts and audit reports
should be presented in the annual general meeting of the society.
The annual accounts should be published each year after approval from the audit officer. It
should also the posted at the headquarter of the co-operative society so that the members can see
it without administering any see.
sale of their members' produce. This enables them to advance loans against the security of
members' agricultural produce. The need for such societies is felt all the more by the
agriculturists whose debts have been adjusted. To satisfy this growing need, it is now desired to
convert gradually agricultural co-operative credit societies into multi-purpose societies and to
extend the field of operation to each society to groups of villages within a radius of five miles. To
enable the multi-purpose societies to carry on their function of selling the produce to their
members. Government have authorised the Registrar to sanction long term loans to the
construction of go downs to store agricultural produce.
There were no multi-purpose societies in the district before 1939-40 at the end of 1948-49
their number was 34 with a membership to 3,915 and a working capital of Rs.2,53,748. These
and other details tor the three years ended 1948-49.
The working of these societies showed a net loss of Rs.4,368 in 1946-47, a net profit of Rs.2,137
in 1947-48 and again a net loss of Rs.144 in 1948-49.
Agricultural credit societies, including multi-purpose societies, are now playing an
increasingly important part in the field of agricultural finance where till recent years there were
no alternatives to money-lenders as sources of credit. Various committees appointed by the State
and Central Governments to study the question of extending rural credit emphasized the need for
enlarging the sphere of co-operative societies with suitable re-organisation. The Co-operative
Planning Committee advocated the extension of the movement so as to bring 50 percent of the
villages and 30 percent of the rural population within the ambit of the reorganised primary
societies. In the State of Bombay the period within which the objective was to be achieved was
proposed as seven years from the year 1946-47. As a result of the steps taken by Government to
implement these recommendations, the primary societies registered in this district up to the year
1948-49 covered 44.5 percent of the villages and 14.8 percent of the rural population.
MAJOR FUNCTION MODULES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Saving bank
Current account
Cash credit account
Daily deposit account
Term deposit
6.
7.
8.
9.
Recurring deposit
Term loans
Trading account
Membership accounting.
KEY FEATURES
FUNCTIONS
It provides credit to the farmers, distribute inputs like fertilizers and also run outlets under
Public Distribution System. These banks provide short term and medium term credit for agriculture
and allied activities. The short term loans are repayable within a period of 12 to 15 months and the
medium term loans are repayable within 3 to 5 years. The loan amount exceeding this limit is secured
with mortgage of property or pledge of jewels.
Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies also issue loans for other agricultural purposes
like purchase of farm machineries and for non-agricultural purposes including loans for the purchase
of consumer durables, housing loans, education loans and professional loans. To provide marketing
facilities for the sale of agricultural produce.To associate itself with economic and social welfare
programs of the village.
Considering the importance of increasing credit flow into the agriculture sector, Government
has reduced the interest rate for the crop loans from 9% to 7% per annum from 2006-07, the interest
differential being compensated by the Government.
ORGANISATIONAL HIERARCHY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(21 member elected as per the provisions
of the act,rules and law)
PRESIDENT
(Elected from among the board of
directors)
MANANGING DIRECTORS
GENERAL MANAGER(7)
BRANCH
MANAGERS (14)
OTHER SUPPORTING
OFFICERS AND STAFFS
OBJECTIVES OF SOCIETY
2. To provide improved customer service through up gradation of technology and adoption of best
practice.
3. To direct effort towards achieving the state government given targets under various crop
production programs and implementation of policies on the co-operative sectors.
4. Term loans for acquisition /creditor development of assets in agriculture and non-agriculture
sector.
Chapter-II
CHAPTER II
To estimate the amount of working capital of the society for a period from 2010 to 2013.
To evaluate the short-term solvency of the society.
To calculate common size balance sheet to assess the financial position of the firm.
To understands the overall financial position of the society.
To assess the factor influencing the financial performance of the society.
1.
LIMITATION
RESEARCH DESIGN
The collected data were presented in tables and these table were analyzed systematically. Ratio
analysis is the vital tools used to study the financial performance of primary agricultural cooperative credit society. A chart and various diagrams are used to explain the analysis clearly.
The study is based on secondary source of data. Secondary data have been mainly obtained
from annual reports, records and books of primary agricultural co-operative credit society. The
Secondary data were also collected from audited financial statement such as income statement
and balance sheet.
PERIOD OF STUDY
Data of 4 financial years are used for the purpose of study. The 4 years of study ranges from
2010-2013.
