Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page
1 of 15
Table of Contents
A brief background of Cognizant Technology Solutions.................................................2
Relative Profitability Position vis--vis industry..........................................................3
Value Proposition for customers............................................................................4
Value drivers for Customers..............................................................................4
Cognizants Value Proposition............................................................................5
The 3 questions of Porter: Is Cognizants Value Proposition Unique?.................................6
Unique Value Proposition from Cognizant:.............................................................6
Benchmarking Cognizants Value proposition with competitors......................................7
Strategy Canvas and the 4-Action tool framework......................................................8
Strategy Canvas.............................................................................................8
ERRC Framework 4 Action Tool.......................................................................10
A Value Chain Analysis of Cognizant......................................................................11
Industries Value Chain:...................................................................................11
Cognizants Value chain when compared with the industry.......................................11
Zero in on price drivers..................................................................................11
Zero in on cost drivers...................................................................................11
Consistency of value chain with value proposition.....................................................12
Benchmarking Cognizants Value proposition with competitors....................................12
Key Resources and Capabilities and the VRIO test.....................................................12
Key Resources and Capabilities.........................................................................12
Now when these resources are put into a VRIO test:...............................................13
Are these resources and capabilities valuable?...................................................13
Are these resources and capabilities rare?........................................................13
Are these resources and capabilities costly to imitate?.........................................13
Are these resources organized to capture value?.................................................13
Suggestions...................................................................................................14
Page
2 of 15
Special Note: throughout the report, Cognizant has been used as a proxy for Cognizant
Technology Solutions.
Page
3 of 15
Let us consider the following 5 metrics to compare the profitability of Cognizant as a whole with
the industry namely, the Software Services Industry, the Service Sector, the S&P 500 companies
belonging to the services sector and the global market leader namely, Accenture. All figures are
mentioned as a percentage of revenues. As far as Cognizant is concerned, it is into 3 main
businesses, Consulting (includes IT consulting), Technology Services and Outsourcing
(including IT Outsourcing). Since, it is difficult to segregate the figures of CTS (the technology
services wing of Cognizant), the company wide figures have been considered for Cognizant as a
whole.
CTSH Profitability Ratio
Gross Margin 5 Yr. Avg.
EBITDA Margin 5 Yr. Avg.
Operating Margin 5 Yr. Avg.
Pre-Tax Margin 5 Yr. Avg.
Net Margin 5 Yr. Avg.
Cognizant
42.04%
20.82%
18.74%
19.13%
14.99%
Industry
43.70%
21.23%
16.66%
15.87%
10.65%
Sector
47.35%
28.21%
15.46%
12.35%
8.72%
S&P 500
38.13%
15.75%
12.80%
10.62%
7.44%
Accenture
30.70%
15.16%
13.22%
13.27%
9.07%
Page
Industry
Sector
S&P 500
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Source2
Accenture
4 of 15
Page
5 of 15
Page
6 of 15
Apart from the above, one of the major things which differentiates CTS from most of its
competitors is the concept of one-stop-shop as far as IT service implementation is concerned.In
this era of IT technology, a huge number of organizations are trying to implement Information
Technologies and Systems in their organizations. For most of such organizations, IT may not be
a direct core competence. And in the absence of already implemented IT systems, many of these
organizations dont have their own IT wing or MIS departments, to effectively guide them
towards decision making as far as IT implementation is concerned. Naturally these organizations
opt for business consultants to guide them in such decisions. Many of these consultants are often
purely into consulting and dont have an integrated IT services execution team of their own. This
is where Cognizant differentiates itself form the herd. They have their own business consulting
group name CBC. They act the front end partner for CTS, who are specialized in the execution of
IT services. CBC has thus the capability of offering a packaged deal to its customers of both the
IT related consulting as well as the execution services. This saves the customers from getting
into unnecessary hassles of appointing separate consulting and execution service suppliers and
the corresponding cost saving achieved by Cognizant through the achieved scale in business also
gets passed on to the customers. Thus it acts as a win-win situation for both the client as well as
Cognizant.
Page
S M A C in c lu d e s th e p o w e r o f S o c ia l m e d ia , M o b ile a s p la tf o rm , A n a ly tic s a n d C lo u d .
C o d e H a l o i n t e g r a t i o n w i t h c o m p a n y 's p r o v i d e f r a m e w o r k 'C r o s r o a d M o d e l ', h e l p s c l i e n t s o t a k e d c i s o n q u i c k l y a n d m o r e a c u r a t e l y .
B T hU i S s I e N n a E b S l e s C c o L m O p U a Dn i e s t o s u p o r t i n o v a t i o n a d p o t e n a i l t o f i n d b u s i n e s i m p r o v e m n t a r e s .
It is antreoadsu cre do tf ing aotrhme atihoendfaotr cpu esto pmle grs ntoe raxtep lovite rbyu sdianye sb oepx oretsu ni tgy ahve milaseb v isn oth ed img atrkl ent aw do rtk si,m wp rio vnegthceaird sxoir thn go use rhv itcaens bcya tmio anksi. g m e a n i g fro m C o d e H a lo .
A l th e s a re s c o m p le m t e a c h o th e rs a c tiv e s , It w o rk a s m u ltip e r in te rm s o f v a lu e a d it o n .
It is n tr o d u c e d to g a th e r th e d a t p e o p le g n e r a te v e ry d a y b e x p re s in g th e m s e lv s o n d ig ta l n e tw o r k s , w ip n g c a rd s o r th o u g h tr a n s c a tio n s .
TS hM isA eCn aib le us dceosm thp a n ie sw tor sufpS ocrtailnm oevda ti,oMn a b dilep oa tse n pa il to rfmin,dAb uasliyntecs iamn dp rCo lv eumd .n t a re s.
It is a tre a s u re o f in o rm a tio n fo r c u s to m e rs to e x p lo it b u s in e s o p o rtu n ity a v ila b e in th e m a rk e t a n d to im p ro v e th e ir x is t n g s e rv ic e s b y m a k in g m e a n i g fro m C o d e H a lo .
Section A Group 3 Software Services Industry CTS Internal Analysis Report
7 of 15
Page
8 of 15
Page
9 of 15
Accenture
IBM
2
0
Factors of Competition
Igate Patni
Page
R
E
C
lr
a
e
ie
d
m
s
u
a
itc
e
n
e
a
t
e
10 of 15
Page
11 of 15
When the process is looked in detail it could be found that only step 5 and 6 derive value
to the customers, but still other steps are necessary for completion of the service and
value addition.
Page
12 of 15
Page
13 of 15
Another most important capability is their partnership and relations with reputed organizations
like SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, SAS etc. They have a very good recognition throughout the
globe, their key resources are their brand image and their loyal customer base.
Page
14 of 15
Suggestions
Since CTSs key resources and capabilities passed the VRIO test, it could be inferred that the
firm has a sustained competitive advantage. The key resources and capabilities like customer
base, customer relations, global presence, and brand image are extremely important to be one of
the leading software service providers. In addition to all these resources CTS lacks in one of the
resource which its competitor possesses, innovative and a new design for every one of its
customers (Accenture). The capabilities which Accenture possess are completely contrasting to
the capabilities of CTS which focuses on resource and design sharing for cost cutting. Cognizant
is losing out on customers who expect innovative and different solutions. For CTS to capture this
base must come up with a separate business plan distinct from the earlier one, where it could fuel
its resources to come up with innovative beyond expectations of the customers. In future the
clients wont be able to know or predict their problems, so it would be ideal if the software
service provider would come up with innovative designs to overcome and predict such problems.
So CTS must focus on making such design and remain as the global leader in software services
and consulting.