Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Rabid industrialization and urbanization in many countries have led to sever pollution. Initial efforts to manage urban
and industrial pollution have concentrated on what is commonly referred to as end-of-pipe treatment. While
improvements in treatment and disposal technology have led to dramatic reductions in quantity and types of pollutants
discharged into the environment for many countries, end-of-pipe methods have proven to be costly and ultimately
unsustainable (Huggins, 1990). Due to increasing environmental concerns associated with industrial waste, companies
must now incorporate waste management and prevention strategies into their industrial processes (Nemerow and
Dasgypta, 1991).
Pollution prevention can be defined as any action which reduces or eliminates the creation of pollutants or waste at
source which may occur due to inefficiencies in the manufacturing process, operational practices, improperly designed
or utilized equipment (Freeman, 1995; Shen, 1995).
Adopting a pollution prevention program is a way of doing business which can provide a number of significant
benefits to a company. By decreasing the amount of waste generated, a company can reduce waste disposal costs,
Abou Elela
improve works safety and reduce long-term liability in addition, pollution prevention methods will lead to increased
efficiency of production line, decreased costs associated with the purchase of raw materials, inventory control and so
forth. Furthermore, any resulting changes in efficiency or expenditures may help the company to maintain or improve
its competitiveness in the market place (Abou-El-ela, 1999). A wide range of pollution prevention opportunities could
be implemented with significant financial advantages for the factories as well as reducing environmental pollution.
These opportunities range from simple low cost improvements to savings which could be made from the recovery of
process chemicals, process modification, potential products from wasted materials and so forth ( Abou-Elela and Zaher,
1998). The possible improvement measures inside the factory can vary widely according to ease of implementation,
initial cost, annual benefits, return of investment and payback periods.
In Egypt, industrial pollution has been identified as a major environmental problem and is being addressed under the
National Industrial Pollution Prevention Program (NIPPP) which has been launched in October 1994. The objectives
of the NIPPP are to : reduce and promote the benefits of low cost pollution prevention measures and to demonstrate the
environmental advantages of this approach, especially those with short payback period (Thimothy et al, 1996).
The National Pollution Prevention/ Cleaner Production Programme
Cleaner production and pollution prevention concepts started to play considerable role in industrial pollution control
activities undertaken by the Egyptian industry. There have been a number of Cleaner Production initiatives (CP), which
have made considerable progress in convincing several industry management for converting to cleaner production.
These initiatives comprised awareness programmes developed by the Egyptian Government and international
development agencies from one side, and research work developed by research centers from the other side (Abou-Elela,
1999).
In the eighties and early nineties most of environmental production initiatives for the industry concentrated upon endof-pipe approach. Cleaner Production and pollution prevention concepts began to be promoted on a National level in
1994, when the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) initiated the National Industrial Pollution Prevention
Program (NIPPP). In parallel with the NIPPP, several programs implemented by international donor agencies promoted
Cleaner Production. This promotion varied from being the direct objective of some programs, to an important tool used
by some other. The Environmental Pollution Prevention Program (EP3) is an example of the first type, EP3 has been
implemented by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), adopting the same concepts and
methodologies considered by the (NIPPP) (Abou-Elela,2000).
Some other programs, which aimed to help the industry comply with environmental legislation, used Cleaner
Production as an important approach in reducing pollution loads of final effluents. Examples of such programs are
the Environmental Pollution Abatement Program (EPAP) implemented by the World Bank and Environmental Facility
for the Public Sector Industry implemented by the German Construction Bank (KfW) .
One of the projects which dealt directly with pollution prevention is the SEAM Project Support for Environment and
Management. It is a multi-disciplinary environmental project being funded by Britains Department for International
Development (DFID). This project is being implemented by the Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA)
through the Technical Cooperation Office for the Environment (TOCE) and Entec, a UK based engineering and
environmental consultancy.
It is worth noting that the Egyptian government has regarded Cleaner Production/ pollution prevention as a strategic
tool in its approach of implementing the National Environmental Law (4). The previously mentioned programs are
working or have worked under this framework set by the government.
230
Pollution prevention
Abou Elela
efficient in the absorption of P2O5. Based on these results full details engineering designs including heat balance,
electrical and mechanical specifications and civil works were carried out. Also, cost estimation of a full scale system
was carried out to enable the implementation of the control system. The bay back period was estimated to be 1.2 year if
the plant operates at 100% capacity (Abdel Salam and Abou-Elela, 1996).
Grinding Phosphate
H2SO4 (70%)
B.P.L.
Apatite-phosphate
Mixer
Conc. H2SO4
SiF4
Gas
Dilution Water
Den
Grinder
Fumes
W.W.
Fluosilicic Acid
(H2SiF6)
Pollution prevention
scrubbing towers was changed to a closed circuit operation to the fluosilicic acid prior to the production of sodium
flu-silicate (Figures 2& 3). Design, construction and implementation of a full scale unit for the production of Na2SiF6
were carried out and put into operation. This solution reduced the pollution load by 40% and saved 2 million L.E/y and
the payback period was 0.6 month (Abou-Elela and Abdelmonem, 1999).