TOOLS
The following are the various tools used to analyze the data
Ratio analysis
Working capital
Common size balance sheet
RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis is a widely-used tool of financial analysis. It is defined as the systematic use of
ratio to interpret the financial statement so that the strengths and weakness of a firm as well as its
historical performance and current financial condition can be determined.
CURRENT RATIO
Current ratio may be defined as the relationship between current assets and current liabilities.
This ratio, also known as working capital ratio,is a measure of general liquidity and is most
widely of the firm, it is calculated by dividing the total of current assets by total of the current
liabilities.
Current ratio= Current assets/ Current liability
LIQUID RATIO
The ratio between quick asset and current liabilities is called liquid assets.
Liquid ratio= Liquid assets/ Current liabilities
It refers to the assets which can be converted into cash very quickly. They are also called liquid
assets. Here liquidity means the ability of the assets to be quickly converted into cash. Therefore,
it is assumed that if stock-in-trade is excluded from current assets, we may have a measure of
quick or liquid assets.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Financial performance analysis is the process of determining the operating and financial
characteristics of the firm from accounting and financial statements. The goal of such analysis is
to determine the efficiency and performance of firms management, as reflected in the financial
records and reports. The analyst attempts to measure the firms liquidity, profitability and other
indicators that the business is conducted in a rational and normal way; ensuring enough to the
shareholders to maintain at least its market value.
According to Myer
Financial statements analysis is largely a study of relationship among various financial
factors in a business as disclosed by a single set of statements and study of these factors shown in
series of statement.
Thus financial analysis is the use of financial statements to analyst companys financial
position and performance, and to assess future financial performance. In short financial analysis
is the process of examining the composition of financial statements for getting valuable
information about the business. It is a technique of x-raying the financial position as well as
progress of a firm.
Financial analysis includes analysis and interpretation of financial statements. The word analysis
literally means to break into parts. In the context of financial statements, analysis is the process
of breaking down a complex set of figure into simple statements in order to have a better
understanding. It is a critical examination of financial transactions effected during a definite
period.
According to Altman and Eberhart
Financial performance analysis is vital for the triumph of an enterprise. financial
performance analysis is an appraisal of the feasibility, solidity and fertility of a business, subbusiness or mission. Altman and Eberhart (1994) reported the use of neural network in
identification of distressed business by the Italian central bank. Using over 1000 sampled firm
with 10 financial ratios as independent variables, they found that the classification of neural
networks was very close to that achieved by discriminate analysis. They concluded that the
neural network is not a clearly dominant mathematical technique compared to traditional
statistical technique.
According to gepp and kumar
Gepp and kumar (2008) incorporated the time bias factor into the classic business
failure prediction model. Using Altman (1968) and Ohlsons (1980) model to a matched sample
of failed and non-failed firms from 1980s, they found that the predictive accuracy of Altmans
model declined when applied against the 1980s data. The findings explained the importance of
incorporating the time factors in the traditional failure prediction models.
According to Campbell
Campbell (2008) constructed a multivariate perdition model that estimates the probability
of bankruptcy reorganization for closely held firms. Six variables were used in developed the
hypotheses and five were significant in distinguishing closely held firms that reorganize from
those that liquidate. The five factors were firm size, assets profitability, the number of secured
creditors, the presence of free assets, and the number of under-secured secured creditors. The
prediction model corrently classified 78.5% of the sampled firms. This model is used as a
decision aid when forming an export opinion regarding a debtors likelihood of rehabilitation. No
study has incorporated the financial performance analysis of the central public sector enterprises
in Indian drug &pharmaceutical industry. Nor has any previous research examined the solvency
position, liquidity position, operating efficiency and the prediction of financial health and
viability of public sector drug & pharmaceutical enterprises in India.
Reliability of figures:
The accuracy and reliability of analysis depends on reliability of figures derived from
financial statement.
Different interpretation:
Result of the analysis may be interpreted differently by different user
Change in accounting methods:
Analysis will be effective if the figures taken from financial statements comparable. If
there are frequent change in accounting policies and method, figures of different periods will be
different and comparable.
Price level change:
The ever rising inflation erodes the value of money in the present day economic situation,
which reduces the validity of analysis.
Limitations of the tools of analysis:
Different techniques of analysis are used by an analyst. These tools are suitable for
different type of analysis. Application of a particular tool or technique depends on the skill and
expertise of the analyst. If an unsuitable technique is used, it give misleading result. It may lead
to wrong conclusions and prove harmful to the business concern.
statement so that the strength and weakness of a firm as well as its historical performance and
current financial condition can be determined.
