l

\

fN 11IE NA rrvs ASSESSORS TRIBUNAl. RFGlSTR Y

AT

.~MARAE

. BETWE EN

BET\VEEN

IN THE MATTER OF

In rc: NO JVRISDICnON

Allplic:ltot

The Crown

Res paudell t

NQ ,Iurisdictioll

L/

\' do sn('ar HII Oath

Any legislatinu eufurced h~ atl org.uli1:ciJ Stale ~n,d :.-ml ,hul~l' / Court ofsurh Ii St:~kllmL eururccs such rules of cnnduct, whether 11:1!St ot' present, c()m~ti1ut(' ..

some khul, of legislation.

When n Jud'ge I Court makes 1i ruling on :I situauun that has out lH!CIl determined before.Ije I S~(' I H, ~s in excess of His/lkr/lts' f::;Clldty ami therefore has [10 jurisdiction to Ilf·~SUUU.· to invem or ~Ippl~.' t~lllIy case a 1"111(' of cunducr which hus never been applied before.

I

I I

I

In so doing. the .Judge I Cmu·t lUIs legisl:JloCtl " v ilIum! a ;\1;:1 (llhilt' and wirh~HI!~ the ben efit (I r ha IlU U deba ee HlH) d icussi Oil

(THumga ~.

'I'he .. tudge 'Court does ~u,1 h~l\ e the PO"\,CI' {u {'gi late. tll,is ca 11 unly b~' dOl C through a Maori GUH'rnltlg Body.

The .JlIdj,~,. Court an: bound by .:vlullidlhll Lms ami e:mont make ~I judgement 011 :\lallri Custoars, Law - ~U:id Usages, These arc 1H'f)rcrtcd under Crl))\.'11

P 110 tecte I'U tcs.

I therefore chnllenge Ibe jurisdiction of the ,Iud::;!;l's f Co II rts and this: shRII IJt'" defined as follows:

I M~lOri Customary Law is ba.'i('lf lin the dcnU;l1ts (If (lie universe between heaven and earth. It is guardianship over all tbilllgs, The nll:ll(;lpapn relative (() M:wri goes somewhat liI,l,tlti'):

•

fu Malua KOl'e - Ke 1'·bmgit:IUt', 11, 1{3 moe it\! i a l)a,ll~l.lImHllw·- <I, k,l puta 1l1:1i a Tang:-u"Qa ( Cod of the sn ) H Te Rn (God of the su n], a Tc Po ( God of 11 e nark} a Tnwhtrlmatea ( God of (he wind '.11 Tune .\Tahuin ("(-:;n~1 of the Forest). <1, kl} 1I1()(~ ia i a Jlint'_'lhutJ"~'ollc, a. ka puta mal a Iline titama, a, ka pura mai hold, Ku UIJ, tc Kaikorero ( b(,fC I am. the speaker, Kaitiaki, tangata whenua (owllcT/guardian.) of the land, All tho: \' elements make UI) who I am as guardlan, I urn Knitiaki, by my wif>d.om and matauranga, knowledge,

c 2-

.'

M 1 knowledge of the waka ~lI til> Native Distri L~ that i~ spoken of are undl:1

a Protectorate Lesislation The Native Districts Rcuulations Act 1858. fi~ , .. .fa t._. i un<..

- ' , .... hl~

.'

• And .. ve are in ace rdance with the ueens, whrch she ha: p r mto place as 3 protectorate, Wbi h i the '.!atl\'C' District Rf'gul<>liolY~ AN 185K f\ protectorate of our Native Drstrict over lands .. vhich IS tule.\1 il'lgui shed of our Naj i e Title, these are OUf waka districts.

• The Native Districts R gulauons Act 1858 (LI"IV S 11'01n the Cust mary L. 1.\' of Occupation of'Te Waka, The Waka District' occupatton

• Waka occupation are those pokcn of and brought here 0) Kupc, The name f his Wah was Te Mamari, which came from Hokianga Harb nr and nut and arounrl. down the We. (Coast of Aotearoa and around the Island of Aotearoa, up the West Coast and back into l10kianga Harbour where he departed from Ilokianga at Opononi and then home to Hawaiiki nom Opononi.

• The evidence of this l \ ithin hrs footprints in [he: sand dunes Eight waka were brought over by hi" mokopuna, Nuku Tav .... ·hiti to Hokianga Harbour Along with him carne eVCI] other waka. Their names are known here teday, sull (11 the. orth Island, They arc

• Tainui, TcArawa, Tokomuru, Mataatua, Ku 'ahaupo, Horouta. ~ itl11111

• Each of those areas arc Native Districts. They still exist today and these native Districts have been and still nrc

( although, not recognised admissible law in New Zealand ) recognised by the British Crown of'rhe U.K under the Native District Resulauons Act 1858 within those districts today Ii sour 0\'71 laws. Those laws ar known and put into

place 011 1 Mara and at ' derived fr m the Dec laranon fInd pcndcnce 011

28th ctober I lB5 d "raring this 'alion or Slate and D minion under the Maori

late.

• The uniting in Article 1 is now depicted in the j lunicipal Law or S atutc law In New Zealand todav under Te Ture Wh nua Maori AcI199'\ Where r a ri arc still ind pendent b ' way Or')10W known Maori [llcorpOmf~al(1" "I I J I

• Article 2 depicts our Sovereignty, whi .h is the soil of this land of Aotearoa > t....o,l'd

and to the way in which if is I be governed ilTJ(T;ho it is 10 b' governeo by "'/,,, ,

and who all oiots a xover ment. (II is we, tangata whenua who have that prerogative and no one else ),

•

rude 3 depict the v a)' in which and who mak s the laws and r gulates the laws in this mighty nation, and w do tha 011 the z, III of October l. 835 each year from 18~ 5 to todav until the 6th of February each year. .e.",I1"",d· .. ~ c: ..j4,' frc.......J./!L •

Up uuril the 10th of March each year is where our government makes laws,

nationally r-. '" I ..... -,f /' 1-:-'/l~r.:.,IL ~ VI

,r.' ~ r: 1

, e I '(c c.~ i'rl to I ~ ,

•

• I 0\\1', I\rti 'I~ ,1 of that Dcclaranon. is the a 'i-1H)wleLi!;;;nl..:111 of III ' Hntl~h Crown or our Ilar of lndep 'lllh..'Ih.: . witl: til ' Il~ liollal rbf r..:..:~i,ing the 21 !;'Ut1 <;J lute from T1 ~ l\ lligator is acknol\'kd!.':l~ hv HI c; f\b_Wqy Kin); \-1/111 iam I V _ and in retu rn our 'J' upu na who signed I he Ike J a ra I II III pn 'm I sed lc I 1001, a ItCI and care for 1 hose of Kin~ Wlllla1l15 SUbJ-:t:lS who iluu 1<..!.'iOrIeJ [0 (he",!: :<I 11\ il "::;5 Ior the purpll~c l,1" rrad ~ and we: 11:l\',: ullowed It and we sull honour It

• 1 oday, we "iIt' I 11' to Him ~I:; 0 tr Pill cnt ni" ~HH' lnfam Sldl! and \ "llilin 11lL" legal realms, om Tupuna were h1(_)killg l\l\'v;ud. a Trustee. more or I -xs a

Protector of Ol r Infant State, 7(4) r,s,,'r. ~A.-;--t

• Follnwing tllll~ Declaration lld'l,~ d j<;:pafdwd and rc,'('ivnl b)' 1h~' culml ia I olfiee, Lord Glellell{ gave instructions Lv Majur Gell(~r;,J1 Burke aud in Hj,~ ~'la.iesl)'S' name Tiley did Iwl f~lit to aruil fh,c ('hi~'h protection as I"(;,lluired. This WH:l Oue Suw{lill{j Order: Tlre other Srmuiitlg Order was h,1" 1 Lord ,Nt1rma"I~~'. ;:tvillfj instruetions It) U Governor Hobson (~fflr(! imefl! (~l (he Brilish Crown that the matters bdlimf the l'rel1(p 4 Hllifuugi Wl!llIlt No Land to be sold. Governor Ilobson It'llS to pwclaim heFu-o! Ids British subjects. il PF(}c/cwUltiml (fun. the CroWll will not honour {my Htfe 10 land thu! WI'S not derir'(!lllhmllgli tne Crown by way of Crown Gran«