Chimney
SiF4
CO 2
HF
Fan
Waste
Storage Tank
Pump
Storage
Tank
Storage
Tank
Supernatant
Drain
Na2 SiF6
Abou Elela
Case Study III: Reuse of Wasted Material from Acetylene Production Plant
In an industrial complex in Egypt, one of its production plant is acetylene. The generation of acetylene is accomplished
by the reaction between water and calcium carbide, calcium hydroxide slurry (2.4 m3/d) is produced as a by-product
waste. The disposal of the slurry to the land causes solid pollution problem due to the accumulation of 500 ton/year
calcium hydroxide, beside the seepages of liquid waste to the ground water in the area. The general objective of this
study, is the management of waste water and solid waste in the plant in order to protect the environment and to gain
benefits as much as possible from the wasted materials. Analysis of the slurry
Ca(OH)2 produced from the end of pipe of the plant revealed that it contains 83% water and 17% solids. The solid
(17%) contents are mainly 83.6% Ca(OH)2, 2.7% carbon, 1.1 silica, 5.6% iron, 2.8 sulfur and 4.1% others. The slurry
was subjected to sand and oven drying. The aim was to determine the water content, energy consumption and operating
cost in order to evaluate the feasibility of reusing dried Ca(OH)2. Since the dried waste is mainly Ca(OH)2 (84%), the
possibility of its reuse as a coagulant and to neutralize any acidic waste was investigated. The efficiency of the dried
solid waste was compared with a laboratory grade lime. The results obtained revealed that the efficiency of wasted
Ca(OH)2 compared with laboratory grade lime was almost the same. However, the dose required from wasted materials
be recycled to the acetylene generator. Techno-economic feasibility study revealed that oven drying of the thickened
slurry is recommended (Abou-Elela et al 1996).
CONCLUSION
The given case studies indicated that there are a wide range of pollution prevention opportunities which could by
implemented, with significant financial advantage for the factories as well as reducing environmental pollution. These
opportunities ranged from simple low cost improvements to savings which could be made from the recovery of process
chemicals and potential products from materials previously treated as a waste. Cost benefits for the recommended
environmental improvements have been estimated for each factory and the improvements measures had short payback
periods.
In the light of these findings, it is strongly recommended that the audit procedure can be adopted as an efficient
management tool by the industrial sector. This will ensure that improvements, once made are maintained. This process
will also work towards the objectives of NIPPP by proving and implementing the benefits of the low-cost
pollution prevention approach, both in terms of increased factory productivity and minimizing environmental
pollution.
REFERENCES
Abdelmonem N.M and Abou-Elela S.I. (1994) In plant control in oil and soap Industry J. Wat. Sci-Tech., 29 vol. 9,
pp 143-149.
Abdel Salam O.E and Abou Elela S.I, 1996 Control and Recovery of Phosphorous Pentoxide Emission in a Rodencide
Production Plant Case Study, 2nd Int. Specialized Conference on Pretreatment of Industrial Waste Water Oct
16-18, Athens, Greece.
Abou-Elela, S.I. and Abdelmonem M. Utilization of Waste Water from fertilizer Plant-Case Study, 1994. J. Wat. Sci.
Tech. Vol 29, No. 9, pp 169-173.
Abou -Elela S.I, El-Kamah, H.M and Abdelmonem M, (1996) Reuse of Wasted Material from Acetylene Production
Plant 2nd International Specialized Conference on Pretreatment of Industrial Waste Water, Oct. 16-18,
Athens, Greece.
Abou-Elela, (1999) Oil and Soap Sector, Egypt, Cleaner Production Opportunites Technical Report. With
234
Pollution prevention
Contributions from EEAA Technical Cooperation Office for the Environment (TOCE) and Entec UK Ltd,
SEAM project
Abou-Elela, S.I and Zaher, F. (1998) Pollution Prevention in Oil and Soap Industry, Case Study J. Wat. Sci. Tech.
Vol. 38, No.4, pp 139-144.
Abou-Elela, S.I (1999) Pollution Prevention Incduces Revenue in Egyptian Industry.Water Environmental Federation
Conference, WEFTEC, New Orleanse, Louisiana, U.S.A.
Abou-Elela, S.I (2001) Baseline Assessment Report for Cleaner Production in Food Sector Oil and Soap and Dairy
products. Submitted to the Egyptian Industrial Union, Jointly with Finida.
Freeman H.M (1995) Industrial Pollution Prevention Handbook, McGraw Hill, Inc.
Higgins T (1990) Hazardous Waste Minimization Handbook Lewis publishers Inc.
Nemerow N.L and dasgypta A (1991) Industrial and Hazardous Waste treatment Van Nostr and New York.
Shen T.T. (1995) Industrial Pollution Prevention, Springer-verlag.
Thimothy L.K, Lotayef, Jago P.A and Kandeel M. (1997) Industrial Pollution Prevention Opportunities in Egypt, first
International and Trade Fair on Environmental Management and Technologies, Feb 16-18, Cairo, Egypt.
235