A ratio is only comparison of the numerator with the denominator .The term ratio refers
to the numerical or quantitative relationship between two figures. Thus, ratio is the relationship
between two figures and obtained by dividing a former by the latter. Ratios are designed show
how one number is related to another.
The data given in the financial statements are in absolute form and are dumb and are
unable to communicate anything. Ratios are relative form of financial data and are very useful
technique to check upon the efficiency of a firm. Some ratios indicate the trend or progress or
downfall of the firm.
In the view of the requirements of the various users of ratio, it is divided in to the following
important categories.
1. Liquidity ratios
2. Activity ratios
3. Profitability ratios
4. Earning ratios
LIQUIDITY RATIOS:
Liquidity ratios measure the ability of the firm to meet its a current obligation. In fact,
analysis of liquidity needs the preparation of cash budgets and cash and fund flow statements;
but liquidity ratios, by establishing a relationship between cash and other current asset to current
obligations provide a quick measure of liquidity.
A firm should ensure that it does not suffer From lack or liquidity, and it does not have
excess liquidity .the failure of the company to meet its obligations due to its lack of liquidity, will
result in a poor creditworthiness, loss of creditors confidence, or even in legal tangles resulting
in the closure of the company a very high degree of liquidity is also bad idle assets earn nothing.
The firms fund will be unnecessarily tied up in current assets. Therefore it is necessary to strike a
proper balance between high liquidity and lack of liquidity.
hapter III
CHAPTER III
CURRENT LIABILITIES
CURRENT ASSET
YEARS
(IN Rs.)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
(IN Rs.)
2010
20203896.82
3935235
5.2
2011
20953554.4
2928987.14
7.2
2012
32927949
4698150.3
2013
34432991.9
4165344.17
7.0
8.2
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table it was analyzed that current ratio was increased from 5.2 to
8.2. The current ratio is lessthan the rule of thumb 2:1 except the year 2013.
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
YEARS
3.2QUICK RATIO
2010
2011
2012
2013
The ratio between quick asset and quick liabilities is called liquid ratio. Quick ratio is also
known as acid ratio it isa more rigorous test of that the current ratio quick ratio may also be
defined as relation between quick liquidity assets and current liquid liabilities.
Quick ratio refers to the assets which can be converted into cash very quickly. They are
also called liquid assets.
LIQUID RATIO =
LIQUID ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
QUICK ASSET
YEARS
(IN Rs.)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
(IN Rs.)
2010
20079131.56
2011
19408245.89
3935235
2784663
5.1
6.9
2012
27552737.7
4585665
6.0
2013
522227.81
3443446
1.8
INTERPRETATION:
Usually a high acid test ratio is an indication that the firm is liquid and has the ability to meet its
current or liquid liabilities in time and on the other hand a low quick ratio represents that the
firms liquidity position is not good.
From the above table it was analyzed that quick ratio was increased from 5.1 to 6.9 and
decreased to 1.8. it was due to improper maintenance of quick assets. The quick ratio was below
the rule thumb of 1:1 i.e quick asset were less than current liabilities.
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
YEARS
2010
2011
2012
2013
Liquid ratio is the modified version of current ratio and absolute liquid ratio is the modified
version of liquid ratio. Here current assets are bereft of stock-in-trade, accounts receivable, and
current liabilities are bereft of bank overdraft. The ratio can be written in following way:
(IN Rs.)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
(IN Rs.)
RATIO
2010
143898.67
3935235
0.04
0.01
2011
280491.34
2784663
2012
1228408.71
4585665
2.72
2013
969800.16
3443446
0.29
INTERPRETATION:
It shows the cash or absolute ratio. It is calculated for comparing cash and current
liabilities. The higher proportion denotes idleness of cash, which affects the profitability
position of the firm, and a low proportion of cash means shortage of cash poor liquidity.
It satisfies the proportion of 0.75:1.
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
YEARS
2010
2011
2012
2013
CURRENT ASSET
YEARS
(IN Rs.)
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
RATIO
(IN Rs.)
2010
2011
20571772.39
3935235
20955355
2928987.14
2012
32927949
4698150.3
2013
34432991.9
4165344.17
16636537.39
18026367.86
28229798.7
30267647.73
INTERPRETATION:
From the above table it was analyzed that net working capital ratio had increase from 2010
to 2013. It was due to changes in working capital.
