Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Earth
Negotiations
Bulletin
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . #10
A Reporting Service for Environment and Development Negotiations
Online at http://www.iisd.ca/climate/cop21/enb/
PARIS HIGHLIGHTS:
WEDNESDAY, 9 DECEMBER 2015
This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin <enb@iisd.org> is written and edited by Jennifer Allan, Beate Antonich, Rishikesh Ram Bhandary,
Mari Luomi, Ph.D., Anna Schulz and Virginia Wiseman. The Digital Editor is Kiara Worth. The Editor is Pamela Chasek, Ph.D. <pam@iisd.org>.
The Director of IISD Reporting Services is Langston James Kimo Goree VI <kimo@iisd.org>. The Sustaining Donors of the Bulletin are the
European Union, the Government of Switzerland (the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN), the Swiss Agency for Developmentand
Cooperation (SDC)), and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. General Support for the Bulletin during 2015 is provided by the German Federal Ministry
for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB), the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, SWAN
International, the Finnish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the Japanese Ministry of Environment (through the Institute for Global Environmental
Strategies - IGES), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Specific
funding for coverage of this conference has been provided by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the European Union (EU), the Austrian Federal Ministry
of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment, and Water Management, and the Ministry of the Environment of Finland. Funding for translation of the http://enb.iisd.mobi/
Bulletin into French has been provided by the Government of France, the Wallonia, Qubec, and the International Organization of La Francophonie/Institute for Sustainable
Development of La Francophonie (IOF/IFDD). The opinions expressed in the Bulletin are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors.
Excerpts from the Bulletin may be used in non-commercial publications with appropriate academic citation. For information on the Bulletin, including requests to provide
reporting services, contact the Director of IISD Reporting Services at <kimo@iisd.org>, +1-646-536-7556 or 300 East 56th St., 11D, New York, NY 10022 USA. The ENB
team at the Paris Climate Change Conference - November 2015 (UNFCCC COP 21) can be contacted by e-mail at <anna@iisd.org>.
..................................
COP 21
CONTACT GROUP: Climate Finance Items (a-b): In
the morning, on the issue of long-term finance, contact group
Co-Chair Andrs Mogro (Ecuador) noted time constraints
prevented parties from tackling political issues that required
further consideration, such as MRV of finance, biennial updates
and private sector climate finance, and highlighted the draft
decisions minimalist structure. Co-Chair Mogro proposed, and
parties agreed, to forward the draft decision to the COP for
consideration.
On the report of the SCF, contact group Co-Chair Mark Storey
(Sweden) presented a draft decision for adoption, based on
consultations carried out by the Co-Chairs. Parties then agreed
on the need to approve the SCFs work plan and continue work
on reviewing the functions of the SCF.
Co-Chair Storey proposed reflecting issues that had not been
discussed due to time limitations in the report of the COP. Parties
agreed to refer to recommendations of the SCF based on the
conclusions of the SCF forum. Parties agreed to send the draft
decision, as amended, to the COP for consideration.
Climate Finance Items (c-d): In the afternoon, parties
considered draft decision texts proposed by Co-Chairs Stefan
Schwager (Switzerland) and Nauman Bashir Bhatti (Pakistan).
On the report of the GEF to the COP and guidance to the
GEF, parties developed compromise language welcoming the
investments by the GEF in sustainable forest management
and other activities referred to, harnessing multiple benefits
from forests, and tackling deforestation and forest degradation.
Parties debated whether to delete a proposal by ARGENTINA,
URUGUAY and COLOMBIA on tackling the drivers of
deforestation and forest degradation.
On support for the NAP process through contributions to the
LDCF and the Special Climate Change Fund, CHINA, supported
by INDIA and MALAYSIA, proposed deleting language inviting
parties that may make voluntary financial contributions
to provide such support. The EU, with JAPAN and the US,
suggested deletion of the whole paragraph if it lacks agreement.
Zambia, for the LDCs, opposed.
On the report of the GCF to the COP and guidance to the
GCF, JAPAN said it is premature to discuss replenishment and
suggested deleting a request to the GCF Board to agree on
replenishment arrangements. South Africa, for the AFRICAN
GROUP, Bolivia, for the G-77/CHINA, and Antigua and
Barbuda, for AOSIS, opposed.
On a paragraph noting that funding decisions by the GCF
projects will contribute to low-emission and climate-resilient
development, ARGENTINA, opposed by the EU, suggested
referencing sustainable development instead. Parties continued
consultations informally.
IN THE CORRIDORS
On Wednesday afternoon, plenary La Seine filled with
anticipation and excitement as parties waited for COP 21
President Laurent Fabius to reveal the new clean text.
Immediately after receiving their copies, delegates poured over
the text. As some optimists had expected, the positive spirit
prevailed throughout the afternoon Comit de Paris meeting,
surprising some observers accustomed to drama as a regular
feature of climate COPs.
Most delegates remained in full praise of the Presidency,
commending their work with the facilitators and Secretariat to
finish the text lasting into the wee hours of Wednesday morning.
One negotiator explained the positive mood was a result of
the Presidency involving the ministers early and often in the
process, which built relationships and facilitated constructive
conversations on sticking points.
Pointing out that the three remaining political issues,
differentiation, finance and ambition, are more than small
details, one long-time observer noted that some brackets are
more stubborn than others. Others eyes initially spotted phrases
that raised eyebrows, either negatively or positively depending
on their perspective, like per capita emissions and respect for
indigenous peoples rights.
Still, some close to the ministerial process seemed confident,
saying that the agreement should be quite agreeable to
parties if they manage to zoom out to see the bigger picture.
Speculating on the evening, one delegate hoped the good
mood would not be ephemeral, calling Wednesday evening the
defining moment of the second week.
To witness that defining moment, delegates again flowed into
La Seine in the evening. Many offered cautious optimism, with
one saying that all the elements are here, and relatively well
balanced. Another cited the quite clean text on workstream 2.
The first round of applause was for the G-77/Chinas
statement that the text formed an acceptable basis for
negotiations. While there seemed to be a never-ending stream of
groups and parties concerns with the text, their overwhelming
general acceptance of the text as the basis for further work
represented to some a collective sigh of relief.
However, one delegate cautioned against assuming that if
everyone expresses concerns, that the text is indeed balanced.
CMP 11
Some also worried parties were regressing to stated positions.
CONTACT GROUP: Issues Relating to the CDM: In
Leaving La Seine for the two midnight sessions announced by
the morning, a contact group co-chaired by Jeffery Spooner
COP 21 President Fabius, many looked ahead to some political
(Jamaica) focused on draft text produced on Tuesday evening,
deals occurring in the coming hours. As they entered into the
8 December. Parties discussed six paragraphs that still remained
midnight consultations, one group of delegates hoped Friday
bracketed.
would be a day of rest, while the legal and linguistic group
On a paragraph on encouraging the CDM Executive Board
reviews the text.
(EB) to explore opportunities for financing through international
However, with COP 21 President Fabius describing the next
climate financing institutions to foster the use of the CDM,
iteration of the text, expected for Thursday afternoon, as the
parties agreed to keep a reference to the GCF while removing to penultimate text, many delegates wondered if their hopes of
foster the use of the CDM.
Paris being an exceptional COP in terms of timeliness could still
materialize.