Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Let
us
imagine
we
drop
a
stone
in
a
water
pond
from
right
above
(orthogonally
to
the
surface,
as
we
would
be
seeing
from
90).
It
will
produce
on
the
surface
of
the
pond
a
beautiful
round
wave,
in
the
shape
of
a
perfect
circle,
a
round
note
C.
Clearly
an
emission
field
(EF).That
wave
will
produce
successive
waves
around
the
first
wave
and
with
longer
radii.
Those
waves
will
form
round
crests
in
between
(called
warps
by
others)
which
in
music
are
called
intervals
or
gaps
in
a
developing
octave,
and
called
planets
in
the
solar
system,
where
there
are
two
bigger
than
the
others:
In
our
example
case
of
decreasing
frequency,
as
we
are
playing
back:
Note-Freq.Hz)
Wavelength
(cm)
Between
the
notes:
G#0/Ab0
25.96
1320.
Between
the
notes:
C#0/Db0
17.32
1990.
These
gaps,
crest
or
wraps
are
caused
by
the
resistance,
in
our
example,
of
water,
and
in
general
by
the
medium
or
by
the
interference
of
other
waves
from
different
emission
sources.
Now,
let
us
imagine
we
draw
on
the
surface
of
the
circle/wave
two
diameters
at
right
angles.
It
will
be
obvious
that
the
ratio
between
two
radii,
if
we
consider
each
of
them
equal
to
unity
will
be
ONE.
As
we
pondered
about
the
constants
which
appear
everywhere
in
physics
to
describe
the
different
phenomena
we
were
interested
in,
and
thinking
what
could
establish
a
relation
among
them,
we
found
in
Plancks
equation,
that
the
amount
of
energy
E
equals
frequency
v
multiplied
by
the
constant
which
bears
his
name
h
,
this
last
one
he
found
it
to
be
equal
to
0.66252
x
10-23Js
0.66252,
it
seemed
us
a
weird
number
by
being
an
irrational
number,
which
we
suspected
could
involved
something
which
could
lead
us
to
the
desired
relation.
That
number,
of
course,
we
supposed,
was
obtained
from
actual
experimentation.
In
order
to
know
whence
it
came,
we
thought
to
replace
it
by
a
harmonic
number,
rounding
it
to
0.6666,
that
is
equal
to
the
ratio
2/3,
which
is
the
inverse
of
the
perfect
fifth
3/2.
Note.-The
suspected
difference
or
irrationality
between
0.66252
and
0.66666
could
be
explained
by
the
action
of
the
local
field
where
the
Plancks
experiment
was
done:
On
the
earth.
This
gives
a
1.98756/3
ratio
and
not
the
expected
2/3
ratio.
The
2/3
ratio
(free
from
local
influence)
it
is
not
a
simple
mathematical
ratio,
but
a
real
one,
then
the
expression
of
two
forces
combining,
one
which
goes
from
the
center
to
the
periphery,
in
this
case
2
and
the
other
opposing
that
force,
which
decreases
the
resultant
force,
in
this
case
3,
the
first
being
the
expression
of
the
manifestation
of
the
vector
of
the
octave
developing
centrifugally,
the
other
the
vector
opposing
centripetally
to
it
from
the
media,
called
by
some
Gravity.
The
resultant
force
of
this
triangle
of
forces
is
what
we
see
as
a
wave
crest,
a
warp,
and,
of
course
we
live
on
one
of
these
where
mass
can
be
understood
as
the
transient
existence
of
what
some
call
a
discrete
amount
of
energy,
a
quanta.
As
we
think
from
daily
experience
that
everything
is
related
to
polarity,
to
ions,
to
electrons
and
protons,
in
the
end
to
Electricity,
then
we
went
to
revisit
the
photoelectric
phenomenon,
which
we
thought
it
was
also
wrongly
interpreted:
It
proved,
beyond
doubt,
the
electrical
nature
of
the
photon,
the
incident
UV
light
on
the
electroscope
plate
contained
in
itself
the
energy
of
the
afterwards
emitted
electron.
So
let
us
be
clear:
It
is
not
that
a
photon
goes
in
and
and
an
electron
goes
out.
Let
us
stop
calling
names:
It
is
energy
which
goes
in
and
energy
which
goes
out,
a
higher
frequency
goes
in
and
a
lower
frequency
goes
out,
a
shorter
wave
length
goes
in
and
a
longer
wave
length
goes
out;
of
course
part
of
the
energy
is
lost
as
the
higher
frequency
wave
interacts
with
a
lower
frequency
medium
(the
transformer
core,
in
the
case
of
an
electric
current
transformer):
PHOTON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ELECTRON >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thus
we
can
stop
thinking
in
particles
of
different
sizes
and
start
correctly
thinking
in
waves
of
different
length.
Wherever
there
is
such
an
energy
level
change
we
have
a
triangle
of
forces,
an
input
force
field
a
vector,
an
external
field
(the
core
in
the
electric
transformer)
with
which
it
interplays,
the
second
vector,
adding
or
subtracting
energy,
and
the
resultant
force
field,
of
higher
or
lower
energy.
Such
places
of
energy
interchange
are
what,
in
music,
are
called
intervals
or
gaps
Thus,
in
the
photoelectric
phenomenon,
the
UV
photon
was
the
Primum
Mobile,
like
the
stone
in
our
example
above.
At
this
point,
we
should
emphasize
that,
indeed
as
you
may
think,
we
can
have
primum
mobili
(several
first
forces)
of
smaller
frequencies,
or
particles
sizes
(whatever
you
prefer).
A
very
important
phenomenon
occurred
when
the
photoelectrical
activity
was
first
detected:
If
the
electroscope
was
charged
leaves
fell,
but
when
there
was
a
big
positive
charge
in
it
the
leaves
did
not
fall.
This
shows
that
what
we
consider
negative
or
positive
is
the
resultant
force
of
the
ratio
of
the
two
forces,
or
the
two
radii
in
our
example:
When,
for
instance,
its
ratio
is,
say
3/2
then
obviously
is
more
than
ONE,
so
it
is
positive;
being
the
primum
mobile
force
greater
than
the
one
which
opposes
to
its
movement,
when
it
is
the
contrary,
say
2/3,
or
0.666,
it
is
less
than
the
unity
thus
we
can
call
it
negative,
so
in
this
case,
the
force
opposing
the
first
force,
is
greater
than
the
one
which
starts
the
movement,
the
primum
mobile.
Thus
we
know,
also,
if
the
octave
is
developing
toward
higher
or
lower
pitches.
Now,
if
we
were
to
observe
closely
where
waves
are
resisted,
at
the
crests,
and
we
could
watch
it
as
in
an
instant,
we
could
see
transversally
a
circle
where
forces
are
acting
as
a
triangle
of
forces
inscribed
in
it.
As
surfers
on
a
round
wave,
living
a
fleeting
eternal
and
transient
instant,
we
would
call
that
wave
of
energy
mass,
the
earth,
and
the
force
which
keep
us
on
it,
gravity.
We
could
make
a
digression
here
and
think
that
apparently
all
phenomena
and
reality
happens
in
between
0
and
1,
or
in
between
the
force=1,
and
the
void=0,
where
the
force
tendency
is
ever
to
fill
the
void.
Either
we
could
say
that
reality
is
encompassed
in
between
0
and
9,
with
8
digits
in
between
the
extremes:
the
octave.
We
have
seen
that
the
EM
field
is
such
a
force,
which
goes
from
the
center
to
the
periphery.
