1

Mr Peter Lauritsen Chief Magistrate, Magistrates Court of Victoria

Ground Floor, 277 William Street
Melbourne Vic 3000

6-12-2015

C/o help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au
Cc:

Michelle Ainsworth michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au

Victorian Electoral Commissioner Email: complaints@vec.vic.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au & attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
Civic Compliance Victoria GPO Box 1916, Melbourne VIC 3001 Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com

10

Case 1564277756-Ob-1537134040
15

Ref; 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement Court & VEC & othersCase 1564277756-Ob-1537134040 Re COMPLAINT-Electoral & judicial issues-etc-Supplement-01

Sir,
Obviously the statement We all think the ship's
necessarily if at all reflect the truth of matters.
20

in safe hands.

Is from another lawyer and not

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/states-new-chief-magistrate-named-20121128-2aefd.html
State's new chief magistrate named, Date November 29, 2012
QUOTE

Perhaps his best endorsement came from a colleague who commented: ''We all think the ship's in safe hands.''
END QUOTE

25

30

In my 4-12-2015 correspondence (incorrectly referring to Grey) I exposed a lot of short coming

in the legal processes and conduct in the Magistrates Court of Victoria regarding Intervention
orders, and I am also currently involved in an appeal (unrelated matter) where the absurdity of
the legal processes are even more ramped in the Magistrates Court of Victoria. Where a Judicial
registrar without any brief filed and without evidence during the court hearing somehow still
make orders against the accused, disregarding written submissions for OBJECTION TO
JURISDICTION.
The NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE AN INFRINGMENT WARRANT also shows on
the reverse side:
QUOTE

35

If you do not pay the fine, or any instalments under a payment order, an infringement
warrant will be issued against you.
END QUOTE

40

As such it appears that no matter what the warrant issue has been predetermined no matter what!
This, I view makes any subsequently order to be null and void!
Yet, contrary to this the face of the NOTICE shows:

p1
6-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

2
As such while this part states TO AVOID THE ISSUING OF AN INFRINGMENT
WARRANT YOU MUST DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING again the flip/reverse/back side
shows:
QUOTE

If you do not pay the fine, or any instalments under a payment order, an infringement
warrant will be issued against you.
END QUOTE

10

A further problem is that in the statement TO AVOID THE ISSUING OF AN

INFRINGMENT WARRANT YOU MUST DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING
It is time some competent person check s Wakim HCA 27 of 1999 such as

15

20

25

Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA 27
(17 June 1999)
QUOTE

For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue estoppel can prevail
against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as
Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour".
That is because those relying on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
END QUOTE

Lets make it very clear, that the notice claims (as reproduced above in part) that within s167 of
the Infringement Act 2006 it is an offence to provide false or misleading information. As such
the VEC concealing my OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION as well as that the then AttorneyGeneral Mr Rob Hulls for the State of Victoria made clear to abide by the courts decision of the
County Court of Victoria to uphold both appeals against conviction for FAILING TO VOTE
then why is it that you cannot manage to conduct proceedings as was assumed ''We all think the
ship's in safe hands.''?

30

35

40

Lets also be clear about it that the orders were issued without jurisdiction and are a nullity and
I do not need to request anything such as for a review of the court orders as
legally/constitutionally they do not exist!
As such, contrary to the 20-10-2015 correspondence that I can request for a re-hearing there is
no need to do so because where the Infringement Court Registrar failed to invoke jurisdiction in
the first place then there can be no hearing De Novo because the case itself never could have
been heard unless the Infringement Court Registrar had dismissed the OBJECTION TO
JURISDICTION by issuing orders and a reason of judgment doing so. Yet, I am not aware such
jurisdictional hearing ever eventuated. As I did set out in previous writings the magistrates
Court of Victoria/Infringement Court Registrar has no judicial powers to interfere or otherwise
undermine the rights and benefits I obtained by the successful appeals and so the orders of the
County Court of Victoria held on 19-6-2006. If you cannot even understand/comprehend this
then perhaps you may consider a job as a fish and chips salesman?
.

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all
details/issues.
45

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Our name is our motto!)

(
Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B.

(Friends call me Gerrit)

p2
6-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati