Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
This study assessed the maintenance of
the effect of a year-long school-based
humane education program on fourth
grade childrens attitudes toward animals.
Generalization to human-directed empathy was also measured. Using a pretestposttest (Year 1) follow-up (Year 2) design
and ANCOVA, we found that the experimental group (children who experienced
the program) humane attitudes mean was
greater than the control group mean at
initial posttesting and at the Year 2 follow
up. At both Year 1 and Year 2 posttesting,
the enhancement of attitudes toward animals generalized to human-directed
empathy, especially when the quality of
the childrens relations with their pets was
considered as a covariate. The results contribute to the growing literature on the significance of the relations between children
Department of Psychology, Utah State University,
Logan, Utah 84322-2810
*Based on a presentation at the Biennial Meeting of
The Society for Research in Child Development,
March 25, 1993. We thank the teachers, parents,
and children for their participation. Funds for this
research were provided by the Utah State University
Vice President for Research and the National
Association for Humane and Environmental
Education. Mary Bissonette, Shayne Bland, Steve
Murdock, Camille Odell, and Teresa Thompson
assisted in data collection. Our thanks to Karen
Ranson for preparing this manuscript. Request
reprints from: Frank R. Ascione, Department of
Psychology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
84322-2810, E-mail:
FRANKA@FS1.ED.USU.EDU.
188
LITERATURE REVIEW
ost people would agree that
teaching children humane attitudes and actions toward animals
is likely to have a beneficial outcome. Intuitively, humane education appears
to be an indirect way to encourage children to
be kind, caring, and sensitive in their relations
with people. Unfortunately, research results in
this area have been disappointing. Evidence
that humane education leads to enduring
changes in humane attitudes and empathy is
sparse (Ascione, under review).
In a comprehensive review, Ascione
(1992) found few reports of effective
humane education programs. Vockell and
Hodal (1980) implemented a brief schoolbased intervention. Their program consisted
of a one-time visit by a humane educator in
third through sixth grade classrooms. Some
of the classrooms received a visit and printed materials while other classrooms
received only printed materials. It was not
clear how long the visit was or how the
printed material was incorporated into the
classroom. There was no pretest to determine potentially significant differences in
groups prior to the intervention. An additional problem not addressed was the control groups differences on two reportedly
equivalent tests. Predictably, the intervention was reported as ineffective.
Fitzgerald (1981) offered a more intense
intervention and included a pretest. He
implemented 1) repeated treatment (four
lessons, one every two weeks), 2) intensive
treatment (a single classroom session), 3)
light treatment (printed material only), and
4) a control condition (no intervention). He
concluded that the intensive treatment was
effective for conveying positive humane attitudes to children. This study used a master
instructor instead of the childrens classroom teacher. Fitzgerald judged that this
was an effective component of his intervention. It is possible that the children were not
RESEARCH RELATED
TO CURRENT STUDY
Considering previous research design
strengths and limitations, Ascione (1992)
implemented and evaluated a forty-hour
classroom-based humane education intervention program. This study involved 32
classrooms of first, second, fourth, and fifth
grade children divided equally and randomly
into experimental and control groups. The
intervention was based on NAHEE s curriculum-blended guides. Concepts related to
human-animal relationships, companion
animals, wild animals, and farm animals
were integrated into the classroom curriculum by the teachers during the school year.
A variety of teaching techniques were used
that included role playing, decision making,
and creative writing. The children were preand posttested on attitudes toward animals
and human-directed empathy. This study
found that the intervention enhanced the
animal-related attitudes of children differentially depending on grade level. The clearest
effects were found with the fourth graders.
The experimental groups mean score
reflected more positive attitudes toward animals than the control groups. The fourth
graders also showed a generalization effect
from animal-related attitudes to humandirected empathy.
METHOD
To determine if the intervention effects
found with fourth grade children in the
above study were maintained and generalized, a one-year follow-up was completed.
Over 80% of the original sample were located and retested. For this study, current fifth
grade classrooms containing children who
were originally tested in the fourth grade
were identified by class lists. Given the
unevenness of the findings with younger
children in earlier studies, it was decided to
focus on the older population.
Teachers were contacted to arrange testing times. They were given a brief explanation of the study but were unaware of the
189
PARTICIPANTS
Teacher Recruitment
After the children were identified by class
lists, the teachers who had the original students in their classrooms were contacted.
They were given a brief description of the
follow-up study, informed of school district
approval, and asked about a convenient
time for follow-up testing. They were
informed that they would receive a $20
honorarium for assisting in the scheduling
and monitoring of testing.
