Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mustafar
Bin Sudin
Programme(s):
Diploma in
Mechanical Engineering
(DME)
Course Title:
Date
: 20 August 2014
Version
: R1-2012
Fluid Mechanics 2
Student Name
Student ID
Laborator
y
: Logendran a/l Mohan
: FM Lab (S106)
: 00010479
LABSHEET
FRICTION LOSSES IN BENDS AND ELBOWS
Notes:
(1) On-the-spot evaluation may be carried out during or at the end of the experiment.
(2) Students are advised to read through this lab sheet before doing the experiment.
(3) Your performance, teamwork effort, and learning attitude will count towards the
marks.
TITLE
FRICTION LOSSES IN BENDS AND ELBOWS.
2.0
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the head loss due to friction across bends and elbow.
3.0
INTRODUCTION
Whenever the direction of the flow is change at a bend or elbows the velocity distribution
across the pipe is disturbed. A centrifugal effect causes the maximum velocity to occur
towards the outside of the bend or elbow whilst at the inside of the bend or elbow the
flow is slowed or even reversed in direction if the flow separates from the wall and a
vena-contracta formed. A secondary flow is set up at right angles to the pipe cross
section which increases the velocity gradient and hence the shear stress of the wall.
4.0
THEORY / FORMULAE
C
B
B
C
Nilai University
Page 2
Section A-A
Normal velocity distribution
hb K b
V2
2g
Value of Kb are related to the pipe friction f or f by a constant which is dependent on the
ratio of bend radius to the pipe diameter R/D. This constant may also be treated as an
equivalent length of straight pipe expressed as diameters by using the Darcy Weisbach
equation
hb K b
V 2 4 fLe V 2
2g
D
2g
hence,
Kb
4 fLe
D
hb K b
OR
OR
V 2 fLe V 2
2g
D 2g
Kb
fLe
D
For single 90 bends and elbow the bend resistance coefficient Kb and the equivalent
length Le are typically:
R/D
Le
Kb
Elbow
30D
120f
Nilai University
1
20D
80f
1.5
14D
56f
2
12D
48f
4
14D
56f
6
17D
68f
8
24D
96f
10
30D
120f
12
34D
136f
14
38D
158f
Page 3
30f
20f
14f
12f
14f
17f
24f
30f
34f
38f
NOTE THAT:
K b Le
f' D
Which suggests a significant advantagein the use of f in comparison with using f for the
pipework design.
Figure 2 P6221 c) and d) are refered.
5.0
Initially P6103 Constant Head Inlet Tank with over flow pipe extension
fitted but replace later by P6105 Feedblock.
Manometer Initially use two of the single manometer tubes. When using the
feedback change to the water on mercury manometer.
6.0
EXPERIMENT PROCEDURE
a. Start the pump and establish a water flow through the test section. Raise the
swivel tube of the outlet tank so that it is close to the vertical. Adjust the
bench regulating valve (or pump speed) to provide a small overflow from the
inlet tank and overflow pipe. Ensure that any air bubbles are bled from the
manometer tubes.
b. Set up a series of flow conditions with differential heads starting at 25 mm in
step of 25 mm up to 150 mm and thereafter in steps of 50 mm up to a
maximum of 500 mm. At each condition carefully measure the flow rate
using volumetric tank and a stop watch.
Nilai University
Page 4
Record the results on a copy of the result sheet for Friction Losses in
Bends and Elbows.
Determine the water density and viscosity from Annex 1 of part 1 of the
manual.
Calculate the velocity and hence the velocity head for each result.
From the results for the 10 mm pipe in experiment 2, or by analysis,
calculate the head loss hp for a 540 mm straight length of tube of the
same diameter as the test section. If using results from the experiment 2
then correct the results for the difference in length of the two test
P L
sections
v.
vi.
D5 .
sections
Calculate the head loss due to a single bend by subtracting the head loss
for a straight length of test section 540 mm long from the measured
head loss for the test section with four bends and divide the result by
four.
Express this head loss per bend as a coefficient Kb by dividing by the
velocity head. Compare the result with that predicted from the empirical
results given in the above paragraph for the appropriate ratio of R/D.
