Professional Documents
Culture Documents
...
01
departmental oraanization and the particular type of develoumint under consideration. For the purpose of the present discussion, let us split the work into six separate steps, as follows:
1. LABORATORY
RESEARCH.Starting with the conception of
the idea, trying it out in ordinary laboratory equipment, and
ending with a general background of facts relative to the process.
2. PRODUCT
EVALUATION.A cost and market study to determine whether the new product or process is worth developing.
3. PROCESS
STUDY.An experimental study of the individual
processing steps to obtain qualitative indications and determine
equipment types.
4. PRELIMINARY
ENGINEERING.
Tentative approximate design and cost estimate of the commercial plant, based on present
knowledge to decide whether it will make a good
profit
and war.
rant proceeding further.
5. PILOT
PLANT
STUDY.The design, construction, and operation of a pilot unit to obtain the quantitative data required to
build the production plant visualized in the previous step.
6. COMMERCIAL
PLANT.Building the large plant and conversion of development efforts into money to pay the stockholders
and finance other development programs.
Such an apportionment of the development work has many advantages. Each step in itself is relatively simple and straight-
413
414
I N D U S T R I A L A N D E N G I N E E R I N G CHEMISTRY
foryard. The completion of one phase demonstrates the conimercial feasibility of progressing to the next and yields the background of information required to proceed.
PURPOSE
What is the purpose of a pilot plant? When the laboratory research work is finished, the individual steps are tentatively
worked out, and the process shows gufficient promise to warrant
the expense of further development, we start planning a pilot
plant. Kow let us ask ourselves a simple serious question, not
easy to answer: Why are a e building this pilot plant? Is it just
for the satisfaction of seeing the process operate on a larger
scale? Is it to make more product so that we can satisfy the
sales department's demand for larger samples? Do we wish t o
determine how to operate our present plant equipment to make a
new product? Or is it to satisfy a superior that the process will
work in steel pipe as readily as in glass tubing? The usual reason
is to obtain quantitative data for the design of the large commercial plant, and this is the basis for its place and scope in the development program. I n a specific case any one of a hundred
reasons might be sufficient cause for the pilot step, and we should
definitely recognize the particular purpose so that it will dictate
the type of pilot plant to build, if any.
For example, if the main purpose is that of demonstration, the
emphasis is placed on showmanship. The equipment must be
neat and pleasing to the eye. Everything must be carefully
painted, preferably in several colors. It must be immediately
obvious to the observer where the raw materials enter and where
the product leaves the apparatus. And most important, the
operating data. After his laboratory work is conipleted and it is decided that the new product has a
demand, he runs several batches in the pilot kettle to determine
how to use his commercial equipment, He must know what conditions of temperature, pressure, time, and agitation give the desired results. It must be done right the first time in the large
kettle because the ingredients are expensive and a batch cannot
be wasted.
As a second example, imagine a reaction involving three ingredients each dissolved in a different common solvent-thy1
alcohol, acetone, and water. The product precipitates out completely and is filtered off, and the main problem becomes recovery
of the alcohol and acetone individually in the required degree of
dryness. We might carry out pilot tests on the reactiofl, precipitation, and filtration, but probably not on the distillation since
the commercial plant can be designed and built from existing
data and knowledge.
As a third example, let us imagine a reaction where a gas must
be whipped into a viscous, sticky, semiliquid mass at 2000
pounds per square inch pressure and 700" F. temperature. The
answer to this problem is not obvious. Even if we can accomplish the result on a small scale, we are not going to change to a
large commercial autoclave without trying the process carefully
in one or more intermediate steps.
Equipment types are to be settled in the process study phase,
and different styles should not be tried for a process requirement
in the pilot plant whose purpose is to produce quantitative data
As an example, suppose we are considering the distillation of a
solvent from a viscous mass; although it works fairly well in a
glass flask, we have a notion that agitation of the still pot is desired in order to obtain the required heat transfer. This should
May, 1945
415
heat transfer rates, pressure drops, and flow rates since these will
have been established in the operation of the pilot equipment.
One reason for preparing a tentative design of the large plant
before we build the pilot apparatus is to force ourselves to rerognize what information is needed. We list the data required t o design the commercial installation and then work out the pilot
equipment to give these results.
The selection of the pilot plant size is frequently difficult, and
there are no set rules to assist us. This must come largely as a
result of experience. I n a processing operation, a step-up of 5 to 1
might be risky to a novice, whereas an experienced development
engineer might safely step up the ratio of 100 or 1000 to 1. If
one of the main remons for building the pilot plant is t o obtain
larger quantities of product, it may dictate the size. To obtain
design data for a vapor-phase catalytic reaction, we might use a
single-tube reactor, the tube being about the size and length that
would be employed in amultitubular commercial unit. This may,
however, produce only one tenth the amount required to satisfy
the immediate demand for product, so a ten- or twelve-tube converter must be employed.
Care should be exercised to employ pilot equipment which will
give results that can be duplicated. For example, a Soxhlet
type extractor should not be used in the pilot step if the heat
required will be too costly on the large scale. A kettle or autoclave which is agitated more vigorously than is physically possible in a large unit should not be used.
When difficult equipment problems arise in the pilot plant design and operation, manufacturers who are expected to furnish
the commercial plant equipment may be called upon to assist
in the solution. I n this way they will become acquainted with
the requirements and will be in a better position to fill them when
the large plant is constructed.
A common error is to make the piping too large. Velocities
and pressure drops should be about the same as would be used
in a commercial unit. It is difficult to obtain fittings, controls,
and valves in special materials and very small sizes. Frequently
the proper size of connection is smaller than standard pipe. In
such cases tubing and tubing fittings may be employed.
Well water should not be employed for a difficult cooling problem if recooled water must be used in the plant. Water used in
pilot work should, if possible, be identical to that to be employed
in the plant. This will bring to light troubles which may arise
from scale accumulation, stress corrosion, caustic embrittlement,
sludge deposits, and the effect of minor process water impurities
on the reaction. Waste treatment problems are frequently affected by the type of water employed in the process.
On small scale work, sources of electricity, steam, compressed
air, and vacuum should closely resemble those planned for the
production installation. Steam pressure of 300 pounds per.
square inch should not be used for heating if only 100 pounds
will be available on the large scale. A mercury diffusion pump
used for evacuation, which can produce an absolute pressure of 1
micron or less, might lead to false conclusions if steam jets are
planned for the commercial size.
Good judgment must be used in deciding where to concentrate
efforts and where no investigation is needed.
The results should be worth the cost of obtaining them. It would be folly, for cxample, to spend a thousand dollars to secure
complete heat transfer data on an operation
where only a small amount of heat is involved, control is not critical, and the heat
exchanger in the commercial plant will cost
only two hundred dollars. Our desire to
do a good job of investigating should be
tempered by a sense of values.
I n converting pilot data into commercial
design or when designing a pilot plant to
obtain commercial data, i t is necessary t o
416
May, 1945
417
Flow Sheet of a Pilot Plant for Continuous Liquid-Phase Reaction a t 4000 Pounds per Square Inch Pressure
During the course of the pilot work, meetings should be held
et least once a week so that the engineers assigned to the job can
discuss the progress and future plans with the department head,
specialists who are working in a consulting capacity, a representative of the research department that carried the project
through the laboratory stage, and a representative of the engineering department that will design the commercial plant.
The proper interpretation of the pilot plant data calls for care
and experience. The more development work an engineer or a
company does, the easier and more effective will be the utilization
of the data. The results should be translated into usable form
and commercial plant implications should be determined each
day or each week, rather than a t the end of a long series of runs;
otherwise we may find that a months work was aimed in the
wrong direction.
The report on the pilot plant operation will be considered by
management in the light of the cost involved. What did they
get for the money spent? The general appearance of the report,
the method of data presentation, goes a long way toward making
the project appear worth while. Let us never become so involved
in engineering that we forget to use salesmanship now and then.
A thorough knowledge of equipment design is essential to reproduce successful pilot operation with equally successful commercial machinery. Large companies frequently have sufficient
experience within their own organization. Smaller concerns can
often employ equipment specialists t o advantage.