Then,
in
the
circle
we
made
with
our
stone
on
the
water
pond,
the
outward
force
is
the
EM
field,
so
we
can
put
it
as
starting
from
the
center,
where
the
stone
fell
in
the
water,
then
if
Gravity
it
is
the
force
which
opposes
to
it
we
can
draw
it
from
the
periphery
to
the
center.
But,
as
the
EM
field
irradiates
in
every
direction
from
the
center
outwards,
as
the
waves
produced
by
our
stone
proves
it,
then
we
can
choose
to
draw
anyone
of
them;
then
lets
draw
an
arrow
from
the
center
to
the
periphery
but
in
right
angles
to
the
one
representing
Gravity.
Thus
we
now
have
a
nice
triangle
of
forces,
a
square
triangle.
The
force
of
Gravity,
the
arrow
ending
in
the
center
we
know
it
is
9.81,
a
weird
number
too,
because
if
we
ideally
have
two
equal
cathetus
(radii)
and
we
make
them
equal
to
1
each
one,
then
our
hypotenuse
would
be
equal
to
Sqr.2.
So
if
we
realize
that
weird
9.81
number
is
affected
by
the
local
EM
field,
chances
are
that
it
can
really
be
equal
to
10,
so
we
can
have
each
one
of
the
two
catheti
forming
our
triangle
(radii)
equal
to
10
and
our
hypotenuse
would
be
equal
to
Sqr.200.
Then
if
we
want
to
turn
our
troublesome
cathetus,
Gravity,
equal
to
Zero,
we
should
have
to
make
the
other
cathetus
equal
to
the
hypotenuse,
thats
equal
to
Sqr.200=14.1421.
Then
that
primum
mobile
that
stone
is
the
first
force
which
has
been
opposed
by
a
constant
and
contrary
force,
apparently
from
the
medium.
The
forces,
the
two
radii
combine
in
a
ratio
which
goes
from
0
to
1(sine
and
from
-1
to
0
(cosine).
That,
we
thought,
was
the
origin
of
the
polarity
of
the
EM
field.
Butwhat
does
it
happen
when
our
two
initially
opposing
vectors,
approach
parallelism,
as
the
angle
between
them
approaches
zero?,
each
one
of
them
having
moved
in
90
as
counted
from
its
starting
point?
They
add
one
another
originating
that
dynamically
neutral
force
which
we
imagine
coming
from
outside
coming
from
out
there
as
a
piercing
spear
which
nail
us
to
the
ground:
Gravity!
However,
if
we
could
see
the
earth
as
a
small
particle,
as
one
of
those
of
our
chemical
compound,
we
could
call
it
its
electrical
charge
or
its
static
electric
charge,
which
is
the
same.
When
the
positive
electric
charge
of
the
emission
field
approach
unity
(the
sine
of
90)
and
the
negative
force
approaches
zero
(cosine
of
90),
both
forces
assemble
equilibrated,
MASS
(gravity)
appears,
as
it
can
be
seen
in
this
TEM
picture
of
copper
nanoparticles
,
where
there
is
a
regular
arrangement,
along
axis:
Then,
if
we
consider
the
two
forces
of
a
field,
one
to
the
right
(+)
and
one
to
the
left
(-),
we
will
find
that
one
approaches
(following
the
law
of
sine)
the
unity=1,
the
other,
starting
at
180
degrees,
being
equal
to
-1
approaches
(following
the
law
of
cosine)
zero.
So
Gravity
is
the
sum:
G
=
sin
y
+
cos
y
G
=
1
+
0
Which
means
that
the
resultant
force
will
be
equal
to
1,
or
almost
one,
as
0.981
.
Now,
G,
the
constant,
the
gravitational
constant,
in
Newtons
equation:
F=G
(M1M2)/r2
Actually
represents
the
sine
added
to
the
cosine
of
the
angle
equal
to
90
G
=
Sin
y
+
Cos
y
=
1
0
=
1
The
actual
value:
0.981
reveals
that
the
local
emission
field,
though
small
subtracts
it
to
its
measured
and
known
value.