Formula
Time
Volume of water collected
Volume flow rate , Q=
collect water (m3 / sec)
Mean Velocity , V =
Velocity Head ,V =
Mean Velocity V
= (m/sec)
2g
2g
Page 5
Le
D
V2
2g
( )( )
(Velocity)(Diameter ) VD
=
specific volume
( )
V
2g
Loss Coefficient ( Bends), k b=56 f
Friction Loss for Fitting , hb =k b
Water temperature:
Experiment Title:
Type of pipe
Head difference
(mm)
Quantity of water
collected (liter)
Time to collect
water, t (s)
Volume flow rate,
Q (m3/s)
Mean Velocity, V
(m/s)
Velocity head
(V2/2g) (m/s)
Inlet head, h1 (mm)
Outlet head, h2
(mm)
Nilai University
1.12 106 cP
Viscosity:
Date:
Bend
11.11105
540 mm
Elbow
10
3L (0.003
m3)
27
1000 km/m3
Density:
Test Conditions:
24
40
3L (0.003
m 3)
56
10
3L (0.003
m 3)
48
5.36 105
6.25 105
40
3L (0.003
m 3)
95
3.16 105
1.41
0.6837
0.795
0.402
0.102
0.0237
0.041
0.0083
31.5
46
38
43.5
11
34.5
39.5
Page 6
20.5
11.5
32
0.159
0.046
0.061
0.019
0.165
0.048
0.1722
0.042
1.624
2.016
4.20
5.04
1.41472
=0.102(m/sec)
2(9.81)
(1.41)(0.01)
=12589.3
1.12106
( )(
1.41
=0.165
2 ( 9.81 )
Page 7
m
( 3 /sec)
0.003
Volume flow rate , Q=
=5.36 105
56
5.36 105
Mean Velocity , V =
=0.6837( m/sec)
(0.005)2
Velocity Head ,V =
0.68372
=0.0237(m/ sec)
2(9.81)
(0.6837)(0.01)
=6104.46
1.12 106
( )(
0.68372
Friction Loss for Fitting , hb =56 ( 0.036 )
=0.048
2 ( 9.81 )
Loss Coefficient , k b=56 ( 0.036 )=2.016
6.25 105
=0.795(m/ sec)
(0.005)2
0.7952
Velocity Head ,V =
=0.041(m/sec)
2(9.81)
Nilai University
Page 8
(0.795)(0.01)
=7098.21
1.12 106
( )(
0.795
=0.1722
2 ( 9.81 )
Mean Velocity , V =
3.16 10
=0.402(m/ sec)
2
(0.005)
2
0.402
Velocity Head ,V =
=0.0083(m/sec)
2(9.81)
Friction Head Loss , hf =43.539.5=4 (mm)
Reynolds, Re =
(0.402)(0.01)
=3589.29
1.12 106
( )(
Nilai University
Page 9
0.402
=0.042
2 ( 9.81 )
8.0
OBSEVATIONS
8.0
DISCUSSION
This examination has couple of things difference from the first lab (laminar and
Turbulence stream). The primary differentiation is the test range pipe that using
bens and elbows to supplant straight pipe in the first lab to figure the head disaster.
Pipe Friction Loss, h_p , Loss Coefficient, k_b and Friction Loss for Fitting, k_b
comparison is differ from the first lab for figuring purposes. Turning section of the
bends is smoother than elbows provoked the smaller granulating head disaster.. As
the crushing head disaster is addition in the meantime with the time to assemble
water, association will subject to pick the channel of turns.
9.0
CONCLUSION
Through this investigation, by examining the head misfortune because of
rubbing crosswise over elbows and twists, unmistakably see about the contrasts in
the middle of elbows and curves. Kind of channel will prompt the time expended to
gather 3L of water. In addition, Different kind of direct will have differentiates in
contact head setback. At last, technique must be appreciate and take after before
test start, and the scrutinizing level must record accurately with a particular final
objective to complete up the result unequivocally.
10.0 REFERENCES
1. Munson B. R., Okiishi T. H., Huebsch W. W. (2013) 7 th Edition. Fluid Mechanics.
John Wiley, Singapore.
2. Dr. R. K. Bansal. (2012). A textbook of Fluid Mechanics. Laxmi Publications (P)
Ltd. New Delhi, India.
3. J. M. Cimbala and Y. A. Cengel. (2008). Essentials of Fluid Mechanics,
Fundamentals and Applications. McGraw-Hill International Edition. Singapore.
4. Dr. R. K. Bansal. (2012), A Textbook of Fluid Mechanics, LAXMI PUBLICATION (P)
LTD, New Delhi.
Nilai University
Page 10
Nilai University
Page 11
Assessme
nt
Componen
ts
Percenta
ge
(%)
Hands-on
and Lab
Activities
2%
Viva Voce
Students will be assessed orally, on-thespot through a short viva voce session.
1%
Lab Report
7%
Page 12
Nilai University
Page 13