TJlls fJr()clllll1utioJl }jim' murie flU blic 011 r he 291/1 (~f JaIUUI!)' J S4 0 I~,. U GIJI'<?nwr Ifol;son. In those Jusmlt'fiml,\" Wilt SitU/ding Ort!{!,..., the

SIJ1·t.m:;gllfy to the Soiln'm./o be Uluin{rlill('d. {f.-I;;' NCf-~~..)'

.. This DOW" cerresponcs v ish, '1'(' Tun: Mauri ;\ -t und 'r 1111;' retention of Maori land if] the hands of iss tn, ners, its 1h11HI. its \Vbllllan ~U1d [lid!' descendants under .·ART XIII arul Ihe use, de\"eti~I)(Ill'nt a,nll cHlllruf or the l\bo.-i land unde r section 2 tlf't" Ture \Vh(,rtIU1 Act199J •

.._,

.. Tin' relevance of section 2 of Te Tu re When 1I1I \fam·i ,\d 11.)1)3, is that I he laws made and that the defence acre, i~ aimine, to defellfllhcms\'lvl'.s 011

til ES. Ad \!~ thi II ~ he .1\1 m:1F i hlco qHl nt tim I s:.J

• There is <I, ~1J'oce~!i, of hlw rn:lki:nl-: in ~,"'hidl J\hmri I RlCOrpOnll imlll do han' Jurisdiction to constitute their (nUl lI1t'dr:III[Sms .. , ithiu the law which is

nmndtlhJI'~' nnd stututurv arrd which j.~ Hlso depicted in the Imperial Luw$ I 'I

MfC4' ........

'0-1~pli'-'"lltion Act J 988 under sections 5 ami (I where the Co01l1l0n Laws (If ~

the United l'-!IIgdom forms part of the La-ws f Xew l.ealan<l~J

I

• Section 6 depicts ~uPltorting 11('l!isl:al'iull. One Ill' lilUSt, Common I.a~"

de , ines noted where the 1'C'laliOlI tn I\laol'i Customarv Law wall referred toil Y I rd Phi IIIW re irlI9~) I , re lercu ce N Z P'(: (: I, nut ~ I' h i larorc, sta t{'.~ . that: :' Mmni :u:\l~m.ar-" La,.Y (,I1,in)'e~1 legal f('COgU .i~(,.l! status in ,EU!'OIl(,;U1~

colnuial cnurt in NZ III Ihc ahsencc ul :HI~' stature !itahng otherwise' . "

- ~ '~

• That case was Heneti Rirerire Arani vs ehe Pubhc Trustee 1961. The other W:IS Lord Watson in a case of Nihara Tamaki vs Bnli(~r where his Laird hip referred! to aumereu Statutes and tilE' Common Law and the Maori ell tourary 'isllJ];e,+ wbi:ch i either known to L!lw~'{,J-S I.W discoverable by them byevidence,

• He was ~mwirJiug to accept that the i: sue of Crown (;ranf amounted to- the

xtinguishraent of the native Title, and 111<11 the C~"()wn I; eked unreviewable power in rd;ltion to the l\}ltti'l-'(' Tiitle.

• The other was a case beard by Lord :\Ilcl'lllughton in Willis and the AUoroe_ Generat and tbe bishop ofWeUiugtoll and the agreement with the tribe tor laud to build ll. cbool.

• Lord McNaughton on hearlag such a ease said it W~lS !tot rill' thcc(II;Jrt to deeermt lie what was agreed a breach of trust, tha I the court was no tan instrument of executive power", it was in this case for the Court of Appeal to determine what was a breach of trust. This now exists under Te Ture ,"Vb mua Maori Act under section 3 under :\'Eaori customary values and practises.

• All of this land within Aotearoa is tilli\bm'j Customary land deemed Crown land for certain purposes.

