Color struck: America's White Jesus is a global export and false product

By Wesley Muhammad, PhD.

What color was Jesus? Most American ChristiansBlack and Whitewould

dismiss this question as both irrelevant and unanswerable as the Gospels
fail to give us a physical description. The irony is that most of these same
Americans in their heart of hearts are pretty confident any way that they
know what color Jesus was. They attend churches with images of a tall,
long haired, full bearded White man depicted in stained glass windows or
painted on walls, and they return home to the same depictions framed in
their living room or illustrating their family Bibles.
Further compounding the irony is the fact that America actually has an
obsession with the (presumed) color of Christ and has exported her White
Americanized Savior around the world, as recently documented by Edward
J. Blum and Paul Harvey in their book, The Color of Christ: The Son of God
and the Saga of Race in America (2012).
In fact, the worlds most popular and recognizable image of Christ is a
distinctly 19th-20th century American creation. It is true that versions of
the White Christ appear in European art as early as the 4th century of
the Christian era, but these images coexisted with other, nonwhite
representations throughout European history. The popularity of the cult of
the Black Madonna and Black Christ throughout Europe is evidence of the
fact that the European White Christs never acquired the authority and
authenticity that the White Christ now has globally. This Christ and his
authority are American phenomena. As a predominantly Protestant nation
Early America rejected the imaging of Christ that characterized European
Catholicism.
By the mid-19th century, however, in response to American expansion,
splintering during the Civil War and subsequent reconstructing,
Whiteness took on a new significance and a newly- empowered White
Jesus rose to prominence as the sanctifying symbol of a new national
unity and power. As Blum and Harvey observe:
By wrapping itself with the alleged form of Jesus, whiteness gave itself a
holy face With Jesus as white, Americans could feel that sacred
whiteness stretched back in time thousands of years and forward in
sacred space to heaven and the second coming The white Jesus
promised a white past, a white present, and a future of white glory.
As America rose to superpower status in the 20th century she became the
worlds leading producer and global exporter of White Jesus imagery
through film, art, American business, and Christian missions, and has
thereby defined the worlds view of the Son of God. This globally
recognizable Jesus is a totally American product. Indeed, he is an

American. Warner Sallmans iconic image of Jesus called Head of Christ

(1941) became the most widely reproduced piece of artwork in world
history and its depiction the most recognizable face of Jesus in the world.
By the 1990s it had been printed over 500 million times and achieved
global iconic status. With smooth white skin, long, flowing blondish-brown
hair, long beard and blue eyes, this Nordic Christ consciously disguised
any hint of Jesuss Semitic, oriental originand departed from the older
European depictions. It both shaped and was shaped by emerging
American ideas of whiteness. The beloved White Jesus of todays world
was Made in America.
What, then, did Jesus actually look like? Despite the absence of a detailed
description of Jesuss physical appearance in the Gospels (though John the
Revelator saw the risen Christ apparently with wooly hair and black feet,
Rev. 1:14-15), there are non-biblical evidences that actually allow us to
visualize the Son of God from Nazareth.
Revelation 1:14-15 - King James Version (KJV)
14) His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his
eyes were as a flame of fire;
15) And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his
voice as the sound of many waters.
The first century Jewish writer Josephus (37-100 AD) penned the earliest
non-biblical testimony of Jesus. He reportedly had access to official Roman
records on which he based his information and in his work Halosis or the
Capture (of Jerusalem), written around 72 A.D., Josephus discussed the
human form of Jesus and his wonderful works. Unfortunately his texts
have passed through Christian hands which altered them, removing
offensive material. Fortunately, however, Biblical scholar Robert Eisler in a
classic 1931 study of Josephus Testimony was able to reconstruct the
unaltered testimony based on a newly-discovered Old Russian translation
that preserved the original Greek text. According to Eislers
reconstruction, the oldest non-Biblical description of Jesus read as follows:
At that time also there appeared a certain man of magic power if it be
meet to call him a man, [whose name is Jesus], whom [certain] Greeks call
a son of [a] God, but his disciples [call] the true prophet he was a man
of simple appearance, mature age, black-skinned (melagchrous), short
growth, three cubits tall, hunchbacked, prognathous (lit. with a long face
[macroprosopos]), a long nose, eyebrows meeting above the nose with
scanty [curly] hair, but having a line in the middle of the head after the
fashion of the Nazaraeans, with an undeveloped beard.
This short, black-skinned, mature, hunchbacked Jesus with a unibrow,
short curly hair and undeveloped beard bears no resemblance to the Jesus
Christ taken for granted today by most of the Christian world: the tall,
long haired, long bearded, white-skinned and blue eyed Son of God. Yet,

this earliest textual record matches well the earliest iconographic

evidence.
The earliest visual depiction of Jesus is a painting found in 1921 on a wall
of the baptismal chamber of the house-church at Dura Europos, Syria and
dated around 235 A.D. The Jesus that is Healing the Paralytic Man (Mark
2:1-12) is short and dark-skinned with a small curly afro - see below.
This description has now been supported by the new science of forensic
anthropology. In 2002 British forensic scientists and Israeli archaeologists
reconstructed what they believe is the most accurate image of Jesus
based off of data obtained from the multi-disciplinary approach. In
December 2002 Popular Science Magazine published a cover story on the
findings which confirm that Jesus would have been short, around 51, hair
short with tight curls, a weather-beaten face which would have made
him appear older, dark eyes and complexion: he probably looked a great
deal more like a dark-skinned Semite than Westerners are used to
seeing, they concluded. The textual, visual, and scientific evidence
agrees, then: Jesus likely was a short, dark-skinned Semite with short
curly hair and dark eyes.
Colossians 1:15 describes Christ as the image of the unseen God and in
the Gospel of John (12:45; 14:9) Jesus declares that whoever sees him has
seen God. What Jesus looks like then is not irrelevant as it is in some
way a pointer to God Himself.