Where
M1
and
M2
(both
mass
quantities)
equals
the
diameter
of
the
circles,
on
a
plane,
particles
or
planets
alike,
in
the
present
case
=
2,
and
Gravity=
1,
then
it
follows
that
the
EM
in
the
case
of
the
Earth
would
be
the
difference
between
0.981-
1.0
=
-0.019,
thus
its
force
would
be
1.94
%
that
of
gravity
and
opposed
to
it.
We
find,
also,
that
when
forces
are
arranged
each
at
an
angle
above
the
horizontal
being
equal
to
45
degrees,
the
resultant
force
will
be
composed
of
two
vertical
vectors:
One
from
the
periphery
to
the
center
(Gravity)
and
the
other,
from
the
center
to
the
periphery
(EM
field):
MAGNETIC
FIELD
G1=Sin
y
0
=
+
0.70711
M=
Cos
y
=
-
0.7011
Then
the
resultant
central
vector
equals
a
PERMANENT
MAGNET,
where
its
attraction
is
Gravity
(to
the
center)
and
its
repulsion
is
the
EM
field
(to
the
periphery)
When
both
vectors
are
at
an
angle
lesser
than
45:
EMISSION
FIELD
Sin
y
<
+
0.7011
Cos
y
<
-
0.7011
In
order
to
exemplify
how
these
phenomena
proceed,
let
us
consider
when
on
a
certain
spot
on
the
Earth,
it
happens
a
sudden
change
in
the
acceleration
of
gravity,
usually
a
few
hundredths.we
have
an
earthquake!
,
and
earthquake
lights
happen:
Because
there
is
a
sudden
variation
in
the
ratio
on
which
those
two
vectors
of
opposite
charges
combine
or
neutralize
to
be
gravity,
as
changing
the
leads
on
a
motor
to
change
it
its
direction
of
turn.
In
such
cases
an
arc
can
happen:
the
earthquake
lights
we
see.
Thus,
we
have
demonstrated
that
only
relatively
neutral
(buffered)
matter
exhibits
more
conspicuously
that
almost
neutral
force
called
Gravity,
and
it
is
relatively
more
subjected
to
it,
while
more
ionized
(charged)
matter
it
is
relatively
more
subjected
to
the
local
EM
field.
Conclusion.-
We
can
generalize:
1. When
the
two
polar
forces
oppose,
at
sin
0=0,
and
Cos
180=
-1
,
And,
the
second
one,
the
repulsion
field,
Emission
Field
(EM),
going
from
the
center
to
the
periphery:
M=
Cos
y
=
-
0.7011
3. When
the
two
polar
forces
oppose
at
any
other
angle
different
to
0
we
will
always
find
a
compound
field
of
three
forces:
One
positive,
One
negative
and
One
neutral.
4. Thus
the
constants
which
appear
as
a
factor
in
all
laws
of
physics,
are
not
constant
but
variables,
more
precisely
ONE
variable,
which
corresponds
to
the
addition
of
the
Sin
and
the
Cosine
values
of
the
angle
between
the
two
polar
forces
of
the
ONLY
ONE
EXISTENT
FIELD.
5. Thus,
EVERY
AND
ANY
RATIO
IS
A
RATIO
BETWEEN
TWO
CHARGES
/ = Sin
y
+
Cos
y
1
=C/
Where:
Then:
So
D
is
the
link
with
three
dimensions
if
anyone
feels
more
comfortable
with
it.
(*)
Or:
Where
C
is
the
velocity
of
propagation
(its
maximum
being
the
velicity
of
light).
And
E= (Sin y + Cos y)
(*)In
order
to
understand
that
the
universe
is
Energy,
we
must
abandon
the
wrong
conception
of
dividing
reality
in
different
states
of
matter,
in
special
waves
vs.
mass:
The
obvious
nature
of
the
electron
synthetizes
both
general
qualities.