35000000
30000000
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
YEARS
2010
2011
2012
2013
FIXED ASSET
YEARS
2010
2011
2012
2013
(IN Rs.)
1433190.53
1594354.53
3026339.53
2888955.13
LONG TERM
FUND (IN Rs.)
18031410.41
1478839.82
RATIO
0.08
1.08
1745585.32
1.73
1993585.32
1.44
INTERPRETATION:
Fixed assets are generally taken at written down values at the end of the year. It given
increases when investment on fixed assets is in good position, For the year 2012
gradually increase and it shows the good utilization of fixed assets. For the year 2010 it
decreased by 0.08%.
CHART SHOWING THE FIXED ASSET RATIO FOR THE FOLLOWING YEARS
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
YEARS
2010
2011
2012
2013
PARTICULAR
2010
2011
2012
2013
CURRENT ASSETS
a. CASH
27216.10
32721.4
129830.25
15600.25
b. CASH AT BANK
116782.57
247769.96
1098578.46
954199.91
17589463
18771864
26601651.7
29832109
d. ACCURED ITEMS
544832.62
709097.62
1063901.60
e. STOCK
4031392.18
492640.83
3631713.3
194233.94
f. SUNDRY DEBTORS
1522510.53
699460.53
1466175.3
2372947.12
20571772.39
209553555
32927949
34432991.9
2228906
876656.14
1617525.3
1054799.37
1631331
2008706
2824953.5
2699197.9
74997
43625
255671.50
411346.9
3935234
2928987.14
4698150.3
4165344.17
16636538.4
206624568
28229798.8
30267647.6
INTERPERTATION
This table shows the working capital position is good into the society. Because the current
assets over the access into the liabilities.
Particulars
31-032010
percentag 31-03e
2011
Percentag
e
Current assets
Cash on hand
27216.1
0.12
32721.4
0.14
Cash at bank
116682.57
0.53
247769.96
1.08
Loan& advances
Accrued items
17589463
544832.62
80.0
2.43
18771864
709097.62
82.0
3.17
Stock
Debtors
403192
1.83
6.93
492640.83
699460.53
2.10
3.05
1522510.53
20203896.
82
91.97
20953554.
4
91.6
Fixed asset
Investment
1049159.3
4.78
1049159.30
4.58
Immovable assets
380911.23
1.73
545195.23
2.39
Future
Overdue interest
24365.01
308313
0.11
1.45
344522
1.52
Total assets
21966645.
4
100
22892430.
9
100
Payment items
74997
0.34
43625
0.19
Provision items
Creditors
1631331
2228905.60
7.42
10.15
2008706
876656.14
8.77
3.82
Total current
liabilities
3935233.9
17.91
2928987.1
4
12.78
Deposits
943571.41
4.29
863853.91
3.78
Share capital
Borrowing
913964
16173875
4.16
73.62
948674
4.15
79.29
Total liabilities
21966645.
41
Current liabilities
100
18150915.85
22892430.
9
100
Particulars
31-032011
Current assets
Cash on hand
Cash at bank
32721.4
247769.96
Loan& advances
Accrued items
Stock
Debtors
18771864
709097.62
492640.83
699460.53
20953554.
4
percentag
e
0.14
1.08
82.0
3.17
2.10
3.05
91.6
31-032012
129830.25
1098578.46
26601651.7
363171.32
1466175.33
32927949
Percentag
e
0.37
3.14
74.92
1.02
4.13
92.8
1049159.30
545195.23
344522
22892430.
9
4.58
2.39
1.52
100
2412498.3
162812.85
-
Current liabilities
Payment items
Provision items
43625
2008706
0.19
8.77
255671.5
2824953.5
0.72
7.96
Creditors
Total current
liabilities
876656.14
2928987.1
4
3.82
12.78
1617525.24
4698150.3
4.55
13.23
863853.91
948674
3.78
4.15
79.29
341048.97
955419
0.96
2.70
83.11
18150915.85
22892430.
9
100
35503260.
2
29508641.9
35503260.
2
6.81
0.5
100
100
Particulars
Current assets
Cash on hand
Cash at bank
Loan& advances
Accrued items
Stock
Debtors
31-032012
129830.25
1098578.46
1.02
4.13
29832109
1063901.62
194233.94
2372947.12
92.8
34432991.8
94.84
6.81
0.5
-
962617.3
684077.8
222548
2.65
1.88
0.62
100
36302234.