190
RESULTS
The experimental group humane attitudes
mean was greater than the control group
mean at initial Year 1 posttesting (F=40.77,
To explore the possibility of a ceiling effect, we
administered the IAS to 283 university students (age
17 to 45) (Weber & Ascione, 1992). A mean IAS
score of 105.9 was found with this sample. This
was comparable to the mean score at the first
posttest for fourth graders (E=112.2, C=103.6) and
fifth graders (E=108.3, C=106.2). In addition, this
instrument was administered to a group of humane
educators. Their mean score of 126.6 was much
higher than either the grade school children or the
adult university students. It seems evident that there
was no ceiling effect for the IAS with either children
or an adult university student sample.
DISCUSSION
This is the first empirical study demonstrating that a humane education intervention
can enhance childrens attitudes toward
animals, that intervention effects are maintained at least one year later, and that there
is generalization from humane attitudes to
human-directed empathy. It is likely that
several factors contributed to the success of
this intervention.
191
FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 2:
Mean Intermediate
Attitude Scale Scores*
Mean Intermediate
Attitude Scale Scores*
125
125
EXPERIMENTAL (N=73)
EXPERIMENTAL
120
120
CONTROL
115
115
110
110
105
105
100
100
95
95
90
90
PRETEST-Fall 1989
PRETEST
Fall 1989
125
EXPERIMENTAL
120
CONTROL (N=86)
POSTTEST FOLLOW UP
Spring 1990 Spring 1991
IAS/PRE-Poresky/Past Covariates
*Score range 36-144
CONTROL
115
110
105
FIGURE 3:
100
95
Mean Intermediate
Attitude Scale Scores*
90
POSTTEST-SPRING 1990
125
EXPERIMENTAL (N=28)
125
120
120
115
115
110
110
105
105
100
CONTROL (N=48)
95
100
EXPERIMENTAL
95
CONTROL
90
192
90
PRETEST
Fall 1989
POSTTEST FOLLOW UP
Spring 1990 Spring 1991
IAS/PRE-Poresky/Past Covariates
*Score range 36-144
Note: Mean IAS scores over the three testing
times (using pretest IAS scores and quality of
child-pet relation as covariates). (See Appendix A
for means, standard deviations and Ns.)
FIGURE 4:
Human-Directed Empathy -4th Grade
Mean Empathy Scale Scores*
75
EXPERIMENTAL (N=28)
70
CONTROL (N=45a )
65
60
55
50
Developmental Approach
45
PRETEST
Fall 1989
POSTTEST FOLLOW UP
Spring 1990 Spring 1991
BRYANT/PRE-Poresky/Past Covariates
a48 for POSTTEST
*Score range 22-28
Note: Mean human-directed empathy (BRYANT)
scores (using BRYANT pretest scores and quality
of child-pet relation as covariates). (See Appendix
A for means, standard deviations and Ns.)
Familiar Instructor
Humane attitudes were taught to the children by their familiar classroom instructor. It
is possible that the information was conveyed more effectively than would be possible with an unfamiliar, master instructor or a
researcher. Memories of classroom chaos
under a substitute teacher may offer some
clue to the possible difficulties with providing
instruction by outside instructors.
aged children and adolescents than in families without children (Albert & Bulcroft,
1988). Given this information, it is surprising that few reports on humane education
interventions account for this relevant
factor. Controlling for pet ownership and
childrens involvement with their pets was
an important aspect of this research. This
study found that childrens involvement
with pets is positively related to their
humane attitudes toward animals.
Limitations
193
FIGURE 5:
Correlations Between Humane
Attitudes Toward Animals
and Human-Directed Empathy
0.7
0.6
.49
0.5
0.4
r
0.3
.34
.31
0.2
0.1
0
6-8 yr-olds
(N=365)
9-11 yr-olds
(N=400)
Adults
(N=283)
Age Group
Note: Correlations between scores on measures of
humane attitudes toward animals and measures of
human-directed empathy at three age levels.
REFERENCES
Albert, A. and Bulcroft, K. 1988. Pets, families,
and the life course. Journal of Marriage and
the Family 50:543-552.
Ascione, F.R. 1988. Intermediate Attitude
Scale: Assessment of Third through Sixth
Graders Attitudes Toward the Treatment of
Animals. Logan: Utah State University.
Ascione, F.R. 1992. Enhancing childrens attitudes about the humane treatment of animals:
Generalization to human-directed empathy.
Anthrozos 5:176-191.
194
195