• Under seetion 144 I)fTe Ture Whel1ua JVlaori Act, it should be ft[so noted that the Act is a protective legistation for Manri and a subjcct to be adopted by Maori, and under ~l44 of that Act, ties (he l.aOilr Act J 94,8

v hich bas been and is repealed since 1995 at Wail3ngi hy a national hui held on (he 28,th of October 1994 and concluded, an debates concluded 0111 6th February 1995, where the 1948 land Ad Imd been Jrcpe3l1ed by the .Maori Nation and Sovereigns ofl~ights or Aetearos.

• Section 268 subsection 3 of section 17 of Te Titre Wheou3 Maori Amendment Act 1994 reads; " A !'t'laori Incorporation made by special l'esoDutioJI of thie owners 01" the sbarcholders alter. add to or replace its ennstitutiorr in accordance 1 -ith any Ilfovision of this Al't, mCaining Tc Ture WbeoUl-J Maori Act 1993 or any regulations made under this Act, made by the Governor in Council, as much as to say that l\1aoridom may add to alter or completely replace the Act or the regulations, IU for that mutter under section25D or section 253. Under that section 253 states: "subject to this Act and any other enactment ( Le tile Animal \Vel fa re Act, Crimes Acll961; Summary Proceedings Ad 1957 Crimil1al.1I;i!)tit;e Aet 19850[" lhe General Law or Parllaureat and Maori Ineorporatlon) h~ls both within and outside N ew Zcal:lO(1 subject to its' constiurtiou, full capacity, and discharged its" obligations of Ule Trust to enter into nny transaction, business transaction 1011" tile lin rposes ~r that IHIragral1h A of that section. flJll Rjghts., powers and Privileges,

•

And under tbat section the !\l~lOd Incorporations have constituted ,fleir {J'WD, eourts and tribunals, which are cOIning to I.heir 'final reading this week at 'VaitalJj·~i.

..

We Dote Ol.a.t ,,349 ofTe Ture Whenllt-l i:\I.bori Act refers to the Declaratory J-IJd:g(~ment Act 1908. and under section 1201' the Declaratory JudgcmCiltts Act ]908 it reads:

,.- Suhjer:~ to ally decision. of tile Privy COfln~el; flte COl"( aIAppeal shall serve as a precedent in ull Courts in New ZeallInd, and therefore there are three

decisions Ol~ customary tew ills ide (Inti olilside of New Zealaml, under the

common llTIY of tbe [lJliled. Kingdon.I"

~onstituti(mal Act (U.K)

• Ofthe nurnernus statutes by Lord Hubsun under the Royal Charter of Westmiaster States:

" lit cases arising beh'Pet!n th« ntatve inlwbitlmls of th« same problem alone, tile courts and llfagistmles sfl{lllllpltultl J'flaQli Customary usages, laws anti customs aforesaid",

• NQ'" under section 10 of the New Zea hl,Iillll Constitution Act 1846· it reflects Article Two ofTe Tiriti 0 W~lit'lingi. 10 the {;overnots of Maori, which S~ll!tcs the provisions of Maori laws andusages.Jt also depicts self government of Maori under A rtiele Two of Te Tirits being maintained under districts to be set apart in which tbose Jaws, customs and usages have to be maiurained, that 1\Iaori· and that Her IVlajesty may have Legislated under Bel' Seal, subject to any law of England and enfnrceable into law or any laws lmd usage in New Zealand.

• The same Sec:tim:IIO ofthe New Zealnnd Constitution Ad 1846 was. transferred later ill 1852 wlilell tile government ofNe' SOlllthWa!cs residing in New Zealand, obtained toJ' themselves a warrant from Her Majesty the Queen for the Go\'(mtmcnt of themselves.

• SecHIlD 71 oftlte New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 is merely a censinuant oftlte New Zealand C>onstitutionAct 1846 and Article T1\'0 of Te TiFiti {) Waitangi and the cuntinued Declaration ()f Indepeudenee, wt.idl is now continued under Te Turc \Vhenua Maori Act, The Crown Prntectorate under OUT own. Te Ture "'helma l\'Iaori Corporations Constitutions UegulatiolJS Act, enacted fit Wllit:-moi on the 6tJI February 1995.'