If
there
would
be
an
observer
having
a
size(dimension)
of
thousand
of
light
years,
watching
the
earth,
such
an
observer
could
consider
the
earth
as
being
a
very
small
particle,
perhaps
an
electron,
and
behaving
as
such,
with
its
characteristic
wave
movement.
C
is
the
velocity
of
light,
rather
and
more
exactly,
the
velocity
of
propagation
of
the
energy
wave,
which
is
resisted
and
modified
by
the
medium,
the
other
fields
it
encounters.
Some
have
thought
that
medium
is
what
they
call
a
mysterious
Aether,
however
that
Aether
it
is
the
external
force
opposing
the
development
of
a
wave,
as
in
the
known
phenomenon
of
diffraction
of
light
passing
through
water
in
a
glass:
The
mdium
here
is
water,
of
course
denser
tan
air,
and
we
see
the
difference
between
the
two
mdiumsand
the
two
different
resistances
to
the
propagation
of
light
(energy).
That
field
in
this
case
is
a
field
we
call
water.
So,
liquids,
solids,
mass
are
also
fields
wich
affect
the
propagation
of
energy
waves.
In
chemistry
solids
are
usually
and
correctly
called
solid
solutions,
where
it
is
recognized
they
have
pH
and
thus
charge.
Let
us
say
we
have
a
force,
a
charge
before
manifestation,
before
propagation,
and
we
give
it
the
value
of
ONE
(1),
say
a
charged
rubbed
rod
and
we
then
approach
it
to
an
empty
which
we
could
assign
the
value
of
no
charge
=
0
(a
Leyden
bottle
condenser),
1
will
go
to
fill
the
void
0,
it
will
discharge
in
it:
Now
we
have
a
discharge,
we
have
a
current!,
going
from
1to
fill
0.
It
is
static
electricitybeing
discharged
we
all
could
say,
but
lets
stop
our
custom
of
calling
energy
by
different
names
and
watch
that
it
does
not
go
straight
ahead
as
it
is
opposed
by
the
medium
out
there,
in
this
case
the
atmosphere,
the
air
or
In
the
case
of
a
Solar
CME:
That
outer
EM
field
is
the
interplanetary
EM
environment
,
that
resistance
to
it
is
the
same
as
the
one
called
in
electricity
electric
resistance.
That
opposing
medium,
that
external
field,
that
aether,
it
is
composed
of
planets,
neutrons,
neutrinos,
whatever
names
we
can
give
them
(just
to
confuse
ourselves)
which
are
fields
of
energy
themselves.
Then
we
can
see
physical
reality
occurs
in
the
interval
between
1
to
0
:
The
following
graph
summarizes
what
we
have
told
before:
In
it
we
have
included
Sin
and
Cosine
values,
pH
going
from
0
to
7
and
from
7
to
14
and
octave
frequencies,
following
the
same
order,
thus
encompassing
all
reality.
Spreadsheet
at:
http://www.giurfa.com/unified_field.xlsx
As
everything
follows
the
same
laws,
let
us
give
an
example
of
it:
1. An
electric
condenser:
A
Leyden
bottle
2. A
light
(infrared)
condenser:
A
thermic
flask
Last
but
not
least,
charges
are
in
its
turn
also
waves:
(*)
NOTE:
Though
the
above
refer
to
scalar
units,
which
reflect
the
actual
functioning
of
nature,
in
order
to
make
empirical
calculations
possible
we
must
transform
them
into
quantity
units.
Thus
we
must
consider
an
equivalent
of
mass:
What
we
will
call
density
of
vibrations,
equal
to
the
number
of
cycles
contained
in
a
unit
of
space
(volume)
during
a
certain
time.