9
100
255671.5
2824953.5
0.72
7.96
411346.91
2699197.9
1.13
7.43
1617525.24
4698150.3
4.55
13.23
1054799.34
4165344.2
2.91
11.47
341048.97
0.96
26601651.7
363171.32
2412498.3
162812.85
-
Current liabilities
Payment items
Provision items
Creditors
Total current
liabilities
Long term liabilities
Deposits
Share capital
Borrowing
35503260.
2
955419
29508641.9
0.37
3.14
74.92
2.70
83.11
15600.25
954199.9
Percentag
e
0.04
2.63
82.18
2.93
0.53
6.53
1466175.33
32927949
Total assets
percentag 31-03e
2013
4155751.7
1028419
26952720
11.45
2.83
74.24
Total liabilities
35503260.
2
100
INTERPRETATION:
Common size balance sheet for the year 2010-2011
Fixed asset increase from 8.03% to 8.49%
Loan and advances increase from 80% to 82%
36302234.
9
100
Chapter IV
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
4.1. FINDINGS
1. The current ratio was increased from 5.2% to 8.2%. the current ratio is more than the
rule of thumb 2:1.
2. The quick ratio was increased from 5.1% to 6.9% and decreased to 1.8 in the year 2013.
3. The working capital position is good into the society.
4. The fixed assets decreased from 8.3% to 5.16% and long term liabilities are increased in
82.18%.
5. The schedule of changes in working capital was good. It was properly maintain in
current assets and current liabilities.
6. As per common size balance sheet are gradually increasing total assets and liabilities
ever through decreasing in the year 2012-2013 compared to previous years.
7. Over the period of four years from 2010-2013 the financial analysis of the society
showing on increasing trend. In 2010 the financial analysis was 1433190.53 it was
increasing to 2888955.13 in 2013.
SUGGESTIONS
Society should reduce to provide credit facility to same members and administrative
expenses, it will increases overall efficiency of the firm.
The society has to maintain the saving of cash account is not satisfactory.
The quick ratio was decreased from 5.1% to 1.8%. itwas due to improper maintences of
ratio.
Fixed asset ratio is decreases from 2011-2013. So concentrate the fixed assets and
payable accounts.
As far as accounting is concerned, although the entire system is computerized, but there
still involved lot of paper work. The society should be reducing the paperwork. It
consumes the time saving and to increases the efficient work due to advanced accounting
software.
It is observed that the society does not follow any method of financing of working
capital. So in order to maintain a trade-off between profitability and liquidity, the society
should follow a well-planned financing performance of working capital.
The current ratio and liquid ratio was at a satisfactory level for all Financial year. It show
that the society was able to meet its current obligations.
A test applied to check the solvency of the society in terms of cash (absolute liquid ratio)
seems to be unsatisfactory to meet the emergencies. So it recommended to take quick and
effective measures to rectity the absolute liquid ratio as early as possible.
CONCLUSION
The study is expected to help understanding the overall financial performance of society.
Finally the study helped me to acquire practical knowledge that was only over by books and
paper alone.
Appendix
PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY
BALANCE SHEET
Particulars
2010
2011
2012
2013
943571.41
863853.91
341048.97
4155751.7
913964
948674
955419
1028419
16173875
18150915.85
29508641.9
26952720
74997
43625
255671.5
411346.91
2228905.60
876656.14
1617525.24
1054799.34
363573
403477
424788
133268
428841
222548
308313
344522
166375.05
82446.15
1167343
1167343
18262260.4
1969517.56
21966645.4
22892430.90
35503260.2
36302234.9
Cash on hand
27216.1
32721.4
129830.25
15600.25
Cash at bank
116682.57
247769.96
1098578.46
954199.9
17589463
18771864
26601651.7
29832109
Accrued items
544832.62
709097.62
1063901.62
403192
492640.83
363171.32
194233.94
Debtors
1522510.53
699460.53
1466175.33
2372947.12
Investment
1049159.3
1049159.30
2412498.3
962617.3
Immovable assets
380911.23
545195.23
162812.85
684077.8
Future
24365.01
308313
344522
222548
21966645.4
22892430.9
35503260.2
36302234.9
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Share capital
Borrowing
Payment items
Creditors
Stock
Overdue interest
Total assets
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Book
1. Financial
management
I.M.Pandey
Ninth
Edition
Vikash
accounting
priciples
and
practice
Website
www.diffnotes.com
www.financialeducation.com
www.google.com