• That Act is also binding OrJI the defendant who is also Mao:ri, il') this case, OJ) myself and every other Mauri \ itlliu tb:~s uarloa,

1

• '\1'0 under section S ofTe Ture WIlCIlUlI 'Jaori .\('t 1993il ststes: " TI,is .• :1.("'( Shall m.m] Tit!! Crowil .'.

• lIy tha. 1n1ll1)dlltC. H. Mnorl l.nnJI·p(lit"Minn has ('JI lie il't.1 their Q,rn

fegi,s lation, also bya In :llIIh, re of thei I' own Rese In tion pa ·S\.·tl III \\ ':: ~[a fig i,

• Other Statute .... are, besides Iho",c c.ited in t.his evidence. are:

• The N a ti e Vist rices R('gu I:ltious Ad II,tiS 'in. 4 w hich COt·I'(·sIIOU ds wi I II section 15(11) of To Til n' Wht'nu:l \I:wri Ad 11)~)J

• The .:"I~til'c Clrcnit Courts A~'-t 1858 1\10.5

• Alld tI.H." Magistratcs Courts jurisdi itirm previou ·ly had II \:~ltiH~ Asse . or s.itting with that Ma~istrllte uuder scetien 2 IIf that Act And where HIl' IH:lori Incorporations mandates " r e today come under section 32 of Ilmt Ad. They are or have hecn Ilnh~l! :is the "\al.iv(' AsscssUI"S ('our( under that Act, wh ich has, crimiual.ci.\ il and gen('wl jurisdiction over our 11COpk.

• Under the Legislative CotllH~ils Act 1.891. tfw Maori peoples' intended position was 10 hl/ltl the (IIlPCT) louse of <;ovcnllucn1 or AO(l'rtroa.

• In 189.f the :s'atin: Land Courts Act unds-r Dilision Two or Pari Two form the basis of the present day Maori Im.:oqlOrations where thl' owners m3J! be incorperated,

• These, Statute_ were referred to h)' I.onl \VHtson in his limliflUs. The Common Law findings were those of Lord Blenheim, t.ord .\orm.'l!lh)":Justice -'Iarlin, .Justice ("ll:ctrm1an in 11'le Symonds C!ISe, and the overfurning of several cases by the Pri., ~ Council i I Wi Parat;l _ hould be noted.

laSH: THE NATIVE CIRCUIT COURTS ACT. l"Jfnt IV, no. XXX

( Civil, General. Land ano Criminal Jltrisdktlf)f1 J (CROW PROTECTORATF.}

185:8 TIlE NATiVE CmC1IJIT COU.RTS ACT. [lar{ V, no. Xx..X[

(Appointment and Jurisdidioll ur ',,6ve Assessurs » C ROWN PROTE(,TOI~ArE I

1931 STATln'f:S OF WESTMlNSTEH. ACT, scCti:OI~ 8. ( CROWN

PROT crOR"- T£ .

( 0 "nlhorit,)' (0 lllhl( or reru"ll, .onstllutioll of a. " Dominisn " .,. 1I,;; adopted iJ.f the NZ Parfiarne: t in The Statate vf\\'estminster Adoption Act 1947. However thnt "'ct' provit!cd ")Althe NZ

ra rh,ml~nll,;ouh1 make. Full I.aws rill' themselves withnut the asrulanc·e from the Wccr.tminrter Parliament ).