Dv=
()3
And
it
follows
that
Mass
is
:
m=
1/()3
Summarizing:
Everything
in
the
universe
moves
and
manifests
according
to
the
laws
of
the
opposites,
which
at
the
start
are
=
1
and
0,
and
then
evolve
attracting
and
repelling
among
them,
following
the
sine
and
the
cosine;
each
movement
developing
on
frequencies
as
the
law
of
the
octave,
where,
in
the
intervals
(gaps)
there
is
an
exchange
of
energy/force,
be
it
as
emmision
or
absorption,
input
and
output,
feeding
and
excreting.
At
these
points
on
inflection
it
manifests
the
law
of
three:
active,
pasive
and
resultant.
Morals:
Let
us
forget,
erase,
the
name
Gravity
from
our
psyche,
IT
DOES
NOT
EXIST!!
And
Time,
also,
does
not
exist,
Tempo
(frequency)
does
instead.
Note.-Please
take
into
consideration
that
the
two
dimensional
circle
above
it
is
but
a
transversal
cut
of
a
train
of
waves,
moving
along
an
axis,
the
center
of
the
circle,
a
current
of
four
waves:
East-West
and
North-South,
and
all
its
possible
analogies,
biological,
non
biological,
etc.
It
is
really
A
Golden
Compass.
Though
all
the
above
can
be
understood,
more
or
less,
within
the
frame
of
the
current
paradigm,
something
remains
irrational,
and
this
is
the
existence
of
ZERO
itself,
so
we
can
arrange
our
two
dimensional
graph
this
way:
Such
a
concept
of
nothingness,
as
it
contradicts
reason,
does
not
exist,
then
the
ZERO
integer
does
not
exist.
As
we
see
polarity
is
relative
to
the
sense
of
spin,
to
the
relative
position
of
forces:
To
the
right
or
to
left,
up
or
down.
In ANY triangle of forces one of the angles must necessarily and always be equal to 90
It
follows
that
only
the
legs
can
change
its
strength(length),
and
the
ratio
between
the
legs
causes
spin
and
apparent
polarity.
HOW
THE
UNIVERSE
(THE
COSMOS)
IS
AND
HOW
IT
WORKS:
We
already
have
enough
data
or
input
to
clarify
for
ourselves
how
the
universe
is
and
how
it
works.
We
have
also
found
that
these
two
polar
forces,
as
nothingness
does
not
exist
by
definition,
then,
these
can
be
defined
as
the
two
extremes
of
a
unit:
+
1
and
-1
If we take a closer look at the point, if we zoom in, we will find, repeated, the same structure:
A
mono-dimensional
spiral:
We
know,
already,
that
this
point-spiral
has
been
originated
by
the
opposition
of
two
forces:
+
1
and
-1
The
graph,
above,
shows
the
arrangement
for
the
construction
of
an
apparatus
for
the
Art
of
transmitting
electrical
energy
through
the
natural
mediums
as
shown
in
the
US
Patent
Nr.142352,
given
to
Nikola
Tesla
in
April
17,
1906,
and
which
depicts
02
two
dimensional
(flat)
spirals,
each
one
carrying
an
opposite
force,
which
evidently
produce
a
both
sided
emission
field,
as
two
semi-spheres:
As
seen
in
the
following
video,
where
Professor
Eric
Dollard
shows
it:
http://youtu.be/DFa-IymyWHM
This
phenomenon
can
be
also
proved
mechanically
by
any
one
just
by
kicking
on
the
central
point
of
a
gong:
Then, it follows that every point of the universe contains the totality in itself.
It
also
follows
that
when
such
field
increases
its
wave
frequency
it
can
ultimately
become
a
point,
again,
relative
to
the
observer.
The
evolution
and
involution
of
waves
happens
following
the
laws
shown
above
and
are
scalar
in
nature,
just
becoming
quantifiable
when
compared
subjectively
by
the
observer.
These
basic
and
universal
laws
are
those,
as
taught
by
tradition,
of
the
three
forces,
composed
in
a
triangle
and,
when
this
triangle
moves,
those
of
the
musical
scale.