Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microalgal Bioprocessing:
Process Technologies,
Modelling and Optimization
Hector De la Hoz Siegler. PhD.
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
University of Calgary
h.siegler@ucalgary.ca
Part I
INTRODUCTION TO MICROALGAL
BIOTECHNOLOGY
3
Challenges
Low culture density
Slow growth: low productivity
High production cost
5
Applications
Human and
animal food
Pharma- and
nutraceuticals
CO2 Capture
Microalgae
Biofuel
s
Waste-water
treatment /
Remediation
Fine chemicals
6
Product
Application areas
Production
facilities
References
Haematococcus
pluvialis /
Chlorophyta
Carotenoids,
astaxanthin
Open ponds,
PBR
Odontella aurita
/ Bacillariophyta
Fatty acids
Pharmaceuticals,
cosmetics, baby food
Open ponds
Isochrysis
galbana /
Chlorophyta
Fatty acids
Animal nutrition
Open ponds,
PBR
Phaedactylum
tricornutum /
Bacillariophyta
Lipids, fatty
acids
Open ponds,
basins, PBR
Muriellopsis sp.
/ Chlorophyta
Carotenoids,
Lutein
Open ponds,
PBR
Crypthecodinium
cohnii
DHA
Food additive
Fermenters
(heterotrophic)
Carvalho et al.
(2006)
Currently, applications of microalgal biotechnology are limited to niche (small) markets. Though
high value! We expect to move into large scale markets.
7
Biofuels
10
Photosynthesis
CO2
Algal Biomass:
Water
Sunlight
Trace elements
Intermediates
Biodiesel
- Oil/Lipids
- Sugars/Starch
Fuels
Hydrodeoxygenation
Hydrolysis
- Lignocellulose
Excreted products:
Pyrolysis
Green Diesel
Sugars
Bio-oil
Hydrotreating
Gasoline
SynGas
- Hydrogen
Hydrogen
- Alcohols
Alcohols
11
Oil yield
(L/Ha)
% of existing US
cropping area
Corn
172
1540
846
Soybean
446
594
326
Canola
1190
223
122
Oil Palm
5950
45
24
136900
1.1
Microalgae
(70% oil w/w)
Microalgae
58700
4.5
2.5
Oil content
(% dw)
Reference
Ankistrodesmus TR-87
28 40
Botryococcus braunii
25 75
Sheehan et al. (1998); Banerjee et al. (2002); Metzger and Largeau (2005)
Chlorella sp.
28 32
Chlorella protothecoides
15 55
Xu et al. (2006)
Cyclotella DI-35
Dunaliella tertiolecta
Hantzschia DI-160
42
36 42
66
Isochrysis sp.
7 33
Nannochloris
20 - 35 (6 - 63)
Nannochloropsis
46 (31 - 68)
Nitzschia TR-114
28 50
Phaeodactylum tricornutum
20 31
Scenedesmus TR-84
Stichococcus
45
33 (9 - 59)
Tetraselmis suecica
15 32
Thalassiosira pseudonana
(21 - 31)
13
Glycerol
Triglycerides:
Biodiesel Production:
14
DHA: C22:6
16
ARA (20:4)
EPA (20:5)
DHA (22:6)
Gymnodinium splendens
30
Cricosphaera elongata
28
Isochrysis galbana
15
7.5
Monodus subterraneus
4.7
33
Nannochloropsis sp.
35
Schizochytrium sp.
1.0
2.3
40.9
Chlorella minutissima
5.7
45
Hetermastrix rotundra
28
Chromonas sp.
12.0
6.6
Cryptomonas sp.
16
10
Rhodomonas sp.
8.7
4.6
Asterionella japonica
11
20
Biddulphia sinensis
24
Crypthecodinium cohnii
30
Nitzschia laevis
6.2
19.1
Phaeodactylum Tricornutum
34.5
Skeletonema costatum
29.2
17
Solvent
recovery
Crude
Product
Harvesting
debris
Cell disrupter
Dryer
S/L Separator
18
Part II
MICROALGAL CULTURING
TECHNIQUES
19
Nutritional requirements
Depends on application
Food or health oils: food grade chemicals
Otherwise industrial chemicals or seawater / wastewater
20
4181 MJ/m2y
4510 MJ/m2y
5221 MJ/m2y
Munich (GE):
Naples (IT):
Kuala Lumpur:
Orlando (FL):
Acapulco (MX):
Phoenix (AZ):
4044 MJ/m2y
5293 MJ/m2y
5622 MJ/m2y
5922 MJ/m2y
7261 MJ/m2y
7621 MJ/m2y
Solar radiation data taken from: U.S. Department of Energy - EnergyPlus Weather Data.
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/energyplus/cfm/weather_data.cfm
23
Culturing: Photobioreactors
Flat Panel photobioreactor
Arizona Center for Algal Technology and Innovation
25
Culturing: Photobioreactors
Better culture control
Higher productivity, and culture
density
Minimal contamination risk
Well mixed
Excellent temperature control
Oxygen control is an issue
High capital investment
Frequent cleaning required
Cooling required
26
27
Cell conc.
(g/L)
Oil Prod.
(mg/L d)
Ettlia oleoabundans
36 42
2.9
164
Griffiths et al (2009);
Li et al. (2008)
Nannochloropsis sp.
31 68
2.1
204
Amphora
40 51
593
Chlorella sp.
28 32
1.1
139
Chlorella vulgaris
25 42
1.7
54
Chlorella zofingiensis
25.8
1.9
35
Chlorella zofingiensis
51.1
9.6
354
Nitzschia laevis
16.5
22.1
914
S. Limacinum (DHA)
17.3
37.9
656
A. protothecoides
38.3 53.0
8.4
820
A. protothecoides
50.3 57.8
51.1
3320
Phototrophic
References
Heterotrophic
Specie
28
Part III
MODEL-BASED OPTIMIZATION OF
HETEROTROPHIC ALGAL CULTURES
29
Bioprocess Optimization
Continuous /
Real-time
Process conditions
Media formulation
Strain selection
Genetic modification
30
Nitrogen
31
Lipid production
32
Nitrogen uptake
Oil production
33
Macroscopic balances
34
Subject to:
35
Simulation results
Biomass productivity in
continuous cultures
Lipid productivity in
continuous cultures
36
Experimental results
37
38
39
Oil Productivity
(g/L h)
Bacteria
Specie
E. coli (gen. modified)
25.4
0.246
Elbahoul et al (2010)
R. opacus PD630
38.4
0.171
Kurosawa et al (2010)
M. ramanniana
67.7
0.17
Hiruta et al (1997)
C. echinulata
26.9
0.07
Kosa et al (2011)
R. toruloides
67.5
0.54
Li et al. (2007)
L. starkeyi
56.0
0.04
C. curvatus
82.7
0.47
Schizochytrium sp.
30
0.096
Ganuza et al (2007)
C. vulgaris
9.7
0.12
A. protothecoides
50.3
0.14
A. protothecoides
49.4
0.43 0.84
Microalgae
Yeasts
Lipid content
(%, w/w)
Molds
De la Hoz et al (2012)
40
Summary
Algae are promising organisms: highly efficient
Good source of oil: PUFA, biodiesel precursor
Algae can growth on simple inexpensive media
Several reactor types and geometry. Application will limit
reactor choice
Several successful commercial applications currently working.
A lot of research is still needed!
42