1988 1ll1pcriall.aws Applications Ad (CROW' PROTECfOllATlE)

(""as enacted and 'reverted all New ~;dll"d Culofliul Lnws btlck 10 01t Common LlIw~. of England !\ot;wr, (:uSlllm3ry Law is " part of the T l.K Laws. The Imrrerial Laws Applica.tion Act 1988 !",d I o he adopted by tlte- New Zeltlaml Parli tne'll( due to 11111 3CI.;01) of ir Gcoff¢.y Palmer ill 1986, whidlltft this flUlllry willi nO Curt~!iiution lItHI tllllcgalllulh rily tllt.nforcI1' laws over Tungate

\ 'henua, )-

1993195 Te TlJJr'e \Vhenua Mao .. ~ Maori Land Act s53.5, 12 (LETI't.:HS " ..... TENT)

section 3

TDlumgll

section 5

This 'Act' shall hi nd the Crowl} on'-' estill i II ster Parlfament (UK)

section 12

and whereas PUl'SlI3JOt to the provi ion of section of the mstrict Courts Regulations Act 1947 (removal F"'llllltellll~ (If of lice ror illability mrll tHi~bdra~;(u,."J>

1995,Tc Ture WheDua Maori Inc{)flloratioos Constitutions l<e2;urations Act clause 4: suuchwse 1 (a) (II) (h).

(Omu.~iw"ka Incorporarien jurisdiiction to Re-gulate Jlind Legislate J"laori L:lW5. u toms and

Usage).

This affidavit is not an attack on jurtsdiction, It is rather a cbaUcnge 011 jurisdictioo pertaioin.g to l\bQri Iacospuratioa and the presumed authori'y that Munie:ir):l1 Law bas taken over Tangata 'Whcnua Customs, Laws and Usage. As evidence reveals is a legal ollilorlllllity for Maori ttl administer their own :1IT:I i.'s.

(ii). Municipal Law bas no ,jurisdiiction over International Statutes and Common L:l'W Dectriaes ..

The above named International Starates of Law and the Common Law Doctrine of the British Crown of the United Kiugdon1llursuant to the provisions of the 1835 DcchmJ.tioo of Independence, form the basis of present day Maori Ineorporation, with the first hring Mangatll B!ock Incorporariou,

18J5 Decl:n~.tioD of Indeuendence : Common Law Dodrine

Article 1 -Article 2 -Articte 3 - Artiele 4

The L835 Beda nil iOll of hulep~lldellCe Article 2 reads:

" All Sovereign Pnwer 311(t Aul horily withilll I'he Ten-iloric;$ of the l'nitiet1 'l'ribes of New .Ze:\bmd is~~

hlf"l"(by DeaarecttOl~eSi«e Entirely and Exclusively ill (he hercdi(ar." Chiefs nnd Heads or the T ~j'be$

in their Collective C;lptll.:ity, whollr.~o Uednc thatlhey will " Not ""Crlll!,' any Legisl. live A lit 110 ri l:y

epa rate from themselve, ill their Cllltedive C:lfl:l(i:ty (I) Exist "nor" Any liUllClioll of GOl'enllllent

tlll,e Exen:isrd within the said Terriseries' '" Ulllcss by }lCJi'SOfiS Appoillled b)' them", tllld " A~lillg uadcr the: A[llhtll".ily ofL..'lwS Rcg;ullu"ly "acted by them in Congl"l~:ls AS!I('IIIbted

"

It is from 11CI"C lhal the Crow]1 der~ve its' POWC," to legi!;h,(f~ Law HIlde.' Te Th'W o Wfl.ilangi

1.840 Tiriti 0 Wnitangi ~ Common Law Doctrine,

(l.\'ta~ri verslun sludi prevail) Trusteeship to. Her Majesty Queen Victoria.

Te Tidti I) Wllilanli enfolJ"e~ the Crown and it~' GIl\'l'rmucnt, The Privy Cnuucil in Westl11iuster P;t,li .. meJ1t

the- night to Legis:hlte J~~ in Nelli Zenfalld •

1846 New Zealand Om!i:titution Act ( UI< ) Section lO.Wes,tll1ins~er Statofe

AND

1846 Royal Charter AND Jostn.ctions of J 846, CHAPTER xrv.

("fhe MagiSIl"iI!"'_~ and Cou .. ts in Nfffl U-lIIlII,d llIX' .,bligcd to tufon;.e M~ol"i L~wj:, Cu '(oms and 'SiIl2,C8, respecting

Tan~alll \\'I!cnlm). CROWN IJROTECTORA'FES .

