Professional Documents
Culture Documents
this
compilation
poverty
can motivate individuals to commit crime or create the
circumstances that serve as a breeding ground for crime,
especially property crime. Several theories have been used in this writing to tie-in to the
the motivations of crime and the influences on criminal behavior. Economic deprivation or
socio-economics of crime. Nevertheless, there are many who are poor but still choose to live a life of high
So lets say the advantages are evened out, and poor people and rich
people have the same chance of going to prison, even then, rich
people have a better life style in prison than the average person does.
Matt Clarke, (Writer for Prison legal News, Lawyer, Archer Shut up),
Celebrity Justice: Prison Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous, 2012
There are two criminal justice systems in the United States.
One is for people with wealth, fame or influence who can afford
to hire top-notch attorneys and public relations firms, who
make campaign contributions to sheriffs, legislators and other
elected officials, and who enjoy certain privileges due to their
celebrity status or the size of their bank accounts. The other
justice system is for everybody else.
As one example of this dichotomy, for over a decade suburban jails in Southern California have been
These pay-tostay programs, also called self-pay jails, cost wealthy prisoners
between $45 and $175 a day and include such amenities as
iPods, cell phones, computers, private cells and work release
programs. Some even let prisoners (who are referred to as
clients) bring in their own food.
renting upscale cells to affluent people convicted of crimes in Los Angeles County.
Impact
Capitalisms expansion requires the subordination of nature to resources to be
exploited, making ecological destruction of massive proportions inevitable.
John Foster Professor of Sociology 07 (John Bellamy, Professor of Sociology
at University of Oregon, The Ecology of Destruction, Feb 2007,
http://www.monthlyreview.org/0207jbf.htm) JXu
In the almost five years that have elapsed since the second
earth summit it has become increasingly difficult to separate
the class and imperial war inherent to capitalism from war on
the planet itself. At a time when the United States is battling for
imperial control of the richest oil region on earth, the ecology of the
planet is experiencing rapid deterioration, marked most
dramatically by global warming. Meanwhile, neoliberal
economic restructuring emanating from the new regime of
monopoly-finance capital is not only undermining the economic
welfare of much of humanity, but in some regions is removing
such basic ecological conditions of human existence as access
to clean air, drinkable water, and adequate food. Ecologists
who once warned of the possibility of future apocalypse now
insist that global disaster is on our doorstep. Bill McKibben, author of The End of
Nature, declared in his article The Debate is Over in the November 17, 2005, issue of Rolling Stone magazine that we are now entering the
Oh Shit era of global warming. At first, he wrote, there was the I wonder what will happen? era. Then there was the Can this really be
All we can do is
limit its scope and intensity. Much of the uncertainty has to do
with the fact that the world...has some trapdoors
mechanisms that dont work in straightforward fashion, but
instead trigger a nasty chain reaction.6 In his book, The Revenge of Gaia, influential
true? era. Now we are in the Oh Shit era. We now know that it is too late to avert global disaster entirely.
scientist James Lovelock, best known as the originator of the Gaia hypothesis, has issued a grim assessment of the earths prospects based on
, Lovelock highlights a
number of positive feedback mechanisms that couldand in
his view almost certainly willamplify the earth warming
tendency. The destructive effect of increasing global
temperatures on ocean algae and tropical forests (on top of the
direct removal of these forests) will, it is feared, reduce the
capacity of the oceans and forests to absorb carbon dioxide,
raising the global temperature still further. The freeing up and release into the
such sudden chain reactions.7 Voicing the concerns of numerous scientists
atmosphere of enormous quantities of methane (a greenhouse gas twenty-four times as potent as carbon dioxide) as the permafrost of the
return and temperatures are destined to rise eventually as much as 8 C (14 F) in temperate regions. The human species will survive in some
form, he assures us. Nevertheless he points to an imminent shift in our climate towards one that could easily be described as Hell: so hot, so
Lovelocks fears are not easily dismissed. James Hansen, who did so much to bring the issue of global warming to world attention, has recently
issued his own warning. In an article entitled The Threat to the Planet (New York Review of Books, July 13, 2006), Hansen points out that
animal and plant species are migrating throughout the earth in response to global warmingthough not fast enough in relation to changes in
their environmentsand that alpine species are being pushed off the planet. We are facing, he contends, the possibility of mass extinctions
associated with increasing global temperature comparable to earlier periods in the earths history in which 50 to 90 percent of living species
separates the climate of today from the warmest interglacial periods in the last half million years when the sea level was as much as sixteen
feet higher. Further, increases in temperature this century by around 2.8 C (5 F) under business as usual could lead to a long term rise in sea
level by as much as eighty feet, judging by what happened the last time the earths temperature rose this highthree million years ago. We
have, Hansen says, at most ten yearsnot ten years to decide upon action but ten years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of greenhouse
gas emissionsif we are to prevent such disastrous outcomes from becoming inevitable. One crucial decade, in other words, separates us
from irreversible changes that could produce a very different world. The contradictions of the entire Holocenethe geological epoch in which
human civilization has developedare suddenly being revealed in our time.10 In the Oh shit era, the debate, McKibben says, is over.
The point is that not just global warming but many of these
other problems as well can each be seen as constituting a
global ecological crisis. Today every major ecosystem on the
earth is in decline. Issues of environmental justice are
becoming more prominent and pressing everywhere we turn.
Underlying this is the fact that the class/imperial war that
people to consume more product, prompting more production, and hence more
ecological devastation.
Are you beset by problems in your scheme to run down the human race? Not enough consumers buying useless and environmentally-damaging goods? You
need ADVERTISING! Yes! Just implant the seeds of product-promotion in any sentient population and see the consumption take off! Now there's new improved
Advertising, with Television! Guaranteed to have grasping, materialistic populations running for extinction before you can say "thirty second product slot". Try some
today! Most of this project is just a matter of prompting the societies along occasionally -- there's a bit of work to be done to start it all off but mostly the species
adopt a monetary
system, then later push for embellishments like
`representative democracy' and a consumer culture. After a
few thousand years of hard work, you should be able to sit
back and watch as the human population approaches
doomsday numbers (about x billion) and natural disasters, especially famines, droughts and epidemic diseases start to decimate the
population. Civil wars, tribal and religious violence, riots, bloody revolutions (and so on) become more common. Eventually the
backbone of civilisation breaks and billions die in the resulting
anarchy. Without the Economy to support them, most starve,
unable to eke out a living on infertile land. Softened by a safe
life with excellent medical care, the inhospitable wilderness
and epidemic diseases take their toll on the ex-civilians of our
global economy.
you're trying to kill will do your job for you. To recap: you first prompt the indigenous humans to
At this point there are still hundreds of millions of surviving humans, but
faced with only limited food and land resources, we can expect most to
quickly dwindle to extinction. Many others, will take the quick way out; tinpot dictatorships unleash chemical, biological and nuclear death on other
nations in competing for tiny and shrinking resources . This should quickly wipe
out the rest of the survivors. There will soon be no sign of Homo Sapiens.
Alt
Roll of the ballot: When you judge vote for me it functions as a micro
political action sign ballot rupture and reject cap. Micro political action
is important because it allows debate community to realize that
rejecting cap is viable option and starts a movement. It only takes one
person to take a stance, and the good idea will run along.
If there are any arguments for why I dont reject capitalism, this is not
in the real world, again, its methodology. We just need to see if
capitalism is a good mindset or a bad and when you sign the ballot for
me, it says that cap is not a positive mindset to engage in.
When we stop the devil we call capitalism we can solve the impact of
the ozone layer falling apart and stop nuclear war.