Te Tare Wbenua'Maorj Act 93/95, and J\"Is(Jd l.ncOllJOraHolls Constitutions Regulations 1994/95

( S8 3, ;;::10,.253" 253AJ93 and s268 (3) or Sec 17 of ).

Mnori CU:;tORl!l, LaW'S ;uul Usage ( of Adoption) treated as enjoying Legally Recognisable S'ttlfus jll Celenial Courts 'in the nbseuce of uy Statnte i Idi.c:alillg' Qthel"wi.~e "

1852 New Ze;dand COllstitujtiol) Act (UK) SectioJl 71. Westminster Stllitue

[Parliament (If New Zeallltld, re<;ci,;(~d: WIU'rf!!-11 lO the Governmentl of themselves ( NOT TAI''iGATA WHJi:NUA ,and whe are" subject til" the Rules set dcwn by tile PARUAMENT 01' \\I'ESTMTNSTER (UK). AS prcwidcd illlhe NEW ZEALAI D CONs-rnlJrION ACT IB51( UK)

f <; I

AU of these matters taken into account vi-\'idly reveals the extent ef the

ju dsdidion of:~ Maori Incerpcra tion as an au ronom ous, Statuto r: and MllIllIdi:ltol"Y Representativeef Maori, that is; Protected b th '" Bt-iti~h Cro\\ n, Westminste,r Parliament ( UK) and the Privy C01J}ud[ of the United Kingdr m {God ave TI~e Queen) under Jntermliionat St~tlltes of Law ami the Common Law Wfllcb cannot be R.ellealed by any Act or the Parliament of New Zealand.

This Leavlog Maor] undoubtedly as lite InterJlO1~ Sovereign of (he Nation of New Zealaad, with rbe External Sovereign of Protection of Maori Rjghts being the British Crown of the United Kingdom. with it's Legal Severeign Powers vested in the Governor Genera] under Section 44 (If the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852 (UK) to prorogue 01" dissolve U's ceastltuents Parliament, Honse of Reprc.sel.lfati'Wts in New Zealand.

The New Zealand Con. titulion Act 1986

( NZ Parliament removed nl~ Right> tl) govern themselves when they rep '111 d the 1852 New 't "l\lfllld O;ltI'stkhltion Act )_

The Municipal Laws that gevern the jurisdictioll of the Jurlge/Court arc ineffective UJo Tangata WltenlJl~l, whom I am.

The judicial system waived all rig,Iils they bad to frame and administer Laws in 1986 'when Sk (;eoffery Palmer repealed the 1852 New Zealand Constitution Act (UK ).

However, Incerpcration has the jurtsdlction (0 have this matter

heard (1)11 the Marae.

re: Gazette No. 172 • 4309,

Ineorporation under Part XllI of Te Ture Whenun Maori Act 1993/ 95, has a unlqse, bistorical foomJati(}1l and features second to none in Municipal New Zealand Legtslattve Law, ill that (he ro~nl(I~{j()ons whil~b a Maori Ineorperation is based upon are 18350 Declaration of Independence and the International Statutes, and the Cemmon Law Doctrines of the British! Crown re.~iding in ils Imperial Parjiament of 'Westminster and the .Priv), Council of the United Kingdom.

CONCLusrON:

/ to l

I now re-iterate li11Y' statement, This Court has no jurisdictiuu to malic filly decision and especially any judgement over me and tbis case at band. Therefore the only alternative is for this case to be heard on the I )larae where all cases pcrtlli.rling t~1 Tangata \Vhcrma Customs. Law and Usag at Tangata 'Whellua level shallprevail before our Native Justice's ofthc Peace and the Native Tribunal Assessors Registry ( Te IHlCI1:tC ).

I have available the On~er of Inl~OIv()nHioll of of The Seal. upon it.

Thfs case can either be referred to the Marae or dismissed. '''hieh ever YOU ha e dClermined doe: s not exchrde thc " FACT ,. tbat this Judge/Conrt has no jurtsdictlon "ab oiute"

"SWORN .,a;"

'~L~

• !\ta rai::<tliiS¥16th ... :.HefOFe'1lte:- .;

' .....

Na

1 '.